Election To Exclude Certain Unincorporated Organizations Owned by Applicable Entities From Application of the Rules on Partners and Partnerships, 91552-91563 [2024-26944]
Download as PDF
91552
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 10012]
RIN 1545–BR09
Election To Exclude Certain
Unincorporated Organizations Owned
by Applicable Entities From
Application of the Rules on Partners
and Partnerships
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
AGENCY:
This document sets forth final
regulations that modify existing
regulations to allow certain
unincorporated organizations that are
owned in whole or in part by applicable
entities to be excluded from the
application of partnership tax rules.
These regulations affect unincorporated
organizations and their members,
including tax-exempt organizations, the
District of Columbia, State and local
governments, Indian Tribal
governments, Alaska Native
Corporations, the Tennessee Valley
Authority, rural electric cooperatives,
and certain agencies and
instrumentalities. The final regulations
also update certain outdated language in
the existing regulations.
DATES:
Effective date: These regulations are
effective on January 19, 2025.
Applicability date: For the date of
applicability, see § 1.761–2(f).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Concerning these final regulations,
contact Cameron Williamson at (202)
317–6684 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
Authority
This document contains amendments
to the Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR
part 1) under section 761(a) of the
Internal Revenue Code (Code) issued by
the Secretary of the Treasury (Secretary)
pursuant to the authority granted under
sections 761(a), 6031(a), 6417(d) and (h),
and 7805(a) of the Code (final
regulations).
Section 761(a) provides, in part, an
express grant of regulatory authority for
section 761(a) stating, ‘‘[u]nder
regulations the Secretary may, at the
election of all the members of an
unincorporated organization, exclude
such organization from the application
of all or a part of this subchapter.’’
Section 6031(a) provides an express
grant of regulatory authority for the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
Secretary to prescribe in forms or
regulations partnership reporting
information required ‘‘for the purpose of
carrying out the provisions of subtitle
A.’’
Section 6417(d) provides several
express delegations of authority to the
Secretary to enforce requirements for
elective payments of applicable credits
under section 6417 and recapture
excessive payments. Section 6417(h)
provides an express delegation of
authority with respect to elective
payments under section 6417, stating, in
part, that ‘‘[t]he Secretary shall issue
such regulations or other guidance as
may be necessary to carry out the
purposes of this section.’’
Finally, section 7805(a) authorizes the
Secretary to ‘‘prescribe all needful rules
and regulations for the enforcement of
[the Code], including all rules and
regulations as may be necessary by
reason of any alteration of law in
relation to internal revenue.’’
Background
I. Elective Payment of Applicable
Credits
Section 6417 was added to the Code
by section 13801(a) of Public Law 117–
169, 136 Stat. 1818, 2003 (August 16,
2022), commonly referred to as the
Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA).
Section 6417 allows an ‘‘applicable
entity’’ (including tax-exempt
organizations, the District of Columbia,
State and local governments, Indian
Tribal governments, Alaska Native
Corporations, the Tennessee Valley
Authority, rural electric cooperatives,
and certain agencies and
instrumentalities) to make an election to
treat an ‘‘applicable credit’’ (as defined
in section 6417(b)) determined with
respect to such entity as making a
payment by such entity against the tax
imposed by subtitle A of the Code, for
the taxable year with respect to which
such credit is determined, equal to the
amount of such credit. Section 6417 also
provides special rules relating to
partnerships and directs the Secretary to
provide rules for making elections
under section 6417. Section 13801(g) of
the IRA provides that section 6417
applies to taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2022.
On March 11, 2024, the Department of
the Treasury (Treasury Department) and
the IRS published in the Federal
Register (88 FR 40528) final regulations
(TD 9988) providing guidance on the
section 6417 elective payment election
(section 6417 regulations). Section
1.6417–2(a)(1)(iv) provides that
partnerships are not applicable entities
described in section 6417(d)(1)(A) or
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 1.6417–1(c), regardless of how many of
their partners are themselves applicable
entities. Accordingly, any partnership
making an elective payment election
must be an electing taxpayer (as defined
in § 1.6417–1(g)), and, as such, the only
applicable credits with respect to which
the partnership could make an elective
payment election would be credits
determined under sections 45Q, 45V,
and 45X for the time periods allowed in
section 6417(d). However, § 1.6417–
2(a)(1)(iii) provides that if an applicable
entity is a co-owner in an applicable
credit property (as defined in § 1.6417–
1(e)), through an organization that has
made a valid election under section
761(a) (section 761(a) election) to be
excluded from the application of the
partnership tax rules of subchapter K of
chapter 1 of the Code (subchapter K),
then the applicable entity’s undivided
ownership share of the applicable credit
property is treated as a separate
applicable credit property owned by
such applicable entity. As a result, the
applicable entity may make an elective
payment election for the applicable
credit(s) determined with respect to
such applicable credit property.
Also on March 11, 2024, the Treasury
Department and the IRS published in
the Federal Register (89 FR 17613)
proposed amendments (REG–101552–
24) to the regulations under section
761(a) to carry out the purposes of
section 6417 (proposed regulations).
Generally, the proposed regulations
would have amended certain provisions
of § 1.761–2 as in effect and contained
in 26 CFR part 1 to provide that
unincorporated organizations meeting
certain requirements (applicable
unincorporated organizations) are
eligible for certain modifications
(referred to in the proposed regulations
as ‘‘exceptions’’) to the existing
requirements for making a section
761(a) election. The provisions of the
proposed regulations are explained in
greater detail in the preamble to the
proposed regulations.
Concurrently with the publication of
these final regulations, the Treasury
Department and the IRS are publishing
in the Proposed Rules section of this
edition of the Federal Register a notice
of proposed rulemaking (REG–116017–
24) proposing to further add to and
revise the provisions of § 1.761–2
(November 2024 proposed regulations).
The proposed revisions to the
provisions of § 1.761–2 by the
November 2024 proposed regulations
are explained in greater detail in the
preamble to the November 2024
proposed regulations.
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
II. Overview of Section 761(a) and Prior
§ 1.761–2(a)(3)
Section 761(a) provides, in part, that
under regulations the Secretary may, at
the election of all of the members of an
unincorporated organization, exclude
such organization from the application
of all or part of subchapter K if the
organization is availed of: (1) for
investment purposes only and not for
the active conduct of a business, (2) for
the joint production, extraction, or use
of property, but not for the purpose of
selling services or property produced or
extracted, or (3) by dealers in securities
for a short period for the purpose of
underwriting, selling, or distributing a
particular issue of securities, provided
that the income of the members of the
organization may be adequately
determined without the computation of
partnership taxable income.
As discussed in the preamble to the
proposed regulations, unincorporated
organizations seeking to be excluded
from the application of subchapter K so
that one or more of their members can
make an election under section 6417 are
likely to be availed of for the purposes
listed in section 761(a)(2), that is, for the
joint production, extraction, or use of
property, but not for the purpose of
selling services or property produced or
extracted. Pursuant to the authority in
section 761(a), prior § 1.761–2(a)(3)
provides additional requirements for an
unincorporated organization to elect to
be excluded from the application of
subchapter K under section 761(a)(2).
Specifically, prior § 1.761–2(a)(3)
requires that the participants in the joint
production, extraction, or use of
property: (i) own the property as coowners, either in fee or under lease or
other form of contract granting exclusive
operating rights (co-ownership
requirement), (ii) reserve the right
separately to take in kind or dispose of
their shares of any property produced,
extracted, or used (severance
requirement), and (iii) do not jointly sell
services or the property produced or
extracted (joint marketing requirement),
although each separate participant may
delegate authority to sell the
participant’s share of the property
produced or extracted for the time being
for the participant’s account, but not for
a period of time in excess of the
minimum needs of the industry, and in
no event for more than one year (oneyear exception). These additional
regulatory requirements are hereinafter
referred to as the ‘‘existing regulatory
requirements’’ and, along with the
previously discussed statutory
requirements, are referred to herein as
the ‘‘existing requirements’’ to be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
eligible to elect out of the application of
subchapter K.
As discussed in the Summary of
Comments and Explanation of
Revisions, the proposed regulations
would have modified some of the
existing regulatory requirements for
unincorporated organizations that meet
certain requirements.
Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Revisions
The Treasury Department and the IRS
received 11 written comments in
response to the proposed regulations.
The comments are available for public
inspection at www.regulations.gov or
upon request. A public hearing on the
proposed regulations was scheduled for
May 20, 2024. There were no requests
to speak at the scheduled public
hearing. Consequently, the public
hearing was cancelled. See Election To
Exclude Certain Unincorporated
Organizations Owned by Applicable
Entities From Application of the Rules
on Partners and Partnerships; Hearing
Cancellation, 89 FR 43349 (May 17,
2024). After full consideration of the
comments received, these final
regulations adopt the proposed
regulations with modifications in
response to the comments described in
this Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Revisions. The
provisions of § 1.761–2 as amended by
the final regulations are referred to as
‘‘revised § 1.761–2’’ in this Summary of
Comments and Explanation of
Revisions.
Comments merely summarizing the
statute or proposed regulations,
recommending statutory revisions to
section 761 or other statutes, addressing
unrelated issues, or recommending
changes to IRS forms or procedures are
generally not addressed in this
Summary of Comments and Explanation
of Revisions or adopted in these final
regulations. These comments included
recommendations and questions
regarding fact patterns specific to
section 6417, the domestic content rules
of section 45(b)(10), the credit for
qualified commercial clean vehicles of
section 45W, and the credit for
alternative fuel vehicle refueling
property of section 30C. While the
Treasury Department and the IRS are
studying some of those issues and
intend to issue future guidance on those
provisions, those recommendations and
questions are unrelated to the purpose
of these final regulations. Unless
otherwise indicated in this Summary of
Comments and Explanation of
Revisions, provisions of the proposed
regulations with respect to which no
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
91553
comments were received are adopted
without substantive change.
I. Overview
Proposed § 1.761–2(a)(4)(ii) would
have defined ‘‘applicable
unincorporated organizations’’ as
unincorporated organizations that meet
several requirements. Proposed § 1.761–
2(a)(4)(iii) would have modified the
regulatory requirements in prior
§ 1.761–2(a)(3)(i) and (iii) for an
applicable unincorporated organization
that also met the regulatory
requirements of prior § 1.761–2(b) and
(e).
Part II of this Summary of Comments
and Explanation of Revisions discusses
comments received concerning the
general effects of a section 761(a)
election. Part III of this Summary of
Comments and Explanation of Revisions
discusses the comments received on the
definition of an applicable
unincorporated organization. Part IV of
this Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Revisions discusses the
comments received on the modifications
to the existing regulatory requirements.
Part V of this Summary of Comments
and Explanation of Revisions discusses
the applicability date of these final
regulations, the elimination of certain
obsolete language, and certain
administrative requirements that are
under consideration for organizations
taking advantage of the modifications to
the existing regulatory requirements.
Part VI of this Summary of Comments
and Explanation of Revisions
summarizes two comments not
addressed in these final regulations.
II. Effects of an Election Under Section
761(a)
A. General
Subchapter K provides rules
governing the taxation of partners and
partnerships. When an unincorporated
organization makes a valid section
761(a) election out of subchapter K, the
rules of subchapter K no longer apply to
that organization. As a result, for
purposes of subchapter K, the
unincorporated organization ceases to
be a partnership and each member of
the unincorporated organization is
generally treated as a co-owner, that is,
as directly owning its proportionate
share of the organization’s assets.
For example, an unincorporated
organization that has made a valid
section 761(a) election is not subject to
section 704, which provides the rules
for determining a partner’s distributive
share of a partnership’s tax items.
Instead, each member of an
unincorporated organization that has
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
91554
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
made a valid section 761(a) election
takes into account directly its
ownership share of the organization’s
tax items. Accordingly, if an
unincorporated organization with a
valid section 761(a) election purchases
depreciable property, an owner of a 30
percent interest in the organization may
claim depreciation deductions as if it
owned an undivided 30 percent interest
in the organization’s property (provided
the owner is otherwise eligible for such
deductions). That member cannot claim
depreciation deductions beyond that
member’s ownership interest in the
organization’s property. Thus, any
agreement among the members to
specially allocate one member’s
depreciation deductions to another
member would make the organization
ineligible for a section 761(a) election.
One commenter asked for clarification
of whether the following fact pattern is
compatible with an election under
section 761(a). A church (an applicable
entity) forms a partnership with a
nonprofit investor and a for-profit
developer. The church contributes a site
for energy property, which generates
electricity and reduces the church’s
energy bill. The nonprofit investor
makes grants and loans to the
organization and is repaid by virtue of
renewable energy credits or net
metering from the clean energy
property. The for-profit developer enters
into a contract to maintain the system in
exchange for a fee.
The facts described in the comment
letter do not provide sufficient
information to determine whether this
situation is compatible with a section
761(a) election. If the investor receives
all payments in its capacity as a lender
and the for-profit developer receives its
profits in its capacity as a third-party
service provider, there might not be an
unincorporated organization at all. If
there is an unincorporated organization
and it intends to make a section 761(a)
election, each of its members must
reserve the right separately to take in
kind or dispose of their shares of any
property produced, extracted, or used. If
the investor or developer receives
payments in excess of its pro rata
ownership interests, this requirement
will not be met. Moreover, if the
contributions mentioned in this
situation are intended to be nonrecognition transfers for Federal income
tax purposes, the contributing members
would generally need to make such
contributions under section 721(a),
which is part of subchapter K. However,
if a section 761(a) election is made, the
organization is not subject to subchapter
K, and thus, section 721(a) is
inapplicable to transfers to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
organization. Without section 721(a),
the transfers would generally be taxable
events.
One commenter asked how certain
capital stacking combinations
(including loans, forgivable loans, and
grants) affect an organization’s
eligibility to make a section 761(a)
election. To make a valid section 761(a)
election, an unincorporated
organization must comply with the
requirements of section 761(a) and
revised § 1.761–2. Provided that those
requirements are met, the structure of an
organization’s capital stack would not
appear to preclude it from making a
valid section 761(a) election. Federal
income tax law governs the treatment of
these arrangements for purposes of
determining whether an arrangement
violates the requirements of section
761(a). For example, loans between
members of the organization will be
treated as debt to the extent they are
treated as debt under Federal income
tax law. Likewise, loans by a member to
an organization would not be treated as
a partnership liability under section
752, but a loan to each member of the
organization in proportion to the
member’s ownership interest.
One commenter asked that applicable
entities who are members in an
applicable unincorporated organization
that makes a 761(a) election be
permitted to claim all applicable tax
credit bonuses and adders. Bonus credit
amounts, such as amounts for
applicable credit properties located in
energy communities, apply to property
co-owned through an applicable
unincorporated organization. The
Treasury Department and the IRS have
determined that no change to the final
regulations is required to clarify this
issue.
B. Effect of a Section 761(a) Election on
Sections of the Code Outside of
Subchapter K
One commenter requested a
discussion of the effects of a section
761(a) election on provisions of the
Code outside of subchapter K that
reference partnerships, including
section 6417. A detailed discussion of
the effects of a section 761(a) election on
provisions of the Code outside of
subchapter K would require a careful
examination of numerous provisions of
the Code apart from those relevant to
these final regulations and is not
necessary for purposes of these final
regulations. However, the application of
a section 761(a) election to section 6417
is fundamental to the purpose of these
final regulations, which is to carry out
the purposes of section 6417 and thus,
is addressed herein.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
An organization with a valid section
761(a) election may be treated as a
partnership for purposes of sections of
the Code outside of subchapter K. In
Bryant v. Commissioner, 46 T.C. 848
(1966), aff’d, 399 F.2d 800 (5th Cir.
1968), the Tax Court concluded that an
organization that made a section 761(a)
election was still a partnership for
purposes of other parts of the Code,
including the $50,000 investment tax
credit limit on partnership assets
provided by then section 48(c)(2)(D) of
the Code. See also Cokes v.
Commissioner, 91 T.C. 222 (1988)
(section 761 election did not affect
partnership status under the selfemployment tax provisions of section
1402(a) of the Code); Madison Gas and
Electric Company v. Commissioner, 72
T.C. 521 (1979), aff’d, 633 F.2d 512 (7th
Cir. 1980) (notwithstanding a section
761 election, the startup costs of a joint
venture were attributable to the
partnership business and were not
deductible under section 162(a) of the
Code as the ordinary and necessary
business expenses of the individual
partners).
