Estate Tax Closing Letter User Fee Update, 21410-21413 [2025-08928]
Download as PDF
21410
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 20, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
*
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p.389.
V–286 [Amended]
From Elkins, WV; Casanova, VA; INT
Casanova 142° and Brooke, VA, 300° radials;
to Brooke.
§ 71.1
*
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order JO 7400.11J,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated July 31, 2024, and
effective September 15, 2024, is
amended as follows:
■
Paragraph 6010(a)
Airways.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
V–38 [Amended]
From Moline, IL; INT Moline 082° and
Peotone, IL, 281° radials; Peotone; Fort
Wayne, IN; to INT Fort Wayne 091° and
Rosewood, OH, 334° radials. From Appleton,
OH; Zanesville, OH; Parkersburg, WV; Elkins,
WV; Gordonsville, VA; Richmond, VA;
Harcum, VA; to INT Harcum 100° and
Norfolk, VA, 026° radials.
*
*
*
*
*
V–139 [Amended]
From Florence, SC; Wilmington, NC; New
Bern, NC; INT New Bern 006° and Norfolk,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 15,
2025.
Brian Eric Konie,
Manager (A), Rules and Regulations Group.
[FR Doc. 2025–09002 Filed 5–19–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
*
V–29 [Amended]
From Smyrna, DE; Dupont, DE; Modena,
PA; Pottstown, PA; East Texas, PA; WilkesBarre, PA; Binghamton, NY; INT Binghamton
005° and Syracuse, NY, 169° radials; to
Syracuse.
*
*
Domestic VOR Federal
V–1 [Amended]
From Craig, FL; INT Craig 020° and
Charleston, SC, 214° radials; Charleston;
Grand Strand, SC; INT Grand Strand 031°
and Kinston, NC, 214° radials; Kinston;
Cofield, NC; to Norfolk, VA. From Waterloo,
DE; INT Waterloo 024° and Coyle, NJ, 216°
radials; Coyle; INT Coyle 036° and Kennedy,
NY, 209° radials; Kennedy; Deer Park, NY;
Madison, CT; Hartford, CT; INT Hartford
040° and Boston, MA, 252° radials; to Boston,
MA; excluding the airspace below 2,700 feet
MSL outside the United States between
STARY INT and Charleston, SC. The portions
within R–5002A, R–5002C, R–5002D and R–
5002F are excluded during their times of
designation.
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
VA, 209° radials; INT Norfolk 209° and
Elizabeth City, NC, 243° radials; INT
Elizabeth City 243° and Norfolk 194° radials;
Norfolk; Sea Isle, NJ; INT Sea Isle 050° and
Hampton, NY, 223° radials; Hampton;
Providence, RI; INT Providence 079° and
Sandy Point, RI, 031° radials; INT Sandy
Point 031° and Kennebunk, ME, 180° radials;
to Kennebunk. The airspace below 2,000 feet
MSL outside the United States, the airspace
below 3,000 feet MSL between the Kennedy,
NY, 087° and 141° radials, and the portions
within R–5301, R–5302, R–5303, R–5304, R–
5306 and R–6604 are excluded during their
times of designation.
15:51 May 19, 2025
Jkt 265001
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 300
[TD 10031]
RIN 1545–BR28
Estate Tax Closing Letter User Fee
Update
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
AGENCY:
This document contains
interim final regulations relating to the
imposition of a user fee on authorized
persons requesting the issuance of IRS
Letter 627, also referred to as an estate
tax closing letter. These regulations
reduce the amount of the user fee
imposed on a request for the issuance of
an estate tax closing letter. The
Independent Offices Appropriations Act
of 1952 authorizes the charging of user
fees. The text of the interim final
regulations also serves as the text of the
proposed regulations set forth in the
notice of proposed rulemaking on this
subject in the Proposed Rules section of
this edition of the Federal Register.
DATES:
Effective date: These regulations are
effective on May 20, 2025.
Applicability date: For date of
applicability, see § 300.12(d).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning the interim final
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
regulations, Juli Ro Kim at (202) 317–
6859; concerning cost methodology,
Maria E. Arias-Buchanan at (202) 803–
9569 (not toll-free numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority
This document contains interim final
amendments to 26 CFR part 300
regarding user fees for authorized
persons who request the issuance of an
estate tax closing letter (IRS Letter 627).
The Independent Offices
Appropriations Act of 1952 (IOAA) (31
U.S.C. 9701) authorizes each agency to
prescribe regulations that establish user
fees for services provided by the agency.
