Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fees for Nasdaq 100 Index Options in Options 7, Section 5.A, 26387-26389 [2025-11297]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 117 / Friday, June 20, 2025 / Notices
securities were allocated provides
useful insight that is more comparable
to the information reported and
disseminated today, without adding
undue complexity to the aggregate
reporting framework. As such, FINRA
believes the proposed aggregate
allocation report indicating the number
of allocations is preferable.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) by order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
FINRA–2025–008 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FINRA–2025–008. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Jun 18, 2025
Jkt 265001
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing
also will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of
FINRA. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FINRA–2025–008 and
should be submitted on or before July
11, 2025.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.20
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
26387
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
fees for Nasdaq 100 Index options in the
Exchange’s Pricing Schedule at Options
7, Section 5.A to adopt a new surcharge
for removing liquidity.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/phlx/rulefilings, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
1. Purpose
[FR Doc. 2025–11298 Filed 6–18–25; 8:45 am]
[Release No. 34–103268; File No. SR–Phlx–
2025–22]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the Fees for
Nasdaq 100 Index Options in Options
7, Section 5.A
June 16, 2025.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 2,
2025, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (‘‘Phlx’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
20 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00122
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to amend the fees for NDX 3
and NDXP.4
As set forth in Options 7, Section 5.A,
the Exchange currently charges all NonCustomer 5 orders in NDX and NDXP a
$0.75 per contract transaction fee.
Customer 6 orders are currently assessed
a $0.25 per contract transaction fee in
NDX and NDXP. These transaction fees
apply to electronic simple and complex
executions as well as floor transactions.
3 NDX represents A.M.-settled options on the full
value of the Nasdaq 100 Index traded under the
symbol NDX.
4 NDXP represents P.M.-settled options on the full
value of the Nasdaq 100 Index traded under the
symbol NDXP.
5 The term ‘‘Non-Customer’’ applies to
transactions for the accounts of Lead Market
Makers, Market Makers, Firms, Professionals,
Broker-Dealers and JBOs.
6 The term ‘‘Customer’’ applies to any transaction
that is identified by a member or member
organization for clearing in the Customer range at
The Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) which
is not for the account of a broker or dealer or for
the account of a ‘‘Professional’’ (as that term is
defined in Options 1, Section 1(b)(45)).
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
26388
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 117 / Friday, June 20, 2025 / Notices
The Exchange now proposes to assess
a surcharge of $1.50 per contract to all
electronic simple Non-Customer orders
that remove liquidity.7 Customer NDX
and NDXP fees will remain unchanged
under this proposal. The proposed
surcharge is aimed at encouraging NonCustomers to add more liquidity and
reduce ‘‘take’’ behavior that removes
liquidity from the order book. The
Exchange notes that the proposed
surcharge amount is within the range of
surcharges assessed for transactions in
other proprietary products at another
options exchange.8
Lastly, the Exchange proposes a nonsubstantive change in the Section 5.A
pricing schedule. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to relocate the note
1 references currently appended to
NDX, NDXP, and EXGN under the
‘‘Symbol’’ column to the relevant
transaction fees under the columns for
‘‘Professional,’’ ‘‘Lead Market Maker
and Market Maker,’’ ‘‘Broker-Dealer,’’
and ‘‘Firm.’’ Note 1 currently sets forth
the $0.25 per contract surcharge for
NDX, NDXP and EXGN assessed to NonCustomers. The Exchange seeks to
promote clarity in its Section 5.A
pricing schedule by relocating the note
1 references so that they are appended
to the respective transaction fees for
Non-Customers.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,9 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5)
of the Act,10 in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other
persons using any facility, and is not
designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to add a $1.50 per contract
surcharge to all electronic simple NonCustomer orders that remove liquidity is
reasonable because the proposed pricing
reflects the proprietary nature of this
product. Similar to other proprietary
products like options overlying the
Nasdaq 100 Micro Index (‘‘XND’’), the
Exchange seeks to recoup the
operational costs of listing proprietary
products.11 Also, pricing by symbol is a
proposed note 3 in Options 7, Section 5.A.
example, Cboe Options (‘‘Cboe’’) currently
assesses market participants LEAPS surcharge fees
for SPX ranging from $1.00 to $2.50 per contract.
See Cboe Fees Schedule.
