Safety and Security Zones: Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, Plymouth Massachusetts, 101892-101893 [2024-29803]

Download as PDF 101892 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations on the Dockets tab and then the proposed rule, you should see a ‘‘Subscribe’’ option for email alerts. The option will notify you when comments are posted, or a final rule is published. We review all comments received, but we will only post comments that address the topic of the proposed rule. We may choose not to post off-topic, inappropriate, or duplicate comments that we receive. Personal information. We accept anonymous comments. Comments we post to https://www.regulations.gov will include any personal information you have provided. For more about privacy and submissions to the docket in response to this document, see DHS’s eRulemaking System of Records notice (85 FR 14226, March 11, 2020). List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: Y. Moon, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Southeastern New England. [FR Doc. 2024–29802 Filed 12–16–24; 8:45 am] PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS BILLING CODE 9110–04–P ■ 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3. Coast Guard 2. Revise and republish § 165.T01– 0559 to read as follows: [Docket Number USCG–2024–0500] § 165.T01–0559 Safety Zone; West Passage Narragansett Bay, Jamestown, RI. Safety and Security Zones: Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, Plymouth Massachusetts ■ ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 section unless authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s designated representative. (2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP’s representative by VHF–FM radio channel 16 or phone at 508–457–3211. Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP’s designated representative. (d) Enforcement period. This section is effective from 12:01 a.m. on December 17, 2024, through 11:59 p.m. on Friday, January 31, 2025. The safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section will only be subject to enforcement while the cable laying vessel SKAGERRAK and the J.F. Brennan construction barge #4132 are engaged in cable laying operations in West Passage Narraganset Bay, Jamestown, RI, between Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge (41°31′43.7″ N 71°24′18.2″ W) and Dutch Island (41°29′47.3″ N, 71°24′16.5″ W). RIN 1625–AA00 (a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters within a 250yard radius of cable laying vessel Skagerrak and the J.F. Brennan construction barge #4132 while operating in West Passage Narraganset Bay, Jamestown, RI, between Jamestown Verrazzano Bridge (41°31′43.7″ N 71°24′18.2″ W) and Dutch Island (41°29′47.3″ N, 71°24′16.5″ W). (b) Definitions. As used in this section, Designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the Captain of the Port Sector Southeastern New England (COTP) in the enforcement of the safety zone. (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this part, you may not enter the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:03 Dec 16, 2024 Jkt 265001 33 CFR Part 165 Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Coast Guard is disestablishing the existing safety and security zone for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, Plymouth, Massachusetts. Since the implementation of the regulation, the facility has permanently ceased power operations making the provisions of the security zone no longer applicable. The waterfront facility’s safety and security zone will be removed from all charts, publications, and other navigational references. All related private aids to navigational marking the boundaries of the security zone will also be removed. DATES: This rule is effective January 16, 2025. ADDRESSES: To view the documents mentioned in the preamble as being SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 available in the docket, go to https:// www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2024– 0500 in the search box and click ‘‘Search’’ in the Document Type column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related Material.’’ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule, call, or email Mr. Timothy Chase. Sector Boston, Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 617–447–1620, email: Timothy.w.chase@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking § Section U.S.C. United States Code II. Background Information and Regulatory History On January 9, 2024, Entergy Nuclear Operation, Inc, notified the Coast Guard that they had provided all the required documentation for disestablishment to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission as per 10 CFR 50.82(a)(1)(i). Power operations have ceased at the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station. In response, on August 30, 2024, the Coast Guard published a NPRM titled ‘‘Safety and Security Zones; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, Plymouth Massachusetts’’ in the Federal Register (89 FR 70587). There we stated why we issued the NPRM and invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related to Safety and Security Zones: Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, Plymouth, Massachusetts. During the comment period that ended September 30, 2024, we received three written submissions. III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under the authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, and 70124. The Captain of the Port Sector Boston Massachusetts (COTP) has determined that disestablishing the safety and security zone cited in 33 CFR 165.115, Safety and Security Zones: Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, Plymouth Massachusetts, by removing that section. IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule As noted above the Coast Guard received three written submissions on our NPRM published on August 30, 2024. All three commenters were in favor of our proposal, no Public Meetings were requested or held. There are no changes in the regulatory text of E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM 17DER1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations this rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM. The Coast Guard is disestablishing the safety and security zone cited in 33 CFR 165.115, Safety and Security Zones: Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, Plymouth, Massachusetts, by removing that section. V. Regulatory Analyses We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 12866 as amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory review). Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This regulatory action determination is based on the need to align the regulations with the current arrangements of the port as the waterfront facility safety and security zone is no longer required. The Captain of the Port of Boston Massachusetts is removing 33 CFR 165.115. B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:03 Dec 16, 2024 Jkt 265001 concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency’s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. C. Collection of Information This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132 (Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments) because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result in such an PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 101893 expenditure, we do discuss the potential effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves the disestablishment of a security zone. Normally such actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(b) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01– 001–01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places, or vessels. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3. § 165.115 ■ [Removed] 2. Remove § 165.115. J.C. Frederick, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Boston. [FR Doc. 2024–29803 Filed 12–16–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM 17DER1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 101892-101893]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29803]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2024-0500]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety and Security Zones: Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, Plymouth 
Massachusetts

