National Wildlife Refuge System; 2024-2025 Station-Specific Hunting and Sport Fishing Regulations, 88147-88170 [2024-25905]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 88147 NEW HAMPSHIRE NONREGULATORY Name of nonregulatory SIP provision Applicable geographic or nonattainment area State submittal date/effective date EPA approved date * * New Hampshire Regional Haze Plan Periodic Comprehensive Revision for 2nd planning period 2018–2028. * Statewide ................... * Submitted May 6, 2022 (supplemented September 21, 2023). * 11/7/2024 [Insert Federal Register citation]. ‘‘§ 2584.116(a)(1) through (4) and (6) and (d)’’ is corrected to read ‘‘§ 2584.116(a)(1) through (4), (a)(6), and (d)’’. [FR Doc. 2024–25679 Filed 11–6–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE 45 CFR Part 2584 RIN 3045–AA60 Protection of Human Subjects Corporation for National and Community Service. ACTION: Final rule; correction. AGENCY: The Corporation for National and Community Service (operating as AmeriCorps) is correcting a final rule that appeared in the Federal Register on October 29, 2024. These corrections do not include any substantive changes to the final rule. The final rule adopted the Federal Policy for Protection of Human Subjects (referred to as the Common Rule). SUMMARY: DATES: [Corrected] 4. On page 85874, in the second column, the section number ‘‘2258.111’’ in the section heading is corrected to read ‘‘2584.111’’ and on page 85874, in the third column, in § 2584.111(a)(8)(i), the language ‘‘§ 2584.116(a)(1) through (4) and (6) and (d)’’ is corrected to read ‘‘§ 2584.116(a)(1) through (4), (a)(6), and (d)’’. ■ § 2584.113 [Corrected] 5. On page 85875, in the first column, the section number ‘‘2258.113’’ in the section heading is corrected to read ‘‘2584.113’’. ■ Andrea Grill, Acting General Counsel. [FR Doc. 2024–25881 Filed 11–6–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6050–28–P Effective on November 29, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Hyde, Ph.D., Director, AmeriCorps Office of Research and Evaluation, at (202) 606–6834 or mhyde@ americorps.gov. In FR Doc. 2024–24517 beginning on page 85870 in the Federal Register of October 29, 2024, the following corrections are made: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: § 2584.102 [Corrected] 1. Beginning on page 85870, in the third column, and continuing onto page 85871, in the first and second columns, correct § 2584.102 by removing the paragraph designations (f) through (m). ■ § 2584.103 2. On page 85871, in the second column, the section number ‘‘2558.103’’ in the section heading is corrected to read ‘‘2584.103’’. § 2584.104 [Corrected] 3. On page 85873, in the first column, in § 2584.104(d)(8)(i), the language ■ VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 32 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2024–0034; FXRS12610900000–245–FF09R20000] RIN 1018–BH17 National Wildlife Refuge System; 2024– 2025 Station-Specific Hunting and Sport Fishing Regulations Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), open or expand hunting opportunities on 12 National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs). We also close hunting on 111 acres at Crab Orchard NWR so that the area can be repurposed for other recreational uses, including camping. We also make changes to existing station-specific regulations in order to reduce the SUMMARY: [Corrected] ■ lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 § 2584.111 Jkt 265001 PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Explanations * * Approves full plan including supplemental submission containing updated Appendix W. regulatory burden on the public, increase access for hunters and anglers on Service lands and waters, and comply with a Presidential mandate for plain-language standards. Finally, the best available science, analyzed as part of this rulemaking, indicates that lead ammunition and tackle have negative impacts on both wildlife and human health. With this final rule, Canaan Valley NWR in West Virginia will require lead-free ammunition for all hunting on the new Big Cove Unit. Additionally, Des Lacs, J. Clark Salyer, Lostwood, and Upper Souris NWRs in North Dakota will require lead-free ammunition for newly opened elk hunting. While the Service continues to evaluate the future of lead use in hunting and fishing on Service lands and waters, this rulemaking does not include any opportunities that increase or authorize the new use of lead. DATES: This rule is effective November 6, 2024. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christian Myers, (571) 422–3595. Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services. Individuals outside the United States should use the relay services offered within their country to make international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C. 668dd–668ee), as amended (Administration Act), closes NWRs in all States except Alaska to all uses until opened. The Secretary of the Interior (Secretary) may open refuge areas to any use, including hunting and/or sport fishing, upon a determination that the use is compatible with the purposes of the refuge and National Wildlife Refuge System (Refuge System) mission. The action also must be in accordance with provisions of all laws applicable to the areas, developed in coordination with E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 88148 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations the appropriate State fish and wildlife agency(ies), consistent with the principles of sound fish and wildlife management and administration, and otherwise in the public interest. These requirements ensure that we maintain the biological integrity, diversity, and environmental health of the Refuge System for the benefit of present and future generations of Americans. We annually review hunting and sport fishing programs to determine whether to include additional stations or whether individual station regulations governing existing programs need modifications. Changing environmental conditions, State and Federal regulations, and other factors affecting fish and wildlife populations and habitat may warrant modifications to station-specific regulations to ensure the continued compatibility of hunting and sport fishing programs and to ensure that these programs will not materially interfere with or detract from the fulfillment of station purposes or the Service’s mission. Provisions governing hunting and sport fishing on refuges are in title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations at part 32 (50 CFR part 32), and on hatcheries at part 71 (50 CFR part 71). We regulate hunting and sport fishing to: • Ensure compatibility with refuge and hatchery purpose(s); • Properly manage fish and wildlife resource(s); • Protect other values; • Ensure visitor safety; and • Provide opportunities for fish- and wildlife-dependent recreation. On many stations where we decide to allow hunting and sport fishing, our general policy of adopting regulations identical to State hunting and sport fishing regulations is adequate to meet these objectives. On other stations, we must supplement State regulations with more-restrictive Federal regulations to ensure that we meet our management responsibilities, as outlined under Statutory Authority, below. We issue station-specific hunting and sport fishing regulations when we open wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries to migratory game bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, or sport fishing. These regulations may list the wildlife species that you may hunt or fish; seasons; bag or creel (container for carrying fish) limits; methods of hunting or sport fishing; descriptions of areas open to hunting or sport fishing; and other provisions as appropriate. Statutory Authority The Administration Act, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge System Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 Act; Pub. L. 105–57), governs the administration and public use of refuges, and the Refuge Recreation Act of 1962 (Recreation Act; 16 U.S.C. 460k– 460k–4) governs the administration and public use of refuges and hatcheries. Amendments enacted by the Improvement Act were built upon the Administration Act in a manner that provides an ‘‘organic act’’ for the Refuge System, similar to organic acts that exist for other public Federal lands. The Improvement Act serves to ensure that we effectively manage the Refuge System as a national network of lands, waters, and interests for the protection and conservation of our Nation’s wildlife resources. The Administration Act states first and foremost that we focus our Refuge System mission on conservation of fish, wildlife, and plant resources and their habitats. The Improvement Act requires the Secretary, before allowing a new use of a refuge, or before expanding, renewing, or extending an existing use of a refuge, to determine that the use is compatible with the purpose for which the refuge was established and the mission of the Refuge System. The Improvement Act established as the policy of the United States that wildlife-dependent recreation, when compatible, is a legitimate and appropriate public use of the Refuge System, through which the American public can develop an appreciation for fish and wildlife. The Improvement Act established six wildlife-dependent recreational uses as the priority general public uses of the Refuge System. These uses are hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and environmental education and interpretation. The Recreation Act authorizes the Secretary to administer areas within the Refuge System and Hatchery System for public recreation as an appropriate incidental or secondary use only to the extent that doing so is practicable and not inconsistent with the primary purpose(s) for which Congress and the Service established the areas. The Recreation Act requires that any recreational use of refuge or hatchery lands be compatible with the primary purpose(s) for which we established the refuge and not inconsistent with other previously authorized operations. The Administration Act and Recreation Act also authorize the Secretary to issue regulations to carry out the purposes of the Acts and regulate uses. We develop specific management plans for each refuge prior to opening it to hunting or sport fishing. In many cases, we develop station-specific regulations to ensure the compatibility PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 of the programs with the purpose(s) for which we established the refuge or hatchery and the Refuge and Hatchery System mission. We ensure initial compliance with the Administration Act and the Recreation Act for hunting and sport fishing on newly acquired land through an interim determination of compatibility made at or near the time of acquisition. These regulations ensure that we make the determinations required by these acts prior to adding refuges to the lists of areas open to hunting and sport fishing in 50 CFR parts 32 and 71. We ensure continued compliance by the development of comprehensive conservation plans and step-down management plans, and by annual review of hunting and sport fishing programs and regulations. Summary of Comments and Responses On August 2, 2024, we published in the Federal Register (89 FR 63139) a proposed rule to open or expand hunting and fishing opportunities at 12 refuges for the 2024–2025 hunting seasons. We accepted public comments on the proposed rule for 30 days, ending September 3, 2024. By that date, we received 154 comments on the proposed rule. More than two-thirds of these comments were identical or nonsubstantive comments. We received 68 unique comments, and 47 of those comments were substantive. We discuss the unique, substantive comments we received below by topic. Beyond our responses below, additional stationspecific information on how we responded to comments on particular hunting or fishing opportunities at a given refuge or hatchery can be found in that station’s final hunting and/or fishing package, each of which can be located in Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS– 2024–0034 on https:// www.regulations.gov. Comment (1): We received more than 100 comments expressing general support for the proposed hunting expansions in the rule. These comments of general support either expressed appreciation for the increased hunting access in the proposed rule overall, expressed appreciation for increased access at particular refuges, or both. In addition to this general support, some commenters requested additional hunting and fishing opportunities. Requests for additional opportunities to hunt waterfowl were most common. Our Response: Hunting and fishing on Service lands is a tradition that dates back to the early 1900s. In passing the Improvement Act, Congress reaffirmed that the Refuge System was created to conserve fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats, and would facilitate E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations opportunities for Americans to participate in compatible wildlifedependent recreation, including hunting and fishing, on Refuge System lands. We prioritize wildlife-dependent recreation, including hunting and fishing, when doing so is compatible with the purpose of the refuge and the mission of the Refuge System. We will continue to open and expand hunting and sport fishing opportunities across the Refuge System; however, as detailed further in our response to Comment (2), below, opening or expanding hunting or fishing opportunities on Service lands is not a quick or simple process. The annual regulatory cycle begins in June or July of each year for the following hunting and sport fishing season (the planning cycle for this 2024–2025 final rule began in June 2023). This annual timeline allows us time to collaborate closely with our State, Tribal, and Territorial partners, as well as other partners including nongovernmental organizations, on potential opportunities. It also provides us with time to complete environmental analyses and other requirements for opening or expanding new opportunities. Therefore, it would be impracticable for the Service to complete multiple regulatory cycles in one calendar year due to the logistics of coordinating with various partners. Once we determine that a hunting or sport fishing opportunity can be carried out in a manner compatible with individual station purposes and objectives, we work expeditiously to open it. In addition to creation of new opportunities, this also applies to commenter requests for changes in the season dates, days of the week, hours open, methods of take, or other logistical requirements that would expand existing opportunities, including those that would also align our hunting and fishing regulations more closely with State hunting and fishing regulations. Within the context of these continuous annual regulatory cycles, the Service does welcome nongovernmental organizations and individual hunters and anglers sharing their thoughts on potential future opportunities through public comments and other opportunities. We seek to provide hunting and fishing opportunities that both serve our wildlife conservation and management objectives and provide the highest quality recreational experience that we can offer for hunters and anglers, including when it comes to waterfowl hunting specifically, so we give due consideration to the requests and recommendations that we receive. VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (2): Several commenters expressed general opposition to any hunting or fishing in the Refuge System. Some of these commenters stated that hunting was antithetical to the purposes of a ‘‘refuge,’’ which, in their opinion, should serve as an inviolate sanctuary for all wildlife. The remaining commenters generically opposed expanded hunting or fishing opportunities at specific stations, or opposed specific hunting activities such as waterfowl hunting. Our Response: The Service prioritizes facilitating wildlife-dependent recreational opportunities, including hunting and fishing, on Service land in compliance with applicable Service law and policy. For refuges, the Administration Act, as amended, stipulates that hunting (along with fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and environmental education and interpretation), if found to be compatible, is a legitimate and priority general public use of a refuge and should be facilitated (16 U.S.C. 668dd(a)(3)(D)). Thus, we only allow hunting of resident wildlife on Refuge System lands if such activity has been determined compatible with the established purpose(s) of the refuge and the mission of the Refuge System as required by the Administration Act. For the 12 stations opening or expanding hunting or fishing in this rule, we determined that the proposed actions were compatible. Each station manager makes a decision regarding hunting and fishing opportunities only after rigorous examination of the available information, consultation and coordination with States and Tribes, and compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), as well as other applicable laws and regulations. The many steps taken before a station opens or expands a hunting or fishing opportunity on the refuge ensure that the Service does not allow any opportunity that would compromise the purpose of the station or the mission of the Refuge System. Hunting of resident wildlife on Service lands generally occurs consistent with State regulations, including seasons and bag limits. Station-specific hunting regulations can be more restrictive (but not more liberal) than State regulations and often are more restrictive in order to help meet specific refuge objectives. These objectives include resident wildlife PO 00000 Frm 00035 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 88149 population and habitat objectives, minimizing disturbance impacts to wildlife, maintaining high-quality opportunities for hunting and other wildlife-dependent recreation, minimizing conflicts with other public uses and/or refuge management activities, and protecting public safety. The word ‘‘refuge’’ includes the idea of providing a haven of safety as one of its definitions, and as such, hunting might seem an inconsistent use of the Refuge System. However, again, the Administration Act stipulates that hunting, if found compatible, is a legitimate and priority general public use of a wildlife refuge. Furthermore, we manage refuges to support healthy wildlife populations that in many cases produce harvestable surpluses that are a renewable resource. As practiced on refuges, hunting and fishing do not pose a threat to wildlife populations. It is important to note that taking certain individuals through hunting does not necessarily reduce a population overall, as hunting can simply replace other types of mortality. In some cases, however, we use hunting as a management tool with the explicit goal of reducing a population; this is often the case with exotic and/or invasive species that threaten ecosystem stability. Therefore, facilitating hunting opportunities is an important aspect of the Service’s roles and responsibilities as outlined in the legislation establishing the Refuge System, and the Service will continue to facilitate these opportunities where compatible with the purpose of the specific refuge and the mission of the Refuge System. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (3): We received comments from the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, and the Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies on the opportunities in the proposed rule. The West Virginia Division of Natural Resources supported the expansion of hunting at Canaan Valley NWR, but also expressed concern that requiring leadfree ammunition on the new Big Cove Unit could reduce hunter participation, reduce take of deer, and create enforcement challenges. The West Virginia Division of Natural Resources also recommended incentive-based approaches to the use of lead-free ammunition. The Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries commented specifically on the proposed hunt plan for Bayou Teche NWR and expressed support for the expanded hunting access. The Association of Fish and E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 88150 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations Wildlife Agencies expressed general support for increased access for hunters and anglers, but expressed concerns about the Service’s position on the use of lead ammunition and the individual refuges introducing lead-free ammunition requirements; the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies also expressed appreciation for coordination and communication between the Service and State agencies and advocated for the Service to pursue approaches based in education and incentives that encourage hunters to voluntarily choose to use lead-free ammunition, in particular the voluntary incentive pilot program developed in collaboration with the Hunting and Wildlife Conservation Council, an external stakeholder advisory group for the Department of the Interior. The Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies expressed support for the Service increasing hunting and fishing opportunities and for the Service’s pilot program for providing hunters with incentives to voluntarily use lead-free ammunition, but objected to the regulations requiring the use of lead-free ammunition as inconsistent with State regulations and as lacking sufficient scientific support. Our Response: The Service appreciates the support of, and is committed to working with, our state partners to identify additional opportunities for expansion of hunting and sport fishing on Service lands and waters. We welcome and value State partner input on all aspects of our hunting and fishing programs. In response to the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, we appreciate the support for the expanded hunting acres for all existing hunting and acknowledge the concerns expressed with the lead-free ammunition requirement on the new Big Cove Unit. As to the recommendation to explore incentives for the use of lead-free ammunition, we are actively implementing a pilot program to test out direct incentives for hunters to voluntarily use lead-free ammunition for designated hunts at Canaan Valley NWR and six other refuges in the fall of 2024, as discussed in our response to Comment (4), below. On the concerns about hunter participation and harvest rates related to the lead-free ammunition requirement, as discussed in more detail in our responses to Comments (6) through (13), below, the Service has not seen evidence of hunter participation declines elsewhere in response to leadfree requirements, and, accordingly, we do not anticipate insufficient harvest of deer. Also, in the specific case of VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 Canaan Valley NWR, even if declines in hunter participation on the Big Cove Unit were to occur in response to the lead-free ammunition requirement, hunters would likely simply shift their activities to the other hunt units of the same refuge and still harvest from the same deer population. On the concern about enforcement challenges for the lead-free ammunition requirement, as discussed in our response to Comment (14), below, we are confident in our ability to enforce the regulations, since this requirement does not fundamentally differ from existing regulations elsewhere in the Refuge System and our law enforcement personnel receive applicable training. In response to the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, we appreciate the support for the new opportunities at Bayou Teche NWR and look forward to collaboration and coordination on potential future hunting and fishing opportunities in Louisiana. In response to the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, we appreciate the support for the hunting and fishing openings and expansions in this rulemaking and value our shared commitment to compatible hunter and angler access on the National Wildlife Refuge System. We also appreciate the support for our lead-free voluntary incentive pilot program, developed in collaboration and coordination with State agencies in the seven States where the pilot sites are located. As discussed in our response to Comment (4), below, we are committed to robustly pursuing this voluntary approach and evaluating the potential efficacy for addressing lead poisoning in wildlife. At the same time, the Service’s position remains that the best available science demonstrates the impacts of lead ammunition on wildlife and ecological health and supports the Service not introducing new opportunities that would increase the use of lead ammunition until we have identified the best path forward. Our lead-free pilot program could produce a voluntary incentive model that proves to be the best path forward, but we must first take time to test out the incentives, collect data, and evaluate our results. Going forward, we will continue to invite input and involvement from the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies and our individual State partners as we continue to evaluate the future of lead use on Service lands and waters as part of an open and transparent process to find the best methods to address lead’s impact on wildlife and ecological health. As to the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies’ objections to regulations requiring lead-free ammunition use, see PO 00000 Frm 00036 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 our responses to Comments (7) through (9), below, addressing the concerns about scientific evidence, cost, and availability, which are shared by some other commenters. Similarly, see our response to Comment (14), below, regarding commenters’ concerns about the enforceability of lead-free ammunition requirements. In response to the Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, we value the support for the increased recreational access through this rule and appreciate the recognition of our collaboration and coordination on increasing access and on exploring voluntary incentives for the use of leadfree ammunition. We disagree with the notion that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support regulatory requirements for hunters to use lead-free ammunition, as discussed in our response to Comment (7), below, but the Service is willing to address the demonstrated poisoning of wildlife from the use of lead ammunition for hunting through voluntary incentives, should they prove to be sufficiently effective. As to the concern that such regulations typically differ from State regulations, while we endeavor to align our regulations with State regulations wherever feasible, the Service routinely sets requirements for hunters and anglers that are more restrictive than the applicable State regulations whenever necessitated by our conservation mission or refuge purposes, as noted in our response to Comment (2), above. Requirements to use lead-free ammunition are one example in this category, alongside limitations on season dates, time of day, methods of take, and more that are similarly necessary because the Service is obligated to prioritize the health of wildlife species and their habitats on Refuge System lands and waters. Hunting and fishing activities must be assessed to be compatible with our conservation mission as authorized by appropriate regulations, and we must introduce further regulations as necessary to ensure their continued compatibility in order to keep a given opportunity open. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (4): Several commenters either encouraged the Service to pursue incentives encouraging hunters to voluntarily use lead-free ammunition or specifically expressed support for the Service’s new pilot program providing direct incentives for hunters participating in designated hunts at seven selected refuges in the fall of 2024. Most of these commenters noted that they objected to any regulations E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations requiring the use of lead-free ammunition, but some commenters were supportive of both lead-free regulatory requirements and voluntary approaches like the Service’s new pilot program. Our Response: The Service has encouraged and will continue to encourage voluntary use of non-lead ammunition and tackle, including through our new collaborative pilot program for providing direct incentives and robust educational workshops to hunters, but we also have the authority to impose regulatory requirements for use of lead-free ammunition for designated hunting on individual refuges. Notably, the Refuge System, and all Service lands and waters, are different from private, State, and even other Federal public lands. We have legal obligations to prioritize wildlife health and biodiversity, to consider the compatibility of new and ongoing hunting and fishing activities, and to assess the potential impact of these activities on the natural resources under our jurisdiction. The Service is evaluating the future of lead use through an open and transparent process with input from a broad array of partners and stakeholders about the best approach, which may include education and incentives encouraging voluntary choice. During this process, the Service does not intend to authorize hunting and fishing opportunities that increase the use of lead ammunition and tackle on the Refuge System. This is consistent with our full commitment to the leadfree pilot program for hunter education and incentives, which is aimed at identifying the most effective voluntary approach to addressing lead poisoning in wildlife from lead ammunition. In this rule, the Service has put in place a lead-free ammunition requirement for newly opened elk hunting at four refuges in North Dakota and for all hunting on the new Big Cove Unit at Canaan Valley NWR in West Virginia. These requirements are each either limited to a specific species or to a specific hunt unit. Each of these targeted requirements is based on the best available science and the sound professional judgement of Service personnel, and was put in place only after discussions with the relevant State agency. We appreciate the support from commenters for our new pilot program for providing hunters with educational workshops and direct economic incentives to voluntarily use lead-free ammunition. The Service was able to collaborate with some of the commenter organizations and others, in particular the Hunting and Wildlife Conservation VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 Council, in the design of the lead-free pilot program. The Service is also collaborating with individual State agencies and the North American NonLead Partnership in implementing the pilot program. We are encouraged by the potential for the pilot program to identify and demonstrate the most effective voluntary approach to addressing lead ammunition impacts to wildlife and ecological health. The 2024 iteration of the pilot program will take place for designated hunts at seven selected refuges throughout the Refuge System. The pilot program is designed to address the hurdles of awareness, demonstrated performance, price, and availability that are considered some of the major barriers for hunters in voluntarily choosing to use lead-free ammunition. Accordingly, at each pilot site, the Service will utilize educational messaging, including voluntary intensive educational workshops with ammunition performance demonstrations at selected sites. Similarly, at each pilot site, we will offer a rebate incentive in the form of a prepaid debit card for eligible hunters who provide proof of their purchase of lead-free ammunition, on a first come, first served basis. The implementation of the pilot program at seven sites in 2024 will mark a substantial step in progress toward addressing poisoning of wildlife from lead ammunition and will set the stage for further refinement of the educational and direct incentive elements of the lead-free pilot program, as well as provide data for analysis of the potential impacts and potential scalability of the program. As we operate the pilot program, we will seek to continue the open and collaborative approach we have utilized thus far and hope to receive continued support and cooperation from hunters and from external hunting and conservation organizations. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (5): Several commenters expressed concern over the use of lead ammunition or lead fishing tackle on Service lands and waters. Nearly all of these commenters expressed support for the individual lead-free requirements in the proposed rule. Most of these commenters urged the Service to eliminate the use of lead ammunition and tackle throughout the Refuge System. Many commenters expressed concerns about raptor species, including the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), and other species that scientific studies have shown to be especially susceptible to adverse health PO 00000 Frm 00037 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 88151 impacts from lead ammunition and tackle. Our Response: The Service appreciates the concerns from commenters about the issue of bioavailability of lead in the environment and is aware of the potential impacts of lead on fish and wildlife. See, for example, the recent study from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) with Service collaboration, Vincent Slabe, et al. ‘‘Demographic implications of lead poisoning for eagles across North America,’’ which is available online through a link at https://www.usgs.gov/news/nationalnews-release/groundbreaking-studyfinds-widespread-lead-poisoning-baldand-golden. Accordingly, the Service pays special attention to species susceptible to lead uptake and to sources of lead that could impact wildlife and ecological health. Historically, the principal cause of lead poisoning in waterfowl was the high densities of lead shot in wetland sediments associated with migratory bird hunting activities (Kendall et al. 1996). In 1991, as a result of high bird mortality, the Service instituted a nationwide ban on the use of lead shot for hunting waterfowl and coots (see 50 CFR 32.2(k)). However, lead ammunition is still used for other types of hunting, and lead tackle is used for fishing on private and public lands and waters, including within the Refuge System. Due to the continued lead use outside of waterfowl hunting, there remains concern about the bioavailability of spent lead ammunition (bullets) and fishing tackle on the environment, the health of fish and wildlife, and human health. The Service is aware of fish and wildlife species, including endangered and threatened species, that are susceptible to the build-up of lead in their systems coming directly from their food sources or secondhand through the food ingested by their food sources. There is also evidence that some species are susceptible to direct ingestion of lead ammunition or tackle due to their foraging behaviors. For example, the Service recognizes that ingested lead fishing tackle has been found to be a leading cause of mortality in adult common loons (Grade, T. et al. (2017). Population-level effects of lead fishing tackle on common loons. The Journal of Wildlife Management 82(1): pp. 155– 164). The impacts of lead on human health and safety have been a focus of several scientific studies. We are familiar with studies that have found the ingestion of animals harvested via the use of lead ammunition increased levels of lead in the human body (e.g., E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 88152 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations Buenz, E. (2016). Lead exposure through eating wild game. American Journal of Medicine, 128: p. 458). It is because of lead’s potential for ecological health impacts that, in this rulemaking, the Service has continued to take a measured approach in not adding to the use of lead on refuge lands (see 87 FR 35136, June 9, 2022). Accordingly, the opportunities in this final rule either do not involve the use of lead ammunition or tackle (i.e., waterfowl hunting or archery) or require the use of lead-free ammunition or tackle. This measured approach is also part of the Service’s broader commitment to evaluating the future of lead use throughout the Refuge System. In response to the commenters’ request that the Service eliminate the use of lead ammunition and fishing tackle throughout the Refuge System, the Service is committed to doing what best serves the public interest and our conservation mission, including facilitating compatible, wildlifedependent, recreational hunting and fishing. As we committed to do in our 2021–2022 rulemaking (see 86 FR 48822 at 48830, August 31, 2021) and our 2022–2023 rulemaking (see 87 FR 57108 at 57122, September 16, 2022), the Service has been evaluating, and continues to evaluate, lead use in hunting and fishing on Service lands and waters. This rule is designed to avoid increased use of lead on refuges as the Service continues to evaluate the future of lead use by seeking input from partners, through a transparent process, to inform the determination of what actions and methods are appropriate for addressing the potential for adverse environmental and ecological health impacts. This process includes a commitment to fully exploring a voluntary approach through our new pilot program for hunter education and incentives. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (6): Several commenters expressed opposition to the Service requiring the use of lead-free ammunition for designated hunting opportunities at individual refuges in this rule or in general. Some of these commenters simply expressed a general opposition to the concept of lead-free requirements, but the rest put forward one or more points in arguing against lead-free requirements. The concerns collectively expressed by these more substantive comments are addressed in Comment (7) through Comment (13), below. Our Response: The Service has allowed, and with the promulgation of this rule continues to allow, the use of VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 lead ammunition and/or tackle in hunting and sport fishing in most of the Refuge System. The vast majority of stations and individual hunting and fishing opportunities currently permit lead use, consistent with State regulations allowing the use of lead ammunition and tackle. Lead ammunition and tackle are currently allowed where we have previously determined the activity is not likely to result in dangerous levels of lead exposure. However, the Service has been transparent about its intent to seriously consider the future of lead use, consistent with its role as the steward of the Refuge System. Therefore, we are evaluating what is best for the resources belonging to the American public regarding the future use of lead ammunition and tackle on Service lands and waters. The best available science, analyzed as part of this rulemaking, demonstrates that lead ammunition and tackle have negative impacts on both human health and wildlife health, and those impacts are more acute for some species. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (7): Most of the comments opposed to regulations concerning the use of lead ammunition questioned the sufficiency of scientific support for leadfree requirements. Some of the commenters also claimed there is specifically a lack of scientific evidence of ‘‘population-level’’ lead impacts and this means lead-free ammunition requirements are unwarranted. Our Response: We refer commenters concerned about scientific evidence in support of the rulemaking to the analyses of environmental impacts in the NEPA and ESA section 7 documentation for each refuge in this rulemaking and the cumulative impacts report accompanying the rulemaking, which are all available in Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2024–0034 on https:// www.regulations.gov. For our NEPA and ESA section 7 analyses, we considered peer-reviewed scientific studies evaluating the impacts of lead to humans, to wildlife generally, and to specific species—including endangered and threatened species and species especially susceptible to lead ammunition or tackle exposure. While this evidence is not determinative as to whether lead-free ammunition and tackle should be required in all cases, given the full range of factors to consider on the topic of lead use, it is inaccurate to claim that there is no scientific evidence of adverse impacts to human health or wildlife and ecological health, or both, from lead ammunition and tackle or that the Service has not PO 00000 Frm 00038 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 presented such evidence as part of this rulemaking. Each refuge in this rule used the best available science and the expertise and sound professional judgment of refuge staff to determine that our management strategies, including promulgated non-lead requirements, are based on sound science and the specific circumstances of that individual refuge. Moreover, we also reject the related claim that scientific evidence of socalled ‘‘population-level’’ impacts to wildlife is both a prerequisite to Service action and lacking in the available science. Depending on the situation, we may manage wildlife at the ‘‘population level’’ or at the ‘‘individual level,’’ such as acting to protect individuals of an endangered or threatened species. Similarly, depending on the situation, we may adopt regulations, policies, or practices that respond to or prevent adverse impacts at the population level or to individual animals and plants. In fact, there are clear cases where we need to act preventatively or early to control invasive species, pests, or animal diseases, since they are much more difficult to eradicate when there is ‘‘population-level’’ damage. ‘‘Population-level’’ impacts are not necessary for regulation to the exclusion of any other factors, although in the past the Service and others have regulated lead use based, at least in part, on addressing impacts to whole populations, as demonstrated impacts to waterfowl populations and the population of California condors prompted the 1991 nationwide prohibition on waterfowl hunting with lead ammunition (see 56 FR 22100, May 13, 1991) and the 2019 prohibition on hunting with lead ammunition in California (see California Assembly Bill No. 711, California Fish and Game Code at section 3004.5), respectively. In any case, the scientific literature demonstrates that lead use has ‘‘population-level’’ impacts. There is evidence of population-level impacts and potential population-level impacts to waterfowl and upland game bird species from lead fishing tackle and lead ammunition through direct ingestion. Lead fishing tackle presents a risk of lead poisoning to many waterfowl species, including loons and swans (Pokras and Chafel 1992; Rattner et al. 2008; Strom et al. 2009). The primary concerns are discarded whole or fragmented lead sinkers, as well as other lead tackle and even lead ammunition released into the water, that rest on river and lake bottoms where diving birds ingest them alongside pebbles, as pebbles are necessary to break down food through E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations grinding in the birds’ digestive systems. This results in lead poisoning because the grinding action breaks down the pieces of ingested lead into fine lead particles inside of the birds that can then enter their blood streams. Studies have consistently found impacts of ingested lead fishing tackle are a leading cause of mortality in adult common loons (Pokras and Chafel 1992; Scheuhammer and Norris 1995; Franson et al. 2003; Pokras et al. 2009; Grade et al. 2017; Grade et al. 2019). Strom et al. (2009) assessed lead exposure in Wisconsin birds and found that approximately 25 percent of the trumpeter swan fatalities from 1991 through 2007 were attributed to ingested lead. Also, lead ammunition discarded on land presents a similar risk of lead poisoning from upland game birds swallowing discarded ammunition alongside the pebbles they use for digestion. Another source of population-level impacts and potential population-level impacts from lead is indirect ingestion by birds of prey and other scavengers from consuming animals shot with lead ammunition. The primary concerns for birds of prey are lead fragments from lead ammunition that remain in the carcasses and gut piles of hunted animals that are scavenged by these birds. The fine fragments of lead, observable in x-rays of harvested game animals, are ingested because they are embedded in the meat and other animal tissues being scavenged and then enter the digestive systems and blood streams of the birds of prey. Many studies have looked at the impacts of this lead exposure to eagle health (see, e.g., Kramer and Redig 1997; O’Halloran et al. 1998; Kelly and Kelly 2005; Golden et al. 2016; Hoffman 1985a, 1985b; Pattee 1984; Stauber 2010). This includes the recent study, published in 2022, from the USGS with Service collaboration, Vincent Slabe, et al. ‘‘Demographic implications of lead poisoning for eagles across North America,’’ which is available online via a link at https://www.usgs.gov/news/ national-news-release/groundbreakingstudy-finds-widespread-lead-poisoningbald-and-golden. This study explicitly finds that lead poisoning is causing population growth ratesto slowfor bald eagles by 3.8percentand golden eagles by 0.8 percent annually. These growthslowing impacts to populations are statistically significant and, in the case of bald eagles, are occurring for a species that was previously endangered and is still in the process of recovering to historical levels. Thus, it is inaccurate to claim there are not known VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 ‘‘population-level’’ impacts from lead use. Finally, the Service’s mission and statutory obligations require refuges to be closed to hunting and fishing by default, and this changes only when we have determined hunting or fishing activities are compatible with our conservation mission and we have promulgated regulations to open designated areas to hunting and fishing. Hunting and fishing access and opportunities are thus constrained by the regulations to only those activities that are compatible. Thus, the Service has an obligation to demonstrate, using the best available science, that any given aspect of hunting or fishing on the Refuge System is compatible with our mission. The Service has also built into our compatibility process the need to reevaluate compatibility determinations after a set period, either 10 or 15 years, depending on the use, because new science or new conditions could compel the Service to change our compatibility determinations. In the case of the use of lead, our past determinations that lead ammunition and lead tackle were permissible to use on Refuge System lands does not change this fundamental structure of our processes. The use of lead ammunition and tackle, like any other visitor activity, can only be allowed on a refuge if, and only for as long as, the refuge applies the best available science and sound professional judgment to find it compatible. The suggestion from some commenters that historical use of lead or past determinations that lead use was compatible compels us to find the future use of lead compatible is therefore counter to our mission and statutory obligations. This suggestion also ignores the accumulation of lead in the environment over time. The Service will continue to revisit our compatibility determinations, as required, while considering the best available science and applying sound professional judgment. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (8): Some commenters opposed to requirements in this rule to use lead-free ammunition claimed leadfree ammunition is more expensive than lead ammunition. Some of these commenters further expressed the concern that lead-free ammunition requirements could prevent participation in hunting due to price differences. Our Response: We do not agree that lead-free ammunition is prohibitively expensive, especially in comparison to lead ammunition. However, we recognize that there could be some cost PO 00000 Frm 00039 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 88153 burden of compliance for hunting and fishing opportunities where lead-free ammunition or tackle is required. For example, lead-free ammunition is very close in price to premium lead ammunition but can be more expensive than some lead ammunition. Notably, the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife and others have recognized that this cost difference is typically less than $10 per box of ammunition, with boxes usually lasting multiple hunting seasons (see online at https://www.maine.gov/ifw/huntingtrapping/hunting/nonleadammunition.html). When we have restricted lead ammunition use, we have first ensured that the ecological health and conservation benefits outweigh any potential for cost burden on hunters. We are confident that non-lead ammunition is not cost-prohibitive, as hunting continues on all Refuge System stations where we have restricted lead use. Moreover, we have not seen declines in hunting use attributable to lead-free ammunition requirements. In other words, hunting-use day declines at stations that require lead-free ammunition do not appear to deviate from general trends of declining hunting participation that affect all stations in the Refuge System. Where we have seen meaningful declines is in the price of lead-free ammunition options, as there has been a continuous trend for years of decreasing prices, and the 1991 nationwide ban on lead ammunition for waterfowl hunting shows that regulations can spur innovation and production, which brings the prices down for lead-free options. Finally, even though the cost burden of compliance with lead-free ammunition requirements on individual refuges is not onerous, the Service is considering various measures to incentivize hunters to transition from lead to lead-free ammunition and mitigate the costs of the transition. In fact, we are in the process of implementing an ambitious lead-free voluntary pilot program, beginning this fall for the 2024 hunting seasons, that includes providing direct economic incentives to hunters to address the price difference as a barrier to choosing lead-free ammunition. This pilot program is discussed further in our response to Comment (4), above. We look forward to continuing to work closely with the Hunting and Wildlife Conservation Council, the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, our state agency partners, and other hunting organizations to further develop our lead-free voluntary pilot program. E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 88154 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (9): Most commenters opposed to non-lead ammunition and tackle requirements asserted that there is limited availability of lead-free ammunition compared to that of lead ammunition, such that requiring leadfree ammunition would prevent participation in refuge hunting opportunities. Some of these commenters further noted that the availability of non-lead ammunition is more limited for certain firearms and types of ammunition, especially .22 rifle ammunition. One commenter also, tangentially to the topic of availability, stated that the Gun Control Act of 1968, as amended (GCA; 18 U.S.C. 921 et seq.), and associated Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) regulations (27 CFR part 478) concerning armor piercing ammunition hinder the production and thus availability of lead-free ammunition. Our Response: We do not agree that lead-free ammunition and tackle are insufficiently available to hunters and anglers in localities where we have restricted the use of lead ammunition or tackle, either in the past or through this rulemaking. However, we recognize that there could be some compliance burden in identifying and locating lead-free ammunition and tackle for hunting and fishing opportunities, where required. Where we have restricted lead use in the past or will restrict it through this rulemaking, we have ensured that the ecological health and conservation benefits outweigh any potential for compliance burden on hunters and anglers, including the ease of locating available lead-free ammunition and tackle. As with the costs of lead-free options, for opportunities where leadfree ammunition or tackle are required, the Service has not seen declines in hunting or fishing participation that can be attributed to lead-free ammunition or tackle being less widely available than lead ammunition and tackle. Also, as with costs, there are existing trends of increasing availability of lead-free options, and the 1991 national ban on lead ammunition for waterfowl hunting demonstrates that regulations requiring the use of lead-free ammunition can promote increased availability. Also, the pilot program that the Service is implementing this fall for the 2024 hunting seasons will also help to address availability, as more hunters voluntarily participate and the increased demand gives manufacturers a reason to produce, and retailers a reason to offer, more lead-free ammunition. In fact, the Service is interested in collaboration with retailers that can VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 directly address awareness and availability of lead-free ammunition and tackle as we continue to develop our pilot program. Additionally, we recognize that nonlead ammunition may be less available than lead ammunition, in general, for some models of firearms and certain ammunition calibers. This is especially concerning, as noted by some commenters, for .22 rifle ammunition where existing lines of lead-free ammunition have been recently discontinued. Lead-free ammunition remains available, but this development will impact availability and could impact refuge hunting where lead-free ammunition is required, particularly squirrel hunting. The Service will continue to monitor the lead-free options in the market and take the information into account in deciding whether and where to require lead-free ammunition. We also encourage industry and retailers to continue to manufacture and offer more lead-free ammunition options so that ammunition is available to hunters, whether they are required, or voluntarily choose, to use lead-free ammunition. Finally, the claim that the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA) and associated ATF regulations concerning armor piercing ammunition hinder the production and thus availability of leadfree ammunition is beyond the scope of this rulemaking. However, the Service has raised this issue with the ATF at the recommendation of the Hunting and Wildlife Conservation Council. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (10): A few commenters pointed to sources of lead, other than hunting and fishing with lead ammunition and tackle, in the environment. These commenters asserted that the Service should not have lead-free ammunition and tackle requirements because these other sources of lead also cause negative health impacts for fish and wildlife. Our Response: While there are of course other potential sources of lead in the environment, including other sources that may be bioavailable to wildlife, the Service does not see this as diminishing the importance or conservation benefits of addressing lead poisoning of wildlife from hunting with lead ammunition or from fishing with lead tackle. While these other sources of lead vary in the degree of risk that they could present to wildlife, the Service is duly concerned by the health risks from any potential source of lead exposure for wildlife and humans. There are likely benefits to be had from efforts to address each of these sources in turn, PO 00000 Frm 00040 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 but that is generally beyond the scope of this rulemaking. Moreover, these other potential sources of lead do not change the fact that the best available science has drawn a clear link between the use of lead ammunition and tackle and its ecological health impacts. In fact, the study from Slabe et al. (2022), cited earlier in our response to Comment (7), provides strong evidence that not only is there an impact to eagles from lead ammunition specifically, but there is also strong evidence that it represents the most important source of lead exposure for the species studied. Essentially, the study demonstrated that the highest rates of acute lead poisoning in eagles, measured by liver lead concentrations, corresponded in terms of timing with the use of lead ammunition in the form of a nationwide spike in lead poisoning during winter months in the midst of hunting seasons. To the extent other sources of lead do bear on our decisions about lead ammunition and tackle use, these additional lead sources in fact weigh in favor of lead-use restrictions, as lead can accumulate in wildlife from repeated exposure from one or multiple sources (see, e.g., Behmke 2015). Similarly, the Service is also not discouraged from either incentivizing or requiring the use of lead-free ammunition and tackle, where appropriate, by the continued use of lead ammunition and tackle for hunting and fishing on nearby State and privately held lands and waters. The Service will act to address threats, including from visitor uses, as necessary within our authority, in the interest of our conservation mission even if, and often especially when, human activities outside of refuge borders present similar threats. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (11): One comment opposed to non-lead ammunition and tackle requirements maintained that lead ammunition and tackle are made of an inorganic, insoluble form of lead that poses less risk of harm to humans or animals. Our Response: While inorganic lead presents a low risk of adverse health impacts while it retains its solid, molded form (i.e., anglers face relatively little risk from handling lead tackle), the basis for concern about lead ammunition and tackle is that there are multiple ways for such lead to become harmful to human and wildlife health. Organic lead (i.e., the banned gasoline additive tetramethyl lead) is more dangerous than inorganic lead because it can be absorbed through the skin. Inorganic lead can also have serious E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations impacts in certain forms (e.g., fragments and particles) and once it is inside an animal. First, as briefly described in our response to Comment (7), lead ammunition, including bonded lead ammunition, fragments when it hits an animal, and this distributes tiny pieces of lead within a wide radius in the soft tissues of the harvested animal (see Trinogga et al. (2019). Fragmentation of lead-free and lead-based hunting rifle bullets under real life hunting conditions in Germany. Amibo 48(9): pp. 1056–1064 (published online March 23, 2019)). These tiny fragments of lead are then consumed by scavenger species eating carcasses or gut piles left behind or humans eating the game meat. In this tiny, fragmented form and acted on by digestive enzymes and acids, the lead derived from ammunition can then shed particles that enter the blood stream and affect systems throughout the body, presenting both chronic and acute health risks. Second, as briefly described in our response to Comment (7), lead ammunition and tackle that is deposited along shores or at the bottom of bodies of water can be ingested by several species of birds that forage in these locations for pebbles, as pebbles are necessary to break down food through grinding in a special organ of their digestive systems called a gizzard. This grinding process, along with digestive acids and enzymes that accompany food into the gizzard, can easily break down lead ammunition and tackle into fragments and cause it to shed particles, just as the process breaks down the stones and shells the birds intended to ingest. These lead particles are then able to enter the bloodstream and affect systems throughout the body, presenting both chronic and acute health risks. Third, lead ammunition and tackle that ends up discarded in bodies of water may begin to dissolve and thus introduce lead particles into the water that present both chronic and acute health risks to both aquatic animals living in the water and terrestrial animals drinking from the water. This process requires high acidity in the water that dissolves lead ammunition or tackle, and it is essentially the same concern as the problem of corrosion from acidic water in lead water pipes. These particles of lead dissolved into the water are easily taken up into the bloodstream as they pass through digestive systems. It is through these known processes that lead ammunition and tackle present a risk, and the best available scientific evidence indicates that these processes are occurring at rates that are causing VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 negative impacts on the health of certain wildlife species. Thus, we seriously consider the impact of inorganic forms of lead, such as lead ammunition and tackle, on wildlife and human health in our regulatory and management processes. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of this comment. Comment (12): One commenter, in objecting to the regulation of lead ammunition and tackle, expressed nonsubstantive concerns centered on their views about the constitutionality and/or legality of the Service creating non-lead ammunition and tackle requirements through our regulations. This comment also offered nonsubstantive concerns about their general projections of impacts to the ammunition and tackle industry and the broader economy. Our Response: The Service thoroughly addressed these and similar concerns in our final rule for the 2022– 2023 station-specific hunting and sport fishing regulations (see 87 FR 57108 at 57117–57119, September 16, 2022). Our position remains the same on these topics in this 2024–2025 rulemaking. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of this comment. Comment (13): A few commenters expressed concerns about the availability of copper for use in ammunition, as copper is one of the alternatives to lead used for non-lead ammunition. The comments expressed concern that due to limited sources of copper and demand for copper for other uses, an increase in demand for copper for ammunition from non-lead ammunition requirements may not be possible or could drive up the cost of non-lead ammunition. Our Response: These concerns are outside the scope of this rulemaking. It is outside the expertise of the Service and the scope of this rule to speculate about the current or future availability of copper, or how it could affect prices for goods made using copper. There are, however, two things the Service can say on this topic. First, by requiring the use of lead-free ammunition for elk hunting at four refuges and all hunting on one unit of another refuge in this rule, the Service is not specifically requiring the use of copper ammunition. Second, the non-lead ammunition regulations in this rulemaking impact a small portion of the market for ammunition. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (14): We also received several comments concerning potential compliance and enforcement challenges related to requirements for hunters to use lead-free ammunition, in particular PO 00000 Frm 00041 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 88155 the requirement specific to the Big Cove Unit of Canaan Valley NWR set forth in this rule. Some of these comments specifically noted the compliance challenge that it may be difficult for hunters to discern when they are on the Big Cove Unit and when they are on another unit of the refuge. Some also expressed concerns related to enforcement with the difficulty of law enforcement to differentiate between lead-free and lead ammunition and with the wording of the lead-free requirement stating that hunters may only ‘‘possess’’ lead-free ammunition when this is applied to big game hunters who choose to carry a sidearm containing lead ammunition for self-defense. Our Response: The compliance and enforcement challenges identified in these comments are indeed inherent challenges when it comes to lead-free ammunition requirements within a given jurisdictional boundary. On the compliance side, while we recognize that differences in regulations between adjacent units of huntable land present the potential for confusion, this situation occurs in other contexts because of differences in land uses and ownership, and responsible hunters are familiar with the responsibility to be aware of what land they are on and the applicable regulations. Our law enforcement personnel have been appropriately and effectively enforcing similar requirements for years at various individual refuges and already receive applicable training. The requirement will be enforced by Service law enforcement officers in the same manner as similar existing lead-free ammunition requirements elsewhere in the Refuge System, some of which already apply to big game hunting ammunition and some of which apply only to designated units within a given refuge or individual refuges within a complex. This includes the scenario of a big game hunter carrying a lawful side-arm for self-defense purposes while hunting. The Service’s refuge hunting regulations govern the lawful use and possession of firearms and ammunition for hunting, but do not prohibit possession for purposes of self-defense of a handgun, and ammunition it contains, lawfully carried under applicable State law. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (15): Several commenters expressed concerns about or objections to the removal of a permit requirement for the existing muzzleloader deer hunt at Fort Niobrara NWR, including concern about hunting pressure reducing the quality of the deer hunt. E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 88156 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations Our Response: The Service acknowledges the concern that removing the Fort Niobrara NWR refugespecific permit requirement may affect the quality of the muzzleloader deer hunt there. We do not anticipate that removing the refuge permit requirement will increase the number of hunters that participate in the Fort Niobrara muzzleloader deer hunt, but we recognize that it could. Our desired result is to reduce an administrative burden for hunters and to more closely align refuge regulations with State regulations. We will continue to monitor muzzleloader deer hunter use at the refuge. If we identify significant negative impacts to habitat, wildlife, or refuge visitors, we will consider further regulatory changes. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (16): Two comments expressed objections to the closing of 111 acres that are currently open to hunting at Crab Orchard NWR. Our Response: This closure of a small area within Crab Orchard NWR is necessary in order to allow for use of the area for other public recreational uses, including camping. In addition to our safety and compatibility considerations, the Service must comply with State laws related to how close hunting may be authorized to the intended camping area. Crab Orchard NWR will still offer hunters more than 44,000 huntable acres. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (17): We received multiple comments expressing concern about opportunities for hunting of predator species, including black bear, bobcat, fox, and coyote hunting. Some of these comments also object to the use of dogs and hunting at night when hunting these species. Our Response: Refuge managers consider predator management decisions on a case-by-case basis. As with all species, a refuge manager makes a decision about managing predator populations, which are included in the category of resident wildlife, including allowing predatory species to be hunted, only after careful examination to ensure the action would comply with relevant laws, policies, and directives. The Administration Act, as amended, directs the Service to manage refuges for biological integrity, diversity, and environmental health. Predators play a critical role in the integrity, diversity, and overall health of ecosystems, so before allowing predators to be hunted, a refuge manager must ensure that these actions do not threaten the integrity, VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 diversity, or health of the refuge ecosystem. The refuge manager must also determine that the action is compatible with refuge purposes and the mission of the Refuge System, and in keeping with the refuge’s comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) and other stepdown plans. In addition, the refuge manager analyzes the impacts of the actions on the environment through the NEPA process and section 7 of the ESA. Therefore, a refuge manager must take many steps to ensure that any opportunity for hunting predators on a refuge meets the Service’s applicable laws and policies. All of the same considerations apply where, on a caseby-case basis, we authorize the use of dogs or align with State regulations to allow hunting at night in conjunction with predator hunting or other hunting. The Administration Act, as amended, also mandates that regulations authorizing hunting or fishing of fish and resident wildlife within the Refuge System shall be, to the extent practicable, consistent with State fish and wildlife laws, regulations, and management plans (16 U.S.C. 668dd(m)). Therefore, all the opportunities for hunting predators in this rule that are intended to bring greater consistency with State fish and wildlife laws, regulations, and management plans are part of realizing the Service’s mission. Moreover, these, as with all predator hunting determinations and all hunting and fishing determinations, were only made after careful consideration by the refuge manager to ensure that such actions would not threaten the integrity, diversity, and overall health of the ecosystem and were compatible with both the purpose of the refuge and the mission of the Refuge System. Finally, both the NEPA process and the rulemaking process provide the opportunity for the public to provide comments and any additional information on the impacts of our actions. We considered the additional information provided from the public on this issue during these public comment periods and determined that they did not affect our initial determinations that the opportunities for hunting predators on specific refuges will have no more than minor impacts on the population health of these species or other wildlife at the local, regional, or national level. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (18): We received two comments expressing concern about the Service having adequate funding and staffing, including law enforcement PO 00000 Frm 00042 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 officers, to administer our hunting and fishing opportunities. Our Response: We appreciate the concern of these commenters for sufficient funding and staffing to safely and effectively administer hunting and fishing activities throughout the Refuge System. Importantly, Service policy (603 FW 2.12.A.(7); see https:// www.fws.gov/policy-library/603fw2) requires station managers to determine that adequate resources, including personnel, exist or can be provided by the Service or a partner to properly develop, operate, and maintain the use in a way that will not materially interfere with or detract from fulfillment of the refuge purpose(s) and the Service’s mission. If resources are lacking for establishment or continuation of wildlife-dependent recreational uses, the refuge manager will make reasonable efforts to obtain additional resources or outside assistance from States, other public agencies, local communities, and/or private and nonprofit groups before determining that the use is not compatible. For example, when Service law enforcement resources are lacking, we are often able to rely upon State fish and game law-enforcement capacity to assist in enforcement of hunting and fishing regulations. For all refuges opening or expanding hunting or sport fishing in this rule, we have determined that we have adequate resources, including available funds and personnel, to develop, operate, and maintain the proposed hunt programs. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (19): We received one comment arguing that we should have prepared an environmental impact statement (EIS) instead of stationspecific environmental analyses (EAs) combined with a national cumulative impact report. Our Response: The Service disagrees with the assertion that we should prepare an EIS before opening or expanding hunting and fishing opportunities on refuges. We completed individual EAs for, or applied categorical exclusions to, each refuge in this rule, in compliance with NEPA, to evaluate the impacts of opening or expanding hunting or fishing opportunities through this rulemaking. These EAs and categorical exclusions underwent regional and national review to address and consider these actions from a local, regional, multi-State, and/ or flyway perspective, and to consider the cumulative impacts from this larger geographical context. The 2024–2025 cumulative impacts report concludes, after analyzing the impacts, collectively, E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations of all EAs and categorical exclusions prepared in connection with this rule, that the rule would not have significant impacts at the local, regional, or national level. The commenter who raised these environmental analysis concerns provided no additional information that would change this analysis or our conclusion. As discussed above, we annually conduct management activities on refuges that minimize or offset impacts of hunting and fishing on physical and cultural resources, including establishing designated areas for hunting; restricting levels of use; confining access and travel to designated locations; providing education programs and materials for hunters, anglers, and other users; and conducting law enforcement activities. In this rulemaking, the Service is expanding opportunities for recreational hunting and fishing. Expanding opportunities does not necessarily result in increased impacts to refuge resources. We anticipate that for some refuges, these expansions will not result in changes in usage of the refuge. In other cases, these expansions may lead to some increase in use of refuges, but these changes would likely be minor. Opening of new refuges or new opportunities may attract people to the refuge, but these hunters and/or anglers were likely already participating elsewhere on State or other Federal lands. Overall, considering the decreasing trends in hunting generally, and trends on refuges specifically, we do not expect this final rule to have a significant impact on the environment. As noted in our cumulative impacts report, hunter participation trends have been generally declining, some refuges attract a very small number of participants, and often participation rates decline over the course of a season. Finally, a Federal court found that this approach, using a bottom-up analysis to assess the cumulative impact of increased hunting and fishing across the entire Refuge System, was an appropriate way for the Service to analyze the impacts of the rule in compliance with NEPA (see Fund for Animals v. Hall, 777 F. Supp. 2d 92, 105 (D.D.C. 2011)). We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of this comment. Comment (20): We received two comments that advocated for requiring some form of monetary payment to the Service for members of the public to participate in recreational uses other than hunting or fishing. Our Response: Notably, the Service does not uniformly charge entrance or recreation fees, but does for some stations on a case-by-case basis. Any VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 such fee, however, is outside the scope of this rulemaking, which is devoted to regulations for hunting and fishing activities on the Refuge System. The Service collects entrance and recreation fees under the authorities of the Refuge Revenue Sharing Act of 1935 (16 U.S.C. 715s) and the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (FLREA; 16 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.). Service policy requires refuge managers to consider two factors in determining fees for any activity: Fair market value and costs involved in providing the use. Because fair market value and refuge costs can differ among localities, there is often a range of different fees for similar activities in different locations. For locations that collect fees under FLREA, public comment periods are required when refuges initiate fees and to change the types and amounts of fees. We encourage public participation in this process. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these comments. Comment (21): We received one comment that advocated for barring all filming on the Refuge System. Our Response: The Service already has policies and regulations governing filming on the Refuge System, which are outside the scope of this rulemaking. We will note that filming has the potential to impact wildlife or habitat, particularly larger-scale commercial filming and noncommercial filming involving models, sets, or lighting equipment. Under our current regulations (see 50 CFR 27.71 and 43 CFR part 5), such filming will require a special use permit and the associated evaluation of the potential impacts prior to granting the permit. However, we encourage refuge visitors to use their personal hand-held cameras and cellphones to capture photos video of wildlife and of natural scenery in order to share with friends and loved ones and to preserve memories of their visits. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of this comment. Comment (22): We received one comment requesting an extension of the public comment period through December 3, 2024. Our Response: We declined to extend the public comment period for the August 2, 2024, proposed rule (89 FR 63139). While extending the comment period was not necessary and extending it by 3 months would not have been feasible, the Service acknowledges that, for this annual rule cycle, the public comment period was shorter than those we provided in the last few years. This was necessitated by consideration of the balance between providing as much opportunity for public comment as PO 00000 Frm 00043 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 88157 possible while keeping delays to fall hunting opportunities to a minimum. We provided 30 days for public comments, and, within that time, we received comments covering the full range of typical topics for this annual rulemaking from a substantial number of the industry, sporting, and conservation organizations that are stakeholders for these regulations. The comments we received on the August 2, 2024, proposed rule are also a representative set of comments from individual members of the public. The Service believes that 30 days was an adequate amount of time for interested parties to provide their comments to us. We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of this comment. Changes From the Proposed Rule As discussed above, under Summary of Comments and Responses, we made no changes in this final rule based on comments we received on the August 2, 2024, proposed rule (89 FR 63139) and NEPA documents for individual refuges. We did, however, withdraw the proposed authorization of incidental take of feral hog when big game hunting on Green River NWR. As of earlier this year, the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources prohibits hunting of feral hogs, also known as wild pigs, within Kentucky. The Department is pursuing a strategy of eradication through trapping for this invasive species, and we are seeking to ensure our refuge regulations are aligned with this effort. We encourage anyone hunting or otherwise recreating on Green River NWR to report sightings of feral hogs to the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources. We also made several editorial, nonsubstantive revisions to this rule to improve clarity or to correct crossreferences. Effective Date We are making this rule effective upon the date of its filing at the Office of the Federal Register (see DATES, above). We provided a 30-day public comment period for the August 2, 2024, proposed rule (89 FR 63139). We have determined that any further delay in implementing these station-specific hunting and sport fishing regulations would not be in the public interest, in that a delay would hinder the effective planning and administration of refuges’ hunting and sport fishing programs. This rule does not impact the public generally in terms of requiring lead time for compliance. Rather, it relieves restrictions in that it allows activities on refuges and hatcheries that we would E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 88158 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations otherwise prohibit. Therefore, we find good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) and 808(1) to make this rule effective upon the date of its filing at the Office of the Federal Register. Amendments to Existing Regulations Updates to Hunting and Fishing Opportunities on NWRs This document codifies in the Code of Federal Regulations all the Service’s hunting and/or sport fishing regulations that we are updating since the last time we published a rule amending these regulations (88 FR 74050; October 30, 2023) and that are applicable at Refuge System units previously opened to hunting and/or sport fishing. We adopt these changes to better inform the general public of the regulations at each station, to increase understanding and compliance with these regulations, and to make enforcement of these regulations more efficient. In addition to finding these regulations in 50 CFR parts 32, visitors to our stations may find them reiterated in literature distributed by each station or posted on signs. TABLE 1—CHANGES FOR 2024–2025 HUNTING/SPORT FISHING SEASON Station State Migratory bird hunting Upland game hunting Big game hunting Bayou Teche NWR ..................... Canaan Valley NWR ................... Des Lacs NWR ............................ Green River NWR ....................... Horicon NWR .............................. J. Clark Salyer NWR ................... Lostwood NWR ........................... Trinity River NWR ....................... Turnbull NWR .............................. Upper Souris NWR ...................... Valentine NWR ............................ Waccamaw NWR ........................ Louisiana ............... West Virginia ......... North Dakota ......... Kentucky ................ Wisconsin .............. North Dakota ......... North Dakota ......... Texas ..................... Washington ............ North Dakota ......... Nebraska ............... South Carolina ....... E ............................ E ............................ Closed ................... N ............................ Already Open ........ Already Open ........ Closed ................... O ............................ Already Open ........ Closed ................... Already Open ........ E ............................ Already Open ........ E ............................ Already Open ........ Closed ................... Already Open ........ Already Open ........ Already Open ........ Already Open ........ Closed ................... Already Open ........ E ............................ Already Open ........ E ............................ E ............................ O ............................ N ............................ Already Open ........ O ............................ O ............................ E ............................ E ............................ O ............................ Already Open ........ Already Open ........ Sport fishing Already Already Closed. Closed. E. Already Closed. Already Closed. Already Already Already Open. Open. Open. Open. Open. Open. Open. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Key: N = New station opened for the first time. O = Opening (New species and/or new activity on a station previously open to other activities). E = Expansion (Station is already open to the activity: the final rule adds new lands/waters, modifies areas open to hunting or fishing, extends season dates, adds a targeted hunt, modifies season dates, modifies hunting hours, etc.). The changes for the 2024–2025 hunting/fishing season noted in the table above are each based on a complete administrative record which, among other detailed documentation, also includes a hunt plan, a compatibility determination (for refuges), and the appropriate NEPA analysis, all of which were the subject of a public review and comment process. These documents are available upon request. The Service recognizes the possible effects of lead ammunition on refuge resources and human health, and we will continue to evaluate and appropriately regulate the use of lead ammunition and tackle on Service lands and waters. The Service has initiated stakeholder engagement to implement a deliberate, open, and transparent process of evaluating the future of lead use on Service lands and waters, working with our State partners and seeking input and recommendations from the Hunting and Wildlife Conservation Council, other stakeholders, and the public. The best available science, analyzed as part of this rulemaking, indicates that lead ammunition and tackle have negative impacts on both wildlife and human health. Based on the best available science and sound professional VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 judgment, where appropriate, the Service may propose to require the use of non-lead ammunition and tackle on Service lands and waters, as we have previously done in certain areas. While the Service continues to evaluate the future of lead use in hunting and fishing on Service lands and waters, we will work with stakeholders and the public to evaluate lead use through the annual rulemaking process. In the interim, the Service does not intend to allow opportunities increasing or authorizing the new use of lead on Service lands and waters, and this rule is consistent with that approach. Crab Orchard NWR will close hunting on 111 acres that are currently open to hunting, out of more than 44,000 huntable acres, so that the area can be repurposed for other visitor recreational uses, including camping. Turnbull, Horicon, and Valentine NWRs are expanding hunting and fishing to species where lead-free ammunition or tackle is already required on the refuges. Trinity River, Bayou Teche, Green River, and Waccamaw NWRs will each open or expand archery deer hunting or open or expand migratory bird hunting, both of which are hunting activities that do not involve lead ammunition. Des Lacs, J. Clark Salyer, Lostwood, and Upper Souris NWRs are opening elk PO 00000 Frm 00044 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 hunting that will require the use of leadfree ammunition immediately in the fall 2024 season. In this final rule, Canaan Valley NWR will expand all existing hunting onto the newly acquired Big Cove Unit and require the use of leadfree ammunition immediately for all hunting in the fall 2024 seasons on the Big Cove Unit. Fish Advisory For health reasons, anglers should review and follow State-issued consumption advisories before enjoying recreational sport fishing opportunities on Service-managed waters. You can find information about current fishconsumption advisories on the internet at https://www.epa.gov/choose-fish-andshellfish-wisely. Required Determinations Regulatory Planning and Review— Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 14094 Executive Order 14094 amends and reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866 and E.O. 13563 and states that regulatory analysis should facilitate agency efforts to develop regulations that serve the public interest, advance statutory objectives, and are consistent with E.O. 12866, E.O. 13563, and E.O. 14094. Regulatory analysis, as E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations practicable and appropriate, shall recognize distributive impacts and equity, to the extent permitted by law. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that regulations must be based on the best available science and that the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open exchange of ideas. We have developed this final rule in a manner consistent with these requirements. E.O. 12866, as reaffirmed by E.O. 13563 and amended by E.O. 14094, provides that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will review all significant rules. OIRA has determined that this rule is not significant. Regulatory Flexibility Act Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA; 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA; title II of Pub. L. 104–121, March 29, 1996), whenever a Federal agency is required to publish a notice of rulemaking for any proposed or final rule, it must prepare and make available for public comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the effect of the rule on small entities (i.e., small businesses, small organizations, and small government jurisdictions). However, no regulatory flexibility analysis is required if the head of an agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Thus, for a regulatory flexibility analysis to be required, impacts must exceed a threshold for ‘‘significant impact’’ and a threshold for a ‘‘substantial number of small entities.’’ See 5 U.S.C. 605(b). SBREFA amended the Regulatory Flexibility Act to require Federal 88159 agencies to provide a statement of the factual basis for certifying that a rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This rule opens or expands hunting or fishing on 12 NWRs. As a result, visitor use for wildlife-dependent recreation on these stations will change. If the stations establishing new programs were a pure addition to the current supply of those activities, it would mean an estimated maximum increase of 1,481 user days (one person per day participating in a recreational opportunity; see table 2, below). Because the participation trend is flat in these activities, this increase in supply will most likely be offset by other sites losing participants. Therefore, this is likely to be a substitute site for the activity and not necessarily an increase in participation rates for the activity. TABLE 2—ESTIMATED MAXIMUM CHANGE IN RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES IN 2024–2025 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 [2023 Dollars in thousands] Station Additional hunting days Additional fishing days Bayou Teche NWR ...................................................................................................................... Canaan Valley NWR .................................................................................................................... Des Lacs NWR ............................................................................................................................ Green River NWR ........................................................................................................................ Horicon NWR ............................................................................................................................... J. Clark Salyer NWR ................................................................................................................... Lostwood NWR ............................................................................................................................ Trinity River NWR ........................................................................................................................ Turnbull NWR .............................................................................................................................. Upper Souris NWR ...................................................................................................................... Valentine NWR ............................................................................................................................ Waccamaw NWR ......................................................................................................................... 40 20 70 144 ........................ 70 70 300 272 70 60 0 ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 365 ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ $1.6 0.8 2.8 5.7 15.1 2.8 2.8 11.9 10.8 2.8 2.4 0 Total ...................................................................................................................................... 1,116 365 59.5 To the extent visitors spend time and money in the area of the station that they would not have spent there anyway, they contribute new income to the regional economy and benefit local businesses. Due to the unavailability of site-specific expenditure data, we use the national estimates from the 2016 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife Associated Recreation to identify expenditures for food and lodging, transportation, and other incidental expenses. Using the average expenditures for these categories with the maximum expected additional participation of the Refuge System yields approximately $59,000 in recreation-related expenditures (see table 2, above). By having ripple effects throughout the economy, these direct expenditures are only part of the economic impact of these recreational activities. Using a national impact VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 multiplier for hunting activities (2.51) derived from the report ‘‘Hunting in America: An Economic Force for Conservation’’ and for fishing activities (2.51) derived from the report ‘‘Sportfishing in America’’ yields a total maximum economic impact of approximately $150,000 (2023 dollars) (Southwick Associates, Inc., 2018). Since we know that most of the fishing and hunting occurs within 100 miles of a participant’s residence, then it is unlikely that most of this spending will be ‘‘new’’ money coming into a local economy; therefore, this spending will be offset with a decrease in some other sector of the local economy. The net gain to the local economies will be no more than $149,000 and likely less. Since 80 percent of the participants travel less than 100 miles to engage in hunting and fishing activities, their spending patterns will not add new PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Additional expenditures money into the local economy and, therefore, the real impact will be on the order of about $30,000 annually. Small businesses within the retail trade industry (such as hotels, gas stations, taxidermy shops, bait-andtackle shops, and similar businesses) may be affected by some increased or decreased station visitation. A large percentage of these retail trade establishments in the local communities around NWRs qualify as small businesses (see table 3, below). We expect that the incremental recreational changes will be scattered, and so we do not expect that the rule will have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities in any region or nationally. As noted previously, we expect at most $59,500 to be spent in total in the refuges’ local economies. The maximum increase will be less than one-tenth of 1 percent for E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 88160 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations local retail trade spending (see table 3, below). Table 3 does not include entries for those NWRs for which we project no changes in recreation opportunities in 2024–2025; see table 2, above. TABLE 3—COMPARATIVE EXPENDITURES FOR RETAIL TRADE ASSOCIATED WITH ADDITIONAL STATION VISITATION FOR 2024–2025 [Thousands, 2023 dollars] Retail trade in 2017 1 Station/county(ies) Bayou Teche: St. Mary Parish, LA .......................................................... Canaan Valley: Grant, WV ......................................................................... Tucker, WV ....................................................................... Des Lacs: Renville, ND ...................................................................... Green River: Henderson, KY ................................................................. Horicon: Dodge, WI ......................................................................... Fond du Lac, WI ............................................................... J. Clark Salyer: McHenry, ND .................................................................... Lostwood: Burke, ND ......................................................................... Mountrail, ND .................................................................... Trinity River: Liberty, TX ........................................................................ Turnbull: Spokane, WA .................................................................... Upper Souris: Renville, ND ...................................................................... Ward, ND .......................................................................... Valentine: Cherry, NE ........................................................................ Waccamaw: Georgetown, SC ............................................................... 1 U.S. Addition as % of total Establishments in 2017 1 Establishments with fewer than 10 employees in 2017 $658,214 $2 <0.1 186 145 133,024 79,611 0 0 <0.1 <0.1 42 28 28 20 43,869 3 <0.1 13 11 825,225 6 <0.1 150 98 1,069,734 2,137,970 8 8 <0.1 <0.1 232 344 154 207 39,926 3 <0.1 19 14 38,614 228,282 1 1 <0.1 <0.1 8 47 4 27 1,047,020 12 <0.1 201 143 9,754,429 11 <0.1 1,627 1,036 43,869 1,844,525 1 1 <0.1 <0.1 13 309 11 169 116,107 2 <0.1 43 30 1,035,984 0 0 287 206 Census Bureau. With the small change in overall spending anticipated from this rule, it is unlikely that a substantial number of small entities will have more than a small impact from the spending change near the affected stations. Therefore, we certify that this rule will not have a significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). A regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. Accordingly, a small entity compliance guide is not required. Congressional Review Act lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Estimated maximum addition from new activities The rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the Congressional Review Act. We anticipate no significant employment or small business effects. This rule: a. Will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more. The minimal impact will be scattered across the country and will most likely not be significant in any local area. VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for consumers; individual industries; Federal, State, or local government agencies; or geographic regions. This rule will have only a slight effect on the costs of hunting opportunities for Americans. If the substitute sites are farther from the participants’ residences, then an increase in travel costs will occur. The Service does not have information to quantify this change in travel cost but assumes that, since most people travel less than 100 miles to hunt, the increased travel cost will be small. We do not expect this rule to affect the supply or demand for hunting opportunities in the United States, and, therefore, it should not affect prices for hunting equipment and supplies, or the retailers that sell equipment. c. Will not have significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. This rule represents only a small PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 proportion of recreational spending at NWRs. Therefore, this rule will have no measurable economic effect on the wildlife-dependent industry, which has annual sales of equipment and travel expenditures of $72 billion nationwide. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act Since this rule will apply to public use of federally owned and managed refuges, it will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per year. The rule will not have a significant or unique effect on State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector. A statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required. Takings (E.O. 12630) In accordance with E.O. 12630, this rule will not have significant takings implications. This rule will affect only visitors at NWRs and describes what E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations they can do while they are on a Service station. of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. available from the stations at the addresses provided below. Federalism (E.O. 13132) Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation Available Information for Specific Stations We comply with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), when developing comprehensive conservation plans and step-down management plans—which includes hunting and/or fishing plans—for public use of refuges and hatcheries, and prior to implementing any new or revised public recreation program on a station as identified in 50 CFR 26.32. We complied with section 7 for each of the stations affected by this rulemaking. Individual refuge and hatchery headquarters have information about public use programs and conditions that apply to their specific programs and maps of their respective areas. To find out how to contact a specific refuge or hatchery, contact the appropriate Service office for the States and Territories listed below: Hawaii, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Eastside Federal Complex, Suite 1692, 911 NE 11th Avenue, Portland, OR 97232–4181; Telephone (503) 231–6203. Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, 500 Gold Avenue SW, Albuquerque, NM 87103; Telephone (505) 248–6635. Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, and Wisconsin. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 5600 American Blvd. West, Suite 990, Bloomington, MN 55437–1458; Telephone (612) 713–5476. Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1875 Century Boulevard, Atlanta, GA 30345; Telephone (404) 679–7356. Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center Drive, Hadley, MA 01035–9589; Telephone (413) 253–8307. Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 134 Union Blvd., Lakewood, CO 80228; Telephone (303) 236–4377. Alaska. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1011 E Tudor Rd., Anchorage, AK 99503; Telephone (907) 786–3545. California and Nevada. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2800 Cottage Way, Room W–2606, As discussed under Regulatory Planning and Review and Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, above, this rule will not have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism summary impact statement under E.O. 13132. In preparing this rule, we worked with State governments. Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988) In accordance with E.O. 12988, the Department of the Interior has determined that this rule will not unduly burden the judicial system and that it meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order. Energy Supply, Distribution or Use (E.O. 13211) On May 18, 2001, the President issued E.O. 13211 on regulations that significantly affect energy supply, distribution, or use. E.O. 13211 requires agencies to prepare statements of energy effects when undertaking certain actions. Because this rule will open or expand hunting opportunities on 12 NWRs, it is not a significant regulatory action under E.O. 12866, and we do not expect it to significantly affect energy supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore, this action is not a significant energy action, and no statement of energy effects is required. Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments (E.O. 13175) In accordance with E.O. 13175, we have evaluated possible effects on federally recognized Indian Tribes and have determined that there are no effects. We coordinate recreational use on NWRs and National Fish Hatcheries with Tribal governments having adjoining or overlapping jurisdiction before we propose new or revised regulations. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 88161 This rule does not contain any new collections of information that require approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). OMB previously approved the information collection requirements associated with application and reporting requirements associated with hunting and sport fishing and assigned OMB Control Number 1018–0140 (expires 09/30/2025). An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 National Environmental Policy Act We analyzed this rule in accordance with the criteria of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4332(C)), 43 CFR part 46, and 516 Departmental Manual (DM) 8. A categorical exclusion from NEPA documentation applies to publication of amendments to station-specific hunting and fishing regulations because they are technical and procedural in nature, and the environmental effects are too broad, speculative, or conjectural to lend themselves to meaningful analysis (43 CFR 46.210 and 516 DM 8). Concerning the actions that are the subject of this rulemaking, we have complied with NEPA at the project level when developing each package. This is consistent with the Department of the Interior instructions for compliance with NEPA where actions are covered sufficiently by an earlier environmental document (43 CFR 46.120). Prior to the addition of a refuge or hatchery to the list of areas open to hunting and fishing in 50 CFR parts 32 and 71, we develop hunting and fishing plans for the affected stations. We incorporate these station hunting and fishing activities in the station comprehensive conservation plan and/ or other step-down management plans, pursuant to our refuge planning guidance in 602 Fish and Wildlife Service Manual (FW) 1, 3, and 4. We prepare these comprehensive conservation plans and step-down plans in compliance with section 102(2)(C) of NEPA, the Council on Environmental Quality’s regulations for implementing NEPA in 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508, and the Department of Interior’s NEPA regulations at 43 CFR part 46. We invite the affected public to participate in the review, development, and implementation of these plans. Copies of all plans and NEPA compliance are PO 00000 Frm 00047 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 88162 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations Sacramento, CA 95825; Telephone (916) 767–9241. Primary Author Christian Myers, Division of Natural Resources and Conservation Planning, National Wildlife Refuge System, is the primary author of this rulemaking document. Regulation Changes Summary Table The regulatory amendments set forth below are presented alongside existing station-specific regulations that have not been amended. For a table that provides additional clarity on which specific regulatory provisions have been amended, please see Docket No. FWS– HQ–NWRS–2024–0034 on https:// www.regulations.gov for a separate document containing a table that provides additional clarity on which specific regulatory provisions have been amended and how they have been amended. List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 32 Fishing, Hunting, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife, Wildlife refuges. Regulation Promulgation For the reasons described in the preamble, we amend title 50, chapter I, subchapter C of the Code of Federal Regulations as set forth below: PART 32—HUNTING AND FISHING 1. The authority citation for part 32 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 16 U.S.C. 460k, 664, 668dd–668ee, and 715i; Pub. L. 115–20, 131 Stat. 86. 