Safety Zone; Waterway Training Area, Delaware River, Near Eddystone, PA, 88648-88650 [2024-25958]
Download as PDF
88648
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2024–0680]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Waterway Training Area,
Delaware River, Near Eddystone, PA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone for certain
waters of the Delaware River. This
action is necessary to provide for the
safety of life on the navigable waters on
a portion of the Delaware River near
Eddystone, PA, during non-lethal
signaling and warning device training
conducted from onboard U.S. Coast
Guard vessels. This rule prohibits
persons and vessels from being in the
safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port (COTP), Sector
Delaware Bay or a designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
This rule is effective December 9,
2024.
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2024–
0680 in the search box and click
‘‘Search.’’ Next, in the Document Type
column, select ‘‘Supporting & Related
Material.’’
ADDRESSES:
If
you have questions about this
rulemaking, call or email LCDR Owen
Mims, Chief Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; 215–271–
4814, SecDelBayWWM@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
To maintain ports, waterways, and
coastal security mission readiness, Coast
Guard personnel within the Sector
Delaware Bay COTP Zone must conduct
LA51 device training. As we explained
in a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM), the LA51 is a non-lethal
signaling and warning device Coast
Guard personnel use during law
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:38 Nov 07, 2024
Jkt 265001
enforcement operations for getting the
attention of vessels which do not
respond to orders from the Coast Guard.
The NPRM was published on September
9, 2024, and titled Safety Zone;
Waterway Training Area, Delaware
River, Near Eddystone, PA (89 FR
73055).
At the present time, Coast Guard
personnel within the Sector Delaware
Bay COTP Zone must transit beyond the
12 NM baseline to conduct LA51 device
training. This is a logistical and
financial burden for the units within
Sector Delaware Bay COTP Zone and it
limits training opportunities. To better
accommodate the Sector’s training
needs, the COTP Sector Delaware Bay
proposed to establish a safety zone
shoreward of the 12 nautical miles (NM)
baseline for use as a waterway training
area in the Delaware River. In the
NPRM, we invited comments on our
proposed regulatory action related to
this safety zone. During the comment
period that ended October 9, 2024, we
received no comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under the authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034.
The purpose of this rulemaking is to
ensure the safety of vessels and the
navigable waters within the waterway
training area before, during, and after
the training events.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes,
and the Rule
As noted above, we received no
comments on our NPRM. There are no
changes in the regulatory text of this
rule from the proposed rule in the
NPRM.
The COTP Sector Delaware Bay is
establishing a safety zone for use as a
waterway training area. The safety zone
waterway training area will only be
used to conduct LA51 device training as
needed for Coast Guard Law
Enforcement training requirements. And
the COTP Sector Delaware Bay will only
activate the safety zone, making it
subject to enforcement, during periods
when training is being conducted.
The waterway training area includes
all navigable waters, on a portion of the
Delaware River, near Eddystone, PA,
west of Little Tinicum Island and east
of Chester Island. The safety zone is a
square in shape measuring
approximately 2,500 yards in length and
approximately 2,500 yards in width.
The exact coordinates of the safety zone
are provided in the text of the rule,
which is provided at the end of this FR
article.
The waterway training area will be
located within a portion of the main
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
navigable channel in the Delaware
River. Although this safety zone
encompasses a portion of the main
navigational channel in the Delaware
River that is used by the commercial
and recreational vessels, vessel traffic in
this area would be able to safely transit
through the safety zone after obtaining
permission from the COTP Sector
Delaware Bay or a designated
representative. The Coast Guard will
ensure appropriate monitoring of the
waterway while the safety zone is
activated.
The Coast Guard anticipates that the
proposed safety zone would be activated
for approximately two hours on six
separate occasions annually—a total of
approximately 12 annual enforcement
hours for the zone. The Coast Guard
anticipates that it would activate the
zone at various times of the year during
daylight hours only. Whenever a LA51
device training event is planned, the
COTP Sector Delaware Bay would notify
the maritime community of the
enforcement dates and times of the
safety zone as the training event
dictates. Such notification would be
made by broadcast or local notice to
mariners, on-scene oral notice, or other
appropriate means in accordance with
33 CFR 165.7.
The duration and enforcement of the
zone is intended to ensure the safety of
vessels and these navigable waters
before, during, and after these training
events. Except for training participants,
no vessel or person would be permitted
to enter the safety zone without
obtaining permission from the COTP
Sector Delaware Bay or a designated
representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094
(Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB).
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, duration, and
location of the safety zone. It is
anticipated that the safety zone will be
activated for six separate events
annually. Vessel traffic will be able to
safely transit through the safety zone
while being enforced, with permission
from the COTP Sector Delaware Bay or
a designated representative by
telephone at (215) 271–4807 or on VHF–
FM radio channel 16. The impact to the
Delaware River would be for
approximately 2 hours or less.
