Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Extension, 1128-1129 [2025-00008]
Download as PDF
1128
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 4 / Tuesday, January 7, 2025 / Notices
The policy statement can be
found at the following link: https://
www2.fmc.gov/readingroom/
proceeding/24-29/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Eng, Secretary; Phone: (202) 523–
5725; Email: Secretary@fmc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
January 2, 2025, the Commission issued
a policy statement to provide guidance
to shippers and other third parties on
bringing class action complaints at the
Commission. As the policy statement
explains, class action complaints are not
precluded by Title 46 or the
Commission’s interpretation of the
statute. In accordance with 46 CFR
502.12, the Commission may follow the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ‘‘for
situations which are not covered by a
specific Commission rule . . . to the
extent that they are consistent with
sound administrative practice.’’ The
Commission may use the procedures of
Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure to evaluate class action
complaints filed with the Commission
because the requirements under
§ 502.12 are satisfied.
The policy statement can be found at
the following link: https://
www2.fmc.gov/readingroom/
proceeding/24-29/.
This document is issued under
authority of 5 U.S.C. 552, 46 U.S.C.
46105 and 46 CFR 502.12.
ADDRESSES:
By the Commission.
David Eng,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2025–00074 Filed 1–6–25; 8:45 am]
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System.
Michele Taylor Fennell,
Associate Secretary of the Board.
BILLING CODE 6730–02–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
[FR Doc. 2025–00075 Filed 1–6–25; 8:45 am]
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Change in Bank Control Notices;
Acquisitions of Shares of a Bank or
Bank Holding Company
BILLING CODE P
The notificants listed below have
applied under the Change in Bank
Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and
§ 225.41 of the Board’s Regulation Y (12
CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank
or bank holding company. The factors
that are considered in acting on the
applications are set forth in paragraph 7
of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).
The public portions of the
applications listed below, as well as
other related filings required by the
Board, if any, are available for
immediate inspection at the Federal
Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at
the offices of the Board of Governors.
This information may also be obtained
on an expedited basis, upon request, by
contacting the appropriate Federal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Jan 06, 2025
Jkt 265001
Reserve Bank and from the Board’s
Freedom of Information Office at
https://www.federalreserve.gov/foia/
request.htm. Interested persons may
express their views in writing on the
standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of
the Act.
Comments received are subject to
public disclosure. In general, comments
received will be made available without
change and will not be modified to
remove personal or business
information including confidential,
contact, or other identifying
information. Comments should not
include any information such as
confidential information that would not
be appropriate for public disclosure.
Comments regarding each of these
applications must be received at the
Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of
the Board of Governors, Ann E.
Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th
Street and Constitution Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20551–0001, not later
than January 22, 2025.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
(Erien O. Terry, Assistant Vice
President) 1000 Peachtree Street NE,
Atlanta, Georgia 30309. Comments can
also be sent electronically to
Applications.Comments@atl.frb.org:
1. Linda M. Young and Nathaniel J.
Pierson, both of Fort Payne, Alabama,
and Chris Y. Pierson, Valley Head,
Alabama; to join the Young Family
Control Group, a group acting in
concert, to retain voting shares of FBDC
Financial Corp., and thereby indirectly
retain voting shares of First Fidelity
Bank, both of Fort Payne, Alabama.
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Extension
Federal Trade Commission.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Federal Trade
Commission (‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
requests that the Office of Management
and Budget (‘‘OMB’’) extend for an
additional three years the current
Paperwork Reduction Act (‘‘PRA’’)
clearance for information collection
requirements contained in the Red
Flags, Card Issuers, and Address
Discrepancy Rules (‘‘Rules’’). That
clearance expires on January 31, 2025.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Comments must be filed by
February 6, 2025.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Whitney Moore, Attorney, Division of
Division of Privacy and Identity
Protection, Bureau of Consumer
Protection, Federal Trade Commission,
Mail Code CC–8232, 600 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20580,
(202) 326–2645.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
A. Background and Comments
The FTC’s Office of Management and
Budget (‘‘OMB’’) clearance (OMB
Control No.: 3084–0137) for the
collection of information under the Red
Flags, Card Issuers, and Address
Discrepancy Rules (‘‘Rules’’),1 which
implement sections 114 and 315 of the
Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions
Act of 2003 (‘‘FACT Act’’), as amended
by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act (‘‘DoddFrank Act’’) 2 and the Red Flags Program
Clarification Act of 2010 (‘‘Clarification
Act’’),3 is set to expire on January 31,
2025. Accordingly, on August 22, 2024,
the Commission published a Federal
Register Notice seeking public comment
on the proposal to renew this OMB
clearance for an additional three-year
period. See 89 FR 67938 (Aug. 22,
2024). In response to the Federal
Register Notice, the Commission
received two germane comments.
