Request for Information (RFI) on Science Research Goals/Objectives Affecting Proposed U.S. Antarctic Science Monitoring And Reliable Telecommunications (SMART) Cable and Route Design, 92178-92185 [2024-27292]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
92178
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 2024 / Notices
culminating project (e.g., musical
composition) and (2) is not primarily
intended as a degree for the practice of
a profession. The most common
research doctorate degree is the Ph.D.
Recipients of professional doctoral
degrees, such as MD, DDS, JD, DPharm,
and PsyD, are not included in the SED.
The 2026 and 2027 SED are expected to
include about 630 separately reporting
schools with eligible research doctoral
programs from about 460 doctorategranting institutions. Based on the
historical trend and the disruptive
impacts of the COVID 19 pandemic that
suppressed the enrollment of research
doctoral programs since 2020, NCSES
expects a stable turnout of research
doctorates for the next few years with a
nominal increase from the 2025 cycle,
estimating that approximately 58,000
individuals will receive a research
doctorate from U.S. institutions in each
of the 2026 and 2027 cycle.
In addition to the questionnaire for
individuals receiving their research
doctorates, the SED needs to collect
administrative data such as graduation
lists from participating academic
institutions. The Institutional
Coordinator at the institution helps
distribute the Web survey link, track
survey completions, and submit
information to the SED survey
contractor.
Estimate of Burden: An average
overall response rate of 91.5% of the
persons who earned a research doctorate
from a U.S. institution was obtained in
the academic years 2021, 2022, and
2023. Using the past response rate, the
number of SED respondents is estimated
to be 53,070 (58,000 doctorate recipients
× 0.915 response rate) in each of the
2026 and 2027 cycles.
Based on the average Web survey
completion time for the 2023 SED (19.5
minutes), NCSES estimates that, on
average, 20 minutes per respondent will
be required to complete the 2026 or
2027 SED Web survey. The annual
respondent burden for completing the
SED is therefore estimated at 17,690
hours each in 2026 and 2027 (based on
53,070 respondents × 20 minutes).
Based on focus groups conducted
with Institutional Coordinators, it is
estimated that the SED takes no more
than 1% of the Institutional
Coordinator’s time over the course of a
year, which computes to 20 hours per
year per Institutional Coordinator (40
hours per week × 50 weeks per year ×
.01). With about 650 schools expected to
participate in the SED in 2026 and 2027,
the estimated annual burden to
Institutional Coordinators of
administering the SED is 13,000 hours
per survey cycle.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Nov 20, 2024
Jkt 265001
Therefore, the total information
burden for the SED is estimated to be
30,690 (17,690 + 13,000) hours each in
the 2026 and 2027 survey cycle. NCSES
estimates that the average annual
burden for the 2026 and 2027 survey
cycles over the course of the three-year
OMB clearance period will be no more
than 20,460 hours [(30,690 hours +
30,690 hours)/3 years].
Comments: Comments are invited on
(a) whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
NSF, including whether the information
shall have practical utility; (b) the
accuracy of the NSF’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, use, and clarity of the
information on respondents, including
through the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology; and (d) ways to minimize
the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Dated: November 18, 2024.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2024–27334 Filed 11–20–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Request for Information (RFI) on
Science Research Goals/Objectives
Affecting Proposed U.S. Antarctic
Science Monitoring And Reliable
Telecommunications (SMART) Cable
and Route Design
U.S. National Science
Foundation.
ACTION: Request for public comment;
extension of comment period.
AGENCY:
On August 28, 2024, the U.S.
National Science Foundation (NSF)
published in the Federal Register a
document entitled, ‘‘Request for
Information (RFI) on Science Research
Goals/Objectives Affecting Proposed
U.S. Antarctic Science Monitoring and
Reliable Telecommunications (SMART)
Cable and Route Design.’’ In response to
delays to widely publicize the RFI
within the science research community
to enhance public response and provide
sufficient time to adequately consider
and respond to the RFI, NSF has
determined that an extension of the
comment period until Wednesday,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
January 15 at 11:59 p.m. (eastern), is
appropriate.
The end of the comment period
for the document entitled ‘‘Request for
Information’’ published on August 28,
2024 (89 FR 68934), is extended from
November 5, 2024, until January 15,
2025.
DATES:
To respond to this Request
for Information, please use the official
submission form available at:
• Electronic On-line Submission:
https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/
subseacable.
Respondents only need to provide
feedback on one or more questions of
interest or relevance to them. Each
question is voluntary and optional.
Further announcements and
information may be found on the NSF
web page: https://www.nsf.gov/geo/opp/
ail/subsea_cable/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information, please direct
questions to Patrick D. Smith through
email: AntarcticSubseaCable-RFI@
nsf.gov, phone: 703–292–7455, or mail:
2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Suite W7251,
Alexandria, VA 22314, USA.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
Introduction
Over 500 subsea fiber optic
telecommunications cables, including
both installed and planned cables, cover
nearly all ocean regions including
multiple high Arctic cables. NSF is
investigating the implementation of a
modern subsea fiber optic
telecommunications cable connecting
the largest U.S. Antarctic Program
(https://www.usap.gov/) research
facility, McMurdo Station (77°50′47″
S,166°40′06″ E) (https://www.usap.gov/
videoclipsandmaps/
mcmwebcam.cfm?t=1), with either New
Zealand or Australia. Although the main
scope of the installation is to provide
advanced high-speed, low delay
telecommunications, this cable will
contain additional point sensors (e.g.,
SMART—Science Monitoring And
Reliable Telecommunications) and/or
distributed sensing infrastructure,
enabling for the first time myriad
investigations across a broad range of
scientific disciplines.
The NSF Directorates for Geosciences
(GEO), Computer and Information
Science and Engineering (CISE), and
Technology, Innovation, and
Partnerships (TIP) have identified the
potential subsea cable as an opportunity
for transformational changes in the
conduct of science, vast improvements
in telecommunications capability
supporting Antarctica, and innovative
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
public-private partnerships linking
science and technology.
Additionally, the cable would have
the ability to accommodate additional,
multiple forms of distributed fiber optic
sensing that are advancing rapidly in
technology maturity (e.g., Distributed
Acoustic Sensing, Distributed
Temperature Sensing, State of
Polarization, etc.). Preliminary cable
routes have been established using
standard subsea cable industry best
practices that avoid areas posing high
geophysical risk, as well as initial
feedback from the scientific community
via a virtual workshop in 2021,
producing a broad corridor where
opportunities exist to adjust the final
route to best align with Earth science
areas of high science research interest.
