Tennessee: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions, 91574-91578 [2024-26922]
Download as PDF
91574
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
quality of the affected area.
Consideration of EJ is not required as
part of this action, and there is no
information in the record inconsistent
with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of
achieving EJ for communities with EJ
concerns.
This action is subject to the
Congressional Review Act, and EPA will
submit a rule report to each House of
the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. This action
is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by January 21, 2025. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: November 12, 2024.
Jeaneanne Gettle,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA amends 40 CFR part
52 as follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart RR—Tennessee
2. In § 52.2220(c), amend Table 2
under the heading ‘‘Division IV—
Emission Standards’’ by:
■ a. Adding ‘‘Section 9–12–24 Limits on
Emissions due to Malfunctions,
Startups, and Shutdowns’’ to be in
numerical order; and
■ b. Revising ‘‘Section 16–87 Limits on
Emissions due to Malfunctions,
Startups, and Shutdowns.’’
The addition and revision read as
follows:
■
§ 52.2220
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
TABLE 2—EPA APPROVED MEMPHIS-SHELBY COUNTY REGULATIONS
State citation
State effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
EPA approval date
*
Division IV Source
Section 9–12–24 ...............
Limits on Emissions due to Malfunctions, Startups & Shutdowns.
*
Section 16–87 ...................
*
*
Limits on Emissions due to Malfunctions, Startups & Shutdowns.
[FR Doc. 2024–26928 Filed 11–19–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
2/22/22
8/14/89
Explanation
*
*
Emissions Standards
11/20/2024, [Insert first
page of Federal Register citation].
With the exception of TAPCR Section 1200–3–20–.03,
.06(1), (4) and (5). With the same exceptions,
EPA’s approval includes the corresponding sections
of the Air Pollution Control Regulations/Ordinances
for the remaining jurisdictions within Shelby County:
Shelby County—Section 3–9 (locally effective on
January 13, 2020); Town of Arlington—Section 20–
101 (locally effective on November 2, 2020); City of
Bartlett—Section 20–101 (locally effective on December 8, 2020); Town of Collierville—Section
96.02 (locally effective on November 23, 2020); City
of Germantown—Section 9–21(24) (locally effective
on July 12, 2021); City of Lakeland—Section 20–
101 (locally effective on February 10, 2022); and
Town of Millington—Section 20–101 (locally effective on October 12, 2020).
*
*
11/20/2024, [Insert first
page of Federal Register citation].
*
*
Only TAPCR Section 1200–3–20–.03 with a State effective date of March 21, 1979, and the first sentence of TAPCR Section 1200–3–20–.07(1) with a
State effective date of December 14, 1981.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
ACTION:
Final action.
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is taking direct final
action on the authorization of changes
to Tennessee’s hazardous waste program
under the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended.
These changes were outlined in a
December 8, 2023, application to the
EPA. We have determined that these
changes satisfy all requirements needed
for final authorization.
SUMMARY:
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA–R04–RCRA–2024–0451; FRL–12278–
01–R4]
Tennessee: Final Authorization of
State Hazardous Waste Management
Program Revisions
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
PO 00000
Frm 00046
*
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
This authorization is effective on
January 21, 2025 without further notice
unless the EPA receives adverse
comment by December 20, 2024. If the
EPA receives adverse comment, we will
either publish a timely withdrawal of
this direct final action in the Federal
Register informing the public that the
authorization will not take effect, or we
will publish a notification containing a
response to comments that either
reverses the decision or affirms that the
final action will take effect. In the event
that the final action is withdrawn, we
would address all public comments and
make a final decision on authorization
in a subsequent final action.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
RCRA–2024–0451, at https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from
www.regulations.gov. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
The EPA encourages electronic
submittals and lists all publicly
available docket materials electronically
at www.regulations.gov. If you are
unable to make electronic submittals or
require alternative access to docket
materials, please notify Robin Billings
through the provided contacts in the
DATES:
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section. Please also contact Robin
Billings if you need assistance in a
language other than English or if you are
a person with disabilities who needs a
reasonable accommodation at no cost to
you.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robin Billings; RCRA Programs and
Cleanup Branch; Land, Chemicals and
Redevelopment Division; U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960;
telephone number: (404) 562–8515; fax
number: (404) 562–9964; email address:
billings.robin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why is the EPA using a direct final
action?
The EPA is publishing this action
without a prior proposed rule because
we view this as a noncontroversial
action and anticipate no adverse
comment. This action is a routine
program change. However, in the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of this
Federal Register, we are publishing a
separate document that will serve as the
proposed rule allowing the public an
opportunity to comment. We will not
institute a second comment period on
this action. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so at this time. For
further information about commenting
on this action, see the ADDRESSES
section of this document.
If the EPA receives adverse
comments, we will either withdraw this
action by publishing a document in the
Federal Register before the action
becomes effective, or we will publish a
notification containing a response to
comments that either reverses the
decision or affirms that the final action
will take effect. In the event that the
final action is withdrawn, the EPA
would base any further decision on the
authorization of the State’s program
changes on the proposal mentioned in
the previous paragraph and after
consideration of all comments received
during the comment period. We would
address all public comments and make
a final decision on authorization in a
subsequent final action.
II. Why are revisions to State programs
necessary?
States that have received final
authorization from the EPA under RCRA
section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must
maintain a hazardous waste program
that is equivalent to, consistent with,
and no less stringent than the Federal
program. As the Federal program
changes, States must change their
programs and ask the EPA to authorize
the changes. Changes to State programs
may be necessary when Federal or State
statutory or regulatory authority is
modified or when certain other changes
occur. Most commonly, States must
change their programs because of
changes to the EPA’s regulations in title
40 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), parts 124, 260 through 268, 270,
273, and 279.
