Notice of Information Collection and Request for Public Comment, 97167-97169 [2024-28521]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2024 / Notices
strategic goal to Maintain and
Modernize the Maritime workforce.
Respondents: Postsecondary
educational and vocational institutions,
registered apprenticeship sponsors, and
structured experiential learning training
programs in certain eligible locations
are eligible to apply for CoE designation.
Additionally, ‘‘maritime training centers
previously designated as a 2021 CoE’’
are eligible under the statute.
Affected Public: Postsecondary
educational and vocational institutions,
registered apprenticeship sponsors, and
structured experiential learning training
programs.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
50.
Estimated Number of Responses: 50.
Estimated Hours per Response: 48.
Annual Estimated Total Annual
Burden Hours: 2,400.
Frequency of Response: Once
Annually.
A 60-day Federal Register Notice
soliciting comments on this information
collection was published on October 1,
2024 (89 FR 80012).
(Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995; 44 U.S.C. chapter 35, as amended; and
49 CFR 1.49.)
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
T. Mitchell Hudson, Jr.
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024–28613 Filed 12–5–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Maritime Administration
[Docket No. MARAD–2024–0156]
Request for Comments on the
Reinstatement of a Previously
Approved Information Collection:
United States Marine Highway Program
Maritime Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Maritime Administration
(MARAD) invites public comments on
our intention to request the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
approval to renew an information
collection in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The
proposed collection OMB 2133–0541
(United States Marine Highway
Program) (also known as America’s
Marine Highway Program) will be used
to evaluate and review applications
being submitted for grant award
consideration. This collection was
initially discontinued on August 28,
2023, due to the elimination of the
project designation application for this
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Dec 05, 2024
Jkt 265001
program from the James M. Inhofe
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2023. However, in order to
facilitate the operation of the United
States Marine Highway Program Grant
Program (the Program), which provides
funding to develop, expand, or promote
marine highway transportation or
shipper use of marine highway
transportation, this collection is being
reinstated. We are required to publish
this notice in the Federal Register to
obtain comments from the public and
affected agencies.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before February 4, 2025.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Docket No. MARAD–
2024–0156 through one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Search using the
above DOT docket number and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• Mail or Hand Delivery: Docket
Management Facility, U.S. Department
of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, West Building, Room W12–
140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except on Federal holidays.
Instructions: All submissions must
include the agency name and docket
number for this rulemaking.
Note: All comments received will be
posted without change to
www.regulations.gov including any personal
information provided.
Comments are invited on: (a) whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the Department’s
performance; (b) the accuracy of the
estimated burden; (c) ways for the
Department to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information
collection; and (d) ways that the burden
could be minimized without reducing
the quality of the collected information.
The agency will summarize and/or
include your comments in the request
for OMB’s clearance of this information
collection.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Timothy Pickering, 202–366–0704,
Office of Ports & Waterways Planning,
Maritime Administration, 1200 New
Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, DC 20590,
Email: timothy.pickering@dot.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: United States Marine Highway
Program
OMB Control Number: 2133–0541.
Type of Request: Reinstatement of a
Previously Approved Collection
Abstract: The Department of
Transportation will reinstate solicitation
PO 00000
Frm 00232
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
97167
of grant applications for Marine
Highway Grant Funding as specified in
the United States Marine Highway
Program, codified at 46 U.S.C. 55601.
These applications must comply with
the requirements of the referenced
United States Marine Highway Notice of
Funding Opportunity and be submitted
in accordance with the instructions
contained in that Notice of Funding
Opportunity. United States Marine
Highway Grant Notice of Funding
Opportunities occurs when funds are
appropriated by Congress.
Respondents: States, political
subdivisions of a State, or a local
government, a United States
metropolitan planning organization, a
United States port authority, a Tribal
government, or a United States private
sector operator of marine highway
projects.
Affected Public: Vessel Operators.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
25.
Estimated Number of Responses: 25.
Estimated Hours per Response: 125.
Annual Estimated Total Annual
Burden Hours: 1,700.
Frequency of Response: Annually.
(Authority: The Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995; 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended; and
49 CFR 1.49.)
By Order of the Maritime Administrator.