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
11 By way of example, in analyzing an obvious
error, the Exchange would have additional data
common practice on many U.S. options
exchanges as a means to incentivize
order flow to be sent to an exchange for
execution in particular products. As
noted above, another options exchange
assesses surcharges for its proprietary
index options products that are within
the range (or higher) of what the
Exchange is proposing herein.12
Further, the Exchange notes that market
participants are offered different ways to
gain exposure to the Nasdaq 100 Index,
whether through the Exchange’s
proprietary products like options
overlying NDX, NDXP, or XND, or
separately through multi-listed options
overlying Invesco QQQ Trust
(‘‘QQQ’’).13 Offering such products
provides market participants with a
variety of choices in selecting the
product they desire to utilize in order to
gain exposure to the Nasdaq 100 Index.
When exchanges are able to recoup
costs associated with offering
proprietary products, it incentivizes
growth and competition for the
innovation of additional products.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it will be
applied uniformly to all electronic
simple Non-Customer NDX and NDXP
orders that remove liquidity. Assessing
this surcharge only to Non-Customers is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because Customers have
historically been assessed more
favorable pricing on the Exchange,
including on NDX and NDXP orders
where they will continue to be assessed
the lowest transaction fee of $0.25 per
contract under this proposal. Customer
order flow benefits all market
participants by providing more trading
opportunities, which attracts market
makers. An increase in the activity of
these market participants in turn
facilitates tighter spreads, which may
cause an additional corresponding
increase in order flow from other market
participants, to the benefit of all market
participants who may interact with this
order flow. Further, the proposed
surcharge is aimed at encouraging NonCustomers to add more liquidity and
reduce ‘‘take’’ behavior that removes
liquidity from the order book. To the
extent the Exchange is successful in
incentivizing this behavior, the
additional liquidity on the Exchange
will benefit all market participants
7 See
8 For
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Jun 18, 2025
Jkt 265001
points available in establishing a theoretical price
for a multiply listed option as compared to a
proprietary product, which requires additional
analysis and administrative time to comply with
Exchange rules to resolve an obvious error.
12 See supra note 8.
13 QQQ is an exchange-traded fund based on the
same Nasdaq 100 Index as NDX, NDXP, and XND.
PO 00000
Frm 00123
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
through more trading opportunities,
tighter spreads, and added price
discovery.
Lastly, the Exchange believes that the
non-substantive changes to relocate the
note 1 references in the Section 5.A
pricing schedule as described above are
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory because they will
promote clarity in the Exchange’s
pricing schedule and make it easier to
follow, to the benefit of all market
participants.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
In terms of intra-market competition,
the Exchange will apply the proposed
surcharge uniformly to all NonCustomers. As discussed above, the
proposed change is aimed at
encouraging Non-Customers to add
more liquidity and reduce ‘‘take’’
behavior that removes liquidity from the
order book. To the extent the Exchange
is successful in incentivizing this
behavior, the additional liquidity on the
Exchange will benefit all market
participants through more trading
opportunities, tighter spreads, and
added price discovery.
In terms of inter-market competition,
the Exchange notes that it operates in a
highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee
levels at a particular venue to be
excessive, or rebate opportunities
available at other venues to be more
favorable. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually adjust its
fees to remain competitive with other
options exchanges. Because competitors
are free to modify their own fees in
response, and because market
participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange
believes that the degree to which fee
changes in this market may impose any
burden on competition is extremely
limited. As noted above, market
participants are offered an opportunity
to transact in NDX, NDXP, or XND, or
separately execute options overlying
QQQ. Offering these products provides
market participants with a variety of
choices in selecting the product they
desire to use to gain exposure to the
Nasdaq 100 Index. Furthermore, the
proposed surcharge is in line with
surcharges assessed on other proprietary
products at another options exchange.14
14 See
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
supra note 8.
20JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 117 / Friday, June 20, 2025 / Notices
In addition to the Exchange, market
participants have alternative options
exchanges that they may participate on
and direct their order flow, which list
proprietary products that compete with
NDX and NDXP.15 In sum, if the
changes proposed herein are
unattractive to market participants, it is
likely that the Exchange will lose
market share as a result. Accordingly,
the Exchange does not believe that the
proposed changes will impair the ability
of members or competing options
exchanges to maintain their competitive
standing in the financial markets.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.16
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is: (i) necessary or appropriate in
the public interest; (ii) for the protection
of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
Phlx–2025–22 on the subject line.
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Jun 18, 2025
Jkt 265001
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–Phlx–2025–22. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–Phlx–2025–22 and should be
submitted on or before July 11, 2025.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025–11297 Filed 6–18–25; 8:45 am]
[Release No. 34–103260; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2025–035]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Order Instituting
Proceedings To Determine Whether To
Approve or Disapprove a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the Rules
Governing the Listing and Trading of
Shares of the Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin
ETF and the Invesco Galaxy Ethereum
ETF To Permit In-Kind Creations and
Redemptions Under Rule 14.11(e)(4)
(Commodity-Based Trust Shares)
June 16, 2025.
