Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Geophysical Surveys Related to Oil and Gas Activities in the Gulf of America (Formerly Gulf of Mexico), 13346-13348 [2025-04850]

Download as PDF 13346 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 54 / Friday, March 21, 2025 / Notices Northern fur seal). A list of revised SARs in 2024 for the Pacific region is presented in table 3. Information on the remaining Pacific region stocks can be found in the final 2023 SARs (Carretta et al. 2024). TABLE 3—LIST OF MARINE MAMMAL SARS IN THE PACIFIC REGION REVISED IN 2024 Strategic stocks Non-strategic stocks • Monk seal, Hawai1i * .............................................................................. • Killer whale, Eastern North Pacific Southern Resident * ...................... • Guadalupe fur seal * ............................................................................. • Northern elephant seal, California breeding stock.* • Northern fur seal, California stock.* * Includes updated abundance estimates. References Carretta et al. 2024. U.S. Pacific marine mammal stock assessments: 2023. U.S. Department of Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS– SWFSC–704.2024 Hayes, S.A., E. Josephson, K. Maze-Foley, P.E. Rosel, and J. McCordic, eds. 2024. U.S. Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico marine mammal stock assessments 2023. NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS–NE–321, 375 p. National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2023a. Guidelines for preparing stock assessment reports pursuant to the Marine Mammal Protection Act. Protected Resources Policy 02–038–01. Available online: https://www.fisheries. noaa.gov/s3/2023-05/02-204-01-FinalGAMMS-IV-Revisions-clean-1-kdr.pdf. Accessed September 2024. Young, N.C., Brower, A.A., Muto, M.M., Freed, J.C., Angliss, R.P., Friday, N.A., Birkemeier, B.D., Boveng, P.L., Brost, B.M., Cameron, M.F., Crance, J.L., Dahle, S.P., Fadely, B.S., Ferguson, M.C., Goetz, K.T., London, J.M., Oleson, E.M., Ream, R.R., Richmond, E.L., Shelden, K.E. W., Sweeney, K.L., Towell, R.G., Wade, P.R., Waite, J.M., and Zerbini, A.N. 2024. Alaska marine mammal stock assessments, 2023. U.S. Dep. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS–AFSC–XXX, 327 p. Dated: March 17, 2025. Evan Howell, Director, Office of Science and Technology, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2025–04861 Filed 3–20–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES [RTID 0648–XE767] Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Geophysical Surveys Related to Oil and Gas Activities in the Gulf of America (Formerly Gulf of Mexico) National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 Notice; issuance of letter of authorization. ACTION: 16:34 Mar 20, 2025 Jkt 265001 In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), as amended, its implementing regulations, and NMFS’ MMPA regulations for taking marine mammals incidental to geophysical surveys related to oil and gas activities in the Gulf of America, originally published as ‘‘Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Geophysical Surveys Related to Oil and Gas Activities in the Gulf of Mexico,’’ notification is hereby given that a Letter of Authorization (LOA) has been issued to TGS for the take of marine mammals incidental to geophysical survey activity in the Gulf of America (GOA). DATES: The LOA is effective from March 17, 2025, through December 31, 2025. ADDRESSES: The LOA, LOA request, and supporting documentation are available online at: https://www.fisheries. noaa.gov/action/incidental-takeauthorization-oil-and-gas-industrygeophysical-survey-activity-gulf-mexico. In case of problems accessing these documents, please call the contact listed below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Wachtendonk, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 427– 8401. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Background Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed authorization is provided to the public for review. An authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or stock(s), will PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where relevant), and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings are set forth. NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival. Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the MMPA defines ‘‘harassment’’ as: any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild (Level A harassment); or (ii) has the potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering (Level B harassment). On January 19, 2021, we issued a final rule with regulations to govern the unintentional taking of marine mammals incidental to geophysical survey activities conducted by oil and gas industry operators, and those persons authorized to conduct activities on their behalf (collectively ‘‘industry operators’’), in U.S. waters of the GOA 1 over the course of 5 years (86 FR 5322, January 19, 2021). The rule was based on our findings that the total taking from the specified activities over the 5year period will have a negligible impact on the affected species or stock(s) of marine mammals and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of those species or stocks for subsistence uses, and became effective on April 19, 2021. 