Initial Guidance for Environmental-Economic Accounting Classifications for Economic Statistics-Request for Comments on Future Natural Capital Accounting Statistical Classifications, 104226-104229 [2024-30058]
Download as PDF
104226
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2024 / Notices
Employer name
DBA
City
Vector Force Development, LLC ...........................
Velocity Maintenance Solutions LLC .....................
Verium, LLC ...........................................................
Veterans Alliance ...................................................
Veterans Assistance Commission of Lake County
Veterans Bridge Home ..........................................
Veterans Changing Services, Inc ..........................
Veterans Guardian VA Claim Consulting ..............
Veterans Inc ...........................................................
Veterans Management Services, Inc ....................
Veterans Medical Distributors, Inc .........................
Veterans Medical Supply Inc .................................
Veterans Mortgage of America, Inc .......................
Veterans Moving America LLC ..............................
Veterans Outreach Center, Inc ..............................
Veterans Stand Together ......................................
Veterans Trading Company Inc .............................
Veterans United Home Loans ...............................
VETForce, Inc ........................................................
VETS, LLC .............................................................
Vets2PM, LLC ........................................................
VetsEZ ...................................................................
Vetted Tech Inc .....................................................
ViaPath Technologies ............................................
Victory Solutions, Inc .............................................
Village of Hanover Park .........................................
Virtual Service Operations .....................................
VISTA Technology Services, Inc ...........................
Vulcan, Inc .............................................................
W R Systems, Ltd ..................................................
Walsh Enterprises, LLC .........................................
Walsingham Group, Inc .........................................
Wander Staffing .....................................................
Warfeather .............................................................
Warrior Service Company LLC ..............................
Watco .....................................................................
Waterdogs SCUBA and Safety LLC ......................
Watermark Risk Management International, LLC
Watershed Security, LLC .......................................
Watteredge, LLC ....................................................
Web Business Solutions Inc ..................................
WEL Companies Inc ..............................................
West Point Engineers LLC ....................................
Westerwood Global USA Corporation ...................
Whalls Group LLC .................................................
William C. Brown, Inc ............................................
Williams Creek Management Corporation .............
Willis Mechanical Inc .............................................
Windstream Holdings .............................................
WorkerBees Staffing LLC ......................................
Worldwide Counter Threat Solutions, LLC ............
Wounded Warrior Project, Inc ...............................
WPS Labor, LLC ....................................................
XCEL Engineering, Inc ..........................................
Xynergie Corp ........................................................
Zero Point, Incorporated ........................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
Veterans Life Changing Services ........................
..............................................................................
Veterans Inc ........................................................
VMSI ....................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
Veterans United Home Loans .............................
VETFORCE, INC .................................................
Veterans Engineering, Training, & Services .......
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
Global Tel*Link ....................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
VSO .....................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
Watco Companies, LLC ......................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
WBSI ....................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
WGNSTAR ..........................................................
..............................................................................
William C Brown Inc ............................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
Wounded Warrior Project ....................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
..............................................................................
Zero Point Incorporated .......................................
Westminster ..................
Absecon ........................
Owings ..........................
Stateline ........................
Gurnee ..........................
Charlotte .......................
Gary ..............................
Pinehurst ......................
Worcester .....................
Sterling .........................
Jupiter ...........................
St. Petersburg ..............
Dallas ............................
Fort Worth ....................
Rochester .....................
South Gate ...................
Salt Lake City ...............
Columbia ......................
Lock Haven ..................
Huntsville ......................
Indialantic .....................
San Diego .....................
Syracuse .......................
Falls Church .................
Huntsville ......................
Hanover Park ...............
Manassas .....................
Arlington .......................
Foley .............................
Fairfax ...........................
Dayton ..........................
Fayetteville ...................
Austin ............................
Coweta .........................
Palm Springs ................
Pittsburg .......................
Clarksville .....................
Triangle .........................
Chesapeake .................
Avon Lake ....................
Fredericksburg ..............
De Pere ........................
Louisville .......................
Malta .............................
Aliso Viejo .....................
Manassas .....................
Plainfield .......................
Norcross .......................
Little Rock .....................
Lakeland .......................
Fredericksburg ..............
Jacksonville ..................
Rogers ..........................
Oak Ridge ....................
Gurabo ..........................
Virginia Beach ..............
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Dated: December 17, 2024.
James D. Rodriguez,
Assistant Secretary, Veterans’ Employment
and Training Service.
[FR Doc. 2024–30419 Filed 12–19–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–79–P
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET
Initial Guidance for EnvironmentalEconomic Accounting Classifications
for Economic Statistics—Request for
Comments on Future Natural Capital
Accounting Statistical Classifications
Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Executive
Office of the President.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:12 Dec 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
PO 00000
Frm 00155
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
State/
terr.
