Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension: Business Conduct Standards for Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap Participants, 22551-22552 [2025-09476]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 28, 2025 / Notices submissions should refer to file number SR–CboeBZX–2025–066 and should be submitted on or before June 18, 2025. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.32 Sherry R. Haywood, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2025–09489 Filed 5–27–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [OMB Control No. 3235–0732] Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension: Business Conduct Standards for Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major SecurityBased Swap Participants Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–2736 Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) is soliciting comments on the proposed collection of information provided for in Business Conduct Standards for Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap Participants 1 (17 CFR 240.3a67– 10, 240.3a71–3, 240.3a71–6, 240.15Fh– 1 through 15Fh–6 and 240.15Fk–1), under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (‘‘Exchange Act’’). In 2010, Congress enacted the DoddFrank Act, establishing a comprehensive framework for regulating the over-thecounter swaps markets.2 As required by Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act, new section 15F(h) of the Exchange Act established business conduct standards for security-based swap Dealers (‘‘SBS Dealers’’) and Major security-based swap Participants (‘‘collectively ‘‘SBS Entities’’) in their dealings with counterparties, including special entities.3 32 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). Conduct Standards for Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap Participants, Exchange Act Release 77617 (Apr. 14, 2016), 81 FR 29959 (May 13, 2016). See also Business Conduct Standards for Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap Participants; Correction, Exchange Act Release 77617A (May 19, 2016), 81 FR 32643 (May 24, 2016) (together, the ‘‘BCS Rules’’). 2 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, Public Law 111–203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010) (‘‘Dodd-Frank Act’’). 3 ‘‘Special Entity’’ means: a federal agency; State, State agency, city, county, municipality, other khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES 1 Business VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:10 May 27, 2025 Jkt 265001 In 2016, in order to implement the Dodd-Frank Act, the Commission adopted the BCS Rules for SBS Dealers and Major SBS Participants,4 a comprehensive set of business conduct standards and chief compliance officer (‘‘CCO’’) requirements applicable to SBS Entities, that are designed to enhance transparency, facilitate informed customer decision-making, and heighten standards of professional conduct to better protect investors. Rules 15Fh–1 through 15Fh–6 and 15Fk–1 require SBS Entities to: • Verify whether a counterparty is an eligible contract participant and whether it is a special entity; • Disclose to the counterparty material information about the securitybased swap, including material risks, characteristics, incentives and conflicts of interest; • Provide the counterparty with information concerning the daily mark of the security-based swap; • Provide the counterparty with information regarding the ability to require clearing of the security-based swap; • Communicate with counterparties in a fair and balanced manner based on principles of fair dealing and good faith; • Establish a supervisory and compliance infrastructure; and • Designate a CCO that is required to fulfill the described duties and provide an annual compliance report. The rules also require SBS Dealers to: • Determine that recommendations they make regarding security-based swaps are suitable for their counterparties. • Establish, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to obtain and retain a record of the essential facts concerning each known counterparty that are necessary to conduct business with such counterparty; and • Comply with rules designed to prevent ‘‘pay-to-play.’’ political subdivision of a State, or any instrumentality, department, or a corporation of or established by a State or political subdivision of a State; any employee benefit plan subject to Title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002); any governmental plan, as defined in Section 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002); any endowment, including an endowment that is an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)); or any employee benefit plan defined in Section 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002), not otherwise defined as a Special Entity, that elects to be a Special Entity by notifying a swap dealer or major swap participant of its election prior to entering into a swap with the particular swap dealer or major swap participant. 17 CFR 23.401(c). 