Moreover, the Coast Guard will release
the details of the zone via a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners on VHF–FM radio
channel 16 and publish in the Local
Notice to Mariners.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this proposed rule would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the safety
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section IV.A above,
this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule. If the
proposed rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this proposed rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:38 Nov 07, 2024
Jkt 265001
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a safety
zone lasting approximately two hours
on six separate occasions annually for
LA51 device training. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table
1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
88649
001–01, Rev. 1. A Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
■
2. Add § 165.523 to read as follows:
§ 165.523 Safety Zone; Waterway Training
Area, Sector Delaware Bay Captain of the
Port Zone
(a) Location. All navigable waters, on
a portion of the Delaware River,
encompassed by a line connecting the
following points beginning at latitude
39°51′05.4″ N, longitude 075°20′17.4″
W; thence east to latitude 39°51′42.0″ N,
longitude 075°18′39.6″ W; thence south
to latitude 39°50′38.4″ N, longitude
075°18′09.0″ W; thence west to latitude
39°50′05.4″ N, 075°19′37.2″ W; and
thence north back to the beginning
point. (WGS 84)
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
petty officer, warrant or commissioned
officer onboard a Coast Guard vessel or
onboard a federal, state, or local law
enforcement vessel assisting the Captain
of the Port (COTP), Sector Delaware Bay
in the enforcement of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
safety zone regulations in subpart C of
this part, you may not enter or remain
in the safety zone described in
paragraph (a) of this section unless
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
88650
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 217 / Friday, November 8, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter or
remain in the zone, contact the COTP or
the COTP’s representative via VHF–FM
channel 16 or (215) 271–4807. Those in
the safety zone must comply with all
lawful orders or directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(3) No vessel authorized to enter or
remain in the zone may take on bunkers
or conduct lightering operations within
the safety zone during its enforcement
period.
(4) This section applies to all vessels
except those engaged in law
enforcement, aids to navigation
servicing, and emergency response
operations.
(d) Enforcement. (1) The safety zone
created by this section will be enforced
only upon issuance of a Broadcast
Notice to Mariners (BNM) by the COTP
or the COTP’s representative, as well as
on-scene notice or other appropriate
means in accordance with § 165.7.
(2) The U.S. Coast Guard may be
assisted in the patrol and enforcement
of the safety zone by Federal, State, and
local agencies.
Dated: November 4, 2024.
Kate F. Higgins-Bloom,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port, Sector Delaware Bay.
[FR Doc. 2024–25958 Filed 11–7–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 9 and 257
[EPA–HQ–OLEM–2020–0107; FRL–7814.1–
02–OLEM]
RIN 2050–AH34
Hazardous and Solid Waste
Management System: Disposal of Coal
Combustion Residuals From Electric
Utilities; Legacy CCR Surface
Impoundments; Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA or the Agency) is taking
direct final action to correct three errors
published in the Federal Register on
May 8, 2024. This May 8, 2024 rule
(Legacy Final Rule) established
regulatory requirements for legacy coal
combustion residuals (CCR) surface
impoundments and CCR management
units, among other things, under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with RULES1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:38 Nov 07, 2024
Jkt 265001
Act (RCRA). This document makes clear
that the effective date of the Legacy
Final Rule is November 8, 2024 and
corrects inadvertent deletions in the
existing 2015 regulatory text.
DATES: This rule is effective on February
6, 2025 without further notice unless
EPA receives adverse comment by
December 9, 2024. If EPA receives
adverse comment, the Agency will
publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register informing the public
about the specific regulatory paragraph
or amendment that will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OLEM–2020–0107. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., CBI or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Taylor Holt, Office of Resource
Conservation and Recovery, Materials
Recovery and Waste Management
Division, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, MC: 5304T, Washington, DC
20460; telephone number: (202) 566–
1439; email address: Holt.Taylor@
epa.gov, or Frank Behan, Office of
Resource Conservation and Recovery,
Materials Recovery and Waste
Management Division, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, MC: 5304T, Washington,
DC 20460; telephone number: (202)
566–0531; email address: Behan.Frank@
epa.gov. For more information on this
rulemaking, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/coalash.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Why is the EPA using a direct final
rule?
EPA is publishing this rule without a
prior proposed rule because EPA views
this as a noncontroversial action and
anticipates no adverse comment since
the amendments merely correct errors in
the Legacy Final Rule. However, in the
‘‘Proposed Rules’’ section of this
Federal Register publication, EPA is
publishing a separate document that
will serve as the proposed rule to adopt
the provisions in this direct final rule if
adverse comments are received on this
direct final rule. The Agency will not
institute a second comment period on
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
this action. Any parties interested in
commenting must do so at this time. For
further information about commenting
on this rule, see the ADDRESSES section
of the proposed rule document.
