Restrictions on Operation of AmeriCorps Seniors Programs, 100456-100458 [2024-28765]
Download as PDF
100456
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 239 / Thursday, December 12, 2024 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)—ANNUAL RENEWABLE FUEL STANDARDS
Year
Cellulosic biofuel
standard
(%)
Biomass-based
diesel standard
(%)
Advanced biofuel
standard
(%)
Renewable fuel
standard
(%)
Supplemental total
renewable fuel
standard
(%)
*
*
2024 ........................................................
*
0.51
*
2.82
*
3.79
*
12.50
*
n/a
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
12. Amend § 80.1451 by:
a. Revising paragraph (f)(1)(i)(A)
introductory text; and
■ b. Adding paragraphs (f)(1)(i)(B)(5)
and (f)(1)(i)(C).
The revision and additions read as
follows:
■
■
§ 80.1451 What are the reporting
requirements under the RFS program?
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) Except as specified in paragraphs
(f)(1)(i)(B) and (C) of this section,
obligated parties must submit annual
compliance reports by whichever of the
following dates is latest:
*
*
*
*
*
(B) * * *
(5) For the 2024 compliance year,
annual compliance reports must be
submitted by the next quarterly
reporting deadline under paragraph
(f)(2) of this section after the date the
revised 2024 cellulosic biofuel standard
becomes effective in § 80.1405(a).
(C) If EPA publishes a document in
the Federal Register that proposes to
revise a renewable fuel standard in
§ 80.1405(a), annual compliance reports
for that compliance year must be
submitted by the following date, as
applicable:
(1) If EPA publishes a document in
the Federal Register that finalizes the
proposed revision to the renewable fuel
standard in § 80.1405(a), whichever of
the following dates is latest:
(i) The next quarterly reporting
deadline under paragraph (f)(2) of this
section after the date the revised
renewable fuel standard becomes
effective in § 80.1405(a).
(ii) The applicable compliance
reporting deadline under paragraph
(f)(1)(i)(A) or (B) of this section.
(2) If EPA publishes a document in
the Federal Register that withdraws the
proposed revision to the renewable fuel
standard in § 80.1405(a), whichever of
the following dates is latest:
(i) The next quarterly reporting
deadline under paragraph (f)(2) of this
section that is 60 days after the date the
withdrawal is published.
(ii) The applicable compliance
reporting deadline under paragraph
(f)(1)(i)(A) or (B) of this section.
(3) If EPA does not publish a
document in the Federal Register that
either finalizes or withdraws the
proposed revision to the renewable fuel
standard in § 80.1405(a) within 12
months after the date the proposed rule
was published, whichever of the
following dates is latest:
(i) The next quarterly reporting
deadline under paragraph (f)(2) of this
section that is 12 months after the
proposed rule was published.
(ii) The applicable compliance
reporting deadline under paragraph
(f)(1)(i)(A) or (B) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. Amend § 80.1456 by revising
paragraph (d)(2) to read as follows:
§ 80.1456 What are the provisions for
cellulosic biofuel waiver credits?
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) The wholesale price of gasoline is
calculated by applying the weighting
factors specified in table 1 to this
paragraph (d)(2) to the Energy
Information Administration average
monthly gasoline spot price values
specified in table 1 for the twelve-month
period ending June of the year
preceding the compliance period.
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (d)(2)—WHOLESALE PRICE OF GASOLINE WEIGHTING FACTORS
Weighting factor
(%)
Gasoline spot price data source
Conventional Gasoline—New York Harbor, Regular ..................................................................................................................
Conventional Gasoline—U.S. Gulf Coast, Regular .....................................................................................................................
RBOB Regular Gasoline—Los Angeles ......................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
14. Amend § 80.1464 by revising
paragraph (d)(1) to read as follows:
compliance reporting deadline under
§ 80.1451(f)(1)(i).
*
*
*
*
*
■
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
[FR Doc. 2024–28978 Filed 12–11–24; 8:45 am]
§ 80.1464 What are the attest engagement
requirements under the RFS program?
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(1) Obligated parties. Obligated
parties must submit annual attest
engagement reports to EPA by the next
June 1 annual attest engagement
reporting deadline after the annual
18:06 Dec 11, 2024
Jkt 265001
PO 00000
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
45 CFR Parts 2550, 2551, 2552, 2553
RIN 3045–AA91
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
37.5
37.5
25.0
Restrictions on Operation of
AmeriCorps Seniors Programs
Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking; request for comments.
