Agency Information Collection Extension, 24392-24394 [2025-10475]
Download as PDF
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
24392
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 10, 2025 / Notices
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. The
Department is soliciting comments on
the proposed information collection
request (ICR) that is described below.
The Department is especially interested
in public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: Transition and
Postsecondary Programs for Students
with Intellectual Disabilities (TPSID)
Evaluation Protocol.
OMB Control Number: 1840–0825.
Type of Review: A revision of a
currently approved ICR.
Respondents/Affected Public: Private
Sector.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 40.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 788.
Abstract: In October 2020, the
Institute for Community Inclusion (ICI),
UMass Boston received a five-year
cooperative agreement from the Office
of Postsecondary Education to serve as
the National Coordinating Center (NCC)
for colleges and universities
implementing inclusive higher
education programs for students with
intellectual disabilities, including 22
model demonstration projects aimed at
creating inclusive comprehensive
transition and postsecondary programs
for students with intellectual disabilities
known as Transition and Postsecondary
Programs for Students with Intellectual
Disabilities (TPSIDs).
To reduce respondent burden, the
NCC has streamlined and simplified the
previously approved evaluation system
for the TPSID programs. The NCC will
enhance the collection and analyses of
longitudinal follow-up data from the 22
TPSID model programs via an already
developed and previously OMB
approved evaluation system for the
TPSID programs. The revised data
collection system is part of an
evaluation effort. The system will
collect program data at the institutions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Jun 09, 2025
Jkt 265001
from TPSID program staff via an online,
secure data management system.
Ross Santy,
Chief Data Officer, Office of Planning,
Evaluation and Policy Development.
[FR Doc. 2025–10433 Filed 6–9–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No.: ED–2025–SCC–0024]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Comment Request;
Application Package for TRIO Training
Program for Federal TRIO Programs
Office of Postsecondary
Education (OPE), Department of
Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of
1995, the Department is proposing a
reinstatement without change of a
previously approved information
collection request (ICR).
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before July 10,
2025.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for proposed
information collection requests should
be submitted within 30 days of
publication of this notice. Click on this
link www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain to access the site. Find this
information collection request (ICR) by
selecting ‘‘Department of Education’’
under ‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ then
check the ‘‘Only Show ICR for Public
Comment’’ checkbox. Reginfo.gov
provides two links to view documents
related to this information collection
request. Information collection forms
and instructions may be found by
clicking on the ‘‘View Information
Collection (IC) List’’ link. Supporting
statements and other supporting
documentation may be found by
clicking on the ‘‘View Supporting
Statement and Other Documents’’ link.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact ReShone
Moore, 202–453–7624.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: Application
Package for TRIO Training Program for
Federal TRIO Programs.
OMB Control Number: 1840–0814.
Type of Review: A reinstatement
without change of a previously
approved ICR.
Respondents/Affected Public: State,
Local, and Tribal Governments; Private
Sector.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 46.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 1,452.
Abstract: This information collection
provides the U.S. Department of
Education with information needed to
evaluate, score and rank the quality of
the projects proposed by institutions of
higher education and public or private
nonprofit agencies and organizations
applying for a TRIO Training grant, in
accordance with Title IV, Part A,
Subpart 2, Section 402G of the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as amended
(HEA), which requires the collection of
specific information and data necessary
for applicants to receive an initial
competitive grant and a non-competing
grant for the second year.
This collection is being submitted
under the Streamlined Clearance
Process for Discretionary Grant
Information Collections (1894–0001).
Therefore, the 30-day public comment
period notice will be the only public
comment notice published for this
information collection.
Ross Santy,
Chief Data Officer, Office of Planning,
Evaluation and Policy Development.
[FR Doc. 2025–10463 Filed 6–9–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Energy Information Administration
Agency Information Collection
Extension
U.S. Energy Information
Administration (EIA), U.S. Department
of Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
EIA submitted an information
collection request for extension as
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM
10JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 10, 2025 / Notices
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995. The information collection
requests a three-year extension with
changes of its Generic Clearance for
Questionnaire Testing, Evaluation, and
Research, OMB Control Number 1905–
0186. EIA–882T, ‘‘Generic Clearance for
Questionnaire Testing, Evaluation, and
Research,’’ provides EIA with the
authority to utilize qualitative and
quantitative methodologies to pretest
questionnaires and validate the quality
of data collected on EIA’s surveys. EIA
uses EIA–882T to meet its obligation to
publish, and otherwise make available
independent, high-quality statistical
data to federal government agencies,
state and local governments, the energy
industry, researchers, and the general
public.
