International Trade Commission April 5, 2006 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 3 of 3
In the Matter of Certain Digital Processors and Digital Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Decision Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting Complainant's Motion To Amend the Complaint and Notice of Investigation
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') granting complainant's motion to amend the complaint and notice of investigation.
In the Matter of Certain Optical Disk Controller Chips, and Chipsets and Products Containing, Same, Including Dvd Players and Pc Optical, Storage Devices II; Notice of Commission Decisions: To Grant Joint Motions To Terminate the Investigation as to All Respondents on the Basis of Settlement Agreements; To Grant-in-Part and Deny-in-Part Requests To Vacate a Final Initial Determination; To Grant a Motion for Leave To File Corrected Versions of a Joint Motion To Terminate; To Deny Motions for Leave To File Reply; To Deny a Petition for Reconsideration
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to grant joint motions to terminate the above-captioned investigation as to all respondents on the basis of settlement agreements. The Commission has also granted-in-part and denied-in-part the private parties' requests to vacate the presiding administrative law judge's (``ALJ's'') final initial determination (``ID''). Specifically, the Commission has determined to vacate those portions of the final ID that are presently under review by the Commission, and has determined to deny the request for vacatur as to those portions of the final ID that were previously adopted by the Commission. The Commission has also granted a joint motion for leave to file corrected versions of the joint motion to terminate the investigation as to respondent Sunext Technology Co., Ltd.; denied motions for leave to reply; and denied a petition for reconsideration.
Polychloroprene Rubber From Japan: Dismissal of Request for Institution of a Section 751(b) Review Investigation
The Commission determines, pursuant to section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (the Act) \1\ and Commission rule 207.45,\2\ that the subject request does not show changed circumstances sufficient to warrant institution of an investigation to review the Commission's affirmative finding in investigation No. AA1921-129, Polychloroprene Rubber from Japan.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.