The IOAA provides that regulations
implementing user fees are subject to
policies prescribed by the President;
these policies are set forth in the Office
of Management and Budget Circular A–
25, 58 FR 38142 (July 15, 1993) (OMB
Circular A–25).
The IOAA states that the services
provided by an agency should be selfsustaining to the extent possible. Under
OMB Circular A–25, agencies that
provide services that confer special
benefits on identifiable recipients
beyond those accruing to the general
public must identify those services,
determine whether user fees should be
assessed for those services, and, if so,
establish user fees that recover the full
cost of providing those services, unless
an exception to the full cost requirement
is granted. As required by the IOAA and
OMB Circular A–25, agencies are to
review user fees biennially and update
them as necessary to reflect changes in
the cost of providing the underlying
services.
Background and Explanation of
Provisions
A. Estate Tax Closing Letter User Fee
On September 28, 2021, the
Department of the Treasury (Treasury
Department) and the IRS published final
regulations (TD 9957) in the Federal
Register (86 FR 53539) establishing a
$67 user fee to apply to requests for the
issuance of an estate tax closing letter,
based on a 2019 Cost Model. As
explained in the Background section of
the preamble of TD 9957, the issuance
of an estate tax closing letter constitutes
the provision of a service and confers
special benefits to authorized persons
requesting such letters beyond those
accruing to the general public.
Therefore, the IRS is authorized,
pursuant to the IOAA and OMB Circular
A–25, to charge a user fee for the
issuance of an estate tax closing letter
that reflects the full cost of providing
this service. See also section
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 20, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
6103(p)(2)(B) (allowing for a reasonable
fee for furnishing return information to
any person).
In 2021, the IRS conducted a biennial
review of the estate tax closing letter
user fee and issued a new Cost Model
that resulted in no change to the $67
user fee.
In 2023, the IRS conducted a biennial
review of the estate tax closing letter
user fee and issued a new Cost Model,
which determined that the full cost of
issuing estate tax closing letters to
authorized persons is $56.
B. Calculation of User Fees Generally
The IRS follows generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP) in
calculating the full cost of providing
services. The Federal Accounting
Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) is
the body that establishes GAAP that
apply for Federal reporting entities,
such as the IRS. FASAB publishes the
FASAB Handbook of Accounting
Standards and Other Pronouncements,
as amended, available at https://
fasab.gov/accounting-standards/. The
FASAB Handbook includes the
Statement of Federal Financial
Accounting Standards 4: Managerial
Cost Accounting Standards and
Concepts (SFFAS No. 4) for the Federal
government. SFFAS No. 4 establishes
internal costing standards under GAAP
to accurately measure and manage the
full cost of Federal programs. The
methodology described below is in
accordance with SFFAS No. 4.
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
1. Cost Center Allocation
The IRS determines the cost of its
services and the activities involved in
producing them through a cost
accounting system that tracks costs to
organizational units. The lowest
organizational unit in the IRS’s cost
accounting system is a cost center. Cost
centers usually are separate offices
distinguished by subject-matter area of
responsibility or geographic region. All
costs of operating a cost center are
recorded in the IRS’s cost accounting
system and allocated to that cost center.
These costs include the direct costs for
the cost center’s activities and all
indirect costs, including overhead,
associated with that cost center. Each
cost is recorded in only one cost center.
2. Cost Estimation of Direct Labor and
Benefits
Not all cost centers are fully devoted
to only one service for which the IRS
charges a user fee. When cost centers
include multiple services, the IRS
measures the time required to
accomplish activities associated with
each service to estimate the average time
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 May 19, 2025
Jkt 265001
spent on the service in the related cost
center. The average time devoted is
multiplied by the relevant
organizational unit’s average labor and
benefits cost per unit of time to
determine the direct labor and benefits
cost incurred to provide the service. To
determine the full cost, the IRS then
adds an appropriate overhead charge.
3. Calculating Overhead
Overhead is an indirect cost of
operating an organization that cannot be
immediately associated with an activity
that the organization performs.
Overhead includes costs of resources
that are jointly or commonly consumed
by one or more organizational unit’s
activities but are not specifically
identifiable to a single activity, such as
the following:
• General management and
administrative services of sustaining
and supporting organizations
• Facilities management and ground
maintenance services (security, rent,
utilities, and building maintenance)
• Procurement and contracting services
• Financial management and
accounting services
• Information technology services
• Services to acquire and operate
property, plants, and equipment
• Publication, reproduction, and
graphics and video services
• Research, analytical, and statistical
services
• Human resources/personnel services
• Library and legal services
To calculate the overhead allocable to
a service, the IRS multiplies the current
overhead rate by the direct labor and
benefits costs of the service. The
overhead rate is the ratio of the IRS’s
indirect labor, benefits, and non-labor
costs of business divisions that do not
interact with taxpayers to the direct
labor and benefits costs of business
divisions that interact with taxpayers.
