Wyoming Regulatory Program, 2614-2621 [2025-00198]
Download as PDF
2614
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 7 / Monday, January 13, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
6. Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use (E.O. 13211)
This rule is not a ‘‘significant energy
action’’ under the definition of that term
found in E.O. 13211. Therefore, a
statement of energy effects is not
required.
List of Subjects
30 CFR Part 550
Administrative practice and
procedure, Continental shelf,
Environmental impact statements,
Environmental protection, Federal
lands, Government contracts,
Investigations, Mineral resources, Oil
and gas exploration, Outer continental
shelf, Penalties, Pipelines, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Rightsof-way, Sulfur.
30 CFR Part 553
Administrative practice and
procedure, Continental shelf, Financial
responsibility, Liability, Limit of
liability, Oil and gas exploration, Oil
pollution, Outer continental shelf,
Penalties, Pipelines, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Rights-ofway, Surety bonds, Treasury securities.
This action by the Principal Deputy
Assistant Secretary is taken pursuant to
an existing delegation of authority.
Steven H. Feldgus,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Land
and Minerals Management.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, BOEM amends 30 CFR parts
550 and 553 as follows:
PART 550—OIL AND GAS AND
SULPHUR OPERATIONS IN THE
OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF
1. The authority citation for part 550
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1751; 31 U.S.C. 9701;
43 U.S.C. 1334.
2. Revise § 550.1403 to read as
follows:
■
§ 550.1403
penalty?
What is the maximum civil
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
The maximum civil penalty is
$55,764 per day per violation.
PART 553—OIL SPILL FINANCIAL
RESPONSIBILITY FOR OFFSHORE
FACILITIES
3. The authority citation for part 553
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 2704, 2716; 2716a;
E.O. 12777, as amended.
4. Revise § 553.51(a) to read as
follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Jan 09, 2025
Jkt 265001
§ 553.51 What are the penalties for not
complying with this part?
(a) If you fail to comply with the
financial responsibility requirements of
OPA at 33 U.S.C. 2716 or with the
requirements of this part, then you may
be liable for a civil penalty of up to
$59,114 per COF per day of violation
(that is, each day a COF is operated
without acceptable evidence of OSFR).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2025–00257 Filed 1–10–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4340–98–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation
and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 950
[SATS No. WY–049–FOR; Docket No. OSM–
2021–0003; S1D1S SS08011000 SX064A000
245S180110; S1D1S SS08011000
SX064A000 24XS501520]
Wyoming Regulatory Program
Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of
amendment.
AGENCY:
We, the Office of Surface
Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), are approving an amendment
to the Wyoming regulatory program
(hereinafter, the Wyoming Program or
Program) under the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977
(SMCRA or the Act). On its own
initiative, the Wyoming Land Quality
Division (LQD), in response to State
legislative changes enacted in 2020,
proposed rules to its Program that
facilitate the disposal of inert
decommissioned wind turbine blades
and towers as backfill in end walls or
the final pit voids in surface coal mining
operations. In addition, Wyoming has
updated Chapter 2 of its Coal Rules,
titled ‘‘Permit Application
Requirements for Surface Coal Mining
Operations,’’ to provide consistency
with the Wyoming Secretary of State’s
Rules on Rules, as well as correct
grammatical errors.
DATES: Effective February 12, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Attn: Jeffrey Fleischman, Field Office
Director, Office of Surface Mining
Reclamation and Enforcement, 100 East
B Street, Casper, Wyoming 82602,
Telephone: (307) 261–6550, Email:
jfleischman@osmre.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Background on the Wyoming Program
II. Submission of the Amendment
III. OSMRE’s Findings
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSMRE’s Decision
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background on the Wyoming
Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a
State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and
reclamation operations on non-Federal
and non-Indian lands within its borders
by demonstrating that its program
includes, among other things, State laws
and regulations that govern surface coal
mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the Act and consistent
with the Federal regulations. See 30
U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7).
On the basis of these criteria, the
Secretary of the Interior conditionally
approved the Wyoming program on
November 26, 1980. You can find
background information on the
Wyoming program, including the
Secretary’s findings, the disposition of
comments, and conditions of approval
in the November 26, 1980, Federal
Register (45 FR 78637). You can also
find later actions concerning Wyoming’s
program and program amendments at 30
CFR 950.11, 950.12, 950.15, 950.16, and
950.20.
II. Submission of the Amendment
By letter dated June 4, 2021
(Administrative Record No. WY–49–01),
Wyoming LQD sent us an amendment to
its program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1201 et seq.). Wyoming submitted the
amendment in response to legislative
changes made through Wyoming House
Bill HB0129 during the 2020 legislative
session, to Wyoming Statute (W.S.)
§ 35–11–402(a)(xiii). These changes
outlined rules regarding how noncoal,
non-mining waste, in the form of inert
decommissioned wind turbine blades
and towers, could be used as backfill in
open surface coal mine pits in order to
facilitate disposal of those materials.
The proposed revisions to Chapter 2 of
the Program allow for inert wind turbine
blades and towers to be placed in the
final pit voids or end walls of surface
coal mining operations during
reclamation. In addition, Wyoming has
proposed grammatical changes to
Chapter 2 as well as minor edits to
provide consistency with the Wyoming
Secretary of State’s Rules on Rules.
Wyoming stated in its submission that
the Wyoming Legislature tasked LDQ
with developing rules and regulations
about the disposal of noncoal, nonmining-generated solid wastes at surface
coal mining and reclamation operations
because of the large volume of
decommissioned wind turbine blades
and towers, a lack of scalable recycling
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 7 / Monday, January 13, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
methods to facilitate their disposal, and
limited guidance in SMCRA about this
type of disposal. Wyoming’s submission
seeks to address issues associated with
the resulting stockpile of
decommissioned wind turbine blades
and towers as a result of wind energy
generation, upgrades, and routine
maintenance.
We announced receipt of the
proposed amendment in the August 4,
2021, Federal Register (86 FR 41907).
With that announcement, we opened
the public comment period and
provided an opportunity for a public
hearing or meeting on the adequacy of
the proposed amendment. We did not
hold a public hearing or meeting
because none was requested. We did not
receive any comments regarding the
amendment. The public comment
period ended on September 3, 2021.
On September 27, 2024, OSMRE sent
a letter to the Environmental Protection
Agency’s Office of Land and Emergency
Management (EPA) for comment on
Wyoming’s proposed amendment. On
October 24, 2024, EPA responded that it
does not see a conflict between
Wyoming’s proposed revisions and the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA) as long as the facilities are
permitted and subject to Wyoming’s
Construction and Demolition Landfill
Regulations under Chapter 4 of
Wyoming’s Solid Waste Division Rules,
and meet the Federal criteria at 40 CFR
257, Subpart A. To further assist us in
making a final determination on
Wyoming’s submission, by letter dated
November 26, 2024, OSMRE sent
Wyoming a letter requesting
clarification on certain issues
(Administrative Record No. WY–049–
12; www.regulations.gov Docket No.
OSM–2021–0003–0009). Wyoming
responded by letter dated December 3,
2024 (‘‘Clarification Letter’’)
(Administrative Record No. WY–049–
13; www.regulations.gov Docket No.
OSM–2021–0003–0010).
III. OSMRE’s Findings
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
We are approving the revisions to
Wyoming’s State program. We made the
following findings about Wyoming’s
amendment as provided under SMCRA
and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR
730.5, 732.15, and 732.17.
1. Discussion of Regulatory Changes
Submitted by Wyoming
a. WCWR 020–0006–2 Section 1(a);
Section 2(a); Section 3 (b)–(d), (f), (j)–
(k); Section 4(a); and Section 5(a)—
Minor corrections
In these sections, Wyoming proposed
grammatical changes to Chapter 2 as
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Jan 09, 2025
Jkt 265001
well as minor edits to provide
consistency with the Wyoming
Secretary of State’s Rules on Rules.
These revisions were non-substantive
changes. Therefore, we are approving
Wyoming’s proposed changes to WCWR
020–0006–2 Section 1(a); Section 2(a);
Section 3 (b)–(d), (f), (j)–(k); Section
4(a); and Section 5(a) because they are
consistent with SMCRA and no less
effective than the Federal regulations.
b. WCWR 020–0006–2 Section 6—Wind
Turbine Blades and Towers as Backfill
Wyoming’s proposed rule changes
WCWR 020–0006–2 Section 6(b)(ii),
primarily by adding paragraph (F),
which describes what information is
required in the reclamation plan where
an operator intends to dispose of ‘‘inert
decommissioned wind turbine blades
and towers’’ as backfill. Neither SMCRA
nor the Federal regulations expressly
provide for the disposal of noncoal,
non-mining solid waste, such as inert
decommissioned wind turbine blades
and towers, on surface coal mining and
reclamation operations as part of
reclamation. The lack of Federal
counterpart, however, does not
automatically determine whether
Wyoming’s proposed changes to its
State program are consistent with
SMCRA and no less effective than the
Federal regulations. Any material
placed in mine pits or otherwise used to
reclaim a permitted mine site must
comply with SMCRA permitting
requirements and performance
standards, regardless of whether the
material originates within the permit
area or whether it is imported from
outside the permit area, and the
regulatory authority has the authority to
establish monitoring and analysis
requirements for those materials. See,
e.g., Pacific Coal Co. v. OSM, Civ. No.
03–0260Z, (W.D. Wash. Feb. 2, 2004).
So, to ensure Wyoming’s proposed
amendment meets our approval
standards, we must conduct a
comparison of Wyoming’s proposed
rules to SMCRA and the Federal
regulations.
WCWR 020–0006–2 Section 6(b)(ii)(F)
has six requirements, which specify: (I)
that ‘‘only inert base material from
decommissioned wind turbine blades
and towers’’ are allowed to be disposed
of in the backfill; (II) ‘‘[n]acelles and
nacelle housings’’ and ‘‘mechanical,
electrical, and other materials’’ are not
permitted to be disposed of in the
backfill and must be removed before
disposal; (III) as described in more
detail below, the material disposed of
may only be placed in approved
locations that meet certain criteria with
certain disclosures; (IV) certain
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2615
placement requirements, including how
the material must be placed in the pits
and groundwater monitoring; (V) final
surface reclamation requirements; and
(IV) the operator pay Wyoming, on a
quarterly basis, 25 percent of any
revenues collected by the operator for
disposal of this material.
WCWR 020–0006–2 Section
6(b)(ii)(F)(I) and (II) simply describe the
types of noncoal, non-mining solid
wastes that may be placed in the backfill
under this section. As proposed, WCWR
020–0006–2 Section 6(b)(ii)(F)(III)
contains six requirements for locations
where inert decommissioned wind
turbine blades and towers are
authorized as part of the backfill. The
first two requirements provide the
location within the backfill area in
which inert decommissioned wind
turbine blades and towers may be
placed. Specifically, these materials can
be placed in ‘‘end walls’’ or ‘‘final pit
voids’’ and placed ‘‘a minimum of
twenty feet above the pre-mining
potentiometric surface of the coal
aquifer and a minimum of twenty feet
below the final regraded spoils
surface[.]’’ WCWR 020–0006–2 Section
6(b)(ii)(F)(III)(1.) and (2.)
