Establish Anchorage Ground; Rice Island Anchorage, Columbia River, Oregon and Washington, 101469-101471 [2024-29536]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[USCG–2023–0485]
RIN 1625–AA01
Establish Anchorage Ground; Rice
Island Anchorage, Columbia River,
Oregon and Washington
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing an anchorage ground near
Rice Island, Oregon on the Lower
Columbia River. The purpose of this
rule is to improve navigation safety by
establishing an area to provide for the
safe anchoring of commercial vessels in
the navigable waters of the Lower
Columbia River.
DATES: This rule is effective January 15,
2025.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2023–
0485 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
SUMMARY:
If
you have questions about this rule, call
or email Lieutenant Commander Jesse
Wallace, Waterways Management
Division, Sector Columbia River, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone 503–240–9319,
email SCRWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
In the last several years, the Columbia
River Marine Transportation System has
seen an increase in commercial traffic
and vessel size near the Lower
Columbia River, thus creating a concern
for anchorage capacity around that area.
The Columbia River Steamship
Operators Association and the Columbia
River Pilots formally requested the
Coast Guard review and evaluate the
establishment of this new anchorage
ground to address the safety and
navigation concerns with the expanding
vessel traffic in the Lower Columbia
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Dec 13, 2024
Jkt 265001
River. In response, on December 28,
2023, the Coast Guard published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
titled ‘‘Establish Anchorage Ground;
Rice Island Anchorage, Columbia River,
Oregon and Washington’’ (88 FR 89646).
There we stated why we issued the
NPRM and invited comments on our
proposed regulatory action to establish
this anchorage ground. During the
comment period that ended February
26, 2024, we received 39 comments. The
Coast Guard opened another 30-day
comment period that ended on June 7,
2024 (89 FR 38854), in which we
received an additional 3 comments. In
total, we had 90 days of comment
period and received 42 total comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
Under Title 33 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 109.05, the
Commandant of the Coast Guard has
delegated the authority to establish
anchorage grounds to Coast Guard
District Commanders. The Coast Guard
establishes anchorage grounds under
Section 7 of the Rivers and Harbors Act
of March 4, 1915, as amended (38 Stat.
1053; 46 U.S.C. 70006) and places these
regulations in Title 33 CFR part 110,
subpart B. The purpose of this rule is to
establish a Federal anchorage ground in
the Lower Columbia River to improve
safety of navigation by creating
additional anchorage grounds for the
increased vessel traffic transiting
through the Lower Columbia River. The
Coast Guard is issuing this rule under
its authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received 42 total
comments on our NPRM during the 2
comment periods. One comment asked
the Coast Guard to consider three
observations regarding the
establishment of the proposed
anchorage ground. First, the anchorage
ground depth. Second, a charted
sandwave area that intersects the
proposed anchorage ground. And third,
the boundary coordinates for the
proposed anchorage ground are stated as
latitude and longitude without a
statement of the associated horizontal
datum. Another comment made by a
self-identified member of a nonfederally recognized tribe, asked the
Coast Guard to consider all potential
impacts to the Green Sturgeon, a
threatened species of fish present in the
lower Columbia River Estuary. The
other comments wrote in support of the
proposed anchorage ground and are not
discussed here.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
101469
A. Anchorage Ground Depth
The commenter noted there is
variation in the depth of the anchorage
ground and that some vessels with deep
drafts would need to be cognizant of
areas within the anchorage shallower
than 43 feet. The commenter also asked
if there are plans to dredge the
shallower areas to a standard depth of
43 feet. The Coast Guard believes the
range of depths within the anchorage
ground will accommodate a variety of
vessel types and configurations. If it is
later determined that dredging is
required, then 33 U.S.C. 365 authorizes
the United States Army Corps of
Engineers to dredge within, and
adjacent to, Federal anchorages
established by the Coast Guard.
Environmental reviews and approvals
are required prior to dredging in the
anchorage.
B. Charted Sandwaves
The commenter indicated that a
sandwave shoal formation intersects the
anchorage ground. Sandwave shoal
formations are common throughout the
Lower Columbia River to include the
area of the anchorage ground. Presence
of sandwave shoal formations have not
historically precluded this area from
being used as an anchorage ground.
C. Horizontal Datum
The commenter asked us to explicitly
state the horizontal datum for the
anchorage ground. The NPRM included
the boundary coordinates for the
anchorage ground as latitude and
longitude without a statement of the
associated horizontal datum. In
response to this comment, we revised
the associated horizontal datum in the
regulatory text at the end of this
rulemaking. All other regulatory text
remains unchanged.
