Members of the Performance Review Board for the Department of the Air Force, 92910-92911 [2024-27567]
Download as PDF
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES
92910
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2024 / Notices
‘‘comment’’ button next to the
information collection on the ‘‘OIRA
Information Collections Under Review’’
page, or the ‘‘View ICR—Agency
Submission’’ page. A copy of the
supporting statement for the collection
of information discussed herein may be
obtained by visiting https://
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
In addition to the submission of
comments to https://Reginfo.gov as
indicated above, a copy of all comments
submitted to OIRA may also be
submitted to the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’ or ‘‘CFTC’’) by clicking
on the ‘‘Submit Comment’’ box next to
the descriptive entry for OMB Control
No. 3038–3033, at https://comments.
cftc.gov/FederalRegister/PublicInfo.
aspx.
Or by either of the following methods:
• Mail: Christopher Kirkpatrick,
Secretary of the Commission,
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, Three Lafayette Centre,
1155 21st Street NW, Washington, DC
20581.
• Hand Delivery/Courier: Same as
Mail above.
All comments must be submitted in
English, or if not, accompanied by an
English translation. Comments
submitted to the Commission should
include only information that you wish
to make available publicly. If you wish
the Commission to consider information
that you believe is exempt from
disclosure under the Freedom of
Information Act, a petition for
confidential treatment of the exempt
information may be submitted according
to the procedures established in § 145.9
of the Commission’s regulations.1 The
Commission reserves the right, but shall
have no obligation, to review, prescreen, filter, redact, refuse or remove
any or all of your submission from
https://www.cftc.gov that it may deem to
be inappropriate for publication, such as
obscene language. All submissions that
have been redacted or removed that
contain comments on the merits of the
ICR will be retained in the public
comment file and will be considered as
required under the Administrative
Procedure Act and other applicable
laws, and may be accessible under the
Freedom of Information Act.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lynn Bulan, Managing Counsel, Office
of the General Counsel, Commodity
Futures Trading Commission, (202)
418–5143; email: lbulan@cftc.gov, and
refer to OMB Control No. 3038–3033.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1 17
CFR 145.9.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:29 Nov 22, 2024
Jkt 265001
Title: Notification of Pending Legal
Proceedings Pursuant to 17 CFR 1.60
(OMB Control Number 3038–0033). This
is a request for extension of a currently
approved information collection.
Abstract: Rule 1.60 of the
Commission’s Part 1 regulations
requires every designated contract
market (‘‘DCM’’) and futures
commission merchant (‘‘FCM’’) to
submit to the Commodity Futures
Trading Commission (‘‘Commission’’)
certain specified information
concerning pending legal proceedings to
which the DCM or FCM is a party or to
which its property is subject. Rule 37.2
of the same part makes the requirement
of 1.60 applicable to swap execution
facilities (‘‘SEFs’’). This renewal
updates the total requested burden
based on available reported data.
The Commission originally estimated
that 101 entities would be affected by
this rule. That number was based on the
number of active registrants, including
62 FCMs,18 DCMs, and 21 SEFs.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.2 On September 13,
2024, the Commission published in the
Federal Register notice of the proposed
extension of this information collection
and provided 60 days for public
comment on the proposed extension, 89
FR 74930 (‘‘60-Day Notice’’). The
Commission did not receive any
comments on the 60-Day Notice.
Burden Statement: The respondent
burden for this collection is estimated to
average 0.25 hours per response, once
annually. This estimate includes
providing the Commission with notice
and copies of specified legal documents.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
101.
Estimated Average Burden Hours per
Respondent: 0.25.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 25.25.
Frequency of Collection: Once
annually.
There are no capital costs or operating
and maintenance costs associated with
this collection.
(Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
Dated: November 20, 2024.
Robert Sidman,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024–27549 Filed 11–22–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
2 44 U.S.C. 3512, 5 CFR 1320.5(b)(2)(i) and
1320.8(b)(3)(vi). The OMB control numbers for the
CFTC regulations were published on December 30,
1981. See 46 FR 63035 (Dec. 30, 1981).
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Members of the Performance Review
Board for the Department of the Air
Force
Department of the Air Force,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is given of the names
of members of the 2024 Performance
Review Board for the Department of the
Air Force.
DATES: Applicable December 16, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Please direct any written comments or
requests for information to Ms. Virginia
Reynolds (Primary Point of Contact) and
Ms. Jacquelyn Salkeld, Department of
the Air Force Civilian Senior Executive
Management Office, SAF/MRL, 1660 Air
Force Pentagon, Washington, DC 20330–
1040, Primary POC telephone (703)
695–4555; email virginia.reynolds@
us.af.mil.
SUMMARY:
Pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c) (1–5), the
Department of the Air Force announces
the appointment of members to the Air
Force’s Senior Executive Service (SES)
Performance Review Board.
Appointments are made by the
authorizing official. Each board member
shall review and evaluate performance
scores provided by the Senior
Executive’s rater/immediate supervisor.
