Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fees for Nasdaq 100 Index Options in Options 7, Section 3, 26353-26354 [2025-11294]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 117 / Friday, June 20, 2025 / Notices
rule change so that it has sufficient time
to consider the proposed rule change
and the issues raised therein.
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant
to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,5
designates August 7, 2025, as the date
by which the Commission shall either
approve or disapprove, or institute
proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change
(File No. SR–CboeBZX–2025–059).
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.6
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025–11302 Filed 6–18–25; 8:45 am]
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–103264; File No. SR–
GEMX–2025–12]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the Fees for
Nasdaq 100 Index Options in Options
7, Section 3
June 16, 2025.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 2,
2025, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (‘‘GEMX’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III, below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
fees for Nasdaq 100 Index options in the
Exchange’s Pricing Schedule at Options
7, Section 3 to adopt a new surcharge
for removing liquidity.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/gemx/rulefilings, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
5 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
6 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Jun 18, 2025
Jkt 265001
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to amend the fees for NDX 3
in Options 7, Section 3.
Today, the Exchange assesses
transaction fees of $0.75 per contract for
all Non-Priority Customer 4 orders in
NDX and $0.25 per contract for all
Priority Customers 5 NDX orders. The
Exchange now proposes to assess a
surcharge of $1.50 per contract to all
regular Non-Priority Customer orders
that remove liquidity.6 Priority
Customer NDX fees will remain
unchanged under this proposal. The
proposed surcharge is aimed at
encouraging Non-Priority Customers to
add more liquidity and reduce ‘‘take’’
behavior that removes liquidity from the
order book. The Exchange notes that the
proposed surcharge amount is within
the range of surcharges assessed for
transactions in other proprietary
products at another options exchange.7
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,8 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5)
3 NDX represents A.M. settled options on the full
value of the Nasdaq 100 Index traded under the
symbol NDX.
4 ‘‘Non-Priority Customers’’ include Market
Makers, Non-Nasdaq GEMX Market Makers
(FarMMs), Firm Proprietary/Broker-Dealers, and
Professional Customers.
5 A ‘‘Priority Customer’’ is a person or entity that
is not a broker/dealer in securities, and does not
place more than 390 orders in listed options per day
on average during a calendar month for its own
beneficial account(s), as defined in Nasdaq GEMX
Options 1, Section 1(a)(36).
6 See proposed note 18 in Options 7, Section 3.
7 For example, Cboe Options (‘‘Cboe’’) currently
assesses market participants LEAPS surcharge fees
for SPX ranging from $1.00 to $2.50 per contract.
See Cboe Fees Schedule.
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
26353
of the Act,9 in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among members and issuers and other
persons using any facility, and is not
designed to permit unfair
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to add a $1.50 per contract
surcharge to all regular Non-Priority
Customer orders that remove liquidity is
reasonable because the proposed pricing
reflects the proprietary nature of this
product. Similar to other proprietary
products like options overlying the
Nasdaq 100 Micro Index (‘‘XND’’), the
Exchange seeks to recoup the
operational costs of listing proprietary
products.10 Also, pricing by symbol is a
common practice on many U.S. options
exchanges as a means to incentivize
order flow to be sent to an exchange for
execution in particular products. As
noted above, another options exchange
assesses surcharges for its proprietary
index options products that are within
the range (or higher) of what the
Exchange is proposing herein.11
Further, the Exchange notes that market
participants are offered different ways to
gain exposure to the Nasdaq 100 Index,
whether through the Exchange’s
proprietary products like options
overlying NDX or XND, or separately
through multi-listed options overlying
Invesco QQQ Trust (‘‘QQQ’’).12 Offering
such products provides market
participants with a variety of choices in
selecting the product they desire to
utilize in order to gain exposure to the
Nasdaq 100 Index. When exchanges are
able to recoup costs associated with
offering proprietary products, it
incentivizes growth and competition for
the innovation of additional products.
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it will be
applied uniformly to all regular NonPriority Customer NDX orders that
remove liquidity. Assessing this
surcharge only to Non-Priority
Customers is equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because Priority
Customers have historically been
assessed more favorable pricing on the
Exchange, including on NDX orders
9 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
way of example, in analyzing an obvious
error, the Exchange would have additional data
points available in establishing a theoretical price
for a multiply listed option as compared to a
proprietary product, which requires additional
analysis and administrative time to comply with
Exchange rules to resolve an obvious error.
11 See supra note 7.
12 QQQ is an exchange-traded fund based on the
same Nasdaq 100 Index as NDX and XND.