I. Introduction
On March 10, 2025, Cboe BZX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BZX’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule
change to amend the rules governing the
listing and trading of shares (‘‘Shares’’)
of the Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF
(‘‘Bitcoin Trust’’) and the Invesco
Galaxy Ethereum ETF (‘‘ETH Trust’’
and, together with the Bitcoin Trust, the
‘‘Trusts’’) under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4).
The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on March 18, 2025.3
On April 29, 2025, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,4 the
Commission designated a longer period
within which to approve the proposed
rule change, disapprove the proposed
rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the
proposed rule change.5 This order
institutes proceedings under Section
19(b)(2)(B) of the Act 6 to determine
whether to approve or disapprove the
proposed rule change.
II. Summary of the Proposal
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
As described in more detail in the
Notice,7 the Exchange proposes to
amend the rules governing the listing
and trading of the Shares of the Trusts
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 102645
(Mar. 12, 2025), 90 FR 12602 (‘‘Notice’’).
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
102949, 90 FR 19039 (May 5, 2025). The
Commission designated June 16, 2025, as the date
by which the Commission shall approve or
disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine
whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change.
6 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
7 See Notice, supra note 3.
2 17
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
15 See e.g., pricing for Russell 2000 Index (‘‘RUT’’)
on Cboe’s Fees Schedule and Cboe C2 Exchange,
Inc.’s (‘‘C2’’) Fees Schedule. See also SPX pricing
on Cboe’s Fees Schedule. Both RUT and SPX are
proprietary products on the Cboe markets that are
broad-based index options, like NDX and NDXP.
16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
26389
17 17
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00124
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 117 (Friday, June 20, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26387-26389]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-11297]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-103268; File No. SR-Phlx-2025-22]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq PHLX LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fees
for Nasdaq 100 Index Options in Options 7, Section 5.A
June 16, 2025.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 2, 2025, Nasdaq PHLX LLC (``Phlx'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the fees for Nasdaq 100 Index
options in the Exchange's Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 5.A to
adopt a new surcharge for removing liquidity.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/phlx/rulefilings,
at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the fees for
NDX \3\ and NDXP.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ NDX represents A.M.-settled options on the full value of the
Nasdaq 100 Index traded under the symbol NDX.
\4\ NDXP represents P.M.-settled options on the full value of
the Nasdaq 100 Index traded under the symbol NDXP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As set forth in Options 7, Section 5.A, the Exchange currently
charges all Non-Customer \5\ orders in NDX and NDXP a $0.75 per
contract transaction fee. Customer \6\ orders are currently assessed a
$0.25 per contract transaction fee in NDX and NDXP. These transaction
fees apply to electronic simple and complex executions as well as floor
transactions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The term ``Non-Customer'' applies to transactions for the
accounts of Lead Market Makers, Market Makers, Firms, Professionals,
Broker-Dealers and JBOs.
\6\ The term ``Customer'' applies to any transaction that is
identified by a member or member organization for clearing in the
Customer range at The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') which
is not for the account of a broker or dealer or for the account of a
``Professional'' (as that term is defined in Options 1, Section
1(b)(45)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 26388]]
The Exchange now proposes to assess a surcharge of $1.50 per
contract to all electronic simple Non-Customer orders that remove
liquidity.\7\ Customer NDX and NDXP fees will remain unchanged under
this proposal. The proposed surcharge is aimed at encouraging Non-
Customers to add more liquidity and reduce ``take'' behavior that
removes liquidity from the order book. The Exchange notes that the
proposed surcharge amount is within the range of surcharges assessed
for transactions in other proprietary products at another options
exchange.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See proposed note 3 in Options 7, Section 5.A.
