Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation, Rescinding Reserve Officer Training Corps and Military Recruiting on Campus Clause (HSAR Case 2024-001), 92847-92849 [2024-27631]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2024 / Rules and Regulations khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES Connect American Model (A–CAM) or Alaska Plan support to file line count data on FCC Form 507 as a condition of high-cost support. Connect America Fund et al., WC Docket No. 10–90 et al., Report and Order, Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Order on Reconsideration, 33 FCC Rcd 11893 (2018) (2018 Rate-of-Return Reform Order). Historically, all rate-of-return carriers that received CAF–BLS or, prior to that, ICLS, were required to file line count data on FCC Form 507 as a condition of that support but Rate-ofreturn carriers that had elected to receive A–CAM I, A–CAM II, or Alaska Plan instead were not. Id. at 11937, para. 148. In order to restore a data set that the Commission relied on to evaluate the effectiveness of its highcost universal service programs, the Commission revised its rules in that Order to require all rate-of-return carriers to file that data. See id. at 11937, para. 51. While carriers receiving CAF–BLS must file the line count data on March 31 for line counts as of the prior December 31, the A–CAM I, A– CAM II, and Alaska Plan carriers will be required to file on July 1 of each year to coincide with other existing requirements in OMB Control No. 3060– 0986. 47 CFR 54.903(a)(1), 54.313(f)(5). On October 20, 2023, the Commission made changes to rate-of-return reporting rules by eliminating optional unseparated loop cost data quarterly updates. Connect America Fund et al., WC Docket No. 10–90 et al. WT Docket No. 10–208, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Report and Order, FCC 23–87 at 79–80, paras. 181–82 (Oct. 20, 2023). In addition, the Commission amended section 36.4 of the Commission’s rules, 47 CFR 36.4, to require local exchange carriers seeking a change in study area boundaries to submit a petition for waiver of these boundary changes notwithstanding any prior exemptions from such waiver requests including, but not limited to, when a company is combining previously unserved territory with one of its study areas or a holding company is consolidating existing study areas within the same state. See id. at 176– 180, paras. 77–79. Federal Communications Commission. Marlene Dortch, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2024–27481 Filed 11–22–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 Nov 22, 2024 Jkt 265001 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 48 CFR Parts 3009 and 3052 [Docket No. DHS–2024–0023] RIN 1601–AB14 Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation, Rescinding Reserve Officer Training Corps and Military Recruiting on Campus Clause (HSAR Case 2024–001) Office of the Chief Procurement Officer, Department of Homeland Security (DHS). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: DHS is issuing a final rule to amend the Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation (HSAR) to remove and reserve an HSAR clause and subpart. These provisions contain regulatory requirements, which prohibits the award of certain Federal contracts to institutions of higher education that prohibit Reserve Officer Training Corps units or military recruiting on campus. These HSAR provisions are no longer needed in light of amendments made in the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), which DHS has adhered to since December 2020. SUMMARY: This final rule is effective December 26, 2024. DATES: Ms. Ellen Murray, Procurement Analyst, DHS, Office of the Chief Procurement Officer, Acquisition Policy and Legislation at (202) 282–8000 or email HSAR@hq.dhs.gov. When using email, include HSAR Case 2024–001 in the ‘‘Subject’’ line. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Table of Contents for Preamble I. Background II. Discussion of Comments and the Final Rule III. Regulatory Analyses A. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094 B. Regulatory Flexibility Act C. Paperwork Reduction Act D. National Environmental Policy Act 92847 Reserve Officer Training Corps units or military recruiting on campus.1 As explained in the NPRM, on December 4, 2003, DHS published an interim final rule to establish the HSAR.2 On May 2, 2006, DHS published a final rule, which adopted the interim rule with some changes in response to public comment (HSAR final rule).3 The HSAR final rule finalized, among other provisions, HSAR clause 3052.209–71, Reserve Officer Training Corps and Military Recruiting on Campus (48 CFR 3052.209–71). This prohibited the award of certain Federal contracts to institutions of higher education that prohibit Reserve Officer Training Corps units or military recruiting on campus. HSAR clause 3052.209–71 required certain contractors to represent at time of contract award that it did not have and agree that during performance of a contract to not adopt, any policy or practice that prohibits or prevents the maintenance, establishment, or operation of a Senior Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) unit