AGENCY:
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\12DEP1.SGM
12DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 239 / Thursday, December 12, 2024 / Proposed Rules
The Corporation for National
and Community Service (operating as
AmeriCorps) is requesting comment on
certain restrictions on the operation of
AmeriCorps Seniors programs. These
restrictions, which are contained in
AmeriCorps’ current regulations,
include a prohibition on State
Commissions operating AmeriCorps
Seniors programs, a prohibition on
AmeriCorps Seniors grantees delegating
or contracting overall management
responsibilities to another entity, a
limitation on for-profit childcare
organizations’ facilities being used as
volunteer sites, and the requirement for
AmeriCorps Seniors grantees to carry
certain types of insurance. This advance
notice of proposed rulemaking
(ANPRM) seeks public input on whether
these prohibitions and requirements
should be retained without change,
modified, or removed.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted by February 10, 2025.
ADDRESSES: You may send your
comments electronically through the
Federal Government’s one-stop
rulemaking website at
www.regulations.gov. You may also
send your comments to Elizabeth Appel,
Associate General Counsel, at eappel@
americorps.gov or by mail to
AmeriCorps (ATTN: Elizabeth Appel),
250 E Street SW, Washington, DC
20525.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robin Corindo, Deputy Director,
AmeriCorps Seniors, at rcorindo@
americorps.gov, (202) 489–5578.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AmeriCorps Seniors operates four
programs: the Senior Companion
Program (SCP), Foster Grandparent
Program (FGP), Retired and Senior
Volunteer Program (RSVP), and a Senior
Demonstration Program. This ANPRM
requests public comment on four
specific prohibitions and restrictions
applicable to these programs, as
explained below.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
1. Restriction on State Commissions
Operating AmeriCorps Seniors
Programs
State Commissions are prohibited by
regulation from directly carrying out
any national service program under title
II of the Domestic Volunteer Service Act
of 1973, as amended (DVSA), 42 U.S.C.
4950 et seq. See 45 CFR 2550.80(j).
Those programs include the four
programs operated by AmeriCorps
Seniors. A separate regulatory provision
prohibits any AmeriCorps Seniors
grantee from delegating or contracting
overall management responsibilities to
another entity. See 42 CFR 2551.22
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Dec 11, 2024
Jkt 265001
(SCP), 2552.22 (FGP), and 2553.22
(RSVP). Together, these two restrictions
effectively create a categorical ban on
State Commissions being AmeriCorps
Seniors grantees—as they can neither
directly operate nor delegate/contract
the program.
There is no statutory prohibition on
State Commissions operating
AmeriCorps Seniors programs. There is
a statutory prohibition on State
Commissions directly carrying out
programs receiving AmeriCorps State
and National (ASN) grants. See 42
U.S.C. 12638(h). In 1993, a regulatory
provision expanding on this statutory
prohibition was issued to also prohibit
Commissions from operating
AmeriCorps Seniors or VISTA
programs. See 58 FR 60978 (November
18, 1993) (providing no explanation for
expansion of the prohibition). In 2005,
AmeriCorps removed VISTA programs
from the regulatory prohibition, but
retained the prohibition for AmeriCorps
Seniors programs. See 70 FR 39562 (July
8, 2005). The reasons stated for retaining
the prohibition on State Commissions
were that the Agency did not believe
that, without the ability to delegate or
subgrant program management, most
State Commissions were in a position to
operate AmeriCorps Seniors programs
directly, and that local organizations
were in the best position to identify
local needs and operate AmeriCorps
Seniors programs. Id. at 39594. The
Agency also stated that it received no
indication that State commissions were
eager to operate AmeriCorps Seniors
programs. Id.
Since that time, it has become evident
that at least one of the justifications for
the regulatory prohibitions no longer
exists. There is some State Commission
interest in operating AmeriCorps
Seniors programs, as demonstrated by
the fact that some State Commissions
have applied to operate AmeriCorps
Seniors programs and some are
currently operating AmeriCorps Seniors
programs under a waiver of the
regulatory prohibition. However, given
the statutory prohibition on State
Commissions directly carrying out
programs that receive ASN grants, the
State Commissions generally do not
operate programs themselves; rather,
they facilitate the provision of grant
funding to other more locally based
organizations. See generally, 42 U.S.C.
