Visas: Special Immigrant Visas-U.S. Government Employee Special Immigrant Visas for Service Abroad, 99076-99081 [2024-28846]
Download as PDF
99076
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
but to hold down the fort, conduct routine
law enforcement, and provide for an orderly
transition to the Trump Administration. I
will vote against all new rules not required
by statute, and any enforcement action that
advances an unprecedented theory of
liability until that transition is complete.
[FR Doc. 2024–28399 Filed 12–9–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 42
[Public Notice: 12446]
RIN 1400–AF82
Visas: Special Immigrant Visas—U.S.
Government Employee Special
Immigrant Visas for Service Abroad
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This final rule makes updates
to reflect a statutory change to the class
of individuals who may qualify for
Special Immigrant Visas (SIVs).
DATES: This final rule is effective
December 10, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jami
Thompson, Senior Regulatory
Coordinator, U.S. Department of State,
Bureau of Consular Affairs, Visa
Services, 600 19th Street NW,
Washington, DC 20522, (202) 485–7586,
VisaRegs@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
I. Special Immigrant Visas for Certain
Employees or Former Employees of the
United States Abroad, and for the
Surviving Spouses or Children of
Certain Deceased Employees of the U.S.
Government Abroad
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
A. Legal Authority
Section 203(b)(4) of the Immigration
and Nationality Act (INA), as amended
8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(4), generally provides
that visas may be issued to qualified
special immigrants described in INA
section 101(a)(27). Among the
individuals considered ‘‘special
immigrants’’ as defined in this
provision, INA section 101(a)(27)(D), 8
U.S.C. 1101(a)(27)(D), defines ‘‘special
immigrant’’ to include employees, or
honorably retired former employees, of
the U.S. Government abroad, or of the
American Institute in Taiwan, who have
performed faithful service for a total of
fifteen years or more, in addition to
their accompanying spouse and
children, and who have been
recommended and approved for such
status in accordance with enumerated
criteria.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:16 Dec 09, 2024
Jkt 265001
Section 403(a) of the Emergency
Security Supplemental Appropriations
Act, 2021 (‘‘ESSAA’’), Public Law 117–
31, 135 Stat. 309, 318, amended the
definition of a special immigrant at INA
section 101(a)(27)(D) to include a new
subclause (ii). The new subclause
includes in the definition of ‘‘special
immigrant’’ the surviving spouse or
child of an employee of the United
States Government abroad: Provided,
[t]hat the employee performed faithful
service for a total of not less than 15
years or was killed in the line of duty.’’
Under this provision, the qualifying
surviving spouse or child of a U.S.
Government employee is a principal
applicant for special immigrant status,
and consequently, their current spouse
and minor child(ren) are entitled to SIVs
as derivatives under INA section 203(d),
8 U.S.C. 1153(d), if accompanying or
following to join the qualifying
surviving spouse or parent. Pursuant to
section 403(d) of the ESSAA, these
changes are effective June 30, 2021, and
have retroactive effect.
In addition to the qualifications for
this group of ‘‘special immigrants,’’ INA
section 204(a)(1)(G)(ii) governs the
process through which an individual
claiming status as a special immigrant
under INA section 101(a)(27)(D) must
file a petition with the Department of
State, requiring that they first be
recommended and approved for such
status.
B. Processing for Special Immigrants
Under INA Section 101(a)(27)(D)
Under INA sections 204(a)(1)(G)(ii)
and 101(a)(27)(D)(i), acquisition of
special immigrant status under INA
section 101(a)(27)(D) requires multiple
sequential steps. First, the principal
officer of the U.S. embassy or consulate
with jurisdiction over where the
individual was employed must have
recommended the granting of special
immigrant status in exceptional
circumstances, and the Secretary of
State or appropriate designee must have
approved the recommendation and
found that it is in the national interest
to grant such status. Second, under INA
section 204(a)(1)(G)(ii), only after the
approval of the recommendation, the
applicant may submit a Form DS–1884,
Petition to Classify Special Immigrant
Under INA 203(b)(4) as an Employee or
Former Employee of the U.S.
Government Abroad, or the Surviving
Spouse or Child of an Employee of the
U.S. Government Abroad, to a consular
officer at a foreign service post. Under
Department regulations at 22 CFR
42.34(b)(2), the date the applicant’s
properly completed DS–1884 is
accepted becomes the applicant’s
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
priority date. Those same regulations at
22 CFR 42.34(b)(4) provide that a
petition from a qualifying individual is
valid for six months from the date of
approval or the date an immigrant visa
number becomes available, whichever is
later.
C. What is the impact of the ESSAA?
Prior to passage of the ESSAA, if the
employee were to die before entering
the United States using their immigrant
visa, the surviving spouse or child
would be ineligible for immigrant
status. With the passage of the ESSAA,
a surviving spouse and surviving
child(ren), as a principal applicant, are
eligible to seek qualification as a special
immigrant. Additionally, in situations
where the employee did not pursue
special immigrant status prior to the
employee’s death, their surviving
spouse and/or child may now qualify to
be approved for status. These changes
apply retroactively, meaning that the
surviving spouse or child of an
employee who died prior to the effective
date of the ESSAA may also seek to
qualify. To be a surviving spouse, the
spousal relationship must have existed
at the time of the deceased employee’s
death. To be a surviving child, the adult
son or daughter of the deceased
employee must have met the definition
of ‘‘child’’ under INA section 101(b)(1)
on the date of the employee’s death.
II. Changes the Department Is Making
A. 22 CFR 42.11
This rule makes updates to the
Department’s regulations at 22 CFR
42.11 that list the symbols of the current
immigrant visa classifications to
conform with the new classifications
added by the ESSAA. Specifically,
under the ‘‘Employment 4th Preference
(Certain Special Immigrants)’’ header,
the Department is adding: The ‘‘SS1’’
symbol that will be used for issuance of
SIVs to the surviving spouse or child of
a U.S. Government employee; the ‘‘SS2’’
symbol that will be used for issuance of
an SIV to the current spouse of an SS1
who qualifies as a derivative under INA
203(d); and the ‘‘SS3’’ symbol that will
be used for issuance of an SIV to the
minor child(ren) of an SS1 who meet(s)
the definition of ‘‘child’’ under INA
101(b)(1) and 203(h), and qualify(ies) as
a derivative under INA 203(d).
B. 22 CFR 42.34
This rule makes changes to
Department regulations at 22 CFR 42.34
to conform with the expanded
definition of ‘‘special immigrant’’ under
the ESSAA. For the reasons explained
below, the Department believes these (or
E:\FR\FM\10DER1.SGM
10DER1
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
equivalent) changes are necessary to
implement the best reading of the
ESSAA. The changes include the
explanation of the classification of a
surviving spouse or child of an
employee of the United States
Government abroad who was killed in
the line of duty, or who performed
faithful service for at least fifteen years
before their death.
As summarized above, the ESSAA
added a new subsection (ii) to INA
101(a)(27)(D) and amended INA
101(a)(27)(D) to specify that a ‘‘special
immigrant’’ includes an individual
described in clause (D)(i) ‘‘or’’ clause
(D)(ii). The ESSAA did not amend INA
204(a)(1)(G)(ii), which governs the
process through which an individual
petitions for status ‘‘as a special
immigrant under INA 101(a)(27)(D).’’
Consequently, as this provision was not
amended to distinguish the petition
process for special immigrants
described in INA 101(a)(27)(D)(i) or INA
101(a)(27)(D)(ii), INA 204(a)(1)(G)(ii)
continues to govern the petition process
for both subcategories of ‘‘special
immigrants’’ described in section
101(a)(27)(D), providing that applicants
seeking status under either subcategory
‘‘may file a petition . . . only after
notification by the Secretary of State
that such status has been recommended
and approved pursuant to such
section.’’ Although INA 101(a)(27)(D)(ii)
as amended does not expressly
reference a framework for
recommendation and approval, INA
101(a)(27)(D)(i) establishes the
standards for a recommendation and
approval process, including that the
recommendation of an individual for
special immigrant status be made in
‘‘exceptional circumstances’’ and the
approval be ‘‘in the national interest,’’
as well as identifies officers vested with
authority for those respective functions.
