Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air Act, 7708-7709 [2025-01485]
Download as PDF
7708
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 22, 2025 / Notices
Gina Allery, Office of Tribal Justice, 950
Penn Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20530,
(202) 514–8812, gina.allery@usdoj.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Written
comments and suggestions from the
public and affected agencies concerning
the proposed collection of information
are encouraged. Your comments should
address one or more of the following
four points:
—Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Bureau of Justice
Statistics, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
—Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
—Evaluate whether and if so how the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected can be
enhanced; and
—Minimize the burden of the collection
of information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms
of information technology, e.g.,
permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Abstract: This rule establishes the
procedures for an Indian tribe that is
subject to Public Law 280 (18 U.S.C.
1162(a)) to request that the United
States accept concurrent criminal
jurisdiction within the tribe’s Indian
country, and for the Attorney General to
decide whether to consent to such a
request.
Overview of This Information
Collection
1. Type of Information Collection:
Extension of a previously approved
collection.
2. The Title of the Form/Collection:
Assumption of Concurrent Federal
Criminal Jurisdiction in Certain Areas of
Indian Country.
3. The agency form number, if any,
and the applicable component of the
Department sponsoring the collection:
1105–0091, Office of Tribal Justice.
4. Affected public who will be asked
or required to respond, as well as the
obligation to respond: Affected Public
State, local and tribal governments. The
obligation to respond is voluntary.
5. An estimate of the total number of
respondents and the amount of time
estimated for an average respondent to
respond: The total or estimated number
of respondents fewer than 350
respondents.
The time per response is 80 hours.
6. An estimate of the total annual
burden (in hours) associated with the
collection: Ex: The total annual burden
hours for this collection is 28,000 hours.
7. An estimate of the total annual cost
burden associated with the collection, if
applicable: $1,174,058.
TOTAL BURDEN HOURS
Number of
respondents
Activity
Time per
response
(hours)
Total annual
responses
Total annual
burden
(hours)
Ex: Survey (individuals or households) ...............................
350
1
1
80
28,000
Unduplicated Totals .............................................................
350
........................
1
........................
28,000
If additional information is required
contact: Darwin Arceo, Department
Clearance Officer, United States
Department of Justice, Justice
Management Division, Policy and
Planning Staff, Two Constitution
Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W–218,
Washington, DC.
Dated: January 15, 2024.
Darwin Arceo,
Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S.
Department of Justice.
[FR Doc. 2025–01404 Filed 1–21–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–FX–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Frequency
(annually)
On January 16, 2025, the Department
of Justice lodged a proposed Consent
Decree with the United States District
Court for the District of Columbia in the
lawsuit entitled United States v. Fayat
S.A.S., et al., Civil Action No. 1:25-cv120.
The United States filed a Complaint,
on behalf of the United States
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Jan 21, 2025
Jkt 265001
Environmental Protection Agency,
against Fayat S.A.S. and its subsidiaries
BOMAG GmbH, BOMAG Americas,
Inc., BOMAG (China) Construction
Machinery Co., Ltd., MARINI S.p.A.,
RAVO B.V., Charlatte of America, Inc.,
PTC S.A.S., Secmair S.A.S., and
MATHIEU S.A. alleging violations of
sections 203(a) and 213(d) of the Clean
Air Act, 42 U.S.C. 7522(a) and 7547(d),
and implementing regulations, by their
importation, introduction into
commerce, and sale of nonroad
equipment containing diesel engines
that were not certified to model year
engine emission standards. The
Complaint also alleges related violations
of labeling and reporting requirements
and seeks civil penalties and
appropriate injunctive relief.
Under the proposed Consent Decree,
the Defendants will pay a civil penalty
of $11,000,000 and will complete a
project to mitigate harm caused by
excess nitrogen oxide and particulate
matter emissions from the noncompliant
engines.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
proposed Consent Decree. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and should
refer to United States v. Fayat S.A.S., et
al., D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–2–1–12522. All
comments must be submitted no later
than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
By mail .........
Any comments submitted in writing
may be filed by the United States in
whole or in part on the public court
docket without notice to the commenter.
