Air Plan Approval; Pennsylvania; Redesignation of the Allegheny County Nonattainment Area to Attainment and Approval of the Area's Maintenance Plan for the 2010 1-Hour Primary Sulfur Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality Standard, 99790-99799 [2024-28536]
Download as PDF
99790
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Par 4. Section 1.987–9 is amended by
revising paragraphs (b)(5) and (6) to read
as follows:
■
§ 1.987–9
Recordkeeping requirements.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(5) The amount of assets and
liabilities transferred by the owner to
the section 987 QBU determined in the
functional currency of the owner and
the section 987 QBU (to the extent those
amounts are taken into account in
applying § 1.987–4 or § 1.987–5).
(6) The amount of assets and
liabilities transferred by the section 987
QBU to the owner determined in the
functional currency of the owner and
the section 987 QBU (to the extent those
amounts are taken into account in
applying § 1.987–4 or § 1.987–5).
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par 5. Section 1.987–15 is amended
by adding paragraph (e) to read as
follows:
§ 1.987–15
Applicability date.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Recurring transfer group election.
Sections 1.987–2(f),1.987–
4(d)(10)(ii)(D), and 1.987–9(b)(5) and (6)
apply to taxable years beginning after
[DATE OF PUBLICATION OF THE
FINAL RULE IN THE FEDERAL
REGISTER].
Douglas W. O’Donnell,
Deputy Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2024–28371 Filed 12–10–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2024–0417; FRL–12279–
01–R9]
Air Plan Conditional Approval;
California; Bay Area Air Quality
Management District
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Correction
In Proposed Rule document 2024–
27518 beginning on page 94633 in the
issue of Friday, November 29th, 2024,
make the following correction:
On page 94633, in the first column, in
the DATES section, in the second line,
‘‘December 30, 2025’’ should read
‘‘December 30, 2024’’.
[FR Doc. C1–2024–27518 Filed 12–10–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 0099–10–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:23 Dec 10, 2024
Jkt 265001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA–R03–OAR–2024–0316; FRL–11777–
01–R3]
Air Plan Approval; Pennsylvania;
Redesignation of the Allegheny County
Nonattainment Area to Attainment and
Approval of the Area’s Maintenance
Plan for the 2010 1-Hour Primary Sulfur
Dioxide National Ambient Air Quality
Standard
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
state implementation plan (SIP) revision
and redesignation request submitted on
November 14, 2023, by the
Pennsylvania Department of
Environmental Protection (PADEP) on
behalf of the Allegheny County Health
Department (ACHD). The SIP revision
asks the EPA to redesignate the
Allegheny County, Pennsylvania area
from nonattainment to attainment for
the 2010 1-hour primary sulfur dioxide
(SO2) national ambient air quality
standard (NAAQS). The revision also
asks the EPA to approve into the SIP
Allegheny County’s maintenance plan
for the 2010 1-hour primary SO2
standard for the Allegheny County area.
This action is being taken under the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before January 10, 2025.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R03–
OAR–2024–0316 at
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
talley.david@epa.gov. For comments
submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the
online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments
cannot be edited or removed from
Regulations.gov. For either manner of
submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
confidential business information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Philip McGuire, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air &
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1600 John
F Kennedy Boulevard, Philadelphia,
Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone
number is (215) 814–2251. Mr. McGuire
can also be reached via electronic mail
at mcguire.philip@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Nonattainment Designation
On June 22, 2010, the EPA revised the
primary SO2 NAAQS, establishing a
new 1-hour primary standard of 75 parts
per billion (ppb).1 Under the EPA’s
regulations at title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part 50, the
2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS is met at a
monitoring site when the 3-year average
of the annual 99th percentile of daily
maximum 1-hour average
concentrations is less than or equal to
75 ppb (based on the rounding
convention in 40 CFR part 50, appendix
T).2 Ambient air quality monitoring data
for the 3-year period must meet a data
completeness requirement. A year meets
data completeness requirements when
all four quarters are complete, and a
quarter is complete when at least 75
percent of the sampling days for each
quarter have complete data. A sampling
day has complete data if 75 percent of
the hourly concentration values,
including State-flagged data affected by
exceptional events which have been
approved for exclusion by the
Administrator, are reported.3
Upon promulgation of a new or
revised NAAQS, the CAA requires the
EPA to designate as nonattainment any
area that does not meet (or that
contributes to ambient air quality in a
nearby area that does not meet) the
NAAQS.4 On August 5, 2013, the EPA
designated a portion of Allegheny
County, Pennsylvania (hereafter the
‘‘Allegheny County NAA’’), as
nonattainment for the 2010 1-hour
primary SO2 NAAQS, effective October
1 75
FR 35520, June 22, 2010.
CFR 50.17.
3 40 CFR part 50, appendix T, section 3(b).
4 CAA section 107(d)(1)(A)(i).
2 40
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2024 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
4, 2013.5 The designation was based on
violating air quality monitoring data for
calendar years 2009–2011. The
Allegheny County NAA consists of 22
municipalities including: the Borough
of Braddock, Borough of Dravosburg,
Borough of East McKeesport, Borough of
East Pittsburgh, Borough of Elizabeth,
Borough of Glassport, Borough of
Jefferson Hills, Borough of Liberty,
Borough of Lincoln, Borough of North
Braddock, Borough of Pleasant Hills,
Borough of Port Vue, Borough of
Versailles, Borough of Wall, Borough of
West Elizabeth, Borough of West
Mifflin, City of Clairton, City of
Duquesne, City of McKeesport,
Elizabeth Township, Forward
Township, and North Versailles
Township.6 This action established an
attainment date five years after the
effective date for the areas designated as
nonattainment for the 2010 SO2 NAAQS
(i.e., by October 4, 2018). The
Commonwealth was also required to
submit an attainment SIP revision for
the Allegheny County NAA to the EPA
that meets the requirements of CAA
sections 110, 172(c) and 191–192 within
18 months following the October 4,
2013, effective date of designation (i.e.,
by April 6, 2015).
B. Relevant Historical SIP Actions
The EPA did not receive an
attainment SIP revision for the
Allegheny County NAA by the April 6,
2015 deadline and subsequently on
March 18, 2016, the EPA published a
finding of failure to submit indicating
that Pennsylvania did not submit the
required SO2 attainment plan.7 This
finding initiated a clock under CAA
section 179(a) for the potential
imposition of new source review
sanctions 18 months after the effective
date of the finding and the potential
imposition of highway funding
sanctions 6 months following that, in
accordance with CAA section 179(b)
and 40 CFR 52.31. Additionally, under
CAA section 110(c), the finding
triggered a requirement for the EPA to
promulgate a Federal implementation
plan (FIP) within two years of the
effective date of the finding unless, by
that time, Pennsylvania made the
necessary complete submittal, and the
EPA approved the submittal.
Pursuant to Pennsylvania’s October 3,
2017 attainment plan submittal, and the
EPA’s October 6, 2017 letter to
Pennsylvania finding the submittal
complete and noting the stopping of the
5 78
FR 47191, August 5, 2013.
list of Pennsylvania’s attainment status
designations is available at 40 CFR 81.339.
7 81 FR 14736, March 18, 2016.
6A
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Dec 10, 2024
Jkt 265001
sanctions’ deadline, these CAA section
179(b) sanctions were not imposed as
Pennsylvania did not miss the original
deadline.8 The EPA proposed approving
the SIP revision submittal on November
19, 2018,9 and issued a final approval
on April 23, 2020.10 This approval
ended the requirement for the EPA to
promulgate a FIP under CAA section
110(c). On November 14, 2023, PADEP,
on behalf of ACHD, submitted a revision
to its SIP for the inclusion of a
maintenance plan for the 2010 1-hour
primary SO2 NAAQS and requested a
concurrent redesignation of the
Allegheny County NAA to attainment
for the 2010 1-hour primary SO2
NAAQS.
C. Redesignation to Attainment Criteria
After a State has submitted a
redesignation request for a
nonattainment area, the EPA must
assess if the statutory criteria identified
in CAA section 107(d)(3)(E) have been
met to redesignate the area to
attainment. These conditions include:
(1) the EPA has determined that the
applicable NAAQS has been attained;
(2) the applicable SIP has been fully
approved by the EPA under CAA
section 110(k); (3) the EPA has
determined that the improvement in the
area’s air quality is due to permanent
and enforceable reductions in
emissions; (4) the area has a fully
approved maintenance plan, including a
contingency plan, under CAA section
175A; and (5) the State has met all
applicable requirements for the area
under CAA section 110 and part D. The
EPA has provided direction for how it
would consider if these conditions have
been met in the April 23, 2014
memorandum ‘‘Guidance for 1-Hour
SO2 Nonattainment Area SIP
Submissions’’ (2014 SO2 Guidance).11
D. Maintenance Plan Approval Criteria
CAA section 175A and additional
EPA guidance, including the September
4, 1992 memorandum ‘‘Procedures for
Processing Requests to Redesignate
Areas to Attainment’’ (Calcagni
Memo),12 identify the required elements
8 Both the 2017 attainment plan submittal and
EPA completeness letter are available in the docket
for this action and are titled Allegheny County
September 2017 Attainment Demonstration and
EPA Letter of Completeness dated October 6, 2017,
respectively.
9 83 FR 58206, November 19, 2018.
10 85 FR 22593, April 23, 2020.
11 Available in the docket for this action as 2014_
SO2_Guidance and at www.epa.gov/sites/default/
files/2016-06/documents/20140423guidance_
nonattainment_sip.pdf.
12 Available in the docket for this action as
Calcagni Memo and at www.epa.gov/sites/default/
files/2016-03/documents/calcagni_memo__
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
99791
for an approvable maintenance plan for
areas seeking redesignation from
nonattainment to attainment. Under
CAA section 175A, the plan must
demonstrate continued attainment of
the applicable NAAQS for at least 10
years after the EPA approves a
redesignation request to attainment.
Eight years after the redesignation, the
State must submit a revised
maintenance plan demonstrating that
attainment will continue to be
maintained for an additional 10 years
following the initial 10-year period. To
address the possibility of future NAAQS
violations, the maintenance plan must
contain contingency measures, as the
EPA deems necessary, to assure prompt
correction of any future 2010 1-hour
SO2 violations. The Calcagni Memo
provides further guidance on the
content of a maintenance plan,
explaining that a maintenance plan
should address five requirements: (1) an
attainment emissions inventory that
identifies the level of emissions in the
area which is sufficient to attain the
NAAQS; (2) a maintenance
demonstration that shows future
emissions of a pollutant will not exceed
the level of the attainment inventory; (3)
the continued operation of a monitoring
network that conforms to 40 CFR part
58; (4) a means for verifying the
continued attainment of the NAAQS;
and (5) a contingency plan to correct
any violation of the NAAQS in the area
following redesignation of the area.
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA
Analysis
The EPA’s evaluation of
Pennsylvania’s redesignation request
and maintenance plan is based on
consideration of the five redesignation
criteria provided under CAA section
107(d)(3)(E) and relevant guidance,
including the aforementioned 2014 SO2
Guidance and Calcagni Memo.
A. Criterion (1)—The Allegheny County
SO2 Nonattainment Area Has Attained
the 2010 1-Hour SO2 NAAQS
CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(i) requires
that the EPA determine if a
nonattainment area has attained the
applicable NAAQS in order to
redesignate the area to attainment. In
assessing if the area has attained the
NAAQS, the 2014 SO2 Guidance
stipulates that the EPA can
interdependently consider two
components to support an attainment
procedures_for_processing_requests_to_
redesignate_areas_to_attainment_090492.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
99792
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2024 / Proposed Rules
determination: air quality monitoring
data and air quality modeling data.13
The Allegheny County NAA contains
two operational SO2 monitor sites: the
Liberty site (Air Quality System (AQS)
Site ID 42–003–0064) and the North
Braddock site (AQS Site ID 42–003–
1301). The Liberty monitor is located
centrally within the Allegheny County
NAA and has been in operation since
1969, while the North Braddock monitor
is located in the northern segment of the
Allegheny County NAA and has been in
operation since 2014. Both monitors
have been in attainment of the 2010 1hour primary SO2 NAAQS since the
2019–2021 period, with Liberty
recording a design value of 63 ppb for
the 2021–2023 period and North
Braddock recording a design value of 54
ppb for the 2021–2023 period.14 Design
values for the past 10 years are reported
in Table 1 in this document. Although
both monitors are currently in
attainment of the NAAQS, prior analysis
has determined that neither of these
monitoring sites are located in the area
of maximum concentration,15 and as
such, additional air quality modeling is
generally needed to estimate SO2
concentrations within the area.
TABLE 1—2014–2023 SO2 DESIGN VALUES FOR ALLEGHENY COUNTY NONATTAINMENT AREA MONITOR SITES
[Parts per billion]
Monitor site
2012–2014
2013–2015
2014–2016
2015–2017
2016–2018
2017–2019
2018–2020
2019–2021
2020–2022
2021–2023
101
89
99
71
94
64
97
55
103
61
109
63
85
64
59
58
56
56
63
54
Liberty ....................................
North Braddock * ...................
* North Braddock design values from the 2012–2014 and 2013–2015 periods are comprised of less than three years of data as the monitor began operating in
2014.
Pennsylvania’s 2017 attainment plan
contained an attainment demonstration
which utilized allowable SO2 emission
limits from stationary sources within
the Allegheny County NAA to inform
several modeling analyses for SO2
emissions.16 These modeling analyses
were based on emissions limits for large,
stationary sources of SO2, which, if
enacted, would ensure that the
Allegheny County NAA would attain
the 2010 1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS.
