Special Conditions: Carson Helicopters Inc., Sikorsky Model S-61A, S-61L, and S-61N (Including Those Modified by Supplemental Type Certificate (STC) No. SH640NE) Helicopters; Overload Protection Device in a Hoist, 13705-13707 [2025-04567]
Download as PDF
13705
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 90, No. 57
Wednesday, March 26, 2025
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 29
[Docket No. FAA–2024–2383; Notice No. 29–
24–02–SC]
Special Conditions: Carson
Helicopters Inc., Sikorsky Model S–
61A, S–61L, and S–61N (Including
Those Modified by Supplemental Type
Certificate (STC) No. SH640NE)
Helicopters; Overload Protection
Device in a Hoist
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special
conditions.
AGENCY:
This action proposes special
conditions for a supplemental type
certificate (STC) to install a helicopter
hoist equipped with an overload
protection device (OLPD) on Sikorsky
Model S–61A, S–61L, and S–61N
(including those modified by STC No.
SH640NE, which shortens the S–61N by
50 inches) helicopters. These
helicopters, as modified by Carson
Helicopters, Inc. (Carson), will have a
novel or unusual design feature when
compared to the state of technology
envisioned in the airworthiness
standards for transport category
rotorcraft. This design feature is an
OLPD installed in the hoist. The
applicable airworthiness regulations do
not contain adequate or appropriate
safety standards for this design feature.
These proposed special conditions
contain the additional safety standards
that the Administrator considers
necessary to establish a level of safety
equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send comments on or before
April 25, 2025.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified
by Docket No. FAA–2024–2383 using
any of the following methods:
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:00 Mar 25, 2025
Jkt 265001
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov and follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket
Operations, M–30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Room W12–140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take
comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12–140 of the West Building
Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket
Operations at 202–493–2251.
Docket: Background documents or
comments received may be read at
www.regulations.gov at any time.
Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to Docket
Operations in Room W12–140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Johnson, Mechanical Systems
Section, AIR–623, Technical Policy
Branch, Policy and Standards Division,
Aircraft Certification Service, Federal
Aviation Administration, telephone
202–267–4644; email Scott.R.Johnson@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested people to
take part in this rulemaking by sending
written comments, data, or views. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the proposed special
conditions, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
The FAA will consider all comments
received by the closing date for
comments and will consider comments
filed late if it is possible to do so
without incurring delay. The FAA may
change these special conditions based
on the comments received.
Privacy
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in title 14,
Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR)
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received without change to
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
FAA will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about these special
conditions.
Confidential Business Information
Confidential Business Information
(CBI) is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to these special
conditions contain commercial or
financial information that is customarily
treated as private, that you actually treat
as private, and that is relevant or
responsive to these special conditions, it
is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI. Please
mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA
will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and the
indicated comments will not be placed
in the public docket of these proposed
special conditions. Send submissions
containing CBI to the individual listed
in the contact section above. Comments
the FAA receives, which are not
specifically designated as CBI, will be
placed in the public docket for these
proposed special conditions.
Background
On September 21, 2021, Carson
applied for an amendment to STC No.
SR02507NY to add a hoist with an
OLPD, to be installed on Sikorsky
Model S–61A, S–61L, and S–61N
(including those modified by STC No.
SH640NE, which shortens the S–61N by
50 inches) helicopters. The S–61
helicopter is a twin-engine rotorcraft.
The maximum takeoff weight is between
19,000 and 22,000 pounds, depending
on configuration, and the helicopter has
a maximum capacity of 39 passengers
and a crew of 2.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of § 21.101,
Carson must show that the helicopters,
for which they make application to
modify by STC No. SR02507NY, as will
be changed, continue to meet the
applicable provisions of the regulations
listed in each helicopter’s respective
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
26MRP1
13706
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 57 / Wednesday, March 26, 2025 / Proposed Rules
type certificate or the applicable
regulations in effect on the date of
application for the change except for
earlier amendments as agreed upon by
the FAA.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(e.g., 14 CFR part 29) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Sikorsky Model S–61A, S–61L,
and S–61N (including those modified by
STC No. SH640NE) helicopters because
of a novel or unusual design feature,
special conditions are prescribed under
the provisions of § 21.16.