4 See supra note 1. PO 00000 Frm 00087 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 22551 The rules also define what it means to ‘‘act as an advisor’’ to a special entity, and require an SBS Dealer who acts as an advisor to a special entity to: • Make a reasonable determination that any security-based swap or trading strategy involving a security-based swap recommended by the SBS Dealer is in the best interests of the special entity whose identity is known at a reasonably sufficient time prior to the execution of the transaction to permit the SBS Dealer to comply with this obligation; and • Make reasonable efforts to obtain such information that the SBS Dealer considers necessary to make a reasonable determination that a security-based swap or trading strategy involving a security-based swap is in the best interests of the known special entity. In addition, the rules require SBS Entities acting as counterparties to special entities to reasonably believe that the counterparty has an independent representative who meets the following requirements: • Has sufficient knowledge to evaluate the transaction and risks; • Is not subject to a statutory disqualification; • Undertakes a duty to act in the best interests of the special entity; • Makes appropriate and timely disclosures to the special entity of material information concerning the security-based swap; • Evaluates, consistent with any guidelines provided by the special entity, the fair pricing and the appropriateness of the security-based swap; • Is independent of the security-based swap dealer or major security-based swap participant that is the counterparty to a proposed securitybased swap. Under the rules, the special entity’s independent representative must also be subject to pay-to-play regulations, and if the special entity is an ERISA plan, the independent representative must be an ERISA fiduciary. The information that must be collected pursuant to the BCS Rules is intended to increase accountability and transparency in the market. The information should therefore help establish a framework that protects investors and promotes efficiency, competition and capital formation. Based on a review of recent data, as of 2025, the Commission staff estimate the number of respondents to be as follows: 53 SBS Dealers, 0 Major SBS Participants, for a total of 53 ‘‘SBS E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM 28MYN1 22552 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 101 / Wednesday, May 28, 2025 / Notices Entities.’’ 5 Further, The Commission staff estimate that approximately 46 of these 53 SBS Entities will be dually registered with the CFTC as Swap Entities. The Commission staff also estimate that there are currently 16,061 security-based swap market participants of which 12,406 are also swap market participants.6 From October 2021 through September 2022, the Commission staff estimate that there were approximately 377,271 securitybased swap transactions between an SBS Dealer and counterparty that is not an SBS Dealer of which approximately 234,654 were new and 5,559 amended trades (totaling 240,213). The Commission staff estimate there are 283 independent, third-party representatives and 22 in-house independent representatives, for a total of 305 independent representatives.7 The Commission staff estimate that there are approximately 14,005 unique SBS Dealer and non-SBS-Dealer pairs.8 The Commission staff have used these IC Title Type of burden 15Fh–3(b), (c), (d): Disclosures—SBS Entities .............................. 15Fh–3(b), (c), (d): Disclosures—SBS Transactions Between SBS Dealer and Non-SBSD Counterparty. 15Fh–3(e), (f): Know Your Counterparty and Recommendations (SBS Dealers). 15Fh–3(g): Fair and Balanced Communications ............... 15Fh–3(h): Supervision ...................................................... 15Fh–5: SBS Entities Acting as Counterparties to Special Entities. 15Fh–5: SBS Entities Acting as Counterparties to Special Entities. 15Fh–6: Political Contributions ...................................... 15Fk–1: Chief Compliance Officer ................................ khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES 16:10 May 27, 2025 Jkt 265001 Ongoing annual burden Industry-wide annual burden Industry-wide annual burden Hours Cost Hours Cost 53 4,120 $0 218,360 $0 Reporting ............... 53 4,427.4 0 234,654 0 Reporting ............... 53 132.1 0 7,003 0 Reporting ............... 53 2 4,158 106 220,374 Reporting ............... 53 540 5,544 28,620 293,832 Reporting ............... 53 305 0 16,165 0 Third-Party Disclosure. 53 305 0 16,165 0 Reporting ............... 53 1 29,568 53 1,567,104 Reporting ............... 53 273 8,316 14,469 440,748 ................................ .......................... .......................... .......................... 535,595 2,522,058 An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. Written comments are invited on: (a) whether this proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the SEC, including whether the information will have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the SEC’s estimate of the burden imposed by the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and the assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including through the use of automated, electronic VerDate Sep<11>2014 Ongoing annual burden Reporting ............... Total .......................................................... 