Possession, Use, and Transfer of Select Agents and Toxins; Biennial Review of the List of Select Agents and Toxins, 101941-101952 [2024-29583]
Download as PDF
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997). This action does not
contain any information collections
subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require
any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the exemptions from the requirement of
a tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or Tribal governments, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States or Tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999), and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 174
[Docket No. CDC–2020–0024]
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: December 4, 2024.
Edward Messina,
Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR
chapter I as follows:
PART 174—PROCEDURES AND
REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANTINCORPORATED PROTECTANTS
1. The authority citation for part 174
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 136–136y; 21 U.S.C.
321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Add §§ 174.551 and 174.552 to
subpart W to read as follows:
■
Subpart W—Tolerances and Tolerance
Exemptions
*
*
*
*
*
§ 174.551 Brevibacillus laterosporus
Mpp75Aa1.1 protein; exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance.
Residues of Brevibacillus laterosporus
Mpp75Aa1.1 protein in or on the food
and feed commodities of corn: corn,
field; corn, sweet; and corn, pop are
exempt from the requirement of a
tolerance when used as a plantincorporated protectant in corn.
§ 174.552 Bacillus thuringiensis Vpb4Da2
protein; exemption from the requirement of
a tolerance.
Residues of Bacillus thuringiensis
Vpb4Da2 protein in or on the food and
feed commodities of corn: corn, field;
corn, sweet; and corn, pop are exempt
from the requirement of a tolerance
when used as a plant-incorporated
protectant in corn.
[FR Doc. 2024–29133 Filed 12–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
V. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Dec 16, 2024
Jkt 265001
101941
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
42 CFR Part 73
RIN 0920–AA71
Possession, Use, and Transfer of
Select Agents and Toxins; Biennial
Review of the List of Select Agents and
Toxins
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This rule finalizes updates to
the HHS list of select agents and toxins
that could pose a severe threat to public
health and safety. These updates were
proposed along with other changes to
the select agent and toxin regulations,
which will be addressed in a separate
regulatory action. In a companion
document published in this issue of the
Federal Register, the U.S. Department of
Agriculture (USDA) is making parallel
regulatory changes.
DATES: This final rule is effective
January 16, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Daniel A. Singer, MD, Acting Director,
Division of Regulatory Science and
Compliance, Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE,
Mailstop H21–4, Atlanta, Georgia 30329.
Telephone: (404) 553–8266.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The final
rule is organized as follows:
SUMMARY:
I. Background
A. Legal Authority
B. 2024 Proposed Rule
II. Responses to Comments and Provisions of
the Proposed Rule
A. Removal of Brucella abortus, Brucella
melitensis, and Brucella suis
B. Nomenclature and Other Changes in the
Select Agent and Toxin List
C. Additional Comments Received
D. Retaining Tier 1 Designation of
Botulinum Neurotoxin Producing
Species of Clostridium
E. No Addition of Hantaviruses
F. Toxin Review: Changes to Exclusion
Limits for Short, Paralytic Alpha
Conotoxins
G. Designation of Nipah Virus as a Tier 1
Select Agent
H. Addition of a Footnote to the HHS
Select Agent and Overlap Select Agent
List
I. Summary of Final Rule Provisions
III. Alternatives Considered
IV. Required Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
14094
B. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as
Amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
(SBREFA)
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
101942
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
C. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
D. E.O. 12988: Civil Justice Reform
E. E.O. 13132: Federalism
F. Plain Language Act of 2010
V. References
I. Background
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
A. Legal Authority
Under the Public Health Security and
Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002 (Bioterrorism
Response Act), the HHS Secretary must,
by regulation, establish and maintain a
list of biological agents and toxins that
have the potential to pose a severe
threat to public health and safety (42
U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)). In determining
whether to include a biological agent or
toxin on the list, the Bioterrorism
Response Act requires that the HHS
Secretary consider the following
criteria:
• the effect on human health of
exposure to an agent or toxin;
• the degree of contagiousness of the
agent and the methods by which the
agent or toxin is transferred to humans;
• the availability and effectiveness of
pharmacotherapies and immunizations
to treat and prevent illnesses resulting
from an agent or toxin; and
• any other criteria, including the
needs of children and other vulnerable
populations, that the HHS Secretary
considers appropriate (42 U.S.C.
262a(a)(1)(B)).
Under 42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(2), the HHS
Secretary must review and republish the
list of HHS select agents and toxins at
least biennially.
In the preparation of this rulemaking,
HHS/CDC considered the statutory
criteria and evaluated each agent and
toxin based on the following:
• Effect on human health:
Æ the degree of pathogenicity (ability
of an organism to cause disease);
Æ long-term health effects;
Æ severity of illness;
Æ case fatality rate;
Æ status of host immunity (e.g.,
whether an individual has already been
exposed to the agent and generated an
immune response);
Æ vulnerability of special
populations;
• Degree of contagiousness:
Æ dissemination efficacy;
Æ aerosol stability;
Æ rate of transmission;
• Availability and effectiveness of
pharmacotherapies:
Æ available treatment;
• Other Criteria:
Æ decontamination and restoration
(the extent remediation efforts are
needed due to agent persistence in the
environment and population);
Æ matrix stability;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Dec 16, 2024
Jkt 265001
Æ ease of production;
Æ ability to genetically manipulate or
alter;
Æ the burden or impact on the health
care system.
The Federal Select Agent Program
(FSAP) is the collaboration of the CDC,
Division of Regulatory Science and
Compliance (previously known as the
Division of Select Agents and Toxins),
and the USDA Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS), Division of
Agricultural Select Agents and Toxins.
These two agencies administer the HHS
and USDA select agent and toxin
regulations and coordinate Federal
oversight of select agents and toxins in
a manner to minimize the
administrative burden on the regulated
community.
The list of HHS select agents and
toxins is divided into two sections—
agents and toxins regulated solely by
HHS and agents that are regulated by
both HHS and USDA. The biological
agents and toxins listed in 42 CFR 73.3
(HHS select agents and toxins) have the
potential to pose a severe threat to
human health and safety and are
regulated only by HHS. The biological
agents listed in § 73.4 (overlap select
agents and toxins) have the potential to
pose a severe threat to human health
and safety, as determined by HHS, and
a severe threat to animals and animal
products, as determined by the USDA,
pursuant to USDA’s authority under the
Agriculture Bioterrorism Protection Act
of 2002 (7 U.S.C. 8401). Accordingly,
these biological agents are jointly
regulated by HHS and USDA as
‘‘overlap’’ select agents. The
Bioterrorism Response Act defines the
term ‘‘overlap agents and toxins’’ to
mean biological agents and toxins that
are listed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
262a(a)(1) and listed pursuant to 7
U.S.C. 8401(a)(1). If HHS/CDC removes
any overlap select agents from its list,
these agents might still be regulated as
USDA select agents dependent on the
outcome of the USDA biennial review.
B. 2024 Proposed Rule
On March 17, 2020, CDC published an
advance notice of proposed rulemaking
(ANPRM) (85 FR 15087) seeking public
comments on potential changes to the
current list of HHS and overlap select
agents and toxins that are regulated by
both HHS and USDA. The received
comments broadly supported removal of
the Brucella species—of the 335
comments received, 325 supported
removal of one or more species of
Brucella. Only two commenters were in
favor of retaining the Brucella species.
HHS/CDC engaged the
Intragovernmental Select Agents and
PO 00000
Frm 00106
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Toxins Technical Advisory Committee
(ISATTAC) to review and consider the
public comments. The committee
reviewed the public comments over a
series of seven meetings held between
June 12, 2020, and December 11, 2020.
Other Federal subject-matter experts
were invited to the meetings to address
questions from the committee. The
ANPRM also requested input on
removal of other agents from the list
(e.g., Coxiella burnetii, Rickettsia
prowazekii, Bacillus anthracis [Pasteur
strain]). After considering public
comments, ISATTAC advisory input,
and Federal subject-matter experts’
input, CDC proposed changes to the
select agent and toxin list and removal
of three species of Brucella.
On January 30, 2024, HHS issued a
proposed rule entitled ‘‘Possession, Use,
and Transfer of Select Agents and
Toxins; Biennial Review of the List of
Select Agents and Toxins’’ (89 FR 5823).
The proposed rule included two sets of
proposals: (1) regulatory changes related
to the select agents and toxins on the list
(i.e., remove three species of Brucella
from the list of overlap select agents and
toxins, raise one toxin’s exclusion
amounts, rename three viruses,
designate a current agent as a Tier 1
agent, and remove the designation of
Tier 1 status from one agent), and (2)
regulatory changes related to the
administration of FSAP. This second set
of proposals included adding
definitions and provisions to clarify
inactivation of select agents, adding
requirements to report discoveries of
select agents and toxins, and codifying
policies regarding effluent
decontamination systems and biosafety
provisions for facility verification
requirements for registered biosafety
level 3 and animal biosafety level 3
laboratories.
HHS/CDC has elected to finalize the
January 30, 2024, proposed rule in two
separate rulemakings—one final rule
focused on changes to the select agents
and toxins list (this final rule), and a
second final rule focused on regulatory
changes to the administration of the
FSAP discussed above. This final rule
will focus solely on removing three
select agents, raising one toxin’s
exclusion limit, updating nomenclature,
and designating an agent as Tier 1.
HHS/CDC is proceeding with two final
rules for clarity and to avoid any
unnecessary delay in finalizing the
revised select agents and toxins list.
HHS/CDC will publish another
regulatory action focused on the
proposed rule’s administrative and
programmatic changes at a later date.
Like HHS/CDC, USDA/APHIS is also
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
proceeding with two separate final rules
for this rulemaking.
Interested persons or organizations
were invited to participate by
submitting written views,
recommendations, and data. HHS/CDC
invited general comments as to whether
there are additional biological agents or
toxins that should be added or removed
from the HHS list of select agents and
toxins based on the following criteria
outlined under 42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)(B):
(1) ‘‘the effect on human health of
exposure to the agent or toxin;’’
(2) ‘‘the degree of contagiousness of
the agent or toxin and the methods by
which the agent or toxin is transferred
to humans;’’
(3) ‘‘the availability and effectiveness
of pharmacotherapies and
immunizations to treat and prevent any
illness resulting from infection by the
agent or toxin;’’ and
(4) ‘‘any other criteria, including the
needs of children and other vulnerable
populations, that the Secretary
considers appropriate’’.
Comments were also requested on the
following specific proposed changes to
the list of HHS select agents and toxins:
• Removal of Brucella abortus,
Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis:
Proposal to remove Brucella abortus,
Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis
from the select agent list.
• Updates to nomenclature of select
agents: To change ‘‘SARS coronavirus
(SARS–CoV)’’ to ‘‘Severe acute
respiratory syndrome coronavirus
(SARS–CoV)’’ to correct the
nomenclature; to remove the exclusion
regarding South American genotype of
Eastern Equine Encephalitis virus as
this terminology is no longer the correct
nomenclature; and to rename Ebola
virus to Ebolavirus in accordance with
the recent taxonomic change by the
International Committee on Taxonomy
of Viruses (ICTV) (this was initially
included as its own section in the
proposed rule but moved under this
section for nomenclature changes).
• Updates to nomenclature of
monkeypox virus: Proposal to update
the terminology of ‘‘monkeypox virus,’’
which was initially proposed to be
updated to ‘‘Mpox Clade I.’’
• Removal of the Designation of
Botulinum neurotoxin producing
species of Clostridium as a Tier 1 Agent:
Proposal to retain botulinum neurotoxin
producing species of Clostridium as an
HHS select agent, but no longer list it as
a Tier 1 agent.
• No Addition of Hantaviruses:
Proposal to not add Sin Nombre virus
(SNV), Andes virus (ANDV), Hantaan
virus (HTNV), and Dobrava virus
(DOBV) to the select agent list.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Dec 16, 2024
Jkt 265001
• Toxin Review: Changes to
Exclusion Limits for Short, Paralytic
Alpha Conotoxins: Proposal to increase
the exclusion amount for short,
paralytic alpha conotoxins from 100 mg
to 200 mg.
• Designation of Nipah virus as a Tier
1 Select Agent: Proposal to designate
Nipah virus as a Tier 1 select agent.
• Addition of a Footnote to the HHS
Select Agent List on the FSAP website:
Proposal to add a footnote to the list for
HHS and Overlap select agents
indicating that the current nomenclature
will be available on the FSAP website
(https://www.selectagents.gov) to
harmonize the list of select agent viruses
with ICTV nomenclature.
The public comment period for the
proposed rule ended on April 1, 2024.
HHS/CDC received 44 unique comments
from individuals, stakeholders, and
groups and carefully reviewed and
considered the comments in this
preparation of the final rule. Of these 44
comments, 37 include discussion of the
list of select agents discussed in this
final rule. A summary of the comments
relevant to the content of this final rule
and responses to those comments are
found at section II, below. Public
comments addressing other topics from
the proposed rule will be addressed in
a separate regulatory action.
II. Responses to Comments and
Provisions of the Proposed Rule
The following is a section-by-section
discussion of the changes HHS/CDC is
making to the list of select agents and
toxins in 42 CFR 73.3 and 73.4 after
consideration of public comments. As
previously stated, the changes proposed
in the proposed rule will be finalized in
two separate rules. This final rule
addresses changes to the list of select
agents and toxins in 42 CFR 73.3 and
73.4. All other revisions to definitions,
policies, and regulatory requirements
addressed in the proposed rule will be
addressed in a separate final rule.
A. Removal of Brucella abortus,
Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis
Regarding the request for comment on
whether to remove three species of
Brucella (B. abortus, B. melitensis, and
B. suis) from the select agent and toxins
list, HHS/CDC received 37 comments
from individuals, animal health groups,
regulated entities, and public health
associations that fully supported
removing the three agents. No public
comments proposed maintaining these
agents on the select agent and toxins
list.
Individuals and animal health groups
stated that they support removing B.
abortus, B. melitensis, and B. suis to
PO 00000
Frm 00107
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
101943
allow for more robust studies on
alternative methods of surveillance,
effective delivery mechanisms for
wildlife vaccination, and techniques to
limit disease spread, such as
contraception and novel sustainedrelease antibiotics in conjunction with
immuno-contraception. Commenters
stated the etiology and pathophysiology
of the Brucella species make it poorly
suited to cause a severe threat to human
health. Commenters further noted that
the disease is extremely rare in North
America and has limited capacity for
human-to-human transmission. The
same commenters stated maintaining
the Brucella species as select agents
causes considerable burden to the
research community, impairing
necessary scientific developments of
diagnostic tools and vaccine delivery
methods. Regulatory constraints on
Brucella species were further correlated
to fewer individuals entering the field of
Brucella research. The commenters
agreed removal of these agents would
not affect the nationally recognized
biosafety measures used by U.S.
researchers in handling these agents.
Commenters also noted that, regardless
of the FSAP’s regulation of these agents,
Brucella species remain endemic
worldwide. This change would,
however, enhance proactive measures
for research and diagnostics.
State veterinarians, state agriculture
departments, and livestock associations
also support the removal of the Brucella
species and believe delisting these
agents will allow for faster production
of improved diagnostics. These groups
believe delisting ultimately will reduce
the cost for ranching families and other
taxpayers when performing the required
testing on domestic livestock. These
groups stated that current tests often
cross-react or result in false positives
that threaten animal agribusinesses; the
benefits to delist the Brucella species
are numerous; and the perceived risk to
national security is not supported by
peer-reviewed science. One group stated
removal of these agents is a step toward
using a modernized risk-based approach
for biosafety and security.
Regulated entities (i.e., entities
registered with FSAP under 42 CFR
73.7) reported similar support for
removing B. abortus, B. melitensis, and
B. suis and included that they have no
concerns with maintaining work using
BSL–3/ABSL–3 practices. Commenters
stated that guidance will be needed for
the regulated community currently
registered for these agents on how to
remove registered space and/or removal
of Brucella species from registration
while active work is ongoing with
Brucella.
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
101944
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Public health associations commented
that B. abortus, B. melitensis, and B. suis
should be removed because of the low
mortality rate and because current
molecular and diagnostic methods allow
for the effective detection of the agents.
Comments stated delisting these agents
will remove substantial regulatory
requirements on individuals,
specifically the Responsible Official and
Alternate Responsible Official, and
allow for an expanded work staff to
contribute to testing. Further, antibiotic
treatment regimens are effective and
well-established for treating brucellosis
due to infections with B. abortus, B.
melitensis, or B. suis.
In accordance with the proposed rule
and public comments, HHS/CDC is
removing B. abortus, B. melitensis, and
B. suis from the select agent and toxins
list upon publication of the final rule.
This decision is based on the criteria
and considerations outlined in 42 U.S.C.