Though section 6417 is not in
subchapter K, a section 761(a) election
affects whether an entity is treated as a
partnership for purposes of section
6417. Section 6417(h) provides that the
Secretary shall issue such regulations or
other guidance as may be necessary to
carry out the purposes of section 6417.
Pursuant to this broad authority, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
published § 1.6417–2(a)(1)(iii), which
provides that if an applicable entity is
a co-owner in an applicable credit
property through an organization that
has made a valid section 761(a) election,
then the applicable entity’s undivided
ownership share of the applicable credit
property will be treated as a separate
applicable credit property owned by
such applicable entity, and the
applicable entity may make an elective
payment election for the applicable
credits determined with respect to such
applicable credit property. This means
that a section 761(a) election effectively
causes an unincorporated organization
not to be treated as a partnership for
purposes of section 6417, including
section 6417(c). Thus, the effect of a
valid section 761(a) election for
purposes of section 6417 is that each
member of the organization is treated as
directly owning its proportionate share
of the applicable credit property. As a
result, each applicable entity member of
the organization may make an elective
payment election (or, if not an
applicable entity member, a transfer
election under section 6418) with
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
respect to its proportionate share of the
applicable credit property.
Another commenter requested
confirmation that a Tribal Energy
Development Organization that makes a
section 761(a) election is not a
partnership for purposes of sections
168(h)(5) and (6) and 50(b)(3).
Section 168(h) describes tax-exempt
use property (generally, certain property
leased to a tax-exempt entity), the cost
recovery of which is subject to special
rules. Section 168(h)(5) generally
provides that the determination of
whether property leased to a
partnership is tax-exempt use property
shall be made by treating each taxexempt entity partner’s proportionate
share as being leased to such partner.
Section 168(h)(6) generally provides
that, if any property which is not taxexempt use property is owned by a
partnership that has as partners both a
tax-exempt entity and a person who is
not a tax-exempt entity, an amount
equal to such tax-exempt entity’s
proportionate share of such property is
treated as tax-exempt use property. This
rule applies only if any allocation to the
tax-exempt entity of partnership items is
not a ‘‘qualified allocation,’’ which (i) is
consistent with such entity’s being
allocated the same distributive share of
each item of income, gain, loss,
deduction, credit, and basis and such
share remains the same during the
entire period the entity is a partner in
the partnership, and (ii) has substantial
economic effect within the meaning of
section 704(b)(2). See section
168(h)(6)(B). Section 50(b)(3) and (4)
preclude certain property used by taxexempt organizations, governmental
entities, and foreign persons from
qualifying for an investment tax credit.
For these purposes, section 50(b)(4)(D)
provides that rules similar to those in
section 168(h)(5) and (6) apply.
The existence of a partnership for
purposes of these sections does not
change the amount of depreciation
deductions attributable to each member
of an unincorporated organization that
has validly made a section 761(a)
election. A valid section 761(a) election
requires the shares of property leased to
or owned by an organization to be
treated as leased to or owned by the
members of the organization in
proportion to their shares of the
organization. This is how partnership
property would be treated under section
168(h)(5) and would cause all
allocations to the partners to be treated
as ‘‘qualified allocations’’ for purposes
of section 168(h)(6). Similarly, the IRS
has determined in other areas of the law
that co-owners of property may make
independent elections with respect to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
deductions affecting their taxable
income. See Rev. Rul. 83–129, 1983–2
C.B. 105, in which the IRS ruled that the
co-owners of mineral leases that make a
section 761(a) election may
independently elect to deduct or
capitalize their shares of mining
development costs under section 616 of
the Code; see also Rev. Rul. 81–261,
1981–2 C.B. 60, where the IRS noted
that if a partnership makes a section
761(a) election, each partner is deemed
to own directly its proportionate share
of the partnership property for purposes
of computing depreciation. Moreover, in
the case of an applicable entity that
makes an election under section
6417(a), section 6417(d)(2)(A) provides
that applicable credits are determined
without regard to section 50(b)(3) and
(4)(A)(i).
III. Applicable Unincorporated
Organizations
A. Applicable Entity Owner
Proposed § 1.761–2(a)(4)(ii)(A) would
have required an applicable
unincorporated organization to be
owned, in whole or in part, by one or
more applicable entities, as defined in
section 6417(d)(1)(A) and § 1.6417–1(c).
The Treasury Department and the IRS
received no comments related to this
section and adopt the proposed
language without changes.
B. Joint Operating Agreements
Proposed § 1.761–2(a)(4)(ii)(B) would
have provided that an applicable
unincorporated organization must be an
organization the members of which
enter into a joint operating agreement
(JOA) in which the members reserve the
right separately to take in kind or
dispose of their pro rata shares of the
electricity produced, extracted, or used,
and any associated renewable energy
credits or similar credits. Proposed
§ 1.761–2(a)(4)(ii)(C) would also have
provided, in part, that an applicable
unincorporated organization must be
organized pursuant to a JOA.
1. General
Commenters requested more
information about the types of JOAs
required by these provisions. Some
commenters requested examples of
permissible JOAs, and another
commenter requested identification of
any JOA provisions that would ‘‘create
issues’’ for a JOA. One commenter asked
whether JOAs that satisfy the
requirements of § 1.761–2(a)(3) would
also satisfy the requirements of
proposed § 1.761–2(a)(4)(ii)(B) and (C)
and requested that any specific rules
applicable to JOAs solely for purposes
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
91555
of the proposed regulations apply
prospectively so as to avoid any
uncertainty with respect to existing
JOAs.
As used in the proposed regulations,
the term ‘‘joint operating agreement’’ is
intended to refer to agreements similar
to those used by organizations that
made an election under section 761(a)
prior to the proposed regulations. Such
agreements typically provide the terms
by which the members of the
unincorporated organization will meet
the existing requirements to make a
section 761(a) election. JOAs should
continue to serve this purpose under the
final regulations, regardless of whether
an applicable unincorporated
organization holds its property in an
entity organized under local law.
Accordingly, as a general matter, a JOA
that satisfies the requirements of revised
§ 1.761–2(a)(1) and (3) will satisfy the
requirements in revised § 1.761–
2(a)(4)(ii)(B) and (C), provided that the
organization to which that JOA applies
satisfies the existing regulatory
requirements, as modified by revised
§ 1.761–2(a)(4)(iii), if applicable.
Because the final regulations do not
change the rules currently applicable to
JOAs, these final regulations do not
need to make such rules apply
prospectively. For the same reason,
further clarification of the JOA
requirements is unnecessary.
2. Right to Pro Rata Share
Commenters requested clarification of
how credits and ownership interests
would be allocated when members of an
unincorporated organization reserve the
right separately to take in kind or
dispose of their pro rata shares of the
electricity produced, extracted, or used,
and any associated renewable energy
credits or similar credits.
Pursuant to proposed § 1.761–
2(a)(4)(ii)(B), each member of an
applicable unincorporated organization
would have been required to reserve the
right separately to take in kind or
dispose of their pro rata shares of any
property produced, extracted, or used,
and any associated renewable energy
credits or similar credits. The
determination of each member’s
ownership interest of an unincorporated
organization (and, accordingly, each
member’s proportionate share of
property produced, extracted, or used)
must be made by the members and
based on their ownership interests in
the same manner as if they were coowners in the underlying properties.
To illustrate, a co-owner of 40 percent
of an unincorporated organization that
has made a section 761(a) election must
reserve the right separately to take in
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
91556
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
kind or dispose of its 40 percent pro rata
share of the property produced,
extracted, or used by the co-owners.
This is true even when the members of
an applicable unincorporated
organization own property through an
entity, as permitted by revised § 1.761–
2(a)(4)(iii)(A). Example 1 has been
added in revised § 1.761–2(a)(5)(i) to
illustrate the general rule.
One commenter requested
clarification that renewable energy
certificates (RECs) produced through the
generation of clean energy qualify as
‘‘similar credits’’ for these purposes.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
clarify that RECs are included as
‘‘renewable energy credits or similar
credits’’ pursuant to revised § 1.761–
2(a)(4)(ii)(B) and thus, each member of
an unincorporated organization must
reserve the right separately to take in
kind or dispose of their pro rata shares
of any RECs generated as a result of the
organization’s activities.
3. Joint Marketing
Some commenters asked whether
specific JOA provisions or activities
would violate requirements that apply
to applicable unincorporated
organizations, including that the
organization’s members do not jointly
sell services or property produced or
extracted. One commenter asked
whether appointing a manager, creating
an ownership committee, having
expense-sharing agreements or incurring
project-level debt would violate the
existing requirements to make a section
761(a) election. Another commenter
requested clarification that a managing
member or general partner-equivalent
(presumably, if the unincorporated
organization takes advantage of the
modification in proposed § 1.761–
2(a)(4)(iii)(A)) can conduct normal
project management functions for an
unincorporated organization without
violating the joint marketing
requirement. That commenter
requested, in the alternative, a
‘‘roadmap’’ setting forth how a
managing member or general partner
can comply with the joint marketing
requirement in a practical manner. The
same commenter also requested
allowing representatives of an
unincorporated organization to perform
pre-filing and other ministerial services
on behalf of the entities jointly owning
applicable credit property.
An applicable unincorporated
organization must meet all applicable
requirements, including the existing
requirements with the modifications
contained in these final regulations, to
elect out of subchapter K under section
761(a) and to maintain a section 761(a)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
election. Generally, the members of an
unincorporated organization are
permitted to have a representative
handle management and ministerial
duties typical of a managing member of
a limited liability company (LLC) or
general partner of a limited partnership
without violating these requirements.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
understand that representatives with
such duties may be required by local
law for entities that may hold the
organization’s property under § 1.761–
2(a)(4)(iii)(A) of these final regulations.
These final regulations, however, do not
provide a ‘‘roadmap’’ for permissible
arrangements or rights and duties of
such representatives as the list would
not be exhaustive and could cause
unintentional inferences to be drawn.
One commenter proposed allowing an
applicable entity to direct some or all of
its elective payments of applicable
credit amounts under section 6417 to a
separate account jointly owned by the
applicable entity and other members of
an applicable unincorporated
organization to pay expenses directly
related to the underlying applicable
credit property’s co-ownership. The
commenter suggested applying rules
similar to those applicable to
assignments of payments under section
1603 (regarding grants for specified
energy properties in lieu of tax credits)
of the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009, Public Law
111–5, 123 Stat. 115 (2009), including
that each payment be assigned to a bank
or other financing institution, that the
assignment cover all amounts payable
and not be subject to further assignment
(except that any assignment may be
made to one party acting as an agent or
trustee for the co-owners), and that the
assignee file a Notice of Assignment.
As already discussed, § 1.6417–
2(a)(1)(iii) provides that if an applicable
entity is a co-owner in an applicable
credit property through an organization
that has made a valid section 761(a)
election, then the applicable entity’s
undivided ownership share of the
applicable credit property will be
treated as a separate applicable credit
property owned by such applicable
entity, and the applicable entity may
make an election under section 6417(a)
for the applicable credits determined
with respect to such applicable credit
property. When an applicable entity
makes an election under section
6417(a), such entity is treated as making
a payment against the tax imposed by
subtitle A of the Code. If this payment
causes the entity to have an
‘‘overpayment’’ of tax in a taxable year,
section 6402(a) generally provides that
the entity may receive a refund equal to
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the amount of the overpayment over the
entity’s tax liability. This refund must
be made to the person who made the
overpayment (i.e., the applicable entity).
If that applicable member is a
partnership or S corporation, section
6417(c)(1)(A) specifies that the payment
for such election is made to the
partnership or S corporation that made
the section 6417(a) election.
Accordingly, similar to the general rule
under section 6417(a), refunds or
payments under section 6417(c)
generally cannot be paid to accounts in
the name of someone other than the
entity making the election. A valid
section 761(a) election does not affect
the application of this general rule and,
therefore, these final regulations do not
adopt the commenter’s proposal.
C. Purpose of Organization
Proposed § 1.761–2(a)(4)(ii)(C) would
have provided that an organization is an
applicable unincorporated organization
if it ‘‘is organized exclusively to
produce electricity from its applicable
credit property (as defined in § 1.6417–
1(e)) and with respect to which one or
more applicable credits listed in section
6417(b)(2), (4), (8), (10), and (12) is
determined.’’ The scope of this rule was
intended to remove certain
impediments for these types of
applicable unincorporated organizations
that would otherwise comply with
existing requirements. The Treasury
Department and the IRS sought
comments on the scope and
requirements of the proposed
regulations, including whether
modifications similar to those in
proposed § 1.761–2(a)(4)(iii) are needed
for applicable entities that own
applicable credit properties that do not
produce electricity.
Commenters generally recommended
that the modifications in proposed
§ 1.761–2(a)(4)(iii) are also needed for
organizations organized to own
applicable credit property with respect
to which any other applicable credit
listed in section 6417(b) is determined.
Some commenters requested clarity that
certain facilities, especially battery
storage facilities, ‘‘produce electricity’’
for purposes of the definition of an
applicable unincorporated organization.
One commenter asserted that the ‘‘nongenerative’’ credits from section 6417(b)
that were not included in proposed
§ 1.761–2(a)(4)(ii)(C) could be claimed
by organizations ‘‘availed of . . . for the
joint . . . use of property’’ and that such
organizations should therefore be
permitted to make a section 761(a)
election if other existing requirements
are met. The same commenter requested
clarification that certain activities with
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
respect to applicable credits, including
time-limited delegations of relevant
powers, would not violate the existing
requirements to make a section 761(a)
election. Another commenter asked for
clarification that common, nonelectricity revenue streams related to
jointly owned projects, such as revenues
from the sale of capacity and ancillary
services, do not violate the requirement
that an organization must be organized
exclusively to produce electricity.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
agree that organizations formed to own
applicable credit property with respect
to which any applicable credits
(including non-generative credits) are
determined should be permitted to
apply the modifications to the existing
section 761(a) rules contained in the
proposed regulations. Section 761(a)(2)
refers to organizations availed of ‘‘for
the joint production, extraction, or use
of property,’’ which is not limited to
activities that produce electricity.
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
in sections 761(a) and 6417(h), the final
regulations revise the definition of an
applicable unincorporated organization
to include organizations organized
exclusively to own and operate
applicable credit property (as defined in
§ 1.6417–1(e)). The adoption in the final
regulations of this definition of
applicable unincorporated organization
should not be read to imply that any
particular factual arrangement permits a
valid section 761(a) election. To make a
valid section 761(a) election, an
unincorporated organization, including
an applicable unincorporated
organization, must meet all the
requirements of section 761(a) and the
regulations thereunder.
D. Section 6417 Election
Proposed § 1.761–2(a)(4)(ii)(D) would
have provided that an unincorporated
organization is an applicable
unincorporated organization only if one
or more of its applicable entity members
will make an elective payment election
under section 6417(a) for the applicable
credits determined with respect to its
share of the applicable credit property.
One commenter recommended
extending the modifications in proposed
§ 1.761–2(a)(4)(iii) to organizations for
which no applicable entity member will
make an election under section 6417.
These final regulations are of limited
scope and are promulgated, in part,
pursuant to the authority in section
6417(h) to carry out the purposes of
section 6417 by facilitating jointownership arrangements of applicable
credit property by applicable entities.
These final regulations do not adopt this
commenter’s recommendation because
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
it is not necessary for purposes of these
final regulations.
E. Other Requirements
Proposed § 1.761–2(a)(4)(ii) would
have provided that an applicable
unincorporated organization is an
unincorporated organization described
in prior § 1.761–2(a)(1) that meets the
requirements of proposed § 1.761–
2(a)(4)(ii)(A) through (D). The reference
to prior § 1.761–2(a)(1) was intended to
emphasize the statutory requirements
under section 761(a) and prior § 1.761–
2(a)(1) that: (1) the members of the
unincorporated organization must be
able to compute their income without
the necessity of computing partnership
income, and (2) the unincorporated
organization must not be a syndicate,
group, pool, or joint venture which is
classifiable as an association, or operate
under an agreement which creates an
organization classifiable as an
association. For clarity, the final
regulations remove the reference to
prior § 1.761–2(a)(1) in proposed
§ 1.761–2(a)(4)(ii) and include the
requirements of prior § 1.761–2(a)(1) as
revised § 1.761–2(a)(4)(ii)(E) and (F). In
the final regulations, therefore, an
applicable unincorporated organization
is an unincorporated organization that
meets the requirements of revised
§ 1.761–2(a)(4)(ii)(A) through (F).