5 List of Registered Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap Participants, available at: https://www.sec.gov/about/divisionsoffices/division-trading-markets/list-registeredsecurity-based-swap-dealers-major-security-basedswap-participants (providing the list of registered security-based swap dealers and major securitybased swap participants that was updated as of December 31, 2024). Information concerning Swap Respondents estimates in calculating the hour and cost burdens for the rule provisions that the Commission staff anticipate have a ‘‘collection of information’’ burden within the meaning of the PRA. The Commission staff estimate that the aggregate burden of the ongoing reporting and disclosures required by the BCS Rules, as described above, is approximately 535,595 hours and $2,522,058 calculated as follows: collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Please direct your written comment to Austin Gerig, Director/Chief Data Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Tanya Ruttenberg, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 and send it by email to PaperworkReductionAct@sec.gov within 60 days of publication of this notice, by July 28, 2025. Dated: May 21, 2025. Sherry R. Haywood, Assistant Secretary. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Investment Company Act Release No. 35605; File No. 812–15512] Eagle Point Credit Company Inc., et al. May 22, 2025. Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’). AGENCY: ACTION: Notice. BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Notice of application for an order under sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Act’’) and rule 17d–1 under the Act to permit certain joint transactions otherwise prohibited by sections 17(d) and 57(a)(4) of the Act and rule 17d–1 under the Act. Entities registered with the CFTC available at: (https://www.cftc.gov/IndustryOversight/ Intermediaries/MajorSwapParticipantMSP/ index.htm). 6 Unless otherwise noted, estimates were derived from the DTCC–TIW data set (November 30, 2006 through September 2022). In October 2022, DTCC– TIW transaction data went through a major structural change. Commission staff are still in the process of resolving the consistency issue associated with this data. 7 See Information About Registered Municipal Advisors as of January 1, 2025 (https:// www.sec.gov/data-research/sec-markets-data/ information-about-registered-municipal-advisors). 8 See supra note 6. [FR Doc. 2025–09476 Filed 5–27–25; 8:45 am] PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM 28MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 101 (Wednesday, May 28, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22551-22552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-09476]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[OMB Control No. 3235-0732]


Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Extension: Business Conduct 
Standards for Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap 
Participants

Upon Written Request, Copies Available From: Securities and Exchange 
Commission, Office of FOIA Services, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549-2736

    Notice is hereby given that, pursuant to the Paperwork Reduction 
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities and Exchange 
Commission (``SEC'' or ``Commission'') is soliciting comments on the 
proposed collection of information provided for in Business Conduct 
Standards for Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major Security-Based Swap 
Participants \1\ (17 CFR 240.3a67-10, 240.3a71-3, 240.3a71-6, 240.15Fh-
1 through 15Fh-6 and 240.15Fk-1), under the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.) (``Exchange Act'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Business Conduct Standards for Security-Based Swap Dealers 
and Major Security-Based Swap Participants, Exchange Act Release 
77617 (Apr. 14, 2016), 81 FR 29959 (May 13, 2016). See also Business 
Conduct Standards for Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major 
Security-Based Swap Participants; Correction, Exchange Act Release 
77617A (May 19, 2016), 81 FR 32643 (May 24, 2016) (together, the 
``BCS Rules'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 2010, Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Act, establishing a 
comprehensive framework for regulating the over-the-counter swaps 
markets.\2\ As required by Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act, new section 
15F(h) of the Exchange Act established business conduct standards for 
security-based swap Dealers (``SBS Dealers'') and Major security-based 
swap Participants (``collectively ``SBS Entities'') in their dealings 
with counterparties, including special entities.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, 
Public Law 111-203, 124 Stat. 1376 (2010) (``Dodd-Frank Act'').