The IRS calculates the overhead rate
annually based on cost elements
underlying the Statement of Net Cost
included in the IRS Annual Financial
Statements, which are audited by the
Government Accountability Office.
For this estate tax closing letter user
fee review, the fiscal year (FY) 2023
overhead rate, based on FY 2022 costs,
of 62.50 percent was used.
C. Full Cost Determination for the Estate
Tax Closing Letter User Fee
The IRS followed the guidance
provided by the OMB Circular A–25
guidance to compute the full cost of
issuing estate tax closing letters to
authorized persons. OMB Circular A–25
explains that the full cost includes all
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21411
indirect and direct costs to any part of
the Federal Government including but
not limited to, direct and indirect
personnel costs, physical overhead,
rents, utilities, travel, and management
costs.
1. Request Processing Costs
Requests for estate tax closing letters
are processed by employees at grades 5,
8, and 11 of the general schedule (GS–
5, GS–8, and GS–11). Approximately
0.65 staff hours are required to review
the return, create the estate tax closing
letters, and prepare the letters for
mailing. The IRS received an average of
8,894 annual requests for estate tax
closing letters in FY 2021 and FY 2022,
requiring 5,781 staff hours.
Total hours allocated to the cost also
must include indirect hours for campus
employees, which are calculated by
multiplying the number of direct hours
by the applicable 60 percent indirect
employee rate. Using this information,
IRS determined that the total staff hours
for processing requests for estate tax
closing letters are 9,250 annually.
Direct Staff Hours ....................
Indirect Hours (60%) ...............
5,781
+ 3,469
Total Hours ..........................
9,250
To determine the labor and benefits
costs, the IRS divided the 9,250 total
hours by 2,080 (the total annual hours
worked by a full-time employee (FTE))
to convert the hours to a 4.45 FTE
equivalent. The processing of requests
for estate tax closing letters is performed
primarily (87.7 percent) by employees at
the GS–5 level, but also by employees
at the GS–8 level (1.7 percent) and GS–
11 level (10.6 percent). The average
salary and benefit cost for each of those
levels was multiplied by that grade’s
percentage of processing time to arrive
at a $67,355 total cost per FTE.
Multiplying the cost per FTE by the 4.45
FTE equivalent resulted in a total labor
and benefits cost of $299,730, as
follows:
Total Cost Per FTE ..................
Total FTE .................................
$67,355
× 4.45
Processing Labor & Benefits ....
$299,730
2. Quality Assurance Review Costs
Outgoing estate tax closing letters are
reviewed by quality assurance
professionals at the following Internal
Revenue (IR) paybands of the IRS
Payband System: IR–10 (87.7 percent)
and IR–06 (12.3 percent). Three out of
every 100 estate tax closing letters
mailed are reviewed to verify (1) the
estate tax closing letter was authorized,
(2) the information included in the letter
was accurate, and (3) the address was
correct. The 8,894 average number of
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
21412
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 20, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. These
regulations, which reduce the amount of
a fee to obtain a particular service, affect
decedents’ estates, which generally are
not small entities as defined under 5
U.S.C. 601(6). Thus, these regulations
have no economic impact on small
entities. In addition, the interim final
regulations will establish a $56 fee,
which is a reduction from the
Direct Staff Hours ....................
133 previously established fee and is not
Indirect Hours (60%) ...............
+ 80 substantial enough to have a significant
economic impact on any entities that
Total Hours ..........................
213 could be affected by establishing such a
fee. Accordingly, the Secretary certifies
QA reviews are processed by
employees at various IR levels. Dividing that the rule will not have a significant
the total hours by 2,080 (the total annual economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
hours for each FTE), resulted in 0.10
FTEs. The average salary and benefits
III. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
for both IR paybands conducting quality
Section 202 of the Unfunded
assurance reviews was multiplied by
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that IR payband’s percentage of
that agencies assess anticipated costs
processing time to arrive at the $95,460
and benefits and take certain other
total cost per FTE. The total cost per
actions before issuing a final rule that
FTE was then multiplied by the total
FTE to determine the labor and benefits includes any Federal mandate that may
result in expenditures in any one year
cost for QA reviews, as follows:
by a State, local, or Tribal government,
Total Cost Per FTE ..................