The 2014 SO2 Guidance states that the
EPA may make a determination of
attainment based on this attainment
plan modeling, eliminating the need for
separate actual emissions-based
modeling to support a redesignation
request—provided that the source
characteristics are still reasonably
represented.17 The source
characteristics are still reasonably
represented 18 and from 2020–2021,
large, stationary SO2 sources 19 within
the Allegheny County NAA were
meeting their allowable emission limits
for attainment.20 As such, the 2017
attainment demonstration modeling
submitted by Pennsylvania will allow
for the EPA’s determination of
attainment. The 2014 SO2 Guidance
further states that a demonstration that
the control strategy in the SIP has been
fully implemented will also be pertinent
for making the determination of
13 See
2014 SO2 Guidance, at 62.
values are calculated by computing the
three-year average of the annual 99th percentile
daily maximum 1-hour average concentrations. An
SO2 1-hour primary standard design value is valid
if it encompasses three consecutive calendar years
of complete data. The data completeness
requirements were previously described in the
Nonattainment Designation section I.A. of this
document above.
15 See Allegheny County EPA Modeling TSD at
pp. 16–17, available in the docket for this action.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
14 Design
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Dec 10, 2024
Jkt 265001
attainment.21 Pennsylvania has
submitted information detailed in its
redesignation request and maintenance
plan to confirm that the control strategy
outlined in the SIP has been fully
implemented. The specific measures
identified in the control strategy include
upgrades to the Vacuum Carbonate Unit
equipment at the U.S. Steel (USS)
Clairton Plant, the implementation of a
tail gas recycling project at the USS
Clairton Plant, and a new stack and
combined flue system for select boilers
at the USS Edgar Thomson Plant.22
Additionally, lower permitted SO2
emission rates were implemented for
nearly all processes at the primary
stationary SO2 sources in the Allegheny
County NAA, including the USS
Clairton Plant, the USS Edgar Thomson
Plant, the USS Irvin Plant, and Harsco
Metals. These implemented, permanent
and federally enforceable control
measures have aided in reducing the
actual total emissions from large,
stationary USS SO2 sources to 2,373
tons per year (as of 2021),23 which is
below the revised total emissions limits
proposed for USS facilities in the 2017
attainment demonstration modeling
(2,669 tons per year),24 thus
contributing to bringing the Allegheny
County NAA into attainment.
In this action, the EPA proposes to
find that the air quality monitoring data
CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(ii) requires
that the EPA fully approve the
applicable implementation plan for the
area under CAA section 110(k) in order
to redesignate that area to attainment.
The EPA has fully approved the
applicable Pennsylvania SIP for the
Allegheny County NAA under section
110(k) of the CAA for all requirements
applicable for purposes of
redesignation. An area cannot be
redesignated to attainment if a required
element of the SIP is the subject of a
disapproval; a finding of failure to
submit, or failure to implement the SIP;
or a partial, conditional, or limited
approval.25 The 2017 attainment plan
SIP was initially proposed for EPA
approval on November 19, 2018 26 and
received final EPA approval on April
23, 2020.27 The approved elements from
the 2017 attainment plan include a 2011
base year emissions inventory, a control
strategy and air quality modeling
demonstration, a reasonable available
control measures/reasonably available
control technology (RACM/RACT)
16 See Allegheny County September 2017
Attainment Demonstration.
17 See 2014 SO Guidance, at 50.
2
18 See ACHD_Email_Source_Characteristics,
available in the docket for this action.
19 Large, stationary sources specifically include
US Steel Clairton, US Steel Edgar Thomson, and US
Steel Irvin, which collectively account for over 99%
of all point source SO2 emissions within the
Allegheny County NAA.
20 See Allegheny County September 2017
Attainment Demonstration, at 15, and ACHD_SO2_
RR_and_MP_App_B_Emissions_Inv, at 2, available
in the docket for this action.
21 See supra Note 17.
22 See ACHD_SO _RR_and_MP, at 15.
2
23 See ACHD_SO _RR_and_MP_App_B_
2
Emissions_Inv, at 2.
24 See Allegheny County September 2017 Attain_
Demo_App_D, at 2, available in the docket for this
action.
25 See 2014 SO Guidance, at 64.
2
26 83 FR 58206, November 19, 2018.
27 85 FR 22593, April 23, 2020.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and air quality modeling data
demonstrate that the Allegheny County
NAA has attained the 2010 1-hour
primary SO2 NAAQS.
B. Criterion (2)—Pennsylvania Has a
Fully Approved SIP Under Section
110(k)
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2024 / Proposed Rules
analysis, a reasonable further progress
(RFP) analysis, contingency measures,
and nonattainment new source review
(NNSR) regulations.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
C. Criterion (3)—The Air Quality
Improvement in the Allegheny County
SO2 Nonattainment Area Is Due to
Permanent and Enforceable Reductions
in Emissions
For redesignating a nonattainment
area to attainment, CAA section
107(d)(3)(E)(iii) requires the EPA to
determine that the air quality
improvement in the area is due to
permanent and enforceable reductions
in emissions resulting from
implementation of the SIP, applicable
Federal air pollution control
regulations, and other permanent and
enforceable reductions. The EPA
proposes to find that Pennsylvania has
demonstrated that the requirements of
CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(iii) have been
met.
Specifically, the implementation of
multiple permanent and federally
enforceable control measures at
stationary point sources of SO2
identified in the EPA-approved 2017
attainment demonstration aided in a
substantial decrease in SO2 emissions,
and consequently lower SO2
concentrations in the Allegheny County
NAA. These measures include upgrades
to the Vacuum Carbonate Unit
equipment at the USS Clairton Plant,
the implementation of a tail gas
recycling project at the USS Clairton
Plant, and a new stack and combined
flue system for select boilers at the USS
Edgar Thomson Plant. Furthermore, the
Guardian Glass Plant ceased operations
in August 2015 and its operating permit
was terminated in November 2015.28
The Calcagni Memo states that
‘‘[e]mission reductions from source
shutdowns can be considered
permanent and enforceable to the extent
that those shutdowns have been
reflected in the SIP and all applicable
permits have been modified
accordingly,’’ and therefore the
Guardian shutdown is considered
permanent and enforceable.29 Any
future operations at this location would
require a new permit and a new source
evaluation, as described in ACHD
Article XXI, sections 2102.04 and
2103.13.30 Additionally, Emissions
28 Documentation of this closure is in Guardian_
closure-App_J, available in the docket for this
action.
29 See Calcagni Memo, at 10.
30 See Allegheny_County_Article_XXI, available
in the docket for this action and at
www.alleghenycounty.us/files/assets/county/v/1/
government/health/documents/air-quality/article21-air-pollution-control.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Dec 10, 2024
Jkt 265001
Reductions Credits for SO2 were not
requested for the Guardian Glass Plant,
preventing the transfer or sale of
associated emission credits to another
entity in Pennsylvania or some
surrounding states.
Allegheny County also established
lower SO2 emissions limits for nearly all
processes at the USS facilities in the
Allegheny County NAA, including USS
Clairton, USS Edgar Thomson, and USS
Irvin, as well as the Harsco (Braddock
Recovery) facility, located on the
property of USS Edgar Thomson. These
emissions limits are embedded in the
installation permits issued by ACHD for
these facilities and are federally
enforceable as they have been approved
into Pennsylvania’s SIP, and they are
permanent because they cannot be
altered without an additional SIP
submittal.31 Details on the imposed
emissions limits were included as
copies of the installation permits in
Appendix K of the 2017 attainment plan
submittal and are available in the docket
for this action.32
Collectively, the implemented
controls and lower permitted SO2
emissions rates resulted in an actual
decrease of 835 tons of SO2 emitted per
year from 2011 to 2017. This is
approximately a 25% reduction from
2011 levels of 3,418 tons of SO2 emitted
per year.33 As this reduction comes from
EPA-approved SIP controls and permitcontrolled emission limits, the EPA
finds the air quality improvement in the
Allegheny County NAA to be due to
permanent and enforceable reductions
in emissions.
D. Criterion (4)—The Allegheny County
SO2 Nonattainment Area Has a Fully
Approved Maintenance Plan Pursuant
to Section 175A of the CAA
To redesignate a NAA to attainment,
CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(iv) requires
the EPA to determine that the area has
a fully approved maintenance plan
pursuant to section 175A of the CAA. In
conjunction with its request to
redesignate the Allegheny County NAA
to attainment for the 2010 1-hour
primary SO2 NAAQS, the State
submitted a SIP revision to provide for
the maintenance of the 2010 1-hour
primary SO2 NAAQS for at least 10
years after the effective date of
redesignation to attainment. The EPA is
proposing to find that this maintenance
plan meets the requirements for
31 85 FR 22593, April 23, 2020 and 40 CFR
52.2020(d)(3).
32 See Installation_Permits_with_emission_limitsApp_K, available in the docket for this action.
33 See ACHD_SO _RR_and_MP, at 16.
2
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
99793
approval under section 175A of the
CAA.
1. What is required in a maintenance
plan?
CAA section 175A sets forth the
elements of a maintenance plan. Under
section 175A, the plan must
demonstrate continued attainment of
the applicable NAAQS for at least 10
years after the Administrator approves a
redesignation request to attainment.
Eight years after the redesignation, the
State must submit a revised
maintenance plan demonstrating that
attainment will continue to be
maintained for an additional 10 years
following the initial 10-year period. To
address the possibility of future NAAQS
violations, the maintenance plan must
contain contingency measures as the
EPA deems necessary to assure prompt
correction of any future 2010 1-hour
primary SO2 NAAQS violations. The
Calcagni Memo provides further
guidance on the content of a
maintenance plan, explaining that a
maintenance plan should address five
requirements: the attainment emissions
inventory, maintenance demonstration,
monitoring, verification of continued
attainment, and a contingency plan.34
As is discussed more fully later in this
section, the EPA is proposing to
determine that Pennsylvania’s
maintenance plan meets the
requirements in CAA section 175A and
is thus proposing to approve it as a
revision to the Allegheny County
portion of the Pennsylvania SIP.
2. Attainment Emissions Inventory
In a maintenance plan, states are
required to submit an emissions
inventory to identify the level of
emissions in the area which is sufficient
to attain and maintain the SO2 NAAQS,
which is called the attainment
inventory. This inventory is used as the
basis for future, projected emission
inventories that are used to show the
area will remain in attainment.
Pennsylvania submitted a 2017 SO2
emissions inventory as the attainment
inventory with its maintenance plan.
The year 2017 was selected because it
was the first year in which emissions
were at levels required to demonstrate
attainment of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS,
with the exception of emissions
associated with malfunctions of the
desulfurization facility at the USS
Clairton Plant. Additionally, 2017 was a
year in which a fully reviewed National
Emission Inventory (NEI) was released.
The NEI is a comprehensive, triennial
estimate of emissions. Generally, the
34 See
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
Calcagni Memo, at pp. 8–12.
11DEP1
99794
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2024 / Proposed Rules
attainment year is selected as a year
within the attaining design value period
(i.e., 2019–2021). However, alternate
years from 2018–2022 were less ideal
than 2017 for the attainment year for a
variety of factors, including excess
emissions from sources due to
equipment breakdowns, atypical
emissions during the COVID pandemic,
and incomplete emissions compilations
for recent years. Additional details for
choosing 2017 as the attainment year are
available in the submitted redesignation
request.35
For the 2017 attainment year
inventory, Pennsylvania directly used
point and area source emissions
reported in the 2017 NEI, except for
corrections identified in Appendix B of
the submitted redesignation request.36
The point source emissions for the
Allegheny County NAA were verified
against the EPA’s emissions inventory
system (EIS) and the EPA found them to
be acceptable.37 Area source emissions
were estimated based on the relative
percentage of the Allegheny County
population residing in the Allegheny
County NAA and the resulting factor
allocated the appropriate fraction of the
County’s total emissions to the
Allegheny County NAA.
Nonroad and onroad mobile source
emissions for 2017 were obtained from
the EPA’s Motor Vehicle Emissions
Simulator (MOVES) model, specifically
the MOVES3 version. PADEP executed
the MOVES3 modeling runs for nonroad
mobile sources and utilized a contractor
to run the model for onroad mobile
source emissions.
Natural SO2 emission sources, such as
fires and biogenics, were also compiled.
Fire emissions data was pulled from the
EPA’s Fires 38 inventory, while biogenic
emissions from soils and vegetation
were predicted by the Biogenic
Emission Inventory System 39 (BEIS)
model.
Projection inventories predicted from
the attainment inventory demonstrate
that the area will continue to remain in
attainment during the maintenance
period. Pennsylvania developed 2026
and 2035 emission projections for the
interim and maintenance plan end year,
respectively. Projected emissions for
these years—as well as the base year
inventory—are available in Table 2 in
this document. Projected emissions for
point and area sources were estimated
from the 2017 base year emissions and
growth factors developed by the MidAtlantic Regional Air Management
Association, Inc., and other sources.
These growth factors are developed
based on forecasts from various
databases and tools, including the
Energy Information Administration’s
Annual Energy Outlook 2022,
Pennsylvania Industry Employment
2018–2028 Long-Term Projections,
National Inventory Collaborative 2016v1
Emissions Modeling Platform, and the
Federal Aviation Administration’s
Terminal Area Forecast. Projected
emissions were subject to the same
corrections utilized in the 2017 base
year inventory for consistency.