Incorporating into INA 101(a)(27)(D)(ii)
the standards and process for
recommendation and approval
expressly provided by Congress in INA
101(a)(27)(D)(i) reflects the best reading
of the statutory framework as amended
by ensuring consistency with the
companion provision in INA
204(a)(1)(G)(ii) requiring
recommendation and approval of such
cases and ensuring the consistent
application of the longstanding
framework for the granting of special
immigrant visas to U.S. Government
employees.
To address potential inconsistencies
in how this change would be
implemented using the existing
definition of ‘‘exceptional
circumstances’’ at 22 CFR 42.34(c)(7),
this rule explains the circumstances in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:16 Dec 09, 2024
Jkt 265001
which a surviving spouse or child
would be recommended for special
immigrant status, based on the criteria
described in INA section
101(a)(27)(D)(ii). In addition to
qualifying employees’ deaths that
occurred in the line of duty, these
include when the deceased employee
performed at least 15 years of faithful
service for the U.S. Government and
either would have qualified for special
immigrant status before dying or was
employed by the U.S. Government as of
the date of their death or in the
immediately preceding five-year period.
These parameters will encompass those
family members of deceased employees
who, but for their death following at
least 15 years of faithful service, were
likely to have soon qualified for special
immigrant status by accumulating 20
years of faithful service (where 20 years
is a strong indicator of exceptional
circumstances under 22 CFR
42.34(c)(7)(ii)(E)). This standard
encompasses those who were employed
by the U.S. Government in the period
immediately preceding their death, as
the Department anticipates that in some
cases, an employee may have ceased
employment by the U.S. Government
with the intention of returning, but for
circumstances out of their control. For
example, an employee who dies
following a serious illness may have
ceased or temporarily left their
employment for a period to combat their
illness. Consequently, to provide clarity
to the public and support consistent
application, the rule establishes a
rebuttable presumption that a death
occurring more than five years after
cessation of employment is not related
to the cessation of their employment for
purposes of their surviving spouse or
child qualifying for special immigrant
status.
The Department believes this fiveyear presumption will account for the
gravity and severity of the
circumstances surrounding cessation of
employment, and the likelihood that a
previously employed individual would
have returned to work to complete 20
years of service, if they were able to do
so. This presumption is rebuttable and
will require case-specific consideration
of those individuals whose
circumstances fall outside the five-year
presumption and who wish to provide
evidence to establish their
qualifications. Surviving spouses and
children of employees who died for
reasons unrelated to cessation of
employment are not precluded from
qualifying as special immigrants,
provided they can demonstrate that the
employee demonstrated at least one
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
99077
form of ‘‘exceptional circumstances’’
while still employed. The changes also
highlight that the processes to qualify
for eligibility are the same for a
surviving spouse or child as they are for
employees. These changes make
necessary amendments to 22 CFR 42.34
to provide for the issuance of SIVs to
qualified surviving spouses and
children of U.S. Government employees,
and to reflect the amended citations in
INA section 101(a)(27)(D) under the
ESSAA.
This rule also makes corrections
throughout 22 CFR 42.34 to replace the
term ‘‘alien’’ with the term ‘‘applicant’’
or ‘‘employee,’’ as appropriate. This
change is consistent with current
Department practice.1
Finally, this rule also amends the
certification, required as part of the
principal officer’s recommendation, that
the individual being recommended is
prepared to pursue an immigrant visa
application ‘‘within one year of the
Department’s notification to the post of
approval of special immigrant status.’’
As applicants in numerically limited
immigrant visa categories, including
INA section 203(b)(4), may not pursue
an immigrant visa application until
such time that a visa number becomes
available in that category, this
requirement has been changed to reflect
that the recommended individual must
be prepared to pursue their application
‘‘within one year of the Department’s
notification to the post of approval of
special immigrant status, or of an
immigrant visa becoming available,
whichever is later.’’
Regulatory Findings
A. Administrative Procedure Act
This rule is exempted from the notice
and comment and delayed effective date
rulemaking procedures set forth in 5
U.S.C. 553 because the rule involves a
foreign affairs function. 5 U.S.C.
553(a)(1). This exemption applies when
the rule’s subject matter ‘‘is clearly and
directly involved in a foreign affairs
function.’’ Mast Indus. v. Regan, 596 F.
Supp. 1567, 1582 (C.I.T. 1984)
(quotation marks omitted). In addition,
although the text of the APA does not
require an agency invoking this
exemption to show that rulemaking
with public notice and comment would
result in ‘‘definitely undesirable
international consequences,’’ some
courts have required such a showing.
See, e.g., Yassini v. Crosland, 618 F.2d
1356, 1360 n.4 (9th Cir. 1980). This rule
satisfies both standards.
1 See
E:\FR\FM\10DER1.SGM
88 FR 45072 (July 14, 2023).
10DER1
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
99078
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
This rule extends the authority to
grant special immigrant status to the
surviving spouse or child of a U.S.
Government employee who performed
faithful service for at least fifteen years
or was killed in the line of duty. As with
the availability of special immigrant
status to qualifying locally employed
staff, eligibility for employees’ surviving
spouses and children encourages
employees to remain in their jobs and to
provide long-term, institutional memory
to U.S. Government agencies abroad.
This is particularly essential in
countries where local staff members and
their families face retribution by the
host government, making it even more
challenging to recruit and retain a
locally employed workforce. For this
reason, extending eligibility to the
employee’s surviving spouse and
children critically impacts the
willingness of foreign nationals to
become, and remain, employees of the
U.S. Government in overseas posts, and
hence directly impacts the effectiveness
of U.S. diplomatic efforts in those
countries.
The Department’s establishment of
criteria for surviving spouses and
child(ren) to qualify for special
immigrant status under ESSAA clearly
and directly relates to U.S. foreign
affairs, because the criteria itself is
critical for the U.S. Government to
recruit and retain loyal, valuable local
staff outside the United States, without
whom the Department could not fulfill
its diplomatic functions overseas. The
Department alone employs
approximately 50,000 local staff at over
200 Foreign Service posts overseas.
Expanded qualifications for surviving
spouses and child(ren) is critical to
recruitment, retention, and morale of
these locally employed staff who help
the Department carry out its foreign
affairs functions overseas. For example,
following the 2013 death of Mustafa
Akarsu, a member of the local guard
force for U.S. Embassy Ankara for 22
years, when he confronted a suicide
bomber outside the Embassy,
Department employee organizations
including the American Foreign Service
Association, advocated for passage of
legislation eventually enacted in ESSAA
to provide SIVs to the surviving spouses
and children of U.S. Government
employees killed in the line of duty.
Consequently, implementation of these
standards for surviving family members
clearly and directly involves a U.S.
foreign affairs function.
Finally, the Department considers that
providing the opportunity for public
notice and comment would provide
‘‘definitely undesirable international
consequences,’’ in that conducting and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:16 Dec 09, 2024
Jkt 265001
resolving a public debate regarding the
safety of surviving spouses and children
of U.S. Government employees killed
abroad would risk impairing U.S.
relations with other countries. See, e.g.,
Rajah v. Mukasey, 544 F.3d 427, 437 (2d
Cir. 2008). The loss of United States
local employees in the line of duty has
previously had the effect of straining
bilateral relations, and has the
continued potential to do so,
particularly when such losses involve
local foreign authorities or other parties
over which the host country exercises
control. This may be even more so in
countries with which the United States
already has sensitive or strained
relations, which may oppose the
availability of immigrant visas to the
surviving spouses and children of such
staff, who are usually nationals of the
host country. Accordingly, the
promulgation of standards for approval
under the Secretary of State’s authority
in INA 101(a)(27)(D) involves an
inherently foreign affairs function of the
Department of State.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive
Order 13272: Small Business
As this final rule is exempt from
notice and comment rulemaking under
5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1), it is exempt from the
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements set forth by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
Nonetheless, as this action only directly
impacts visa applicants, the Department
certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small U.S.
entities.
