Agency Information Collection Extension, 24392-24394 [2025-10475]

Download as PDF ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 24392 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 10, 2025 / Notices Department’s information collection requirements and provide the requested data in the desired format. The Department is soliciting comments on the proposed information collection request (ICR) that is described below. The Department is especially interested in public comment addressing the following issues: (1) is this collection necessary to the proper functions of the Department; (2) will this information be processed and used in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate of burden accurate; (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Please note that written comments received in response to this notice will be considered public records. Title of Collection: Transition and Postsecondary Programs for Students with Intellectual Disabilities (TPSID) Evaluation Protocol. OMB Control Number: 1840–0825. Type of Review: A revision of a currently approved ICR. Respondents/Affected Public: Private Sector. Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 40. Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 788. Abstract: In October 2020, the Institute for Community Inclusion (ICI), UMass Boston received a five-year cooperative agreement from the Office of Postsecondary Education to serve as the National Coordinating Center (NCC) for colleges and universities implementing inclusive higher education programs for students with intellectual disabilities, including 22 model demonstration projects aimed at creating inclusive comprehensive transition and postsecondary programs for students with intellectual disabilities known as Transition and Postsecondary Programs for Students with Intellectual Disabilities (TPSIDs). To reduce respondent burden, the NCC has streamlined and simplified the previously approved evaluation system for the TPSID programs. The NCC will enhance the collection and analyses of longitudinal follow-up data from the 22 TPSID model programs via an already developed and previously OMB approved evaluation system for the TPSID programs. The revised data collection system is part of an evaluation effort. The system will collect program data at the institutions VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Jun 09, 2025 Jkt 265001 from TPSID program staff via an online, secure data management system. Ross Santy, Chief Data Officer, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. [FR Doc. 2025–10433 Filed 6–9–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000–01–P DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION [Docket No.: ED–2025–SCC–0024] Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Application Package for TRIO Training Program for Federal TRIO Programs Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE), Department of Education (ED). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995, the Department is proposing a reinstatement without change of a previously approved information collection request (ICR). DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before July 10, 2025. ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for proposed information collection requests should be submitted within 30 days of publication of this notice. Click on this link www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ PRAMain to access the site. Find this information collection request (ICR) by selecting ‘‘Department of Education’’ under ‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ then check the ‘‘Only Show ICR for Public Comment’’ checkbox. Reginfo.gov provides two links to view documents related to this information collection request. Information collection forms and instructions may be found by clicking on the ‘‘View Information Collection (IC) List’’ link. Supporting statements and other supporting documentation may be found by clicking on the ‘‘View Supporting Statement and Other Documents’’ link. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For specific questions related to collection activities, please contact ReShone Moore, 202–453–7624. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Department is especially interested in public comment addressing the following issues: (1) is this collection necessary to the proper functions of the Department; (2) will this information be processed and used in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate of burden accurate; SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 (4) how might the Department enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (5) how might the Department minimize the burden of this collection on the respondents, including through the use of information technology. Please note that written comments received in response to this notice will be considered public records. Title of Collection: Application Package for TRIO Training Program for Federal TRIO Programs. OMB Control Number: 1840–0814. Type of Review: A reinstatement without change of a previously approved ICR. Respondents/Affected Public: State, Local, and Tribal Governments; Private Sector. Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 46. Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 1,452. Abstract: This information collection provides the U.S. Department of Education with information needed to evaluate, score and rank the quality of the projects proposed by institutions of higher education and public or private nonprofit agencies and organizations applying for a TRIO Training grant, in accordance with Title IV, Part A, Subpart 2, Section 402G of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended (HEA), which requires the collection of specific information and data necessary for applicants to receive an initial competitive grant and a non-competing grant for the second year. This collection is being submitted under the Streamlined Clearance Process for Discretionary Grant Information Collections (1894–0001). Therefore, the 30-day public comment period notice will be the only public comment notice published for this information collection. Ross Santy, Chief Data Officer, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development. [FR Doc. 2025–10463 Filed 6–9–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4000–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Energy Information Administration Agency Information Collection Extension U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: EIA submitted an information collection request for extension as SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM 10JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 10, 2025 / Notices required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The information collection requests a three-year extension with changes of its Generic Clearance for Questionnaire Testing, Evaluation, and Research, OMB Control Number 1905– 0186. EIA–882T, ‘‘Generic Clearance for Questionnaire Testing, Evaluation, and Research,’’ provides EIA with the authority to utilize qualitative and quantitative methodologies to pretest questionnaires and validate the quality of data collected on EIA’s surveys. EIA uses EIA–882T to meet its obligation to publish, and otherwise make available independent, high-quality statistical data to federal government agencies, state and local governments, the energy industry, researchers, and the general public. Comments on this information collection must be received no later than July 10, 2025. Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or by using the search function. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you need additional information, contact Kenneth Pick, EIA Clearance Officer, at (202) 586–5562, or by email at EIA-FRNcomments@eia.gov. Include the OMB control number listed in the subject line of the message. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This information collection request contains: (1) OMB No.: 1905–0186; (2) Information Collection Request Title: Generic Clearance for Questionnaire Testing, Evaluation, and Research; (3) Type of Request: Three-year extension with change; (4) Purpose: The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is requesting a three-year approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to utilize qualitative and quantitative methodologies to pretest questionnaires and validate the quality of the data that are collected on EIA and DOE survey forms. Through the use of these methodologies, EIA will conduct research studies to improve the quality of energy data being collected, reduce or minimize survey respondent burden, and increase agency efficiency. This authority would also allow EIA to improve data collection in order to meet the needs of EIA’s customers while also staying current in the evolving nature of the energy industry. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 DATES: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Jun 09, 2025 Jkt 265001 The specific methods EIA will continue to use for the coverage by this clearance are described below. Pilot Surveys. Pilot surveys conducted under this clearance will generally be methodological studies and will always employ statistically representative samples. The pilot surveys will replicate all components of the methodological design, sampling procedures (where possible), and questionnaires of the fullscale survey. Pilot surveys will normally be utilized when EIA undertakes a complete redesign of a particular data collection methodology or when EIA undertakes data collection in new energy areas of the energy sector where data collection would provide utility to EIA. Cognitive Interviews. Cognitive interviews are typically one-on-one interviews in which the respondent is usually asked to ‘‘think aloud’’ or is asked ‘‘retrospective questions’’ as they answer questions, reads survey materials, defines terminology, or completes other activities as part of a typical survey process. A number of different techniques may be involved including asking respondents what specific words or phrases mean or asking respondents probing questions to determine how they estimate, calculate, or determine specific data elements on a survey. The objectives of these cognitive interviews are to identify problems of ambiguity or misunderstanding, examine the process that respondents follow for reporting information, assess survey respondents’ ability to report new information, or identify other difficulties respondents have answering survey questions in order to reduce measurement error from estimates based on a survey. Respondent Debriefings. Respondent debriefings conducted under this clearance will generally be methodological or cognitive research studies. The debriefing form is administered after a respondent completes a questionnaire either in paper format, electronically, or through personal interviews. The debriefings contain probing questions to determine how respondents interpret the survey questions, how much time and effort was spent completing the questionnaire, and whether they have problems in completing the survey/questionnaire. Respondent debriefings also are useful in determining potential issues with data quality and in estimating respondent burden. Usability Testing. Usability tests are similar to cognitive interviews in which a respondent is typically asked to ‘‘think aloud’’ or asked ‘‘retrospective questions’’ as they review a survey PO 00000 Frm 00012 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 24393 questionnaire, related materials, or website. The objective of usability testing is to check that respondents can easily and intuitively navigate survey questionnaires, related materials, and websites to submit their data to EIA. Focus Groups. Focus groups are a qualitative method used early in questionnaire development to gather information about a topic that can later be used to write survey questions, such as specific terminology, definitions, sensitivity of topics, organizational processes, and burden associated with reporting. Information is collected by a moderator using a guided discussion with small groups of people (e.g., 8–10). Field Techniques. Field techniques described in survey research and survey methodology literature will be employed as appropriate. These include follow-up probing, memory cue tasks, paraphrasing, confidence rating, response latency measurements, free and dimensional sort classification tasks, and vignette classifications. The objective of all of these techniques is to aid in the development of surveys that work with respondents’ thought processes, thus reducing response error and burden. These techniques have also proven useful for studying and revising pre-existing questionnaires. Behavior Coding. Behavior coding is a quantitative technique in which a standard set of codes is systematically applied to respondent/interviewer interactions in interviewer-administered surveys or respondent/questionnaire interactions in self-administered surveys. Split Panel Test. Split panel tests refer to controlled experimental testing of alternative hypotheses. Thus, they allow one to choose from among competing questions, questionnaires, definitions, error messages or survey improvement methodologies with greater confidence than any of the other methods. Split panel tests conducted during the fielding of the survey are superior in that they can support both internal validity (controlled comparisons of the variable(s) under investigation) and external validity (represent the population under study). Most of the previously mentioned survey improvement methods can be strengthened when teamed with this method. (4a) Changes to Information Collection: EIA proposes to collect personally identifiable information (PII) only to the extent necessary to recruit participants for questionnaire testing, evaluation, and research. This PII would not be retained, with the exception of information needed to provide E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM 10JNN1 24394 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 