One commenter requested that a
Tribal Energy Development
Organization (TEDO) be permitted to
make an elective payment election
regardless of its partnership status and
be permitted to make special
allocations. A TEDO that is formed as a
partnership and meets the requirements
may make a 761(a) election. Section 761
does not apply, however, to entities
formed as corporations. In addition,
special allocations are inconsistent with
a section 761(a) election, which is
available under the statute only to
organizations that satisfy the severance
requirement and the members of which
can compute their income without the
necessity of computing partnership
taxable income. Accordingly, the final
regulations do not adopt these requested
changes.
Another commenter requested clarity
about the eligibility of a ‘‘partnership
flip’’ structure to make a section 761(a)
election. Generally, these structures
involve allocations of income, gains,
losses, deductions, or credits that
change at some point after the
partnership has been formed. In the
commenter’s proposed structure, a
taxable member of an unincorporated
organization does not control the
organization but owns a profits interest
in the organization that allows the
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
91557
member to earn preferred returns over
the course of its investment. The
commenter suggested that this type of
member should be permitted to
individually elect out of partnership tax
treatment under subchapter K, and then
elect back into partnership treatment
under subchapter K after it has
recouped its investment.
Partnership flip structures, such as
the one described by the commenter,
violate the existing statutory
requirements for electing out of
subchapter K, even as modified by
proposed § 1.761–2(a)(4)(iii). This is
because such structures provide
members with disproportionate
amounts of income, gains, losses,
deductions, or credits and thereby
require an unincorporated organization
to compute partnership taxable income
to determine each member’s share of the
organization’s income. These
arrangements are also incompatible with
the severance requirement, under which
members must reserve the right
separately to take in kind or dispose of
their shares of any property produced,
extracted, or used because members do
not have a determinate ‘‘share’’ of the
applicable credit property. For these
reasons, the Treasury Department and
the IRS clarify that partnership flip
structures are not eligible to make a
section 761(a) election.
IV. Specified Modifications for
Applicable Unincorporated
Organizations
A. Modified Co-Ownership Requirement
For applicable unincorporated
organizations, proposed § 1.761–
2(a)(4)(iii)(A) would have modified the
co-ownership requirement such that the
participants in the applicable
unincorporated organization would be
permitted to own applicable credit
property through an unincorporated
organization that is a legal entity, other
than one treated as a corporation under
any provision of the Code (modified coownership requirement).
One commenter requested
confirmation whether the following
situation is compatible with an election
under section 761(a). A tax-exempt
entity forms an LLC to raise money and
serve as a special purpose vehicle to
own and operate a clean energy project.
The tax-exempt entity then sells equity
securities in the LLC to investors. Prior
to submitting the pre-filing registration
with the IRS, the LLC makes an election
under section 761(a). The tax-exempt
entity or operator then decides if, and
when, investors should be paid
dividends based on their fractional
ownership.
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
91558
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
This situation is inconsistent with the
modified co-ownership requirement.
Organizations that have made a section
761(a) election do not pay dividends for
Federal income tax purposes. Because
each member of such organization is
generally treated as directly owning its
proportionate share of the organization’s
assets, each member is entitled to
payments or credits with respect to the
member’s share of property produced,
extracted, or used, regardless of whether
any other member would have approved
the distribution of such amounts.
B. Joint Marketing Modification and
Agent Delegation Rule
For applicable unincorporated
organizations, proposed § 1.761–
2(a)(4)(iii)(B) would have modified the
joint marketing requirement in prior
§ 1.761–2(a)(3)(iii) to provide that a
delegation of authority to sell the
participant’s share of the property
produced may allow the delegee to enter
into contracts the duration of which
exceeds the minimum needs of the
industry and may be for longer than one
year (the joint marketing modification),
provided that the delegation of authority
to act on behalf of the participant may
not be for a period of time that exceeds
the minimum needs of the industry, and
in no event for more than one year (the
agent delegation rule). Proposed
§ 1.761–2(a)(4)(vi) would have provided
an example illustrating this
modification to the existing regulatory
requirements, in which each member of
an unincorporated organization grants
to the same agent a one-year delegation
(not exceeding the minimum needs of
the industry) of the member’s authority
to sell the member’s share of electricity
produced by the organization. The agent
commits each member to a 15-year
power purchase agreement (PPA).
Because the delegation of authority is
for a period no longer than one year, the
requirements of proposed § 1.761–
2(a)(4)(iii)(B) are met.
Commenters requested clarification
on several issues relating to the joint
marketing modification. Some
commenters asked whether two or more
members of an applicable
unincorporated organization that has
made a section 761(a) election may sell
their share of the organization’s output
in the same contract. Some commenters
also asked whether the 15-year period
for the contract in the example is
intended to serve as a safe harbor or
limitation on the duration of such
agreements.
Provided that the agent delegation
rule and all other requirements under
section 761(a) are satisfied, the joint
marketing modification allows members
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
of an applicable unincorporated
organization to enter into contracts of
any duration. Multiple members of the
same applicable unincorporated
organization may be party to the same
contract. Members can also choose to
sell their shares without a multi-year
contract. The example merely illustrates
the joint marketing modification and is
not intended to be a safe harbor. No
clarification is required to the joint
marketing modification in the final
regulations.
Commenters also requested
clarification of the agent delegation rule.
One commenter asked whether an agent
would be subject to the rule if it was an
Indian Tribal government or other
applicable entity. Some commenters
suggested eliminating the one-year
limitation on agent delegations or
allowing agent delegations to
automatically renew after each year.
One commenter suggested that certain
organizations would need to sell their
output into an organized market rather
than pursuant to a fixed PPA. In this
situation, according to the commenter,
authority to sell the output for each
applicable entity may need to be
pursuant to an agreement that
automatically renews annually. Another
commenter suggested that the one-year
limitation on agent delegations will
harm applicable entities without
technical expertise because nonapplicable entities with their own
expertise will not require an agent and
could be able to take advantage of an
applicable entity that is only able to use
an agent for one year. Another
commenter asked for clarification that a
member of an unincorporated
organization may delegate powers to an
agent without limitation as long as no
other member makes such a delegation.
The purpose of the agent delegation
rule is to fulfill the statutory
requirement in section 761(a)(2) that no
organization making a section 761(a)
election is formed ‘‘for the purpose of
selling services or property produced or
extracted.’’ This is a prohibition on joint
marketing; accordingly, any member of
an unincorporated organization may
have an agent for any duration of time,
provided that the agent does not
represent more than one member of the
applicable unincorporated organization.
The agent delegation rule applies to any
person or group of people acting on
behalf of more than one member of an
unincorporated organization, regardless
of their status as an applicable entity.
The longstanding one-year exception
to the joint marketing requirement in
the existing regulations reflects a
balancing of the statutory language with
commercial necessities, and the
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
proposed regulations reflected a similar
balancing. Section 761(a)(2) does not
permit an electing organization to
conduct sales through an agent with
indefinite authority on behalf of
multiple members. Such a structure is
necessarily ‘‘availed of . . . for the
purpose of selling services or property
produced or extracted’’ and is not
eligible to elect out of subchapter K.
These final regulations, therefore, do not
adopt the suggestions to eliminate the
agent delegation rule or allow agent
delegations to automatically renew.
However, in any given year, an agent
may be delegated authority on terms
identical to those in a past year,
provided that the delegation of authority
to act is not for a period of time that
exceeds the minimum needs of the
industry and each member delegating
authority to that agent consents to those
terms in writing at least once per year.
Example 3 has been added in revised
§ 1.761–2(a)(5)(iii) to illustrate this rule.
One commenter requested that the
phrase ‘‘minimum needs of the
industry’’ be either clarified or deleted.
That phrase is intended to be factsensitive; like the rest of the joint
marketing requirement, the phrase is
intended to balance statutory
requirements with commercial
necessities. These final regulations,
therefore, do not adopt the commenter’s
request to clarify or eliminate it.
C. Specific Examples
Several commenters generally asked
for more examples showing applications
of the proposed regulations. In response,
the Treasury Department and the IRS
have added two examples to the final
regulations.
V. Additional Information
A. Applicability Date
Except as provided in § 1.761–2(d),
these final regulations apply to taxable
years ending on or after March 11, 2024,
the date on which the proposed
regulations were published in the
Federal Register. An applicable
unincorporated organization that validly
made a section 761(a) election meeting
the requirements of these final
regulations for a taxable year ending on
or after March 11, 2024, will be treated
as having made a valid section 761(a)
election even if the election was made
prior to the publication of these final
regulations in the Federal Register.
B. Administrative Requirements
The preamble to the proposed
regulations noted that the Treasury
Department and the IRS were
considering certain rules to prevent
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
abuse of the modifications in proposed
§ 1.761–2(a)(4)(iii). One rule described
in the preamble to the proposed
regulations would have prevented the
deemed election rules in prior § 1.761–
2(b)(2)(ii) from applying to any
unincorporated organization relying on
a modification in proposed § 1.761–
2(a)(4)(iii). One commenter
recommended against adopting such a
rule, which the commenter believed
would be inconsistent with the goals of
the proposed regulations and increase
the likelihood of inadvertent
disallowances of section 761(a)
elections in non-abusive situations.
Although these final regulations do
not adopt any rules regarding deemed
elections, more administrative guidance
is needed under section 761(a) to fulfill
the purposes of section 6417. As a
result, concurrently with the
publication of these final regulations,
the Treasury Department and the IRS
are publishing in the Proposed Rules
section of this edition of the Federal
Register the November 2024 proposed
regulations under section 761(a) (REG–
116017–24), which would provide rules
affecting the validity of elections under
section 761(a) by applicable
unincorporated organizations whose
elections would not have been valid
without the application of revised
§ 1.761–2(a)(4)(iii).
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
C. Obsolete Language
Section 1.761–2(b)(3)(i) provides, in
part, that an application for permission
to revoke a section 761(a) election must
be submitted to the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue, Attention: T:I,
Washington, DC 20224, no later than 30
days after the beginning of the first
taxable year to which the revocation is
to apply. This language no longer
reflects the correct procedure for
obtaining permission to revoke a section
761(a) election and is therefore
eliminated by these final regulations.
The November 2024 proposed
regulations would instead provide that
such an application must be made by
submitting a letter ruling request that
complies with the requirements of Rev.
Proc. 2024–1 or successor guidance.
Section 1.761–2(b)(3)(i) also provides, in
part, that a section 761(a) will be
effective unless a member of the
organization sends proper notice to the
Commissioner ‘‘within 90 days after the
formation of the organization (or by
October 15, 1956, whichever is later)
. . .’’. The final regulations would strike
the parenthetical language to update
and streamline the paragraph.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
VI. Comments That Are Not Addressed
in These Final Regulations
Two comments received were related
to section 761 but outside the scope of
these final regulations. These comments
are summarized in this Part VI.
A. Implementation
One commenter asked for clarification
of how audits of joint structures would
take place, including by identifying the
specific parts of Treasury and the IRS
involved in such audits and the
standard of review for such audits.
Another commenter requested the
development of educational materials,
‘‘office hours,’’ and other guidance to
improve understanding of the
regulations and uptake of applicable
credits. Another commenter requested
that the Treasury Department and the
IRS provide clear rules for the preregistration filing process for applicable
credit property co-owned by taxpayers
making transferability elections. These
final regulations do not provide
information about audit procedures or
the development of further guidance,
but the Treasury Department and the
IRS will continue to monitor the
elective payment process to determine
whether there are areas in which more
efficiencies can be created.
B. Tribal Organizations
One commenter noted that wholly
owned Tribal corporations appear to be
incapable of making an election under
section 761(a) because such entities are
corporations for Federal tax purposes.
The treatment of entities wholly owned
by Tribal governments is addressed by
a separate rulemaking and is therefore
outside the scope of these final
regulations. For information on how to
provide comments in response to that
separate rulemaking, see the notice of
proposed rulemaking (REG–113628–21),
Entities Wholly Owned by Indian Tribal
Governments, published in the Federal
Register (89 FR 81871) on October 9,
2024.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review
Pursuant to the Memorandum of
Agreement, Review of Treasury
Regulations under Executive Order
12866 (June 9, 2023), tax regulatory
actions issued by the IRS are not subject
to the requirements of section 6 of
Executive Order 12866, as amended.
Therefore, a regulatory impact
assessment is not required.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) (PRA) generally
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
91559
requires that a federal agency obtain the
approval of the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) before collecting
information from the public, whether
such collection of information is
mandatory, voluntary, or required to
obtain or retain a benefit. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless the
collection of information displays a
valid control number.
These final regulations mention
reporting and recordkeeping
requirements that must be satisfied for
unincorporated organizations to elect
out of subchapter K. These collections
of information are generally used by the
IRS for tax compliance purposes and by
taxpayers to facilitate proper reporting
and recordkeeping. The likely
respondents to these collections are
businesses and tax-exempt
organizations.
Unincorporated entities meeting the
requirements outlined in § 1.761–2(a)(4)
of these final regulations satisfy relevant
reporting requirements by submitting a
statement attached to, or incorporated
in, a properly executed partnership
return, Form 1065, U.S. Return of
Partnership Income, containing, in lieu
of the information required by Form
1065 and by the instructions relating
thereto, only the name or other
identification and the address of the
organization together with information
on the return, or in the statement
attached to the return, showing the
names, addresses, and identification
numbers of all the members of the
organization; a statement that the
organization qualifies under § 1.761–
2(a)(1) and either § 1.761–2(a)(2) or (3);
a statement that all of the members of
the organization elect that it be
excluded from all of subchapter K; and
a statement indicating where a copy of
the agreement under which the
organization operates is available (or if
the agreement is oral, from whom the
provisions of the agreement may be
obtained). These requirements and
associated forms are already approved
by OMB under 1545–0123 for business
filers. These final regulations are not
changing or creating new collection
requirements not already approved by
OMB.
The recordkeeping requirements
mentioned in these final regulations are
considered general tax records under
§ 1.6001–1(e). These records are
required for the IRS to validate that
electing taxpayers have consistently met
the regulatory requirements outlined in
§ 1.761–2. For PRA purposes, general
tax records are already approved by
OMB under 1545–0123 for business
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
91560
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
filers and 1545–0047 for tax-exempt
organizations.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary of the Treasury hereby
certifies that the final regulations will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities
pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6).
These final regulations would affect
unincorporated organizations that elect
out of subchapter K in connection with
an election under section 6417, as well
as the members of such organizations.
Data is not readily available about
these organizations. Such organizations
could not have made an election out of
subchapter K under the preexisting
regulations, so information about
existing organizations that have made
section 761(a) elections is not
instructive.
Even if these final regulations affect a
substantial number of small entities,
such impact will not be significant. The
final regulations do not make it more
costly to make or maintain an election
under section 761(a).
These final regulations do not change
the procedural requirements under
§ 1.761–2(b) for making an election
under section 761(a). Other than to
conform to modern formatting
conventions, the final regulations would
amend § 1.761–2(b) only by adding a
parenthetical to clarify that in making a
valid section 761 election, which
requires attaching certain statements to
a Form 1065 as required in accordance
with the preexisting regulations,
§ 1.761–2(a)(4) should be taken into
account, as applicable, with regard to
the required statement that the
organization qualifies under § 1.761–
2(a)(1) and either § 1.761–2(a)(2) or (3)
‘‘(taking into account § 1.761–2(a)(4), as
applicable)’’. Otherwise, an
unincorporated organization making an
election under these final regulations
would not be required to submit
anything additional or different than
required under the preexisting version
of § 1.761–2(b).
These final regulations impose no
new ongoing compliance costs. Though
any unincorporated organization that
has made an election under section
761(a) should ensure that it remains
qualified under § 1.761–2(a)(1) and
either § 1.761–2(a)(2) or (3) (taking into
account § 1.761–2(a)(4), as applicable),
the final regulations do not add to this
obligation. In fact, these final
regulations could make it simpler for
certain unincorporated organizations to
stay qualified, given their joint
operating agreements that satisfy the
modified co-ownership and severance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
requirements and multi-year contracts
that satisfy the modified joint marketing
requirement.
For the reasons stated, a regulatory
flexibility analysis under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act is not required.
Pursuant to section 7805(f), the notice
of proposed rulemaking preceding these
regulations was submitted to the Chief
Counsel for the Office of Advocacy of
the Small Business Administration for
comment on its impact on small
business, and no comments were
received.