12638(e) (Duties of a State Commission).
AmeriCorps therefore requests public
input on whether to retain, modify, or
remove the regulatory prohibition on
State commissions directly operating
AmeriCorps Seniors programs and the
reasoning for retaining, modifying, or
removing the regulatory prohibition.
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
100457
2. Restrictions on AmeriCorps Seniors
Grantees Delegating or Contracting
The current regulations require
AmeriCorps Seniors grantees to fulfill
all project management requirements
necessary to accomplish the purposes of
the program and prohibit them from
delegating or contracting (i.e.,
subcontracting) the overall management
responsibilities to another entity. See 45
CFR 2551.22, 2552.22, and 2553.22. The
regulations also provide flexibility to
AmeriCorps to determine what types of
management responsibilities may or
may not be contracted. Id. Removal of
the general prohibition on delegating or
subcontracting would enable small
grantees to obtain assistance from
outside experts on financial
management. Grantees sometimes lack
financial management experts in house
and would benefit by subcontracting for
recordkeeping, accounting, and other
professional financial services. Possible
benefits to this approach include freeing
up time to allow in-house staff to focus
on programmatic goals and reducing
audit and monitoring findings that
might arise from a lack of expertise in
financial management systems and
internal controls. Removing the
prohibition on grantees delegating or
contracting out management
responsibilities could also increase State
Commissions’ ability to directly carry
out AmeriCorps Seniors programs.
AmeriCorps therefore seeks public
comment on whether and why to retain,
modify, or remove the prohibition on
delegating or contracting management
duties.
3. Limitation on For-Profit Childcare or
Educational Centers Being Volunteer
Sites for Foster Grandparents
Sponsors (grantees) in the Foster
Grandparent Program are responsible for
developing and managing one or more
volunteer stations, including ensuring
that each is a public or non-profit
private organization or an eligible
proprietary health care agency. See 45
CFR 2552.23(c)(1) and 2552.12
(definition of ‘‘volunteer station’’). The
regulations allow for proprietary health
care organizations to serve as volunteer
stations. Proprietary health care
organizations have been included as a
volunteer station type since before 1983,
and in 2018, the Agency added a
definition of ‘‘proprietary health care
organization’’ as a ‘‘private, for-profit
health care organization that serves one
or more vulnerable populations.’’ See 83
FR 64636 (December 17, 2018).
AmeriCorps Seniors is considering
adding a similar allowance for
proprietary childcare organizations,
E:\FR\FM\12DEP1.SGM
12DEP1
100458
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 239 / Thursday, December 12, 2024 / Proposed Rules
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
which would be defined as private, forprofit childcare or child-education
organizations that serve one or more
vulnerable populations with a high
percentage of those populations
represented in the children and families
serviced. Sometimes there are no
nonprofit childcare organizations in or
near communities where there are
children in need of Foster Grandparent
services, but there are for-profit
childcare organizations in the
communities. Allowing childcare
organizations to serve as volunteer
stations, when there are not enough
non-profit organizations, would help
AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers, and
particularly Foster Grandparent
volunteers, provide services to more
children and provide ways for those
communities to receive the services they
need. AmeriCorps therefore seeks public
comment on whether to add for-profit
child-care organizations to the list of
organization types eligible to be a
volunteer station, whether for-profit
child-care organizations should be
eligible to be a volunteer station only
when there are no non-profit child-care
organizations in or near the
communities, and whether there is any
basis for continuing to exclude them.
4. Requirements for Insurance
Current regulations require grantees
(sponsors) to provide appropriate
coverage for AmeriCorps Seniors
volunteers, including accident
insurance, personal liability insurance,
and excess automobile liability
insurance. See 45 CFR 2551.25, 2552.25,
and 2553.25. The regulations explain
each of these types of insurance and
allow for reimbursement of costs
associated with the insurance if grantees
maintain the insurance at minimum
levels set by AmeriCorps. See 45 CFR
2551.46(b), 2552.46(b), and 2553.46(b).
These insurance requirements are
intended to help protect both volunteers
and grantees in the event of accidents or
injuries that might occur during an
AmeriCorps Seniors volunteer’s service.