Comments on this information
collection must be received no later
than July 10, 2025. Written comments
and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you need additional information,
contact Kenneth Pick, EIA Clearance
Officer, at (202) 586–5562, or by email
at EIA-FRNcomments@eia.gov. Include
the OMB control number listed in the
subject line of the message.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
information collection request contains:
(1) OMB No.: 1905–0186;
(2) Information Collection Request
Title: Generic Clearance for
Questionnaire Testing, Evaluation, and
Research;
(3) Type of Request: Three-year
extension with change;
(4) Purpose: The U.S. Energy
Information Administration (EIA) is
requesting a three-year approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) to utilize qualitative and
quantitative methodologies to pretest
questionnaires and validate the quality
of the data that are collected on EIA and
DOE survey forms. Through the use of
these methodologies, EIA will conduct
research studies to improve the quality
of energy data being collected, reduce or
minimize survey respondent burden,
and increase agency efficiency. This
authority would also allow EIA to
improve data collection in order to meet
the needs of EIA’s customers while also
staying current in the evolving nature of
the energy industry.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Jun 09, 2025
Jkt 265001
The specific methods EIA will
continue to use for the coverage by this
clearance are described below.
Pilot Surveys. Pilot surveys conducted
under this clearance will generally be
methodological studies and will always
employ statistically representative
samples. The pilot surveys will replicate
all components of the methodological
design, sampling procedures (where
possible), and questionnaires of the fullscale survey. Pilot surveys will normally
be utilized when EIA undertakes a
complete redesign of a particular data
collection methodology or when EIA
undertakes data collection in new
energy areas of the energy sector where
data collection would provide utility to
EIA.
Cognitive Interviews. Cognitive
interviews are typically one-on-one
interviews in which the respondent is
usually asked to ‘‘think aloud’’ or is
asked ‘‘retrospective questions’’ as they
answer questions, reads survey
materials, defines terminology, or
completes other activities as part of a
typical survey process. A number of
different techniques may be involved
including asking respondents what
specific words or phrases mean or
asking respondents probing questions to
determine how they estimate, calculate,
or determine specific data elements on
a survey. The objectives of these
cognitive interviews are to identify
problems of ambiguity or
misunderstanding, examine the process
that respondents follow for reporting
information, assess survey respondents’
ability to report new information, or
identify other difficulties respondents
have answering survey questions in
order to reduce measurement error from
estimates based on a survey.
Respondent Debriefings. Respondent
debriefings conducted under this
clearance will generally be
methodological or cognitive research
studies. The debriefing form is
administered after a respondent
completes a questionnaire either in
paper format, electronically, or through
personal interviews. The debriefings
contain probing questions to determine
how respondents interpret the survey
questions, how much time and effort
was spent completing the questionnaire,
and whether they have problems in
completing the survey/questionnaire.
Respondent debriefings also are useful
in determining potential issues with
data quality and in estimating
respondent burden.
Usability Testing. Usability tests are
similar to cognitive interviews in which
a respondent is typically asked to ‘‘think
aloud’’ or asked ‘‘retrospective
questions’’ as they review a survey
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
24393
questionnaire, related materials, or
website. The objective of usability
testing is to check that respondents can
easily and intuitively navigate survey
questionnaires, related materials, and
websites to submit their data to EIA.
Focus Groups. Focus groups are a
qualitative method used early in
questionnaire development to gather
information about a topic that can later
be used to write survey questions, such
as specific terminology, definitions,
sensitivity of topics, organizational
processes, and burden associated with
reporting. Information is collected by a
moderator using a guided discussion
with small groups of people (e.g., 8–10).
Field Techniques. Field techniques
described in survey research and survey
methodology literature will be
employed as appropriate. These include
follow-up probing, memory cue tasks,
paraphrasing, confidence rating,
response latency measurements, free
and dimensional sort classification
tasks, and vignette classifications. The
objective of all of these techniques is to
aid in the development of surveys that
work with respondents’ thought
processes, thus reducing response error
and burden. These techniques have also
proven useful for studying and revising
pre-existing questionnaires.
Behavior Coding. Behavior coding is a
quantitative technique in which a
standard set of codes is systematically
applied to respondent/interviewer
interactions in interviewer-administered
surveys or respondent/questionnaire
interactions in self-administered
surveys.