IV. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandate
Reform Act of 1995 requires that
agencies assess anticipated costs and
benefits and take certain other actions
before issuing a final rule that includes
any Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures in any one year by a State,
local, or Tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million (updated annually for
inflation). These final regulations do not
include any Federal mandate that may
result in expenditures by State, local, or
Tribal governments or by the private
sector in excess of that threshold.
V. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
prohibits an agency from publishing any
rule that has federalism implications if
the rule either imposes substantial,
direct compliance costs on State and
local governments, and is not required
by statute, or preempts State law, unless
the agency meets the consultation and
funding requirements of section 6 of the
Executive order. These final regulations
do not have federalism implications and
do not impose substantial, direct
compliance costs on State and local
governments or preempt State law
within the meaning of the Executive
order.
VI. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has Tribal
implications if the rule either imposes
substantial direct compliance costs on
Indian Tribal governments, and is not
required by statute, or preempts Tribal
law, unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 5 of the Executive order.
These final rules do not have substantial
direct effects on one or more federally
recognized Indian tribes and do not
impose substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian Tribal governments
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
within the meaning of the Executive
order.
Nevertheless, on April 5, 2024, the
Treasury Department and the IRS held
a consultation with Tribal leaders
requesting assistance in addressing
questions related to the section 761(a)
proposed rules published on March 11,
2024, which informed the development
of these final regulations.
VII. Executive Order 14112: Reforming
Federal Funding and Support for Tribal
Nations To Better Embrace Our Trust
Responsibilities and Promote the Next
Era of Tribal Self-Determination
Executive Order 14112 (Reforming
Federal Funding and Support for Tribal
Nations to Better Embrace Our Trust
Responsibilities and Promote the Next
Era of Tribal Self-Determination)
reaffirms the executive branch’s support
for Tribal self-determination as the most
effective policy for the economic growth
of Tribal Nations and the economic
well-being of Tribal citizens. Executive
Order 14112 requires agency heads to
take certain actions, consistent with
applicable law and to the extent
practicable, to increase access to
‘‘Federal funding and support programs
for Tribal Nations’’; provide Tribal
Nations with the flexibility to improve
economic growth and address the
specific needs of their communities; and
reduce administrative burdens. Section
2(b) of the Executive order defines
‘‘Federal funding and support programs
for Tribal Nations’’ as including
‘‘funding, programs, technical
assistance, loans, grants, or other
financial support or direct services that
the Federal Government provides to
Tribal Nations or Indians because of
their status as Indians.’’ As section 1 of
the Executive order explains, ‘‘As we
continue to support Tribal Nations, we
must respect their sovereignty by better
ensuring that they are able to make their
own decisions about where and how to
meet the needs of their communities. No
less than for any other sovereign, Tribal
self-governance is about the
fundamental right of a people to
determine their own destiny and to
prosper and flourish on their own
terms.’’ These commitments build on a
recognition of principles of sovereignty,
sovereign immunity, and selfgovernance that have been repeatedly
reaffirmed by the Supreme Court. See,
e.g., Three Affiliated Tribes of the Fort
Berthold Reservation v. Wold
Engineering, P.C., et al., 476 U.S. 877,
890–91 (1986); Oklahoma Tax Comm’n
v. Citizen Band Potawatomi Indian
Tribe of Oklahoma, 498 U.S. 505, 510
(1991). The Treasury Tribal Advisory
Committee has advised that Tribes
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
consider ‘‘financial support’’ in
Executive Order 14112 to include tax
matters that range from tax credits to
Federal tax rules that regulate Tribal
revenue.
Consistent with Executive Order
14112, the Treasury Department and the
IRS recognize the importance of
protecting and supporting Tribal
sovereignty and self-determination.
These final regulations would further
Tribal self-determination and selfgovernance and reduce administrative
burdens by providing Tribes the ability
to directly make section 6417 elections
for applicable credit property held
through applicable unincorporated
organizations provided all applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements
are satisfied.
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
designated this rule as a ‘‘major rule,’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Statement of Availability of IRS
Documents
IRS notices and other guidance cited
in this preamble are published in the
Internal Revenue Bulletin (or
Cumulative Bulletin) and are available
from the Superintendent of Documents,
U.S. Government Publishing Office,
Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting
the IRS website at https://www.irs.gov.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these final
regulations is Cameron Williamson.
However, other personnel from the
Treasury Department and the IRS
participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, the Treasury Department
and the IRS amend 26 CFR part 1 as
follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAXES
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 is amended by revising the
entry for § 1.761–2 to read in part as
follows:
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
*
*
*
*
*
Section 1.761–2 also issued under 26
U.S.C. 446(b), 761(a), 6031(a), 6417(d), and
6417(h).
*
*
*
*
*
Par. 2. Section 1.761–2 is amended
by:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
a. Revising and republishing
paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2)(i), and (a)(3)(i);
■ b. Adding paragraphs (a)(4) and (5);
■ c. Revising and republishing
paragraphs (b)(1) and (2), (b)(3)(i), (c),
and (e); and
■ d. Adding paragraph (f).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
§ 1.761–2 Exclusion of certain
unincorporated organizations from the
application of all or part of subchapter K of
chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue Code.
(a) * * *
(1) In general. Under the conditions
set forth in this section, an
unincorporated organization described
in paragraph (a)(2) or (3) of this section
(taking into account paragraph (a)(4) of
this section, as applicable) may be
excluded from the application of all or
a part of the provisions of subchapter K
of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue
Code (subchapter K). Such organization
must be availed of for investment
purposes only and not for the active
conduct of a business, or for the joint
production, extraction, or use of
property, but not for the purpose of
selling services or property produced or
extracted. The members of such
organization must be able to compute
their income without the necessity of
computing partnership taxable income.
Any syndicate, group, pool, or joint
venture which is treated as a
corporation for Federal tax purposes
does not fall within the provisions in
this paragraph (a)(1).
(2) * * *
(i) Own the property as co-owners;
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(i) Own the property as co-owners,
either in fee or under lease or other form
of contract granting exclusive operating
rights; and
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Modifications for certain joint
ownership arrangements of applicable
credit property—(i) Scope. Paragraph
(a)(4)(iii) of this section provides certain
modifications to specified rules in
paragraph (a)(3) of this section in the
case of an applicable unincorporated
organization meeting the requirements
of paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of this section.
(ii) Applicable unincorporated
organization. For purposes of this
section, an applicable unincorporated
organization is an unincorporated
organization:
(A) That is owned, in whole or in
part, by one or more applicable entities,
as defined in section 6417(d)(1)(A) and
§ 1.6417–1(c);
(B) The members of which enter into
a joint operating agreement in which the
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
91561
members reserve the right separately to
take in kind or dispose of their pro rata
shares of any property produced,
extracted, or used, and any associated
renewable energy credits or similar
credits;
(C) That, pursuant to the joint
operating agreement, is organized
exclusively to own and operate
applicable credit property (as defined in
§ 1.6417–1(e));
(D) For which one or more of the
applicable entities will make an elective
payment election under section 6417(a)
for the applicable credits determined
with respect to its share of the
applicable credit property;
(E) The members of which are able to
compute their income without the
necessity of computing partnership
taxable income; and
(F) Which is not a syndicate, group,
pool, or joint venture which is
classifiable as an association, or any
group operating under an agreement
which creates an organization
classifiable as an association.
(iii) Specified modifications for
applicable unincorporated
organizations. Solely for purposes of an
election under section 761(a) by an
applicable unincorporated organization
that meets the requirements of
paragraphs (b) and (e) of this section:
(A) The requirement in paragraph
(a)(3)(i) of this section is modified such
that the participants are permitted to
own the applicable credit property
through an unincorporated organization
that is an entity, other than one that is
treated as a corporation for Federal tax
purposes; and
(B) The requirement in paragraph
(a)(3)(iii) of this section is modified
such that the delegation of authority to
sell the participant’s share of the
property produced or used may allow
the delegee to enter into contracts the
duration of which exceeds the
minimum needs of the industry and
may be for more than one year, provided
that the delegation of authority to act on
behalf of the participant may not be for
a period of time that exceeds the
minimum needs of the industry, and in
no event for more than one year.
(5) Examples. The following examples
are intended to illustrate the principles
of this section.
(i) Example 1—(A) Facts. G and H
enter into a joint operating agreement to
own and operate a facility that will
produce solar energy. G, an applicable
entity, is entitled under the joint
operating agreement to take in kind or
dispose of 40% of the energy produced
by the unincorporated organization and
H, which is not an applicable entity, is
entitled to the remaining 60%. G and H
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
91562
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
form LLC, a limited liability company,
to hold the solar energy property that G
and H intend to operate pursuant to the
joint operating agreement. In accordance
with the joint operating agreement, G
owns a 40% ownership interest in LLC
and H owns the remaining 60%
ownership interest. G will sell its share
of energy produced by the facility in a
manner designed to generate applicable
credits under section 45(a) and will
make an election under section 6417(a)
with respect thereto. LLC makes a valid
election under section 761(a) to be
excluded from subchapter K.
(B) Analysis. G will be entitled to any
credits under section 45(a) generated by
its sale of energy produced by LLC that
G has the right to take in kind or dispose
of (which, under the joint operating
agreement, is 40% of the energy
produced by LLC). Assuming all other
requirements are met, G will be able to
make an elective payment election
under section 6417 for the applicable
credits determined with respect to its
ownership share of the solar energy
property.
(ii) Example 2—(A) Facts. T is an
Indian Tribal government as defined in
§ 1.6417–1(c) and an applicable entity.
Through a limited liability company
organized under T’s Tribal law (TLLC),
T and Y own and operate applicable
credit property that will generate
electricity the sale of which will
generate applicable credits under
section 45(a). TLLC is not treated as an
association taxable as a corporation for
Federal tax purposes and no election
under § 301.7701–3 of this chapter has
been made to treat TLLC as such. T and
Y enter into a joint operating agreement
with respect to the ownership and
operation of the applicable credit
property in which each of T and Y
reserve the right separately to take in
kind or dispose of their pro rata shares
of property produced, extracted, or used
and any associated renewable energy
credits or similar credits. TLLC is
formed exclusively to own and operate
an applicable credit property with
respect to which section 45(a) credits
will be determined. On January 1st of
year 1, T and Y enter into delegation
agreements with Q that delegate T’s and
Y’s authority to Q to sell the electricity
generated by T’s and Y’s shares of the
applicable credit property. The term of
the delegation agreements is one year,
which does not exceed the minimum
needs of the industry. On June 1st of
year 1, Q enters into a power purchase
agreement with Utility on T’s and Y’s
behalf that commits T and Y to sell the
electricity produced from their shares of
the applicable credit property to Utility
for a term of 15 years. At the end of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
day on December 31st of year 1, the
delegation agreements terminate.
(B) Analysis. Because T and Y did not
delegate authority for a period of more
than one year to sell the output from
their shares of the applicable credit
property, the requirements of paragraph
(a)(3)(iii) of this section (as modified by
paragraph (a)(4)(iii)(B) of this section)
are met. Assuming that TLLC otherwise
qualifies as an applicable
unincorporated organization, TLLC is an
organization described in paragraph
(a)(4)(iii)(A) of this section and can
make an election under paragraphs (b)
and (e) of this section to be excluded
from the application of all of subchapter
K under section 761(a). As such, T can
make an elective payment election for
the applicable credits determined with
respect to its share of the applicable
credit property held by TLLC, assuming
the requirements of section 6417 are
otherwise met. The analysis in this
example would be the same whether Y
is also an Indian Tribal government,
another applicable entity, or some other
person.
(iii) Example 3—(A) Facts. The facts
are the same as in paragraph (a)(5)(ii)(A)
of this section (Example 2), except that
at the end of the day on December 31,
T and Y each agree, in writing, to a new
agent delegation agreement with Q with
substantively identical terms as the
agent delegation agreement in effect
during year 1.
(B) Analysis. Because each of T and Y
have agreed, in writing, to engage Q in
an agency relationship lasting no longer
than one year, the results are the same
as in paragraph (a)(5)(ii)(B) of this
section (Example 2). In contrast, if the
agent delegation agreement renewed
automatically, T and Y have effectively
entered into an agent delegation
agreement lasting longer than one year
and have violated the requirements of
paragraph (a)(4)(iii)(B) of this section. In
that case, TLLC would not be eligible to
make or maintain an election under
section 761(a). As such, T could not
make an elective payment election for
the applicable credits determined with
respect to its share of the applicable
credit property held through TLLC.
(b) * * *
(1) Time for making election for
exclusion. Any unincorporated
organization described in paragraph
(a)(1) of this section and either
paragraph (a)(2) or (3) of this section
(taking into account paragraph (a)(4) of
this section, as applicable) that wishes
to be excluded from all of subchapter K
must make the election provided in
section 761(a) not later than the time
prescribed by § 1.6031(a)–1(e)
(including extensions thereof) for filing
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the partnership return for the first
taxable year for which exclusion from
subchapter K is desired.
Notwithstanding the prior sentence,
such organization may be deemed to
have made the election in the manner
prescribed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this
section.
(2) Method of making election—(i) In
general. Except as provided in
paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section, any
unincorporated organization described
in paragraph (a)(1) of this section and
either paragraph (a)(2) or (3) of this
section (taking into account paragraph
(a)(4) of this section, as applicable)
which wishes to be excluded from all of
subchapter K must make the election
provided in section 761(a) in a
statement attached to, or incorporated
in, a properly executed partnership
return, Form 1065, U.S. Return of
Partnership Income, which must
contain the information required in this
paragraph (b)(2)(i). Such return must be
filed with the Internal Revenue Service
Center where the partnership return,
Form 1065, would be required to be
filed if no election were made. To
determine the appropriate Internal
Revenue Service Center, the principal
office or place of business of the person
filing the return will be considered the
principal office or place of business of
the organization. The partnership return
must be filed not later than the time
prescribed § 1.6031(a)–1(e) (including
extensions thereof) for filing the
partnership return with respect to the
first taxable year for which exclusion
from subchapter K is desired. Such
partnership return must contain, in lieu
of the information required by Form
1065 and by the instructions relating
thereto, only the name or other
identification and the address of the
organization together with information
on the return, or in the statement
attached to the return, showing the
names, addresses, and taxpayer
identification numbers of all the
members of the organization; a
statement that the organization qualifies
under paragraph (a)(1) of this section
and either paragraph (a)(2) or (3) of this
section (taking into account paragraph
(a)(4) of this section, as applicable); a
statement that all of the members of the
organization elect that it be excluded
from all of subchapter K; and a
statement indicating where a copy of the
agreement under which the organization
operates is available (or if the agreement
is oral, from whom the provisions of the
agreement may be obtained).
(ii) Deemed election rule. If an
unincorporated organization described
in paragraph (a)(1) of this section and
either paragraph (a)(2) or (3) of this
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
section (taking into account paragraph
(a)(4) of this section, as applicable) does
not make the election provided in
section 761(a) in the manner prescribed
by paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section, it
will nevertheless be deemed to have
made the election if it can be shown
from all the surrounding facts and
circumstances that it was the intention
of the members of such organization at
the time of its formation to secure
exclusion from all of subchapter K
beginning with the first taxable year of
the organization. Although the
following facts are not exclusive, either
one of such facts may indicate the
requisite intent:
(A) At the time of the formation of the
organization there is an agreement
among the members that the
organization be excluded from
subchapter K beginning with the first
taxable year of the organization; or
(B) The members of the organization
owning substantially all of the capital
interests report their respective shares of
the items of income, deductions, and
credits of the organization on their
respective returns (making such
elections as to individual items as may
be appropriate) in a manner consistent
with the exclusion of the organization
from subchapter K beginning with the
first taxable year of the organization.
(3) * * *
(i) In general. An election under this
section to be excluded will be effective
unless within 90 days after the
formation of the organization any
member of the organization notifies the
Commissioner that the member desires
subchapter K to apply to such
organization, and also advises the
Commissioner that the member has so
notified all other members of the
organization by registered or certified
mail. Such election is irrevocable as
long as the organization remains
qualified under paragraph (a)(1) of this
section and either paragraph (a)(2) or (3)
of this section (taking into account
paragraph (a)(4) of this section, as
applicable), or unless approval of
revocation of the election is secured
from the Commissioner.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Partial exclusion from subchapter
K. An unincorporated organization
which wishes to be excluded from only
certain sections of subchapter K must
submit to the Commissioner, no later
than 90 days after the beginning of the
first taxable year for which partial
exclusion is desired, a request for
permission to be excluded from certain
provisions of subchapter K. The request
must set forth the sections of subchapter
K from which exclusion is sought and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
must state that such organization
qualifies under paragraph (a)(1) of this
section and either paragraph (a)(2) or (3)
of this section (taking into account
paragraph (a)(4) of this section, as
applicable), and that the members of the
organization elect to be excluded to the
extent indicated. Such exclusion will be
effective only upon approval of the
election by the Commissioner and
subject to the conditions the
Commissioner may impose.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Cross reference. For requirements
with respect to the filing of a return on
Form 1065 by a partnership, see
§ 1.6031(a)–1.