2. Amend § 32.7 by revising and republishing paragraph (q) to read as follows: ■ § 32.7 What refuge units are open to hunting and/or sport fishing? * * * * (q) Kentucky. (1) Clarks River National Wildlife Refuge. (2) Green River National Wildlife Refuge. (3) Ohio River Islands National Wildlife Refuge. (4) Reelfoot National Wildlife Refuge. * * * * * ■ 3. Amend § 32.24 by revising and republishing paragraphs (j), (m), and (x) to read as follows: lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 * § 32.24 California. * * * * * (j) Lower Klamath National Wildlife Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, coot, moorhen, and snipe on VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) In the controlled waterfowl hunting area, we require a valid Refuge Recreation Pass (available electronically or in person at the refuge office) for all hunters age 16 or older. All hunters age 15 and younger must remain in the immediate presence of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times while in the field. (ii) Unless otherwise posted, we require advance reservations for the first 2 days of the hunting season. Reservations are obtained through the waterfowl lottery each year. (iii) Hunters may enter the refuge at 4:30 a.m. unless otherwise posted. (iv) Shooting hours end at 1 p.m. on all California portions of the refuge with the following exceptions: (A) The refuge manager may designate up to 6 afternoon special youth, ladies, veteran, or disabled hunter waterfowl hunts per season. (B) The refuge manager may designate up to 3 days per week of afternoon waterfowl hunting for the general public after December 1. (v) We prohibit the setting of decoys in retrieving zones. (vi) Pit-style hunting blinds located in the Stearns units and unit 9D are firstcome, first-served. We require you to hunt within a 200-foot (61-meter) radius of the blind. (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of pheasant on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) In the controlled pheasant hunting area, we require a valid Refuge Recreation Pass (available electronically or in person at the refuge office) for all hunters age 16 or older. (ii) All hunters age 15 or younger must remain in the immediate presence of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times while in the field. (3)–(4) [Reserved] * * * * * (m) Modoc National Wildlife Refuge— (1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, coot, moorhen, and snipe on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) On the opening weekend of the hunting season, hunters must possess and carry a refuge permit (FWS Form 3– 2439, Hunt Application/Permit— National Wildlife Refuge System) issued through random drawing to hunters with advance reservations only. (ii) After the opening weekend of the hunting season, we only allow hunting on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. Hunters must check-in and out of the refuge by using self-service permits PO 00000 Frm 00048 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 (FWS Form 3–2405, Self-Clearing Check-in/out Permit). Hunters must completely fill out the ‘‘Refuge Hunt Permit’’ portion of the permit and deposit it in the drop box prior to hunting. Hunters must complete and display the ‘‘Daily Vehicle Permit’’ in the windshield of the hunter’s vehicle prior to hunting. The hunter must possess and carry the ‘‘Record of Kill’’ and ‘‘Waterfowl Harvest Statistics’’ portions of the permit while on the refuge and turn them in prior to exiting the hunting area. (iii) In the designated spaced blind area, you must remain within the blind assigned to you. (iv) All hunters age 15 and younger must remain in the immediate presence of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times while in the field. (v) You may not possess more than 25 shot shells while in the field once you have left your assigned parking lot or boat launch. (vi) You may only use portable blinds in the free-roam hunting areas. (vii) You must remove all blinds, decoys, shell casings, other personal equipment, and refuse from the refuge at the end of each day (see §§ 27.93 and 27.94 of this chapter). (viii) Hunters must enter and exit the hunting area from the three designated hunt parking lots, which we open 11⁄2 hours before legal shooting time and close 1 hour after legal shooting time each hunt day. (ix) We only allow walk-in access to the hunt area by foot and nonmotorized cart. (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of pheasant on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We limit hunting to junior hunters possessing a valid State Junior Hunting License and refuge Junior Pheasant Hunt Permit (FWS Form 3–2439, Hunt Application/Permit—National Wildlife Refuge System). (ii) All hunters age 15 and younger must remain in the immediate presence of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times while in the field. (3) [Reserved] (4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing only on Dorris Reservoir subject to the following conditions: (i) We prohibit fishing from October 1 to January 31. (ii) We allow fishing only from legal sunrise to legal sunset. (iii) We allow only walk-in access to Dorris Reservoir from February 1 through March 31. E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations (iv) We allow use of boats for fishing on Dorris Reservoir only from April 1 through September 30. * * * * * (x) Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, coot, moorhen, and snipe on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) In the controlled waterfowl hunting area, we require a valid Refuge Recreation Pass (available electronically or in person at the refuge office) for all hunters age 16 or older. (ii) All hunters age 15 or younger must remain in the immediate presence of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times while in the field. (iii) Unless otherwise posted, we require advance reservations for the first 2 days of the hunting season. You may obtain a reservation through the waterfowl lottery each year. (iv) Hunters may enter the refuge at 4:30 a.m. unless otherwise posted. (v) Shooting hours end at 1 p.m. on all portions of the refuge with the following exceptions: (A) The refuge manager may designate up to 6 afternoon special youth, ladies, veteran, or disabled hunter waterfowl hunts per season. (B) The refuge manager may designate up to 3 days per week of afternoon waterfowl hunting for the general public after December 1. (vi) You select blind sites by lottery at the beginning of each hunt day. You may shoot only from within your assigned blind site. (vii) We prohibit the setting of decoys in retrieving zones. (viii) We prohibit air-thrust and inboard water-thrust boats while hunting. We prohibit the use of allterrain amphibious or utility-type vehicles (UTVs) in wetland units. (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of pheasant on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) In the controlled pheasant hunting area, we require a valid Refuge Recreation Pass (available electronically or in person at the refuge office) for all hunters age 16 or older. (ii) All hunters age 15 or younger must remain in the immediate presence of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times while in the field. (3)–(4) [Reserved] ■ 4. Amend § 32.36 by redesignating paragraphs (b) and (c) as (c) and (d), respectively; and adding a new paragraph (b). The addition reads as follows: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 § 32.36 Kentucky. * * * * * (b) Green River National Wildlife Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of duck, goose, coot, merganser, teal, and dove on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) Each hunter age 12 and older must possess and carry a signed refuge hunting brochure (FWS Form 3–2439, Hunt Application/Permit—National Wildlife Refuge System) while hunting on the refuge. (ii) All hunters age 15 or younger must be supervised by an adult age 21 or older and must remain in sight of and normal voice contact with the adult. The adult may supervise no more than two youths. (iii) We prohibit hunting within 100 yards (91 meters) of a residence, graveled road, or hiking trail managed by the Service as part of Green River NWR. (iv) We prohibit the use of trail cameras. (v) We allow the use of boats operated only by manual power or an electric trolling motor for hunters to access the refuge. We prohibit the use of internal combustion motors, personal watercraft (e.g., jet skis), airboats, and hovercraft on waters owned and managed by Green River NWR. (vi) We allow the use of bikes, including e-bikes, for hunters to access the refuge along designated routes only (graveled and paved roads, and established trails) managed by the Service as part of Green River NWR. We prohibit the use of internal combustion motors on lands owned and managed by Green River NWR. (vii) We allow the use of off-road or all-terrain vehicles (e.g., ATVs/UTVs) only for mobility-impaired hunters who, while hunting on the refuge, possess and carry a valid General Activities Special Use Permit (FWS Form 3–1383– G) approved by the refuge manager. (viii) We prohibit marking or flagging any tree or other refuge feature with non-biodegradable reflectors, paint, flagging, or other substances. (ix) Access to open hunting areas of the refuge is from 2 hours before legal sunrise to 2 hours after legal sunset. (x) We prohibit the killing or wounding of a game animal and then intentionally or knowingly failing to make a reasonable effort to retrieve and include it in the hunter’s bag limit. (xi) We allow duck, goose, coot, wood duck, teal, and merganser hunting from 1⁄2 hour before legal sunrise until 12 p.m. (noon). We allow dove hunting according to State shooting hours. PO 00000 Frm 00049 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 88163 (xii) We allow the use of dogs for migratory game bird hunting. Dog owners and handlers must have a collar on each dog with the owner’s contact information (FWS Form 3–2439). (xiii) For migratory game bird hunting, you must remove all decoys, blinds, and hunting equipment at the end of each day’s hunt (see § 27.93 of this chapter). (xiv) For youth, seniors, and disabled hunters, as defined by the State, the Horseshoe Bend Unit will be open to waterfowl hunting during the months of December and January of the Statewide waterfowl season, and during the additional Statewide veterans and youth hunt dates in February. (xv) We prohibit waterfowl hunting during any Statewide seasons prior to December. (xvi) We prohibit all entry to the Tscharner East section of the Bluff Unit from November 1 through March 31. (xvii) The big game quota hunt in the month of November of the Statewide white-tailed deer season is open only to holders of a big game quota permit (FWS Form 3–2439, Hunt Application/ Permit—National Wildlife Refuge System). During that hunt, the Tscharner West section of the Bluff Unit and the Horseshoe Bend Unit are closed to all non-selected hunters and the general public. (2) [Reserved] (3) Big game hunting. We allow only archery and crossbow hunting of whitetailed deer and turkey on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (b)(1)(i), (iii) through (x), (xvi), and (xvii) of this section apply. (ii) Hunters age 15 and younger must be supervised by an adult age 21 or older and must remain in sight of and normal voice contact with the adult. The adult may supervise no more than one youth. (iii) We allow white-tailed deer and turkey hunting according to State shooting hours. (iv) You must use safety belts at all times when occupying tree stands. (v) You must remove all tree stands (portable and climbing) and ground blinds by legal sunset of each day’s hunt. (vi) You may use no more than one stand or blind per hunter. (vii) The big game quota permit (FWS Form 3–2439, Hunt Application/ Permit—National Wildlife Refuge System) is a limited entry permit, is zone-specific, and is nontransferable. (viii) During the big game quota hunt, we allow only hunters possessing a valid big game quota permit (FWS Form E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 88164 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations 3–2439, Hunt Application/Permit— National Wildlife Refuge System) on the refuge and only for the purposes of deer and turkey hunting. (ix) For the drawn holders of a big game quota permit (FWS Form 3–2439, Hunt Application/Permit—National Wildlife Refuge System), the Horseshoe Bend Unit and Tscharner West section of the Bluff Unit will be open, up to 21 days, during the month of November of the Statewide season. (x) For youth, seniors, and disabled hunters, as defined by the State, the Horseshoe Bend Unit and Tscharner West section of the Bluff Unit will be open to archery and crossbow hunting of deer and turkey during the months of September and October in accordance with State season dates. (xi) For youth, as defined by the State, the Horseshoe Bend Unit and Tscharner West section of the Bluff Unit will be open to archery and crossbow hunting of turkey during the months of April and May in accordance with State season dates. (4) [Reserved] * * * * * ■ 5. Amend § 32.37 by revising and republishing paragraphs (d), (e), and (m) to read as follows: § 32.37 Louisiana. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 * * * * * (d) Bayou Teche National Wildlife Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of duck, merganser, teal, light and dark goose, coot, gallinule, rail, snipe, dove, and woodcock on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) Each person age 18 and older must possess and carry a valid, signed refuge user brochure while on the refuge. (ii) We prohibit hunting or discharge of firearms (see § 27.42 of this chapter) within 500 feet (152 meters (m)) of any residence or oil and gas infrastructure, or within 200 feet (61 m) of any road, railroad, levee, water control structure, designated public use trail, designated parking area, or other designated public use facility. (iii) All youth hunters age 15 and younger must be supervised by an adult during all hunts. One adult may supervise up to two youths during small game and migratory game bird hunts, but may supervise only one youth during big game hunts. The supervising adult must maintain visual and voice contact with the youth at all times. Adult guardians are responsible for ensuring that youth hunters do not violate refuge rules. (iv) We require waterfowl and gallinule hunters to remove all portable VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 blinds and decoys from the refuge by 2 p.m. each day (see §§ 27.93 and 27.94 of this chapter). (v) Migratory bird hunters are only allowed to enter the refuge after 4 a.m. (vi) We allow waterfowl hunting daily until 2 p.m. during the State regular season, State teal season, and State youth and veteran waterfowl seasons. We allow gallinule, snipe, and rail hunting until 2 p.m. (vii) When hunting migratory game birds, you may only use dogs to locate, point, and retrieve game. (viii) We allow only the use of reflective tacks as marking devices. (ix) We only allow the incidental take of nutria with approved shot and weapons during any open waterfowl season on the refuge. We allow the incidental take of raccoon, feral hog, armadillo, opossum, and coyote with approved shot and weapons during any open season on the refuge. (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of squirrel and rabbit, and the incidental take of nutria, coyote, raccoon, armadillo, and opossum, on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We only allow hunting from the start of the State squirrel and rabbit seasons until the last day of State waterfowl season for the State Waterfowl Zone in which you are hunting. (ii) We prohibit upland game hunting on days corresponding with refuge deer gun hunts. (iii) Hunters must leave the refuge no later than 2 hours after legal sunset. (iv) When hunting, you must possess only shot size 4 or smaller or 0.22 caliber rimfire rifles or smaller. We allow the use of air rifles. (v) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (iii), (viii), and (ix) of this section apply. (vi) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (d)(2)(i) through (iv) of this section do not apply to upland game hunting on the Mitigation Units. (3) Big game hunting. We allow the hunting of white-tailed deer, and the incidental take of feral hog, on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We allow hunting of deer only with firearms (see § 27.42 of this chapter) during 5 specific days during October and November. A youth gun hunt will occur during the last weekend of October, on both Saturday and Sunday. The general gun hunt will occur during the final full weekend in November over 3 days: the Friday immediately before the weekend, Saturday, and Sunday. (ii) We allow archery deer hunting according to the State of Louisiana PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 archery season. We close refuge archery hunting during refuge deer gun hunts. (iii) We allow each hunter to possess only one deer per day; the deer may be a buck or a doe. (iv) Hunters may use only portable deer stands. Hunters may erect deer stands no earlier than 48 hours before the deer archery season and must remove them from the refuge within 48 hours after the season closes (see § 27.93 of this chapter). Hunters may place only one deer stand on the refuge. Deer stands must have the owner’s State hunting license/sportsman’s identification number clearly printed on the stand. (v) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (iii), (viii), and (ix), and (d)(2)(iii) of this section apply. (vi) The condition set forth at paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this section does not apply to big game hunting on the Mitigation Units. (vii) We prohibit the use of deer decoys. (viii) We prohibit organized deer drives. We define a ‘‘deer drive’’ as an organized or planned effort to pursue, drive, chase, or otherwise frighten or cause deer to move in the direction of any person(s) who is part of the organized or planned hunt and known to be waiting for the deer. (ix) Deer hunters must display State Wildlife Management Area (WMA) hunter-orange or blaze-pink (as governed by State WMA regulations). (4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing in all refuge waters subject to the following conditions: (i) We prohibit the use of unattended nets, traps, or lines (trot, jug, bush, etc.). (ii) The condition set forth at paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section applies. (iii) The refuge is only open to recreational finfishing and shellfishing from legal sunrise to legal sunset. (e) Big Branch Marsh National Wildlife Refuge— (1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of duck, merganser, teal, coot, light and dark goose, snipe, rail, gallinule, dove, and woodcock on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) Each person age 18 and older must possess and carry a valid, signed refuge user brochure while on the refuge. (ii) We allow waterfowl, snipe, rail, gallinule, dove, and goose hunting on Wednesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays, and Sundays from 1⁄2 hour before legal sunrise until 2 p.m., including waterfowl hunting during the State teal season and State youth and veterans E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations waterfowl seasons. We only allow hunting of woodcock until 2 p.m. (iii) We allow light goose hunting for that part of the season that extends beyond the regular duck season from 1⁄2 hour before legal sunrise until 2 p.m. (iv) We allow only temporary blinds, and hunters must remove blinds and decoys by 2 p.m. each day (see § 27.93 of this chapter). (v) All youth hunters age 15 and younger must be supervised by an adult during all hunts. One adult may supervise up to two youths during small game hunts and migratory bird hunts, but may supervise only one youth during big game hunts. The supervising adult must maintain visual and voice contact with the youth at all times. Adult guardians are responsible for ensuring that youth hunters do not violate refuge rules. (vi) We prohibit hunting or discharge of firearms (see § 27.42 of this chapter) within 500 feet (152 meters (m)) of any residence adjacent to the refuge or oil and gas infrastructure on the refuge, or within 200 feet (61 m) from the center of any road, railroad, levee, water control structure, designated public use maintained trail, designated parking area, or other designated public use facility. (vii) We allow migratory bird hunters to enter the refuge no earlier than 4 a.m., and all hunters must exit the refuge no later than 2 hours after legal sunset. (viii) We allow only reflective tacks as trail markers on the refuge. (ix) We allow the incidental take of raccoon, feral hog, armadillo, opossum, and coyote with approved shot and weapons allowed during any open season on the refuge. (x) We only allow the incidental take of nutria with approved shot and weapons during any open waterfowl (duck, teal, merganser, light and dark goose, and coot) season on the refuge. (xi) We prohibit hunters and anglers from utilizing air boats, air thrust boats, mud boats, aircraft, and air-cooled propulsion engines on the refuge. (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of squirrel, rabbit, and quail, and the incidental take of nutria, coyote, raccoon, armadillo, and opossum, on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) When hunting, you must possess only shot size 4 or smaller, or 0.22 caliber rim-fire rifles or smaller. We allow the use of air rifles. (ii) When hunting squirrel and rabbit, and for the incidental take of raccoon, we allow the use of dogs only after the close of the State archery deer season. When hunting quail, you may only use dogs to locate, point, and retrieve. VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 (iii) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (v), (vi), and (viii) through (xi) of this section apply. (iv) During the dog season for squirrel and rabbit, all hunters, including archers (while on the ground), except waterfowl hunters, must wear a minimum of a cap or hat that is hunter orange, blaze pink, or other such color as governed by State regulations. (v) We only allow hunting of quail until 2 p.m. (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer, and the incidental take of feral hog, on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We are open only during the State season for archery hunting of deer. (ii) We prohibit organized deer drives. We define a ‘‘deer drive’’ as an organized or planned effort to pursue, drive, chase, or otherwise frighten or cause deer to move in the direction of any person(s) who is part of the organized or planned hunt and known to be waiting for the deer. (iii) We allow placement of temporary deer stands no earlier than 48 hours prior to the start of deer archery season. Hunters must remove all deer stands within 48 hours after the archery deer season closes (see § 27.93 of this chapter). We allow only one deer stand per hunter on the refuge. Deer stands must have the owner’s State license/ sportsmen’s identification number clearly printed on the stand. We prohibit hunting stands on trees painted with white bands. (iv) Deer hunters must display State Wildlife Management Area (WMA) hunter-orange or blaze-pink (as governed by State WMA regulations) while on the ground. (v) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (v), (vi), and (viii) through (xi) of this section apply. (vi) We prohibit the use of deer decoys. (4) Sport fishing. We allow recreational finfishing and shellfishing on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) You may only fish from legal sunrise until legal sunset, except we allow night fishing from the bank and pier on Lake Road. (ii) You must only use rod and reel or pole and line while finfishing. (iii) You must attend to any fishing, crabbing, and crawfishing equipment at all times. (iv) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (e)(1)(i) and (xi) of this section apply. * * * * * (m) Delta National Wildlife Refuge— (1) Migratory game bird hunting. We PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 88165 allow hunting of duck, merganser, teal, light and dark goose, dove, snipe, rail, gallinule, and coot on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) Each person age 18 and older must possess and carry a valid, signed refuge user brochure while on the refuge. (ii) We allow migratory bird hunting on Wednesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays, and Sundays from 1⁄2 hour before legal sunrise until 2 p.m. during the State seasons, including the regular waterfowl season, the State teal season, State youth waterfowl season, State veterans waterfowl season, and State light goose special conservation season. (iii) We only allow temporary blinds. You must remove both blinds and decoys by 2 p.m. each day (see § 27.93 of this chapter). (iv) When hunting migratory game birds, you may only use dogs to locate, point, and retrieve game. (v) We prohibit discharge of firearms (see § 27.42 of this chapter) within 500 feet (152 meters (m)) of any residence or oil and gas infrastructure, or within 200 feet (61 m) of any road, railroad, levee, water control structure, designated public use trail, designated parking area, or other designated public use facilities. (vi) All youth hunters age 15 and younger must be supervised by an adult during all hunts. One adult may supervise up to two youths during upland game and migratory game bird hunts, but may supervise only one youth during big game hunts. The supervising adult must maintain visual and voice contact with the youth at all times. (vii) Migratory bird hunters may enter the refuge no earlier than 4 a.m., and all hunters must exit the refuge no later than 2 hours after legal sunset. (viii) We allow the incidental take of raccoon, feral hog, armadillo, opossum, and coyote with approved shot and weapons allowed during any open season on the refuge. (ix) We only allow the incidental take of nutria with approved shot and weapons during any open waterfowl season on the refuge. (x) We allow only the use of reflective tacks as marking devices. (xi) We close all refuge lands between Raphael Pass and Main Pass to public entry, including hunting and fishing, from November 1 through the end of February; year-round access is only allowed in Main, Raphael, Octave, Women, and Flatboat passes. (xii) We prohibit hunters and anglers from utilizing air boats, air thrust boats, mud boats, aircraft, and air-cooled propulsion engines on the refuge. E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 88166 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of rabbit, and the incidental take of nutria, coyote, raccoon, armadillo, and opossum, on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) The refuge rabbit season opens the day after the State duck season closes and continues through the remainder of the State rabbit season. (ii) We restrict hunting to shotgun only. (iii) We allow the use of dogs when rabbit hunting. (iv) We prohibit upland game hunting on days corresponding with refuge deer gun hunts. (v) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (m)(1)(i), (v) through (viii), (xi), and (xii) of this section apply. (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (m)(1)(i) and (v) through (xii) of this section apply. (ii) We allow archery deer hunting, bucks only, from October 1 through 15. We allow either-sex archery deer hunting from October 16 through 31, and from the day after the close of the State duck season through the end of the State deer archery season. (iii) We allow placement of temporary deer stands up to 48 hours prior to the start of deer archery season. Hunters must remove all deer stands within 48 hours after the archery deer season closes (see § 27.93 of this chapter). We allow only one deer stand per hunter on the refuge. Deer stands must have the owner’s State license/sportsmen’s identification number clearly printed on the stand. (iv) We prohibit organized deer drives. We define a ‘‘deer drive’’ as an organized or planned effort to pursue, drive, chase, or otherwise frighten or cause deer to move in the direction of any person(s) who is part of the organized or planned hunt and known to be waiting for the deer. (v) We prohibit the use of deer decoys. (vi) We allow shotgun hunting of deer on the Saturday and Sunday during the first split of the regular waterfowl season. (vii) Deer hunters must display State Wildlife Management Area (WMA) hunter-orange or blaze-pink (as governed by State WMA regulations). (4) Sport fishing. We allow recreational finfishing and shellfishing on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We only allow sport finfishing and shellfishing from 1⁄2 hour before legal VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 sunrise until 1⁄2 hour after legal sunset. During the State waterfowl hunting seasons, we only allow sport finfishing and shellfishing from 2 p.m. until 1⁄2 hour after legal sunset. (ii) We prohibit the use of trotlines, limblines, slat traps, jug lines, nets, or alligator lines. (iii) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (m)(1)(i), (xi), and (xii) of this section apply. * * * * * ■ 6. Amend § 32.41 by revising and republishing paragraph (f) to read as follows: § 32.41 Michigan. * * * * * (f) Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of waterfowl (duck and goose), American woodcock, American crow, American coot, common gallinule, sora, Virginia rail, and Wilson’s snipe on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) You must possess and carry a refuge check-in card (FWS Form 3– 2405, Self-Clearing Check-in Permit). (ii) We allow waterfowl hunting on Saturdays, Sundays, Tuesdays, and Thursdays during the regular goose season after September 30. (iii) We allow hunter access to the refuge 2 hours before legal shooting time to 2 hours after legal shooting time. (iv) You may possess no more than 25 shotgun shells while hunting in the field. (v) We allow the use of dogs while hunting, provided the dog is under the immediate control of the hunter at all times. (vi) We allow the take of feral hogs incidental to other lawful hunting using legal methods of take. (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of turkey, small game (eastern fox squirrel, eastern cottontail, and ringnecked pheasant), and furbearers (raccoon, coyote, and red fox) on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (f)(1)(iii) and (vi) of this section apply, except we allow hunter access to the refuge for furbearer hunting from 1⁄2 hour before legal sunrise to 1⁄2 hour after legal sunset. (ii) You may only hunt turkey during the spring season. (iii) We allow dogs for hunting. Raccoon hunting dogs must wear global positioning system (GPS) or radio collars. (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer on PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (f)(1)(iii) and (vi) of this section apply. (ii) You must possess and carry a refuge permit (State-issued permit). (4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We allow fishing by boat in navigable waterways but not within any managed refuge units. (ii) We allow bank fishing from legal sunrise to legal sunset only at designated sites along the Tittabawassee and Cass Rivers. ■ 7. Amend § 32.42 by revising and republishing paragraph (a) to read as follows: § 32.42 Minnesota. * * * * * (a) Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge— (1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow youth waterfowl hunting on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We allow the use of dogs while hunting, provided the dog is under the immediate control of the hunter at all times. (ii) Hunters must dismantle hunting blinds, platforms, and ladders made from natural vegetation at the end of each day. (iii) You must remove all boats, decoys, blind materials, stands, platforms, cameras, and other personal property brought onto the refuge at the end of each day (see §§ 27.93 and 27.94 of this chapter). (iv) We close the refuge from 7 p.m. to 5:30 a.m. (v) We allow the use of motorless boats for hunting. (vi) We only allow waterfowl hunting during the State’s youth waterfowl season. (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of ruffed grouse and sharptailed grouse on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (v) of this section apply. (ii) We only allow hunting from the opening of the State’s deer firearms season to the close of the State’s ruffed grouse and sharp-tailed grouse seasons, respectively. (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer and moose on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (iv), and (v) of this section apply. E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations (ii) We prohibit shooting on, from, over, across, or within 30 feet (9 meters) of a roadway open to motorized public vehicle transportation at a big game animal or a decoy of a big game animal. (iii) We only allow archery hunting from the start of the State’s deer firearms season, and close as governed by the State’s archery deer season. (iv) You must remove all boats, decoys, cameras, and other personal property brought onto the refuge at the end of each day (see §§ 27.93 and 27.94 of this chapter). (v) We allow only portable tree stands; portable, elevated hunting platforms not attached to trees; and portable ground blinds that can be hand-carried into the hunting area. (vi) You may place your tree stand(s), elevated platform(s), and/or ground blind(s) on the refuge only during your designated licensed season. You must remove these stands/blinds by the end of your designated licensed season (see § 27.93 of this chapter). Unoccupied stands/blinds may be used by anyone. (vii) We allow only two stands/blinds per hunter on the refuge. You must clearly label the stands/blinds with your State hunting license number. (viii) We prohibit the use of nails, wire, screws, or bolts to attach a stand to a tree. (ix) We prohibit hunting from a tree into which a metal object has been driven to support a hunter. (4) [Reserved] * * * * * ■ 8. Amend § 32.45 by revising and republishing paragraph (o) to read as follows: § 32.45 Montana. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 * * * * * (o) Lost Trail National Wildlife Refuge—(1) [Reserved] (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of turkey and mountain grouse on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We allow use of riding or pack stock on designated access routes through the refuge to access off-refuge lands as identified in the public use leaflet. (ii) We prohibit retrieval of game in areas closed to hunting without a refuge retrieval permit. (iii) We allow portable or temporary blinds and tree stands. (iv) You may only use or possess nontoxic shot shells while in the field (see § 32.2(k)). (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of elk, white-tailed deer, and mule deer on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (o)(2)(i) through (iii) of this section apply. (ii) Persons assisting disabled hunters must not be afield with a hunting firearm, bow, or other hunting device. (4) [Reserved] * * * * * ■ 9. Amend § 32.46 by revising and republishing paragraph (c) to read as follows: § 32.46 Nebraska. * * * * * (c) Fort Niobrara National Wildlife Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of coot, crow, dark goose, dove, duck, light goose, rail, snipe, teal, and woodcock on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) Hunters and anglers may access the refuge from 2 hours before legal sunrise until 2 hours after legal sunset. (ii) We allow access from designated areas of the refuge. (iii) You must remove all blinds and decoys at the conclusion of each day’s hunt (see § 27.93 of this chapter). (iv) We allow the use of dogs when hunting August 1 through April 30. (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of badger, bobcat, coyote, fox, long-tailed weasel, mink, opossum, prairie dog, porcupine, rabbit, hare, raccoon, skunk, squirrel, woodchuck, State-defined furbearers, greater prairie chicken, grouse, partridge, pheasant, quail, and turkey on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (ii), and (iv) of this section apply. (ii) We allow hunting with muzzleloader, archery, shotgun, and falconry. (iii) You may only possess nontoxic shot when hunting turkey (see § 32.2(k)). (iv) Shooting hours for coyote, prairie dog, porcupine, woodchuck, and Statedefined furbearers are 1⁄2 hour before legal sunrise to 1⁄2 hour after legal sunset. (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of deer, elk, and pronghorn antelope on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section apply. (ii) We allow hunting only with muzzleloader and archery equipment. (iii) We allow portable tree stands and ground blinds to be used from August 16 through January 31. PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 88167 (4) Sport fishing. We allow fishing on Minnechaduza Creek and on the Niobrara River, downstream from the Cornell Dam, subject to the following conditions: (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii) of this section apply. (ii) We prohibit the use of limb or set lines. (iii) We prohibit the take of baitfish, reptiles, and amphibians. (iv) We prohibit use or possession of alcoholic beverages while fishing on refuge lands and waters. * * * * * ■ 10. Amend § 32.53 by revising and republishing paragraphs (q), (w), (oo), and (kkk) to read as follows: § 32.53 North Dakota. * * * * * (q) Des Lacs National Wildlife Refuge—(1) [Reserved] (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of fox, sharp-tailed grouse, Hungarian partridge, turkey, and ringnecked pheasant on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We open for upland game bird hunting on the day following the close of the regular deer gun season through the end of the State season. (ii) We allow the use of hunting dogs for retrieval of upland game. (iii) We allow fox hunting from the day following the regular firearm deer season until March 31. (iv) We prohibit accessing refuge lands from refuge waters. (3) Big game hunting. We allow deer, elk, and moose hunting on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We only allow the use of portable tree stands and ground blinds. We prohibit leaving stands and blinds overnight on the refuge (see § 27.93 of this chapter). (ii) We prohibit entry to the refuge before 12 p.m. (noon) on the first day of the respective bow, gun, or muzzleloader deer hunting seasons. (iii) The condition set forth at paragraph (q)(2)(iv) of this section applies. (iv) You may only possess nontoxic ammunition when hunting elk (see § 32.2(k)). (4) [Reserved] * * * * * (w) J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, and coot on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following condition: We allow the use of dogs for hunting and retrieving game birds. E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 88168 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of ruffed and sharp-tailed grouse, Hungarian partridge, turkey, ring-necked pheasant, and fox on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We open the refuge to hunting for sharp-tailed grouse, Hungarian partridge, and ring-necked pheasant north of the Willow-Upham road on the day following the close of the regular firearm deer season. (ii) We open the refuge to fox hunting on the day following the close of the regular firearm deer season. Fox hunting on the refuge closes March 31. (iii) Hunters may possess only approved nontoxic shot (see § 32.2(k)) for all upland game hunting, including turkey. (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of deer, elk, and moose on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) You must possess and carry a refuge permit to hunt antlered deer on the refuge outside the nine public hunting areas during the regular firearms season. (ii) We prohibit entry to the refuge before 12 p.m. (noon) on the first day of the respective bow, gun, or muzzleloader deer hunting seasons. You may access refuge roads open to the public before 12 p.m. (noon). (iii) You may only possess nontoxic ammunition when hunting elk (see § 32.2(k)). (4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We allow boat fishing from May 1 through September 30. (ii) We allow ice fishing and dark house spearfishing. We allow snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), utility terrain vehicles (UTVs), motor vehicles, and fish houses on the ice as conditions allow. * * * * * (oo) Lostwood National Wildlife Refuge—(1) [Reserved] (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of sharp-tailed grouse, Hungarian partridge, and ring-necked pheasant on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following condition: We allow the use of dogs to retrieve upland game. (3) Big game hunting. We allow deer, elk, and moose hunting on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We prohibit entry to the refuge before 12 p.m. (noon) on the first day of the respective archery, gun, or muzzleloader deer hunting season. VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 (ii) You may only possess nontoxic ammunition when hunting elk (see § 32.2(k)). (4) [Reserved] * * * * * (kkk) Upper Souris National Wildlife Refuge—(1) [Reserved] (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of wild turkey, sharp-tailed grouse, Hungarian partridge, and pheasant on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We allow the use of dogs for hunting and retrieving of upland game birds. (ii) We allow hunters on the refuge from 5 a.m. until 10 p.m. (3) Big game hunting. We allow deer, elk, and moose hunting on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We only allow the use of portable tree stands and ground blinds. You must remove stands and blinds from the refuge at the end of each day’s hunt (see § 27.93 of this chapter). (ii) The condition set forth at paragraph (kkk)(2)(ii) of this section applies. (iii) We prohibit entry to the refuge before 12 p.m. (noon) on the first day of the respective bow, gun, or muzzleloader deer hunting seasons. (iv) You may only possess nontoxic ammunition when hunting elk (see § 32.2(k)). (4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We allow the use of fishing boats, canoes, kayaks, and float tubes in designated boat fishing areas from Lake Darling Dam north to State Highway 28 (Greene) crossing for fishing from May 1 through September 30. (ii) We allow fishing from nonmotorized vessels only on the Beaver Lodge Canoe Trail from May 1 through September 30. (iii) We allow boating and fishing from vessels on the Souris River from Mouse River Park to the north boundary of the refuge from May 1 through September 30. (iv) We allow snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), utility terrain vehicles (UTVs), motor vehicles, and fish houses on the ice as conditions allow from Lake Darling Dam north to Carter Dam (Dam 41) for ice fishing. (v) We allow you to place fish houses overnight on the ice of Lake Darling as governed by State regulations. (vi) We allow anglers to place portable fish houses on the Souris River north of Carter Dam (Dam 41) and south of Lake Darling Dam for ice fishing, but anglers PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 must remove the fish houses from the refuge at the end of each day’s fishing activity (see § 27.93 of this chapter). (vii) We allow anglers on the refuge from 5 a.m. until 10 p.m. * * * * * ■ 11. Amend § 32.62 by revising and republishing paragraph (p) to read as follows: § 32.62 Texas. * * * * * (p) Trinity River National Wildlife Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of duck, merganser, and coot on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We only allow hunting on Champion Lake with a refuge-issued permit (signed hunt brochure). (ii) We only allow hunting on Champion Lake on Saturdays and Sundays during the State duck season. Hunters may not enter the refuge until 4:30 a.m. and must be out of the hunt area by 12 p.m. (noon). (iii) We allow the use of dogs when retrieving game. (iv) Hunters age 16 and younger must be under the direct supervision of an adult age 17 or older. (v) We require a minimum distance between hunt parties of 150 yards (135 meters). (vi) We allow motors of 10 horsepower or less on Champion Lake. (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting for squirrel, and incidental take of rabbit, on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We require hunters to possess a permit issued by Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD). Permits are issued by a lottery drawing. The hunter must carry the nontransferable permit at all times while hunting. (ii) The condition set forth at paragraph (p)(1)(iii) of this section applies. (iii) We allow all-terrain vehicle use for hunters with disabilities in designated units. (iv) We require a minimum distance between hunt parties of 200 yards (180 meters). (v) Hunters may enter the refuge no earlier than 4:30 a.m. We allow hunting from 30 minutes before legal sunrise to 30 minutes after legal sunset only during the days specified on the permit. Hunters must be off the refuge 11⁄2 hours after legal sunset. (vi) Hunters may place no more than one temporary stand on the refuge. Hunters may place the stand during the scouting week before the hunt begins E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations and must remove it the day the hunt ends (see § 27.93 of this chapter). Hunters must label blinds with the name of the permit holder. (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer, and incidental take of feral hog, on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We require hunters to possess a TPWD-issued permit. Permits are issued by a lottery drawing. The hunter must carry the nontransferable permit at all times while hunting. (ii) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (p)(1)(iii) and (p)(2)(iii) through (vi) of this section apply. (iii) We allow archery hunting of white-tailed deer during the refuge designated 23-day archery season. (iv) We allow gun hunting of whitetailed deer during the State-designated general gun season in two 9-day ‘‘miniseasons’’ and during the Statedesignated muzzleloader season. (4) Sport fishing. We allow fishing on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We only allow fishing with pole and line, rod and reel, or hand-held line. (ii) We prohibit the use of trotlines, setlines, bows and arrows, gigs, spears, fish traps, crab/crawfish traps, and/or nets. (iii) We prohibit the harvesting of frog or turtle (see § 27.21 of this chapter). (iv) We allow fishing from legal sunrise to legal sunset. ■ 12. Amend § 32.66 by revising and republishing paragraph (c) to read as follows: § 32.66 Washington. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 * * * * * (c) Conboy Lake National Wildlife Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, coot, and snipe on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We prohibit discharge of any firearm within 1⁄4 mile (396 meters) of any maintained building or Federal facility, such as, but not limited to, a structure designed for storage, human occupancy, or shelter for animals. (ii) Hunters must remove all decoys and other equipment at the end of each day’s hunt (see § 27.93 of this chapter). (2)–(4) [Reserved] * * * * * ■ 13. Amend § 32.67 by revising and republishing paragraph (a) to read as follows: § 32.67 * * West Virginia. * VerDate Sep<11>2014 * * 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 (a) Canaan Valley National Wildlife Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, rail, coot, gallinule, mourning dove, snipe, and woodcock on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We require each hunter to possess and carry a signed refuge hunting brochure (signed brochure). (ii) Hunters may enter the refuge 1 hour before legal sunrise and must exit the refuge, including parking areas, no later than 1 hour after legal sunset. (iii) We prohibit overnight parking except by Special Use Permit (FWS Form 3–1383–G) on Forest Road 80. (iv) We allow the use of dogs consistent with State regulations. (v) We prohibit dog training except during legal hunting seasons. (vi) You may only use or possess approved lead-free shot shells and ammunition while in the Big Cove Unit (see § 32.2(k)). (2) Upland game hunting. We allow the hunting of ruffed grouse, squirrel, cottontail rabbit, snowshoe hare, red fox, gray fox, bobcat, woodchuck, coyote, opossum, striped skunk, and raccoon on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (iv), (v), and (vi) of this section apply. (ii) You may hunt coyote, raccoon, opossum, skunk, and fox at night, but you must obtain a Special Use Permit (FWS Form 3–1383–G) at the refuge headquarters before hunting. (iii) We only allow hunting in the No Rifle Zones with the following equipment: archery (including crossbow), shotgun, or muzzleloader. (iv) We prohibit the hunting of upland game species from March 1 through August 31. (3) Big game hunting. We allow the hunting of white-tailed deer, black bear, and turkey on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (iv), (vi), and (a)(2)(iii) of this section apply. (ii) We allow the use of dogs for hunting black bear during the gun season. (iii) We prohibit organized deer drives. We define a ‘‘deer drive’’ as an organized or planned effort to pursue, drive, chase, or otherwise frighten or cause deer to move in the direction of any person(s) who is part of the organized or planned hunt and known to be waiting for the deer. (4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of the refuge PO 00000 Frm 00055 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 88169 subject to the following condition: We prohibit the use of lead fishing tackle on designated areas of the refuge. * * * * * ■ 14. Amend § 32.68 by revising and republishing paragraph (d) to read as follows: § 32.68 Wisconsin. * * * * * (d) Horicon National Wildlife Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, coot, common moorhen, and American woodcock on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following condition: We allow only participants in the Learn to Hunt and other special programs to hunt goose, duck, coot, and common moorhen. (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of wild turkey, ring-necked pheasant, gray partridge, ruffed grouse, squirrel, cottontail rabbit, snowshoe hare, raccoon, opossum, striped skunk, red fox, gray fox, coyote, and bobcat on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) For hunting, you may use or possess only approved nontoxic shot shells while in the field, including shot shells used for hunting wild turkey (see § 32.2(k)). (ii) We prohibit night hunting of upland game from 30 minutes after legal sunset until 30 minutes before legal sunrise the following day. (iii) We allow the use of dogs while hunting upland game (except raccoon, opossum, striped skunk, red fox, gray fox, coyote, and bobcat), provided the dog is under the immediate control of the hunter at all times. (iv) Coyote, red fox, gray fox, and bobcat hunting begins on the first day of the traditional 9-day gun deer season. (v) Coyote hunting ends on the last day of the season for fox. (vi) You may only hunt striped skunk and opossum during the season for raccoon. (vii) You may only hunt snowshoe hare during the season for cottontail rabbit. (viii) Hunters may enter the refuge no earlier than 2 hours before legal shooting hours and must exit the refuge no later than 2 hours after legal shooting hours. (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer and black bear in designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) You must remove all boats, decoys, game cameras, blinds, blind materials, stands, platforms, and other personal equipment brought onto the refuge at the end of each day’s hunt (see § 27.93 E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 88170 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations of this chapter). We prohibit hunting from any stand left up overnight. (ii) We prohibit hunting bear with dogs. (iii) Hunters must possess a refuge permit (FWS Form 3–2439, Hunt Application/Permit—National Wildlife Refuge System) to hunt in Area E (surrounding the office/visitor center). (iv) The condition set forth at paragraph (d)(2)(viii) applies. (v) Any ground blind used during any gun deer season must display at least 144 square inches (929 square centimeters) of solid-blaze-orange or fluorescent pink material visible from all directions. (4) Sport fishing. We allow fishing on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions: (i) We only allow bank fishing or fishing through the ice. (ii) We prohibit the use of fishing weights or lures containing lead. (iii) We prohibit the taking of any mussel (clam), crayfish, frog, leech, or turtle species by any method on the refuge (see § 27.21 of this chapter). (iv) We allow fishing in designated areas from legal sunrise to legal sunset each day. * * * * * Shannon A. Estenoz, Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks. [FR Doc. 2024–25905 Filed 11–6–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4333–15–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 50 CFR Part 665 [Docket No. 241101–0287] available at https:// www.regulations.gov/docket/NOAANMFS-2024-0088, or from Sarah Malloy, Regional Administrator, NMFS Pacific Islands Regional Office (PIRO), 1845 Wasp Blvd., Bldg. 176, Honolulu, HI 96818. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: RIN 0648–BN03 Pacific Island Fisheries; Amendment 7 to the Fishery Ecosystem Plan for the American Samoa Archipelago and Final Rule; Discontinue Rebuilding Plan for American Samoa Bottomfish and Implement Annual Catch Limits and Accountability Measures for Fishing Years 2024–2026 National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Department of Commerce. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: This final rule amends the Fishery Ecosystem Plan for the American Samoa Archipelago (FEP) to discontinue the rebuilding plan for American Samoa bottomfish and implements single-species annual catch limits (ACL) and accountability measures (AM) for bottomfish in the American Samoa archipelago for fishing years 2024, 2025 and 2026. The action is necessary because new best scientific information indicates the fishery is not overfished or experiencing overfishing, and new ACLs and AMs are warranted. This final rule supports the long-term sustainability of the fishery. DATES: This rule is effective December 9, 2024. ADDRESSES: Background information on the bottomfish fishery in American Samoa is found in the FEP available from the Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, 1164 Bishop St., Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI 96813, telephone 808–522–8220, fax 808–522–8226, or https:// www.wpcouncil.org. Copies of supporting documents for this action are SUMMARY: Keith Kamikawa, NMFS Pacific Islands Regional Office, Sustainable Fisheries, 808–725–5177. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS and the Western Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) manage the bottomfish fishery in the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (i.e., Federal waters, generally 3–200 nautical miles (nmi) (6–345 kilometers (km)) around American Samoa under the FEP for the American Samoa Archipelago, as authorized by the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The 2019 stock assessment for the American Samoa bottomfish fishery indicated that the stock was overfished and experiencing overfishing. The fishery has therefore been managed under a rebuilding plan since 2022 (87 FR 25590, May 5, 2022). However, in September 2023 NMFS determined that none of the stocks in the fishery are overfished and were not overfished in the year in which the 2019 overfished determination was made or in any year since. Accordingly, NMFS is discontinuing the rebuilding plan, and implementing new ACLs and AMs to prevent overfishing and provide sustainable management for the fishery consistent with the FEP, the MagnusonStevens Act and implementing regulations. NMFS is implementing the following single-species ACLs for each of the bottomfish management unit species (BMUS) assessed by the 2023 benchmark stock assessment for fishing years 2024, 2025 and 2026. The fishing year for American Samoa bottomfish begins on January 1 and ends on December 31. lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 TABLE 1—ACLS FOR AMERICAN SAMOA BMUS FOR FISHING YEARS 2024, 2025, AND 2026 ACL (lb/kg) Species Samoan name Aphareus rutilans ..................................................................... Aprion virescens ...................................................................... Caranx lugubris ........................................................................ Etelis coruscans ....................................................................... Lethrinus rubrioperculatus ....................................................... Lutjanus kasmira ...................................................................... Pristipomoides flavipinnis ......................................................... Pristipomoides zonatus ............................................................ Variola louti .............................................................................. Palu-gutusiliva ......................................................................... Asoama ................................................................................... Tafauli ...................................................................................... Palu-loa ................................................................................... Filoa-paomumu ....................................................................... Savane .................................................................................... Palu-sina ................................................................................. Palu-ula ................................................................................... Velo ......................................................................................... VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:55 Nov 06, 2024 Jkt 265001 PO 00000 Frm 00056 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM 07NOR1 8,554/3,880 4,872/2,210 3,086/1,400 4,872/2,210 8,554/3,880 16,645/7,550 2,579/1,170 1,521/690 2,205/1,000