Furthermore, point sources with
implemented enforceable controls or
shutdowns since the 2017 base year
were excluded from the 2026 and 2035
projections. Specifically, the Koppers
Clairton tar refining facility ceased
operation in 2017 and its permit expired
in 2021. Additionally, Coke Batteries 1,
2, and 3 at the USS Clairton Plant
ceased operation in March 2023.
Conversely, projections for the 2026 and
2035 inventories included the permitted
plantwide SO2 emissions limit of 23.89
tons/year for a new major source
facility—the Invenergy Allegheny
Energy Center. However, the permit for
this facility was terminated on
November 9, 2023,40 and construction
of this facility is not expected to
proceed at this time. As such, the actual
emissions in 2026 and 2035 should be
even lower than the anticipated values
reported in the maintenance year
projections. Nonroad and onroad mobile
source emissions for the projected years
2026 and 2035 were also obtained from
the MOVES3 version. MOVES3
modeling runs were once again
executed by PADEP for nonroad mobile
source emissions and by the contractor
for onroad mobile source emissions.
Additional details on some of the
assumptions and inputs to the model
are available in the redesignation
request and its associated Appendix B.41
Fire and biogenic sources are typically
not projected for future case scenarios
and therefore emissions were held
constant from 2017 to 2026 and 2035.
TABLE 2—EMISSIONS INVENTORIES FOR THE ALLEGHENY COUNTY NONATTAINMENT AREA
[Tons per year]
2017 Actual
emissions
(base year)
Sector
2035 Projected
emissions
(maintenance year)
Point Sources ..................................................................................................
Area Sources ...................................................................................................
Nonroad Mobile Sources .................................................................................
Onroad Mobile Sources ...................................................................................
Fires .................................................................................................................
Biogenics .........................................................................................................
2,556
22
0
5
0
0
2,511
26
0
2
0
0
2,472
27
0
2
0
0
Total ..........................................................................................................
2,583
2,539
2,501
3. Maintenance Demonstration
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
2026 Projected
emissions
(interim year)
The Calcagni memo describes two
ways for a State to demonstrate
maintenance of the NAAQS for a period
of at least 10 years following the
ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP, at 19.
ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP_App_B_
Emissions_Inv, at pp. 1–2.
37 See EI_TSD_ACHD_SO _RR_and_MP, available
2
in the docket for this action.
35 See
36 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Dec 10, 2024
Jkt 265001
redesignation of the area: (1) the State
can show that future emissions of a
pollutant will not exceed the level of the
attainment inventory, or (2) the State
can model to show that the future mix
of sources and emission rates will not
cause a violation of the standard.42
Pennsylvania’s projected actual
emissions for the interim year of 2026
and for the maintenance year of 2035
38 EPA Fires: www3.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch13/
related/firerept.pdf.
39 EPA BEIS: www.epa.gov/air-emissionsmodeling/biogenic-emission-inventory-system-beis.
40 See Allegheny County Energy Center
Termination Letter, available in the docket for this
action.
41 See ACHD_SO _RR_and_MP, at 22 and ACHD_
2
SO2_RR_and_MP_App_B_Emissions_Inv.
42 See Calcagni Memo, at 9.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2024 / Proposed Rules
are both below the total attainment
inventory, which is acceptable for
showing maintenance in the Allegheny
County NAA.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
4. Monitoring Network
The 2014 SO2 Guidance indicates that
once an area has been redesignated to
attainment, the state should continue to
operate an appropriate air quality
monitoring network as provided under
40 CFR part 58 to verify the attainment
status of the area. ACHD has committed
to continued operation of its SO2
monitoring network in the Allegheny
County NAA to verify the attainment
status. Also, ACHD will continue to
submit an annual monitoring network
plan to the EPA for approval, in
accordance with 40 CFR 58.10. No
changes will be made to the existing
network unless pre-approved by the
EPA.
5. Verification of Continued Attainment
The 2014 SO2 Guidance states that
each air agency should ensure that it has
the legal authority to implement and
enforce all measures necessary to attain
and maintain the 2010 SO2 NAAQS.
The air agency’s submittal should
indicate how it will track the progress
of the maintenance plan for the area
either through air quality monitoring or
modeling.
Article XXI, section 2101.07(a) grants
the ACHD legal authority to implement
and enforce all measures necessary to
maintain the 2010 1-hour primary SO2
NAAQS. In addition, ACHD has
indicated it will track the progress of the
maintenance plan through an integrated
approach utilizing monitoring data and
emissions inventories.
As previously indicated, ACHD will
continue to operate its SO2 monitoring
network to verify the attainment status
of the Allegheny County NAA.
Monitored concentrations will serve as
the primary indicator for verifying
continued attainment and will also act
as the triggering mechanism for
contingency measures.
ACHD will also use emissions
inventories—developed annually by
ACHD for point sources and triennially
by PADEP for area and mobile sources—
and compare these inventories to the
2017 attainment inventory for assessing
continued attainment. It is anticipated
that future inventories will remain
below the levels of the attainment
inventory. However, if future
inventories exceed the attainment
inventory levels, ACHD will conduct a
study to evaluate if the increased
emissions have caused increased
monitored concentrations within the
Allegheny County NAA and, if so,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Dec 10, 2024
Jkt 265001
ACHD will determine if any additional
emission control measures should be
enacted. Emissions data will not serve
as a triggering mechanism for
contingency measures for two reasons.
Primarily, increased emissions may not
directly affect monitored
concentrations, as SO2 concentrations
can be impacted by meteorological
conditions. Additionally, emissions
inventory reporting is slower than
monitoring data reporting, and the use
of emissions data as a contingency
initiator would not provide for a prompt
response to any potential NAAQS
violations.
Under ACHD’s new source review
program, any major new sources or
modifications to existing sources that
would affect emissions must provide a
modeling demonstration that illustrates
new emissions will not cause or
contribute to a violation of the 2010 1hour primary SO2 NAAQS, as described
in ACHD Article XXI, section
2102.04(b). ACHD will not approve any
modifications that would lead to
expected violations of the 2010 1-hour
primary SO2 NAAQS in the Allegheny
County NAA.
The EPA proposes to find that these
proposed measures will provide for
verifying continued attainment within
the Allegheny County NAA.
6. Contingency Measures
Section 175A(d) of the CAA requires
that a maintenance plan include such
contingency measures as the EPA deems
necessary to assure that the State will
promptly correct a violation of the
NAAQS that occurs after redesignation.
The maintenance plan should identify
the contingency measures to be adopted,
a schedule and procedure for adoption
and implementation, and a time limit
for action by the State. A State should
also identify specific indicators to be
used to determine when the
contingency measures need to be
implemented. The maintenance plan
must also include a requirement that a
State will continue to implement all
measures with respect to control of the
pollutant that were contained in the SIP
before redesignation of the area to
attainment.
ACHD has committed to continuing
implementation of all measures
indicated in the SIP after redesignation
of the Allegheny County NAA.43
Furthermore, ACHD has identified
triggering indicators for its contingency
measures, a schedule for implementing
these potential measures, and has
43 See
PO 00000
ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP, at 27.
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
99795
specified multiple potential options to
correct any NAAQS violation.44
Fully validated and quality assured
SO2 monitoring data will serve as the
primary trigger for any responses to
prevent or correct a NAAQS violation in
the Area. ACHD has established both
warning level and action level responses
with specific triggering indicators for
each.
Warning level responses are subdivided into two tiers. A first-level
warning will occur when the 99th
percentile daily maximum 1-hour SO2
concentration exceeds 75 ppb at any
monitor site in the Allegheny County
NAA in a single calendar year. This
first-level warning will prompt an
ACHD study to determine if the trigger
indicates a trend toward increasing SO2
concentrations in the Allegheny County
NAA. If there seems to be a rising trend
in SO2 concentrations, the study will
examine if the trend is likely to
continue and if so, the needed measures
that could reverse the trend. A secondlevel warning will occur when the
average of two consecutive years of 99th
percentile daily maximum 1-hour SO2
concentrations exceeds 75 ppb at any
monitor in the Allegheny County NAA.
This second-level warning will result in
ACHD evaluating the chance of a
violation of the NAAQS and the need
for supplemental control measures to be
activated. Both first- and second-level
warnings will allow for ACHD to
consider the early adoption of measures
to permit the expeditious
implementation of these measures in the
event of a NAAQS violation. This early
adoption could allow for
implementation of the measures within
30 to 90 days following the potential
occurrence of a NAAQS violation.
An action level response will occur
when the 1-hour design value, based on
the average of three consecutive years of
99th percentile daily maximum 1-hour
SO2 concentrations, violates the 2010 1hour SO2 NAAQS at any monitor site in
the Allegheny County NAA. This
response will include the adoption and
implementation of additional control
measures as needed to promptly correct
the violation. If regulatory measures are
selected, these measures will conform to
all Federal, State, and local rules and
regulations. Both non-regulatory and
regulatory measures are expected to be
implemented within one year following
a violation of the NAAQS.45
ACHD has specified multiple
potential regulatory and non-regulatory
44 See
ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP, at 28–31.
schedules and associated procedures
for the adoption and implementation of regulatory
and non-regulatory measures are available in the
ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP document at pp. 29–30.
45 Specific
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
99796
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2024 / Proposed Rules
contingency measures for this
maintenance plan—including both areawide and USS Mon Valley Works
measures.46 Selection will be based on
several factors, including but not
limited to, the degree of the violation,
the emission reduction potential, and
cost. ACHD has identified nonregulatory, area-wide measures such as
wood burning-related programs and
alternative fuel promotions as potential
options for correcting a NAAQS
violation. Additionally, ACHD has
proposed USS Mon Valley Works
regulatory measures, including but not
limited to, additional desulfurization
controls for coke oven gas at USS
Clairton, additional fugitive controls at
USS Mon Valley Works plants, and
restrictions on fuel usage at USS Mon
Valley Works plants. All of these
measures can be individually
implemented or in conjunction with
others to ensure correction of any
NAAQS violation.
The EPA proposes to find that
ACHD’s submitted maintenance plan
meets the requirements set forth in CAA
section 175A and EPA guidance and is
proposing to approve the maintenance
plan as a revision to the Pennsylvania
SIP.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
E. Criterion (5)—Pennsylvania Has Met
All Applicable Requirements Under
Section 110 and Part D of Title I of the
CAA
In accordance with section
107(d)(3)(E)(v) of the CAA, to
redesignate the Allegheny County NAA
to attainment, Pennsylvania must meet
all requirements applicable to the
Allegheny County NAA under CAA
section 110 (general SIP requirements)
and part D of title I of the CAA (SIP
requirements for nonattainment areas).
1. Section 110 General Requirements for
SIPs
Pursuant to CAA section 110(a)(1),
whenever new or revised NAAQS are
promulgated, the CAA requires States to
submit a plan (i.e., SIP) for the
implementation, maintenance, and
enforcement of such NAAQS. Section
110(a)(2) of title I of the CAA contains
the general requirements for a SIP, also
known as ‘‘infrastructure’’ requirements.
These requirements include, but are not
limited to, the following: submittal of a
SIP that has been adopted by the state
after reasonable public notice and
hearing; provisions for establishment
and operation of appropriate procedures
needed to monitor ambient air quality;
46 USS Mon Valley Works collectively refers to
the USS Clairton, Edgar Thomson, and Irvin Plants
located within the Allegheny County NAA.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Dec 10, 2024
Jkt 265001
implementation of a source permit
program; provisions for the
implementation of part C requirements
(Prevention of Significant Deterioration
(PSD)) and provisions for the
implementation of part D requirements
(New Source Review (NSR) permit
programs); provisions for air pollution
modeling; and provisions for public and
local agency participation in planning
and emission control rule development.
Section 110(a)(2)(D) requires that SIPs
contain certain measures to prevent
sources in a state from significantly
contributing to air quality problems in
another state. To implement this
provision, the EPA has required certain
states to establish programs to address
the interstate transport of air
pollutants.47 The section 110(a)(2)(D)
requirements for a state are not linked
with a particular nonattainment area’s
designation and classification in that
state. The EPA has concluded that the
requirements linked with a particular
nonattainment area’s designation and
classifications are the relevant measures
to evaluate in reviewing a redesignation
request. The transport SIP submittal
requirements, where applicable,
continue to apply to a state regardless of
the designation of any one particular
area in the state. Thus, the EPA has
concluded that the CAA’s interstate
transport requirements should not be
construed to be applicable requirements
for purposes of redesignation.
In addition, the EPA has concluded
other section 110 elements—those that
are neither connected with
nonattainment plan submissions nor
linked with an area’s attainment
status—are not applicable requirements
for purposes of redesignation. The area
will still be subject to these
requirements after the area is
redesignated. The section 110 and part
D requirements which are linked with a
particular area’s designation and
classification are the relevant measures
to evaluate in reviewing a redesignation
request. This approach is consistent
with the EPA’s existing policy on
applicability (i.e., for redesignations) of
conformity and oxygenated fuels
requirements, as well as with section
184 ozone transport requirements. See
Reading, Pennsylvania, proposed and
final rules (61 FR 53174–53176, October
10, 1996), (62 FR 24826, May 7, 2008);
Cleveland-Akron-Loraine, Ohio, final
rule (61 FR 20458, May 7,1996); and
Tampa, Florida, final rule (60 FR 62748,
December 7, 1995). See also the
47 See Nitrogen Oxides (NO ) SIP Call and
X
amendments to the NOX SIP Call (64 FR 26298, May
14, 1999 and 65 FR 11222, March 2, 2000), and the
Cross-State Air Pollution Rule (CSAPR) Update (81
FR 74504, October 26, 2016).