Further, science research supported
by the cable sensors is of societal
relevance on a global scale for a number
of reasons, such as (1) filling significant
knowledge gaps of key global ocean
processes and trends for improved
understanding and monitoring climate
change, including ocean heat transport,
CO2 sequestration, and sea level rise; (2)
regional seismic monitoring and early
warning of potential tsunami seismic
events; (3) global measurements of
geophysical Earth structure; and (4)
developing the technological
capabilities to enhance other global
telecommunications infrastructure for
scientific research and human benefit.
Science Workshop
In late June 2021, the NSF Directorate
for Geosciences, Office of Polar
Programs (GEO/OPP) (https://
www.nsf.gov/div/index.jsp?div=OPP)
and Directorate for Computer
Information Science and Engineering,
Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure
(CISE/OAC) (https://new.nsf.gov/cise/
oac), jointly funded a research
community-led science workshop
(https://www.pgc.umn.edu/workshops/
antarctic-cable/) to review the scientific
benefits of a sensor-enabled subsea fiber
cable. The Workshop endorsed the cable
concept and noted that existing
technology and cable systems make it
feasible. The Workshop concluded that
the proposed activity would benefit
Antarctic science research by both
increasing telecommunications capacity
and including new science sensors in
the cable design.
The Workshop’s Executive Summary
captured four primary findings:
Finding 1: Existing and future
Antarctic research would be
significantly enhanced if bandwidth
limitations were eliminated through the
availability of a modern submarine
cable system.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Nov 20, 2024
Jkt 265001
Finding 2: A new submarine cable
could be constructed with embedded
instrumentation (a Scientific Monitoring
And Reliable Telecommunications, or
SMART, cable) that would itself enable
meaningful new research and
understanding of the region.
Finding 3: Robust bandwidth for
interpersonal connectivity for scientists
and staff, if thoughtfully approached,
could be transformative for research and
work functions, participation in
Antarctic science, education,
engagement, and community wellbeing.
Finding 4: Construction of a new
SMART cable that provides essentially
unlimited bandwidth to McMurdo is
feasible and could also serve as the
platform to extend connectivity to deepfield research sites as well as critical
research programs at Amundsen-Scott
South Pole Station. This level of
connectivity can transform the science
and research platforms for future
generations.
Feasibility Study
In response to the 2021 Science
Workshop, NSF contracted a
comprehensive preliminary concept/
feasibility study (known as a Desktop
Study, or DTS https://gbs1.com/
desktop-studies/), incorporating the
unique attributes of implementing a
sensor-enabled cable to Antarctica. The
public version of the McMurdo Cable
DTS (https://www.nsf.gov/geo/opp/
documents/NSF_Public%20
Release%20DTS_Final.pdf) was
released in October 2023. NSF also
provided a summary and news release
(https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_
summ.jsp?cntn_id=308774&org=OPP).
The DTS addresses two proposed
routes for comparison: (1) McMurdo
Station to Sydney, Australia and (2)
McMurdo Station to Invercargill, New
Zealand. It includes brief assessments of
optional extensions from the main cable
routes to Macquarie Island for potential
interconnection to the Australian
research station located there and to
nearby international research stations
located in the Western Ross Sea/Terra
Nova Bay area. More details on the
proposed routes including landing sites
and relevant diagrams can be found in
section 2 of the DTS.
The study Executive Summary
summarizes the key study results in a
comparison of the two routes
considered.
Both routes were considered
technically feasible with the following
observations:
(1) The NZ route is 1,500 km shorter
and thus considerably more economical.
(2) The Australian route has
additional geophysical risk to the cable
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
92179
arising from a crossing of the
seismically active Macquarie Ridge
Complex to the north of Macquarie
Island.
(3) The New Zealand route covers
more regions of science interest as
indicated by science researcher input to
the study. Seismologist interests
obtained during the study proposed
cable branching units located at 60°S
and 50°S for future sea bottom
seismometer instruments tapping the
cable’s power and communications.
(4) The risk from ice scour appears
reasonable based upon detailed nearshore bathymetry—the Antarctic
SMART Cable landing risk mitigation
uses standard subsea cable landing
techniques called Horizontal Directional
Drilling (HDD). Bathymetry and iceberg
keel depth studies pertaining to the
cable route transit across the Ross Sea
continental shelf yield a similar low risk
assessment.
(5) Environmental assessments and
permitting will be a significant
component of future work, as is the case
with all subsea cable projects, and will
include the Antarctic Treaty Committee
on Environmental Protection protocols.
Coordination with the Committee for
the Conservation of Antarctic Marine
Living Resources (CCAMLR) will be
needed as the proposed cable route
transits the CCAMLR governed Marine
Protected Areas in the Ross Sea region.
Subsea Cable Industry Considerations
A subsea cable installation represents
a substantial economic investment. As
such, modern subsea
telecommunications cables are designed
with a 25-year or greater lifetime and
thus are designed for high reliability
and low maintenance. The introduction
of SMART sensors into commercial
subsea telecommunications cables is a
new phenomenon, with the Government
of Portugal-sponsored Atlantic CAM
cable (https://www.infraestruturas
deportugal.pt/pt-pt/ip-e-asn-assinamcontrato-para-construcao-de-novo-anelcam) and the TAMTAM cable
connecting New Caledonia and Vanuatu
(https://www.soest.hawaii.edu/soestwp/
announce/news/contract-signedvanuatu-new-caledonia/) being the first
examples. The introduction of sensors
into a standard telecommunications
cable meeting scientific requirements
and inherent cable design life/reliability
requirements represents both a new
market opportunity and a new technical
frontier for industry that will influence
the design and adoption of SMART
sensors. Point sensors also complement
and enhance commercially available
cable sensing technologies such as
distributed fiber sensing.
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
92180
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 2024 / Notices
Resources
NSF, United States Antarctic Program Portal;
https://www.usap.gov/
NSF, Office of Polar Programs; https://
www.nsf.gov/div/index.jsp?div=OPP
NSF, Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure;
https://new.nsf.gov/cise/oac
NSF, McMurdo Station Webcams; https://
www.usap.gov/videoclipsandmaps/
mcmwebcam.cfm
Joint Task Force on Science Monitoring And
Reliable Telecommunications, SMART
Cables; https://www.smartcables.org/
Neff, P.D., Andreasen, J.R., Roop, H.A.,
Pundsack, J., Howe, B., Jacobs, G.,
Lassner, D., Yoshimi, G., and Timm, K.
(2021). 2021 Antarctic Subsea Cable
Workshop Report: High-Speed
Connectivity Needs to Advance US
Antarctic Science. October 1, 2021.