New Federal requirements and
prohibitions imposed by Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
91575
regulations that the EPA promulgates
pursuant to the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA)
take effect in authorized states at the
same time they take effect in
unauthorized States. Thus, the EPA will
implement those requirements and
prohibitions in Tennessee, including the
issuance of new permits implementing
those requirements, until the State is
granted authorization to do so.
III. What decisions has the EPA made
in this action?
Tennessee submitted a complete
program revision application (PRA),
dated December 8, 2023, seeking
authorization of changes to its
hazardous waste program corresponding
to certain Federal rules promulgated
between December 1, 1987, and June 30,
2022 (including HSWA Cluster II 1
(Checklist 2 44C only) and RCRA
Clusters XXVII (Checklist 241 only) and
XXX). Additionally, Tennessee
included, in its PRA, amendments to
provisions that had been excluded from
previously authorized checklists in
parts of Clusters XVI, XVII, XXIII, XXIV,
and XXV. The EPA concludes that
Tennessee’s application to revise its
authorized program meets all of the
statutory and regulatory requirements
established under RCRA, as set forth in
RCRA section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C.
6926(b), and 40 CFR part 271. Therefore,
the EPA grants Tennessee final
authorization to operate its hazardous
waste program with the changes
described in the PRA and as outlined
below in section VI of this document.
Tennessee has responsibility for
permitting treatment, storage, and
disposal facilities within its borders and
for carrying out the aspects of the RCRA
program described in its PRA, subject to
the limitations of HSWA, as discussed
above.
IV. What is the effect of this
authorization decision?
The effect of this decision is that the
changes described in Tennessee’s PRA
as outlined below and in section VI of
this document will become part of the
authorized State hazardous waste
program and will therefore be federally
enforceable. Tennessee will continue to
have primary enforcement authority and
responsibility for its State hazardous
waste program. The EPA will maintain
1 A ‘‘Cluster’’ is a grouping of hazardous waste
rules that the EPA promulgates from July 1st of one
year to June 30th of the following year.
2 A ‘‘checklist’’ is developed by the EPA for each
Federal rule amending the RCRA regulations. The
checklists document the changes made by each
Federal rule and are presented and numbered in
chronological order by date of promulgation.
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
91576
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
V. What has Tennessee previously been
authorized for?
effective July 31, 1992 (57 FR 23063);
May 8, 1995, effective July 7, 1995 (60
FR 22524); August 24, 1995, effective
October 23, 1995 (60 FR 43979); May 23,
1996, effective July 22, 1996 (61 FR
25796); January 30, 1998, effective
March 31, 1998 (63 FR 4587); September
15, 1999, effective November 15, 1999
(64 FR 49998); October 26, 2000,
effective December 26, 2000 (65 FR
64161); December 26, 2001, effective
February 25, 2002 (66 FR 66342); April
11, 2003, effective June 10, 2003 (68 FR
17748); March 14, 2005, effective May
13, 2005 (70 FR 12416); May 11, 2006,
effective July 10, 2006 (71 FR 27405);
October 5, 2012, effective December 4,
2012 (77 FR 60919); March 20, 2015,
effective May 19, 2015 (80 FR 14847);
and July 13, 2022, effective September
12, 2022 (87 FR 41610).
Tennessee initially received final
authorization on January 22, 1985,
effective February 5, 1985 (50 FR 2820),
to implement the RCRA hazardous
waste management program. The EPA
granted authorization for changes to
Tennessee ’s program on the following
dates: June 12, 1987, effective August
11, 1987 (52 FR 22443); June 1, 1992,
VI. What changes is the EPA
authorizing with this action?
Tennessee submitted a complete PRA,
dated December 8, 2023, seeking
authorization of changes to its
hazardous waste management program
in accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. This
application included changes associated
with Checklists 44C, 241, and 244 from
its authorities under RCRA sections
3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003, including
its authority to:
• Conduct inspections, and require
monitoring, tests, analyses, and reports;
• Enforce RCRA requirements,
including authorized State program
requirements, and suspend or revoke
permits; and
• Take enforcement actions regardless
of whether the State has taken its own
actions.
This action does not impose
additional requirements on the
regulated community because the
regulations for which the EPA is
authorizing Tennessee are already
effective under State law and are not
changed by this action.
HSWA Cluster II and RCRA Clusters
XXVII and XXX. The EPA is authorizing
all of these changes.
The PRA also included revisions to
Checklists 212, 214, 231, 233B, 233D2,
233E, and 237. Tennessee was
previously authorized for these
Checklists in the September 12, 2022,
Final Authorization (87 FR 41610);
however, certain provisions of the
Tennessee regulations associated with
these Checklists included omissions or
errors that required correction.
Tennessee has corrected these
omissions and errors and has submitted
the corrected provisions for
authorization. The EPA is authorizing
all but two 3 of these revised provisions.
The EPA has determined, subject to
receipt of written comments that oppose
this action, that Tennessee’s hazardous
waste program revisions are equivalent
to, consistent with, and no less stringent
than the Federal program, and therefore
satisfy all of the requirements necessary
to qualify for final authorization.
Therefore, the EPA grants final
authorization to Tennessee for the
following program changes:
A. Newly Submitted Checklists
Federal Register date and
page
Analogous state authority 1
Checklist 44C, Corrective Action for
Injection Wells.
Checklist 241, Management Standards for Hazardous Waste Pharmaceuticals and Amendment to
the P075 Listing for Nicotine.
52 FR 45788, 12/1/1987 .......
Checklist 244, Canada Import Export
Recovery and Disposal Code
Changes.
86 FR 54381, 10/01/2021 .....
0400–12–01–.05(1)(b)2(ix) [reserved]; and 0400–12–01–.07(1)(c)1(ii)(III)I
and II.
