Safety Zone; Waterway Training Area, Delaware River, Near Eddystone, PA, 88648-88650 [2024-25958]

Download as PDF 88648 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2024 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket Number USCG–2024–0680] RIN 1625–AA00 Safety Zone; Waterway Training Area, Delaware River, Near Eddystone, PA Coast Guard, DHS. Final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone for certain waters of the Delaware River. This action is necessary to provide for the safety of life on the navigable waters on a portion of the Delaware River near Eddystone, PA, during non-lethal signaling and warning device training conducted from onboard U.S. Coast Guard vessels. This rule prohibits persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP), Sector Delaware Bay or a designated representative. SUMMARY: DATES: This rule is effective December 9, 2024. To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket, go to https:// www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2024– 0680 in the search box and click ‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related Material.’’ ADDRESSES: If you have questions about this rulemaking, call or email LCDR Owen Mims, Chief Waterways Management Division, U.S. Coast Guard; 215–271– 4814, SecDelBayWWM@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: I. Table of Abbreviations CFR Code of Federal Regulations COTP Captain of the Port DHS Department of Homeland Security FR Federal Register NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking § Section U.S.C. United States Code ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 II. Background Information and Regulatory History To maintain ports, waterways, and coastal security mission readiness, Coast Guard personnel within the Sector Delaware Bay COTP Zone must conduct LA51 device training. As we explained in a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), the LA51 is a non-lethal signaling and warning device Coast Guard personnel use during law VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:38 Nov 07, 2024 Jkt 265001 enforcement operations for getting the attention of vessels which do not respond to orders from the Coast Guard. The NPRM was published on September 9, 2024, and titled Safety Zone; Waterway Training Area, Delaware River, Near Eddystone, PA (89 FR 73055). At the present time, Coast Guard personnel within the Sector Delaware Bay COTP Zone must transit beyond the 12 NM baseline to conduct LA51 device training. This is a logistical and financial burden for the units within Sector Delaware Bay COTP Zone and it limits training opportunities. To better accommodate the Sector’s training needs, the COTP Sector Delaware Bay proposed to establish a safety zone shoreward of the 12 nautical miles (NM) baseline for use as a waterway training area in the Delaware River. In the NPRM, we invited comments on our proposed regulatory action related to this safety zone. During the comment period that ended October 9, 2024, we received no comments. III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under the authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of vessels and the navigable waters within the waterway training area before, during, and after the training events. IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM. There are no changes in the regulatory text of this rule from the proposed rule in the NPRM. The COTP Sector Delaware Bay is establishing a safety zone for use as a waterway training area. The safety zone waterway training area will only be used to conduct LA51 device training as needed for Coast Guard Law Enforcement training requirements. And the COTP Sector Delaware Bay will only activate the safety zone, making it subject to enforcement, during periods when training is being conducted. The waterway training area includes all navigable waters, on a portion of the Delaware River, near Eddystone, PA, west of Little Tinicum Island and east of Chester Island. The safety zone is a square in shape measuring approximately 2,500 yards in length and approximately 2,500 yards in width. The exact coordinates of the safety zone are provided in the text of the rule, which is provided at the end of this FR article. The waterway training area will be located within a portion of the main PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 navigable channel in the Delaware River. Although this safety zone encompasses a portion of the main navigational channel in the Delaware River that is used by the commercial and recreational vessels, vessel traffic in this area would be able to safely transit through the safety zone after obtaining permission from the COTP Sector Delaware Bay or a designated representative. The Coast Guard will ensure appropriate monitoring of the waterway while the safety zone is activated. The Coast Guard anticipates that the proposed safety zone would be activated for approximately two hours on six separate occasions annually—a total of approximately 12 annual enforcement hours for the zone. The Coast Guard anticipates that it would activate the zone at various times of the year during daylight hours only. Whenever a LA51 device training event is planned, the COTP Sector Delaware Bay would notify the maritime community of the enforcement dates and times of the safety zone as the training event dictates. Such notification would be made by broadcast or local notice to mariners, on-scene oral notice, or other appropriate means in accordance with 33 CFR 165.7. The duration and enforcement of the zone is intended to ensure the safety of vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after these training events. Except for training participants, no vessel or person would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining permission from the COTP Sector Delaware Bay or a designated representative. V. Regulatory Analyses We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we discuss First Amendment rights of protestors. A. Regulatory Planning and Review Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review). Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM 08NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2024 / Rules and Regulations This regulatory action determination is based on the size, duration, and location of the safety zone. It is anticipated that the safety zone will be activated for six separate events annually. Vessel traffic will be able to safely transit through the safety zone while being enforced, with permission from the COTP Sector Delaware Bay or a designated representative by telephone at (215) 271–4807 or on VHF– FM radio channel 16. The impact to the Delaware River would be for approximately 2 hours or less. Moreover, the Coast Guard will release the details of the zone via a Broadcast Notice to Mariners on VHF–FM radio channel 16 and publish in the Local Notice to Mariners. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 B. Impact on Small Entities The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on any vessel owner or operator. If you think that your business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what degree this rule would economically affect it. Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we want to assist small entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:38 Nov 07, 2024 Jkt 265001 C. Collection of Information This rule will not call for a new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520). D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 13132. Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. F. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a safety zone lasting approximately two hours on six separate occasions annually for LA51 device training. It is categorically excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01– PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 88649 001–01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket. For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this preamble. G. Protest Activities The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or security of people, places or vessels. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3. ■ 2. Add § 165.523 to read as follows: § 165.523 Safety Zone; Waterway Training Area, Sector Delaware Bay Captain of the Port Zone (a) Location. All navigable waters, on a portion of the Delaware River, encompassed by a line connecting the following points beginning at latitude 39°51′05.4″ N, longitude 075°20′17.4″ W; thence east to latitude 39°51′42.0″ N, longitude 075°18′39.6″ W; thence south to latitude 39°50′38.4″ N, longitude 075°18′09.0″ W; thence west to latitude 39°50′05.4″ N, 075°19′37.2″ W; and thence north back to the beginning point. (WGS 84) (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard petty officer, warrant or commissioned officer onboard a Coast Guard vessel or onboard a federal, state, or local law enforcement vessel assisting the Captain of the Port (COTP), Sector Delaware Bay in the enforcement of the safety zone. (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in subpart C of this part, you may not enter or remain in the safety zone described in paragraph (a) of this section unless E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM 08NOR1 88650 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2024 / Rules and Regulations authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s designated representative. (2) To seek permission to enter or remain in the zone, contact the COTP or the COTP’s representative via VHF–FM channel 16 or (215) 271–4807. Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP’s designated representative. (3) No vessel authorized to enter or remain in the zone may take on bunkers or conduct lightering operations within the safety zone during its enforcement period. (4) This section applies to all vessels except those engaged in law enforcement, aids to navigation servicing, and emergency response operations. (d) Enforcement. (1) The safety zone created by this section will be enforced only upon issuance of a Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNM) by the COTP or the COTP’s representative, as well as on-scene notice or other appropriate means in accordance with § 165.7. (2) The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local agencies. Dated: November 4, 2024. Kate F. Higgins-Bloom, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Delaware Bay. [FR Doc. 2024–25958 Filed 11–7–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Parts 9 and 257 [EPA–HQ–OLEM–2020–0107; FRL–7814.1– 02–OLEM] RIN 2050–AH34 Hazardous and Solid Waste Management System: Disposal of Coal Combustion Residuals From Electric Utilities; Legacy CCR Surface Impoundments; Correction Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Direct final rule; correction. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or the Agency) is taking direct final action to correct three errors published in the Federal Register on May 8, 2024. This May 8, 2024 rule (Legacy Final Rule) established regulatory requirements for legacy coal combustion residuals (CCR) surface impoundments and CCR management units, among other things, under the Resource Conservation and Recovery ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:38 Nov 07, 2024 Jkt 265001 Act (RCRA). This document makes clear that the effective date of the Legacy Final Rule is November 8, 2024 and corrects inadvertent deletions in the existing 2015 regulatory text. DATES: This rule is effective on February 6, 2025 without further notice unless EPA receives adverse comment by December 9, 2024. If EPA receives adverse comment, the Agency will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public about the specific regulatory paragraph or amendment that will not take effect. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OLEM–2020–0107. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available electronically through https:// www.regulations.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Taylor Holt, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, Materials Recovery and Waste Management Division, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, MC: 5304T, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 566– 1439; email address: Holt.Taylor@ epa.gov, or Frank Behan, Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, Materials Recovery and Waste Management Division, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, MC: 5304T, Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: (202) 566–0531; email address: Behan.Frank@ epa.gov. For more information on this rulemaking, please visit https:// www.epa.gov/coalash. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Why is the EPA using a direct final rule? EPA is publishing this rule without a prior proposed rule because EPA views this as a noncontroversial action and anticipates no adverse comment since the amendments merely correct errors in the Legacy Final Rule. However, in the ‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of this Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document that will serve as the proposed rule to adopt the provisions in this direct final rule if adverse comments are received on this direct final rule. The Agency will not institute a second comment period on PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. For further information about commenting on this rule, see the ADDRESSES section of the proposed rule document. If EPA receives adverse comment, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register informing the public about the specific regulatory paragraph(s) or amendment(s) that will not take effect. The corrections that are not withdrawn will become effective on the date set out above. EPA would address all public comments in any subsequent final rule based on the comments and new information submitted in response to the proposed rule. In light of the narrow purpose of this rule to conform the regulatory text to the final actions described in the Legacy Final Rule, EPA is only soliciting comment on whether the changes in this direct final rule conform the text to EPA’s stated intent in the Legacy Final Rule preamble. EPA is not reconsidering, proposing to reopen, or otherwise soliciting comment on any provisions of the Legacy Final Rule itself. For the reader’s convenience, EPA has provided a background description of individual provisions in the Legacy Final Rule in several places throughout this preamble. These descriptions do not reopen the underlying described provisions, but merely explain the context to inform the public of the basis for this action’s technical corrections. EPA will not respond to comments submitted on any issues other than those specifically identified in this action, and such comments will not be considered part of the rulemaking record. II. General Information A. Does this action apply to me? This rule may be of interest to electric utilities and independent power producers that fall within the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 221112. The reference to NAICS code 221112 is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this action. This discussion lists the types of entities that EPA is now aware could potentially be regulated by this action. Other types of entities not described here could also be regulated. To determine whether your entity is regulated by this action, you should carefully examine the applicability criteria found in 40 CFR 257.50 of title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations. If you have questions regarding the applicability of this action to a E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM 08NOR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 217 (Friday, November 8, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 88648-88650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25958]