(f) Applicability date. Except as
provided in paragraph (d) of this
section, this section applies to taxable
years ending on or after March 11, 2024.
Heather C. Maloy,
Acting Deputy Commissioner.
Approved: November 6, 2024.
Aviva R. Aron-Dine,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury
(Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2024–26944 Filed 11–19–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket Number USCG–2024–0869]
RIN 1625–AA08
Special Local Regulation; Lake
Havasu, Lake Havasu City, AZ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a special local regulation
for the 2024 Lake Havasu City Christmas
Parade of Lights that will be held on the
navigable waters of Lake Havasu, AZ.
This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on these navigable
waters of Lake Havasu during a vessel
parade. This rule would prohibit
spectators from anchoring, blocking,
loitering, or transiting through the area
of a predetermined parade route unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
San Diego or a designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 4 p.m.
through 9 p.m. on December 14, 2024.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
91563
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2024–
0869 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant Shelley Turner,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Diego, CA; telephone
(619) 278–7656, email
MarineEventsSD@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule under the authority in 5
U.S.C. 553(b)(B). This statutory
provision authorizes an agency to issue
a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the
agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ The Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because we
must establish this special local
regulation by December 14, 2024. The
Coast Guard did not receive sufficient
notice of the parade in time to publish
an NPRM. As such, it is impracticable
to publish an NPRM because we lack
sufficient time to provide a reasonable
comment period and then consider
those comments before issuing the rule.
This regulation is necessary to ensure
the safety of life on the navigable waters
of Lake Havasu during the marine event.
Also, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists
for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be contrary to public
interest because immediate action is
needed to ensure the safety of life on the
navigable waters of Lake Havasu during
the marine event on December 14, 2024.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70041. The
Captain of the Port Sector San Diego
(COTP) has determined that the large
presence of vessels in Lake Havasu
associated with the 2024 Lake Havasu
City Christmas Parade of Lights on
December 14, 2024, poses a potential
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 91552-91563]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26944]
[[Page 91552]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 10012]
RIN 1545-BR09
Election To Exclude Certain Unincorporated Organizations Owned by
Applicable Entities From Application of the Rules on Partners and
Partnerships
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document sets forth final regulations that modify
existing regulations to allow certain unincorporated organizations that
are owned in whole or in part by applicable entities to be excluded
from the application of partnership tax rules. These regulations affect
unincorporated organizations and their members, including tax-exempt
organizations, the District of Columbia, State and local governments,
Indian Tribal governments, Alaska Native Corporations, the Tennessee
Valley Authority, rural electric cooperatives, and certain agencies and
instrumentalities. The final regulations also update certain outdated
language in the existing regulations.
DATES:
Effective date: These regulations are effective on January 19,
2025.
Applicability date: For the date of applicability, see Sec. 1.761-
2(f).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Concerning these final regulations,
contact Cameron Williamson at (202) 317-6684 (not a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority
This document contains amendments to the Income Tax Regulations (26
CFR part 1) under section 761(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (Code)
issued by the Secretary of the Treasury (Secretary) pursuant to the
authority granted under sections 761(a), 6031(a), 6417(d) and (h), and
7805(a) of the Code (final regulations).
Section 761(a) provides, in part, an express grant of regulatory
authority for section 761(a) stating, ``[u]nder regulations the
Secretary may, at the election of all the members of an unincorporated
organization, exclude such organization from the application of all or
a part of this subchapter.''
Section 6031(a) provides an express grant of regulatory authority
for the Secretary to prescribe in forms or regulations partnership
reporting information required ``for the purpose of carrying out the
provisions of subtitle A.''
Section 6417(d) provides several express delegations of authority
to the Secretary to enforce requirements for elective payments of
applicable credits under section 6417 and recapture excessive payments.
Section 6417(h) provides an express delegation of authority with
respect to elective payments under section 6417, stating, in part, that
``[t]he Secretary shall issue such regulations or other guidance as may
be necessary to carry out the purposes of this section.''
Finally, section 7805(a) authorizes the Secretary to ``prescribe
all needful rules and regulations for the enforcement of [the Code],
including all rules and regulations as may be necessary by reason of
any alteration of law in relation to internal revenue.''
Background
I. Elective Payment of Applicable Credits
Section 6417 was added to the Code by section 13801(a) of Public
Law 117-169, 136 Stat. 1818, 2003 (August 16, 2022), commonly referred
to as the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (IRA). Section 6417 allows an
``applicable entity'' (including tax-exempt organizations, the District
of Columbia, State and local governments, Indian Tribal governments,
Alaska Native Corporations, the Tennessee Valley Authority, rural
electric cooperatives, and certain agencies and instrumentalities) to
make an election to treat an ``applicable credit'' (as defined in
section 6417(b)) determined with respect to such entity as making a
payment by such entity against the tax imposed by subtitle A of the
Code, for the taxable year with respect to which such credit is
determined, equal to the amount of such credit. Section 6417 also
provides special rules relating to partnerships and directs the
Secretary to provide rules for making elections under section 6417.
Section 13801(g) of the IRA provides that section 6417 applies to
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2022.
On March 11, 2024, the Department of the Treasury (Treasury
Department) and the IRS published in the Federal Register (88 FR 40528)
final regulations (TD 9988) providing guidance on the section 6417
elective payment election (section 6417 regulations). Section 1.6417-
2(a)(1)(iv) provides that partnerships are not applicable entities
described in section 6417(d)(1)(A) or Sec. 1.6417-1(c), regardless of
how many of their partners are themselves applicable entities.
Accordingly, any partnership making an elective payment election must
be an electing taxpayer (as defined in Sec. 1.6417-1(g)), and, as
such, the only applicable credits with respect to which the partnership
could make an elective payment election would be credits determined
under sections 45Q, 45V, and 45X for the time periods allowed in
section 6417(d). However, Sec. 1.6417-2(a)(1)(iii) provides that if an
applicable entity is a co-owner in an applicable credit property (as
defined in Sec. 1.6417-1(e)), through an organization that has made a
valid election under section 761(a) (section 761(a) election) to be
excluded from the application of the partnership tax rules of
subchapter K of chapter 1 of the Code (subchapter K), then the
applicable entity's undivided ownership share of the applicable credit
property is treated as a separate applicable credit property owned by
such applicable entity. As a result, the applicable entity may make an
elective payment election for the applicable credit(s) determined with
respect to such applicable credit property.
Also on March 11, 2024, the Treasury Department and the IRS
published in the Federal Register (89 FR 17613) proposed amendments
(REG-101552-24) to the regulations under section 761(a) to carry out
the purposes of section 6417 (proposed regulations). Generally, the
proposed regulations would have amended certain provisions of Sec.
1.761-2 as in effect and contained in 26 CFR part 1 to provide that
unincorporated organizations meeting certain requirements (applicable
unincorporated organizations) are eligible for certain modifications
(referred to in the proposed regulations as ``exceptions'') to the
existing requirements for making a section 761(a) election. The
provisions of the proposed regulations are explained in greater detail
in the preamble to the proposed regulations.
Concurrently with the publication of these final regulations, the
Treasury Department and the IRS are publishing in the Proposed Rules
section of this edition of the Federal Register a notice of proposed
rulemaking (REG-116017-24) proposing to further add to and revise the
provisions of Sec. 1.761-2 (November 2024 proposed regulations). The
proposed revisions to the provisions of Sec. 1.761-2 by the November
2024 proposed regulations are explained in greater detail in the
preamble to the November 2024 proposed regulations.
[[Page 91553]]
II. Overview of Section 761(a) and Prior Sec. 1.761-2(a)(3)
Section 761(a) provides, in part, that under regulations the
Secretary may, at the election of all of the members of an
unincorporated organization, exclude such organization from the
application of all or part of subchapter K if the organization is
availed of: (1) for investment purposes only and not for the active
conduct of a business, (2) for the joint production, extraction, or use
of property, but not for the purpose of selling services or property
produced or extracted, or (3) by dealers in securities for a short
period for the purpose of underwriting, selling, or distributing a
particular issue of securities, provided that the income of the members
of the organization may be adequately determined without the
computation of partnership taxable income.
As discussed in the preamble to the proposed regulations,
unincorporated organizations seeking to be excluded from the
application of subchapter K so that one or more of their members can
make an election under section 6417 are likely to be availed of for the
purposes listed in section 761(a)(2), that is, for the joint
production, extraction, or use of property, but not for the purpose of
selling services or property produced or extracted. Pursuant to the
authority in section 761(a), prior Sec. 1.761-2(a)(3) provides
additional requirements for an unincorporated organization to elect to
be excluded from the application of subchapter K under section
761(a)(2). Specifically, prior Sec. 1.761-2(a)(3) requires that the
participants in the joint production, extraction, or use of property:
(i) own the property as co-owners, either in fee or under lease or
other form of contract granting exclusive operating rights (co-
ownership requirement), (ii) reserve the right separately to take in
kind or dispose of their shares of any property produced, extracted, or
used (severance requirement), and (iii) do not jointly sell services or
the property produced or extracted (joint marketing requirement),
although each separate participant may delegate authority to sell the
participant's share of the property produced or extracted for the time
being for the participant's account, but not for a period of time in
excess of the minimum needs of the industry, and in no event for more
than one year (one-year exception). These additional regulatory
requirements are hereinafter referred to as the ``existing regulatory
requirements'' and, along with the previously discussed statutory
requirements, are referred to herein as the ``existing requirements''
to be eligible to elect out of the application of subchapter K.
As discussed in the Summary of Comments and Explanation of
Revisions, the proposed regulations would have modified some of the
existing regulatory requirements for unincorporated organizations that
meet certain requirements.
Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions
The Treasury Department and the IRS received 11 written comments in
response to the proposed regulations. The comments are available for
public inspection at www.regulations.gov or upon request. A public
hearing on the proposed regulations was scheduled for May 20, 2024.
There were no requests to speak at the scheduled public hearing.
Consequently, the public hearing was cancelled. See Election To Exclude
Certain Unincorporated Organizations Owned by Applicable Entities From
Application of the Rules on Partners and Partnerships; Hearing
Cancellation, 89 FR 43349 (May 17, 2024). After full consideration of
the comments received, these final regulations adopt the proposed
regulations with modifications in response to the comments described in
this Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions. The provisions
of Sec. 1.761-2 as amended by the final regulations are referred to as
``revised Sec. 1.761-2'' in this Summary of Comments and Explanation
of Revisions.
Comments merely summarizing the statute or proposed regulations,
recommending statutory revisions to section 761 or other statutes,
addressing unrelated issues, or recommending changes to IRS forms or
procedures are generally not addressed in this Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Revisions or adopted in these final regulations. These
comments included recommendations and questions regarding fact patterns
specific to section 6417, the domestic content rules of section
45(b)(10), the credit for qualified commercial clean vehicles of
section 45W, and the credit for alternative fuel vehicle refueling
property of section 30C. While the Treasury Department and the IRS are
studying some of those issues and intend to issue future guidance on
those provisions, those recommendations and questions are unrelated to
the purpose of these final regulations. Unless otherwise indicated in
this Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions, provisions of
the proposed regulations with respect to which no comments were
received are adopted without substantive change.
I. Overview
Proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(ii) would have defined ``applicable
unincorporated organizations'' as unincorporated organizations that
meet several requirements. Proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(iii) would have
modified the regulatory requirements in prior Sec. 1.761-2(a)(3)(i)
and (iii) for an applicable unincorporated organization that also met
the regulatory requirements of prior Sec. 1.761-2(b) and (e).
Part II of this Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions
discusses comments received concerning the general effects of a section
761(a) election. Part III of this Summary of Comments and Explanation
of Revisions discusses the comments received on the definition of an
applicable unincorporated organization. Part IV of this Summary of
Comments and Explanation of Revisions discusses the comments received
on the modifications to the existing regulatory requirements. Part V of
this Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions discusses the
applicability date of these final regulations, the elimination of
certain obsolete language, and certain administrative requirements that
are under consideration for organizations taking advantage of the
modifications to the existing regulatory requirements. Part VI of this
Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions summarizes two
comments not addressed in these final regulations.
II. Effects of an Election Under Section 761(a)
A. General
Subchapter K provides rules governing the taxation of partners and
partnerships. When an unincorporated organization makes a valid section
761(a) election out of subchapter K, the rules of subchapter K no
longer apply to that organization. As a result, for purposes of
subchapter K, the unincorporated organization ceases to be a
partnership and each member of the unincorporated organization is
generally treated as a co-owner, that is, as directly owning its
proportionate share of the organization's assets.
For example, an unincorporated organization that has made a valid
section 761(a) election is not subject to section 704, which provides
the rules for determining a partner's distributive share of a
partnership's tax items. Instead, each member of an unincorporated
organization that has
[[Page 91554]]
made a valid section 761(a) election takes into account directly its
ownership share of the organization's tax items. Accordingly, if an
unincorporated organization with a valid section 761(a) election
purchases depreciable property, an owner of a 30 percent interest in
the organization may claim depreciation deductions as if it owned an
undivided 30 percent interest in the organization's property (provided
the owner is otherwise eligible for such deductions). That member
cannot claim depreciation deductions beyond that member's ownership
interest in the organization's property. Thus, any agreement among the
members to specially allocate one member's depreciation deductions to
another member would make the organization ineligible for a section
761(a) election.
One commenter asked for clarification of whether the following fact
pattern is compatible with an election under section 761(a). A church
(an applicable entity) forms a partnership with a nonprofit investor
and a for-profit developer. The church contributes a site for energy
property, which generates electricity and reduces the church's energy
bill. The nonprofit investor makes grants and loans to the organization
and is repaid by virtue of renewable energy credits or net metering
from the clean energy property. The for-profit developer enters into a
contract to maintain the system in exchange for a fee.
The facts described in the comment letter do not provide sufficient
information to determine whether this situation is compatible with a
section 761(a) election. If the investor receives all payments in its
capacity as a lender and the for-profit developer receives its profits
in its capacity as a third-party service provider, there might not be
an unincorporated organization at all. If there is an unincorporated
organization and it intends to make a section 761(a) election, each of
its members must reserve the right separately to take in kind or
dispose of their shares of any property produced, extracted, or used.
If the investor or developer receives payments in excess of its pro
rata ownership interests, this requirement will not be met. Moreover,
if the contributions mentioned in this situation are intended to be
non-recognition transfers for Federal income tax purposes, the
contributing members would generally need to make such contributions
under section 721(a), which is part of subchapter K. However, if a
section 761(a) election is made, the organization is not subject to
subchapter K, and thus, section 721(a) is inapplicable to transfers to
the organization. Without section 721(a), the transfers would generally
be taxable events.
One commenter asked how certain capital stacking combinations
(including loans, forgivable loans, and grants) affect an
organization's eligibility to make a section 761(a) election. To make a
valid section 761(a) election, an unincorporated organization must
comply with the requirements of section 761(a) and revised Sec. 1.761-
2. Provided that those requirements are met, the structure of an
organization's capital stack would not appear to preclude it from
making a valid section 761(a) election. Federal income tax law governs
the treatment of these arrangements for purposes of determining whether
an arrangement violates the requirements of section 761(a). For
example, loans between members of the organization will be treated as
debt to the extent they are treated as debt under Federal income tax
law. Likewise, loans by a member to an organization would not be
treated as a partnership liability under section 752, but a loan to
each member of the organization in proportion to the member's ownership
interest.
One commenter asked that applicable entities who are members in an
applicable unincorporated organization that makes a 761(a) election be
permitted to claim all applicable tax credit bonuses and adders. Bonus
credit amounts, such as amounts for applicable credit properties
located in energy communities, apply to property co-owned through an
applicable unincorporated organization. The Treasury Department and the
IRS have determined that no change to the final regulations is required
to clarify this issue.