During the public comment period,
the proposed Consent Decree may be
examined and downloaded at this
Justice Department website: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
If you require assistance accessing the
proposed Consent Decree, you may
request assistance by email or by mail
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 13 / Wednesday, January 22, 2025 / Notices
and downloaded at this Justice
Department website: https://
www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees.
If you require assistance accessing the
consent decree, you may request
assistance by email or mail to the
addresses provided above for submitting
comments.
to the addresses provided above for
submitting comments.
Jason A. Dunn,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2025–01485 Filed 1–21–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed
Consent Decree Under the Clean Water
Act
On January 15, 2025, the Department
of Justice lodged a proposed Consent
Decree with the United States District
Court for the District of Idaho in the
lawsuit entitled United States of
America v. City of Driggs, Idaho, et. al.
Civ. No. 4:22–cv–00444.
The United States filed a complaint
under the Clean Water Act (‘‘CWA’’)
against the City of Driggs, Idaho (‘‘the
City’’) and State of Idaho seeking
injunctive relief and civil penalties for
violations of the requirements of the
City’s National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (‘‘NPDES’’) permit
and violations of an administrative
order with the Environmental Protection
Agency (‘‘EPA’’). The proposed Consent
Decree would resolve the claims in the
complaint, require the City to perform
injunctive relief measures to ensure
future compliance, and require the City
to pay a penalty of $400,0000.
The publication of this notice opens
a period for public comment on the
proposed Consent Decree. Comments
should be addressed to the Assistant
Attorney General, Environment and
Natural Resources Division, and should
refer to United States of America v. City
of Driggs, Idaho, et. al. Civ. No. 4:22–
cv–00444, D.J. Ref. No. 90–5–1–1–
12596. All comments must be submitted
no later than thirty (30) days after the
publication date of this notice.
Comments may be submitted either by
email or by mail:
To submit
comments:
Send them to:
By email .......
pubcomment-ees.enrd@
usdoj.gov.
Assistant Attorney General,
U.S. DOJ—ENRD, P.O.
Box 7611, Washington, DC
20044–7611.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
By mail .........
Any comments submitted in writing
may be filed by the United States in
whole or in part on the public court
docket without notice to the commenter.
During the public comment period,
the consent decree may be examined
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:16 Jan 21, 2025
Jkt 265001
Kathryn C. Macdonald,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental
Enforcement Section, Environment and
Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2025–01480 Filed 1–21–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration
[Docket No. OSHA–2006–0040]
SGS North America, Inc.: Grant of
Expansion of Recognition
Occupational Safety and Health
Administration (OSHA), Labor.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In this notice, OSHA
announces the final decision to expand
the scope of recognition for SGS North
America, Inc., as a Nationally
Recognized Testing Laboratory (NRTL).
DATES: The expansion of the scope of
recognition becomes effective on
January 22, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Information regarding this notice is
available from the following sources:
Press inquiries: Contact Mr. Frank
Meilinger, Director, OSHA Office of
Communications, U.S. Department of
Labor, telephone: (202) 693–1999;
email: meilinger.francis2@dol.gov.
General and technical information:
Contact Mr. Kevin Robinson, Director,
Office of Technical Programs and
Coordination Activities, Directorate of
Technical Support and Emergency
Management, Occupational Safety and
Health Administration, U.S. Department
of Labor, phone: (202) 693–2300 or
email: robinson.kevin@dol.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Notice of Final Decision
OSHA hereby gives notice of the
expansion of the scope of recognition of
SGS North America, Inc. (SGS) as a
NRTL. SGS’s expansion covers the
addition of six test sites and one test
standard to the NRTL scope of
recognition.
OSHA recognition of a NRTL signifies
that the organization meets the
requirements specified in 29 CFR
1910.7. Recognition is an
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7709
acknowledgment that the organization
can perform independent safety testing
and certification of the specific products
covered within the scope of recognition.
Each NRTL’s scope of recognition
includes (1) the type of products the
NRTL may test, with each type specified
by the applicable test standard; and (2)
the recognized site(s) that has/have the
technical capability to perform the
product-testing and productcertification activities for test standards
within the NRTL’s scope. Recognition is
not a delegation or grant of government
authority; however, recognition enables
employers to use products approved by
the NRTL to meet OSHA standards that
require product testing and certification.