T. Mitchell Hudson, Jr.,
Secretary, Maritime Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024–28614 Filed 12–5–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–81–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Community Development Financial
Institutions Fund
Notice of Information Collection and
Request for Public Comment
Notice and request for public
comment.
ACTION:
The U.S. Department of the
Treasury, as part of a continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent
burden, invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on proposed
and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of
1995. Currently, the Community
Development Financial Institutions
Fund (CDFI Fund), Department of the
Treasury, is soliciting comments
concerning the Small Dollar Loan
Program (SDL Program) Application
(Application). The Application is an
online form submitted through the CDFI
Fund’s Awards Management
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
97168
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2024 / Notices
Information System (AMIS). Information
on the SDL Program can be found on the
CDFI Fund’s website at https://
www.cdfifund.gov/programs-training/
programs/sdlp. The CDFI Fund is
required by law to make the
Applications publicly available for
comment prior to submission for a new
PRA number.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before February 4, 2025
to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
concerning the SDL Program
Application via the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions on the website for the
submission of comments. In general, all
comments will be available for
inspection at www.regulations.gov.
Comments, including attachments and
other supporting materials, are part of
the public record. Do not submit any
information in your comments or
supporting materials that you consider
confidential or inappropriate for public
disclosure. Information regarding the
CDFI Fund and its programs may be
obtained through the CDFI Fund’s
website at https://www.cdfifund.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eddie Tsibulevskiy, Program Manager,
SDL Program, CDFI Fund, U.S.
Department of the Treasury, 1500
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20220, by email to SDLP@
cdfi.treas.gov, or phone 202–653–0421
(Option 3).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Small Dollar Loan Program
Application.
OMB Number: 1559–0051.
Abstract: The Small Dollar Loan
Program (SDL Program) was authorized
by Title XII—Improving Access to
Mainstream Financial Institutions Act of
the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Pub.
L. 111–203), which amended the
Community Development Banking and
Financial Institutions Act of 1994 (12
U.S.C. 4719). Through the SDL Program,
the CDFI Fund provides Federal
Financial Assistance in the form of
grants for loan loss reserves and
technical assistance to enable award
recipients to establish and/or expand
small dollar loan programs. Small dollar
loan programs supported by the SDL
Program are intended to address the
issues of consumer access to
mainstream financial institutions and
provide alternatives to high-cost small
dollar loans. The SDL Program is also
intended to enable award recipients to
help unbanked and underbanked
populations build credit, access
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Dec 05, 2024
Jkt 265001
affordable capital, and allow greater
access into the mainstream financial
system.
Through the SDL Program, the CDFI
Fund provides:
• Grants for Loan Loss Reserves
(LLR): The awards will enable a
Certified Community Development
Financial Institution (CDFI) to establish
a loan loss reserve fund to defray the
costs of establishing or expanding a
small dollar loan program.
• Grants for Technical Assistance
(TA): The awards will support
technology, staff support, and other
eligible activities to enable a Certified
CDFI to establish and maintain a small
dollar loan program.
SDL Program Award Recipients are
selected through a competitive process
involving a careful review of all
Applications for program funding. The
Application requires the submission of
numeric data and narrative responses in
three parts: 1. Market Need; 2. Business
Strategy and Impact; and 3.
Organizational Capacity, including
financial and compliance-related data.
The Award selection process is defined
in the Notice of Funds Availability
(NOFA) for each funding round.
SDL Program Award Recipients enter
into Assistance Agreements with the
CDFI Fund that set forth required terms
and conditions of the Award, including
reporting and data collection
requirements. The Assistance
Agreement requires the submission of
annual performance reports. The CDFI
Fund reviews the information collected
in the performance reports to ensure the
Recipient’s compliance with its
Performance Goals and contractual
obligations, as well as monitor the
overall performance of the program.
This request for public comment
relates to the SDL Program form under
OMB control number 1559–0051, which
includes the Application. Capitalized
terms not defined in this Notice (other
than titles) have the meaning set forth
in the fiscal year (FY) 2024 SDL
Program NOFA.
Current Actions: Renewal of existing
Information Collection.
Type of Review: Regular Review.
Affected Public: Businesses or other
for-profit institutions, non-profit
entities, and State, local and Tribal
entities participating in CDFI Fund
programs.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
100 (Application).