Neither SMCRA nor the Federal
regulations nor Wyoming’s regulations
contain definitions of ‘‘end wall’’ or
‘‘final pit voids.’’ However, the end wall
and final pit are commonly understood
to refer to the final cut of an open pit
or the last pit excavation in a mining
area. Therefore, OSMRE interprets this
to mean that Wyoming intends to allow
disposal of certain types of inert
decommissioned wind turbine blades
and towers in the open space, or void,
left in the final mining cut and not the
first or middle cuts on a mine site.
Similarly, SMCRA, the Federal
regulations, and Wyoming’s regulations
do not contain a definition or
explanation of the phrase ‘‘pre-mining
potentiometric surface of the coal
aquifer.’’ OSMRE interprets this to mean
that any disposal would only be allowed
in the area 20 feet above the pre-mining
potentiometric surface of the coal
aquifer. If the disposal is occurring
above a pre-mining unconfined coal
aquifer, OSMRE interprets this to mean
that the material would be placed at
least 20 feet above the top of the coal
seam aquifer. It is OSMRE’s
understanding that this is designed to
ensure that when groundwater returns
to the backfilled area, the wind turbines
and blades will not come in contact
with groundwater. As such, we find that
these provisions are in accordance with
SMCRA and consistent with the Federal
regulations; any implementation of this
phrase by Wyoming that is inconsistent
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
2616
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 7 / Monday, January 13, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
with this interpretation may require
OSMRE to reevaluate this approval.
Because SMCRA and the Federal
regulations do not contemplate disposal
of any noncoal, non-mine waste in
backfill areas on SMCRA sites, there are
no existing corresponding statutory or
regulatory requirements for this type of
disposal. While this type of disposal is
not explicitly authorized under SMCRA,
the fact that Wyoming’s proposed
changes do not exempt the areas
accepting this waste material from any
other requirements of either SMCRA or
the Federal regulations indicates that
the practice should not result in mining
or reclamation that is not in accordance
with the minimum requirements of
SMCRA or inconsistent with the Federal
regulations. Furthermore, the proposed
changes requiring that the specific types
of waste be placed only in limited areas,
a minimum of 20 feet above the premining potentiometric surface of the
coal aquifer and a minimum of 20 feet
below the final regraded spoils surface
should reduce the potential for this
material to come into contact with
water. This requirement should reduce
the potential for leachate and not
conflict with the existing SMCRA
performance standards.
WCWR 020–0006–2 Section
6(b)(ii)(F)(III) sections (3.) and (5.)
require that the backfill disposal
location be mapped with a legal
description, with backfill locations and
groundwater monitoring locations
updated annually, and that a disclosure
be placed on the real property deed for
the described lands before final bond
release. Again, because SMCRA and the
Federal regulations do not contemplate
disposal of such noncoal, non-mine
waste in backfill areas on SMCRA sites,
there are no corresponding Federal
statutory or regulatory requirements for
this type of disposal under SMCRA.
Instead, OSMRE evaluated this proposal
to ensure that Wyoming’s proposed
changes are in accordance with SMCRA
and consistent with the Federal
regulations, which raised two potential
concerns.
First, the wording of WCWR 020–
0006–2 Section 6(b)(ii)(F) appears to
require all applicants to include a plan
to dispose of inert decommissioned
towers and blades in their reclamation
plan. For example, WCWR 020–0006–2
Section 6(b)(ii)(B) and (C) each contain
a preface that reclamation plans for
terraces & benches and permanent water
impoundments are required only when
those features ‘‘are proposed’’ by the
applicant; in contrast, WCWR 020–
0006–2 Section 6(b)(ii)(F) has no such
preface. In the Clarification Letter,
Wyoming stated that disposal of inert
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Jan 09, 2025
Jkt 265001
decommissioned wind turbine blades
and towers on a SMCRA mine site is ‘‘a
voluntary requirement’’ and will only be
included in the reclamation plan if ‘‘the
operator chooses to accept and use the
towers and blades as backfill.’’
Second, the proposed rules do not
address what would happen if a mineral
or surface owner does not consent to a
proposal to place inert decommissioned
wind turbine blades and towers in the
excavated pits. In the Clarification
Letter, Wyoming responded that: ‘‘[t]he
rules apply regardless of surface
ownership (private, state or federal) but
surface owner consent would be
required before the disposal of any wind
turbine blades or towers would be
allowed under WS § 35–11–406(b)(xi)
and (xii).’’ See, e.g., WS § 35–11–
406(b)(xii) (which ‘‘requires an
instrument of consent from the surface
landowner, if different from the owner
of the mineral estate, be included to the
mining and reclamation plans. If
consent cannot be obtained, the
applicant can request a hearing on the
issue before the Environmental Quality
Council. The Council is required to
issue an order in lieu of consent if
certain findings are made.’’). Wyoming
also noted that WCWR 020–0006–2
Section 6(b)(ii)(F)(III)(5.) would require
that where inert decommissioned wind
turbine blades and towers have been
disposed of on a SMCRA site, a
disclosure of such must be placed on
the real property deed, ‘‘which would
also require surface owner consent.’’
Furthermore, Wyoming has clarified
that consent from surface owners,
including the Federal government, is
required before such disposal can occur.
We note, however, that Federal lands, as
defined in SMCRA, applies to ‘‘any
land, including mineral interests,
owned by the United States . . . .’’ 30
U.S.C. 1291(4). To the extent that
Wyoming seeks to apply this rule to
Federal lands (including lands with
either Federal surface or mineral
ownership) through its State-Federal
Cooperative Agreement (30 CFR 950.20),
Wyoming must receive all necessary
Federal agency approvals before any
disposal occurs.
After clarification of these two points,
we find that these provisions are in
accordance with SMCRA and consistent
with the Federal regulations; any
implementation of this regulations by
Wyoming that is inconsistent with these
clarifications may require OSMRE to
reevaluate this approval.
WCWR 020–0006–2 Section
6(b)(ii)(F)(III)(4.) allows the reclaimed
land above an approved backfill
disposal location to be designated as a
joint or alternative land use as long as
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the applicant provides the required
demonstration in Section 6(b)(x)(C) of
the same Chapter and the disposal
supports the approved land use as
required in Section 6(b)(x).
Under the Federal regulations at 30
CFR 816.133, all disturbed lands are
required to be restored in a timely
manner to conditions capable of
supporting the uses they were capable
of supporting before any mining or to a
higher or better use. If the postmining
land use is different than the pre-mining
uses of land, a regulatory authority may
approve an ‘‘alternative land use’’ if it
is a higher or better use. Wyoming’s
currently approved regulations at
WCWR 020–0006–2 Section 6(b)(x)(B)–
(C) are substantially similar to the
Federal regulations. Wyoming’s
proposed amendment states that ‘‘[t]he
approved backfill disposal location may
be designed as a joint or alternative land
use in the approved reclamation plan
(WCWR 020–0006–2 Sec. 6(b)(x)(B)).
Approval of alternative land uses
requires a demonstration as required in
WCWR 020–0006–2 Sec. 6(b)(x)(C) [of
WYDEQ’s Coal Rules]. The disposal of
inert towers and blades must support
the postmining land use identified in
accordance with the requirements of
Section 6(x) of this Chapter.’’ In its
Clarification Letter, Wyoming confirmed
that the inert decommissioned wind
turbine tower and blade disposal will
occur contemporaneously with
reclamation and that it is not creating a
new postmining land use for waste
disposal areas. Specifically, Wyoming
noted that the wind turbine blades and
towers ‘‘would only be part of the
backfill plan and not contemporaneous
with final reclamation.’’
We understand Wyoming’s response
to mean, as required by the proposed
changes to their reclamation plan
requirements, wind turbine blade and
tower disposal would only occur during
the backfill stage of the reclamation
once the operation has met an end wall
or final void. As required by the
performance standards in both the
Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.100
and the Wyoming regulations at WCWR
020–0006–4 Section 2(b)(i), all coal
mine operators are required to reclaim
land as contemporaneously as
practicable with mining operations,
including but not limited to backfilling,
grading, topsoil replacement, and
revegetation. Nothing in Wyoming’s
proposed amendment would remove or
alter the existing contemporaneous
reclamation requirement from
Wyoming’s performance standards.
Operators who elect to dispose of wind
turbine blades and towers must still
reclaim their land as
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 7 / Monday, January 13, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
contemporaneously as possible with
their mining operation. Thus, with this
understanding, Wyoming’s proposed
amendment is in accordance SMCRA
and consistent with the Federal
regulations in relation to
contemporaneous reclamation
requirements.
WCWR 020–0006–2 Section
6(b)(ii)(F)(III)(6.) requires that any
‘‘backfill disposal location approved by
the Division shall comply with Chapter
4, Section 4 of the Solid and Hazardous
Waste Division Rules. As enacted in
1977, SMCRA states that ‘‘[n]othing in
this Act shall be construed as
superseding, amending, modifying, or
repealing . . . The Solid Waste Disposal
Act . . .’’ 30 U.S.C. 1292(a)(5). One year
prior, RCRA amended the Solid Waste
Disposal Act on October 21, 1976.
Public Law 94–580, Oct. 21, 1976, 90
Stat. 2795. Therefore, SMCRA does not
permit an action that has the effect of
superseding, amending, modifying, or
repealing RCRA or the Solid Waste
Disposal Act.
In Wyoming’s June 4, 2021,
submission letter for this proposed
amendment, Wyoming stated that its
proposed rules for the disposal of
decommissioned inert towers and
blades would be compliant with the
Wyoming Solid Waste Diversion Rules
Chapter 4 Construction and Demolition
Landfill Regulations. However,
Wyoming’s proposed rules do not
require a permit under the Construction
and Demolition Landfill Regulations
and only provide cross-references to
Chapter 4, Sections 4 and 8(b)(iv)(A) of
the Solid and Hazardous Waste Division
Rules, which are subsets of Wyoming’s
Construction and Demolition Landfill
within WCWR 020–0009–4 Section 2(a)
and the Federal requirements of 40 CFR
part 257, subpart A.
OSMRE acknowledges that an LQD
permit issued pursuant to SMCRA can,
in certain circumstances, substitute for
the separate permit required by
Wyoming’s Construction and
Demolition Landfill requirements. As
noted earlier and as discussed below
under ‘‘Section IV. Summary and
Disposition of Comments,’’ OSMRE
sought consultation from EPA because
Wyoming’s proposal would authorize
disposal of waste material normally
regulated under RCRA on SMCRA sites.
