Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the MIAX Pearl Equities Fee Schedule To Adopt Fees for the U.S. Equity Short Volume & Trade Report, 21088-21092 [2025-08696]
Download as PDF
21088
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 94 / Friday, May 16, 2025 / Notices
Lucy C. Trout,
Acting Secretary of the Board of Governors.
[FR Doc. 2025–08709 Filed 5–15–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
35582; File No. 812–15562]
MSD Investment Corp., et al.
May 12, 2025.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘SEC’’).
ACTION: Notice.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
AGENCY:
Notice of application for an order
under sections 17(d) and 57(i) of the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (the
‘‘Act’’) and rule 17d–1 under the Act to
permit certain joint transactions
otherwise prohibited by sections 17(d)
and 57(a)(4) of the Act and rule 17d–1
under the Act.
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants
request an order to permit certain
business development companies
(‘‘BDCs’’) and closed-end management
investment companies to co-invest in
portfolio companies with each other and
with certain affiliated investment
entities.
APPLICANTS: MSD Investment Corp.,
MSD Partners, L.P., BDT Capital
Partners, LLC, BDTCP Investments
2022, LLC, Arcus Parent, LLC, Arcus
Holdings, Inc., Investors Life Insurance
Company of North America, MSD BDC
SPV I, LLC, MSD BDC SPV II, LLC, and
MSD BDC CLO I, LLC, and certain of
their affiliated entities as described in
Schedule A to the application.
FILING DATES: The application was filed
on April 11, 2024, and amended on
August 13, 2024, November 25, 2024,
March 26, 2025 and April 29, 2025.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An
order granting the requested relief will
be issued unless the Commission orders
a hearing. Interested persons may
request a hearing on any application by
emailing the SEC’s Secretary at
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov and serving
the Applicants with a copy of the
request by email, if an email address is
listed for the relevant Applicant below,
or personally or by mail, if a physical
address is listed for the relevant
Applicant below. Hearing requests
should be received by the Commission
by 5:30 p.m. on June 6, 2025, and
should be accompanied by proof of
service on the Applicants, in the form
of an affidavit or, for lawyers, a
certificate of service. Pursuant to rule 0–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 May 15, 2025
Jkt 265001
5 under the Act, hearing requests should
state the nature of the writer’s interest,
any facts bearing upon the desirability
of a hearing on the matter, the reason for
the request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a
hearing may request notification by
emailing the Commission’s Secretary at
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov.
ADDRESSES: The Commission:
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov. Applicants:
Robert Simonds, MSD Partners, L.P.,
550 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor, New
York, NY 10022, bsimonds@
bdtmsd.com; Anne G. Oberndorf,
Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP, 700
Sixth Street NW, Suite 700, Washington,
DC 20001, anneoberndorf@evershedssutherland.com.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adam Large, Senior Special Counsel,
Deepak T. Pai, Senior Counsel, or
Daniele Marchesani, Assistant Chief
Counsel, at (202) 551–6825 (Division of
Investment Management, Chief
Counsel’s Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: For
Applicants’ representations, legal
analysis, and conditions, please refer to
Applicants’ fourth amended
application, filed April 29, 2025, which
may be obtained via the Commission’s
website by searching for the file number
at the top of this document, or for an
Applicant using the Company name
search field, on the SEC’s EDGAR
system. The SEC’s EDGAR system may
be searched at https://www.sec.gov/
edgar/searchedgar/company
search.html. You may also call the
SEC’s Office of Investor Education and
Advocacy at (202) 551–8090.
For the Commission, by the Division
of Investment Management, under
delegated authority.
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that
on April 30, 2025, MIAX PEARL, LLC
(‘‘MIAX Pearl’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) a
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
fee schedule (the ‘‘Fee Schedule’’)
applicable to the Exchange’s equities
trading platform (‘‘MIAX Pearl
Equities’’ 3) to adopt monthly fees
assessed to users that elect to subscribe
to the U.S. Equity Short Volume &
Trades Report.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/
us-options/pearl-options/rule-filings at
MIAX Pearl’s principal office, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
1. Purpose
[FR Doc. 2025–08718 Filed 5–15–25; 8:45 am]
[Release No. 34–103025; File No. SR–
PEARL–2025–20]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX
PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the MIAX Pearl
Equities Fee Schedule To Adopt Fees
for the U.S. Equity Short Volume &
Trade Report
May 12, 2025.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Fee Schedule to adopt monthly fees
assessed to users that elect to subscribe
to the U.S. Equity Short Volume &
Trades Report.
The Exchange recently adopted a new
data product known as the U.S. Equity
Short Volume & Trades Report (the
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 All references to the ‘‘Exchange’’ in this filing
refer to MIAX Pearl Options. Any references to the
equities trading facility of MIAX PEARL, LLC will
specifically be referred to as ‘‘MIAX Pearl Equities.’’
2 17
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 94 / Friday, May 16, 2025 / Notices
‘‘Report’’).4 The Report, which will be
available for subscription beginning
May 1, 2025, includes (i) an end-of-day
report that provides certain equity
trading activity on the Exchange,
including trade date, total trade volume,
sell short trade volume, and sell short
exempt trade volume, by symbol; and
(ii) an end-of-month report that provides
a record of all short sale transactions for
the month, including trade date and
time (in nanoseconds), trade size, trade
price, and type of short sale execution,
by symbol and exchange.5 In addition to
a monthly or annual subscription,
Equity Members 6 and non-Members
may purchase the Report on a historical
monthly basis, which provides the endof-day reports for each day and the
corresponding end-of-month report for a
given calendar month.