B. Effect of a Section 761(a) Election on Sections of the Code Outside
of Subchapter K
One commenter requested a discussion of the effects of a section
761(a) election on provisions of the Code outside of subchapter K that
reference partnerships, including section 6417. A detailed discussion
of the effects of a section 761(a) election on provisions of the Code
outside of subchapter K would require a careful examination of numerous
provisions of the Code apart from those relevant to these final
regulations and is not necessary for purposes of these final
regulations. However, the application of a section 761(a) election to
section 6417 is fundamental to the purpose of these final regulations,
which is to carry out the purposes of section 6417 and thus, is
addressed herein.
An organization with a valid section 761(a) election may be treated
as a partnership for purposes of sections of the Code outside of
subchapter K. In Bryant v. Commissioner, 46 T.C. 848 (1966), aff'd, 399
F.2d 800 (5th Cir. 1968), the Tax Court concluded that an organization
that made a section 761(a) election was still a partnership for
purposes of other parts of the Code, including the $50,000 investment
tax credit limit on partnership assets provided by then section
48(c)(2)(D) of the Code. See also Cokes v. Commissioner, 91 T.C. 222
(1988) (section 761 election did not affect partnership status under
the self-employment tax provisions of section 1402(a) of the Code);
Madison Gas and Electric Company v. Commissioner, 72 T.C. 521 (1979),
aff'd, 633 F.2d 512 (7th Cir. 1980) (notwithstanding a section 761
election, the startup costs of a joint venture were attributable to the
partnership business and were not deductible under section 162(a) of
the Code as the ordinary and necessary business expenses of the
individual partners).
Though section 6417 is not in subchapter K, a section 761(a)
election affects whether an entity is treated as a partnership for
purposes of section 6417. Section 6417(h) provides that the Secretary
shall issue such regulations or other guidance as may be necessary to
carry out the purposes of section 6417. Pursuant to this broad
authority, the Treasury Department and the IRS published Sec. 1.6417-
2(a)(1)(iii), which provides that if an applicable entity is a co-owner
in an applicable credit property through an organization that has made
a valid section 761(a) election, then the applicable entity's undivided
ownership share of the applicable credit property will be treated as a
separate applicable credit property owned by such applicable entity,
and the applicable entity may make an elective payment election for the
applicable credits determined with respect to such applicable credit
property. This means that a section 761(a) election effectively causes
an unincorporated organization not to be treated as a partnership for
purposes of section 6417, including section 6417(c). Thus, the effect
of a valid section 761(a) election for purposes of section 6417 is that
each member of the organization is treated as directly owning its
proportionate share of the applicable credit property. As a result,
each applicable entity member of the organization may make an elective
payment election (or, if not an applicable entity member, a transfer
election under section 6418) with
[[Page 91555]]
respect to its proportionate share of the applicable credit property.
Another commenter requested confirmation that a Tribal Energy
Development Organization that makes a section 761(a) election is not a
partnership for purposes of sections 168(h)(5) and (6) and 50(b)(3).
Section 168(h) describes tax-exempt use property (generally,
certain property leased to a tax-exempt entity), the cost recovery of
which is subject to special rules. Section 168(h)(5) generally provides
that the determination of whether property leased to a partnership is
tax-exempt use property shall be made by treating each tax-exempt
entity partner's proportionate share as being leased to such partner.
Section 168(h)(6) generally provides that, if any property which is not
tax-exempt use property is owned by a partnership that has as partners
both a tax-exempt entity and a person who is not a tax-exempt entity,
an amount equal to such tax-exempt entity's proportionate share of such
property is treated as tax-exempt use property. This rule applies only
if any allocation to the tax-exempt entity of partnership items is not
a ``qualified allocation,'' which (i) is consistent with such entity's
being allocated the same distributive share of each item of income,
gain, loss, deduction, credit, and basis and such share remains the
same during the entire period the entity is a partner in the
partnership, and (ii) has substantial economic effect within the
meaning of section 704(b)(2). See section 168(h)(6)(B). Section
50(b)(3) and (4) preclude certain property used by tax-exempt
organizations, governmental entities, and foreign persons from
qualifying for an investment tax credit. For these purposes, section
50(b)(4)(D) provides that rules similar to those in section 168(h)(5)
and (6) apply.
The existence of a partnership for purposes of these sections does
not change the amount of depreciation deductions attributable to each
member of an unincorporated organization that has validly made a
section 761(a) election. A valid section 761(a) election requires the
shares of property leased to or owned by an organization to be treated
as leased to or owned by the members of the organization in proportion
to their shares of the organization. This is how partnership property
would be treated under section 168(h)(5) and would cause all
allocations to the partners to be treated as ``qualified allocations''
for purposes of section 168(h)(6). Similarly, the IRS has determined in
other areas of the law that co-owners of property may make independent
elections with respect to deductions affecting their taxable income.
See Rev. Rul. 83-129, 1983-2 C.B. 105, in which the IRS ruled that the
co-owners of mineral leases that make a section 761(a) election may
independently elect to deduct or capitalize their shares of mining
development costs under section 616 of the Code; see also Rev. Rul. 81-
261, 1981-2 C.B. 60, where the IRS noted that if a partnership makes a
section 761(a) election, each partner is deemed to own directly its
proportionate share of the partnership property for purposes of
computing depreciation. Moreover, in the case of an applicable entity
that makes an election under section 6417(a), section 6417(d)(2)(A)
provides that applicable credits are determined without regard to
section 50(b)(3) and (4)(A)(i).
III. Applicable Unincorporated Organizations
A. Applicable Entity Owner
Proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(ii)(A) would have required an
applicable unincorporated organization to be owned, in whole or in
part, by one or more applicable entities, as defined in section
6417(d)(1)(A) and Sec. 1.6417-1(c). The Treasury Department and the
IRS received no comments related to this section and adopt the proposed
language without changes.
B. Joint Operating Agreements
Proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(ii)(B) would have provided that an
applicable unincorporated organization must be an organization the
members of which enter into a joint operating agreement (JOA) in which
the members reserve the right separately to take in kind or dispose of
their pro rata shares of the electricity produced, extracted, or used,
and any associated renewable energy credits or similar credits.
Proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(ii)(C) would also have provided, in part,
that an applicable unincorporated organization must be organized
pursuant to a JOA.
1. General
Commenters requested more information about the types of JOAs
required by these provisions. Some commenters requested examples of
permissible JOAs, and another commenter requested identification of any
JOA provisions that would ``create issues'' for a JOA. One commenter
asked whether JOAs that satisfy the requirements of Sec. 1.761-2(a)(3)
would also satisfy the requirements of proposed Sec. 1.761-
2(a)(4)(ii)(B) and (C) and requested that any specific rules applicable
to JOAs solely for purposes of the proposed regulations apply
prospectively so as to avoid any uncertainty with respect to existing
JOAs.
As used in the proposed regulations, the term ``joint operating
agreement'' is intended to refer to agreements similar to those used by
organizations that made an election under section 761(a) prior to the
proposed regulations. Such agreements typically provide the terms by
which the members of the unincorporated organization will meet the
existing requirements to make a section 761(a) election. JOAs should
continue to serve this purpose under the final regulations, regardless
of whether an applicable unincorporated organization holds its property
in an entity organized under local law. Accordingly, as a general
matter, a JOA that satisfies the requirements of revised Sec. 1.761-
2(a)(1) and (3) will satisfy the requirements in revised Sec. 1.761-
2(a)(4)(ii)(B) and (C), provided that the organization to which that
JOA applies satisfies the existing regulatory requirements, as modified
by revised Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(iii), if applicable. Because the final
regulations do not change the rules currently applicable to JOAs, these
final regulations do not need to make such rules apply prospectively.
For the same reason, further clarification of the JOA requirements is
unnecessary.
2. Right to Pro Rata Share
Commenters requested clarification of how credits and ownership
interests would be allocated when members of an unincorporated
organization reserve the right separately to take in kind or dispose of
their pro rata shares of the electricity produced, extracted, or used,
and any associated renewable energy credits or similar credits.
Pursuant to proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(ii)(B), each member of an
applicable unincorporated organization would have been required to
reserve the right separately to take in kind or dispose of their pro
rata shares of any property produced, extracted, or used, and any
associated renewable energy credits or similar credits. The
determination of each member's ownership interest of an unincorporated
organization (and, accordingly, each member's proportionate share of
property produced, extracted, or used) must be made by the members and
based on their ownership interests in the same manner as if they were
co-owners in the underlying properties.
To illustrate, a co-owner of 40 percent of an unincorporated
organization that has made a section 761(a) election must reserve the
right separately to take in
[[Page 91556]]
kind or dispose of its 40 percent pro rata share of the property
produced, extracted, or used by the co-owners. This is true even when
the members of an applicable unincorporated organization own property
through an entity, as permitted by revised Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(iii)(A).
Example 1 has been added in revised Sec. 1.761-2(a)(5)(i) to
illustrate the general rule.
One commenter requested clarification that renewable energy
certificates (RECs) produced through the generation of clean energy
qualify as ``similar credits'' for these purposes. The Treasury
Department and the IRS clarify that RECs are included as ``renewable
energy credits or similar credits'' pursuant to revised Sec. 1.761-
2(a)(4)(ii)(B) and thus, each member of an unincorporated organization
must reserve the right separately to take in kind or dispose of their
pro rata shares of any RECs generated as a result of the organization's
activities.
3. Joint Marketing
Some commenters asked whether specific JOA provisions or activities
would violate requirements that apply to applicable unincorporated
organizations, including that the organization's members do not jointly
sell services or property produced or extracted. One commenter asked
whether appointing a manager, creating an ownership committee, having
expense-sharing agreements or incurring project-level debt would
violate the existing requirements to make a section 761(a) election.
Another commenter requested clarification that a managing member or
general partner-equivalent (presumably, if the unincorporated
organization takes advantage of the modification in proposed Sec.
1.761-2(a)(4)(iii)(A)) can conduct normal project management functions
for an unincorporated organization without violating the joint
marketing requirement. That commenter requested, in the alternative, a
``roadmap'' setting forth how a managing member or general partner can
comply with the joint marketing requirement in a practical manner. The
same commenter also requested allowing representatives of an
unincorporated organization to perform pre-filing and other ministerial
services on behalf of the entities jointly owning applicable credit
property.
An applicable unincorporated organization must meet all applicable
requirements, including the existing requirements with the
modifications contained in these final regulations, to elect out of
subchapter K under section 761(a) and to maintain a section 761(a)
election. Generally, the members of an unincorporated organization are
permitted to have a representative handle management and ministerial
duties typical of a managing member of a limited liability company
(LLC) or general partner of a limited partnership without violating
these requirements. The Treasury Department and the IRS understand that
representatives with such duties may be required by local law for
entities that may hold the organization's property under Sec. 1.761-
2(a)(4)(iii)(A) of these final regulations. These final regulations,
however, do not provide a ``roadmap'' for permissible arrangements or
rights and duties of such representatives as the list would not be
exhaustive and could cause unintentional inferences to be drawn.
One commenter proposed allowing an applicable entity to direct some
or all of its elective payments of applicable credit amounts under
section 6417 to a separate account jointly owned by the applicable
entity and other members of an applicable unincorporated organization
to pay expenses directly related to the underlying applicable credit
property's co-ownership. The commenter suggested applying rules similar
to those applicable to assignments of payments under section 1603
(regarding grants for specified energy properties in lieu of tax
credits) of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Public
Law 111-5, 123 Stat. 115 (2009), including that each payment be
assigned to a bank or other financing institution, that the assignment
cover all amounts payable and not be subject to further assignment
(except that any assignment may be made to one party acting as an agent
or trustee for the co-owners), and that the assignee file a Notice of
Assignment.
As already discussed, Sec. 1.6417-2(a)(1)(iii) provides that if an
applicable entity is a co-owner in an applicable credit property
through an organization that has made a valid section 761(a) election,
then the applicable entity's undivided ownership share of the
applicable credit property will be treated as a separate applicable
credit property owned by such applicable entity, and the applicable
entity may make an election under section 6417(a) for the applicable
credits determined with respect to such applicable credit property.
When an applicable entity makes an election under section 6417(a), such
entity is treated as making a payment against the tax imposed by
subtitle A of the Code. If this payment causes the entity to have an
``overpayment'' of tax in a taxable year, section 6402(a) generally
provides that the entity may receive a refund equal to the amount of
the overpayment over the entity's tax liability. This refund must be
made to the person who made the overpayment (i.e., the applicable
entity). If that applicable member is a partnership or S corporation,
section 6417(c)(1)(A) specifies that the payment for such election is
made to the partnership or S corporation that made the section 6417(a)
election. Accordingly, similar to the general rule under section
6417(a), refunds or payments under section 6417(c) generally cannot be
paid to accounts in the name of someone other than the entity making
the election. A valid section 761(a) election does not affect the
application of this general rule and, therefore, these final
regulations do not adopt the commenter's proposal.
C. Purpose of Organization
Proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(ii)(C) would have provided that an
organization is an applicable unincorporated organization if it ``is
organized exclusively to produce electricity from its applicable credit
property (as defined in Sec. 1.6417-1(e)) and with respect to which
one or more applicable credits listed in section 6417(b)(2), (4), (8),
(10), and (12) is determined.'' The scope of this rule was intended to
remove certain impediments for these types of applicable unincorporated
organizations that would otherwise comply with existing requirements.
The Treasury Department and the IRS sought comments on the scope and
requirements of the proposed regulations, including whether
modifications similar to those in proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(iii) are
needed for applicable entities that own applicable credit properties
that do not produce electricity.
Commenters generally recommended that the modifications in proposed
Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(iii) are also needed for organizations organized to
own applicable credit property with respect to which any other
applicable credit listed in section 6417(b) is determined. Some
commenters requested clarity that certain facilities, especially
battery storage facilities, ``produce electricity'' for purposes of the
definition of an applicable unincorporated organization. One commenter
asserted that the ``non-generative'' credits from section 6417(b) that
were not included in proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(ii)(C) could be
claimed by organizations ``availed of . . . for the joint . . . use of
property'' and that such organizations should therefore be permitted to
make a section 761(a) election if other existing requirements are met.
The same commenter requested clarification that certain activities with
[[Page 91557]]
respect to applicable credits, including time-limited delegations of
relevant powers, would not violate the existing requirements to make a
section 761(a) election. Another commenter asked for clarification that
common, non-electricity revenue streams related to jointly owned
projects, such as revenues from the sale of capacity and ancillary
services, do not violate the requirement that an organization must be
organized exclusively to produce electricity.
The Treasury Department and the IRS agree that organizations formed
to own applicable credit property with respect to which any applicable
credits (including non-generative credits) are determined should be
permitted to apply the modifications to the existing section 761(a)
rules contained in the proposed regulations. Section 761(a)(2) refers
to organizations availed of ``for the joint production, extraction, or
use of property,'' which is not limited to activities that produce
electricity. Accordingly, pursuant to the authority in sections 761(a)
and 6417(h), the final regulations revise the definition of an
applicable unincorporated organization to include organizations
organized exclusively to own and operate applicable credit property (as
defined in Sec. 1.6417-1(e)). The adoption in the final regulations of
this definition of applicable unincorporated organization should not be
read to imply that any particular factual arrangement permits a valid
section 761(a) election. To make a valid section 761(a) election, an
unincorporated organization, including an applicable unincorporated
organization, must meet all the requirements of section 761(a) and the
regulations thereunder.
D. Section 6417 Election
Proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(ii)(D) would have provided that an
unincorporated organization is an applicable unincorporated
organization only if one or more of its applicable entity members will
make an elective payment election under section 6417(a) for the
applicable credits determined with respect to its share of the
applicable credit property.
One commenter recommended extending the modifications in proposed
Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(iii) to organizations for which no applicable
entity member will make an election under section 6417. These final
regulations are of limited scope and are promulgated, in part, pursuant
to the authority in section 6417(h) to carry out the purposes of
section 6417 by facilitating joint-ownership arrangements of applicable
credit property by applicable entities. These final regulations do not
adopt this commenter's recommendation because it is not necessary for
purposes of these final regulations.