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 216 (Thursday, November 7, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 88147-88170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25905]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Fish and Wildlife Service

50 CFR Part 32

[Docket No. FWS-HQ-NWRS-2024-0034; FXRS12610900000-245-FF09R20000]
RIN 1018-BH17


National Wildlife Refuge System; 2024-2025 Station-Specific 
Hunting and Sport Fishing Regulations

AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), open or 
expand hunting opportunities on 12 National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs). We 
also close hunting on 111 acres at Crab Orchard NWR so that the area 
can be repurposed for other recreational uses, including camping. We 
also make changes to existing station-specific regulations in order to 
reduce the regulatory burden on the public, increase access for hunters 
and anglers on Service lands and waters, and comply with a Presidential 
mandate for plain-language standards. Finally, the best available 
science, analyzed as part of this rulemaking, indicates that lead 
ammunition and tackle have negative impacts on both wildlife and human 
health. With this final rule, Canaan Valley NWR in West Virginia will 
require lead-free ammunition for all hunting on the new Big Cove Unit. 
Additionally, Des Lacs, J. Clark Salyer, Lostwood, and Upper Souris 
NWRs in North Dakota will require lead-free ammunition for newly opened 
elk hunting. While the Service continues to evaluate the future of lead 
use in hunting and fishing on Service lands and waters, this rulemaking 
does not include any opportunities that increase or authorize the new 
use of lead.

DATES: This rule is effective November 6, 2024.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christian Myers, (571) 422-3595. 
Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of 
hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or 
TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services. Individuals 
outside the United States should use the relay services offered within 
their country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in 
the United States.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16 
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee), as amended (Administration Act), closes NWRs in 
all States except Alaska to all uses until opened. The Secretary of the 
Interior (Secretary) may open refuge areas to any use, including 
hunting and/or sport fishing, upon a determination that the use is 
compatible with the purposes of the refuge and National Wildlife Refuge 
System (Refuge System) mission. The action also must be in accordance 
with provisions of all laws applicable to the areas, developed in 
coordination with

[[Page 88148]]

the appropriate State fish and wildlife agency(ies), consistent with 
the principles of sound fish and wildlife management and 
administration, and otherwise in the public interest. These 
requirements ensure that we maintain the biological integrity, 
diversity, and environmental health of the Refuge System for the 
benefit of present and future generations of Americans.
    We annually review hunting and sport fishing programs to determine 
whether to include additional stations or whether individual station 
regulations governing existing programs need modifications. Changing 
environmental conditions, State and Federal regulations, and other 
factors affecting fish and wildlife populations and habitat may warrant 
modifications to station-specific regulations to ensure the continued 
compatibility of hunting and sport fishing programs and to ensure that 
these programs will not materially interfere with or detract from the 
fulfillment of station purposes or the Service's mission.
    Provisions governing hunting and sport fishing on refuges are in 
title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations at part 32 (50 CFR part 
32), and on hatcheries at part 71 (50 CFR part 71). We regulate hunting 
and sport fishing to:
     Ensure compatibility with refuge and hatchery purpose(s);
     Properly manage fish and wildlife resource(s);
     Protect other values;
     Ensure visitor safety; and
     Provide opportunities for fish- and wildlife-dependent 
recreation.
    On many stations where we decide to allow hunting and sport 
fishing, our general policy of adopting regulations identical to State 
hunting and sport fishing regulations is adequate to meet these 
objectives. On other stations, we must supplement State regulations 
with more-restrictive Federal regulations to ensure that we meet our 
management responsibilities, as outlined under Statutory Authority, 
below. We issue station-specific hunting and sport fishing regulations 
when we open wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries to migratory game 
bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, or sport fishing. 
These regulations may list the wildlife species that you may hunt or 
fish; seasons; bag or creel (container for carrying fish) limits; 
methods of hunting or sport fishing; descriptions of areas open to 
hunting or sport fishing; and other provisions as appropriate.