    \3\ ``Special Entity'' means: a federal agency; State, State 
agency, city, county, municipality, other political subdivision of a 
State, or any instrumentality, department, or a corporation of or 
established by a State or political subdivision of a State; any 
employee benefit plan subject to Title I of the Employee Retirement 
Income Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002); any governmental plan, 
as defined in Section 3 of the Employee Retirement Income Security 
Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002); any endowment, including an endowment 
that is an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (26 U.S.C. 501(c)(3)); or any employee 
benefit plan defined in Section 3 of the Employee Retirement Income 
Security Act of 1974 (29 U.S.C. 1002), not otherwise defined as a 
Special Entity, that elects to be a Special Entity by notifying a 
swap dealer or major swap participant of its election prior to 
entering into a swap with the particular swap dealer or major swap 
participant. 17 CFR 23.401(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In 2016, in order to implement the Dodd-Frank Act, the Commission 
adopted the BCS Rules for SBS Dealers and Major SBS Participants,\4\ a 
comprehensive set of business conduct standards and chief compliance 
officer (``CCO'') requirements applicable to SBS Entities, that are 
designed to enhance transparency, facilitate informed customer 
decision-making, and heighten standards of professional conduct to 
better protect investors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See supra note 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rules 15Fh-1 through 15Fh-6 and 15Fk-1 require SBS Entities to:
     Verify whether a counterparty is an eligible contract 
participant and whether it is a special entity;
     Disclose to the counterparty material information about 
the security-based swap, including material risks, characteristics, 
incentives and conflicts of interest;
     Provide the counterparty with information concerning the 
daily mark of the security-based swap;
     Provide the counterparty with information regarding the 
ability to require clearing of the security-based swap;
     Communicate with counterparties in a fair and balanced 
manner based on principles of fair dealing and good faith;
     Establish a supervisory and compliance infrastructure; and
     Designate a CCO that is required to fulfill the described 
duties and provide an annual compliance report.
    The rules also require SBS Dealers to:
     Determine that recommendations they make regarding 
security-based swaps are suitable for their counterparties.
     Establish, maintain and enforce written policies and 
procedures reasonably designed to obtain and retain a record of the 
essential facts concerning each known counterparty that are necessary 
to conduct business with such counterparty; and
     Comply with rules designed to prevent ``pay-to-play.''
    The rules also define what it means to ``act as an advisor'' to a 
special entity, and require an SBS Dealer who acts as an advisor to a 
special entity to:
     Make a reasonable determination that any security-based 
swap or trading strategy involving a security-based swap recommended by 
the SBS Dealer is in the best interests of the special entity whose 
identity is known at a reasonably sufficient time prior to the 
execution of the transaction to permit the SBS Dealer to comply with 
this obligation; and
     Make reasonable efforts to obtain such information that 
the SBS Dealer considers necessary to make a reasonable determination 
that a security-based swap or trading strategy involving a security-
based swap is in the best interests of the known special entity.
    In addition, the rules require SBS Entities acting as 
counterparties to special entities to reasonably believe that the 
counterparty has an independent representative who meets the following 
requirements:
     Has sufficient knowledge to evaluate the transaction and 
risks;
     Is not subject to a statutory disqualification;
     Undertakes a duty to act in the best interests of the 
special entity;
     Makes appropriate and timely disclosures to the special 
entity of material information concerning the security-based swap;
     Evaluates, consistent with any guidelines provided by the 
special entity, the fair pricing and the appropriateness of the 
security-based swap;
     Is independent of the security-based swap dealer or major 
security-based swap participant that is the counterparty to a proposed 
security-based swap.
    Under the rules, the special entity's independent representative 
must also be subject to pay-to-play regulations, and if the special 
entity is an ERISA plan, the independent representative must be an 
ERISA fiduciary.
    The information that must be collected pursuant to the BCS Rules is 
intended to increase accountability and transparency in the market. The 
information should therefore help establish a framework that protects 
investors and promotes efficiency, competition and capital formation.