[[Page 88648]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket Number USCG-2024-0680]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Waterway Training Area, Delaware River, Near 
Eddystone, PA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone for certain 
waters of the Delaware River. This action is necessary to provide for 
the safety of life on the navigable waters on a portion of the Delaware 
River near Eddystone, PA, during non-lethal signaling and warning 
device training conducted from onboard U.S. Coast Guard vessels. This 
rule prohibits persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless 
authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP), Sector Delaware Bay or a 
designated representative.

DATES: This rule is effective December 9, 2024.

ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being 
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2024-0680 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document 
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this 
rulemaking, call or email LCDR Owen Mims, Chief Waterways Management 
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; 215-271-4814, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Table of Abbreviations

CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec.  Section
U.S.C. United States Code

II. Background Information and Regulatory History

    To maintain ports, waterways, and coastal security mission 
readiness, Coast Guard personnel within the Sector Delaware Bay COTP 
Zone must conduct LA51 device training. As we explained in a notice of 
proposed rulemaking (NPRM), the LA51 is a non-lethal signaling and 
warning device Coast Guard personnel use during law enforcement 
operations for getting the attention of vessels which do not respond to 
orders from the Coast Guard. The NPRM was published on September 9, 
2024, and titled Safety Zone; Waterway Training Area, Delaware River, 
Near Eddystone, PA (89 FR 73055).
    At the present time, Coast Guard personnel within the Sector 
Delaware Bay COTP Zone must transit beyond the 12 NM baseline to 
conduct LA51 device training. This is a logistical and financial burden 
for the units within Sector Delaware Bay COTP Zone and it limits 
training opportunities. To better accommodate the Sector's training 
needs, the COTP Sector Delaware Bay proposed to establish a safety zone 
shoreward of the 12 nautical miles (NM) baseline for use as a waterway 
training area in the Delaware River. In the NPRM, we invited comments 
on our proposed regulatory action related to this safety zone. During 
the comment period that ended October 9, 2024, we received no comments.

III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule

    The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under the authority in 46 
U.S.C. 70034. The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of 
vessels and the navigable waters within the waterway training area 
before, during, and after the training events.

IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule

    As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM. There are no 
changes in the regulatory text of this rule from the proposed rule in 
the NPRM.
    The COTP Sector Delaware Bay is establishing a safety zone for use 
as a waterway training area. The safety zone waterway training area 
will only be used to conduct LA51 device training as needed for Coast 
Guard Law Enforcement training requirements. And the COTP Sector 
Delaware Bay will only activate the safety zone, making it subject to 
enforcement, during periods when training is being conducted.
    The waterway training area includes all navigable waters, on a 
portion of the Delaware River, near Eddystone, PA, west of Little 
Tinicum Island and east of Chester Island. The safety zone is a square 
in shape measuring approximately 2,500 yards in length and 
approximately 2,500 yards in width. The exact coordinates of the safety 
zone are provided in the text of the rule, which is provided at the end 
of this FR article.
    The waterway training area will be located within a portion of the 
main navigable channel in the Delaware River. Although this safety zone 
encompasses a portion of the main navigational channel in the Delaware 
River that is used by the commercial and recreational vessels, vessel 
traffic in this area would be able to safely transit through the safety 
zone after obtaining permission from the COTP Sector Delaware Bay or a 
designated representative. The Coast Guard will ensure appropriate 
monitoring of the waterway while the safety zone is activated.
    The Coast Guard anticipates that the proposed safety zone would be 
activated for approximately two hours on six separate occasions 
annually--a total of approximately 12 annual enforcement hours for the 
zone. The Coast Guard anticipates that it would activate the zone at 
various times of the year during daylight hours only. Whenever a LA51 
device training event is planned, the COTP Sector Delaware Bay would 
notify the maritime community of the enforcement dates and times of the 
safety zone as the training event dictates. Such notification would be 
made by broadcast or local notice to mariners, on-scene oral notice, or 
other appropriate means in accordance with 33 CFR 165.7.
    The duration and enforcement of the zone is intended to ensure the 
safety of vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after 
these training events. Except for training participants, no vessel or 
person would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining 
permission from the COTP Sector Delaware Bay or a designated 
representative.

V. Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we 
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.

A. Regulatory Planning and Review

    Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the 
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if 
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize 
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant 
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as 
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review). 
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB).

[[Page 88649]]

    This regulatory action determination is based on the size, 
duration, and location of the safety zone. It is anticipated that the 
safety zone will be activated for six separate events annually. Vessel 
traffic will be able to safely transit through the safety zone while 
being enforced, with permission from the COTP Sector Delaware Bay or a 
designated representative by telephone at (215) 271-4807 or on VHF-FM 
radio channel 16. The impact to the Delaware River would be for 
approximately 2 hours or less. Moreover, the Coast Guard will release 
the details of the zone via a Broadcast Notice to Mariners on VHF-FM 
radio channel 16 and publish in the Local Notice to Mariners.

B. Impact on Small Entities

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as 
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of 
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small 
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations 
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their 
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this 
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities.
    While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the 
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section 
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic 
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
    If you think that your business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule 
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment 
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to 
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small 
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule 
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental 
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or 
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the 
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not 
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this 
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.

C. Collection of Information

    This rule will not call for a new collection of information under 
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments

    A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the 
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the 
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of 
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have 
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism 
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order 
13132.
    Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive 
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal 
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on 
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal 
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for 
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in 
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere 
in this preamble.

F. Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and 
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast 
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of 
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a 
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a 
safety zone lasting approximately two hours on six separate occasions 
annually for LA51 device training. It is categorically excluded from 
further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS 
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental 
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket. 
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of 
this preamble.

G. Protest Activities

    The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters. 
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR 
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so 
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or 
security of people, places or vessels.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.

    For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 
33 CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.


0
2. Add Sec.  165.523 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.523  Safety Zone; Waterway Training Area, Sector Delaware Bay 
Captain of the Port Zone

    (a) Location. All navigable waters, on a portion of the Delaware 
River, encompassed by a line connecting the following points beginning 
at latitude 39[deg]51'05.4'' N, longitude 075[deg]20'17.4'' W; thence 
east to latitude 39[deg]51'42.0'' N, longitude 075[deg]18'39.6'' W; 
thence south to latitude 39[deg]50'38.4'' N, longitude 
075[deg]18'09.0'' W; thence west to latitude 39[deg]50'05.4'' N, 
075[deg]19'37.2'' W; and thence north back to the beginning point. (WGS 
84)
    (b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative 
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard petty 
officer, warrant or commissioned officer onboard a Coast Guard vessel 
or onboard a federal, state, or local law enforcement vessel assisting 
the Captain of the Port (COTP), Sector Delaware Bay in the enforcement 
of the safety zone.
    (c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in 
subpart C of this part, you may not enter or remain in the safety zone 
described in paragraph (a) of this section unless

[[Page 88650]]

authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
    (2) To seek permission to enter or remain in the zone, contact the 
COTP or the COTP's representative via VHF-FM channel 16 or (215) 271-
4807. Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or 
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated 
representative.
    (3) No vessel authorized to enter or remain in the zone may take on 
bunkers or conduct lightering operations within the safety zone during 
its enforcement period.
    (4) This section applies to all vessels except those engaged in law 
enforcement, aids to navigation servicing, and emergency response 
operations.
    (d) Enforcement. (1) The safety zone created by this section will 
be enforced only upon issuance of a Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNM) 
by the COTP or the COTP's representative, as well as on-scene notice or 
other appropriate means in accordance with Sec.  165.7.
    (2) The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and 
enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.

    Dated: November 4, 2024.
Kate F. Higgins-Bloom,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Delaware Bay.
[FR Doc. 2024-25958 Filed 11-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.