Statutory Authority

    The Administration Act, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge 
System Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement Act; Pub. L. 105-57), 
governs the administration and public use of refuges, and the Refuge 
Recreation Act of 1962 (Recreation Act; 16 U.S.C. 460k-460k-4) governs 
the administration and public use of refuges and hatcheries.
    Amendments enacted by the Improvement Act were built upon the 
Administration Act in a manner that provides an ``organic act'' for the 
Refuge System, similar to organic acts that exist for other public 
Federal lands. The Improvement Act serves to ensure that we effectively 
manage the Refuge System as a national network of lands, waters, and 
interests for the protection and conservation of our Nation's wildlife 
resources. The Administration Act states first and foremost that we 
focus our Refuge System mission on conservation of fish, wildlife, and 
plant resources and their habitats. The Improvement Act requires the 
Secretary, before allowing a new use of a refuge, or before expanding, 
renewing, or extending an existing use of a refuge, to determine that 
the use is compatible with the purpose for which the refuge was 
established and the mission of the Refuge System. The Improvement Act 
established as the policy of the United States that wildlife-dependent 
recreation, when compatible, is a legitimate and appropriate public use 
of the Refuge System, through which the American public can develop an 
appreciation for fish and wildlife. The Improvement Act established six 
wildlife-dependent recreational uses as the priority general public 
uses of the Refuge System. These uses are hunting, fishing, wildlife 
observation and photography, and environmental education and 
interpretation.
    The Recreation Act authorizes the Secretary to administer areas 
within the Refuge System and Hatchery System for public recreation as 
an appropriate incidental or secondary use only to the extent that 
doing so is practicable and not inconsistent with the primary 
purpose(s) for which Congress and the Service established the areas. 
The Recreation Act requires that any recreational use of refuge or 
hatchery lands be compatible with the primary purpose(s) for which we 
established the refuge and not inconsistent with other previously 
authorized operations.
    The Administration Act and Recreation Act also authorize the 
Secretary to issue regulations to carry out the purposes of the Acts 
and regulate uses.
    We develop specific management plans for each refuge prior to 
opening it to hunting or sport fishing. In many cases, we develop 
station-specific regulations to ensure the compatibility of the 
programs with the purpose(s) for which we established the refuge or 
hatchery and the Refuge and Hatchery System mission. We ensure initial 
compliance with the Administration Act and the Recreation Act for 
hunting and sport fishing on newly acquired land through an interim 
determination of compatibility made at or near the time of acquisition. 
These regulations ensure that we make the determinations required by 
these acts prior to adding refuges to the lists of areas open to 
hunting and sport fishing in 50 CFR parts 32 and 71. We ensure 
continued compliance by the development of comprehensive conservation 
plans and step-down management plans, and by annual review of hunting 
and sport fishing programs and regulations.

Summary of Comments and Responses

    On August 2, 2024, we published in the Federal Register (89 FR 
63139) a proposed rule to open or expand hunting and fishing 
opportunities at 12 refuges for the 2024-2025 hunting seasons. We 
accepted public comments on the proposed rule for 30 days, ending 
September 3, 2024. By that date, we received 154 comments on the 
proposed rule. More than two-thirds of these comments were identical or 
nonsubstantive comments. We received 68 unique comments, and 47 of 
those comments were substantive. We discuss the unique, substantive 
comments we received below by topic. Beyond our responses below, 
additional station-specific information on how we responded to comments 
on particular hunting or fishing opportunities at a given refuge or 
hatchery can be found in that station's final hunting and/or fishing 
package, each of which can be located in Docket No. FWS-HQ-NWRS-2024-
0034 on https://www.regulations.gov.
    Comment (1): We received more than 100 comments expressing general 
support for the proposed hunting expansions in the rule. These comments 
of general support either expressed appreciation for the increased 
hunting access in the proposed rule overall, expressed appreciation for 
increased access at particular refuges, or both. In addition to this 
general support, some commenters requested additional hunting and 
fishing opportunities. Requests for additional opportunities to hunt 
waterfowl were most common.
    Our Response: Hunting and fishing on Service lands is a tradition 
that dates back to the early 1900s. In passing the Improvement Act, 
Congress reaffirmed that the Refuge System was created to conserve 
fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats, and would facilitate

[[Page 88149]]

opportunities for Americans to participate in compatible wildlife-
dependent recreation, including hunting and fishing, on Refuge System 
lands. We prioritize wildlife-dependent recreation, including hunting 
and fishing, when doing so is compatible with the purpose of the refuge 
and the mission of the Refuge System.
    We will continue to open and expand hunting and sport fishing 
opportunities across the Refuge System; however, as detailed further in 
our response to Comment (2), below, opening or expanding hunting or 
fishing opportunities on Service lands is not a quick or simple 
process. The annual regulatory cycle begins in June or July of each 
year for the following hunting and sport fishing season (the planning 
cycle for this 2024-2025 final rule began in June 2023). This annual 
timeline allows us time to collaborate closely with our State, Tribal, 
and Territorial partners, as well as other partners including 
nongovernmental organizations, on potential opportunities. It also 
provides us with time to complete environmental analyses and other 
requirements for opening or expanding new opportunities. Therefore, it 
would be impracticable for the Service to complete multiple regulatory 
cycles in one calendar year due to the logistics of coordinating with 
various partners. Once we determine that a hunting or sport fishing 
opportunity can be carried out in a manner compatible with individual 
station purposes and objectives, we work expeditiously to open it. In 
addition to creation of new opportunities, this also applies to 
commenter requests for changes in the season dates, days of the week, 
hours open, methods of take, or other logistical requirements that 
would expand existing opportunities, including those that would also 
align our hunting and fishing regulations more closely with State 
hunting and fishing regulations.
    Within the context of these continuous annual regulatory cycles, 
the Service does welcome nongovernmental organizations and individual 
hunters and anglers sharing their thoughts on potential future 
opportunities through public comments and other opportunities. We seek 
to provide hunting and fishing opportunities that both serve our 
wildlife conservation and management objectives and provide the highest 
quality recreational experience that we can offer for hunters and 
anglers, including when it comes to waterfowl hunting specifically, so 
we give due consideration to the requests and recommendations that we 
receive.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (2): Several commenters expressed general opposition to any 
hunting or fishing in the Refuge System. Some of these commenters 
stated that hunting was antithetical to the purposes of a ``refuge,'' 
which, in their opinion, should serve as an inviolate sanctuary for all 
wildlife. The remaining commenters generically opposed expanded hunting 
or fishing opportunities at specific stations, or opposed specific 
hunting activities such as waterfowl hunting.
    Our Response: The Service prioritizes facilitating wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities, including hunting and fishing, on 
Service land in compliance with applicable Service law and policy. For 
refuges, the Administration Act, as amended, stipulates that hunting 
(along with fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and 
environmental education and interpretation), if found to be compatible, 
is a legitimate and priority general public use of a refuge and should 
be facilitated (16 U.S.C. 668dd(a)(3)(D)). Thus, we only allow hunting 
of resident wildlife on Refuge System lands if such activity has been 
determined compatible with the established purpose(s) of the refuge and 
the mission of the Refuge System as required by the Administration Act. 
For the 12 stations opening or expanding hunting or fishing in this 
rule, we determined that the proposed actions were compatible.
    Each station manager makes a decision regarding hunting and fishing 
opportunities only after rigorous examination of the available 
information, consultation and coordination with States and Tribes, and 
compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 
4321 et seq.) and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), as well as other applicable laws 
and regulations. The many steps taken before a station opens or expands 
a hunting or fishing opportunity on the refuge ensure that the Service 
does not allow any opportunity that would compromise the purpose of the 
station or the mission of the Refuge System.
    Hunting of resident wildlife on Service lands generally occurs 
consistent with State regulations, including seasons and bag limits. 
Station-specific hunting regulations can be more restrictive (but not 
more liberal) than State regulations and often are more restrictive in 
order to help meet specific refuge objectives. These objectives include 
resident wildlife population and habitat objectives, minimizing 
disturbance impacts to wildlife, maintaining high-quality opportunities 
for hunting and other wildlife-dependent recreation, minimizing 
conflicts with other public uses and/or refuge management activities, 
and protecting public safety.
    The word ``refuge'' includes the idea of providing a haven of 
safety as one of its definitions, and as such, hunting might seem an 
inconsistent use of the Refuge System. However, again, the 
Administration Act stipulates that hunting, if found compatible, is a 
legitimate and priority general public use of a wildlife refuge. 
Furthermore, we manage refuges to support healthy wildlife populations 
that in many cases produce harvestable surpluses that are a renewable 
resource. As practiced on refuges, hunting and fishing do not pose a 
threat to wildlife populations. It is important to note that taking 
certain individuals through hunting does not necessarily reduce a 
population overall, as hunting can simply replace other types of 
mortality. In some cases, however, we use hunting as a management tool 
with the explicit goal of reducing a population; this is often the case 
with exotic and/or invasive species that threaten ecosystem stability. 
Therefore, facilitating hunting opportunities is an important aspect of 
the Service's roles and responsibilities as outlined in the legislation 
establishing the Refuge System, and the Service will continue to 
facilitate these opportunities where compatible with the purpose of the 
specific refuge and the mission of the Refuge System.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (3): We received comments from the West Virginia Division 
of Natural Resources, the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and 
Fisheries, the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, and the 
Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies on the 
opportunities in the proposed rule. The West Virginia Division of 
Natural Resources supported the expansion of hunting at Canaan Valley 
NWR, but also expressed concern that requiring lead-free ammunition on 
the new Big Cove Unit could reduce hunter participation, reduce take of 
deer, and create enforcement challenges. The West Virginia Division of 
Natural Resources also recommended incentive-based approaches to the 
use of lead-free ammunition. The Louisiana Department of Wildlife and 
Fisheries commented specifically on the proposed hunt plan for Bayou 
Teche NWR and expressed support for the expanded hunting access. The 
Association of Fish and

[[Page 88150]]

Wildlife Agencies expressed general support for increased access for 
hunters and anglers, but expressed concerns about the Service's 
position on the use of lead ammunition and the individual refuges 
introducing lead-free ammunition requirements; the Association of Fish 
and Wildlife Agencies also expressed appreciation for coordination and 
communication between the Service and State agencies and advocated for 
the Service to pursue approaches based in education and incentives that 
encourage hunters to voluntarily choose to use lead-free ammunition, in 
particular the voluntary incentive pilot program developed in 
collaboration with the Hunting and Wildlife Conservation Council, an 
external stakeholder advisory group for the Department of the Interior. 
The Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies expressed 
support for the Service increasing hunting and fishing opportunities 
and for the Service's pilot program for providing hunters with 
incentives to voluntarily use lead-free ammunition, but objected to the 
regulations requiring the use of lead-free ammunition as inconsistent 
with State regulations and as lacking sufficient scientific support.
    Our Response: The Service appreciates the support of, and is 
committed to working with, our state partners to identify additional 
opportunities for expansion of hunting and sport fishing on Service 
lands and waters. We welcome and value State partner input on all 
aspects of our hunting and fishing programs.
    In response to the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, we 
appreciate the support for the expanded hunting acres for all existing 
hunting and acknowledge the concerns expressed with the lead-free 
ammunition requirement on the new Big Cove Unit. As to the 
recommendation to explore incentives for the use of lead-free 
ammunition, we are actively implementing a pilot program to test out 
direct incentives for hunters to voluntarily use lead-free ammunition 
for designated hunts at Canaan Valley NWR and six other refuges in the 
fall of 2024, as discussed in our response to Comment (4), below. On 
the concerns about hunter participation and harvest rates related to 
the lead-free ammunition requirement, as discussed in more detail in 
our responses to Comments (6) through (13), below, the Service has not 
seen evidence of hunter participation declines elsewhere in response to 
lead-free requirements, and, accordingly, we do not anticipate 
insufficient harvest of deer. Also, in the specific case of Canaan 
Valley NWR, even if declines in hunter participation on the Big Cove 
Unit were to occur in response to the lead-free ammunition requirement, 
hunters would likely simply shift their activities to the other hunt 
units of the same refuge and still harvest from the same deer 
population. On the concern about enforcement challenges for the lead-
free ammunition requirement, as discussed in our response to Comment 
(14), below, we are confident in our ability to enforce the 
regulations, since this requirement does not fundamentally differ from 
existing regulations elsewhere in the Refuge System and our law 
enforcement personnel receive applicable training.
    In response to the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries, 
we appreciate the support for the new opportunities at Bayou Teche NWR 
and look forward to collaboration and coordination on potential future 
hunting and fishing opportunities in Louisiana.
    In response to the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, we 
appreciate the support for the hunting and fishing openings and 
expansions in this rulemaking and value our shared commitment to 
compatible hunter and angler access on the National Wildlife Refuge 
System. We also appreciate the support for our lead-free voluntary 
incentive pilot program, developed in collaboration and coordination 
with State agencies in the seven States where the pilot sites are 
located. As discussed in our response to Comment (4), below, we are 
committed to robustly pursuing this voluntary approach and evaluating 
the potential efficacy for addressing lead poisoning in wildlife. At 
the same time, the Service's position remains that the best available 
science demonstrates the impacts of lead ammunition on wildlife and 
ecological health and supports the Service not introducing new 
opportunities that would increase the use of lead ammunition until we 
have identified the best path forward. Our lead-free pilot program 
could produce a voluntary incentive model that proves to be the best 
path forward, but we must first take time to test out the incentives, 
collect data, and evaluate our results. Going forward, we will continue 
to invite input and involvement from the Association of Fish and 
Wildlife Agencies and our individual State partners as we continue to 
evaluate the future of lead use on Service lands and waters as part of 
an open and transparent process to find the best methods to address 
lead's impact on wildlife and ecological health. As to the Association 
of Fish and Wildlife Agencies' objections to regulations requiring 
lead-free ammunition use, see our responses to Comments (7) through 
(9), below, addressing the concerns about scientific evidence, cost, 
and availability, which are shared by some other commenters. Similarly, 
see our response to Comment (14), below, regarding commenters' concerns 
about the enforceability of lead-free ammunition requirements.
    In response to the Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife 
Agencies, we value the support for the increased recreational access 
through this rule and appreciate the recognition of our collaboration 
and coordination on increasing access and on exploring voluntary 
incentives for the use of lead-free ammunition. We disagree with the 
notion that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support 
regulatory requirements for hunters to use lead-free ammunition, as 
discussed in our response to Comment (7), below, but the Service is 
willing to address the demonstrated poisoning of wildlife from the use 
of lead ammunition for hunting through voluntary incentives, should 
they prove to be sufficiently effective. As to the concern that such 
regulations typically differ from State regulations, while we endeavor 
to align our regulations with State regulations wherever feasible, the 
Service routinely sets requirements for hunters and anglers that are 
more restrictive than the applicable State regulations whenever 
necessitated by our conservation mission or refuge purposes, as noted 
in our response to Comment (2), above. Requirements to use lead-free 
ammunition are one example in this category, alongside limitations on 
season dates, time of day, methods of take, and more that are similarly 
necessary because the Service is obligated to prioritize the health of 
wildlife species and their habitats on Refuge System lands and waters. 
Hunting and fishing activities must be assessed to be compatible with 
our conservation mission as authorized by appropriate regulations, and 
we must introduce further regulations as necessary to ensure their 
continued compatibility in order to keep a given opportunity open.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (4): Several commenters either encouraged the Service to 
pursue incentives encouraging hunters to voluntarily use lead-free 
ammunition or specifically expressed support for the Service's new 
pilot program providing direct incentives for hunters participating in 
designated hunts at seven selected refuges in the fall of 2024. Most of 
these commenters noted that they objected to any regulations

[[Page 88151]]

requiring the use of lead-free ammunition, but some commenters were 
supportive of both lead-free regulatory requirements and voluntary 
approaches like the Service's new pilot program.
    Our Response: The Service has encouraged and will continue to 
encourage voluntary use of non-lead ammunition and tackle, including 
through our new collaborative pilot program for providing direct 
incentives and robust educational workshops to hunters, but we also 
have the authority to impose regulatory requirements for use of lead-
free ammunition for designated hunting on individual refuges. Notably, 
the Refuge System, and all Service lands and waters, are different from 
private, State, and even other Federal public lands. We have legal 
obligations to prioritize wildlife health and biodiversity, to consider 
the compatibility of new and ongoing hunting and fishing activities, 
and to assess the potential impact of these activities on the natural 
resources under our jurisdiction. The Service is evaluating the future 
of lead use through an open and transparent process with input from a 
broad array of partners and stakeholders about the best approach, which 
may include education and incentives encouraging voluntary choice. 
During this process, the Service does not intend to authorize hunting 
and fishing opportunities that increase the use of lead ammunition and 
tackle on the Refuge System. This is consistent with our full 
commitment to the lead-free pilot program for hunter education and 
incentives, which is aimed at identifying the most effective voluntary 
approach to addressing lead poisoning in wildlife from lead ammunition.
    In this rule, the Service has put in place a lead-free ammunition 
requirement for newly opened elk hunting at four refuges in North 
Dakota and for all hunting on the new Big Cove Unit at Canaan Valley 
NWR in West Virginia. These requirements are each either limited to a 
specific species or to a specific hunt unit. Each of these targeted 
requirements is based on the best available science and the sound 
professional judgement of Service personnel, and was put in place only 
after discussions with the relevant State agency.
    We appreciate the support from commenters for our new pilot program 
for providing hunters with educational workshops and direct economic 
incentives to voluntarily use lead-free ammunition. The Service was 
able to collaborate with some of the commenter organizations and 
others, in particular the Hunting and Wildlife Conservation Council, in 
the design of the lead-free pilot program. The Service is also 
collaborating with individual State agencies and the North American 
Non-Lead Partnership in implementing the pilot program. We are 
encouraged by the potential for the pilot program to identify and 
demonstrate the most effective voluntary approach to addressing lead 
ammunition impacts to wildlife and ecological health.
    The 2024 iteration of the pilot program will take place for 
designated hunts at seven selected refuges throughout the Refuge 
System. The pilot program is designed to address the hurdles of 
awareness, demonstrated performance, price, and availability that are 
considered some of the major barriers for hunters in voluntarily 
choosing to use lead-free ammunition. Accordingly, at each pilot site, 
the Service will utilize educational messaging, including voluntary 
intensive educational workshops with ammunition performance 
demonstrations at selected sites. Similarly, at each pilot site, we 
will offer a rebate incentive in the form of a prepaid debit card for 
eligible hunters who provide proof of their purchase of lead-free 
ammunition, on a first come, first served basis. The implementation of 
the pilot program at seven sites in 2024 will mark a substantial step 
in progress toward addressing poisoning of wildlife from lead 
ammunition and will set the stage for further refinement of the 
educational and direct incentive elements of the lead-free pilot 
program, as well as provide data for analysis of the potential impacts 
and potential scalability of the program. As we operate the pilot 
program, we will seek to continue the open and collaborative approach 
we have utilized thus far and hope to receive continued support and 
cooperation from hunters and from external hunting and conservation 
organizations.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (5): Several commenters expressed concern over the use of 
lead ammunition or lead fishing tackle on Service lands and waters. 
Nearly all of these commenters expressed support for the individual 
lead-free requirements in the proposed rule. Most of these commenters 
urged the Service to eliminate the use of lead ammunition and tackle 
throughout the Refuge System. Many commenters expressed concerns about 
raptor species, including the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), 
and other species that scientific studies have shown to be especially 
susceptible to adverse health impacts from lead ammunition and tackle.
    Our Response: The Service appreciates the concerns from commenters 
about the issue of bioavailability of lead in the environment and is 
aware of the potential impacts of lead on fish and wildlife. See, for 
example, the recent study from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) with 
Service collaboration, Vincent Slabe, et al. ``Demographic implications 
of lead poisoning for eagles across North America,'' which is available 
online through a link at https://www.usgs.gov/news/national-news-release/groundbreaking-study-finds-widespread-lead-poisoning-bald-and-golden. Accordingly, the Service pays special attention to species 
susceptible to lead uptake and to sources of lead that could impact 
wildlife and ecological health.
    Historically, the principal cause of lead poisoning in waterfowl 
was the high densities of lead shot in wetland sediments associated 
with migratory bird hunting activities (Kendall et al. 1996). In 1991, 
as a result of high bird mortality, the Service instituted a nationwide 
ban on the use of lead shot for hunting waterfowl and coots (see 50 CFR 
32.2(k)). However, lead ammunition is still used for other types of 
hunting, and lead tackle is used for fishing on private and public 
lands and waters, including within the Refuge System.
    Due to the continued lead use outside of waterfowl hunting, there 
remains concern about the bioavailability of spent lead ammunition 
(bullets) and fishing tackle on the environment, the health of fish and 
wildlife, and human health. The Service is aware of fish and wildlife 
species, including endangered and threatened species, that are 
susceptible to the build-up of lead in their systems coming directly 
from their food sources or secondhand through the food ingested by 
their food sources. There is also evidence that some species are 
susceptible to direct ingestion of lead ammunition or tackle due to 
their foraging behaviors. For example, the Service recognizes that 
ingested lead fishing tackle has been found to be a leading cause of 
mortality in adult common loons (Grade, T. et al. (2017). Population-
level effects of lead fishing tackle on common loons. The Journal of 
Wildlife Management 82(1): pp. 155-164). The impacts of lead on human 
health and safety have been a focus of several scientific studies. We 
are familiar with studies that have found the ingestion of animals 
harvested via the use of lead ammunition increased levels of lead in 
the human body (e.g.,

[[Page 88152]]

Buenz, E. (2016). Lead exposure through eating wild game. American 
Journal of Medicine, 128: p. 458).
    It is because of lead's potential for ecological health impacts 
that, in this rulemaking, the Service has continued to take a measured 
approach in not adding to the use of lead on refuge lands (see 87 FR 
35136, June 9, 2022). Accordingly, the opportunities in this final rule 
either do not involve the use of lead ammunition or tackle (i.e., 
waterfowl hunting or archery) or require the use of lead-free 
ammunition or tackle. This measured approach is also part of the 
Service's broader commitment to evaluating the future of lead use 
throughout the Refuge System.
    In response to the commenters' request that the Service eliminate 
the use of lead ammunition and fishing tackle throughout the Refuge 
System, the Service is committed to doing what best serves the public 
interest and our conservation mission, including facilitating 
compatible, wildlife-dependent, recreational hunting and fishing. As we 
committed to do in our 2021-2022 rulemaking (see 86 FR 48822 at 48830, 
August 31, 2021) and our 2022-2023 rulemaking (see 87 FR 57108 at 
57122, September 16, 2022), the Service has been evaluating, and 
continues to evaluate, lead use in hunting and fishing on Service lands 
and waters. This rule is designed to avoid increased use of lead on 
refuges as the Service continues to evaluate the future of lead use by 
seeking input from partners, through a transparent process, to inform 
the determination of what actions and methods are appropriate for 
addressing the potential for adverse environmental and ecological 
health impacts. This process includes a commitment to fully exploring a 
voluntary approach through our new pilot program for hunter education 
and incentives.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (6): Several commenters expressed opposition to the Service 
requiring the use of lead-free ammunition for designated hunting 
opportunities at individual refuges in this rule or in general. Some of 
these commenters simply expressed a general opposition to the concept 
of lead-free requirements, but the rest put forward one or more points 
in arguing against lead-free requirements. The concerns collectively 
expressed by these more substantive comments are addressed in Comment 
(7) through Comment (13), below.
    Our Response: The Service has allowed, and with the promulgation of 
this rule continues to allow, the use of lead ammunition and/or tackle 
in hunting and sport fishing in most of the Refuge System. The vast 
majority of stations and individual hunting and fishing opportunities 
currently permit lead use, consistent with State regulations allowing 
the use of lead ammunition and tackle. Lead ammunition and tackle are 
currently allowed where we have previously determined the activity is 
not likely to result in dangerous levels of lead exposure. However, the 
Service has been transparent about its intent to seriously consider the 
future of lead use, consistent with its role as the steward of the 
Refuge System. Therefore, we are evaluating what is best for the 
resources belonging to the American public regarding the future use of 
lead ammunition and tackle on Service lands and waters. The best 
available science, analyzed as part of this rulemaking, demonstrates 
that lead ammunition and tackle have negative impacts on both human 
health and wildlife health, and those impacts are more acute for some 
species.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (7): Most of the comments opposed to regulations concerning 
the use of lead ammunition questioned the sufficiency of scientific 
support for lead-free requirements. Some of the commenters also claimed 
there is specifically a lack of scientific evidence of ``population-
level'' lead impacts and this means lead-free ammunition requirements 
are unwarranted.
    Our Response: We refer commenters concerned about scientific 
evidence in support of the rulemaking to the analyses of environmental 
impacts in the NEPA and ESA section 7 documentation for each refuge in 
this rulemaking and the cumulative impacts report accompanying the 
rulemaking, which are all available in Docket No. FWS-HQ-NWRS-2024-0034 
on https://www.regulations.gov. For our NEPA and ESA section 7 
analyses, we considered peer-reviewed scientific studies evaluating the 
impacts of lead to humans, to wildlife generally, and to specific 
species--including endangered and threatened species and species 
especially susceptible to lead ammunition or tackle exposure. While 
this evidence is not determinative as to whether lead-free ammunition 
and tackle should be required in all cases, given the full range of 
factors to consider on the topic of lead use, it is inaccurate to claim 
that there is no scientific evidence of adverse impacts to human health 
or wildlife and ecological health, or both, from lead ammunition and 
tackle or that the Service has not presented such evidence as part of 
this rulemaking. Each refuge in this rule used the best available 
science and the expertise and sound professional judgment of refuge 
staff to determine that our management strategies, including 
promulgated non-lead requirements, are based on sound science and the 
specific circumstances of that individual refuge.
    Moreover, we also reject the related claim that scientific evidence 
of so-called ``population-level'' impacts to wildlife is both a 
prerequisite to Service action and lacking in the available science. 
Depending on the situation, we may manage wildlife at the ``population 
level'' or at the ``individual level,'' such as acting to protect 
individuals of an endangered or threatened species. Similarly, 
depending on the situation, we may adopt regulations, policies, or 
practices that respond to or prevent adverse impacts at the population 
level or to individual animals and plants. In fact, there are clear 
cases where we need to act preventatively or early to control invasive 
species, pests, or animal diseases, since they are much more difficult 
to eradicate when there is ``population-level'' damage. ``Population-
level'' impacts are not necessary for regulation to the exclusion of 
any other factors, although in the past the Service and others have 
regulated lead use based, at least in part, on addressing impacts to 
whole populations, as demonstrated impacts to waterfowl populations and 
the population of California condors prompted the 1991 nationwide 
prohibition on waterfowl hunting with lead ammunition (see 56 FR 22100, 
May 13, 1991) and the 2019 prohibition on hunting with lead ammunition 
in California (see California Assembly Bill No. 711, California Fish 
and Game Code at section 3004.5), respectively. In any case, the 
scientific literature demonstrates that lead use has ``population-
level'' impacts.
    There is evidence of population-level impacts and potential 
population-level impacts to waterfowl and upland game bird species from 
lead fishing tackle and lead ammunition through direct ingestion. Lead 
fishing tackle presents a risk of lead poisoning to many waterfowl 
species, including loons and swans (Pokras and Chafel 1992; Rattner et 
al. 2008; Strom et al. 2009). The primary concerns are discarded whole 
or fragmented lead sinkers, as well as other lead tackle and even lead 
ammunition released into the water, that rest on river and lake bottoms 
where diving birds ingest them alongside pebbles, as pebbles are 
necessary to break down food through

[[Page 88153]]

grinding in the birds' digestive systems. This results in lead 
poisoning because the grinding action breaks down the pieces of 
ingested lead into fine lead particles inside of the birds that can 
then enter their blood streams. Studies have consistently found impacts 
of ingested lead fishing tackle are a leading cause of mortality in 
adult common loons (Pokras and Chafel 1992; Scheuhammer and Norris 
1995; Franson et al. 2003; Pokras et al. 2009; Grade et al. 2017; Grade 
et al. 2019). Strom et al. (2009) assessed lead exposure in Wisconsin 
birds and found that approximately 25 percent of the trumpeter swan 
fatalities from 1991 through 2007 were attributed to ingested lead. 
Also, lead ammunition discarded on land presents a similar risk of lead 
poisoning from upland game birds swallowing discarded ammunition 
alongside the pebbles they use for digestion.
    Another source of population-level impacts and potential 
population-level impacts from lead is indirect ingestion by birds of 
prey and other scavengers from consuming animals shot with lead 
ammunition. The primary concerns for birds of prey are lead fragments 
from lead ammunition that remain in the carcasses and gut piles of 
hunted animals that are scavenged by these birds. The fine fragments of 
lead, observable in x-rays of harvested game animals, are ingested 
because they are embedded in the meat and other animal tissues being 
scavenged and then enter the digestive systems and blood streams of the 
birds of prey. Many studies have looked at the impacts of this lead 
exposure to eagle health (see, e.g., Kramer and Redig 1997; O'Halloran 
et al. 1998; Kelly and Kelly 2005; Golden et al. 2016; Hoffman 1985a, 
1985b; Pattee 1984; Stauber 2010). This includes the recent study, 
published in 2022, from the USGS with Service collaboration, Vincent 
Slabe, et al. ``Demographic implications of lead poisoning for eagles 
across North America,'' which is available online via a link at https://www.usgs.gov/news/national-news-release/groundbreaking-study-finds-widespread-lead-poisoning-bald-and-golden. This study explicitly finds 
that lead poisoning is causing population growth ratesto slowfor bald 
eagles by 3.8percentand golden eagles by 0.8 percent annually. These 
growth-slowing impacts to populations are statistically significant 
and, in the case of bald eagles, are occurring for a species that was 
previously endangered and is still in the process of recovering to 
historical levels. Thus, it is inaccurate to claim there are not known 
``population-level'' impacts from lead use.
    Finally, the Service's mission and statutory obligations require 
refuges to be closed to hunting and fishing by default, and this 
changes only when we have determined hunting or fishing activities are 
compatible with our conservation mission and we have promulgated 
regulations to open designated areas to hunting and fishing. Hunting 
and fishing access and opportunities are thus constrained by the 
regulations to only those activities that are compatible. Thus, the 
Service has an obligation to demonstrate, using the best available 
science, that any given aspect of hunting or fishing on the Refuge 
System is compatible with our mission. The Service has also built into 
our compatibility process the need to reevaluate compatibility 
determinations after a set period, either 10 or 15 years, depending on 
the use, because new science or new conditions could compel the Service 
to change our compatibility determinations. In the case of the use of 
lead, our past determinations that lead ammunition and lead tackle were 
permissible to use on Refuge System lands does not change this 
fundamental structure of our processes. The use of lead ammunition and 
tackle, like any other visitor activity, can only be allowed on a 
refuge if, and only for as long as, the refuge applies the best 
available science and sound professional judgment to find it 
compatible. The suggestion from some commenters that historical use of 
lead or past determinations that lead use was compatible compels us to 
find the future use of lead compatible is therefore counter to our 
mission and statutory obligations. This suggestion also ignores the 
accumulation of lead in the environment over time. The Service will 
continue to revisit our compatibility determinations, as required, 
while considering the best available science and applying sound 
professional judgment.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (8): Some commenters opposed to requirements in this rule 
to use lead-free ammunition claimed lead-free ammunition is more 
expensive than lead ammunition. Some of these commenters further 
expressed the concern that lead-free ammunition requirements could 
prevent participation in hunting due to price differences.
    Our Response: We do not agree that lead-free ammunition is 
prohibitively expensive, especially in comparison to lead ammunition. 
However, we recognize that there could be some cost burden of 
compliance for hunting and fishing opportunities where lead-free 
ammunition or tackle is required. For example, lead-free ammunition is 
very close in price to premium lead ammunition but can be more 
expensive than some lead ammunition. Notably, the Maine Department of 
Inland Fisheries and Wildlife and others have recognized that this cost 
difference is typically less than $10 per box of ammunition, with boxes 
usually lasting multiple hunting seasons (see online at https://www.maine.gov/ifw/hunting-trapping/hunting/nonlead-ammunition.html).
    When we have restricted lead ammunition use, we have first ensured 
that the ecological health and conservation benefits outweigh any 
potential for cost burden on hunters. We are confident that non-lead 
ammunition is not cost-prohibitive, as hunting continues on all Refuge 
System stations where we have restricted lead use. Moreover, we have 
not seen declines in hunting use attributable to lead-free ammunition 
requirements. In other words, hunting-use day declines at stations that 
require lead-free ammunition do not appear to deviate from general 
trends of declining hunting participation that affect all stations in 
the Refuge System. Where we have seen meaningful declines is in the 
price of lead-free ammunition options, as there has been a continuous 
trend for years of decreasing prices, and the 1991 nationwide ban on 
lead ammunition for waterfowl hunting shows that regulations can spur 
innovation and production, which brings the prices down for lead-free 
options.
    Finally, even though the cost burden of compliance with lead-free 
ammunition requirements on individual refuges is not onerous, the 
Service is considering various measures to incentivize hunters to 
transition from lead to lead-free ammunition and mitigate the costs of 
the transition. In fact, we are in the process of implementing an 
ambitious lead-free voluntary pilot program, beginning this fall for 
the 2024 hunting seasons, that includes providing direct economic 
incentives to hunters to address the price difference as a barrier to 
choosing lead-free ammunition. This pilot program is discussed further 
in our response to Comment (4), above. We look forward to continuing to 
work closely with the Hunting and Wildlife Conservation Council, the 
Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, our state agency partners, 
and other hunting organizations to further develop our lead-free 
voluntary pilot program.