10 By
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
20JNN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
26354
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 117 / Friday, June 20, 2025 / Notices
where they will continue to be assessed
the lowest transaction fee of $0.25 per
contract under this proposal. Priority
Customer order flow benefits all market
participants by providing more trading
opportunities, which attracts market
makers. An increase in the activity of
these market participants in turn
facilitates tighter spreads, which may
cause an additional corresponding
increase in order flow from other market
participants, to the benefit of all market
participants who may interact with this
order flow. Further, the proposed
surcharge is aimed at encouraging NonPriority Customers to add more liquidity
and reduce ‘‘take’’ behavior that
removes liquidity from the order book.
To the extent the Exchange is successful
in incentivizing this behavior, the
additional liquidity on the Exchange
will benefit all market participants
through more trading opportunities,
tighter spreads, and added price
discovery.
to transact in NDX or XND, or separately
execute options overlying QQQ.
Offering these products provides market
participants with a variety of choices in
selecting the product they desire to use
to gain exposure to the Nasdaq 100
Index. Furthermore, the proposed
surcharge is in line with surcharges
assessed on other proprietary products
at another options exchange.13
In addition to the Exchange, market
participants have alternative options
exchanges that they may participate on
and direct their order flow, which list
proprietary products that compete with
NDX.14 In sum, if the changes proposed
herein are unattractive to market
participants, it is likely that the
Exchange will lose market share as a
result. Accordingly, the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed changes
will impair the ability of members or
competing options exchanges to
maintain their competitive standing in
the financial markets.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
In terms of intra-market competition,
the Exchange will apply the proposed
surcharge uniformly to all Non-Priority
Customers. As discussed above, the
proposed change is aimed at
encouraging Non-Priority Customers to
add more liquidity and reduce ‘‘take’’
behavior that removes liquidity from the
order book. To the extent the Exchange
is successful in incentivizing this
behavior, the additional liquidity on the
Exchange will benefit all market
participants through more trading
opportunities, tighter spreads, and
added price discovery.
In terms of inter-market competition,
the Exchange notes that it operates in a
highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee
levels at a particular venue to be
excessive, or rebate opportunities
available at other venues to be more
favorable. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually adjust its
fees to remain competitive with other
options exchanges. Because competitors
are free to modify their own fees in
response, and because market
participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange
believes that the degree to which fee
changes in this market may impose any
burden on competition is extremely
limited. As noted above, market
participants are offered an opportunity
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:05 Jun 18, 2025
Jkt 265001
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.15 At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is: (i)
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest; (ii) for the protection of
investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
GEMX–2025–12 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–GEMX–2025–12. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–GEMX–2025–12 and should be
submitted on or before July 11, 2025.
13 See
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.16
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
14 See
[FR Doc. 2025–11294 Filed 6–18–25; 8:45 am]
supra note 7.
e.g., pricing for Russell 2000 Index (‘‘RUT’’)
on Cboe’s Fees Schedule and Cboe C2 Exchange,
Inc.’s (‘‘C2’’) Fees Schedule. See also SPX pricing
on Cboe’s Fees Schedule. Both RUT and SPX are
proprietary products on the Cboe markets that are
broad-based index options, like NDX.
15 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
16 17
E:\FR\FM\20JNN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
20JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 117 (Friday, June 20, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26353-26354]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-11294]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-103264; File No. SR-GEMX-2025-12]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq GEMX, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fees
for Nasdaq 100 Index Options in Options 7, Section 3
June 16, 2025.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on June 2, 2025, Nasdaq GEMX, LLC (``GEMX'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed
rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the fees for Nasdaq 100 Index
options in the Exchange's Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 3 to
adopt a new surcharge for removing liquidity.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/gemx/rulefilings,
at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the fees for
NDX \3\ in Options 7, Section 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ NDX represents A.M. settled options on the full value of the
Nasdaq 100 Index traded under the symbol NDX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Today, the Exchange assesses transaction fees of $0.75 per contract
for all Non-Priority Customer \4\ orders in NDX and $0.25 per contract
for all Priority Customers \5\ NDX orders. The Exchange now proposes to
assess a surcharge of $1.50 per contract to all regular Non-Priority
Customer orders that remove liquidity.\6\ Priority Customer NDX fees
will remain unchanged under this proposal. The proposed surcharge is
aimed at encouraging Non-Priority Customers to add more liquidity and
reduce ``take'' behavior that removes liquidity from the order book.
The Exchange notes that the proposed surcharge amount is within the
range of surcharges assessed for transactions in other proprietary
products at another options exchange.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ ``Non-Priority Customers'' include Market Makers, Non-Nasdaq
GEMX Market Makers (FarMMs), Firm Proprietary/Broker-Dealers, and
Professional Customers.
\5\ A ``Priority Customer'' is a person or entity that is not a
broker/dealer in securities, and does not place more than 390 orders
in listed options per day on average during a calendar month for its
own beneficial account(s), as defined in Nasdaq GEMX Options 1,
Section 1(a)(36).
