Adoption of Categorical Exclusion From the Department of the Navy Under the National Environmental Policy Act, 106456-106458 [2024-30972]

Download as PDF 106456 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 249 / Monday, December 30, 2024 / Notices 3.155 the DoD has determined that this meeting shall be closed to the public. The Acting Under Secretary of Defense (Policy), in consultation with the DoD FACA Attorney, has determined in writing that this meeting is closed to the public because the discussions fall under the purview of 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(1) and are so inextricably intertwined with unclassified material that they cannot reasonably be segregated into separate discussions without disclosing classified material. Written Statements: In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 1009(a)(3) and 41 CFR 102–3.140(c) and 102–3.150(6) the public or interested organizations may submit written statements to the membership of the DPB at any time regarding its mission or in response to the stated agenda of a planned meeting. Written statements should be submitted to the DPB’s DFO, who’s information is listed above in this notice in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section or can be obtained from the GSA’s FACA Database—https:// www.facadatabase.gov/. Written statements that do not pertain to a scheduled meeting of the DPB may be submitted at any time. However, if individual comments pertain to a specific topic being discussed at a planned meeting, then these statements must be submitted no later than one business day prior to the meeting in question. The DFO will review all submitted written statements and provide copies to all members. Dated: December 20, 2024. Stephanie J. Bost, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary [Docket ID: DoD–2024–OS–0140] Proposed Collection; Comment Request Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment (USD(A&S)), Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: 60-Day information collection notice. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 AGENCY: In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) announces a proposed public information collection and seeks public comment on the provisions thereof. Comments are invited on: whether the VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:58 Dec 27, 2024 Jkt 265001 You may submit comments, identified by docket number and title, by any of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Mail: Department of Defense, Office of the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Privacy, Civil Liberties, and Transparency, Regulatory Directorate, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Mailbox #24, Suite 05F16, Alexandria, VA 22350– 1700. Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name, docket number and title for this Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the internet at https:// www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any personal identifiers or contact information. ADDRESSES: To request more information on this proposed information collection or to obtain a copy of the proposal and associated collection instruments, please write to Defense Logistics Agency, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Suite 14G07–01, Alexandria, VA 22350, ATTN: Carla Smith, (804) 279–1340. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Title; Associated Form; and OMB Number: Defense Logistics Agency Child and Youth Program Forms; DLA Forms 1849, 1849–1, 1849–2, 1849–3, 1849–4, 1855, 1855–1, 1855–1A, 1855– 1B, 1855–1C, 1855–1D (Parts I and II), 1855–1E, 1855–1F; OMB Control Number 0704–0582. Needs and Uses: The DoD requires the information in the proposed collection in support of the DLA Child and Youth Programs (CYPs). This collection includes fourteen DLA forms, some of which are used by all the collection respondents and some of which are FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: [FR Doc. 2024–30975 Filed 12–27–24; 8:45 am] SUMMARY: proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection; ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and ways to minimize the burden of the information collection on respondents, including through the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. DATES: Consideration will be given to all comments received by February 28, 2025. PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 used under specific circumstances. The information collected is used for program planning, management, and health and safety purposes. More specifically, the information in the proposed collection allows CYP staff to provide safe, developmentally appropriate day care services and to ensure proper, effective response in the event of an emergency. Respondents include patrons enrolling their children in a CYP; these patrons may include active-duty military, DoD civilian employees, and DoD contractors. Affected Public: Individuals or households. Annual Burden Hours: 1,004.6. Number of Respondents: 828. Responses per Respondent: 14.56. Annual Responses: 12,056. Average Burden per Response: 5 minutes. Frequency: On occasion. Dated: December 18, 2024. Stephanie J. Bost, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. [FR Doc. 2024–30892 Filed 12–27–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Office of the Secretary Adoption of Categorical Exclusion From the Department of the Navy Under the National Environmental Policy Act Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation (OLDCC), Department of Defense (DoD). ACTION: Notice of adoption of the Department of Navy’s (DoN) Categorical Exclusion for facility renovation pursuant to section 109 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). AGENCY: OLDCC is adopting the DoN’s Categorical Exclusion 14 for the alteration of an existing building. This notice describes the proposed action for which OLDCC intends to use the DoN Categorical Exclusion and details the consultation between the agencies. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick J. O’Brien, Director, Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation, Office of the Secretary of Defense, 2231 Crystal Drive, Suite 520, Arlington VA 22202–4704, (703) 697–2130. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: I. NEPA and Categorical Exclusions NEPA and Categorical Exclusions, 42 United States Code (U.S.C.) 4321–4347, requires all Federal agencies to assess the environmental impacts of their E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM 30DEN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 249 / Monday, December 30, 2024 / Notices actions. Congress enacted NEPA to encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between humans and the environment, recognizing the profound impact of human activity and the critical importance of restoring and maintaining environmental quality to the overall welfare of humankind. NEPA seeks to ensure agencies consider the environmental effects of their proposed actions in their decision-making processes and inform and involve the public in that process. NEPA created the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ), which based on 42 U.S.C. 4336c, promulgated NEPA implementing guidance at 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) parts 1500 through 1508 (CEQ regulations). To comply with NEPA, agencies determine the appropriate level of review—an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Environmental Assessment (EA), or categorical exclusion (42 U.S.C. 4336). If a proposed action is likely to have significant environmental effects, the agency must prepare an EIS and document its decision in a record of decision. Id. If the proposed action is not likely to have significant environmental effects or the effects are unknown, the agency may instead prepare an EA, which involves a more concise analysis and process than an EIS. Id. Following the EA, the agency may conclude the process with a finding of no significant impact if the analysis shows that the action will have no significant effects. If the analysis in the EA finds that the action is likely to have significant effects, however, then an EIS is required. Under NEPA and the CEQ regulations, a Federal agency may establish in its NEPA implementing procedures categorical exclusions, which are categories of actions the agency has determined normally do not significantly affect the quality of the human environment (40 CFR 1501.4, 1507.3(e)(2)(ii), 1508.1(d)). If an agency determines that a categorical exclusion covers a proposed action, it then evaluates the proposed action for extraordinary circumstances in which a normally excluded action may have a significant effect (40 CFR 1501.4(b)). If no extraordinary circumstances are present, or if further analysis determines that the extraordinary circumstances do not involve the potential for significant environmental impacts, the agency may apply the categorical exclusion to the proposed action without preparing an EA or EIS (40 CFR 1501.4). If the extraordinary circumstances have the potential to result in significant effects, VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:58 Dec 27, 2024 Jkt 265001 the agency is required to prepare an EA or EIS. Section 109 of NEPA, enacted as part of the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023, allows a Federal agency to adopt a categorical exclusion listed in another agency’s NEPA procedures for a category of proposed agency actions for which the categorical exclusion was established (42 U.S.C. 4336(c)). To adopt another agency’s categorical exclusion under section 109, an agency must identify the relevant categorical exclusion listed in that agency’s (‘‘establishing agency’’) NEPA procedures that cover its category of proposed actions or related actions; consult with the establishing agency to ensure that the proposed adoption of the categorical exclusion to a category of actions is appropriate; identify to the public the categorical exclusion that the agency plans to use for its proposed actions; and document adoption of the categorical exclusion. Id. This notice documents OLDCC’s adoption of DoN’s categorical exclusion under Section 109 of NEPA. II. Identification of the Categorical Exclusion DoN’s categorical exclusion for the alteration to an existing building when the environmental effects will remain substantially the same and the use is consistent with applicable regulations is codified in DoN’s NEPA procedures as categorical exclusion 14 in 32 CFR 775.6(f)(14). Proposed Action The Manufacturers’ Association of South-Central Pennsylvania (Association) proposes to renovate their existing facility at 3405 Board Road, York, Pennsylvania to simulate a manufacturing environment as part of the association’s scope of work undertaken as part of an OLDCC Defense Manufacturing Community Support Program funded grant. III. Rationale for the Categorical Exclusion The proposed renovation will take place within the existing envelope of the facility by expanding training and classroom space. All proposed renovation activities will not require any ground disturbance or external changes. The proposed renovation will alter 6,000 square feet of the existing interior warehouse space, adjacent to the Association’s currently occupied space of 12,000 square feet. PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 106457 IV. Consideration of Extraordinary Circumstances If an agency determines that a categorical exclusion covers a proposed action, the agency must evaluate the proposed action for extraordinary circumstances in which a normally excluded action may have a significant effect (40 CFR 1501.4(b)). OLDCC does not currently have its own NEPA implementing procedures to guide its application of extraordinary circumstances. Until OLDCC establishes NEPA implementing procedures, for purposes of considering extraordinary circumstances in connection with the DoN categorical exclusion discussed in this notice, OLDCC has considered whether the proposed action has the potential to result in significant effects, including by considering the factors listed in DoN’s definition of extraordinary circumstances (32 CFR 775.6(e)(1)). OLDCC has assessed the proposed action and determined that none of the extraordinary circumstances listed in 32 CFR 775.6(e)(1) that preclude the use of categorical exclusion 14 are applicable to the proposed action. V. Consultation With DoN and Determination of Appropriateness OLDCC and DoN consulted on the appropriateness of OLDCC’s adoption of the categorical exclusion from July to September 2024. DoN has provided OLDCC with a ‘‘no objection concurrence’’ for OLDCC’s proposed adoption of the categorical exclusion. This consultation included a review of DoN’s experience applying the categorical exclusion and the proposed action for which OLDCC plans to utilize it. Following this consultation and review, OLDCC has determined that the impacts of the proposed action to renovate the Association’s facility is similar to the impacts, which are not significant, of projects for which DoN may apply the categorical exclusion. Additionally, OLDCC determined that there are no extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, OLDCC has determined that its proposed use of DoN’s categorical exclusion 14, as described within this notice, would be appropriate. Notice to the Public and Documentation of Adoption This notice documents adoption of the DoN categorical exclusion listed above in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 4336(c) and 32 CFR 775.6(e)(1) and is available for use by OLDCC, effective immediately. E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM 30DEN1 106458 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 249 / Monday, December 30, 2024 / Notices Dated: December 19, 2024. Stephanie J. Bost, Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense. Renewable Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, EE–5B, Washington, DC 20585; (202) 441–1288; Jeremiah.Williams@ee.doe.gov. For legal issues, please contact: Ms. Laura Zuber; U.S. Department of Energy, Office of the General Counsel, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, GC–33, Washington, DC 20585; (202) 586–4798; Laura.Zuber@hq.doe.