The Exchange proposes to amend the
heading of Section 4) of the Fee
Schedule to now be ‘‘Reports’’. The
Exchange proposes to adopt subsection
4)a) to establish fees for the Report.
Specifically, the Exchange proposes to
adopt fees applicable to users that
subscribe to the Report. As proposed,
the Exchange would assess a monthly
fee of $650 per month to an Internal
Distributor 7 of the Report, and a fee of
$900 per month to an External
Distributor 8 of the Report. External
Distributors, unlike Internal
Distributors, are typically compensated
for the distribution of short sale data
through subscription fees or other
mechanisms. Some External Distributors
incorporate short sale data into their
own proprietary products, which they
sell to downstream users. These
distributors may not charge separately
for data included in the Report, but
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
4 See
Exchange Rule 2625(b)(1)(i); see also
Securities and Exchange Act No. 102918 (April 23,
2025), 90 FR 17860 (April 29, 2025) (SR–PEARL–
2025–17) (Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX
PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Exchange Rule 2625 To Introduce a New Data
Product Known as the U.S. Equity Short Volume &
Trades Report).
5 See Exchange Rule 2625(b)(1)(i).
6 The term ‘‘Equity Member’’ is a Member
authorized by the Exchange to transact business on
MIAX Pearl Equities. See Exchange Rule 1901.
7 The term ‘‘Distributor’’ is any entity that
receives the Exchange data product directly from
the Exchange or indirectly through another entity
and then distributes it internally or externally to a
third party. The term ‘‘Internal Distributor’’ is a
Distributor that receives the Exchange data product
and then distributes that data to one or more Users
within the Distributor’s own entity. See Fee
Schedule, Section 3) Market Data Fees, Market Data
Definitions.
8 The term ‘‘External Distributor’’ is a Distributor
that receives the Exchange data product and then
distributes that data to a third party or one or more
Users outside the Distributor’s own entity. See Fee
Schedule, Section 3) Market Data Fees, Market Data
Definitions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 May 15, 2025
Jkt 265001
nevertheless gain value from the data by
incorporating it into their product. The
higher price for External Distributors
reflects the additional value these
distributors gain from the product. The
Exchange also proposes to add a
footnote ‘‘a’’ to provide that the Report
is available for purchase on a monthly
basis or on an annual basis and a
subscriber to the Report will receive
access to the end-of-day report
beginning on the date of subscription
and will receive the end-of-month
report for the subscription month on the
last business day of the month during
which the user subscribed. In addition,
the Exchange proposes to add a footnote
‘‘b’’ to specify that new monthly and
annual subscribers will be charged for
the full calendar month for which they
subscribe and will be provided end-ofday report data for each trading day of
the calendar month prior to the day on
which they subscribed. The purpose of
the proposed changes is to establish fees
for the Report and provide clarity to
Equity Members and non-Members as to
when subscribers will receive the endof-day report and end-of-month report
respectively and what reports the
subscribers will receive when they
subscribe the Reports in the middle of
a calendar month.
In addition, the Exchange proposes to
adopt fees for the Report provided on a
historical basis. The Report will be
available for each calendar month
dating back to September 2020, and
users of such data will be assessed a fee
of $450 per historical monthly Report
for which they subscribe. The Exchange
proposes to add a footnote ‘‘c’’ to
provide that the Report provided on a
historical basis is only for display use
redistribution; users who subscribe on
an annual basis will receive 12 months
of historical data included at no extra
charge; in addition, users who subscribe
on a monthly basis would have the
option of purchasing historical data on
a per month basis. Data provided via the
historical Report is only for display use
redistribution (e.g., the data may be
provided on the User’s platform).
Therefore, users of the historical data
may not charge separately for data
included in the Report or incorporate
such data into their product.
Nonetheless, the Exchange believes it is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to charge a fee for
display use redistribution that reflects
the value these distributors gain from
the historical product.
The Exchange anticipates that a wide
variety of market participants will
purchase the Report, including, but not
limited to, active equity trading firms
and academic institutions. For example,
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21089
the Exchange notes that academic
institutions may utilize the Report data
and as a result promote research and
studies of the equities industry to the
benefit of all market participants. The
Exchange further believes the Report
may provide helpful trading information
regarding investor sentiment that may
allow market participants to make more
informed trading decisions and may be
used to create and test trading models
and analytical strategies and provide
comprehensive insight into trading on
the Exchange.
The Exchange further notes that the
Report is a completely voluntary
product, in that the Exchange is not
required by any rule or regulation to
make the reports or services available
and that potential subscribers may
purchase it only if they voluntarily
choose to do so. Further, the Exchange
notes that other exchanges offer similar
products for a higher or comparable fee,
including for monthly, annual and
historical subscribers.9
Additionally, the Exchange proposes
to make conforming changes to the
hierarchical headings in the Fee
Schedule. Specifically, current Sections
4)–6) will be renumbered as Sections
5)–7). The purpose of the proposed
changes is to provide consistency and
clarity in the Fee Schedule regarding
available market data products and
reports.
Implementation
The proposed fee changes will be
effective beginning May 1, 2025.