at the institution; students at that institution from enrolling in a unit of the Senior ROTC at another institution of higher education; the Secretary of a military department or Secretary of Homeland Security from gaining access to campuses, or students on campuses, for military recruiting purposes; or access by military recruiters, for the purposes of military recruiting, to certain information pertaining to students enrolled at the institution. The clause also listed the two statutory exceptions to the prohibition concerning the award of a contract found in 10 U.S.C. 983(c). On October 23, 2020, the Department of Defense (DoD), the General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) jointly issued a final rule entitled Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Reserve Officer Training Corps and Military Recruiting on Campus (‘‘FAR final rule’’).4 The FAR final rule, among other amendments, codified for all affected Federal agencies a requirement to include, where applicable, a clause that prohibits the award of certain Federal contracts to institutions of higher education that I. Background In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), published in the Federal Register on July 31, 2024, DHS proposed to amend certain Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation (HSAR) provisions prohibiting the award of certain Federal contracts to institutions of higher education that prohibit PO 00000 Frm 00061 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 1 See Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation, Rescinding Reserve Officer Training Corps and Military Recruiting on Campus Clause (HSAR Case 2024–001), 89 FR 61384 (Jul. 31, 2024). 2 See Department of Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation, 68 FR 67868 (Dec. 4, 2003). 3 See Revision of Department of Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation, 71 FR 25759 (May 2, 2006). 4 See 85 FR 67619 (Oct. 23, 2020). E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM 25NOR1 92848 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2024 / Rules and Regulations prohibit Reserve Officer Training Corps units or military recruiting on campus.5 On December 8, 2020, DHS issued HSAR Class Deviation 21–02, Reserve Officer Training Corps and Military Recruiting on Campus.6 The deviation explained that the FAR final rule ‘‘effective November 23, 2020, added FAR 9.110 that provides the policy and procedures for complying with the 10 U.S.C. 983 prohibition, including FAR clause 52.209–14.’’ 7 The deviation then directed DHS contracting officers to follow the FAR when complying with the requirements of 10 U.S.C. 983 and suspended use of HSAR 3009.470 and HSAR clause 3052.209–71. As a result of the FAR revision and HSAR Class Deviation 21–02, HSAR clause 3052.209–71 has not been used to comply with 10 U.S.C. 983 since 2020. II. Discussion of Comments and the Final Rule Interested parties were given until September 30, 2024, to comment on the NPRM. DHS received one public comment that was not substantive. The one public comment received provided support for the rule. As explained previously, since 2020 DHS has complied with the requirements of 10 U.S.C. 983 by following the regulatory provisions of the FAR final rule; not 48 CFR 3052.209–71 and 48 CFR 3009.470. This final rule amends the HSAR to remove and reserve 48 CFR 3052.209–71 and subpart 3009.4 of 48 CFR part 3009. III. Regulatory Analyses A. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094 Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), as amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review), and 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES 5 See 85 FR 67619 (Oct. 23, 2020). HSAR Deviation 21–02, Reserve Officer Training Corps and Military Recruiting on Campus, available at: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/ publications/hsarclassdeviation_21_02_3009.470_ 12-8-2020.pdf (last accessed May 28, 2024). 7 See HSAR Deviation 21–02, Reserve Officer Training Corps and Military Recruiting on Campus, available at: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/ publications/hsarclassdeviation_21_02_3009.470_ 12-8-2020.pdf (last accessed May 28, 2024). 6 See VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 Nov 22, 2024 Jkt 265001 quantifying both costs and benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not designated this rule a significant regulatory action, under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094. Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed this regulatory action. within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq. Need for the Rule D. National Environmental Policy Act Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA), Public Law 91–190, 83 Stat. 852 (Jan. 1, 1970) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), as amended, requires Federal agencies to evaluate the impacts of a major Federal actions that may significantly affect the human environment, consider alternatives to the proposed action, provide public notice and opportunity to comment, and properly document its analysis. DHS and its agency components analyzed the actions in this rule to determine whether NEPA applies to them and, if so, what level of documentation and analysis is required. DHS Directive 023–01, Rev. 01 and DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–001– 01, Rev. 01 (Instruction Manual) establish the policies and procedures DHS and its component agencies use to comply with NEPA and the Council on Environmental Quality regulations for implementing NEPA codified in 40 CFR parts 1500–1508. The CEQ regulations allow Federal agencies to establish, in their implementing procedures, with CEQ review and concurrence, categories of actions (‘‘categorical exclusions’’) that experience has shown do not, individually or in the aggregate, have a significant effect on the human environment and, therefore, do not require preparation of an environmental assessment or environmental impact statement. 40 CFR 1501.4, 1507.3(e)(2)(ii). Appendix A of the Instruction Manual lists the DHS categorical exclusions. Under DHS NEPA implementing procedures, for an action to be categorically excluded, it must satisfy each of the following three conditions: (1) the entire action clearly fits within one or more categorical exclusions; (2) the action is not a piece of a larger action; and (3) no extraordinary circumstances exist that create the potential for a significant environmental effect. This final rule amends the HSAR to remove and reserve HSAR clause 3052.209–71 and subpart 3009.4. As stated previously, this HSAR clause and its corresponding policy that this rule removes are now obsolete given that a This final rule codifies the requirements set forth in the HSAR Class Deviation 21–02, Reserve Officer Training Corps and Military Recruiting on Campus, that directs DHS contracting officers to follow the FAR when complying with the requirements of 10 U.S.C. 983 and suspends use of HSAR 3009.470 and HSAR clause 3052.209–71. As stated previously, because of the amendments made in the FAR final rule that standardized compliance with 10 U.S.C. 983 for all affected Federal agencies, DHS determined that HSAR clause 3052.209– 71 and subpart 3009.4 are not needed to comply with the requirements of 10 U.S.C. 983. Therefore, this final rule amends the HSAR to remove and reserve this clause and its corresponding policy. Benefits and Costs of the Final Rule There are no quantified costs or cost savings to this rule as it simply rescinds HSAR requirements that DoD, GSA and NASA have already incorporated in the FAR. DHS believes there will be efficiency and streamlining benefits from this rule as it will remove agency specific provisions from the HSAR. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, Public Law 104–121, (Mar. 29, 1996), requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small businesses, small governmental jurisdictions, and small organizations during the development of their rules. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, or governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. This final rule rescinds HSAR clause 3052.209–71 and does not impose new requirements on small entities. As such, DHS certifies this final rule will not result in a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities PO 00000 Frm 00062 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 C. Paperwork Reduction Act The rule does not contain any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM 25NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2024 / Rules and Regulations FAR clause has been implemented to create a single standard for all agencies subject to 10 U.S.C. 983 to comply with the statutory requirements. DHS is not aware of any significant impact on the environment, or any change in environmental effect that will result from this final rule. DHS finds promulgation of the rule clearly fits within categorical exclusion A3, established in the Department’s NEPA implementing procedures as removing and reserving HSAR clause 3052.209–71 and subpart 3009.4 is strictly administrative in nature. This final rule is a standalone rule and is not part of any larger action. This final rule will not result in any major Federal action that will significantly affect the quality of the human environment. Furthermore, DHS has determined that no extraordinary circumstances exist that will create the potential for significant environmental effects. Therefore, this final rule is categorically excluded from further NEPA review and documentation. List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 3009 and 3052 Government procurement. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, DHS amends 48 CFR parts 3009 and 3052 as follows: PART 3009—CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS 1. The authority citation for part 3009 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301–302, 41 U.S.C. 1303, 41 U.S.C. 1707, 41 U.S.C. 1702, and 48 CFR subpart 1.3. 