D. Green Sturgeon
One commenter asked the Coast
Guard to consider all potential impacts
to the Green Sturgeon, a threatened
species of fish present in the lower
Columbia River Estuary. While the
anchorage ground is located within the
Green Sturgeon’s critical habitat, this
rule will have no effect on the Green
Sturgeon or the critical habitat. This
rule will not disturb the Green
Sturgeon’s ability to spawn or forage for
food. Moreover, this rule will not create
an increase in vessel traffic through its
habitat or impede its migratory pathway
through the Columbia River.
E. Final Rule
This rule establishes a Federal
anchorage ground in the vicinity of Rice
Island, in the Lower Columbia River.
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
101470
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
The specific coordinates for this
anchorage ground are included in the
regulatory text at the end of this
document.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094
(Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the location and size of the
anchorage ground, as well as the vessel
traffic and anchoring data provided by
the Coast Guard Navigation Center. The
regulation will ensure approximately
1.745 square miles of anchorage grounds
are designated to provide necessary
commercial deep draft anchorages and
enhance the safety of navigation to
commercial vessels transiting to, from,
and within the Columbia River. The
expected impact to navigation created
by the establishment of this anchorage
ground is expected to be minimal
because the anchorages ground is
located outside the federal channel and
is consistent with current anchorage
habits. When not occupied, vessels will
be able to maneuver in, around, and
through the anchorages.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard received no comments
from the Small Business Administration
on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard
certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Dec 13, 2024
Jkt 265001
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to use the anchorage
ground may be small entities, for
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule would not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
All guidance set out in Executive
Order 13132 and 13175 were followed
prior to this rulemaking and there is no
objection in moving forward with this
rulemaking from a federally recognized
tribe.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969(42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves
establishing an anchorage ground, Rice
Island Anchorage, in an area
traditionally used by commercial ships
for anchoring in the Lower Columbia
River system; and increasing the safety
of navigation and anchorage capacity of
the Lower Columbia River system. It is
categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L59(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023–01–001–01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110—ANCHORAGE
REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 110
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 2071; 46 U.S.C.
70006, 70034; 33 CFR 1.05–1; Department of
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 241 / Monday, December 16, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1
Revision No. 01.3.
2. Amend § 110.228 by adding
paragraph (a)(12) to subpart B to read as
follows:
■
§ 110.228 Columbia River, Oregon and
Washington.
(a) * * *
(12) Rice Island Anchorage. All
waters in the vicinity of Rice Island,
Oregon, bound by a line connecting the
following points, which are based on
the World Geodetic System (WGS 84):
TABLE 3 TO PARAGRAPH (a)(12)
Latitude
*
*
I. Table of Abbreviations
Longitude
46°13′15.60″
46°13′37.20″
46°14′42.00″
46°14′52.80″
46°14′42.60″
46°13′47.40″
46°13′36.60″
46°13′07.20″
46°13′00.60″
COTP Captain of the Port, MarylandNational Capital Region
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
123°46′28.20″
123°45′22.20″
123°43′12.00″
123°42′12.00″
123°42′00.00″
123°43′48.60″
123°44′15.60″
123°45′58.20″
123°46′16.80″
*
*
*
Dated: December 3, 2024.
Charles E. Fosse,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander,
Thirteenth Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2024–29536 Filed 12–12–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2024–1066]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; New Years Eve Fireworks
on the Patapsco River, Baltimore, MD
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
certain waters of the Patapsco River.
This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on these navigable
waters in Baltimore, MD from potential
hazards during a fireworks display to
commemorate the New Years Eve. Entry
of vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port,
Maryland-National Capital Region or a
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 11:55
p.m. on December 31, 2024, through
12:15 a.m. January 1, 2025.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 Dec 13, 2024
Jkt 265001
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2024–
1066 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Next, in the Document
Type column, select ‘‘Supporting &
Related Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this rule, call
or email LCDR Kate Newkirk, Sector
Maryland-National Capital Region
Waterways Management Division, U.S.
Coast Guard; telephone 410–576–2570,
email Kate.m.newkirk@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
On December 4, 2024, the Baltimore
Office of Promotions notified the Coast
Guard that it will be conducting a
fireworks display from 11:55 p.m. on
December 31, 2024, through 12:15 a.m.
January 1, 2025. The fireworks are to be
launched from a fireworks barge located
in the Patapsco River, in position
39°16′36″, N 07 076°35′53″ W. Hazards
from the fireworks display include harm
from the accidental discharge of
fireworks, and being hit by dangerous
projectiles, falling hot embers, or other
debris. The Captain of the Port,
Maryland-National Capital Region
(COTP) has determined that potential
hazards associated with the fireworks to
be used in this display would be a safety
concern for anyone within 300 feet of
the fireworks barge.
