Securities and Exchange Commission November 2007 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Results 51 - 100 of 131
Kiewit Investment Fund LLLP; Notice of Application
Document Number: E7-22736
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-11-21
Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission, Agencies and Commissions
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Document Number: E7-22511
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-11-19
Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission, Agencies and Commissions
Submissions for OMB Review; Comment Request
Document Number: E7-22510
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-11-19
Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission, Agencies and Commissions
Tower 21st Century Fund LLC, et al.; Notice of Application
Document Number: E7-22297
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-11-15
Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission, Agencies and Commissions
BTOP50 Managed Futures Fund and Asset Alliance Advisors, Inc.; Notice of Application
Document Number: E7-22204
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-11-15
Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission, Agencies and Commissions
Sunshine Act Meeting
Document Number: E7-22169
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-11-14
Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission, Agencies and Commissions
Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Document Number: E7-22006
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-11-09
Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission, Agencies and Commissions
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 109
Document Number: E7-21927
Type: Rule
Date: 2007-11-09
Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission, Agencies and Commissions
This staff accounting bulletin (``SAB'') expresses the views of the staff regarding written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings under generally accepted accounting principles. SAB No. 105, Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments (``SAB 105''), provided the views of the staff regarding derivative loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings pursuant to Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. SAB 105 stated that in measuring the fair value of a derivative loan commitment, the staff believed it would be inappropriate to incorporate the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan. This SAB supersedes SAB 105 and expresses the current view of the staff that, consistent with the guidance in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 156, Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, the expected net future cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan should be included in the measurement of all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. SAB 105 also indicated that the staff believed that internally-developed intangible assets (such as customer relationship intangible assets) should not be recorded as part of the fair value of a derivative loan commitment. This SAB retains that staff view and broadens its application to all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. The staff expects registrants to apply the views in Question 1 of SAB 109 on a prospective basis to derivative loan commitments issued or modified in fiscal quarters beginning after December 15, 2007.
Rulemaking for EDGAR System; Mandatory Electronic Submission of Applications for Orders Under the Investment Company Act and Filings Made Pursuant to Regulation E
Document Number: E7-21911
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2007-11-09
Agency: Securities and Exchange Commission, Agencies and Commissions
We propose several amendments to rules regarding our Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system. Specifically, we propose to amend our rules to make mandatory the electronic submission on EDGAR of applications for orders under any section of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (``Investment Company Act'') and Regulation E filings of small business investment companies and business development companies. We also propose to amend the electronic filing rules to make the temporary hardship exemption unavailable for submission of applications under the Investment Company Act. Finally, we propose amendments to Rule 0-2 under the Investment Company Act that would eliminate the requirement that certain documents accompanying an application be notarized and the requirement that applicants submit a draft notice as an exhibit to an application.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.