3009.4 ■ [Removed and Reserved] 2. Remove and reserve subpart 3009.4. PART 3052—SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES 3. The authority citation for part 3052 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301–302, 41 U.S.C. 1707, 41 U.S.C. 1702, 41 U.S.C. 1303(a)(2), 48 CFR part 1, subpart 1.3, and DHS Delegation Number 0702. khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES 3052.209–71 [Removed and Reserved] 4. Remove and reserve section 3052.209–71. ■ Paul Courtney, Chief Procurement Officer, Department of Homeland Security. [FR Doc. 2024–27631 Filed 11–22–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9112–FE–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:59 Nov 22, 2024 Jkt 265001 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 48 CFR Parts 3025 and 3052 [Docket No. DHS–2024–0022] RIN 1601–AB13 Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation, Restrictions on Foreign Acquisition Update (HSAR Case 2024– 002) Office of the Chief Procurement Officer, Department of Homeland Security (DHS). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: DHS is issuing a final rule to amend the Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation (HSAR) provisions that relate to the Kissell Amendment, a section of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, that deals with the acquisition of certain clothing, canvas or textile products and natural and synthetic fabrics. These changes are intended to reduce confusion and provide clarity to the requirements under the Kissell Amendment. DATES: This final rule is effective December 26, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nancy Harvey, Department of Homeland Security, Office of the Chief Procurement Officer, Acquisition Policy and Legislation, at (202) 282–8000 or email at HSAR@hq.dhs.gov. Include HSAR Case 2024–002 in the subject line. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: SUMMARY: Table of Contents for Preamble I. Background II. Discussion of Comments and the Final Rule III. Regulatory Analyses A. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094 B. Regulatory Flexibility Act C. Paperwork Reduction Act D. National Environmental Policy Act I. Background In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), published in the Federal Register on July 24, 2024, DHS proposed to amend the Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation (HSAR) provisions that relate to the Kissell Amendment, a section of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act), that deals with the acquisition of certain clothing, canvas or textile products and natural and synthetic fabrics.1 1 See 89 FR 59877, Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation, Restrictions on Foreign PO 00000 Frm 00063 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 92849 As explained in the NPRM, the Recovery Act was enacted in 2009.2 Section 604 of the Recovery Act is also known as the Kissell Amendment.3 The Kissell Amendment requires, with limited exceptions, that funds appropriated or otherwise available to DHS may not be used for the procurement of certain textiles, clothing and footwear, if that item is directly related to the national security interests of the United States, unless the item is grown, reprocessed, reused, or produced in the United States.4 One of the exceptions is a De Minimis Exception, which allows the Secretary of Homeland Security to accept delivery of the aforementioned textiles, clothing and footwear ‘‘that contain non-compliant fibers if the total value of non-compliant fibers contained in the end item does not exceed 10 percent of the total purchase price of the end item.’’ 5 The Kissel Amendment further requires DHS to apply it in a manner consistent with United States obligations under international agreements.6 As DHS has explained in prior notices, this includes free trade agreements and the World Trade Organization Agreement on Government Procurement.7 These requirements apply with respect to contracts entered into by DHS on or after August 16, 2009.8 As discussed in the NPRM, in 2009, DHS published an interim rule (‘‘2009 Interim Rule’’) amending the Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation (HSAR) at 48 CFR part 3025, Foreign Acquisitions, and part 3052, Solicitation Provisions and Contract Clauses, incorporating the Kissell Amendment requirements.9 In 2010, DHS published a final rule (‘‘2010 Final Rule’’) adopting the 2009 Interim Rule as final without change.10 The 2009 Interim Rule made amendments to the HSAR ‘‘to add solicitation provisions, contract clauses and related policy statements implementing these requirements and Acquisition Update (HSAR Case 2024–002) (Jul. 24, 2024). 2 See Public Law 111–5, 123 Stat. 115,165–166 (Feb. 17, 2009). 3 Section 604 of the Recovery Act is codified at 6 U.S.C. 453b. 4 See 6 U.S.C. 453b. 5 See 6 U.S.C. 453b(d). 6 See 6 U.S.C. 453b(k). 7 See, e.g., 75 FR 32676, (June 9, 2010). 8 See 6 U.S.C. 453b(l). 9 See Revision of Department of Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation; Restrictions on Foreign Acquisition (HSAR Case 2009–004), 74 FR 41346 (Aug. 17, 2009). 10 See Revision of Department of Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation; Restrictions on Foreign Acquisition (HSAR Case 2009–004), 75 FR 32676 (June 9, 2010). E:\FR\FM\25NOR1.SGM 25NOR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 227 (Monday, November 25, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 92847-92849]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27631]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