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: [FR Doc. 2024–30972 Filed 12–27–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY [EERE–2024–BT–DET–0007] RIN 1904–AF66 I. Background II. Determination Statement III. State Certification Determination Regarding Energy Efficiency Improvements in the 2024 International Energy Conservation Code I. Background Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Department of Energy. ACTION: Notification of determination. AGENCY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has reviewed the 2024 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) and determined the updated edition would improve energy efficiency in residential buildings. DOE analysis indicates that buildings meeting the 2024 IECC, as compared with buildings meeting the 2021 IECC, would result in national site energy savings of 7.80 percent, source energy savings of 6.80 percent, and energy cost savings of approximately 6.60 percent of residential building energy consumption. Under the Energy Conservation and Production Act, as amended (ECPA), upon publication of an affirmative determination, each State must review the energy efficiency provisions of its residential building code and determine whether it is appropriate for such state to revise its building code to meet or exceed the 2024 IECC. Additionally, this notification provides guidance on state code review processes and associated certifications. SUMMARY: Certification statements provided by States shall be submitted by December 30, 2026. ADDRESSES: A copy of the supporting analysis and a link to the Federal docket are available at https:// www.energycodes.gov/determinations. Certification Statements must be addressed to the Building Technologies Office—Building Energy Codes Program Manager, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW, EE–5B, Washington, DC 20585. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 DATES: Mr. Jeremiah Williams; U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: VerDate Sep<11>2014 23:58 Dec 27, 2024 Jkt 265001 Title III of the Energy Conservation and Production Act, as amended (ECPA), establishes requirements for DOE to review consensus-based building energy conservation standards. 42 U.S.C. 6831 et seq. Section 304(a) of ECPA, as amended, provides that whenever the 1992 Council of American Building Officials (CABO) Model Energy Code, or any successor to that code, is revised, the Secretary of Energy (Secretary) must make a determination, no later than 12 months after such revision, whether the revised code would improve energy efficiency in residential buildings, and must publish notice of such determination in the Federal Register. 42 U.S.C. 6833(a)(5)(A). If the Secretary makes an affirmative determination, within two years of the publication of the determination, each State is required to certify that it has reviewed the provisions of its residential building code regarding energy efficiency and made a determination as to whether it is appropriate to revise its code to meet or exceed the provisions of the successor code. 42 U.S.C. 6833(a)(5)(B). The International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) is the contemporary successor to the CABO Model Energy Code specified in ECPA. The IECC is revised every three years through an established code development and consensus process administered by the International Code Council (ICC). The ICC published the most recent edition of the IECC in August 2024 (the 2024 IECC) and triggered the statutorily required DOE review process. As part of the ICC process, any interested party may submit proposals, as well as written comments or suggested changes to any proposal, and make arguments before a committee of experts assembled by the ICC. The collection of accepted proposals forms the revised edition of the IECC. More information on the ICC code development process is available at https://www.iccsafe.org/products- PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 and-services/i-codes/code-development/ cs/iecc-residential-consensuscommittee. As required by ECPA, DOE conducts a technical analysis to assess the energy savings impacts associated with the updated code, the 2024 IECC. DOE’s review under ECPA is technical in nature and helps to inform and advise interested industry stakeholders of the effects of the updated code, and informs states and local governments who ultimately adopt, implement, and enforce building codes. Although DOE is an active participant in the review and update process for the 2024 IECC, as directed under ECPA (42 U.S.C. 6836(b)), the Department neither administers nor publishes the model energy codes. Additionally, the directive for states to update their energy efficiency codes based on the updated edition of the 2024 IECC is required by ECPA. DOE’s technical analysis serves as the basis for DOE’s determination and helps inform states who seek to update their codes and comply with ECPA. DOE’s full technical analysis, including assumptions and parameters applied in the analysis, is published as a separate technical support document (TSD) and available for review at https://www.energycodes.gov/ determinations. DOE publishes a wide range of technical assistance resources supporting building energy codes. These include additional technical analyses evaluating the impacts of updated building energy codes, such as quantifying the energy and environmental benefits, as well as additional resources supporting the adoption and successful implementation of energy codes across states and local governments. New Federal assistance is also available to support state and local adoption and implementation of building energy codes through the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (Section 40511) and Inflation Reduction Act (Section 50131). Visit www.energycodes.gov to learn more about these initiatives and technical assistance resources. II. Determination Statement Residential buildings meeting the 2024 IECC are expected to experience the following savings on a weighted national average basis (compared to the previous 2021 edition): • 7.80 percent site energy savings • 6.80 percent source energy savings • 6.60 percent energy cost savings • 6.51 percent carbon emissions savings E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM 30DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 249 (Monday, December 30, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 106456-106458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30972]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Office of the Secretary