However, insurance is not required by
statute and some grantees find it
challenging to secure it. AmeriCorps
therefore seeks public comment on
whether to remove the requirement for
grantees to obtain insurance but retain
insurance premiums as allowable costs
for cost reimbursement should grantees
choose to obtain the listed insurance
types.
Regulatory Analyses
This ANPRM was developed in
accordance with the principles of
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866,
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review,’’ E.O.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:06 Dec 11, 2024
Jkt 265001
13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review,’’ and E.O. 14094,
‘‘Modernizing Regulatory Review.’’
Since this action is an ANPRM, it does
not create, or propose to create, any new
requirements. Therefore, this regulatory
action is not significant under section
3(f) of E.O. 12866.
The requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) do
not apply to this action because at this
stage, it is an ANPRM and not a ‘‘rule’’
as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601. Following
review of the comments received in
response to this ANPRM, if AmeriCorps
proceeds with a notice of proposed
rulemaking regarding this matter,
AmeriCorps will conduct all relevant
analyses as required by statute or
Executive Order.
Andrea Grill,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2024–28765 Filed 12–11–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050–28–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 224
[Docket No.: 241206–0316; RTID 0648–
XR136]
Endangered and Threatened Fish and
Wildlife; Description of the Western
North Pacific Gray Whale Distinct
Population Segment
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NMFS proposes a revision to
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) to
update the description of the western
North Pacific gray whale distinct
population segment (DPS) under the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) of 1973
in light of the best available science.
The proposed revision is informed by
our recently completed 5-year review
and a DPS analysis prepared by a Status
Review Team. We do not propose to
change the ESA-listing status of western
North Pacific gray whales, which are
classified as an endangered species.
DATES: Comments and information
regarding the proposed rule must be
received by January 13, 2025.
ADDRESSES: A plain language summary
of this proposed rule is available at
https://www.regulations.gov/docket/
NOAA-NMFS-2024-0095. You may
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
submit comments, information, or data
on this document, identified by docket
number NOAA–NMFS–2024–0095, by
any of the following methods:
• Electronic Submissions: Submit all
electronic comments via the Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://
www.regulations.gov. In the Search box,
enter the above docket number for this
document. Then, click on the Search
icon. On the resulting web page, click
the ‘‘Comment’’ icon, complete the
required fields, and enter or attach your
comments.
• Mail: Submit written information to
Megan Wallen, NMFS West Coast
Region, 7600 Sand Point Way NE,
Seattle, WA 98115.
Instructions: Comments must be
submitted by one of the above methods
to ensure that the comments are
received, documented, and considered
by NMFS. Comments sent by any other
method, to any other address or
individual, or received after the end of
the comment period, may not be
considered. All comments received are
a part of the public record and will
generally be posted for public viewing
on https://www.regulations.gov without
change. All personal identifying
information (e.g., name, address, etc.)
submitted voluntarily by the sender will
be publicly accessible. Do not submit
confidential business information, or
otherwise sensitive or protected
information. NMFS will accept
anonymous comments (enter ‘‘N/A’’ in
the required fields if you wish to remain
anonymous).
The western North Pacific gray whale
DPS analysis (Weller et al. 2023) and the
5-year review of the DPS (NMFS 2023)
are both available to access on our
website at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/
document/dps-analysis-western-northpacific-gray-whales-under-esa and
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/
resource/document/western-northpacific-dps-gray-whale-5-year-review,
respectively.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Megan Wallen, Protected Resources
Division, West Coast Region, 206–473–
0812, megan.wallen@noaa.gov,
Adrienne Lohe, Endangered Species
Division, Office of Protected Resources,
301–427–8442, adrienne.lohe@
noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
NMFS and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (FWS) jointly administer the
ESA, with NMFS having jurisdiction
over most marine species, and FWS
having jurisdiction over terrestrial
E:\FR\FM\12DEP1.SGM
12DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 239 (Thursday, December 12, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 100456-100458]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28765]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE
45 CFR Parts 2550, 2551, 2552, 2553
RIN 3045-AA91
Restrictions on Operation of AmeriCorps Seniors Programs
AGENCY: Corporation for National and Community Service.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 100457]]
SUMMARY: The Corporation for National and Community Service (operating
as AmeriCorps) is requesting comment on certain restrictions on the
operation of AmeriCorps Seniors programs. These restrictions, which are
contained in AmeriCorps' current regulations, include a prohibition on
State Commissions operating AmeriCorps Seniors programs, a prohibition
on AmeriCorps Seniors grantees delegating or contracting overall
management responsibilities to another entity, a limitation on for-
profit childcare organizations' facilities being used as volunteer
sites, and the requirement for AmeriCorps Seniors grantees to carry
certain types of insurance. This advance notice of proposed rulemaking
(ANPRM) seeks public input on whether these prohibitions and
requirements should be retained without change, modified, or removed.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted by February 10, 2025.