EPA’s response indicated that a facility
receiving decommissioned inert towers
and blades, including SMCRA coal
mines, would need to meet all
requirements of Wyoming’s
Construction and Demolition Landfill
regulations within WCWR 020–0009–4,
Section 2(a), and the Federal criteria at
40 CFR part 257, subpart A. The EPA
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Jan 09, 2025
Jkt 265001
notes that Section 2(a) of Wyoming’s
Construction and Demolition Landfill
regulations requires RCRA permit
applications to contain applicable
information related to Sections 3
through 17, which include criteria for
the location, design and construction,
operating, monitoring, and corrective
action standards, among others. The
EPA concluded that it does not see a
conflict between Wyoming’s proposed
rule and the RCRA program, so long as
these proposed rules are implemented
such that they meet Wyoming’s
Construction and Demolition Landfill
regulations within WCWR 020–0009–4,
Section 2(a) and the Federal
requirements of 40 CFR part 257,
subpart A.
In its Clarification Letter, Wyoming
stated that ‘‘[a]lthough specific sections
of Solid Waste Rule, Chapter 4 are listed
in the Land Quality Rule, facilities are
required to meet all applicable
standards in all rules.’’ Based on this
representation that all facilities,
including SMCRA sites receiving wind
turbine and blade waste materials, are
required to satisfy all Construction and
Demolition Landfill regulations within
WCWR 020–0009–4 Section 2(a) and the
Federal requirements of 40 CFR part
257, subpart A, OSMRE determined that
these provisions would be in
accordance with SMCRA and consistent
with Federal regulations; any
implementation of this section that is
inconsistent with this interpretation
may require OSMRE to reevaluate its
approval.
As proposed, WCWR 020–0006–2
Section 6(b)(ii)(F)(IV) contains three
closure requirements for locations
where inert decommissioned wind
turbine blades and towers are
authorized as part of the backfill. The
first outlines how this material should
be placed in lifts to prevent subsidence,
the second outlines groundwater
monitoring requirements, and the third
relates to bond releases. WCWR 020–
0006–2 Section 6(b)(ii)(F)(IV).
WCWR 020–0006–2 Section
6(b)(ii)(F)(IV)(1.) requires that inert
decommissioned wind turbine blades
and towers be placed in lifts not to
exceed 10 feet and covered with a
minimum of 15 feet of suitable backfill
‘‘dry tomb placement.’’ The Federal
regulations at 30 CFR 780.18(b)(3)
require a plan for backfilling, soil
stabilization, grading, and compacting,
with contour maps or cross sections to
show the anticipated final surface
configuration in accordance with 30
CFR 816.102. Federal regulation 30 CFR
816.102(c) requires the operator to
compact spoil to ensure stability or to
prevent leaching of toxic material.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2617
Under Wyoming’s rules at WCWR 020–
0006–2 Section 6(b)(ii)(E), a mine
operator’s reclamation plan must be
designed to ensure stability of the
reclaimed land surface.
A lift is a method in which an
operator puts dirt above and below an
area or object. Typically, these areas are
compacted. This placement
configuration stabilizes the surrounding
area and helps to prevent leaching of
material throughout the surrounding
soil; thus, assuming the lift uses
compacted dirt, this section is in
accordance with SMCRA and consistent
with the Federal regulations.
While lifts are helpful in preventing
subsidence, Wyoming’s proposed
amendment does not specify whether
this proposed regulation requires the
lifts to be compacted or if loose fill is
allowed. Wyoming’s proposed
regulations do not address if or how
inert decommissioned wind turbine
blades and towers will be processed
before disposal. Inert towers and blade
casings are generally rigid and hollow
and are made of fiberglass and epoxy
resin. While the material is durable,
over an extended period of time it will
break down. In addition, unprocessed
inert turbine blades and casings are
hollow, so the breakdown of material
could potentially cause soil instability
and subsidence, which could be
worsened if multiple inert turbine
blades and towers are stacked together.
Therefore, there is potential that surface
and postmining land use activities will
be affected by a subsidence issue in the
future, after bond release.
In its Clarification Letter, Wyoming
stated that Chapter 4, Section 2(b) of the
Wyoming’s Coal Rules (Coal Chapter 2,
Section 6(b)(ii)(F)(IV)(1)), which details
the requirements for a plan for
backfilling, grading, and contouring all
affected lands, requires an applicant to
provide procedures for assuring stability
of the reclaimed land surface.
Wyoming’s response indicates that
Wyoming intends for its rules to require
an operator to reclaim areas, including
wind turbine disposal sites, in a way
that prevents subsidence. Thus,
Wyoming’s proposed rules are in
accordance with SMCRA and consistent
with the Federal regulations in
preventing subsidence in reclaimed
areas; any implementation of this
section that is inconsistent with this
interpretation may cause OSMRE to
reevaluate its approval.
WCWR 020–0006–2 Section
6(b)(ii)(F)(IV)(2.) and (3.) require that
the groundwater monitoring plan
required by Wyoming’s existing coal
rules also include monitoring wells to
be installed and monitored in
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
2618
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 7 / Monday, January 13, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
accordance with Chapter 4, Section
8(b)(iv)(A) of the Solid and Hazardous
Waste Division Rules, and that this
groundwater monitoring and vegetation
monitoring continue until final bond
release.
Under SMCRA at 30 U.S.C. 1259, a
coal mine operator is required to obtain
a performance bond once their permit
has been approved by the regulatory
authority. The amount of the bond is
calculated by determining the cost to
fully reclaim a mine site. To obtain full
release of its performance bond, an
operator must meet the requirements of
30 CFR 800.40, which includes rules for
re-vegetation and water monitoring,
among others. Wyoming has equivalent
requirements under its own Coal
Program at WCWR 020–0006–15.
Wyoming’s proposed amendment does
not explicitly require recalculating bond
amounts to account for potential
impacts or uncertainty related to the
disposal of inert decommissioned wind
turbines and towers on their permit.
While Wyoming did not specifically
indicate how the proposed amendment
will affect its bonding calculations,
Wyoming reiterated in its Clarification
Letter that operators are required to
meet all of the existing and approved
bonding rules in WCWR 020–0006–11,
as well as those prescribed by SMCRA
and the Federal regulations. Under
Wyoming’s existing rules, if disposal of
wind turbine blades or towers caused
unanticipated impacts, Wyoming would
be required to adjust the bond amounts
and order an operator to correct the
issue without any further revision to its
regulations.
Wyoming’s proposal adds the
requirement that any additional
groundwater monitoring requirements
under Chapter 4, Section 8(b)(iv)(A) of
the Solid and Hazardous Waste Division
Rules be added to LDQ’s permit.
Wyoming’s proposal does not remove
any existing groundwater monitoring
requirements or bond requirements
already approved by OSMRE.
Consequently, Wyoming’s proposed
amendment is in accordance with
SMCRA and consistent with the Federal
regulations with regard to groundwater
monitoring and bonding.
As proposed, WCWR 020–0006–2
Section 6(b)(ii)(F)(V) contains two final
surface reclamation requirements. First,
Section 6(b)(ii)(F)(V)(1.) requires that
the final reclamation surface must blend
with the surrounding mine reclamation
and have a permanent vegetative cover
in accordance with Chapter 4, Section
2(d) of the Division’s Coal Chapter 4
requirements. Second, Section
6(b)(ii)(F)(V)(2.) requires that the final
reclamation must drain properly and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Jan 09, 2025
Jkt 265001
not impound water in accordance with
the Division’s Coal Chapter 4
requirements.
Under the Federal regulations at 30
CFR 816.102, areas disturbed by surface
coal mining operations must be
backfilled and graded to achieve
approximate original contour (AOC),
except in limited cases. Wyoming’s
regulations, at WCWR 020–0006–4 Sec.
2 (b)(iii), also require all affected lands
to be returned to AOC, with some
exceptions. Wyoming defines AOC to
mean ‘‘surface configuration achieved
by backfilling and grading of the mined
areas so that the reclaimed land surface
closely resembles the general surface
configuration of the land prior to mining
and blends into and complements the
drainage pattern of the surrounding
terrain.’’ WCWR 020–0006–1 Sec. 2 (h).
Under its proposed regulations for the
disposal of inert towers and blades
within surface coal mining sites,
Wyoming would require the reclaimed
surface to not exceed the approximate
pre-mining slopes, WCWR 020–0006–2
Sec. 6 (b)(ii)(D), and the lands to blend
with the surrounding mine reclamation.
WCWR 020–0006–2 Sec. 6
(b)(ii)(F)(V)(1). To clarify this matter, we
asked Wyoming if it could describe how
its proposed regulations will ensure that
the surface configuration achieved by
backfilling and grading of the areas
receiving inert towers and blades will
closely resemble the general surface
configuration of the land prior to mining
and blend into and complement the
drainage pattern of the surrounding
terrain. (Administrative Record No.
WY–049–12).
In its Clarification Letter, Wyoming
confirmed that the requirements in
Sections 6(b)(ii)(F)(V)(1.) and (2.) are in
addition to the requirement that the
entire mine, including areas receiving
disposal of inert towers and blades,
must achieve approximate original
contour as required by Chapter 4,
Section 2(b)(iii) of the Division’s Coal
Rules. Because this provision does not
remove any existing requirements
related to achieving approximate
original contour and only adds the
requirement that the disposal areas must
blend with the surrounding mine and
drain properly, Wyoming’s proposed
amendment is in accordance with
SMCRA and consistent with the Federal
regulations in ensuring that these sites
will be reclaimed to achieve
approximate original contour.
2. Conclusion
As explained above, with the
information contained in its initial
submission and the Clarification Letter,
we conclude that the proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
amendment is in accordance with
SMCRA and consistent with the Federal
regulations. We therefore approve
Wyoming’s changes to its State program.
IV. Summary and Disposition of
Comments
Public Comments
We asked for public comments on the
amendment, but we did not receive any.
Federal Agency Comments
On June 16, 2021, under 30 CFR
732.17(h)(11)(i) and section 503(b) of
SMCRA, we requested comments on the
amendment from various Federal
agencies with an actual or potential
interest in the Wyoming program
(Administrative Record No. WY–49–04).
We did not receive any comments.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Concurrence and Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), we
are required to get a written concurrence
from EPA for those provisions of the
program amendment that relate to air or
water quality standards issued under
the authority of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act
(42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). None of the
revisions that Wyoming proposed to
make in this amendment pertain to air
or water quality standards. Therefore,
we did not ask EPA to concur on the
amendment. However, on June 16, 2021,
under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), we
requested comments from EPA Region 8
on the amendment (Administrative
Record No. WY–049–04). The EPA did
not respond to this request.
OSMRE identified that Wyoming’s
proposed amendment may have RCRA
implications because Wyoming’s
proposal would authorize the disposal
of waste material normally regulated
under RCRA in SMCRA sites. So,
pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), on
September 27, 2024, we sent a letter to
the EPA’s Office of Land and Emergency
Management requesting comment.
(Administrative Record No. WY–049–
07). The EPA responded on October 24,
2024. (Administrative Record No. WY–
049–10). These letters are posted on
www.regulations.gov (Docket Nos.