1 Pursuant to Executive Order 14172, ‘‘Restoring Names That Honor American Greatness,’’ and Department of the Interior Secretarial Order 3423, ‘‘The Gulf of America,’’ the body of water formerly known as the Gulf of Mexico is now called the Gulf of America. Accordingly, this Federal Register notice hereafter refers to the Gulf of America. E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 54 / Friday, March 21, 2025 / Notices khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES The regulations at 50 CFR 217.180 et seq. allow for the issuance of LOAs to industry operators for the incidental take of marine mammals during geophysical survey activities and prescribe the permissible methods of taking and other means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact on marine mammal species or stocks and their habitat (often referred to as mitigation), as well as requirements pertaining to the monitoring and reporting of such taking. Under 50 CFR 217.186(e), issuance of an LOA shall be based on a determination that the level of taking will be consistent with the findings made for the total taking allowable under these regulations and a determination that the amount of take authorized under the LOA is of no more than small numbers. NMFS subsequently discovered that the 2021 rule was based on erroneous take estimates. We conducted another rulemaking using correct take estimates and other newly available and pertinent information relevant to the analyses supporting some of the findings in the 2021 final rule and the taking allowable under the regulations. We issued a final rule in April 2024, effective May 24, 2024 through April 19, 2026 (89 FR 31488, April 24, 2024). The 2024 final rule made no changes to the specified activities or the specified geographical region in which those activities would be conducted, nor to the original 5-year period of effectiveness. In consideration of the new information, the 2024 rule presented new analyses supporting affirmance of the negligible impact determinations for all species, and affirmed that the existing regulations, which contain mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements, are consistent with the ‘‘least practicable adverse impact’’ standard of the MMPA. Summary of Request and Analysis TGS plans to conduct a threedimensional (3D) ocean bottom node (OBN) survey over 240 lease blocks in the Garden Banks, Keathley Canyon, and Sigsbee Escarpment areas, with water depths ranging from approximately 2,000 to 2,800 meters (m). See section F of the LOA application for a map of the area. TGS anticipates using two source vessels with a low-frequency dual barbell source known as Gemini. Please see TGS’s application for additional detail. The Gemini source was not included in the acoustic exposure modeling developed in support of the rule. However, the Gemini was described and evaluated in support of a previous LOA and we rely on that analysis here (88 FR VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:34 Mar 20, 2025 Jkt 265001 72739, October 23, 2023). For additional detail regarding the source, see section C of the LOA application. Based on this information we have determined there will be no effects of a magnitude or intensity different from those evaluated in support of the rules. NMFS expects that use of modeling results supporting the final rule are conservative as a proxy for use in evaluating potential impacts of use of the Gemini. Consistent with the preamble to the final rule, the survey effort proposed by TGS in its LOA request was used to develop LOA-specific take estimates based on the acoustic exposure modeling results described in the preamble (89 FR 31488, April 24, 2024). In order to generate the appropriate take number for authorization, the following information was considered: (1) survey type; (2) location (by modeling zone 2); (3) number of days; (4) source; and (5) month.3 In this case, the 4,130 cubic inch (in3) airgun array was selected, as its use for purposes of generating take numbers for authorization represents the least impactful airgun array (but remains conservative for use in estimating takes that are expected to result from use of the Gemini source, as discussed above. The acoustic exposure modeling performed in support of the rule provides 24-hour exposure estimates for each species, specific to each modeled source and survey type in each zone and month. No 3D OBN surveys were included in the modeled survey types, and use of existing proxies (i.e., two-dimensional (2D), 3D narrow-azimuth (NAZ), 3D wide-azimuth (WAZ), Coil) is generally conservative for use in evaluation of 3D OBN survey effort, largely due to the greater area covered by the modeled proxies. Summary descriptions of these modeled survey geometries are available in the preamble to the proposed rule (83 FR 29212, 29220, June 22, 2018). Coil was selected as the best available proxy survey type in this