Occupational Safety and Health Administration 2005 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

TUV America, Inc., Application for Expansion of Recognition
Document Number: 05-9868
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-05-18
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
This notice announces the application of TUV America, Inc., (TUVAM) for expansion of its recognition to use additional test standards, and presents the Agency's preliminary finding. This preliminary finding does not constitute an interim or temporary approval of this application.
Oregon State Plan; Final Approval Determination
Document Number: 05-9321
Type: Rule
Date: 2005-05-12
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
This document amends OSHA's regulations to reflect the Assistant Secretary's decision to grant final approval to the Oregon State Plan. As a result of this affirmative determination under Section 18(e) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, Federal OSHA's standards and enforcement authority no longer apply and Federal concurrent jurisdiction is relinquished with respect to occupational safety and health issues covered by the Oregon plan (with the exception of temporary labor camps). Federal enforcement jurisdiction is retained over private sector establishments on Indian reservations and tribal trust lands, including tribal and Indian-owned enterprises; Federal agencies; the U.S. Postal Service and its contractors; contractors on U.S. military reservations, except those working on U.S. Army Corps of Engineers dam construction projects; and private sector maritime employment on or adjacent to navigable waters, including shipyard operations and marine terminals.
Oregon State Plan: Approval of Oregon State Standards
Document Number: 05-8918
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-05-05
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is approving three standards: fall protection, forest activities and steel erection, promulgated by the Oregon Department of Consumer and Business Services pursuant to its OSHA-approved state plan. These standards differ from the equivalent federal standards but have been determined to be ``at least as effective'' as the federal standards. On August 9, 2004, OSHA published a Federal Register notice (69 FR 48253) requesting public comment on whether the Oregon standards met both the ``at least as effective'' criterion and product clause tests of Section 18(c)(2) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act. This notice invited interested persons to submit by September 8, 2004, written comments and views regarding the Oregon state standards and whether they should be approved by the Regional Administrator. OSHA received two comments in response to the fall protection standard.
Survey of Automatic External Defibrillator Use in Occupational Settings; Proposed Information Collection Activity; Request for Comment
Document Number: 05-8824
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-05-04
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, OSHA is soliciting public comment on a survey addressing the usefulness and efficacy of automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) in occupational settings.
Occupational Exposure to Ionizing Radiation
Document Number: 05-8805
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2005-05-03
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
OSHA requests data, information and comment on issues related to the increasing use of ionizing radiation in the workplace and potential worker exposure to it. Specifically, OSHA requests data and information about the sources and uses of ionizing radiation in workplaces today, current employee exposure levels, and adverse health effects associated with ionizing radiation exposure. OSHA also requests data and information about practices and programs employers are using to control employee exposure, such as exposure assessment and monitoring methods, control methods, employee training, and medical surveillance. The Agency will use the data and information it receives to determine what action, if any, is necessary to address worker exposure to occupational ionizing radiation.
Notice; Addendum to the Memorandum of Understanding: To Formalize the Working Relationship Between the Department of Energy and the Department of Labor (August 28, 1992)
Document Number: 05-8370
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-04-27
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Office of the Environment, Safety and Health, Department of Energy
This notice is an addendum to the 1992 interagency Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the U.S. Department of Labor and the U.S. Department of Energy. That MOU states that DOE has exclusive authority over the occupational safety and health of contractor employees at DOE GOCOs. In addition, the MOU between the departments dated July 25, 2000 on safety and health enforcement at privatized facilities and operations provides that OSHA has regulatory authority over occupational safety and health at certain privatized facilities and operations on DOE land leased to private enterprises. This action is taken in accordance with the July 25, 2000 MOU, which establishes specific interagency procedures for the transfer of occupational safety and health coverage for such privatized facilities and operations from DOE to OSHA. The MOUs may be found on the internet via the OSHA Web page www.osha.gov under the ``D'' for Department of Energy Transition Activities.