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule under the authority in 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). This statutory
provision authorizes an agency to issue
a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the
agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ The Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because there
is insufficient time to provide notice
and opportunity to comment before the
date of the event.
In addition, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3),
the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less
than 30 days after publication in the
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
101471
Federal Register. Delaying the effective
date of this rule would be impracticable
and contrary to the public interest
because the rule must be in place within
30 days of the date of publication to
respond to the potential safety hazards
associated with this fireworks display.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The COTP
has determined that potential hazards
associated with the fireworks to be used
in this December 31, 2024 display will
be a safety concern for anyone within a
300-foot radius of the barge. The
purpose of this rule is to ensure safety
of vessels and of the navigable waters in
the safety zone before, during, and after
the scheduled event.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
This rule establishes a safety zone that
will be enforced from 11:55 p.m. on
December 31, 2024, through 12:15 a.m.
January 1, 2025. The safety zone will
cover all navigable waters within 300
feet of a barge in the Patapsco River
located in approximate position latitude
39°16′36″ N, longitude 076°36′53″ W, on
the Patapsco River. The duration of the
zone is intended to ensure the safety of
vessels and these navigable waters
before, during, and after the scheduled
fireworks display. No vessel or person
will be permitted to enter the safety
zone without obtaining permission from
the COTP or a designated
representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866 as amended by
Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing
Regulatory Review). Accordingly, this
rule has not been subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, duration, and timeof-day of the safety zone, which will
E:\FR\FM\16DER1.SGM
16DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 241 (Monday, December 16, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 101469-101471]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-29536]
[[Page 101469]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 110
[USCG-2023-0485]
RIN 1625-AA01
Establish Anchorage Ground; Rice Island Anchorage, Columbia
River, Oregon and Washington
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing an anchorage ground near Rice
Island, Oregon on the Lower Columbia River. The purpose of this rule is
to improve navigation safety by establishing an area to provide for the
safe anchoring of commercial vessels in the navigable waters of the
Lower Columbia River.
DATES: This rule is effective January 15, 2025.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2023-0485 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this rule,
call or email Lieutenant Commander Jesse Wallace, Waterways Management
Division, Sector Columbia River, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 503-240-
9319, email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
In the last several years, the Columbia River Marine Transportation
System has seen an increase in commercial traffic and vessel size near
the Lower Columbia River, thus creating a concern for anchorage
capacity around that area. The Columbia River Steamship Operators
Association and the Columbia River Pilots formally requested the Coast
Guard review and evaluate the establishment of this new anchorage
ground to address the safety and navigation concerns with the expanding
vessel traffic in the Lower Columbia River. In response, on December
28, 2023, the Coast Guard published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) titled ``Establish Anchorage Ground; Rice Island Anchorage,
Columbia River, Oregon and Washington'' (88 FR 89646). There we stated
why we issued the NPRM and invited comments on our proposed regulatory
action to establish this anchorage ground. During the comment period
that ended February 26, 2024, we received 39 comments. The Coast Guard
opened another 30-day comment period that ended on June 7, 2024 (89 FR
38854), in which we received an additional 3 comments. In total, we had
90 days of comment period and received 42 total comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
Under Title 33 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 109.05, the
Commandant of the Coast Guard has delegated the authority to establish
anchorage grounds to Coast Guard District Commanders. The Coast Guard
establishes anchorage grounds under Section 7 of the Rivers and Harbors
Act of March 4, 1915, as amended (38 Stat. 1053; 46 U.S.C. 70006) and
places these regulations in Title 33 CFR part 110, subpart B. The
purpose of this rule is to establish a Federal anchorage ground in the
Lower Columbia River to improve safety of navigation by creating
additional anchorage grounds for the increased vessel traffic
transiting through the Lower Columbia River. The Coast Guard is issuing
this rule under its authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
As noted above, we received 42 total comments on our NPRM during
the 2 comment periods. One comment asked the Coast Guard to consider
three observations regarding the establishment of the proposed
anchorage ground. First, the anchorage ground depth. Second, a charted
sandwave area that intersects the proposed anchorage ground. And third,
the boundary coordinates for the proposed anchorage ground are stated
as latitude and longitude without a statement of the associated
horizontal datum. Another comment made by a self-identified member of a
non-federally recognized tribe, asked the Coast Guard to consider all
potential impacts to the Green Sturgeon, a threatened species of fish
present in the lower Columbia River Estuary. The other comments wrote
in support of the proposed anchorage ground and are not discussed here.