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the applicant apply
for a supplemental type certificate to
modify any other model included on the
same type certificate to incorporate the
same novel or unusual design feature,
these special conditions would also
apply to the other model under § 21.101.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Sikorsky Model S–61A,
S–61L, and S–61N (including those
modified by STC No. SH640NE)
helicopters must comply with the
exhaust-emission requirements of part
34, and the noise-certification
requirements of part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as
defined in § 11.19, in accordance with
§ 11.38, and they become part of the
type certification basis under § 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Feature
The Sikorsky Model S–61A, S–61L,
and S–61N (including those modified by
STC No. SH640NE) helicopters will
incorporate the following novel or
unusual design feature:
An OLPD installed in a hoist.
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with PROPOSALS
Discussion
These special conditions are
necessary because regulations
concerning external load carriage
requirements for part 29 rotorcraft do
not address hoists that include an OLPD
feature.
In 1991 the FAA tasked the External
Load Working Group (Working Group)
of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory
Committee (ARAC) with investigating
the need to complement the rotorcraft
14 CFR part 133 Class D external load
carriage regulations (including transport
of passengers external to the rotorcraft).
Upon completion of their review, the
Working Group issued a report 1
recommending updates to the external
1 External Load Working Group report https://
www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/advisory_
rulemaking_committees/RelwgT1-12041991.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:00 Mar 25, 2025
Jkt 265001
load regulations in 14 CFR part 27 and
part 29.
Based on the Working Group’s report,
the FAA recommended several changes
to part 27 and part 29 to improve safety.
On July 13, 1998, the FAA published a
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 2
(NPRM) (63 FR 37746). This NPRM
proposed amendments to the
airworthiness standards for rotorcraft
load combination certification. The FAA
issued the final rule based on this
NPRM for part 27 at amendment 27–36
and part 29 at amendment 29–43;
however, the revised parts 27 and 29
did not address OLPD features in hoist
systems. As a result, the current
§§ 27.865 and 29.865 do not address
hoist systems with OLPD features.
The hoist being installed by Carson
includes an OLPD in its design. The
OLPD reduces the likelihood of the loss
of rotorcraft and crew due to an
entanglement of the hoist cable. Upon
activation, the OLPD affords the pilot
time to respond and potentially jettison
the load to save the aircraft and the crew
onboard.
Because the OLPD activation range is
less than the limit static load factor for
human external cargo published in
§§ 27.865 and 29.865, it introduces a
risk that the cable could completely
unspool (i.e., loss of cargo), particularly
if unspooling is not subsequently
arrested once the load is reduced below
the activation threshold. Despite this
risk, the overall safety will be improved
with the inclusion of this OLPD.
Meeting the requirements of these
proposed special conditions
demonstrates that the OLPD in the hoist
installed by Carson will activate to
allow a slip and recapture in response
to the load conditions outlined in these
proposed special conditions. By
‘‘activation’’ the FAA means all states of
its intended function, which consists of
uncommanded cable payout (i.e.,
slippage) and the recapture of the load
(i.e., arresting the slippage). The FAA
intends the activation range to bound
both payout and arrest. The FAA
proposes that the activation range for
these special conditions would be 2.2 to
3.2 times the rated load. The
functionality and activation requirement
comes from SAE AS6342, ‘‘Minimum
Operational Performance Standard
(MOPS) for Helicopter Hoist Systems,’’
December 2020, section 4.7 paragraph
2.3 The OLPD must slip and recapture
load only within the activation range of
2 Docket No. 29277; Notice No. 98–6, ‘‘Rotorcraft
Load Combination Safety Requirements.’’