[[Page 88154]]

    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (9): Most commenters opposed to non-lead ammunition and 
tackle requirements asserted that there is limited availability of 
lead-free ammunition compared to that of lead ammunition, such that 
requiring lead-free ammunition would prevent participation in refuge 
hunting opportunities. Some of these commenters further noted that the 
availability of non-lead ammunition is more limited for certain 
firearms and types of ammunition, especially .22 rifle ammunition. One 
commenter also, tangentially to the topic of availability, stated that 
the Gun Control Act of 1968, as amended (GCA; 18 U.S.C. 921 et seq.), 
and associated Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives 
(ATF) regulations (27 CFR part 478) concerning armor piercing 
ammunition hinder the production and thus availability of lead-free 
ammunition.
    Our Response: We do not agree that lead-free ammunition and tackle 
are insufficiently available to hunters and anglers in localities where 
we have restricted the use of lead ammunition or tackle, either in the 
past or through this rulemaking. However, we recognize that there could 
be some compliance burden in identifying and locating lead-free 
ammunition and tackle for hunting and fishing opportunities, where 
required. Where we have restricted lead use in the past or will 
restrict it through this rulemaking, we have ensured that the 
ecological health and conservation benefits outweigh any potential for 
compliance burden on hunters and anglers, including the ease of 
locating available lead-free ammunition and tackle. As with the costs 
of lead-free options, for opportunities where lead-free ammunition or 
tackle are required, the Service has not seen declines in hunting or 
fishing participation that can be attributed to lead-free ammunition or 
tackle being less widely available than lead ammunition and tackle. 
Also, as with costs, there are existing trends of increasing 
availability of lead-free options, and the 1991 national ban on lead 
ammunition for waterfowl hunting demonstrates that regulations 
requiring the use of lead-free ammunition can promote increased 
availability. Also, the pilot program that the Service is implementing 
this fall for the 2024 hunting seasons will also help to address 
availability, as more hunters voluntarily participate and the increased 
demand gives manufacturers a reason to produce, and retailers a reason 
to offer, more lead-free ammunition. In fact, the Service is interested 
in collaboration with retailers that can directly address awareness and 
availability of lead-free ammunition and tackle as we continue to 
develop our pilot program.
    Additionally, we recognize that non-lead ammunition may be less 
available than lead ammunition, in general, for some models of firearms 
and certain ammunition calibers. This is especially concerning, as 
noted by some commenters, for .22 rifle ammunition where existing lines 
of lead-free ammunition have been recently discontinued. Lead-free 
ammunition remains available, but this development will impact 
availability and could impact refuge hunting where lead-free ammunition 
is required, particularly squirrel hunting. The Service will continue 
to monitor the lead-free options in the market and take the information 
into account in deciding whether and where to require lead-free 
ammunition. We also encourage industry and retailers to continue to 
manufacture and offer more lead-free ammunition options so that 
ammunition is available to hunters, whether they are required, or 
voluntarily choose, to use lead-free ammunition.
    Finally, the claim that the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA) and 
associated ATF regulations concerning armor piercing ammunition hinder 
the production and thus availability of lead-free ammunition is beyond 
the scope of this rulemaking. However, the Service has raised this 
issue with the ATF at the recommendation of the Hunting and Wildlife 
Conservation Council.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (10): A few commenters pointed to sources of lead, other 
than hunting and fishing with lead ammunition and tackle, in the 
environment. These commenters asserted that the Service should not have 
lead-free ammunition and tackle requirements because these other 
sources of lead also cause negative health impacts for fish and 
wildlife.
    Our Response: While there are of course other potential sources of 
lead in the environment, including other sources that may be 
bioavailable to wildlife, the Service does not see this as diminishing 
the importance or conservation benefits of addressing lead poisoning of 
wildlife from hunting with lead ammunition or from fishing with lead 
tackle. While these other sources of lead vary in the degree of risk 
that they could present to wildlife, the Service is duly concerned by 
the health risks from any potential source of lead exposure for 
wildlife and humans. There are likely benefits to be had from efforts 
to address each of these sources in turn, but that is generally beyond 
the scope of this rulemaking.
    Moreover, these other potential sources of lead do not change the 
fact that the best available science has drawn a clear link between the 
use of lead ammunition and tackle and its ecological health impacts. In 
fact, the study from Slabe et al. (2022), cited earlier in our response 
to Comment (7), provides strong evidence that not only is there an 
impact to eagles from lead ammunition specifically, but there is also 
strong evidence that it represents the most important source of lead 
exposure for the species studied. Essentially, the study demonstrated 
that the highest rates of acute lead poisoning in eagles, measured by 
liver lead concentrations, corresponded in terms of timing with the use 
of lead ammunition in the form of a nationwide spike in lead poisoning 
during winter months in the midst of hunting seasons. To the extent 
other sources of lead do bear on our decisions about lead ammunition 
and tackle use, these additional lead sources in fact weigh in favor of 
lead-use restrictions, as lead can accumulate in wildlife from repeated 
exposure from one or multiple sources (see, e.g., Behmke 2015). 
Similarly, the Service is also not discouraged from either 
incentivizing or requiring the use of lead-free ammunition and tackle, 
where appropriate, by the continued use of lead ammunition and tackle 
for hunting and fishing on nearby State and privately held lands and 
waters. The Service will act to address threats, including from visitor 
uses, as necessary within our authority, in the interest of our 
conservation mission even if, and often especially when, human 
activities outside of refuge borders present similar threats.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (11): One comment opposed to non-lead ammunition and tackle 
requirements maintained that lead ammunition and tackle are made of an 
inorganic, insoluble form of lead that poses less risk of harm to 
humans or animals.
    Our Response: While inorganic lead presents a low risk of adverse 
health impacts while it retains its solid, molded form (i.e., anglers 
face relatively little risk from handling lead tackle), the basis for 
concern about lead ammunition and tackle is that there are multiple 
ways for such lead to become harmful to human and wildlife health. 
Organic lead (i.e., the banned gasoline additive tetramethyl lead) is 
more dangerous than inorganic lead because it can be absorbed through 
the skin. Inorganic lead can also have serious

[[Page 88155]]

impacts in certain forms (e.g., fragments and particles) and once it is 
inside an animal.
    First, as briefly described in our response to Comment (7), lead 
ammunition, including bonded lead ammunition, fragments when it hits an 
animal, and this distributes tiny pieces of lead within a wide radius 
in the soft tissues of the harvested animal (see Trinogga et al. 
(2019). Fragmentation of lead-free and lead-based hunting rifle bullets 
under real life hunting conditions in Germany. Amibo 48(9): pp. 1056-
1064 (published online March 23, 2019)). These tiny fragments of lead 
are then consumed by scavenger species eating carcasses or gut piles 
left behind or humans eating the game meat. In this tiny, fragmented 
form and acted on by digestive enzymes and acids, the lead derived from 
ammunition can then shed particles that enter the blood stream and 
affect systems throughout the body, presenting both chronic and acute 
health risks.
    Second, as briefly described in our response to Comment (7), lead 
ammunition and tackle that is deposited along shores or at the bottom 
of bodies of water can be ingested by several species of birds that 
forage in these locations for pebbles, as pebbles are necessary to 
break down food through grinding in a special organ of their digestive 
systems called a gizzard. This grinding process, along with digestive 
acids and enzymes that accompany food into the gizzard, can easily 
break down lead ammunition and tackle into fragments and cause it to 
shed particles, just as the process breaks down the stones and shells 
the birds intended to ingest. These lead particles are then able to 
enter the bloodstream and affect systems throughout the body, 
presenting both chronic and acute health risks.
    Third, lead ammunition and tackle that ends up discarded in bodies 
of water may begin to dissolve and thus introduce lead particles into 
the water that present both chronic and acute health risks to both 
aquatic animals living in the water and terrestrial animals drinking 
from the water. This process requires high acidity in the water that 
dissolves lead ammunition or tackle, and it is essentially the same 
concern as the problem of corrosion from acidic water in lead water 
pipes. These particles of lead dissolved into the water are easily 
taken up into the bloodstream as they pass through digestive systems.
    It is through these known processes that lead ammunition and tackle 
present a risk, and the best available scientific evidence indicates 
that these processes are occurring at rates that are causing negative 
impacts on the health of certain wildlife species. Thus, we seriously 
consider the impact of inorganic forms of lead, such as lead ammunition 
and tackle, on wildlife and human health in our regulatory and 
management processes.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of this 
comment.
    Comment (12): One commenter, in objecting to the regulation of lead 
ammunition and tackle, expressed nonsubstantive concerns centered on 
their views about the constitutionality and/or legality of the Service 
creating non-lead ammunition and tackle requirements through our 
regulations. This comment also offered nonsubstantive concerns about 
their general projections of impacts to the ammunition and tackle 
industry and the broader economy.
    Our Response: The Service thoroughly addressed these and similar 
concerns in our final rule for the 2022-2023 station-specific hunting 
and sport fishing regulations (see 87 FR 57108 at 57117-57119, 
September 16, 2022). Our position remains the same on these topics in 
this 2024-2025 rulemaking.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of this 
comment.
    Comment (13): A few commenters expressed concerns about the 
availability of copper for use in ammunition, as copper is one of the 
alternatives to lead used for non-lead ammunition. The comments 
expressed concern that due to limited sources of copper and demand for 
copper for other uses, an increase in demand for copper for ammunition 
from non-lead ammunition requirements may not be possible or could 
drive up the cost of non-lead ammunition.
    Our Response: These concerns are outside the scope of this 
rulemaking. It is outside the expertise of the Service and the scope of 
this rule to speculate about the current or future availability of 
copper, or how it could affect prices for goods made using copper. 
There are, however, two things the Service can say on this topic. 
First, by requiring the use of lead-free ammunition for elk hunting at 
four refuges and all hunting on one unit of another refuge in this 
rule, the Service is not specifically requiring the use of copper 
ammunition. Second, the non-lead ammunition regulations in this 
rulemaking impact a small portion of the market for ammunition.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (14): We also received several comments concerning 
potential compliance and enforcement challenges related to requirements 
for hunters to use lead-free ammunition, in particular the requirement 
specific to the Big Cove Unit of Canaan Valley NWR set forth in this 
rule. Some of these comments specifically noted the compliance 
challenge that it may be difficult for hunters to discern when they are 
on the Big Cove Unit and when they are on another unit of the refuge. 
Some also expressed concerns related to enforcement with the difficulty 
of law enforcement to differentiate between lead-free and lead 
ammunition and with the wording of the lead-free requirement stating 
that hunters may only ``possess'' lead-free ammunition when this is 
applied to big game hunters who choose to carry a sidearm containing 
lead ammunition for self-defense.
    Our Response: The compliance and enforcement challenges identified 
in these comments are indeed inherent challenges when it comes to lead-
free ammunition requirements within a given jurisdictional boundary. On 
the compliance side, while we recognize that differences in regulations 
between adjacent units of huntable land present the potential for 
confusion, this situation occurs in other contexts because of 
differences in land uses and ownership, and responsible hunters are 
familiar with the responsibility to be aware of what land they are on 
and the applicable regulations. Our law enforcement personnel have been 
appropriately and effectively enforcing similar requirements for years 
at various individual refuges and already receive applicable training. 
The requirement will be enforced by Service law enforcement officers in 
the same manner as similar existing lead-free ammunition requirements 
elsewhere in the Refuge System, some of which already apply to big game 
hunting ammunition and some of which apply only to designated units 
within a given refuge or individual refuges within a complex.
    This includes the scenario of a big game hunter carrying a lawful 
side-arm for self-defense purposes while hunting. The Service's refuge 
hunting regulations govern the lawful use and possession of firearms 
and ammunition for hunting, but do not prohibit possession for purposes 
of self-defense of a handgun, and ammunition it contains, lawfully 
carried under applicable State law.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (15): Several commenters expressed concerns about or 
objections to the removal of a permit requirement for the existing 
muzzleloader deer hunt at Fort Niobrara NWR, including concern about 
hunting pressure reducing the quality of the deer hunt.

[[Page 88156]]

    Our Response: The Service acknowledges the concern that removing 
the Fort Niobrara NWR refuge-specific permit requirement may affect the 
quality of the muzzleloader deer hunt there. We do not anticipate that 
removing the refuge permit requirement will increase the number of 
hunters that participate in the Fort Niobrara muzzleloader deer hunt, 
but we recognize that it could. Our desired result is to reduce an 
administrative burden for hunters and to more closely align refuge 
regulations with State regulations. We will continue to monitor 
muzzleloader deer hunter use at the refuge. If we identify significant 
negative impacts to habitat, wildlife, or refuge visitors, we will 
consider further regulatory changes.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (16): Two comments expressed objections to the closing of 
111 acres that are currently open to hunting at Crab Orchard NWR.
    Our Response: This closure of a small area within Crab Orchard NWR 
is necessary in order to allow for use of the area for other public 
recreational uses, including camping. In addition to our safety and 
compatibility considerations, the Service must comply with State laws 
related to how close hunting may be authorized to the intended camping 
area. Crab Orchard NWR will still offer hunters more than 44,000 
huntable acres.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (17): We received multiple comments expressing concern 
about opportunities for hunting of predator species, including black 
bear, bobcat, fox, and coyote hunting. Some of these comments also 
object to the use of dogs and hunting at night when hunting these 
species.
    Our Response: Refuge managers consider predator management 
decisions on a case-by-case basis. As with all species, a refuge 
manager makes a decision about managing predator populations, which are 
included in the category of resident wildlife, including allowing 
predatory species to be hunted, only after careful examination to 
ensure the action would comply with relevant laws, policies, and 
directives.
    The Administration Act, as amended, directs the Service to manage 
refuges for biological integrity, diversity, and environmental health. 
Predators play a critical role in the integrity, diversity, and overall 
health of ecosystems, so before allowing predators to be hunted, a 
refuge manager must ensure that these actions do not threaten the 
integrity, diversity, or health of the refuge ecosystem.
    The refuge manager must also determine that the action is 
compatible with refuge purposes and the mission of the Refuge System, 
and in keeping with the refuge's comprehensive conservation plan (CCP) 
and other step-down plans. In addition, the refuge manager analyzes the 
impacts of the actions on the environment through the NEPA process and 
section 7 of the ESA. Therefore, a refuge manager must take many steps 
to ensure that any opportunity for hunting predators on a refuge meets 
the Service's applicable laws and policies. All of the same 
considerations apply where, on a case-by-case basis, we authorize the 
use of dogs or align with State regulations to allow hunting at night 
in conjunction with predator hunting or other hunting.
    The Administration Act, as amended, also mandates that regulations 
authorizing hunting or fishing of fish and resident wildlife within the 
Refuge System shall be, to the extent practicable, consistent with 
State fish and wildlife laws, regulations, and management plans (16 
U.S.C. 668dd(m)). Therefore, all the opportunities for hunting 
predators in this rule that are intended to bring greater consistency 
with State fish and wildlife laws, regulations, and management plans 
are part of realizing the Service's mission. Moreover, these, as with 
all predator hunting determinations and all hunting and fishing 
determinations, were only made after careful consideration by the 
refuge manager to ensure that such actions would not threaten the 
integrity, diversity, and overall health of the ecosystem and were 
compatible with both the purpose of the refuge and the mission of the 
Refuge System.
    Finally, both the NEPA process and the rulemaking process provide 
the opportunity for the public to provide comments and any additional 
information on the impacts of our actions. We considered the additional 
information provided from the public on this issue during these public 
comment periods and determined that they did not affect our initial 
determinations that the opportunities for hunting predators on specific 
refuges will have no more than minor impacts on the population health 
of these species or other wildlife at the local, regional, or national 
level.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (18): We received two comments expressing concern about the 
Service having adequate funding and staffing, including law enforcement 
officers, to administer our hunting and fishing opportunities.
    Our Response: We appreciate the concern of these commenters for 
sufficient funding and staffing to safely and effectively administer 
hunting and fishing activities throughout the Refuge System. 
Importantly, Service policy (603 FW 2.12.A.(7); see https://www.fws.gov/policy-library/603fw2) requires station managers to 
determine that adequate resources, including personnel, exist or can be 
provided by the Service or a partner to properly develop, operate, and 
maintain the use in a way that will not materially interfere with or 
detract from fulfillment of the refuge purpose(s) and the Service's 
mission. If resources are lacking for establishment or continuation of 
wildlife-dependent recreational uses, the refuge manager will make 
reasonable efforts to obtain additional resources or outside assistance 
from States, other public agencies, local communities, and/or private 
and nonprofit groups before determining that the use is not compatible. 
For example, when Service law enforcement resources are lacking, we are 
often able to rely upon State fish and game law-enforcement capacity to 
assist in enforcement of hunting and fishing regulations. For all 
refuges opening or expanding hunting or sport fishing in this rule, we 
have determined that we have adequate resources, including available 
funds and personnel, to develop, operate, and maintain the proposed 
hunt programs.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (19): We received one comment arguing that we should have 
prepared an environmental impact statement (EIS) instead of station-
specific environmental analyses (EAs) combined with a national 
cumulative impact report.
    Our Response: The Service disagrees with the assertion that we 
should prepare an EIS before opening or expanding hunting and fishing 
opportunities on refuges. We completed individual EAs for, or applied 
categorical exclusions to, each refuge in this rule, in compliance with 
NEPA, to evaluate the impacts of opening or expanding hunting or 
fishing opportunities through this rulemaking. These EAs and 
categorical exclusions underwent regional and national review to 
address and consider these actions from a local, regional, multi-State, 
and/or flyway perspective, and to consider the cumulative impacts from 
this larger geographical context. The 2024-2025 cumulative impacts 
report concludes, after analyzing the impacts, collectively,

[[Page 88157]]

of all EAs and categorical exclusions prepared in connection with this 
rule, that the rule would not have significant impacts at the local, 
regional, or national level. The commenter who raised these 
environmental analysis concerns provided no additional information that 
would change this analysis or our conclusion. As discussed above, we 
annually conduct management activities on refuges that minimize or 
offset impacts of hunting and fishing on physical and cultural 
resources, including establishing designated areas for hunting; 
restricting levels of use; confining access and travel to designated 
locations; providing education programs and materials for hunters, 
anglers, and other users; and conducting law enforcement activities.
    In this rulemaking, the Service is expanding opportunities for 
recreational hunting and fishing. Expanding opportunities does not 
necessarily result in increased impacts to refuge resources. We 
anticipate that for some refuges, these expansions will not result in 
changes in usage of the refuge. In other cases, these expansions may 
lead to some increase in use of refuges, but these changes would likely 
be minor. Opening of new refuges or new opportunities may attract 
people to the refuge, but these hunters and/or anglers were likely 
already participating elsewhere on State or other Federal lands. 
Overall, considering the decreasing trends in hunting generally, and 
trends on refuges specifically, we do not expect this final rule to 
have a significant impact on the environment. As noted in our 
cumulative impacts report, hunter participation trends have been 
generally declining, some refuges attract a very small number of 
participants, and often participation rates decline over the course of 
a season.
    Finally, a Federal court found that this approach, using a bottom-
up analysis to assess the cumulative impact of increased hunting and 
fishing across the entire Refuge System, was an appropriate way for the 
Service to analyze the impacts of the rule in compliance with NEPA (see 
Fund for Animals v. Hall, 777 F. Supp. 2d 92, 105 (D.D.C. 2011)).
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of this 
comment.
    Comment (20): We received two comments that advocated for requiring 
some form of monetary payment to the Service for members of the public 
to participate in recreational uses other than hunting or fishing.
    Our Response: Notably, the Service does not uniformly charge 
entrance or recreation fees, but does for some stations on a case-by-
case basis. Any such fee, however, is outside the scope of this 
rulemaking, which is devoted to regulations for hunting and fishing 
activities on the Refuge System.
    The Service collects entrance and recreation fees under the 
authorities of the Refuge Revenue Sharing Act of 1935 (16 U.S.C. 715s) 
and the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (FLREA; 16 U.S.C. 6801 
et seq.). Service policy requires refuge managers to consider two 
factors in determining fees for any activity: Fair market value and 
costs involved in providing the use. Because fair market value and 
refuge costs can differ among localities, there is often a range of 
different fees for similar activities in different locations. For 
locations that collect fees under FLREA, public comment periods are 
required when refuges initiate fees and to change the types and amounts 
of fees. We encourage public participation in this process.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these 
comments.
    Comment (21): We received one comment that advocated for barring 
all filming on the Refuge System.
    Our Response: The Service already has policies and regulations 
governing filming on the Refuge System, which are outside the scope of 
this rulemaking. We will note that filming has the potential to impact 
wildlife or habitat, particularly larger-scale commercial filming and 
noncommercial filming involving models, sets, or lighting equipment. 
Under our current regulations (see 50 CFR 27.71 and 43 CFR part 5), 
such filming will require a special use permit and the associated 
evaluation of the potential impacts prior to granting the permit. 
However, we encourage refuge visitors to use their personal hand-held 
cameras and cellphones to capture photos video of wildlife and of 
natural scenery in order to share with friends and loved ones and to 
preserve memories of their visits.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of this 
comment.
    Comment (22): We received one comment requesting an extension of 
the public comment period through December 3, 2024.
    Our Response: We declined to extend the public comment period for 
the August 2, 2024, proposed rule (89 FR 63139). While extending the 
comment period was not necessary and extending it by 3 months would not 
have been feasible, the Service acknowledges that, for this annual rule 
cycle, the public comment period was shorter than those we provided in 
the last few years. This was necessitated by consideration of the 
balance between providing as much opportunity for public comment as 
possible while keeping delays to fall hunting opportunities to a 
minimum. We provided 30 days for public comments, and, within that 
time, we received comments covering the full range of typical topics 
for this annual rulemaking from a substantial number of the industry, 
sporting, and conservation organizations that are stakeholders for 
these regulations. The comments we received on the August 2, 2024, 
proposed rule are also a representative set of comments from individual 
members of the public. The Service believes that 30 days was an 
adequate amount of time for interested parties to provide their 
comments to us.
    We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of this 
comment.

Changes From the Proposed Rule

    As discussed above, under Summary of Comments and Responses, we 
made no changes in this final rule based on comments we received on the 
August 2, 2024, proposed rule (89 FR 63139) and NEPA documents for 
individual refuges.
    We did, however, withdraw the proposed authorization of incidental 
take of feral hog when big game hunting on Green River NWR. As of 
earlier this year, the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife 
Resources prohibits hunting of feral hogs, also known as wild pigs, 
within Kentucky. The Department is pursuing a strategy of eradication 
through trapping for this invasive species, and we are seeking to 
ensure our refuge regulations are aligned with this effort. We 
encourage anyone hunting or otherwise recreating on Green River NWR to 
report sightings of feral hogs to the Kentucky Department of Fish and 
Wildlife Resources.
    We also made several editorial, nonsubstantive revisions to this 
rule to improve clarity or to correct cross-references.

Effective Date

    We are making this rule effective upon the date of its filing at 
the Office of the Federal Register (see DATES, above). We provided a 
30-day public comment period for the August 2, 2024, proposed rule (89 
FR 63139). We have determined that any further delay in implementing 
these station-specific hunting and sport fishing regulations would not 
be in the public interest, in that a delay would hinder the effective 
planning and administration of refuges' hunting and sport fishing 
programs. This rule does not impact the public generally in terms of 
requiring lead time for compliance. Rather, it relieves restrictions in 
that it allows activities on refuges and hatcheries that we would

[[Page 88158]]

otherwise prohibit. Therefore, we find good cause under 5 U.S.C. 
553(d)(3) and 808(1) to make this rule effective upon the date of its 
filing at the Office of the Federal Register.

Amendments to Existing Regulations

Updates to Hunting and Fishing Opportunities on NWRs

    This document codifies in the Code of Federal Regulations all the 
Service's hunting and/or sport fishing regulations that we are updating 
since the last time we published a rule amending these regulations (88 
FR 74050; October 30, 2023) and that are applicable at Refuge System 
units previously opened to hunting and/or sport fishing. We adopt these 
changes to better inform the general public of the regulations at each 
station, to increase understanding and compliance with these 
regulations, and to make enforcement of these regulations more 
efficient. In addition to finding these regulations in 50 CFR parts 32, 
visitors to our stations may find them reiterated in literature 
distributed by each station or posted on signs.

                                               Table 1--Changes for 2024-2025 Hunting/Sport Fishing Season
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Station                         State          Migratory bird hunting   Upland game hunting      Big game hunting        Sport fishing
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bayou Teche NWR....................  Louisiana.............  E.....................  Already Open.........  E....................  Already Open.
Canaan Valley NWR..................  West Virginia.........  E.....................  E....................  E....................  Already Open.
Des Lacs NWR.......................  North Dakota..........  Closed................  Already Open.........  O....................  Closed.
Green River NWR....................  Kentucky..............  N.....................  Closed...............  N....................  Closed.
Horicon NWR........................  Wisconsin.............  Already Open..........  Already Open.........  Already Open.........  E.
J. Clark Salyer NWR................  North Dakota..........  Already Open..........  Already Open.........  O....................  Already Open.
Lostwood NWR.......................  North Dakota..........  Closed................  Already Open.........  O....................  Closed.
Trinity River NWR..................  Texas.................  O.....................  Already Open.........  E....................  Already Open.
Turnbull NWR.......................  Washington............  Already Open..........  Closed...............  E....................  Closed.
Upper Souris NWR...................  North Dakota..........  Closed................  Already Open.........  O....................  Already Open.
Valentine NWR......................  Nebraska..............  Already Open..........  E....................  Already Open.........  Already Open.
Waccamaw NWR.......................  South Carolina........  E.....................  Already Open.........  Already Open.........  Already Open.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key:
N = New station opened for the first time.
O = Opening (New species and/or new activity on a station previously open to other activities).
E = Expansion (Station is already open to the activity: the final rule adds new lands/waters, modifies areas open to hunting or fishing, extends season
  dates, adds a targeted hunt, modifies season dates, modifies hunting hours, etc.).

    The changes for the 2024-2025 hunting/fishing season noted in the 
table above are each based on a complete administrative record which, 
among other detailed documentation, also includes a hunt plan, a 
compatibility determination (for refuges), and the appropriate NEPA 
analysis, all of which were the subject of a public review and comment 
process. These documents are available upon request.
    The Service recognizes the possible effects of lead ammunition on 
refuge resources and human health, and we will continue to evaluate and 
appropriately regulate the use of lead ammunition and tackle on Service 
lands and waters. The Service has initiated stakeholder engagement to 
implement a deliberate, open, and transparent process of evaluating the 
future of lead use on Service lands and waters, working with our State 
partners and seeking input and recommendations from the Hunting and 
Wildlife Conservation Council, other stakeholders, and the public. The 
best available science, analyzed as part of this rulemaking, indicates 
that lead ammunition and tackle have negative impacts on both wildlife 
and human health. Based on the best available science and sound 
professional judgment, where appropriate, the Service may propose to 
require the use of non-lead ammunition and tackle on Service lands and 
waters, as we have previously done in certain areas. While the Service 
continues to evaluate the future of lead use in hunting and fishing on 
Service lands and waters, we will work with stakeholders and the public 
to evaluate lead use through the annual rulemaking process. In the 
interim, the Service does not intend to allow opportunities increasing 
or authorizing the new use of lead on Service lands and waters, and 
this rule is consistent with that approach.
    Crab Orchard NWR will close hunting on 111 acres that are currently 
open to hunting, out of more than 44,000 huntable acres, so that the 
area can be repurposed for other visitor recreational uses, including 
camping. Turnbull, Horicon, and Valentine NWRs are expanding hunting 
and fishing to species where lead-free ammunition or tackle is already 
required on the refuges. Trinity River, Bayou Teche, Green River, and 
Waccamaw NWRs will each open or expand archery deer hunting or open or 
expand migratory bird hunting, both of which are hunting activities 
that do not involve lead ammunition. Des Lacs, J. Clark Salyer, 
Lostwood, and Upper Souris NWRs are opening elk hunting that will 
require the use of lead-free ammunition immediately in the fall 2024 
season. In this final rule, Canaan Valley NWR will expand all existing 
hunting onto the newly acquired Big Cove Unit and require the use of 
lead-free ammunition immediately for all hunting in the fall 2024 
seasons on the Big Cove Unit.