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
discussion on this issue in the
Cincinnati, Ohio, redesignation (65 FR
37890, June 19, 2000), and in the
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, redesignation
(66 FR 50399, October 19, 2001).
The EPA approved elements of
Pennsylvania’s June 15, 2014 SO2
infrastructure SIP submittal on August
5, 2015.48 As explained previously,
certain general requirements of CAA
section 110(a)(2) are statewide
requirements that are not linked to the
nonattainment status of the Allegheny
County NAA and are therefore not
‘‘applicable requirements’’ for the
purpose of reviewing Pennsylvania’s
redesignation request. Because
Pennsylvania satisfies the general SIP
elements and requirements set forth in
CAA section 110(a)(2) applicable to and
necessary for SO2 redesignation, the
EPA proposes to conclude that
Pennsylvania has satisfied the criterion
of section 107(d)(3)(E)(v) related to
section 110(a)(2) of the CAA.
2. Part D Requirements
In addition to the CAA section 110
requirements, section 107(d)(3)(E)(v)
requires that the state meet all the
requirements applicable to the
nonattainment area ‘‘under part D of
this subchapter’’ for the nonattainment
area to be redesignated. Both section
107 and part D are within subchapter 1
of the CAA. Part D, entitled ‘‘Plan
Requirements for Nonattainment
Areas,’’ consists of six subparts, of
which only subparts 1 and 5 are
applicable to SO2 nonattainment areas.
Subpart 1 (sections 171 through 179B)
contains provisions that can apply to all
nonattainment areas for all criteria
pollutants, while subpart 5 (sections 191
through 192) contains additional
provisions for SO2, NOX, or lead
nonattainment areas. The requirements
applicable to this redesignation are
discussed below.
a. Subpart 1 Requirements
1. Section 172 Requirements
CAA section 172 requires states with
nonattainment areas to submit plans
that provide for timely attainment of the
NAAQS. More specifically, CAA section
172(c) contains general requirements for
nonattainment plans. A thorough
discussion of these requirements is
found in the General Preamble for
Implementation of title I.49
As noted in the General Preamble,
certain attainment-related planning
requirements under section 172(c) no
longer have meaning for an area that is
already attaining the NAAQS, and
48 80
49 57
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
FR 46494, August 5, 2015.
FR 13498, April 16, 1992.
11DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2024 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
therefore are not applicable for purposes
of redesignation. For example, for an
area that is already attaining the
NAAQS, there would be nothing for the
State to provide to show reasonable
further progress to attainment in that
area. Similarly, the CAA section 172
requirements for the attainment
demonstration, implementation of
reasonably available control measures,
including reasonably available control
technology, and contingency measures
that are triggered if an area fails to meet
RFP or fails to attain are also not
applicable for purposes of
redesignation.
With respect to CAA section 172(c)(3),
Pennsylvania was required to submit an
actual current emissions inventory with
its attainment plan. Pennsylvania had
submitted a base year inventory with its
attainment plan SIP on October 3, 2017
and the EPA approved this element on
April 23, 2020.50
2. Section 173 Requirements
Section 173 of the CAA includes
requirements for permit programs that
are required in a nonattainment area for
new sources as required by section
172(c)(5), known as nonattainment new
source review (NNSR). However, the
EPA has a longstanding interpretation
that because the NNSR permit program
is replaced by the PSD permit program
upon an area’s redesignation to
attainment, nonattainment areas seeking
redesignation to attainment do not need
a fully approved part D NNSR program
to be redesignated. A more detailed
rationale for this view is described in a
memorandum from Mary Nichols,
Assistant Administrator for Air and
Radiation, dated October 14, 1994,
entitled, ‘‘Part D New Source Review
Requirements for Areas Requesting
Redesignation to Attainment.’’ 51
Nevertheless, the EPA notes that the
ACHD’s Article XXI Rules and
Regulations for Air Pollution Control
have SIP-approved NNSR and PSD
programs found in section 2102.06 for
NNSR and section 2102.07 for PSD.
Allegheny County has incorporated by
reference Pennsylvania’s NNSR
provisions at 25 Pa. Code 127.201–
127.218 and also Pennsylvania’s PSD
regulations found at 25 Pa. Code
127.81–127.83. Pennsylvania’s PSD
regulations merely incorporate by
reference the Federal PSD regulations
found at 40 CFR part 52. Allegheny
County has therefore addressed all
required provisions for the permitting of
FR 22593, April 23, 2020.
in the docket for this action as
Nichols_Memo and at www.epa.gov/sites/default/
files/2015-07/documents/101494m.pdf.
sources in NAAs, including NNSR. See
40 CFR 52.2020(c). Pennsylvania’s PSD
program will become applicable for SO2
in the Allegheny County NAA upon
redesignation to attainment.
3. Section 175A Requirements
CAA section 175A requires that states
seeking redesignation of an area to
attainment submit a ‘‘maintenance
plan’’ containing certain elements.
Pennsylvania included a maintenance
plan for the Allegheny County NAA
with its November 14, 2023
redesignation request, which the EPA is
proposing to approve in conjunction
with the redesignation, and it is
discussed in detail in section II,
Criterion (4) of this document.
4. Section 176 Requirements
Section 176(c) of the CAA requires
that Federal actions conform to the air
quality planning goals in the applicable
SIP. The requirement to determine
conformity applies to transportation
plans, programs, and projects that are
developed, funded, or approved under
title 23 of the United States Code and
the Federal Transit Act (transportation
conformity) as well as to all other
Federally-supported or funded projects
(general conformity). Section 176(c) of
the CAA also requires that states
establish criteria and procedures to
ensure that Federally-supported or
funded transportation plans,
transportation improvement programs
(TIPs) and projects conform to the goals
of the applicable SIP. This is referred to
as a transportation conformity SIP. In
the preamble to the January 1993
proposed transportation conformity
rule, the EPA stated that, ‘‘Based on
available emissions information, EPA
believes highway and transit motor
vehicles are not significant sources of
lead or sulfur dioxide. Therefore,
transportation plans, TIPs, and projects
are presumed to conform to the
applicable implementation plans for
these pollutants.’’ 52 In November 1993,
the EPA finalized its transportation
conformity regulations. One section of
those regulations addressed the
geographic applicability of the
transportation conformity regulations.
The regulation stated at that time that,
‘‘The provisions of this subpart apply
with respect to emissions of the
following criteria pollutants: Ozone,
carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, and
particles with an aerodynamic diameter
less than or equal to a nominal 10
micrometers (PM10).’’ 53 Based on this
50 85
51 Available
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Dec 10, 2024
Jkt 265001
FR 3776, January 11, 1993.
provision has been revised to include
particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than or
99797
provision, transportation conformity
does not apply in nonattainment or
maintenance areas for SO2. Therefore, a
transportation conformity SIP is not
required for SO2 nonattainment and
maintenance areas and is not necessary
for an SO2 nonattainment area to be
redesignated to attainment, and the
EPA’s transportation conformity rules
do not apply to SO2 for the Allegheny
County NAA.
5. Section 179 Requirements
Section 179(a) of the CAA addresses
potential sanctions for the failure of a
State to submit certain required SIP
elements by statutory deadlines. The
EPA is not aware of any missing or
incomplete Allegheny County planning
elements subject to Section 179(a) of the
CAA.
b. Subpart 5 Requirements
The subpart 5 requirements, which
consist of sections 191 and 192 of the
CAA, are specific provisions applicable
to SO2, NO2 or lead nonattainment
areas. Section 191 of the CAA requires
states with areas designated
nonattainment for SO2, NO2 or lead after
November 15, 1990, to submit within 18
months of the designation an
implementation plan meeting the
requirements of part D. The substance of
the required plans is established by
section 172(c). Section 192 sets forth
attainment dates for nonattainment
areas under section 191.
For SO2, section 192(a) requires that
attainment plans provide for attainment
of the primary standard as expeditiously
as possible, but no later than five years
from the date of the nonattainment
designation. The EPA designated the
Allegheny County NAA as
nonattainment on August 5, 2013, with
an attainment date of October 4, 2018.
However, because the EPA is reviewing
a redesignation request under section
107(d)(3)(E), rather than a determination
of attainment under section 179(c), the
determination of whether the Area
attained by the attainment date set forth
in section 192 is not applicable to this
action proposing approval of
Pennsylvania’s redesignation request.
Based on the above, the EPA is
proposing to find that Pennsylvania has
satisfied the applicable requirements for
the redesignation of the Allegheny
County NAA under section 110 and part
D of title I of the CAA.
III. Environmental Justice Concerns
Within its redesignation request and
maintenance plan, ACHD provided
52 58
53 This
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
equal to a nominal 2.5 micrometers (PM2.5). See 40
CFR 93.102(b)(1).
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
99798
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2024 / Proposed Rules
supplemental information regarding
environmental justice considerations
within the Allegheny County NAA.
Utilizing the Environmental Justice
Index (EJI) tool developed by ACHD’s
Bureau of Assessment, Statistics, &
Epidemiology, ACHD identified areas
within the Allegheny County NAA with
higher environmental health risks. The
EJI tool uses Allegheny County-specific
factors to evaluate environmental justice
concerns, including the following
indicators: race, education, median
household income, housing vacancy,
lead paint risk, greenness, air quality,
and flood risk. Six municipalities
within the Allegheny County NAA were
designated as ‘‘highest need’’ areas
according to EJI, while seven other
municipalities were designated as ‘‘high
need’’ areas. ACHD has indicated that
its SO2 monitoring network provides
enhanced surveillance in vulnerable
communities, and the two current SO2
monitors in the Allegheny County NAA
are located within or directly downwind
of areas labeled as ‘‘highest need.’’
Furthermore, ACHD states that the
controls specified in its 2017 attainment
demonstration as well as the shutdowns
denoted in the maintenance
demonstration illustrate the greatest
emissions reductions in the ‘‘highest
need’’ areas.
As explained in the EJ Legal Tools to
Advance Environmental Justice 2022
document, the CAA provides states with
the discretion to consider
environmental justice in developing
rules and measures related to
redesignation requests and maintenance
plans. In this instance, ACHD exercised
this discretion, as is described above in
summary. In reviewing ACHD’s
analysis, the EPA defers to ACHD’s
reasonable exercise of its discretion in
considering EJ in this way. The EPA is
taking proposed action to approve the
SIP revision because it meets minimum
requirements pursuant to the CAA and
relevant implementing regulations. The
EPA also finds that ACHD’s
consideration of EJ analyses in this
context is reasonable. The EPA
encourages air agencies generally to
evaluate environmental justice
considerations of their actions and
carefully consider impacts to
communities. The EJ analyses submitted
by the air agency were considered but
were not the basis for the EPA’s
decision making and the SIP met the
minimum applicable requirements, as
explained above.
IV. Proposed Action
The EPA’s review of this material
indicates that the Allegheny County
NAA has met the criteria necessary
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Dec 10, 2024
Jkt 265001
under CAA section 107(d)(3)(E) for the
EPA to redesignate the Area from
nonattainment to attainment for the
2010 1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS. The
EPA is proposing to approve the
Pennsylvania redesignation request for
the Allegheny County NAA, which was
submitted on behalf of ACHD on
November 14, 2023. Final approval of
Pennsylvania’s redesignation request
would change the legal designation of
the portion of Allegheny County
designated nonattainment at 40 CFR
81.339 to attainment for the 2010 1-hour
primary SO2 NAAQS. The EPA is also
proposing to approve ACHD’s
maintenance plan, which is designed to
ensure that the potentially redesignated
Allegheny County NAA will continue to
maintain the SO2 NAAQS. The EPA is
soliciting public comments on the
issues discussed in this document.
These comments will be considered
before taking final action.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the redesignation of
an area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of the
maintenance plan under CAA section
107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the
status of geographical area and do not
impose any additional regulatory
requirements on sources beyond those
required by state law. A redesignation to
attainment does not in and of itself
impose any new requirements, but
rather results in the application of
requirements contained in the CAA for
areas that have been redesignated to
attainment. Moreover, the Administrator
is required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves state law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by state law. For that
reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001); and
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal
agencies to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on minority populations
and low-income populations to the
greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. The EPA defines
environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair
treatment and meaningful involvement
of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect
to the development, implementation,
and enforcement of environmental laws,
regulations, and policies.’’ The EPA
further defines the term fair treatment to
mean that ‘‘no group of people should
bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks,
including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’
ACHD evaluated environmental
justice considerations as part of its SIP
submittal even though the CAA and
applicable implementing regulations
neither prohibit nor require an
evaluation. The EPA’s evaluation of
ACHD’s environmental justice
considerations is described above in the
section titled, ‘‘Environmental Justice
Considerations.’’ The analysis was done
for the purpose of providing additional
context and information about this
rulemaking to the public, not as a basis
of the action. The EPA is taking action
under the CAA on bases independent of
ACHD’s evaluation of environmental
justice. Due to the nature of the action
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 238 / Wednesday, December 11, 2024 / Proposed Rules
being taken here, this action is expected
to have a neutral to positive impact on
the air quality of the affected area. In
addition, there is no information in the
record upon which this decision is
based that is inconsistent with the
stated goal of Executive Order 12898 of
achieving environmental justice for
people of color, low-income
populations, and Indigenous peoples.
