National Highway Traffic Safety Administration August 2007 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Denial of Petition for Rulemaking
Document Number: E7-17374
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2007-08-31
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
Based on the agency's evaluation, the NHTSA denies a petition for rulemaking from Ricon Corporation (Ricon) to amend S6.1/S7.4 (threshold warning signal requirement and related test procedure), S6.10.2.3 (anti-stow interlock requirement) and S6.10.2.7/S7.6 (occupied inner roll stop interlock requirement and related test procedure) of FMVSS No. 403. The NHTSA believes that the rulemaking is unnecessary because granting the proposed amendments would not result in a substantial increase in the effectiveness and safety benefit of the requirements and related test procedures. The NHTSA also believes that the current requirements and test procedures are appropriate and objective ways of ensuring compliance.
Insurer Reporting Requirements; List of Insurers Required to File Reports
Document Number: E7-17149
Type: Rule
Date: 2007-08-30
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
This final rule amends regulations on insurer reporting requirements. The appendices list those passenger motor vehicle insurers that are required to file reports on their motor vehicle theft loss experiences. An insurer included in any of these appendices must file three copies of its report for the 2004 calendar year before October 25, 2007. If the passenger motor vehicle insurers remain listed, they must submit reports by each subsequent October 25.
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Tires
Document Number: E7-16934
Type: Rule
Date: 2007-08-28
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
In June 2003, NHTSA published a final rule establishing upgraded tire performance requirements for new tires for use on vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating of 10,000 pounds or less. In January 2006, NHTSA published a final rule; response to petitions for reconsideration, which modified certain performance requirements to better address snow tires and certain specialty tires. This document responds to a petition for reconsideration of the January 2006 rule. After carefully considering the issues raised, the agency is denying the petition. We are also making a number of technical corrections in several tire-related Federal safety standards.
Britax Child Safety, Inc.; Denial of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
Document Number: E7-16408
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-08-21
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
Federal Motor Vehicle Theft Prevention Standard
Document Number: E7-16125
Type: Rule
Date: 2007-08-17
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
On May 19, 2005, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) published a final rule; response to petitions for reconsideration of a final rule published on April 6, 2004. As part of that final rule, we added a new part 545 containing the reporting requirements for the phase-in to the amendments to part 541. We inadvertently incorrectly cited some cross-references in the regulatory text of part 545. This document corrects those errors.
Public Comment on Educational Messages To Improve Use of Child Restraint Systems
Document Number: 07-4022
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-08-17
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
NHTSA is working with representatives of the child restraint and automobile manufacturers and child passenger safety advocacy groups to identify common awareness messages that could be used by manufacturers, advocates and others to inform parents or caregivers about the importance of correct use of the Lower Anchors and Tethers for Children (LATCH) system. This notice presents proposed messages and solicits public comment on their suitability.
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards; Occupant Crash Protection
Document Number: E7-16139
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2007-08-16
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
This document denies a petition for expedited rulemaking submitted by the Smart Vision group to amend Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 208, ``Occupant Crash Protection.'' The petition requested that the agency add a test procedure for the Dynamic Automatic Suppression System (DASS) option under the advanced air bag options in accordance with Part 552, Subpart B.
Bentley Motors, Inc., Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
Document Number: E7-16127
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-08-16
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
Reports, Forms, and Recordkeeping Requirements
Document Number: E7-16108
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-08-16
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
This document corrects the mailing addresses and the completeness of the notice published on June 21, 2007 (72 FR 34348) for the Paperwork Reduction Action of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., OMB Control Number 2127-0573).
Sidump'r Trailer Company, Inc., Receipt of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
Document Number: E7-16093
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-08-16
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
Reliance Trailer Company, LLC; Receipt of Application for a Temporary Exemption From Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 224
Document Number: E7-15836
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-08-14
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
In accordance with the procedures of 49 CFR Part 555, Reliance Trailer Company, LLC (Reliance) has applied for a Temporary Exemption from Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 224, Rear impact protection for three years. The basis of the application is that compliance would cause substantial economic hardship to a manufacturer that has tried in good faith to comply with the standard. We are publishing this notice of receipt of the application in accordance with the requirements of 49 U.S.C. 30113(b)(2), and have made no judgment on the merits of the application.
Notice of Tentative Decision That Certain Nonconforming Vehicles Are Eligible for Importation
Document Number: E7-15829
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-08-14
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
This notice requests comments on a tentative decision by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) that certain vehicles that do not comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards, but that are certified by their original manufacturer as complying with all applicable Canadian motor vehicle safety standards, are eligible for importation into the United States. The vehicles in question either (1) Are substantially similar to vehicles that were certified by their manufacturers as complying with the U.S. safety standards and are capable of being readily altered to conform to those standards, or (2) have safety features that comply with, or are capable of being altered to comply with, all U.S. safety standards.
New Car Assessment Program (NCAP); Safety Labeling
Document Number: E7-15743
Type: Rule
Date: 2007-08-13
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
A provision of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users requires new passenger vehicles to be labeled with safety rating information published by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration under its New Car Assessment Program. NHTSA was required to issue regulations to ensure that the labeling requirements ``are implemented by September 1, 2007.'' In September 2006, we published a final rule to fulfill that mandate. We received petitions for reconsideration of the final rule. Today's document responds to those petitions and makes technical amendments clarifying certain details of the presentation of the information on the labels.
Reports, Forms and Recordkeeping Requirements Agency Information Collection Activity Under OMB Review
Document Number: E7-15739
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-08-13
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this notice announces that the Information Collection Request (ICR) abstracted below has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and comment. The ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its expected burden. A Federal Register Notice soliciting public comment on the ICR, with a 60-day comment period, was published on May 15, 2007 at 72 FR 27354.
Grote Industries, LLC; Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
Document Number: E7-15613
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-08-10
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
The Braun Corporation; Denial of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
Document Number: E7-15611
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-08-10
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
Decision That Nonconforming 1994 and 1996 Left-Hand and Right-Hand Drive Jeep Cherokee Multipurpose Passenger Vehicles Are Eligible for Importation
Document Number: E7-15249
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-08-07
Agency: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Department of Transportation
This document announces a decision by NHTSA that certain 1994 and 1996 LHD and RHD Jeep Cherokee MPVs that were not originally manufactured to comply with all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety standards (FMVSS) are eligible for importation into the United States because (1) they are substantially similar to vehicles that were originally manufactured for sale in the United States and that were certified by their manufacturer as complying with the safety standards (the U.S.-certified version of the 1994 and 1995 LHD and RHD Jeep Cherokee MPVs), and (2) they are capable of being readily altered to conform to the standards.