Surface Transportation Board January 2011 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Released Rates of Motor Common Carriers of Household Goods
Document Number: 2011-2019
Type: Notice
Date: 2011-01-31
Agency: Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation
The Surface Transportation Board seeks written public comments and evidence on the average per-pound replacement value for household goods that are lost or damaged while in the care of a moving company.
CSX Transportation, Inc.-Temporary Trackage Rights-Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Document Number: 2011-1300
Type: Notice
Date: 2011-01-24
Agency: Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation
Western Kentucky Railway, LLC-Abandonment Exemption-in Webster, Union, Caldwell and Crittenden Counties, KY
Document Number: 2011-1184
Type: Notice
Date: 2011-01-20
Agency: Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation
Competition in the Railroad Industry
Document Number: 2011-774
Type: Notice
Date: 2011-01-14
Agency: Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation
The Surface Transportation Board will receive comments and hold a public hearing to explore the current state of competition in the railroad industry and possible policy alternatives to facilitate more competition, where appropriate. The Board is seeking written comments prior to the hearing addressing the legal, factual, and policy matters described below.
City of Temple, Tex.-Acquisition Exemption-Georgetown Railroad Company
Document Number: 2011-639
Type: Notice
Date: 2011-01-13
Agency: Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation
On December 15, 2010, the City of Temple, Tex. (Temple), a noncarrier, filed a petition under 49 U.S.C. 10502 for exemption from the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 10901 to acquire from the Georgetown Railroad Company (Georgetown) an approximately 6.277-mile line of railroad, between milepost 0.0, near Belton, and milepost 6.277, at Smith, in Bell County, Tex. (the line), and the trackage rights granted to Georgetown to operate over the line.\1\ In a related transaction, Temple & Central Texas Railway, Inc. (TCTR), a Class III carrier, filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1150.41 to operate over the line. That notice was served and published in the Federal Register on December 10, 2010 (75 FR 77,044). Temple & Central Tex. Ry.Operation ExemptionCity of Temple, Tex., FD 35447 (STB served Dec. 10, 2010). The Board seeks comments from interested persons on Temple's request to acquire the line.
BNSF Railway Company-Abandonment Exemption-in Rolette and Towner Counties, ND
Document Number: 2011-632
Type: Notice
Date: 2011-01-13
Agency: Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation
Release of Waybill Data
Document Number: 2011-450
Type: Notice
Date: 2011-01-12
Agency: Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation
Release of Waybill Data
Document Number: 2011-155
Type: Notice
Date: 2011-01-10
Agency: Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation
Gabriel D. Hall-Corporate Family Transaction Exemption-U S Rail New York, LLC and U S Rail Corporation
Document Number: 2011-128
Type: Notice
Date: 2011-01-07
Agency: Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation
Union Pacific Railroad Company-Abandonment Exemption-In Wright County, IA
Document Number: 2011-126
Type: Notice
Date: 2011-01-07
Agency: Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation
Amtrak Emergency Routing Orders
Document Number: 2010-33284
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2011-01-06
Agency: Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation
The Surface Transportation Board (Board or STB) proposes to establish regulations governing the issuance of emergency routing orders upon application of the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak). Pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 24308(b), the Board has statutory authority to require rail carriers to provide facilities immediately when necessary for the movement of Amtrak trains when Amtrak cannot operate its trains via normal routings due to rail line closures or other emergencies.
CSX Transportation, Inc.-Abandonment Exemption-in Allegany County, Md.
Document Number: 2010-33191
Type: Notice
Date: 2011-01-04
Agency: Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the Board is granting a petition for exemption from the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10904(f)(4)(A) to permit Eighteen Thirty Group, LLC (Eighteen Thirty) to go forward with its plan to acquire and restore to service an 8.54-mile line of railroad between milepost BAI 27.0 near Morrison and milepost BAI 18.46 at the end of the track near Carlos, in Allegany County, Md. (the Line). Eighteen Thirty is seeking to acquire the Line as a result of the bankruptcy of James Riffin through an agreement with Mark J. Friedman, Chapter 7 Trustee of the Bankruptcy Estate of James Riffin. Because the line previously was acquired from CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) pursuant to the Board's offer of financial assistance provisions at 49 U.S.C. 10904 and 49 CFR 1152.27, section 10904(f)(4)(A) otherwise would prohibit the transfer of the Line to any entity other than CSXT until July 10, 2011.
Notice and Request for Comments
Document Number: 2010-33079
Type: Notice
Date: 2011-01-03
Agency: Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation
As required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. 3501-3519 (PRA), the Surface Transportation Board (STB or Board) has submitted a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for an extension of approval for the collection of the Waybill Sample. The Board previously published a notice about this collection in the Federal Register on June 29, 2010, at 75 FR 37,522. That notice allowed for a 60-day public review and comment period. No comments were received. The Waybill Sample collection is described in detail below. Comments may now be submitted to OMB concerning: (1) The accuracy of the Board's burden estimates; (2) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information collected; (3) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on the respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, when appropriate; and (4) whether this collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Board, including whether the collection has practical utility.