University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN,
USA; https://www.pgc.umn.edu/
workshops/antarctic-cable/
ICPC, Minimum Technical Requirements for
a Desktop Study (6 March 2012),
Recommendation No. 9, at pp. 4–8;
www.iscpc.org/publications/
recommendations
NSF, Connecting the Last Continent: New
desktop study on Antarctica’s potential
subsea telecommunications cable, with
link to study, 27 December 2023; https://
www.nsf.gov/news/news_
summ.jsp?cntn_id=308774&org=OPP
Infraestruturas de Portugal, IP and ASN sign
contract for the construction of a New
CAM Ring, 13 March 2024; https://
www.infraestruturasdeportugal.pt/pt-pt/
ip-e-asn-assinam-contrato-paraconstrucao-de-novo-anel-cam
University of Hawai’i, Contract signed for
world’s first SMART subsea cable,
connecting Vanuatu, New Caledonia,
School of Ocean and Earth Science and
Technology, 29 February 2024; https://
www.soest.hawaii.edu/soestwp/
announce/news/contract-signedvanuatu-new-caledonia/
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
Definition of Terms/References
2021 Antarctic Subsea Cable Workshop:
https://www.pgc.umn.edu/workshops/
antarctic-cable/
Branching Unit (BU): https://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_
branching_unit
Ocean Bottom Pressure A–0–A Technology:
https://oceanobservatories.org/piinstrument/a-0-a-calibrated-pressureinstrument/#:∼:text=
The%20A%2D0%2DA%20method,
pressure%20inside%20the%20
instrument%20housing.
Repeater: S. Lentz and B. Howe, ‘‘Scientific
Monitoring And Reliable
Telecommunications (SMART) Cable
Systems: Integration of Sensors into
Telecommunications Repeaters,’’ 2018
OCEANS—MTS/IEEE Kobe TechnoOceans (OTO), Kobe, Japan, 2018, pp. 1–
7, doi: 10.1109/
OCEANSKOBE.2018.8558862. (pg.
2)https://www.researchgate.net/
publication/329618575_Scientific_
Monitoring_And_Reliable_
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Nov 20, 2024
Jkt 265001
Telecommunications_SMART_Cable_
Systems_Integration_of_Sensors_into_
Telecommunications_Repeaters
SMART Cables: https://
www.smartcables.org/smart
Technology Readiness Level (TRL):https://
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_
readiness_level
Information Requested
Through this notice, NSF seeks
information from the public to evolve
the development of the Antarctic
SMART Cable. NSF requests
information regarding the subsea cable
route that both minimizes the risk to the
cable and maximizes science research
potential, the range of potential science
sensors to include, as well as their
geographic distribution, the locations of
powered cable branching units for
future sensor cable build-out or
undersea observatory-style point sensor
arrays, concepts for the incorporation of
existing or promising distributed fiber
sensing techniques, and suggested paths
to catalyze the necessary technology to
develop such a cable system.
Additionally, NSF seeks information
relevant to partnership opportunities
with the public (U.S., international) and
private (academia, for-profit and nonprofit) sectors that will facilitate the
conceptualization, development,
deployment and sustainment of the
cable system and related scientific
infrastructure.
The information requested here will
be used to inform the proposed
Antarctic SMART Cable project via the
NSF Major Research Equipment
Facilities and Construction (MREFC)
program that funds the development of
facility infrastructure. MREFC projects
are funded via a separate appropriation
intended for large capital-intensive
investments, distinct from the NSF
appropriations funding research and
related activities.
Responses submitted via Email and
Letter Mail are requested to follow the
Electronic On-line Submission data
capture questions and format for ease in
analyzing responses. These responses
may address one or as many topics as
desired from the enumerated list
provided in this RFI, noting the
corresponding number of the topic(s) to
which the response pertains. Written
submissions must be type-written and
not exceed 3 pages (exclusive of cover
page and accompanying graphics) in 11point or larger font, single spacing and
with a page number provided on each
page.
Comments containing references,
studies, research, and other empirical
data that are not widely published or
widely available should include copies
or electronic links of the referenced
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
materials; these materials, as well as a
list of references, do not count toward
the 3-page limit. No business
proprietary information, copyrighted
information, or personally identifiable
information (aside from optional
information requested below) should be
submitted in response to this RFI.
Comments submitted in response to this
RFI will be used internally at NSF and
may be shared with other Federal
agencies and NSF contractors assigned
to process the responses.
Responders are asked to answer one
or more of the following questions in
responses to the RFI. There are no
known risks to participating, and
participation is voluntary. Unless
provided by you, no identifying
information will be collected; therefore,
all responses will remain confidential,
anonymous, and reported in the
aggregate. While there is no sensitive
content, you may skip a question at any
time.
Demographic Questions
1. In which sector do you currently
work?
(a) Academia
(b) Private or publicly traded company
(c) Government agency/public sector
(d) Non-governmental organization/nonprofit
(e) Venture capital/private equity
(f) Other (Please specify)
2. Please select up to three (3) areas
of expertise/interest:
(a) Physical Oceanography
(b) Cryosphere
(c) Biochemistry
(d) Science Education
(e) Geodesy
(f) Hydrology
(g) Climate Change Research
(h) Marine Geology/Geophysics
(i) Natural Hazards
(j) Solid Earth Geophysics
(k) Subsea Fiber Optic Cable Systems
(l) Sensor/Instrumentation Development
(m) Data Management
(n) Distributed Fiber Sensing
(o) Other (Please specify)
3. For how long have you been
working in your current field(s)?
(a) Less than five years
(b) Five to less than ten years
(c) Ten to less than twenty years
(d) Twenty years or more
(e) Prefer not to answer
SMART Cables and Antarctic SMART
Cable Science Objectives
4. How familiar are you with the
overall SMART Cable concept?
Very familiar
Familiar
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
92181
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 2024 / Notices
Acoustic Monitoring
Long-Term Global Ocean Observations
(general)
Seismology Research
Earthquake/Tsunami Monitoring
Sea Level Research
Deep Ocean Circulation Research
Southern Ocean Research
Other (Please specify)
None of the above
7. If you selected ‘‘NONE OF THE
ABOVE’’ in the previous question,
please elaborate here:
Somewhat familiar
Not very familiar
Not at all familiar
5. Prior to the NSF Federal Register
Notice and this Electronic On-Line
Submission, how familiar were you
with the nascent Antarctic SMART
Cable project?
Very familiar
Familiar
Somewhat familiar
Not very familiar
Not at all familiar
6. Which of the following major
research areas do you see the
observational capability of the cable
supporting? Select all that apply.