If EPA receives adverse comment,
EPA will publish a timely withdrawal in
the Federal Register informing the
public about the specific regulatory
paragraph(s) or amendment(s) that will
not take effect. The corrections that are
not withdrawn will become effective on
the date set out above. EPA would
address all public comments in any
subsequent final rule based on the
comments and new information
submitted in response to the proposed
rule.
In light of the narrow purpose of this
rule to conform the regulatory text to the
final actions described in the Legacy
Final Rule, EPA is only soliciting
comment on whether the changes in this
direct final rule conform the text to
EPA’s stated intent in the Legacy Final
Rule preamble. EPA is not
reconsidering, proposing to reopen, or
otherwise soliciting comment on any
provisions of the Legacy Final Rule
itself. For the reader’s convenience, EPA
has provided a background description
of individual provisions in the Legacy
Final Rule in several places throughout
this preamble. These descriptions do
not reopen the underlying described
provisions, but merely explain the
context to inform the public of the basis
for this action’s technical corrections.
EPA will not respond to comments
submitted on any issues other than
those specifically identified in this
action, and such comments will not be
considered part of the rulemaking
record.
II. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
This rule may be of interest to electric
utilities and independent power
producers that fall within the North
American Industry Classification
System (NAICS) code 221112. The
reference to NAICS code 221112 is not
intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide for readers regarding
entities likely to be regulated by this
action. This discussion lists the types of
entities that EPA is now aware could
potentially be regulated by this action.
Other types of entities not described
here could also be regulated. To
determine whether your entity is
regulated by this action, you should
carefully examine the applicability
criteria found in 40 CFR 257.50 of title
40 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
If you have questions regarding the
applicability of this action to a
E:\FR\FM\08NOR1.SGM
08NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 217 (Friday, November 8, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 88648-88650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25958]
[[Page 88648]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2024-0680]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Waterway Training Area, Delaware River, Near
Eddystone, PA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone for certain
waters of the Delaware River. This action is necessary to provide for
the safety of life on the navigable waters on a portion of the Delaware
River near Eddystone, PA, during non-lethal signaling and warning
device training conducted from onboard U.S. Coast Guard vessels. This
rule prohibits persons and vessels from being in the safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port (COTP), Sector Delaware Bay or a
designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective December 9, 2024.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2024-0680 in the search box and click ``Search.'' Next, in the Document
Type column, select ``Supporting & Related Material.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions about this
rulemaking, call or email LCDR Owen Mims, Chief Waterways Management
Division, U.S. Coast Guard; 215-271-4814, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
COTP Captain of the Port
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
To maintain ports, waterways, and coastal security mission
readiness, Coast Guard personnel within the Sector Delaware Bay COTP
Zone must conduct LA51 device training. As we explained in a notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM), the LA51 is a non-lethal signaling and
warning device Coast Guard personnel use during law enforcement
operations for getting the attention of vessels which do not respond to
orders from the Coast Guard. The NPRM was published on September 9,
2024, and titled Safety Zone; Waterway Training Area, Delaware River,
Near Eddystone, PA (89 FR 73055).
At the present time, Coast Guard personnel within the Sector
Delaware Bay COTP Zone must transit beyond the 12 NM baseline to
conduct LA51 device training. This is a logistical and financial burden
for the units within Sector Delaware Bay COTP Zone and it limits
training opportunities. To better accommodate the Sector's training
needs, the COTP Sector Delaware Bay proposed to establish a safety zone
shoreward of the 12 nautical miles (NM) baseline for use as a waterway
training area in the Delaware River. In the NPRM, we invited comments
on our proposed regulatory action related to this safety zone. During
the comment period that ended October 9, 2024, we received no comments.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under the authority in 46
U.S.C. 70034. The purpose of this rulemaking is to ensure the safety of
vessels and the navigable waters within the waterway training area
before, during, and after the training events.
IV. Discussion of Comments, Changes, and the Rule
As noted above, we received no comments on our NPRM. There are no
changes in the regulatory text of this rule from the proposed rule in
the NPRM.
The COTP Sector Delaware Bay is establishing a safety zone for use
as a waterway training area. The safety zone waterway training area
will only be used to conduct LA51 device training as needed for Coast
Guard Law Enforcement training requirements. And the COTP Sector
Delaware Bay will only activate the safety zone, making it subject to
enforcement, during periods when training is being conducted.