48 CFR Parts 3009 and 3052

[Docket No. DHS-2024-0023]
RIN 1601-AB14


Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation, Rescinding Reserve 
Officer Training Corps and Military Recruiting on Campus Clause (HSAR 
Case 2024-001)

AGENCY: Office of the Chief Procurement Officer, Department of Homeland 
Security (DHS).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DHS is issuing a final rule to amend the Homeland Security 
Acquisition Regulation (HSAR) to remove and reserve an HSAR clause and 
subpart. These provisions contain regulatory requirements, which 
prohibits the award of certain Federal contracts to institutions of 
higher education that prohibit Reserve Officer Training Corps units or 
military recruiting on campus. These HSAR provisions are no longer 
needed in light of amendments made in the Federal Acquisition 
Regulation (FAR), which DHS has adhered to since December 2020.

DATES: This final rule is effective December 26, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Ellen Murray, Procurement Analyst, 
DHS, Office of the Chief Procurement Officer, Acquisition Policy and 
Legislation at (202) 282-8000 or email [email protected]. When using 
email, include HSAR Case 2024-001 in the ``Subject'' line.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents for Preamble

I. Background
II. Discussion of Comments and the Final Rule
III. Regulatory Analyses
    A. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094
    B. Regulatory Flexibility Act
    C. Paperwork Reduction Act
    D. National Environmental Policy Act

I. Background

    In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), published in the Federal 
Register on July 31, 2024, DHS proposed to amend certain Homeland 
Security Acquisition Regulation (HSAR) provisions prohibiting the award 
of certain Federal contracts to institutions of higher education that 
prohibit Reserve Officer Training Corps units or military recruiting on 
campus.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation, Rescinding 
Reserve Officer Training Corps and Military Recruiting on Campus 
Clause (HSAR Case 2024-001), 89 FR 61384 (Jul. 31, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As explained in the NPRM, on December 4, 2003, DHS published an 
interim final rule to establish the HSAR.\2\ On May 2, 2006, DHS 
published a final rule, which adopted the interim rule with some 
changes in response to public comment (HSAR final rule).\3\ The HSAR 
final rule finalized, among other provisions, HSAR clause 3052.209-71, 
Reserve Officer Training Corps and Military Recruiting on Campus (48 
CFR 3052.209-71). This prohibited the award of certain Federal 
contracts to institutions of higher education that prohibit Reserve 
Officer Training Corps units or military recruiting on campus.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ See Department of Homeland Security Acquisition Regulation, 
68 FR 67868 (Dec. 4, 2003).
    \3\ See Revision of Department of Homeland Security Acquisition 
Regulation, 71 FR 25759 (May 2, 2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    HSAR clause 3052.209-71 required certain contractors to represent 
at time of contract award that it did not have and agree that during 
performance of a contract to not adopt, any policy or practice that 
prohibits or prevents the maintenance, establishment, or operation of a 
Senior Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) unit at the institution; 
students at that institution from enrolling in a unit of the Senior 
ROTC at another institution of higher education; the Secretary of a 
military department or Secretary of Homeland Security from gaining 
access to campuses, or students on campuses, for military recruiting 
purposes; or access by military recruiters, for the purposes of 
military recruiting, to certain information pertaining to students 
enrolled at the institution. The clause also listed the two statutory 
exceptions to the prohibition concerning the award of a contract found 
in 10 U.S.C. 983(c).
    On October 23, 2020, the Department of Defense (DoD), the General 
Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration (NASA) jointly issued a final rule entitled Federal 
Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Reserve Officer Training Corps and 
Military Recruiting on Campus (``FAR final rule'').\4\ The FAR final 
rule, among other amendments, codified for all affected Federal 
agencies a requirement to include, where applicable, a clause that 
prohibits the award of certain Federal contracts to institutions of 
higher education that