The two comments were generally
supportive of the information collection,
although the two commenters indicated
that they believe that the federal
government’s efforts in the context of
personal data protections should be
expanded.4 The Commission thanks the
commenters for their submissions, and
notes that the Commission has also
1 Red Flags Rule, 16 CFR 681.1; Card Issuers Rule,
16 CFR 681.2; Address Discrepancy Rule, 16 CFR
part 641.
2 Public Law 111–203 (2010).
3 Red Flag Program Clarification Act of 2010, 15
U.S.C. 1681m(e)(4).
4 See https://www.regulations.gov/comment/FTC2022-0010-0004; https://www.regulations.gov/
comment/FTC-2022-0010-0003.
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 4 / Tuesday, January 7, 2025 / Notices
supported greater personal data
protections for American consumers by,
among other things, encouraging
Congress to enact comprehensive
federal privacy legislation.5 However,
such initiatives would be beyond the
scope of this PRA renewal request.
Accordingly, for the foregoing reasons,
the Commission declines to make any
adjustments to its prior burden
estimates or to modify its initial
proposal.
B. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Collection: Red Flags Rule, 16
CFR 681.1; Card Issuers Rule, 16 CFR
681.2; Address Discrepancy Rule, 16
CFR part 641.
OMB Control Number: 3084–0137.
Type of Review: Extension of
currently approved collection.
Abstract: The Red Flags Rule requires
financial institutions and certain
creditors to develop and implement
written Identity Theft Prevention
Programs. The Card Issuers Rule
requires credit and debit card issuers to
assess the validity of notifications of
address changes under certain
circumstances. The Address
Discrepancy Rule provides guidance on
what covered users of consumer reports
must do when they receive a notice of
address discrepancy from a nationwide
consumer reporting agency.
Collectively, these three anti-identity
theft provisions are intended to prevent
impostors from misusing another
person’s personal information for a
fraudulent purpose. The Rules
implement sections 114 and 315 of the
FACT Act.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Affected Public
Red Flags Rule: Utilities; motor
vehicle dealerships;
telecommunications firms; colleges and
universities; hospitals; nursing homes;
public warehouse and storage firms; fuel
dealers; financial transaction processing
firms; certain creditors; 6 and other
categories of persons that qualify as
financial institutions.
Card Issuers Rule: State-chartered
credit unions; general merchandise
stores; colleges and universities;
telecommunications firms; and certain
creditors.7
Address Discrepancy Rule: Users of
consumer reports that are motor vehicle
5 See, e.g., A Look Behind the Screens: Examining
the Data Practices of Social Media and Video
Streaming Services (Sept. 11, 2024), https://
www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/Social-Media6b-Report-9-11-2024.pdf (recommending that
Congress enact comprehensive federal privacy
legislation that limits surveillance and grants
consumers data rights).
6 15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)(4).
7 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:44 Jan 06, 2025
Jkt 265001
dealers described in section 1029(a) of
the Dodd-Frank Act, 12 U.S.C. 5519,
and that are predominantly engaged in
the sale and servicing of motor vehicles,
the leasing and servicing of them, or
both.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
238,942 (165,494 for Red Flags Rule +
18,500 for Card Issuers Rule + 54,948 for
Address Discrepancy Rule).
Estimated Annual Burden Hours:
398,479 hours (358,124 hours for Red
Flags Rule + 18,608 hours for Card
Issuers Rule + 21,747 hours for Address
Discrepancy Rule).
Estimated Annual Labor Costs:
$22,350,652 ($21,850,471 for Red Flags
and Card Issuers Rule + $500,181 for
Address Discrepancy Rule).
Estimated Annual Non-Labor Costs:
$0.
1129
patterns devices, manufacturing
processes, or customer names.
Josephine Liu,
Assistant General Counsel for Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2025–00008 Filed 1–6–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY
OFFICE
Request for Medicare Payment
Advisory Commission (MedPAC)
Nominations
AGENCY:
Government Accountability
Office.