$95,460
Total FTE .................................
×
0.1 in the aggregate, or by the private sector,
of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated
Quality Assurance & Benefits
$95.46 annually for inflation. This rule does
not include any Federal mandate that
3. Full Cost Per Request Calculation
may result in expenditures by State,
The IRS applied the 62.5 percent
local, or Tribal governments, or by the
overhead rate to the total labor and
private sector in excess of that
benefits cost to calculate the full cost of
threshold.
the estate tax closing letter program.
IV. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
requests for FY 2021 and FY 2022
resulted in 266 letters reviewed. On
average, quality assurance professionals
spend 0.5 hours reviewing one estate tax
closing letter, totaling 133 direct staff
hours. The direct staff hours were
multiplied by the 60 percent indirect
employee rate for campus employees,
resulting in a combined total of 213
annual staff hours allocated for quality
assurance (QA) reviews, as follows:
Processing Labor & Benefits ....
Quality Assurance & Benefits
$299,730
+
9,546
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
prohibits an agency from publishing any
Total Labor and Benefits .....
309,276 rule that has federalism implications if
Overhead (62.50%) ..................
+ 193,297 the rule either imposes substantial,
direct compliance costs on State and
Full Cost ...............................
$502.573
local governments, and is not required
The $56 cost per request was
by statute, or preempts State law, unless
determined by dividing the full cost by
the agency meets the consultation and
the average annual volume of requests,
funding requirements of section 6 of the
as follows:
Executive order. These regulations do
Full Cost ...................................
$502.573 not have federalism implications and do
Estimated Annual Request
not impose substantial direct
Volume ................................. ÷
8,894 compliance costs on State and local
governments or preempt State law
Cost Per Request ......................
$56
within the meaning of the Executive
order.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review
V. Good Cause
The OMB’s Office of Information and
Regulatory Analysis has determined that
these regulations are not significant and
subject to review under section 6(b) of
Executive Order 12866.
The user fee for the estate tax closing
letter applies to all individuals who
make a request and pay for the estate tax
closing letter on https://www.pay.gov. It
would be unnecessary and contrary to
the public interest for the IRS to
continue to charge the current, higher
user fee during the period provided for
public comment on the proposal to
reduce that fee. To enable the reduced
fee amount to be in effect immediately
II. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it is hereby
certified that these interim final
regulations will not have a significant
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 May 19, 2025
Jkt 265001
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
for authorized persons requesting an
estate tax closing letter, the Treasury
Department and the IRS find that there
is good cause to dispense with (1) notice
and public comment pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b) and (c) and (2) a delayed
effective date pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(d). The Treasury Department and
the IRS will consider public comments
submitted in response to the crossreferenced notice of proposed
rulemaking published in the Proposed
Rules section of this issue of the Federal
Register and will promulgate a final rule
after considering those comments.
VI. Submission to Small Business
Administration
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code, this regulation
has been submitted to the Chief Counsel
for the Office of Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment
on its impact on small business.
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
designated this rule as not a major rule,
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Drafting Information
The principal author of these
regulations is Juli Ro Kim of the Office
of the Associate Chief Counsel
(Passthroughs, Trusts, and Estates).
Other personnel from the Treasury
Department and the IRS participated in
the development of the regulations.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 300
Estate taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 300 is
amended as follows:
PART 300—USER FEES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 300 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701.
Par. 2. Section 300.12 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b) and (d) to read
as follows:
■
§ 300.12
*
*
Fee for estate tax closing letter.
*
*
*
(b) Fee. The fee for issuing an estate
tax closing letter is $56.
*
*
*
*
*
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 96 / Tuesday, May 20, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
(d) Applicability date. This section
applies to requests received by the IRS
after May 20, 2025.
Edward Killen,
Acting Chief Tax Compliance Officer.
Approved: May 5, 2025.
Kevin M. Salinger,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Treasury
(Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2025–08928 Filed 5–16–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2024–0198]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway,
Beaufort, SC
Coast Guard, Department of
Homeland Security (DHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is modifying
the operating schedule that governs the
Lady’s Island (Woods Memorial) Bridge
across the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway (AICW) (Beaufort River), mile
536.0, at Beaufort, SC. We are modifying
the specific requirement for the seasonal
operating schedule. This action will
assist in reducing vehicular traffic
congestion and provide a consistent
operating schedule for the bridge.
DATES: This rule is effective June 20,
2025.