10, 2025 / Notices renumeration for participants of questionnaire testing, evaluation, and research and conduct associated data analysis. (5) Annual Estimated Number of Respondents: 7,500; (6) Annual Estimated Number of Total Responses: 7,500; (7) Annual Estimated Number of Burden Hours: 7,500; (8) Annual Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden: $712,425 (7,500 annual burden hours multiplied by $94.99 per hour). EIA estimates that respondents will have no additional costs associated with the surveys other than the burden hours and the maintenance of the information during the normal course of business. Statutory Authority: 15 U.S.C. 772(b), 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq. Signed in Washington, DC, on June 5, 2025. Samson A. Adeshiyan, Director, Office of Statistical Methods and Research, U. S. Energy Information Administration. [FR Doc. 2025–10475 Filed 6–9–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission [Docket No. CP25–497–000] ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Northwest Pipeline LLC; Notice of Application and Establishing Intervention Deadline Take notice that on May 21, 2025, Northwest Pipeline LLC (Northwest), P.O. Box 1396, Houston, Texas 77251, filed an application under section 7(c) of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Part 157 of the Commission’s regulations requesting authorization to construct the new Daggett Compressor Station in Daggett County, Utah, including one Solar Taurus 70 gas turbine-driven compressor unit and associated facilities (Wild Trail Project or Project). The Project will enable Northwest to provide up to 57,955 dekatherms per day of incremental firm transportation service from the White River Hub in Rio Blanco County, Colorado, to Kern River Gas Transmission at the existing Muddy Creek interconnect in Lincoln County, Wyoming. Northwest estimates the total cost of the Project to be $77,298,599 and proposes to charge a negotiated reservation rate under Rate Schedule TF–1, all as more fully set forth in the application which is on file with the Commission and open for public inspection. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:53 Jun 09, 2025 Jkt 265001 In addition to publishing the full text of this document in the Federal Register, the Commission provides all interested persons an opportunity to view and/or print the contents of this document via the internet through the Commission’s Home Page (https:// www.ferc.gov). From the Commission’s Home Page on the internet, this information is available on eLibrary. The full text of this document is available on eLibrary in PDF and Microsoft Word format for viewing, printing, and/or downloading. To access this document in eLibrary, type the docket number excluding the last three digits of this document in the docket number field. User assistance is available for eLibrary and the Commission’s website during normal business hours from FERC Online Support at (202) 502–6652 (toll free at 1–866–208–3676) or email at ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or the Public Reference Room at (202) 502– 8371, TTY (202) 502–8659. Email the Public Reference Room at public.referenceroom@ferc.gov. Any questions concerning this request should be directed to Moe Daraiseh, Senior Regulatory Analyst, Northwest, LLC. P.O. Box 1396, Houston, Texas 77251, by phone at (281) 520–1904, or email at Outreach@Williams.com. Pursuant to section 157.9 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure,1 within 90 days of this Notice the Commission staff will either: complete its environmental review and place it into the Commission’s public record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or issue a Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review. If a Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review is issued, it will indicate, among other milestones, the anticipated date for the Commission staff’s issuance of the final environmental impact statement (FEIS) or environmental assessment (EA) for this proposal. The filing of an EA in the Commission’s public record for this proceeding or the issuance of a Notice of Schedule for Environmental Review will serve to notify federal and state agencies of the timing for the completion of all necessary reviews, and the subsequent need to complete all federal authorizations within 90 days of the date of issuance of the Commission staff’s FEIS or EA. Public Participation There are three ways to become involved in the Commission’s review of this project: you can file comments on the project, you can protest the filing, and you can file a motion to intervene 1 18 PO 00000 CFR 157.9. Frm 00013 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 in the proceeding. There is no fee or cost for filing comments or intervening. The deadline for filing a motion to intervene is 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on June 25, 2025. How to file protests, motions to intervene, and comments is explained below. The Commission’s Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, community organizations, Tribal members and others, access publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502–6595 or OPP@ferc.gov. Comments Any person wishing to comment on the project may do so. Comments may include statements of support or objections, to the project as a whole or specific aspects of the project. The more specific your comments, the more useful they will be. Protests Pursuant to sections 157.10(a)(4) 2 and 385.211 3 of the Commission’s regulations under the NGA, any person 4 may file a protest to the application. Protests must comply with the requirements specified in section 385.2001 5 of the Commission’s regulations. A protest may also serve as a motion to intervene so long as the protestor states it also seeks to be an intervenor. To ensure that your comments or protests are timely and properly recorded, please submit your comments on or before June 25, 2025. There are three methods you can use to submit your comments or protests to the Commission. In all instances, please reference the Project docket number CP25–497–000 in your submission. (1) You may file your comments electronically by using the eComment feature, which is located on the Commission’s website at www.ferc.gov under the link to Documents and Filings. Using eComment is an easy method for interested persons to submit brief, text-only comments on a project; (2) You may file your comments or protests electronically by using the eFiling feature, which is located on the 2 18 CFR 157.10(a)(4). CFR 385.211. 4 Persons include individuals, organizations, businesses, municipalities, and other entities. 18 CFR 385.102(d). 5 18 CFR 385.2001. 3 18 E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM 10JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 10, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24392-24394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-10475]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Energy Information Administration