C. Congressional Review Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as
defined in 5 U.S.C. 804. This rule will
not result in an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more; a
major increase in costs or prices; or
adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or the ability of United
States-based companies to compete with
foreign-based companies in domestic
and import markets.
D. Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory
Planning and Review), 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review), and 14094 (Modernizing
Regulatory Review)
This rule has been drafted in
accordance with the principles of
Executive Orders 12866 (as amended by
Executive Order 14094) and 13563. The
Department has submitted this rule to
OIRA for review and it has been deemed
a significant regulatory action.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
The Department of State has reviewed
the rule considering sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to
eliminate ambiguity, minimize
litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burdens.
F. Executive Order 13175—Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
The Department of State has
determined that this rulemaking will
not have Tribal implications, will not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian Tribal Governments,
and will not pre-empt Tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirements of
Section 5 of Executive Order 13175 do
not apply to this rulemaking.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new
reporting or record-keeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. Chapter
35. The Form DS–1884, Petition to
Classify Special Immigrant under INA
203(b)(4) as an Employee or Former
Employee of the U.S. Government
Abroad, is approved under the PRA
(OMB Control No. 1405–0082).
H. Other
The Department has also considered
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995 and Executive Orders 12372 and
13132 and affirms this rule is consistent
with the applicable mandates or
guidance therein.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 42
Administrative practice and
procedure, Aliens, Passports and visas.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth
in the preamble, 22 CFR part 42 is
amended as follows:
PART 42—VISAS: DOCUMENTATION
OF IMMIGRANTS UNDER THE
IMMIGRATION AND NATIONALITY
ACT, AS AMENDED
1. The authority citation for part 42
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1104 and 1182; Pub.
L. 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681; Pub. L. 108–449,
118 Stat. 3469; The Convention on Protection
of Children and Co-operation in Respect of
Intercountry Adoption (done at the Hague,
May 29, 1993), S. Treaty Doc. 105–51 (1998),
1870 U.N.T.S. 167 (Reg. No. 31922 (1993));
42 U.S.C. 14901–14954 (Pub. L. 106–279, 114
Stat. 825); 8 U.S.C. 1101 (Pub L. 117–31, 135
Stat. 309); 8 U.S.C. 1154 (Pub. L. 109–162,
119 Stat. 2960); 8 U.S.C. 1201 (Pub. L. 114–
70, 129 Stat. 561).
2. Section 42.11 is amended in table
1 to § 42.11 under the undesignated
■
E:\FR\FM\10DER1.SGM
10DER1
99079
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
center heading ‘‘Employment 4th
Preference (Certain Special
Immigrants)’’ by:
■ a. Revising the entries for SE1, SE2,
SE3, and SS1; and
§ 42.11
b. Adding entries for SS2 and SS3 in
alphanumeric order.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
*
Classification symbols.
*
*
*
*
TABLE 1 TO § 42.11
Symbol
Class
*
*
*
Section of Law
*
*
*
*
Employment 4th Preference (Certain Special Immigrants)
*
SE1 ...................
SE2 ...................
SE3 ...................
*
*
*
*
*
*
Certain Employee or Former Employee of the U.S. Government Abroad .. INA 101(a)(27)(D)(i) & INA 203(b)(4).
Spouse of SE1 ............................................................................................. INA 101(a)(27)(D)(i) & INA 203(b)(4).
Child of SE1 ................................................................................................. INA 101(a)(27)(D)(i) & INA 203(b)(4).
*
SS1 ...................
*
*
*
*
*
*
Surviving Spouse or Child of an Employee of the United States GovernINA 101(a)(27)(D)(ii) & INA 203(b)(4).
ment Abroad.
Current Spouse of SS1 ................................................................................ INA 101(a)(27)(D)(ii), INA 203(b)(4) & INA
203(d).
Child of SS1 (Excludes Surviving Child of an Employee of the United
INA 101(a)(27)(D)(ii), INA 1101(b)(1), 203(b)(4),
States Government Abroad), provided the child meets the definition of
& INA 203(d).
101(b)(1) of the INA.
SS2 ...................
SS3 ...................
*
*
*
3. Section 42.34 is revised to read as
follows:
■
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
§ 42.34 Special immigrant visas–certain
U.S. Government employees.
(a) General. An applicant is
classifiable under INA 203(b)(4) as a
special immigrant described in INA
101(a)(27)(D) provided:
(1) (i) The applicant has performed
faithful service to the United States
Government abroad, or the American
Institute in Taiwan, for a total of fifteen
years or more; or
(ii) The applicant is the surviving
spouse or child of an employee of the
United States Government abroad who
performed faithful service for a total of
not less than 15 years or was killed in
the line of duty; and
(2) The principal officer of a Foreign
Service establishment (or, in the case of
the American Institute in Taiwan, the
Director), recommends granting special
immigrant status to such person in
exceptional circumstances; and
(3) The Secretary of State, or designee,
approves such recommendation and
finds that it is in the national interest to
grant such status.
(b) Petition requirement. An applicant
who seeks classification as a special
immigrant described in paragraph (a) of
this section must file a Form DS–1884,
Petition to Classify Special Immigrant
under INA 203(b)(4) as an Employee or
Former Employee of the U.S.
Government Abroad, or the Surviving
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:16 Dec 09, 2024
Jkt 265001
*
*
Spouse or Child of an Employee of the
U.S. Government Abroad, with the
Department of State. An applicant
described in INA 101(a)(27)(D) may file
such a petition only after, but within
one year of, notification from the
Department that the Secretary of State or
designee has approved a
recommendation from the principal
officer that special immigrant status be
accorded the applicant in exceptional
circumstances and has found it in the
national interest to do so.
(1) Petition fees. The Secretary of
State shall establish a fee for the filing
of a petition to accord status under INA
203(b)(4) which shall be collected
following notification that the Secretary
of State, or designee, has approved the
recommendation that the applicant be
granted status as a special immigrant
under INA 101(a)(27)(D).
(2) Establishing priority date. The
priority date of an applicant seeking
status under INA 203(b)(4) as a special
immigrant described in INA
101(a)(27)(D) shall be the date on which
the petition to accord such
classification, the DS–1884, is filed. The
filing date of the petition is the date on
which a properly completed form and
the required fee are accepted by a
Foreign Service post. Pursuant to INA
203(d), and whether named in the
petition, the current spouse or child
who meets the definition of ‘‘child’’
under INA 101(b)(1) of an applicant
classified under INA 203(b)(4), if not
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
otherwise entitled to an immigrant
status and the immediate issuance of a
visa, is entitled to the classification and
priority date of the beneficiary of the
petition.
(3) Delegation of authority to approve
petitions. The authority to approve
petitions to accord status under INA
203(b)(4) to an applicant described in
INA 101(a)(27)(D) is hereby delegated to
the chief consular officer at the post of
recommendation or, in the absence of
the consular officer, to any alternate
approving officer designated by the
principal officer. Such authority may
not be exercised until the Foreign
Service post has received formal
notification of the Secretary of State or
designee’s approval of special
immigrant status for the petitioning
applicant.
(4) Petition validity. Except as noted
in this paragraph, the validity of a
petition approved for classification
under INA 203(b)(4) shall be six months
beyond the date of the Secretary of
State’s approval thereof or the
availability of a visa number, whichever
is later.
(5) Extension of special immigrant
status and petition validity. If the
principal officer of a post concludes that
circumstances in a particular case are
such that an extension of validity of the
Secretary of State or designee’s approval
of the principal officer’s
recommendation or of the petition
would be in the national interest, the
E:\FR\FM\10DER1.SGM
10DER1
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
99080
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
principal officer shall recommend to the
Secretary of State or designee that such
validity be extended for not more than
one additional year.