[[Page 92848]]

prohibit Reserve Officer Training Corps units or military recruiting on 
campus.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See 85 FR 67619 (Oct. 23, 2020).
    \5\ See 85 FR 67619 (Oct. 23, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 8, 2020, DHS issued HSAR Class Deviation 21-02, Reserve 
Officer Training Corps and Military Recruiting on Campus.\6\ The 
deviation explained that the FAR final rule ``effective November 23, 
2020, added FAR 9.110 that provides the policy and procedures for 
complying with the 10 U.S.C. 983 prohibition, including FAR clause 
52.209-14.'' \7\ The deviation then directed DHS contracting officers 
to follow the FAR when complying with the requirements of 10 U.S.C. 983 
and suspended use of HSAR 3009.470 and HSAR clause 3052.209-71. As a 
result of the FAR revision and HSAR Class Deviation 21-02, HSAR clause 
3052.209-71 has not been used to comply with 10 U.S.C. 983 since 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See HSAR Deviation 21-02, Reserve Officer Training Corps and 
Military Recruiting on Campus, available at: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/hsarclassdeviation_21_02_3009.470_12-8-2020.pdf (last accessed May 
28, 2024).
    \7\ See HSAR Deviation 21-02, Reserve Officer Training Corps and 
Military Recruiting on Campus, available at: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/publications/hsarclassdeviation_21_02_3009.470_12-8-2020.pdf (last accessed May 
28, 2024).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Discussion of Comments and the Final Rule

    Interested parties were given until September 30, 2024, to comment 
on the NPRM. DHS received one public comment that was not substantive. 
The one public comment received provided support for the rule.
    As explained previously, since 2020 DHS has complied with the 
requirements of 10 U.S.C. 983 by following the regulatory provisions of 
the FAR final rule; not 48 CFR 3052.209-71 and 48 CFR 3009.470. This 
final rule amends the HSAR to remove and reserve 48 CFR 3052.209-71 and 
subpart 3009.4 of 48 CFR part 3009.

III. Regulatory Analyses

A. Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094

    Executive Orders 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), as amended 
by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review), and 13563 
(Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review) direct agencies to assess 
the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public 
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive 
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and 
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
    The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not designated this 
rule a significant regulatory action, under section 3(f) of Executive 
Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094. Accordingly, OMB has 
not reviewed this regulatory action.
Need for the Rule
    This final rule codifies the requirements set forth in the HSAR 
Class Deviation 21-02, Reserve Officer Training Corps and Military 
Recruiting on Campus, that directs DHS contracting officers to follow 
the FAR when complying with the requirements of 10 U.S.C. 983 and 
suspends use of HSAR 3009.470 and HSAR clause 3052.209-71. As stated 
previously, because of the amendments made in the FAR final rule that 
standardized compliance with 10 U.S.C. 983 for all affected Federal 
agencies, DHS determined that HSAR clause 3052.209-71 and subpart 
3009.4 are not needed to comply with the requirements of 10 U.S.C. 983. 
Therefore, this final rule amends the HSAR to remove and reserve this 
clause and its corresponding policy.
Benefits and Costs of the Final Rule
    There are no quantified costs or cost savings to this rule as it 
simply rescinds HSAR requirements that DoD, GSA and NASA have already 
incorporated in the FAR. DHS believes there will be efficiency and 
streamlining benefits from this rule as it will remove agency specific 
provisions from the HSAR.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (RFA), 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 
1996, Public Law 104-121, (Mar. 29, 1996), requires Federal agencies to 
consider the potential impact of regulations on small businesses, small 
governmental jurisdictions, and small organizations during the 
development of their rules. The term ``small entities'' comprises small 
businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned 
and operated and are not dominant in their fields, or governmental 
jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. This final rule 
rescinds HSAR clause 3052.209-71 and does not impose new requirements 
on small entities. As such, DHS certifies this final rule will not 
result in a significant economic impact on a substantial number of 
small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 
U.S.C. 601, et seq.