3 SAE AS6342 is available for purchase at https://
saemobilus.sae.org/standards/as6342-minimumoperational-performance-standard-mopshelicopter-hoist-systems.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2.2 to 3.2 times the rated load. These
special conditions do not change the
structural limit load factors specified in
§§ 27.865 and 29.865. These special
conditions contain the additional safety
standards that the Administrator
considers necessary to establish a level
of safety equivalent to that established
by the existing airworthiness standards.
In addition to the activation range
explained previously, the OLPD must be
designed to continue working correctly
or as expected in every way (i.e.,
function properly) when experiencing
the maximum external limit load
specified in §§ 27.865 and 29.865.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the
helicopter models listed on the AML of
STC No. SR02507NY, which is available
at DRS. Should Carson apply at a later
date for a change to STC No.
SR02507NY to include any new models
on the AML to incorporate the same
novel or unusual design feature, these
special conditions would apply to that
model as well.
Conclusion
This action only affects the
application for an STC to approve
installation of hoists that contain an
OLPD listed on the AML of STC No.
SR02507NY. It is not a rule of general
applicability and affects only the
applicant who applied to the FAA for
approval of these features on the
helicopter.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 29
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
Authority Citation
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, 44701,
44702, and 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the FAA proposes the
following special conditions as part of
the type certification basis for the Model
S–61A, S–61L, and S–61N, and S–61N
(including those modified by STC No.
SH640NE) helicopters listed on the
AML of STC No. SR02507NY, as
modified by Carson.
(a) The Overload Protection Device
(OLPD) must:
(1) Function properly for all loads up
to and including the § 29.865(a)
maximum external limit load.
(2) Be designed to hold any load up
to 2.2 times the rated load and shall
activate between 2.2 times the rated
load and 3.2 times the rated load. This
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
26MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 57 / Wednesday, March 26, 2025 / Proposed Rules
activation range must take into account
production and maintenance tolerances,
variations due to the environment (e.g.,
temperature and humidity), and
operations (e.g., length of cable paid
out). The above requirements must be
met over the entire activation range.
(3) Protect the helicopter and cargo by
incorporating design activation limits
(i.e., defined set point(s)) which:
(i) Prevent excess cable tension that
might result in cable failure or loads on
the helicopter that endanger the aircraft,
(ii) Prevent uncommanded cable
payout when experiencing cable loads
below the activation range,
(iii) Allow cable payout when
experiencing loads above the activation
range, and
(iv) Arrest cable unspooling to
prevent loss of cargo after an activation
event.
(b) The OLPD installation,
maintenance, and inspection
instructions must be made a part of the
applicable section(s) of the Instructions
for Continued Airworthiness (ICA).
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March
14, 2025.
Patrick R. Mullen,
Manager, Technical Policy Branch, Policy and
Standards Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2025–04567 Filed 3–25–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2025–0475; Project
Identifier MCAI–2024–00600–T]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus SAS Model A350–941 and –1041
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by a determination that the
applicable aircraft flight manual (AFM)
was providing an incorrect value for
maximum cumulative taxi time in
freezing fog conditions. This proposed
AD would require revising the existing
AFM to provide the flightcrew with
normal procedures to follow under
certain conditions, as specified in a
European Union Aviation Safety Agency
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:00 Mar 25, 2025
Jkt 265001
(EASA) AD, which is proposed for
incorporation by reference (IBR). The
FAA is proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by May 12, 2025.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD
docket at regulations.gov under Docket
No. FAA–2025–0475; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the mandatory
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI), any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
• For EASA material identified in this
proposed AD, contact EASA, KonradAdenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000;
email ADs@easa.europa.eu; website
easa.europa.eu. You may find this
material on the EASA website at
ad.easa.europa.eu. It is also available at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–
2025–0475.