Fish Advisory

    For health reasons, anglers should review and follow State-issued 
consumption advisories before enjoying recreational sport fishing 
opportunities on Service-managed waters. You can find information about 
current fish-consumption advisories on the internet at https://www.epa.gov/choose-fish-and-shellfish-wisely.

Required Determinations

Regulatory Planning and Review--Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 
14094

    Executive Order 14094 amends and reaffirms the principles of E.O. 
12866 and E.O. 13563 and states that regulatory analysis should 
facilitate agency efforts to develop regulations that serve the public 
interest, advance statutory objectives, and are consistent with E.O. 
12866, E.O. 13563, and E.O. 14094. Regulatory analysis, as

[[Page 88159]]

practicable and appropriate, shall recognize distributive impacts and 
equity, to the extent permitted by law. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further 
that regulations must be based on the best available science and that 
the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open 
exchange of ideas. We have developed this final rule in a manner 
consistent with these requirements.
    E.O. 12866, as reaffirmed by E.O. 13563 and amended by E.O. 14094, 
provides that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) 
in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will review all 
significant rules. OIRA has determined that this rule is not 
significant.

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA; 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), 
as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 
1996 (SBREFA; title II of Pub. L. 104-121, March 29, 1996), whenever a 
Federal agency is required to publish a notice of rulemaking for any 
proposed or final rule, it must prepare and make available for public 
comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the effect of 
the rule on small entities (i.e., small businesses, small 
organizations, and small government jurisdictions). However, no 
regulatory flexibility analysis is required if the head of an agency 
certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on 
a substantial number of small entities. Thus, for a regulatory 
flexibility analysis to be required, impacts must exceed a threshold 
for ``significant impact'' and a threshold for a ``substantial number 
of small entities.'' See 5 U.S.C. 605(b). SBREFA amended the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act to require Federal agencies to provide a statement of 
the factual basis for certifying that a rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
    This rule opens or expands hunting or fishing on 12 NWRs. As a 
result, visitor use for wildlife-dependent recreation on these stations 
will change. If the stations establishing new programs were a pure 
addition to the current supply of those activities, it would mean an 
estimated maximum increase of 1,481 user days (one person per day 
participating in a recreational opportunity; see table 2, below). 
Because the participation trend is flat in these activities, this 
increase in supply will most likely be offset by other sites losing 
participants. Therefore, this is likely to be a substitute site for the 
activity and not necessarily an increase in participation rates for the 
activity.

                   Table 2--Estimated Maximum Change in Recreation Opportunities in 2024-2025
                                           [2023 Dollars in thousands]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                    Additional      Additional      Additional
                             Station                               hunting days    fishing days    expenditures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bayou Teche NWR.................................................              40  ..............            $1.6
Canaan Valley NWR...............................................              20  ..............             0.8
Des Lacs NWR....................................................              70  ..............             2.8
Green River NWR.................................................             144  ..............             5.7
Horicon NWR.....................................................  ..............             365            15.1
J. Clark Salyer NWR.............................................              70  ..............             2.8
Lostwood NWR....................................................              70  ..............             2.8
Trinity River NWR...............................................             300  ..............            11.9
Turnbull NWR....................................................             272  ..............            10.8
Upper Souris NWR................................................              70  ..............             2.8
Valentine NWR...................................................              60  ..............             2.4
Waccamaw NWR....................................................               0  ..............               0
                                                                 -----------------------------------------------
    Total.......................................................           1,116             365            59.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    To the extent visitors spend time and money in the area of the 
station that they would not have spent there anyway, they contribute 
new income to the regional economy and benefit local businesses. Due to 
the unavailability of site-specific expenditure data, we use the 
national estimates from the 2016 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, 
and Wildlife Associated Recreation to identify expenditures for food 
and lodging, transportation, and other incidental expenses. Using the 
average expenditures for these categories with the maximum expected 
additional participation of the Refuge System yields approximately 
$59,000 in recreation-related expenditures (see table 2, above). By 
having ripple effects throughout the economy, these direct expenditures 
are only part of the economic impact of these recreational activities. 
Using a national impact multiplier for hunting activities (2.51) 
derived from the report ``Hunting in America: An Economic Force for 
Conservation'' and for fishing activities (2.51) derived from the 
report ``Sportfishing in America'' yields a total maximum economic 
impact of approximately $150,000 (2023 dollars) (Southwick Associates, 
Inc., 2018).
    Since we know that most of the fishing and hunting occurs within 
100 miles of a participant's residence, then it is unlikely that most 
of this spending will be ``new'' money coming into a local economy; 
therefore, this spending will be offset with a decrease in some other 
sector of the local economy. The net gain to the local economies will 
be no more than $149,000 and likely less. Since 80 percent of the 
participants travel less than 100 miles to engage in hunting and 
fishing activities, their spending patterns will not add new money into 
the local economy and, therefore, the real impact will be on the order 
of about $30,000 annually.
    Small businesses within the retail trade industry (such as hotels, 
gas stations, taxidermy shops, bait-and-tackle shops, and similar 
businesses) may be affected by some increased or decreased station 
visitation. A large percentage of these retail trade establishments in 
the local communities around NWRs qualify as small businesses (see 
table 3, below). We expect that the incremental recreational changes 
will be scattered, and so we do not expect that the rule will have a 
significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities 
in any region or nationally. As noted previously, we expect at most 
$59,500 to be spent in total in the refuges' local economies. The 
maximum increase will be less than one-tenth of 1 percent for

[[Page 88160]]

local retail trade spending (see table 3, below). Table 3 does not 
include entries for those NWRs for which we project no changes in 
recreation opportunities in 2024-2025; see table 2, above.

 Table 3--Comparative Expenditures for Retail Trade Associated With Additional Station Visitation for 2024-2025
                                            [Thousands, 2023 dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                       Estimated
                                                        maximum                                   Establishments
         Station/county(ies)           Retail trade     addition   Addition as   Establishments  with fewer than
                                        in 2017 \1\     from new    % of total    in 2017 \1\    10 employees in
                                                       activities                                      2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bayou Teche:
    St. Mary Parish, LA.............        $658,214           $2         <0.1              186              145
Canaan Valley:
    Grant, WV.......................         133,024            0         <0.1               42               28
    Tucker, WV......................          79,611            0         <0.1               28               20
Des Lacs:
    Renville, ND....................          43,869            3         <0.1               13               11
Green River:
    Henderson, KY...................         825,225            6         <0.1              150               98
Horicon:
    Dodge, WI.......................       1,069,734            8         <0.1              232              154
    Fond du Lac, WI.................       2,137,970            8         <0.1              344              207
J. Clark Salyer:
    McHenry, ND.....................          39,926            3         <0.1               19               14
Lostwood:
    Burke, ND.......................          38,614            1         <0.1                8                4
    Mountrail, ND...................         228,282            1         <0.1               47               27
Trinity River:
    Liberty, TX.....................       1,047,020           12         <0.1              201              143
Turnbull:
    Spokane, WA.....................       9,754,429           11         <0.1            1,627            1,036
Upper Souris:
    Renville, ND....................          43,869            1         <0.1               13               11
    Ward, ND........................       1,844,525            1         <0.1              309              169
Valentine:
    Cherry, NE......................         116,107            2         <0.1               43               30
Waccamaw:
    Georgetown, SC..................       1,035,984            0            0              287              206
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ U.S. Census Bureau.

    With the small change in overall spending anticipated from this 
rule, it is unlikely that a substantial number of small entities will 
have more than a small impact from the spending change near the 
affected stations. Therefore, we certify that this rule will not have a 
significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities 
as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). 
A regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. Accordingly, a small 
entity compliance guide is not required.

Congressional Review Act

    The rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the 
Congressional Review Act. We anticipate no significant employment or 
small business effects. This rule:
    a. Will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or 
more. The minimal impact will be scattered across the country and will 
most likely not be significant in any local area.
    b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for 
consumers; individual industries; Federal, State, or local government 
agencies; or geographic regions. This rule will have only a slight 
effect on the costs of hunting opportunities for Americans. If the 
substitute sites are farther from the participants' residences, then an 
increase in travel costs will occur. The Service does not have 
information to quantify this change in travel cost but assumes that, 
since most people travel less than 100 miles to hunt, the increased 
travel cost will be small. We do not expect this rule to affect the 
supply or demand for hunting opportunities in the United States, and, 
therefore, it should not affect prices for hunting equipment and 
supplies, or the retailers that sell equipment.
    c. Will not have significant adverse effects on competition, 
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of 
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. This 
rule represents only a small proportion of recreational spending at 
NWRs. Therefore, this rule will have no measurable economic effect on 
the wildlife-dependent industry, which has annual sales of equipment 
and travel expenditures of $72 billion nationwide.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    Since this rule will apply to public use of federally owned and 
managed refuges, it will not impose an unfunded mandate on State, 
local, or Tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100 
million per year. The rule will not have a significant or unique effect 
on State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector. A 
statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates 
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.

Takings (E.O. 12630)

    In accordance with E.O. 12630, this rule will not have significant 
takings implications. This rule will affect only visitors at NWRs and 
describes what

[[Page 88161]]

they can do while they are on a Service station.

Federalism (E.O. 13132)

    As discussed under Regulatory Planning and Review and Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act, above, this rule will not have sufficient 
federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism 
summary impact statement under E.O. 13132. In preparing this rule, we 
worked with State governments.

Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)

    In accordance with E.O. 12988, the Department of the Interior has 
determined that this rule will not unduly burden the judicial system 
and that it meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the 
Order.

Energy Supply, Distribution or Use (E.O. 13211)

    On May 18, 2001, the President issued E.O. 13211 on regulations 
that significantly affect energy supply, distribution, or use. E.O. 
13211 requires agencies to prepare statements of energy effects when 
undertaking certain actions. Because this rule will open or expand 
hunting opportunities on 12 NWRs, it is not a significant regulatory 
action under E.O. 12866, and we do not expect it to significantly 
affect energy supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore, this action is 
not a significant energy action, and no statement of energy effects is 
required.

Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments (E.O. 
13175)

    In accordance with E.O. 13175, we have evaluated possible effects 
on federally recognized Indian Tribes and have determined that there 
are no effects. We coordinate recreational use on NWRs and National 
Fish Hatcheries with Tribal governments having adjoining or overlapping 
jurisdiction before we propose new or revised regulations.

Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

    This rule does not contain any new collections of information that 
require approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). OMB 
previously approved the information collection requirements associated 
with application and reporting requirements associated with hunting and 
sport fishing and assigned OMB Control Number 1018-0140 (expires 09/30/
2025). An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not 
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays 
a currently valid OMB control number.

Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation

    We comply with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as 
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), when developing comprehensive 
conservation plans and step-down management plans--which includes 
hunting and/or fishing plans--for public use of refuges and hatcheries, 
and prior to implementing any new or revised public recreation program 
on a station as identified in 50 CFR 26.32. We complied with section 7 
for each of the stations affected by this rulemaking.

National Environmental Policy Act

    We analyzed this rule in accordance with the criteria of the 
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4332(C)), 43 
CFR part 46, and 516 Departmental Manual (DM) 8.
    A categorical exclusion from NEPA documentation applies to 
publication of amendments to station-specific hunting and fishing 
regulations because they are technical and procedural in nature, and 
the environmental effects are too broad, speculative, or conjectural to 
lend themselves to meaningful analysis (43 CFR 46.210 and 516 DM 8). 
Concerning the actions that are the subject of this rulemaking, we have 
complied with NEPA at the project level when developing each package. 
This is consistent with the Department of the Interior instructions for 
compliance with NEPA where actions are covered sufficiently by an 
earlier environmental document (43 CFR 46.120).
    Prior to the addition of a refuge or hatchery to the list of areas 
open to hunting and fishing in 50 CFR parts 32 and 71, we develop 
hunting and fishing plans for the affected stations. We incorporate 
these station hunting and fishing activities in the station 
comprehensive conservation plan and/or other step-down management 
plans, pursuant to our refuge planning guidance in 602 Fish and 
Wildlife Service Manual (FW) 1, 3, and 4. We prepare these 
comprehensive conservation plans and step-down plans in compliance with 
section 102(2)(C) of NEPA, the Council on Environmental Quality's 
regulations for implementing NEPA in 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508, 
and the Department of Interior's NEPA regulations at 43 CFR part 46. We 
invite the affected public to participate in the review, development, 
and implementation of these plans. Copies of all plans and NEPA 
compliance are available from the stations at the addresses provided 
below.

Available Information for Specific Stations

    Individual refuge and hatchery headquarters have information about 
public use programs and conditions that apply to their specific 
programs and maps of their respective areas. To find out how to contact 
a specific refuge or hatchery, contact the appropriate Service office 
for the States and Territories listed below:
    Hawaii, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Regional Chief, National 
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Eastside 
Federal Complex, Suite 1692, 911 NE 11th Avenue, Portland, OR 97232-
4181; Telephone (503) 231-6203.
    Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. Regional Chief, National 
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306, 
500 Gold Avenue SW, Albuquerque, NM 87103; Telephone (505) 248-6635.
    Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, and 
Wisconsin. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish 
and Wildlife Service, 5600 American Blvd. West, Suite 990, Bloomington, 
MN 55437-1458; Telephone (612) 713-5476.
    Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, 
Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Puerto Rico, 
and the Virgin Islands. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge 
System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1875 Century Boulevard, 
Atlanta, GA 30345; Telephone (404) 679-7356.
    Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland, 
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode 
Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia. Regional Chief, National 
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate 
Center Drive, Hadley, MA 01035-9589; Telephone (413) 253-8307.
    Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, 
Utah, and Wyoming. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System, 
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 134 Union Blvd., Lakewood, CO 80228; 
Telephone (303) 236-4377.
    Alaska. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish 
and Wildlife Service, 1011 E Tudor Rd., Anchorage, AK 99503; Telephone 
(907) 786-3545.
    California and Nevada. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge 
System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2606,

[[Page 88162]]

Sacramento, CA 95825; Telephone (916) 767-9241.

Primary Author

    Christian Myers, Division of Natural Resources and Conservation 
Planning, National Wildlife Refuge System, is the primary author of 
this rulemaking document.

Regulation Changes Summary Table

    The regulatory amendments set forth below are presented alongside 
existing station-specific regulations that have not been amended. For a 
table that provides additional clarity on which specific regulatory 
provisions have been amended, please see Docket No. FWS-HQ-NWRS-2024-
0034 on https://www.regulations.gov for a separate document containing 
a table that provides additional clarity on which specific regulatory 
provisions have been amended and how they have been amended.

List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 32

    Fishing, Hunting, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, 
Wildlife, Wildlife refuges.

Regulation Promulgation

    For the reasons described in the preamble, we amend title 50, 
chapter I, subchapter C of the Code of Federal Regulations as set forth 
below:

PART 32--HUNTING AND FISHING

0
1. The authority citation for part 32 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  5 U.S.C. 301; 16 U.S.C. 460k, 664, 668dd-668ee, and 
715i; Pub. L. 115-20, 131 Stat. 86.


0
2. Amend Sec.  32.7 by revising and republishing paragraph (q) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  32.7   What refuge units are open to hunting and/or sport 
fishing?

* * * * *
    (q) Kentucky. (1) Clarks River National Wildlife Refuge.
    (2) Green River National Wildlife Refuge.
    (3) Ohio River Islands National Wildlife Refuge.
    (4) Reelfoot National Wildlife Refuge.
* * * * *

0
3. Amend Sec.  32.24 by revising and republishing paragraphs (j), (m), 
and (x) to read as follows:


Sec.  32.24  California.

* * * * *
    (j) Lower Klamath National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird 
hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, coot, moorhen, and snipe on 
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) In the controlled waterfowl hunting area, we require a valid 
Refuge Recreation Pass (available electronically or in person at the 
refuge office) for all hunters age 16 or older. All hunters age 15 and 
younger must remain in the immediate presence of an adult (age 18 or 
older) at all times while in the field.
    (ii) Unless otherwise posted, we require advance reservations for 
the first 2 days of the hunting season. Reservations are obtained 
through the waterfowl lottery each year.
    (iii) Hunters may enter the refuge at 4:30 a.m. unless otherwise 
posted.
    (iv) Shooting hours end at 1 p.m. on all California portions of the 
refuge with the following exceptions:
    (A) The refuge manager may designate up to 6 afternoon special 
youth, ladies, veteran, or disabled hunter waterfowl hunts per season.
    (B) The refuge manager may designate up to 3 days per week of 
afternoon waterfowl hunting for the general public after December 1.
    (v) We prohibit the setting of decoys in retrieving zones.
    (vi) Pit-style hunting blinds located in the Stearns units and unit 
9D are first-come, first-served. We require you to hunt within a 200-
foot (61-meter) radius of the blind.
    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of pheasant on designated 
areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) In the controlled pheasant hunting area, we require a valid 
Refuge Recreation Pass (available electronically or in person at the 
refuge office) for all hunters age 16 or older.
    (ii) All hunters age 15 or younger must remain in the immediate 
presence of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times while in the field.
    (3)-(4) [Reserved]
* * * * *
    (m) Modoc National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird 
hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, coot, moorhen, and snipe on 
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) On the opening weekend of the hunting season, hunters must 
possess and carry a refuge permit (FWS Form 3-2439, Hunt Application/
Permit--National Wildlife Refuge System) issued through random drawing 
to hunters with advance reservations only.
    (ii) After the opening weekend of the hunting season, we only allow 
hunting on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. Hunters must check-in 
and out of the refuge by using self-service permits (FWS Form 3-2405, 
Self-Clearing Check-in/out Permit). Hunters must completely fill out 
the ``Refuge Hunt Permit'' portion of the permit and deposit it in the 
drop box prior to hunting. Hunters must complete and display the 
``Daily Vehicle Permit'' in the windshield of the hunter's vehicle 
prior to hunting. The hunter must possess and carry the ``Record of 
Kill'' and ``Waterfowl Harvest Statistics'' portions of the permit 
while on the refuge and turn them in prior to exiting the hunting area.
    (iii) In the designated spaced blind area, you must remain within 
the blind assigned to you.
    (iv) All hunters age 15 and younger must remain in the immediate 
presence of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times while in the field.
    (v) You may not possess more than 25 shot shells while in the field 
once you have left your assigned parking lot or boat launch.
    (vi) You may only use portable blinds in the free-roam hunting 
areas.
    (vii) You must remove all blinds, decoys, shell casings, other 
personal equipment, and refuse from the refuge at the end of each day 
(see Sec. Sec.  27.93 and 27.94 of this chapter).
    (viii) Hunters must enter and exit the hunting area from the three 
designated hunt parking lots, which we open 1\1/2\ hours before legal 
shooting time and close 1 hour after legal shooting time each hunt day.
    (ix) We only allow walk-in access to the hunt area by foot and 
nonmotorized cart.
    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of pheasant on designated 
areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We limit hunting to junior hunters possessing a valid State 
Junior Hunting License and refuge Junior Pheasant Hunt Permit (FWS Form 
3-2439, Hunt Application/Permit--National Wildlife Refuge System).
    (ii) All hunters age 15 and younger must remain in the immediate 
presence of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times while in the field.
    (3) [Reserved]
    (4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing only on Dorris Reservoir 
subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We prohibit fishing from October 1 to January 31.
    (ii) We allow fishing only from legal sunrise to legal sunset.
    (iii) We allow only walk-in access to Dorris Reservoir from 
February 1 through March 31.

[[Page 88163]]

    (iv) We allow use of boats for fishing on Dorris Reservoir only 
from April 1 through September 30.
* * * * *
    (x) Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird 
hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, coot, moorhen, and snipe on 
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) In the controlled waterfowl hunting area, we require a valid 
Refuge Recreation Pass (available electronically or in person at the 
refuge office) for all hunters age 16 or older.
    (ii) All hunters age 15 or younger must remain in the immediate 
presence of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times while in the field.
    (iii) Unless otherwise posted, we require advance reservations for 
the first 2 days of the hunting season. You may obtain a reservation 
through the waterfowl lottery each year.
    (iv) Hunters may enter the refuge at 4:30 a.m. unless otherwise 
posted.
    (v) Shooting hours end at 1 p.m. on all portions of the refuge with 
the following exceptions:
    (A) The refuge manager may designate up to 6 afternoon special 
youth, ladies, veteran, or disabled hunter waterfowl hunts per season.
    (B) The refuge manager may designate up to 3 days per week of 
afternoon waterfowl hunting for the general public after December 1.
    (vi) You select blind sites by lottery at the beginning of each 
hunt day. You may shoot only from within your assigned blind site.
    (vii) We prohibit the setting of decoys in retrieving zones.
    (viii) We prohibit air-thrust and inboard water-thrust boats while 
hunting. We prohibit the use of all-terrain amphibious or utility-type 
vehicles (UTVs) in wetland units.
    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of pheasant on designated 
areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) In the controlled pheasant hunting area, we require a valid 
Refuge Recreation Pass (available electronically or in person at the 
refuge office) for all hunters age 16 or older.
    (ii) All hunters age 15 or younger must remain in the immediate 
presence of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times while in the field.
    (3)-(4) [Reserved]

0
4. Amend Sec.  32.36 by redesignating paragraphs (b) and (c) as (c) and 
(d), respectively; and adding a new paragraph (b).
    The addition reads as follows:


Sec.  32.36   Kentucky.

* * * * *
    (b) Green River National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird 
hunting. We allow hunting of duck, goose, coot, merganser, teal, and 
dove on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following 
conditions:
    (i) Each hunter age 12 and older must possess and carry a signed 
refuge hunting brochure (FWS Form 3-2439, Hunt Application/Permit--
National Wildlife Refuge System) while hunting on the refuge.
    (ii) All hunters age 15 or younger must be supervised by an adult 
age 21 or older and must remain in sight of and normal voice contact 
with the adult. The adult may supervise no more than two youths.
    (iii) We prohibit hunting within 100 yards (91 meters) of a 
residence, graveled road, or hiking trail managed by the Service as 
part of Green River NWR.
    (iv) We prohibit the use of trail cameras.
    (v) We allow the use of boats operated only by manual power or an 
electric trolling motor for hunters to access the refuge. We prohibit 
the use of internal combustion motors, personal watercraft (e.g., jet 
skis), airboats, and hovercraft on waters owned and managed by Green 
River NWR.
    (vi) We allow the use of bikes, including e-bikes, for hunters to 
access the refuge along designated routes only (graveled and paved 
roads, and established trails) managed by the Service as part of Green 
River NWR. We prohibit the use of internal combustion motors on lands 
owned and managed by Green River NWR.
    (vii) We allow the use of off-road or all-terrain vehicles (e.g., 
ATVs/UTVs) only for mobility-impaired hunters who, while hunting on the 
refuge, possess and carry a valid General Activities Special Use Permit 
(FWS Form 3-1383-G) approved by the refuge manager.
    (viii) We prohibit marking or flagging any tree or other refuge 
feature with non-biodegradable reflectors, paint, flagging, or other 
substances.
    (ix) Access to open hunting areas of the refuge is from 2 hours 
before legal sunrise to 2 hours after legal sunset.
    (x) We prohibit the killing or wounding of a game animal and then 
intentionally or knowingly failing to make a reasonable effort to 
retrieve and include it in the hunter's bag limit.
    (xi) We allow duck, goose, coot, wood duck, teal, and merganser 
hunting from \1/2\ hour before legal sunrise until 12 p.m. (noon). We 
allow dove hunting according to State shooting hours.
    (xii) We allow the use of dogs for migratory game bird hunting. Dog 
owners and handlers must have a collar on each dog with the owner's 
contact information (FWS Form 3-2439).
    (xiii) For migratory game bird hunting, you must remove all decoys, 
blinds, and hunting equipment at the end of each day's hunt (see Sec.  
27.93 of this chapter).
    (xiv) For youth, seniors, and disabled hunters, as defined by the 
State, the Horseshoe Bend Unit will be open to waterfowl hunting during 
the months of December and January of the Statewide waterfowl season, 
and during the additional Statewide veterans and youth hunt dates in 
February.
    (xv) We prohibit waterfowl hunting during any Statewide seasons 
prior to December.
    (xvi) We prohibit all entry to the Tscharner East section of the 
Bluff Unit from November 1 through March 31.
    (xvii) The big game quota hunt in the month of November of the 
Statewide white-tailed deer season is open only to holders of a big 
game quota permit (FWS Form 3-2439, Hunt Application/Permit--National 
Wildlife Refuge System). During that hunt, the Tscharner West section 
of the Bluff Unit and the Horseshoe Bend Unit are closed to all non-
selected hunters and the general public.
    (2) [Reserved]
    (3) Big game hunting. We allow only archery and crossbow hunting of 
white-tailed deer and turkey on designated areas of the refuge subject 
to the following conditions:
    (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (b)(1)(i), (iii) through 
(x), (xvi), and (xvii) of this section apply.
    (ii) Hunters age 15 and younger must be supervised by an adult age 
21 or older and must remain in sight of and normal voice contact with 
the adult. The adult may supervise no more than one youth.
    (iii) We allow white-tailed deer and turkey hunting according to 
State shooting hours.
    (iv) You must use safety belts at all times when occupying tree 
stands.
    (v) You must remove all tree stands (portable and climbing) and 
ground blinds by legal sunset of each day's hunt.
    (vi) You may use no more than one stand or blind per hunter.
    (vii) The big game quota permit (FWS Form 3-2439, Hunt Application/
Permit--National Wildlife Refuge System) is a limited entry permit, is 
zone-specific, and is nontransferable.
    (viii) During the big game quota hunt, we allow only hunters 
possessing a valid big game quota permit (FWS Form

[[Page 88164]]

3-2439, Hunt Application/Permit--National Wildlife Refuge System) on 
the refuge and only for the purposes of deer and turkey hunting.
    (ix) For the drawn holders of a big game quota permit (FWS Form 3-
2439, Hunt Application/Permit--National Wildlife Refuge System), the 
Horseshoe Bend Unit and Tscharner West section of the Bluff Unit will 
be open, up to 21 days, during the month of November of the Statewide 
season.
    (x) For youth, seniors, and disabled hunters, as defined by the 
State, the Horseshoe Bend Unit and Tscharner West section of the Bluff 
Unit will be open to archery and crossbow hunting of deer and turkey 
during the months of September and October in accordance with State 
season dates.
    (xi) For youth, as defined by the State, the Horseshoe Bend Unit 
and Tscharner West section of the Bluff Unit will be open to archery 
and crossbow hunting of turkey during the months of April and May in 
accordance with State season dates.
    (4) [Reserved]
* * * * *

0
5. Amend Sec.  32.37 by revising and republishing paragraphs (d), (e), 
and (m) to read as follows:


Sec.  32.37   Louisiana.