9 See Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BZX Equities’’)
U.S. Equity Short Volume & Trades Report,
available at https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/
membership/fee_schedule/bzx/?_gl=1*1pl6apd*_
up*MQ..*_ga*MTY1NTIwODQyLjE3NDQ2NT
AwNjk.*_ga_5Q99WB9X71*MTc0NDY
1MDA2Ny4xLjEuMTc0NDY1MDA3NC4wLjAuMA
(last visited April 23, 2025); see also Cboe BYX
Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BYX Equities’’) U.S. Equity Short
Volume & Trades Report, available at https://
www.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/fee_
schedule/byx/?_gl=1*l056iz*_up*MQ..*_
ga*MTY1NTIwODQyLjE3NDQ2NTAwNjk.*_ga_
5Q99WB9X71*MTc0NDY1MDA2Ny4x
LjEuMTc0NDY1MDEwMS4wLjAuMA (last visited
April 23, 2025); see also Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘EDGA Equities’’) U.S. Equity Short Volume &
Trades Report, available at https://www.cboe.com/
us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/edga/?_
gl=1*g9lsei*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTY1NTIwODQy
LjE3NDQ2NTAwNjk.*_ga_5Q99WB9X71
*MTc0NDY1MDA2Ny4xLjEuMTc0NDY
1MDI4OC4wLjAuMA (last visited April 23, 2025);
see also Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGX
Equities’’) U.S. Equity Short Volume & Trades
Report, available at https://www.cboe.com/us/
equities/membership/fee_schedule/edgx/?_
gl=1*8aj13d*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTY1NTI
wODQyLjE3NDQ2NTAwNjk.*_ga_5Q99WB9X71
*MTc0NDY1MDA2Ny4xLjEuMTc0NDY
1MDQyMi4wLjAuMA (last visited April 23, 2025).
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
21090
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 94 / Friday, May 16, 2025 / Notices
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act
and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.10 Specifically,
the Exchange believes that its proposal
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4)
of the Act 11 in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among members and issuers and other
persons using any facility. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change furthers the objectives of Section
6(b)(5) of the Act,12 in particular, in that
it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices,
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and protect investors and the
public interest, and is not designed to
permit unfair discrimination among
customers, brokers, or dealers.
In adopting Regulation NMS, the
Commission granted self-regulatory
organizations (‘‘SROs’’) and brokerdealers increased authority and
flexibility to offer new and unique
market data to the public. It was
believed that this authority would
expand the amount of data available to
consumers, and also spur innovation
and competition for the provision of
market data. The Exchange believes that
the Report further broadens the
availability of U.S. equity market data to
investors consistent with the principles
of Regulation NMS. The Report also
promotes increased transparency
through the dissemination of short
volume data. The Report benefits
investors by providing access to the
Report, which may promote better
informed trading, as well as research
and studies of the equities industry.
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive environment. Indeed, there
are currently 16 registered equities
exchanges that trade equities. Based on
publicly available information, no single
equities exchange has more than
approximately 15% of the equity market
share.13 The Commission has repeatedly
expressed its preference for competition
over regulatory intervention in
determining prices, products, and
services in the securities markets.
10 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
13 See the ‘‘Market Share’’ section of the
Exchange’s website, available at https://
www.miaxglobal.com/company/data/market-share
(last visited April 23, 2025).
11 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 May 15, 2025
Jkt 265001
Particularly, in Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance
of market forces in determining prices
and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market
system ‘‘has been remarkably successful
in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 14
Making similar data products available
to market participants fosters
competition in the marketplace, and
constrains the ability of exchanges to
charge supercompetitive fees. In the
event that a market participant views
one exchange’s data product as more
attractive than the competition, that
market participant can, and often does,
switch between similar products. The
proposed fees are a result of the
competitive environment of the U.S.
equities industry as the Exchange seeks
to adopt fees to attract purchasers of the
recently introduced Report.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed fees for the Report are
consistent with the Act in that they are
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory. In particular, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
fees are reasonable because they are
reasonably aligned with the value and
benefits provided to users that choose to
subscribe to the Report on the Exchange.
As discussed above, the Report may be
beneficial to Equity Members and nonMembers as it may provide helpful
trading information regarding investor
sentiment that may allow market
participants to make more informed
trading decisions and may be used to
create and test trading models and
analytical strategies and provide
comprehensive insight into trading on
the Exchange. Therefore, the Exchange
believes that it is reasonable to assess
modest fees to users that subscribe to
the Report.
The Exchange further believes the
proposed fees are reasonable because
the proposed amounts are lower than or
comparable to the analogous fees
charged by other exchanges for similar
data products. For example, BZX
Equities and its affiliated equity markets
(the ‘‘Cboe Group’’) charge $750 per
month to Internal Distributors and
$1,250 per month to External
Distributors of the U.S. Equity Short
Volume & Trades Report, and a back
history fee of $500 per data content
month.15 The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq’’) charges $783 per month to
Internal Distributors and $1,300 per
14 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005)
(‘‘Regulation NMS Adopting Release’’).