(c) Definitions—(1) Full-time service.
Where 15 years of service is the
minimum time required for eligibility
for a special immigrant visa, the
employee must have been employed for
a total of at least 15 full-time years, or
the equivalent thereof, in the service of
the U.S. Government abroad. The
number of hours per week that qualify
an employee as full-time is dependent
on local law and prevailing practice in
the country where the individual is or
was employed, as reflected in the
employment documentation submitted
with the application for special
immigrant status. The years of service
may be met based on employment
abroad with one, or more than one,
agency of the U.S. Government provided
the total amount of full-time service
with the U.S. Government is 15 years or
more, or the equivalent thereof.
(2) Faithful service. Where faithful
service is required for eligibility for a
special immigrant visa, an employee
must have performed faithfully in the
position held. The principal officer has
the primary responsibility for
determining whether the employee’s
service meets this requirement. A record
of disciplinary actions that have been
taken against the employee does not
automatically disqualify the applicant.
The principal officer must assess the
record of disciplinary actions
considering the extent and gravity of the
misconduct and when the incidents
occurred, and determine whether the
record as a whole, notwithstanding
disciplinary actions, is one of faithful
service.
(3) Continuity. Where 15 years of
service is the minimum time required
for eligibility for a special immigrant
visa, the employee’s period of service
need not have been continuous but must
have an aggregate total of 15 years of
service to qualify.
(4) Abroad. The service must have
occurred anywhere outside the United
States, as the term ‘‘United States’’ is
defined in INA 101(a)(38).
(5) Employment at the American
Institute in Taiwan. INA 101(a)(27)(D)
permits both present and former
employees of the American Institute in
Taiwan to apply for special immigrant
status. An employee’s service before and
after the founding of the American
Institute in Taiwan is counted toward
the minimum 15 years of service
requirement.
(6) Honorably retired. Separations
within the meaning of ‘‘honorably
retired’’ include, for example, those
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:16 Dec 09, 2024
Jkt 265001
resulting from mandatory or voluntary
retirement, reduction-in-force, or
resignation for personal reasons.
Separations not within the meaning of
‘‘honorably retired’’ would include a
termination for cause or an involuntary
termination or resignation in lieu of a
termination for cause.
(7) Exceptional circumstances for
employees of the United States
Government abroad. For classification
as a special immigrant under INA
101(a)(27)(D)(i), the principal officer
must determine that an employee
demonstrates at least one form of
‘‘exceptional circumstances’’ to support
an application for special immigrant
status.
(i) Prima facie indicators of
exceptional circumstances. In the
following situations, an employee’s
service with the U.S. Government
generally will be deemed to have met
exceptional circumstances.
(A) Diplomatic relations between the
employee’s country of nationality and
the United States have been severed;
(B) Diplomatic relations between the
country in which the employee was
employed and the United States have
been severed;
(C) The country in which the
employee was employed and the United
States have strained relations and the
employee may be subjected to
retribution by the local, State, Federal,
or other official government body
merely because of association with the
U.S. Government, or the employee may
be pressured to divulge information
contrary to U.S. national interests; or
(D) The employee was hired at the
Consulate General at Hong Kong on or
before July 1, 1999.
(ii) Strong indicators of exceptional
circumstances. (A) It is believed that
continued service to the U.S.
Government might endanger the life of
the employee;
(B) The employee has fulfilled
responsibilities or given service in a
manner that approaches the heroic;
(C) The employee has been awarded
a global or a regional ‘‘Foreign Service
National of the Year’’ Award;
(D) The employee has disclosed
waste, fraud or abuse, a substantial and
specific danger to public health or
safety, or a violation of law, rule, or
regulation within the Department or
other U.S. Government agency, if such
disclosure results in significant action
by the Department or other U.S.
Government agency against an offending
party, such as termination or severance
of a contractual relationship, or criminal
charges against any person or entity.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(E) The employee has served the U.S.
Government for a period of twenty years
or more.
(8) Exceptional circumstances for
surviving spouses and children. For
classification as a special immigrant
under INA 101(a)(27)(D)(ii), the
principal officer must determine that
the deceased employee:
(i) Was killed in the line of duty; or
(ii) Performed faithful service to the
United States Government abroad for a
total of not less than 15 years; and
(A) Was employed by the U.S.
Government as of the date of their death
or in the immediately preceding period
as defined in paragraph (c)(9) of this
section, or
(B) Was an honorably retired former
employee who, prior to their death,
demonstrated at least one form of
‘‘exceptional circumstances’’ as defined
in paragraph (c)(7) of this section.
(9) Immediately preceding period. (i)
As provided in paragraph (c)(8)(ii)(A) of
this section, a deceased employee is
considered to have been employed by
the U.S. Government in the period
immediately preceding their death if
such employment ceased due to
circumstances that resulted in their
death.
(ii) A deceased employee is presumed
to not meet the criteria in paragraph
(c)(8)(ii)(A) of this section if the
employee’s death occurred more than
five years following cessation of
employment. This presumption can be
rebutted if the applicant establishes, to
the satisfaction of the principal officer,
that the employment ceased due to
circumstances that resulted in the
employee’s death, and the Secretary or
appropriate designee finds it in the
national interest to grant such status.
The principal officer has the primary
responsibility for determining whether
the applicant meets this criterion, taking
into consideration as informed by the
circumstances of the cessation of
employment, the cause of the
employee’s death as documented by the
applicant, and other relevant evidence
the applicant presents that demonstrates
that the cessation of employment was
for reasons that ultimately resulted in
the employee’s death.
(10) Immediate intent to immigrate. (i)
The recommendation of the principal
officer must certify that the applicant
being recommended is prepared to file
a petition within one year of the
Department’s notification to the post of
approval of special immigrant status,
and to pursue an immigrant visa
application within six months of the
Secretary of State’s approval of the
petition or of an immigrant visa
becoming available, whichever is later.
E:\FR\FM\10DER1.SGM
10DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 237 / Tuesday, December 10, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
If the applicant is an employee who is
not yet honorably retired, the
recommendation must also certify that
the employee intends permanent
separation from U.S. Government
employment abroad no later than the
date of departure for the United States
following issuance of an immigrant visa.
(ii) Employees of Hong Kong
Consulate General hired on or before
July 1, 1999, are not required to
establish immediate intent to immigrate.
Employees of the Hong Kong Consulate
General who received or were approved
for special immigrant status before July
1, 1999, also may continue employment
with the U.S. Government.
Julie M. Stufft,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Consular Affairs,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024–28846 Filed 12–9–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Parts 122 and 129
[Public Notice: 12542]
RIN 1400–AF78
International Traffic in Arms
Regulations: Registration Fees
Department of State.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of State
published a proposed rule on April 24,
2024, requesting comment on proposals
to amend the International Traffic in
Arms Regulations (ITAR) by increasing
and specifying the fees required for
registration with the Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls (DDTC). The
Department now responds to the public
comments received in response to that
proposed rule and issues this final rule.
DATES: This rule is effective January 9,
2025.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Allison Smith, Director, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Management,
Department of State, telephone (202)
663–1282; email
DDTCCustomerService@state.gov.
ATTN: Registration Fee Change.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
Overview
This final rule implements a change
and increase in registration fees for
certain persons required under 22
U.S.C. 2778(b) to register with the
Department of State’s Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) and pay
a registration fee. It also returns the
amount of fees registrants must pay to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:16 Dec 09, 2024
Jkt 265001
the International Traffic in Arms
Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR parts 120
through 130) and makes clarifying
revisions to part 122 of the ITAR. This
final rule follows a proposed rule (89 FR
31119), published on April 24, 2024,
which included the proposed revisions
to DDTC’s registration fees and
corresponding amendments to the ITAR.
As noted in its proposed rule, for the
first time in fifteen years, the
Department proposed to revise and
increase the registration fees (also
referred to as ‘‘fees’’) charged to those
required to register with DDTC. This
increase is necessary because DDTC
operations are primarily funded by fees.