Estimated Annual Time per
Respondent: 89 hours (Application).
Estimated Annual Burden Hours:
8,900 hours (Application).
Request for Comments: Comments
submitted in response to this Notice
PO 00000
Frm 00233
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
will be summarized and/or included in
the request for Office of Management
and Budget approval. All comments will
become a matter of public record and
may be published on the CDFI Fund
website at https://www.cdfifund.gov.
The CDFI Fund is seeking input on the
SDL Program Application. The
Application may be obtained from the
Request for Public Comments page of
the CDFI Fund’s website at https://
www.cdfifund.gov/requests-forcomments.
The CDFI Fund is seeking: (a) specific
input on the content of the SDL Program
Application and (b) general input on the
SDL Program related topics and
considerations.
Comments concerning the
Application are invited on: (a) whether
the collection of information is
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
collection of information; (c) ways to
enhance the quality, utility and clarity
of the information to be collected; (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of technology; (e) estimates of capital or
start-up costs and costs of operation,
maintenance and purchase of services
required to provide information; and (f)
whether any additional questions or
factors should be considered as part of
the CMF Application and/or review
process.
Additionally, the CDFI Fund
specifically requests comments
concerning the following questions:
1. Should any data fields, questions,
or tables, be added, removed, or
clarified to ensure collection of relevant
information?
2. The Application states that LLR
Awards cannot exceed 20% of the
Applicant’s three-year projected total of
small dollar loans closed. Is the 20%
cap appropriate for the purpose of
supporting a wide variety of small
dollar loan program designs? If not,
provide a rationale and state what
alternative cap would be more
appropriate.
3. Is the maximum LLR Award size of
$350,000 appropriate for the purpose of
supporting a wide variety of small
dollar loan program designs? If not,
what maximum award size would be
more appropriate and why?
4. The Application requests
information on how the Applicant will
use an LLR Award to establish a small
dollar loan program or expand an
existing one. Is the requested
information adequate to demonstrate a
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 235 / Friday, December 6, 2024 / Notices
need for an LLR Award? Why or why
not? What, if any, additional
information should be collected to
assess the need and use of an LLR
Award request?
5. Is the maximum award size for
Technical Assistance Awards of
$150,000 appropriate to support eligible
Technical Assistance activities? If not,
what maximum award size would be
appropriate and why?
6. Is the data collected in the track
record and projections tables adequate
and appropriate to assess an Applicant’s
experience in small dollar lending and
projections? Why or why not?
7. The period of performance for
SDLP awards is three years. Is three
years sufficient to expend the award to
launch or expand a small dollar loan
program? If it’s not sufficient, what
period would be more appropriate and
why?
8. Is there other information not
requested (such as additional detail on
other unsecured consumer loans below
$10,000) in the Application that would
demonstrate an Applicant’s experience
in small dollar lending and projected
small dollar lending activities? If yes,
what is that information?
9. The Application includes questions
about the intended impact of an
Applicant’s small dollar lending
strategy. (1) How should the CDFI Fund
assess the impact of SDL Program
Awards on communities served by
Applicants? (2) The CDFI Fund has
97169
identified a set of impact options for
Applicants to choose in the Application.
Are the current impact choices
sufficient? Why or why not? Are there
impacts that should be added or
modified and if yes, what are they?
10. The SDL Program Application
states that the Awards will not be made
to Applicants that engage in the
Prohibited Practices listed in Table 1.
Are the Prohibited Practices appropriate
to prevent predatory or abusive lending
practices that low-income borrowers
often face? Why are why not? Are there
any Prohibited Practices that should be
added, eliminated, or clarified? What
are they?
TABLE 1—SDL PROGRAM PROHIBITED PRACTICES
Prohibited practice
Prohibited practice definition
i. High-Rate loans .....................................................................
Loans that exceed the lower of the following two rates: (1) an all-inclusive 36%
APR (using the methodology prescribed in 32 CFR 232.4 of the Military Lending Act (referred to as the Military Annual Percentage Rate [MAPR]; or (2) the
interest rate limit as set by the state agency that oversees financial institutions
in your state.
Loans that: (1) have delayed loan disbursements for borrowers who do not agree
to automatic repayments, (2) charge fees for borrowers who select manual
payments, or (3) require borrowers to make payments using wire transfers or
other means that may result in additional fees for borrowers.