SUMMARY:
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov. Type the docket
number (USCG–2024–0198) in the
‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click ‘‘SEARCH’’. In
the Document Type column, select
‘‘Supporting & Related Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Ms. Jennifer Zercher, Bridge
Management Specialist, Seventh Coast
Guard District; telephone 571–607–
5951, email Jennifer.N.Zercher@
uscg.mil.
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
OMB Office of Management and Budget
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 May 19, 2025
Jkt 265001
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
SC South Carolina
SCDOT South Carolina Department of
Transportation
TD Temporary Deviation
AICW Atlantic Intracoastal Waterway
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On March 20, 2024, the Coast Guard
published a temporary deviation
entitled ‘‘Drawbridge Operation
Regulation; Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway, Beaufort, SC’’ in the Federal
Register (89 FR 19731). That temporary
deviation, effective from 12:01 a.m. on
March 25, 2024, through 11:59 p.m. on
September 29, 2024, allowed Lady’s
Island (Woods Memorial) Bridge to
operate without a seasonal opening
schedule. Fifteen comments were
received during the test period and
those comments were addressed in the
NPRM.
On October 25, 2024, the Coast Guard
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking entitled ‘‘Drawbridge
Operation Regulation; Atlantic
Intracoastal Waterway, Beaufort, SC’’ in
the Federal Register (89 FR 85117).
There we stated why we issued the
NPRM, and invited comments on our
proposed regulatory action related to
this regulatory change. During the
comment period that ended December 9,
2024, we received 70 comments, and
those comments are addressed in
section IV of this final rule.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority 33 U.S.C. 499.
Lady’s Island (Woods Memorial)
Bridge across the Atlantic Intracoastal
Waterway (AICW) Beaufort River, mile
536.0, at Beaufort, SC, is a swing bridge
with a 30-foot vertical clearance at mean
high water in the closed position. The
normal operating schedule for the
bridge is found in 33 CFR 117.911(f).
SCDOT requested the Coast Guard
consider changing the operating
schedule for the Lady’s Island (Woods
Memorial) Bridge by removing the
seasonal operating schedule which
would align with other drawbridges
along the AICW in SC. The change
would also extend restrictions during
peak traffic hours to assist with
alleviating vehicle congestion.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes
and the Final Rule
The Coast Guard provided a comment
period of 45 days on the NPRM, and we
received 70 comments. Most of the
comments, approximately 47, were in
favor of the proposed changes. Some of
the commentors in favor of the proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
21413
changes were unaware the swing bridge
is currently regulated to allow for
scheduled openings to assist with
vehicle congestion. Some commenters
alluded that the swing bridge opens on
demand and it should not open on
demand because vehicle traffic is more
important. The Coast Guard has the
responsibility to ensure the reasonable
needs of navigation are maintained
while assisting with competing modes
of transportation. Some comments also
asserted that reducing openings will
benefit the aging swing bridge and help
with operational integrity. Regardless of
the swing bridge’s age, SCDOT is
required by Federal law to maintain the
working machinery in good operating
condition. If the swing bridge is
experiencing frequent operating failures
that result in impacts to navigation,
SCDOT would be subject to enforcement
proceedings. Specific drawbridge
operating schedules are not issued to
relieve the owner or operator of the duty
to properly maintain or operate the
swing span to save wear and tear on the
structure or machinery.
Eight comments proposed alternate
operating schedules that would not
meet the reasonable needs of navigation.
The commenters’ proposed alternate
operating schedules included: no
openings from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m. for
lunch; the restricted openings should
begin at 3 p.m.; no openings for
navigation between 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.;
no openings during school hours, and
no openings on Sundays during church
hours. These proposed alternate
operating schedules do not meet the
reasonable needs of navigation and
could lead to unsafe conditions for
vessels plying these waters.
Additionally, there is a high-level fixed
bridge, McTeer Bridge, approximately
two miles away which provides an
alternate route for vehicle traffic. The
AICW is a Federal Project Waterway
that extends over 1,500 miles from
Boston to Florida Bay. It is the main
waterway artery for all recreational and
commercial traffic that are unable to
safely transit offshore.
Nine comments gave no opinion on
the proposed rule and provided general
comments that were outside the scope
of the proposed rule. One comment was
a duplicate comment.