262a, including the low mortality rate,
rare human-to-human transmission, and
availability of therapeutics, and is
supported by the strong and unanimous
support received through public
comments in favor of removing these
agents (Olsen et al., 2018). Please note
that all entities currently working with
B. abortus, B. melitensis, or B. suis will
need to remove these agents from their
APHIS/CDC Form 1 (registration),
including Sections 3, 7A/C (and
associated attachments), and 7B. FSAP
will be reaching out to affected entities
upon publication of this final rule.
Further guidance can be found at
https://www.selectagents.gov/efsap/
using/form1/docs/eFSAP_Form_1_
Amendments_Guidance_508.pdf.
For brucellosis case reporting and
national notification, please visit
https://www.cdc.gov/brucellosis/hcp/
surveillance/.
Additionally, BSL–3/ABSL–3
laboratory safety and containment
recommendations for Brucella species
are outlined in the Biosafety in
Microbiological and Biomedical
Laboratories (BMBL) found at https://
www.cdc.gov/labs/bmbl/.
B. Nomenclature and Other Changes in
the Select Agent and Toxin List
HHS/CDC proposed to amend the
select agent list by updating
‘‘monkeypox virus’’ to the regulated
virus variant ‘‘Mpox virus (clade I).’’
Initially, HHS/CDC based this change on
the World Health Organization (WHO)
recommendation to adopt a new disease
name from monkeypox to mpox (https://
www.who.int/news/item/28-11-2022who-recommends-new-name-formonkeypox-disease). This was updated
in the International Classification of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Dec 16, 2024
Jkt 265001
Diseases (ICD) system (https://
icd.who.int/browse/2024-01/mms/
en#160886685).
Global experts, including the
International Committee on the
Taxonomy of Viruses, assigned new
names to the monkeypox virus variants
but not to the virus itself. The virus
variants became known as monkeypox
virus Clade I (formerly Congo Basin,
Central African clade) and Clade II
(formerly West African Clade) (https://
www.who.int/news/item/12-08-2022monkeypox--experts-give-virus-variantsnew-names). These efforts were in part
to align the disease name and virus
variants with current best naming
practices.
FSAP issued guidance during the
2022 mpox outbreak to assist
individuals and entities to comply with
select agent and toxin regulations after
they identified monkeypox virus in
diagnostic samples. The guidance
clarified that when materials are
identified as being or containing
monkeypox virus, and the clade is
unknown, the materials are considered
select agents. The guidance also
explained when regulatory exemptions
and exclusions would apply. This
guidance was issued based on current
diagnostic assays not being specific to
the monkeypox virus clade.
Based on these considerations and
recognition that this change would have
implications beyond a change in
nomenclature, HHS/CDC will not
change the listed agent from
‘‘monkeypox virus’’ to ‘‘Mpox virus
(clade I).’’ The decision to retain the
existing listing is to ensure consistency
in nomenclature and the regulation of
select agent material. FSAP does not
include clade-specific designations for
other select agents, but the regulations
provide exclusions when appropriate.
This ensures select agent material is
possessed, used, and transferred in
accordance with the regulations, which
is critically important when cladespecific assays are generally used.
Therefore, HHS/CDC is retaining the
current listing and monkeypox virus,
meaning monkeypox virus with clade
unknown is a select agent. Likewise,
monkeypox virus identified as clade I is
a select agent. The decision to retain the
current listing means no changes are
made to the regulation of this select
agent or the applicable exclusions and
exemptions.
As mentioned above, monkeypox
virus contains two virus variants, or
clades. In 2012, HHS/CDC excluded the
West African Clade of monkeypox virus
from the select agent regulatory
requirements (https://
www.selectagents.gov/sat/exclusions/
PO 00000
Frm 00108
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
hhs.htm). Excluded select agents have
been determined to not pose a severe
threat to public health and safety and
are not regulated as select agents.
Though not explicitly proposed in the
proposed rule, HHS/CDC has decided to
rename the excluded West African
Clade monkeypox virus to clade II
monkeypox virus. This nomenclature
change aligns with WHO
recommendations (Ulaeto et al., 2023,
https://www.who.int/news/item/28-112022-who-recommends-new-name-formonkeypox-disease). This change
promotes consistent terminology in
global and public health and will not
impact regulated entities.
Additionally, HHS/CDC proposed to
change SARS coronavirus (SARS–CoV)
to ‘‘Severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus (SARS–CoV),’’ which is the
correct nomenclature. This
nomenclature change was also
supported by two comments and is
finalized as proposed.
Though ‘‘Eastern equine encephalitis
virus’’ is an HHS select agent, the
regulations exclude any South
American genotype of Eastern Equine
Encephalitis Virus from the
requirements. HHS/CDC proposed to
remove the exclusion regarding South
American genotype of Eastern Equine
Encephalitis virus as this no longer
reflected the appropriate nomenclature,
but did not provide the updated virus
name. The updated nomenclature of the
South American genotype of Eastern
Equine Encephalitis virus is ‘‘Madariaga
virus.’’ HHS/CDC received two
comments requesting clarification on
whether Madariaga virus would be
excluded from regulatory requirements
and one comment in favor of this
exclusion. The nomenclature of the
excluded South American genotype of
Eastern Equine Encephalitis virus is
finalized as ‘‘Madariaga virus.’’ For
clarity, 42 CFR 73.3(d)(12) will now
read as excluding ‘‘Madariaga virus’’
from the regulatory requirements.
Lastly, HHS/CDC proposed the
renaming of Ebola virus to the genus
Ebolavirus. HHS/CDC received 10
public comments that supported
renaming Ebola virus to the genus
Ebolavirus to align with the
International Committee on Taxonomy
of Viruses (ICTV). None of the
commenters provided evidence or
rationale for their support of this
change. One commenter stated that
HHS/CDC should also make it clear that
any strain that is similar enough to this
genus, whether naturally discovered or
artificially derived, should be regarded
as a select agent. HHS/CDC will not
make any changes based on this
comment but does note that any virus
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
(including separate strains or species)
that is classified as being a member of
the genus Ebolavirus would be subject
to the requirements of this part. The
renaming of Ebolavirus is finalized as
proposed.
C. Additional Comments Received
HHS/CDC also received three public
comments recommending the removal
of monkeypox virus (clade I) from the
HHS list of select agents and toxins. One
commenter stated that given the
virulence and transmission patterns of
circulating strains of clade I combined
with the similarity of prophylaxis and
treatment measures for both clade I and
II, they did not feel it should be
regarded as a select agent any longer.
Another commenter stated that the risk
of a severe monkeypox virus (clade I)
outbreak in the United States is likely
minimal, given the low risk of casual
human-to-human transmission; mild
clinical symptoms for
immunocompetent people; low
mortality rate; an FDA-approved,
effective vaccine; availability of
pharmacotherapy treatment; and a
robust healthcare infrastructure and
public health response. The final
commenter recommended removal of
monkeypox virus (clade I), as its status
as a select agent could potentially
restrict early detection via wastewater
surveillance and may lead to
unnecessary burdens on healthcare
facilities, particularly in underresourced communities. This
commenter stated that removing
monkeypox virus (clade I) from the
select agent list would remove barriers
to rapid diagnosis, ensure equitable
access to care, and streamline public
health response efforts by increasing
accessibility to testing in the event
monkeypox virus (clade I) begins to
circulate in the United States. The select
agent regulations include provisions
that exempt diagnostic laboratories from
the requirements, as long as these
laboratories secure, destroy, and report
positive samples. This exemption
allows for continued rapid diagnosis,
equitable access to care, and a robust
public health response effort. As new
data from current outbreaks are
collected and analyzed, HHS/CDC will
take these comments along with future
data into consideration during the next
biennial review. The review process
considers how the agent affects human
health, the degree of transmissibility, if
there are effective medical
countermeasures available, and the
needs of vulnerable populations.
Appropriate departments and agencies
with scientific experts will also be
consulted. At present, more data would
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Dec 16, 2024
Jkt 265001
be needed to support the removal of
monkeypox virus from the select agent
list, so monkeypox virus will remain on
the list as an HHS-only select agent, and
monkeypox virus (clade I) will remain
a regulated variant.
Additionally, one commenter stated
that they do not support the addition of
SARS–CoV/SARS–CoV–2 chimeric
viruses, which were previously added
as a select agent on November 17, 2021.
HHS/CDC is not making changes to the
final rule based on this comment. A
final rule published on March 3, 2023
(88 FR 13322), outlines the basis for
adding SARS–CoV/SARS–CoV–2
chimeric viruses resulting from any
deliberate manipulation of SARS–CoV–
2 to incorporate nucleic acids coding for
SARS–CoV virulence factors as an HHS
select agent.
One commenter inquired why H2N2
(a subtype of Influenza A virus) was not
considered a select agent, especially
since NIAID’s Laboratory of Infectious
Diseases published that the 1957
pandemic strain of H2N2 would most
likely cause a pandemic. As mentioned
above, changes to the list of select
agents and toxins are carefully
considered using specific criteria and in
consultation with appropriate
departments, agencies, and scientific
experts. This review also takes into
account current data to support changes
to the list. FSAP will continue assessing
changes to the select agent and toxin list
as part of its ongoing biennial review
process, but HHS/CDC is not making
any changes based on this comment at
this time.
Another commenter stated that, given
the further development of reverse
genetics systems, FSAP should consider
oversight of the nucleic acids, in part or
in whole, that could be used to create
select agents. HHS/CDC is not making
any changes based on this comment but
does understand that the ability to
synthetically create agents capable of
posing a severe threat to public health
and safety is becoming less difficult
because of newer technologies. HHS/
CDC will further review the risks posed
by these technologies.
One additional public commenter
thanked the Federal Government for
transparency regarding the criteria for
adding/delisting agents and toxins and
strongly supported the continued use of
these criteria and processes. Another
commenter stated that a list-based
approach no longer adequately
addresses the current biological threat
landscape, which includes unknown,
accidental, engineered, and naturally
occurring hazardous biological agents
and toxins. To address the current
biological threat landscape, the
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
101945
commenter stated that FSAP should
take into account transmissibility, not
just pathogenicity, and should move
toward a ‘‘tiered, risk-based program’’
and away from a ‘‘list-based program.’’
HHS/CDC thanks these commenters for
their thoughts. HHS/CDC does evaluate
transmissibility in the assessments of
whether to include an agent in our list,
specifically under the direction of the
statute that includes contagiousness as a
criterion for inclusion. Also, FSAP
derives its regulatory authority from
section 351A(a)(1) of the Public Health
Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)),
which states that HHS/CDC must
maintain a list of select agents and
toxins. HHS/CDC may consider
additional tiering to the list of select
agents and toxins at the next biennial
review.
D. Retaining Tier 1 Designation of
Botulinum Neurotoxin Producing
Species of Clostridium
Botulinum neurotoxin, which causes
botulism, is a Tier 1 select toxin, and
botulinum neurotoxin producing
species of Clostridium are a Tier 1 select
agent, regulated by HHS/CDC. In the
2024 proposed rule, HHS/CDC
requested comment on the proposal to
retain botulinum neurotoxin producing
species of Clostridium as an HHS select
agent, but no longer designate it as a
Tier 1 agent because the organism itself
does not normally cause disease.
Botulinum neurotoxin would still be
designated as a Tier 1 toxin. HHS/CDC
received mixed reactions and a total of
14 comments on whether to downgrade
botulinum neurotoxin producing
species of Clostridium from a Tier 1
agent, while keeping it as an HHS select
agent.
Nine commenters supported
downgrading the agent from Tier 1,
three opposed the change, and two
comments requested clarification of
when nucleic acids that encode for toxic
forms of botulinum neurotoxin would
be considered Tier 1 or non-Tier 1. One
commenter stated the most compelling
rationale for no longer designating the
agent as Tier 1 is that public health
outbreaks with this organism are not
likely or projected to be particularly
disruptive.
Three commenters did not support
the change. They stated that no longer
designating botulinum neurotoxin
producing species of Clostridium as a
Tier 1 select agent—while keeping
botulinum neurotoxin as a Tier 1
toxin—would introduce ambiguity to
procedures related to storage,
possession, use, and in the event of an
accidental release. One commenter
stated that if the neurotoxin remains as
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
101946
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
a Tier 1 agent and regulatory
requirements are only reduced for the
organism, it could potentially cause
violations relating to an entity
producing the toxin in an unregulated
manner.
One commenter recommended that if
botulinum neurotoxin remains a Tier 1
agent, then botulinum neurotoxin
producing species of Clostridium should
also remain as Tier 1. Another
commenter pointed out that HHS/CDC
would need to provide extensive
guidance regarding differentiating
between experiments or steps in
experiments that include both the agent
and toxin that require Tier 1 personnel
and practices versus non-Tier 1
personnel and practices if this change
were to take effect. Both commenters
recommended that the agent, toxin, and
regulated nucleic acids all be regulated
as either non-Tier 1 or Tier 1 because
regulating the related materials
differently would create a substantial
administrative burden to registered
entities.
HHS/CDC agrees that public health
outbreaks are unlikely to occur with
botulinum neurotoxin producing
species of Clostridium. Per Executive
Order 13546, ‘‘Optimizing the Security
of Biological Select Agents and Toxins
in the United States,’’ botulinum
neurotoxin producing species of
Clostridium do not pose a great risk of
deliberate misuse with the most
significant potential for mass casualties,
and therefore do not meet the standard
of Tier 1. However, in accordance with
several other comments, HHS/CDC
agrees that downgrading the agent (or
nucleic acids encoding for toxic forms
of botulinum neurotoxin) from Tier 1,
while continuing to regulate botulinum
neurotoxin as a Tier 1 toxin would
require registered entities to
differentiate between the applicable
regulatory requirements, which may
cause confusion. Likewise, establishing
different regulatory standards for the
select agent and related toxin would
create challenges for HHS/CDC in
assessing compliance. The agent has the
inherent ability to produce Tier 1 toxin.
In consideration of the logistical
challenges raised in the comments
referenced above, HHS/CDC will
continue to regulate botulinum
neurotoxin producing species of
Clostridium as a Tier 1 select agent.
Dobrava virus (DOBV)] to the select
agent and toxins list. Eight commenters
did not offer a rationale or evidence for
their stance; however, one commenter
stated that because there is no evidence
of sustained person-to-person
transmission of SNV, ANDV, HTNV, or
DOBV, they concurred with the
proposal not to add these viruses to the
select agent list. Given the limited direct
person-to-person transmission and
difficulty propagating in a laboratory
setting, it is unclear whether
Hantaviruses would pose a severe threat
to public health and safety. In
accordance with the criteria and
considerations for determining whether
to include an agent or toxin on the list
as articulated in 42 U.S.C. 262a, as
proposed and in addition to the
unanimous support for not adding these
agents via public comment, HHS/CDC
will not be adding SNV, ANDV, HTNV,
and DOBV as HHS select agents.
E. No Addition of Hantaviruses
In response to the 2024 proposed rule,
HHS/CDC received nine public
comments that unanimously supported
the proposal to not add Hantaviruses
[Sin Nombre virus (SNV), Andes virus
(ANDV), Hantaan virus (HTNV), and
In the 2024 proposed rule, HHS/CDC
sought public comment on whether
Nipah virus should be identified as a
Tier 1 select agent because of its human
transmissibility, high case fatality rate,
low infectious dose, high severity of
illness, and severity of long-term effects.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Dec 16, 2024
Jkt 265001
F. Toxin Review: Changes to Exclusion
Limits for Short, Paralytic Alpha
Conotoxins
In response to the 2024 proposed rule,
HHS/CDC received eight public
comments that unanimously supported
the proposal to increase the exclusion
amount for short, paralytic alpha
conotoxins from 100 mg to 200 mg.
HHS/CDC proposed this change based
on assessments of lethal doses of
conotoxin compared to other regulated
toxins and the amount of the toxin that
would be needed if a bad actor sought
to weaponize it. To assess the amount
necessary to weaponize a biological
toxin, the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) developed toxin
parameters and attack scenarios for
potential inhalation and ingestion
exposures to select toxins. The DHS
models determined the impact of the
dissemination of varying concentrations
of toxins on public health. HHS/CDC
reviewed the DHS models, and the
lethal doses of conotoxins are
comparable to other regulated toxins
with a much higher permissible amount.
Based on the DHS model and the public
comments mentioned above, HHS/CDC
is raising the exclusion limit for
conotoxin from 100 mg to 200 mg as
proposed.
G. Designation of Nipah virus as a Tier
1 Select Agent
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
HHS/CDC received a total of 10
comments on this proposal. One
commenter was in favor of designating
Nipah virus as a Tier 1 select agent,
especially given the known person-toperson transmissibility of the virus.