Without a sufficient increase to meet
operational costs that have significantly
risen since 2008, DDTC would be faced
with untenable budget deficits and
would be forced to reduce its services.
In accordance with section 38(b) of
the Arms Export Control Act (AECA) (22
U.S.C. 2778(b)) and ITAR § 122.1 (22
CFR 122.1), every person who engages
in the business of manufacturing,
exporting, temporarily importing, or
brokering any defense articles or
defense services is required to register
with DDTC, the agency charged with
administering the relevant sections of
the AECA. Section 38(b) of the AECA
also requires that every person required
to register pay a registration fee. As the
ITAR implements section 38 of the
AECA, and as its parts 122 and 129 (22
CFR parts 122 and 129) address
registration, the Department proposed to
revise those provisions to restate
registration requirements without
substantive change, to revise the
Department’s methodology for
determining the fees paid by certain
registrants, to increase registration fees,
and to reinsert the actual amount of fees
within the ITAR itself. The Department
now provides responses to comments
received on the proposed rule and
amends the ITAR as of the effective date
of this rule, with one correction from
the proposed rule.
Summary of Changes From the
Proposed Rule
In this final rule, the Department
makes the changes it previously
proposed, with one minor change. Due
to a typographical error, the Tier 3 fee
multiplier for favorable determinations
was misidentified in two places as
$1,110 instead of the correct amount of
$1,100. The Tier 3 fee multiplier was
correctly introduced in the preamble as
$1,100 (89 FR 31121), but a subsequent
preamble reference to the Tier 3 fee
multiplier was misidentified as $1,110
(89 FR 31122). In addition, the incorrect
reference was carried forward to
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
99081
amendatory instruction 3 of the
proposed rule and identified the Tier 3
fee multiplier at proposed § 122.3(a)(3)
as $1,110 (89 FR 31124). This final rule
adopts the correct Tier 3 fee multiplier
of $1,100 at ITAR § 122.3(a)(3).
Response to Comments
During the 45-day public comment
period (April 24, 2024, through June 10,
2024) DDTC received 19 separate
submissions from individuals,
corporations, and industry associations
in response to the notice of proposed
rulemaking, some of which discussed
more than one aspect of the proposed
rule. All relevant comments addressed
only ITAR § 122.3, which included
proposed changes to the registration
fees. The Department received no
questions or comments on other changes
in the proposed rule.
Several commenters expressed a view
that the proposed increase is an unjust
burden on small business and may be a
barrier to entry for new small business
registrants. One commenter in particular
claimed that the increase in registration
fees would be especially difficult for
manufacturers who do not export but
are required by large corporations to be
registered with DDTC to do business
with them and advised the new
registration fee would subject their
company to paying 1 percent of their
gross revenue to be able to sell products
domestically for DoD end-use. As a
threshold matter, the Department is
aware that some private sector
businesses elect to have their own
separate requirement for businesses
with which they contract to be
registered with DDTC, even when those
contracting businesses are not legally
required to register with DDTC under
ITAR § 122.1. Such varying
requirements by some private sector
businesses are outside of the scope of
ITAR § 122.1. Pursuant to ITAR § 122.1,
persons who are not engaged in the
business of manufacturing, exporting, or
temporarily importing defense articles
are not required by ITAR § 122.1 to
register with DDTC. With respect to the
fee amount, the Department notes that
registrants who do not export fall within
Tier 1 and pay the base fee of $3,000.
That base fee represents a 33.1 percent
increase from the prior Tier 1 fee, which
is approximately 12 percent less than
the increase for Tier 2 and is slightly
less than it would have been had the
Department used the 40.1 percent
inflation adjustment based on 2008
dollars, when the registration fees were
last amended.
The Department acknowledges and
understands the commenters’ concerns
regarding small businesses. In response,
E:\FR\FM\10DER1.SGM
10DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 237 (Tuesday, December 10, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 99076-99081]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28846]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 42
[Public Notice: 12446]
RIN 1400-AF82
Visas: Special Immigrant Visas--U.S. Government Employee Special
Immigrant Visas for Service Abroad
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule makes updates to reflect a statutory change to
the class of individuals who may qualify for Special Immigrant Visas
(SIVs).
DATES: This final rule is effective December 10, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jami Thompson, Senior Regulatory
Coordinator, U.S. Department of State, Bureau of Consular Affairs, Visa
Services, 600 19th Street NW, Washington, DC 20522, (202) 485-7586,
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Special Immigrant Visas for Certain Employees or Former Employees of
the United States Abroad, and for the Surviving Spouses or Children of
Certain Deceased Employees of the U.S. Government Abroad
A. Legal Authority
Section 203(b)(4) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), as
amended 8 U.S.C. 1153(b)(4), generally provides that visas may be
issued to qualified special immigrants described in INA section
101(a)(27). Among the individuals considered ``special immigrants'' as
defined in this provision, INA section 101(a)(27)(D), 8 U.S.C.
1101(a)(27)(D), defines ``special immigrant'' to include employees, or
honorably retired former employees, of the U.S. Government abroad, or
of the American Institute in Taiwan, who have performed faithful
service for a total of fifteen years or more, in addition to their
accompanying spouse and children, and who have been recommended and
approved for such status in accordance with enumerated criteria.
Section 403(a) of the Emergency Security Supplemental
Appropriations Act, 2021 (``ESSAA''), Public Law 117-31, 135 Stat. 309,
318, amended the definition of a special immigrant at INA section
101(a)(27)(D) to include a new subclause (ii). The new subclause
includes in the definition of ``special immigrant'' the surviving
spouse or child of an employee of the United States Government abroad:
Provided, [t]hat the employee performed faithful service for a total of
not less than 15 years or was killed in the line of duty.'' Under this
provision, the qualifying surviving spouse or child of a U.S.
Government employee is a principal applicant for special immigrant
status, and consequently, their current spouse and minor child(ren) are
entitled to SIVs as derivatives under INA section 203(d), 8 U.S.C.
1153(d), if accompanying or following to join the qualifying surviving
spouse or parent. Pursuant to section 403(d) of the ESSAA, these
changes are effective June 30, 2021, and have retroactive effect.
In addition to the qualifications for this group of ``special
immigrants,'' INA section 204(a)(1)(G)(ii) governs the process through
which an individual claiming status as a special immigrant under INA
section 101(a)(27)(D) must file a petition with the Department of
State, requiring that they first be recommended and approved for such
status.
B. Processing for Special Immigrants Under INA Section 101(a)(27)(D)
Under INA sections 204(a)(1)(G)(ii) and 101(a)(27)(D)(i),
acquisition of special immigrant status under INA section 101(a)(27)(D)
requires multiple sequential steps. First, the principal officer of the
U.S. embassy or consulate with jurisdiction over where the individual
was employed must have recommended the granting of special immigrant
status in exceptional circumstances, and the Secretary of State or
appropriate designee must have approved the recommendation and found
that it is in the national interest to grant such status. Second, under
INA section 204(a)(1)(G)(ii), only after the approval of the
recommendation, the applicant may submit a Form DS-1884, Petition to
Classify Special Immigrant Under INA 203(b)(4) as an Employee or Former
Employee of the U.S. Government Abroad, or the Surviving Spouse or
Child of an Employee of the U.S. Government Abroad, to a consular
officer at a foreign service post. Under Department regulations at 22
CFR 42.34(b)(2), the date the applicant's properly completed DS-1884 is
accepted becomes the applicant's priority date. Those same regulations
at 22 CFR 42.34(b)(4) provide that a petition from a qualifying
individual is valid for six months from the date of approval or the
date an immigrant visa number becomes available, whichever is later.