Performance standards must be applied
consistently across the Air Force. The
board will make final recommendations
to the authorizing official relative to the
performance of the executive.
The members of the 2024 Performance
Review Board for the Air Force are:
1. Honorable Alex Wagner (Chair),
Assistant Secretary of the Air Force
for Manpower and Reserve Affairs
2. General Duke Richardson (Co-Chair),
Commander, Air Force Materiel
Command
3. Ms. Gwendolyn DeFilippi, Principal
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the
Air Force for Manpower and
Reserve Affairs
4. Mr. Carlos Rodgers, Principal Deputy
Assistant Secretary of the Air Force
for Financial Management and
Comptroller
5. Major General Michael Martin,
Director of Operations, United
States Special Operations
Command
6. Mr. Edwin Oshiba, Administrative
Assistant to the Secretary of the Air
Force
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM
25NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2024 / Notices
7. Ms. Glenda Scheiner, Assistant
Deputy Chief of Staff for Manpower,
Personnel and Services
8. Ms. Darlene Costello, Principal
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the
Air Force Acquisition, Technology
& Logistics
9. Mr. Douglas Sanders, Principal
Deputy General Counsel of the Air
Force
10. Ms. Katharine Kelley, Deputy Chief
of Space Operations for Human
Capital, United States Space Force
11. Ms. Shannon McGuire (Legal
Advisor), Deputy General Counsel
for Fiscal Ethics and Administrative
Law
12. Mr. Richard Desmond (Legal
Advisor), Associate General
Counsel of the Air Force
The following Tier 3 Career SES
members will serve as alternates:
1. Mr. Douglas Bennett, Auditor General
of the Air Force
2. Mr. William Bailey, Director and
Program Executive Officer for the
Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office
3. Mr. Thomas Lawhead, Assistant
Deputy Chief of Staff, Strategy
Integration and Requirements
4. Mr. Stephen Hart, Assistant Deputy
Chief of Staff, Strategic Plans and
Programs
5. Ms. Venice Goodwine, Chief
Information Officer
6. Ms. Jennifer Miller, Director of Staff,
Office of the Secretary of the Air
Force
Tommy W. Lee,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024–27567 Filed 11–22–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3911–44–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Notice of Adoption of Categorical
Exclusions Under the National
Environmental Policy Act
Department of the Air Force,
Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of adoption of categorical
exclusions.
AGENCY:
The Department of the Air
Force (DAF) has identified categorical
exclusions (CATEXes) established by
the Department of the Army (DA),
Department of the Navy (DON), National
Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA), Tennessee Valley Authority
(TVA) and Agricultural Research
Service (ARS) that cover categories of
actions that DAF is adopting. This
notice identifies the thirty-five
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:29 Nov 22, 2024
Jkt 265001
CATEXes established by the above
listed Federal agencies and describes
the categories of proposed actions for
which the DAF intends to use these
CATEXes. The DAF has consulted with
these agencies, as described herein, and
obtained concurrence on DAF use of
these CATEXes.
DATES: The CATEXes identified below
are available for DAF use effective
immediately.
Mr. Jack Bush, DAF NEPA
Policy and Execution Oversite, 703–
695–1773, af.a4c.nepaworkflow@
us.af.mil.
ADDRESSES:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
NEPA and CATEXes
Congress enacted the National
Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C.
4321–4347 (NEPA) to encourage
productive and enjoyable harmony
between humans and the environment,
recognizing the profound impact of
human activity and the critical
importance of restoring and maintaining
environmental quality to the overall
welfare of humankind. (42 U.S.C. 4321
and 4331). NEPA seeks to ensure that
agencies consider the environmental
effects of their proposed major actions
in their decision-making processes and
inform and involve the public in that
process. NEPA created the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ), which
promulgated NEPA implementing
regulations, 40 CFR parts 1500–1508
(CEQ regulations).
To comply with NEPA, agencies
determine the appropriate level of
review of any major Federal action—an
environmental impact statement (EIS),
environmental assessment (EA), or
categorical exclusion (CATEX) (40 CFR
1501.3). If a proposed action is likely to
have significant environmental effects,
the agency must prepare an EIS and
document its decision in a record of
decision (40 CFR part 1502, and
§ 1505.2). If the proposed action is not
likely to have significant environmental
effects or the effects are unknown, the
agency may instead prepare an
environmental assessment (EA), which
involves a more concise analysis and
process than an EIS (40 CFR 1501.5).
Following the EA, the agency may
conclude that the action will have no
significant effects and document that
conclusion in a finding of no significant
impact (40 CFR 1501.6). If the analysis
concludes that the action is likely to
have significant effects, then an EIS is
required.
Pursuant to NEPA and the CEQ
regulations, a Federal agency can also
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
92911
establish CATEXes—categories of
actions that the agency has determined
normally do not significantly affect the
quality of the human environment—in
their agency NEPA procedures (42
U.S.C. 4336e(1); 40 CFR 1501.4,
1507.3(c)(8)(ii), and 1508.1(e)).