There were nine commenters against
this change. Eight of these commenters
stated the justification is not sufficient
support for designating Nipah virus as
a Tier 1 select agent over other agents
on the select agent list that are Risk
Group 4 pathogens. One commenter
thought it was unclear what value the
Tier 1 designation would have for Nipah
virus.
CDC disagrees with these
commenters. Executive Order 13546,
‘‘Optimizing the Security of Biological
Select Agents and Toxins in the United
States,’’ directs the HHS Secretary to
designate a subset of select agents and
toxins as Tier 1 that present the greatest
risk of deliberate misuse with the most
significant potential for mass casualties
or devastating effects to the economy,
critical infrastructure, or public
confidence. Nipah virus has high
human transmissibility; a high case
fatality rate (estimated between 40–
100%); a low infectious dose (ranging
from 101¥107 plaque forming units
depending on route of infection); high
severity of illness; and severe long-term
effects, including neurological
complications including
encephalopathy, cranial nerve palsies,
and dystonia (Sejvar et al., 2007 and Lo
et al., 2008).
For these reasons, HHS/CDC is
designating Nipah virus as a Tier 1
select agent.
H. Addition of a Footnote to the HHS
Select Agent and Overlap Select Agent
List
In the 2024 proposed rule, HHS/CDC
received one public comment that
supported the proposal to add a footnote
to the list of HHS and Overlap select
agents indicating that the current ICTV
nomenclature for select agent viruses, if
different from that published in the
HHS regulations, will be available on
the FSAP website (https://
www.selectagents.gov). This commenter
stated that the FSAP website is a good
place to provide this information. As
proposed, HHS/CDC will proceed with
adding a footnote to the list for HHS and
Overlap select agents for this purpose.
I. Summary of Final Rule Provisions
In summary of the discussions in
section II. of this rule, HHS/CDC is
finalizing these revisions to the Federal
Select Agent Program at 42 CFR part 73:
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
• Remove Brucella abortus, Brucella
melitensis, and Brucella suis from the
select agent list.
• Update the nomenclature of select
agents:
Æ Change ‘‘SARS coronavirus (SARS–
CoV)’’ to ‘‘Severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus (SARS–CoV)’’ to
correct the nomenclature;
Æ Rename the exclusion of ‘‘South
American genotype of Eastern Equine
Encephalitis virus’’ to ‘‘Madariaga
virus’’;
Æ Rename the exclusion of ‘‘West
African Clade of Monkeypox virus’’ to
‘‘clade II monkeypox virus’’;
Æ Rename Ebola virus to Ebolavirus
in accordance with the recent
taxonomic change by the International
Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses
(ICTV);
• Retain nomenclature of monkeypox
virus;
• Retain designation of botulinum
neurotoxin producing species of
Clostridium as a Tier 1 agent;
• No addition of Hantaviruses:
specifically not adding Sin Nombre
virus (SNV), Andes virus (ANDV),
Hantaan virus (HTNV), and Dobrava
virus (DOBV) to the select agent list;
• Increase the exclusion amount for
short, paralytic alpha conotoxins from
100 mg to 200 mg;
• Designate Nipah virus as a Tier 1
Select agent;
• Add a footnote to the list for HHS
and Overlap select agents indicating
that the current nomenclature will be
available on the FSAP website (https://
www.selectagents.gov).
III. Alternatives Considered
Under 42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(2), the HHS
Secretary must review and republish the
list of HHS select agents and toxins at
least biennially. This ensures scientific
advancements and gained knowledge
are applied to each agent and toxin on
the list.
Below are reasonable regulatory
alternatives considered regarding key
individual provisions listed in this final
rule.
This final rule contains several
updates to outdated nomenclature of
agents, including monkeypox virus,
Severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus (SARS–CoV), and
Ebolavirus. Retaining outdated
nomenclature is not scientifically
accurate and causes confusion when
organizations seek to be in compliance
with the regulations. Retaining outdated
nomenclature can also cause
discrepancies between HHS/CDC and
other global health organizations. There
is a low, one-time cost associated with
updating nomenclature. The alternative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Dec 16, 2024
Jkt 265001
of finalizing the rule without the
proposed changes, i.e., retaining
outdated nomenclature, is not feasible
or accurate.
Several changes in this final rule also
ensure continued compliance with E.O.
13546.
If HHS/CDC were to retain Nipah
virus without a Tier 1 designation, the
select agent and toxin list would have
an agent that has a great risk of
deliberate misuse with the potential for
mass casualties, like other Tier 1 select
agents, but without the additional
provisions outlined for Tier 1 select
agents and toxins. These additional
provisions include advanced security
even compared to non-Tier 1 agents,
laboratory personnel enrollment in an
entity-specific Occupational Health
Program, and that entity-specific risk
assessments include Nipah virus as a
Tier 1 agent. Not having Nipah virus
designated as Tier 1 select agent could
potentially result in entities or
personnel handling the agent
incorrectly, causing public health,
biosafety, and biosecurity concerns. It
also would not enable FSAP to ensure
and require compliance with the
enhanced Tier 1 biosafety and
biosecurity requirements provided for in
the regulations.
All entities currently registered with
FSAP for Nipah virus are also registered
for other Tier 1 select agents and toxins.
Therefore, these entities have Tier 1
provisions in place already that can be
applied to Nipah virus. If HHS/CDC
were to retain Nipah virus as a select
agent without Tier 1 designation, the
department and agency would be out of
compliance with E.O. 13546. It could
also potentially cause public health and
biosecurity concerns in that the agent is
not handled appropriately. Nipah virus
has high human transmissibility; a high
case fatality rate (estimated between 40–
100%); a low infectious dose; high
severity of illness; and severe long-term
effects.
Along similar reasoning, new models
from DHS illustrate the lethal doses of
conotoxins are comparable to other
regulated toxins with a much higher
permissible amount. The alternative to
not raising the permissible toxin limit
for short, paralytic alpha conotoxins
would lead to irregularities of regulatory
application as it pertains to select
toxins. Keeping the permissible toxin
limit at 100 mg for short, paralytic alpha
conotoxins could prevent research and
advancement of understanding the
select toxin, with no advancement on
biosafety and biosecurity. The raised
permissible toxin limit of 200 mg will
allow more research to occur with the
select toxin with no effect on public
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
101947
health and safety. It is important that
HHS/CDC considers new data while
reviewing the select agent and toxin list
to ensure the list is in accordance with
criteria and considerations as
articulated in 42 U.S.C. 262a.
Similarly, the final rule does not
include adding Hantaviruses (i.e., Sin
Nombre virus (SNV), Andes virus
(ANDV), Hantaan virus (HTNV), and
Dobrava virus (DOBV)) to the list as was
initially proposed in the ANPRM.
Adding Hantaviruses to the list would
lead to the agency regulating agents that
are not proven to pose a severe threat to
public health and safety. Hantaviruses
have limited direct person-to-person
transmission and are difficult to
propagate in a laboratory setting. At this
time, research shows it is not certain
that Hantaviruses require any regulation
in accordance with the criteria and
considerations as articulated in 42
U.S.C. 262a. If FSAP were to begin
regulating Hantaviruses, there would be
costs associated with onboarding,
inspecting, and managing those entities
that would be required to register with
FSAP, with no current need to regulate
the agents.
The most significant impact of this
rule is the delisting of Brucella species,
and HHS/CDC has carefully considered
the alternative of delisting the agents,
which would be retaining the agents on
the list and continuing regulating these
agents.
Retaining the Brucella species on the
list has several economic, agricultural,
and economic effects with little
biosecurity benefit. Most notably,
retaining Brucella species on the list
prevents researchers from progressing
advancement of science with regards to
study of the agents and development of
countermeasures for this agent by
subjecting these laboratories to FSAP’s
regulatory authority. These agents are
designated as Risk Group 3 agents,
meaning entities and organizations will
continue working with these agents at
the appropriate biosafety level
(Biosafety Level 3), as outlined in the
national standard Biosafety in
Microbiological and Biomedical
Laboratories, 6th edition.
Continuing regulation of Brucella
melitensis, suis, and abortus has a onetime cost of approximately $29k to an
entity that wishes to register with FSAP
for work with these agents. This cost to
the regulated community, due to the
reasons listed above, does not enhance
biosafety and biosecurity, and may be a
regulatory burden to entities that wish
to advance understanding of the agent
and research medical countermeasures.
There is no alternative to foregoing
review of the select agent and toxin list.
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
101948
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
This rulemaking is intended to meet the
regulatory mandate under 42 U.S.C.
262a(a)(2) where the HHS Secretary
must review and republish the list of
HHS select agents and toxins at least
biennially. CDC conducts the biennial
review in consultation with CDC’s
Intragovernmental Select Agents and
Toxins Technical Advisory Committee
(ISATTAC). An alternative to the rule
was to not delist three select agents, not
raise the exclusion amount of a
regulated toxin, not update
nomenclature, and not add the Tier 1
designation to a select agent. Retaining
the Brucella species would maintain the
current status quo; it does not consider
that these agents no longer pose a severe
threat to public health and safety, does
not promote better research and vaccine
development, and does not align with
USDA’s decision to delist the Brucella
agents. Additionally, the alternative to
not amend the select agent list is
inconsistent with USDA’s rule, creating
regulatory conflict. In addition, this
option is not consistent with the public
comment received to support amending
the select agent list.
After carefully considering the
technical input of subject-matter
experts, both within the Federal
Government and from public comments,
and recommendations from Federal
advisory groups, HHS/CDC is finalizing
the changes listed in section II, part I
(Summary of Final Rule Provisions)
above to the list of select agents and
toxins.
IV. Required Regulatory Analyses
The HHS/CDC modifications to the
list of select agents and toxins addressed
in this rule will benefit producers,
research and reference laboratories, and
state and Federal oversight agencies,
while also maintaining adequate
program oversight of select agents and
toxins. Specifically, HHS/CDC is
removing Brucella abortus, Brucella
melitensis, and Brucella suis from the
select agent and toxin list; updating the
nomenclature for several select agents
(‘‘SARS coronavirus (SARS–CoV),’’
removing the exclusion regarding
‘‘South American genotype of Eastern
Equine Encephalitis virus,’’ renaming
the exclusion regarding ‘‘West African
Clade of Monkeypox virus,’’ and ‘‘Ebola
virus’’); retaining the nomenclature of
Monkeypox virus; retain the Tier 1
designation of Botulinum neurotoxin
producing species of Clostridium; no
addition of Hantaviruses to the current
select agent and toxin list; increase the
exclusion amount for short, paralytic
alpha conotoxins from 100 mg to 200
mg; and designating Nipah virus as a
Tier 1 Select Agent. HHS/CDC is also
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Dec 16, 2024
Jkt 265001
adding a footnote to the list for HHS and
Overlap select agents indicating that the
current nomenclature will be available
on the website (www.selectagents.gov).
Currently, 236 entities are registered
with the Federal Select Agent Program
(FSAP). Of these entities, there are 13
private entities, 30 Federal entities, 42
commercial entities, 84 academic
entities, and 67 state entities (registered
with either APHIS or CDC, depending
on the select agents and toxins they
work with). Less than 4 percent of all
firms operating within these North
American Industry Classification
categories are considered to be small
entities. This final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The benefits of strengthened
safeguards against the unintentional or
deliberate release of a select agent or
toxin greatly exceed the costs of
complying with the regulatory
requirements. As an example of losses
that can occur due to a select agent
release, the October 2001 anthrax
attacks caused 5 fatalities and 17
illnesses, disrupted business and
government activities (including $2
billion in lost revenues for the U.S.
Postal Service) and required more than
$23 million to decontaminate one
Senate office building and $3 billion to
decontaminate postal facilities and
procure mail-sanitizing equipment.
Deliberate introduction greatly increases
the probability of a select agent
becoming established and causing wideranging and devastating impacts to the
economy, other disruptions to society,
and diminished confidence in public
and private institutions.
HHS has examined the impacts of this
rule as required by Executive Order
12866 on Regulatory Planning and
Review (September 30, 1993), Executive
Order 13563 on Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review (January 18,
2011), Executive Order 14094, entitled
‘‘Modernizing Regulatory Review’’
(April 6, 2023), the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (September 19,
1980, Pub. L. 96–354), section 1102(b) of
the Social Security Act, section 202 of
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (March 22, 1995; Pub. L. 104–4),
and Executive Order 13132 on
Federalism (August 4, 1999). This final
rule does not meet the criteria set forth
in 5 U.S.C. 804(2) under the
Congressional Review Act.
A. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
14094
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
PO 00000
Frm 00112
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 14094 (the
Modernizing E.O.) amends section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review). The amended
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
defines a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
as an action that is likely to result in a
rule: (1) having an annual effect on the
economy of $200 million or more in any
1 year (adjusted every 3 years by the
Administrator of Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for
changes in gross domestic product), or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, territorial, or Tribal
governments or communities; (2)
creating a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfering with an action
taken or planned by another agency; (3)
materially altering the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4)
raise legal or policy issues for which
centralized review would meaningfully
further the President’s priorities or the
principles set forth in this Executive
order, as specifically authorized in a
timely manner by the Administrator of
OIRA in each case. OIRA has
determined that this rule is significant.
Statement of Need
As discussed above, HHS/CDC is
removing Brucella abortus, Brucella
melitensis, and Brucella suis from the
select agent list; updating the
nomenclature for several select agents
(‘‘SARS coronavirus (SARS–CoV),’’ the
exclusion regarding ‘‘South American
genotype of Eastern Equine Encephalitis
virus,’’ the exclusion regarding ‘‘West
African Clade of Monkeypox virus,’’ and
‘‘Ebola virus’’); retaining the
nomenclature of Monkeypox virus;
retaining the Tier 1 designation of
Botulinum neurotoxin producing
species of Clostridium; not adding
Hantaviruses to the current select agent
list; increasing the exclusion amount for
short, paralytic alpha conotoxins from
100 mg to 200 mg; and designating
Nipah virus as a Tier 1 Select Agent.
HHS/CDC is also adding a footnote to
the list for HHS and Overlap select
agents indicating that the current
nomenclature will be available on the
website (www.selectagents.gov).
Some of the regulatory changes
described in the preamble and reported
below are a minor in nature, and as
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
such, are expected to have minimal
impact on the costs and benefits of
current regulations, except for the onetime costs of updating official
documents for CDC. These regulatory
changes are the updates to the
nomenclature for several select agents
(‘‘SARS coronavirus [SARS–CoV],’’ the
exclusion regarding ‘‘South American
genotype of Eastern Equine Encephalitis
virus,’’ the exclusion regarding ‘‘West
African Clade of Monkeypox virus.’’ and
‘‘Ebola virus); retaining the
nomenclature of Monkeypox virus,
retaining the Tier 1 designation of
Botulinum neurotoxin producing
species of Clostridium; no addition of
Hantaviruses to the current select agent
list; increasing the exclusion amount for
short, paralytic alpha conotoxins from
100 mg to 200 mg; and designating
Nipah virus as a Tier 1 Select Agent.
This final rule changes the regulatory
baseline by removing Brucella abortus,
Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis
from the select agent list. As of July
2024, of the 236 registered entities with
FSAP, 112 were registered for select
agents and toxins including Brucella
abortus, melitensis, and/or suis, and
three of those entities were registered
for only Brucella species. CDC expects
the three entities registered for only
Brucella species will deregister from
FSAP, which HHS/CDC expects will
cause minimal savings for these
laboratories, as well as CDC. The
remaining 109 entities will likely
submit amendments to their
registrations to remove the delisted
agents while maintaining the rest of
their registration. Therefore, HHS/CDC
expects no change in the costs for these
entities; there is no cost to deregister
with FSAP. Because of the small
number of entities that will deregister
due to the delisting of Brucella species,
the cost-savings to the government will
be minimal, roughly a net value
(benefits-costs) of $8,795.78 in one-time
cost savings.
101949
Costs
This final rule does not impose any
mandatory costs on the public and
benefits laboratories who choose to
develop research using Brucella abortus,
Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis.
Nonetheless, the changes in this rule
will have a minimal economic impact
on CDC due to the process of updating
official documentation for the
implementation of the changes listed in
this final rule.
To estimate the cost to CDC of
including the changes listed in this final
rule in official documents, HHS/CDC
assumed that 1 GS–14, step 5 employee
and one GS–15, step 5 employee each
spend 40 hours (i.e., 80 hours in total)
for any updates to cite the language in
this final rule. The hourly wage rates for
two employees based in WashingtonBaltimore-Arlington, DC-MD-VA-WVPA are $75.70 (GS–14) and $89.03 (GS–
15).1 To account for the non-wage
benefits, we multiplied the wage cost by
two to result in a total cost estimate of
$13,178 (table 1).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
TABLE 1—SUMMARY OF THE ONE-TIME COSTS IN 2024 USD TO UPDATE OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS FOR DEPARTMENT OF
STATE (DOS), CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC) COSTS FROM UPDATING OFFICIAL DOCUMENTS WITH THE CHANGES IN THIS FINAL RULE
Hourly wage
rate 2
Multiplier nonwage benefits
and overhead
Agency
Cost components
Total
CDC ........................................
