Air Plan Revisions; Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality Department, 1903-1907 [2024-31028]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 6 / Friday, January 10, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to Subtitle E of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (known as the
Congressional Review Act) (5 U.S.C. 801
et seq.), the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs designated this rule
as not satisfying the criteria under 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
38 CFR Part 36
Condominiums, housing, individuals
with disabilities, loan programs—
housing and community development,
loan programs—Veterans, manufactured
homes, mortgage insurance, reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Veterans.
38 CFR Part 42
Administrative practice and
procedure, claims, fraud, penalties.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs amends 38 CFR parts 36 and 42
as set forth below:
PART 36—LOAN GUARANTY
1. The authority citation for part 36
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501 and 3720.
[Amended]
2. In § 36.4340, amend paragraphs
(k)(1)(i) introductory text and (k)(3) by
removing ‘‘$27,894’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘$28,619’’.
■
PART 42—STANDARDS
IMPLEMENTING THE PROGRAM
FRAUD CIVIL REMEDIES ACT
3. The authority citation for part 42
continues to read as follows:
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
■
Authority: Pub. L. 99–509, secs. 6101–
6104, 100 Stat. 1874, codified at 31 U.S.C.
3801–3812.
[Amended]
4. In § 42.3, amend paragraphs
(a)(1)(iv) and (b)(1)(ii) by removing
■
Jkt 265001
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2021–0863; EPA–R03–
OAR–2023–0179; FRL–12161–03–OAR]
RIN 2060–AW38
Excess Emissions During Periods of
Startup, Shutdown, and Malfunction;
Partial Withdrawals of Findings of
Failure To Submit State
Implementation Plan (SIP)
Due to the receipt of adverse
comment, the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is withdrawing the
November 26, 2024, direct final rule to
partially withdraw two final actions
finding that 13 States and/or local air
pollution control agencies failed to
submit State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions required by the Clean Air Act
(CAA) in a timely manner to address the
EPA’s 2015 findings of substantial
inadequacy and ‘‘SIP calls’’ for
provisions applying to excess emissions
during periods of startup, shutdown,
and malfunction (SSM). The EPA will
address all comments received in a
subsequent final rule for which the EPA
will not institute a second comment
period.
SUMMARY:
Effective January 10, 2025, the
EPA withdraws the direct final rule
published at 89 FR 93187 on November
26, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
General questions concerning this
document should be addressed to,
Sydney Lawrence, Office of Air Quality
Planning and Standards, Air Quality
Policy Division, 109 T.W. Alexander
Drive, Research Triangle Park, NC
27711; by telephone (919) 541–4768; or
by email at lawrence.sydney@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 26, 2024, the EPA published
a direct final rule (89 FR 93187) to
partially withdraw two final actions
finding that 13 States and/or local air
pollution control agencies failed to
submit SIP revisions required by the
CAA to address the EPA’s 2015 findings
of substantial inadequacy and ‘‘SIP
calls’’ for provisions applying to excess
emissions during periods of SSM. In the
DATES:
■
16:01 Jan 08, 2025
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule; withdrawal.
Consuela Benjamin,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office
of Regulation Policy & Management, Office
of General Counsel, Department of Veterans
Affairs.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
AGENCY:
Signing Authority
Denis McDonough, Secretary of
Veterans Affairs, approved and signed
this document on December 31, 2024,
and authorized the undersigned to sign
and submit the document to the Office
of the Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
§ 42.3
[FR Doc. 2025–00094 Filed 1–8–25; 8:45 am]
40 CFR Part 52
List of Subjects
§ 36.4340
‘‘$13,946’’ and adding in its place
‘‘$14,308’’.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1903
proposal for the direct final rule
published on the same day (89 FR
93243), the EPA stated that written
comments must be received on or before
December 26, 2024. The EPA stated that
if any relevant adverse comments are
received on the proposal, the EPA will
publish a timely withdrawal of the
direct final rule in the Federal Register.
On December 22, 2024, an adverse
comment dated December 18, 2024, was
posted in the docket that the EPA
interprets as relevant and adverse.