Five comments were against the
proposed changes. The first comment
opposing the proposed change stated
that with the drawbridge operation
regulation at the Wappoo Creek Bridge,
this action will make the transit difficult
for boats slower than 10 knots and it
will force mariners to transit during the
night or offshore when navigation is
inherently more dangerous. The
E:\FR\FM\20MYR1.SGM
20MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 96 (Tuesday, May 20, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 21410-21413]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-08928]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 300
[TD 10031]
RIN 1545-BR28
Estate Tax Closing Letter User Fee Update
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Interim final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains interim final regulations relating to
the imposition of a user fee on authorized persons requesting the
issuance of IRS Letter 627, also referred to as an estate tax closing
letter. These regulations reduce the amount of the user fee imposed on
a request for the issuance of an estate tax closing letter. The
Independent Offices Appropriations Act of 1952 authorizes the charging
of user fees. The text of the interim final regulations also serves as
the text of the proposed regulations set forth in the notice of
proposed rulemaking on this subject in the Proposed Rules section of
this edition of the Federal Register.
DATES:
Effective date: These regulations are effective on May 20, 2025.
Applicability date: For date of applicability, see Sec. 300.12(d).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning the interim final
regulations, Juli Ro Kim at (202) 317-6859; concerning cost
methodology, Maria E. Arias-Buchanan at (202) 803-9569 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority
This document contains interim final amendments to 26 CFR part 300
regarding user fees for authorized persons who request the issuance of
an estate tax closing letter (IRS Letter 627).
The Independent Offices Appropriations Act of 1952 (IOAA) (31
U.S.C. 9701) authorizes each agency to prescribe regulations that
establish user fees for services provided by the agency. The IOAA
provides that regulations implementing user fees are subject to
policies prescribed by the President; these policies are set forth in
the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-25, 58 FR 38142 (July
15, 1993) (OMB Circular A-25).
The IOAA states that the services provided by an agency should be
self-sustaining to the extent possible. Under OMB Circular A-25,
agencies that provide services that confer special benefits on
identifiable recipients beyond those accruing to the general public
must identify those services, determine whether user fees should be
assessed for those services, and, if so, establish user fees that
recover the full cost of providing those services, unless an exception
to the full cost requirement is granted. As required by the IOAA and
OMB Circular A-25, agencies are to review user fees biennially and
update them as necessary to reflect changes in the cost of providing
the underlying services.
Background and Explanation of Provisions
A. Estate Tax Closing Letter User Fee
On September 28, 2021, the Department of the Treasury (Treasury
Department) and the IRS published final regulations (TD 9957) in the
Federal Register (86 FR 53539) establishing a $67 user fee to apply to
requests for the issuance of an estate tax closing letter, based on a
2019 Cost Model. As explained in the Background section of the preamble
of TD 9957, the issuance of an estate tax closing letter constitutes
the provision of a service and confers special benefits to authorized
persons requesting such letters beyond those accruing to the general
public. Therefore, the IRS is authorized, pursuant to the IOAA and OMB
Circular A-25, to charge a user fee for the issuance of an estate tax
closing letter that reflects the full cost of providing this service.
See also section
[[Page 21411]]
6103(p)(2)(B) (allowing for a reasonable fee for furnishing return
information to any person).
In 2021, the IRS conducted a biennial review of the estate tax
closing letter user fee and issued a new Cost Model that resulted in no
change to the $67 user fee.
In 2023, the IRS conducted a biennial review of the estate tax
closing letter user fee and issued a new Cost Model, which determined
that the full cost of issuing estate tax closing letters to authorized
persons is $56.
B. Calculation of User Fees Generally
The IRS follows generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in
calculating the full cost of providing services. The Federal Accounting
Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) is the body that establishes GAAP that
apply for Federal reporting entities, such as the IRS. FASAB publishes
the FASAB Handbook of Accounting Standards and Other Pronouncements, as
amended, available at https://fasab.gov/accounting-standards/. The
FASAB Handbook includes the Statement of Federal Financial Accounting
Standards 4: Managerial Cost Accounting Standards and Concepts (SFFAS
No. 4) for the Federal government. SFFAS No. 4 establishes internal
costing standards under GAAP to accurately measure and manage the full
cost of Federal programs. The methodology described below is in
accordance with SFFAS No. 4.
1. Cost Center Allocation
The IRS determines the cost of its services and the activities
involved in producing them through a cost accounting system that tracks
costs to organizational units. The lowest organizational unit in the
IRS's cost accounting system is a cost center. Cost centers usually are
separate offices distinguished by subject-matter area of responsibility
or geographic region. All costs of operating a cost center are recorded
in the IRS's cost accounting system and allocated to that cost center.
These costs include the direct costs for the cost center's activities
and all indirect costs, including overhead, associated with that cost
center. Each cost is recorded in only one cost center.