15 See supra note 9.
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
month to External Distributors of the
Nasdaq Short Sale Volume Reports
provided on both a daily and historical
monthly basis.16 Additionally, the New
York Stock Exchange LLC (‘‘NYSE’’) and
its affiliated equity markets (the ‘‘NYSE
Group’’) also charge for the TAQ NYSE
Group Short Sales (Monthly File) and
TAQ NYSE Group Short Volume (Daily
File). Specifically, NYSE Group charges
an access fee of $1,000 per month for an
ongoing subscription that includes 12
months of back history, then additional
back history charged at $500 per data
content month. NYSE Group also
charges a back history fee, of $1,000 per
data content month for the first 12
months of history, then additional back
history charged at $500 per data content
month.17 The Exchange therefore
believes that the proposed fees are
reasonable and set at a level to compete
with other equity exchanges that offer
similar reports. Indeed, proposing fees
that are excessively higher than
established fees for similar data
products would simply serve to reduce
demand for the Exchange’s data
product, which as noted, is entirely
optional. Although each of these similar
data products provide only proprietary
trade data and not trade data from other
exchanges, it is possible investors are
still able to gauge overall investor
sentiment across different equities based
on the included data points on any one
exchange. As such, if a market
participant views another exchange’s
potential report as more attractive, then
such market participant can merely
choose not to purchase the Exchange’s
Report and instead purchase another
exchange’s similar data product, which
offers similar data points, albeit based
on that other market’s trading activity.
In addition, the Exchange believes
that the proposed fees are equitable and
not unfairly discriminatory because they
will apply equally to all Equity
Members and non-Members that choose
to subscribe to the Report. As stated, the
Report is completely optional and not
necessary for trading. Rather, the
Exchange voluntarily makes the Report
available, and users may choose to
subscribe to (and pay for) the report
based on their own individual business
needs. Potential subscribers may
subscribe to the Report at any time if
16 See Nasdaq Short Sale Volume Reports,
available at https://data.nasdaq.com/pricelist?category=U.S.+Equities&subcategory=
Nasdaq+Short+Sale+Volume+Reports (last visited
April 23, 2025).
17 See ‘‘NYSE Group Summary Data Products’’
portion of the NYSE Historical Proprietary Market
Data Pricing, available at https://www.nyse.com/
publicdocs/nyse/data/NYSE_Historical_Market_
Data_Pricing.pdf (last visited April 23, 2025).
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 94 / Friday, May 16, 2025 / Notices
they believe it to be valuable or may
decline to purchase it.
The Exchange also believes it is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to charge an External
Distributor of the Report a higher fee
than an Internal Distributor as an
External Distributor will ordinarily
charge a fee to its downstream
customers for this service, and, even if
the vendor is not charging a specific fee
for this particular service, the Exchange
expects products from the Report to be
part of a suite of offerings from
distributors that generally promote
sales. External distribution is also
fundamentally different than internal
use, in that the former generates revenue
from external sales while the latter does
not. Therefore, the Exchange believes it
is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to charge a higher fee for
a product that generates downstream
revenue. Further, the proposed fee will
apply equally to Internal and External
Distributors, respectively, that choose to
distribute data from the Report.
Moreover, as described above, other
exchanges similarly charge External
Distributors higher fees as compared to
Internal Distributors for similar data
products.18
The Exchange believes that the
proposed changes to the headings in the
Fee Schedule will promote just and
equitable principles of trade and remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system because
the proposed rule changes will provide
greater clarity to Equity Members and
the public regarding available market
data products and reports offered by the
Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed changes will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Intramarket Competition
The Exchange believes its proposal
will not impose any burden on
intramarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act because the
Report will be available equally to all
Equity Members and non-Members that
choose to subscribe to the report. As
stated, the Report is optional and Equity
Members and non-Members may choose
to subscribe to such report, or not, based
on their view of the additional benefits
18 See
supra notes 9 and 16.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:41 May 15, 2025
Jkt 265001
and added value provided by utilizing
the Report.
Intermarket Competition
The Exchange believes its proposal
will not impose any burden on
intermarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. As
previously discussed, similar products
offered by Nasdaq, the Cboe Group, and
the NYSE Group are priced higher than
or comparable to the Report. Moreover,
the Commission has repeatedly
expressed its preference for competition
over regulatory intervention in
determining prices, products, and
services in the securities markets.
Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance
of market forces in determining prices
and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market
system ‘‘has been remarkably successful
in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ The
fact that this market is competitive has
also long been recognized by the courts.
In NetCoalition v. Securities and
Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit
stated as follows: ‘‘[n]o one disputes
that competition for order flow is
‘fierce.’ . . . As the SEC explained, ‘[i]n
the U.S. national market system, buyers
and sellers of securities, and the brokerdealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution’;
[and] ‘no exchange can afford to take its
market share percentages for granted’
because ‘no exchange possesses a
monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in
the execution of order flow from broker
dealers’. . . .’’. Accordingly, the
Exchange does not believe its proposal
imposes any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed changes to the headings in
the Fee Schedule will impose any
burden on competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed changes
will not impose any burden on intramarket because the rules of the
Exchange apply to all Equity Members
equally. The proposed rule changes to
the headings in the Fee Schedule will
have no impact on inter-market
competition as they are not designed to
address any competitive issue but rather
are designed to provide added clarity to
the Fee Schedule.
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
21091
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,19 and Rule
19b–4(f)(2) 20 thereunder. At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include file number SR–
PEARL–2025–20 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to file
number SR–PEARL–2025–20. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
19 15
20 17
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
16MYN1
21092
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 94 / Friday, May 16, 2025 / Notices
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also
will be available for inspection and
copying at the principal office of the
Exchange. Do not include personal
identifiable information in submissions;
you should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly. We may redact in part or
withhold entirely from publication
submitted material that is obscene or
subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number
SR–PEARL–2025–20 and should be
submitted on or before June 6, 2025.