0400–12–01–.02(1)(d)1(i)(II) and (1)(g)3; 0400–12–01–.02(4)(d)3, (4)(d)3
Comment, and (4)(d)5 Table; 0400–12–01–.03(1)(a)2(xii), (1)(a)2(xiii)(I)
through (III), (1)(d)3(x), (1)(e)1(v)(IX), and (1)(e)1(v)(X); 0400–12–01–
.06(1)(b)2(xi); 0400–12–01–.05(1)(b)2(xiii); 0400–12–01–.09(16); 0400–
12–01–.10(1)(g), (1)(g)1, and (4)(a)1(iv) and (v); 0400–12–01–
.07(1)(b)4(x); and 0400–12–01–.12(7)(a)1 and (7)(a)4.
0400–12–01–.03(9)(b), (9)(d)2(iii), (9)(d)6(vi), (9)(d)6(vi)(I) and (II),
(9)(e)2(ii), (9)(e)6(v), (9)(e)7(ii), and (9)(e)8(ii)(III); 0400–12–01–
.06(2)(c)1(iv)(II); and 0400–12–01–.05(2)(c)1(iv)(II).
Description of Federal requirement
84 FR 5816, 02/22/2019 .......
1 The Tennessee regulatory citations are from the Tennessee Rules of the Division of Solid Waste Management (Hazardous Waste Program),
Chapter 0400–12–01. Citations to Rules .02, .03, .05–.07, .09, and .10 within this Chapter refer to the regulatory text revised as of September
2022. Citations to Rule .12 within this Chapter refer to the regulatory text revised as of April 2022.
part of the Final Authorization effective
September 12, 2022 (87 FR 41610),
although certain provisions contained
omissions or errors that required
B. Revisions to Previously Authorized
Checklists
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
Tennessee was authorized for each of
the Checklists in the table below as a
Description of Federal requirement
Federal Register
date and page
Checklist 212, National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Final Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for Hazardous Waste Combustors (Phase
I Final Replacement Standards
and Phase II).
70 FR 59402, 10/12/2005 .....
3 The changes to both Rule 0400–12–
01.09(8)(a)2(iii) from Checklist 212, and Rule 0400–
12–01–.02 (29)(a)1, from Checklist 233E, are not
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
Analogous state authority 1
0400–12–01–.06(15)(a)2(i) and (iii); 0400–12–01–.05(15)(a)2(i); 0400–
12–01–.09(8)(a)2(i); 0400–12–01–.07(2)(h), (2)(h)1, (2)(h)1(i) through
(ix),2 and (2)(h)2 (removed); 0400–12–01–.07(5)(b)5(v), (5)(b)8,
(5)(b)10(iv)(III), and (5)(b)11(v)(III); 0400–12–01–.07(8)(b)2(iii); 0400–
12–01–.07(9)(c)5(x)(I) through (III), (9)(c)5(xi)(I), (9)(c)5(xi)(I) I and II,
(9)(c)5(xi)(I) IV, and (9)(c)5(xi)(II), and (9)(c)5(xi)(II) I; 0400–12–01–
.07(10)(l)10; 0400–12–01–.07(1)(e) and (1)(j); and 0400–12–01–
.07(12)(a)1(i)–(ii), (12)(a)2(i), and (12)(a)3.
being authorized due to inaccuracies in the state
regulatory text. The prior versions of each of these
provisions were authorized in the September 12,
PO 00000
Frm 00048
correction. Tennessee is submitting its
revisions to these previously authorized
provisions, and the EPA is authorizing
them here.
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
2022, Final Authorization (87 FR 41610). Tennessee
will correct these inaccuracies in a future
rulemaking.
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
91577
Description of Federal requirement
Federal Register
date and page
Checklist 214, Corrections to Errors
in the Code of Federal Regulations.
Checklist 231, Hazardous Waste
Electronic Manifest System; Final
Rule.
Checklist 233B, Legitimacy-related
provisions, including prohibition of
sham recycling, definition of legitimacy, definition of contained.
Checklist 233D2, 2008 DSW exclusions and non-waste determinations, including revisions from
2015 DSW final rule and 2018
DSW final rule.
Checklist 233E, Remanufacturing exclusion.
71 FR 40254, 7/14/2006 .......
0400–12–01–.05(14)(b)4(i); 3 and 0400–12–01–.10(3)(f) table 1.
79 FR 7518, 2/7/2014 ...........
0400–12–01–.01(7)(a)1(i)(II).
80 FR 1694, 1/13/2015 .........
0400–12–01–.01(5)(d)2 and (5)(d)2(ii).4
80 FR 1694, 1/13/2015; 83
FR 24664, 5/30/2018.
0400–12–01–.01(2)(a) Definition of ‘‘Facility’’; and 0400–12–01–
.02(13)(b)5, (13)(b)6(i), (13)(b)6(ii), (13)(c), (13)(c)2, (13)(c)3,
(13)(c)4(iii), (13)(d), (13)(d)1(i), (13)(d)2(ii), and (13)(d)6(viii)(II).5
80 FR 1694, 1/13/2015 .........
Checklist 237, Hazardous Waste
Generator Improvements Rule.
81 FR 85732, 11/28/2016 .....
0400–12–01–.02(1)(d)1(xxvii)(VI) II E and (1)(d)1(xxvii)(VI) V; 0400–12–
01–.02(10)(d)1 Note and (10)(g) Notes; 0400–12–01–.02(27)(a),
(27)(d)14(i)(II),6 and (27)(d)14(i)(III); 0400–12–01–.02(28)(a)1; and
0400–12–01–.02(29)(b).
0400–12–01–.03(1)(a)2(i)(II); 0400–12–01–.03(12)(j)4 (removed).7
Analogous state authority 1
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
1 The Tennessee regulatory citations are from the Tennessee Rules of the Division of Solid Waste Management (Hazardous Waste Program),
Chapter 0400–12–01. Citations to Rules .01–.03, .05–.07, .09, and .10 within this Chapter refer to the regulatory text revised as of September
2023.