2. Cost Estimation of Direct Labor and Benefits
Not all cost centers are fully devoted to only one service for
which the IRS charges a user fee. When cost centers include multiple
services, the IRS measures the time required to accomplish activities
associated with each service to estimate the average time spent on the
service in the related cost center. The average time devoted is
multiplied by the relevant organizational unit's average labor and
benefits cost per unit of time to determine the direct labor and
benefits cost incurred to provide the service. To determine the full
cost, the IRS then adds an appropriate overhead charge.
3. Calculating Overhead
Overhead is an indirect cost of operating an organization that
cannot be immediately associated with an activity that the organization
performs. Overhead includes costs of resources that are jointly or
commonly consumed by one or more organizational unit's activities but
are not specifically identifiable to a single activity, such as the
following:
General management and administrative services of sustaining
and supporting organizations
Facilities management and ground maintenance services
(security, rent, utilities, and building maintenance)
Procurement and contracting services
Financial management and accounting services
Information technology services
Services to acquire and operate property, plants, and
equipment
Publication, reproduction, and graphics and video services
Research, analytical, and statistical services
Human resources/personnel services
Library and legal services
To calculate the overhead allocable to a service, the IRS
multiplies the current overhead rate by the direct labor and benefits
costs of the service. The overhead rate is the ratio of the IRS's
indirect labor, benefits, and non-labor costs of business divisions
that do not interact with taxpayers to the direct labor and benefits
costs of business divisions that interact with taxpayers. The IRS
calculates the overhead rate annually based on cost elements underlying
the Statement of Net Cost included in the IRS Annual Financial
Statements, which are audited by the Government Accountability Office.
For this estate tax closing letter user fee review, the fiscal year
(FY) 2023 overhead rate, based on FY 2022 costs, of 62.50 percent was
used.
C. Full Cost Determination for the Estate Tax Closing Letter User Fee
The IRS followed the guidance provided by the OMB Circular A-25
guidance to compute the full cost of issuing estate tax closing letters
to authorized persons. OMB Circular A-25 explains that the full cost
includes all indirect and direct costs to any part of the Federal
Government including but not limited to, direct and indirect personnel
costs, physical overhead, rents, utilities, travel, and management
costs.
1. Request Processing Costs
Requests for estate tax closing letters are processed by employees
at grades 5, 8, and 11 of the general schedule (GS-5, GS-8, and GS-11).
Approximately 0.65 staff hours are required to review the return,
create the estate tax closing letters, and prepare the letters for
mailing. The IRS received an average of 8,894 annual requests for
estate tax closing letters in FY 2021 and FY 2022, requiring 5,781
staff hours.
Total hours allocated to the cost also must include indirect hours
for campus employees, which are calculated by multiplying the number of
direct hours by the applicable 60 percent indirect employee rate. Using
this information, IRS determined that the total staff hours for
processing requests for estate tax closing letters are 9,250 annually.
Direct Staff Hours......................................... 5,781
Indirect Hours (60%)....................................... + 3,469
------------
Total Hours.............................................. 9,250
To determine the labor and benefits costs, the IRS divided the
9,250 total hours by 2,080 (the total annual hours worked by a full-
time employee (FTE)) to convert the hours to a 4.45 FTE equivalent. The
processing of requests for estate tax closing letters is performed
primarily (87.7 percent) by employees at the GS-5 level, but also by
employees at the GS-8 level (1.7 percent) and GS-11 level (10.6
percent). The average salary and benefit cost for each of those levels
was multiplied by that grade's percentage of processing time to arrive
at a $67,355 total cost per FTE. Multiplying the cost per FTE by the
4.45 FTE equivalent resulted in a total labor and benefits cost of
$299,730, as follows:
Total Cost Per FTE......................................... $67,355
Total FTE.................................................. x 4.45
------------
Processing Labor & Benefits................................ $299,730
2. Quality Assurance Review Costs
Outgoing estate tax closing letters are reviewed by quality
assurance professionals at the following Internal Revenue (IR) paybands
of the IRS Payband System: IR-10 (87.7 percent) and IR-06 (12.3
percent). Three out of every 100 estate tax closing letters mailed are
reviewed to verify (1) the estate tax closing letter was authorized,
(2) the information included in the letter was accurate, and (3) the
address was correct. The 8,894 average number of
[[Page 21412]]
requests for FY 2021 and FY 2022 resulted in 266 letters reviewed. On
average, quality assurance professionals spend 0.5 hours reviewing one
estate tax closing letter, totaling 133 direct staff hours. The direct
staff hours were multiplied by the 60 percent indirect employee rate
for campus employees, resulting in a combined total of 213 annual staff
hours allocated for quality assurance (QA) reviews, as follows:
Direct Staff Hours......................................... 133
Indirect Hours (60%)....................................... + 80
------------
Total Hours.............................................. 213
QA reviews are processed by employees at various IR levels.