\6\ See proposed note 18 in Options 7, Section 3.
\7\ For example, Cboe Options (``Cboe'') currently assesses
market participants LEAPS surcharge fees for SPX ranging from $1.00
to $2.50 per contract. See Cboe Fees Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\8\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\9\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility,
and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that its proposal to add a $1.50 per contract
surcharge to all regular Non-Priority Customer orders that remove
liquidity is reasonable because the proposed pricing reflects the
proprietary nature of this product. Similar to other proprietary
products like options overlying the Nasdaq 100 Micro Index (``XND''),
the Exchange seeks to recoup the operational costs of listing
proprietary products.\10\ Also, pricing by symbol is a common practice
on many U.S. options exchanges as a means to incentivize order flow to
be sent to an exchange for execution in particular products. As noted
above, another options exchange assesses surcharges for its proprietary
index options products that are within the range (or higher) of what
the Exchange is proposing herein.\11\ Further, the Exchange notes that
market participants are offered different ways to gain exposure to the
Nasdaq 100 Index, whether through the Exchange's proprietary products
like options overlying NDX or XND, or separately through multi-listed
options overlying Invesco QQQ Trust (``QQQ'').\12\ Offering such
products provides market participants with a variety of choices in
selecting the product they desire to utilize in order to gain exposure
to the Nasdaq 100 Index. When exchanges are able to recoup costs
associated with offering proprietary products, it incentivizes growth
and competition for the innovation of additional products.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ By way of example, in analyzing an obvious error, the
Exchange would have additional data points available in establishing
a theoretical price for a multiply listed option as compared to a
proprietary product, which requires additional analysis and
administrative time to comply with Exchange rules to resolve an
obvious error.
\11\ See supra note 7.
\12\ QQQ is an exchange-traded fund based on the same Nasdaq 100
Index as NDX and XND.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that its proposal is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because it will be applied uniformly to all
regular Non-Priority Customer NDX orders that remove liquidity.
Assessing this surcharge only to Non-Priority Customers is equitable
and not unfairly discriminatory because Priority Customers have
historically been assessed more favorable pricing on the Exchange,
including on NDX orders
[[Page 26354]]
where they will continue to be assessed the lowest transaction fee of
$0.25 per contract under this proposal. Priority Customer order flow
benefits all market participants by providing more trading
opportunities, which attracts market makers. An increase in the
activity of these market participants in turn facilitates tighter
spreads, which may cause an additional corresponding increase in order
flow from other market participants, to the benefit of all market
participants who may interact with this order flow. Further, the
proposed surcharge is aimed at encouraging Non-Priority Customers to
add more liquidity and reduce ``take'' behavior that removes liquidity
from the order book. To the extent the Exchange is successful in
incentivizing this behavior, the additional liquidity on the Exchange
will benefit all market participants through more trading
opportunities, tighter spreads, and added price discovery.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
In terms of intra-market competition, the Exchange will apply the
proposed surcharge uniformly to all Non-Priority Customers. As
discussed above, the proposed change is aimed at encouraging Non-
Priority Customers to add more liquidity and reduce ``take'' behavior
that removes liquidity from the order book. To the extent the Exchange
is successful in incentivizing this behavior, the additional liquidity
on the Exchange will benefit all market participants through more
trading opportunities, tighter spreads, and added price discovery.
In terms of inter-market competition, the Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at
other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other
options exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their own
fees in response, and because market participants may readily adjust
their order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to
which fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition
is extremely limited. As noted above, market participants are offered
an opportunity to transact in NDX or XND, or separately execute options
overlying QQQ. Offering these products provides market participants
with a variety of choices in selecting the product they desire to use
to gain exposure to the Nasdaq 100 Index. Furthermore, the proposed
surcharge is in line with surcharges assessed on other proprietary
products at another options exchange.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to the Exchange, market participants have alternative
options exchanges that they may participate on and direct their order
flow, which list proprietary products that compete with NDX.\14\ In
sum, if the changes proposed herein are unattractive to market
participants, it is likely that the Exchange will lose market share as
a result. Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe that the proposed
changes will impair the ability of members or competing options
exchanges to maintain their competitive standing in the financial
markets.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See e.g., pricing for Russell 2000 Index (``RUT'') on
Cboe's Fees Schedule and Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc.'s (``C2'') Fees
Schedule. See also SPX pricing on Cboe's Fees Schedule. Both RUT and
SPX are proprietary products on the Cboe markets that are broad-
based index options, like NDX.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\15\ At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission
that such action is: (i) necessary or appropriate in the public
interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether
the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-GEMX-2025-12 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-GEMX-2025-12. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other
than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-GEMX-2025-12 and should be
submitted on or before July 11, 2025.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-11294 Filed 6-18-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P