Therefore, the EPA is withdrawing the
direct final rule and will publish a
subsequent final rule wherein the EPA
will address all comments received. The
EPA will not institute a second
comment period on the subsequent final
rule.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Air pollution control, Approval and
promulgation of implementation plans,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, and
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Joesph Goffman,
Assistant Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2025–00433 Filed 1–8–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2024–0349; FRL–12130–
02–R9]
Air Plan Revisions; Arizona; Maricopa
County Air Quality Department
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is finalizing a limited
approval and limited disapproval of
revisions to the Maricopa County Air
Quality Department (MCAQD or
‘‘County’’) portion of the Arizona State
Implementation Plan (SIP). These
revisions concern emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) from
loading of organic liquids and gasoline.
Under the authority of the Clean Air Act
(CAA or ‘‘Act’’), this action
simultaneously approves local rules that
regulate these emission sources and
directs Arizona to correct rule
deficiencies. We are also finalizing a
disapproval of MCAQD’s reasonably
available control technology (RACT)
demonstration for the source categories
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
1904
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 6 / Friday, January 10, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
associated with these rules for the 2008
8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standard (NAAQS) in the
Phoenix-Mesa ozone nonattainment
area.
This rule is effective February
10, 2025.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket No.
EPA–R09–OAR–2024–0349. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
DATES:
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information. If
you need assistance in a language other
than English or if you are a person with
a disability who needs a reasonable
accommodation at no cost to you, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Donnique Sherman, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA
94105. By phone: (415) 947–4129; email
at sherman.donnique@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On November 8, 2024 (89 FR 88690),
the EPA proposed a limited approval
and limited disapproval of the following
rules that were submitted for
incorporation into the Arizona SIP.
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
Local agency
Rule No.
MCAQD ........
MCAQD ........
352
353
Rule title
Revised
Gasoline Cargo Tank Testing and Use ............................................................
Storage and Loading of Gasoline at a Gasoline Dispensing Facility (GDF) ...
We proposed a limited approval
because we determined that these rules
improve the SIP and are largely
consistent with the relevant CAA
requirements. We simultaneously
proposed a limited disapproval because
some rule provisions conflict with
section 110 and part D of the Act. In
addition, we proposed a disapproval of
MCAQD’s RACT demonstration for the
11/18/2020
11/18/2020
Submitted
12/03/2020
12/03/2020
source categories listed in Table 2 for
the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS in the
Phoenix-Mesa ozone nonattainment
area.
TABLE 2—APPLICABLE SOURCE CATEGORIES
Title/source category
EPA–450/2–78–051 .................................
Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor
Collection Systems.
Design Criteria for Stage I Vapor Control Systems—Gasoline Service Stations ..........
EPA–450/R–75–102 ................................
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
Applicable
MCAQD rule
CTG
The following provisions of Rule 352
preclude full approval of the rule:
1. In addition to the annual
certification test required by Section
301.1, Sections 502 and 503 of Rule 352
outline ongoing monitoring tests to
perform to detect potential leaks.
However, the rule does not identify any
enforceable requirements to monitor
using these tests on a periodic basis or
any recordkeeping and reporting
associated with this requirement.
2. Section 103.3(a) requires that an
‘‘owner or operator of a gasoline cargo
tank provides documentation from the
gasoline cargo tank testing company to
the Control Officer that certifies that the
gasoline cargo tank was tested and
verified vapor tight using test methods
at least as stringent as those in Section
501.1 (Maricopa County Vapor
Tightness Test).’’ This provision allows
the Control Officer authority to approve
another test method, and without
further specificity regarding how this
authority will be exercised, it could
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jan 08, 2025
Jkt 265001
functionally allow for a revision of the
SIP without complying with the process
for SIP revisions required by the CAA.
The following provisions of Rule 353
preclude full approval of the rule:
1. Rule 353 requires that control
equipment or spill containment
equipment at a stationary GDF or on a
gasoline cargo tank be leak free and
vapor tight, requiring weekly
inspections. Rule 353 generally requires
a facility to determine if there is a
‘‘potential vapor leak’’ prior to being
required to conduct a more stringent
vapor tightness determination. Section
501 of Rule 353 allows for four different
options to identify potential vapor leaks.
Section 501.1 allows for the ‘‘use of
sight, sound, or smell’’ as an acceptable
method for identifying potential vapor
leaks. Although using sight, sound, or
smell can play a role in identifying
potential vapor leaks, allowing for that
to potentially be the only method used
could functionally allow for potential
leak identification to be left solely to the
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Rule 352.