The waterway training area includes all navigable waters, on a
portion of the Delaware River, near Eddystone, PA, west of Little
Tinicum Island and east of Chester Island. The safety zone is a square
in shape measuring approximately 2,500 yards in length and
approximately 2,500 yards in width. The exact coordinates of the safety
zone are provided in the text of the rule, which is provided at the end
of this FR article.
The waterway training area will be located within a portion of the
main navigable channel in the Delaware River. Although this safety zone
encompasses a portion of the main navigational channel in the Delaware
River that is used by the commercial and recreational vessels, vessel
traffic in this area would be able to safely transit through the safety
zone after obtaining permission from the COTP Sector Delaware Bay or a
designated representative. The Coast Guard will ensure appropriate
monitoring of the waterway while the safety zone is activated.
The Coast Guard anticipates that the proposed safety zone would be
activated for approximately two hours on six separate occasions
annually--a total of approximately 12 annual enforcement hours for the
zone. The Coast Guard anticipates that it would activate the zone at
various times of the year during daylight hours only. Whenever a LA51
device training event is planned, the COTP Sector Delaware Bay would
notify the maritime community of the enforcement dates and times of the
safety zone as the training event dictates. Such notification would be
made by broadcast or local notice to mariners, on-scene oral notice, or
other appropriate means in accordance with 33 CFR 165.7.
The duration and enforcement of the zone is intended to ensure the
safety of vessels and these navigable waters before, during, and after
these training events. Except for training participants, no vessel or
person would be permitted to enter the safety zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP Sector Delaware Bay or a designated
representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, as
amended by Executive Order 14094 (Modernizing Regulatory Review).
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB).
[[Page 88649]]
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
duration, and location of the safety zone. It is anticipated that the
safety zone will be activated for six separate events annually. Vessel
traffic will be able to safely transit through the safety zone while
being enforced, with permission from the COTP Sector Delaware Bay or a
designated representative by telephone at (215) 271-4807 or on VHF-FM
radio channel 16. The impact to the Delaware River would be for
approximately 2 hours or less. Moreover, the Coast Guard will release
the details of the zone via a Broadcast Notice to Mariners on VHF-FM
radio channel 16 and publish in the Local Notice to Mariners.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this
proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
safety zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
IV.A above, this proposed rule would not have a significant economic
impact on any vessel owner or operator.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this proposed rule
would have a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment
(see ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to
what degree this rule would economically affect it.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule. If the proposed rule
would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please call or email the person listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. The Coast Guard will not
retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this
proposed rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves a
safety zone lasting approximately two hours on six separate occasions
annually for LA51 device training. It is categorically excluded from
further review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS
Instruction Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental
Consideration supporting this determination is available in the docket.
For instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of
this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051, 70124; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1,
6.04-6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No.
00170.1, Revision No. 01.3.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.523 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.523 Safety Zone; Waterway Training Area, Sector Delaware Bay
Captain of the Port Zone
(a) Location. All navigable waters, on a portion of the Delaware
River, encompassed by a line connecting the following points beginning
at latitude 39[deg]51'05.4'' N, longitude 075[deg]20'17.4'' W; thence
east to latitude 39[deg]51'42.0'' N, longitude 075[deg]18'39.6'' W;
thence south to latitude 39[deg]50'38.4'' N, longitude
075[deg]18'09.0'' W; thence west to latitude 39[deg]50'05.4'' N,
075[deg]19'37.2'' W; and thence north back to the beginning point. (WGS
84)
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard petty
officer, warrant or commissioned officer onboard a Coast Guard vessel
or onboard a federal, state, or local law enforcement vessel assisting
the Captain of the Port (COTP), Sector Delaware Bay in the enforcement
of the safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general safety zone regulations in
subpart C of this part, you may not enter or remain in the safety zone
described in paragraph (a) of this section unless
[[Page 88650]]
authorized by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter or remain in the zone, contact the
COTP or the COTP's representative via VHF-FM channel 16 or (215) 271-
4807. Those in the safety zone must comply with all lawful orders or
directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative.
(3) No vessel authorized to enter or remain in the zone may take on
bunkers or conduct lightering operations within the safety zone during
its enforcement period.
(4) This section applies to all vessels except those engaged in law
enforcement, aids to navigation servicing, and emergency response
operations.
(d) Enforcement. (1) The safety zone created by this section will
be enforced only upon issuance of a Broadcast Notice to Mariners (BNM)
by the COTP or the COTP's representative, as well as on-scene notice or
other appropriate means in accordance with Sec. 165.7.
(2) The U.S. Coast Guard may be assisted in the patrol and
enforcement of the safety zone by Federal, State, and local agencies.
Dated: November 4, 2024.
Kate F. Higgins-Bloom,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port, Sector Delaware Bay.
[FR Doc. 2024-25958 Filed 11-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P