Split Panel Test. Split panel tests refer
to controlled experimental testing of
alternative hypotheses. Thus, they allow
one to choose from among competing
questions, questionnaires, definitions,
error messages or survey improvement
methodologies with greater confidence
than any of the other methods. Split
panel tests conducted during the
fielding of the survey are superior in
that they can support both internal
validity (controlled comparisons of the
variable(s) under investigation) and
external validity (represent the
population under study). Most of the
previously mentioned survey
improvement methods can be
strengthened when teamed with this
method.
(4a) Changes to Information
Collection:
EIA proposes to collect personally
identifiable information (PII) only to the
extent necessary to recruit participants
for questionnaire testing, evaluation,
and research. This PII would not be
retained, with the exception of
information needed to provide
E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM
10JNN1
24394
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 110 / Tuesday, June 10, 2025 / Notices
renumeration for participants of
questionnaire testing, evaluation, and
research and conduct associated data
analysis.
(5) Annual Estimated Number of
Respondents: 7,500;
(6) Annual Estimated Number of
Total Responses: 7,500;
(7) Annual Estimated Number of
Burden Hours: 7,500;
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and
Recordkeeping Cost Burden: $712,425
(7,500 annual burden hours multiplied
by $94.99 per hour). EIA estimates that
respondents will have no additional
costs associated with the surveys other
than the burden hours and the
maintenance of the information during
the normal course of business.
Statutory Authority: 15 U.S.C. 772(b),
42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.
Signed in Washington, DC, on June 5,
2025.
Samson A. Adeshiyan,
Director, Office of Statistical Methods and
Research, U. S. Energy Information
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2025–10475 Filed 6–9–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. CP25–497–000]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Northwest Pipeline LLC; Notice of
Application and Establishing
Intervention Deadline
Take notice that on May 21, 2025,
Northwest Pipeline LLC (Northwest),
P.O. Box 1396, Houston, Texas 77251,
filed an application under section 7(c)
of the Natural Gas Act (NGA) and Part
157 of the Commission’s regulations
requesting authorization to construct the
new Daggett Compressor Station in
Daggett County, Utah, including one
Solar Taurus 70 gas turbine-driven
compressor unit and associated facilities
(Wild Trail Project or Project). The
Project will enable Northwest to provide
up to 57,955 dekatherms per day of
incremental firm transportation service
from the White River Hub in Rio Blanco
County, Colorado, to Kern River Gas
Transmission at the existing Muddy
Creek interconnect in Lincoln County,
Wyoming. Northwest estimates the total
cost of the Project to be $77,298,599 and
proposes to charge a negotiated
reservation rate under Rate Schedule
TF–1, all as more fully set forth in the
application which is on file with the
Commission and open for public
inspection.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:53 Jun 09, 2025
Jkt 265001
In addition to publishing the full text
of this document in the Federal
Register, the Commission provides all
interested persons an opportunity to
view and/or print the contents of this
document via the internet through the
Commission’s Home Page (https://
www.ferc.gov). From the Commission’s
Home Page on the internet, this
information is available on eLibrary.
The full text of this document is
available on eLibrary in PDF and
Microsoft Word format for viewing,
printing, and/or downloading. To access
this document in eLibrary, type the
docket number excluding the last three
digits of this document in the docket
number field.
User assistance is available for
eLibrary and the Commission’s website
during normal business hours from
FERC Online Support at (202) 502–6652
(toll free at 1–866–208–3676) or email at
ferconlinesupport@ferc.gov, or the
Public Reference Room at (202) 502–
8371, TTY (202) 502–8659. Email the
Public Reference Room at
public.referenceroom@ferc.gov.
Any questions concerning this request
should be directed to Moe Daraiseh,
Senior Regulatory Analyst, Northwest,
LLC. P.O. Box 1396, Houston, Texas
77251, by phone at (281) 520–1904, or
email at Outreach@Williams.com.
Pursuant to section 157.9 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure,1 within 90 days of this
Notice the Commission staff will either:
complete its environmental review and
place it into the Commission’s public
record (eLibrary) for this proceeding; or
issue a Notice of Schedule for
Environmental Review. If a Notice of
Schedule for Environmental Review is
issued, it will indicate, among other
milestones, the anticipated date for the
Commission staff’s issuance of the final
environmental impact statement (FEIS)
or environmental assessment (EA) for
this proposal. The filing of an EA in the
Commission’s public record for this
proceeding or the issuance of a Notice
of Schedule for Environmental Review
will serve to notify federal and state
agencies of the timing for the
completion of all necessary reviews, and
the subsequent need to complete all
federal authorizations within 90 days of
the date of issuance of the Commission
staff’s FEIS or EA.