Award
type
CO
NJ
MD
NV
IL
NC
IN
NC
MA
VA
FL
FL
TX
TX
NY
CA
UT
MO
PA
AL
FL
CA
NY
VA
AL
IL
VA
VA
AL
VA
TX
NC
TX
OK
FL
KS
TN
VA
VA
OH
VA
WI
KY
NY
CA
VA
IN
GA
AR
FL
VA
FL
AR
TN
PR
VA
MG
SG
SG
SG
SG
SP
SG
MP
MP
MP
SG
SG
SG
SG
SG
SG
MG
LG
SG
SP
SG
MG
SP
LP
MP
MG
MP
MP
MG
MG
SG
MP
SG
SP
MG
LG
SG
MP
SP
MG
SG
MG
SG
MP
SG
SP
SG
SP
LP
SG
SG
LG
SG
SP
SG
MP
Notice of solicitation of
comments on a preliminary draft of new
statistical classification guidance for
environmental-economic statistics.
ACTION:
The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), on behalf of the
Environmental-Economic Accounting
Classification Interagency Technical
Working Group (ITWG), seeks public
comments on an Interim Report which
contains initial draft statistical
classification guidance for
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2024 / Notices
environmental-economic accounting
classifications. Details about the Interim
Report, its contents, and specific
questions of interest for public comment
are available in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section below.
DATES: To ensure consideration of
comments on this notice, they must be
received no later than February 18,
2025. Because of delays in the receipt of
regular mail related to security
screening, respondents are encouraged
to send comments electronically (see
ADDRESSES section, below).
ADDRESSES: Submit comments through
www.regulations.gov, a Federal EGovernment website that allows the
public to find, review, and submit
comments on documents that agencies
have published in the Federal Register
and that are open for comment. Enter
‘‘OMB–2024–0011’’ (in quotes) in the
Comment or Submission search box,
click Go and follow the instructions for
submitting comments. Comments
received by the date specified above
will be included as part of the official
record. OMB and the ITWG will
respond to comments by issue and
theme, and not to individual
submissions. Please include the Docket
ID (OMB–2024–0011) and the phrase
‘‘Environmental-Economic Accounting
Classifications Guidance’’ at the
beginning of your comments. Please also
indicate which questions in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION of
this notice are addressed in your
comments.
Privacy Act Statement: OMB is
issuing this request for comments
pursuant to its authority to oversee the
Federal statistical system under 44
U.S.C. 3504(e). Submission of comments
in response to this notice is voluntary.
Information you provide will be used to
inform sound decision making regarding
potential future OMB statistical
classifications. Please note that all
submissions received in response to this
notice may be posted on
www.regulations.gov or otherwise
released in their entirety, including any
personal and business confidential
information provided. Do not include in
your submissions any copyrighted
material; information of a confidential
nature, such as personal or proprietary
information; or any information you
would not like to be made publicly
available. The OMB System of Records
Notice, OMB Public Input System of
Records, OMB/INPUT/01, 88 FR 20913
(www.federalregister.gov/documents/
2023/04/07/2023–07452/privacy-act-of1974-systemof-records), includes a list
of routine uses associated with the
collection of this information.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:12 Dec 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
Electronic Availability: Federal
Register notices are available
electronically at https://
www.federalregister.gov/.
For general inquiries email:
Statistical_Directives@omb.eop.gov.
Please note: Communication through
this email will not be included in the
record for OMB–2024–0011. Comments
should be submitted through
www.regulations.gov.
Pursuant
to its authority under 44 U.S.C. 3504(e),
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) announces the start of the
classification development process for
new statistical classification guidance
for environmental-economic statistics.
OMB, on behalf of its EnvironmentalEconomic Accounting Classification
Interagency Technical Working Group
(ITWG), seeks public comment on an
Interim Draft report which contains an
initial draft of statistical classification
guidance, as well as on the specific
topics presented in Section IV of this
Federal Register Notice (FRN). This is
the first of multiple FRNs requesting
public comment in the process leading
up to OMB publishing new statistical
classification guidance for
environmental-economic statistics.
OMB anticipates issuing final guidance
in 2028.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background on National Economic
Accounts
National economic accounts were
created to organize the broad concept of
an economy in a useful way, beyond
just an understanding of the size of its
many components, to also understand
their systematic interdependencies. The
U.S. National Income and Product
Accounts (NIPA) are used to compute
Gross Domestic Product (GDP), calculate
a national balance sheet, and help
conduct long-term forecasting. Existing
national economic accounts data for the
United States, however, do not include
environmental data, leaving an
incomplete view of U.S. assets and
economic dependencies on natural
assets.1
International statistical standards are
created for national economic statistics
in order to promote consistency and
comparability that can help all nations
in a complex, interconnected world
economy, but are also broad enough and
allow for nation-level adaptations. The
United States actively participates and
1 Off. of Sci. & Tech. Pol’y, Off. of Mgmt. &
Budget, & Dep’t of Com., National Strategy to
Develop Statistics for Environmental-Economic
Decisions (Jan. 2023), available at
www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/
Natural-Capital-Accounting-Strategy-final.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00156
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
104227
assists in developing these international
standards. The United States’ NIPA
accounts are compliant with the United
Nations Statistical Commission’s
System of National Accounts (SNA,
2008),2 which is being revised in 2025.