case because the spatial coverage of the planned survey is most similar to the coil survey pattern. The planned OBN survey will involve two source vessels sailing along closely spaced survey lines, with daily survey area coverage of approximately 200 kilometers squared (km2) per day, similar to that assumed for the coil survey proxy. Among the different 2 For purposes of acoustic exposure modeling, the GOA was divided into seven zones. Zone 1 is not included in the geographic scope of the rule. 3 Acoustic propagation modeling was performed for two seasons: Winter (December–March) and Summer (April–November). Marine mammal density data is generally available on a monthly basis, and therefore further refines take estimates temporally. PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 13347 parameters of the modeled survey patterns (e.g., area covered, line spacing, number of sources, shot interval, total simulated pulses), NMFS considers area covered per day to be most influential on daily modeled exposures exceeding Level B harassment criteria. Although TGS is not proposing to perform a survey using the coil geometry, the coil proxy is most representative of the effort planned by TGS in terms of predicted Level B harassment exposures. The survey will take place over approximately 109 days with 64 days of sound source operation, including 38 days planned in Zone 5, 15 days planned in Zone 6, and 11 days planned in Zone 7. The monthly distribution of survey days is not known in advance, though we assume that the planned 64 days of source operation would occur contiguously. Take estimates for each species are based on the time period that produces the greatest value. For Rice’s whale, take estimates based on the modeling yielded results that are not realistically likely to occur when considered in light of other relevant information concerning Rice’s whale habitat preferences considered during the rulemaking process. NMFS’ 2024 final rule provided detailed discussion regarding Rice’s whale habitat (see, e.g., 89 FR 31508, 31519, April 24, 2024). In summary, recent survey data, sightings, and acoustic data support Rice’s whale occurrence in waters throughout the GOA between approximately 100 m and 400 m depth along the continental shelf break, and associated habitat-based density modeling has identified similar habitat (i.e., approximately 100 to 400 m water depths along the continental shelf break) as being Rice’s whale habitat (Garrison et al., 2023; Soldevilla et al., 2022, 2024). Although Rice’s whales may occur outside of the general depth range expected to provide suitable habitat, we expect that any such occurrence would be rare. TGS’s planned activities will occur in water depths of approximately 2,000 to 2,800 m in the central GOA. Thus, NMFS does not expect there to be the reasonable potential for take of Rice’s whale in association with this survey and, accordingly, does not authorize take of Rice’s whale in the LOA. Based on the results of our analysis, NMFS has determined that the level of taking expected for this survey and authorized through the LOA is consistent with the findings made for the total taking allowable under the regulations. See table 1 in this notice and table 6 of the rule (89 FR 31488, April 24, 2024). E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1 13348 Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 54 / Friday, March 21, 2025 / Notices Small Numbers Determination Under the rule, NMFS may not authorize incidental take of marine mammals in an LOA if it will exceed ‘‘small numbers.’’ In short, when an acceptable estimate of the individual marine mammals taken is available, if the estimated number of individual animals taken is up to, but not greater than, one-third of the best available abundance estimate, NMFS will determine that the numbers of marine mammals taken of a species or stock are small (see 89 FR 31535, May 24, 2024). For more information please see NMFS’ discussion of small numbers in the 2021 final rule (86 FR 5438, January 19, 2021). The take numbers for authorization are determined as described above in the Summary of Request and Analysis section. Subsequently, the total incidents of harassment for each species are multiplied by scalar ratios to produce a derived product that better reflects the number of individuals likely to be taken within a survey (as compared to the total number of instances of take), accounting for the likelihood that some individual marine mammals may be taken on more than 1 day (see 86 FR 5404, January 19, 2021). The output of this scaling, where appropriate, is incorporated into adjusted total take estimates that are the basis for NMFS’ small numbers determinations, as depicted in table 1. This product is used by NMFS in making the necessary small numbers determinations through comparison with the best available abundance estimates (see discussion at 86 FR 5391, January 19, 2021). For this comparison, NMFS’ approach is to use the maximum theoretical population, determined through review of current stock assessment reports (SAR; https:// www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/ marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-stock-assessments) and modelpredicted abundance information (https://seamap.env.duke.edu/models/ Duke/GOM/). Information supporting the small numbers determinations is provided in table 1. TABLE 1—TAKE ANALYSIS Authorized take Species Rice’s whale ..................................................................................................... Sperm whale .................................................................................................... Kogia spp ......................................................................................................... Beaked whales ................................................................................................ Rough-toothed dolphin .................................................................................... Bottlenose dolphin ........................................................................................... Clymene dolphin .............................................................................................. Atlantic spotted dolphin ................................................................................... Pantropical spotted dolphin ............................................................................. Spinner dolphin ................................................................................................ Striped dolphin ................................................................................................. Fraser’s dolphin ............................................................................................... Risso’s dolphin ................................................................................................. Blackfish 4 ......................................................................................................... Short-finned pilot whale ................................................................................... 0 518 3 194 1,297 1,341 1,573 1,339 1,070 12,286 207 2,376 517 404 3,216 900 Scaled take 1 Abundance 2 n/a 218.9 58.7 131.0 385.0 451.4 384.2 307.2 3,526.0 59.5 681.8 148.3 119.1 948.7 265.4 Percent abundance 51 3,007 980 803 4,853 165,125 4,619 21,506 67,225 5,548 5,634 1,665 1,974 6,113 2,741 n/a 7.3 7.1 16.3 7.9 0.3 8.3 1.4 5.2 1.1 12.1 8.9 6.0 15.5 9.7 1 Scalar ratios were applied to ‘‘Authorized Take’’ values as described at 86 FR 5322, 5404 (January 19, 2021) to derive scaled take numbers shown here. 2 Best abundance estimate. For most taxa, the best abundance estimate for purposes of comparison with take estimates is considered here to be the model-predicted abundance (Garrison et al., 2023). For Rice’s whale, Atlantic spotted dolphin, and Risso’s dolphin, the larger estimated SAR abundance estimate is used. 3 Includes 11 takes by Level A harassment and 183 takes by Level B harassment. Scalar ratio is applied to takes by Level B harassment only; small numbers determination made on basis of scaled Level B harassment take plus authorized Level A harassment take. 4 The ‘‘blackfish’’ guild includes melon-headed whales, false killer whales, pygmy killer whales, and killer whales. khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES Based on the analysis contained herein of TGS’s proposed survey activity described in its LOA application and the anticipated take of marine mammals, NMFS finds that small numbers of marine mammals will be taken relative to the affected species or stock sizes (i.e., less than one-third of the best available abundance estimate) and therefore the taking is of no more than small numbers. mammals incidental to its geophysical survey activity, as described above. Dated: March 17, 2025. Catherine Marzin, Deputy Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine Fisheries Service. [FR Doc. 2025–04850 Filed 3–20–25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–22–P 16:34 Mar 20, 2025 Jkt 265001 PO 00000 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [RTID 0648–XE777] Magnuson-Stevens Act Provisions; General Provisions for Domestic Fisheries; Application for Exempted Fishing Permits National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice of receipt of application; request for comments. AGENCY: Authorization NMFS has determined that the level of taking for this LOA request is consistent with the findings made for the total taking allowable under the incidental take regulations and that the amount of take authorized under the LOA is of no more than small numbers. Accordingly, we have issued an LOA to TGS authorizing the take of marine VerDate Sep<11>2014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE The Assistant Regional Administrator for Sustainable Fisheries, Greater Atlantic Region, NMFS, has made a preliminary determination that SUMMARY: Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\21MRN1.SGM 21MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 54 (Friday, March 21, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13346-13348]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-04850]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XE767]