80 hours split between GS–14, step 5, and GS–15, step 5
levels.
$82.4
2
$13,178
Total .................................
.................................................................................................
........................
........................
13,178
The changes in this final rule that are
minor in nature and should not result in
an additional regulatory burden to
regulated entities. Instead, they should
help reduce costs by reducing confusion
regarding the requirements for the
possession, use, and transfer of
biological select agents and toxins.
The elimination of Brucella abortus,
Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis
from the select agents and toxins list
should not result in additional
regulatory burden for CDC or regulated
entities as this change would imply less
regulatory burden. However, one
concern about this reduction in
regulatory burden is that it could cause
costs or losses to the general public by
increasing the risk of Brucella abortus,
Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis
being accessed without authorization,
stolen, lost, or released. Although this
cost cannot be measured until after the
regulation has been applied, HHS/CDC
expects that the risk of Brucella abortus,
Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis
being accessed without authorization,
stolen, lost, or released would be
minimal as the current recommended
best practices in place to mitigate these
biosafety and biosecurity risks
(Biosafety in Microbiological and
Biomedical Laboratories) will remain in
place. USDA’s prevention and
eradication efforts against Brucellosis
from livestock in the United States
through the National Bovine Brucellosis
Surveillance Plan and the National
Brucellosis Eradication program will
continue even with the changes in this
rule.
Another concern linked to the
reduction in regulatory burden to
agencies and laboratories is that it could
increase cost to the general public by
increasing the risk of Brucella abortus,
Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis
becoming an agent of interest to be used
as a bioweapon. Although this risk
cannot be measured by HHS/CDC
currently, HHS/CDC expects this risk to
be minimal as recent literature indicates
that Brucella’s ‘‘minimal mortality,
availability of treatment options,
protracted inoculation period and the
emergence of new, more virulent
potential weapons means that its
inclusion among agents of bioterrorism
is nowadays mainly of historical
significance.’’ 3
Increasing the exclusion limits for
short paralytic alpha conotoxins will
have a negligible impact on costs for
regulated entities. There are only four
registered entities currently working
with these conotoxins, and increasing
1 U.S. Office of Personnel and Management.
https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/payleave/salaries-wages/2024/general-schedule-gssalary-calculator/ accessed on September 4, 2024.
2 U S Office of Personnel Management: General
Schedule (opm.gov).
3 Pappas, G., Panagopoulou, P., Christou, L., &
Akritidis, N. (2006). Biological weapons: Brucella as
a biological weapon. Cellular and molecular life
sciences CMLS, 63, 2229–2236.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Dec 16, 2024
Jkt 265001
PO 00000
Frm 00113
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
101950
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
the exclusion limit will allow for
additional research and testing without
the additional burden of select agent
and toxin regulatory requirements.
Change to the designation of Nipah
virus as a Tier 1 select agent will have
a negligible impact on costs for
regulated entities. All eight of the
entities that are currently registered for
Nipah virus are already registered for
other Tier 1 select agents; therefore they
are already complying with the
additional Tier 1 requirements and will
not incur additional costs with this
change.
Benefits
HHS found the benefits of this
rulemaking to outweigh the costs to
regulated entities as all the changes
described in this final rule have a zero
cost to regulated entities. Furthermore,
these changes are likely to reduce
regulated entities’ costs by simplifying
their processes and reducing some of
the regulatory burden. HHS/CDC is
unable to quantify the cost reductions to
regulated entities due to the minor
changes but expects this final rule will
potentially simplify processes for them.
Nonetheless, at a minimum, costs of
these changes are zero for regulated
entities, thus any simplification of
processes coming out of this change
implies a gain.
As of July 2024, of the 236 registered
entities with APHIS and CDC, 112 were
registered for select agents and toxins
including Brucella abortus, melitensis,
and/or suis, and three of those entities
are registered for only Brucella species.
CDC expects the three entities registered
for only Brucella species will deregister
from FSAP, which HHS/CDC expects to
cause small savings for these entities.
Although FSAP registration does not
have a direct cost for regulated entities,
HHS/CDC estimates that it takes 12
hours of labor a week for eight months
to perform the registration processes
required to get an FSAP registration.
These activities are usually performed
by a Responsible Official/Biosafety
Officer or an Alternate Responsible
Official/Biosafety Officer. The GS scale
for these professionals typically ranges
from GS–9 to GS–14. Assuming a GS–
14 scale, the hourly wage rate based in
Washington-Baltimore-Arlington, DCMD-VA-WV-PA is $75.70. Thus, the
estimated one-time cost of registration
with FSAP for an entity is $29,069. This
estimated one-time cost savings will
apply to any entities not registered with
FSAP that wish to work with Brucella
species. Renewal of registration with
FSAP is a negligible cost as the process
takes less than 10 minutes. Because
three entities are currently registered
solely for Brucella species, the
exclusion of Brucella abortus, Brucella
melitensis, and Brucella suis from the
select agent list means they will not
need to participate in the registration
renewal process, which is a negligible
cost.
HHS/CDC expects that the
deregistration of the three entities
registered only for Brucella species with
FSAP will also cause small one-time
cost-savings to CDC, as CDC personnel
will no longer follow these entities
throughout the registration process.
HHS/CDC estimates that CDC personnel
spend about three hours a week for six
months reviewing laboratories’ Standard
Operating Procedures (SOPs) for entity’s
registration applications to FSAP.
Assuming that the CDC staff reviewing
SOPs is GS–13 step 5, the hourly salary
in 2024 dollars would be $64.06, thus
the one-time cost savings to CDC of
reviewing the SOPs required for one
entity’s registration is $1,153.08, and
this implies a total of $3,459.24 in cost
savings for CDC of not going through the
registration process of the three entities
that would deregister after the
publication of this rule.
In addition to these cost savings CDC
will also have cost savings from not
having to perform inspections on the
three entities that are ending their FSAP
registrations as a result of the exclusion
of Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis,
and Brucella suis from the select agent
list. Assuming that the personnel
performing the inspections are a GS–12
step 5, and a GS–13 step 5 inspectors,
the hourly wage is $53.87, and $64.06,
respectively. Using an overhead
multiplier of 2 to take into account nonwage benefits, and considering the
travel costs of inspections, HHS/CDC
estimates one-time costs savings of
$10,564.18 per inspection not
performed per entity (table 2). Since
each entity goes through at least one
inspection during registration, HHS/
CDC estimates CDC will have a cost
savings of at least $31,692.54 due to
inspections not performed for the three
entities deregistering from FSAP.
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED ANNUAL CDC COST-SAVINGS IN 2024 USD FOR INSPECTION OF EACH FACILITY ONLY WORKING
WITH BRUCELLA
One-time
annual
benefit
Number of
staff
Number of inspections
per year
Number of hours spent
per inspection
GS–12 (step 5) .............
GS–13 (step 5) .............
1 ................
1 ................
0.5 .................................
0.5 .................................
40 ..................................
40 ..................................
$53.87
64.06
2
2
$4,309.6
5,124.8
Total .......................
...................
.......................................
.......................................
........................
........................
9,438.4
Travel costs ...................
Airfare 5 ......
417.79/per person .........
Hotel, food, lodging 6 .....
...................
.......................................
.......................................
Total (Personnel +
Travel).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
Average
hourly
wage rate 4
Type of CDC staff
Executive Order 14094 reaffirms the
principles of E.O. 12866 and E.O. 13563
and states that regulatory analysis
4 U.S. Office of Personnel Management: General
Schedule (opm.gov).
5 Bureau of Transportation Statistics: Air Fares √
Bureau of Transportation Statistics (bts.gov).
6 FY 2024 Federal Per Diem Rates: FY 2024
Federal Per Diem Rates (federalpay.org).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Dec 16, 2024
Jkt 265001
should facilitate agency efforts to
develop regulations that serve the
public interest, advance statutory
objectives, and are consistent with E.O.
12866, E.O. 13563, and the Presidential
Memorandum of January 20, 2021
(Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Regulatory analysis, as practicable and
appropriate, should recognize
PO 00000
Frm 00114
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Overhead
multiplier
145.10/per person
........................
........................
1125.78
10,564.18
distributive impacts and equity, to the
extent permitted by law. HHS/CDC
developed this final rule in a manner
consistent with these requirements. E.O.
13563 emphasizes further that
regulations must be based on the best
available science and that the
rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
exchange of ideas. HHS/CDC developed
this final rule in a manner consistent
with these requirements. In
administering FSAP, HHS, along with
USDA, regularly interact with the
affected registered entities via email,
phone, online webinars, through the
eFSAP information system, and through
designated points of contact at
registered entities. All changes result
from entity questions received or
interaction with registered entities who
have contacted FSAP when they had
questions or regulatory interpretation
requests. Therefore, HHS/CDC believes
this final rule serves the public interest.
Additionally, HHS/CDC encouraged
public participation and informed
registered entities of the proposed rule
via a Select Agent (SA) Gram and a
GovD message to ensure they were
aware and had a chance to provide
public comments. The FSAP website
(www.selectagents.gov) was updated to
share the proposed changes and
provided a link to web visitors so that
they could review and provide
comments on the proposed rule. Lastly,
HHS/CDC emailed outreach notes
summarizing the proposed rule directly
to national partner organizations (e.g.,
the Association of Public Health
Laboratories, American Society for
Microbiology, American Biological
Safety Association) so that they could
share among their constituents. As
discussed above, HHS/CDC carefully
reviewed and considered public
comments in the development of this
final rule.
B. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
as Amended by the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
(SBREFA)
HHS/CDC examined the impacts of
this final rule under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612).
Unless HHS/CDC certifies that the final
rule is not expected to have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities, the RFA, as
amended by SBREFA, requires agencies
to analyze regulatory options that would
minimize any significant economic
impact of a rule on small entities.
Currently, 236 entities are registered
with FSAP. Of these entities, there are
13 private entities, 30 Federal entities,
42 commercial entities, 84 academic
entities, and 67 state entities (registered
with either APHIS or CDC, depending
on the select agents and toxins they
work with). Less than 4 percent of all
firms operating within these North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) categories are
considered to be small entities. HHS/
CDC estimates that 13 entities will be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Dec 16, 2024
Jkt 265001
impacted by the changes in this rule. Of
these 13 entities, which are not
considered small, 4 are associated with
colleges, universities, and professional
schools; 2 are categorized as research
and development in biotechnology; and
7 are part of research and development
in the physical, engineering, and life
sciences. Applying NAICS’ estimation
of less than 4 percent of entities
classified as small, we find that not even
one small entity will be affected by the
changes in this rule. Based on our
analysis as described above, we certify
that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the RFA. In
addition, no public comments were
received from any small entities on the
RFA section.
Based on the information above, this
regulatory action is not a major rule as
defined by sec. 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996. This final rule will
not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; a
major increase in cost or prices; or
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of U.S.-based companies to
compete with foreign-based companies
in domestic and export markets.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with section 3507(d) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), HHS/CDC
determined that the Paperwork
Reduction Act does apply to
information collection and
recordkeeping requirements included in
this rule. This final rule focuses on the
select agent and toxins list. Any changes
to burden hours caused by the removal
of Brucella abortus, Brucella suis, and
Brucella melitensis from the list of
select agents and toxins will be
submitted for consideration by OMB
under the existing approved PRA
package (Possession, Use, and Transfer
of Select Agents and Toxins (42 CFR
part 73)). Other changes put forth in this
final rule, i.e., updating entity
registrations to reflect the nomenclature
updates to the list, will be instituted by
FSAP, resulting in no additional
paperwork for the regulated community.
D. E.O. 12988: Civil Justice Reform
This rule has been reviewed under
E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform. Once
the final rule is in effect, HHS/CDC
notes that (1) All state and local laws
and regulations that are inconsistent
with this rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect will be given to this
PO 00000
Frm 00115
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
101951
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings
will not be required before parties may
file suit in court challenging this rule.
E. E.O. 13132: Federalism
HHS/CDC reviewed this final rule in
accordance with Executive Order 13132
regarding federalism and determined
that it does not have federalism
implications. The rule does not ‘‘have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.’’
In accordance with section 361(e) of
the PHSA [42 U.S.C. 264(e)], nothing in
this rule would supersede any
provisions of state or local law except to
the extent that such a provision
conflicts with this rule.
F. Plain Language Act of 2010
Under the Plain Language Act of 2010
(Pub. L. 111–274, October 13, 2010),
executive departments and agencies are
required to use plain language in
documents that explain to the public
how to comply with a requirement the
Federal Government administers or
enforces. HHS/CDC has attempted to
use plain language in issuing this rule
consistent with the Federal Plain
Writing Act guidelines.
V. References
Government Accountability Office. 2023.
Public Health Preparedness: HHS Could
Improve Oversight of Research Involving
Enhanced Potential Pandemic Pathogens
(GAO–23–105455). https://www.gao.gov/
products/gao-23-105455
Lo, M., et al. The Emergence of Nipah virus,
a Highly Pathogenic Paramyxovirus. J
Clin Virol, 2008. 43(4): p. 396–400.
Olsen, S., et al. Biosafety Concerns Related to
Brucella and its Potential Use as a
Bioweapon. Applied Biosafety, 2018.
23(2): p. 77–90. Biosafety Concerns
Related to Brucella and Its Potential Use
as a Bioweapon | Applied Biosafety
(liebertpub.com).
Sejvar, J., et al. Long-term Neurological and
Functional Outcome in Nipah virus
Infection. Ann Neurol. 2007 Sep;62(3): p.
235–42.
Ulaeto, D., et al. New Nomenclature for mpox
(monkeypox) and Monkeypox Virus
Clades. The Lancet: Infectious Diseases,
2023. 23(3): pg 273–275. https://
www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/
article/PIIS1473-3099(23)00055-5/
fulltext.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 73
Biologics, Packaging and containers,
Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, HHS amends 42 CFR part 73
as follows:
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
101952
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 242 / Tuesday, December 17, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
PART 73—SELECT AGENTS AND
TOXINS
1. The authority citation for part 73 is
revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 262a.
2. Section 73.3 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraph (b);
b. In paragraph (d)(7), removing the
text ‘‘100 mg of Conotoxins’’ and adding
in its place the text ‘‘200 mg of
Conotoxins’’; and
■ c. Revising paragraph (d)(12).
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
■
§ 73.3
HHS select agents and toxins.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
(b) HHS select agents and toxins 1 are:
(1) Abrin.
(2) Bacillus cereus Biovar anthracis.*
(3) Botulinum neurotoxins.*
(4) Botulinum neurotoxin producing
species of Clostridium.*
(5) Conotoxins (Short, paralytic alpha
conotoxins containing the following
amino acid sequence
X1CCX2PACGX3X4X5X6CX7).2
(6) Coxiella burnetii.
(7) Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever
virus.
(8) Diacetoxyscirpenol.
(9) Eastern equine encephalitis virus.
(10) Ebolavirus *
(11) Francisella tularensis.*
(12) Lassa fever virus.
(13) Lujo virus.
(14) Marburg virus.*
(15) Monkeypox virus.
(16) Reconstructed replication
competent forms of the 1918 pandemic
influenza A virus containing any
portion of the coding regions of all eight
gene segments (Reconstructed 1918
influenza A virus).
(17) Ricin.
(18) Rickettsia prowazekii.
(19) Severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus (SARS–CoV).
(20) SARS–CoV/SARS–CoV–2
chimeric viruses resulting from any
deliberate manipulation of SARS–CoV–
2 to incorporate nucleic acids coding for
SARS–CoV virulence factors.
(21) Saxitoxin.
(22) South American hemorrhagic
fever virus: Chapare.
(23) South American hemorrhagic
fever virus: Guanarito.
(24) South American hemorrhagic
fever virus: Junin.
(25) South American hemorrhagic
fever virus: Machupo.
(26) South American hemorrhagic
fever virus: Sabia.
(27) Staphylococcal enterotoxins
(subtypes A,B,C,D,E).
(28) T–2 toxin.
(29) Tetrodotoxin.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:03 Dec 16, 2024
Jkt 265001
(30) Tick-borne encephalitis virus: Far
Eastern subtype.
(31) Tick-borne encephalitis virus:
Siberian subtype.
(32) Kyasanur Forest disease virus.
(33) Omsk haemorrhagic fever virus.