U.S. and international economic
accounting standards and account
structures are routinely and cyclically
improved to make them more
comprehensive and accurate. As part of
this iterative improvement process, the
United States and the international
statistical community have committed
to developing environmental-economic
statistics that extend the SNA through
the newer international statistical
standards and supporting documents
that comprise the System of
Environmental-Economic Accounting
(SEEA) framework. The U.S.
commitment includes the United States’
January 2023 National Strategy to
Develop Statistics for EnvironmentalEconomic Decisions (National Strategy).
The SEEA Central Framework (SEEA–
CF, 2012) 3 is an international statistical
standard that offers principles and
guidance for constructing physical flow
accounts and physical asset accounts
that cover specific environmental assets
(e.g., land, water, timber, harvestable
marine resources), along with economic
accounts that cover a named set of
human economic activities that manage
environmental resources.
As the SEEA is generally additive
with the SNA, it does not alter the
SNA’s fundamental principles. The
SEEA aligns with existing SNA
accounting principles and boundaries,
while extending them to explicitly
include the environment and
environmental flows. Thus, accounting
rules for environmental-economic
accounting begin by orienting, to the
extent possible, with preexisting rules
for national economic statistics
including the national balance sheet.
II. Role of the Office of the Chief
Statistician of the United States and the
U.S. Federal Statistical System in
Developing Statistical Classification
Standards
The U.S. Federal statistical system is
decentralized, with 16 OMB-recognized
statistical agencies and units (RSAUs)
that have data collection as their
primary mission and over 100 other
agencies that collect statistical data,
2 United Nations Stat. Comm’n, System of
National Accounts 2008, United Nations,
unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/sna2008.asp
(last visited Oct. 30, 2024).
3 United Nations et al., System of EnvironmentalEconomic Accounting 2012 (2014), available at
seea.un.org/sites/seea.un.org/files/seea_cf_final_
en.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
104228
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2024 / Notices
along with carrying out other primary
missions. The Chief Statistician of the
United States at OMB serves as
coordinator of the Federal statistical
system under the authority of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), and must ensure the efficiency
and effectiveness of the system as well
as the integrity, objectivity, impartiality,
utility, and confidentiality of
information collected for statistical
purposes.4 The PRA also charges the
Chief Statistician of the United States
with coordinating the Federal statistical
system by developing and overseeing
the implementation of Governmentwide principles, policies, standards, and
guidelines concerning the presentation
and dissemination of statistical
information.5 These coordination efforts
promote the efficiency and effectiveness
of the Federal statistical system. More
information on the Federal statistical
system, including its structure and
policies that govern it, is available at
www.statspolicy.gov.
The Office of the Chief Statistician of
the United States is initiating the
development of new statistical
classification guidance for an
environmental-economic statistics
series, in alignment with the January
2023 National Strategy to Develop
Statistics for Environmental-Economic
Decisions (National Strategy). This
National Strategy was jointly published
by the Office of Science and Technology
Policy, the Office of Management and
Budget, and the Department of
Commerce, and presents a plan for
developing the first U.S. national system
to standardize environmental-economic
statistics, built from the collaborative
efforts of 27 Federal departments,
agencies, and offices. The National
Strategy itself underwent public
comment,6 and is built on decades of
theoretical and empirical research.
Ultimately, completion of the
National Strategy’s 15-year plan would
create statistical classifications for a
new national economic statistics series,
that further connects the environment to
the economy. This would provide a
reliable, regularly updated statistical
series of data. It would introduce
environmental-economic accounting of
the nation’s environmental assets like
land, water, and clean air, and economic
flows associated with these assets, to
supplement the National Income and
4 See
44 U.S.C. 3504(e)(1).
5 See 44 U.S.C. 3504(e)(3).
6 See Off. of Mgmt. & Budget, Revised Strategic
Plan on Statistics for Environmental-Economic
Decisions, 88 FR 5374 (Jan. 27, 2023), available at
www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/27/
2023–01608/revised-strategic-plan-on-statistics-forenvironmental-economic-decisions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:12 Dec 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
Product Accounts (NIPA) from which
the United States calculates GDP and
understands economic
interdependencies across sectors and
resources. This FRN publicly announces
the start of this classification
development process and also seeks
public comment on the initial draft of
statistical classification guidance on the
Phase I accounts within the National
Strategy.
The Chief Statistician of the United
States initiated the development of new
statistical classification guidance via the
convening of an EnvironmentalEconomic Accounting Classification
Interagency Technical Working Group
(EEA–C ITWG) in November 2023. This
working group, made up of Federal
experts on economic classification and
environmental-economic accounting
from more than a dozen Federal
agencies, is charged to help advise OMB
by providing recommendations for
account classifications and guidance on
how to develop official environmentaleconomic accounting classifications to
define accounts for environmentaleconomic statistics to pair with
traditional economic statistics accounts.
The EEA–C ITWG developed an
Interim Report,7 which contains the first
draft of their recommendations for
future statistical classification guidance
for environmental-economic accounting
classifications. This Interim Report
represents the first interagency effort to
build the principles and processes to
construct an environmental-economic
accounting classification system for use
in official economic statistics in the
United States. This classification work
will deepen and expand from this
foundation.