• You may view this material at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Clary, Aviation Safety Engineer,
FAA, 2200 South 216th St., Des Moines,
WA 98198; telephone: 817–222–5138;
email: james.clary@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include
‘‘Docket No. FAA–2025–0475; Project
Identifier MCAI–2024–00600–T’’ at the
beginning of your comments. The most
helpful comments reference a specific
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13707
portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change,
and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by
the closing date and may amend this
proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. The agency
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received
about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to James Clary, Aviation
Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone:
817–222–5138; email: james.clary@
faa.gov. Any commentary that the FAA
receives which is not specifically
designated as CBI will be placed in the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Background
EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD 2024–0190,
dated October 10, 2024; corrected
October 11, 2024 (EASA AD 2024–0190)
(also referred to as the MCAI), to correct
an unsafe condition for all Airbus SAS
Model A350–941, A350–1041, A380–
841, and A380–842 airplanes. The
MCAI states the applicable AFM was
providing an incorrect value for
maximum cumulative taxi time in
freezing fog conditions, which could
lead to multiple engine surges in a
critical flight phase and possibly result
in loss of control of the airplane.
The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
E:\FR\FM\26MRP1.SGM
26MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 57 (Wednesday, March 26, 2025)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13705-13707]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-04567]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 57 / Wednesday, March 26, 2025 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 13705]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 29
[Docket No. FAA-2024-2383; Notice No. 29-24-02-SC]
Special Conditions: Carson Helicopters Inc., Sikorsky Model S-
61A, S-61L, and S-61N (Including Those Modified by Supplemental Type
Certificate (STC) No. SH640NE) Helicopters; Overload Protection Device
in a Hoist
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of proposed special conditions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This action proposes special conditions for a supplemental
type certificate (STC) to install a helicopter hoist equipped with an
overload protection device (OLPD) on Sikorsky Model S-61A, S-61L, and
S-61N (including those modified by STC No. SH640NE, which shortens the
S-61N by 50 inches) helicopters. These helicopters, as modified by
Carson Helicopters, Inc. (Carson), will have a novel or unusual design
feature when compared to the state of technology envisioned in the
airworthiness standards for transport category rotorcraft. This design
feature is an OLPD installed in the hoist. The applicable airworthiness
regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for
this design feature. These proposed special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary
to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
DATES: Send comments on or before April 25, 2025.
ADDRESSES: Send comments identified by Docket No. FAA-2024-2383 using
any of the following methods:
Federal eRegulations Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for sending your comments electronically.
Mail: Send comments to Docket Operations, M-30, U.S. Department of
Transportation (DOT), 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Room W12-140, West
Building Ground Floor, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery or Courier: Take comments to Docket Operations in
Room W12-140 of the West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: Fax comments to Docket Operations at 202-493-2251.
Docket: Background documents or comments received may be read at
www.regulations.gov at any time. Follow the online instructions for
accessing the docket or go to Docket Operations in Room W12-140 of the
West Building Ground Floor at 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington,
DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Scott Johnson, Mechanical Systems
Section, AIR-623, Technical Policy Branch, Policy and Standards
Division, Aircraft Certification Service, Federal Aviation
Administration, telephone 202-267-4644; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites interested people to take part in this rulemaking
by sending written comments, data, or views. The most helpful comments
reference a specific portion of the proposed special conditions,
explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting
data.
The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date for
comments and will consider comments filed late if it is possible to do
so without incurring delay. The FAA may change these special conditions
based on the comments received.
Privacy
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in title
14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) 11.35, the FAA will post all
comments received without change to www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The FAA will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal contact received about these
special conditions.
Confidential Business Information
Confidential Business Information (CBI) is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and actually treated as private by
its owner. Under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552),
CBI is exempt from public disclosure. If your comments responsive to
these special conditions contain commercial or financial information
that is customarily treated as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or responsive to these special
conditions, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and the indicated comments will not be
placed in the public docket of these proposed special conditions. Send
submissions containing CBI to the individual listed in the contact
section above. Comments the FAA receives, which are not specifically
designated as CBI, will be placed in the public docket for these
proposed special conditions.