(34) Variola major virus (Smallpox
virus).*
(35) Variola minor virus (Alastrim).*
(36) Yersinia pestis.*
1 Please refer to https://
www.selectagents.gov for current
information on historical or proposed
nomenclature for the HHS select agents
on the list.
2 C = Cysteine residues are all present
as disulfides, with the 1st and 3rd
Cysteine, and the 2nd and 4th Cysteine
forming specific disulfide bridges; The
consensus sequence includes known
toxins a-MI and a-GI (shown above) as
well as a-GIA, Ac1.1a, a-CnIA, a-CnIB;
X1 = any amino acid(s) or Des-X; X2 =
Asparagine or Histidine; P = Proline; A
= Alanine; G = Glycine; X3 = Arginine
or Lysine; X4 = Asparagine, Histidine,
Lysine, Arginine, Tyrosine,
Phenylalanine or Tryptophan; X5 =
Tyrosine, Phenylalanine, or
Tryptophan; X6 = Serine, Threonine,
Glutamate, Aspartate, Glutamine, or
Asparagine; X7 = Any amino acid(s) or
Des X and; ‘‘Des X’’ = ‘‘an amino acid
does not have to be present at this
position.’’ For example, if a peptide
sequence were XCCHPA then the
related peptide CCHPA would be
designated as Des-X.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(12) Madariaga virus and any Clade II
Monkeypox provided that the
individual or entity can identify that the
agent is within the exclusion category.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Section 73.4 is amended by revising
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 73.4
Overlap select agents and toxins.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Overlap select agents and toxins 1
are:
(1) Bacillus anthracis.*
(2) Bacillus anthracis Pasteur strain.
(3) Burkholderia mallei.*
(4) Burkholderia pseudomallei.*
(5) Hendra virus.
(6) Nipah virus.*
(7) Rift Valley fever virus.
(8) Venezuelan equine encephalitis
virus.
1 Please refer to https://
www.selectagents.gov for current
information on historical or proposed
nomenclature for the Overlap select
agents on the list.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00116
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Dated: December 11, 2024.
Xavier Becerra,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[FR Doc. 2024–29583 Filed 12–16–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
49 CFR Part 513
[Docket No. NHTSA–2023–0014]
RIN 2127–AL85
Implementing the Whistleblower
Provisions of the Vehicle Safety Act
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule addresses an
important source of motor vehicle safety
information and fulfills a requirement in
the Motor Vehicle Safety Whistleblower
Act (Whistleblower Act) that NHTSA
promulgate regulations on the
requirements of the Act, in complement
to NHTSA’s existing whistleblower
program. The Whistleblower Act
authorizes the Secretary of
Transportation to pay an award, subject
to certain limitations, to eligible
whistleblowers who voluntarily provide
original information relating to any
motor vehicle defect, noncompliance, or
any violation or alleged violation of any
notification or reporting requirement,
which is likely to cause unreasonable
risk of death or serious physical injury,
if the information provided leads to the
successful resolution of a covered
action. This final rule defines certain
terms important to the operation of the
whistleblower program, outlines the
procedures for submitting original
information to NHTSA and applying for
awards, discusses NHTSA’s procedures
for making decisions on award
applications, and generally explains the
scope of the whistleblower program to
the public and potential whistleblowers.
DATES:
Effective date: This rule is effective
January 16, 2025.
Petitions for Reconsideration: If you
wish to submit a petition for
reconsideration of this rule, your
petition must be received by January 31,
2025.
ADDRESSES: Any petitions for
reconsideration should refer to the
docket number set forth above (NHTSA–
2023–0014) and be submitted to the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17DER1.SGM
17DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 242 (Tuesday, December 17, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 101941-101952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29583]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 73
[Docket No. CDC-2020-0024]
RIN 0920-AA71
Possession, Use, and Transfer of Select Agents and Toxins;
Biennial Review of the List of Select Agents and Toxins
AGENCY: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule finalizes updates to the HHS list of select agents
and toxins that could pose a severe threat to public health and safety.
These updates were proposed along with other changes to the select
agent and toxin regulations, which will be addressed in a separate
regulatory action. In a companion document published in this issue of
the Federal Register, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) is
making parallel regulatory changes.
DATES: This final rule is effective January 16, 2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Daniel A. Singer, MD, Acting Director,
Division of Regulatory Science and Compliance, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop H21-4, Atlanta,
Georgia 30329. Telephone: (404) 553-8266.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The final rule is organized as follows:
I. Background
A. Legal Authority
B. 2024 Proposed Rule
II. Responses to Comments and Provisions of the Proposed Rule
A. Removal of Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, and
Brucella suis
B. Nomenclature and Other Changes in the Select Agent and Toxin
List
C. Additional Comments Received
D. Retaining Tier 1 Designation of Botulinum Neurotoxin
Producing Species of Clostridium
E. No Addition of Hantaviruses
F. Toxin Review: Changes to Exclusion Limits for Short,
Paralytic Alpha Conotoxins
G. Designation of Nipah Virus as a Tier 1 Select Agent
H. Addition of a Footnote to the HHS Select Agent and Overlap
Select Agent List
I. Summary of Final Rule Provisions
III. Alternatives Considered
IV. Required Regulatory Analyses
A. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094
B. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as Amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
[[Page 101942]]
C. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
D. E.O. 12988: Civil Justice Reform
E. E.O. 13132: Federalism
F. Plain Language Act of 2010
V. References
I. Background
A. Legal Authority
Under the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002 (Bioterrorism Response Act), the HHS Secretary
must, by regulation, establish and maintain a list of biological agents
and toxins that have the potential to pose a severe threat to public
health and safety (42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)). In determining whether to
include a biological agent or toxin on the list, the Bioterrorism
Response Act requires that the HHS Secretary consider the following
criteria:
the effect on human health of exposure to an agent or
toxin;
the degree of contagiousness of the agent and the methods
by which the agent or toxin is transferred to humans;
the availability and effectiveness of pharmacotherapies
and immunizations to treat and prevent illnesses resulting from an
agent or toxin; and
any other criteria, including the needs of children and
other vulnerable populations, that the HHS Secretary considers
appropriate (42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)(B)).
Under 42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(2), the HHS Secretary must review and
republish the list of HHS select agents and toxins at least biennially.
In the preparation of this rulemaking, HHS/CDC considered the
statutory criteria and evaluated each agent and toxin based on the
following:
Effect on human health:
[cir] the degree of pathogenicity (ability of an organism to cause
disease);
[cir] long-term health effects;
[cir] severity of illness;
[cir] case fatality rate;
[cir] status of host immunity (e.g., whether an individual has
already been exposed to the agent and generated an immune response);
[cir] vulnerability of special populations;
Degree of contagiousness:
[cir] dissemination efficacy;
[cir] aerosol stability;
[cir] rate of transmission;
Availability and effectiveness of pharmacotherapies:
[cir] available treatment;
Other Criteria:
[cir] decontamination and restoration (the extent remediation
efforts are needed due to agent persistence in the environment and
population);
[cir] matrix stability;
[cir] ease of production;
[cir] ability to genetically manipulate or alter;
[cir] the burden or impact on the health care system.
The Federal Select Agent Program (FSAP) is the collaboration of the
CDC, Division of Regulatory Science and Compliance (previously known as
the Division of Select Agents and Toxins), and the USDA Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), Division of Agricultural
Select Agents and Toxins. These two agencies administer the HHS and
USDA select agent and toxin regulations and coordinate Federal
oversight of select agents and toxins in a manner to minimize the
administrative burden on the regulated community.
The list of HHS select agents and toxins is divided into two
sections--agents and toxins regulated solely by HHS and agents that are
regulated by both HHS and USDA. The biological agents and toxins listed
in 42 CFR 73.3 (HHS select agents and toxins) have the potential to
pose a severe threat to human health and safety and are regulated only
by HHS. The biological agents listed in Sec. 73.4 (overlap select
agents and toxins) have the potential to pose a severe threat to human
health and safety, as determined by HHS, and a severe threat to animals
and animal products, as determined by the USDA, pursuant to USDA's
authority under the Agriculture Bioterrorism Protection Act of 2002 (7
U.S.C. 8401). Accordingly, these biological agents are jointly
regulated by HHS and USDA as ``overlap'' select agents. The
Bioterrorism Response Act defines the term ``overlap agents and
toxins'' to mean biological agents and toxins that are listed pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(1) and listed pursuant to 7 U.S.C. 8401(a)(1). If
HHS/CDC removes any overlap select agents from its list, these agents
might still be regulated as USDA select agents dependent on the outcome
of the USDA biennial review.
B. 2024 Proposed Rule
On March 17, 2020, CDC published an advance notice of proposed
rulemaking (ANPRM) (85 FR 15087) seeking public comments on potential
changes to the current list of HHS and overlap select agents and toxins
that are regulated by both HHS and USDA. The received comments broadly
supported removal of the Brucella species--of the 335 comments
received, 325 supported removal of one or more species of Brucella.
Only two commenters were in favor of retaining the Brucella species.
HHS/CDC engaged the Intragovernmental Select Agents and Toxins
Technical Advisory Committee (ISATTAC) to review and consider the
public comments. The committee reviewed the public comments over a
series of seven meetings held between June 12, 2020, and December 11,
2020. Other Federal subject-matter experts were invited to the meetings
to address questions from the committee. The ANPRM also requested input
on removal of other agents from the list (e.g., Coxiella burnetii,
Rickettsia prowazekii, Bacillus anthracis [Pasteur strain]). After
considering public comments, ISATTAC advisory input, and Federal
subject-matter experts' input, CDC proposed changes to the select agent
and toxin list and removal of three species of Brucella.
On January 30, 2024, HHS issued a proposed rule entitled
``Possession, Use, and Transfer of Select Agents and Toxins; Biennial
Review of the List of Select Agents and Toxins'' (89 FR 5823). The
proposed rule included two sets of proposals: (1) regulatory changes
related to the select agents and toxins on the list (i.e., remove three
species of Brucella from the list of overlap select agents and toxins,
raise one toxin's exclusion amounts, rename three viruses, designate a
current agent as a Tier 1 agent, and remove the designation of Tier 1
status from one agent), and (2) regulatory changes related to the
administration of FSAP. This second set of proposals included adding
definitions and provisions to clarify inactivation of select agents,
adding requirements to report discoveries of select agents and toxins,
and codifying policies regarding effluent decontamination systems and
biosafety provisions for facility verification requirements for
registered biosafety level 3 and animal biosafety level 3 laboratories.
HHS/CDC has elected to finalize the January 30, 2024, proposed rule
in two separate rulemakings--one final rule focused on changes to the
select agents and toxins list (this final rule), and a second final
rule focused on regulatory changes to the administration of the FSAP
discussed above. This final rule will focus solely on removing three
select agents, raising one toxin's exclusion limit, updating
nomenclature, and designating an agent as Tier 1. HHS/CDC is proceeding
with two final rules for clarity and to avoid any unnecessary delay in
finalizing the revised select agents and toxins list. HHS/CDC will
publish another regulatory action focused on the proposed rule's
administrative and programmatic changes at a later date. Like HHS/CDC,
USDA/APHIS is also
[[Page 101943]]
proceeding with two separate final rules for this rulemaking.
Interested persons or organizations were invited to participate by
submitting written views, recommendations, and data. HHS/CDC invited
general comments as to whether there are additional biological agents
or toxins that should be added or removed from the HHS list of select
agents and toxins based on the following criteria outlined under 42
U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)(B):
(1) ``the effect on human health of exposure to the agent or
toxin;''
(2) ``the degree of contagiousness of the agent or toxin and the
methods by which the agent or toxin is transferred to humans;''
(3) ``the availability and effectiveness of pharmacotherapies and
immunizations to treat and prevent any illness resulting from infection
by the agent or toxin;'' and
(4) ``any other criteria, including the needs of children and other
vulnerable populations, that the Secretary considers appropriate''.
Comments were also requested on the following specific proposed
changes to the list of HHS select agents and toxins:
Removal of Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, and
Brucella suis: Proposal to remove Brucella abortus, Brucella
melitensis, and Brucella suis from the select agent list.
Updates to nomenclature of select agents: To change ``SARS
coronavirus (SARS-CoV)'' to ``Severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus (SARS-CoV)'' to correct the nomenclature; to remove the
exclusion regarding South American genotype of Eastern Equine
Encephalitis virus as this terminology is no longer the correct
nomenclature; and to rename Ebola virus to Ebolavirus in accordance
with the recent taxonomic change by the International Committee on
Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) (this was initially included as its own
section in the proposed rule but moved under this section for
nomenclature changes).
Updates to nomenclature of monkeypox virus: Proposal to
update the terminology of ``monkeypox virus,'' which was initially
proposed to be updated to ``Mpox Clade I.''
Removal of the Designation of Botulinum neurotoxin
producing species of Clostridium as a Tier 1 Agent: Proposal to retain
botulinum neurotoxin producing species of Clostridium as an HHS select
agent, but no longer list it as a Tier 1 agent.
No Addition of Hantaviruses: Proposal to not add Sin
Nombre virus (SNV), Andes virus (ANDV), Hantaan virus (HTNV), and
Dobrava virus (DOBV) to the select agent list.
Toxin Review: Changes to Exclusion Limits for Short,
Paralytic Alpha Conotoxins: Proposal to increase the exclusion amount
for short, paralytic alpha conotoxins from 100 mg to 200 mg.
Designation of Nipah virus as a Tier 1 Select Agent:
Proposal to designate Nipah virus as a Tier 1 select agent.
Addition of a Footnote to the HHS Select Agent List on the
FSAP website: Proposal to add a footnote to the list for HHS and
Overlap select agents indicating that the current nomenclature will be
available on the FSAP website (https://www.selectagents.gov) to
harmonize the list of select agent viruses with ICTV nomenclature.
The public comment period for the proposed rule ended on April 1,
2024. HHS/CDC received 44 unique comments from individuals,
stakeholders, and groups and carefully reviewed and considered the
comments in this preparation of the final rule. Of these 44 comments,
37 include discussion of the list of select agents discussed in this
final rule. A summary of the comments relevant to the content of this
final rule and responses to those comments are found at section II,
below. Public comments addressing other topics from the proposed rule
will be addressed in a separate regulatory action.
II. Responses to Comments and Provisions of the Proposed Rule
The following is a section-by-section discussion of the changes
HHS/CDC is making to the list of select agents and toxins in 42 CFR
73.3 and 73.4 after consideration of public comments. As previously
stated, the changes proposed in the proposed rule will be finalized in
two separate rules. This final rule addresses changes to the list of
select agents and toxins in 42 CFR 73.3 and 73.4. All other revisions
to definitions, policies, and regulatory requirements addressed in the
proposed rule will be addressed in a separate final rule.
A. Removal of Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis
Regarding the request for comment on whether to remove three
species of Brucella (B. abortus, B. melitensis, and B. suis) from the
select agent and toxins list, HHS/CDC received 37 comments from
individuals, animal health groups, regulated entities, and public
health associations that fully supported removing the three agents. No
public comments proposed maintaining these agents on the select agent
and toxins list.
Individuals and animal health groups stated that they support
removing B. abortus, B. melitensis, and B. suis to allow for more
robust studies on alternative methods of surveillance, effective
delivery mechanisms for wildlife vaccination, and techniques to limit
disease spread, such as contraception and novel sustained-release
antibiotics in conjunction with immuno-contraception. Commenters stated
the etiology and pathophysiology of the Brucella species make it poorly
suited to cause a severe threat to human health. Commenters further
noted that the disease is extremely rare in North America and has
limited capacity for human-to-human transmission. The same commenters
stated maintaining the Brucella species as select agents causes
considerable burden to the research community, impairing necessary
scientific developments of diagnostic tools and vaccine delivery
methods. Regulatory constraints on Brucella species were further
correlated to fewer individuals entering the field of Brucella
research. The commenters agreed removal of these agents would not
affect the nationally recognized biosafety measures used by U.S.
researchers in handling these agents. Commenters also noted that,
regardless of the FSAP's regulation of these agents, Brucella species
remain endemic worldwide. This change would, however, enhance proactive
measures for research and diagnostics.
State veterinarians, state agriculture departments, and livestock
associations also support the removal of the Brucella species and
believe delisting these agents will allow for faster production of
improved diagnostics. These groups believe delisting ultimately will
reduce the cost for ranching families and other taxpayers when
performing the required testing on domestic livestock. These groups
stated that current tests often cross-react or result in false
positives that threaten animal agribusinesses; the benefits to delist
the Brucella species are numerous; and the perceived risk to national
security is not supported by peer-reviewed science. One group stated
removal of these agents is a step toward using a modernized risk-based
approach for biosafety and security.