The Interim Report includes one
chapter for each of six Environmental
Sectors per Phase I in the National
Strategy, and in full knowledge that the
Interim Report is preliminary. The
accounts are Air Emissions, Water,
Land, Environmental Activities & Jobs,
the first phase of Marine natural capital
accounts, and Forests.8
Request for comment at this stage is
the first of several public interaction
and solicitations in support of this
effort, in the spirit of robust and wide
engagement during the classification
development processes, and a key step
in the EEA–C ITWG’s development of
7 The Interim Report is available on
regulations.gov docket.
8 Note that Forests accounts were added from the
Phase II set to the Phase I set described in the
National Strategy, because the ITWG agreed they
were mature enough to be included in this first
classification effort, provided that ecosystem
services are not considered in this ‘‘Phase I’’
classification building effort.
PO 00000
Frm 00157
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
account classifications and guidance. As
that process continues, the EEA–C
ITWG will consider public feedback
from this request for comments and
from any public listening sessions that
this group or its account sub-groups
may hold. There will be a further
request for public comment in 2025,
before an EEA–C ITWG Final Report is
submitted to the Chief Statistician of the
United States. Further, similar
classification work and public comment
opportunities are expected on Phase II
and Phase III accounts (i.e., the
remaining 10 environmental sector
accounts) from the National Strategy.
This FRN seeks public input on the
potential approaches to building
categories and on the initial six
accounts. It is general, checking
alignment with theory and practical
constraints, and also requests comment
on certain potential metrics associated
with specific accounts and categories
that are presented in the Interim
Report’s account chapters. In the next
round of public comment in 2025, the
EEA–C ITWG expects to ask for public
comment about a more detailed and
complete classification set, including
possible metrics for the classification
tables. Note that constructing the
classification system is key, but only
one part of the larger effort to develop
environmental-economic accounts.
The National Strategy defines a suite
of targets, timelines, and tasks to build
statistics to support environmentaleconomic decisions. Among these are
Headline Summaries (e.g., changes in
natural capital wealth); Satellite
Accounts and Supporting Products (e.g.,
‘‘Hazards’’ account, dashboards, and an
environmental activities report);
Environmental Sector accounts (in
Phases I, II and III); and Supporting
Activities (e.g., engagement across
accounts and cross-cutting topics like
classification systems, data sharing, and
valuation standards). From this wider
suite, the building of common U.S.
environmental-economic accounting
classifications will help to ensure
agencies are using standardized
categories and definitions. As with any
standardized statistical classification,
common taxonomies of mutually
exclusive and comparable categories
will serve as a unifying platform for
consistent statistical data development.
Each Environmental Sector account
(e.g., Water, Land) will be comprised of
multiple tables or sub-accounts.
Environmental-economic accounting
classifications will name essential rows
and columns in specific tables or
accounts.
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 245 / Friday, December 20, 2024 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
III. EEA–C ITWG Interim Report—
Chapter Content
Each of the six account chapters in
the Interim Report begins with an
introduction of the account topic area,
followed by an overview of the relevant
conceptual history and an exploration of
other countries’ or intergovernmental
organizations’ relevant work in the
account topic area that may be
considered for application in the United
States (e.g., ‘‘United Nations,’’
‘‘Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development,’’ or
‘‘European Union’’). Any relevant U.S.
work is also described, in order to
promote efficiency when the application
of past U.S. or international approaches
is feasible and desirable (section 2).
Each account chapter then proposes a
classification framework and guidance
particular to that account (which is
usually a set of accounts within that
topic area (section 3); discusses current
data gaps and limitations to be
considered when attempting consistent
national quantification within the
proposed classification framework
(section 4); and closes with a conceptual
discussion of connections to other
accounts, and guidance for using the
proposed account in its current form
(section 5).
IV. Request for Information
The National Strategy recommends
that environmental-economic accounts
be pragmatic and useful for a wide range
of decision-making (Recommendation
1), comparable through time and across
accounts (Recommendation 2), and
align with international accounting
standards as our national economic
accounts do (Recommendation 3). The
accounts have been developed thus far
with beneficial input from 27 U.S.
departments and agencies. In order to
improve the utility of these accounts to
users as the accounts are further
developed over time, it is important to
seek feedback across a broad range of
perspectives. We therefore focus this
request for public comment on the
following questions. The questions
posed below are those the EEA–C ITWG
deemed most significant and relevant to
its recommendations and do not
indicate positions of OMB or the
agencies participating in the EEA–C
ITWG. The questions have been sorted
into broad categories for ease of review.
Responses should be concise, and if
summarizing or depending on
published works, please include
citations and electronic links to
reference materials, studies, research,
and other empirical data that are not
widely available.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:12 Dec 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
1. Is the overall U.S. approach to
environmental-economic accounting, as
proposed through this initial set of
classifications, consistent with the
principles of environmental-economic
accounting and economic statistics? Is
there pertinent information or are there
key priorities that the EEA–C ITWG
should consider when improving the
recommendations for classifications?