E. Other Requirements
Proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(ii) would have provided that an
applicable unincorporated organization is an unincorporated
organization described in prior Sec. 1.761-2(a)(1) that meets the
requirements of proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(ii)(A) through (D). The
reference to prior Sec. 1.761-2(a)(1) was intended to emphasize the
statutory requirements under section 761(a) and prior Sec. 1.761-
2(a)(1) that: (1) the members of the unincorporated organization must
be able to compute their income without the necessity of computing
partnership income, and (2) the unincorporated organization must not be
a syndicate, group, pool, or joint venture which is classifiable as an
association, or operate under an agreement which creates an
organization classifiable as an association. For clarity, the final
regulations remove the reference to prior Sec. 1.761-2(a)(1) in
proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(ii) and include the requirements of prior
Sec. 1.761-2(a)(1) as revised Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(ii)(E) and (F). In
the final regulations, therefore, an applicable unincorporated
organization is an unincorporated organization that meets the
requirements of revised Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(ii)(A) through (F).
One commenter requested that a Tribal Energy Development
Organization (TEDO) be permitted to make an elective payment election
regardless of its partnership status and be permitted to make special
allocations. A TEDO that is formed as a partnership and meets the
requirements may make a 761(a) election. Section 761 does not apply,
however, to entities formed as corporations. In addition, special
allocations are inconsistent with a section 761(a) election, which is
available under the statute only to organizations that satisfy the
severance requirement and the members of which can compute their income
without the necessity of computing partnership taxable income.
Accordingly, the final regulations do not adopt these requested
changes.
Another commenter requested clarity about the eligibility of a
``partnership flip'' structure to make a section 761(a) election.
Generally, these structures involve allocations of income, gains,
losses, deductions, or credits that change at some point after the
partnership has been formed. In the commenter's proposed structure, a
taxable member of an unincorporated organization does not control the
organization but owns a profits interest in the organization that
allows the member to earn preferred returns over the course of its
investment. The commenter suggested that this type of member should be
permitted to individually elect out of partnership tax treatment under
subchapter K, and then elect back into partnership treatment under
subchapter K after it has recouped its investment.
Partnership flip structures, such as the one described by the
commenter, violate the existing statutory requirements for electing out
of subchapter K, even as modified by proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(iii).
This is because such structures provide members with disproportionate
amounts of income, gains, losses, deductions, or credits and thereby
require an unincorporated organization to compute partnership taxable
income to determine each member's share of the organization's income.
These arrangements are also incompatible with the severance
requirement, under which members must reserve the right separately to
take in kind or dispose of their shares of any property produced,
extracted, or used because members do not have a determinate ``share''
of the applicable credit property. For these reasons, the Treasury
Department and the IRS clarify that partnership flip structures are not
eligible to make a section 761(a) election.
IV. Specified Modifications for Applicable Unincorporated Organizations
A. Modified Co-Ownership Requirement
For applicable unincorporated organizations, proposed Sec. 1.761-
2(a)(4)(iii)(A) would have modified the co-ownership requirement such
that the participants in the applicable unincorporated organization
would be permitted to own applicable credit property through an
unincorporated organization that is a legal entity, other than one
treated as a corporation under any provision of the Code (modified co-
ownership requirement).
One commenter requested confirmation whether the following
situation is compatible with an election under section 761(a). A tax-
exempt entity forms an LLC to raise money and serve as a special
purpose vehicle to own and operate a clean energy project. The tax-
exempt entity then sells equity securities in the LLC to investors.
Prior to submitting the pre-filing registration with the IRS, the LLC
makes an election under section 761(a). The tax-exempt entity or
operator then decides if, and when, investors should be paid dividends
based on their fractional ownership.
[[Page 91558]]
This situation is inconsistent with the modified co-ownership
requirement. Organizations that have made a section 761(a) election do
not pay dividends for Federal income tax purposes. Because each member
of such organization is generally treated as directly owning its
proportionate share of the organization's assets, each member is
entitled to payments or credits with respect to the member's share of
property produced, extracted, or used, regardless of whether any other
member would have approved the distribution of such amounts.
B. Joint Marketing Modification and Agent Delegation Rule
For applicable unincorporated organizations, proposed Sec. 1.761-
2(a)(4)(iii)(B) would have modified the joint marketing requirement in
prior Sec. 1.761-2(a)(3)(iii) to provide that a delegation of
authority to sell the participant's share of the property produced may
allow the delegee to enter into contracts the duration of which exceeds
the minimum needs of the industry and may be for longer than one year
(the joint marketing modification), provided that the delegation of
authority to act on behalf of the participant may not be for a period
of time that exceeds the minimum needs of the industry, and in no event
for more than one year (the agent delegation rule). Proposed Sec.
1.761-2(a)(4)(vi) would have provided an example illustrating this
modification to the existing regulatory requirements, in which each
member of an unincorporated organization grants to the same agent a
one-year delegation (not exceeding the minimum needs of the industry)
of the member's authority to sell the member's share of electricity
produced by the organization. The agent commits each member to a 15-
year power purchase agreement (PPA). Because the delegation of
authority is for a period no longer than one year, the requirements of
proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(iii)(B) are met.
Commenters requested clarification on several issues relating to
the joint marketing modification. Some commenters asked whether two or
more members of an applicable unincorporated organization that has made
a section 761(a) election may sell their share of the organization's
output in the same contract. Some commenters also asked whether the 15-
year period for the contract in the example is intended to serve as a
safe harbor or limitation on the duration of such agreements.
Provided that the agent delegation rule and all other requirements
under section 761(a) are satisfied, the joint marketing modification
allows members of an applicable unincorporated organization to enter
into contracts of any duration. Multiple members of the same applicable
unincorporated organization may be party to the same contract. Members
can also choose to sell their shares without a multi-year contract. The
example merely illustrates the joint marketing modification and is not
intended to be a safe harbor. No clarification is required to the joint
marketing modification in the final regulations.
Commenters also requested clarification of the agent delegation
rule. One commenter asked whether an agent would be subject to the rule
if it was an Indian Tribal government or other applicable entity. Some
commenters suggested eliminating the one-year limitation on agent
delegations or allowing agent delegations to automatically renew after
each year. One commenter suggested that certain organizations would
need to sell their output into an organized market rather than pursuant
to a fixed PPA. In this situation, according to the commenter,
authority to sell the output for each applicable entity may need to be
pursuant to an agreement that automatically renews annually. Another
commenter suggested that the one-year limitation on agent delegations
will harm applicable entities without technical expertise because non-
applicable entities with their own expertise will not require an agent
and could be able to take advantage of an applicable entity that is
only able to use an agent for one year. Another commenter asked for
clarification that a member of an unincorporated organization may
delegate powers to an agent without limitation as long as no other
member makes such a delegation.
The purpose of the agent delegation rule is to fulfill the
statutory requirement in section 761(a)(2) that no organization making
a section 761(a) election is formed ``for the purpose of selling
services or property produced or extracted.'' This is a prohibition on
joint marketing; accordingly, any member of an unincorporated
organization may have an agent for any duration of time, provided that
the agent does not represent more than one member of the applicable
unincorporated organization. The agent delegation rule applies to any
person or group of people acting on behalf of more than one member of
an unincorporated organization, regardless of their status as an
applicable entity.
The longstanding one-year exception to the joint marketing
requirement in the existing regulations reflects a balancing of the
statutory language with commercial necessities, and the proposed
regulations reflected a similar balancing. Section 761(a)(2) does not
permit an electing organization to conduct sales through an agent with
indefinite authority on behalf of multiple members. Such a structure is
necessarily ``availed of . . . for the purpose of selling services or
property produced or extracted'' and is not eligible to elect out of
subchapter K. These final regulations, therefore, do not adopt the
suggestions to eliminate the agent delegation rule or allow agent
delegations to automatically renew. However, in any given year, an
agent may be delegated authority on terms identical to those in a past
year, provided that the delegation of authority to act is not for a
period of time that exceeds the minimum needs of the industry and each
member delegating authority to that agent consents to those terms in
writing at least once per year. Example 3 has been added in revised
Sec. 1.761-2(a)(5)(iii) to illustrate this rule.
One commenter requested that the phrase ``minimum needs of the
industry'' be either clarified or deleted. That phrase is intended to
be fact-sensitive; like the rest of the joint marketing requirement,
the phrase is intended to balance statutory requirements with
commercial necessities. These final regulations, therefore, do not
adopt the commenter's request to clarify or eliminate it.
C. Specific Examples
Several commenters generally asked for more examples showing
applications of the proposed regulations. In response, the Treasury
Department and the IRS have added two examples to the final
regulations.
V. Additional Information
A. Applicability Date
Except as provided in Sec. 1.761-2(d), these final regulations
apply to taxable years ending on or after March 11, 2024, the date on
which the proposed regulations were published in the Federal Register.
An applicable unincorporated organization that validly made a section
761(a) election meeting the requirements of these final regulations for
a taxable year ending on or after March 11, 2024, will be treated as
having made a valid section 761(a) election even if the election was
made prior to the publication of these final regulations in the Federal
Register.
B. Administrative Requirements
The preamble to the proposed regulations noted that the Treasury
Department and the IRS were considering certain rules to prevent
[[Page 91559]]
abuse of the modifications in proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(iii). One
rule described in the preamble to the proposed regulations would have
prevented the deemed election rules in prior Sec. 1.761-2(b)(2)(ii)
from applying to any unincorporated organization relying on a
modification in proposed Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4)(iii). One commenter
recommended against adopting such a rule, which the commenter believed
would be inconsistent with the goals of the proposed regulations and
increase the likelihood of inadvertent disallowances of section 761(a)
elections in non-abusive situations.
Although these final regulations do not adopt any rules regarding
deemed elections, more administrative guidance is needed under section
761(a) to fulfill the purposes of section 6417. As a result,
concurrently with the publication of these final regulations, the
Treasury Department and the IRS are publishing in the Proposed Rules
section of this edition of the Federal Register the November 2024
proposed regulations under section 761(a) (REG-116017-24), which would
provide rules affecting the validity of elections under section 761(a)
by applicable unincorporated organizations whose elections would not
have been valid without the application of revised Sec. 1.761-
2(a)(4)(iii).
C. Obsolete Language
Section 1.761-2(b)(3)(i) provides, in part, that an application for
permission to revoke a section 761(a) election must be submitted to the
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Attention: T:I, Washington, DC 20224,
no later than 30 days after the beginning of the first taxable year to
which the revocation is to apply. This language no longer reflects the
correct procedure for obtaining permission to revoke a section 761(a)
election and is therefore eliminated by these final regulations. The
November 2024 proposed regulations would instead provide that such an
application must be made by submitting a letter ruling request that
complies with the requirements of Rev. Proc. 2024-1 or successor
guidance. Section 1.761-2(b)(3)(i) also provides, in part, that a
section 761(a) will be effective unless a member of the organization
sends proper notice to the Commissioner ``within 90 days after the
formation of the organization (or by October 15, 1956, whichever is
later) . . .''. The final regulations would strike the parenthetical
language to update and streamline the paragraph.
VI. Comments That Are Not Addressed in These Final Regulations
Two comments received were related to section 761 but outside the
scope of these final regulations. These comments are summarized in this
Part VI.
A. Implementation
One commenter asked for clarification of how audits of joint
structures would take place, including by identifying the specific
parts of Treasury and the IRS involved in such audits and the standard
of review for such audits. Another commenter requested the development
of educational materials, ``office hours,'' and other guidance to
improve understanding of the regulations and uptake of applicable
credits. Another commenter requested that the Treasury Department and
the IRS provide clear rules for the pre-registration filing process for
applicable credit property co-owned by taxpayers making transferability
elections. These final regulations do not provide information about
audit procedures or the development of further guidance, but the
Treasury Department and the IRS will continue to monitor the elective
payment process to determine whether there are areas in which more
efficiencies can be created.
B. Tribal Organizations
One commenter noted that wholly owned Tribal corporations appear to
be incapable of making an election under section 761(a) because such
entities are corporations for Federal tax purposes. The treatment of
entities wholly owned by Tribal governments is addressed by a separate
rulemaking and is therefore outside the scope of these final
regulations. For information on how to provide comments in response to
that separate rulemaking, see the notice of proposed rulemaking (REG-
113628-21), Entities Wholly Owned by Indian Tribal Governments,
published in the Federal Register (89 FR 81871) on October 9, 2024.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review
Pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement, Review of Treasury
Regulations under Executive Order 12866 (June 9, 2023), tax regulatory
actions issued by the IRS are not subject to the requirements of
section 6 of Executive Order 12866, as amended. Therefore, a regulatory
impact assessment is not required.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) (PRA)
generally requires that a federal agency obtain the approval of the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) before collecting information
from the public, whether such collection of information is mandatory,
voluntary, or required to obtain or retain a benefit. An agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless the collection of information displays
a valid control number.
These final regulations mention reporting and recordkeeping
requirements that must be satisfied for unincorporated organizations to
elect out of subchapter K. These collections of information are
generally used by the IRS for tax compliance purposes and by taxpayers
to facilitate proper reporting and recordkeeping. The likely
respondents to these collections are businesses and tax-exempt
organizations.
Unincorporated entities meeting the requirements outlined in Sec.
1.761-2(a)(4) of these final regulations satisfy relevant reporting
requirements by submitting a statement attached to, or incorporated in,
a properly executed partnership return, Form 1065, U.S. Return of
Partnership Income, containing, in lieu of the information required by
Form 1065 and by the instructions relating thereto, only the name or
other identification and the address of the organization together with
information on the return, or in the statement attached to the return,
showing the names, addresses, and identification numbers of all the
members of the organization; a statement that the organization
qualifies under Sec. 1.761-2(a)(1) and either Sec. 1.761-2(a)(2) or
(3); a statement that all of the members of the organization elect that
it be excluded from all of subchapter K; and a statement indicating
where a copy of the agreement under which the organization operates is
available (or if the agreement is oral, from whom the provisions of the
agreement may be obtained). These requirements and associated forms are
already approved by OMB under 1545-0123 for business filers. These
final regulations are not changing or creating new collection
requirements not already approved by OMB.
The recordkeeping requirements mentioned in these final regulations
are considered general tax records under Sec. 1.6001-1(e). These
records are required for the IRS to validate that electing taxpayers
have consistently met the regulatory requirements outlined in Sec.
1.761-2. For PRA purposes, general tax records are already approved by
OMB under 1545-0123 for business
[[Page 91560]]
filers and 1545-0047 for tax-exempt organizations.
III. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary of the Treasury hereby certifies that the final
regulations will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities pursuant to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6).
These final regulations would affect unincorporated organizations
that elect out of subchapter K in connection with an election under
section 6417, as well as the members of such organizations.
Data is not readily available about these organizations. Such
organizations could not have made an election out of subchapter K under
the preexisting regulations, so information about existing
organizations that have made section 761(a) elections is not
instructive.
Even if these final regulations affect a substantial number of
small entities, such impact will not be significant. The final
regulations do not make it more costly to make or maintain an election
under section 761(a).
These final regulations do not change the procedural requirements
under Sec. 1.761-2(b) for making an election under section 761(a).
Other than to conform to modern formatting conventions, the final
regulations would amend Sec. 1.761-2(b) only by adding a parenthetical
to clarify that in making a valid section 761 election, which requires
attaching certain statements to a Form 1065 as required in accordance
with the preexisting regulations, Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4) should be taken
into account, as applicable, with regard to the required statement that
the organization qualifies under Sec. 1.761-2(a)(1) and either Sec.
1.761-2(a)(2) or (3) ``(taking into account Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4), as
applicable)''. Otherwise, an unincorporated organization making an
election under these final regulations would not be required to submit
anything additional or different than required under the preexisting
version of Sec. 1.761-2(b).
These final regulations impose no new ongoing compliance costs.
Though any unincorporated organization that has made an election under
section 761(a) should ensure that it remains qualified under Sec.
1.761-2(a)(1) and either Sec. 1.761-2(a)(2) or (3) (taking into
account Sec. 1.761-2(a)(4), as applicable), the final regulations do
not add to this obligation. In fact, these final regulations could make
it simpler for certain unincorporated organizations to stay qualified,
given their joint operating agreements that satisfy the modified co-
ownership and severance requirements and multi-year contracts that
satisfy the modified joint marketing requirement.
For the reasons stated, a regulatory flexibility analysis under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act is not required.
Pursuant to section 7805(f), the notice of proposed rulemaking
preceding these regulations was submitted to the Chief Counsel for the
Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration for comment on
its impact on small business, and no comments were received.
IV. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandate Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits and take certain
other actions before issuing a final rule that includes any Federal
mandate that may result in expenditures in any one year by a State,
local, or Tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million (updated annually for inflation). These final
regulations do not include any Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures by State, local, or Tribal governments or by the private
sector in excess of that threshold.
V. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule either
imposes substantial, direct compliance costs on State and local
governments, and is not required by statute, or preempts State law,
unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of
section 6 of the Executive order. These final regulations do not have
federalism implications and do not impose substantial, direct
compliance costs on State and local governments or preempt State law
within the meaning of the Executive order.
VI. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments) prohibits an agency from publishing any rule that
has Tribal implications if the rule either imposes substantial direct
compliance costs on Indian Tribal governments, and is not required by
statute, or preempts Tribal law, unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements of section 5 of the Executive
order. These final rules do not have substantial direct effects on one
or more federally recognized Indian tribes and do not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on Indian Tribal governments within
the meaning of the Executive order.
Nevertheless, on April 5, 2024, the Treasury Department and the IRS
held a consultation with Tribal leaders requesting assistance in
addressing questions related to the section 761(a) proposed rules
published on March 11, 2024, which informed the development of these
final regulations.
VII. Executive Order 14112: Reforming Federal Funding and Support for
Tribal Nations To Better Embrace Our Trust Responsibilities and Promote
the Next Era of Tribal Self-Determination
Executive Order 14112 (Reforming Federal Funding and Support for
Tribal Nations to Better Embrace Our Trust Responsibilities and Promote
the Next Era of Tribal Self-Determination) reaffirms the executive
branch's support for Tribal self-determination as the most effective
policy for the economic growth of Tribal Nations and the economic well-
being of Tribal citizens. Executive Order 14112 requires agency heads
to take certain actions, consistent with applicable law and to the
extent practicable, to increase access to ``Federal funding and support
programs for Tribal Nations''; provide Tribal Nations with the
flexibility to improve economic growth and address the specific needs
of their communities; and reduce administrative burdens. Section 2(b)
of the Executive order defines ``Federal funding and support programs
for Tribal Nations'' as including ``funding, programs, technical
assistance, loans, grants, or other financial support or direct
services that the Federal Government provides to Tribal Nations or
Indians because of their status as Indians.'' As section 1 of the
Executive order explains, ``As we continue to support Tribal Nations,
we must respect their sovereignty by better ensuring that they are able
to make their own decisions about where and how to meet the needs of
their communities. No less than for any other sovereign, Tribal self-
governance is about the fundamental right of a people to determine
their own destiny and to prosper and flourish on their own terms.''
These commitments build on a recognition of principles of sovereignty,
sovereign immunity, and self-governance that have been repeatedly
reaffirmed by the Supreme Court. See, e.g., Three Affiliated Tribes of
the Fort Berthold Reservation v. Wold Engineering, P.C., et al., 476
U.S. 877, 890-91 (1986); Oklahoma Tax Comm'n v. Citizen Band Potawatomi
Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, 498 U.S. 505, 510 (1991). The Treasury Tribal
Advisory Committee has advised that Tribes
[[Page 91561]]
consider ``financial support'' in Executive Order 14112 to include tax
matters that range from tax credits to Federal tax rules that regulate
Tribal revenue.
Consistent with Executive Order 14112, the Treasury Department and
the IRS recognize the importance of protecting and supporting Tribal
sovereignty and self-determination. These final regulations would
further Tribal self-determination and self-governance and reduce
administrative burdens by providing Tribes the ability to directly make
section 6417 elections for applicable credit property held through
applicable unincorporated organizations provided all applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements are satisfied.
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has designated this
rule as a ``major rule,'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Statement of Availability of IRS Documents
IRS notices and other guidance cited in this preamble are published
in the Internal Revenue Bulletin (or Cumulative Bulletin) and are
available from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government
Publishing Office, Washington, DC 20402, or by visiting the IRS website
at https://www.irs.gov.
Drafting Information
The principal author of these final regulations is Cameron
Williamson. However, other personnel from the Treasury Department and
the IRS participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, the Treasury Department and the IRS amend 26 CFR part
1 as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAXES
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 is amended by revising
the entry for Sec. 1.761-2 to read in part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
* * * * *
Section 1.761-2 also issued under 26 U.S.C. 446(b), 761(a),
6031(a), 6417(d), and 6417(h).
* * * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.761-2 is amended by:
0
a. Revising and republishing paragraphs (a)(1), (a)(2)(i), and
(a)(3)(i);
0
b. Adding paragraphs (a)(4) and (5);
0
c. Revising and republishing paragraphs (b)(1) and (2), (b)(3)(i), (c),
and (e); and
0
d. Adding paragraph (f).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.761-2 Exclusion of certain unincorporated organizations from
the application of all or part of subchapter K of chapter 1 of the
Internal Revenue Code.
(a) * * *
(1) In general. Under the conditions set forth in this section, an
unincorporated organization described in paragraph (a)(2) or (3) of
this section (taking into account paragraph (a)(4) of this section, as
applicable) may be excluded from the application of all or a part of
the provisions of subchapter K of chapter 1 of the Internal Revenue
Code (subchapter K). Such organization must be availed of for
investment purposes only and not for the active conduct of a business,
or for the joint production, extraction, or use of property, but not
for the purpose of selling services or property produced or extracted.
The members of such organization must be able to compute their income
without the necessity of computing partnership taxable income. Any
syndicate, group, pool, or joint venture which is treated as a
corporation for Federal tax purposes does not fall within the
provisions in this paragraph (a)(1).
(2) * * *
(i) Own the property as co-owners;
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Own the property as co-owners, either in fee or under lease or
other form of contract granting exclusive operating rights; and
* * * * *
(4) Modifications for certain joint ownership arrangements of
applicable credit property--(i) Scope. Paragraph (a)(4)(iii) of this
section provides certain modifications to specified rules in paragraph
(a)(3) of this section in the case of an applicable unincorporated
organization meeting the requirements of paragraph (a)(4)(ii) of this
section.
(ii) Applicable unincorporated organization. For purposes of this
section, an applicable unincorporated organization is an unincorporated
organization:
(A) That is owned, in whole or in part, by one or more applicable
entities, as defined in section 6417(d)(1)(A) and Sec. 1.6417-1(c);
(B) The members of which enter into a joint operating agreement in
which the members reserve the right separately to take in kind or
dispose of their pro rata shares of any property produced, extracted,
or used, and any associated renewable energy credits or similar
credits;
(C) That, pursuant to the joint operating agreement, is organized
exclusively to own and operate applicable credit property (as defined
in Sec. 1.6417-1(e));
(D) For which one or more of the applicable entities will make an
elective payment election under section 6417(a) for the applicable
credits determined with respect to its share of the applicable credit
property;
(E) The members of which are able to compute their income without
the necessity of computing partnership taxable income; and
(F) Which is not a syndicate, group, pool, or joint venture which
is classifiable as an association, or any group operating under an
agreement which creates an organization classifiable as an association.
(iii) Specified modifications for applicable unincorporated
organizations. Solely for purposes of an election under section 761(a)
by an applicable unincorporated organization that meets the
requirements of paragraphs (b) and (e) of this section:
(A) The requirement in paragraph (a)(3)(i) of this section is
modified such that the participants are permitted to own the applicable
credit property through an unincorporated organization that is an
entity, other than one that is treated as a corporation for Federal tax
purposes; and
(B) The requirement in paragraph (a)(3)(iii) of this section is
modified such that the delegation of authority to sell the
participant's share of the property produced or used may allow the
delegee to enter into contracts the duration of which exceeds the
minimum needs of the industry and may be for more than one year,
provided that the delegation of authority to act on behalf of the
participant may not be for a period of time that exceeds the minimum
needs of the industry, and in no event for more than one year.
(5) Examples. The following examples are intended to illustrate the
principles of this section.
(i) Example 1--(A) Facts. G and H enter into a joint operating
agreement to own and operate a facility that will produce solar energy.
G, an applicable entity, is entitled under the joint operating
agreement to take in kind or dispose of 40% of the energy produced by
the unincorporated organization and H, which is not an applicable
entity, is entitled to the remaining 60%. G and H
[[Page 91562]]
form LLC, a limited liability company, to hold the solar energy
property that G and H intend to operate pursuant to the joint operating
agreement. In accordance with the joint operating agreement, G owns a
40% ownership interest in LLC and H owns the remaining 60% ownership
interest. G will sell its share of energy produced by the facility in a
manner designed to generate applicable credits under section 45(a) and
will make an election under section 6417(a) with respect thereto. LLC
makes a valid election under section 761(a) to be excluded from
subchapter K.
(B) Analysis. G will be entitled to any credits under section 45(a)
generated by its sale of energy produced by LLC that G has the right to
take in kind or dispose of (which, under the joint operating agreement,
is 40% of the energy produced by LLC). Assuming all other requirements
are met, G will be able to make an elective payment election under
section 6417 for the applicable credits determined with respect to its
ownership share of the solar energy property.
(ii) Example 2--(A) Facts. T is an Indian Tribal government as
defined in Sec. 1.6417-1(c) and an applicable entity. Through a
limited liability company organized under T's Tribal law (TLLC), T and
Y own and operate applicable credit property that will generate
electricity the sale of which will generate applicable credits under
section 45(a). TLLC is not treated as an association taxable as a
corporation for Federal tax purposes and no election under Sec.
301.7701-3 of this chapter has been made to treat TLLC as such. T and Y
enter into a joint operating agreement with respect to the ownership
and operation of the applicable credit property in which each of T and
Y reserve the right separately to take in kind or dispose of their pro
rata shares of property produced, extracted, or used and any associated
renewable energy credits or similar credits. TLLC is formed exclusively
to own and operate an applicable credit property with respect to which
section 45(a) credits will be determined. On January 1st of year 1, T
and Y enter into delegation agreements with Q that delegate T's and Y's
authority to Q to sell the electricity generated by T's and Y's shares
of the applicable credit property. The term of the delegation
agreements is one year, which does not exceed the minimum needs of the
industry. On June 1st of year 1, Q enters into a power purchase
agreement with Utility on T's and Y's behalf that commits T and Y to
sell the electricity produced from their shares of the applicable
credit property to Utility for a term of 15 years. At the end of the
day on December 31st of year 1, the delegation agreements terminate.
(B) Analysis. Because T and Y did not delegate authority for a
period of more than one year to sell the output from their shares of
the applicable credit property, the requirements of paragraph
(a)(3)(iii) of this section (as modified by paragraph (a)(4)(iii)(B) of
this section) are met. Assuming that TLLC otherwise qualifies as an
applicable unincorporated organization, TLLC is an organization
described in paragraph (a)(4)(iii)(A) of this section and can make an
election under paragraphs (b) and (e) of this section to be excluded
from the application of all of subchapter K under section 761(a). As
such, T can make an elective payment election for the applicable
credits determined with respect to its share of the applicable credit
property held by TLLC, assuming the requirements of section 6417 are
otherwise met. The analysis in this example would be the same whether Y
is also an Indian Tribal government, another applicable entity, or some
other person.
(iii) Example 3--(A) Facts. The facts are the same as in paragraph
(a)(5)(ii)(A) of this section (Example 2), except that at the end of
the day on December 31, T and Y each agree, in writing, to a new agent
delegation agreement with Q with substantively identical terms as the
agent delegation agreement in effect during year 1.
(B) Analysis. Because each of T and Y have agreed, in writing, to
engage Q in an agency relationship lasting no longer than one year, the
results are the same as in paragraph (a)(5)(ii)(B) of this section
(Example 2). In contrast, if the agent delegation agreement renewed
automatically, T and Y have effectively entered into an agent
delegation agreement lasting longer than one year and have violated the
requirements of paragraph (a)(4)(iii)(B) of this section. In that case,
TLLC would not be eligible to make or maintain an election under
section 761(a). As such, T could not make an elective payment election
for the applicable credits determined with respect to its share of the
applicable credit property held through TLLC.
(b) * * *
(1) Time for making election for exclusion. Any unincorporated
organization described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section and either
paragraph (a)(2) or (3) of this section (taking into account paragraph
(a)(4) of this section, as applicable) that wishes to be excluded from
all of subchapter K must make the election provided in section 761(a)
not later than the time prescribed by Sec. 1.6031(a)-1(e) (including
extensions thereof) for filing the partnership return for the first
taxable year for which exclusion from subchapter K is desired.
Notwithstanding the prior sentence, such organization may be deemed to
have made the election in the manner prescribed in paragraph (b)(2)(ii)
of this section.
(2) Method of making election--(i) In general. Except as provided
in paragraph (b)(2)(ii) of this section, any unincorporated
organization described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section and either
paragraph (a)(2) or (3) of this section (taking into account paragraph
(a)(4) of this section, as applicable) which wishes to be excluded from
all of subchapter K must make the election provided in section 761(a)
in a statement attached to, or incorporated in, a properly executed
partnership return, Form 1065, U.S. Return of Partnership Income, which
must contain the information required in this paragraph (b)(2)(i). Such
return must be filed with the Internal Revenue Service Center where the
partnership return, Form 1065, would be required to be filed if no
election were made. To determine the appropriate Internal Revenue
Service Center, the principal office or place of business of the person
filing the return will be considered the principal office or place of
business of the organization. The partnership return must be filed not
later than the time prescribed Sec. 1.6031(a)-1(e) (including
extensions thereof) for filing the partnership return with respect to
the first taxable year for which exclusion from subchapter K is
desired. Such partnership return must contain, in lieu of the
information required by Form 1065 and by the instructions relating
thereto, only the name or other identification and the address of the
organization together with information on the return, or in the
statement attached to the return, showing the names, addresses, and
taxpayer identification numbers of all the members of the organization;
a statement that the organization qualifies under paragraph (a)(1) of
this section and either paragraph (a)(2) or (3) of this section (taking
into account paragraph (a)(4) of this section, as applicable); a
statement that all of the members of the organization elect that it be
excluded from all of subchapter K; and a statement indicating where a
copy of the agreement under which the organization operates is
available (or if the agreement is oral, from whom the provisions of the
agreement may be obtained).
(ii) Deemed election rule. If an unincorporated organization
described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section and either paragraph
(a)(2) or (3) of this
[[Page 91563]]
section (taking into account paragraph (a)(4) of this section, as
applicable) does not make the election provided in section 761(a) in
the manner prescribed by paragraph (b)(2)(i) of this section, it will
nevertheless be deemed to have made the election if it can be shown
from all the surrounding facts and circumstances that it was the
intention of the members of such organization at the time of its
formation to secure exclusion from all of subchapter K beginning with
the first taxable year of the organization. Although the following
facts are not exclusive, either one of such facts may indicate the
requisite intent:
(A) At the time of the formation of the organization there is an
agreement among the members that the organization be excluded from
subchapter K beginning with the first taxable year of the organization;
or
(B) The members of the organization owning substantially all of the
capital interests report their respective shares of the items of
income, deductions, and credits of the organization on their respective
returns (making such elections as to individual items as may be
appropriate) in a manner consistent with the exclusion of the
organization from subchapter K beginning with the first taxable year of
the organization.
(3) * * *
(i) In general. An election under this section to be excluded will
be effective unless within 90 days after the formation of the
organization any member of the organization notifies the Commissioner
that the member desires subchapter K to apply to such organization, and
also advises the Commissioner that the member has so notified all other
members of the organization by registered or certified mail. Such
election is irrevocable as long as the organization remains qualified
under paragraph (a)(1) of this section and either paragraph (a)(2) or
(3) of this section (taking into account paragraph (a)(4) of this
section, as applicable), or unless approval of revocation of the
election is secured from the Commissioner.
* * * * *
(c) Partial exclusion from subchapter K. An unincorporated
organization which wishes to be excluded from only certain sections of
subchapter K must submit to the Commissioner, no later than 90 days
after the beginning of the first taxable year for which partial
exclusion is desired, a request for permission to be excluded from
certain provisions of subchapter K. The request must set forth the
sections of subchapter K from which exclusion is sought and must state
that such organization qualifies under paragraph (a)(1) of this section
and either paragraph (a)(2) or (3) of this section (taking into account
paragraph (a)(4) of this section, as applicable), and that the members
of the organization elect to be excluded to the extent indicated. Such
exclusion will be effective only upon approval of the election by the
Commissioner and subject to the conditions the Commissioner may impose.
* * * * *
(e) Cross reference. For requirements with respect to the filing of
a return on Form 1065 by a partnership, see Sec. 1.6031(a)-1.
(f) Applicability date. Except as provided in paragraph (d) of this
section, this section applies to taxable years ending on or after March
11, 2024.
Heather C. Maloy,
Acting Deputy Commissioner.
Approved: November 6, 2024.
Aviva R. Aron-Dine,
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2024-26944 Filed 11-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P