Loans that allow refinancing before at least 80% of the principal has been repaid.
Loans that offer add-on insurance or credit card products, whether they are automatic or not, that require borrowers to opt-in or opt-out to decline coverage or
require the borrower to accept or opt-out of a credit card. For example, loans
that automatically include insurance products such as credit, life, disability insurance or involuntary unemployment insurance coverage, or loans that automatically open a credit card for the borrower.
Loans that are secured, except for loans secured by a savings account for loans
with a savings component or credit builder loans.
ii. Coerced automated repayments ..........................................
iii. Excessive refinancing ..........................................................
iv. Loan insurance or credit card add-ons ...............................
v. Security interests in household goods, vehicles, or deposit
accounts. Exception: loans with a savings account component or credit builder loans.
vi. Excessive late fees on missed loan payments ...................
vii. Abusive overdraft practices ................................................
viii. Aggressive debt collection practices .................................
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
ix. Forced arbitration clause, class action ban, and other
bans on legal remedies.
Loans that charge more than one fee per late payment.
Lenders who hold the account from which repayment is being made may not collect a loan payment from the borrower’s account that overdraws the account,
triggering overdraft fees.
Loans in which the lender:
• Does not offer a workout program or other accommodations to help struggling
borrowers before pursuing other debt collection avenues.
• All debt collection activities must comply with the Fair Debt Collection Practices
Act, whether conducted by the lender, a contract debt collector or sold to third
party debt collectors.
• Does not disclose to borrowers the details of its debt collection practices or
provide notice to a borrower when its account is placed with debt collectors.
Loan contracts that contain clauses that prevent borrowers from seeking legal
remedies in court, such as mandatory arbitration clauses, or clauses requiring
that the borrower waive the right to a trial by jury or the right to participate in a
class action lawsuit.
Authority: (Pub. L. 111–203. 12 U.S.C.
4719, 12 CFR part 1805, 12 CFR part
1815, 12 U.S.C. 4502)
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Pravina Raghavan,
Director, Community Development Financial
Institutions Fund.
Proposed Extension of Information
Collection Request Submitted for
Public Comment; Comment Request
on Burden Related to Advanced
Pricing Agreements
[FR Doc. 2024–28521 Filed 12–5–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–05–P
Internal Revenue Service
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Dec 05, 2024
Jkt 265001
PO 00000
Frm 00234
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice and request for
comments.
ACTION:
The Internal Revenue Service,
as part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing information collections, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\06DEN1.SGM
06DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 235 (Friday, December 6, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 97167-97169]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-28521]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
Notice of Information Collection and Request for Public Comment
ACTION: Notice and request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of the Treasury, as part of a continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment
on proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) of 1995. Currently, the Community
Development Financial Institutions Fund (CDFI Fund), Department of the
Treasury, is soliciting comments concerning the Small Dollar Loan
Program (SDL Program) Application (Application). The Application is an
online form submitted through the CDFI Fund's Awards Management
[[Page 97168]]
Information System (AMIS). Information on the SDL Program can be found
on the CDFI Fund's website at https://www.cdfifund.gov/programs-training/programs/sdlp. The CDFI Fund is required by law to make the
Applications publicly available for comment prior to submission for a
new PRA number.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before February 4, 2025
to be assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments concerning the SDL Program
Application via the Federal e-Rulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions on the website for the submission of comments.
In general, all comments will be available for inspection at
www.regulations.gov. Comments, including attachments and other
supporting materials, are part of the public record. Do not submit any
information in your comments or supporting materials that you consider
confidential or inappropriate for public disclosure. Information
regarding the CDFI Fund and its programs may be obtained through the
CDFI Fund's website at https://www.cdfifund.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Eddie Tsibulevskiy, Program Manager,
SDL Program, CDFI Fund, U.S. Department of the Treasury, 1500
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20220, by email to
[email protected], or phone 202-653-0421 (Option 3).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Small Dollar Loan Program Application.
OMB Number: 1559-0051.
Abstract: The Small Dollar Loan Program (SDL Program) was
authorized by Title XII--Improving Access to Mainstream Financial
Institutions Act of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-203), which amended the Community
Development Banking and Financial Institutions Act of 1994 (12 U.S.C.