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Terms of Substance of the Proposed
Rule Change
The proposed rule change consists of
modifications to FICC’s Government
Securities Division (‘‘GSD’’) Rulebook
(‘‘GSD Rules’’ and ‘‘Rules’’) in order to
permit Inter-Dealer Broker Netting
Members who maintain both Dealer
Account(s) and Broker Account(s) at
FICC to use the same Deposit ID when
making the Required Fund Deposit
Portions for those Accounts.5
II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
In its filing with the Commission, the
clearing agency included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
clearing agency has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
(A) Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Proposed Rule Change
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.21
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025–08696 Filed 5–15–25; 8:45 am]
1. Purpose
[Release No. 34–103023; File No. SR–FICC–
2025–013]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Fixed
Income Clearing Corporation; Notice of
Filing of Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Permit InterDealer Broker Netting Members To Use
the Same Deposit ID
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
May 12, 2025.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on April 30,
2025, Fixed Income Clearing
Corporation (‘‘FICC’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II and III
below, which Items have been prepared
by the clearing agency. FICC filed the
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 3 and Rule
19b–4(f)(4) thereunder.4 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
21 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(4).
17:41 May 15, 2025
Background
The GSD Rules include provisions
that operate to separately record and
5 Capitalized terms not defined herein are defined
in the GSD Rules, as applicable, available at
www.dtcc.com/legal/rules-and-procedures.
6 See Rule 2B (Accounts) and Rule 4 (Clearing
Fund and Loss Allocation), id.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
FICC is proposing to amend the GSD
Rules to permit Inter-Dealer Broker
Netting Members to use the same
Deposit ID when making the Required
Fund Deposit Portions for its Broker
Account(s) and Dealer Account(s),
which are both Proprietary Accounts.
The proposed rule change would not
affect the requirements that (i) Brokered
Transactions be recorded in Broker
Accounts, separate from other
Proprietary Transactions that are
recorded in Dealer Accounts, pursuant
to Rule 2B; and (ii) margin for Brokered
Transactions that are recorded in Broker
Accounts be calculated separately,
through separate Margin Portfolios, from
other Proprietary Transactions recorded
in Dealer Accounts and from activity of
indirect participants recorded in
Indirect Participants Accounts, pursuant
to Rule 4.6
Jkt 265001
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
margin different types of activity. These
provisions are primarily designed to
ensure margin for Proprietary
Transactions is calculated, collected and
held separately and independently of
margin for indirect participant
transactions, in compliance with the
requirements of Rule 17ad–22(e)(6)(i)
under the Act.7 The provisions in the
GSD Rules that accomplish this separate
margining include requirements that (i)
Proprietary Transactions and Indirect
Participant Transactions be recorded in
different Types of Accounts pursuant to
Rule 2B; (ii) each Margin Portfolio
established by Netting Members shall
not contain more than one Type of
Account, pursuant to Section 1b(a) of
Rule 4; (iii) FICC calculates each
Member’s Required Fund Deposit to the
Clearing Fund with reference to the
Margin Portfolios established by that
Member, pursuant to Section 1b(b) of
Rule 4; and (iv) each Member’s Required
Fund Deposit consists of separate
Required Fund Deposit Portions, each of
which are calculated with respect to a
separate Margin Portfolio, pursuant to
Section 2(a) of Rule 4.8
In addition, to ensure separate
collection and holding of margin
deposited for Proprietary Transactions
and indirect participant transactions,
Section 2a(a) of Rule 4 requires that a
Netting Member identify the different
Account types for which a deposit is
made on its wire instructions.
Specifically, this Rule provides that
each Required Fund Deposit Portion be
made to FICC through a separate
Deposit ID established by the Netting
Member.9
The GSD Rules also require that
brokered activity be recorded separately
from other Proprietary Transactions.
Specifically, Brokered Transactions can
only be submitted to FICC by Netting
Members that have qualified to be InterDealer Broker Netting Members and
must be recorded in Broker Accounts,
separately from other Proprietary
Transactions that are recorded in Dealer
Accounts. Inter-Dealer Broker Netting
Members receive favorable treatment
under the loss allocation provisions
with respect to their brokered activity.10
7 17
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(6)(i).
Rule 2B (Accounts) and Rule 4 (Clearing
Fund and Loss Allocation), supra note 5.
9 See Rule 1 (Definitions), where ‘‘Deposit ID’’ is
defined as ‘‘an operational mechanism used by
[FICC] to identify the Account for which a deposit
is being made with [FICC] pursuant to Rule 4 and
to facilitate the separate holding of such deposits
on [FICC]’s books and records.’’ Id.
10 See Rule 4 (Clearing Fund and Loss Allocation)
(providing that Inter-Dealer Broker Netting
Members are subject to a cap on the application of
FICC’s loss allocation procedure of no greater than
$5 million if they meet a set of conditions), id.
8 See
E:\FR\FM\16MYN1.SGM
16MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 94 (Friday, May 16, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21088-21092]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-08696]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-103025; File No. SR-PEARL-2025-20]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the MIAX
Pearl Equities Fee Schedule To Adopt Fees for the U.S. Equity Short
Volume & Trade Report
May 12, 2025.
Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice
is hereby given that on April 30, 2025, MIAX PEARL, LLC (``MIAX Pearl''
or ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(``Commission'') a proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the fee schedule (the ``Fee
Schedule'') applicable to the Exchange's equities trading platform
(``MIAX Pearl Equities'' \3\) to adopt monthly fees assessed to users
that elect to subscribe to the U.S. Equity Short Volume & Trades
Report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ All references to the ``Exchange'' in this filing refer to
MIAX Pearl Options. Any references to the equities trading facility
of MIAX PEARL, LLC will specifically be referred to as ``MIAX Pearl
Equities.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://www.miaxglobal.com/markets/us-options/pearl-options/rule-filings at MIAX Pearl's principal office, and at the Commission's
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule to adopt monthly
fees assessed to users that elect to subscribe to the U.S. Equity Short
Volume & Trades Report.
The Exchange recently adopted a new data product known as the U.S.
Equity Short Volume & Trades Report (the
[[Page 21089]]
``Report'').\4\ The Report, which will be available for subscription
beginning May 1, 2025, includes (i) an end-of-day report that provides
certain equity trading activity on the Exchange, including trade date,
total trade volume, sell short trade volume, and sell short exempt
trade volume, by symbol; and (ii) an end-of-month report that provides
a record of all short sale transactions for the month, including trade
date and time (in nanoseconds), trade size, trade price, and type of
short sale execution, by symbol and exchange.\5\ In addition to a
monthly or annual subscription, Equity Members \6\ and non-Members may
purchase the Report on a historical monthly basis, which provides the
end-of-day reports for each day and the corresponding end-of-month
report for a given calendar month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Exchange Rule 2625(b)(1)(i); see also Securities and
Exchange Act No. 102918 (April 23, 2025), 90 FR 17860 (April 29,
2025) (SR-PEARL-2025-17) (Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL,
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend Exchange Rule 2625 To Introduce a New Data Product
Known as the U.S. Equity Short Volume & Trades Report).
\5\ See Exchange Rule 2625(b)(1)(i).
\6\ The term ``Equity Member'' is a Member authorized by the
Exchange to transact business on MIAX Pearl Equities. See Exchange
Rule 1901.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange proposes to amend the heading of Section 4) of the Fee
Schedule to now be ``Reports''. The Exchange proposes to adopt
subsection 4)a) to establish fees for the Report. Specifically, the
Exchange proposes to adopt fees applicable to users that subscribe to
the Report. As proposed, the Exchange would assess a monthly fee of
$650 per month to an Internal Distributor \7\ of the Report, and a fee
of $900 per month to an External Distributor \8\ of the Report.
External Distributors, unlike Internal Distributors, are typically
compensated for the distribution of short sale data through
subscription fees or other mechanisms. Some External Distributors
incorporate short sale data into their own proprietary products, which
they sell to downstream users. These distributors may not charge
separately for data included in the Report, but nevertheless gain value
from the data by incorporating it into their product. The higher price
for External Distributors reflects the additional value these
distributors gain from the product. The Exchange also proposes to add a
footnote ``a'' to provide that the Report is available for purchase on
a monthly basis or on an annual basis and a subscriber to the Report
will receive access to the end-of-day report beginning on the date of
subscription and will receive the end-of-month report for the
subscription month on the last business day of the month during which
the user subscribed. In addition, the Exchange proposes to add a
footnote ``b'' to specify that new monthly and annual subscribers will
be charged for the full calendar month for which they subscribe and
will be provided end-of-day report data for each trading day of the
calendar month prior to the day on which they subscribed. The purpose
of the proposed changes is to establish fees for the Report and provide
clarity to Equity Members and non-Members as to when subscribers will
receive the end-of-day report and end-of-month report respectively and
what reports the subscribers will receive when they subscribe the
Reports in the middle of a calendar month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The term ``Distributor'' is any entity that receives the
Exchange data product directly from the Exchange or indirectly
through another entity and then distributes it internally or
externally to a third party. The term ``Internal Distributor'' is a
Distributor that receives the Exchange data product and then
distributes that data to one or more Users within the Distributor's
own entity. See Fee Schedule, Section 3) Market Data Fees, Market
Data Definitions.
\8\ The term ``External Distributor'' is a Distributor that
receives the Exchange data product and then distributes that data to
a third party or one or more Users outside the Distributor's own
entity. See Fee Schedule, Section 3) Market Data Fees, Market Data
Definitions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Exchange proposes to adopt fees for the Report
provided on a historical basis. The Report will be available for each
calendar month dating back to September 2020, and users of such data
will be assessed a fee of $450 per historical monthly Report for which
they subscribe. The Exchange proposes to add a footnote ``c'' to
provide that the Report provided on a historical basis is only for
display use redistribution; users who subscribe on an annual basis will
receive 12 months of historical data included at no extra charge; in
addition, users who subscribe on a monthly basis would have the option
of purchasing historical data on a per month basis. Data provided via
the historical Report is only for display use redistribution (e.g., the
data may be provided on the User's platform). Therefore, users of the
historical data may not charge separately for data included in the
Report or incorporate such data into their product. Nonetheless, the
Exchange believes it is reasonable, equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to charge a fee for display use redistribution that
reflects the value these distributors gain from the historical product.
The Exchange anticipates that a wide variety of market participants
will purchase the Report, including, but not limited to, active equity
trading firms and academic institutions. For example, the Exchange
notes that academic institutions may utilize the Report data and as a
result promote research and studies of the equities industry to the
benefit of all market participants. The Exchange further believes the
Report may provide helpful trading information regarding investor
sentiment that may allow market participants to make more informed
trading decisions and may be used to create and test trading models and
analytical strategies and provide comprehensive insight into trading on
the Exchange.