OSM–2021–0003–00007 and OSM–
2021–0003–0008).
The EPA commented that, under
RCRA, the EPA establishes a national
minimum standard for non-hazardous
waste, the states are delegated the lead
role in overseeing the disposal of nonhazardous waste, and the generator of
waste is ultimately responsible for
determining whether the waste qualifies
as non-hazardous. The EPA explained
that, if wind turbine blades and towers
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 7 / Monday, January 13, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
are appropriately characterized as nonhazardous waste and no other waste is
accepted at these wind turbine disposal
facilities, then such facilities would be
subject to 40 CFR part 257, subpart A,
entitled ‘‘Classification of Solid Waste
Disposal Facilities and Practices.’’
As explained in more detail above,
the EPA interpreted Wyoming’s
proposed amendment to mean that the
wind turbine disposal facilities are
permitted and subject to Wyoming’s
Construction and Demolition Landfill
Regulations under Chapter 4 of
Wyoming’s Solid Waste Division Rules.
Accordingly, a facility under these
proposed rules would need to meet both
the Wyoming criteria and Federal
criteria at 40 CFR part 257, subpart A.
The EPA concluded its comment by
stating that, so long as these criteria are
met, it does not anticipate a conflict
between Wyoming’s proposed
amendments and RCRA.
OSMRE Response
OSMRE appreciates EPA’s response.
As explained above, SMCRA provides
that nothing in SMCRA can be
construed as superseding, amending,
modifying, or repealing various
environmental laws, including the Solid
Waste Disposal Act, which RCRA
amended. In its June 4, 2021,
submission letter for this proposed
amendment, Wyoming stated that its
proposed rules for the disposal of
decommissioned inert towers and
blades would be compliant with
Wyoming Solid Waste Diversion Rules
Chapter 4, ‘‘Construction and
Demolition Landfill Regulations.’’ In our
November 26, 2024, letter to Wyoming,
we asked Wyoming to describe how its
proposed regulations will comply with
all of Chapter 4 of Wyoming’s Solid
Waste Diversion Rules. Wyoming’s
Clarification Letter stated: ‘‘The
standards found in Wyoming Solid
Waste Rule Chapter 4 are state standards
and there is no federal oversight for this
type of waste disposal under [RCRA]
and as verified in US EPA’s October 24,
2024, letter. Although specific sections
of Solid Waste Rule, Chapter 4 are listed
in the Land Quality Rule, facilities are
required to meet all applicable
standards in all rules.’’
Based on EPA’s response and
Wyoming’s commitment that ‘‘facilities
are required to meet all applicable
standards in all rules[,]’’ we conclude
that this amendment does not
supersede, amend, modify, or repeal
RCRA so long as the disposal facilities
authorized under this amendment are
permitted and subject to all of
Wyoming’s Construction and
Demolition Landfill Regulations under
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Jan 09, 2025
Jkt 265001
Chapter 4 of Wyoming’s Solid Waste
Division Rules and meet the Federal
criteria at 40 CFR part 257, subpart A.
State Historical Preservation Officer
(SHPO) and the Advisory Council on
Historic Preservation (ACHP)
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), we are
required to request comments from the
SHPO and ACHP on amendments that
may have an effect on historic
properties. On June 16, 2021, we
requested comments on Wyoming’s
amendment (Administrative Record No.
WY–054–04). We did not receive
comments from the SHPO or ACHP.
Nevertheless, OSMRE determined there
will be no effect on historic or cultural
resources as a result of this amendment
because wind turbine blades and towers
will be disposed of in pits as backfill
material within the footprint of areas
disturbed by coal mining activities.
V. OSMRE’s Decision
Based on the above findings, we are
approving Wyoming’s amendment
submitted to us on June 4, 2021. To
implement this decision, we are
amending the Federal regulations at 30
CFR part 950, which codify decisions
concerning the Wyoming program. In
accordance with the Administrative
Procedure Act, this rule will take effect
30 days after the date of publication.
Section 503(a) of SMCRA requires that
the State’s program demonstrate that the
State has the capability of carrying out
the provisions of the Act and meeting its
purposes. SMCRA requires consistency
of State and Federal standards.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Executive Order 12630—Governmental
Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights
This rule would not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications that would result in
private property being taken for
government use without just
compensation under the law. Therefore,
a takings implication assessment is not
required.
Executive Order 12866—Regulatory
Planning and Review, 13563—
Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review, 14094—Modernizing Regulatory
Review
Executive Order 12866, as amended
by Executive Order 14094, provides that
the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs in the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) will review all significant
rules. Pursuant to OMB guidance dated
October 12, 1993 (OMB Memo M–94–3),
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2619
the approval of state program
amendments is exempted from OMB
review under Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094.
Executive Order 13563, which reaffirms
and supplements Executive Order
12866, retains this exemption.
Executive Order 12988—Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of the Interior has
reviewed this rule as required by section
3 of Executive Order 12988. The
Department determined that this
Federal Register document meets the
criteria of Section 3 of Executive Order
12988, which is intended to ensure that
the agency review its legislation and
proposed regulations to eliminate
drafting errors and ambiguity; that the
agency write its legislation and
regulations to minimize litigation; and
that the agency’s legislation and
regulations provide a clear legal
standard for affected conduct rather
than a general standard, and promote
simplification and burden reduction.
Because section 3 focuses on the quality
of Federal legislation and regulations,
the Department limited its review under
this Executive Order to the quality of
this Federal Register document and to
changes to the Federal regulations. The
review under this Executive Order did
not extend to the language of the State
regulatory program or to the program
amendment that the State of Wyoming
drafted.
Executive Order 13132—Federalism
This rule has potential Federalism
implications as defined under Section
1(a) of Executive Order 13132.
Executive Order 13132 directs agencies
to ‘‘grant the States the maximum
administrative discretion possible’’ with
respect to Federal statutes and
regulations administered by the States.
Wyoming, through its approved
regulatory program, implements and
administers SMCRA and its
implementing regulations at the State
level. This rule approves an amendment
to the Wyoming program submitted and
drafted by the State and, thus, is
consistent with the direction to provide
maximum administrative discretion to
States.
Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department of the Interior strives
to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Tribes
through a commitment to consultation
with Tribes and recognition of their
right to self-governance and tribal
sovereignty. We have evaluated this rule
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
2620
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 7 / Monday, January 13, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
under the Department’s consultation
policy and under the criteria of
Executive Order 13175 and have
determined that, although no Indian
lands, as defined under SMCRA, are
implicated by this rule, this State
program amendment may have
substantial direct effects on 49
Federally-recognized Tribes because of
the potential implications for the Tribe
or Tribal members, Tribal treaty rights,
reserved rights, trust resources, or
ancestral lands. Therefore, on
September 27, 2024, we sent invitation
letters to consult to these 49 Tribes
(Administrative Record No. WY–049–
08).
In response to our invitation, we
received one request for Tribal
consultation, one request for an
informational meeting, and two written
comments. Despite the request for Tribal
consultation, we did not receive a
response to our follow-up
communication to set up a date and
time, so the Tribal consultation did not
go forward. In response to the request
for an informational meeting, we met
with a representative of the Shoshone
Paiute Tribe on October 28, 2024.
During the meeting, we explained
Wyoming’s proposed amendment to the
Tribe in further detail. At the end of the
meeting, the Shoshone Paiute decided
to not pursue Tribal consultation.
We received a written comment from
the Northern Cheyenne Tribe on
October 22, 2024 (Administrative
Record No. WY–049–09). The Tribe
recognized that this proposed
amendment would allow for the
disposal of wind turbines and blades
without the need to seek out any new
undisturbed land; however, the Tribe
expressed concern with how Tribal
governments are included in the
determination of potential impacts to
archaeological resources. The Northern
Cheyenne Tribe stated that Wyoming
does not include Tribes as part of the
state SMCRA permit review process and
that the best outcome would be to
include Tribes in the reviews and
approvals on State-owned lands with
the applicable coal mine areas for
disposition of wind turbine blades and
towers.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Jan 09, 2025
Jkt 265001
We also received a written comment
from the Comanche Nation on October
25, 2024 (Administrative Record No.
WY–049–11). In their comment, the
Comanche Nation’s Historic
Preservation Officer stated that no
prehistoric or historic archaeological
materials for the Tribe were identified
within areas of mineable coal in
Wyoming.
Executive Order 13211—Regulations
That Significantly Affect the Supply,
Distribution, or Use of Energy
Executive Order 13211 requires
agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rulemaking that is
(1) considered significant under
Executive Order 12866, and (2) likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the
supply, distribution, or use of energy.
Because this rule is exempt from review
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
a significant energy action under the
definition in Executive Order 13211, a
Statement of Energy Effects is not
required.
National Environmental Policy Act
Consistent with sections 501(a) and
702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C. 1251(a) and
1291 (d) respectively) and the U.S.
Department of the Interior Departmental
Manual, part 516, section 13.5(A), State
program amendments are not major
Federal actions within the meaning of
section 102(2)(C) of the National
Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act.
This rule: (a) does not have an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million;
(b) will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and (c) does not
have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule does not impose an
unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments or the private sector
of $100 million per year. Although there
is no Federal counterpart for Wyoming’s
proposed amendment, OSMRE’s
determination regarding unfunded
mandates is based on OSMRE’s
collaboration with State regulatory
authorities and years of experience.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 950
Intergovernmental relations, Surface
mining, Underground mining.
David A. Berry,
Regional Director, Unified Regions, 5, 7–11.
This rule does not include requests
and requirements of an individual,
partner, or corporation to obtain
information and report it to a Federal
agency. As this rule does not contain
information collection requirements, a
submission to OMB under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507 et seq.) is not required.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, 30 CFR part 950 is amended
as set forth below:
Regulatory Flexibility Act
■
Although there is no Federal
counterpart for Wyoming’s proposed
amendment, based on OSMRE’s
collaboration with State regulatory
authorities and years of experience,
OSMRE certifies that this final rule will
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PART 950—WYOMING
1. The authority citation for part 950
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
2. In § 950.15 amend the table by
adding a new entry in chronological
order by ‘‘Date of final publication’’ to
read as follows:
§ 950.15 Approval of Wyoming regulatory
program amendments.
*
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
*
*
13JAR1
*
*
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 7 / Monday, January 13, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
Original amendment
submission date
Date of final publication
*
*
June 4, 2021 ..................................
BILLING CODE 4310–05–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
National Park Service
36 CFR Part 7
[NPS–GLCA–NPS0039168; NPS–2024–0005;
PPIMGLCAA0.PPMPSAS1Z.Y00000–
255P10361]
RIN 1024–AE91
Glen Canyon National Recreation Area;
Motor Vehicles
National Park Service, Interior.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
The National Park Service
revises special regulations for Glen
Canyon National Recreation Area to
update rules about the use of motor
vehicles on roads and off roads on
designated routes and areas.