In addition, this proposed
rulemaking, for the redesignation and
approval of the maintenance plan for
the Allegheny County NAA, does not
have tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and the EPA notes
that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt
tribal law.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Adam Ortiz,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2024–28536 Filed 12–10–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
COUNCIL ON ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY
40 CFR Parts 1515 and 1516
[CEQ–2024–001]
RIN 0331–AA02
I. Background
Freedom of Information Act and
Privacy Act Regulations
Council on Environmental
Quality.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
AGENCY:
The Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) is
proposing to amend its Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) regulations to
incorporate amendments to the FOIA set
forth in the FOIA Improvement Act of
2016; to conform to guidance for Federal
agencies from the Department of Justice;
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:23 Dec 10, 2024
Jkt 265001
to make them easier for the public to
understand and use; and to better reflect
CEQ’s current policy and practice.
These proposed regulations reaffirm
CEQ’s commitment to providing the
fullest possible disclosure of records to
the public. In addition, CEQ is
proposing to amend its regulations
implementing the Privacy Act of 1974
(the Privacy Act) to make them easier
for the public to understand and use
and to better reflect CEQ’s current
policy and practice. The proposed
regulations would also make
administrative changes, including
reorganizing, renumbering, and
renaming the sections of CEQ’s current
FOIA and Privacy Act regulations.
DATES: Send comments on or before
January 10, 2025.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number [CEQ–
2024–0001], by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Visit
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for submitting
comments.
• Fax: 202–456–6546.
• Mail: Council on Environmental
Quality, 730 Jackson Place NW,
Washington, DC 20503.
Instructions: Your submission must
include the agency name, ‘‘Council on
Environmental Quality,’’ and the docket
number for this rulemaking, [CEQ–
2024–0001]. CEQ will post your
comment without change, including any
personal information you provide, to
https://www.regulations.gov. Do not
submit any information you consider to
be private information, privileged or
confidential commercial or financial
information, or other information the
disclosure of which is restricted by
statute.
Docket: For access to the docket, visit
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Samuel Roth, Associate General
Counsel, 202–395–5750,
Samuel.E.Roth@ceq.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. The FOIA
The FOIA, 5 U.S.C. 552, provides a
right of access to certain records that
Federal agencies maintain and control.
The FOIA directs each Federal agency to
publish regulations that describe how
the agency will process FOIA requests it
receives from members of the public.
CEQ first adopted its FOIA
regulations in 1977.1 In 2010, CEQ
1 CEQ, Freedom of Information Act Procedures;
Final Rule, 42 FR 65158 (Dec. 30, 1977).
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
99799
amended its regulation to reflect
legislative amendments to the FOIA, a
2009 Presidential Memorandum
regarding FOIA policy, and additional
guidance from the Department of Justice
(DOJ) and the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB).2 CEQ’s current FOIA
regulation is codified at 40 CFR part
1515.
CEQ is proposing to revise and
republish its FOIA regulation in its
entirety in order to make several
improvements to the current rule. First,
CEQ is proposing updates to reflect a
number of important changes to the
FOIA made by the FOIA Improvement
Act of 2016 (Pub. L. 114–185). Section
3(a) of the Act directs each agency to
review its FOIA regulations and update
them to implement the changes set forth
in the Act. Second, CEQ is proposing to
include a number of provisions to
improve the usefulness and readability
of its FOIA regulations consistent with
DOJ’s 2017 revised Template for Agency
Regulations (the Template).3 CEQ
modeled this proposed rule on the
Template, which also incorporates the
FOIA Improvement Act of 2016’s
amendments to the FOIA.
Third, CEQ is proposing updates to
better convey the FOIA’s and CEQ’s
requirements to members of the public
who are interested in CEQ’s operations
and activities, so they can easily
understand and use CEQ’s FOIA
process.4 Specifically, CEQ referred to
the Plain Writing Act of 2010 and the
Federal Plain Language Guidelines 5 in
preparing the proposed rule.
Finally, the proposed rule reflects
updates to CEQ’s FOIA policies and
procedures, as well as the practical
experience of CEQ’s FOIA staff. As it
does under its current regulations, CEQ
would administer the FOIA under the
proposed regulations with a
presumption of openness, consistent
with the Memorandum of the Attorney
General dated March 15, 2022.6
B. The Privacy Act
The Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. 552a,
governs each Federal agency’s
2 CEQ, Revision of Freedom of Information Act
Regulations, 75 FR 48585 (Sept. 10, 2010).
3 Template for Agency FOIA Regulations
(February 22, 2017), https://www.justice.gov/oip/
template-agency-foia-regulations.
4 See, e.g., E.O. 13563, Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review, (Jan. 18, 2011) (‘‘regulations
[must be] accessible, consistent, written in plain
language, and easy to understand’’), 76 FR 3821
(Jan. 21, 2011).
5 Federal Plain Language Guidelines (1st rev. May
2011), https://www.plainlanguage.gov/media/
FederalPLGuidelines.pdf.
6 Department of Justice, Freedom of Information
Act Guidelines (March 15, 2022), https://
www.justice.gov/media/1212566/dl.
E:\FR\FM\11DEP1.SGM
11DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 238 (Wednesday, December 11, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 99790-99799]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28536]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 52 and 81
[EPA-R03-OAR-2024-0316; FRL-11777-01-R3]
Air Plan Approval; Pennsylvania; Redesignation of the Allegheny
County Nonattainment Area to Attainment and Approval of the Area's
Maintenance Plan for the 2010 1-Hour Primary Sulfur Dioxide National
Ambient Air Quality Standard
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a state implementation plan (SIP) revision and redesignation
request submitted on November 14, 2023, by the Pennsylvania Department
of Environmental Protection (PADEP) on behalf of the Allegheny County
Health Department (ACHD). The SIP revision asks the EPA to redesignate
the Allegheny County, Pennsylvania area from nonattainment to
attainment for the 2010 1-hour primary sulfur dioxide (SO2)
national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). The revision also asks
the EPA to approve into the SIP Allegheny County's maintenance plan for
the 2010 1-hour primary SO2 standard for the Allegheny
County area. This action is being taken under the Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before January 10, 2025.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R03-
OAR-2024-0316 at www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow
the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. For either
manner of submission, the EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be confidential business information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Philip McGuire, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air & Radiation Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, Region III, 1600 John F Kennedy
Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103. The telephone number is
(215) 814-2251. Mr. McGuire can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Nonattainment Designation
On June 22, 2010, the EPA revised the primary SO2 NAAQS,
establishing a new 1-hour primary standard of 75 parts per billion
(ppb).\1\ Under the EPA's regulations at title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) part 50, the 2010 1-hour SO2 NAAQS
is met at a monitoring site when the 3-year average of the annual 99th
percentile of daily maximum 1-hour average concentrations is less than
or equal to 75 ppb (based on the rounding convention in 40 CFR part 50,
appendix T).\2\ Ambient air quality monitoring data for the 3-year
period must meet a data completeness requirement. A year meets data
completeness requirements when all four quarters are complete, and a
quarter is complete when at least 75 percent of the sampling days for
each quarter have complete data. A sampling day has complete data if 75
percent of the hourly concentration values, including State-flagged
data affected by exceptional events which have been approved for
exclusion by the Administrator, are reported.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 75 FR 35520, June 22, 2010.
\2\ 40 CFR 50.17.
\3\ 40 CFR part 50, appendix T, section 3(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Upon promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS, the CAA requires the
EPA to designate as nonattainment any area that does not meet (or that
contributes to ambient air quality in a nearby area that does not meet)
the NAAQS.\4\ On August 5, 2013, the EPA designated a portion of
Allegheny County, Pennsylvania (hereafter the ``Allegheny County
NAA''), as nonattainment for the 2010 1-hour primary SO2
NAAQS, effective October
[[Page 99791]]
4, 2013.\5\ The designation was based on violating air quality
monitoring data for calendar years 2009-2011. The Allegheny County NAA
consists of 22 municipalities including: the Borough of Braddock,
Borough of Dravosburg, Borough of East McKeesport, Borough of East
Pittsburgh, Borough of Elizabeth, Borough of Glassport, Borough of
Jefferson Hills, Borough of Liberty, Borough of Lincoln, Borough of
North Braddock, Borough of Pleasant Hills, Borough of Port Vue, Borough
of Versailles, Borough of Wall, Borough of West Elizabeth, Borough of
West Mifflin, City of Clairton, City of Duquesne, City of McKeesport,
Elizabeth Township, Forward Township, and North Versailles Township.\6\
This action established an attainment date five years after the
effective date for the areas designated as nonattainment for the 2010
SO2 NAAQS (i.e., by October 4, 2018). The Commonwealth was
also required to submit an attainment SIP revision for the Allegheny
County NAA to the EPA that meets the requirements of CAA sections 110,
172(c) and 191-192 within 18 months following the October 4, 2013,
effective date of designation (i.e., by April 6, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ CAA section 107(d)(1)(A)(i).
\5\ 78 FR 47191, August 5, 2013.
\6\ A list of Pennsylvania's attainment status designations is
available at 40 CFR 81.339.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Relevant Historical SIP Actions
The EPA did not receive an attainment SIP revision for the
Allegheny County NAA by the April 6, 2015 deadline and subsequently on
March 18, 2016, the EPA published a finding of failure to submit
indicating that Pennsylvania did not submit the required SO2
attainment plan.\7\ This finding initiated a clock under CAA section
179(a) for the potential imposition of new source review sanctions 18
months after the effective date of the finding and the potential
imposition of highway funding sanctions 6 months following that, in
accordance with CAA section 179(b) and 40 CFR 52.31. Additionally,
under CAA section 110(c), the finding triggered a requirement for the
EPA to promulgate a Federal implementation plan (FIP) within two years
of the effective date of the finding unless, by that time, Pennsylvania
made the necessary complete submittal, and the EPA approved the
submittal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 81 FR 14736, March 18, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pursuant to Pennsylvania's October 3, 2017 attainment plan
submittal, and the EPA's October 6, 2017 letter to Pennsylvania finding
the submittal complete and noting the stopping of the sanctions'
deadline, these CAA section 179(b) sanctions were not imposed as
Pennsylvania did not miss the original deadline.\8\ The EPA proposed
approving the SIP revision submittal on November 19, 2018,\9\ and
issued a final approval on April 23, 2020.\10\ This approval ended the
requirement for the EPA to promulgate a FIP under CAA section 110(c).
On November 14, 2023, PADEP, on behalf of ACHD, submitted a revision to
its SIP for the inclusion of a maintenance plan for the 2010 1-hour
primary SO2 NAAQS and requested a concurrent redesignation
of the Allegheny County NAA to attainment for the 2010 1-hour primary
SO2 NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Both the 2017 attainment plan submittal and EPA completeness
letter are available in the docket for this action and are titled
Allegheny County September 2017 Attainment Demonstration and EPA
Letter of Completeness dated October 6, 2017, respectively.
\9\ 83 FR 58206, November 19, 2018.
\10\ 85 FR 22593, April 23, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Redesignation to Attainment Criteria
After a State has submitted a redesignation request for a
nonattainment area, the EPA must assess if the statutory criteria
identified in CAA section 107(d)(3)(E) have been met to redesignate the
area to attainment. These conditions include: (1) the EPA has
determined that the applicable NAAQS has been attained; (2) the
applicable SIP has been fully approved by the EPA under CAA section
110(k); (3) the EPA has determined that the improvement in the area's
air quality is due to permanent and enforceable reductions in
emissions; (4) the area has a fully approved maintenance plan,
including a contingency plan, under CAA section 175A; and (5) the State
has met all applicable requirements for the area under CAA section 110
and part D. The EPA has provided direction for how it would consider if
these conditions have been met in the April 23, 2014 memorandum
``Guidance for 1-Hour SO2 Nonattainment Area SIP
Submissions'' (2014 SO2 Guidance).\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Available in the docket for this action as
2014_SO2_Guidance and at www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-06/documents/20140423guidance_nonattainment_sip.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Maintenance Plan Approval Criteria
CAA section 175A and additional EPA guidance, including the
September 4, 1992 memorandum ``Procedures for Processing Requests to
Redesignate Areas to Attainment'' (Calcagni Memo),\12\ identify the
required elements for an approvable maintenance plan for areas seeking
redesignation from nonattainment to attainment. Under CAA section 175A,
the plan must demonstrate continued attainment of the applicable NAAQS
for at least 10 years after the EPA approves a redesignation request to
attainment. Eight years after the redesignation, the State must submit
a revised maintenance plan demonstrating that attainment will continue
to be maintained for an additional 10 years following the initial 10-
year period. To address the possibility of future NAAQS violations, the
maintenance plan must contain contingency measures, as the EPA deems
necessary, to assure prompt correction of any future 2010 1-hour
SO2 violations. The Calcagni Memo provides further guidance
on the content of a maintenance plan, explaining that a maintenance
plan should address five requirements: (1) an attainment emissions
inventory that identifies the level of emissions in the area which is
sufficient to attain the NAAQS; (2) a maintenance demonstration that
shows future emissions of a pollutant will not exceed the level of the
attainment inventory; (3) the continued operation of a monitoring
network that conforms to 40 CFR part 58; (4) a means for verifying the
continued attainment of the NAAQS; and (5) a contingency plan to
correct any violation of the NAAQS in the area following redesignation
of the area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ Available in the docket for this action as Calcagni Memo
and at www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016-03/documents/calcagni_memo__procedures_for_processing_requests_to_redesignate_areas_to_attainment_090492.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA Analysis
The EPA's evaluation of Pennsylvania's redesignation request and
maintenance plan is based on consideration of the five redesignation
criteria provided under CAA section 107(d)(3)(E) and relevant guidance,
including the aforementioned 2014 SO2 Guidance and Calcagni
Memo.