Rule 353.
operator’s discretion and sensory
inputs. Therefore, without a provision
to periodically utilize methods beyond
sight, sound, or smell, this provision
undermines the enforceability of the
rule’s requirement for vapor tight
compliance.
2. Section 500 of Rule 353 contains
ongoing monitoring and recordkeeping
requirements but does not specifically
contain any requirements to report
compliance information. However,
reporting requirements are contained
within Section 301 of the rule because
it incorporates the applicable
requirements from the National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Source Category: Gasoline
Dispensing Facilities at 40 CFR part 63,
subpart CCCCCC (‘‘Subpart CCCCCC’’),
which includes reporting requirements.1
1 See 40 CFR 63.11126 and Table 3 to Subpart
CCCCCC. For example, Subpart CCCCCC requires
annual reporting related to malfunctions
(malfunction of process equipment and air
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 6 / Friday, January 10, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
However, Subpart CCCCCC is not
applicable to the loading of aviation
gasoline into storage tanks at airports
and the subsequent transfer of aviation
gasoline within the airport.2 Rule 353
does apply to loading of aviation
gasoline at airports, but it does not
elsewhere require periodic reporting for
these facilities. Given this framework,
Rule 353 has a reporting gap, because
there is no periodic compliance
reporting required for loading of
aviation gasoline at airports. Due to the
lack of adequate reporting requirements
(or some alternative means of ensuring
enforceability) during loading of
aviation gasoline into storage tanks, this
provision undermines the enforceability
of the rule’s requirement for vapor tight
compliance, constitutes a SIP
deficiency, and is inconsistent with the
requirements of CAA Section 110.
Our proposed action contains more
information on the basis for this
rulemaking and on our evaluation of the
submittal.
II. Public Comments and EPA
Responses
The EPA’s proposed action provided
a 30-day public comment period. During
this period, we received one anonymous
comment in support of EPA’s November
8, 2024 proposed action. We thank the
commenter for the comment.
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that
change our assessment of the rules as
described in our proposed action.
Therefore, as authorized in sections
110(k)(3) and 301(a) of the Act, the EPA
is finalizing a limited approval of the
submitted rules. This action
incorporates the submitted rules into
the Arizona SIP, including those
provisions identified as deficient. As
authorized under sections 110(k)(3) and
301(a), the EPA is simultaneously
finalizing a limited disapproval of the
rules. The EPA is also finalizing a
disapproval of the RACT
demonstrations for the 2008 ozone
NAAQS for the sources covered by the
CTGs listed in Table 2.
As a result, the EPA must promulgate
a federal implementation plan (FIP)
under section 110(c) unless we approve
subsequent SIP revisions that correct the
rule deficiencies within 24 months.
In addition, the offset sanction in
CAA section 179(b)(2) will be imposed
18 months after the effective date this
action, and the highway funding
pollution control equipment), requires all
performance tests reports to be submitted, and
requires advanced notification of performance tests.
2 See 40 CFR part 63.11111(g).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jan 08, 2025
Jkt 265001
1905
sanction in CAA section 179(b)(1) will
be imposed six months after the offset
sanction is imposed. A sanction will not
be imposed if the EPA determines that
a subsequent SIP submission corrects
the identified deficiencies before the
applicable deadline.
Note that the submitted rules have
been adopted by the MCAQD, and the
EPA’s final limited disapproval does not
prevent the local agency from enforcing
them. The limited disapproval also does
not prevent any portion of the rules
from being incorporated by reference
into the federally enforceable SIP as
discussed in a July 9, 1992 EPA memo
found at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/
production/files/2015-07/documents/
procsip.pdf.
Accordingly, this final action is
finalizing a limited approval and
limited disapproval of state law as
meeting federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.
Additional information about these
statutes and Executive orders can be
found at https://www.epa.gov/lawsregulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of MCAQD
Rule 352, ‘‘Gasoline Cargo Tank Testing
and Use,’’ revised on November 18,
2020, which regulates VOC emissions
during loading and unloading of
gasoline to any gasoline cargo tank
within Maricopa County. The EPA is
also incorporating by reference MCAQD
Rule 353, ‘‘Storage and Loading of
Gasoline at a Gasoline Dispensing
Facility,’’ revised on November 18,
2020, which regulates VOC emissions
during storage and loading of gasoline at
a gasoline dispensing facility. Therefore,
these materials have been approved by
EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have been
incorporated by reference by EPA into
that plan, are fully federally enforceable
under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA
as of the effective date of this final
rulemaking, and will be incorporated by
reference in the next update to the SIP
compilation.3 The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these documents
available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to review state choices and
approve those choices if they meet the
minimum criteria of the Act.