Regulated entities (i.e., entities registered with FSAP under 42
CFR 73.7) reported similar support for removing B. abortus, B.
melitensis, and B. suis and included that they have no concerns with
maintaining work using BSL-3/ABSL-3 practices. Commenters stated that
guidance will be needed for the regulated community currently
registered for these agents on how to remove registered space and/or
removal of Brucella species from registration while active work is
ongoing with Brucella.
[[Page 101944]]
Public health associations commented that B. abortus, B.
melitensis, and B. suis should be removed because of the low mortality
rate and because current molecular and diagnostic methods allow for the
effective detection of the agents. Comments stated delisting these
agents will remove substantial regulatory requirements on individuals,
specifically the Responsible Official and Alternate Responsible
Official, and allow for an expanded work staff to contribute to
testing. Further, antibiotic treatment regimens are effective and well-
established for treating brucellosis due to infections with B. abortus,
B. melitensis, or B. suis.
In accordance with the proposed rule and public comments, HHS/CDC
is removing B. abortus, B. melitensis, and B. suis from the select
agent and toxins list upon publication of the final rule. This decision
is based on the criteria and considerations outlined in 42 U.S.C. 262a,
including the low mortality rate, rare human-to-human transmission, and
availability of therapeutics, and is supported by the strong and
unanimous support received through public comments in favor of removing
these agents (Olsen et al., 2018). Please note that all entities
currently working with B. abortus, B. melitensis, or B. suis will need
to remove these agents from their APHIS/CDC Form 1 (registration),
including Sections 3, 7A/C (and associated attachments), and 7B. FSAP
will be reaching out to affected entities upon publication of this
final rule. Further guidance can be found at https://www.selectagents.gov/efsap/using/form1/docs/eFSAP_Form_1_Amendments_Guidance_508.pdf.
For brucellosis case reporting and national notification, please
visit https://www.cdc.gov/brucellosis/hcp/surveillance/.
Additionally, BSL-3/ABSL-3 laboratory safety and containment
recommendations for Brucella species are outlined in the Biosafety in
Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories (BMBL) found at https://www.cdc.gov/labs/bmbl/.
B. Nomenclature and Other Changes in the Select Agent and Toxin List
HHS/CDC proposed to amend the select agent list by updating
``monkeypox virus'' to the regulated virus variant ``Mpox virus (clade
I).'' Initially, HHS/CDC based this change on the World Health
Organization (WHO) recommendation to adopt a new disease name from
monkeypox to mpox (https://www.who.int/news/item/28-11-2022-who-recommends-new-name-for-monkeypox-disease). This was updated in the
International Classification of Diseases (ICD) system (https://icd.who.int/browse/2024-01/mms/en#160886685).
Global experts, including the International Committee on the
Taxonomy of Viruses, assigned new names to the monkeypox virus variants
but not to the virus itself. The virus variants became known as
monkeypox virus Clade I (formerly Congo Basin, Central African clade)
and Clade II (formerly West African Clade) (https://www.who.int/news/item/12-08-2022-monkeypox--experts-give-virus-variants-new-names).
These efforts were in part to align the disease name and virus variants
with current best naming practices.
FSAP issued guidance during the 2022 mpox outbreak to assist
individuals and entities to comply with select agent and toxin
regulations after they identified monkeypox virus in diagnostic
samples. The guidance clarified that when materials are identified as
being or containing monkeypox virus, and the clade is unknown, the
materials are considered select agents. The guidance also explained
when regulatory exemptions and exclusions would apply. This guidance
was issued based on current diagnostic assays not being specific to the
monkeypox virus clade.
Based on these considerations and recognition that this change
would have implications beyond a change in nomenclature, HHS/CDC will
not change the listed agent from ``monkeypox virus'' to ``Mpox virus
(clade I).'' The decision to retain the existing listing is to ensure
consistency in nomenclature and the regulation of select agent
material. FSAP does not include clade-specific designations for other
select agents, but the regulations provide exclusions when appropriate.
This ensures select agent material is possessed, used, and transferred
in accordance with the regulations, which is critically important when
clade-specific assays are generally used. Therefore, HHS/CDC is
retaining the current listing and monkeypox virus, meaning monkeypox
virus with clade unknown is a select agent. Likewise, monkeypox virus
identified as clade I is a select agent. The decision to retain the
current listing means no changes are made to the regulation of this
select agent or the applicable exclusions and exemptions.
As mentioned above, monkeypox virus contains two virus variants, or
clades. In 2012, HHS/CDC excluded the West African Clade of monkeypox
virus from the select agent regulatory requirements (https://www.selectagents.gov/sat/exclusions/hhs.htm). Excluded select agents
have been determined to not pose a severe threat to public health and
safety and are not regulated as select agents. Though not explicitly
proposed in the proposed rule, HHS/CDC has decided to rename the
excluded West African Clade monkeypox virus to clade II monkeypox
virus. This nomenclature change aligns with WHO recommendations (Ulaeto
et al., 2023, https://www.who.int/news/item/28-11-2022-who-recommends-new-name-for-monkeypox-disease). This change promotes consistent
terminology in global and public health and will not impact regulated
entities.
Additionally, HHS/CDC proposed to change SARS coronavirus (SARS-
CoV) to ``Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV),''
which is the correct nomenclature. This nomenclature change was also
supported by two comments and is finalized as proposed.
Though ``Eastern equine encephalitis virus'' is an HHS select
agent, the regulations exclude any South American genotype of Eastern
Equine Encephalitis Virus from the requirements. HHS/CDC proposed to
remove the exclusion regarding South American genotype of Eastern
Equine Encephalitis virus as this no longer reflected the appropriate
nomenclature, but did not provide the updated virus name. The updated
nomenclature of the South American genotype of Eastern Equine
Encephalitis virus is ``Madariaga virus.'' HHS/CDC received two
comments requesting clarification on whether Madariaga virus would be
excluded from regulatory requirements and one comment in favor of this
exclusion. The nomenclature of the excluded South American genotype of
Eastern Equine Encephalitis virus is finalized as ``Madariaga virus.''
For clarity, 42 CFR 73.3(d)(12) will now read as excluding ``Madariaga
virus'' from the regulatory requirements.
Lastly, HHS/CDC proposed the renaming of Ebola virus to the genus
Ebolavirus. HHS/CDC received 10 public comments that supported renaming
Ebola virus to the genus Ebolavirus to align with the International
Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV). None of the commenters
provided evidence or rationale for their support of this change. One
commenter stated that HHS/CDC should also make it clear that any strain
that is similar enough to this genus, whether naturally discovered or
artificially derived, should be regarded as a select agent. HHS/CDC
will not make any changes based on this comment but does note that any
virus
[[Page 101945]]
(including separate strains or species) that is classified as being a
member of the genus Ebolavirus would be subject to the requirements of
this part. The renaming of Ebolavirus is finalized as proposed.
C. Additional Comments Received
HHS/CDC also received three public comments recommending the
removal of monkeypox virus (clade I) from the HHS list of select agents
and toxins. One commenter stated that given the virulence and
transmission patterns of circulating strains of clade I combined with
the similarity of prophylaxis and treatment measures for both clade I
and II, they did not feel it should be regarded as a select agent any
longer. Another commenter stated that the risk of a severe monkeypox
virus (clade I) outbreak in the United States is likely minimal, given
the low risk of casual human-to-human transmission; mild clinical
symptoms for immunocompetent people; low mortality rate; an FDA-
approved, effective vaccine; availability of pharmacotherapy treatment;
and a robust healthcare infrastructure and public health response. The
final commenter recommended removal of monkeypox virus (clade I), as
its status as a select agent could potentially restrict early detection
via wastewater surveillance and may lead to unnecessary burdens on
healthcare facilities, particularly in under-resourced communities.
This commenter stated that removing monkeypox virus (clade I) from the
select agent list would remove barriers to rapid diagnosis, ensure
equitable access to care, and streamline public health response efforts
by increasing accessibility to testing in the event monkeypox virus
(clade I) begins to circulate in the United States. The select agent
regulations include provisions that exempt diagnostic laboratories from
the requirements, as long as these laboratories secure, destroy, and
report positive samples. This exemption allows for continued rapid
diagnosis, equitable access to care, and a robust public health
response effort. As new data from current outbreaks are collected and
analyzed, HHS/CDC will take these comments along with future data into
consideration during the next biennial review. The review process
considers how the agent affects human health, the degree of
transmissibility, if there are effective medical countermeasures
available, and the needs of vulnerable populations. Appropriate
departments and agencies with scientific experts will also be
consulted. At present, more data would be needed to support the removal
of monkeypox virus from the select agent list, so monkeypox virus will
remain on the list as an HHS-only select agent, and monkeypox virus
(clade I) will remain a regulated variant.
Additionally, one commenter stated that they do not support the
addition of SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2 chimeric viruses, which were previously
added as a select agent on November 17, 2021. HHS/CDC is not making
changes to the final rule based on this comment. A final rule published
on March 3, 2023 (88 FR 13322), outlines the basis for adding SARS-CoV/
SARS-CoV-2 chimeric viruses resulting from any deliberate manipulation
of SARS-CoV-2 to incorporate nucleic acids coding for SARS-CoV
virulence factors as an HHS select agent.
One commenter inquired why H2N2 (a subtype of Influenza A virus)
was not considered a select agent, especially since NIAID's Laboratory
of Infectious Diseases published that the 1957 pandemic strain of H2N2
would most likely cause a pandemic. As mentioned above, changes to the
list of select agents and toxins are carefully considered using
specific criteria and in consultation with appropriate departments,
agencies, and scientific experts. This review also takes into account
current data to support changes to the list. FSAP will continue
assessing changes to the select agent and toxin list as part of its
ongoing biennial review process, but HHS/CDC is not making any changes
based on this comment at this time.
Another commenter stated that, given the further development of
reverse genetics systems, FSAP should consider oversight of the nucleic
acids, in part or in whole, that could be used to create select agents.
HHS/CDC is not making any changes based on this comment but does
understand that the ability to synthetically create agents capable of
posing a severe threat to public health and safety is becoming less
difficult because of newer technologies. HHS/CDC will further review
the risks posed by these technologies.
One additional public commenter thanked the Federal Government for
transparency regarding the criteria for adding/delisting agents and
toxins and strongly supported the continued use of these criteria and
processes. Another commenter stated that a list-based approach no
longer adequately addresses the current biological threat landscape,
which includes unknown, accidental, engineered, and naturally occurring
hazardous biological agents and toxins. To address the current
biological threat landscape, the commenter stated that FSAP should take
into account transmissibility, not just pathogenicity, and should move
toward a ``tiered, risk-based program'' and away from a ``list-based
program.'' HHS/CDC thanks these commenters for their thoughts. HHS/CDC
does evaluate transmissibility in the assessments of whether to include
an agent in our list, specifically under the direction of the statute
that includes contagiousness as a criterion for inclusion. Also, FSAP
derives its regulatory authority from section 351A(a)(1) of the Public
Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(1)), which states that HHS/CDC
must maintain a list of select agents and toxins. HHS/CDC may consider
additional tiering to the list of select agents and toxins at the next
biennial review.
D. Retaining Tier 1 Designation of Botulinum Neurotoxin Producing
Species of Clostridium
Botulinum neurotoxin, which causes botulism, is a Tier 1 select
toxin, and botulinum neurotoxin producing species of Clostridium are a
Tier 1 select agent, regulated by HHS/CDC. In the 2024 proposed rule,
HHS/CDC requested comment on the proposal to retain botulinum
neurotoxin producing species of Clostridium as an HHS select agent, but
no longer designate it as a Tier 1 agent because the organism itself
does not normally cause disease. Botulinum neurotoxin would still be
designated as a Tier 1 toxin. HHS/CDC received mixed reactions and a
total of 14 comments on whether to downgrade botulinum neurotoxin
producing species of Clostridium from a Tier 1 agent, while keeping it
as an HHS select agent.
Nine commenters supported downgrading the agent from Tier 1, three
opposed the change, and two comments requested clarification of when
nucleic acids that encode for toxic forms of botulinum neurotoxin would
be considered Tier 1 or non-Tier 1. One commenter stated the most
compelling rationale for no longer designating the agent as Tier 1 is
that public health outbreaks with this organism are not likely or
projected to be particularly disruptive.
Three commenters did not support the change. They stated that no
longer designating botulinum neurotoxin producing species of
Clostridium as a Tier 1 select agent--while keeping botulinum
neurotoxin as a Tier 1 toxin--would introduce ambiguity to procedures
related to storage, possession, use, and in the event of an accidental
release. One commenter stated that if the neurotoxin remains as
[[Page 101946]]
a Tier 1 agent and regulatory requirements are only reduced for the
organism, it could potentially cause violations relating to an entity
producing the toxin in an unregulated manner.
One commenter recommended that if botulinum neurotoxin remains a
Tier 1 agent, then botulinum neurotoxin producing species of
Clostridium should also remain as Tier 1. Another commenter pointed out
that HHS/CDC would need to provide extensive guidance regarding
differentiating between experiments or steps in experiments that
include both the agent and toxin that require Tier 1 personnel and
practices versus non-Tier 1 personnel and practices if this change were
to take effect. Both commenters recommended that the agent, toxin, and
regulated nucleic acids all be regulated as either non-Tier 1 or Tier 1
because regulating the related materials differently would create a
substantial administrative burden to registered entities.
HHS/CDC agrees that public health outbreaks are unlikely to occur
with botulinum neurotoxin producing species of Clostridium. Per
Executive Order 13546, ``Optimizing the Security of Biological Select
Agents and Toxins in the United States,'' botulinum neurotoxin
producing species of Clostridium do not pose a great risk of deliberate
misuse with the most significant potential for mass casualties, and
therefore do not meet the standard of Tier 1. However, in accordance
with several other comments, HHS/CDC agrees that downgrading the agent
(or nucleic acids encoding for toxic forms of botulinum neurotoxin)
from Tier 1, while continuing to regulate botulinum neurotoxin as a
Tier 1 toxin would require registered entities to differentiate between
the applicable regulatory requirements, which may cause confusion.
Likewise, establishing different regulatory standards for the select
agent and related toxin would create challenges for HHS/CDC in
assessing compliance. The agent has the inherent ability to produce
Tier 1 toxin. In consideration of the logistical challenges raised in
the comments referenced above, HHS/CDC will continue to regulate
botulinum neurotoxin producing species of Clostridium as a Tier 1
select agent.
E. No Addition of Hantaviruses
In response to the 2024 proposed rule, HHS/CDC received nine public
comments that unanimously supported the proposal to not add
Hantaviruses [Sin Nombre virus (SNV), Andes virus (ANDV), Hantaan virus
(HTNV), and Dobrava virus (DOBV)] to the select agent and toxins list.
Eight commenters did not offer a rationale or evidence for their
stance; however, one commenter stated that because there is no evidence
of sustained person-to-person transmission of SNV, ANDV, HTNV, or DOBV,
they concurred with the proposal not to add these viruses to the select
agent list. Given the limited direct person-to-person transmission and
difficulty propagating in a laboratory setting, it is unclear whether
Hantaviruses would pose a severe threat to public health and safety. In
accordance with the criteria and considerations for determining whether
to include an agent or toxin on the list as articulated in 42 U.S.C.
262a, as proposed and in addition to the unanimous support for not
adding these agents via public comment, HHS/CDC will not be adding SNV,
ANDV, HTNV, and DOBV as HHS select agents.
F. Toxin Review: Changes to Exclusion Limits for Short, Paralytic Alpha
Conotoxins
In response to the 2024 proposed rule, HHS/CDC received eight
public comments that unanimously supported the proposal to increase the
exclusion amount for short, paralytic alpha conotoxins from 100 mg to
200 mg. HHS/CDC proposed this change based on assessments of lethal
doses of conotoxin compared to other regulated toxins and the amount of
the toxin that would be needed if a bad actor sought to weaponize it.
To assess the amount necessary to weaponize a biological toxin, the
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) developed toxin parameters and
attack scenarios for potential inhalation and ingestion exposures to
select toxins. The DHS models determined the impact of the
dissemination of varying concentrations of toxins on public health.
HHS/CDC reviewed the DHS models, and the lethal doses of conotoxins are
comparable to other regulated toxins with a much higher permissible
amount. Based on the DHS model and the public comments mentioned above,
HHS/CDC is raising the exclusion limit for conotoxin from 100 mg to 200
mg as proposed.
G. Designation of Nipah virus as a Tier 1 Select Agent
In the 2024 proposed rule, HHS/CDC sought public comment on whether
Nipah virus should be identified as a Tier 1 select agent because of
its human transmissibility, high case fatality rate, low infectious
dose, high severity of illness, and severity of long-term effects.