A. Criterion (1)--The Allegheny County SO2 Nonattainment Area Has
Attained the 2010 1-Hour SO2 NAAQS
CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(i) requires that the EPA determine if a
nonattainment area has attained the applicable NAAQS in order to
redesignate the area to attainment. In assessing if the area has
attained the NAAQS, the 2014 SO2 Guidance stipulates that
the EPA can interdependently consider two components to support an
attainment
[[Page 99792]]
determination: air quality monitoring data and air quality modeling
data.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See 2014 SO2 Guidance, at 62.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Allegheny County NAA contains two operational SO2
monitor sites: the Liberty site (Air Quality System (AQS) Site ID 42-
003-0064) and the North Braddock site (AQS Site ID 42-003-1301). The
Liberty monitor is located centrally within the Allegheny County NAA
and has been in operation since 1969, while the North Braddock monitor
is located in the northern segment of the Allegheny County NAA and has
been in operation since 2014. Both monitors have been in attainment of
the 2010 1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS since the 2019-2021
period, with Liberty recording a design value of 63 ppb for the 2021-
2023 period and North Braddock recording a design value of 54 ppb for
the 2021-2023 period.\14\ Design values for the past 10 years are
reported in Table 1 in this document. Although both monitors are
currently in attainment of the NAAQS, prior analysis has determined
that neither of these monitoring sites are located in the area of
maximum concentration,\15\ and as such, additional air quality modeling
is generally needed to estimate SO2 concentrations within
the area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Design values are calculated by computing the three-year
average of the annual 99th percentile daily maximum 1-hour average
concentrations. An SO2 1-hour primary standard design
value is valid if it encompasses three consecutive calendar years of
complete data. The data completeness requirements were previously
described in the Nonattainment Designation section I.A. of this
document above.
\15\ See Allegheny County EPA Modeling TSD at pp. 16-17,
available in the docket for this action.
Table 1--2014-2023 SO2 Design Values for Allegheny County Nonattainment Area Monitor Sites
[Parts per billion]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Monitor site 2012-2014 2013-2015 2014-2016 2015-2017 2016-2018 2017-2019 2018-2020 2019-2021 2020-2022 2021-2023
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Liberty......................... 101 99 94 97 103 109 85 59 56 63
North Braddock *................ 89 71 64 55 61 63 64 58 56 54
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* North Braddock design values from the 2012-2014 and 2013-2015 periods are comprised of less than three years of data as the monitor began operating in
2014.
Pennsylvania's 2017 attainment plan contained an attainment
demonstration which utilized allowable SO2 emission limits
from stationary sources within the Allegheny County NAA to inform
several modeling analyses for SO2 emissions.\16\ These
modeling analyses were based on emissions limits for large, stationary
sources of SO2, which, if enacted, would ensure that the
Allegheny County NAA would attain the 2010 1-hour primary
SO2 NAAQS. The 2014 SO2 Guidance states that the
EPA may make a determination of attainment based on this attainment
plan modeling, eliminating the need for separate actual emissions-based
modeling to support a redesignation request--provided that the source
characteristics are still reasonably represented.\17\ The source
characteristics are still reasonably represented \18\ and from 2020-
2021, large, stationary SO2 sources \19\ within the
Allegheny County NAA were meeting their allowable emission limits for
attainment.\20\ As such, the 2017 attainment demonstration modeling
submitted by Pennsylvania will allow for the EPA's determination of
attainment. The 2014 SO2 Guidance further states that a
demonstration that the control strategy in the SIP has been fully
implemented will also be pertinent for making the determination of
attainment.\21\ Pennsylvania has submitted information detailed in its
redesignation request and maintenance plan to confirm that the control
strategy outlined in the SIP has been fully implemented. The specific
measures identified in the control strategy include upgrades to the
Vacuum Carbonate Unit equipment at the U.S. Steel (USS) Clairton Plant,
the implementation of a tail gas recycling project at the USS Clairton
Plant, and a new stack and combined flue system for select boilers at
the USS Edgar Thomson Plant.\22\ Additionally, lower permitted
SO2 emission rates were implemented for nearly all processes
at the primary stationary SO2 sources in the Allegheny
County NAA, including the USS Clairton Plant, the USS Edgar Thomson
Plant, the USS Irvin Plant, and Harsco Metals. These implemented,
permanent and federally enforceable control measures have aided in
reducing the actual total emissions from large, stationary USS
SO2 sources to 2,373 tons per year (as of 2021),\23\ which
is below the revised total emissions limits proposed for USS facilities
in the 2017 attainment demonstration modeling (2,669 tons per
year),\24\ thus contributing to bringing the Allegheny County NAA into
attainment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Allegheny County September 2017 Attainment
Demonstration.
\17\ See 2014 SO2 Guidance, at 50.
\18\ See ACHD_Email_Source_Characteristics, available in the
docket for this action.
\19\ Large, stationary sources specifically include US Steel
Clairton, US Steel Edgar Thomson, and US Steel Irvin, which
collectively account for over 99% of all point source SO2
emissions within the Allegheny County NAA.
\20\ See Allegheny County September 2017 Attainment
Demonstration, at 15, and ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP_App_B_Emissions_Inv, at
2, available in the docket for this action.
\21\ See supra Note 17.
\22\ See ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP, at 15.
\23\ See ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP_App_B_Emissions_Inv, at 2.
\24\ See Allegheny County September 2017 Attain_Demo_App_D, at
2, available in the docket for this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In this action, the EPA proposes to find that the air quality
monitoring data and air quality modeling data demonstrate that the
Allegheny County NAA has attained the 2010 1-hour primary
SO2 NAAQS.
B. Criterion (2)--Pennsylvania Has a Fully Approved SIP Under Section
110(k)
CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(ii) requires that the EPA fully approve
the applicable implementation plan for the area under CAA section
110(k) in order to redesignate that area to attainment. The EPA has
fully approved the applicable Pennsylvania SIP for the Allegheny County
NAA under section 110(k) of the CAA for all requirements applicable for
purposes of redesignation. An area cannot be redesignated to attainment
if a required element of the SIP is the subject of a disapproval; a
finding of failure to submit, or failure to implement the SIP; or a
partial, conditional, or limited approval.\25\ The 2017 attainment plan
SIP was initially proposed for EPA approval on November 19, 2018 \26\
and received final EPA approval on April 23, 2020.\27\ The approved
elements from the 2017 attainment plan include a 2011 base year
emissions inventory, a control strategy and air quality modeling
demonstration, a reasonable available control measures/reasonably
available control technology (RACM/RACT)
[[Page 99793]]
analysis, a reasonable further progress (RFP) analysis, contingency
measures, and nonattainment new source review (NNSR) regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See 2014 SO2 Guidance, at 64.
\26\ 83 FR 58206, November 19, 2018.
\27\ 85 FR 22593, April 23, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Criterion (3)--The Air Quality Improvement in the Allegheny County
SO2 Nonattainment Area Is Due to Permanent and Enforceable Reductions
in Emissions
For redesignating a nonattainment area to attainment, CAA section
107(d)(3)(E)(iii) requires the EPA to determine that the air quality
improvement in the area is due to permanent and enforceable reductions
in emissions resulting from implementation of the SIP, applicable
Federal air pollution control regulations, and other permanent and
enforceable reductions. The EPA proposes to find that Pennsylvania has
demonstrated that the requirements of CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(iii)
have been met.
Specifically, the implementation of multiple permanent and
federally enforceable control measures at stationary point sources of
SO2 identified in the EPA-approved 2017 attainment
demonstration aided in a substantial decrease in SO2
emissions, and consequently lower SO2 concentrations in the
Allegheny County NAA. These measures include upgrades to the Vacuum
Carbonate Unit equipment at the USS Clairton Plant, the implementation
of a tail gas recycling project at the USS Clairton Plant, and a new
stack and combined flue system for select boilers at the USS Edgar
Thomson Plant. Furthermore, the Guardian Glass Plant ceased operations
in August 2015 and its operating permit was terminated in November
2015.\28\ The Calcagni Memo states that ``[e]mission reductions from
source shutdowns can be considered permanent and enforceable to the
extent that those shutdowns have been reflected in the SIP and all
applicable permits have been modified accordingly,'' and therefore the
Guardian shutdown is considered permanent and enforceable.\29\ Any
future operations at this location would require a new permit and a new
source evaluation, as described in ACHD Article XXI, sections 2102.04
and 2103.13.\30\ Additionally, Emissions Reductions Credits for
SO2 were not requested for the Guardian Glass Plant,
preventing the transfer or sale of associated emission credits to
another entity in Pennsylvania or some surrounding states.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ Documentation of this closure is in Guardian_closure-App_J,
available in the docket for this action.
\29\ See Calcagni Memo, at 10.
\30\ See Allegheny_County_Article_XXI, available in the docket
for this action and at www.alleghenycounty.us/files/assets/county/v/
1/government/health/documents/air-quality/article-21-air-pollution-
control.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Allegheny County also established lower SO2 emissions
limits for nearly all processes at the USS facilities in the Allegheny
County NAA, including USS Clairton, USS Edgar Thomson, and USS Irvin,
as well as the Harsco (Braddock Recovery) facility, located on the
property of USS Edgar Thomson. These emissions limits are embedded in
the installation permits issued by ACHD for these facilities and are
federally enforceable as they have been approved into Pennsylvania's
SIP, and they are permanent because they cannot be altered without an
additional SIP submittal.\31\ Details on the imposed emissions limits
were included as copies of the installation permits in Appendix K of
the 2017 attainment plan submittal and are available in the docket for
this action.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ 85 FR 22593, April 23, 2020 and 40 CFR 52.2020(d)(3).
\32\ See Installation_Permits_with_emission_limits-App_K,
available in the docket for this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Collectively, the implemented controls and lower permitted
SO2 emissions rates resulted in an actual decrease of 835
tons of SO2 emitted per year from 2011 to 2017. This is
approximately a 25% reduction from 2011 levels of 3,418 tons of
SO2 emitted per year.\33\ As this reduction comes from EPA-
approved SIP controls and permit-controlled emission limits, the EPA
finds the air quality improvement in the Allegheny County NAA to be due
to permanent and enforceable reductions in emissions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ See ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP, at 16.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
D. Criterion (4)--The Allegheny County SO2 Nonattainment Area Has a
Fully Approved Maintenance Plan Pursuant to Section 175A of the CAA
To redesignate a NAA to attainment, CAA section 107(d)(3)(E)(iv)
requires the EPA to determine that the area has a fully approved
maintenance plan pursuant to section 175A of the CAA. In conjunction
with its request to redesignate the Allegheny County NAA to attainment
for the 2010 1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS, the State submitted a
SIP revision to provide for the maintenance of the 2010 1-hour primary
SO2 NAAQS for at least 10 years after the effective date of
redesignation to attainment. The EPA is proposing to find that this
maintenance plan meets the requirements for approval under section 175A
of the CAA.
1. What is required in a maintenance plan?
CAA section 175A sets forth the elements of a maintenance plan.
Under section 175A, the plan must demonstrate continued attainment of
the applicable NAAQS for at least 10 years after the Administrator
approves a redesignation request to attainment. Eight years after the
redesignation, the State must submit a revised maintenance plan
demonstrating that attainment will continue to be maintained for an
additional 10 years following the initial 10-year period. To address
the possibility of future NAAQS violations, the maintenance plan must
contain contingency measures as the EPA deems necessary to assure
prompt correction of any future 2010 1-hour primary SO2
NAAQS violations. The Calcagni Memo provides further guidance on the
content of a maintenance plan, explaining that a maintenance plan
should address five requirements: the attainment emissions inventory,
maintenance demonstration, monitoring, verification of continued
attainment, and a contingency plan.\34\ As is discussed more fully
later in this section, the EPA is proposing to determine that
Pennsylvania's maintenance plan meets the requirements in CAA section
175A and is thus proposing to approve it as a revision to the Allegheny
County portion of the Pennsylvania SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\34\ See Calcagni Memo, at pp. 8-12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Attainment Emissions Inventory
In a maintenance plan, states are required to submit an emissions
inventory to identify the level of emissions in the area which is
sufficient to attain and maintain the SO2 NAAQS, which is
called the attainment inventory. This inventory is used as the basis
for future, projected emission inventories that are used to show the
area will remain in attainment. Pennsylvania submitted a 2017
SO2 emissions inventory as the attainment inventory with its
maintenance plan. The year 2017 was selected because it was the first
year in which emissions were at levels required to demonstrate
attainment of the 2010 SO2 NAAQS, with the exception of
emissions associated with malfunctions of the desulfurization facility
at the USS Clairton Plant. Additionally, 2017 was a year in which a
fully reviewed National Emission Inventory (NEI) was released. The NEI
is a comprehensive, triennial estimate of emissions. Generally, the
[[Page 99794]]
attainment year is selected as a year within the attaining design value
period (i.e., 2019-2021). However, alternate years from 2018-2022 were
less ideal than 2017 for the attainment year for a variety of factors,
including excess emissions from sources due to equipment breakdowns,
atypical emissions during the COVID pandemic, and incomplete emissions
compilations for recent years. Additional details for choosing 2017 as
the attainment year are available in the submitted redesignation
request.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ See ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP, at 19.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the 2017 attainment year inventory, Pennsylvania directly used
point and area source emissions reported in the 2017 NEI, except for
corrections identified in Appendix B of the submitted redesignation
request.\36\ The point source emissions for the Allegheny County NAA
were verified against the EPA's emissions inventory system (EIS) and
the EPA found them to be acceptable.\37\ Area source emissions were
estimated based on the relative percentage of the Allegheny County
population residing in the Allegheny County NAA and the resulting
factor allocated the appropriate fraction of the County's total
emissions to the Allegheny County NAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\36\ See ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP_App_B_Emissions_Inv, at pp. 1-2.