ADDRESSES: You may send your comments electronically through the
Federal Government's one-stop rulemaking website at
www.regulations.gov. You may also send your comments to Elizabeth
Appel, Associate General Counsel, at [email protected] or by mail
to AmeriCorps (ATTN: Elizabeth Appel), 250 E Street SW, Washington, DC
20525.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robin Corindo, Deputy Director,
AmeriCorps Seniors, at [email protected], (202) 489-5578.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AmeriCorps Seniors operates four programs: the Senior Companion
Program (SCP), Foster Grandparent Program (FGP), Retired and Senior
Volunteer Program (RSVP), and a Senior Demonstration Program. This
ANPRM requests public comment on four specific prohibitions and
restrictions applicable to these programs, as explained below.
1. Restriction on State Commissions Operating AmeriCorps Seniors
Programs
State Commissions are prohibited by regulation from directly
carrying out any national service program under title II of the
Domestic Volunteer Service Act of 1973, as amended (DVSA), 42 U.S.C.
4950 et seq. See 45 CFR 2550.80(j). Those programs include the four
programs operated by AmeriCorps Seniors. A separate regulatory
provision prohibits any AmeriCorps Seniors grantee from delegating or
contracting overall management responsibilities to another entity. See
42 CFR 2551.22 (SCP), 2552.22 (FGP), and 2553.22 (RSVP). Together,
these two restrictions effectively create a categorical ban on State
Commissions being AmeriCorps Seniors grantees--as they can neither
directly operate nor delegate/contract the program.
There is no statutory prohibition on State Commissions operating
AmeriCorps Seniors programs. There is a statutory prohibition on State
Commissions directly carrying out programs receiving AmeriCorps State
and National (ASN) grants. See 42 U.S.C. 12638(h). In 1993, a
regulatory provision expanding on this statutory prohibition was issued
to also prohibit Commissions from operating AmeriCorps Seniors or VISTA
programs. See 58 FR 60978 (November 18, 1993) (providing no explanation
for expansion of the prohibition). In 2005, AmeriCorps removed VISTA
programs from the regulatory prohibition, but retained the prohibition
for AmeriCorps Seniors programs. See 70 FR 39562 (July 8, 2005). The
reasons stated for retaining the prohibition on State Commissions were
that the Agency did not believe that, without the ability to delegate
or subgrant program management, most State Commissions were in a
position to operate AmeriCorps Seniors programs directly, and that
local organizations were in the best position to identify local needs
and operate AmeriCorps Seniors programs. Id. at 39594. The Agency also
stated that it received no indication that State commissions were eager
to operate AmeriCorps Seniors programs. Id.
Since that time, it has become evident that at least one of the
justifications for the regulatory prohibitions no longer exists. There
is some State Commission interest in operating AmeriCorps Seniors
programs, as demonstrated by the fact that some State Commissions have
applied to operate AmeriCorps Seniors programs and some are currently
operating AmeriCorps Seniors programs under a waiver of the regulatory
prohibition. However, given the statutory prohibition on State
Commissions directly carrying out programs that receive ASN grants, the
State Commissions generally do not operate programs themselves; rather,
they facilitate the provision of grant funding to other more locally
based organizations. See generally, 42 U.S.C. 12638(e) (Duties of a
State Commission). AmeriCorps therefore requests public input on
whether to retain, modify, or remove the regulatory prohibition on
State commissions directly operating AmeriCorps Seniors programs and
the reasoning for retaining, modifying, or removing the regulatory
prohibition.