Taking and Importing Marine Mammals; Taking Marine Mammals 
Incidental to Geophysical Surveys Related to Oil and Gas Activities in 
the Gulf of America (Formerly Gulf of Mexico)

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; issuance of letter of authorization.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), as 
amended, its implementing regulations, and NMFS' MMPA regulations for 
taking marine mammals incidental to geophysical surveys related to oil 
and gas activities in the Gulf of America, originally published as 
``Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Geophysical Surveys Related to 
Oil and Gas Activities in the Gulf of Mexico,'' notification is hereby 
given that a Letter of Authorization (LOA) has been issued to TGS for 
the take of marine mammals incidental to geophysical survey activity in 
the Gulf of America (GOA).

DATES: The LOA is effective from March 17, 2025, through December 31, 
2025.

ADDRESSES: The LOA, LOA request, and supporting documentation are 
available online at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/incidental-take-authorization-oil-and-gas-industry-geophysical-survey-activity-gulf-mexico. In case of problems accessing these documents, please call 
the contact listed below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Wachtendonk, Office of 
Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 427-8401.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) 
direct the Secretary of Commerce to allow, upon request, the 
incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine 
mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than 
commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain 
findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking 
is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed authorization is 
provided to the public for review.
    An authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS 
finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or 
stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the 
availability of the species or stock(s) for subsistence uses (where 
relevant), and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements 
pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings 
are set forth. NMFS has defined ``negligible impact'' in 50 CFR 216.103 
as an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be 
reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely 
affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of 
recruitment or survival.
    Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the 
MMPA defines ``harassment'' as: any act of pursuit, torment, or 
annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or 
marine mammal stock in the wild (Level A harassment); or (ii) has the 
potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild 
by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not 
limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or 
sheltering (Level B harassment).
    On January 19, 2021, we issued a final rule with regulations to 
govern the unintentional taking of marine mammals incidental to 
geophysical survey activities conducted by oil and gas industry 
operators, and those persons authorized to conduct activities on their 
behalf (collectively ``industry operators''), in U.S. waters of the GOA 
\1\ over the course of 5 years (86 FR 5322, January 19, 2021). The rule 
was based on our findings that the total taking from the specified 
activities over the 5-year period will have a negligible impact on the 
affected species or stock(s) of marine mammals and will not have an 
unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of those species or 
stocks for subsistence uses, and became effective on April 19, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Pursuant to Executive Order 14172, ``Restoring Names That 
Honor American Greatness,'' and Department of the Interior 
Secretarial Order 3423, ``The Gulf of America,'' the body of water 
formerly known as the Gulf of Mexico is now called the Gulf of 
America. Accordingly, this Federal Register notice hereafter refers 
to the Gulf of America.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 13347]]

    The regulations at 50 CFR 217.180 et seq. allow for the issuance of 
LOAs to industry operators for the incidental take of marine mammals 
during geophysical survey activities and prescribe the permissible 
methods of taking and other means of effecting the least practicable 
adverse impact on marine mammal species or stocks and their habitat 
(often referred to as mitigation), as well as requirements pertaining 
to the monitoring and reporting of such taking. Under 50 CFR 
217.186(e), issuance of an LOA shall be based on a determination that 
the level of taking will be consistent with the findings made for the 
total taking allowable under these regulations and a determination that 
the amount of take authorized under the LOA is of no more than small 
numbers.
    NMFS subsequently discovered that the 2021 rule was based on 
erroneous take estimates. We conducted another rulemaking using correct 
take estimates and other newly available and pertinent information 
relevant to the analyses supporting some of the findings in the 2021 
final rule and the taking allowable under the regulations. We issued a 
final rule in April 2024, effective May 24, 2024 through April 19, 2026 
(89 FR 31488, April 24, 2024).
    The 2024 final rule made no changes to the specified activities or 
the specified geographical region in which those activities would be 
conducted, nor to the original 5-year period of effectiveness. In 
consideration of the new information, the 2024 rule presented new 
analyses supporting affirmance of the negligible impact determinations 
for all species, and affirmed that the existing regulations, which 
contain mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements, are 
consistent with the ``least practicable adverse impact'' standard of 
the MMPA.