2 The subparts of 0400–12–01–.07(2)(h)1 were also renumbered by the State, but the contents of the Part did not change as a result of the renumbering.
3 Rule 0400–12–01.05(14)(b)4(i) was noted in the 2022 Final Authorization to have an incorrect cross-reference to Rule 0400–12–01–.02(3)(d).
It has now been corrected to properly refer to Rule 0400–12–01–.02(3)(e).
4 In the 2022 Final Authorization, these two provisions were authorized, but it was noted that the parenthetical notes about legitimate recycling
that accompanied each provision at that time were unclear and would be removed or clarified by Tennessee in a subsequent rulemaking. Both
parenthetical notes have now been removed, and the EPA is re-authorizing both provisions without them.
5 Several subsections throughout Paragraph 13 of Rule 0400–12–01–.02 that were noted in the 2022 Final Authorization have been clarified
with respect to the management of hazardous secondary materials.
6 Tennessee Rule 0400–12–01–.02(27)(d)14(i)(II) was noted in the 2022 Final Authorization to have incorrect cross-references to Paragraphs
(30) and (32) of Rule 0400–12–01–.06. They have now been corrected to properly refer to Rules 0400–12–01–.02(27) and (29).
7 Tennessee Rule 0400–12–01–.03(12)(j)4 was noted in the 2022 Final Authorization as containing an incorrect waiver that would need to be
excluded in a subsequent rulemaking. Tennessee has now properly removed it from its regulations.
VII. Where are the revised State rules
different than the Federal rules?
When revised State rules differ from
the Federal rules in the RCRA state
authorization process, the EPA
determines whether the State rules are
equivalent to, more stringent than, or
broader in scope than the Federal
program. Pursuant to RCRA section
3009, 42 U.S.C. 6929, State programs
may contain requirements that are more
stringent than the Federal regulations.
Such more stringent requirements can
be federally authorized and, once
authorized, become federally
enforceable. Although the statute does
not prevent States from adopting
regulations that are broader in scope
than the Federal program, states cannot
receive Federal authorization for such
regulations, and they are not federally
enforceable. There are no State
requirements in the program revisions
listed in the tables above that are
considered to be broader in scope than
the Federal requirements. The EPA has
determined that certain regulations
included in Tennessee’s program
revisions listed in the first table above
are more stringent than the Federal
program. These more stringent
requirements will become part of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
federally enforceable RCRA program in
Tennessee when authorized.
Tennessee’s program is more stringent
than the Federal program at 0400–12–
01–.09(16)(c)1(i)(I); 0400–12–01–
.09(16)(c)9(i); 0400–12–01–.09(16)(d)4;
and 0400–12–01–.09(16)(k)3(ix)(I)—in
each case because the Tennessee
program requires annual reporting
instead of biennial reporting.
It should be noted that States cannot
receive authorization for certain Federal
regulatory functions involving
international shipments (i.e., import and
export provisions) such as those
associated with the Canada Import
Export Recovery and Disposal Code
Changes Rule (Checklist 244). Although
Tennessee has adopted these rules to
maintain its equivalency with the
Federal program, it has appropriately
maintained the Federal references.
VIII. Who handles permits after the
authorization takes effect?
When final authorization takes effect,
Tennessee will issue permits for all the
provisions for which it is authorized
and will administer the permits it
issues. The EPA will continue to
administer any RCRA hazardous waste
permits or portions of permits that the
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
EPA issued prior to the effective date of
authorization until they expire or are
terminated. The EPA will not issue any
new permits or new portions of permits
for the provisions listed in the table
above after the effective date of the final
authorization. The EPA will continue to
implement and issue permits for HSWA
requirements for which Tennessee is not
yet authorized. The EPA has the
authority to enforce State-issued permits
after the State is authorized.
IX. What is codification and is the EPA
codifying Tennessee’s hazardous waste
program as authorized in this action?
Codification is the process of placing
citations and references to the State’s
statutes and regulations that comprise
the State’s authorized hazardous waste
program into the Code of Federal
Regulations. The EPA does this by
adding those citations and references to
the authorized State rules in 40 CFR
part 272. The EPA is not codifying the
authorization of Tennessee’s revisions at
this time. However, the EPA reserves
the ability to amend 40 CFR part 272,
subpart RR, for the authorization of
Tennessee’s program changes at a later
date.
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
khammond on DSK9W7S144PROD with RULES
91578
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 224 / Wednesday, November 20, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
X. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has exempted this action from
the requirements of Executive Order
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993)
and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011). This action authorizes State
requirements for the purpose of RCRA
section 3006 and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
State law. Therefore, this action is not
subject to review by OMB. This action
is not an Executive Order 14094 (88 FR
21879, April 11, 2023) regulatory action
because actions such as the
authorization of Tennessee’s revised
hazardous waste program under RCRA
are exempted under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, I certify that this
action will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.). Because this action authorizes
pre-existing requirements under State
law and does not impose any additional
enforceable duty beyond that required
by State law, it does not contain any
unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as
described in the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538). For the same reason, this action
also does not significantly or uniquely
affect the communities of Tribal
governments, as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). This action will not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999), because it merely
authorizes State requirements as part of
the State RCRA hazardous waste
program without altering the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established by
RCRA. This action also is not subject to
Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), because it is not
economically significant, and it does not
make decisions based on environmental
health or safety risks. This action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
Under RCRA section 3006(b), the EPA
grants a State’s application for
authorization as long as the State meets
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:35 Nov 19, 2024
Jkt 265001
the criteria required by RCRA. It would
thus be inconsistent with applicable law
for the EPA, when it reviews a State
authorization application, to require the
use of any particular voluntary
consensus standard in place of another
standard that otherwise satisfies the
requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. As required by
section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996), in issuing
this rule, the EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct. The
EPA has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 18, 1988), by
examining the takings implications of
this action in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the Executive
order. This action does not impose an
information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
‘‘Burden’’ is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) establishes Federal
executive policy on environmental
justice. Its main provision directs
Federal agencies, to the greatest extent
practicable and permitted by law, to
make environmental justice part of their
mission by identifying and addressing,
as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or
environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority
populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
Because this action authorizes preexisting State rules which are at least
equivalent to, and no less stringent than
existing Federal requirements, and
imposes no additional requirements
beyond those imposed by State law, and
there are no anticipated significant
adverse human health or environmental
effects, this rule is not subject to
Executive Order 12898.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. The EPA will
submit a report containing this
document and other required
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication in the
Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is
published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined
by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This final action will
be effective January 21, 2025.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Intergovernmental
relations, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the
authority of sections 2002(a), 3006, and
7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, and
6974(b).