\8\ For example, Cboe Options (``Cboe'') currently assesses
market participants LEAPS surcharge fees for SPX ranging from $1.00
to $2.50 per contract. See Cboe Fees Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, the Exchange proposes a non-substantive change in the
Section 5.A pricing schedule. Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
relocate the note 1 references currently appended to NDX, NDXP, and
EXGN under the ``Symbol'' column to the relevant transaction fees under
the columns for ``Professional,'' ``Lead Market Maker and Market
Maker,'' ``Broker-Dealer,'' and ``Firm.'' Note 1 currently sets forth
the $0.25 per contract surcharge for NDX, NDXP and EXGN assessed to
Non-Customers. The Exchange seeks to promote clarity in its Section 5.A
pricing schedule by relocating the note 1 references so that they are
appended to the respective transaction fees for Non-Customers.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\9\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\10\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is
not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that its proposal to add a $1.50 per contract
surcharge to all electronic simple Non-Customer orders that remove
liquidity is reasonable because the proposed pricing reflects the
proprietary nature of this product. Similar to other proprietary
products like options overlying the Nasdaq 100 Micro Index (``XND''),
the Exchange seeks to recoup the operational costs of listing
proprietary products.\11\ Also, pricing by symbol is a common practice
on many U.S. options exchanges as a means to incentivize order flow to
be sent to an exchange for execution in particular products. As noted
above, another options exchange assesses surcharges for its proprietary
index options products that are within the range (or higher) of what
the Exchange is proposing herein.\12\ Further, the Exchange notes that
market participants are offered different ways to gain exposure to the
Nasdaq 100 Index, whether through the Exchange's proprietary products
like options overlying NDX, NDXP, or XND, or separately through multi-
listed options overlying Invesco QQQ Trust (``QQQ'').\13\ Offering such
products provides market participants with a variety of choices in
selecting the product they desire to utilize in order to gain exposure
to the Nasdaq 100 Index. When exchanges are able to recoup costs
associated with offering proprietary products, it incentivizes growth
and competition for the innovation of additional products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ By way of example, in analyzing an obvious error, the
Exchange would have additional data points available in establishing
a theoretical price for a multiply listed option as compared to a
proprietary product, which requires additional analysis and
administrative time to comply with Exchange rules to resolve an
obvious error.
\12\ See supra note 8.
\13\ QQQ is an exchange-traded fund based on the same Nasdaq 100
Index as NDX, NDXP, and XND.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that its proposal is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because it will be applied uniformly to all
electronic simple Non-Customer NDX and NDXP orders that remove
liquidity. Assessing this surcharge only to Non-Customers is equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because Customers have historically
been assessed more favorable pricing on the Exchange, including on NDX
and NDXP orders where they will continue to be assessed the lowest
transaction fee of $0.25 per contract under this proposal. Customer
order flow benefits all market participants by providing more trading
opportunities, which attracts market makers. An increase in the
activity of these market participants in turn facilitates tighter
spreads, which may cause an additional corresponding increase in order
flow from other market participants, to the benefit of all market
participants who may interact with this order flow. Further, the
proposed surcharge is aimed at encouraging Non-Customers to add more
liquidity and reduce ``take'' behavior that removes liquidity from the
order book. To the extent the Exchange is successful in incentivizing
this behavior, the additional liquidity on the Exchange will benefit
all market participants through more trading opportunities, tighter
spreads, and added price discovery.
Lastly, the Exchange believes that the non-substantive changes to
relocate the note 1 references in the Section 5.A pricing schedule as
described above are reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory because they will promote clarity in the Exchange's
pricing schedule and make it easier to follow, to the benefit of all
market participants.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
In terms of intra-market competition, the Exchange will apply the
proposed surcharge uniformly to all Non-Customers. As discussed above,
the proposed change is aimed at encouraging Non-Customers to add more
liquidity and reduce ``take'' behavior that removes liquidity from the
order book. To the extent the Exchange is successful in incentivizing
this behavior, the additional liquidity on the Exchange will benefit
all market participants through more trading opportunities, tighter
spreads, and added price discovery.
In terms of inter-market competition, the Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at
other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other
options exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their own
fees in response, and because market participants may readily adjust
their order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to
which fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition
is extremely limited. As noted above, market participants are offered
an opportunity to transact in NDX, NDXP, or XND, or separately execute
options overlying QQQ. Offering these products provides market
participants with a variety of choices in selecting the product they
desire to use to gain exposure to the Nasdaq 100 Index. Furthermore,
the proposed surcharge is in line with surcharges assessed on other
proprietary products at another options exchange.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See supra note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 26389]]
In addition to the Exchange, market participants have alternative
options exchanges that they may participate on and direct their order
flow, which list proprietary products that compete with NDX and
NDXP.\15\ In sum, if the changes proposed herein are unattractive to
market participants, it is likely that the Exchange will lose market
share as a result. Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the
proposed changes will impair the ability of members or competing
options exchanges to maintain their competitive standing in the
financial markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See e.g., pricing for Russell 2000 Index (``RUT'') on
Cboe's Fees Schedule and Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc.'s (``C2'') Fees
Schedule. See also SPX pricing on Cboe's Fees Schedule. Both RUT and
SPX are proprietary products on the Cboe markets that are broad-
based index options, like NDX and NDXP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i)
necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-Phlx-2025-22 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-Phlx-2025-22. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-Phlx-2025-22 and should be
submitted on or before July 11, 2025.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-11297 Filed 6-18-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P