* * * * *
    (d) Bayou Teche National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird 
hunting. We allow hunting of duck, merganser, teal, light and dark 
goose, coot, gallinule, rail, snipe, dove, and woodcock on designated 
areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) Each person age 18 and older must possess and carry a valid, 
signed refuge user brochure while on the refuge.
    (ii) We prohibit hunting or discharge of firearms (see Sec.  27.42 
of this chapter) within 500 feet (152 meters (m)) of any residence or 
oil and gas infrastructure, or within 200 feet (61 m) of any road, 
railroad, levee, water control structure, designated public use trail, 
designated parking area, or other designated public use facility.
    (iii) All youth hunters age 15 and younger must be supervised by an 
adult during all hunts. One adult may supervise up to two youths during 
small game and migratory game bird hunts, but may supervise only one 
youth during big game hunts. The supervising adult must maintain visual 
and voice contact with the youth at all times. Adult guardians are 
responsible for ensuring that youth hunters do not violate refuge 
rules.
    (iv) We require waterfowl and gallinule hunters to remove all 
portable blinds and decoys from the refuge by 2 p.m. each day (see 
Sec. Sec.  27.93 and 27.94 of this chapter).
    (v) Migratory bird hunters are only allowed to enter the refuge 
after 4 a.m.
    (vi) We allow waterfowl hunting daily until 2 p.m. during the State 
regular season, State teal season, and State youth and veteran 
waterfowl seasons. We allow gallinule, snipe, and rail hunting until 2 
p.m.
    (vii) When hunting migratory game birds, you may only use dogs to 
locate, point, and retrieve game.
    (viii) We allow only the use of reflective tacks as marking 
devices.
    (ix) We only allow the incidental take of nutria with approved shot 
and weapons during any open waterfowl season on the refuge. We allow 
the incidental take of raccoon, feral hog, armadillo, opossum, and 
coyote with approved shot and weapons during any open season on the 
refuge.
    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of squirrel and rabbit, 
and the incidental take of nutria, coyote, raccoon, armadillo, and 
opossum, on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following 
conditions:
    (i) We only allow hunting from the start of the State squirrel and 
rabbit seasons until the last day of State waterfowl season for the 
State Waterfowl Zone in which you are hunting.
    (ii) We prohibit upland game hunting on days corresponding with 
refuge deer gun hunts.
    (iii) Hunters must leave the refuge no later than 2 hours after 
legal sunset.
    (iv) When hunting, you must possess only shot size 4 or smaller or 
0.22 caliber rimfire rifles or smaller. We allow the use of air rifles.
    (v) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (iii), 
(viii), and (ix) of this section apply.
    (vi) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (d)(2)(i) through (iv) 
of this section do not apply to upland game hunting on the Mitigation 
Units.
    (3) Big game hunting. We allow the hunting of white-tailed deer, 
and the incidental take of feral hog, on designated areas of the refuge 
subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We allow hunting of deer only with firearms (see Sec.  27.42 of 
this chapter) during 5 specific days during October and November. A 
youth gun hunt will occur during the last weekend of October, on both 
Saturday and Sunday. The general gun hunt will occur during the final 
full weekend in November over 3 days: the Friday immediately before the 
weekend, Saturday, and Sunday.
    (ii) We allow archery deer hunting according to the State of 
Louisiana archery season. We close refuge archery hunting during refuge 
deer gun hunts.
    (iii) We allow each hunter to possess only one deer per day; the 
deer may be a buck or a doe.
    (iv) Hunters may use only portable deer stands. Hunters may erect 
deer stands no earlier than 48 hours before the deer archery season and 
must remove them from the refuge within 48 hours after the season 
closes (see Sec.  27.93 of this chapter). Hunters may place only one 
deer stand on the refuge. Deer stands must have the owner's State 
hunting license/sportsman's identification number clearly printed on 
the stand.
    (v) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (iii), 
(viii), and (ix), and (d)(2)(iii) of this section apply.
    (vi) The condition set forth at paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this section 
does not apply to big game hunting on the Mitigation Units.
    (vii) We prohibit the use of deer decoys.
    (viii) We prohibit organized deer drives. We define a ``deer 
drive'' as an organized or planned effort to pursue, drive, chase, or 
otherwise frighten or cause deer to move in the direction of any 
person(s) who is part of the organized or planned hunt and known to be 
waiting for the deer.
    (ix) Deer hunters must display State Wildlife Management Area (WMA) 
hunter-orange or blaze-pink (as governed by State WMA regulations).
    (4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing in all refuge waters 
subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We prohibit the use of unattended nets, traps, or lines (trot, 
jug, bush, etc.).
    (ii) The condition set forth at paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section 
applies.
    (iii) The refuge is only open to recreational finfishing and 
shellfishing from legal sunrise to legal sunset.
    (e) Big Branch Marsh National Wildlife Refuge--
    (1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of duck, 
merganser, teal, coot, light and dark goose, snipe, rail, gallinule, 
dove, and woodcock on designated areas of the refuge subject to the 
following conditions:
    (i) Each person age 18 and older must possess and carry a valid, 
signed refuge user brochure while on the refuge.
    (ii) We allow waterfowl, snipe, rail, gallinule, dove, and goose 
hunting on Wednesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays, and Sundays from \1/2\ 
hour before legal sunrise until 2 p.m., including waterfowl hunting 
during the State teal season and State youth and veterans

[[Page 88165]]

waterfowl seasons. We only allow hunting of woodcock until 2 p.m.
    (iii) We allow light goose hunting for that part of the season that 
extends beyond the regular duck season from \1/2\ hour before legal 
sunrise until 2 p.m.
    (iv) We allow only temporary blinds, and hunters must remove blinds 
and decoys by 2 p.m. each day (see Sec.  27.93 of this chapter).
    (v) All youth hunters age 15 and younger must be supervised by an 
adult during all hunts. One adult may supervise up to two youths during 
small game hunts and migratory bird hunts, but may supervise only one 
youth during big game hunts. The supervising adult must maintain visual 
and voice contact with the youth at all times. Adult guardians are 
responsible for ensuring that youth hunters do not violate refuge 
rules.
    (vi) We prohibit hunting or discharge of firearms (see Sec.  27.42 
of this chapter) within 500 feet (152 meters (m)) of any residence 
adjacent to the refuge or oil and gas infrastructure on the refuge, or 
within 200 feet (61 m) from the center of any road, railroad, levee, 
water control structure, designated public use maintained trail, 
designated parking area, or other designated public use facility.
    (vii) We allow migratory bird hunters to enter the refuge no 
earlier than 4 a.m., and all hunters must exit the refuge no later than 
2 hours after legal sunset.
    (viii) We allow only reflective tacks as trail markers on the 
refuge.
    (ix) We allow the incidental take of raccoon, feral hog, armadillo, 
opossum, and coyote with approved shot and weapons allowed during any 
open season on the refuge.
    (x) We only allow the incidental take of nutria with approved shot 
and weapons during any open waterfowl (duck, teal, merganser, light and 
dark goose, and coot) season on the refuge.
    (xi) We prohibit hunters and anglers from utilizing air boats, air 
thrust boats, mud boats, aircraft, and air-cooled propulsion engines on 
the refuge.
    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of squirrel, rabbit, and 
quail, and the incidental take of nutria, coyote, raccoon, armadillo, 
and opossum, on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following 
conditions:
    (i) When hunting, you must possess only shot size 4 or smaller, or 
0.22 caliber rim-fire rifles or smaller. We allow the use of air 
rifles.
    (ii) When hunting squirrel and rabbit, and for the incidental take 
of raccoon, we allow the use of dogs only after the close of the State 
archery deer season. When hunting quail, you may only use dogs to 
locate, point, and retrieve.
    (iii) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (v), (vi), 
and (viii) through (xi) of this section apply.
    (iv) During the dog season for squirrel and rabbit, all hunters, 
including archers (while on the ground), except waterfowl hunters, must 
wear a minimum of a cap or hat that is hunter orange, blaze pink, or 
other such color as governed by State regulations.
    (v) We only allow hunting of quail until 2 p.m.
    (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer, and 
the incidental take of feral hog, on designated areas of the refuge 
subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We are open only during the State season for archery hunting of 
deer.
    (ii) We prohibit organized deer drives. We define a ``deer drive'' 
as an organized or planned effort to pursue, drive, chase, or otherwise 
frighten or cause deer to move in the direction of any person(s) who is 
part of the organized or planned hunt and known to be waiting for the 
deer.
    (iii) We allow placement of temporary deer stands no earlier than 
48 hours prior to the start of deer archery season. Hunters must remove 
all deer stands within 48 hours after the archery deer season closes 
(see Sec.  27.93 of this chapter). We allow only one deer stand per 
hunter on the refuge. Deer stands must have the owner's State license/
sportsmen's identification number clearly printed on the stand. We 
prohibit hunting stands on trees painted with white bands.
    (iv) Deer hunters must display State Wildlife Management Area (WMA) 
hunter-orange or blaze-pink (as governed by State WMA regulations) 
while on the ground.
    (v) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (v), (vi), 
and (viii) through (xi) of this section apply.
    (vi) We prohibit the use of deer decoys.
    (4) Sport fishing. We allow recreational finfishing and 
shellfishing on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following 
conditions:
    (i) You may only fish from legal sunrise until legal sunset, except 
we allow night fishing from the bank and pier on Lake Road.
    (ii) You must only use rod and reel or pole and line while 
finfishing.
    (iii) You must attend to any fishing, crabbing, and crawfishing 
equipment at all times.
    (iv) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (e)(1)(i) and (xi) of 
this section apply.
* * * * *
    (m) Delta National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird 
hunting. We allow hunting of duck, merganser, teal, light and dark 
goose, dove, snipe, rail, gallinule, and coot on designated areas of 
the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) Each person age 18 and older must possess and carry a valid, 
signed refuge user brochure while on the refuge.
    (ii) We allow migratory bird hunting on Wednesdays, Thursdays, 
Saturdays, and Sundays from \1/2\ hour before legal sunrise until 2 
p.m. during the State seasons, including the regular waterfowl season, 
the State teal season, State youth waterfowl season, State veterans 
waterfowl season, and State light goose special conservation season.
    (iii) We only allow temporary blinds. You must remove both blinds 
and decoys by 2 p.m. each day (see Sec.  27.93 of this chapter).
    (iv) When hunting migratory game birds, you may only use dogs to 
locate, point, and retrieve game.
    (v) We prohibit discharge of firearms (see Sec.  27.42 of this 
chapter) within 500 feet (152 meters (m)) of any residence or oil and 
gas infrastructure, or within 200 feet (61 m) of any road, railroad, 
levee, water control structure, designated public use trail, designated 
parking area, or other designated public use facilities.
    (vi) All youth hunters age 15 and younger must be supervised by an 
adult during all hunts. One adult may supervise up to two youths during 
upland game and migratory game bird hunts, but may supervise only one 
youth during big game hunts. The supervising adult must maintain visual 
and voice contact with the youth at all times.
    (vii) Migratory bird hunters may enter the refuge no earlier than 4 
a.m., and all hunters must exit the refuge no later than 2 hours after 
legal sunset.
    (viii) We allow the incidental take of raccoon, feral hog, 
armadillo, opossum, and coyote with approved shot and weapons allowed 
during any open season on the refuge.
    (ix) We only allow the incidental take of nutria with approved shot 
and weapons during any open waterfowl season on the refuge.
    (x) We allow only the use of reflective tacks as marking devices.
    (xi) We close all refuge lands between Raphael Pass and Main Pass 
to public entry, including hunting and fishing, from November 1 through 
the end of February; year-round access is only allowed in Main, 
Raphael, Octave, Women, and Flatboat passes.
    (xii) We prohibit hunters and anglers from utilizing air boats, air 
thrust boats, mud boats, aircraft, and air-cooled propulsion engines on 
the refuge.

[[Page 88166]]

    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of rabbit, and the 
incidental take of nutria, coyote, raccoon, armadillo, and opossum, on 
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) The refuge rabbit season opens the day after the State duck 
season closes and continues through the remainder of the State rabbit 
season.
    (ii) We restrict hunting to shotgun only.
    (iii) We allow the use of dogs when rabbit hunting.
    (iv) We prohibit upland game hunting on days corresponding with 
refuge deer gun hunts.
    (v) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (m)(1)(i), (v) through 
(viii), (xi), and (xii) of this section apply.
    (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer on 
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (m)(1)(i) and (v) 
through (xii) of this section apply.
    (ii) We allow archery deer hunting, bucks only, from October 1 
through 15. We allow either-sex archery deer hunting from October 16 
through 31, and from the day after the close of the State duck season 
through the end of the State deer archery season.
    (iii) We allow placement of temporary deer stands up to 48 hours 
prior to the start of deer archery season. Hunters must remove all deer 
stands within 48 hours after the archery deer season closes (see Sec.  
27.93 of this chapter). We allow only one deer stand per hunter on the 
refuge. Deer stands must have the owner's State license/sportsmen's 
identification number clearly printed on the stand.
    (iv) We prohibit organized deer drives. We define a ``deer drive'' 
as an organized or planned effort to pursue, drive, chase, or otherwise 
frighten or cause deer to move in the direction of any person(s) who is 
part of the organized or planned hunt and known to be waiting for the 
deer.
    (v) We prohibit the use of deer decoys.
    (vi) We allow shotgun hunting of deer on the Saturday and Sunday 
during the first split of the regular waterfowl season.
    (vii) Deer hunters must display State Wildlife Management Area 
(WMA) hunter-orange or blaze-pink (as governed by State WMA 
regulations).
    (4) Sport fishing. We allow recreational finfishing and 
shellfishing on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following 
conditions:
    (i) We only allow sport finfishing and shellfishing from \1/2\ hour 
before legal sunrise until \1/2\ hour after legal sunset. During the 
State waterfowl hunting seasons, we only allow sport finfishing and 
shellfishing from 2 p.m. until \1/2\ hour after legal sunset.
    (ii) We prohibit the use of trotlines, limblines, slat traps, jug 
lines, nets, or alligator lines.
    (iii) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (m)(1)(i), (xi), and 
(xii) of this section apply.
* * * * *

0
6. Amend Sec.  32.41 by revising and republishing paragraph (f) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  32.41   Michigan.

* * * * *
    (f) Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird 
hunting. We allow hunting of waterfowl (duck and goose), American 
woodcock, American crow, American coot, common gallinule, sora, 
Virginia rail, and Wilson's snipe on designated areas of the refuge 
subject to the following conditions:
    (i) You must possess and carry a refuge check-in card (FWS Form 3-
2405, Self-Clearing Check-in Permit).
    (ii) We allow waterfowl hunting on Saturdays, Sundays, Tuesdays, 
and Thursdays during the regular goose season after September 30.
    (iii) We allow hunter access to the refuge 2 hours before legal 
shooting time to 2 hours after legal shooting time.
    (iv) You may possess no more than 25 shotgun shells while hunting 
in the field.
    (v) We allow the use of dogs while hunting, provided the dog is 
under the immediate control of the hunter at all times.
    (vi) We allow the take of feral hogs incidental to other lawful 
hunting using legal methods of take.
    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of turkey, small game 
(eastern fox squirrel, eastern cottontail, and ring-necked pheasant), 
and furbearers (raccoon, coyote, and red fox) on designated areas of 
the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (f)(1)(iii) and (vi) of 
this section apply, except we allow hunter access to the refuge for 
furbearer hunting from \1/2\ hour before legal sunrise to \1/2\ hour 
after legal sunset.
    (ii) You may only hunt turkey during the spring season.
    (iii) We allow dogs for hunting. Raccoon hunting dogs must wear 
global positioning system (GPS) or radio collars.
    (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer on 
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (f)(1)(iii) and (vi) of 
this section apply.
    (ii) You must possess and carry a refuge permit (State-issued 
permit).
    (4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of 
the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We allow fishing by boat in navigable waterways but not within 
any managed refuge units.
    (ii) We allow bank fishing from legal sunrise to legal sunset only 
at designated sites along the Tittabawassee and Cass Rivers.

0
7. Amend Sec.  32.42 by revising and republishing paragraph (a) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  32.42  Minnesota.

* * * * *
    (a) Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird 
hunting. We allow youth waterfowl hunting on designated areas of the 
refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We allow the use of dogs while hunting, provided the dog is 
under the immediate control of the hunter at all times.
    (ii) Hunters must dismantle hunting blinds, platforms, and ladders 
made from natural vegetation at the end of each day.
    (iii) You must remove all boats, decoys, blind materials, stands, 
platforms, cameras, and other personal property brought onto the refuge 
at the end of each day (see Sec. Sec.  27.93 and 27.94 of this 
chapter).
    (iv) We close the refuge from 7 p.m. to 5:30 a.m.
    (v) We allow the use of motorless boats for hunting.
    (vi) We only allow waterfowl hunting during the State's youth 
waterfowl season.
    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of ruffed grouse and 
sharp-tailed grouse on designated areas of the refuge subject to the 
following conditions:
    (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (v) of 
this section apply.
    (ii) We only allow hunting from the opening of the State's deer 
firearms season to the close of the State's ruffed grouse and sharp-
tailed grouse seasons, respectively.
    (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer and 
moose on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following 
conditions:
    (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (iv), and (v) 
of this section apply.

[[Page 88167]]

    (ii) We prohibit shooting on, from, over, across, or within 30 feet 
(9 meters) of a roadway open to motorized public vehicle transportation 
at a big game animal or a decoy of a big game animal.
    (iii) We only allow archery hunting from the start of the State's 
deer firearms season, and close as governed by the State's archery deer 
season.
    (iv) You must remove all boats, decoys, cameras, and other personal 
property brought onto the refuge at the end of each day (see Sec. Sec.  
27.93 and 27.94 of this chapter).
    (v) We allow only portable tree stands; portable, elevated hunting 
platforms not attached to trees; and portable ground blinds that can be 
hand-carried into the hunting area.
    (vi) You may place your tree stand(s), elevated platform(s), and/or 
ground blind(s) on the refuge only during your designated licensed 
season. You must remove these stands/blinds by the end of your 
designated licensed season (see Sec.  27.93 of this chapter). 
Unoccupied stands/blinds may be used by anyone.
    (vii) We allow only two stands/blinds per hunter on the refuge. You 
must clearly label the stands/blinds with your State hunting license 
number.
    (viii) We prohibit the use of nails, wire, screws, or bolts to 
attach a stand to a tree.
    (ix) We prohibit hunting from a tree into which a metal object has 
been driven to support a hunter.
    (4) [Reserved]
* * * * *

0
8. Amend Sec.  32.45 by revising and republishing paragraph (o) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  32.45  Montana.

* * * * *
    (o) Lost Trail National Wildlife Refuge--(1) [Reserved]
    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of turkey and mountain 
grouse on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following 
conditions:
    (i) We allow use of riding or pack stock on designated access 
routes through the refuge to access off-refuge lands as identified in 
the public use leaflet.
    (ii) We prohibit retrieval of game in areas closed to hunting 
without a refuge retrieval permit.
    (iii) We allow portable or temporary blinds and tree stands.
    (iv) You may only use or possess nontoxic shot shells while in the 
field (see Sec.  32.2(k)).
    (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of elk, white-tailed deer, 
and mule deer on designated areas of the refuge subject to the 
following conditions:
    (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (o)(2)(i) through (iii) 
of this section apply.
    (ii) Persons assisting disabled hunters must not be afield with a 
hunting firearm, bow, or other hunting device.
    (4) [Reserved]
* * * * *

0
9. Amend Sec.  32.46 by revising and republishing paragraph (c) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  32.46   Nebraska.

* * * * *
    (c) Fort Niobrara National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird 
hunting. We allow hunting of coot, crow, dark goose, dove, duck, light 
goose, rail, snipe, teal, and woodcock on designated areas of the 
refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) Hunters and anglers may access the refuge from 2 hours before 
legal sunrise until 2 hours after legal sunset.
    (ii) We allow access from designated areas of the refuge.
    (iii) You must remove all blinds and decoys at the conclusion of 
each day's hunt (see Sec.  27.93 of this chapter).
    (iv) We allow the use of dogs when hunting August 1 through April 
30.
    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of badger, bobcat, 
coyote, fox, long-tailed weasel, mink, opossum, prairie dog, porcupine, 
rabbit, hare, raccoon, skunk, squirrel, woodchuck, State-defined 
furbearers, greater prairie chicken, grouse, partridge, pheasant, 
quail, and turkey on designated areas of the refuge subject to the 
following conditions:
    (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (ii), and 
(iv) of this section apply.
    (ii) We allow hunting with muzzleloader, archery, shotgun, and 
falconry.
    (iii) You may only possess nontoxic shot when hunting turkey (see 
Sec.  32.2(k)).
    (iv) Shooting hours for coyote, prairie dog, porcupine, woodchuck, 
and State-defined furbearers are \1/2\ hour before legal sunrise to \1/
2\ hour after legal sunset.
    (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of deer, elk, and pronghorn 
antelope on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following 
conditions:
    (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii) of 
this section apply.
    (ii) We allow hunting only with muzzleloader and archery equipment.
    (iii) We allow portable tree stands and ground blinds to be used 
from August 16 through January 31.
    (4) Sport fishing. We allow fishing on Minnechaduza Creek and on 
the Niobrara River, downstream from the Cornell Dam, subject to the 
following conditions:
    (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii) of 
this section apply.
    (ii) We prohibit the use of limb or set lines.
    (iii) We prohibit the take of baitfish, reptiles, and amphibians.
    (iv) We prohibit use or possession of alcoholic beverages while 
fishing on refuge lands and waters.
* * * * *

0
10. Amend Sec.  32.53 by revising and republishing paragraphs (q), (w), 
(oo), and (kkk) to read as follows:


Sec.  32.53  North Dakota.

* * * * *
    (q) Des Lacs National Wildlife Refuge--(1) [Reserved]
    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of fox, sharp-tailed 
grouse, Hungarian partridge, turkey, and ring-necked pheasant on 
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We open for upland game bird hunting on the day following the 
close of the regular deer gun season through the end of the State 
season.
    (ii) We allow the use of hunting dogs for retrieval of upland game.
    (iii) We allow fox hunting from the day following the regular 
firearm deer season until March 31.
    (iv) We prohibit accessing refuge lands from refuge waters.
    (3) Big game hunting. We allow deer, elk, and moose hunting on 
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We only allow the use of portable tree stands and ground 
blinds. We prohibit leaving stands and blinds overnight on the refuge 
(see Sec.  27.93 of this chapter).
    (ii) We prohibit entry to the refuge before 12 p.m. (noon) on the 
first day of the respective bow, gun, or muzzleloader deer hunting 
seasons.
    (iii) The condition set forth at paragraph (q)(2)(iv) of this 
section applies.
    (iv) You may only possess nontoxic ammunition when hunting elk (see 
Sec.  32.2(k)).
    (4) [Reserved]
* * * * *
    (w) J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game 
bird hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, and coot on designated 
areas of the refuge subject to the following condition: We allow the 
use of dogs for hunting and retrieving game birds.

[[Page 88168]]

    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of ruffed and sharp-
tailed grouse, Hungarian partridge, turkey, ring-necked pheasant, and 
fox on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following 
conditions:
    (i) We open the refuge to hunting for sharp-tailed grouse, 
Hungarian partridge, and ring-necked pheasant north of the Willow-Upham 
road on the day following the close of the regular firearm deer season.
    (ii) We open the refuge to fox hunting on the day following the 
close of the regular firearm deer season. Fox hunting on the refuge 
closes March 31.
    (iii) Hunters may possess only approved nontoxic shot (see Sec.  
32.2(k)) for all upland game hunting, including turkey.
    (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of deer, elk, and moose on 
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) You must possess and carry a refuge permit to hunt antlered 
deer on the refuge outside the nine public hunting areas during the 
regular firearms season.
    (ii) We prohibit entry to the refuge before 12 p.m. (noon) on the 
first day of the respective bow, gun, or muzzleloader deer hunting 
seasons. You may access refuge roads open to the public before 12 p.m. 
(noon).
    (iii) You may only possess nontoxic ammunition when hunting elk 
(see Sec.  32.2(k)).
    (4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of 
the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We allow boat fishing from May 1 through September 30.
    (ii) We allow ice fishing and dark house spearfishing. We allow 
snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), utility terrain vehicles 
(UTVs), motor vehicles, and fish houses on the ice as conditions allow.
* * * * *
    (oo) Lostwood National Wildlife Refuge--(1) [Reserved]
    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of sharp-tailed grouse, 
Hungarian partridge, and ring-necked pheasant on designated areas of 
the refuge subject to the following condition: We allow the use of dogs 
to retrieve upland game.
    (3) Big game hunting. We allow deer, elk, and moose hunting on 
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We prohibit entry to the refuge before 12 p.m. (noon) on the 
first day of the respective archery, gun, or muzzleloader deer hunting 
season.
    (ii) You may only possess nontoxic ammunition when hunting elk (see 
Sec.  32.2(k)).
    (4) [Reserved]
* * * * *
    (kkk) Upper Souris National Wildlife Refuge--(1) [Reserved]
    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of wild turkey, sharp-
tailed grouse, Hungarian partridge, and pheasant on designated areas of 
the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We allow the use of dogs for hunting and retrieving of upland 
game birds.
    (ii) We allow hunters on the refuge from 5 a.m. until 10 p.m.
    (3) Big game hunting. We allow deer, elk, and moose hunting on 
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We only allow the use of portable tree stands and ground 
blinds. You must remove stands and blinds from the refuge at the end of 
each day's hunt (see Sec.  27.93 of this chapter).
    (ii) The condition set forth at paragraph (kkk)(2)(ii) of this 
section applies.
    (iii) We prohibit entry to the refuge before 12 p.m. (noon) on the 
first day of the respective bow, gun, or muzzleloader deer hunting 
seasons.
    (iv) You may only possess nontoxic ammunition when hunting elk (see 
Sec.  32.2(k)).
    (4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of 
the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We allow the use of fishing boats, canoes, kayaks, and float 
tubes in designated boat fishing areas from Lake Darling Dam north to 
State Highway 28 (Greene) crossing for fishing from May 1 through 
September 30.
    (ii) We allow fishing from nonmotorized vessels only on the Beaver 
Lodge Canoe Trail from May 1 through September 30.
    (iii) We allow boating and fishing from vessels on the Souris River 
from Mouse River Park to the north boundary of the refuge from May 1 
through September 30.
    (iv) We allow snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), utility 
terrain vehicles (UTVs), motor vehicles, and fish houses on the ice as 
conditions allow from Lake Darling Dam north to Carter Dam (Dam 41) for 
ice fishing.
    (v) We allow you to place fish houses overnight on the ice of Lake 
Darling as governed by State regulations.
    (vi) We allow anglers to place portable fish houses on the Souris 
River north of Carter Dam (Dam 41) and south of Lake Darling Dam for 
ice fishing, but anglers must remove the fish houses from the refuge at 
the end of each day's fishing activity (see Sec.  27.93 of this 
chapter).
    (vii) We allow anglers on the refuge from 5 a.m. until 10 p.m.
* * * * *

0
11. Amend Sec.  32.62 by revising and republishing paragraph (p) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  32.62  Texas.

* * * * *
    (p) Trinity River National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird 
hunting. We allow hunting of duck, merganser, and coot on designated 
areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We only allow hunting on Champion Lake with a refuge-issued 
permit (signed hunt brochure).
    (ii) We only allow hunting on Champion Lake on Saturdays and 
Sundays during the State duck season. Hunters may not enter the refuge 
until 4:30 a.m. and must be out of the hunt area by 12 p.m. (noon).
    (iii) We allow the use of dogs when retrieving game.
    (iv) Hunters age 16 and younger must be under the direct 
supervision of an adult age 17 or older.
    (v) We require a minimum distance between hunt parties of 150 yards 
(135 meters).
    (vi) We allow motors of 10 horsepower or less on Champion Lake.
    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting for squirrel, and 
incidental take of rabbit, on designated areas of the refuge subject to 
the following conditions:
    (i) We require hunters to possess a permit issued by Texas Parks 
and Wildlife Department (TPWD). Permits are issued by a lottery 
drawing. The hunter must carry the nontransferable permit at all times 
while hunting.
    (ii) The condition set forth at paragraph (p)(1)(iii) of this 
section applies.
    (iii) We allow all-terrain vehicle use for hunters with 
disabilities in designated units.
    (iv) We require a minimum distance between hunt parties of 200 
yards (180 meters).
    (v) Hunters may enter the refuge no earlier than 4:30 a.m. We allow 
hunting from 30 minutes before legal sunrise to 30 minutes after legal 
sunset only during the days specified on the permit. Hunters must be 
off the refuge 1\1/2\ hours after legal sunset.
    (vi) Hunters may place no more than one temporary stand on the 
refuge. Hunters may place the stand during the scouting week before the 
hunt begins

[[Page 88169]]

and must remove it the day the hunt ends (see Sec.  27.93 of this 
chapter). Hunters must label blinds with the name of the permit holder.
    (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer, and 
incidental take of feral hog, on designated areas of the refuge subject 
to the following conditions:
    (i) We require hunters to possess a TPWD-issued permit. Permits are 
issued by a lottery drawing. The hunter must carry the nontransferable 
permit at all times while hunting.
    (ii) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (p)(1)(iii) and 
(p)(2)(iii) through (vi) of this section apply.
    (iii) We allow archery hunting of white-tailed deer during the 
refuge designated 23-day archery season.
    (iv) We allow gun hunting of white-tailed deer during the State-
designated general gun season in two 9-day ``mini-seasons'' and during 
the State-designated muzzleloader season.
    (4) Sport fishing. We allow fishing on designated areas of the 
refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We only allow fishing with pole and line, rod and reel, or 
hand-held line.
    (ii) We prohibit the use of trotlines, setlines, bows and arrows, 
gigs, spears, fish traps, crab/crawfish traps, and/or nets.
    (iii) We prohibit the harvesting of frog or turtle (see Sec.  27.21 
of this chapter).
    (iv) We allow fishing from legal sunrise to legal sunset.

0
12. Amend Sec.  32.66 by revising and republishing paragraph (c) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  32.66   Washington.

* * * * *
    (c) Conboy Lake National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird 
hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, coot, and snipe on designated 
areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We prohibit discharge of any firearm within \1/4\ mile (396 
meters) of any maintained building or Federal facility, such as, but 
not limited to, a structure designed for storage, human occupancy, or 
shelter for animals.
    (ii) Hunters must remove all decoys and other equipment at the end 
of each day's hunt (see Sec.  27.93 of this chapter).
    (2)-(4) [Reserved]
* * * * *

0
13. Amend Sec.  32.67 by revising and republishing paragraph (a) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  32.67   West Virginia.

* * * * *
    (a) Canaan Valley National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird 
hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, rail, coot, gallinule, 
mourning dove, snipe, and woodcock on designated areas of the refuge 
subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We require each hunter to possess and carry a signed refuge 
hunting brochure (signed brochure).
    (ii) Hunters may enter the refuge 1 hour before legal sunrise and 
must exit the refuge, including parking areas, no later than 1 hour 
after legal sunset.
    (iii) We prohibit overnight parking except by Special Use Permit 
(FWS Form 3-1383-G) on Forest Road 80.
    (iv) We allow the use of dogs consistent with State regulations.
    (v) We prohibit dog training except during legal hunting seasons.
    (vi) You may only use or possess approved lead-free shot shells and 
ammunition while in the Big Cove Unit (see Sec.  32.2(k)).
    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow the hunting of ruffed grouse, 
squirrel, cottontail rabbit, snowshoe hare, red fox, gray fox, bobcat, 
woodchuck, coyote, opossum, striped skunk, and raccoon on designated 
areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (iv), (v), 
and (vi) of this section apply.
    (ii) You may hunt coyote, raccoon, opossum, skunk, and fox at 
night, but you must obtain a Special Use Permit (FWS Form 3-1383-G) at 
the refuge headquarters before hunting.
    (iii) We only allow hunting in the No Rifle Zones with the 
following equipment: archery (including crossbow), shotgun, or 
muzzleloader.
    (iv) We prohibit the hunting of upland game species from March 1 
through August 31.
    (3) Big game hunting. We allow the hunting of white-tailed deer, 
black bear, and turkey on designated areas of the refuge subject to the 
following conditions:
    (i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (iv), (vi), 
and (a)(2)(iii) of this section apply.
    (ii) We allow the use of dogs for hunting black bear during the gun 
season.
    (iii) We prohibit organized deer drives. We define a ``deer drive'' 
as an organized or planned effort to pursue, drive, chase, or otherwise 
frighten or cause deer to move in the direction of any person(s) who is 
part of the organized or planned hunt and known to be waiting for the 
deer.
    (4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of 
the refuge subject to the following condition: We prohibit the use of 
lead fishing tackle on designated areas of the refuge.
* * * * *

0
14. Amend Sec.  32.68 by revising and republishing paragraph (d) to 
read as follows:


Sec.  32.68  Wisconsin.

* * * * *
    (d) Horicon National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird 
hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, coot, common moorhen, and 
American woodcock on designated areas of the refuge subject to the 
following condition: We allow only participants in the Learn to Hunt 
and other special programs to hunt goose, duck, coot, and common 
moorhen.
    (2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of wild turkey, ring-
necked pheasant, gray partridge, ruffed grouse, squirrel, cottontail 
rabbit, snowshoe hare, raccoon, opossum, striped skunk, red fox, gray 
fox, coyote, and bobcat on designated areas of the refuge subject to 
the following conditions:
    (i) For hunting, you may use or possess only approved nontoxic shot 
shells while in the field, including shot shells used for hunting wild 
turkey (see Sec.  32.2(k)).
    (ii) We prohibit night hunting of upland game from 30 minutes after 
legal sunset until 30 minutes before legal sunrise the following day.
    (iii) We allow the use of dogs while hunting upland game (except 
raccoon, opossum, striped skunk, red fox, gray fox, coyote, and 
bobcat), provided the dog is under the immediate control of the hunter 
at all times.
    (iv) Coyote, red fox, gray fox, and bobcat hunting begins on the 
first day of the traditional 9-day gun deer season.
    (v) Coyote hunting ends on the last day of the season for fox.
    (vi) You may only hunt striped skunk and opossum during the season 
for raccoon.
    (vii) You may only hunt snowshoe hare during the season for 
cottontail rabbit.
    (viii) Hunters may enter the refuge no earlier than 2 hours before 
legal shooting hours and must exit the refuge no later than 2 hours 
after legal shooting hours.
    (3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer and 
black bear in designated areas of the refuge subject to the following 
conditions:
    (i) You must remove all boats, decoys, game cameras, blinds, blind 
materials, stands, platforms, and other personal equipment brought onto 
the refuge at the end of each day's hunt (see Sec.  27.93

[[Page 88170]]

of this chapter). We prohibit hunting from any stand left up overnight.
    (ii) We prohibit hunting bear with dogs.
    (iii) Hunters must possess a refuge permit (FWS Form 3-2439, Hunt 
Application/Permit--National Wildlife Refuge System) to hunt in Area E 
(surrounding the office/visitor center).
    (iv) The condition set forth at paragraph (d)(2)(viii) applies.
    (v) Any ground blind used during any gun deer season must display 
at least 144 square inches (929 square centimeters) of solid-blaze-
orange or fluorescent pink material visible from all directions.
    (4) Sport fishing. We allow fishing on designated areas of the 
refuge subject to the following conditions:
    (i) We only allow bank fishing or fishing through the ice.
    (ii) We prohibit the use of fishing weights or lures containing 
lead.
    (iii) We prohibit the taking of any mussel (clam), crayfish, frog, 
leech, or turtle species by any method on the refuge (see Sec.  27.21 
of this chapter).
    (iv) We allow fishing in designated areas from legal sunrise to 
legal sunset each day.
* * * * *

Shannon A. Estenoz,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2024-25905 Filed 11-6-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.