Background
On September 21, 2021, Carson applied for an amendment to STC No.
SR02507NY to add a hoist with an OLPD, to be installed on Sikorsky
Model S-61A, S-61L, and S-61N (including those modified by STC No.
SH640NE, which shortens the S-61N by 50 inches) helicopters. The S-61
helicopter is a twin-engine rotorcraft. The maximum takeoff weight is
between 19,000 and 22,000 pounds, depending on configuration, and the
helicopter has a maximum capacity of 39 passengers and a crew of 2.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of Sec. 21.101, Carson must show that the
helicopters, for which they make application to modify by STC No.
SR02507NY, as will be changed, continue to meet the applicable
provisions of the regulations listed in each helicopter's respective
[[Page 13706]]
type certificate or the applicable regulations in effect on the date of
application for the change except for earlier amendments as agreed upon
by the FAA.
If the Administrator finds that the applicable airworthiness
regulations (e.g., 14 CFR part 29) do not contain adequate or
appropriate safety standards for the Sikorsky Model S-61A, S-61L, and
S-61N (including those modified by STC No. SH640NE) helicopters because
of a novel or unusual design feature, special conditions are prescribed
under the provisions of Sec. 21.16.
Special conditions are initially applicable to the model for which
they are issued. Should the applicant apply for a supplemental type
certificate to modify any other model included on the same type
certificate to incorporate the same novel or unusual design feature,
these special conditions would also apply to the other model under
Sec. 21.101.
In addition to the applicable airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Sikorsky Model S-61A, S-61L, and S-61N (including those
modified by STC No. SH640NE) helicopters must comply with the exhaust-
emission requirements of part 34, and the noise-certification
requirements of part 36.
The FAA issues special conditions, as defined in Sec. 11.19, in
accordance with Sec. 11.38, and they become part of the type
certification basis under Sec. 21.101.
Novel or Unusual Design Feature
The Sikorsky Model S-61A, S-61L, and S-61N (including those
modified by STC No. SH640NE) helicopters will incorporate the following
novel or unusual design feature:
An OLPD installed in a hoist.
Discussion
These special conditions are necessary because regulations
concerning external load carriage requirements for part 29 rotorcraft
do not address hoists that include an OLPD feature.
In 1991 the FAA tasked the External Load Working Group (Working
Group) of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC) with
investigating the need to complement the rotorcraft 14 CFR part 133
Class D external load carriage regulations (including transport of
passengers external to the rotorcraft). Upon completion of their
review, the Working Group issued a report \1\ recommending updates to
the external load regulations in 14 CFR part 27 and part 29.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ External Load Working Group report https://www.faa.gov/sites/faa.gov/files/advisory_rulemaking_committees/RelwgT1-12041991.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the Working Group's report, the FAA recommended several
changes to part 27 and part 29 to improve safety. On July 13, 1998, the
FAA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking \2\ (NPRM) (63 FR 37746).
This NPRM proposed amendments to the airworthiness standards for
rotorcraft load combination certification. The FAA issued the final
rule based on this NPRM for part 27 at amendment 27-36 and part 29 at
amendment 29-43; however, the revised parts 27 and 29 did not address
OLPD features in hoist systems. As a result, the current Sec. Sec.
27.865 and 29.865 do not address hoist systems with OLPD features.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Docket No. 29277; Notice No. 98-6, ``Rotorcraft Load
Combination Safety Requirements.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The hoist being installed by Carson includes an OLPD in its design.
The OLPD reduces the likelihood of the loss of rotorcraft and crew due
to an entanglement of the hoist cable. Upon activation, the OLPD
affords the pilot time to respond and potentially jettison the load to
save the aircraft and the crew onboard.