Does the overall approach adhere to
national economic accounting concepts,
and reasonably balance these with the
goals of simplicity, feasibility, and
reproducibility? If noting a break from
the Interim Report’s methods or current
recommendations, please cite sources
and be specific as to anticipated
consequences of not making the change.
2. Are the specific approaches—
framing of accounts, which account
tables are recommended in each
environmental-economic account type—
taken in these six account chapters and
any related supplemental materials
clear, logical, and consistent with (a) the
precepts of national economic
accounting (SEEA–CF as supplemental
to SNA); (b) the environmentaleconomic accounting needs of U.S.
agencies and other domestic
stakeholders; and (c) the need for
international comparability of
environmental-economic accounts? If
there are concerns with any specific
approaches, please note how the overall
approach or specific accounting
structures as recommended in the
Interim Report may be improved, being
as specific as possible.
3. Considering first what agencies can
currently measure, what relevant
categories or subcategories are missing
from the initial set of accounts? Or, are
there categories included in this draft
that should not be included? Please
name or describe them, and reasons for
changing the proposal. Where metrics
are discussed that may fill account table
cells, comment on the appropriateness
of these metrics, and whether specific
changes may improve the usefulness of
the accounts to specific stakeholders.
4. Are there additional, alternative, or
forthcoming data sources that should be
considered to (a) improve classifications
in these chapters; or (b) facilitate how
these accounts accurately measure the
components and subcomponents of
these accounts? Please explain why or
why not, and how specific data sources
would improve the utility of specific
accounts.
5. As the EEA–C ITWG moves to
consider metrics that cannot yet be
measured, but that may serve
stakeholder needs, are there
recommendations for specific categories
and metrics not presently measurable
PO 00000
Frm 00158
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
104229
but that should be targeted for inclusion
in the future, or general
recommendations for how to expand on
that list? If a metric or classification has
not been considered to date in the
United States nationally, is there an
example of its feasibility (sub-nationally
in the United States or elsewhere
internationally)?
V. Timing for Developing This New
OMB Statistical Classification
Guidance
Following this public comment
period, the EEA–C ITWG will review
the comments and revise draft statistical
classification guidance on the Phase I
accounts. Then OMB will publish the
EEA–C ITWG’s proposed
recommendations for public comment
in a subsequent Federal Register Notice.
The EEA–C ITWG will then review the
comments and develop final
recommendations to the Chief
Statistician of the United States at OMB
on the statistical classification guidance
on the Phase I accounts in a Final
Report. The EEA–C ITWG will follow a
similar process to make
recommendations for the Phase II and III
accounts (i.e., the remaining 10
environmental sector accounts) in the
National Strategy. OMB will review the
culminative recommendations and
make decisions for Phases I–III. It is
expected that OMB would be issuing
final guidance in an EnvironmentalEconomic Accounting Classifications
Manual in 2028.
Karin A. Orvis,
Chief Statistician of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2024–30058 Filed 12–19–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND
BUDGET
Statistical Policy Directive No. 8 North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS)—Request for
Comments on Possible Revisions for
2027
Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Executive
Office of the President.
ACTION: Notice of Solicitation for
Proposals to Revise Portions of the
NAICS for 2027.
AGENCY:
The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB), on behalf of the
Economic Classification Policy
Committee (ECPC), announces the
review of the 2022 North American
Industry Classification System (NAICS)
for potential revisions to be made to the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20DEN1.SGM
20DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 245 (Friday, December 20, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 104226-104229]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-30058]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
Initial Guidance for Environmental-Economic Accounting
Classifications for Economic Statistics--Request for Comments on Future
Natural Capital Accounting Statistical Classifications
AGENCY: Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, Executive Office of the President.
ACTION: Notice of solicitation of comments on a preliminary draft of
new statistical classification guidance for environmental-economic
statistics.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB), on behalf of the
Environmental-Economic Accounting Classification Interagency Technical
Working Group (ITWG), seeks public comments on an Interim Report which
contains initial draft statistical classification guidance for
[[Page 104227]]
environmental-economic accounting classifications. Details about the
Interim Report, its contents, and specific questions of interest for
public comment are available in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below.
DATES: To ensure consideration of comments on this notice, they must be
received no later than February 18, 2025. Because of delays in the
receipt of regular mail related to security screening, respondents are
encouraged to send comments electronically (see ADDRESSES section,
below).
ADDRESSES: Submit comments through www.regulations.gov, a Federal E-
Government website that allows the public to find, review, and submit
comments on documents that agencies have published in the Federal
Register and that are open for comment. Enter ``OMB-2024-0011'' (in
quotes) in the Comment or Submission search box, click Go and follow
the instructions for submitting comments. Comments received by the date
specified above will be included as part of the official record. OMB
and the ITWG will respond to comments by issue and theme, and not to
individual submissions. Please include the Docket ID (OMB-2024-0011)
and the phrase ``Environmental-Economic Accounting Classifications
Guidance'' at the beginning of your comments. Please also indicate
which questions in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION of this notice are
addressed in your comments.