Agency Information Collection Extension

AGENCY: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. Department 
of Energy (DOE).

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EIA submitted an information collection request for extension 
as

[[Page 24393]]

required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The information 
collection requests a three-year extension with changes of its Generic 
Clearance for Questionnaire Testing, Evaluation, and Research, OMB 
Control Number 1905-0186. EIA-882T, ``Generic Clearance for 
Questionnaire Testing, Evaluation, and Research,'' provides EIA with 
the authority to utilize qualitative and quantitative methodologies to 
pretest questionnaires and validate the quality of data collected on 
EIA's surveys. EIA uses EIA-882T to meet its obligation to publish, and 
otherwise make available independent, high-quality statistical data to 
federal government agencies, state and local governments, the energy 
industry, researchers, and the general public.

DATES: Comments on this information collection must be received no 
later than July 10, 2025. Written comments and recommendations for the 
proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of 
publication of this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find 
this particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under 
30-day Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search 
function.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you need additional information, 
contact Kenneth Pick, EIA Clearance Officer, at (202) 586-5562, or by 
email at [email protected]. Include the OMB control number listed 
in the subject line of the message.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This information collection request 
contains:
    (1) OMB No.: 1905-0186;
    (2) Information Collection Request Title: Generic Clearance for 
Questionnaire Testing, Evaluation, and Research;
    (3) Type of Request: Three-year extension with change;
    (4) Purpose: The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is 
requesting a three-year approval from the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) to utilize qualitative and quantitative methodologies to 
pretest questionnaires and validate the quality of the data that are 
collected on EIA and DOE survey forms. Through the use of these 
methodologies, EIA will conduct research studies to improve the quality 
of energy data being collected, reduce or minimize survey respondent 
burden, and increase agency efficiency. This authority would also allow 
EIA to improve data collection in order to meet the needs of EIA's 
customers while also staying current in the evolving nature of the 
energy industry.
    The specific methods EIA will continue to use for the coverage by 
this clearance are described below.
    Pilot Surveys. Pilot surveys conducted under this clearance will 
generally be methodological studies and will always employ 
statistically representative samples. The pilot surveys will replicate 
all components of the methodological design, sampling procedures (where 
possible), and questionnaires of the full-scale survey. Pilot surveys 
will normally be utilized when EIA undertakes a complete redesign of a 
particular data collection methodology or when EIA undertakes data 
collection in new energy areas of the energy sector where data 
collection would provide utility to EIA.
    Cognitive Interviews. Cognitive interviews are typically one-on-one 
interviews in which the respondent is usually asked to ``think aloud'' 
or is asked ``retrospective questions'' as they answer questions, reads 
survey materials, defines terminology, or completes other activities as 
part of a typical survey process. A number of different techniques may 
be involved including asking respondents what specific words or phrases 
mean or asking respondents probing questions to determine how they 
estimate, calculate, or determine specific data elements on a survey. 
The objectives of these cognitive interviews are to identify problems 
of ambiguity or misunderstanding, examine the process that respondents 
follow for reporting information, assess survey respondents' ability to 
report new information, or identify other difficulties respondents have 
answering survey questions in order to reduce measurement error from 