Dated: November 6, 2024.
Jeaneanne Gettle,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2024–26922 Filed 11–19–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Parts 0 and 90
[PS Docket No. 07–100; FCC 24–114; FR
ID 258077]
Improving Public Safety
Communications in the 4.9 GHz Band
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission
(Commission) takes another major step
towards ensuring that the 4940–4990
MHz band (4.9 GHz band) is efficiently
and intensely utilized in support of
public safety missions nationwide. To
that end, the Commission bolsters the
coordinated nationwide approach to the
band that it established in its Seventh
Report and Order, FCC 23–3, in which
it adopted a nationwide Band Manager
framework to coordinate operations in
the 4.9 GHz band, optimize public
safety use, and facilitate the integration
of the latest commercially available
technologies, including 5G, for the
benefit of public safety users. To further
these goals—and ensure that the 4.9
GHz band is put to more robust use
nationwide in the near term—the 4.9
GHz Band Manager, once selected, will
be eligible to apply for a nationwide
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\20NOR1.SGM
20NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 91574-91578]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-26922]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 271
[EPA-R04-RCRA-2024-0451; FRL-12278-01-R4]
Tennessee: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste
Management Program Revisions
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final action.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking direct
final action on the authorization of changes to Tennessee's hazardous
waste program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA),
as amended. These changes were outlined in a December 8, 2023,
application to the EPA. We have determined that these changes satisfy
all requirements needed for final authorization.
[[Page 91575]]
DATES: This authorization is effective on January 21, 2025 without
further notice unless the EPA receives adverse comment by December 20,
2024. If the EPA receives adverse comment, we will either publish a
timely withdrawal of this direct final action in the Federal Register
informing the public that the authorization will not take effect, or we
will publish a notification containing a response to comments that
either reverses the decision or affirms that the final action will take
effect. In the event that the final action is withdrawn, we would
address all public comments and make a final decision on authorization
in a subsequent final action.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
RCRA-2024-0451, at https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from www.regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
The EPA encourages electronic submittals and lists all publicly
available docket materials electronically at www.regulations.gov. If
you are unable to make electronic submittals or require alternative
access to docket materials, please notify Robin Billings through the
provided contacts in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Please also contact Robin Billings if you need assistance in a language
other than English or if you are a person with disabilities who needs a
reasonable accommodation at no cost to you.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robin Billings; RCRA Programs and
Cleanup Branch; Land, Chemicals and Redevelopment Division; U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency; Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960; telephone number: (404) 562-
8515; fax number: (404) 562-9964; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why is the EPA using a direct final action?
The EPA is publishing this action without a prior proposed rule
because we view this as a noncontroversial action and anticipate no
adverse comment. This action is a routine program change. However, in
the ``Proposed Rules'' section of this Federal Register, we are
publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposed rule
allowing the public an opportunity to comment. We will not institute a
second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so at this time. For further information about
commenting on this action, see the ADDRESSES section of this document.
If the EPA receives adverse comments, we will either withdraw this
action by publishing a document in the Federal Register before the
action becomes effective, or we will publish a notification containing
a response to comments that either reverses the decision or affirms
that the final action will take effect. In the event that the final
action is withdrawn, the EPA would base any further decision on the
authorization of the State's program changes on the proposal mentioned
in the previous paragraph and after consideration of all comments
received during the comment period. We would address all public
comments and make a final decision on authorization in a subsequent
final action.
II. Why are revisions to State programs necessary?
States that have received final authorization from the EPA under
RCRA section 3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), must maintain a hazardous
waste program that is equivalent to, consistent with, and no less
stringent than the Federal program. As the Federal program changes,
States must change their programs and ask the EPA to authorize the
changes. Changes to State programs may be necessary when Federal or
State statutory or regulatory authority is modified or when certain
other changes occur. Most commonly, States must change their programs
because of changes to the EPA's regulations in title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR), parts 124, 260 through 268, 270, 273, and
279.
New Federal requirements and prohibitions imposed by Federal
regulations that the EPA promulgates pursuant to the Hazardous and
Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 (HSWA) take effect in authorized states
at the same time they take effect in unauthorized States. Thus, the EPA
will implement those requirements and prohibitions in Tennessee,
including the issuance of new permits implementing those requirements,
until the State is granted authorization to do so.