Public Participation
There are three ways to become
involved in the Commission’s review of
this project: you can file comments on
the project, you can protest the filing,
and you can file a motion to intervene
1 18
PO 00000
CFR 157.9.
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in the proceeding. There is no fee or
cost for filing comments or intervening.
The deadline for filing a motion to
intervene is 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on
June 25, 2025. How to file protests,
motions to intervene, and comments is
explained below.
The Commission’s Office of Public
Participation (OPP) supports meaningful
public engagement and participation in
Commission proceedings. OPP can help
members of the public, including
landowners, community organizations,
Tribal members and others, access
publicly available information and
navigate Commission processes. For
public inquiries and assistance with
making filings such as interventions,
comments, or requests for rehearing, the
public is encouraged to contact OPP at
(202) 502–6595 or OPP@ferc.gov.
Comments
Any person wishing to comment on
the project may do so. Comments may
include statements of support or
objections, to the project as a whole or
specific aspects of the project. The more
specific your comments, the more useful
they will be.
Protests
Pursuant to sections 157.10(a)(4) 2 and
385.211 3 of the Commission’s
regulations under the NGA, any person 4
may file a protest to the application.
Protests must comply with the
requirements specified in section
385.2001 5 of the Commission’s
regulations. A protest may also serve as
a motion to intervene so long as the
protestor states it also seeks to be an
intervenor.
To ensure that your comments or
protests are timely and properly
recorded, please submit your comments
on or before June 25, 2025.
There are three methods you can use
to submit your comments or protests to
the Commission. In all instances, please
reference the Project docket number
CP25–497–000 in your submission.
(1) You may file your comments
electronically by using the eComment
feature, which is located on the
Commission’s website at www.ferc.gov
under the link to Documents and
Filings. Using eComment is an easy
method for interested persons to submit
brief, text-only comments on a project;
(2) You may file your comments or
protests electronically by using the
eFiling feature, which is located on the
2 18
CFR 157.10(a)(4).
CFR 385.211.
4 Persons include individuals, organizations,
businesses, municipalities, and other entities. 18
CFR 385.102(d).
5 18 CFR 385.2001.
3 18
E:\FR\FM\10JNN1.SGM
10JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 110 (Tuesday, June 10, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24392-24394]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-10475]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Energy Information Administration
Agency Information Collection Extension
AGENCY: U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. Department
of Energy (DOE).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EIA submitted an information collection request for extension
as
[[Page 24393]]
required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The information
collection requests a three-year extension with changes of its Generic
Clearance for Questionnaire Testing, Evaluation, and Research, OMB
Control Number 1905-0186. EIA-882T, ``Generic Clearance for
Questionnaire Testing, Evaluation, and Research,'' provides EIA with
the authority to utilize qualitative and quantitative methodologies to
pretest questionnaires and validate the quality of data collected on
EIA's surveys. EIA uses EIA-882T to meet its obligation to publish, and
otherwise make available independent, high-quality statistical data to
federal government agencies, state and local governments, the energy
industry, researchers, and the general public.
DATES: Comments on this information collection must be received no
later than July 10, 2025. Written comments and recommendations for the
proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of
publication of this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find
this particular information collection by selecting ``Currently under
30-day Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search
function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you need additional information,
contact Kenneth Pick, EIA Clearance Officer, at (202) 586-5562, or by
email at [email protected]. Include the OMB control number listed
in the subject line of the message.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This information collection request
contains:
(1) OMB No.: 1905-0186;
(2) Information Collection Request Title: Generic Clearance for
Questionnaire Testing, Evaluation, and Research;
(3) Type of Request: Three-year extension with change;
(4) Purpose: The U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) is
requesting a three-year approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) to utilize qualitative and quantitative methodologies to
pretest questionnaires and validate the quality of the data that are
collected on EIA and DOE survey forms. Through the use of these
methodologies, EIA will conduct research studies to improve the quality
of energy data being collected, reduce or minimize survey respondent
burden, and increase agency efficiency. This authority would also allow
EIA to improve data collection in order to meet the needs of EIA's
customers while also staying current in the evolving nature of the
energy industry.
The specific methods EIA will continue to use for the coverage by
this clearance are described below.