3 62
PO 00000
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was therefore not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
PRA because this action does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities beyond those imposed by state
law.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain any
unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531–1538, and does
not significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. This action does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, no additional costs to
state, local, or tribal governments, or to
the private sector will result from this
action.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175, because the SIP is not
approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
1906
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 6 / Friday, January 10, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
jurisdiction, and it will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order
13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern
environmental health or safety risks that
the EPA has reason to believe may
disproportionately affect children, per
the definition of ‘‘covered regulatory
action’’ in section 2–202 of the
Executive Order. Therefore, this action
is not subject to Executive Order 13045
because it is merely finalizing a limited
approval and limited disapproval of
state law as meeting federal
requirements. Furthermore, the EPA’s
Policy on Children’s Health does not
apply to this action.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs
the EPA to use voluntary consensus
standards in its regulatory activities
unless to do so would be inconsistent
with applicable law or otherwise
impractical. The EPA believes that this
action is not subject to the requirements
of section 12(d) of the NTTAA because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations and Executive
Order 14096: Revitalizing Our Nation’s
Commitment to Environmental Justice
for All
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal
agencies to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on communities with
environmental justice (EJ) concerns to
the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. Executive Order
14096 (Revitalizing Our Nation’s
Commitment to Environmental Justice
for All, 88 FR 25251, April 26, 2023)
builds on and supplements Executive
Order 12898 and defines EJ as, among
other things, ‘‘the just treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people,
regardless of income, race, color,
national origin, Tribal affiliation, or
disability, in agency decision-making
and other Federal activities that affect
human health and the environment.’’
The State did not evaluate EJ
considerations as part of its SIP
submittal; the CAA and applicable
implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation.
The EPA did not perform an EJ analysis
and did not consider EJ in this action.
Consideration of EJ is not required as
part of this action, and there is no
information in the record inconsistent
with the stated goal of Executive Orders
12898 and 14096 of achieving EJ for
communities with EJ concerns.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by March 11, 2025.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements (see section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: December 19, 2024.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA amends part 52,
chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal
Regulations as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
AUTHORITY: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D—Arizona
2. Amend § 52.119 by removing and
reserving paragraph (c)(1).
■ 3. In § 52.120:
■ a. In paragraph (c), amend table 4, by
revising the entries for ‘‘Rule 352’’ and
‘‘Rule 353’’; and
■ b. In paragraph (e), amend table 1,
under the subheading ‘‘Part D Elements
and Plans for the Metropolitan Phoenix
and Tucson Areas,’’ by revising the
second entry for ‘‘Analysis of
Reasonably Available Control
Technology for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standard
(NAAQS) State Implementation Plan
(RACT SIP)’’ that appears just before the
entry for ‘‘Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) Analysis, Negative
Declaration and Rules Adoption.’’
The revisions read as follows:
■
§ 52.120
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
TABLE 4 TO PARAGRAPH (c)—EPA-APPROVED MARICOPA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATIONS
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
County
citation
*
Title/subject
*
State effective date
*
EPA approval date
*
*
*
Post-July 1998 Rule Codification
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jan 08, 2025
Jkt 265001
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
Additional explanation
10JAR1
*
1907
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 6 / Friday, January 10, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 4 TO PARAGRAPH (c)—EPA-APPROVED MARICOPA COUNTY AIR POLLUTION CONTROL REGULATIONS—Continued
County
citation
Title/subject
*
*
State effective date
*
EPA approval date
*
*
Additional explanation
*
*
Regulation III—Control of Air Contaminants
*
Rule 352 .............................
*
*
Gasoline Cargo Tank
Testing and Use.
*
November 18, 2020 ..........
*
*
1/10/25, [INSERT FIRST
PAGE OF FEDERAL
REGISTER CITATION].
Rule 353 .............................
Storage and Loading of
Gasoline at a Gasoline
Dispensing Facility
(GDF).
November 18, 2020 ..........
1/10/25, [INSERT FIRST
PAGE OF FEDERAL
REGISTER CITATION].
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Submitted electronically on
December 3, 2020, as
an attachment to a letter
dated November 24,
2020.