HHS/CDC received a total of 10 comments on this proposal. One
commenter was in favor of designating Nipah virus as a Tier 1 select
agent, especially given the known person-to-person transmissibility of
the virus. There were nine commenters against this change. Eight of
these commenters stated the justification is not sufficient support for
designating Nipah virus as a Tier 1 select agent over other agents on
the select agent list that are Risk Group 4 pathogens. One commenter
thought it was unclear what value the Tier 1 designation would have for
Nipah virus.
CDC disagrees with these commenters. Executive Order 13546,
``Optimizing the Security of Biological Select Agents and Toxins in the
United States,'' directs the HHS Secretary to designate a subset of
select agents and toxins as Tier 1 that present the greatest risk of
deliberate misuse with the most significant potential for mass
casualties or devastating effects to the economy, critical
infrastructure, or public confidence. Nipah virus has high human
transmissibility; a high case fatality rate (estimated between 40-
100%); a low infectious dose (ranging from 10\1\-10\7\ plaque forming
units depending on route of infection); high severity of illness; and
severe long-term effects, including neurological complications
including encephalopathy, cranial nerve palsies, and dystonia (Sejvar
et al., 2007 and Lo et al., 2008).
For these reasons, HHS/CDC is designating Nipah virus as a Tier 1
select agent.
H. Addition of a Footnote to the HHS Select Agent and Overlap Select
Agent List
In the 2024 proposed rule, HHS/CDC received one public comment that
supported the proposal to add a footnote to the list of HHS and Overlap
select agents indicating that the current ICTV nomenclature for select
agent viruses, if different from that published in the HHS regulations,
will be available on the FSAP website (https://www.selectagents.gov).
This commenter stated that the FSAP website is a good place to provide
this information. As proposed, HHS/CDC will proceed with adding a
footnote to the list for HHS and Overlap select agents for this
purpose.
I. Summary of Final Rule Provisions
In summary of the discussions in section II. of this rule, HHS/CDC
is finalizing these revisions to the Federal Select Agent Program at 42
CFR part 73:
[[Page 101947]]
Remove Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, and Brucella
suis from the select agent list.
Update the nomenclature of select agents:
[cir] Change ``SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV)'' to ``Severe acute
respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)'' to correct the
nomenclature;
[cir] Rename the exclusion of ``South American genotype of Eastern
Equine Encephalitis virus'' to ``Madariaga virus'';
[cir] Rename the exclusion of ``West African Clade of Monkeypox
virus'' to ``clade II monkeypox virus'';
[cir] Rename Ebola virus to Ebolavirus in accordance with the
recent taxonomic change by the International Committee on Taxonomy of
Viruses (ICTV);
Retain nomenclature of monkeypox virus;
Retain designation of botulinum neurotoxin producing
species of Clostridium as a Tier 1 agent;
No addition of Hantaviruses: specifically not adding Sin
Nombre virus (SNV), Andes virus (ANDV), Hantaan virus (HTNV), and
Dobrava virus (DOBV) to the select agent list;
Increase the exclusion amount for short, paralytic alpha
conotoxins from 100 mg to 200 mg;
Designate Nipah virus as a Tier 1 Select agent;
Add a footnote to the list for HHS and Overlap select
agents indicating that the current nomenclature will be available on
the FSAP website (https://www.selectagents.gov).
III. Alternatives Considered
Under 42 U.S.C. 262a(a)(2), the HHS Secretary must review and
republish the list of HHS select agents and toxins at least biennially.
This ensures scientific advancements and gained knowledge are applied
to each agent and toxin on the list.
Below are reasonable regulatory alternatives considered regarding
key individual provisions listed in this final rule.
This final rule contains several updates to outdated nomenclature
of agents, including monkeypox virus, Severe acute respiratory syndrome
coronavirus (SARS-CoV), and Ebolavirus. Retaining outdated nomenclature
is not scientifically accurate and causes confusion when organizations
seek to be in compliance with the regulations. Retaining outdated
nomenclature can also cause discrepancies between HHS/CDC and other
global health organizations. There is a low, one-time cost associated
with updating nomenclature. The alternative of finalizing the rule
without the proposed changes, i.e., retaining outdated nomenclature, is
not feasible or accurate.
Several changes in this final rule also ensure continued compliance
with E.O. 13546.
If HHS/CDC were to retain Nipah virus without a Tier 1 designation,
the select agent and toxin list would have an agent that has a great
risk of deliberate misuse with the potential for mass casualties, like
other Tier 1 select agents, but without the additional provisions
outlined for Tier 1 select agents and toxins. These additional
provisions include advanced security even compared to non-Tier 1
agents, laboratory personnel enrollment in an entity-specific
Occupational Health Program, and that entity-specific risk assessments
include Nipah virus as a Tier 1 agent. Not having Nipah virus
designated as Tier 1 select agent could potentially result in entities
or personnel handling the agent incorrectly, causing public health,
biosafety, and biosecurity concerns. It also would not enable FSAP to
ensure and require compliance with the enhanced Tier 1 biosafety and
biosecurity requirements provided for in the regulations.
All entities currently registered with FSAP for Nipah virus are
also registered for other Tier 1 select agents and toxins. Therefore,
these entities have Tier 1 provisions in place already that can be
applied to Nipah virus. If HHS/CDC were to retain Nipah virus as a
select agent without Tier 1 designation, the department and agency
would be out of compliance with E.O. 13546. It could also potentially
cause public health and biosecurity concerns in that the agent is not
handled appropriately. Nipah virus has high human transmissibility; a
high case fatality rate (estimated between 40-100%); a low infectious
dose; high severity of illness; and severe long-term effects.
Along similar reasoning, new models from DHS illustrate the lethal
doses of conotoxins are comparable to other regulated toxins with a
much higher permissible amount. The alternative to not raising the
permissible toxin limit for short, paralytic alpha conotoxins would
lead to irregularities of regulatory application as it pertains to
select toxins. Keeping the permissible toxin limit at 100 mg for short,
paralytic alpha conotoxins could prevent research and advancement of
understanding the select toxin, with no advancement on biosafety and
biosecurity. The raised permissible toxin limit of 200 mg will allow
more research to occur with the select toxin with no effect on public
health and safety. It is important that HHS/CDC considers new data
while reviewing the select agent and toxin list to ensure the list is
in accordance with criteria and considerations as articulated in 42
U.S.C. 262a.
Similarly, the final rule does not include adding Hantaviruses
(i.e., Sin Nombre virus (SNV), Andes virus (ANDV), Hantaan virus
(HTNV), and Dobrava virus (DOBV)) to the list as was initially proposed
in the ANPRM. Adding Hantaviruses to the list would lead to the agency
regulating agents that are not proven to pose a severe threat to public
health and safety. Hantaviruses have limited direct person-to-person
transmission and are difficult to propagate in a laboratory setting. At
this time, research shows it is not certain that Hantaviruses require
any regulation in accordance with the criteria and considerations as
articulated in 42 U.S.C. 262a. If FSAP were to begin regulating
Hantaviruses, there would be costs associated with onboarding,
inspecting, and managing those entities that would be required to
register with FSAP, with no current need to regulate the agents.
The most significant impact of this rule is the delisting of
Brucella species, and HHS/CDC has carefully considered the alternative
of delisting the agents, which would be retaining the agents on the
list and continuing regulating these agents.
Retaining the Brucella species on the list has several economic,
agricultural, and economic effects with little biosecurity benefit.
Most notably, retaining Brucella species on the list prevents
researchers from progressing advancement of science with regards to
study of the agents and development of countermeasures for this agent
by subjecting these laboratories to FSAP's regulatory authority. These
agents are designated as Risk Group 3 agents, meaning entities and
organizations will continue working with these agents at the
appropriate biosafety level (Biosafety Level 3), as outlined in the
national standard Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical
Laboratories, 6th edition.
Continuing regulation of Brucella melitensis, suis, and abortus has
a one-time cost of approximately $29k to an entity that wishes to
register with FSAP for work with these agents. This cost to the
regulated community, due to the reasons listed above, does not enhance
biosafety and biosecurity, and may be a regulatory burden to entities
that wish to advance understanding of the agent and research medical
countermeasures.
There is no alternative to foregoing review of the select agent and
toxin list.
[[Page 101948]]
This rulemaking is intended to meet the regulatory mandate under 42
U.S.C. 262a(a)(2) where the HHS Secretary must review and republish the
list of HHS select agents and toxins at least biennially. CDC conducts
the biennial review in consultation with CDC's Intragovernmental Select
Agents and Toxins Technical Advisory Committee (ISATTAC). An
alternative to the rule was to not delist three select agents, not
raise the exclusion amount of a regulated toxin, not update
nomenclature, and not add the Tier 1 designation to a select agent.
Retaining the Brucella species would maintain the current status quo;
it does not consider that these agents no longer pose a severe threat
to public health and safety, does not promote better research and
vaccine development, and does not align with USDA's decision to delist
the Brucella agents. Additionally, the alternative to not amend the
select agent list is inconsistent with USDA's rule, creating regulatory
conflict. In addition, this option is not consistent with the public
comment received to support amending the select agent list.
After carefully considering the technical input of subject-matter
experts, both within the Federal Government and from public comments,
and recommendations from Federal advisory groups, HHS/CDC is finalizing
the changes listed in section II, part I (Summary of Final Rule
Provisions) above to the list of select agents and toxins.
IV. Required Regulatory Analyses
The HHS/CDC modifications to the list of select agents and toxins
addressed in this rule will benefit producers, research and reference
laboratories, and state and Federal oversight agencies, while also
maintaining adequate program oversight of select agents and toxins.
Specifically, HHS/CDC is removing Brucella abortus, Brucella
melitensis, and Brucella suis from the select agent and toxin list;
updating the nomenclature for several select agents (``SARS coronavirus
(SARS-CoV),'' removing the exclusion regarding ``South American
genotype of Eastern Equine Encephalitis virus,'' renaming the exclusion
regarding ``West African Clade of Monkeypox virus,'' and ``Ebola
virus''); retaining the nomenclature of Monkeypox virus; retain the
Tier 1 designation of Botulinum neurotoxin producing species of
Clostridium; no addition of Hantaviruses to the current select agent
and toxin list; increase the exclusion amount for short, paralytic
alpha conotoxins from 100 mg to 200 mg; and designating Nipah virus as
a Tier 1 Select Agent. HHS/CDC is also adding a footnote to the list
for HHS and Overlap select agents indicating that the current
nomenclature will be available on the website (www.selectagents.gov).
Currently, 236 entities are registered with the Federal Select
Agent Program (FSAP). Of these entities, there are 13 private entities,
30 Federal entities, 42 commercial entities, 84 academic entities, and
67 state entities (registered with either APHIS or CDC, depending on
the select agents and toxins they work with). Less than 4 percent of
all firms operating within these North American Industry Classification
categories are considered to be small entities. This final rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
The benefits of strengthened safeguards against the unintentional
or deliberate release of a select agent or toxin greatly exceed the
costs of complying with the regulatory requirements. As an example of
losses that can occur due to a select agent release, the October 2001
anthrax attacks caused 5 fatalities and 17 illnesses, disrupted
business and government activities (including $2 billion in lost
revenues for the U.S. Postal Service) and required more than $23
million to decontaminate one Senate office building and $3 billion to
decontaminate postal facilities and procure mail-sanitizing equipment.
Deliberate introduction greatly increases the probability of a select
agent becoming established and causing wide-ranging and devastating
impacts to the economy, other disruptions to society, and diminished
confidence in public and private institutions.
HHS has examined the impacts of this rule as required by Executive
Order 12866 on Regulatory Planning and Review (September 30, 1993),
Executive Order 13563 on Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
(January 18, 2011), Executive Order 14094, entitled ``Modernizing
Regulatory Review'' (April 6, 2023), the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA) (September 19, 1980, Pub. L. 96-354), section 1102(b) of the
Social Security Act, section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 (March 22, 1995; Pub. L. 104-4), and Executive Order 13132 on
Federalism (August 4, 1999). This final rule does not meet the criteria
set forth in 5 U.S.C. 804(2) under the Congressional Review Act.
A. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess all
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 14094 (the Modernizing E.O.) amends section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review). The amended section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866 defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as
an action that is likely to result in a rule: (1) having an annual
effect on the economy of $200 million or more in any 1 year (adjusted
every 3 years by the Administrator of Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) for changes in gross domestic product), or
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, territorial, or Tribal governments
or communities; (2) creating a serious inconsistency or otherwise
interfering with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3)
materially altering the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants, user
fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or (4) raise legal or policy issues for which centralized
review would meaningfully further the President's priorities or the
principles set forth in this Executive order, as specifically
authorized in a timely manner by the Administrator of OIRA in each
case. OIRA has determined that this rule is significant.
Statement of Need
As discussed above, HHS/CDC is removing Brucella abortus, Brucella
melitensis, and Brucella suis from the select agent list; updating the
nomenclature for several select agents (``SARS coronavirus (SARS-
CoV),'' the exclusion regarding ``South American genotype of Eastern
Equine Encephalitis virus,'' the exclusion regarding ``West African
Clade of Monkeypox virus,'' and ``Ebola virus''); retaining the
nomenclature of Monkeypox virus; retaining the Tier 1 designation of
Botulinum neurotoxin producing species of Clostridium; not adding
Hantaviruses to the current select agent list; increasing the exclusion
amount for short, paralytic alpha conotoxins from 100 mg to 200 mg; and
designating Nipah virus as a Tier 1 Select Agent. HHS/CDC is also
adding a footnote to the list for HHS and Overlap select agents
indicating that the current nomenclature will be available on the
website (www.selectagents.gov).
Some of the regulatory changes described in the preamble and
reported below are a minor in nature, and as
[[Page 101949]]
such, are expected to have minimal impact on the costs and benefits of
current regulations, except for the one-time costs of updating official
documents for CDC. These regulatory changes are the updates to the
nomenclature for several select agents (``SARS coronavirus [SARS-
CoV],'' the exclusion regarding ``South American genotype of Eastern
Equine Encephalitis virus,'' the exclusion regarding ``West African
Clade of Monkeypox virus.'' and ``Ebola virus); retaining the
nomenclature of Monkeypox virus, retaining the Tier 1 designation of
Botulinum neurotoxin producing species of Clostridium; no addition of
Hantaviruses to the current select agent list; increasing the exclusion
amount for short, paralytic alpha conotoxins from 100 mg to 200 mg; and
designating Nipah virus as a Tier 1 Select Agent.
This final rule changes the regulatory baseline by removing
Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis from the
select agent list. As of July 2024, of the 236 registered entities with
FSAP, 112 were registered for select agents and toxins including
Brucella abortus, melitensis, and/or suis, and three of those entities
were registered for only Brucella species. CDC expects the three
entities registered for only Brucella species will deregister from
FSAP, which HHS/CDC expects will cause minimal savings for these
laboratories, as well as CDC. The remaining 109 entities will likely
submit amendments to their registrations to remove the delisted agents
while maintaining the rest of their registration. Therefore, HHS/CDC
expects no change in the costs for these entities; there is no cost to
deregister with FSAP. Because of the small number of entities that will
deregister due to the delisting of Brucella species, the cost-savings
to the government will be minimal, roughly a net value (benefits-costs)
of $8,795.78 in one-time cost savings.
Costs
This final rule does not impose any mandatory costs on the public
and benefits laboratories who choose to develop research using Brucella
abortus, Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis. Nonetheless, the
changes in this rule will have a minimal economic impact on CDC due to
the process of updating official documentation for the implementation
of the changes listed in this final rule.
To estimate the cost to CDC of including the changes listed in this
final rule in official documents, HHS/CDC assumed that 1 GS-14, step 5
employee and one GS-15, step 5 employee each spend 40 hours (i.e., 80
hours in total) for any updates to cite the language in this final
rule. The hourly wage rates for two employees based in Washington-
Baltimore-Arlington, DC-MD-VA-WV-PA are $75.70 (GS-14) and $89.03 (GS-
15).\1\ To account for the non-wage benefits, we multiplied the wage
cost by two to result in a total cost estimate of $13,178 (table 1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ U.S. Office of Personnel and Management. https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/2024/general-schedule-gs-salary-calculator/ accessed on September 4,
2024.
Table 1--Summary of the One-Time Costs in 2024 USD To Update Official Documents for Department of State (DOS),
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Costs From Updating Official Documents With the Changes in This
Final Rule
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Multiplier non-
Agency Cost components Hourly wage wage benefits Total
rate \2\ and overhead
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CDC................................ 80 hours split between GS- $82.4 2 $13,178
14, step 5, and GS-15,
step 5 levels.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.......................... ........................... .............. .............. 13,178
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The changes in this final rule that are minor in nature and should
not result in an additional regulatory burden to regulated entities.