The Exchange further notes that the Report is a completely
voluntary product, in that the Exchange is not required by any rule or
regulation to make the reports or services available and that potential
subscribers may purchase it only if they voluntarily choose to do so.
Further, the Exchange notes that other exchanges offer similar products
for a higher or comparable fee, including for monthly, annual and
historical subscribers.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (``BZX Equities'') U.S. Equity
Short Volume & Trades Report, available at https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/bzx/?_gl=1*1pl6apd*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTY1NTIwODQyLjE3NDQ2NTAwNjk.*_ga_5Q99WB9X71*MTc0NDY1MDA2Ny4xLjEuMTc0NDY1MDA3NC4wLjAuMA (last visited April
23, 2025); see also Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (``BYX Equities'') U.S.
Equity Short Volume & Trades Report, available at https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/byx/?_gl=1*l056iz*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTY1NTIwODQyLjE3NDQ2NTAwNjk.*_ga_5Q99WB9X71*MTc0NDY1MDA2Ny4xLjEuMTc0NDY1MDEwMS4wLjAuMA (last visited April 23,
2025); see also Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (``EDGA Equities'') U.S.
Equity Short Volume & Trades Report, available at https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/edga/?_gl=1*g9lsei*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTY1NTIwODQyLjE3NDQ2NTAwNjk.*_ga_5Q99WB9X71*MTc0NDY1MDA2Ny4xLjEuMTc0NDY1MDI4OC4wLjAuMA (last visited April 23,
2025); see also Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (``EDGX Equities'') U.S.
Equity Short Volume & Trades Report, available at https://www.cboe.com/us/equities/membership/fee_schedule/edgx/?_gl=1*8aj13d*_up*MQ..*_ga*MTY1NTIwODQyLjE3NDQ2NTAwNjk.*_ga_5Q99WB9X71*MTc0NDY1MDA2Ny4xLjEuMTc0NDY1MDQyMi4wLjAuMA (last visited April 23,
2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additionally, the Exchange proposes to make conforming changes to
the hierarchical headings in the Fee Schedule. Specifically, current
Sections 4)-6) will be renumbered as Sections 5)-7). The purpose of the
proposed changes is to provide consistency and clarity in the Fee
Schedule regarding available market data products and reports.
Implementation
The proposed fee changes will be effective beginning May 1, 2025.
[[Page 21090]]
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\10\ Specifically, the Exchange believes that its proposal furthers
the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act \11\ in particular, in
that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees
and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any
facility. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\12\ in
particular, in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, promote just and equitable principles
of trade, remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market system, and protect investors and the
public interest, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination
among customers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In adopting Regulation NMS, the Commission granted self-regulatory
organizations (``SROs'') and broker-dealers increased authority and
flexibility to offer new and unique market data to the public. It was
believed that this authority would expand the amount of data available
to consumers, and also spur innovation and competition for the
provision of market data. The Exchange believes that the Report further
broadens the availability of U.S. equity market data to investors
consistent with the principles of Regulation NMS. The Report also
promotes increased transparency through the dissemination of short
volume data. The Report benefits investors by providing access to the
Report, which may promote better informed trading, as well as research
and studies of the equities industry.
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive environment. Indeed,
there are currently 16 registered equities exchanges that trade
equities. Based on publicly available information, no single equities
exchange has more than approximately 15% of the equity market
share.\13\ The Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for
competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities markets. Particularly, in
Regulation NMS, the Commission highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably
successful in promoting market competition in its broader forms that
are most important to investors and listed companies.'' \14\ Making
similar data products available to market participants fosters
competition in the marketplace, and constrains the ability of exchanges
to charge supercompetitive fees. In the event that a market participant
views one exchange's data product as more attractive than the
competition, that market participant can, and often does, switch
between similar products. The proposed fees are a result of the
competitive environment of the U.S. equities industry as the Exchange
seeks to adopt fees to attract purchasers of the recently introduced
Report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See the ``Market Share'' section of the Exchange's website,
available at https://www.miaxglobal.com/company/data/market-share
(last visited April 23, 2025).
\14\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed fees for the Report are
consistent with the Act in that they are reasonable, equitable, and not
unfairly discriminatory. In particular, the Exchange believes that the
proposed fees are reasonable because they are reasonably aligned with
the value and benefits provided to users that choose to subscribe to
the Report on the Exchange. As discussed above, the Report may be
beneficial to Equity Members and non-Members as it may provide helpful
trading information regarding investor sentiment that may allow market
participants to make more informed trading decisions and may be used to
create and test trading models and analytical strategies and provide
comprehensive insight into trading on the Exchange. Therefore, the
Exchange believes that it is reasonable to assess modest fees to users
that subscribe to the Report.
The Exchange further believes the proposed fees are reasonable
because the proposed amounts are lower than or comparable to the
analogous fees charged by other exchanges for similar data products.