Submitted electronically on
December 3, 2020, as
an attachment to a letter
dated November 24,
2020.
*
*
(e) * * *
TABLE 1—EPA-APPROVED NON-REGULATORY AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES
[Excluding certain resolutions and statutes, which are listed in tables 2 and 3, respectively] 1
Name of SIP provision
Applicable geographic
or nonattainment area
or title/subject
State submittal date
EPA approval date
Explanation
The State of Arizona Air Pollution Control Implementation Plan
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Part D Elements and Plans for the Metropolitan Phoenix and Tucson Areas
*
Analysis of Reasonably Available Control Technology for
the 2008 8-Hour
Ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS)
State Implementation Plan (RACT
SIP).
*
*
Maricopa County portion of PhoenixMesa nonattainment
area for 2008 8hour ozone NAAQS.
*
*
*
*
June 22, 2017 ............ February 26, 2020, 85
FR 10986 (conditionally approved);
and December 9,
2024, 89 FR 97543.
*
*
*
*
Only those portions of the document beginning with ‘‘Gasoline Bulk Plants, Fixed
Roof Petroleum Tanks, External Floating
Roof Petroleum Tanks, And Gasoline
Loading Terminals’’ on page 33 through
the first full paragraph on page 34, and
Appendix C: CTG RACT Spreadsheet, the
rows beginning with ‘‘Gasoline Bulk
Plants’’ on page 60, through ‘‘Gasoline
Loading Terminals’’ on pages 64–65.
*
*
*
1 Table
1 is divided into three parts: Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) State Implementation Plan Elements (excluding Part D Elements and
Plans), Part D Elements and Plans (other than for the Metropolitan Phoenix or Tucson Areas), and Part D Elements and Plans for the Metropolitan Phoenix and Tucson Areas.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Amend § 52.124 by adding
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) to read as follows:
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
§ 52.124
Part D disapproval.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) The RACT demonstration titled
‘‘Analysis of Reasonably Available
Control Technology for the 2008 8-Hour
Ozone National Ambient Air Quality
Standard (NAAQS) State
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Jan 08, 2025
Jkt 265001
Implementation Plan (RACT SIP),’’ only
those portions of the document
beginning with ‘‘Gasoline Tank Trucks
And Vapor Collection System Leaks’’ on
page 34 through the first full paragraph
on page 35, and Appendix C: CTG
RACT Spreadsheet, the rows beginning
with ‘‘Gasoline Tank Trucks And Vapor
Collection System Leaks’’ on page 65,
through ‘‘Service Stations—Stage I’’ on
pages 67–69. This demonstration
represents the RACT requirement for the
following source categories: Control of
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Volatile Organic Compound Leaks from
Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor
Collection Systems (EPA–450/2–78–
051) and Design Criteria for Stage I
Vapor Control Systems—Gasoline
Service Stations (EPA–450/R–75–102).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2024–31028 Filed 1–8–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\10JAR1.SGM
10JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 6 (Friday, January 10, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1903-1907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31028]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2024-0349; FRL-12130-02-R9]
Air Plan Revisions; Arizona; Maricopa County Air Quality
Department
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is finalizing a
limited approval and limited disapproval of revisions to the Maricopa
County Air Quality Department (MCAQD or ``County'') portion of the
Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern
emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from loading of organic
liquids and gasoline. Under the authority of the Clean Air Act (CAA or
``Act''), this action simultaneously approves local rules that regulate
these emission sources and directs Arizona to correct rule
deficiencies. We are also finalizing a disapproval of MCAQD's
reasonably available control technology (RACT) demonstration for the
source categories
[[Page 1904]]
associated with these rules for the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient
air quality standard (NAAQS) in the Phoenix-Mesa ozone nonattainment
area.
DATES: This rule is effective February 10, 2025.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket No. EPA-R09-OAR-2024-0349. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance
in a language other than English or if you are a person with a
disability who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you,
please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donnique Sherman, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 947-4129; email
at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Proposed Action
On November 8, 2024 (89 FR 88690), the EPA proposed a limited
approval and limited disapproval of the following rules that were
submitted for incorporation into the Arizona SIP.
Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local agency Rule No. Rule title Revised Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MCAQD........................ 352 Gasoline Cargo Tank Testing and 11/18/2020 12/03/2020
Use.