DATES: This rule is effective February
12, 2025. Comments on the information
collection contained in this final rule
should be submitted to OMB by
February 12, 2025.
ADDRESSES: The comments received on
the proposed rule are available on
www.regulations.gov in Docket No.
NPS–2024–0005.
Information Collection Requirements:
Written comments and suggestions on
the information collection requirements
should be submitted by the date
specified above in DATES to https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find this particular information
collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function. Please
provide a copy of your comments to the
NPS Information Collection Clearance
Officer (ADIR–ICCO), 13461 Sunrise
Valley Drive (MS–244), Herndon, VA
20171 (mail); or phadrea_ponds@
nps.gov (email). Please include ‘‘1024–
AE91’’ in the subject line of your
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michelle Kerns, Superintendent, Glen
Canyon National Recreation Area, P.O.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Jan 09, 2025
Citation/description
*
*
*
*
*
January 13, 2025 ........................... State initiative outlining rules regarding how decommissioned wind
turbine blades and towers can be used as backfill in open surface
coal mine pits, while updating Chapter 2 Permit Application Requirements for Surface Coal Mining Operations to provide consistency with the Wyoming Secretary of State’s Rules on Rules and
correct grammatical errors.
[FR Doc. 2025–00198 Filed 1–10–25; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
2621
Jkt 265001
Box 1507, Page, Arizona 86040, by
phone at 928–608–6210, or by email at
GLCA_Superintendent@nps.gov.
Individuals in the United States who are
deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have
a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY,
TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services.
Individuals outside the United States
should use the relay services offered
within their country to make
international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States. In
compliance with the Providing
Accountability Through Transparency
Act of 2023, the plain language
summary of the rule is available on
Regulations.gov in the docket for this
rulemaking.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Purpose and Significance of Glen
Canyon National Recreation Area
Congress established Glen Canyon
National Recreation Area (the recreation
area) in 1972 ‘‘to provide for the public
outdoor recreation use and enjoyment of
Lake Powell and lands adjacent thereto
in the states of Arizona and Utah and to
preserve the scenic, scientific, and
historic features contributing to the
public enjoyment of the area.’’ 16 U.S.C.
460dd.
The recreation area encompasses
1,254,117 acres in northern Arizona and
southeastern Utah and constitutes a
substantial part of the outstanding
public lands of the Colorado Plateau.
The recreation area offers a natural
diversity of rugged water- and windcarved canyons, buttes, mesas, and
other outstanding physiographic
features. The recreation area allows for
a variety of recreational opportunities,
including on- and off-road motor
vehicle use and contains Lake Powell,
the second-largest human-made lake in
North America, which provides the
opportunity to recreate in a natural
environment and access remote
backcountry areas. Evidence of 11,000
years of human occupation and use of
resources in the recreation area provides
a continuing story of the prehistoric,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
historic, and present-day affiliation of
humans and their environment.
Authority To Promulgate Regulations
The National Park Service (NPS)
manages the recreation area under the
NPS Organic Act (54 U.S.C. 100101 et
seq.), which gives the NPS broad
authority to regulate the use of the park
areas under its jurisdiction. The NPS
Organic Act authorizes the Secretary of
the Interior, acting through the NPS, to
‘‘prescribe such regulations as the
Secretary considers necessary or proper
for the use and management of [National
Park] System units.’’ 54 U.S.C.
100751(a). In the recreation area’s
enabling act, Congress directed the
Secretary of the Interior to ‘‘administer,
protect, and develop the recreation area
in accordance with the [NPS Organic
Act], and with any other statutory
authority available to him for the
conservation and management of
natural resources.’’ 16 U.S.C. 460dd–3.
These general authorities allow the NPS
to regulate the use of motor vehicles
within the recreation area, both on roads
and off roads, and on designated routes
and areas.
Executive Order 11644, Use of OffRoad Vehicles on the Public Lands, was
issued in 1972 and amended by
Executive Order 11989 in 1977.
Executive Order 11644 requires Federal
agencies to issue regulations designating
specific routes and areas on public
lands where the use of off-road vehicles
(ORVs) may be allowed. The NPS
implemented these Executive Orders, in
part, by promulgating a regulation at 36
CFR 4.10 (Travel on park roads and
designated routes). Under 36 CFR 4.10,
the use of motor vehicles off park roads
is not permitted unless routes and areas
are designated for off-road motor vehicle
use by special regulation. Under 36 CFR
4.10(b), such routes and areas may be
designated only in national recreation
areas, national seashores, national
lakeshores and national preserves. This
rule implements regulatory changes for
certain areas where motor vehicles may
be used off park roads in the recreation
area in compliance with 36 CFR 4.10
and Executive Orders 11644 and 11989.
E:\FR\FM\13JAR1.SGM
13JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 7 (Monday, January 13, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2614-2621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00198]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
30 CFR Part 950
[SATS No. WY-049-FOR; Docket No. OSM-2021-0003; S1D1S SS08011000
SX064A000 245S180110; S1D1S SS08011000 SX064A000 24XS501520]
Wyoming Regulatory Program
AGENCY: Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule; approval of amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement
(OSMRE), are approving an amendment to the Wyoming regulatory program
(hereinafter, the Wyoming Program or Program) under the Surface Mining
Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA or the Act). On its own
initiative, the Wyoming Land Quality Division (LQD), in response to
State legislative changes enacted in 2020, proposed rules to its
Program that facilitate the disposal of inert decommissioned wind
turbine blades and towers as backfill in end walls or the final pit
voids in surface coal mining operations. In addition, Wyoming has
updated Chapter 2 of its Coal Rules, titled ``Permit Application
Requirements for Surface Coal Mining Operations,'' to provide
consistency with the Wyoming Secretary of State's Rules on Rules, as
well as correct grammatical errors.
DATES: Effective February 12, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Attn: Jeffrey Fleischman, Field Office
Director, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, 100
East B Street, Casper, Wyoming 82602, Telephone: (307) 261-6550, Email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on the Wyoming Program
II. Submission of the Amendment
III. OSMRE's Findings
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
V. OSMRE's Decision
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Background on the Wyoming Program
Section 503(a) of the Act permits a State to assume primacy for the
regulation of surface coal mining and reclamation operations on non-
Federal and non-Indian lands within its borders by demonstrating that
its program includes, among other things, State laws and regulations
that govern surface coal mining and reclamation operations in
accordance with the Act and consistent with the Federal regulations.
See 30 U.S.C. 1253(a)(1) and (7).
On the basis of these criteria, the Secretary of the Interior
conditionally approved the Wyoming program on November 26, 1980. You
can find background information on the Wyoming program, including the
Secretary's findings, the disposition of comments, and conditions of
approval in the November 26, 1980, Federal Register (45 FR 78637). You
can also find later actions concerning Wyoming's program and program
amendments at 30 CFR 950.11, 950.12, 950.15, 950.16, and 950.20.
II. Submission of the Amendment
By letter dated June 4, 2021 (Administrative Record No. WY-49-01),
Wyoming LQD sent us an amendment to its program under SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1201 et seq.). Wyoming submitted the amendment in response to
legislative changes made through Wyoming House Bill HB0129 during the
2020 legislative session, to Wyoming Statute (W.S.) Sec. 35-11-
402(a)(xiii). These changes outlined rules regarding how noncoal, non-
mining waste, in the form of inert decommissioned wind turbine blades
and towers, could be used as backfill in open surface coal mine pits in
order to facilitate disposal of those materials. The proposed revisions
to Chapter 2 of the Program allow for inert wind turbine blades and
towers to be placed in the final pit voids or end walls of surface coal
mining operations during reclamation. In addition, Wyoming has proposed
grammatical changes to Chapter 2 as well as minor edits to provide
consistency with the Wyoming Secretary of State's Rules on Rules.
Wyoming stated in its submission that the Wyoming Legislature
tasked LDQ with developing rules and regulations about the disposal of
noncoal, non-mining-generated solid wastes at surface coal mining and
reclamation operations because of the large volume of decommissioned
wind turbine blades and towers, a lack of scalable recycling
[[Page 2615]]
methods to facilitate their disposal, and limited guidance in SMCRA
about this type of disposal. Wyoming's submission seeks to address
issues associated with the resulting stockpile of decommissioned wind
turbine blades and towers as a result of wind energy generation,
upgrades, and routine maintenance.
We announced receipt of the proposed amendment in the August 4,
2021, Federal Register (86 FR 41907). With that announcement, we opened
the public comment period and provided an opportunity for a public
hearing or meeting on the adequacy of the proposed amendment. We did
not hold a public hearing or meeting because none was requested. We did
not receive any comments regarding the amendment. The public comment
period ended on September 3, 2021.
On September 27, 2024, OSMRE sent a letter to the Environmental
Protection Agency's Office of Land and Emergency Management (EPA) for
comment on Wyoming's proposed amendment. On October 24, 2024, EPA
responded that it does not see a conflict between Wyoming's proposed
revisions and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) as long
as the facilities are permitted and subject to Wyoming's Construction
and Demolition Landfill Regulations under Chapter 4 of Wyoming's Solid
Waste Division Rules, and meet the Federal criteria at 40 CFR 257,
Subpart A. To further assist us in making a final determination on
Wyoming's submission, by letter dated November 26, 2024, OSMRE sent
Wyoming a letter requesting clarification on certain issues
(Administrative Record No. WY-049-12; www.regulations.gov Docket No.
OSM-2021-0003-0009). Wyoming responded by letter dated December 3, 2024
(``Clarification Letter'') (Administrative Record No. WY-049-13;
www.regulations.gov Docket No. OSM-2021-0003-0010).
III. OSMRE's Findings
We are approving the revisions to Wyoming's State program. We made
the following findings about Wyoming's amendment as provided under
SMCRA and the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 730.5, 732.15, and 732.17.
1. Discussion of Regulatory Changes Submitted by Wyoming
a. WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 1(a); Section 2(a); Section 3 (b)-(d), (f),
(j)-(k); Section 4(a); and Section 5(a)--Minor corrections
In these sections, Wyoming proposed grammatical changes to Chapter
2 as well as minor edits to provide consistency with the Wyoming
Secretary of State's Rules on Rules. These revisions were non-
substantive changes. Therefore, we are approving Wyoming's proposed
changes to WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 1(a); Section 2(a); Section 3 (b)-
(d), (f), (j)-(k); Section 4(a); and Section 5(a) because they are
consistent with SMCRA and no less effective than the Federal
regulations.
b. WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 6--Wind Turbine Blades and Towers as
Backfill
Wyoming's proposed rule changes WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 6(b)(ii),
primarily by adding paragraph (F), which describes what information is
required in the reclamation plan where an operator intends to dispose
of ``inert decommissioned wind turbine blades and towers'' as backfill.