III. What decisions has the EPA made in this action?
Tennessee submitted a complete program revision application (PRA),
dated December 8, 2023, seeking authorization of changes to its
hazardous waste program corresponding to certain Federal rules
promulgated between December 1, 1987, and June 30, 2022 (including HSWA
Cluster II \1\ (Checklist \2\ 44C only) and RCRA Clusters XXVII
(Checklist 241 only) and XXX). Additionally, Tennessee included, in its
PRA, amendments to provisions that had been excluded from previously
authorized checklists in parts of Clusters XVI, XVII, XXIII, XXIV, and
XXV. The EPA concludes that Tennessee's application to revise its
authorized program meets all of the statutory and regulatory
requirements established under RCRA, as set forth in RCRA section
3006(b), 42 U.S.C. 6926(b), and 40 CFR part 271. Therefore, the EPA
grants Tennessee final authorization to operate its hazardous waste
program with the changes described in the PRA and as outlined below in
section VI of this document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A ``Cluster'' is a grouping of hazardous waste rules that
the EPA promulgates from July 1st of one year to June 30th of the
following year.
\2\ A ``checklist'' is developed by the EPA for each Federal
rule amending the RCRA regulations. The checklists document the
changes made by each Federal rule and are presented and numbered in
chronological order by date of promulgation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tennessee has responsibility for permitting treatment, storage, and
disposal facilities within its borders and for carrying out the aspects
of the RCRA program described in its PRA, subject to the limitations of
HSWA, as discussed above.
IV. What is the effect of this authorization decision?
The effect of this decision is that the changes described in
Tennessee's PRA as outlined below and in section VI of this document
will become part of the authorized State hazardous waste program and
will therefore be federally enforceable. Tennessee will continue to
have primary enforcement authority and responsibility for its State
hazardous waste program. The EPA will maintain
[[Page 91576]]
its authorities under RCRA sections 3007, 3008, 3013, and 7003,
including its authority to:
Conduct inspections, and require monitoring, tests,
analyses, and reports;
Enforce RCRA requirements, including authorized State
program requirements, and suspend or revoke permits; and
Take enforcement actions regardless of whether the State
has taken its own actions.
This action does not impose additional requirements on the
regulated community because the regulations for which the EPA is
authorizing Tennessee are already effective under State law and are not
changed by this action.
V. What has Tennessee previously been authorized for?
Tennessee initially received final authorization on January 22,
1985, effective February 5, 1985 (50 FR 2820), to implement the RCRA
hazardous waste management program. The EPA granted authorization for
changes to Tennessee 's program on the following dates: June 12, 1987,
effective August 11, 1987 (52 FR 22443); June 1, 1992, effective July
31, 1992 (57 FR 23063); May 8, 1995, effective July 7, 1995 (60 FR
22524); August 24, 1995, effective October 23, 1995 (60 FR 43979); May
23, 1996, effective July 22, 1996 (61 FR 25796); January 30, 1998,
effective March 31, 1998 (63 FR 4587); September 15, 1999, effective
November 15, 1999 (64 FR 49998); October 26, 2000, effective December
26, 2000 (65 FR 64161); December 26, 2001, effective February 25, 2002
(66 FR 66342); April 11, 2003, effective June 10, 2003 (68 FR 17748);
March 14, 2005, effective May 13, 2005 (70 FR 12416); May 11, 2006,
effective July 10, 2006 (71 FR 27405); October 5, 2012, effective
December 4, 2012 (77 FR 60919); March 20, 2015, effective May 19, 2015
(80 FR 14847); and July 13, 2022, effective September 12, 2022 (87 FR
41610).
VI. What changes is the EPA authorizing with this action?
Tennessee submitted a complete PRA, dated December 8, 2023, seeking
authorization of changes to its hazardous waste management program in
accordance with 40 CFR 271.21. This application included changes
associated with Checklists 44C, 241, and 244 from HSWA Cluster II and
RCRA Clusters XXVII and XXX. The EPA is authorizing all of these
changes.
The PRA also included revisions to Checklists 212, 214, 231, 233B,
233D2, 233E, and 237. Tennessee was previously authorized for these
Checklists in the September 12, 2022, Final Authorization (87 FR
41610); however, certain provisions of the Tennessee regulations
associated with these Checklists included omissions or errors that
required correction. Tennessee has corrected these omissions and errors
and has submitted the corrected provisions for authorization. The EPA
is authorizing all but two \3\ of these revised provisions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The changes to both Rule 0400-12-01.09(8)(a)2(iii) from
Checklist 212, and Rule 0400-12-01-.02 (29)(a)1, from Checklist
233E, are not being authorized due to inaccuracies in the state
regulatory text. The prior versions of each of these provisions were
authorized in the September 12, 2022, Final Authorization (87 FR
41610). Tennessee will correct these inaccuracies in a future
rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EPA has determined, subject to receipt of written comments that
oppose this action, that Tennessee's hazardous waste program revisions
are equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent than the
Federal program, and therefore satisfy all of the requirements
necessary to qualify for final authorization. Therefore, the EPA grants
final authorization to Tennessee for the following program changes:
A. Newly Submitted Checklists
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of Federal Federal Register Analogous state
requirement date and page authority \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Checklist 44C, Corrective 52 FR 45788, 12/1/ 0400-12-01-.05(1)(b)2
Action for Injection Wells. 1987. (ix) [reserved]; and
0400-12-01-.07(1)(c)
1(ii)(III)I and II.
Checklist 241, Management 84 FR 5816, 02/22/ 0400-12-01-.02(1)(d)1
Standards for Hazardous Waste 2019. (i)(II) and (1)(g)3;
Pharmaceuticals and Amendment 0400-12-01-.02(4)(d)
to the P075 Listing for 3, (4)(d)3 Comment,
Nicotine. and (4)(d)5 Table;
0400-12-01-.03(1)(a)
2(xii),
(1)(a)2(xiii)(I)
through (III),
(1)(d)3(x),
(1)(e)1(v)(IX), and
(1)(e)1(v)(X); 0400-
12-01-.06(1)(b)2(xi)
; 0400-12-01-
.05(1)(b)2(xiii);
0400-12-01-.09(16);
0400-12-01-.10(1)(g)
, (1)(g)1, and
(4)(a)1(iv) and (v);
0400-12-01-.07(1)(b)
4(x); and 0400-12-01-
.12(7)(a)1 and
(7)(a)4.