MCAQD........................ 353 Storage and Loading of Gasoline 11/18/2020 12/03/2020
at a Gasoline Dispensing
Facility (GDF).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We proposed a limited approval because we determined that these
rules improve the SIP and are largely consistent with the relevant CAA
requirements. We simultaneously proposed a limited disapproval because
some rule provisions conflict with section 110 and part D of the Act.
In addition, we proposed a disapproval of MCAQD's RACT demonstration
for the source categories listed in Table 2 for the 2008 8-hour ozone
NAAQS in the Phoenix-Mesa ozone nonattainment area.
Table 2--Applicable Source Categories
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CTG Title/source category Applicable MCAQD rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA-450/2-78-051........................ Control of Volatile Organic Compound Rule 352.
Leaks from Gasoline Tank Trucks and
Vapor Collection Systems.
EPA-450/R-75-102........................ Design Criteria for Stage I Vapor Control Rule 353.
Systems--Gasoline Service Stations.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The following provisions of Rule 352 preclude full approval of the
rule:
1. In addition to the annual certification test required by Section
301.1, Sections 502 and 503 of Rule 352 outline ongoing monitoring
tests to perform to detect potential leaks. However, the rule does not
identify any enforceable requirements to monitor using these tests on a
periodic basis or any recordkeeping and reporting associated with this
requirement.
2. Section 103.3(a) requires that an ``owner or operator of a
gasoline cargo tank provides documentation from the gasoline cargo tank
testing company to the Control Officer that certifies that the gasoline
cargo tank was tested and verified vapor tight using test methods at
least as stringent as those in Section 501.1 (Maricopa County Vapor
Tightness Test).'' This provision allows the Control Officer authority
to approve another test method, and without further specificity
regarding how this authority will be exercised, it could functionally
allow for a revision of the SIP without complying with the process for
SIP revisions required by the CAA.
The following provisions of Rule 353 preclude full approval of the
rule:
1. Rule 353 requires that control equipment or spill containment
equipment at a stationary GDF or on a gasoline cargo tank be leak free
and vapor tight, requiring weekly inspections. Rule 353 generally
requires a facility to determine if there is a ``potential vapor leak''
prior to being required to conduct a more stringent vapor tightness
determination. Section 501 of Rule 353 allows for four different
options to identify potential vapor leaks. Section 501.1 allows for the
``use of sight, sound, or smell'' as an acceptable method for
identifying potential vapor leaks. Although using sight, sound, or
smell can play a role in identifying potential vapor leaks, allowing
for that to potentially be the only method used could functionally
allow for potential leak identification to be left solely to the
operator's discretion and sensory inputs. Therefore, without a
provision to periodically utilize methods beyond sight, sound, or
smell, this provision undermines the enforceability of the rule's
requirement for vapor tight compliance.
2. Section 500 of Rule 353 contains ongoing monitoring and
recordkeeping requirements but does not specifically contain any
requirements to report compliance information. However, reporting
requirements are contained within Section 301 of the rule because it
incorporates the applicable requirements from the National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Source Category: Gasoline
Dispensing Facilities at 40 CFR part 63, subpart CCCCCC (``Subpart
CCCCCC''), which includes reporting requirements.\1\
[[Page 1905]]
However, Subpart CCCCCC is not applicable to the loading of aviation
gasoline into storage tanks at airports and the subsequent transfer of
aviation gasoline within the airport.\2\ Rule 353 does apply to loading
of aviation gasoline at airports, but it does not elsewhere require
periodic reporting for these facilities. Given this framework, Rule 353
has a reporting gap, because there is no periodic compliance reporting
required for loading of aviation gasoline at airports. Due to the lack
of adequate reporting requirements (or some alternative means of
ensuring enforceability) during loading of aviation gasoline into
storage tanks, this provision undermines the enforceability of the
rule's requirement for vapor tight compliance, constitutes a SIP
deficiency, and is inconsistent with the requirements of CAA Section
110.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 40 CFR 63.11126 and Table 3 to Subpart CCCCCC. For
example, Subpart CCCCCC requires annual reporting related to
malfunctions (malfunction of process equipment and air pollution
control equipment), requires all performance tests reports to be
submitted, and requires advanced notification of performance tests.
\2\ See 40 CFR part 63.11111(g).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our proposed action contains more information on the basis for this
rulemaking and on our evaluation of the submittal.
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period.