Request for letters of
nomination and resumes.
ACTION:
C. Request for Comment
On August 22, 2024, the FTC sought
public comment on the information
collection requirements associated with
the Rules. 89 FR 67938 (Aug. 22, 2024).
Two germane comments were received
during the first public comment period
and are addressed above. Pursuant to
OMB regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, that
implement the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., the FTC is providing this second
opportunity for public comment while
seeking OMB approval to renew the preexisting clearance for the Rules. For
more details about the Rules’
requirements and the basis for the
calculations summarized above, see 89
FR 67938.
Your comment—including your name
and your state—will be placed on the
public record of this proceeding.
Because your comment will be made
public, you are solely responsible for
making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive personal
information, such as anyone’s Social
Security number; date of birth; driver’s
license number or other state
identification number or foreign country
equivalent; passport number; financial
account number; or credit or debit card
number. You are also solely responsible
for ensuring that your comment does
not include any sensitive health
information, such as medical records or
other individually identifiable health
information. In addition, your comment
should not include any ‘‘[t]rade secret or
any commercial or financial information
which is . . . privileged or
confidential’’—as provided in section
6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)—
including, in particular, competitively
sensitive information, such as costs,
sales statistics, inventories, formulas,
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
The Balanced Budget Act of
1997 established the Medicare Payment
Advisory Commission (MedPAC) and
gave the Comptroller General of the
United States responsibility for
appointing its members. The
Government Accountability Office
(GAO) is now accepting nominations for
MedPAC appointments that will be
effective in May 2025. Nominations
should be sent to the email address
listed below. Acknowledgement of
receipt will be provided within a week
of submission.
SUMMARY:
Letters of nomination and
resumes should be submitted no later
than February 7, 2025, to ensure
adequate opportunity for review and
consideration of nominees prior to
appointment.
DATES:
Submit letters of
nomination and resumes to
MedPACappointments@gao.gov.
ADDRESSES:
Greg
Giusto at giustog@gao.gov or (202) 512–
7114 if you do not receive an
acknowledgement or need additional
information. For general information,
contact GAO’s Office of Public Affairs,
at PublicAffairs@gao.gov.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1395b–6.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gene L. Dodaro,
Comptroller General of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2024–30290 Filed 1–6–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610–02–P
E:\FR\FM\07JAN1.SGM
07JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1128-1129]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2025-00008]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB
Review; Comment Request; Extension
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Trade Commission (``FTC'' or ``Commission'')
requests that the Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') extend for
an additional three years the current Paperwork Reduction Act (``PRA'')
clearance for information collection requirements contained in the Red
Flags, Card Issuers, and Address Discrepancy Rules (``Rules''). That
clearance expires on January 31, 2025.
DATES: Comments must be filed by February 6, 2025.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting
``Currently under 30-day Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using
the search function.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Whitney Moore, Attorney, Division of
Division of Privacy and Identity Protection, Bureau of Consumer
Protection, Federal Trade Commission, Mail Code CC-8232, 600
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20580, (202) 326-2645.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background and Comments
The FTC's Office of Management and Budget (``OMB'') clearance (OMB
Control No.: 3084-0137) for the collection of information under the Red
Flags, Card Issuers, and Address Discrepancy Rules (``Rules''),\1\
which implement sections 114 and 315 of the Fair and Accurate Credit
Transactions Act of 2003 (``FACT Act''), as amended by the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (``Dodd-Frank Act'') \2\
and the Red Flags Program Clarification Act of 2010 (``Clarification
Act''),\3\ is set to expire on January 31, 2025. Accordingly, on August
22, 2024, the Commission published a Federal Register Notice seeking
public comment on the proposal to renew this OMB clearance for an
additional three-year period. See 89 FR 67938 (Aug. 22, 2024). In
response to the Federal Register Notice, the Commission received two
germane comments.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Red Flags Rule, 16 CFR 681.1; Card Issuers Rule, 16 CFR
681.2; Address Discrepancy Rule, 16 CFR part 641.
\2\ Public Law 111-203 (2010).
\3\ Red Flag Program Clarification Act of 2010, 15 U.S.C.