Neither SMCRA nor the Federal regulations expressly provide for the
disposal of noncoal, non-mining solid waste, such as inert
decommissioned wind turbine blades and towers, on surface coal mining
and reclamation operations as part of reclamation. The lack of Federal
counterpart, however, does not automatically determine whether
Wyoming's proposed changes to its State program are consistent with
SMCRA and no less effective than the Federal regulations. Any material
placed in mine pits or otherwise used to reclaim a permitted mine site
must comply with SMCRA permitting requirements and performance
standards, regardless of whether the material originates within the
permit area or whether it is imported from outside the permit area, and
the regulatory authority has the authority to establish monitoring and
analysis requirements for those materials. See, e.g., Pacific Coal Co.
v. OSM, Civ. No. 03-0260Z, (W.D. Wash. Feb. 2, 2004). So, to ensure
Wyoming's proposed amendment meets our approval standards, we must
conduct a comparison of Wyoming's proposed rules to SMCRA and the
Federal regulations.
WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 6(b)(ii)(F) has six requirements, which
specify: (I) that ``only inert base material from decommissioned wind
turbine blades and towers'' are allowed to be disposed of in the
backfill; (II) ``[n]acelles and nacelle housings'' and ``mechanical,
electrical, and other materials'' are not permitted to be disposed of
in the backfill and must be removed before disposal; (III) as described
in more detail below, the material disposed of may only be placed in
approved locations that meet certain criteria with certain disclosures;
(IV) certain placement requirements, including how the material must be
placed in the pits and groundwater monitoring; (V) final surface
reclamation requirements; and (IV) the operator pay Wyoming, on a
quarterly basis, 25 percent of any revenues collected by the operator
for disposal of this material.
WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 6(b)(ii)(F)(I) and (II) simply describe the
types of noncoal, non-mining solid wastes that may be placed in the
backfill under this section. As proposed, WCWR 020-0006-2 Section
6(b)(ii)(F)(III) contains six requirements for locations where inert
decommissioned wind turbine blades and towers are authorized as part of
the backfill. The first two requirements provide the location within
the backfill area in which inert decommissioned wind turbine blades and
towers may be placed. Specifically, these materials can be placed in
``end walls'' or ``final pit voids'' and placed ``a minimum of twenty
feet above the pre-mining potentiometric surface of the coal aquifer
and a minimum of twenty feet below the final regraded spoils
surface[.]'' WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 6(b)(ii)(F)(III)(1.) and (2.)
Neither SMCRA nor the Federal regulations nor Wyoming's regulations
contain definitions of ``end wall'' or ``final pit voids.'' However,
the end wall and final pit are commonly understood to refer to the
final cut of an open pit or the last pit excavation in a mining area.
Therefore, OSMRE interprets this to mean that Wyoming intends to allow
disposal of certain types of inert decommissioned wind turbine blades
and towers in the open space, or void, left in the final mining cut and
not the first or middle cuts on a mine site.
Similarly, SMCRA, the Federal regulations, and Wyoming's
regulations do not contain a definition or explanation of the phrase
``pre-mining potentiometric surface of the coal aquifer.'' OSMRE
interprets this to mean that any disposal would only be allowed in the
area 20 feet above the pre-mining potentiometric surface of the coal
aquifer. If the disposal is occurring above a pre-mining unconfined
coal aquifer, OSMRE interprets this to mean that the material would be
placed at least 20 feet above the top of the coal seam aquifer. It is
OSMRE's understanding that this is designed to ensure that when
groundwater returns to the backfilled area, the wind turbines and
blades will not come in contact with groundwater. As such, we find that
these provisions are in accordance with SMCRA and consistent with the
Federal regulations; any implementation of this phrase by Wyoming that
is inconsistent
[[Page 2616]]
with this interpretation may require OSMRE to reevaluate this approval.
Because SMCRA and the Federal regulations do not contemplate
disposal of any noncoal, non-mine waste in backfill areas on SMCRA
sites, there are no existing corresponding statutory or regulatory
requirements for this type of disposal. While this type of disposal is
not explicitly authorized under SMCRA, the fact that Wyoming's proposed
changes do not exempt the areas accepting this waste material from any
other requirements of either SMCRA or the Federal regulations indicates
that the practice should not result in mining or reclamation that is
not in accordance with the minimum requirements of SMCRA or
inconsistent with the Federal regulations. Furthermore, the proposed
changes requiring that the specific types of waste be placed only in
limited areas, a minimum of 20 feet above the pre-mining potentiometric
surface of the coal aquifer and a minimum of 20 feet below the final
regraded spoils surface should reduce the potential for this material
to come into contact with water. This requirement should reduce the
potential for leachate and not conflict with the existing SMCRA
performance standards.
WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 6(b)(ii)(F)(III) sections (3.) and (5.)
require that the backfill disposal location be mapped with a legal
description, with backfill locations and groundwater monitoring
locations updated annually, and that a disclosure be placed on the real
property deed for the described lands before final bond release. Again,
because SMCRA and the Federal regulations do not contemplate disposal
of such noncoal, non-mine waste in backfill areas on SMCRA sites, there
are no corresponding Federal statutory or regulatory requirements for
this type of disposal under SMCRA. Instead, OSMRE evaluated this
proposal to ensure that Wyoming's proposed changes are in accordance
with SMCRA and consistent with the Federal regulations, which raised
two potential concerns.
First, the wording of WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 6(b)(ii)(F) appears
to require all applicants to include a plan to dispose of inert
decommissioned towers and blades in their reclamation plan. For
example, WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 6(b)(ii)(B) and (C) each contain a
preface that reclamation plans for terraces & benches and permanent
water impoundments are required only when those features ``are
proposed'' by the applicant; in contrast, WCWR 020-0006-2 Section
6(b)(ii)(F) has no such preface. In the Clarification Letter, Wyoming
stated that disposal of inert decommissioned wind turbine blades and
towers on a SMCRA mine site is ``a voluntary requirement'' and will
only be included in the reclamation plan if ``the operator chooses to
accept and use the towers and blades as backfill.''
Second, the proposed rules do not address what would happen if a
mineral or surface owner does not consent to a proposal to place inert
decommissioned wind turbine blades and towers in the excavated pits. In
the Clarification Letter, Wyoming responded that: ``[t]he rules apply
regardless of surface ownership (private, state or federal) but surface
owner consent would be required before the disposal of any wind turbine
blades or towers would be allowed under WS Sec. 35-11-406(b)(xi) and
(xii).'' See, e.g., WS Sec. 35-11-406(b)(xii) (which ``requires an
instrument of consent from the surface landowner, if different from the
owner of the mineral estate, be included to the mining and reclamation
plans. If consent cannot be obtained, the applicant can request a
hearing on the issue before the Environmental Quality Council. The
Council is required to issue an order in lieu of consent if certain
findings are made.''). Wyoming also noted that WCWR 020-0006-2 Section
6(b)(ii)(F)(III)(5.) would require that where inert decommissioned wind
turbine blades and towers have been disposed of on a SMCRA site, a
disclosure of such must be placed on the real property deed, ``which
would also require surface owner consent.'' Furthermore, Wyoming has
clarified that consent from surface owners, including the Federal
government, is required before such disposal can occur. We note,
however, that Federal lands, as defined in SMCRA, applies to ``any
land, including mineral interests, owned by the United States . . . .''
30 U.S.C. 1291(4). To the extent that Wyoming seeks to apply this rule
to Federal lands (including lands with either Federal surface or
mineral ownership) through its State-Federal Cooperative Agreement (30
CFR 950.20), Wyoming must receive all necessary Federal agency
approvals before any disposal occurs.
After clarification of these two points, we find that these
provisions are in accordance with SMCRA and consistent with the Federal
regulations; any implementation of this regulations by Wyoming that is
inconsistent with these clarifications may require OSMRE to reevaluate
this approval.
WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 6(b)(ii)(F)(III)(4.) allows the reclaimed
land above an approved backfill disposal location to be designated as a
joint or alternative land use as long as the applicant provides the
required demonstration in Section 6(b)(x)(C) of the same Chapter and
the disposal supports the approved land use as required in Section
6(b)(x).
Under the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.133, all disturbed
lands are required to be restored in a timely manner to conditions
capable of supporting the uses they were capable of supporting before
any mining or to a higher or better use. If the postmining land use is
different than the pre-mining uses of land, a regulatory authority may
approve an ``alternative land use'' if it is a higher or better use.
Wyoming's currently approved regulations at WCWR 020-0006-2 Section
6(b)(x)(B)-(C) are substantially similar to the Federal regulations.
Wyoming's proposed amendment states that ``[t]he approved backfill
disposal location may be designed as a joint or alternative land use in
the approved reclamation plan (WCWR 020-0006-2 Sec. 6(b)(x)(B)).
Approval of alternative land uses requires a demonstration as required
in WCWR 020-0006-2 Sec. 6(b)(x)(C) [of WYDEQ's Coal Rules]. The
disposal of inert towers and blades must support the postmining land
use identified in accordance with the requirements of Section 6(x) of
this Chapter.'' In its Clarification Letter, Wyoming confirmed that the
inert decommissioned wind turbine tower and blade disposal will occur
contemporaneously with reclamation and that it is not creating a new
postmining land use for waste disposal areas. Specifically, Wyoming
noted that the wind turbine blades and towers ``would only be part of
the backfill plan and not contemporaneous with final reclamation.''
We understand Wyoming's response to mean, as required by the
proposed changes to their reclamation plan requirements, wind turbine
blade and tower disposal would only occur during the backfill stage of
the reclamation once the operation has met an end wall or final void.
As required by the performance standards in both the Federal
regulations at 30 CFR 816.100 and the Wyoming regulations at WCWR 020-
0006-4 Section 2(b)(i), all coal mine operators are required to reclaim
land as contemporaneously as practicable with mining operations,
including but not limited to backfilling, grading, topsoil replacement,
and revegetation. Nothing in Wyoming's proposed amendment would remove
or alter the existing contemporaneous reclamation requirement from
Wyoming's performance standards. Operators who elect to dispose of wind
turbine blades and towers must still reclaim their land as
[[Page 2617]]
contemporaneously as possible with their mining operation. Thus, with
this understanding, Wyoming's proposed amendment is in accordance SMCRA
and consistent with the Federal regulations in relation to
contemporaneous reclamation requirements.
WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 6(b)(ii)(F)(III)(6.) requires that any
``backfill disposal location approved by the Division shall comply with
Chapter 4, Section 4 of the Solid and Hazardous Waste Division Rules.
As enacted in 1977, SMCRA states that ``[n]othing in this Act shall be
construed as superseding, amending, modifying, or repealing . . . The
Solid Waste Disposal Act . . .'' 30 U.S.C. 1292(a)(5). One year prior,
RCRA amended the Solid Waste Disposal Act on October 21, 1976. Public
Law 94-580, Oct. 21, 1976, 90 Stat. 2795. Therefore, SMCRA does not
permit an action that has the effect of superseding, amending,
modifying, or repealing RCRA or the Solid Waste Disposal Act.