Climate Change Research
Seismic Ground Motion (seismic
acceleration and/or velocity). At the
time of the release of this survey, the
supplier for the two commercial
SMART Cable systems under
development is finalizing their sensor
and vendor selection process, but future
systems—like the Antarctic SMART
Cable—may have some limited
flexibility in the types of sensors which
can be incorporated. The following
questions explore the range of potential
sensor capabilities under consideration
for inclusion in the Antarctic SMART
Cable.
8. How important is it for the sensor
to measure each of the following?
Current and Future Sensors
The initial SMART Cable sensor
concept incorporates three basic
measurements: Ocean Bottom Pressure,
Ocean Bottom Temperature, and
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
Table: Responses for Question 8
Seismic
Parameters
Very
Important
Important
Somewhat
Important
Not Very
Important
Not
Important
at All
Don't
Know
Velocity Response
0
0
0
0
0
0
1$;\rIJ.•···
.}<> ·•
o.cn
••• between•
.·Hz.
and JOO Ht}\> • •····
"Intermediate
Band" response
(frequencies
between 0.02 Hz
and 100 Hz)
0
o i .·······•·Pi ··.··••·i>o;>
0
.8i • •• •
oi
0
0
0
0
0
0
to .at reast 0.02 H:tl .•· ·
Very Low
Frequency
Response
(frequencies down
to at least 0.01 Hz
and tower)
High Frequ~ncy
Response
(frequendes. up to
at least 100 Hz)
Very High
Frequency
Response
(frequencies up to
at least 250 Hz)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Nov 20, 2024
Jkt 265001
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PO 00000
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
0
0
21NON1
0
EN21NO24.002
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
LRoe.ws·· ·pFornesqeueMy . \ > . . •• ••• >
>i
. (fr~(luehci~sd<:>wn•.>.·. • ·O ....... • •.•·•·········io··.··
92182
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 2024 / Notices
9. If you’d like, please use this space
to elaborate on your answers to
Question 8.
10. How important is it for the sensor
to measure each of the following?
11. If you’d like, please use this space
to elaborate on your answers to
Question 10.
Table: Responses for Question 10
Pressure
Parameters
Very
Important
5$1f~:t•/ .
Important
Somewhat
Important
Not Very
Important
Not
Important
at All
Don't
Know
,:,i•··
oi
0
0
0
Somewhat
Important
Not Very
Important
Not
Important
at All
Don't
Know
0
0
0
0
6.i.··•· ··•·.·~•··· / \ o<····
~~:;atlon over·.·..
A-O-A Pressure
Gauge (larger,
does not lose
calibration over
time)
0
0
0
12. How important is it for the sensor
to measure each of the following?
Table: Responses for Question 12
Very
Important
Temperature
Parameters
Important
Resoluliort •·• •· ii . · · ••·· ...•0....... ·.·.···. •.•· •.•··•··· •
M•easurableto • •
•••••
o..1°d.<
Resolution
. .
0
Measurable to
0.01°c
0
\'
.O>
,,' ,,
,:
··.\·O ..... •
EN21NO24.004
14. How important is it to include the
following additional sensors in the
cable?
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Nov 20, 2024
Jkt 265001
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
EN21NO24.003
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
13. If you’d like, please use this space
to elaborate on your answers to
Question 12.
_.,,'
92183
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 2024 / Notices
Table: Responses for Question 14
Sensor
Types
sa1ir1ity•· ·•·•·.
Dissolved
Oxygen
N~tri~.n.ts . <.•.• •
Very
Important
Important
Somewhat
Important
Not Very
Important
a.··· . •·•·
0
Don't
Know
0
0
• •.
Not
Important
at All
0
i·
0
0 • .• · . . . . id
0
0
0
0
r o<·
0
Other (Please Specify)
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
New Sensor Technologies
To catalyze rapid sensor development
and increase their Technology
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Nov 20, 2024
Jkt 265001
Readiness Levels (TRLs) for inclusion in
the Antarctic SMART Cable, a range of
organizational approaches may be
necessary.
19. Should NSF facilitate further
development for SMART Cable sensors?
If so, how (i.e., research labs/
institutions/industry/partnerships, etc.)?
Yes
No
Don’t know
20. If you’d like, please use this space
to elaborate on your answer to question
19.
Location of the SMART Cable, Sensors,
and Future Cable Expansion
enable long-term monitoring of specific
scientific targets. Further, depending
upon the final technological solution(s)
for how sensor units will be
incorporated into the cable, there may
be opportunities to select the locations
of some of the sensor modules. Finally,
the cable may be able to include one or
more Branching Units (BUs). A BU can
be used for multiple purposes, such as
adding another cable branch, attaching
a localized device, or providing an entry
point for including a localized network
of sensors focused on a specific area or
areas.
For some segments of the cable, it
may be possible to shift the cable’s path
slightly in some locations to
accommodate additional science or
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
EN21NO24.005
15. In the previous question, for any
selections you indicated were
‘‘important’’ or ‘‘very important,’’ please
explain why you feel these sensor types
should be included on the cable:
16. In question #14, for any selections
you indicated were ‘‘not very
important’’ or ‘‘not important at all,’’
please explain why you feel these
sensor types are not needed:
17. In your view, how do SMART and
distributed fiber sensing (i.e., DAS and
DTS) complement one another?
18. What new scientific discoveries or
breakthroughs do you anticipate as a
direct result of having access to the
long-term measurement data collected
by the cable’s sensors?
92184
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
BILLING CODE 7555–01–C
Figure Caption: Potential routes for
the Antarctica SMART Cable system
based on the 2023 Desktop Study
(https://www.nsf.gov/geo/opp/
documents/NSF_
Public%20Release%20DTS_Final.pdf).
Thick white dashed lines represent
primary McMurdo Trunk and three
proposed cable segments with optional
landings at (a) Macquarie Island, (b)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Nov 20, 2024
Jkt 265001
Invercargill, New Zealand, and (c)
Sydney, Australia. Proposed Cable
Landing Stations are marked by white
circles. Vulnerable Marine Ecosystem
(VME) areas near McMurdo Station are
shaded dark gray. The dark gray zone
around trunk and cable options shows
buffer zones where Branching Unit (BU)
stubs could extend. Tectonic plate
boundaries (AU: Indo-Australian Plate;
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
AN: Antarctic Plate; PA: Pacific Plate)
are denoted by thin black lines.
21. Referring to the above Figure and
noting the region of potential cable
locations, would you shift the position
of the proposed cable route within the
buffer zone (dark gray area in the
figure)? If so, where? Note that cable
path shifts will be minimal without
additional engineering evaluations for
deployment feasibility and cable safety.
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
EN21NO24.006
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 2024 / Notices
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 225 / Thursday, November 21, 2024 / Notices
Yes
No
Don’t Know
27. If you’d like, please use this space
to elaborate on your answers to question
26. If you answered yes, please indicate
where and why.