C. What is the impact of the ESSAA?
Prior to passage of the ESSAA, if the employee were to die before
entering the United States using their immigrant visa, the surviving
spouse or child would be ineligible for immigrant status. With the
passage of the ESSAA, a surviving spouse and surviving child(ren), as a
principal applicant, are eligible to seek qualification as a special
immigrant. Additionally, in situations where the employee did not
pursue special immigrant status prior to the employee's death, their
surviving spouse and/or child may now qualify to be approved for
status. These changes apply retroactively, meaning that the surviving
spouse or child of an employee who died prior to the effective date of
the ESSAA may also seek to qualify. To be a surviving spouse, the
spousal relationship must have existed at the time of the deceased
employee's death. To be a surviving child, the adult son or daughter of
the deceased employee must have met the definition of ``child'' under
INA section 101(b)(1) on the date of the employee's death.
II. Changes the Department Is Making
A. 22 CFR 42.11
This rule makes updates to the Department's regulations at 22 CFR
42.11 that list the symbols of the current immigrant visa
classifications to conform with the new classifications added by the
ESSAA. Specifically, under the ``Employment 4th Preference (Certain
Special Immigrants)'' header, the Department is adding: The ``SS1''
symbol that will be used for issuance of SIVs to the surviving spouse
or child of a U.S. Government employee; the ``SS2'' symbol that will be
used for issuance of an SIV to the current spouse of an SS1 who
qualifies as a derivative under INA 203(d); and the ``SS3'' symbol that
will be used for issuance of an SIV to the minor child(ren) of an SS1
who meet(s) the definition of ``child'' under INA 101(b)(1) and 203(h),
and qualify(ies) as a derivative under INA 203(d).
B. 22 CFR 42.34
This rule makes changes to Department regulations at 22 CFR 42.34
to conform with the expanded definition of ``special immigrant'' under
the ESSAA. For the reasons explained below, the Department believes
these (or
[[Page 99077]]
equivalent) changes are necessary to implement the best reading of the
ESSAA. The changes include the explanation of the classification of a
surviving spouse or child of an employee of the United States
Government abroad who was killed in the line of duty, or who performed
faithful service for at least fifteen years before their death.
As summarized above, the ESSAA added a new subsection (ii) to INA
101(a)(27)(D) and amended INA 101(a)(27)(D) to specify that a ``special
immigrant'' includes an individual described in clause (D)(i) ``or''
clause (D)(ii). The ESSAA did not amend INA 204(a)(1)(G)(ii), which
governs the process through which an individual petitions for status
``as a special immigrant under INA 101(a)(27)(D).'' Consequently, as
this provision was not amended to distinguish the petition process for
special immigrants described in INA 101(a)(27)(D)(i) or INA
101(a)(27)(D)(ii), INA 204(a)(1)(G)(ii) continues to govern the
petition process for both subcategories of ``special immigrants''
described in section 101(a)(27)(D), providing that applicants seeking
status under either subcategory ``may file a petition . . . only after
notification by the Secretary of State that such status has been
recommended and approved pursuant to such section.'' Although INA
101(a)(27)(D)(ii) as amended does not expressly reference a framework
for recommendation and approval, INA 101(a)(27)(D)(i) establishes the
standards for a recommendation and approval process, including that the
recommendation of an individual for special immigrant status be made in
``exceptional circumstances'' and the approval be ``in the national
interest,'' as well as identifies officers vested with authority for
those respective functions. Incorporating into INA 101(a)(27)(D)(ii)
the standards and process for recommendation and approval expressly
provided by Congress in INA 101(a)(27)(D)(i) reflects the best reading
of the statutory framework as amended by ensuring consistency with the
companion provision in INA 204(a)(1)(G)(ii) requiring recommendation
and approval of such cases and ensuring the consistent application of
the longstanding framework for the granting of special immigrant visas
to U.S. Government employees.
To address potential inconsistencies in how this change would be
implemented using the existing definition of ``exceptional
circumstances'' at 22 CFR 42.34(c)(7), this rule explains the
circumstances in which a surviving spouse or child would be recommended
for special immigrant status, based on the criteria described in INA
section 101(a)(27)(D)(ii). In addition to qualifying employees' deaths
that occurred in the line of duty, these include when the deceased
employee performed at least 15 years of faithful service for the U.S.
Government and either would have qualified for special immigrant status
before dying or was employed by the U.S. Government as of the date of
their death or in the immediately preceding five-year period. These
parameters will encompass those family members of deceased employees
who, but for their death following at least 15 years of faithful
service, were likely to have soon qualified for special immigrant
status by accumulating 20 years of faithful service (where 20 years is
a strong indicator of exceptional circumstances under 22 CFR
42.34(c)(7)(ii)(E)). This standard encompasses those who were employed
by the U.S. Government in the period immediately preceding their death,
as the Department anticipates that in some cases, an employee may have
ceased employment by the U.S. Government with the intention of
returning, but for circumstances out of their control. For example, an
employee who dies following a serious illness may have ceased or
temporarily left their employment for a period to combat their illness.
Consequently, to provide clarity to the public and support consistent
application, the rule establishes a rebuttable presumption that a death
occurring more than five years after cessation of employment is not
related to the cessation of their employment for purposes of their
surviving spouse or child qualifying for special immigrant status.
The Department believes this five-year presumption will account for
the gravity and severity of the circumstances surrounding cessation of
employment, and the likelihood that a previously employed individual
would have returned to work to complete 20 years of service, if they
were able to do so. This presumption is rebuttable and will require
case-specific consideration of those individuals whose circumstances
fall outside the five-year presumption and who wish to provide evidence
to establish their qualifications. Surviving spouses and children of
employees who died for reasons unrelated to cessation of employment are
not precluded from qualifying as special immigrants, provided they can
demonstrate that the employee demonstrated at least one form of
``exceptional circumstances'' while still employed. The changes also
highlight that the processes to qualify for eligibility are the same
for a surviving spouse or child as they are for employees. These
changes make necessary amendments to 22 CFR 42.34 to provide for the
issuance of SIVs to qualified surviving spouses and children of U.S.
Government employees, and to reflect the amended citations in INA
section 101(a)(27)(D) under the ESSAA.
This rule also makes corrections throughout 22 CFR 42.34 to replace
the term ``alien'' with the term ``applicant'' or ``employee,'' as
appropriate. This change is consistent with current Department
practice.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 88 FR 45072 (July 14, 2023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, this rule also amends the certification, required as part
of the principal officer's recommendation, that the individual being
recommended is prepared to pursue an immigrant visa application
``within one year of the Department's notification to the post of
approval of special immigrant status.'' As applicants in numerically
limited immigrant visa categories, including INA section 203(b)(4), may
not pursue an immigrant visa application until such time that a visa
number becomes available in that category, this requirement has been
changed to reflect that the recommended individual must be prepared to
pursue their application ``within one year of the Department's
notification to the post of approval of special immigrant status, or of
an immigrant visa becoming available, whichever is later.''
Regulatory Findings
A. Administrative Procedure Act
This rule is exempted from the notice and comment and delayed
effective date rulemaking procedures set forth in 5 U.S.C. 553 because
the rule involves a foreign affairs function. 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1). This
exemption applies when the rule's subject matter ``is clearly and
directly involved in a foreign affairs function.'' Mast Indus. v.
Regan, 596 F. Supp. 1567, 1582 (C.I.T. 1984) (quotation marks omitted).
In addition, although the text of the APA does not require an agency
invoking this exemption to show that rulemaking with public notice and
comment would result in ``definitely undesirable international
consequences,'' some courts have required such a showing. See, e.g.,
Yassini v. Crosland, 618 F.2d 1356, 1360 n.4 (9th Cir. 1980). This rule
satisfies both standards.
[[Page 99078]]
This rule extends the authority to grant special immigrant status
to the surviving spouse or child of a U.S. Government employee who
performed faithful service for at least fifteen years or was killed in
the line of duty. As with the availability of special immigrant status
to qualifying locally employed staff, eligibility for employees'
surviving spouses and children encourages employees to remain in their
jobs and to provide long-term, institutional memory to U.S. Government
agencies abroad. This is particularly essential in countries where
local staff members and their families face retribution by the host
government, making it even more challenging to recruit and retain a
locally employed workforce. For this reason, extending eligibility to
the employee's surviving spouse and children critically impacts the
willingness of foreign nationals to become, and remain, employees of
the U.S. Government in overseas posts, and hence directly impacts the
effectiveness of U.S. diplomatic efforts in those countries.
