Safety Zone; Cypress Passage Overhead Powerline Demolition and Removal, Atchafalaya River, LA, 1037-1039 [2024-31671]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 4 / Tuesday, January 7, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
Docket No.
Type of regulation
Location
USCG–2021–0572
USCG–2021–0577
USCG–2021–0587
USCG–2021–0065
USCG–2021–0578
USCG–2021–0593
USCG–2021–0541
USCG–2021–0330
USCG–2021–0394
USCG–2021–0581
USCG–2021–0561
USCG–2021–0621
USCG–2021–0559
USCG–2021–0645
USCG–2021–0683
USCG–2021–0531
USCG–2021–0068
USCG–2021–0067
USCG–2021–0665
USCG–2021–0705
USCG–2021–0689
USCG–2021–0709
USCG–2021–0712
USCG–2021–0695
USCG–2021–0682
USCG–2021–0687
USCG–2021–0688
USCG–2021–0725
USCG–2021–0660
USCG–2021–0637
USCG–2021–0128
USCG–2021–0127
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Special Local Regulations (Part 100) .................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Security Zones (Part 165) ..................................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Special Local Regulations (Part 100) .................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Security Zones (Part 165) ..................................................
Security Zones (Part 165) ..................................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
Safety Zones (Parts 147 and 165) .....................................
USCG–2021–0693
USCG–2021–0759
USCG–2021–0764
USCG–2021–0670
Safety
Safety
Safety
Safety
Madison Township, OH .................................
Corpus Christi, TX .........................................
Seal Beach, CA .............................................
Cleveland, OH ...............................................
Ingleside, TX .................................................
Chicago, IL ....................................................
Oak Harbor, WA ............................................
Atlantic City, NJ .............................................
Bath, ME .......................................................
Rehoboth Beach, DE ....................................
Michigan City, IN ...........................................
Detroit, MI ......................................................
Stillwater, MN ................................................
Perry, WA ......................................................
Chicago, IL ....................................................
Maidsville, WV ...............................................
Port Arthur Captain of the Port Zone ............
Cameron Parish, LA ......................................
Washington, NC ............................................
Lower Mississippi River, LA ..........................
Chicago, IL ....................................................
Lower Mississippi River, LA ..........................
Cameron Parish, LA ......................................
Glencoe, IL ....................................................
Lakeside, OH ................................................
Boston, MA ....................................................
Boston, MA ....................................................
Chicago, IL ....................................................
Coraopolis, PA ..............................................
Frankfort Harbor, MI ......................................
Virginia Beach, VA ........................................
Potomac River, Between Charles Count, MD
and King George County, VA.
Cleveland, OH ...............................................
Corpus Christi, TX .........................................
Corpus Christi, TX .........................................
Toledo, OH ....................................................
Zones
Zones
Zones
Zones
(Parts
(Parts
(Parts
(Parts
147
147
147
147
Michael Cunningham,
Chief, Office of Regulations and
Administrative Law.
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2024–1095]
This rule is effective from 8 a.m.
Central Standard Time (CST) on
Thursday, January 9, 2025, through 8
p.m. CST on Thursday, January 9, 2025.
Safety Zone; Cypress Passage
Overhead Powerline Demolition and
Removal, Atchafalaya River, LA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters within a 500-yard
radius of 29°47′38.18″ N, 91°21′50.52″
W, approximately MM 105.5, on the
Atchafalaya River, locally known as
Cypress Passage, during an overhead
16:00 Jan 06, 2025
Jkt 265001
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2024–
1095 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
ADDRESSES:
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
.....................................
.....................................
.....................................
.....................................
DATES:
RIN 1625–AA00
SUMMARY:
165)
165)
165)
165)
electrical powerline structure
demolition operation on Thursday,
January 9, 2025. The safety zone is
needed to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment from
potential hazards created by the
demolition of the powerline structures
resulting in electrical powerlines on the
navigational water’s surface. Entry of
vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Marine Safety Unit Houma.
[FR Doc. 2024–31658 Filed 1–6–25; 8:45 am]
ACTION:
and
and
and
and
If
you have questions about this rule, call
or email LCDR Justin Kimrey at
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1037
Enforcement
date
7/24/2021
7/24/2021
7/24/2021
7/24/2021
7/25/2021
7/26/2021
7/31/2021
8/1/2021
8/1/2021
8/6/2021
8/7/2021
8/14/2021
8/14/2021
8/14/2021
8/21/2021
8/23/2021
8/26/2021
8/27/2021
8/27/2021
8/27/2021
8/29/2021
8/31/2021
9/3/2021
9/3/2021
9/4/2021
9/9/2021
9/11/2021
9/11/2021
9/11/2021
9/12/2021
9/12/2021
9/13/2021
9/18/2021
9/22/2021
9/23/2021
9/23/2021
telephone (985) 665–2449 or email d08smb-msuhouma-waterways@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CST Central Standard Time
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MM Mile Marker
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule under the authority in 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). This statutory
provision authorizes an agency to issue
a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the
agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ The Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because during
the 12-hour overhead electrical
powerline structure demolition the
E:\FR\FM\07JAR1.SGM
07JAR1
1038
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 4 / Tuesday, January 7, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
electrical powerlines will be on top of
the navigational water’s surface,
crossing the navigational channel and
posing potential safety hazards to
passing vessels. It is impracticable to
publish an NPRM because we must
establish this safety zone by January 9,
2025.