A. Anchorage Ground Depth
The commenter noted there is variation in the depth of the
anchorage ground and that some vessels with deep drafts would need to
be cognizant of areas within the anchorage shallower than 43 feet. The
commenter also asked if there are plans to dredge the shallower areas
to a standard depth of 43 feet. The Coast Guard believes the range of
depths within the anchorage ground will accommodate a variety of vessel
types and configurations. If it is later determined that dredging is
required, then 33 U.S.C. 365 authorizes the United States Army Corps of
Engineers to dredge within, and adjacent to, Federal anchorages
established by the Coast Guard. Environmental reviews and approvals are
required prior to dredging in the anchorage.
B. Charted Sandwaves
The commenter indicated that a sandwave shoal formation intersects
the anchorage ground. Sandwave shoal formations are common throughout
the Lower Columbia River to include the area of the anchorage ground.
Presence of sandwave shoal formations have not historically precluded
this area from being used as an anchorage ground.
C. Horizontal Datum
The commenter asked us to explicitly state the horizontal datum for
the anchorage ground. The NPRM included the boundary coordinates for
the anchorage ground as latitude and longitude without a statement of
the associated horizontal datum. In response to this comment, we
revised the associated horizontal datum in the regulatory text at the
end of this rulemaking. All other regulatory text remains unchanged.
D. Green Sturgeon
One commenter asked the Coast Guard to consider all potential
impacts to the Green Sturgeon, a threatened species of fish present in
the lower Columbia River Estuary. While the anchorage ground is located
within the Green Sturgeon's critical habitat, this rule will have no
effect on the Green Sturgeon or the critical habitat. This rule will
not disturb the Green Sturgeon's ability to spawn or forage for food.
Moreover, this rule will not create an increase in vessel traffic
through its habitat or impede its migratory pathway through the
Columbia River.
E. Final Rule
This rule establishes a Federal anchorage ground in the vicinity of
Rice Island, in the Lower Columbia River.
[[Page 101470]]
The specific coordinates for this anchorage ground are included in the
regulatory text at the end of this document.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the location and
size of the anchorage ground, as well as the vessel traffic and
anchoring data provided by the Coast Guard Navigation Center. The
regulation will ensure approximately 1.745 square miles of anchorage
grounds are designated to provide necessary commercial deep draft
anchorages and enhance the safety of navigation to commercial vessels
transiting to, from, and within the Columbia River. The expected impact
to navigation created by the establishment of this anchorage ground is
expected to be minimal because the anchorages ground is located outside
the federal channel and is consistent with current anchorage habits.
When not occupied, vessels will be able to maneuver in, around, and
through the anchorages.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard received no comments from the Small Business
Administration on this rulemaking. The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to use the
anchorage ground may be small entities, for reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule would not have a significant economic impact on
any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
All guidance set out in Executive Order 13132 and 13175 were
followed prior to this rulemaking and there is no objection in moving
forward with this rulemaking from a federally recognized tribe.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one
of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have
a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves
establishing an anchorage ground, Rice Island Anchorage, in an area
traditionally used by commercial ships for anchoring in the Lower
Columbia River system; and increasing the safety of navigation and
anchorage capacity of the Lower Columbia River system. It is
categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L59(a) of
Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A
Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see
the ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 110
Anchorage grounds.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 110 as follows:
PART 110--ANCHORAGE REGULATIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 110 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 2071; 46 U.S.C. 70006, 70034; 33 CFR 1.05-
1; Department of
[[Page 101471]]
Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1 Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Amend Sec. 110.228 by adding paragraph (a)(12) to subpart B to read
as follows:
Sec. 110.228 Columbia River, Oregon and Washington.
(a) * * *
(12) Rice Island Anchorage. All waters in the vicinity of Rice
Island, Oregon, bound by a line connecting the following points, which
are based on the World Geodetic System (WGS 84):
Table 3 to Paragraph (a)(12)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Latitude Longitude
------------------------------------------------------------------------
46[deg]13'15.60'' 123[deg]46'28.20''
46[deg]13'37.20'' 123[deg]45'22.20''
46[deg]14'42.00'' 123[deg]43'12.00''
46[deg]14'52.80'' 123[deg]42'12.00''
46[deg]14'42.60'' 123[deg]42'00.00''
46[deg]13'47.40'' 123[deg]43'48.60''
46[deg]13'36.60'' 123[deg]44'15.60''
46[deg]13'07.20'' 123[deg]45'58.20''
46[deg]13'00.60'' 123[deg]46'16.80''
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Dated: December 3, 2024.
Charles E. Fosse,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, Commander, Thirteenth Coast Guard
District.
[FR Doc. 2024-29536 Filed 12-12-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P