Environmental Protection Agency August 24, 2007 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 10 of 10
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments
EPA does not object to the proposed project, but recommended expanding the purpose and need to include active restoration and monitoring survival of fire-damaged trees across the Tripod burn area to validate the proposed methodology for determining post fire tree mortality. Rating LO.
Proposed Administrative Settlement Agreement Under Section 122(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act for the Cornell-Dubilier Electronics, Inc. Superfund Site, Located in South Plainfield, Middlesex County, NJ
The Evironmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to enter into an administrative settlement agreement that resolves certain claims under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (CERCLA) pursuant to section 122(h) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C 9622(h). In accordance with section 122(i) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), this notice is being published to inform the public of the proposed settlement agreement and of the opportunity to comment. Under the proposed administrative settlement, the settling party, D.S.C. of Newark Enterprises, Inc. (``DSC'') will make a payment of $203,249 to resolve its liability for ``Past Response Costs,'' which are defined as those costs that EPA has paid at or in connection with a removal action performed at 126 Spicer Avenue, a residential property in South Plainfield, New Jersey through December 31, 2006, plus accrued interest on those costs. DSC will also make a payment of $25,000 to resolve its liability for violation of an administrative order on consent (``AOC'') that DSC entered into with EPA to perform the removal activities in question. In addition, the proposed administrative settlement provides that EPA may enter onto DSC's propertya former capacitor manufacturing facilityto perform the remedial action called for in the Record of Decision for Operable Unit 2 of the Site, which includes soil excavation and demolition of contaminated buildings. For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, EPA will receive written comments relating to the settlement. EPA will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations that indicate that the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper or inadequate. EPA's response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at EPA Region 2, 290 Broadway, 17th floor New York, New York 10007-1866.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Request for Contractor Access to TSCA Confidential Business Information (CBI); EPA ICR No. 1250.08, OMB No. 2070-0075
In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing approved collection. The ICR, which is abstracted below, describes the nature of the information collection activity and its expected burden and costs.
Chloropicrin, Dazomet, 1,3-Dichloropropene, Metam potassium, Metam sodium, and Methyl bromide; Extension of Comment Period
EPA issued five notices in the Federal Register of May 2, 2007, announcing the availability and seeking comments on EPA's revised human health risk assessments and risk mitigation proposal for the fumigants chloropicrin, dazomet, 1,3-dichloropropene, metam potassium, metam sodium, and methyl bromide. On June 20, 2007, EPA issued a notice in the Federal Register extending the comment period for 60 days, until September 3, 2007. This document is extending the comment period for another 60 days, from September 3, 2007 to November 3, 2007, for the five actions.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Designation of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Kentucky: Redesignation of the Kentucky Portion of the Louisville 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area to Attainment for Ozone; Technical Amendment
On July 5, 2007, EPA published in the Federal Register a final rule redesignating the Kentucky portion of the bi-state Louisville 8- hour ozone nonattainment area to attainment for the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). EPA inadvertently omitted the State effective date in the regulatory text in the final rule for the Louisville 8-hour ozone maintenance plan. This action corrects the July 5, 2007, final rule by adding a State effective date of September 29, 2006.
Adequacy Status of the Atlanta Early Progress 8-Hour Ozone Motor Vehicle Emission Budgets for Transportation Conformity Purposes; Correction
On April 9, 2007, EPA published a notice of adequacy for the 2006 Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) contained in Atlanta's Early Progress Plan. The MVEBs for nitrogen oxide (NOX) and the volatile organic compounds (VOC) were incorrectly stated. This document corrects the notice.
Proposed CERCLA Section 122(h) Ability To Pay Settlement for the Westwood Chemical Corporation Superfund Site, Middletown, Orange County, NY
In accordance with section 122(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(i), notice is hereby given by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (``EPA''), Region II, of a proposed Ability To Pay settlement agreement pursuant to section 122(h) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9622(h), with Rocco Giovanniello, an individual who is a potentially responsible party for the Westwood Chemical Corporation Superfund Site (``Site'') in Middletown, Orange County, New York. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, Mr. Giovanniello would pay to EPA the amount of $25,000 towards reimbursement of EPA's past costs at the Site in installments as follows: an initial installment of $15,000 following the effective date of the settlement agreement, and a second installment of $10,000, plus interest, one year after the effective date. The settlement includes a covenant by EPA not to sue or to take administrative action against the settling party pursuant to sections 106 and 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9606 and 9607(a), with regard to the Site. For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, EPA will receive written comments relating to the settlement. EPA will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations that indicate that the proposed settlement is inappropriate, improper or inadequate. EPA's response to any comments received will be available for public inspection at EPA Region II, 290 Broadway, New York, New York 10007-1866.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Redesignation of the Reading 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area to Attainment and Approval of the Area's Maintenance Plan and 2002 Base-Year Inventory
EPA is approving a redesignation request and State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) is requesting that the Reading, Berks County, Pennsylvania ozone nonattainment area (Reading Area) be redesignated as attainment for the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). In conjunction with its redesignation request, the PADEP submitted SIP revisions consisting of a maintenance plan for the Reading Area that provides for continued attainment of the 8-hour ozone NAAQS for at least 10 years after redesignation. EPA is approving the 8-hour maintenance plan. PADEP also submitted a 2002 base-year inventory for the Reading Area which EPA is approving. In addition, EPA is approving the adequacy determination for the motor vehicle emission budgets (MVEBs) that are identified in the Reading Area maintenance plan for purposes of transportation conformity, and is approving those MVEBs. EPA is approving the redesignation request, and the maintenance plan, and the 2002 base-year emissions inventory as revisions to the Pennsylvania SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Clean Air Act.
Notice of Proposed Settlement Agreement and Opportunity for Public Comment; Pennsylvania Railroad Transformer Superfund Site
In accordance with section 122(i) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622(h)(i), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement, intended to resolve the potential liability under CERCLA of a party for response costs incurred by EPA and by the United States Department of Justice on behalf of EPA in connection with the Pennsylvania Railroad Transformer Superfund Site, Pittsburgh, Allegheny County, Pennsylvania (``Site'').
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.