Notice of Availability of the Regulatory Flexibility Act Review of the Occupational Health Standard for Ethylene Oxide
Document Number: 05-8080
Type: Rule
Date: 2005-04-22
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has conducted a review of its Ethylene Oxide (EtO) Standard pursuant to section 610 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act and section 5 of Executive Order 12866 on Regulatory Planning and Review. EtO is used as a chemical intermediate to produce antifreeze and as a sterilant. In 1984, OSHA promulgated a standard to lower exposure to EtO from 50 parts per million (ppm) to 1 ppm based on evidence EtO exposure was associated with cancer in animals. The regulatory review has concluded that new studies indicate that EtO is associated with cancer in humans, that employee exposures have been substantially reduced thereby lowering risk to employees, that the standard has not had a negative impact on small businesses, that EtO production has increased, and that EtO sterilizers have been developed that meet the standard and cost less than older non-compliant sterilizers. Public commenters agree that the standard should remain in effect. Based on this review, OSHA concludes the EtO standard should remain in effect, but will issue new guidance materials in response to some commenters requests for clarification.
International Chimney Corporation, Karrena International, LLC, and Matrix Service Industrial Contractors, Inc., Application for Permanent Variance and Interim Order, Grant of Interim Order, and Request for Comments
Document Number: 05-7999
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-04-21
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
International Chimney Corporation, Karrena International, LLC, and Matrix Service Industrial Contractors, Inc. (``the employers'') have applied for a permanent variance from the provisions of the OSHA standards that regulate boatswains' chairs and hoist towers, specifically paragraph (o)(3) of Sec. 1926.452 and paragraphs (c)(1) through (c)(4), (c)(8), (c)(13), (c)(14)(i), and (c)(16) of Sec. 1926.552. In addition, the employers have requested an interim order based on the alternative conditions specified by the variance application. Since these conditions are the same as the conditions specified in the most recent permanent variance granted by the Agency for these boatswains'-chair and hoist-tower provisions, OSHA is granting the applicants' request for interim orders.
Electrical Standards for Construction and General Industry; Extension of the Office of Managaement and Budget's (OMB) Approval of the Information-Collection (Paperwork) Requirements
Document Number: 05-7941
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-04-20
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
OSHA solicits comments concerning its request for an extension of the information-collection requirements contained in the Electrical Standards for Construction (29 CFR part 1926, subpart K) and for General Industry (29 CFR part 1910, subpart S).
Agency Information Collection Activities; Announcement of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Numbers Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
Document Number: 05-7939
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-04-20
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) announces that OMB has extended its approval for a number of information collection requirements found in sections of 29 CFR parts 1910 and 1926. OSHA sought approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA-95), and, as required by that Act, is announcing the approval numbers and expiration dates for those requirements.
Procedures for the Handling of Discrimination Complaints Under Section 6 of the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002
Document Number: 05-6925
Type: Rule
Date: 2005-04-08
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
This document provides the final text of regulations governing the employee protection (``whistleblower'') provisions of Section 6 of the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 (``Pipeline Safety Act''), enacted into law December 17, 2002. This rule establishes procedures and time frames for the handling of discrimination complaints under the Pipeline Safety Act, including procedures and time frames for employee complaints to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (``OSHA''), investigations by OSHA, appeals of OSHA determinations to an administrative law judge (``ALJ'') for a hearing de novo, hearings by ALJs, review of ALJ decisions by the Administrative Review Board (acting on behalf of the Secretary) and judicial review of the Secretary's final decision.
Subpart A (“General Provisions”) and Subpart B (“Confined and Enclosed Spaces and Other Dangerous Atmospheres in Shipyard Employment”) of 29 CFR Part 1915; Extension of the Office of Management and Budget's (OMB) Approval of Information Collection (Paperwork) Requirements
Document Number: 05-6487
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-04-01
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
OSHA solicits public comment concerning its request for an extension of the information collection requirements contained in 29 CFR part 1915, subpart A (``General Provisions'') and subpart B (``Confined and Enclosed Spaces and Other Dangerous Atmospheres in Shipyard Employment'').
Federal Advisory Council on Occupational Safety and Health: Notice of Meeting
Document Number: 05-5804
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-03-24
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Fire Protection in Shipyard Employment; Approval of Information Collection Requirements
Document Number: 05-5500
Type: Rule
Date: 2005-03-21
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
OSHA is announcing that the collections of information contained in the Fire Protection in Shipyard Employment Standard (29 CFR part 1915, subpart P) have been approved by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The OMB approval number is 1218-0248.