\37\ See EI_TSD_ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP, available in the docket for
this action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nonroad and onroad mobile source emissions for 2017 were obtained
from the EPA's Motor Vehicle Emissions Simulator (MOVES) model,
specifically the MOVES3 version. PADEP executed the MOVES3 modeling
runs for nonroad mobile sources and utilized a contractor to run the
model for onroad mobile source emissions.
Natural SO2 emission sources, such as fires and
biogenics, were also compiled. Fire emissions data was pulled from the
EPA's Fires \38\ inventory, while biogenic emissions from soils and
vegetation were predicted by the Biogenic Emission Inventory System
\39\ (BEIS) model.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\38\ EPA Fires: www3.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch13/related/firerept.pdf.
\39\ EPA BEIS: www.epa.gov/air-emissions-modeling/biogenic-emission-inventory-system-beis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Projection inventories predicted from the attainment inventory
demonstrate that the area will continue to remain in attainment during
the maintenance period. Pennsylvania developed 2026 and 2035 emission
projections for the interim and maintenance plan end year,
respectively. Projected emissions for these years--as well as the base
year inventory--are available in Table 2 in this document. Projected
emissions for point and area sources were estimated from the 2017 base
year emissions and growth factors developed by the Mid-Atlantic
Regional Air Management Association, Inc., and other sources. These
growth factors are developed based on forecasts from various databases
and tools, including the Energy Information Administration's Annual
Energy Outlook 2022, Pennsylvania Industry Employment 2018-2028 Long-
Term Projections, National Inventory Collaborative 2016v1 Emissions
Modeling Platform, and the Federal Aviation Administration's Terminal
Area Forecast. Projected emissions were subject to the same corrections
utilized in the 2017 base year inventory for consistency. Furthermore,
point sources with implemented enforceable controls or shutdowns since
the 2017 base year were excluded from the 2026 and 2035 projections.
Specifically, the Koppers Clairton tar refining facility ceased
operation in 2017 and its permit expired in 2021. Additionally, Coke
Batteries 1, 2, and 3 at the USS Clairton Plant ceased operation in
March 2023. Conversely, projections for the 2026 and 2035 inventories
included the permitted plantwide SO2 emissions limit of
23.89 tons/year for a new major source facility--the Invenergy
Allegheny Energy Center. However, the permit for this facility was
terminated on November 9, 2023,\40\ and construction of this facility
is not expected to proceed at this time. As such, the actual emissions
in 2026 and 2035 should be even lower than the anticipated values
reported in the maintenance year projections. Nonroad and onroad mobile
source emissions for the projected years 2026 and 2035 were also
obtained from the MOVES3 version. MOVES3 modeling runs were once again
executed by PADEP for nonroad mobile source emissions and by the
contractor for onroad mobile source emissions. Additional details on
some of the assumptions and inputs to the model are available in the
redesignation request and its associated Appendix B.\41\ Fire and
biogenic sources are typically not projected for future case scenarios
and therefore emissions were held constant from 2017 to 2026 and 2035.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\40\ See Allegheny County Energy Center Termination Letter,
available in the docket for this action.
\41\ See ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP, at 22 and
ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP_App_B_Emissions_Inv.
Table 2--Emissions Inventories for the Allegheny County Nonattainment Area
[Tons per year]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2017 Actual 2026 Projected 2035 Projected
Sector emissions (base emissions (interim emissions
year) year) (maintenance year)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Point Sources..................................... 2,556 2,511 2,472
Area Sources...................................... 22 26 27
Nonroad Mobile Sources............................ 0 0 0
Onroad Mobile Sources............................. 5 2 2
Fires............................................. 0 0 0
Biogenics......................................... 0 0 0
-------------------------------------------------------------
Total......................................... 2,583 2,539 2,501
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Maintenance Demonstration
The Calcagni memo describes two ways for a State to demonstrate
maintenance of the NAAQS for a period of at least 10 years following
the redesignation of the area: (1) the State can show that future
emissions of a pollutant will not exceed the level of the attainment
inventory, or (2) the State can model to show that the future mix of
sources and emission rates will not cause a violation of the
standard.\42\ Pennsylvania's projected actual emissions for the interim
year of 2026 and for the maintenance year of 2035
[[Page 99795]]
are both below the total attainment inventory, which is acceptable for
showing maintenance in the Allegheny County NAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\42\ See Calcagni Memo, at 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. Monitoring Network
The 2014 SO2 Guidance indicates that once an area has
been redesignated to attainment, the state should continue to operate
an appropriate air quality monitoring network as provided under 40 CFR
part 58 to verify the attainment status of the area. ACHD has committed
to continued operation of its SO2 monitoring network in the
Allegheny County NAA to verify the attainment status. Also, ACHD will
continue to submit an annual monitoring network plan to the EPA for
approval, in accordance with 40 CFR 58.10. No changes will be made to
the existing network unless pre-approved by the EPA.
5. Verification of Continued Attainment
The 2014 SO2 Guidance states that each air agency should
ensure that it has the legal authority to implement and enforce all
measures necessary to attain and maintain the 2010 SO2
NAAQS. The air agency's submittal should indicate how it will track the
progress of the maintenance plan for the area either through air
quality monitoring or modeling.
Article XXI, section 2101.07(a) grants the ACHD legal authority to
implement and enforce all measures necessary to maintain the 2010 1-
hour primary SO2 NAAQS. In addition, ACHD has indicated it
will track the progress of the maintenance plan through an integrated
approach utilizing monitoring data and emissions inventories.
As previously indicated, ACHD will continue to operate its
SO2 monitoring network to verify the attainment status of
the Allegheny County NAA. Monitored concentrations will serve as the
primary indicator for verifying continued attainment and will also act
as the triggering mechanism for contingency measures.
ACHD will also use emissions inventories--developed annually by
ACHD for point sources and triennially by PADEP for area and mobile
sources--and compare these inventories to the 2017 attainment inventory
for assessing continued attainment. It is anticipated that future
inventories will remain below the levels of the attainment inventory.
However, if future inventories exceed the attainment inventory levels,
ACHD will conduct a study to evaluate if the increased emissions have
caused increased monitored concentrations within the Allegheny County
NAA and, if so, ACHD will determine if any additional emission control
measures should be enacted. Emissions data will not serve as a
triggering mechanism for contingency measures for two reasons.
Primarily, increased emissions may not directly affect monitored
concentrations, as SO2 concentrations can be impacted by
meteorological conditions. Additionally, emissions inventory reporting
is slower than monitoring data reporting, and the use of emissions data
as a contingency initiator would not provide for a prompt response to
any potential NAAQS violations.
Under ACHD's new source review program, any major new sources or
modifications to existing sources that would affect emissions must
provide a modeling demonstration that illustrates new emissions will
not cause or contribute to a violation of the 2010 1-hour primary
SO2 NAAQS, as described in ACHD Article XXI, section
2102.04(b). ACHD will not approve any modifications that would lead to
expected violations of the 2010 1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS in
the Allegheny County NAA.
The EPA proposes to find that these proposed measures will provide
for verifying continued attainment within the Allegheny County NAA.
6. Contingency Measures
Section 175A(d) of the CAA requires that a maintenance plan include
such contingency measures as the EPA deems necessary to assure that the
State will promptly correct a violation of the NAAQS that occurs after
redesignation. The maintenance plan should identify the contingency
measures to be adopted, a schedule and procedure for adoption and
implementation, and a time limit for action by the State. A State
should also identify specific indicators to be used to determine when
the contingency measures need to be implemented. The maintenance plan
must also include a requirement that a State will continue to implement
all measures with respect to control of the pollutant that were
contained in the SIP before redesignation of the area to attainment.
ACHD has committed to continuing implementation of all measures
indicated in the SIP after redesignation of the Allegheny County
NAA.\43\ Furthermore, ACHD has identified triggering indicators for its
contingency measures, a schedule for implementing these potential
measures, and has specified multiple potential options to correct any
NAAQS violation.\44\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\43\ See ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP, at 27.
\44\ See ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP, at 28-31.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fully validated and quality assured SO2 monitoring data
will serve as the primary trigger for any responses to prevent or
correct a NAAQS violation in the Area. ACHD has established both
warning level and action level responses with specific triggering
indicators for each.
Warning level responses are sub-divided into two tiers. A first-
level warning will occur when the 99th percentile daily maximum 1-hour
SO2 concentration exceeds 75 ppb at any monitor site in the
Allegheny County NAA in a single calendar year. This first-level
warning will prompt an ACHD study to determine if the trigger indicates
a trend toward increasing SO2 concentrations in the
Allegheny County NAA. If there seems to be a rising trend in
SO2 concentrations, the study will examine if the trend is
likely to continue and if so, the needed measures that could reverse
the trend. A second-level warning will occur when the average of two
consecutive years of 99th percentile daily maximum 1-hour
SO2 concentrations exceeds 75 ppb at any monitor in the
Allegheny County NAA. This second-level warning will result in ACHD
evaluating the chance of a violation of the NAAQS and the need for
supplemental control measures to be activated. Both first- and second-
level warnings will allow for ACHD to consider the early adoption of
measures to permit the expeditious implementation of these measures in
the event of a NAAQS violation. This early adoption could allow for
implementation of the measures within 30 to 90 days following the
potential occurrence of a NAAQS violation.
An action level response will occur when the 1-hour design value,
based on the average of three consecutive years of 99th percentile
daily maximum 1-hour SO2 concentrations, violates the 2010
1-hour SO2 NAAQS at any monitor site in the Allegheny County
NAA. This response will include the adoption and implementation of
additional control measures as needed to promptly correct the
violation. If regulatory measures are selected, these measures will
conform to all Federal, State, and local rules and regulations. Both
non-regulatory and regulatory measures are expected to be implemented
within one year following a violation of the NAAQS.\45\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\45\ Specific schedules and associated procedures for the
adoption and implementation of regulatory and non-regulatory
measures are available in the ACHD_SO2_RR_and_MP document at pp. 29-
30.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
ACHD has specified multiple potential regulatory and non-regulatory
[[Page 99796]]
contingency measures for this maintenance plan--including both area-
wide and USS Mon Valley Works measures.\46\ Selection will be based on
several factors, including but not limited to, the degree of the
violation, the emission reduction potential, and cost. ACHD has
identified non-regulatory, area-wide measures such as wood burning-
related programs and alternative fuel promotions as potential options
for correcting a NAAQS violation. Additionally, ACHD has proposed USS
Mon Valley Works regulatory measures, including but not limited to,
additional desulfurization controls for coke oven gas at USS Clairton,
additional fugitive controls at USS Mon Valley Works plants, and
restrictions on fuel usage at USS Mon Valley Works plants. All of these
measures can be individually implemented or in conjunction with others
to ensure correction of any NAAQS violation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\46\ USS Mon Valley Works collectively refers to the USS
Clairton, Edgar Thomson, and Irvin Plants located within the
Allegheny County NAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EPA proposes to find that ACHD's submitted maintenance plan
meets the requirements set forth in CAA section 175A and EPA guidance
and is proposing to approve the maintenance plan as a revision to the
Pennsylvania SIP.
E. Criterion (5)--Pennsylvania Has Met All Applicable Requirements
Under Section 110 and Part D of Title I of the CAA
In accordance with section 107(d)(3)(E)(v) of the CAA, to
redesignate the Allegheny County NAA to attainment, Pennsylvania must
meet all requirements applicable to the Allegheny County NAA under CAA
section 110 (general SIP requirements) and part D of title I of the CAA
(SIP requirements for nonattainment areas).
1. Section 110 General Requirements for SIPs
Pursuant to CAA section 110(a)(1), whenever new or revised NAAQS
are promulgated, the CAA requires States to submit a plan (i.e., SIP)
for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of such NAAQS.
Section 110(a)(2) of title I of the CAA contains the general
requirements for a SIP, also known as ``infrastructure'' requirements.
These requirements include, but are not limited to, the following:
submittal of a SIP that has been adopted by the state after reasonable
public notice and hearing; provisions for establishment and operation
of appropriate procedures needed to monitor ambient air quality;
implementation of a source permit program; provisions for the
implementation of part C requirements (Prevention of Significant
Deterioration (PSD)) and provisions for the implementation of part D
requirements (New Source Review (NSR) permit programs); provisions for
air pollution modeling; and provisions for public and local agency
participation in planning and emission control rule development.
Section 110(a)(2)(D) requires that SIPs contain certain measures to
prevent sources in a state from significantly contributing to air
quality problems in another state. To implement this provision, the EPA
has required certain states to establish programs to address the
interstate transport of air pollutants.\47\ The section 110(a)(2)(D)
requirements for a state are not linked with a particular nonattainment
area's designation and classification in that state. The EPA has
concluded that the requirements linked with a particular nonattainment
area's designation and classifications are the relevant measures to
evaluate in reviewing a redesignation request. The transport SIP
submittal requirements, where applicable, continue to apply to a state
regardless of the designation of any one particular area in the state.