28. What potential do you see for the
cable to enable the vision of the
networked ocean as a relay platform for
an ‘‘Internet of Underwater Things’’,
such as subsea gliders, submersible float
sensors, ROVs and similar submersible
autonomous instrumentation systems?
Partnerships and the Project
The Whitepaper (https://
goosocean.org/news/un-ocean-decadechallenge-7-white-paper-a-roadmap-forthe-observing-system-we-need/)
addressing Challenge 7 (‘‘Expand the
Global Ocean Observing System’’) from
the UN IOC/UNESCO Decade of Ocean
Science for Sustainable Development
(2021–2030) (‘‘Ocean Decade 2030’’)
program indicates that significant
investments will be needed to meet the
challenges for global ocean observation
goals while current investments and
mechanisms are inadequate. There is a
clear call for multi-sector engagements
such as public-private partnerships and
Table: Responses for Question 31
Future Science
Very
Workshop
Interested
Interested
Participation
•id•
· • .er:
0
0
Attending In.person
Final Thoughts
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
32. If there is anything else you’d like
to share or elaborate upon regarding the
topics mentioned here, please provide
them here.
33. Please complete the form below to
indicate your interest in future
participation in this project. This is
completely voluntary, and your
responses collected will be included in
the analysis regardless of your response
below.
Name lllllllllllllll
Affiliation lllllllllllll
Title/Position lllllllllll
Email address lllllllllll
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1861, et al.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:02 Nov 20, 2024
Jkt 265001
Somewhat
Interested
C) ,··
0
Dated: November 15, 2024.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2024–27292 Filed 11–20–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[Docket No. 50–263; NRC–2023–0031]
Northern States Power Company;
Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant,
Unit 1; Final Site-Specific
Environmental Impact Statement
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice; issuance.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
international collaborations for a ‘‘new
economic thinking’’ to provide the
resources needed.
29. What private and/or public sector
groups (e.g., academic, non-profit,
industry, etc.) do you think may have an
active interest in partnership activities
with NSF for aspects of the cable system
development?
Contribution of the Antarctic SMART
Cable To Resolve Global Challenges
30. Beyond the potential direct
benefits to support science in the
Antarctic and the region covered
directly by the Antarctic SMART Cable,
there may be broader benefits to
developing the Antarctic SMART Cable.
In your view, what are the global,
national, and societal benefits of this
cable?
Future Science Workshop
31. A successor science workshop is
being considered for 2025 to build upon
and extend the work of the June 2021
workshop and this Electronic On-Line
Submission. How interested would you
be in attending virtually or in-person,
provided full or partial travel expenses
could be provided?
Not Very
Interested
·· .... o
Not
Interested at
All
.\•.\
() .·•·
0
0
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) has published a final
Site-Specific Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS), issued as NUREG–
1437, Supplement 26, Second Renewal,
‘‘Site-Specific Environmental Impact
Statement for License Renewal of
Nuclear Plants Regarding Subsequent
License Renewal for Monticello Nuclear
Generating Plant, Unit 1, Final Report.’’
This EIS evaluates, on a site-specific
basis, the environmental impacts of
subsequent license renewal (SLR) of
Facility Operating License No. DPR–22
for an additional 20 years of operation
for Monticello Nuclear Generating Plant
(Monticello), Unit 1. Monticello is
located approximately 35 miles NW of
Minneapolis, MN. Alternatives to the
proposed action of subsequent license
renewal for Monticello include the no-
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\21NON1.SGM
21NON1
EN21NO24.007
Yes
No
Don’t know
22. If you’d like, please use this space
to elaborate on your answer to question
21.
23. How valuable would it be to your
research to be able to select the specific
locations of the SMART sensor modules
along the cable?
Very valuable
Valuable
Somewhat valuable
Not very valuable
Not valuable at all
24. How important is it to include one
or more Branching Units?
Very important
Important
Somewhat important
Not very important
Not important at all
25. In terms of current and future
research, in your view what are
potential uses for Branching Units?
26. Referring again to the above Figure
and noting the corridor available around
the trunk lines to deploy stubs from
Branching Units (dark gray shaded areas
surrounding the white dotted lines),
would you place additional BUs?
92185
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 225 (Thursday, November 21, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 92178-92185]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-27292]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Request for Information (RFI) on Science Research Goals/
Objectives Affecting Proposed U.S. Antarctic Science Monitoring And
Reliable Telecommunications (SMART) Cable and Route Design
AGENCY: U.S. National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Request for public comment; extension of comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On August 28, 2024, the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF)
published in the Federal Register a document entitled, ``Request for
Information (RFI) on Science Research Goals/Objectives Affecting
Proposed U.S. Antarctic Science Monitoring and Reliable
Telecommunications (SMART) Cable and Route Design.'' In response to
delays to widely publicize the RFI within the science research
community to enhance public response and provide sufficient time to
adequately consider and respond to the RFI, NSF has determined that an
extension of the comment period until Wednesday, January 15 at 11:59
p.m. (eastern), is appropriate.
DATES: The end of the comment period for the document entitled
``Request for Information'' published on August 28, 2024 (89 FR 68934),
is extended from November 5, 2024, until January 15, 2025.
ADDRESSES: To respond to this Request for Information, please use the
official submission form available at:
Electronic On-line Submission: https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/subseacable.
Respondents only need to provide feedback on one or more questions
of interest or relevance to them. Each question is voluntary and
optional. Further announcements and information may be found on the NSF
web page: https://www.nsf.gov/geo/opp/ail/subsea_cable/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, please direct
questions to Patrick D. Smith through email: [email protected], phone: 703-292-7455, or mail: 2415 Eisenhower Avenue,
Suite W7251, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Introduction
Over 500 subsea fiber optic telecommunications cables, including
both installed and planned cables, cover nearly all ocean regions
including multiple high Arctic cables. NSF is investigating the
implementation of a modern subsea fiber optic telecommunications cable
connecting the largest U.S. Antarctic Program (https://www.usap.gov/)
research facility, McMurdo Station (77[deg]50'47'' S,166[deg]40'06'' E)
(https://www.usap.gov/videoclipsandmaps/mcmwebcam.cfm?t=1), with either
New Zealand or Australia. Although the main scope of the installation
is to provide advanced high-speed, low delay telecommunications, this
cable will contain additional point sensors (e.g., SMART--Science
Monitoring And Reliable Telecommunications) and/or distributed sensing
infrastructure, enabling for the first time myriad investigations
across a broad range of scientific disciplines.