4719). Through the SDL Program, the CDFI Fund provides Federal
Financial Assistance in the form of grants for loan loss reserves and
technical assistance to enable award recipients to establish and/or
expand small dollar loan programs. Small dollar loan programs supported
by the SDL Program are intended to address the issues of consumer
access to mainstream financial institutions and provide alternatives to
high-cost small dollar loans. The SDL Program is also intended to
enable award recipients to help unbanked and underbanked populations
build credit, access affordable capital, and allow greater access into
the mainstream financial system.
Through the SDL Program, the CDFI Fund provides:
Grants for Loan Loss Reserves (LLR): The awards will
enable a Certified Community Development Financial Institution (CDFI)
to establish a loan loss reserve fund to defray the costs of
establishing or expanding a small dollar loan program.
Grants for Technical Assistance (TA): The awards will
support technology, staff support, and other eligible activities to
enable a Certified CDFI to establish and maintain a small dollar loan
program.
SDL Program Award Recipients are selected through a competitive
process involving a careful review of all Applications for program
funding. The Application requires the submission of numeric data and
narrative responses in three parts: 1. Market Need; 2. Business
Strategy and Impact; and 3. Organizational Capacity, including
financial and compliance-related data. The Award selection process is
defined in the Notice of Funds Availability (NOFA) for each funding
round.
SDL Program Award Recipients enter into Assistance Agreements with
the CDFI Fund that set forth required terms and conditions of the
Award, including reporting and data collection requirements. The
Assistance Agreement requires the submission of annual performance
reports. The CDFI Fund reviews the information collected in the
performance reports to ensure the Recipient's compliance with its
Performance Goals and contractual obligations, as well as monitor the
overall performance of the program.
This request for public comment relates to the SDL Program form
under OMB control number 1559-0051, which includes the Application.
Capitalized terms not defined in this Notice (other than titles) have
the meaning set forth in the fiscal year (FY) 2024 SDL Program NOFA.
Current Actions: Renewal of existing Information Collection.
Type of Review: Regular Review.
Affected Public: Businesses or other for-profit institutions, non-
profit entities, and State, local and Tribal entities participating in
CDFI Fund programs.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 100 (Application).
Estimated Annual Time per Respondent: 89 hours (Application).
Estimated Annual Burden Hours: 8,900 hours (Application).
Request for Comments: Comments submitted in response to this Notice
will be summarized and/or included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval. All comments will become a matter of
public record and may be published on the CDFI Fund website at https://www.cdfifund.gov. The CDFI Fund is seeking input on the SDL Program
Application. The Application may be obtained from the Request for
Public Comments page of the CDFI Fund's website at https://www.cdfifund.gov/requests-for-comments.
The CDFI Fund is seeking: (a) specific input on the content of the
SDL Program Application and (b) general input on the SDL Program
related topics and considerations.
Comments concerning the Application are invited on: (a) whether the
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall
have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of
the burden of the collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the information to be collected; (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
respondents, including through the use of technology; (e) estimates of
capital or start-up costs and costs of operation, maintenance and
purchase of services required to provide information; and (f) whether
any additional questions or factors should be considered as part of the
CMF Application and/or review process.
Additionally, the CDFI Fund specifically requests comments
concerning the following questions:
1. Should any data fields, questions, or tables, be added, removed,
or clarified to ensure collection of relevant information?
2. The Application states that LLR Awards cannot exceed 20% of the
Applicant's three-year projected total of small dollar loans closed. Is
the 20% cap appropriate for the purpose of supporting a wide variety of
small dollar loan program designs? If not, provide a rationale and
state what alternative cap would be more appropriate.
3. Is the maximum LLR Award size of $350,000 appropriate for the
purpose of supporting a wide variety of small dollar loan program
designs? If not, what maximum award size would be more appropriate and
why?
4. The Application requests information on how the Applicant will
use an LLR Award to establish a small dollar loan program or expand an
existing one. Is the requested information adequate to demonstrate a
[[Page 97169]]
need for an LLR Award? Why or why not? What, if any, additional
information should be collected to assess the need and use of an LLR
Award request?