Modify Scope of Recognition of NRTLs
Document Number: 05-4431
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-03-08
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
This notice modifies the scope of recognition of certain Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratories (NRTLs) primarily as a result of the withdrawal of certain test standards by the standards developing organizations.
Maritime Advisory Committee for Occupational Safety and Health; Notice of Meeting
Document Number: 05-3994
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-03-02
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
The Maritime Advisory Committee for Occupational Safety and Health (MACOSH) was established to advise the Assistant Secretary of Labor for OSHA on issues relating to occupational safety and health in the maritime industries. The purpose of this Federal Register notice is to announce the March 2005 meeting of the committee.
NSF International, Expansion of Recognition; Application for Renewal of Recognition; Intertek Testing Services, NA, Interim Approval Subject to Review
Document Number: 05-3772
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-02-28
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
This notice announces the Agency's final decision on the application of NSF International (NSF) for expansion of its recognition as a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory under 29 CFR 1910.7. This notice also announces NSF's Application for renewal of its recognition and presents the Agency's preliminary finding on the renewal. This preliminary finding does not constitute an interim or temporary approval of the renewal application. In an unrelated matter, we are adding one test standard, NFPA 72, Installation, Maintenance, and Use of Protective Signaling Systems, to the scope of recognition of Intertek Testing Services, NA (ITSNA), on an interim basis, subject to review.
Updating OSHA Standards Based on National Consensus Standards; General, Incorporation by Reference; Hazardous Materials, Flammable and Combustible Liquids; General Environmental Controls, Temporary Labor Camps; Hand and Portable Powered Tools and Other Hand Held Equipment, Guarding of Portable Powered Tools; Welding, Cutting, and Brazing, Arc Welding and Cutting; Special Industries, Sawmills
Document Number: 05-3171
Type: Rule
Date: 2005-02-18
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
Due to significant adverse comment, OSHA is withdrawing the direct final rule for Updating OSHA Standards Based on National Consensus Standards; General, Incorporation by Reference; Hazardous Materials, Flammable and Combustible Liquids; General Environmental Controls, Temporary Labor Camps; Hand and Portable Powered Tools and Other Hand Held Equipment, Guarding of Portable Powered Tools; Welding, Cutting, and Brazing, Arc Welding and Cutting; Special Industries, Sawmills, which was published on November 24, 2004 [69 FR 68712]. In that document, OSHA stated that if it received significant adverse comment, the agency would ``publish a notice of significant adverse comment in the Federal Register withdrawing this direct final rule * * *'' OSHA published a companion proposed rule identical to the direct final rule on the same day. [69 FR 68706]. The agency will address the significant adverse comment and the other comments on the direct final and proposed rules in a new final rule. OSHA will not institute a second comment period.
Advisory Committee on Construction Safety and Health; Notice of Meeting
Document Number: 05-1888
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-02-02
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
ACCSH will meet February 17, 2005, in Rosemont, IL. This meeting is open to the public. Time and Date: ACCSH will meet from 9:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m., Thursday, February 17, 2005. Place: ACCSH will meet at the Holiday Inn Select O'Hare, 10233 West Higgins Road, Rosemont, IL 60018.
Standards Improvement Project-Phase II
Document Number: 04-28221
Type: Rule
Date: 2005-01-05
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) through this final rule is continuing to remove and revise provisions of its standards that are outdated, duplicative, unnecessary, or inconsistent, or can be clarified or simplified by being written in plain language. The Agency completed Phase I of the Standards Improvement Project in June 1998. In this Phase II of the Standards Improvement Project, OSHA is again revising or removing a number of health provisions in its standards for general industry, shipyard employment, and construction. The Agency believes that the changes streamline and make more consistent the regulatory requirements in OSHA health and safety standards. In some cases, OSHA has made substantive revisions to requirements because they are outdated, duplicative, unnecessary, or inconsistent with more recently promulgated health standards. The Agency believes these revisions will reduce regulatory requirements for employers without reducing employee protection.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.