Department of Defense August 27, 2009 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 6 of 6
Advisory Panel on Department of Defense Capabilities for Support of Civil Authorities After Certain Incidents
Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 41 CFR 102-3.150, the Department of Defense announces that the following Federal advisory committee meeting of the Advisory Panel on Department of Defense Capabilities for Support of Civil Authorities after Certain Incidents (hereinafter referred to as the Advisory Panel) will take place:
Military Leadership Diversity Commission
Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 41 CFR 102-3.150, the Department of Defense announces that the following Federal advisory committee meeting of the Military Leadership Diversity Commission (MLDC) will take place:
Office of the Assistant Secretary; Defense Task Force on Sexual Assault in the Military Services
Under the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972 (5 U.S.C., Appendix, as amended), the Government in the Sunshine Act of 1976 (5 U.S.C. 552b, as amended), and 41 CFR 102-3.150, the Department of Defense announces that the following Federal advisory committee meetings of the Defense Task Force on Sexual Assault in the Military Services (hereafter referred to as the Task Force) will take place:
Notice of Intent To Grant Exclusive Patent License: Haleakala R&D, Inc.
The Department of the Navy hereby gives notice of its intent to grant to Haleakala R&D, Inc. a revocable, nonassignable, partially exclusive license to practice throughout the United States the Government-owned inventions described in U.S. Patent No. 6,806,833: CONFINED PLASMA RESONANCE ANTENNA AND PLASMA RESONANCE ANTENNA ARRAY; U.S. Patent No. 6,674,970: PLASMA ANTENNA WITH TWO-FLUID IONIZATION CURRENT; U.S. Patent No. 6,657,594: PLASMA ANTENNA SYSTEM AND METHOD; U.S. Patent No. 6,650,297: LASER DRIVEN PLASMA ANTENNA UTILIZING LASER MODIFIED MAXWELLIAN RELAXATION; U.S. Patent No. 6,169,520: PLASMA ANTENNA WITH CURRENTS GENERATED BY OPPOSED PHOTON BEAMS; U.S. Patent No. 6,087,993: PLASMA ANTENNA WITH ELECTRO-OPTICAL MODULATOR; U.S. Patent No. 6,046,705: STANDING WAVE PLASMA ANTENNA WITH PLASMA REFLECTOR; U.S. Patent No. 6,118,407: HORIZONTAL PLASMA 6,087,992: ACOUSTICALLY DRIVEN PLASMA ANTENNA; and, U.S. Patent No. 5,963,169: MULTIPLE TUBE PLASMA ANTENNA.
Disestablishment of Restricted Area for Pascagoula Naval Station, Pascagoula, MS
The U.S. Navy (USN) requested that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) disestablish the restricted area at the former Naval Station Pascagoula in Pascagoula, Mississippi. The restricted area was established on November 9, 1992. The purpose of the restricted area was to reduce safety hazards and security risks and protect persons and property from dangers encountered in the area. As a result of the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure Act, the Naval Station was closed on June 1, 2007, and the property transferred to the State of Mississippi.
Disestablishment of Restricted Area for Pascagoula Naval Station, Pascagoula, MS
The U.S. Navy (USN) requested that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) disestablish the restricted area at the former Naval Station Pascagoula in Pascagoula, Mississippi. The restricted area was established on November 9, 1992. The purpose of the restricted area was to reduce safety hazards and security risks and protect persons and property from dangers encountered in the area. As a result of the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure Act, the Naval Station was closed on June 1, 2007, and the property transferred to the State of Mississippi. In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of Federal Register, we are publishing the restricted area disestablishment as a direct final rule without prior proposal because we view this as a non-controversial adjustment to our restricted area regulations and anticipate no adverse comment. We have explained our reasons for this approval in the preamble to the direct final rule. If we receive no adverse comment, we will not take further action on this rule and it will go into effect. If we receive adverse comment, we will withdraw the direct final rule
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