2. Restrictions on AmeriCorps Seniors Grantees Delegating or
Contracting
The current regulations require AmeriCorps Seniors grantees to
fulfill all project management requirements necessary to accomplish the
purposes of the program and prohibit them from delegating or
contracting (i.e., subcontracting) the overall management
responsibilities to another entity. See 45 CFR 2551.22, 2552.22, and
2553.22. The regulations also provide flexibility to AmeriCorps to
determine what types of management responsibilities may or may not be
contracted. Id. Removal of the general prohibition on delegating or
subcontracting would enable small grantees to obtain assistance from
outside experts on financial management. Grantees sometimes lack
financial management experts in house and would benefit by
subcontracting for recordkeeping, accounting, and other professional
financial services. Possible benefits to this approach include freeing
up time to allow in-house staff to focus on programmatic goals and
reducing audit and monitoring findings that might arise from a lack of
expertise in financial management systems and internal controls.
Removing the prohibition on grantees delegating or contracting out
management responsibilities could also increase State Commissions'
ability to directly carry out AmeriCorps Seniors programs. AmeriCorps
therefore seeks public comment on whether and why to retain, modify, or
remove the prohibition on delegating or contracting management duties.
3. Limitation on For-Profit Childcare or Educational Centers Being
Volunteer Sites for Foster Grandparents
Sponsors (grantees) in the Foster Grandparent Program are
responsible for developing and managing one or more volunteer stations,
including ensuring that each is a public or non-profit private
organization or an eligible proprietary health care agency. See 45 CFR
2552.23(c)(1) and 2552.12 (definition of ``volunteer station''). The
regulations allow for proprietary health care organizations to serve as
volunteer stations. Proprietary health care organizations have been
included as a volunteer station type since before 1983, and in 2018,
the Agency added a definition of ``proprietary health care
organization'' as a ``private, for-profit health care organization that
serves one or more vulnerable populations.'' See 83 FR 64636 (December
17, 2018). AmeriCorps Seniors is considering adding a similar allowance
for proprietary childcare organizations,
[[Page 100458]]
which would be defined as private, for-profit childcare or child-
education organizations that serve one or more vulnerable populations
with a high percentage of those populations represented in the children
and families serviced. Sometimes there are no nonprofit childcare
organizations in or near communities where there are children in need
of Foster Grandparent services, but there are for-profit childcare
organizations in the communities. Allowing childcare organizations to
serve as volunteer stations, when there are not enough non-profit
organizations, would help AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers, and
particularly Foster Grandparent volunteers, provide services to more
children and provide ways for those communities to receive the services
they need. AmeriCorps therefore seeks public comment on whether to add
for-profit child-care organizations to the list of organization types
eligible to be a volunteer station, whether for-profit child-care
organizations should be eligible to be a volunteer station only when
there are no non-profit child-care organizations in or near the
communities, and whether there is any basis for continuing to exclude
them.
4. Requirements for Insurance
Current regulations require grantees (sponsors) to provide
appropriate coverage for AmeriCorps Seniors volunteers, including
accident insurance, personal liability insurance, and excess automobile
liability insurance. See 45 CFR 2551.25, 2552.25, and 2553.25. The
regulations explain each of these types of insurance and allow for
reimbursement of costs associated with the insurance if grantees
maintain the insurance at minimum levels set by AmeriCorps. See 45 CFR
2551.46(b), 2552.46(b), and 2553.46(b). These insurance requirements
are intended to help protect both volunteers and grantees in the event
of accidents or injuries that might occur during an AmeriCorps Seniors
volunteer's service. However, insurance is not required by statute and
some grantees find it challenging to secure it. AmeriCorps therefore
seeks public comment on whether to remove the requirement for grantees
to obtain insurance but retain insurance premiums as allowable costs
for cost reimbursement should grantees choose to obtain the listed
insurance types.
Regulatory Analyses
This ANPRM was developed in accordance with the principles of
Executive Order (E.O.) 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' E.O.
13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review,'' and E.O. 14094,
``Modernizing Regulatory Review.'' Since this action is an ANPRM, it
does not create, or propose to create, any new requirements. Therefore,
this regulatory action is not significant under section 3(f) of E.O.
12866.
The requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.) do not apply to this action because at this stage, it is an ANPRM
and not a ``rule'' as defined in 5 U.S.C. 601. Following review of the
comments received in response to this ANPRM, if AmeriCorps proceeds
with a notice of proposed rulemaking regarding this matter, AmeriCorps
will conduct all relevant analyses as required by statute or Executive
Order.
Andrea Grill,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2024-28765 Filed 12-11-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050-28-P