Adoption of Categorical Exclusion From the Department of the Navy 
Under the National Environmental Policy Act

AGENCY: Office of Local Defense Community Cooperation (OLDCC), 
Department of Defense (DoD).

ACTION: Notice of adoption of the Department of Navy's (DoN) 
Categorical Exclusion for facility renovation pursuant to section 109 
of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: OLDCC is adopting the DoN's Categorical Exclusion 14 for the 
alteration of an existing building. This notice describes the proposed 
action for which OLDCC intends to use the DoN Categorical Exclusion and 
details the consultation between the agencies.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patrick J. O'Brien, Director, Office 
of Local Defense Community Cooperation, Office of the Secretary of 
Defense, 2231 Crystal Drive, Suite 520, Arlington VA 22202-4704, (703) 
697-2130.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. NEPA and Categorical Exclusions

    NEPA and Categorical Exclusions, 42 United States Code (U.S.C.) 
4321-4347, requires all Federal agencies to assess the environmental 
impacts of their

[[Page 106457]]

actions. Congress enacted NEPA to encourage productive and enjoyable 
harmony between humans and the environment, recognizing the profound 
impact of human activity and the critical importance of restoring and 
maintaining environmental quality to the overall welfare of humankind. 
NEPA seeks to ensure agencies consider the environmental effects of 
their proposed actions in their decision-making processes and inform 
and involve the public in that process. NEPA created the Council on 
Environmental Quality (CEQ), which based on 42 U.S.C. 4336c, 
promulgated NEPA implementing guidance at 40 Code of Federal 
Regulations (CFR) parts 1500 through 1508 (CEQ regulations).
    To comply with NEPA, agencies determine the appropriate level of 
review--an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Environmental 
Assessment (EA), or categorical exclusion (42 U.S.C. 4336). If a 
proposed action is likely to have significant environmental effects, 
the agency must prepare an EIS and document its decision in a record of 
decision. Id. If the proposed action is not likely to have significant 
environmental effects or the effects are unknown, the agency may 
instead prepare an EA, which involves a more concise analysis and 
process than an EIS. Id. Following the EA, the agency may conclude the 
process with a finding of no significant impact if the analysis shows 
that the action will have no significant effects. If the analysis in 
the EA finds that the action is likely to have significant effects, 
however, then an EIS is required. Under NEPA and the CEQ regulations, a 
Federal agency may establish in its NEPA implementing procedures 
categorical exclusions, which are categories of actions the agency has 
determined normally do not significantly affect the quality of the 
human environment (40 CFR 1501.4, 1507.3(e)(2)(ii), 1508.1(d)). If an 
agency determines that a categorical exclusion covers a proposed 
action, it then evaluates the proposed action for extraordinary 
circumstances in which a normally excluded action may have a 
significant effect (40 CFR 1501.4(b)). If no extraordinary 
circumstances are present, or if further analysis determines that the 
extraordinary circumstances do not involve the potential for 
significant environmental impacts, the agency may apply the categorical 
exclusion to the proposed action without preparing an EA or EIS (40 CFR 
1501.4). If the extraordinary circumstances have the potential to 
result in significant effects, the agency is required to prepare an EA 
or EIS.
    Section 109 of NEPA, enacted as part of the Fiscal Responsibility 
Act of 2023, allows a Federal agency to adopt a categorical exclusion 
listed in another agency's NEPA procedures for a category of proposed 
agency actions for which the categorical exclusion was established (42 
U.S.C. 4336(c)). To adopt another agency's categorical exclusion under 
section 109, an agency must identify the relevant categorical exclusion 
listed in that agency's (``establishing agency'') NEPA procedures that 
cover its category of proposed actions or related actions; consult with 
the establishing agency to ensure that the proposed adoption of the 
categorical exclusion to a category of actions is appropriate; identify 
to the public the categorical exclusion that the agency plans to use 
for its proposed actions; and document adoption of the categorical 
exclusion. Id. This notice documents OLDCC's adoption of DoN's 
categorical exclusion under Section 109 of NEPA.