The Department's establishment of criteria for surviving spouses
and child(ren) to qualify for special immigrant status under ESSAA
clearly and directly relates to U.S. foreign affairs, because the
criteria itself is critical for the U.S. Government to recruit and
retain loyal, valuable local staff outside the United States, without
whom the Department could not fulfill its diplomatic functions
overseas. The Department alone employs approximately 50,000 local staff
at over 200 Foreign Service posts overseas. Expanded qualifications for
surviving spouses and child(ren) is critical to recruitment, retention,
and morale of these locally employed staff who help the Department
carry out its foreign affairs functions overseas. For example,
following the 2013 death of Mustafa Akarsu, a member of the local guard
force for U.S. Embassy Ankara for 22 years, when he confronted a
suicide bomber outside the Embassy, Department employee organizations
including the American Foreign Service Association, advocated for
passage of legislation eventually enacted in ESSAA to provide SIVs to
the surviving spouses and children of U.S. Government employees killed
in the line of duty. Consequently, implementation of these standards
for surviving family members clearly and directly involves a U.S.
foreign affairs function.
Finally, the Department considers that providing the opportunity
for public notice and comment would provide ``definitely undesirable
international consequences,'' in that conducting and resolving a public
debate regarding the safety of surviving spouses and children of U.S.
Government employees killed abroad would risk impairing U.S. relations
with other countries. See, e.g., Rajah v. Mukasey, 544 F.3d 427, 437
(2d Cir. 2008). The loss of United States local employees in the line
of duty has previously had the effect of straining bilateral relations,
and has the continued potential to do so, particularly when such losses
involve local foreign authorities or other parties over which the host
country exercises control. This may be even more so in countries with
which the United States already has sensitive or strained relations,
which may oppose the availability of immigrant visas to the surviving
spouses and children of such staff, who are usually nationals of the
host country. Accordingly, the promulgation of standards for approval
under the Secretary of State's authority in INA 101(a)(27)(D) involves
an inherently foreign affairs function of the Department of State.
B. Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business
As this final rule is exempt from notice and comment rulemaking
under 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1), it is exempt from the regulatory flexibility
analysis requirements set forth by the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Nonetheless, as this action only directly impacts
visa applicants, the Department certifies that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small U.S.
entities.
C. Congressional Review Act of 1996
This rule is not a major rule as defined in 5 U.S.C. 804. This rule
will not result in an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more; a major increase in costs or prices; or adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the
ability of United States-based companies to compete with foreign-based
companies in domestic and import markets.
D. Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), 13563
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review), and 14094 (Modernizing
Regulatory Review)
This rule has been drafted in accordance with the principles of
Executive Orders 12866 (as amended by Executive Order 14094) and 13563.
The Department has submitted this rule to OIRA for review and it has
been deemed a significant regulatory action.
E. Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
The Department of State has reviewed the rule considering sections
3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity,
minimize litigation, establish clear legal standards, and reduce
burdens.
F. Executive Order 13175--Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
The Department of State has determined that this rulemaking will
not have Tribal implications, will not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian Tribal Governments, and will not pre-empt
Tribal law. Accordingly, the requirements of Section 5 of Executive
Order 13175 do not apply to this rulemaking.
G. Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule does not impose any new reporting or record-keeping
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35. The Form DS-1884, Petition to Classify Special Immigrant
under INA 203(b)(4) as an Employee or Former Employee of the U.S.
Government Abroad, is approved under the PRA (OMB Control No. 1405-
0082).
H. Other
The Department has also considered the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 and Executive Orders 12372 and 13132 and affirms this rule is
consistent with the applicable mandates or guidance therein.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 42
Administrative practice and procedure, Aliens, Passports and visas.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the preamble, 22 CFR part
42 is amended as follows:
PART 42--VISAS: DOCUMENTATION OF IMMIGRANTS UNDER THE IMMIGRATION
AND NATIONALITY ACT, AS AMENDED
0
1. The authority citation for part 42 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 8 U.S.C. 1104 and 1182; Pub. L. 105-277, 112 Stat.
2681; Pub. L. 108-449, 118 Stat. 3469; The Convention on Protection
of Children and Co-operation in Respect of Intercountry Adoption
(done at the Hague, May 29, 1993), S. Treaty Doc. 105-51 (1998),
1870 U.N.T.S. 167 (Reg. No. 31922 (1993)); 42 U.S.C. 14901-14954
(Pub. L. 106-279, 114 Stat. 825); 8 U.S.C. 1101 (Pub L. 117-31, 135
Stat. 309); 8 U.S.C. 1154 (Pub. L. 109-162, 119 Stat. 2960); 8
U.S.C. 1201 (Pub. L. 114-70, 129 Stat. 561).
0
2. Section 42.11 is amended in table 1 to Sec. 42.11 under the
undesignated
[[Page 99079]]
center heading ``Employment 4th Preference (Certain Special
Immigrants)'' by:
0
a. Revising the entries for SE1, SE2, SE3, and SS1; and
0
b. Adding entries for SS2 and SS3 in alphanumeric order.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 42.11 Classification symbols.
* * * * *
Table 1 to Sec. 42.11
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Symbol Class Section of Law
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Employment 4th Preference (Certain Special Immigrants)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
SE1....................... Certain Employee or INA 101(a)(27)(D)(i)
Former Employee of & INA 203(b)(4).
the U.S. Government
Abroad.
SE2....................... Spouse of SE1........ INA 101(a)(27)(D)(i)
& INA 203(b)(4).
SE3....................... Child of SE1......... INA 101(a)(27)(D)(i)
& INA 203(b)(4).
* * * * * * *
SS1....................... Surviving Spouse or INA 101(a)(27)(D)(ii)
Child of an Employee & INA 203(b)(4).
of the United States
Government Abroad.
SS2....................... Current Spouse of SS1 INA
101(a)(27)(D)(ii),
INA 203(b)(4) & INA
203(d).
SS3....................... Child of SS1 INA
(Excludes Surviving 101(a)(27)(D)(ii),
Child of an Employee INA 1101(b)(1),
of the United States 203(b)(4), & INA
Government Abroad), 203(d).
provided the child
meets the definition
of 101(b)(1) of the
INA.
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
0
3. Section 42.34 is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 42.34 Special immigrant visas-certain U.S. Government employees.
(a) General. An applicant is classifiable under INA 203(b)(4) as a
special immigrant described in INA 101(a)(27)(D) provided:
(1) (i) The applicant has performed faithful service to the United
States Government abroad, or the American Institute in Taiwan, for a
total of fifteen years or more; or
(ii) The applicant is the surviving spouse or child of an employee
of the United States Government abroad who performed faithful service
for a total of not less than 15 years or was killed in the line of
duty; and
(2) The principal officer of a Foreign Service establishment (or,
in the case of the American Institute in Taiwan, the Director),
recommends granting special immigrant status to such person in
exceptional circumstances; and
(3) The Secretary of State, or designee, approves such
recommendation and finds that it is in the national interest to grant
such status.
(b) Petition requirement. An applicant who seeks classification as
a special immigrant described in paragraph (a) of this section must
file a Form DS-1884, Petition to Classify Special Immigrant under INA
203(b)(4) as an Employee or Former Employee of the U.S. Government
Abroad, or the Surviving Spouse or Child of an Employee of the U.S.
Government Abroad, with the Department of State. An applicant described
in INA 101(a)(27)(D) may file such a petition only after, but within
one year of, notification from the Department that the Secretary of
State or designee has approved a recommendation from the principal
officer that special immigrant status be accorded the applicant in
exceptional circumstances and has found it in the national interest to
do so.