Privacy Act Statement: OMB is issuing this request for comments
pursuant to its authority to oversee the Federal statistical system
under 44 U.S.C. 3504(e). Submission of comments in response to this
notice is voluntary. Information you provide will be used to inform
sound decision making regarding potential future OMB statistical
classifications. Please note that all submissions received in response
to this notice may be posted on www.regulations.gov or otherwise
released in their entirety, including any personal and business
confidential information provided. Do not include in your submissions
any copyrighted material; information of a confidential nature, such as
personal or proprietary information; or any information you would not
like to be made publicly available. The OMB System of Records Notice,
OMB Public Input System of Records, OMB/INPUT/01, 88 FR 20913
(www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/04/07/2023-07452/privacy-act-of-1974-systemof-records), includes a list of routine uses associated
with the collection of this information.
Electronic Availability: Federal Register notices are available
electronically at https://www.federalregister.gov/.
For general inquiries email: [email protected].
Please note: Communication through this email will not be included in
the record for OMB-2024-0011. Comments should be submitted through
www.regulations.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to its authority under 44 U.S.C.
3504(e), the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) announces the start
of the classification development process for new statistical
classification guidance for environmental-economic statistics. OMB, on
behalf of its Environmental-Economic Accounting Classification
Interagency Technical Working Group (ITWG), seeks public comment on an
Interim Draft report which contains an initial draft of statistical
classification guidance, as well as on the specific topics presented in
Section IV of this Federal Register Notice (FRN). This is the first of
multiple FRNs requesting public comment in the process leading up to
OMB publishing new statistical classification guidance for
environmental-economic statistics. OMB anticipates issuing final
guidance in 2028.
I. Background on National Economic Accounts
National economic accounts were created to organize the broad
concept of an economy in a useful way, beyond just an understanding of
the size of its many components, to also understand their systematic
interdependencies. The U.S. National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA)
are used to compute Gross Domestic Product (GDP), calculate a national
balance sheet, and help conduct long-term forecasting. Existing
national economic accounts data for the United States, however, do not
include environmental data, leaving an incomplete view of U.S. assets
and economic dependencies on natural assets.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Off. of Sci. & Tech. Pol'y, Off. of Mgmt. & Budget, & Dep't
of Com., National Strategy to Develop Statistics for Environmental-
Economic Decisions (Jan. 2023), available at www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/Natural-Capital-Accounting-Strategy-final.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
International statistical standards are created for national
economic statistics in order to promote consistency and comparability
that can help all nations in a complex, interconnected world economy,
but are also broad enough and allow for nation-level adaptations. The
United States actively participates and assists in developing these
international standards. The United States' NIPA accounts are compliant
with the United Nations Statistical Commission's System of National
Accounts (SNA, 2008),\2\ which is being revised in 2025.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ United Nations Stat. Comm'n, System of National Accounts
2008, United Nations, unstats.un.org/unsd/nationalaccount/sna2008.asp (last visited Oct. 30, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. and international economic accounting standards and account
structures are routinely and cyclically improved to make them more
comprehensive and accurate. As part of this iterative improvement
process, the United States and the international statistical community
have committed to developing environmental-economic statistics that
extend the SNA through the newer international statistical standards
and supporting documents that comprise the System of Environmental-
Economic Accounting (SEEA) framework. The U.S. commitment includes the
United States' January 2023 National Strategy to Develop Statistics for
Environmental-Economic Decisions (National Strategy). The SEEA Central
Framework (SEEA-CF, 2012) \3\ is an international statistical standard
that offers principles and guidance for constructing physical flow
accounts and physical asset accounts that cover specific environmental
assets (e.g., land, water, timber, harvestable marine resources), along
with economic accounts that cover a named set of human economic
activities that manage environmental resources.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ United Nations et al., System of Environmental-Economic
Accounting 2012 (2014), available at seea.un.org/sites/seea.un.org/files/seea_cf_final_en.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As the SEEA is generally additive with the SNA, it does not alter
the SNA's fundamental principles. The SEEA aligns with existing SNA
accounting principles and boundaries, while extending them to
explicitly include the environment and environmental flows. Thus,
accounting rules for environmental-economic accounting begin by
orienting, to the extent possible, with preexisting rules for national
economic statistics including the national balance sheet.
II. Role of the Office of the Chief Statistician of the United States
and the U.S. Federal Statistical System in Developing Statistical
Classification Standards
The U.S. Federal statistical system is decentralized, with 16 OMB-
recognized statistical agencies and units (RSAUs) that have data
collection as their primary mission and over 100 other agencies that
collect statistical data,
[[Page 104228]]
along with carrying out other primary missions. The Chief Statistician
of the United States at OMB serves as coordinator of the Federal
statistical system under the authority of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA), and must ensure the efficiency and effectiveness of the
system as well as the integrity, objectivity, impartiality, utility,
and confidentiality of information collected for statistical
purposes.\4\ The PRA also charges the Chief Statistician of the United
States with coordinating the Federal statistical system by developing
and overseeing the implementation of Government-wide principles,
policies, standards, and guidelines concerning the presentation and
dissemination of statistical information.\5\ These coordination efforts
promote the efficiency and effectiveness of the Federal statistical
system. More information on the Federal statistical system, including
its structure and policies that govern it, is available at
www.statspolicy.gov.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 44 U.S.C. 3504(e)(1).