II. Identification of the Categorical Exclusion

    DoN's categorical exclusion for the alteration to an existing 
building when the environmental effects will remain substantially the 
same and the use is consistent with applicable regulations is codified 
in DoN's NEPA procedures as categorical exclusion 14 in 32 CFR 
775.6(f)(14).

Proposed Action

    The Manufacturers' Association of South-Central Pennsylvania 
(Association) proposes to renovate their existing facility at 3405 
Board Road, York, Pennsylvania to simulate a manufacturing environment 
as part of the association's scope of work undertaken as part of an 
OLDCC Defense Manufacturing Community Support Program funded grant.

III. Rationale for the Categorical Exclusion

    The proposed renovation will take place within the existing 
envelope of the facility by expanding training and classroom space. All 
proposed renovation activities will not require any ground disturbance 
or external changes. The proposed renovation will alter 6,000 square 
feet of the existing interior warehouse space, adjacent to the 
Association's currently occupied space of 12,000 square feet.

IV. Consideration of Extraordinary Circumstances

    If an agency determines that a categorical exclusion covers a 
proposed action, the agency must evaluate the proposed action for 
extraordinary circumstances in which a normally excluded action may 
have a significant effect (40 CFR 1501.4(b)). OLDCC does not currently 
have its own NEPA implementing procedures to guide its application of 
extraordinary circumstances. Until OLDCC establishes NEPA implementing 
procedures, for purposes of considering extraordinary circumstances in 
connection with the DoN categorical exclusion discussed in this notice, 
OLDCC has considered whether the proposed action has the potential to 
result in significant effects, including by considering the factors 
listed in DoN's definition of extraordinary circumstances (32 CFR 
775.6(e)(1)).
    OLDCC has assessed the proposed action and determined that none of 
the extraordinary circumstances listed in 32 CFR 775.6(e)(1) that 
preclude the use of categorical exclusion 14 are applicable to the 
proposed action.

V. Consultation With DoN and Determination of Appropriateness

    OLDCC and DoN consulted on the appropriateness of OLDCC's adoption 
of the categorical exclusion from July to September 2024. DoN has 
provided OLDCC with a ``no objection concurrence'' for OLDCC's proposed 
adoption of the categorical exclusion. This consultation included a 
review of DoN's experience applying the categorical exclusion and the 
proposed action for which OLDCC plans to utilize it. Following this 
consultation and review, OLDCC has determined that the impacts of the 
proposed action to renovate the Association's facility is similar to 
the impacts, which are not significant, of projects for which DoN may 
apply the categorical exclusion. Additionally, OLDCC determined that 
there are no extraordinary circumstances. Therefore, OLDCC has 
determined that its proposed use of DoN's categorical exclusion 14, as 
described within this notice, would be appropriate.

Notice to the Public and Documentation of Adoption

    This notice documents adoption of the DoN categorical exclusion 
listed above in accordance with 42 U.S.C. 4336(c) and 32 CFR 
775.6(e)(1) and is available for use by OLDCC, effective immediately.


[[Page 106458]]


    Dated: December 19, 2024.
Stephanie J. Bost,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2024-30972 Filed 12-27-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.