Pilot Surveys. Pilot surveys conducted under this clearance will
generally be methodological studies and will always employ
statistically representative samples. The pilot surveys will replicate
all components of the methodological design, sampling procedures (where
possible), and questionnaires of the full-scale survey. Pilot surveys
will normally be utilized when EIA undertakes a complete redesign of a
particular data collection methodology or when EIA undertakes data
collection in new energy areas of the energy sector where data
collection would provide utility to EIA.
Cognitive Interviews. Cognitive interviews are typically one-on-one
interviews in which the respondent is usually asked to ``think aloud''
or is asked ``retrospective questions'' as they answer questions, reads
survey materials, defines terminology, or completes other activities as
part of a typical survey process. A number of different techniques may
be involved including asking respondents what specific words or phrases
mean or asking respondents probing questions to determine how they
estimate, calculate, or determine specific data elements on a survey.
The objectives of these cognitive interviews are to identify problems
of ambiguity or misunderstanding, examine the process that respondents
follow for reporting information, assess survey respondents' ability to
report new information, or identify other difficulties respondents have
answering survey questions in order to reduce measurement error from
estimates based on a survey.
Respondent Debriefings. Respondent debriefings conducted under this
clearance will generally be methodological or cognitive research
studies. The debriefing form is administered after a respondent
completes a questionnaire either in paper format, electronically, or
through personal interviews. The debriefings contain probing questions
to determine how respondents interpret the survey questions, how much
time and effort was spent completing the questionnaire, and whether
they have problems in completing the survey/questionnaire. Respondent
debriefings also are useful in determining potential issues with data
quality and in estimating respondent burden.
Usability Testing. Usability tests are similar to cognitive
interviews in which a respondent is typically asked to ``think aloud''
or asked ``retrospective questions'' as they review a survey
questionnaire, related materials, or website. The objective of
usability testing is to check that respondents can easily and
intuitively navigate survey questionnaires, related materials, and
websites to submit their data to EIA.
Focus Groups. Focus groups are a qualitative method used early in
questionnaire development to gather information about a topic that can
later be used to write survey questions, such as specific terminology,
definitions, sensitivity of topics, organizational processes, and
burden associated with reporting. Information is collected by a
moderator using a guided discussion with small groups of people (e.g.,
8-10).
Field Techniques. Field techniques described in survey research and
survey methodology literature will be employed as appropriate. These
include follow-up probing, memory cue tasks, paraphrasing, confidence
rating, response latency measurements, free and dimensional sort
classification tasks, and vignette classifications. The objective of
all of these techniques is to aid in the development of surveys that
work with respondents' thought processes, thus reducing response error
and burden. These techniques have also proven useful for studying and
revising pre-existing questionnaires.
Behavior Coding. Behavior coding is a quantitative technique in
which a standard set of codes is systematically applied to respondent/
interviewer interactions in interviewer-administered surveys or
respondent/questionnaire interactions in self-administered surveys.
Split Panel Test. Split panel tests refer to controlled
experimental testing of alternative hypotheses. Thus, they allow one to
choose from among competing questions, questionnaires, definitions,
error messages or survey improvement methodologies with greater
confidence than any of the other methods. Split panel tests conducted
during the fielding of the survey are superior in that they can support
both internal validity (controlled comparisons of the variable(s) under
investigation) and external validity (represent the population under
study). Most of the previously mentioned survey improvement methods can
be strengthened when teamed with this method.
(4a) Changes to Information Collection:
EIA proposes to collect personally identifiable information (PII)
only to the extent necessary to recruit participants for questionnaire
testing, evaluation, and research. This PII would not be retained, with
the exception of information needed to provide
[[Page 24394]]
renumeration for participants of questionnaire testing, evaluation, and
research and conduct associated data analysis.
(5) Annual Estimated Number of Respondents: 7,500;
(6) Annual Estimated Number of Total Responses: 7,500;
(7) Annual Estimated Number of Burden Hours: 7,500;
(8) Annual Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden:
$712,425 (7,500 annual burden hours multiplied by $94.99 per hour). EIA
estimates that respondents will have no additional costs associated
with the surveys other than the burden hours and the maintenance of the
information during the normal course of business.
Statutory Authority: 15 U.S.C. 772(b), 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.
Signed in Washington, DC, on June 5, 2025.
Samson A. Adeshiyan,
Director, Office of Statistical Methods and Research, U. S. Energy
Information Administration.
[FR Doc. 2025-10475 Filed 6-9-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P