1681m(e)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The two comments were generally supportive of the information
collection, although the two commenters indicated that they believe
that the federal government's efforts in the context of personal data
protections should be expanded.\4\ The Commission thanks the commenters
for their submissions, and notes that the Commission has also
[[Page 1129]]
supported greater personal data protections for American consumers by,
among other things, encouraging Congress to enact comprehensive federal
privacy legislation.\5\ However, such initiatives would be beyond the
scope of this PRA renewal request. Accordingly, for the foregoing
reasons, the Commission declines to make any adjustments to its prior
burden estimates or to modify its initial proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See https://www.regulations.gov/comment/FTC-2022-0010-0004;
https://www.regulations.gov/comment/FTC-2022-0010-0003.
\5\ See, e.g., A Look Behind the Screens: Examining the Data
Practices of Social Media and Video Streaming Services (Sept. 11,
2024), https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/ftc_gov/pdf/Social-Media-6b-Report-9-11-2024.pdf (recommending that Congress enact comprehensive
federal privacy legislation that limits surveillance and grants
consumers data rights).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Collection: Red Flags Rule, 16 CFR 681.1; Card Issuers
Rule, 16 CFR 681.2; Address Discrepancy Rule, 16 CFR part 641.
OMB Control Number: 3084-0137.
Type of Review: Extension of currently approved collection.
Abstract: The Red Flags Rule requires financial institutions and
certain creditors to develop and implement written Identity Theft
Prevention Programs. The Card Issuers Rule requires credit and debit
card issuers to assess the validity of notifications of address changes
under certain circumstances. The Address Discrepancy Rule provides
guidance on what covered users of consumer reports must do when they
receive a notice of address discrepancy from a nationwide consumer
reporting agency. Collectively, these three anti-identity theft
provisions are intended to prevent impostors from misusing another
person's personal information for a fraudulent purpose. The Rules
implement sections 114 and 315 of the FACT Act.
Affected Public
Red Flags Rule: Utilities; motor vehicle dealerships;
telecommunications firms; colleges and universities; hospitals; nursing
homes; public warehouse and storage firms; fuel dealers; financial
transaction processing firms; certain creditors; \6\ and other
categories of persons that qualify as financial institutions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 1681m(e)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Card Issuers Rule: State-chartered credit unions; general
merchandise stores; colleges and universities; telecommunications
firms; and certain creditors.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Address Discrepancy Rule: Users of consumer reports that are motor
vehicle dealers described in section 1029(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act, 12
U.S.C. 5519, and that are predominantly engaged in the sale and
servicing of motor vehicles, the leasing and servicing of them, or
both.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 238,942 (165,494 for Red Flags
Rule + 18,500 for Card Issuers Rule + 54,948 for Address Discrepancy
Rule).
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 398,479 hours (358,124 hours for Red
Flags Rule + 18,608 hours for Card Issuers Rule + 21,747 hours for
Address Discrepancy Rule).
Estimated Annual Labor Costs: $22,350,652 ($21,850,471 for Red
Flags and Card Issuers Rule + $500,181 for Address Discrepancy Rule).
Estimated Annual Non-Labor Costs: $0.
C. Request for Comment
On August 22, 2024, the FTC sought public comment on the
information collection requirements associated with the Rules. 89 FR
67938 (Aug. 22, 2024). Two germane comments were received during the
first public comment period and are addressed above. Pursuant to OMB
regulations, 5 CFR part 1320, that implement the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., the FTC is providing this second opportunity for public comment
while seeking OMB approval to renew the pre-existing clearance for the
Rules. For more details about the Rules' requirements and the basis for
the calculations summarized above, see 89 FR 67938.
Your comment--including your name and your state--will be placed on
the public record of this proceeding. Because your comment will be made
public, you are solely responsible for making sure that your comment
does not include any sensitive personal information, such as anyone's
Social Security number; date of birth; driver's license number or other
state identification number or foreign country equivalent; passport
number; financial account number; or credit or debit card number. You
are also solely responsible for ensuring that your comment does not
include any sensitive health information, such as medical records or
other individually identifiable health information. In addition, your
comment should not include any ``[t]rade secret or any commercial or
financial information which is . . . privileged or confidential''--as
provided in section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule
4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)--including, in particular, competitively
sensitive information, such as costs, sales statistics, inventories,
formulas, patterns devices, manufacturing processes, or customer names.
Josephine Liu,
Assistant General Counsel for Legal Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2025-00008 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P