Also, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because prompt action is needed to
respond to the potential safety hazards
associated with electrical powerlines
crossing the navigational channel.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The
Captain of the Port Houma (COTP) has
determined that potential hazards
associated with the Cypress Passage
overhead powerline demolition and
removal occurring on January 9, 2025,
will be a safety concern for anyone
within a 500-yard radius of 29°47′38.18″
N, 91°21′50.52″ W, approximately MM
105.5 on the Atchafalaya River, locally
known as Cypress Passage. This rule is
needed to protect personnel, vessels,
and the marine environment in the
navigable waters within the safety zone
while the electrical power lines are
being removed from the navigational
channel.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone
from 8 a.m. through 8 p.m. on Thursday
January 9, 2024. The safety zone will
cover all navigable waters within a 500yard radius of 29°47′38.18″ N,
91°21′50.52″ W, approximately MM
105.5 on the Atchafalaya River, locally
known as Cypress Passage. The duration
of the zone is intended to protect
personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment in these navigable waters
while electrical power lines are being
removed from the navigational water’s
surface during the demolition of
overhead powerline structures along the
navigational channel. No vessel or
person will be permitted to enter the
safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or the
COTP’s designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:00 Jan 06, 2025
Jkt 265001
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094
(Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the safety zone.
Vessel traffic will not be able to safely
transit around this safety zone which
would impact this designated area of the
Atchafalaya River for 12 hours. The
Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners via VHF–FM marine
channel 16 about the zone, and the rule
would allow vessels to seek permission
to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have Tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
Tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian Tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
E:\FR\FM\07JAR1.SGM
07JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 90, No. 4 / Tuesday, January 7, 2025 / Rules and Regulations
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting only 12 hours that will
prohibit entry within a 500-yard radius
of the demolition site of overhead
electrical powerlines that will cross the
navigational water’s surface. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
Accordingly, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Marine Safety Unit Houma
(COTP) in the enforcement of the safety
zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter the safety
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative by hailing on VHF radio
channels 13 or 16. Those in the safety
zone must comply with all lawful orders
or directions given to them by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8 a.m. CST on
Thursday January 9, 2025, through 8
p.m. CST on Thursday January 9, 2025.
Dated: December 31, 2024.
Jason S. Franz,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Marine Safety Unit Houma.
[FR Doc. 2024–31671 Filed 1–6–25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2024–1094]
RIN 1625–AA87
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
2. Add § 165.T08–1095 to read as
follows:
■
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the
Atchafalaya River, locally known as
Cypress Passage, from surface to bottom,
within a 500-yard radius of 29°47′38.18″
N, 91°21′50.52″ W, approximately MM
105.5, during an overhead electrical
powerline structure demolition
operation from 8 a.m. CST on Thursday
January 9, 2025 through 8 p.m. CST on
Thursday January 9, 2025.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
16:00 Jan 06, 2025
Jkt 265001
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notification of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard will enforce
a security zone along the Potomac and
Anacostia Rivers and adjacent waters at
Washington, DC to protect government
officials, mitigate potential terrorist acts,
and enhance public and maritime safety
and security in the days leading up to
and after the 60th Presidential
Inauguration. During the enforcement
period, entry into or remaining within
the security zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.508 will be enforced from 8 a.m. on
January 18, 2025, through 11:59 p.m. on
SUMMARY:
§ 165.T08–1095 Safety Zone; Cypress
Passage overhead powerline demolition
and removal, Atchafalaya River, LA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Security Zone; Potomac River and
Anacostia River, and Adjacent Waters;
Washington, DC
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
1039
January 21, 2025, for the security zone
identified in 33 CFR 165.508(a)(6).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this rule, call
or email LCDR Kate Newkirk, Sector
Maryland-NCR, Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; 410–365–
8141, MDNCRWaterways@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
October 2, 2024, the Coast Guard was
notified by the event organizer that the
anticipated dates for the activities
associated with the 60th Presidential
Inauguration are scheduled from
January 18, 2025, to January 21, 2025.
The Coast Guard will enforce
regulations in 33 CFR 165.508 for the
zone identified in paragraph (a)(6). This
action is being taken to protect
government officials, mitigate potential
terrorist acts and incidents, and enhance
public and maritime safety and security
immediately before, during, and after
this event. Thirty-three CFR
165.508(d)(4) provides that the security
zone will be enforced from 8 a.m. on
January 18, 2025, until 11:59 p.m. on
January 21, 2025. Subsection (d)(1) of
§ 165.508 also provides that the security
zone will be enforced, in addition to the
specified times in paragraphs (d)(4) of
that section, upon issuance of a notice
of enforcement by the Captain of the
Port Maryland-National Capital Region.