During this period, we received one anonymous comment in support of
EPA's November 8, 2024 proposed action. We thank the commenter for the
comment.
III. EPA Action
No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rules
as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in
sections 110(k)(3) and 301(a) of the Act, the EPA is finalizing a
limited approval of the submitted rules. This action incorporates the
submitted rules into the Arizona SIP, including those provisions
identified as deficient. As authorized under sections 110(k)(3) and
301(a), the EPA is simultaneously finalizing a limited disapproval of
the rules. The EPA is also finalizing a disapproval of the RACT
demonstrations for the 2008 ozone NAAQS for the sources covered by the
CTGs listed in Table 2.
As a result, the EPA must promulgate a federal implementation plan
(FIP) under section 110(c) unless we approve subsequent SIP revisions
that correct the rule deficiencies within 24 months.
In addition, the offset sanction in CAA section 179(b)(2) will be
imposed 18 months after the effective date this action, and the highway
funding sanction in CAA section 179(b)(1) will be imposed six months
after the offset sanction is imposed. A sanction will not be imposed if
the EPA determines that a subsequent SIP submission corrects the
identified deficiencies before the applicable deadline.
Note that the submitted rules have been adopted by the MCAQD, and
the EPA's final limited disapproval does not prevent the local agency
from enforcing them. The limited disapproval also does not prevent any
portion of the rules from being incorporated by reference into the
federally enforceable SIP as discussed in a July 9, 1992 EPA memo found
at: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-07/documents/procsip.pdf.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of MCAQD
Rule 352, ``Gasoline Cargo Tank Testing and Use,'' revised on November
18, 2020, which regulates VOC emissions during loading and unloading of
gasoline to any gasoline cargo tank within Maricopa County. The EPA is
also incorporating by reference MCAQD Rule 353, ``Storage and Loading
of Gasoline at a Gasoline Dispensing Facility,'' revised on November
18, 2020, which regulates VOC emissions during storage and loading of
gasoline at a gasoline dispensing facility. Therefore, these materials
have been approved by EPA for inclusion in the SIP, have been
incorporated by reference by EPA into that plan, are fully federally
enforceable under sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of the effective
date of this final rulemaking, and will be incorporated by reference in
the next update to the SIP compilation.\3\ The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents available through www.regulations.gov
and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for
more information).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to review state choices
and approve those choices if they meet the minimum criteria of the Act.
Accordingly, this final action is finalizing a limited approval and
limited disapproval of state law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state
law.
Additional information about these statutes and Executive orders
can be found at https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/laws-and-executive-orders.
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This action does not impose an information collection burden under
the PRA because this action does not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law.
C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities beyond those
imposed by state law.
D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in
UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. This action does not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. Accordingly, no additional costs to
state, local, or tribal governments, or to the private sector will
result from this action.
E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
F. Executive Order 13175: Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175, because the SIP is not approved to apply on any
Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian
tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has
[[Page 1906]]
jurisdiction, and it will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying only to those
regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks
that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect
children, per the definition of ``covered regulatory action'' in
section 2-202 of the Executive Order. Therefore, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is merely finalizing a
limited approval and limited disapproval of state law as meeting
federal requirements. Furthermore, the EPA's Policy on Children's
Health does not apply to this action.
H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
Section 12(d) of the NTTAA directs the EPA to use voluntary
consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would
be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. The EPA
believes that this action is not subject to the requirements of section
12(d) of the NTTAA because application of those requirements would be
inconsistent with the CAA.
J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations and
Executive Order 14096: Revitalizing Our Nation's Commitment to
Environmental Justice for All
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on communities with environmental justice
(EJ) concerns to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
Executive Order 14096 (Revitalizing Our Nation's Commitment to
Environmental Justice for All, 88 FR 25251, April 26, 2023) builds on
and supplements Executive Order 12898 and defines EJ as, among other
things, ``the just treatment and meaningful involvement of all people,
regardless of income, race, color, national origin, Tribal affiliation,
or disability, in agency decision-making and other Federal activities
that affect human health and the environment.''
The State did not evaluate EJ considerations as part of its SIP
submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation. The EPA did not perform an EJ
analysis and did not consider EJ in this action. Consideration of EJ is
not required as part of this action, and there is no information in the
record inconsistent with the stated goal of Executive Orders 12898 and
14096 of achieving EJ for communities with EJ concerns.