In Wyoming's June 4, 2021, submission letter for this proposed
amendment, Wyoming stated that its proposed rules for the disposal of
decommissioned inert towers and blades would be compliant with the
Wyoming Solid Waste Diversion Rules Chapter 4 Construction and
Demolition Landfill Regulations. However, Wyoming's proposed rules do
not require a permit under the Construction and Demolition Landfill
Regulations and only provide cross-references to Chapter 4, Sections 4
and 8(b)(iv)(A) of the Solid and Hazardous Waste Division Rules, which
are subsets of Wyoming's Construction and Demolition Landfill within
WCWR 020-0009-4 Section 2(a) and the Federal requirements of 40 CFR
part 257, subpart A.
OSMRE acknowledges that an LQD permit issued pursuant to SMCRA can,
in certain circumstances, substitute for the separate permit required
by Wyoming's Construction and Demolition Landfill requirements. As
noted earlier and as discussed below under ``Section IV. Summary and
Disposition of Comments,'' OSMRE sought consultation from EPA because
Wyoming's proposal would authorize disposal of waste material normally
regulated under RCRA on SMCRA sites. EPA's response indicated that a
facility receiving decommissioned inert towers and blades, including
SMCRA coal mines, would need to meet all requirements of Wyoming's
Construction and Demolition Landfill regulations within WCWR 020-0009-
4, Section 2(a), and the Federal criteria at 40 CFR part 257, subpart
A. The EPA notes that Section 2(a) of Wyoming's Construction and
Demolition Landfill regulations requires RCRA permit applications to
contain applicable information related to Sections 3 through 17, which
include criteria for the location, design and construction, operating,
monitoring, and corrective action standards, among others. The EPA
concluded that it does not see a conflict between Wyoming's proposed
rule and the RCRA program, so long as these proposed rules are
implemented such that they meet Wyoming's Construction and Demolition
Landfill regulations within WCWR 020-0009-4, Section 2(a) and the
Federal requirements of 40 CFR part 257, subpart A.
In its Clarification Letter, Wyoming stated that ``[a]lthough
specific sections of Solid Waste Rule, Chapter 4 are listed in the Land
Quality Rule, facilities are required to meet all applicable standards
in all rules.'' Based on this representation that all facilities,
including SMCRA sites receiving wind turbine and blade waste materials,
are required to satisfy all Construction and Demolition Landfill
regulations within WCWR 020-0009-4 Section 2(a) and the Federal
requirements of 40 CFR part 257, subpart A, OSMRE determined that these
provisions would be in accordance with SMCRA and consistent with
Federal regulations; any implementation of this section that is
inconsistent with this interpretation may require OSMRE to reevaluate
its approval.
As proposed, WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 6(b)(ii)(F)(IV) contains three
closure requirements for locations where inert decommissioned wind
turbine blades and towers are authorized as part of the backfill. The
first outlines how this material should be placed in lifts to prevent
subsidence, the second outlines groundwater monitoring requirements,
and the third relates to bond releases. WCWR 020-0006-2 Section
6(b)(ii)(F)(IV).
WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 6(b)(ii)(F)(IV)(1.) requires that inert
decommissioned wind turbine blades and towers be placed in lifts not to
exceed 10 feet and covered with a minimum of 15 feet of suitable
backfill ``dry tomb placement.'' The Federal regulations at 30 CFR
780.18(b)(3) require a plan for backfilling, soil stabilization,
grading, and compacting, with contour maps or cross sections to show
the anticipated final surface configuration in accordance with 30 CFR
816.102. Federal regulation 30 CFR 816.102(c) requires the operator to
compact spoil to ensure stability or to prevent leaching of toxic
material. Under Wyoming's rules at WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 6(b)(ii)(E),
a mine operator's reclamation plan must be designed to ensure stability
of the reclaimed land surface.
A lift is a method in which an operator puts dirt above and below
an area or object. Typically, these areas are compacted. This placement
configuration stabilizes the surrounding area and helps to prevent
leaching of material throughout the surrounding soil; thus, assuming
the lift uses compacted dirt, this section is in accordance with SMCRA
and consistent with the Federal regulations.
While lifts are helpful in preventing subsidence, Wyoming's
proposed amendment does not specify whether this proposed regulation
requires the lifts to be compacted or if loose fill is allowed.
Wyoming's proposed regulations do not address if or how inert
decommissioned wind turbine blades and towers will be processed before
disposal. Inert towers and blade casings are generally rigid and hollow
and are made of fiberglass and epoxy resin. While the material is
durable, over an extended period of time it will break down. In
addition, unprocessed inert turbine blades and casings are hollow, so
the breakdown of material could potentially cause soil instability and
subsidence, which could be worsened if multiple inert turbine blades
and towers are stacked together. Therefore, there is potential that
surface and postmining land use activities will be affected by a
subsidence issue in the future, after bond release.
In its Clarification Letter, Wyoming stated that Chapter 4, Section
2(b) of the Wyoming's Coal Rules (Coal Chapter 2, Section
6(b)(ii)(F)(IV)(1)), which details the requirements for a plan for
backfilling, grading, and contouring all affected lands, requires an
applicant to provide procedures for assuring stability of the reclaimed
land surface. Wyoming's response indicates that Wyoming intends for its
rules to require an operator to reclaim areas, including wind turbine
disposal sites, in a way that prevents subsidence. Thus, Wyoming's
proposed rules are in accordance with SMCRA and consistent with the
Federal regulations in preventing subsidence in reclaimed areas; any
implementation of this section that is inconsistent with this
interpretation may cause OSMRE to reevaluate its approval.
WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 6(b)(ii)(F)(IV)(2.) and (3.) require that
the groundwater monitoring plan required by Wyoming's existing coal
rules also include monitoring wells to be installed and monitored in
[[Page 2618]]
accordance with Chapter 4, Section 8(b)(iv)(A) of the Solid and
Hazardous Waste Division Rules, and that this groundwater monitoring
and vegetation monitoring continue until final bond release.
Under SMCRA at 30 U.S.C. 1259, a coal mine operator is required to
obtain a performance bond once their permit has been approved by the
regulatory authority. The amount of the bond is calculated by
determining the cost to fully reclaim a mine site. To obtain full
release of its performance bond, an operator must meet the requirements
of 30 CFR 800.40, which includes rules for re-vegetation and water
monitoring, among others. Wyoming has equivalent requirements under its
own Coal Program at WCWR 020-0006-15. Wyoming's proposed amendment does
not explicitly require recalculating bond amounts to account for
potential impacts or uncertainty related to the disposal of inert
decommissioned wind turbines and towers on their permit.
While Wyoming did not specifically indicate how the proposed
amendment will affect its bonding calculations, Wyoming reiterated in
its Clarification Letter that operators are required to meet all of the
existing and approved bonding rules in WCWR 020-0006-11, as well as
those prescribed by SMCRA and the Federal regulations. Under Wyoming's
existing rules, if disposal of wind turbine blades or towers caused
unanticipated impacts, Wyoming would be required to adjust the bond
amounts and order an operator to correct the issue without any further
revision to its regulations.
Wyoming's proposal adds the requirement that any additional
groundwater monitoring requirements under Chapter 4, Section
8(b)(iv)(A) of the Solid and Hazardous Waste Division Rules be added to
LDQ's permit. Wyoming's proposal does not remove any existing
groundwater monitoring requirements or bond requirements already
approved by OSMRE. Consequently, Wyoming's proposed amendment is in
accordance with SMCRA and consistent with the Federal regulations with
regard to groundwater monitoring and bonding.
As proposed, WCWR 020-0006-2 Section 6(b)(ii)(F)(V) contains two
final surface reclamation requirements. First, Section
6(b)(ii)(F)(V)(1.) requires that the final reclamation surface must
blend with the surrounding mine reclamation and have a permanent
vegetative cover in accordance with Chapter 4, Section 2(d) of the
Division's Coal Chapter 4 requirements. Second, Section
6(b)(ii)(F)(V)(2.) requires that the final reclamation must drain
properly and not impound water in accordance with the Division's Coal
Chapter 4 requirements.
Under the Federal regulations at 30 CFR 816.102, areas disturbed by
surface coal mining operations must be backfilled and graded to achieve
approximate original contour (AOC), except in limited cases. Wyoming's
regulations, at WCWR 020-0006-4 Sec. 2 (b)(iii), also require all
affected lands to be returned to AOC, with some exceptions. Wyoming
defines AOC to mean ``surface configuration achieved by backfilling and
grading of the mined areas so that the reclaimed land surface closely
resembles the general surface configuration of the land prior to mining
and blends into and complements the drainage pattern of the surrounding
terrain.'' WCWR 020-0006-1 Sec. 2 (h). Under its proposed regulations
for the disposal of inert towers and blades within surface coal mining
sites, Wyoming would require the reclaimed surface to not exceed the
approximate pre-mining slopes, WCWR 020-0006-2 Sec. 6 (b)(ii)(D), and
the lands to blend with the surrounding mine reclamation. WCWR 020-
0006-2 Sec. 6 (b)(ii)(F)(V)(1). To clarify this matter, we asked
Wyoming if it could describe how its proposed regulations will ensure
that the surface configuration achieved by backfilling and grading of
the areas receiving inert towers and blades will closely resemble the
general surface configuration of the land prior to mining and blend
into and complement the drainage pattern of the surrounding terrain.
(Administrative Record No. WY-049-12).
In its Clarification Letter, Wyoming confirmed that the
requirements in Sections 6(b)(ii)(F)(V)(1.) and (2.) are in addition to
the requirement that the entire mine, including areas receiving
disposal of inert towers and blades, must achieve approximate original
contour as required by Chapter 4, Section 2(b)(iii) of the Division's
Coal Rules. Because this provision does not remove any existing
requirements related to achieving approximate original contour and only
adds the requirement that the disposal areas must blend with the
surrounding mine and drain properly, Wyoming's proposed amendment is in
accordance with SMCRA and consistent with the Federal regulations in
ensuring that these sites will be reclaimed to achieve approximate
original contour.
2. Conclusion
As explained above, with the information contained in its initial
submission and the Clarification Letter, we conclude that the proposed
amendment is in accordance with SMCRA and consistent with the Federal
regulations. We therefore approve Wyoming's changes to its State
program.
IV. Summary and Disposition of Comments
Public Comments
We asked for public comments on the amendment, but we did not
receive any.
Federal Agency Comments
On June 16, 2021, under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i) and section 503(b)
of SMCRA, we requested comments on the amendment from various Federal
agencies with an actual or potential interest in the Wyoming program
(Administrative Record No. WY-49-04). We did not receive any comments.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Concurrence and Comments
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(ii), we are required to get a written
concurrence from EPA for those provisions of the program amendment that
relate to air or water quality standards issued under the authority of
the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.) or the Clean Air Act (42
U.S.C. 7401 et seq.). None of the revisions that Wyoming proposed to
make in this amendment pertain to air or water quality standards.