Dividing the total hours by 2,080 (the total annual hours for each
FTE), resulted in 0.10 FTEs. The average salary and benefits for both
IR paybands conducting quality assurance reviews was multiplied by that
IR payband's percentage of processing time to arrive at the $95,460
total cost per FTE. The total cost per FTE was then multiplied by the
total FTE to determine the labor and benefits cost for QA reviews, as
follows:
Total Cost Per FTE......................................... $95,460
Total FTE.................................................. x 0.1
------------
Quality Assurance & Benefits............................... $95.46
3. Full Cost Per Request Calculation
The IRS applied the 62.5 percent overhead rate to the total labor
and benefits cost to calculate the full cost of the estate tax closing
letter program.
Processing Labor & Benefits................................ $299,730
Quality Assurance & Benefits............................... + 9,546
------------
Total Labor and Benefits................................. 309,276
Overhead (62.50%).......................................... + 193,297
------------
Full Cost................................................ $502.573
The $56 cost per request was determined by dividing the full cost
by the average annual volume of requests, as follows:
Full Cost.................................................. $502.573
Estimated Annual Request Volume............................ / 8,894
------------
Cost Per Request........................................... $56
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review
The OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Analysis has
determined that these regulations are not significant and subject to
review under section 6(b) of Executive Order 12866.
II. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it
is hereby certified that these interim final regulations will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. These regulations, which reduce the amount of a fee to obtain
a particular service, affect decedents' estates, which generally are
not small entities as defined under 5 U.S.C. 601(6). Thus, these
regulations have no economic impact on small entities. In addition, the
interim final regulations will establish a $56 fee, which is a
reduction from the previously established fee and is not substantial
enough to have a significant economic impact on any entities that could
be affected by establishing such a fee. Accordingly, the Secretary
certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
III. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits and take certain
other actions before issuing a final rule that includes any Federal
mandate that may result in expenditures in any one year by a State,
local, or Tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for
inflation. This rule does not include any Federal mandate that may
result in expenditures by State, local, or Tribal governments, or by
the private sector in excess of that threshold.
IV. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule either
imposes substantial, direct compliance costs on State and local
governments, and is not required by statute, or preempts State law,
unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of
section 6 of the Executive order. These regulations do not have
federalism implications and do not impose substantial direct compliance
costs on State and local governments or preempt State law within the
meaning of the Executive order.
V. Good Cause
The user fee for the estate tax closing letter applies to all
individuals who make a request and pay for the estate tax closing
letter on https://www.pay.gov. It would be unnecessary and contrary to
the public interest for the IRS to continue to charge the current,
higher user fee during the period provided for public comment on the
proposal to reduce that fee. To enable the reduced fee amount to be in
effect immediately for authorized persons requesting an estate tax
closing letter, the Treasury Department and the IRS find that there is
good cause to dispense with (1) notice and public comment pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(b) and (c) and (2) a delayed effective date pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(d). The Treasury Department and the IRS will consider public
comments submitted in response to the cross-referenced notice of
proposed rulemaking published in the Proposed Rules section of this
issue of the Federal Register and will promulgate a final rule after
considering those comments.
VI. Submission to Small Business Administration
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, this
regulation has been submitted to the Chief Counsel for the Office of
Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on its impact
on small business.
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs designated this rule
as not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Drafting Information
The principal author of these regulations is Juli Ro Kim of the
Office of the Associate Chief Counsel (Passthroughs, Trusts, and
Estates). Other personnel from the Treasury Department and the IRS
participated in the development of the regulations.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 300
Estate taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 300 is amended as follows:
PART 300--USER FEES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 300 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 31 U.S.C. 9701.
0
Par. 2. Section 300.12 is amended by revising paragraphs (b) and (d) to
read as follows:
Sec. 300.12 Fee for estate tax closing letter.
* * * * *
(b) Fee. The fee for issuing an estate tax closing letter is $56.
* * * * *
[[Page 21413]]
(d) Applicability date. This section applies to requests received
by the IRS after May 20, 2025.
Edward Killen,
Acting Chief Tax Compliance Officer.
Approved: May 5, 2025.
Kevin M. Salinger,
Acting Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2025-08928 Filed 5-16-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P