The agency processes applications by
a NRTL for initial recognition and for an
expansion or renewal of this
recognition, following requirements in
Appendix A to 29 CFR 1910.7. This
appendix requires that the agency
publish two notices in the Federal
Register in processing an application. In
the first notice, OSHA announces the
application and provides a preliminary
finding. In the second notice, the agency
provides the final decision on the
application. These notices set forth the
NRTL’s scope of recognition or
modifications of that scope. OSHA
maintains an informational web page for
each NRTL, including SGS, which
details the NRTL’s scope of recognition.
These pages are available from the
OSHA website at https://www.osha.gov/
dts/otpca/nrtl/.
SGS submitted five applications to
OSHA to expand recognition as a NRTL.
The first application was received on
March 20, 2022 (OSHA–2006–0040–
0084), requesting the addition of one
test site in Brussels, Belgium. This
application was revised on January 9,
2024 (OSHA–2006–0040–0089) to
update the address on the original
application. The second expansion
application was received on March 29,
2022 (OSHA–2006–0040–0085),
requesting the addition of one test site
in Yokohama, Japan. This application
was revised on May 9, 2024 (OSHA–
2006–0040–0091) requesting an
additional test standard in addition to
the Yokohama site. The third expansion
application was received on March 30,
2022 (OSHA–2006–0040–0086),
requesting the addition of one test site
in Munich, Germany. This application
was revised on January 9, 2024 (OSHA–
2006–0040–0090) to update the address
on the application to Puchheim,
Germany. The fourth (OSHA–2006–
0040–0087) and fifth (OSHA–2006–
0040–0088) applications were received
on April 1, 2022, requesting the
addition of two test sites in New Taipei
E:\FR\FM\22JAN1.SGM
22JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 13 (Wednesday, January 22, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7708-7709]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-01485]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Notice of Lodging of Proposed Consent Decree Under the Clean Air
Act
On January 16, 2025, the Department of Justice lodged a proposed
Consent Decree with the United States District Court for the District
of Columbia in the lawsuit entitled United States v. Fayat S.A.S., et
al., Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-120.
The United States filed a Complaint, on behalf of the United States
Environmental Protection Agency, against Fayat S.A.S. and its
subsidiaries BOMAG GmbH, BOMAG Americas, Inc., BOMAG (China)
Construction Machinery Co., Ltd., MARINI S.p.A., RAVO B.V., Charlatte
of America, Inc., PTC S.A.S., Secmair S.A.S., and MATHIEU S.A. alleging
violations of sections 203(a) and 213(d) of the Clean Air Act, 42
U.S.C. 7522(a) and 7547(d), and implementing regulations, by their
importation, introduction into commerce, and sale of nonroad equipment
containing diesel engines that were not certified to model year engine
emission standards. The Complaint also alleges related violations of
labeling and reporting requirements and seeks civil penalties and
appropriate injunctive relief.
Under the proposed Consent Decree, the Defendants will pay a civil
penalty of $11,000,000 and will complete a project to mitigate harm
caused by excess nitrogen oxide and particulate matter emissions from
the noncompliant engines.
The publication of this notice opens a period for public comment on
the proposed Consent Decree. Comments should be addressed to the
Assistant Attorney General, Environment and Natural Resources Division,
and should refer to United States v. Fayat S.A.S., et al., D.J. Ref.
No. 90-5-2-1-12522. All comments must be submitted no later than thirty
(30) days after the publication date of this notice. Comments may be
submitted either by email or by mail:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
To submit comments: Send them to:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
By email............................ [email protected].
By mail............................. Assistant Attorney General, U.S.
DOJ--ENRD, P.O. Box 7611,
Washington, DC 20044-7611.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Any comments submitted in writing may be filed by the United States
in whole or in part on the public court docket without notice to the
commenter.
During the public comment period, the proposed Consent Decree may
be examined and downloaded at this Justice Department website: https://www.justice.gov/enrd/consent-decrees. If you require assistance
accessing the proposed Consent Decree, you may request assistance by
email or by mail
[[Page 7709]]
to the addresses provided above for submitting comments.
Jason A. Dunn,
Assistant Section Chief, Environmental Enforcement Section, Environment
and Natural Resources Division.
[FR Doc. 2025-01485 Filed 1-21-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-15-P