AGENCY: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security (DHS).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is disestablishing the existing safety and 
security zone for Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, Plymouth, Massachusetts. 
Since the implementation of the regulation, the facility has 
permanently ceased power operations making the provisions of the 
security zone no longer applicable. The waterfront facility's safety 
and security zone will be removed from all charts, publications, and 
other navigational references. All related private aids to navigational 
marking the boundaries of the security zone will also be removed.

DATES: This rule is effective January 16, 2025.

ADDRESSES: To view the documents mentioned in the preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2024-0500 in the search box and click ``Search'' in the Document Type 
column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule, 
call, or email Mr. Timothy Chase. Sector Boston, Waterways Management 
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 617-447-1620, email: 
[email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    On January 9, 2024, Entergy Nuclear Operation, Inc, notified the 
Coast Guard that they had provided all the required documentation for 
disestablishment to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission as per 10 
CFR 50.82(a)(1)(i). Power operations have ceased at the Pilgrim Nuclear 
Power Station.
    In response, on August 30, 2024, the Coast Guard published a NPRM 
titled ``Safety and Security Zones; Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, 
Plymouth Massachusetts'' in the Federal Register (89 FR 70587). There 
we stated why we issued the NPRM and invited comments on our proposed 
regulatory action related to Safety and Security Zones: Pilgrim Nuclear 
Power Plant, Plymouth, Massachusetts. During the comment period that 
ended September 30, 2024, we received three written submissions.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under the authority in 46 
U.S.C. 70034, 70051, and 70124. The Captain of the Port Sector Boston 
Massachusetts (COTP) has determined that disestablishing the safety and 
security zone cited in 33 CFR 165.115, Safety and Security Zones: 
Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, Plymouth Massachusetts, by removing that 
section.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    As noted above the Coast Guard received three written submissions 
on our NPRM published on August 30, 2024. All three commenters were in 
favor of our proposal, no Public Meetings were requested or held. There 
are no changes in the regulatory text of

[[Page 101893]]

this rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM. The Coast Guard is 
disestablishing the safety and security zone cited in 33 CFR 165.115, 
Safety and Security Zones: Pilgrim Nuclear Power Plant, Plymouth, 
Massachusetts, by removing that section.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as 
amended by Executive Order 12866 as amended by Executive Order 14094 
(Modernizing Regulatory review). Accordingly, this rule has not been 
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
    This regulatory action determination is based on the need to align 
the regulations with the current arrangements of the port as the 
waterfront facility safety and security zone is no longer required. The 
Captain of the Port of Boston Massachusetts is removing 33 CFR 165.115.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business 
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule would not have a significant economic 
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your 
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have 
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please 
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132 
(Federalism), if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on 
the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on 
the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels 
of government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments) because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule would not result 
in such an expenditure, we do discuss the potential effects of this 
rule elsewhere in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and 
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast 
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have made a preliminary determination that 
this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or 
cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This 
rule involves the disestablishment of a security zone. Normally such 
actions are categorically excluded from further review under paragraph 
L60(b) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, 
Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this 
determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating 
the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so 
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places, or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-
1, 6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.


Sec.  165.115  [Removed]

0
2. Remove Sec.  165.115.

J.C. Frederick,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector Boston.
[FR Doc. 2024-29803 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.