Our regulation entitled ‘‘Security
Zone; Potomac River and Anacostia
River, and adjacent waters; Washington,
DC,’’ § 165.508, specifies the location for
this security zone as an area that
includes all navigable waters described
in paragraphs (a)(1) through (a)(3). This
security zone includes: (1) the area
comprising Zone 1, all navigable waters
of the Potomac River, from shoreline to
shoreline, bounded to the north by the
Francis Scott Key (US–29) Bridge, at
mile 113, and bounded to the south by
a line drawn from the Virginia shoreline
at Ronald Reagan Washington National
Airport, at 38°51′21.3″ N, 077°02′00.0″
W, eastward across the Potomac River to
the District of Columbia shoreline at
Hains Point at position 38°51′24.3″ N,
077°01′19.8″ W, including the waters of
the Boundary Channel, Pentagon
Lagoon, Georgetown Channel Tidal
Basin, and Roaches Run; (2) the area
comprising Zone 2, all navigable waters
of the Anacostia River, from shoreline to
shoreline, bounded to the north by the
John Philip Sousa (Pennsylvania
Avenue) Bridge, at mile 2.9, and
bounded to the south by a line drawn
from the District of Columbia shoreline
at Hains Point at position 38°51′24.3″ N,
077°01′19.8″ W, southward across the
Anacostia River to the District of
Columbia shoreline at Giesboro Point at
E:\FR\FM\07JAR1.SGM
07JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 90, Number 4 (Tuesday, January 7, 2025)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 1037-1039]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-31671]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2024-1095]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Cypress Passage Overhead Powerline Demolition and
Removal, Atchafalaya River, LA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
navigable waters within a 500-yard radius of 29[deg]47'38.18'' N,
91[deg]21'50.52'' W, approximately MM 105.5, on the Atchafalaya River,
locally known as Cypress Passage, during an overhead electrical
powerline structure demolition operation on Thursday, January 9, 2025.
The safety zone is needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine
environment from potential hazards created by the demolition of the
powerline structures resulting in electrical powerlines on the
navigational water's surface. Entry of vessels or persons into this
zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the
Port Marine Safety Unit Houma.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m. Central Standard Time (CST)
on Thursday, January 9, 2025, through 8 p.m. CST on Thursday, January
9, 2025.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2024-1095 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call or email LCDR Justin Kimrey at telephone (985) 665-2449 or email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
CST Central Standard Time
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
MM Mile Marker
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule under the authority
in 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B). This statutory provision authorizes an agency to
issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the
agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ``impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' The Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because during the 12-hour
overhead electrical powerline structure demolition the
[[Page 1038]]
electrical powerlines will be on top of the navigational water's
surface, crossing the navigational channel and posing potential safety
hazards to passing vessels. It is impracticable to publish an NPRM
because we must establish this safety zone by January 9, 2025.
Also, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because prompt action is needed to
respond to the potential safety hazards associated with electrical
powerlines crossing the navigational channel.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034. The Captain of the Port Houma (COTP) has determined that
potential hazards associated with the Cypress Passage overhead
powerline demolition and removal occurring on January 9, 2025, will be
a safety concern for anyone within a 500-yard radius of
29[deg]47'38.18'' N, 91[deg]21'50.52'' W, approximately MM 105.5 on the
Atchafalaya River, locally known as Cypress Passage. This rule is
needed to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in the
navigable waters within the safety zone while the electrical power
lines are being removed from the navigational channel.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone from 8 a.m. through 8 p.m. on
Thursday January 9, 2024. The safety zone will cover all navigable
waters within a 500-yard radius of 29[deg]47'38.18'' N,
91[deg]21'50.52'' W, approximately MM 105.5 on the Atchafalaya River,
locally known as Cypress Passage. The duration of the zone is intended
to protect personnel, vessels, and the marine environment in these
navigable waters while electrical power lines are being removed from
the navigational water's surface during the demolition of overhead
powerline structures along the navigational channel. No vessel or
person will be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the safety zone. Vessel traffic
will not be able to safely transit around this safety zone which would
impact this designated area of the Atchafalaya River for 12 hours. The
Coast Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine
channel 16 about the zone, and the rule would allow vessels to seek
permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have Tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian Tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian Tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or Tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
[[Page 1039]]
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone lasting only 12 hours that will prohibit entry within a
500-yard radius of the demolition site of overhead electrical
powerlines that will cross the navigational water's surface. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
Accordingly, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T08-1095 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T08-1095 Safety Zone; Cypress Passage overhead powerline
demolition and removal, Atchafalaya River, LA.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the Atchafalaya River, locally known as Cypress Passage, from surface
to bottom, within a 500-yard radius of 29[deg]47'38.18'' N,
91[deg]21'50.52'' W, approximately MM 105.5, during an overhead
electrical powerline structure demolition operation from 8 a.m. CST on
Thursday January 9, 2025 through 8 p.m. CST on Thursday January 9,
2025.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit Houma (COTP) in the enforcement
of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by hailing on VHF radio channels 13 or 16. Those in the
safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8 a.m.
CST on Thursday January 9, 2025, through 8 p.m. CST on Thursday January
9, 2025.
Dated: December 31, 2024.
Jason S. Franz,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Marine Safety Unit
Houma.
[FR Doc. 2024-31671 Filed 1-6-25; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P