The NSF Directorates for Geosciences (GEO), Computer and
Information Science and Engineering (CISE), and Technology, Innovation,
and Partnerships (TIP) have identified the potential subsea cable as an
opportunity for transformational changes in the conduct of science,
vast improvements in telecommunications capability supporting
Antarctica, and innovative
[[Page 92179]]
public-private partnerships linking science and technology.
Additionally, the cable would have the ability to accommodate
additional, multiple forms of distributed fiber optic sensing that are
advancing rapidly in technology maturity (e.g., Distributed Acoustic
Sensing, Distributed Temperature Sensing, State of Polarization, etc.).
Preliminary cable routes have been established using standard subsea
cable industry best practices that avoid areas posing high geophysical
risk, as well as initial feedback from the scientific community via a
virtual workshop in 2021, producing a broad corridor where
opportunities exist to adjust the final route to best align with Earth
science areas of high science research interest.
Further, science research supported by the cable sensors is of
societal relevance on a global scale for a number of reasons, such as
(1) filling significant knowledge gaps of key global ocean processes
and trends for improved understanding and monitoring climate change,
including ocean heat transport, CO2 sequestration, and sea
level rise; (2) regional seismic monitoring and early warning of
potential tsunami seismic events; (3) global measurements of
geophysical Earth structure; and (4) developing the technological
capabilities to enhance other global telecommunications infrastructure
for scientific research and human benefit.
Science Workshop
In late June 2021, the NSF Directorate for Geosciences, Office of
Polar Programs (GEO/OPP) (https://www.nsf.gov/div/index.jsp?div=OPP)
and Directorate for Computer Information Science and Engineering,
Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure (CISE/OAC) (https://new.nsf.gov/cise/oac), jointly funded a research community-led science workshop
(https://www.pgc.umn.edu/workshops/antarctic-cable/) to review the
scientific benefits of a sensor-enabled subsea fiber cable. The
Workshop endorsed the cable concept and noted that existing technology
and cable systems make it feasible. The Workshop concluded that the
proposed activity would benefit Antarctic science research by both
increasing telecommunications capacity and including new science
sensors in the cable design.
The Workshop's Executive Summary captured four primary findings:
Finding 1: Existing and future Antarctic research would be
significantly enhanced if bandwidth limitations were eliminated through
the availability of a modern submarine cable system.
Finding 2: A new submarine cable could be constructed with embedded
instrumentation (a Scientific Monitoring And Reliable
Telecommunications, or SMART, cable) that would itself enable
meaningful new research and understanding of the region.
Finding 3: Robust bandwidth for interpersonal connectivity for
scientists and staff, if thoughtfully approached, could be
transformative for research and work functions, participation in
Antarctic science, education, engagement, and community wellbeing.
Finding 4: Construction of a new SMART cable that provides
essentially unlimited bandwidth to McMurdo is feasible and could also
serve as the platform to extend connectivity to deep-field research
sites as well as critical research programs at Amundsen-Scott South
Pole Station. This level of connectivity can transform the science and
research platforms for future generations.
Feasibility Study
In response to the 2021 Science Workshop, NSF contracted a
comprehensive preliminary concept/feasibility study (known as a Desktop
Study, or DTS https://gbs1.com/desktop-studies/), incorporating the
unique attributes of implementing a sensor-enabled cable to Antarctica.
The public version of the McMurdo Cable DTS (https://www.nsf.gov/geo/opp/documents/NSF_Public%20Release%20DTS_Final.pdf) was released in
October 2023. NSF also provided a summary and news release (https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=308774&org=OPP).
The DTS addresses two proposed routes for comparison: (1) McMurdo
Station to Sydney, Australia and (2) McMurdo Station to Invercargill,
New Zealand. It includes brief assessments of optional extensions from
the main cable routes to Macquarie Island for potential interconnection
to the Australian research station located there and to nearby
international research stations located in the Western Ross Sea/Terra
Nova Bay area. More details on the proposed routes including landing
sites and relevant diagrams can be found in section 2 of the DTS.
The study Executive Summary summarizes the key study results in a
comparison of the two routes considered.
Both routes were considered technically feasible with the following
observations:
(1) The NZ route is 1,500 km shorter and thus considerably more
economical.
(2) The Australian route has additional geophysical risk to the
cable arising from a crossing of the seismically active Macquarie Ridge
Complex to the north of Macquarie Island.
(3) The New Zealand route covers more regions of science interest
as indicated by science researcher input to the study. Seismologist
interests obtained during the study proposed cable branching units
located at 60[deg]S and 50[deg]S for future sea bottom seismometer
instruments tapping the cable's power and communications.
(4) The risk from ice scour appears reasonable based upon detailed
near-shore bathymetry--the Antarctic SMART Cable landing risk
mitigation uses standard subsea cable landing techniques called
Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD). Bathymetry and iceberg keel
depth studies pertaining to the cable route transit across the Ross Sea
continental shelf yield a similar low risk assessment.
(5) Environmental assessments and permitting will be a significant
component of future work, as is the case with all subsea cable
projects, and will include the Antarctic Treaty Committee on
Environmental Protection protocols. Coordination with the Committee for
the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR) will be
needed as the proposed cable route transits the CCAMLR governed Marine
Protected Areas in the Ross Sea region.
Subsea Cable Industry Considerations
A subsea cable installation represents a substantial economic
investment. As such, modern subsea telecommunications cables are
designed with a 25-year or greater lifetime and thus are designed for
high reliability and low maintenance. The introduction of SMART sensors
into commercial subsea telecommunications cables is a new phenomenon,
with the Government of Portugal-sponsored Atlantic CAM cable (https://www.infraestruturasdeportugal.pt/pt-pt/ip-e-asn-assinam-contrato-para-construcao-de-novo-anel-cam) and the TAMTAM cable connecting New
Caledonia and Vanuatu (https://www.soest.hawaii.edu/soestwp/announce/news/contract-signed-vanuatu-new-caledonia/) being the first examples.
The introduction of sensors into a standard telecommunications cable
meeting scientific requirements and inherent cable design life/
reliability requirements represents both a new market opportunity and a
new technical frontier for industry that will influence the design and
adoption of SMART sensors. Point sensors also complement and enhance
commercially available cable sensing technologies such as distributed
fiber sensing.