\5\ See 44 U.S.C. 3504(e)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Office of the Chief Statistician of the United States is
initiating the development of new statistical classification guidance
for an environmental-economic statistics series, in alignment with the
January 2023 National Strategy to Develop Statistics for Environmental-
Economic Decisions (National Strategy). This National Strategy was
jointly published by the Office of Science and Technology Policy, the
Office of Management and Budget, and the Department of Commerce, and
presents a plan for developing the first U.S. national system to
standardize environmental-economic statistics, built from the
collaborative efforts of 27 Federal departments, agencies, and offices.
The National Strategy itself underwent public comment,\6\ and is built
on decades of theoretical and empirical research.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Off. of Mgmt. & Budget, Revised Strategic Plan on
Statistics for Environmental-Economic Decisions, 88 FR 5374 (Jan.
27, 2023), available at www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/01/27/2023-01608/revised-strategic-plan-on-statistics-for-environmental-economic-decisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ultimately, completion of the National Strategy's 15-year plan
would create statistical classifications for a new national economic
statistics series, that further connects the environment to the
economy. This would provide a reliable, regularly updated statistical
series of data. It would introduce environmental-economic accounting of
the nation's environmental assets like land, water, and clean air, and
economic flows associated with these assets, to supplement the National
Income and Product Accounts (NIPA) from which the United States
calculates GDP and understands economic interdependencies across
sectors and resources. This FRN publicly announces the start of this
classification development process and also seeks public comment on the
initial draft of statistical classification guidance on the Phase I
accounts within the National Strategy.
The Chief Statistician of the United States initiated the
development of new statistical classification guidance via the
convening of an Environmental-Economic Accounting Classification
Interagency Technical Working Group (EEA-C ITWG) in November 2023. This
working group, made up of Federal experts on economic classification
and environmental-economic accounting from more than a dozen Federal
agencies, is charged to help advise OMB by providing recommendations
for account classifications and guidance on how to develop official
environmental-economic accounting classifications to define accounts
for environmental-economic statistics to pair with traditional economic
statistics accounts.
The EEA-C ITWG developed an Interim Report,\7\ which contains the
first draft of their recommendations for future statistical
classification guidance for environmental-economic accounting
classifications. This Interim Report represents the first interagency
effort to build the principles and processes to construct an
environmental-economic accounting classification system for use in
official economic statistics in the United States. This classification
work will deepen and expand from this foundation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The Interim Report is available on regulations.gov docket.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Interim Report includes one chapter for each of six
Environmental Sectors per Phase I in the National Strategy, and in full
knowledge that the Interim Report is preliminary. The accounts are Air
Emissions, Water, Land, Environmental Activities & Jobs, the first
phase of Marine natural capital accounts, and Forests.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Note that Forests accounts were added from the Phase II set
to the Phase I set described in the National Strategy, because the
ITWG agreed they were mature enough to be included in this first
classification effort, provided that ecosystem services are not
considered in this ``Phase I'' classification building effort.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Request for comment at this stage is the first of several public
interaction and solicitations in support of this effort, in the spirit
of robust and wide engagement during the classification development
processes, and a key step in the EEA-C ITWG's development of account
classifications and guidance. As that process continues, the EEA-C ITWG
will consider public feedback from this request for comments and from
any public listening sessions that this group or its account sub-groups
may hold. There will be a further request for public comment in 2025,
before an EEA-C ITWG Final Report is submitted to the Chief
Statistician of the United States. Further, similar classification work
and public comment opportunities are expected on Phase II and Phase III
accounts (i.e., the remaining 10 environmental sector accounts) from
the National Strategy.
This FRN seeks public input on the potential approaches to building
categories and on the initial six accounts. It is general, checking
alignment with theory and practical constraints, and also requests
comment on certain potential metrics associated with specific accounts
and categories that are presented in the Interim Report's account
chapters. In the next round of public comment in 2025, the EEA-C ITWG
expects to ask for public comment about a more detailed and complete
classification set, including possible metrics for the classification
tables. Note that constructing the classification system is key, but
only one part of the larger effort to develop environmental-economic
accounts.
The National Strategy defines a suite of targets, timelines, and
tasks to build statistics to support environmental-economic decisions.
Among these are Headline Summaries (e.g., changes in natural capital
wealth); Satellite Accounts and Supporting Products (e.g., ``Hazards''
account, dashboards, and an environmental activities report);
Environmental Sector accounts (in Phases I, II and III); and Supporting
Activities (e.g., engagement across accounts and cross-cutting topics
like classification systems, data sharing, and valuation standards).
From this wider suite, the building of common U.S. environmental-
economic accounting classifications will help to ensure agencies are
using standardized categories and definitions. As with any standardized
statistical classification, common taxonomies of mutually exclusive and
comparable categories will serve as a unifying platform for consistent
statistical data development. Each Environmental Sector account (e.g.,
Water, Land) will be comprised of multiple tables or sub-accounts.
