Public Debt Bureau April 2010 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Fiscal Service
This is Supplement No. 12 to the Treasury Department Circular 570, 2009 Revision, published July 1, 2009, at 74 FR 31536.
Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: Regent Insurance Company
This is Supplement No. 11 to the Treasury Department Circular 570, 2009 Revision, published July 1, 2009, at 74 FR 31536.
Surety Companies Acceptable on Federal Bonds: General Casualty Company of Wisconsin
This is Supplement No. 10 to the Treasury Department Circular 570, 2009 Revision, published July 1, 2009, at 74 FR 31536.
Financial Management Service; Proposed Collection of Information: Annual Financial Statement of Surety Companies-Schedule F
The Financial Management Service, as part of its continuing effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on a continuing information collection. By this notice, the Financial Management Service solicits comments concerning the Form FMS-6314 ``Annual Financial Statement of Surety CompaniesSchedule F.''
Garnishment of Accounts Containing Federal Benefit Payments
Treasury, SSA, VA, RRB and OPM (Agencies) are publishing for comment a proposed rule to implement statutory restrictions on the garnishment of Federal benefit payments. The Agencies are taking this action in response to recent developments in technology and debt collection practices that have led to an increase in the freezing of accounts containing Federal benefit payments. The proposed rule would establish procedures that financial institutions must follow when a garnishment order is received for an account into which Federal benefit payments have been directly deposited. The proposed rule would require financial institutions that receive a garnishment order for an account to determine whether any Federal benefit payments were deposited to the account within 60 calendar days prior to receipt of the order and, if so, would require the financial institution to ensure that the account holder has access to an amount equal to the sum of such payments in the account or to the current balance of the account, whichever is lower.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.