[[Page 92180]]
Resources
NSF, United States Antarctic Program Portal; https://www.usap.gov/
NSF, Office of Polar Programs; https://www.nsf.gov/div/index.jsp?div=OPP
NSF, Office of Advanced Cyberinfrastructure; https://new.nsf.gov/cise/oac
NSF, McMurdo Station Webcams; https://www.usap.gov/
videoclipsandmaps/mcmwebcam.cfm
Joint Task Force on Science Monitoring And Reliable
Telecommunications, SMART Cables; https://www.smartcables.org/
Neff, P.D., Andreasen, J.R., Roop, H.A., Pundsack, J., Howe, B.,
Jacobs, G., Lassner, D., Yoshimi, G., and Timm, K. (2021). 2021
Antarctic Subsea Cable Workshop Report: High-Speed Connectivity
Needs to Advance US Antarctic Science. October 1, 2021. University
of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA; https://www.pgc.umn.edu/workshops/antarctic-cable/
ICPC, Minimum Technical Requirements for a Desktop Study (6 March
2012), Recommendation No. 9, at pp. 4-8; www.iscpc.org/publications/recommendations
NSF, Connecting the Last Continent: New desktop study on
Antarctica's potential subsea telecommunications cable, with link to
study, 27 December 2023; https://www.nsf.gov/news/news_summ.jsp?cntn_id=308774&org=OPP
Infraestruturas de Portugal, IP and ASN sign contract for the
construction of a New CAM Ring, 13 March 2024; https://www.infraestruturasdeportugal.pt/pt-pt/ip-e-asn-assinam-contrato-para-construcao-de-novo-anel-cam
University of Hawai'i, Contract signed for world's first SMART
subsea cable, connecting Vanuatu, New Caledonia, School of Ocean and
Earth Science and Technology, 29 February 2024; https://www.soest.hawaii.edu/soestwp/announce/news/contract-signed-vanuatu-new-caledonia/
Definition of Terms/References
2021 Antarctic Subsea Cable Workshop: https://www.pgc.umn.edu/workshops/antarctic-cable/
Branching Unit (BU): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_branching_unit
Ocean Bottom Pressure A-0-A Technology: https://
oceanobservatories.org/pi-instrument/a-0-a-calibrated-pressure-
instrument/
#:~:text=The%20A%2D0%2DA%20method,pressure%20inside%20the%20instrumen
t%20housing.
Repeater: S. Lentz and B. Howe, ``Scientific Monitoring And Reliable
Telecommunications (SMART) Cable Systems: Integration of Sensors
into Telecommunications Repeaters,'' 2018 OCEANS--MTS/IEEE Kobe
Techno-Oceans (OTO), Kobe, Japan, 2018, pp. 1-7, doi: 10.1109/
OCEANSKOBE.2018.8558862. (pg. 2)https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329618575_Scientific_Monitoring_And_Reliable_Telecommunications_SMART_Cable_Systems_Integration_of_Sensors_into_Telecommunications_Repeaters
SMART Cables: https://www.smartcables.org/smart
Technology Readiness Level (TRL):https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Technology_readiness_level
Information Requested
Through this notice, NSF seeks information from the public to
evolve the development of the Antarctic SMART Cable. NSF requests
information regarding the subsea cable route that both minimizes the
risk to the cable and maximizes science research potential, the range
of potential science sensors to include, as well as their geographic
distribution, the locations of powered cable branching units for future
sensor cable build-out or undersea observatory-style point sensor
arrays, concepts for the incorporation of existing or promising
distributed fiber sensing techniques, and suggested paths to catalyze
the necessary technology to develop such a cable system. Additionally,
NSF seeks information relevant to partnership opportunities with the
public (U.S., international) and private (academia, for-profit and non-
profit) sectors that will facilitate the conceptualization,
development, deployment and sustainment of the cable system and related
scientific infrastructure.
The information requested here will be used to inform the proposed
Antarctic SMART Cable project via the NSF Major Research Equipment
Facilities and Construction (MREFC) program that funds the development
of facility infrastructure. MREFC projects are funded via a separate
appropriation intended for large capital-intensive investments,
distinct from the NSF appropriations funding research and related
activities.
Responses submitted via Email and Letter Mail are requested to
follow the Electronic On-line Submission data capture questions and
format for ease in analyzing responses. These responses may address one
or as many topics as desired from the enumerated list provided in this
RFI, noting the corresponding number of the topic(s) to which the
response pertains. Written submissions must be type-written and not
exceed 3 pages (exclusive of cover page and accompanying graphics) in
11-point or larger font, single spacing and with a page number provided
on each page.
Comments containing references, studies, research, and other
empirical data that are not widely published or widely available should
include copies or electronic links of the referenced materials; these
materials, as well as a list of references, do not count toward the 3-
page limit. No business proprietary information, copyrighted
information, or personally identifiable information (aside from
optional information requested below) should be submitted in response
to this RFI. Comments submitted in response to this RFI will be used
internally at NSF and may be shared with other Federal agencies and NSF
contractors assigned to process the responses.
Responders are asked to answer one or more of the following
questions in responses to the RFI. There are no known risks to
participating, and participation is voluntary. Unless provided by you,
no identifying information will be collected; therefore, all responses
will remain confidential, anonymous, and reported in the aggregate.
While there is no sensitive content, you may skip a question at any
time.
Demographic Questions
1. In which sector do you currently work?
(a) Academia
(b) Private or publicly traded company
(c) Government agency/public sector
(d) Non-governmental organization/non-profit
(e) Venture capital/private equity
(f) Other (Please specify)
2. Please select up to three (3) areas of expertise/interest:
(a) Physical Oceanography
(b) Cryosphere
(c) Biochemistry
(d) Science Education
(e) Geodesy
(f) Hydrology
(g) Climate Change Research
(h) Marine Geology/Geophysics
(i) Natural Hazards
(j) Solid Earth Geophysics
(k) Subsea Fiber Optic Cable Systems
(l) Sensor/Instrumentation Development
(m) Data Management
(n) Distributed Fiber Sensing
(o) Other (Please specify)
3. For how long have you been working in your current field(s)?
(a) Less than five years
(b) Five to less than ten years
(c) Ten to less than twenty years
(d) Twenty years or more
(e) Prefer not to answer
SMART Cables and Antarctic SMART Cable Science Objectives
4. How familiar are you with the overall SMART Cable concept?
Very familiar
Familiar
[[Page 92181]]
Somewhat familiar
Not very familiar
Not at all familiar
5. Prior to the NSF Federal Register Notice and this Electronic On-
Line Submission, how familiar were you with the nascent Antarctic SMART
Cable project?
Very familiar
Familiar
Somewhat familiar
Not very familiar
Not at all familiar
6. Which of the following major research areas do you see the
observational capability of the cable supporting? Select all that
apply.