Summary of Request and Analysis

    TGS plans to conduct a three-dimensional (3D) ocean bottom node 
(OBN) survey over 240 lease blocks in the Garden Banks, Keathley 
Canyon, and Sigsbee Escarpment areas, with water depths ranging from 
approximately 2,000 to 2,800 meters (m). See section F of the LOA 
application for a map of the area. TGS anticipates using two source 
vessels with a low-frequency dual barbell source known as Gemini. 
Please see TGS's application for additional detail.
    The Gemini source was not included in the acoustic exposure 
modeling developed in support of the rule. However, the Gemini was 
described and evaluated in support of a previous LOA and we rely on 
that analysis here (88 FR 72739, October 23, 2023). For additional 
detail regarding the source, see section C of the LOA application. 
Based on this information we have determined there will be no effects 
of a magnitude or intensity different from those evaluated in support 
of the rules. NMFS expects that use of modeling results supporting the 
final rule are conservative as a proxy for use in evaluating potential 
impacts of use of the Gemini.
    Consistent with the preamble to the final rule, the survey effort 
proposed by TGS in its LOA request was used to develop LOA-specific 
take estimates based on the acoustic exposure modeling results 
described in the preamble (89 FR 31488, April 24, 2024). In order to 
generate the appropriate take number for authorization, the following 
information was considered: (1) survey type; (2) location (by modeling 
zone \2\); (3) number of days; (4) source; and (5) month.\3\ In this 
case, the 4,130 cubic inch (in\3\) airgun array was selected, as its 
use for purposes of generating take numbers for authorization 
represents the least impactful airgun array (but remains conservative 
for use in estimating takes that are expected to result from use of the 
Gemini source, as discussed above. The acoustic exposure modeling 
performed in support of the rule provides 24-hour exposure estimates 
for each species, specific to each modeled source and survey type in 
each zone and month.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ For purposes of acoustic exposure modeling, the GOA was 
divided into seven zones. Zone 1 is not included in the geographic 
scope of the rule.
    \3\ Acoustic propagation modeling was performed for two seasons: 
Winter (December-March) and Summer (April-November). Marine mammal 
density data is generally available on a monthly basis, and 
therefore further refines take estimates temporally.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    No 3D OBN surveys were included in the modeled survey types, and 
use of existing proxies (i.e., two-dimensional (2D), 3D narrow-azimuth 
(NAZ), 3D wide-azimuth (WAZ), Coil) is generally conservative for use 
in evaluation of 3D OBN survey effort, largely due to the greater area 
covered by the modeled proxies. Summary descriptions of these modeled 
survey geometries are available in the preamble to the proposed rule 
(83 FR 29212, 29220, June 22, 2018). Coil was selected as the best 
available proxy survey type in this case because the spatial coverage 
of the planned survey is most similar to the coil survey pattern. The 
planned OBN survey will involve two source vessels sailing along 
closely spaced survey lines, with daily survey area coverage of 
approximately 200 kilometers squared (km\2\) per day, similar to that 
assumed for the coil survey proxy. Among the different parameters of 
the modeled survey patterns (e.g., area covered, line spacing, number 
of sources, shot interval, total simulated pulses), NMFS considers area 
covered per day to be most influential on daily modeled exposures 
exceeding Level B harassment criteria. Although TGS is not proposing to 
perform a survey using the coil geometry, the coil proxy is most 
representative of the effort planned by TGS in terms of predicted Level 
B harassment exposures.
    The survey will take place over approximately 109 days with 64 days 
of sound source operation, including 38 days planned in Zone 5, 15 days 
planned in Zone 6, and 11 days planned in Zone 7. The monthly 
distribution of survey days is not known in advance, though we assume 
that the planned 64 days of source operation would occur contiguously. 
Take estimates for each species are based on the time period that 
produces the greatest value.
    For Rice's whale, take estimates based on the modeling yielded 
results that are not realistically likely to occur when considered in 
light of other relevant information concerning Rice's whale habitat 
preferences considered during the rulemaking process. NMFS' 2024 final 
rule provided detailed discussion regarding Rice's whale habitat (see, 
e.g., 89 FR 31508, 31519, April 24, 2024). In summary, recent survey 
data, sightings, and acoustic data support Rice's whale occurrence in 
waters throughout the GOA between approximately 100 m and 400 m depth 
along the continental shelf break, and associated habitat-based density 
modeling has identified similar habitat (i.e., approximately 100 to 400 
m water depths along the continental shelf break) as being Rice's whale 
habitat (Garrison et al., 2023; Soldevilla et al., 2022, 2024).
    Although Rice's whales may occur outside of the general depth range 
expected to provide suitable habitat, we expect that any such 
occurrence would be rare. TGS's planned activities will occur in water 
depths of approximately 2,000 to 2,800 m in the central GOA. Thus, NMFS 
does not expect there to be the reasonable potential for take of Rice's 
whale in association with this survey and, accordingly, does not 
authorize take of Rice's whale in the LOA.
    Based on the results of our analysis, NMFS has determined that the 
level of taking expected for this survey and authorized through the LOA 
is consistent with the findings made for the total taking allowable 
under the regulations. See table 1 in this notice and table 6 of the 
rule (89 FR 31488, April 24, 2024).