5. Is the maximum award size for Technical Assistance Awards of
$150,000 appropriate to support eligible Technical Assistance
activities? If not, what maximum award size would be appropriate and
why?
6. Is the data collected in the track record and projections tables
adequate and appropriate to assess an Applicant's experience in small
dollar lending and projections? Why or why not?
7. The period of performance for SDLP awards is three years. Is
three years sufficient to expend the award to launch or expand a small
dollar loan program? If it's not sufficient, what period would be more
appropriate and why?
8. Is there other information not requested (such as additional
detail on other unsecured consumer loans below $10,000) in the
Application that would demonstrate an Applicant's experience in small
dollar lending and projected small dollar lending activities? If yes,
what is that information?
9. The Application includes questions about the intended impact of
an Applicant's small dollar lending strategy. (1) How should the CDFI
Fund assess the impact of SDL Program Awards on communities served by
Applicants? (2) The CDFI Fund has identified a set of impact options
for Applicants to choose in the Application. Are the current impact
choices sufficient? Why or why not? Are there impacts that should be
added or modified and if yes, what are they?
10. The SDL Program Application states that the Awards will not be
made to Applicants that engage in the Prohibited Practices listed in
Table 1. Are the Prohibited Practices appropriate to prevent predatory
or abusive lending practices that low-income borrowers often face? Why
are why not? Are there any Prohibited Practices that should be added,
eliminated, or clarified? What are they?
Table 1--SDL Program Prohibited Practices
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prohibited practice Prohibited practice definition
------------------------------------------------------------------------
i. High-Rate loans..................... Loans that exceed the lower of
the following two rates: (1)
an all-inclusive 36% APR
(using the methodology
prescribed in 32 CFR 232.4 of
the Military Lending Act
(referred to as the Military
Annual Percentage Rate [MAPR];
or (2) the interest rate limit
as set by the state agency
that oversees financial
institutions in your state.
ii. Coerced automated repayments....... Loans that: (1) have delayed
loan disbursements for
borrowers who do not agree to
automatic repayments, (2)
charge fees for borrowers who
select manual payments, or (3)
require borrowers to make
payments using wire transfers
or other means that may result
in additional fees for
borrowers.
iii. Excessive refinancing............. Loans that allow refinancing
before at least 80% of the
principal has been repaid.
iv. Loan insurance or credit card add- Loans that offer add-on
ons. insurance or credit card
products, whether they are
automatic or not, that require
borrowers to opt-in or opt-out
to decline coverage or require
the borrower to accept or opt-
out of a credit card. For
example, loans that
automatically include
insurance products such as
credit, life, disability
insurance or involuntary
unemployment insurance
coverage, or loans that
automatically open a credit
card for the borrower.
v. Security interests in household Loans that are secured, except
goods, vehicles, or deposit accounts. for loans secured by a savings
Exception: loans with a savings account for loans with a
account component or credit builder savings component or credit
loans. builder loans.
vi. Excessive late fees on missed loan Loans that charge more than one
payments. fee per late payment.
vii. Abusive overdraft practices....... Lenders who hold the account
from which repayment is being
made may not collect a loan
payment from the borrower's
account that overdraws the
account, triggering overdraft
fees.
viii. Aggressive debt collection Loans in which the lender:
practices. Does not offer a
workout program or other
accommodations to help
struggling borrowers before
pursuing other debt collection
avenues.
All debt collection
activities must comply with
the Fair Debt Collection
Practices Act, whether
conducted by the lender, a
contract debt collector or
sold to third party debt
collectors.
Does not disclose to
borrowers the details of its
debt collection practices or
provide notice to a borrower
when its account is placed
with debt collectors.
ix. Forced arbitration clause, class Loan contracts that contain
action ban, and other bans on legal clauses that prevent borrowers
remedies. from seeking legal remedies in
court, such as mandatory
arbitration clauses, or
clauses requiring that the
borrower waive the right to a
trial by jury or the right to
participate in a class action
lawsuit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority: (Pub. L. 111-203. 12 U.S.C. 4719, 12 CFR part 1805, 12
CFR part 1815, 12 U.S.C. 4502)
Pravina Raghavan,
Director, Community Development Financial Institutions Fund.
[FR Doc. 2024-28521 Filed 12-5-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-05-P