Thus, the EPA has concluded that the CAA's interstate transport
requirements should not be construed to be applicable requirements for
purposes of redesignation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\47\ See Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) SIP Call and
amendments to the NOX SIP Call (64 FR 26298, May 14, 1999
and 65 FR 11222, March 2, 2000), and the Cross-State Air Pollution
Rule (CSAPR) Update (81 FR 74504, October 26, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the EPA has concluded other section 110 elements--
those that are neither connected with nonattainment plan submissions
nor linked with an area's attainment status--are not applicable
requirements for purposes of redesignation. The area will still be
subject to these requirements after the area is redesignated. The
section 110 and part D requirements which are linked with a particular
area's designation and classification are the relevant measures to
evaluate in reviewing a redesignation request. This approach is
consistent with the EPA's existing policy on applicability (i.e., for
redesignations) of conformity and oxygenated fuels requirements, as
well as with section 184 ozone transport requirements. See Reading,
Pennsylvania, proposed and final rules (61 FR 53174-53176, October 10,
1996), (62 FR 24826, May 7, 2008); Cleveland-Akron-Loraine, Ohio, final
rule (61 FR 20458, May 7,1996); and Tampa, Florida, final rule (60 FR
62748, December 7, 1995). See also the discussion on this issue in the
Cincinnati, Ohio, redesignation (65 FR 37890, June 19, 2000), and in
the Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, redesignation (66 FR 50399, October 19,
2001).
The EPA approved elements of Pennsylvania's June 15, 2014
SO2 infrastructure SIP submittal on August 5, 2015.\48\ As
explained previously, certain general requirements of CAA section
110(a)(2) are statewide requirements that are not linked to the
nonattainment status of the Allegheny County NAA and are therefore not
``applicable requirements'' for the purpose of reviewing Pennsylvania's
redesignation request. Because Pennsylvania satisfies the general SIP
elements and requirements set forth in CAA section 110(a)(2) applicable
to and necessary for SO2 redesignation, the EPA proposes to
conclude that Pennsylvania has satisfied the criterion of section
107(d)(3)(E)(v) related to section 110(a)(2) of the CAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\48\ 80 FR 46494, August 5, 2015.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Part D Requirements
In addition to the CAA section 110 requirements, section
107(d)(3)(E)(v) requires that the state meet all the requirements
applicable to the nonattainment area ``under part D of this
subchapter'' for the nonattainment area to be redesignated. Both
section 107 and part D are within subchapter 1 of the CAA. Part D,
entitled ``Plan Requirements for Nonattainment Areas,'' consists of six
subparts, of which only subparts 1 and 5 are applicable to
SO2 nonattainment areas. Subpart 1 (sections 171 through
179B) contains provisions that can apply to all nonattainment areas for
all criteria pollutants, while subpart 5 (sections 191 through 192)
contains additional provisions for SO2, NOX, or
lead nonattainment areas. The requirements applicable to this
redesignation are discussed below.
a. Subpart 1 Requirements
1. Section 172 Requirements
CAA section 172 requires states with nonattainment areas to submit
plans that provide for timely attainment of the NAAQS. More
specifically, CAA section 172(c) contains general requirements for
nonattainment plans. A thorough discussion of these requirements is
found in the General Preamble for Implementation of title I.\49\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\49\ 57 FR 13498, April 16, 1992.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted in the General Preamble, certain attainment-related
planning requirements under section 172(c) no longer have meaning for
an area that is already attaining the NAAQS, and
[[Page 99797]]
therefore are not applicable for purposes of redesignation. For
example, for an area that is already attaining the NAAQS, there would
be nothing for the State to provide to show reasonable further progress
to attainment in that area. Similarly, the CAA section 172 requirements
for the attainment demonstration, implementation of reasonably
available control measures, including reasonably available control
technology, and contingency measures that are triggered if an area
fails to meet RFP or fails to attain are also not applicable for
purposes of redesignation.
With respect to CAA section 172(c)(3), Pennsylvania was required to
submit an actual current emissions inventory with its attainment plan.
Pennsylvania had submitted a base year inventory with its attainment
plan SIP on October 3, 2017 and the EPA approved this element on April
23, 2020.\50\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\50\ 85 FR 22593, April 23, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Section 173 Requirements
Section 173 of the CAA includes requirements for permit programs
that are required in a nonattainment area for new sources as required
by section 172(c)(5), known as nonattainment new source review (NNSR).
However, the EPA has a longstanding interpretation that because the
NNSR permit program is replaced by the PSD permit program upon an
area's redesignation to attainment, nonattainment areas seeking
redesignation to attainment do not need a fully approved part D NNSR
program to be redesignated. A more detailed rationale for this view is
described in a memorandum from Mary Nichols, Assistant Administrator
for Air and Radiation, dated October 14, 1994, entitled, ``Part D New
Source Review Requirements for Areas Requesting Redesignation to
Attainment.'' \51\ Nevertheless, the EPA notes that the ACHD's Article
XXI Rules and Regulations for Air Pollution Control have SIP-approved
NNSR and PSD programs found in section 2102.06 for NNSR and section
2102.07 for PSD. Allegheny County has incorporated by reference
Pennsylvania's NNSR provisions at 25 Pa. Code 127.201-127.218 and also
Pennsylvania's PSD regulations found at 25 Pa. Code 127.81-127.83.
Pennsylvania's PSD regulations merely incorporate by reference the
Federal PSD regulations found at 40 CFR part 52. Allegheny County has
therefore addressed all required provisions for the permitting of
sources in NAAs, including NNSR. See 40 CFR 52.2020(c). Pennsylvania's
PSD program will become applicable for SO2 in the Allegheny
County NAA upon redesignation to attainment.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\51\ Available in the docket for this action as Nichols_Memo and
at www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-07/documents/101494m.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Section 175A Requirements
CAA section 175A requires that states seeking redesignation of an
area to attainment submit a ``maintenance plan'' containing certain
elements. Pennsylvania included a maintenance plan for the Allegheny
County NAA with its November 14, 2023 redesignation request, which the
EPA is proposing to approve in conjunction with the redesignation, and
it is discussed in detail in section II, Criterion (4) of this
document.
4. Section 176 Requirements
Section 176(c) of the CAA requires that Federal actions conform to
the air quality planning goals in the applicable SIP. The requirement
to determine conformity applies to transportation plans, programs, and
projects that are developed, funded, or approved under title 23 of the
United States Code and the Federal Transit Act (transportation
conformity) as well as to all other Federally-supported or funded
projects (general conformity). Section 176(c) of the CAA also requires
that states establish criteria and procedures to ensure that Federally-
supported or funded transportation plans, transportation improvement
programs (TIPs) and projects conform to the goals of the applicable
SIP. This is referred to as a transportation conformity SIP. In the
preamble to the January 1993 proposed transportation conformity rule,
the EPA stated that, ``Based on available emissions information, EPA
believes highway and transit motor vehicles are not significant sources
of lead or sulfur dioxide. Therefore, transportation plans, TIPs, and
projects are presumed to conform to the applicable implementation plans
for these pollutants.'' \52\ In November 1993, the EPA finalized its
transportation conformity regulations. One section of those regulations
addressed the geographic applicability of the transportation conformity
regulations. The regulation stated at that time that, ``The provisions
of this subpart apply with respect to emissions of the following
criteria pollutants: Ozone, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, and
particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal
10 micrometers (PM10).'' \53\ Based on this provision,
transportation conformity does not apply in nonattainment or
maintenance areas for SO2. Therefore, a transportation
conformity SIP is not required for SO2 nonattainment and
maintenance areas and is not necessary for an SO2
nonattainment area to be redesignated to attainment, and the EPA's
transportation conformity rules do not apply to SO2 for the
Allegheny County NAA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\52\ 58 FR 3776, January 11, 1993.
\53\ This provision has been revised to include particles with
an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to a nominal 2.5
micrometers (PM2.5). See 40 CFR 93.102(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Section 179 Requirements
Section 179(a) of the CAA addresses potential sanctions for the
failure of a State to submit certain required SIP elements by statutory
deadlines. The EPA is not aware of any missing or incomplete Allegheny
County planning elements subject to Section 179(a) of the CAA.
b. Subpart 5 Requirements
The subpart 5 requirements, which consist of sections 191 and 192
of the CAA, are specific provisions applicable to SO2,
NO2 or lead nonattainment areas. Section 191 of the CAA
requires states with areas designated nonattainment for SO2,
NO2 or lead after November 15, 1990, to submit within 18
months of the designation an implementation plan meeting the
requirements of part D. The substance of the required plans is
established by section 172(c). Section 192 sets forth attainment dates
for nonattainment areas under section 191.
For SO2, section 192(a) requires that attainment plans
provide for attainment of the primary standard as expeditiously as
possible, but no later than five years from the date of the
nonattainment designation. The EPA designated the Allegheny County NAA
as nonattainment on August 5, 2013, with an attainment date of October
4, 2018. However, because the EPA is reviewing a redesignation request
under section 107(d)(3)(E), rather than a determination of attainment
under section 179(c), the determination of whether the Area attained by
the attainment date set forth in section 192 is not applicable to this
action proposing approval of Pennsylvania's redesignation request.
Based on the above, the EPA is proposing to find that Pennsylvania
has satisfied the applicable requirements for the redesignation of the
Allegheny County NAA under section 110 and part D of title I of the
CAA.
III. Environmental Justice Concerns
Within its redesignation request and maintenance plan, ACHD
provided
[[Page 99798]]
supplemental information regarding environmental justice considerations
within the Allegheny County NAA. Utilizing the Environmental Justice
Index (EJI) tool developed by ACHD's Bureau of Assessment, Statistics,
& Epidemiology, ACHD identified areas within the Allegheny County NAA
with higher environmental health risks. The EJI tool uses Allegheny
County-specific factors to evaluate environmental justice concerns,
including the following indicators: race, education, median household
income, housing vacancy, lead paint risk, greenness, air quality, and
flood risk. Six municipalities within the Allegheny County NAA were
designated as ``highest need'' areas according to EJI, while seven
other municipalities were designated as ``high need'' areas. ACHD has
indicated that its SO2 monitoring network provides enhanced
surveillance in vulnerable communities, and the two current
SO2 monitors in the Allegheny County NAA are located within
or directly downwind of areas labeled as ``highest need.'' Furthermore,
ACHD states that the controls specified in its 2017 attainment
demonstration as well as the shutdowns denoted in the maintenance
demonstration illustrate the greatest emissions reductions in the
``highest need'' areas.
As explained in the EJ Legal Tools to Advance Environmental Justice
2022 document, the CAA provides states with the discretion to consider
environmental justice in developing rules and measures related to
redesignation requests and maintenance plans. In this instance, ACHD
exercised this discretion, as is described above in summary. In
reviewing ACHD's analysis, the EPA defers to ACHD's reasonable exercise
of its discretion in considering EJ in this way. The EPA is taking
proposed action to approve the SIP revision because it meets minimum
requirements pursuant to the CAA and relevant implementing regulations.
The EPA also finds that ACHD's consideration of EJ analyses in this
context is reasonable. The EPA encourages air agencies generally to
evaluate environmental justice considerations of their actions and
carefully consider impacts to communities. The EJ analyses submitted by
the air agency were considered but were not the basis for the EPA's
decision making and the SIP met the minimum applicable requirements, as
explained above.
IV. Proposed Action
The EPA's review of this material indicates that the Allegheny
County NAA has met the criteria necessary under CAA section
107(d)(3)(E) for the EPA to redesignate the Area from nonattainment to
attainment for the 2010 1-hour primary SO2 NAAQS. The EPA is
proposing to approve the Pennsylvania redesignation request for the
Allegheny County NAA, which was submitted on behalf of ACHD on November
14, 2023. Final approval of Pennsylvania's redesignation request would
change the legal designation of the portion of Allegheny County
designated nonattainment at 40 CFR 81.339 to attainment for the 2010 1-
hour primary SO2 NAAQS. The EPA is also proposing to approve
ACHD's maintenance plan, which is designed to ensure that the
potentially redesignated Allegheny County NAA will continue to maintain
the SO2 NAAQS. The EPA is soliciting public comments on the
issues discussed in this document. These comments will be considered
before taking final action.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the redesignation of an area to attainment and the
accompanying approval of the maintenance plan under CAA section
107(d)(3)(E) are actions that affect the status of geographical area
and do not impose any additional regulatory requirements on sources
beyond those required by state law. A redesignation to attainment does
not in and of itself impose any new requirements, but rather results in
the application of requirements contained in the CAA for areas that
have been redesignated to attainment. Moreover, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions
of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40
CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to
approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act;
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
The EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color,
national origin, or income with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.'' The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean
that ``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and policies.''
ACHD evaluated environmental justice considerations as part of its
SIP submittal even though the CAA and applicable implementing
regulations neither prohibit nor require an evaluation. The EPA's
evaluation of ACHD's environmental justice considerations is described
above in the section titled, ``Environmental Justice Considerations.''
The analysis was done for the purpose of providing additional context
and information about this rulemaking to the public, not as a basis of
the action. The EPA is taking action under the CAA on bases independent
of ACHD's evaluation of environmental justice. Due to the nature of the
action
[[Page 99799]]
being taken here, this action is expected to have a neutral to positive
impact on the air quality of the affected area. In addition, there is
no information in the record upon which this decision is based that is
inconsistent with the stated goal of Executive Order 12898 of achieving
environmental justice for people of color, low-income populations, and
Indigenous peoples.
In addition, this proposed rulemaking, for the redesignation and
approval of the maintenance plan for the Allegheny County NAA, does not
have tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000), because the SIP is not approved to apply in
Indian country located in the State, and the EPA notes that it will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
40 CFR Part 81
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.
Adam Ortiz,
Regional Administrator, Region III.
[FR Doc. 2024-28536 Filed 12-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P