Therefore, we did not ask EPA to concur on the amendment. However, on
June 16, 2021, under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), we requested comments
from EPA Region 8 on the amendment (Administrative Record No. WY-049-
04). The EPA did not respond to this request.
OSMRE identified that Wyoming's proposed amendment may have RCRA
implications because Wyoming's proposal would authorize the disposal of
waste material normally regulated under RCRA in SMCRA sites. So,
pursuant to 30 CFR 732.17(h)(11)(i), on September 27, 2024, we sent a
letter to the EPA's Office of Land and Emergency Management requesting
comment. (Administrative Record No. WY-049-07). The EPA responded on
October 24, 2024. (Administrative Record No. WY-049-10). These letters
are posted on www.regulations.gov (Docket Nos. OSM-2021-0003-00007 and
OSM-2021-0003-0008).
The EPA commented that, under RCRA, the EPA establishes a national
minimum standard for non-hazardous waste, the states are delegated the
lead role in overseeing the disposal of non-hazardous waste, and the
generator of waste is ultimately responsible for determining whether
the waste qualifies as non-hazardous. The EPA explained that, if wind
turbine blades and towers
[[Page 2619]]
are appropriately characterized as non-hazardous waste and no other
waste is accepted at these wind turbine disposal facilities, then such
facilities would be subject to 40 CFR part 257, subpart A, entitled
``Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices.''
As explained in more detail above, the EPA interpreted Wyoming's
proposed amendment to mean that the wind turbine disposal facilities
are permitted and subject to Wyoming's Construction and Demolition
Landfill Regulations under Chapter 4 of Wyoming's Solid Waste Division
Rules. Accordingly, a facility under these proposed rules would need to
meet both the Wyoming criteria and Federal criteria at 40 CFR part 257,
subpart A. The EPA concluded its comment by stating that, so long as
these criteria are met, it does not anticipate a conflict between
Wyoming's proposed amendments and RCRA.
OSMRE Response
OSMRE appreciates EPA's response. As explained above, SMCRA
provides that nothing in SMCRA can be construed as superseding,
amending, modifying, or repealing various environmental laws, including
the Solid Waste Disposal Act, which RCRA amended. In its June 4, 2021,
submission letter for this proposed amendment, Wyoming stated that its
proposed rules for the disposal of decommissioned inert towers and
blades would be compliant with Wyoming Solid Waste Diversion Rules
Chapter 4, ``Construction and Demolition Landfill Regulations.'' In our
November 26, 2024, letter to Wyoming, we asked Wyoming to describe how
its proposed regulations will comply with all of Chapter 4 of Wyoming's
Solid Waste Diversion Rules. Wyoming's Clarification Letter stated:
``The standards found in Wyoming Solid Waste Rule Chapter 4 are state
standards and there is no federal oversight for this type of waste
disposal under [RCRA] and as verified in US EPA's October 24, 2024,
letter. Although specific sections of Solid Waste Rule, Chapter 4 are
listed in the Land Quality Rule, facilities are required to meet all
applicable standards in all rules.''
Based on EPA's response and Wyoming's commitment that ``facilities
are required to meet all applicable standards in all rules[,]'' we
conclude that this amendment does not supersede, amend, modify, or
repeal RCRA so long as the disposal facilities authorized under this
amendment are permitted and subject to all of Wyoming's Construction
and Demolition Landfill Regulations under Chapter 4 of Wyoming's Solid
Waste Division Rules and meet the Federal criteria at 40 CFR part 257,
subpart A.
State Historical Preservation Officer (SHPO) and the Advisory Council
on Historic Preservation (ACHP)
Under 30 CFR 732.17(h)(4), we are required to request comments from
the SHPO and ACHP on amendments that may have an effect on historic
properties. On June 16, 2021, we requested comments on Wyoming's
amendment (Administrative Record No. WY-054-04). We did not receive
comments from the SHPO or ACHP. Nevertheless, OSMRE determined there
will be no effect on historic or cultural resources as a result of this
amendment because wind turbine blades and towers will be disposed of in
pits as backfill material within the footprint of areas disturbed by
coal mining activities.
V. OSMRE's Decision
Based on the above findings, we are approving Wyoming's amendment
submitted to us on June 4, 2021. To implement this decision, we are
amending the Federal regulations at 30 CFR part 950, which codify
decisions concerning the Wyoming program. In accordance with the
Administrative Procedure Act, this rule will take effect 30 days after
the date of publication. Section 503(a) of SMCRA requires that the
State's program demonstrate that the State has the capability of
carrying out the provisions of the Act and meeting its purposes. SMCRA
requires consistency of State and Federal standards.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Executive Order 12630--Governmental Actions and Interference With
Constitutionally Protected Property Rights
This rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications that would result in private
property being taken for government use without just compensation under
the law. Therefore, a takings implication assessment is not required.
Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review, 13563--Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review, 14094--Modernizing Regulatory Review
Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094,
provides that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will review all significant
rules. Pursuant to OMB guidance dated October 12, 1993 (OMB Memo M-94-
3), the approval of state program amendments is exempted from OMB
review under Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order
14094. Executive Order 13563, which reaffirms and supplements Executive
Order 12866, retains this exemption.
Executive Order 12988--Civil Justice Reform
The Department of the Interior has reviewed this rule as required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988. The Department determined that
this Federal Register document meets the criteria of Section 3 of
Executive Order 12988, which is intended to ensure that the agency
review its legislation and proposed regulations to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity; that the agency write its legislation and
regulations to minimize litigation; and that the agency's legislation
and regulations provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct
rather than a general standard, and promote simplification and burden
reduction. Because section 3 focuses on the quality of Federal
legislation and regulations, the Department limited its review under
this Executive Order to the quality of this Federal Register document
and to changes to the Federal regulations. The review under this
Executive Order did not extend to the language of the State regulatory
program or to the program amendment that the State of Wyoming drafted.
Executive Order 13132--Federalism
This rule has potential Federalism implications as defined under
Section 1(a) of Executive Order 13132. Executive Order 13132 directs
agencies to ``grant the States the maximum administrative discretion
possible'' with respect to Federal statutes and regulations
administered by the States. Wyoming, through its approved regulatory
program, implements and administers SMCRA and its implementing
regulations at the State level. This rule approves an amendment to the
Wyoming program submitted and drafted by the State and, thus, is
consistent with the direction to provide maximum administrative
discretion to States.
Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its
government-to-government relationship with Tribes through a commitment
to consultation with Tribes and recognition of their right to self-
governance and tribal sovereignty. We have evaluated this rule
[[Page 2620]]
under the Department's consultation policy and under the criteria of
Executive Order 13175 and have determined that, although no Indian
lands, as defined under SMCRA, are implicated by this rule, this State
program amendment may have substantial direct effects on 49 Federally-
recognized Tribes because of the potential implications for the Tribe
or Tribal members, Tribal treaty rights, reserved rights, trust
resources, or ancestral lands. Therefore, on September 27, 2024, we
sent invitation letters to consult to these 49 Tribes (Administrative
Record No. WY-049-08).
In response to our invitation, we received one request for Tribal
consultation, one request for an informational meeting, and two written
comments. Despite the request for Tribal consultation, we did not
receive a response to our follow-up communication to set up a date and
time, so the Tribal consultation did not go forward. In response to the
request for an informational meeting, we met with a representative of
the Shoshone Paiute Tribe on October 28, 2024. During the meeting, we
explained Wyoming's proposed amendment to the Tribe in further detail.
At the end of the meeting, the Shoshone Paiute decided to not pursue
Tribal consultation.
We received a written comment from the Northern Cheyenne Tribe on
October 22, 2024 (Administrative Record No. WY-049-09). The Tribe
recognized that this proposed amendment would allow for the disposal of
wind turbines and blades without the need to seek out any new
undisturbed land; however, the Tribe expressed concern with how Tribal
governments are included in the determination of potential impacts to
archaeological resources. The Northern Cheyenne Tribe stated that
Wyoming does not include Tribes as part of the state SMCRA permit
review process and that the best outcome would be to include Tribes in
the reviews and approvals on State-owned lands with the applicable coal
mine areas for disposition of wind turbine blades and towers.
We also received a written comment from the Comanche Nation on
October 25, 2024 (Administrative Record No. WY-049-11). In their
comment, the Comanche Nation's Historic Preservation Officer stated
that no prehistoric or historic archaeological materials for the Tribe
were identified within areas of mineable coal in Wyoming.
Executive Order 13211--Regulations That Significantly Affect the
Supply, Distribution, or Use of Energy
Executive Order 13211 requires agencies to prepare a Statement of
Energy Effects for a rulemaking that is (1) considered significant
under Executive Order 12866, and (2) likely to have a significant
adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. Because
this rule is exempt from review under Executive Order 12866 and is not
a significant energy action under the definition in Executive Order
13211, a Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
National Environmental Policy Act
Consistent with sections 501(a) and 702(d) of SMCRA (30 U.S.C.
1251(a) and 1291 (d) respectively) and the U.S. Department of the
Interior Departmental Manual, part 516, section 13.5(A), State program
amendments are not major Federal actions within the meaning of section
102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C.
4332(2)(C)).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not include requests and requirements of an
individual, partner, or corporation to obtain information and report it
to a Federal agency. As this rule does not contain information
collection requirements, a submission to OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3507 et seq.) is not required.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Although there is no Federal counterpart for Wyoming's proposed
amendment, based on OSMRE's collaboration with State regulatory
authorities and years of experience, OSMRE certifies that this final
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C.
601 et seq.).
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
This rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act. This rule: (a) does not
have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million; (b) will not
cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual
industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic
regions; and (c) does not have significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based
enterprises.
Unfunded Mandates
This rule does not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or
Tribal governments or the private sector of $100 million per year.
Although there is no Federal counterpart for Wyoming's proposed
amendment, OSMRE's determination regarding unfunded mandates is based
on OSMRE's collaboration with State regulatory authorities and years of
experience.
List of Subjects in 30 CFR Part 950
Intergovernmental relations, Surface mining, Underground mining.
David A. Berry,
Regional Director, Unified Regions, 5, 7-11.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, 30 CFR part 950 is amended
as set forth below:
PART 950--WYOMING
0
1. The authority citation for part 950 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 30 U.S.C. 1201 et seq.
0
2. In Sec. 950.15 amend the table by adding a new entry in
chronological order by ``Date of final publication'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 950.15 Approval of Wyoming regulatory program amendments.
* * * * *
[[Page 2621]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Original amendment submission Date of final
date publication Citation/description
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
June 4, 2021.................. January 13, 2025. State initiative
outlining rules
regarding how
decommissioned wind
turbine blades and
towers can be used
as backfill in open
surface coal mine
pits, while updating
Chapter 2 Permit
Application
Requirements for
Surface Coal Mining
Operations to
provide consistency
with the Wyoming
Secretary of State's
Rules on Rules and
correct grammatical
errors.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2025-00198 Filed 1-10-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-05-P