Because the OLPD activation range is less than the limit static
load factor for human external cargo published in Sec. Sec. 27.865 and
29.865, it introduces a risk that the cable could completely unspool
(i.e., loss of cargo), particularly if unspooling is not subsequently
arrested once the load is reduced below the activation threshold.
Despite this risk, the overall safety will be improved with the
inclusion of this OLPD. Meeting the requirements of these proposed
special conditions demonstrates that the OLPD in the hoist installed by
Carson will activate to allow a slip and recapture in response to the
load conditions outlined in these proposed special conditions. By
``activation'' the FAA means all states of its intended function, which
consists of uncommanded cable payout (i.e., slippage) and the recapture
of the load (i.e., arresting the slippage). The FAA intends the
activation range to bound both payout and arrest. The FAA proposes that
the activation range for these special conditions would be 2.2 to 3.2
times the rated load. The functionality and activation requirement
comes from SAE AS6342, ``Minimum Operational Performance Standard
(MOPS) for Helicopter Hoist Systems,'' December 2020, section 4.7
paragraph 2.\3\ The OLPD must slip and recapture load only within the
activation range of 2.2 to 3.2 times the rated load. These special
conditions do not change the structural limit load factors specified in
Sec. Sec. 27.865 and 29.865. These special conditions contain the
additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary
to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the
existing airworthiness standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ SAE AS6342 is available for purchase at https://saemobilus.sae.org/standards/as6342-minimum-operational-performance-standard-mops-helicopter-hoist-systems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to the activation range explained previously, the OLPD
must be designed to continue working correctly or as expected in every
way (i.e., function properly) when experiencing the maximum external
limit load specified in Sec. Sec. 27.865 and 29.865.
Applicability
As discussed above, these special conditions are applicable to the
helicopter models listed on the AML of STC No. SR02507NY, which is
available at DRS. Should Carson apply at a later date for a change to
STC No. SR02507NY to include any new models on the AML to incorporate
the same novel or unusual design feature, these special conditions
would apply to that model as well.
Conclusion
This action only affects the application for an STC to approve
installation of hoists that contain an OLPD listed on the AML of STC
No. SR02507NY. It is not a rule of general applicability and affects
only the applicant who applied to the FAA for approval of these
features on the helicopter.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 29
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Authority Citation
The authority citation for these special conditions is as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, 44701, 44702, and 44704.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the FAA proposes the following special conditions as
part of the type certification basis for the Model S-61A, S-61L, and S-
61N, and S-61N (including those modified by STC No. SH640NE)
helicopters listed on the AML of STC No. SR02507NY, as modified by
Carson.
(a) The Overload Protection Device (OLPD) must:
(1) Function properly for all loads up to and including the Sec.
29.865(a) maximum external limit load.
(2) Be designed to hold any load up to 2.2 times the rated load and
shall activate between 2.2 times the rated load and 3.2 times the rated
load. This
[[Page 13707]]
activation range must take into account production and maintenance
tolerances, variations due to the environment (e.g., temperature and
humidity), and operations (e.g., length of cable paid out). The above
requirements must be met over the entire activation range.
(3) Protect the helicopter and cargo by incorporating design
activation limits (i.e., defined set point(s)) which:
(i) Prevent excess cable tension that might result in cable failure
or loads on the helicopter that endanger the aircraft,
(ii) Prevent uncommanded cable payout when experiencing cable loads
below the activation range,
(iii) Allow cable payout when experiencing loads above the
activation range, and
(iv) Arrest cable unspooling to prevent loss of cargo after an
activation event.
(b) The OLPD installation, maintenance, and inspection instructions
must be made a part of the applicable section(s) of the Instructions
for Continued Airworthiness (ICA).
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri, on March 14, 2025.
Patrick R. Mullen,
Manager, Technical Policy Branch, Policy and Standards Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2025-04567 Filed 3-25-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P