Checklist 244, Canada Import 86 FR 54381, 10/ 0400-12-01-.03(9)(b),
Export Recovery and Disposal 01/2021. (9)(d)2(iii),
Code Changes. (9)(d)6(vi),
(9)(d)6(vi)(I) and
(II), (9)(e)2(ii),
(9)(e)6(v),
(9)(e)7(ii), and
(9)(e)8(ii)(III);
0400-12-01-.06(2)(c)
1(iv)(II); and 0400-
12-01-.05(2)(c)1(iv)
(II).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Tennessee regulatory citations are from the Tennessee Rules of
the Division of Solid Waste Management (Hazardous Waste Program),
Chapter 0400-12-01. Citations to Rules .02, .03, .05-.07, .09, and .10
within this Chapter refer to the regulatory text revised as of
September 2022. Citations to Rule .12 within this Chapter refer to the
regulatory text revised as of April 2022.
B. Revisions to Previously Authorized Checklists
Tennessee was authorized for each of the Checklists in the table
below as a part of the Final Authorization effective September 12, 2022
(87 FR 41610), although certain provisions contained omissions or
errors that required correction. Tennessee is submitting its revisions
to these previously authorized provisions, and the EPA is authorizing
them here.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of Federal Federal Register Analogous state
requirement date and page authority \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Checklist 212, National 70 FR 59402, 10/ 0400-12-01-.06(15)(a)
Emission Standards for 12/2005. 2(i) and (iii); 0400-
Hazardous Air Pollutants: 12-01-.05(15)(a)2(i)
Final Standards for Hazardous ; 0400-12-01-
Air Pollutants for Hazardous .09(8)(a)2(i); 0400-
Waste Combustors (Phase I 12-01-.07(2)(h),
Final Replacement Standards (2)(h)1, (2)(h)1(i)
and Phase II). through (ix),\2\ and
(2)(h)2 (removed);
0400-12-01-.07(5)(b)
5(v), (5)(b)8,
(5)(b)10(iv)(III),
and
(5)(b)11(v)(III);
0400-12-01-.07(8)(b)
2(iii); 0400-12-01-
.07(9)(c)5(x)(I)
through (III),
(9)(c)5(xi)(I),
(9)(c)5(xi)(I) I and
II, (9)(c)5(xi)(I)
IV, and
(9)(c)5(xi)(II), and
(9)(c)5(xi)(II) I;
0400-12-01-.07(10)(l
)10; 0400-12-01-
.07(1)(e) and
(1)(j); and 0400-12-
01-.07(12)(a)1(i)-(i
i), (12)(a)2(i), and
(12)(a)3.
[[Page 91577]]
Checklist 214, Corrections to 71 FR 40254, 7/14/ 0400-12-01-.05(14)(b)
Errors in the Code of Federal 2006. 4(i); \3\ and 0400-
Regulations. 12-01-.10(3)(f)
table 1.
Checklist 231, Hazardous Waste 79 FR 7518, 2/7/ 0400-12-01-.01(7)(a)1
Electronic Manifest System; 2014. (i)(II).
Final Rule.
Checklist 233B, Legitimacy- 80 FR 1694, 1/13/ 0400-12-01-.01(5)(d)2
related provisions, including 2015. and (5)(d)2(ii).\4\
prohibition of sham
recycling, definition of
legitimacy, definition of
contained.
Checklist 233D2, 2008 DSW 80 FR 1694, 1/13/ 0400-12-01-.01(2)(a)
exclusions and non-waste 2015; 83 FR Definition of
determinations, including 24664, 5/30/2018. ``Facility''; and
revisions from 2015 DSW final 0400-12-01-.02(13)(b
rule and 2018 DSW final rule. )5, (13)(b)6(i),
(13)(b)6(ii),
(13)(c), (13)(c)2,
(13)(c)3,
(13)(c)4(iii),
(13)(d),
(13)(d)1(i),
(13)(d)2(ii), and
(13)(d)6(viii)(II).\
5\
Checklist 233E, 80 FR 1694, 1/13/ 0400-12-01-.02(1)(d)1
Remanufacturing exclusion. 2015. (xxvii)(VI) II E and
(1)(d)1(xxvii)(VI)
V; 0400-12-01-
.02(10)(d)1 Note and
(10)(g) Notes; 0400-
12-01-.02(27)(a),
(27)(d)14(i)(II),\6\
and
(27)(d)14(i)(III);
0400-12-01-.02(28)(a
)1; and 0400-12-01-
.02(29)(b).
Checklist 237, Hazardous Waste 81 FR 85732, 11/ 0400-12-01-.03(1)(a)2
Generator Improvements Rule. 28/2016. (i)(II); 0400-12-01-
.03(12)(j)4
(removed).\7\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Tennessee regulatory citations are from the Tennessee Rules of
the Division of Solid Waste Management (Hazardous Waste Program),
Chapter 0400-12-01. Citations to Rules .01-.03, .05-.07, .09, and .10
within this Chapter refer to the regulatory text revised as of
September 2023.
\2\ The subparts of 0400-12-01-.07(2)(h)1 were also renumbered by the
State, but the contents of the Part did not change as a result of the
renumbering.
\3\ Rule 0400-12-01.05(14)(b)4(i) was noted in the 2022 Final
Authorization to have an incorrect cross-reference to Rule 0400-12-01-
.02(3)(d). It has now been corrected to properly refer to Rule 0400-12-
01-.02(3)(e).
\4\ In the 2022 Final Authorization, these two provisions were
authorized, but it was noted that the parenthetical notes about
legitimate recycling that accompanied each provision at that time were
unclear and would be removed or clarified by Tennessee in a subsequent
rulemaking. Both parenthetical notes have now been removed, and the
EPA is re-authorizing both provisions without them.