For example, BZX Equities and its affiliated equity markets (the ``Cboe
Group'') charge $750 per month to Internal Distributors and $1,250 per
month to External Distributors of the U.S. Equity Short Volume & Trades
Report, and a back history fee of $500 per data content month.\15\ The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'') charges $783 per month to Internal
Distributors and $1,300 per month to External Distributors of the
Nasdaq Short Sale Volume Reports provided on both a daily and
historical monthly basis.\16\ Additionally, the New York Stock Exchange
LLC (``NYSE'') and its affiliated equity markets (the ``NYSE Group'')
also charge for the TAQ NYSE Group Short Sales (Monthly File) and TAQ
NYSE Group Short Volume (Daily File). Specifically, NYSE Group charges
an access fee of $1,000 per month for an ongoing subscription that
includes 12 months of back history, then additional back history
charged at $500 per data content month. NYSE Group also charges a back
history fee, of $1,000 per data content month for the first 12 months
of history, then additional back history charged at $500 per data
content month.\17\ The Exchange therefore believes that the proposed
fees are reasonable and set at a level to compete with other equity
exchanges that offer similar reports. Indeed, proposing fees that are
excessively higher than established fees for similar data products
would simply serve to reduce demand for the Exchange's data product,
which as noted, is entirely optional. Although each of these similar
data products provide only proprietary trade data and not trade data
from other exchanges, it is possible investors are still able to gauge
overall investor sentiment across different equities based on the
included data points on any one exchange. As such, if a market
participant views another exchange's potential report as more
attractive, then such market participant can merely choose not to
purchase the Exchange's Report and instead purchase another exchange's
similar data product, which offers similar data points, albeit based on
that other market's trading activity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See supra note 9.
\16\ See Nasdaq Short Sale Volume Reports, available at https://data.nasdaq.com/price-list?category=U.S.+Equities&subcategory=Nasdaq+Short+Sale+Volume+Reports (last visited April 23, 2025).
\17\ See ``NYSE Group Summary Data Products'' portion of the
NYSE Historical Proprietary Market Data Pricing, available at
https://www.nyse.com/publicdocs/nyse/data/NYSE_Historical_Market_Data_Pricing.pdf (last visited April 23,
2025).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Exchange believes that the proposed fees are
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because they will apply
equally to all Equity Members and non-Members that choose to subscribe
to the Report. As stated, the Report is completely optional and not
necessary for trading. Rather, the Exchange voluntarily makes the
Report available, and users may choose to subscribe to (and pay for)
the report based on their own individual business needs. Potential
subscribers may subscribe to the Report at any time if
[[Page 21091]]
they believe it to be valuable or may decline to purchase it.
The Exchange also believes it is reasonable, equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory to charge an External Distributor of the Report
a higher fee than an Internal Distributor as an External Distributor
will ordinarily charge a fee to its downstream customers for this
service, and, even if the vendor is not charging a specific fee for
this particular service, the Exchange expects products from the Report
to be part of a suite of offerings from distributors that generally
promote sales. External distribution is also fundamentally different
than internal use, in that the former generates revenue from external
sales while the latter does not. Therefore, the Exchange believes it is
reasonable, equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to charge a
higher fee for a product that generates downstream revenue. Further,
the proposed fee will apply equally to Internal and External
Distributors, respectively, that choose to distribute data from the
Report. Moreover, as described above, other exchanges similarly charge
External Distributors higher fees as compared to Internal Distributors
for similar data products.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See supra notes 9 and 16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed changes to the headings in
the Fee Schedule will promote just and equitable principles of trade
and remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and a national market system because the proposed rule changes
will provide greater clarity to Equity Members and the public regarding
available market data products and reports offered by the Exchange.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed changes will impose
any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act.
Intramarket Competition
The Exchange believes its proposal will not impose any burden on
intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because the Report will be
available equally to all Equity Members and non-Members that choose to
subscribe to the report. As stated, the Report is optional and Equity
Members and non-Members may choose to subscribe to such report, or not,
based on their view of the additional benefits and added value provided
by utilizing the Report.
Intermarket Competition
The Exchange believes its proposal will not impose any burden on
intermarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. As previously discussed,
similar products offered by Nasdaq, the Cboe Group, and the NYSE Group
are priced higher than or comparable to the Report. Moreover, the
Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over
regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services
in the securities markets. Specifically, in Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in determining
prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation
of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting
market competition in its broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.'' The fact that this market is
competitive has also long been recognized by the courts. In
NetCoalition v. Securities and Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit
stated as follows: ``[n]o one disputes that competition for order flow
is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities, and the broker-dealers that
act as their order-routing agents, have a wide range of choices of
where to route orders for execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to
take its market share percentages for granted' because `no exchange
possesses a monopoly, regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of
order flow from broker dealers'. . . .''. Accordingly, the Exchange
does not believe its proposal imposes any burden on competition that is
not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed changes to the
headings in the Fee Schedule will impose any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed changes will not
impose any burden on intra-market because the rules of the Exchange
apply to all Equity Members equally. The proposed rule changes to the
headings in the Fee Schedule will have no impact on inter-market
competition as they are not designed to address any competitive issue
but rather are designed to provide added clarity to the Fee Schedule.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\19\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \20\ thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether
the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
file number SR-PEARL-2025-20 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to file number SR-PEARL-2025-20. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all
written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are
filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to
the
[[Page 21092]]
proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10
a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. Do not
include personal identifiable information in submissions; you should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. We
may redact in part or withhold entirely from publication submitted
material that is obscene or subject to copyright protection. All
submissions should refer to file number SR-PEARL-2025-20 and should be
submitted on or before June 6, 2025.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sherry R. Haywood,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025-08696 Filed 5-15-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P