Environmental-economic accounting classifications will name essential
rows and columns in specific tables or accounts.
[[Page 104229]]
III. EEA-C ITWG Interim Report--Chapter Content
Each of the six account chapters in the Interim Report begins with
an introduction of the account topic area, followed by an overview of
the relevant conceptual history and an exploration of other countries'
or intergovernmental organizations' relevant work in the account topic
area that may be considered for application in the United States (e.g.,
``United Nations,'' ``Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development,'' or ``European Union''). Any relevant U.S. work is also
described, in order to promote efficiency when the application of past
U.S. or international approaches is feasible and desirable (section 2).
Each account chapter then proposes a classification framework and
guidance particular to that account (which is usually a set of accounts
within that topic area (section 3); discusses current data gaps and
limitations to be considered when attempting consistent national
quantification within the proposed classification framework (section
4); and closes with a conceptual discussion of connections to other
accounts, and guidance for using the proposed account in its current
form (section 5).
IV. Request for Information
The National Strategy recommends that environmental-economic
accounts be pragmatic and useful for a wide range of decision-making
(Recommendation 1), comparable through time and across accounts
(Recommendation 2), and align with international accounting standards
as our national economic accounts do (Recommendation 3). The accounts
have been developed thus far with beneficial input from 27 U.S.
departments and agencies. In order to improve the utility of these
accounts to users as the accounts are further developed over time, it
is important to seek feedback across a broad range of perspectives. We
therefore focus this request for public comment on the following
questions. The questions posed below are those the EEA-C ITWG deemed
most significant and relevant to its recommendations and do not
indicate positions of OMB or the agencies participating in the EEA-C
ITWG. The questions have been sorted into broad categories for ease of
review. Responses should be concise, and if summarizing or depending on
published works, please include citations and electronic links to
reference materials, studies, research, and other empirical data that
are not widely available.
1. Is the overall U.S. approach to environmental-economic
accounting, as proposed through this initial set of classifications,
consistent with the principles of environmental-economic accounting and
economic statistics? Is there pertinent information or are there key
priorities that the EEA-C ITWG should consider when improving the
recommendations for classifications? Does the overall approach adhere
to national economic accounting concepts, and reasonably balance these
with the goals of simplicity, feasibility, and reproducibility? If
noting a break from the Interim Report's methods or current
recommendations, please cite sources and be specific as to anticipated
consequences of not making the change.
2. Are the specific approaches--framing of accounts, which account
tables are recommended in each environmental-economic account type--
taken in these six account chapters and any related supplemental
materials clear, logical, and consistent with (a) the precepts of
national economic accounting (SEEA-CF as supplemental to SNA); (b) the
environmental-economic accounting needs of U.S. agencies and other
domestic stakeholders; and (c) the need for international comparability
of environmental-economic accounts? If there are concerns with any
specific approaches, please note how the overall approach or specific
accounting structures as recommended in the Interim Report may be
improved, being as specific as possible.
3. Considering first what agencies can currently measure, what
relevant categories or subcategories are missing from the initial set
of accounts? Or, are there categories included in this draft that
should not be included? Please name or describe them, and reasons for
changing the proposal. Where metrics are discussed that may fill
account table cells, comment on the appropriateness of these metrics,
and whether specific changes may improve the usefulness of the accounts
to specific stakeholders.
4. Are there additional, alternative, or forthcoming data sources
that should be considered to (a) improve classifications in these
chapters; or (b) facilitate how these accounts accurately measure the
components and subcomponents of these accounts? Please explain why or
why not, and how specific data sources would improve the utility of
specific accounts.
5. As the EEA-C ITWG moves to consider metrics that cannot yet be
measured, but that may serve stakeholder needs, are there
recommendations for specific categories and metrics not presently
measurable but that should be targeted for inclusion in the future, or
general recommendations for how to expand on that list? If a metric or
classification has not been considered to date in the United States
nationally, is there an example of its feasibility (sub-nationally in
the United States or elsewhere internationally)?
V. Timing for Developing This New OMB Statistical Classification
Guidance
Following this public comment period, the EEA-C ITWG will review
the comments and revise draft statistical classification guidance on
the Phase I accounts. Then OMB will publish the EEA-C ITWG's proposed
recommendations for public comment in a subsequent Federal Register
Notice. The EEA-C ITWG will then review the comments and develop final
recommendations to the Chief Statistician of the United States at OMB
on the statistical classification guidance on the Phase I accounts in a
Final Report. The EEA-C ITWG will follow a similar process to make
recommendations for the Phase II and III accounts (i.e., the remaining
10 environmental sector accounts) in the National Strategy. OMB will
review the culminative recommendations and make decisions for Phases I-
III. It is expected that OMB would be issuing final guidance in an
Environmental-Economic Accounting Classifications Manual in 2028.
Karin A. Orvis,
Chief Statistician of the United States.
[FR Doc. 2024-30058 Filed 12-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P