(1) Petition fees. The Secretary of State shall establish a fee for
the filing of a petition to accord status under INA 203(b)(4) which
shall be collected following notification that the Secretary of State,
or designee, has approved the recommendation that the applicant be
granted status as a special immigrant under INA 101(a)(27)(D).
(2) Establishing priority date. The priority date of an applicant
seeking status under INA 203(b)(4) as a special immigrant described in
INA 101(a)(27)(D) shall be the date on which the petition to accord
such classification, the DS-1884, is filed. The filing date of the
petition is the date on which a properly completed form and the
required fee are accepted by a Foreign Service post. Pursuant to INA
203(d), and whether named in the petition, the current spouse or child
who meets the definition of ``child'' under INA 101(b)(1) of an
applicant classified under INA 203(b)(4), if not otherwise entitled to
an immigrant status and the immediate issuance of a visa, is entitled
to the classification and priority date of the beneficiary of the
petition.
(3) Delegation of authority to approve petitions. The authority to
approve petitions to accord status under INA 203(b)(4) to an applicant
described in INA 101(a)(27)(D) is hereby delegated to the chief
consular officer at the post of recommendation or, in the absence of
the consular officer, to any alternate approving officer designated by
the principal officer. Such authority may not be exercised until the
Foreign Service post has received formal notification of the Secretary
of State or designee's approval of special immigrant status for the
petitioning applicant.
(4) Petition validity. Except as noted in this paragraph, the
validity of a petition approved for classification under INA 203(b)(4)
shall be six months beyond the date of the Secretary of State's
approval thereof or the availability of a visa number, whichever is
later.
(5) Extension of special immigrant status and petition validity. If
the principal officer of a post concludes that circumstances in a
particular case are such that an extension of validity of the Secretary
of State or designee's approval of the principal officer's
recommendation or of the petition would be in the national interest,
the
[[Page 99080]]
principal officer shall recommend to the Secretary of State or designee
that such validity be extended for not more than one additional year.
(c) Definitions--(1) Full-time service. Where 15 years of service
is the minimum time required for eligibility for a special immigrant
visa, the employee must have been employed for a total of at least 15
full-time years, or the equivalent thereof, in the service of the U.S.
Government abroad. The number of hours per week that qualify an
employee as full-time is dependent on local law and prevailing practice
in the country where the individual is or was employed, as reflected in
the employment documentation submitted with the application for special
immigrant status. The years of service may be met based on employment
abroad with one, or more than one, agency of the U.S. Government
provided the total amount of full-time service with the U.S. Government
is 15 years or more, or the equivalent thereof.
(2) Faithful service. Where faithful service is required for
eligibility for a special immigrant visa, an employee must have
performed faithfully in the position held. The principal officer has
the primary responsibility for determining whether the employee's
service meets this requirement. A record of disciplinary actions that
have been taken against the employee does not automatically disqualify
the applicant. The principal officer must assess the record of
disciplinary actions considering the extent and gravity of the
misconduct and when the incidents occurred, and determine whether the
record as a whole, notwithstanding disciplinary actions, is one of
faithful service.
(3) Continuity. Where 15 years of service is the minimum time
required for eligibility for a special immigrant visa, the employee's
period of service need not have been continuous but must have an
aggregate total of 15 years of service to qualify.
(4) Abroad. The service must have occurred anywhere outside the
United States, as the term ``United States'' is defined in INA
101(a)(38).
(5) Employment at the American Institute in Taiwan. INA
101(a)(27)(D) permits both present and former employees of the American
Institute in Taiwan to apply for special immigrant status. An
employee's service before and after the founding of the American
Institute in Taiwan is counted toward the minimum 15 years of service
requirement.
(6) Honorably retired. Separations within the meaning of
``honorably retired'' include, for example, those resulting from
mandatory or voluntary retirement, reduction-in-force, or resignation
for personal reasons. Separations not within the meaning of ``honorably
retired'' would include a termination for cause or an involuntary
termination or resignation in lieu of a termination for cause.
(7) Exceptional circumstances for employees of the United States
Government abroad. For classification as a special immigrant under INA
101(a)(27)(D)(i), the principal officer must determine that an employee
demonstrates at least one form of ``exceptional circumstances'' to
support an application for special immigrant status.
(i) Prima facie indicators of exceptional circumstances. In the
following situations, an employee's service with the U.S. Government
generally will be deemed to have met exceptional circumstances.
(A) Diplomatic relations between the employee's country of
nationality and the United States have been severed;
(B) Diplomatic relations between the country in which the employee
was employed and the United States have been severed;
(C) The country in which the employee was employed and the United
States have strained relations and the employee may be subjected to
retribution by the local, State, Federal, or other official government
body merely because of association with the U.S. Government, or the
employee may be pressured to divulge information contrary to U.S.
national interests; or
(D) The employee was hired at the Consulate General at Hong Kong on
or before July 1, 1999.
(ii) Strong indicators of exceptional circumstances. (A) It is
believed that continued service to the U.S. Government might endanger
the life of the employee;
(B) The employee has fulfilled responsibilities or given service in
a manner that approaches the heroic;
(C) The employee has been awarded a global or a regional ``Foreign
Service National of the Year'' Award;
(D) The employee has disclosed waste, fraud or abuse, a substantial
and specific danger to public health or safety, or a violation of law,
rule, or regulation within the Department or other U.S. Government
agency, if such disclosure results in significant action by the
Department or other U.S. Government agency against an offending party,
such as termination or severance of a contractual relationship, or
criminal charges against any person or entity.
(E) The employee has served the U.S. Government for a period of
twenty years or more.
(8) Exceptional circumstances for surviving spouses and children.
For classification as a special immigrant under INA 101(a)(27)(D)(ii),
the principal officer must determine that the deceased employee:
(i) Was killed in the line of duty; or
(ii) Performed faithful service to the United States Government
abroad for a total of not less than 15 years; and
(A) Was employed by the U.S. Government as of the date of their
death or in the immediately preceding period as defined in paragraph
(c)(9) of this section, or
(B) Was an honorably retired former employee who, prior to their
death, demonstrated at least one form of ``exceptional circumstances''
as defined in paragraph (c)(7) of this section.
(9) Immediately preceding period. (i) As provided in paragraph
(c)(8)(ii)(A) of this section, a deceased employee is considered to
have been employed by the U.S. Government in the period immediately
preceding their death if such employment ceased due to circumstances
that resulted in their death.
(ii) A deceased employee is presumed to not meet the criteria in
paragraph (c)(8)(ii)(A) of this section if the employee's death
occurred more than five years following cessation of employment. This
presumption can be rebutted if the applicant establishes, to the
satisfaction of the principal officer, that the employment ceased due
to circumstances that resulted in the employee's death, and the
Secretary or appropriate designee finds it in the national interest to
grant such status. The principal officer has the primary responsibility
for determining whether the applicant meets this criterion, taking into
consideration as informed by the circumstances of the cessation of
employment, the cause of the employee's death as documented by the
applicant, and other relevant evidence the applicant presents that
demonstrates that the cessation of employment was for reasons that
ultimately resulted in the employee's death.
(10) Immediate intent to immigrate. (i) The recommendation of the
principal officer must certify that the applicant being recommended is
prepared to file a petition within one year of the Department's
notification to the post of approval of special immigrant status, and
to pursue an immigrant visa application within six months of the
Secretary of State's approval of the petition or of an immigrant visa
becoming available, whichever is later.
[[Page 99081]]
If the applicant is an employee who is not yet honorably retired, the
recommendation must also certify that the employee intends permanent
separation from U.S. Government employment abroad no later than the
date of departure for the United States following issuance of an
immigrant visa.
(ii) Employees of Hong Kong Consulate General hired on or before
July 1, 1999, are not required to establish immediate intent to
immigrate. Employees of the Hong Kong Consulate General who received or
were approved for special immigrant status before July 1, 1999, also
may continue employment with the U.S. Government.
Julie M. Stufft,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Consular Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2024-28846 Filed 12-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-06-P