C. Paperwork Reduction Act

    The rule does not contain any information collection requirements 
that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).

D. National Environmental Policy Act

    Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(NEPA), Public Law 91-190, 83 Stat. 852 (Jan. 1, 1970) (42 U.S.C. 4321 
et seq.), as amended, requires Federal agencies to evaluate the impacts 
of a major Federal actions that may significantly affect the human 
environment, consider alternatives to the proposed action, provide 
public notice and opportunity to comment, and properly document its 
analysis. DHS and its agency components analyzed the actions in this 
rule to determine whether NEPA applies to them and, if so, what level 
of documentation and analysis is required.
    DHS Directive 023-01, Rev. 01 and DHS Instruction Manual 023-01-
001-01, Rev. 01 (Instruction Manual) establish the policies and 
procedures DHS and its component agencies use to comply with NEPA and 
the Council on Environmental Quality regulations for implementing NEPA 
codified in 40 CFR parts 1500-1508. The CEQ regulations allow Federal 
agencies to establish, in their implementing procedures, with CEQ 
review and concurrence, categories of actions (``categorical 
exclusions'') that experience has shown do not, individually or in the 
aggregate, have a significant effect on the human environment and, 
therefore, do not require preparation of an environmental assessment or 
environmental impact statement. 40 CFR 1501.4, 1507.3(e)(2)(ii). 
Appendix A of the Instruction Manual lists the DHS categorical 
exclusions.
    Under DHS NEPA implementing procedures, for an action to be 
categorically excluded, it must satisfy each of the following three 
conditions: (1) the entire action clearly fits within one or more 
categorical exclusions; (2) the action is not a piece of a larger 
action; and (3) no extraordinary circumstances exist that create the 
potential for a significant environmental effect.
    This final rule amends the HSAR to remove and reserve HSAR clause 
3052.209-71 and subpart 3009.4. As stated previously, this HSAR clause 
and its corresponding policy that this rule removes are now obsolete 
given that a

[[Page 92849]]

FAR clause has been implemented to create a single standard for all 
agencies subject to 10 U.S.C. 983 to comply with the statutory 
requirements.
    DHS is not aware of any significant impact on the environment, or 
any change in environmental effect that will result from this final 
rule. DHS finds promulgation of the rule clearly fits within 
categorical exclusion A3, established in the Department's NEPA 
implementing procedures as removing and reserving HSAR clause 3052.209-
71 and subpart 3009.4 is strictly administrative in nature.
    This final rule is a standalone rule and is not part of any larger 
action. This final rule will not result in any major Federal action 
that will significantly affect the quality of the human environment. 
Furthermore, DHS has determined that no extraordinary circumstances 
exist that will create the potential for significant environmental 
effects. Therefore, this final rule is categorically excluded from 
further NEPA review and documentation.

List of Subjects in 48 CFR Parts 3009 and 3052

    Government procurement.

    For the reasons set forth in the preamble, DHS amends 48 CFR parts 
3009 and 3052 as follows:

PART 3009--CONTRACTOR QUALIFICATIONS

0
1. The authority citation for part 3009 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301-302, 41 U.S.C. 1303, 41 U.S.C. 1707, 41 
U.S.C. 1702, and 48 CFR subpart 1.3.


3009.4  [Removed and Reserved]

0
2. Remove and reserve subpart 3009.4.

PART 3052--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES

0
3. The authority citation for part 3052 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301-302, 41 U.S.C. 1707, 41 U.S.C. 1702, 41 
U.S.C. 1303(a)(2), 48 CFR part 1, subpart 1.3, and DHS Delegation 
Number 0702.


3052.209-71  [Removed and Reserved]

0
4. Remove and reserve section 3052.209-71.

Paul Courtney,
Chief Procurement Officer, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. 2024-27631 Filed 11-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9112-FE-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.