\5\ Several subsections throughout Paragraph 13 of Rule 0400-12-01-.02
that were noted in the 2022 Final Authorization have been clarified
with respect to the management of hazardous secondary materials.
\6\ Tennessee Rule 0400-12-01-.02(27)(d)14(i)(II) was noted in the 2022
Final Authorization to have incorrect cross-references to Paragraphs
(30) and (32) of Rule 0400-12-01-.06. They have now been corrected to
properly refer to Rules 0400-12-01-.02(27) and (29).
\7\ Tennessee Rule 0400-12-01-.03(12)(j)4 was noted in the 2022 Final
Authorization as containing an incorrect waiver that would need to be
excluded in a subsequent rulemaking. Tennessee has now properly
removed it from its regulations.
VII. Where are the revised State rules different than the Federal
rules?
When revised State rules differ from the Federal rules in the RCRA
state authorization process, the EPA determines whether the State rules
are equivalent to, more stringent than, or broader in scope than the
Federal program. Pursuant to RCRA section 3009, 42 U.S.C. 6929, State
programs may contain requirements that are more stringent than the
Federal regulations. Such more stringent requirements can be federally
authorized and, once authorized, become federally enforceable. Although
the statute does not prevent States from adopting regulations that are
broader in scope than the Federal program, states cannot receive
Federal authorization for such regulations, and they are not federally
enforceable. There are no State requirements in the program revisions
listed in the tables above that are considered to be broader in scope
than the Federal requirements. The EPA has determined that certain
regulations included in Tennessee's program revisions listed in the
first table above are more stringent than the Federal program. These
more stringent requirements will become part of the federally
enforceable RCRA program in Tennessee when authorized.
Tennessee's program is more stringent than the Federal program at
0400-12-01-.09(16)(c)1(i)(I); 0400-12-01-.09(16)(c)9(i); 0400-12-
01-.09(16)(d)4; and 0400-12-01-.09(16)(k)3(ix)(I)--in each case because
the Tennessee program requires annual reporting instead of biennial
reporting.
It should be noted that States cannot receive authorization for
certain Federal regulatory functions involving international shipments
(i.e., import and export provisions) such as those associated with the
Canada Import Export Recovery and Disposal Code Changes Rule (Checklist
244). Although Tennessee has adopted these rules to maintain its
equivalency with the Federal program, it has appropriately maintained
the Federal references.
VIII. Who handles permits after the authorization takes effect?
When final authorization takes effect, Tennessee will issue permits
for all the provisions for which it is authorized and will administer
the permits it issues. The EPA will continue to administer any RCRA
hazardous waste permits or portions of permits that the EPA issued
prior to the effective date of authorization until they expire or are
terminated. The EPA will not issue any new permits or new portions of
permits for the provisions listed in the table above after the
effective date of the final authorization. The EPA will continue to
implement and issue permits for HSWA requirements for which Tennessee
is not yet authorized. The EPA has the authority to enforce State-
issued permits after the State is authorized.
IX. What is codification and is the EPA codifying Tennessee's hazardous
waste program as authorized in this action?
Codification is the process of placing citations and references to
the State's statutes and regulations that comprise the State's
authorized hazardous waste program into the Code of Federal
Regulations. The EPA does this by adding those citations and references
to the authorized State rules in 40 CFR part 272. The EPA is not
codifying the authorization of Tennessee's revisions at this time.
However, the EPA reserves the ability to amend 40 CFR part 272, subpart
RR, for the authorization of Tennessee's program changes at a later
date.
[[Page 91578]]
X. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted this action
from the requirements of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4,
1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011). This action authorizes
State requirements for the purpose of RCRA section 3006 and imposes no
additional requirements beyond those imposed by State law. Therefore,
this action is not subject to review by OMB. This action is not an
Executive Order 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023) regulatory action
because actions such as the authorization of Tennessee's revised
hazardous waste program under RCRA are exempted under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, I certify that this action will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this action authorizes pre-existing requirements under State law and
does not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
State law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538). For the same reason,
this action also does not significantly or uniquely affect the
communities of Tribal governments, as specified by Executive Order
13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999),
because it merely authorizes State requirements as part of the State
RCRA hazardous waste program without altering the relationship or the
distribution of power and responsibilities established by RCRA. This
action also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April
23, 1997), because it is not economically significant, and it does not
make decisions based on environmental health or safety risks. This
action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
Under RCRA section 3006(b), the EPA grants a State's application
for authorization as long as the State meets the criteria required by
RCRA. It would thus be inconsistent with applicable law for the EPA,
when it reviews a State authorization application, to require the use
of any particular voluntary consensus standard in place of another
standard that otherwise satisfies the requirements of RCRA. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. As required
by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996),
in issuing this rule, the EPA has taken the necessary steps to
eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct. The EPA has
complied with Executive Order 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 18, 1988), by
examining the takings implications of this action in accordance with
the ``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of
Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the
Executive order. This action does not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). ``Burden'' is defined at 5 CFR 1320.3(b).
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States. Because this action authorizes pre-
existing State rules which are at least equivalent to, and no less
stringent than existing Federal requirements, and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by State law, and there are no
anticipated significant adverse human health or environmental effects,
this rule is not subject to Executive Order 12898.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this document
and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect
until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This
action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). This
final action will be effective January 21, 2025.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 271
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous waste, Hazardous waste
transportation, Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Authority: This action is issued under the authority of sections
2002(a), 3006, and 7004(b) of the Solid Waste Disposal Act as
amended, 42 U.S.C. 6912(a), 6926, and 6974(b).
Dated: November 6, 2024.
Jeaneanne Gettle,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2024-26922 Filed 11-19-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P