Department of the Air Force March 2007 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Document Number: 07-1565
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-03-30
Agency: Department of Defense, Department of the Air Force, Air Force Department
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Document Number: 07-1564
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-03-30
Agency: Department of Defense, Department of the Air Force, Air Force Department
Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request
Document Number: 07-1563
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-03-30
Agency: Department of Defense, Department of the Air Force, Air Force Department
Air University Board of Visitors; Notice of Meeting
Document Number: E7-5448
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-03-26
Agency: Department of Defense, Department of the Air Force, Air Force Department
The purpose of the meeting is to give the board an opportunity to review Air University educational programs and to present to the Commander, a report of their findings and recommendations concerning these programs. Discussions will include overall university status, degree-granting authority, reaffirmation preparations, and undergraduate education updates.
HQ USAF Scientific Advisory Board; Notice of Meeting
Document Number: E7-5447
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-03-26
Agency: Department of Defense, Department of the Air Force, Air Force Department
The Air Force Scientific Advisory Board (SAB) will meet on 10 April 2007 at Air Intelligence Agency (AIA), Lackland Air Force Base, TX. The purpose of the meeting is to hold the SAB Spring quarterly meeting. The day will be spent in classified briefings and discussion with Air Intelligence Agency to learn about their roles and mission. Visits will also be made to various tenant units also at Lackland Air Force Base. Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended and 41 CFR 102-3.155, the Department of Defense has determined that the meeting shall be closed to the public. The Administrative Assistant to the Secretary of the Air Force, in consultation with the Office of the Air Force General Counsel, has determined in writing that the public interest requires that all sessions of this meeting be closed to the public because they will be concerned with matters listed in section 552b(c)(1) and (9)(B) of Title 5 United States Code.
Air Force Academy Preparatory School
Document Number: E7-4129
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2007-03-08
Agency: Department of Defense, Department of the Air Force, Air Force Department
This proposed rule tells how to apply for the Air Force Academy Preparatory School. It also explains the procedures for selection, disenrollment, and assignment. This rule has been updated to identify USAFA's revised mission statement, new selection criteria and updates of associated Air Force Instructions.
Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records
Document Number: E7-4022
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-03-07
Agency: Department of Defense, Department of the Air Force, Air Force Department
The Department of the Air Force proposes to add a system of records notice to its inventory of records systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.
Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records
Document Number: E7-4021
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-03-07
Agency: Department of Defense, Department of the Air Force, Air Force Department
The Department of the Air Force proposes to add a system of records notice to its inventory of records systems subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended.
United Launch Alliance Industry Day To Inform Industry of the Federal Trade Commission's Consent Order Regarding United Launch Alliance
Document Number: E7-3771
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-03-05
Agency: Department of Defense, Department of the Air Force, Air Force Department
The purpose of the United Launch Alliance (ULA) Industry Day is to inform industry of the Federal Trade Commission's Consent Order regarding ULA and the role of the Compliance Officer to oversee compliance with the Consent Order. The Order is intended to ensure that ULA affords all satellite manufacturers non-discriminatory treatment for launch services and that Lockheed and Boeing, as satellite manufacturers, consider all qualified launch vehicle providers on a non-discriminatory basis. The order also requires firewalls to prevent information from a satellite or other launch vehicle provider from being shared by ULA with its Boeing or Lockheed Martin parent. The role of the Compliance Officer is to oversee compliance with the Consent Order by all three respondents and to investigate any complaint or representation arising in relation to or connected with compliance of this order.