K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
L. Petitions for Judicial Review
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by March 11, 2025. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements (see section 307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: December 19, 2024.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends part 52,
chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
AUTHORITY: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart D--Arizona
0
2. Amend Sec. 52.119 by removing and reserving paragraph (c)(1).
0
3. In Sec. 52.120:
0
a. In paragraph (c), amend table 4, by revising the entries for ``Rule
352'' and ``Rule 353''; and
0
b. In paragraph (e), amend table 1, under the subheading ``Part D
Elements and Plans for the Metropolitan Phoenix and Tucson Areas,'' by
revising the second entry for ``Analysis of Reasonably Available
Control Technology for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS) State Implementation Plan (RACT SIP)'' that
appears just before the entry for ``Reasonably Available Control
Technology (RACT) Analysis, Negative Declaration and Rules Adoption.''
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 52.120 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Table 4 to Paragraph (c)--EPA-Approved Maricopa County Air Pollution Control Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State effective Additional
County citation Title/subject date EPA approval date explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post-July 1998 Rule Codification
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 1907]]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulation III--Control of Air Contaminants
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Rule 352........................ Gasoline Cargo November 18, 2020. 1/10/25, [INSERT Submitted
Tank Testing and FIRST PAGE OF electronically on
Use. FEDERAL REGISTER December 3, 2020,
CITATION]. as an attachment
to a letter dated
November 24,
2020.
Rule 353........................ Storage and November 18, 2020. 1/10/25, [INSERT Submitted
Loading of FIRST PAGE OF electronically on
Gasoline at a FEDERAL REGISTER December 3, 2020,
Gasoline CITATION]. as an attachment
Dispensing to a letter dated
Facility (GDF). November 24,
2020.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
(e) * * *
Table 1--EPA-Approved Non-Regulatory and Quasi-Regulatory Measures
[Excluding certain resolutions and statutes, which are listed in tables 2 and 3, respectively] \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicable
geographic or
Name of SIP provision nonattainment State submittal EPA approval date Explanation
area or title/ date
subject
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The State of Arizona Air Pollution Control Implementation Plan
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Part D Elements and Plans for the Metropolitan Phoenix and Tucson Areas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Analysis of Reasonably Maricopa County June 22, 2017.... February 26, Only those portions of
Available Control Technology portion of 2020, 85 FR the document
for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone Phoenix-Mesa 10986 beginning with
National Ambient Air Quality nonattainment (conditionally ``Gasoline Bulk
Standard (NAAQS) State area for 2008 8- approved); and Plants, Fixed Roof
Implementation Plan (RACT SIP). hour ozone NAAQS. December 9, Petroleum Tanks,
2024, 89 FR External Floating
97543. Roof Petroleum Tanks,
And Gasoline Loading
Terminals'' on page
33 through the first
full paragraph on
page 34, and Appendix
C: CTG RACT
Spreadsheet, the rows
beginning with
``Gasoline Bulk
Plants'' on page 60,
through ``Gasoline
Loading Terminals''
on pages 64-65.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Table 1 is divided into three parts: Clean Air Act Section 110(a)(2) State Implementation Plan Elements
(excluding Part D Elements and Plans), Part D Elements and Plans (other than for the Metropolitan Phoenix or
Tucson Areas), and Part D Elements and Plans for the Metropolitan Phoenix and Tucson Areas.
* * * * *
0
4. Amend Sec. 52.124 by adding paragraph (b)(2)(ii) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.124 Part D disapproval.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) The RACT demonstration titled ``Analysis of Reasonably
Available Control Technology for the 2008 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient
Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) State Implementation Plan (RACT SIP),''
only those portions of the document beginning with ``Gasoline Tank
Trucks And Vapor Collection System Leaks'' on page 34 through the first
full paragraph on page 35, and Appendix C: CTG RACT Spreadsheet, the
rows beginning with ``Gasoline Tank Trucks And Vapor Collection System
Leaks'' on page 65, through ``Service Stations--Stage I'' on pages 67-
69. This demonstration represents the RACT requirement for the
following source categories: Control of Volatile Organic Compound Leaks
from Gasoline Tank Trucks and Vapor Collection Systems (EPA-450/2-78-
051) and Design Criteria for Stage I Vapor Control Systems--Gasoline
Service Stations (EPA-450/R-75-102).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2024-31028 Filed 1-8-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P