If an agency determines that a CATEX
covers a proposed action, it then
evaluates the proposed action for
extraordinary circumstances in which a
normally excluded action may have a
significant effect (40 CFR 1501.4(b)). If
no extraordinary circumstances are
present, the agency may apply the
CATEX to the proposed action without
preparing an EA or EIS (42 U.S.C.
4336(a)(2), 40 CFR 1501.4). DAF
considers extraordinary circumstances
pursuant to appendix B to 32 CFR part
989—Categorical Exclusions, § A2.2.
Additional Analysis and will
concurrently use the agency
extraordinary circumstances for the
adopted CATEXes as identified below.
If an extraordinary circumstance
exists, the agency nevertheless may
apply the categorical exclusion if the
agency conducts an analysis and
determines that the proposed action
does not in fact have the potential to
result in significant effects
notwithstanding the extraordinary
circumstance or the agency modifies the
action to address the extraordinary
circumstance. In such cases, the agency
shall document such determination and
should publish it on the agency’s
website or otherwise make it publicly
available (40 CFR 1501.4 (b)(1)).
Section 109 of NEPA, enacted as part
of the Fiscal Responsibility Act of 2023,
allows a Federal agency to adopt
another Federal agency’s CATEX for
proposed actions (42 U.S.C. 4336c). To
use another agency’s CATEXes under
section 109, the adopting agency must
identify the relevant CATEX listed in
another agency’s (‘‘establishing agency’’)
NEPA procedures that covers the
adopting agency’s category of proposed
actions or related actions; consult with
the establishing agency to ensure that
the proposed adoption of the CATEX is
appropriate for a category of actions;
identify to the public the CATEX that
the adopting agency plans to use for its
proposed actions; and document
adoption of the CATEX (42 U.S.C.
4336c).
II. DA, DON, NASA, TVA, and ARS
Categorical Exclusions
DAF is adopting fifteen CATEXes
established by the DA. These CATEXes
are listed in DA’s NEPA regulations at
32 CFR part 651, appendix B. Each of
the DA CATEXes includes conditions
on the scope and application of the
E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM
25NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 227 (Monday, November 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 92910-92911]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27567]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
Members of the Performance Review Board for the Department of the
Air Force
AGENCY: Department of the Air Force, Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is given of the names of members of the 2024
Performance Review Board for the Department of the Air Force.
DATES: Applicable December 16, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Please direct any written comments or
requests for information to Ms. Virginia Reynolds (Primary Point of
Contact) and Ms. Jacquelyn Salkeld, Department of the Air Force
Civilian Senior Executive Management Office, SAF/MRL, 1660 Air Force
Pentagon, Washington, DC 20330-1040, Primary POC telephone (703) 695-
4555; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 4314(c) (1-5), the
Department of the Air Force announces the appointment of members to the
Air Force's Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board.
Appointments are made by the authorizing official. Each board member
shall review and evaluate performance scores provided by the Senior
Executive's rater/immediate supervisor. Performance standards must be
applied consistently across the Air Force. The board will make final
recommendations to the authorizing official relative to the performance
of the executive.
The members of the 2024 Performance Review Board for the Air Force
are:
1. Honorable Alex Wagner (Chair), Assistant Secretary of the Air Force
for Manpower and Reserve Affairs
2. General Duke Richardson (Co-Chair), Commander, Air Force Materiel
Command
3. Ms. Gwendolyn DeFilippi, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the
Air Force for Manpower and Reserve Affairs
4. Mr. Carlos Rodgers, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Air
Force for Financial Management and Comptroller
5. Major General Michael Martin, Director of Operations, United States
Special Operations Command
6. Mr. Edwin Oshiba, Administrative Assistant to the Secretary of the
Air Force
[[Page 92911]]
7. Ms. Glenda Scheiner, Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff for Manpower,
Personnel and Services
8. Ms. Darlene Costello, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of the
Air Force Acquisition, Technology & Logistics
9. Mr. Douglas Sanders, Principal Deputy General Counsel of the Air
Force
10. Ms. Katharine Kelley, Deputy Chief of Space Operations for Human
Capital, United States Space Force
11. Ms. Shannon McGuire (Legal Advisor), Deputy General Counsel for
Fiscal Ethics and Administrative Law
12. Mr. Richard Desmond (Legal Advisor), Associate General Counsel of
the Air Force
The following Tier 3 Career SES members will serve as alternates:
1. Mr. Douglas Bennett, Auditor General of the Air Force
2. Mr. William Bailey, Director and Program Executive Officer for the
Air Force Rapid Capabilities Office
3. Mr. Thomas Lawhead, Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff, Strategy
Integration and Requirements
4. Mr. Stephen Hart, Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff, Strategic Plans
and Programs
5. Ms. Venice Goodwine, Chief Information Officer
6. Ms. Jennifer Miller, Director of Staff, Office of the Secretary of
the Air Force
Tommy W. Lee,
Acting Air Force Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2024-27567 Filed 11-22-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3911-44-P