    Based on a review of recent data, as of 2025, the Commission staff 
estimate the number of respondents to be as follows: 53 SBS Dealers, 0 
Major SBS Participants, for a total of 53 ``SBS

[[Page 22552]]

Entities.'' \5\ Further, The Commission staff estimate that 
approximately 46 of these 53 SBS Entities will be dually registered 
with the CFTC as Swap Entities. The Commission staff also estimate that 
there are currently 16,061 security-based swap market participants of 
which 12,406 are also swap market participants.\6\ From October 2021 
through September 2022, the Commission staff estimate that there were 
approximately 377,271 security-based swap transactions between an SBS 
Dealer and counterparty that is not an SBS Dealer of which 
approximately 234,654 were new and 5,559 amended trades (totaling 
240,213). The Commission staff estimate there are 283 independent, 
third-party representatives and 22 in-house independent 
representatives, for a total of 305 independent representatives.\7\ The 
Commission staff estimate that there are approximately 14,005 unique 
SBS Dealer and non-SBS-Dealer pairs.\8\ The Commission staff have used 
these estimates in calculating the hour and cost burdens for the rule 
provisions that the Commission staff anticipate have a ``collection of 
information'' burden within the meaning of the PRA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ List of Registered Security-Based Swap Dealers and Major 
Security-Based Swap Participants, available at: https://www.sec.gov/about/divisions-offices/division-trading-markets/list-registered-security-based-swap-dealers-major-security-based-swap-participants 
(providing the list of registered security-based swap dealers and 
major security-based swap participants that was updated as of 
December 31, 2024). Information concerning Swap Entities registered 
with the CFTC available at: (https://www.cftc.gov/IndustryOversight/Intermediaries/MajorSwapParticipantMSP/index.htm).
    \6\ Unless otherwise noted, estimates were derived from the 
DTCC-TIW data set (November 30, 2006 through September 2022). In 
October 2022, DTCC-TIW transaction data went through a major 
structural change. Commission staff are still in the process of 
resolving the consistency issue associated with this data.
    \7\ See Information About Registered Municipal Advisors as of 
January 1, 2025 (https://www.sec.gov/data-research/sec-markets-data/information-about-registered-municipal-advisors).
    \8\ See supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Commission staff estimate that the aggregate burden of the 
ongoing reporting and disclosures required by the BCS Rules, as 
described above, is approximately 535,595 hours and $2,522,058 
calculated as follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                       Ongoing annual   Ongoing annual   Industry-wide    Industry-wide
                                                                                           burden           burden       annual burden    annual burden
                IC Title                       Type of burden          Respondents   -------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                           Hours             Cost            Hours             Cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
15Fh-3(b), (c), (d):
    Disclosures--SBS Entities..........  Reporting.................               53            4,120               $0          218,360               $0
15Fh-3(b), (c), (d):
    Disclosures--SBS Transactions        Reporting.................               53          4,427.4                0          234,654                0
     Between SBS Dealer and Non-SBSD
     Counterparty.
15Fh-3(e), (f):
    Know Your Counterparty and           Reporting.................               53            132.1                0            7,003                0
     Recommendations (SBS Dealers).
15Fh-3(g):
    Fair and Balanced Communications...  Reporting.................               53                2            4,158              106          220,374
15Fh-3(h):
    Supervision........................  Reporting.................               53              540            5,544           28,620          293,832
15Fh-5:
    SBS Entities Acting as               Reporting.................               53              305                0           16,165                0
     Counterparties to Special Entities.
15Fh-5:
    SBS Entities Acting as               Third-Party Disclosure....               53              305                0           16,165                0
     Counterparties to Special Entities.
15Fh-6:
    Political Contributions............  Reporting.................               53                1           29,568               53        1,567,104
15Fk-1:
    Chief Compliance Officer...........  Reporting.................               53              273            8,316           14,469          440,748
                                                                    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
        Total..........................  ..........................  ...............  ...............  ...............          535,595        2,522,058
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required 
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a 
currently valid OMB Control Number.
    Written comments are invited on: (a) whether this proposed 
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of 
the functions of the SEC, including whether the information will have 
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the SEC's estimate of the burden 
imposed by the proposed collection of information, including the 
validity of the methodology and the assumptions used; (c) ways to 
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be 
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of 
information on respondents, including through the use of automated, 
electronic collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology.
    Please direct your written comment to Austin Gerig, Director/Chief 
Data Officer, Securities and Exchange Commission, c/o Tanya Ruttenberg, 
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 and send it by email to 
[email protected] within 60 days of publication of this 
notice, by July 28, 2025.

    Dated: May 21, 2025.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-09476 Filed 5-27-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.