estimates based on a survey.
    Respondent Debriefings. Respondent debriefings conducted under this 
clearance will generally be methodological or cognitive research 
studies. The debriefing form is administered after a respondent 
completes a questionnaire either in paper format, electronically, or 
through personal interviews. The debriefings contain probing questions 
to determine how respondents interpret the survey questions, how much 
time and effort was spent completing the questionnaire, and whether 
they have problems in completing the survey/questionnaire. Respondent 
debriefings also are useful in determining potential issues with data 
quality and in estimating respondent burden.
    Usability Testing. Usability tests are similar to cognitive 
interviews in which a respondent is typically asked to ``think aloud'' 
or asked ``retrospective questions'' as they review a survey 
questionnaire, related materials, or website. The objective of 
usability testing is to check that respondents can easily and 
intuitively navigate survey questionnaires, related materials, and 
websites to submit their data to EIA.
    Focus Groups. Focus groups are a qualitative method used early in 
questionnaire development to gather information about a topic that can 
later be used to write survey questions, such as specific terminology, 
definitions, sensitivity of topics, organizational processes, and 
burden associated with reporting. Information is collected by a 
moderator using a guided discussion with small groups of people (e.g., 
8-10).
    Field Techniques. Field techniques described in survey research and 
survey methodology literature will be employed as appropriate. These 
include follow-up probing, memory cue tasks, paraphrasing, confidence 
rating, response latency measurements, free and dimensional sort 
classification tasks, and vignette classifications. The objective of 
all of these techniques is to aid in the development of surveys that 
work with respondents' thought processes, thus reducing response error 
and burden. These techniques have also proven useful for studying and 
revising pre-existing questionnaires.
    Behavior Coding. Behavior coding is a quantitative technique in 
which a standard set of codes is systematically applied to respondent/
interviewer interactions in interviewer-administered surveys or 
respondent/questionnaire interactions in self-administered surveys.
    Split Panel Test. Split panel tests refer to controlled 
experimental testing of alternative hypotheses. Thus, they allow one to 
choose from among competing questions, questionnaires, definitions, 
error messages or survey improvement methodologies with greater 
confidence than any of the other methods. Split panel tests conducted 
during the fielding of the survey are superior in that they can support 
both internal validity (controlled comparisons of the variable(s) under 
investigation) and external validity (represent the population under 
study). Most of the previously mentioned survey improvement methods can 
be strengthened when teamed with this method.
    (4a) Changes to Information Collection:
    EIA proposes to collect personally identifiable information (PII) 
only to the extent necessary to recruit participants for questionnaire 
testing, evaluation, and research. This PII would not be retained, with 
the exception of information needed to provide

[[Page 24394]]

renumeration for participants of questionnaire testing, evaluation, and 
research and conduct associated data analysis.
    (5) Annual Estimated Number of Respondents: 7,500;
    (6) Annual Estimated Number of Total Responses: 7,500;
    (7) Annual Estimated Number of Burden Hours: 7,500;
    (8) Annual Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden: 
$712,425 (7,500 annual burden hours multiplied by $94.99 per hour). EIA 
estimates that respondents will have no additional costs associated 
with the surveys other than the burden hours and the maintenance of the 
information during the normal course of business.
    Statutory Authority: 15 U.S.C. 772(b), 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.

    Signed in Washington, DC, on June 5, 2025.
Samson A. Adeshiyan,
Director, Office of Statistical Methods and Research, U. S. Energy 
Information Administration.
[FR Doc. 2025-10475 Filed 6-9-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.