[[Page 13348]]

Small Numbers Determination

    Under the rule, NMFS may not authorize incidental take of marine 
mammals in an LOA if it will exceed ``small numbers.'' In short, when 
an acceptable estimate of the individual marine mammals taken is 
available, if the estimated number of individual animals taken is up 
to, but not greater than, one-third of the best available abundance 
estimate, NMFS will determine that the numbers of marine mammals taken 
of a species or stock are small (see 89 FR 31535, May 24, 2024). For 
more information please see NMFS' discussion of small numbers in the 
2021 final rule (86 FR 5438, January 19, 2021).
    The take numbers for authorization are determined as described 
above in the Summary of Request and Analysis section. Subsequently, the 
total incidents of harassment for each species are multiplied by scalar 
ratios to produce a derived product that better reflects the number of 
individuals likely to be taken within a survey (as compared to the 
total number of instances of take), accounting for the likelihood that 
some individual marine mammals may be taken on more than 1 day (see 86 
FR 5404, January 19, 2021). The output of this scaling, where 
appropriate, is incorporated into adjusted total take estimates that 
are the basis for NMFS' small numbers determinations, as depicted in 
table 1.
    This product is used by NMFS in making the necessary small numbers 
determinations through comparison with the best available abundance 
estimates (see discussion at 86 FR 5391, January 19, 2021). For this 
comparison, NMFS' approach is to use the maximum theoretical 
population, determined through review of current stock assessment 
reports (SAR; https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessments) and model-predicted 
abundance information (https://seamap.env.duke.edu/models/Duke/GOM/). 
Information supporting the small numbers determinations is provided in 
table 1.

                                             Table 1--Take Analysis
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                    Authorized      Scaled take                       Percent
                     Species                           take             \1\        Abundance \2\     abundance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rice's whale....................................               0             n/a              51             n/a
Sperm whale.....................................             518           218.9           3,007             7.3
Kogia spp.......................................         \3\ 194            58.7             980             7.1
Beaked whales...................................           1,297           131.0             803            16.3
Rough-toothed dolphin...........................           1,341           385.0           4,853             7.9
Bottlenose dolphin..............................           1,573           451.4         165,125             0.3
Clymene dolphin.................................           1,339           384.2           4,619             8.3
Atlantic spotted dolphin........................           1,070           307.2          21,506             1.4
Pantropical spotted dolphin.....................          12,286         3,526.0          67,225             5.2
Spinner dolphin.................................             207            59.5           5,548             1.1
Striped dolphin.................................           2,376           681.8           5,634            12.1
Fraser's dolphin................................             517           148.3           1,665             8.9
Risso's dolphin.................................             404           119.1           1,974             6.0
Blackfish \4\...................................           3,216           948.7           6,113            15.5
Short-finned pilot whale........................             900           265.4           2,741             9.7
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Scalar ratios were applied to ``Authorized Take'' values as described at 86 FR 5322, 5404 (January 19, 2021)
  to derive scaled take numbers shown here.
\2\ Best abundance estimate. For most taxa, the best abundance estimate for purposes of comparison with take
  estimates is considered here to be the model-predicted abundance (Garrison et al., 2023). For Rice's whale,
  Atlantic spotted dolphin, and Risso's dolphin, the larger estimated SAR abundance estimate is used.
\3\ Includes 11 takes by Level A harassment and 183 takes by Level B harassment. Scalar ratio is applied to
  takes by Level B harassment only; small numbers determination made on basis of scaled Level B harassment take
  plus authorized Level A harassment take.
\4\ The ``blackfish'' guild includes melon-headed whales, false killer whales, pygmy killer whales, and killer
  whales.

    Based on the analysis contained herein of TGS's proposed survey 
activity described in its LOA application and the anticipated take of 
marine mammals, NMFS finds that small numbers of marine mammals will be 
taken relative to the affected species or stock sizes (i.e., less than 
one-third of the best available abundance estimate) and therefore the 
taking is of no more than small numbers.

Authorization

    NMFS has determined that the level of taking for this LOA request 
is consistent with the findings made for the total taking allowable 
under the incidental take regulations and that the amount of take 
authorized under the LOA is of no more than small numbers. Accordingly, 
we have issued an LOA to TGS authorizing the take of marine mammals 
incidental to its geophysical survey activity, as described above.

    Dated: March 17, 2025.
Catherine Marzin,
Deputy Director, Office of Protected Resources, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2025-04850 Filed 3-20-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.