Instead, they should help reduce costs by reducing confusion regarding
the requirements for the possession, use, and transfer of biological
select agents and toxins.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ U S Office of Personnel Management: General Schedule
(opm.gov).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The elimination of Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, and
Brucella suis from the select agents and toxins list should not result
in additional regulatory burden for CDC or regulated entities as this
change would imply less regulatory burden. However, one concern about
this reduction in regulatory burden is that it could cause costs or
losses to the general public by increasing the risk of Brucella
abortus, Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis being accessed without
authorization, stolen, lost, or released. Although this cost cannot be
measured until after the regulation has been applied, HHS/CDC expects
that the risk of Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, and Brucella
suis being accessed without authorization, stolen, lost, or released
would be minimal as the current recommended best practices in place to
mitigate these biosafety and biosecurity risks (Biosafety in
Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories) will remain in place.
USDA's prevention and eradication efforts against Brucellosis from
livestock in the United States through the National Bovine Brucellosis
Surveillance Plan and the National Brucellosis Eradication program will
continue even with the changes in this rule.
Another concern linked to the reduction in regulatory burden to
agencies and laboratories is that it could increase cost to the general
public by increasing the risk of Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis,
and Brucella suis becoming an agent of interest to be used as a
bioweapon. Although this risk cannot be measured by HHS/CDC currently,
HHS/CDC expects this risk to be minimal as recent literature indicates
that Brucella's ``minimal mortality, availability of treatment options,
protracted inoculation period and the emergence of new, more virulent
potential weapons means that its inclusion among agents of bioterrorism
is nowadays mainly of historical significance.'' \3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Pappas, G., Panagopoulou, P., Christou, L., & Akritidis, N.
(2006). Biological weapons: Brucella as a biological weapon.
Cellular and molecular life sciences CMLS, 63, 2229-2236.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Increasing the exclusion limits for short paralytic alpha
conotoxins will have a negligible impact on costs for regulated
entities. There are only four registered entities currently working
with these conotoxins, and increasing
[[Page 101950]]
the exclusion limit will allow for additional research and testing
without the additional burden of select agent and toxin regulatory
requirements.
Change to the designation of Nipah virus as a Tier 1 select agent
will have a negligible impact on costs for regulated entities. All
eight of the entities that are currently registered for Nipah virus are
already registered for other Tier 1 select agents; therefore they are
already complying with the additional Tier 1 requirements and will not
incur additional costs with this change.
Benefits
HHS found the benefits of this rulemaking to outweigh the costs to
regulated entities as all the changes described in this final rule have
a zero cost to regulated entities. Furthermore, these changes are
likely to reduce regulated entities' costs by simplifying their
processes and reducing some of the regulatory burden. HHS/CDC is unable
to quantify the cost reductions to regulated entities due to the minor
changes but expects this final rule will potentially simplify processes
for them. Nonetheless, at a minimum, costs of these changes are zero
for regulated entities, thus any simplification of processes coming out
of this change implies a gain.
As of July 2024, of the 236 registered entities with APHIS and CDC,
112 were registered for select agents and toxins including Brucella
abortus, melitensis, and/or suis, and three of those entities are
registered for only Brucella species. CDC expects the three entities
registered for only Brucella species will deregister from FSAP, which
HHS/CDC expects to cause small savings for these entities. Although
FSAP registration does not have a direct cost for regulated entities,
HHS/CDC estimates that it takes 12 hours of labor a week for eight
months to perform the registration processes required to get an FSAP
registration. These activities are usually performed by a Responsible
Official/Biosafety Officer or an Alternate Responsible Official/
Biosafety Officer. The GS scale for these professionals typically
ranges from GS-9 to GS-14. Assuming a GS-14 scale, the hourly wage rate
based in Washington-Baltimore-Arlington, DC-MD-VA-WV-PA is $75.70.
Thus, the estimated one-time cost of registration with FSAP for an
entity is $29,069. This estimated one-time cost savings will apply to
any entities not registered with FSAP that wish to work with Brucella
species. Renewal of registration with FSAP is a negligible cost as the
process takes less than 10 minutes. Because three entities are
currently registered solely for Brucella species, the exclusion of
Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis from the
select agent list means they will not need to participate in the
registration renewal process, which is a negligible cost.
HHS/CDC expects that the deregistration of the three entities
registered only for Brucella species with FSAP will also cause small
one-time cost-savings to CDC, as CDC personnel will no longer follow
these entities throughout the registration process. HHS/CDC estimates
that CDC personnel spend about three hours a week for six months
reviewing laboratories' Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for
entity's registration applications to FSAP. Assuming that the CDC staff
reviewing SOPs is GS-13 step 5, the hourly salary in 2024 dollars would
be $64.06, thus the one-time cost savings to CDC of reviewing the SOPs
required for one entity's registration is $1,153.08, and this implies a
total of $3,459.24 in cost savings for CDC of not going through the
registration process of the three entities that would deregister after
the publication of this rule.
In addition to these cost savings CDC will also have cost savings
from not having to perform inspections on the three entities that are
ending their FSAP registrations as a result of the exclusion of
Brucella abortus, Brucella melitensis, and Brucella suis from the
select agent list. Assuming that the personnel performing the
inspections are a GS-12 step 5, and a GS-13 step 5 inspectors, the
hourly wage is $53.87, and $64.06, respectively. Using an overhead
multiplier of 2 to take into account non-wage benefits, and considering
the travel costs of inspections, HHS/CDC estimates one-time costs
savings of $10,564.18 per inspection not performed per entity (table
2). Since each entity goes through at least one inspection during
registration, HHS/CDC estimates CDC will have a cost savings of at
least $31,692.54 due to inspections not performed for the three
entities deregistering from FSAP.
Table 2--Estimated Annual CDC Cost-Savings in 2024 USD for Inspection of Each Facility Only Working With Brucella
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of inspections Number of hours spent Average hourly Overhead One-time
Type of CDC staff Number of staff per year per inspection wage rate \4\ multiplier annual benefit
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GS-12 (step 5)..................... 1.................... 0.5.................. 40................... $53.87 2 $4,309.6
GS-13 (step 5)..................... 1.................... 0.5.................. 40................... 64.06 2 5,124.8
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.......................... ..................... ..................... ..................... .............. .............. 9,438.4
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Travel costs....................... Airfare \5\.......... 417.79/per person.... Hotel, food, lodging 145.10/per person 1125.78
\6\.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total (Personnel + Travel)..... ..................... ..................... ..................... .............. .............. 10,564.18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Executive Order 14094 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 and
E.O. 13563 and states that regulatory analysis should facilitate agency
efforts to develop regulations that serve the public interest, advance
statutory objectives, and are consistent with E.O. 12866, E.O. 13563,
and the Presidential Memorandum of January 20, 2021 (Modernizing
Regulatory Review). Regulatory analysis, as practicable and
appropriate, should recognize distributive impacts and equity, to the
extent permitted by law. HHS/CDC developed this final rule in a manner
consistent with these requirements. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that
regulations must be based on the best available science and that the
rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open
[[Page 101951]]
exchange of ideas. HHS/CDC developed this final rule in a manner
consistent with these requirements. In administering FSAP, HHS, along
with USDA, regularly interact with the affected registered entities via
email, phone, online webinars, through the eFSAP information system,
and through designated points of contact at registered entities. All
changes result from entity questions received or interaction with
registered entities who have contacted FSAP when they had questions or
regulatory interpretation requests. Therefore, HHS/CDC believes this
final rule serves the public interest. Additionally, HHS/CDC encouraged
public participation and informed registered entities of the proposed
rule via a Select Agent (SA) Gram and a GovD message to ensure they
were aware and had a chance to provide public comments. The FSAP
website (www.selectagents.gov) was updated to share the proposed
changes and provided a link to web visitors so that they could review
and provide comments on the proposed rule. Lastly, HHS/CDC emailed
outreach notes summarizing the proposed rule directly to national
partner organizations (e.g., the Association of Public Health
Laboratories, American Society for Microbiology, American Biological
Safety Association) so that they could share among their constituents.
As discussed above, HHS/CDC carefully reviewed and considered public
comments in the development of this final rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ U.S. Office of Personnel Management: General Schedule
(opm.gov).
\5\ Bureau of Transportation Statistics: Air Fares
Bureau of Transportation Statistics (bts.gov).
\6\ FY 2024 Federal Per Diem Rates: FY 2024 Federal Per Diem
Rates (federalpay.org).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), as Amended by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (SBREFA)
HHS/CDC examined the impacts of this final rule under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612). Unless HHS/CDC certifies
that the final rule is not expected to have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities, the RFA, as amended
by SBREFA, requires agencies to analyze regulatory options that would
minimize any significant economic impact of a rule on small entities.
Currently, 236 entities are registered with FSAP. Of these entities,
there are 13 private entities, 30 Federal entities, 42 commercial
entities, 84 academic entities, and 67 state entities (registered with
either APHIS or CDC, depending on the select agents and toxins they
work with). Less than 4 percent of all firms operating within these
North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) categories are
considered to be small entities. HHS/CDC estimates that 13 entities
will be impacted by the changes in this rule. Of these 13 entities,
which are not considered small, 4 are associated with colleges,
universities, and professional schools; 2 are categorized as research
and development in biotechnology; and 7 are part of research and
development in the physical, engineering, and life sciences. Applying
NAICS' estimation of less than 4 percent of entities classified as
small, we find that not even one small entity will be affected by the
changes in this rule. Based on our analysis as described above, we
certify that this final rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of
the RFA. In addition, no public comments were received from any small
entities on the RFA section.
Based on the information above, this regulatory action is not a
major rule as defined by sec. 804 of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996. This final rule will not result in an
annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase
in cost or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of
U.S.-based companies to compete with foreign-based companies in
domestic and export markets.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), HHS/CDC determined that the Paperwork
Reduction Act does apply to information collection and recordkeeping
requirements included in this rule. This final rule focuses on the
select agent and toxins list. Any changes to burden hours caused by the
removal of Brucella abortus, Brucella suis, and Brucella melitensis
from the list of select agents and toxins will be submitted for
consideration by OMB under the existing approved PRA package
(Possession, Use, and Transfer of Select Agents and Toxins (42 CFR part
73)). Other changes put forth in this final rule, i.e., updating entity
registrations to reflect the nomenclature updates to the list, will be
instituted by FSAP, resulting in no additional paperwork for the
regulated community.
D. E.O. 12988: Civil Justice Reform
This rule has been reviewed under E.O. 12988, Civil Justice Reform.
Once the final rule is in effect, HHS/CDC notes that (1) All state and
local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with this rule will be
preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to this rule; and
(3) administrative proceedings will not be required before parties may
file suit in court challenging this rule.
E. E.O. 13132: Federalism
HHS/CDC reviewed this final rule in accordance with Executive Order
13132 regarding federalism and determined that it does not have
federalism implications. The rule does not ``have substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
In accordance with section 361(e) of the PHSA [42 U.S.C. 264(e)],
nothing in this rule would supersede any provisions of state or local
law except to the extent that such a provision conflicts with this
rule.
F. Plain Language Act of 2010
Under the Plain Language Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-274, October 13,
2010), executive departments and agencies are required to use plain
language in documents that explain to the public how to comply with a
requirement the Federal Government administers or enforces. HHS/CDC has
attempted to use plain language in issuing this rule consistent with
the Federal Plain Writing Act guidelines.
V. References
Government Accountability Office. 2023. Public Health Preparedness:
HHS Could Improve Oversight of Research Involving Enhanced Potential
Pandemic Pathogens (GAO-23-105455). https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-105455
Lo, M., et al. The Emergence of Nipah virus, a Highly Pathogenic
Paramyxovirus. J Clin Virol, 2008. 43(4): p. 396-400.
Olsen, S., et al. Biosafety Concerns Related to Brucella and its
Potential Use as a Bioweapon. Applied Biosafety, 2018. 23(2): p. 77-
90. Biosafety Concerns Related to Brucella and Its Potential Use as
a Bioweapon [verbar] Applied Biosafety (liebertpub.com).
Sejvar, J., et al. Long-term Neurological and Functional Outcome in
Nipah virus Infection. Ann Neurol. 2007 Sep;62(3): p. 235-42.
Ulaeto, D., et al. New Nomenclature for mpox (monkeypox) and
Monkeypox Virus Clades. The Lancet: Infectious Diseases, 2023.
23(3): pg 273-275. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(23)00055-5/fulltext.
List of Subjects in 42 CFR Part 73
Biologics, Packaging and containers, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, HHS amends 42 CFR part
73 as follows:
[[Page 101952]]
PART 73--SELECT AGENTS AND TOXINS
0
1. The authority citation for part 73 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 262a.
0
2. Section 73.3 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (b);
0
b. In paragraph (d)(7), removing the text ``100 mg of Conotoxins'' and
adding in its place the text ``200 mg of Conotoxins''; and
0
c. Revising paragraph (d)(12).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 73.3 HHS select agents and toxins.
* * * * *
(b) HHS select agents and toxins \1\ are:
(1) Abrin.
(2) Bacillus cereus Biovar anthracis.*
(3) Botulinum neurotoxins.*
(4) Botulinum neurotoxin producing species of Clostridium.*
(5) Conotoxins (Short, paralytic alpha conotoxins containing the
following amino acid sequence
X1CCX2PACGX3X4X5X
6CX7).\2\
(6) Coxiella burnetii.
(7) Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus.
(8) Diacetoxyscirpenol.
(9) Eastern equine encephalitis virus.
(10) Ebolavirus *
(11) Francisella tularensis.*
(12) Lassa fever virus.
(13) Lujo virus.
(14) Marburg virus.*
(15) Monkeypox virus.
(16) Reconstructed replication competent forms of the 1918 pandemic
influenza A virus containing any portion of the coding regions of all
eight gene segments (Reconstructed 1918 influenza A virus).
(17) Ricin.
(18) Rickettsia prowazekii.
(19) Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV).
(20) SARS-CoV/SARS-CoV-2 chimeric viruses resulting from any
deliberate manipulation of SARS-CoV-2 to incorporate nucleic acids
coding for SARS-CoV virulence factors.
(21) Saxitoxin.
(22) South American hemorrhagic fever virus: Chapare.
(23) South American hemorrhagic fever virus: Guanarito.
(24) South American hemorrhagic fever virus: Junin.
(25) South American hemorrhagic fever virus: Machupo.
(26) South American hemorrhagic fever virus: Sabia.
(27) Staphylococcal enterotoxins (subtypes A,B,C,D,E).
(28) T-2 toxin.
(29) Tetrodotoxin.
(30) Tick-borne encephalitis virus: Far Eastern subtype.
(31) Tick-borne encephalitis virus: Siberian subtype.
(32) Kyasanur Forest disease virus.
(33) Omsk haemorrhagic fever virus.
(34) Variola major virus (Smallpox virus).*
(35) Variola minor virus (Alastrim).*
(36) Yersinia pestis.*
\1\ Please refer to https://www.selectagents.gov for current
information on historical or proposed nomenclature for the HHS select
agents on the list.
\2\ C = Cysteine residues are all present as disulfides, with the
1st and 3rd Cysteine, and the 2nd and 4th Cysteine forming specific
disulfide bridges; The consensus sequence includes known toxins a-MI
and a-GI (shown above) as well as a-GIA, Ac1.1a, a-CnIA, a-CnIB; X1 =
any amino acid(s) or Des-X; X2 = Asparagine or Histidine; P = Proline;
A = Alanine; G = Glycine; X3 = Arginine or Lysine; X4 = Asparagine,
Histidine, Lysine, Arginine, Tyrosine, Phenylalanine or Tryptophan; X5
= Tyrosine, Phenylalanine, or Tryptophan; X6 = Serine, Threonine,
Glutamate, Aspartate, Glutamine, or Asparagine; X7 = Any amino acid(s)
or Des X and; ``Des X'' = ``an amino acid does not have to be present
at this position.'' For example, if a peptide sequence were XCCHPA then
the related peptide CCHPA would be designated as Des-X.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(12) Madariaga virus and any Clade II Monkeypox provided that the
individual or entity can identify that the agent is within the
exclusion category.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 73.4 is amended by revising paragraph (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 73.4 Overlap select agents and toxins.
* * * * *
(b) Overlap select agents and toxins \1\ are:
(1) Bacillus anthracis.*
(2) Bacillus anthracis Pasteur strain.
(3) Burkholderia mallei.*
(4) Burkholderia pseudomallei.*
(5) Hendra virus.
(6) Nipah virus.*
(7) Rift Valley fever virus.
(8) Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus.
\1\ Please refer to https://www.selectagents.gov for current
information on historical or proposed nomenclature for the Overlap
select agents on the list.
* * * * *
Dated: December 11, 2024.
Xavier Becerra,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2024-29583 Filed 12-16-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P