Climate Change Research
Acoustic Monitoring
Long-Term Global Ocean Observations (general)
Seismology Research
Earthquake/Tsunami Monitoring
Sea Level Research
Deep Ocean Circulation Research
Southern Ocean Research
Other (Please specify)
None of the above
7. If you selected ``NONE OF THE ABOVE'' in the previous question,
please elaborate here:
Current and Future Sensors
The initial SMART Cable sensor concept incorporates three basic
measurements: Ocean Bottom Pressure, Ocean Bottom Temperature, and
Seismic Ground Motion (seismic acceleration and/or velocity). At the
time of the release of this survey, the supplier for the two commercial
SMART Cable systems under development is finalizing their sensor and
vendor selection process, but future systems--like the Antarctic SMART
Cable--may have some limited flexibility in the types of sensors which
can be incorporated. The following questions explore the range of
potential sensor capabilities under consideration for inclusion in the
Antarctic SMART Cable.
8. How important is it for the sensor to measure each of the
following?
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21NO24.002
[[Page 92182]]
9. If you'd like, please use this space to elaborate on your
answers to Question 8.
10. How important is it for the sensor to measure each of the
following?
11. If you'd like, please use this space to elaborate on your
answers to Question 10.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21NO24.003
12. How important is it for the sensor to measure each of the
following?
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21NO24.004
13. If you'd like, please use this space to elaborate on your
answers to Question 12.
14. How important is it to include the following additional sensors
in the cable?
[[Page 92183]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21NO24.005
15. In the previous question, for any selections you indicated were
``important'' or ``very important,'' please explain why you feel these
sensor types should be included on the cable:
16. In question #14, for any selections you indicated were ``not
very important'' or ``not important at all,'' please explain why you
feel these sensor types are not needed:
17. In your view, how do SMART and distributed fiber sensing (i.e.,
DAS and DTS) complement one another?
18. What new scientific discoveries or breakthroughs do you
anticipate as a direct result of having access to the long-term
measurement data collected by the cable's sensors?
New Sensor Technologies
To catalyze rapid sensor development and increase their Technology
Readiness Levels (TRLs) for inclusion in the Antarctic SMART Cable, a
range of organizational approaches may be necessary.
19. Should NSF facilitate further development for SMART Cable
sensors? If so, how (i.e., research labs/institutions/industry/
partnerships, etc.)?
Yes
No
Don't know
20. If you'd like, please use this space to elaborate on your
answer to question 19.
Location of the SMART Cable, Sensors, and Future Cable Expansion
For some segments of the cable, it may be possible to shift the
cable's path slightly in some locations to accommodate additional
science or enable long-term monitoring of specific scientific targets.
Further, depending upon the final technological solution(s) for how
sensor units will be incorporated into the cable, there may be
opportunities to select the locations of some of the sensor modules.
Finally, the cable may be able to include one or more Branching Units
(BUs). A BU can be used for multiple purposes, such as adding another
cable branch, attaching a localized device, or providing an entry point
for including a localized network of sensors focused on a specific area
or areas.
[[Page 92184]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21NO24.006
BILLING CODE 7555-01-C
Figure Caption: Potential routes for the Antarctica SMART Cable
system based on the 2023 Desktop Study (https://www.nsf.gov/geo/opp/documents/NSF_Public%20Release%20DTS_Final.pdf). Thick white dashed
lines represent primary McMurdo Trunk and three proposed cable segments
with optional landings at (a) Macquarie Island, (b) Invercargill, New
Zealand, and (c) Sydney, Australia. Proposed Cable Landing Stations are
marked by white circles. Vulnerable Marine Ecosystem (VME) areas near
McMurdo Station are shaded dark gray. The dark gray zone around trunk
and cable options shows buffer zones where Branching Unit (BU) stubs
could extend. Tectonic plate boundaries (AU: Indo-Australian Plate; AN:
Antarctic Plate; PA: Pacific Plate) are denoted by thin black lines.
21. Referring to the above Figure and noting the region of
potential cable locations, would you shift the position of the proposed
cable route within the buffer zone (dark gray area in the figure)? If
so, where? Note that cable path shifts will be minimal without
additional engineering evaluations for deployment feasibility and cable
safety.
[[Page 92185]]
Yes
No
Don't know
22. If you'd like, please use this space to elaborate on your
answer to question 21.
23. How valuable would it be to your research to be able to select
the specific locations of the SMART sensor modules along the cable?
Very valuable
Valuable
Somewhat valuable
Not very valuable
Not valuable at all
24. How important is it to include one or more Branching Units?
Very important
Important
Somewhat important
Not very important
Not important at all
25. In terms of current and future research, in your view what are
potential uses for Branching Units?
26. Referring again to the above Figure and noting the corridor
available around the trunk lines to deploy stubs from Branching Units
(dark gray shaded areas surrounding the white dotted lines), would you
place additional BUs?
Yes
No
Don't Know
27. If you'd like, please use this space to elaborate on your
answers to question 26. If you answered yes, please indicate where and
why.
28. What potential do you see for the cable to enable the vision of
the networked ocean as a relay platform for an ``Internet of Underwater
Things'', such as subsea gliders, submersible float sensors, ROVs and
similar submersible autonomous instrumentation systems?
Partnerships and the Project
The Whitepaper (https://goosocean.org/news/un-ocean-decade-challenge-7-white-paper-a-roadmap-for-the-observing-system-we-need/)
addressing Challenge 7 (``Expand the Global Ocean Observing System'')
from the UN IOC/UNESCO Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable
Development (2021-2030) (``Ocean Decade 2030'') program indicates that
significant investments will be needed to meet the challenges for
global ocean observation goals while current investments and mechanisms
are inadequate. There is a clear call for multi-sector engagements such
as public-private partnerships and international collaborations for a
``new economic thinking'' to provide the resources needed.
29. What private and/or public sector groups (e.g., academic, non-
profit, industry, etc.) do you think may have an active interest in
partnership activities with NSF for aspects of the cable system
development?
Contribution of the Antarctic SMART Cable To Resolve Global Challenges
30. Beyond the potential direct benefits to support science in the
Antarctic and the region covered directly by the Antarctic SMART Cable,
there may be broader benefits to developing the Antarctic SMART Cable.
In your view, what are the global, national, and societal benefits of
this cable?
Future Science Workshop
31. A successor science workshop is being considered for 2025 to
build upon and extend the work of the June 2021 workshop and this
Electronic On-Line Submission. How interested would you be in attending
virtually or in-person, provided full or partial travel expenses could
be provided?
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN21NO24.007
Final Thoughts
32. If there is anything else you'd like to share or elaborate upon
regarding the topics mentioned here, please provide them here.
33. Please complete the form below to indicate your interest in
future participation in this project. This is completely voluntary, and
your responses collected will be included in the analysis regardless of
your response below.
Name _______________
Affiliation _____________
Title/Position ___________
Email address ___________
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1861, et al.
Dated: November 15, 2024.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2024-27292 Filed 11-20-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P