National Wildlife Refuge System; 2024-2025 Station-Specific Hunting and Sport Fishing Regulations, 88147-88170 [2024-25905]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
88147
NEW HAMPSHIRE NONREGULATORY
Name of nonregulatory SIP provision
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment area
State submittal date/effective date
EPA approved
date
*
*
New Hampshire Regional Haze
Plan Periodic Comprehensive Revision for 2nd planning period
2018–2028.
*
Statewide ...................
*
Submitted May 6, 2022
(supplemented September 21, 2023).
*
11/7/2024 [Insert
Federal Register citation].
‘‘§ 2584.116(a)(1) through (4) and (6)
and (d)’’ is corrected to read
‘‘§ 2584.116(a)(1) through (4), (a)(6), and
(d)’’.
[FR Doc. 2024–25679 Filed 11–6–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
CORPORATION FOR NATIONAL AND
COMMUNITY SERVICE
45 CFR Part 2584
RIN 3045–AA60
Protection of Human Subjects
Corporation for National and
Community Service.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
AGENCY:
The Corporation for National
and Community Service (operating as
AmeriCorps) is correcting a final rule
that appeared in the Federal Register on
October 29, 2024. These corrections do
not include any substantive changes to
the final rule. The final rule adopted the
Federal Policy for Protection of Human
Subjects (referred to as the Common
Rule).
SUMMARY:
DATES:
[Corrected]
4. On page 85874, in the second
column, the section number ‘‘2258.111’’
in the section heading is corrected to
read ‘‘2584.111’’ and on page 85874, in
the third column, in § 2584.111(a)(8)(i),
the language ‘‘§ 2584.116(a)(1) through
(4) and (6) and (d)’’ is corrected to read
‘‘§ 2584.116(a)(1) through (4), (a)(6), and
(d)’’.
■
§ 2584.113
[Corrected]
5. On page 85875, in the first column,
the section number ‘‘2258.113’’ in the
section heading is corrected to read
‘‘2584.113’’.
■
Andrea Grill,
Acting General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2024–25881 Filed 11–6–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6050–28–P
Effective on November 29, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Hyde, Ph.D., Director, AmeriCorps
Office of Research and Evaluation, at
(202) 606–6834 or mhyde@
americorps.gov.
In FR Doc.
2024–24517 beginning on page 85870 in
the Federal Register of October 29,
2024, the following corrections are
made:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
§ 2584.102
[Corrected]
1. Beginning on page 85870, in the
third column, and continuing onto page
85871, in the first and second columns,
correct § 2584.102 by removing the
paragraph designations (f) through (m).
■
§ 2584.103
2. On page 85871, in the second
column, the section number ‘‘2558.103’’
in the section heading is corrected to
read ‘‘2584.103’’.
§ 2584.104
[Corrected]
3. On page 85873, in the first column,
in § 2584.104(d)(8)(i), the language
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 32
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–2024–0034;
FXRS12610900000–245–FF09R20000]
RIN 1018–BH17
National Wildlife Refuge System; 2024–
2025 Station-Specific Hunting and
Sport Fishing Regulations
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), open or
expand hunting opportunities on 12
National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs). We
also close hunting on 111 acres at Crab
Orchard NWR so that the area can be
repurposed for other recreational uses,
including camping. We also make
changes to existing station-specific
regulations in order to reduce the
SUMMARY:
[Corrected]
■
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
§ 2584.111
Jkt 265001
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Explanations
*
*
Approves full plan including supplemental submission containing
updated Appendix W.
regulatory burden on the public,
increase access for hunters and anglers
on Service lands and waters, and
comply with a Presidential mandate for
plain-language standards. Finally, the
best available science, analyzed as part
of this rulemaking, indicates that lead
ammunition and tackle have negative
impacts on both wildlife and human
health. With this final rule, Canaan
Valley NWR in West Virginia will
require lead-free ammunition for all
hunting on the new Big Cove Unit.
Additionally, Des Lacs, J. Clark Salyer,
Lostwood, and Upper Souris NWRs in
North Dakota will require lead-free
ammunition for newly opened elk
hunting. While the Service continues to
evaluate the future of lead use in
hunting and fishing on Service lands
and waters, this rulemaking does not
include any opportunities that increase
or authorize the new use of lead.
DATES: This rule is effective November
6, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christian Myers, (571) 422–3595.
Individuals in the United States who are
deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have
a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY,
TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services.
Individuals outside the United States
should use the relay services offered
within their country to make
international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (16 U.S.C.
668dd–668ee), as amended
(Administration Act), closes NWRs in
all States except Alaska to all uses until
opened. The Secretary of the Interior
(Secretary) may open refuge areas to any
use, including hunting and/or sport
fishing, upon a determination that the
use is compatible with the purposes of
the refuge and National Wildlife Refuge
System (Refuge System) mission. The
action also must be in accordance with
provisions of all laws applicable to the
areas, developed in coordination with
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
88148
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
the appropriate State fish and wildlife
agency(ies), consistent with the
principles of sound fish and wildlife
management and administration, and
otherwise in the public interest. These
requirements ensure that we maintain
the biological integrity, diversity, and
environmental health of the Refuge
System for the benefit of present and
future generations of Americans.
We annually review hunting and
sport fishing programs to determine
whether to include additional stations
or whether individual station
regulations governing existing programs
need modifications. Changing
environmental conditions, State and
Federal regulations, and other factors
affecting fish and wildlife populations
and habitat may warrant modifications
to station-specific regulations to ensure
the continued compatibility of hunting
and sport fishing programs and to
ensure that these programs will not
materially interfere with or detract from
the fulfillment of station purposes or the
Service’s mission.
Provisions governing hunting and
sport fishing on refuges are in title 50 of
the Code of Federal Regulations at part
32 (50 CFR part 32), and on hatcheries
at part 71 (50 CFR part 71). We regulate
hunting and sport fishing to:
• Ensure compatibility with refuge
and hatchery purpose(s);
• Properly manage fish and wildlife
resource(s);
• Protect other values;
• Ensure visitor safety; and
• Provide opportunities for fish- and
wildlife-dependent recreation.
On many stations where we decide to
allow hunting and sport fishing, our
general policy of adopting regulations
identical to State hunting and sport
fishing regulations is adequate to meet
these objectives. On other stations, we
must supplement State regulations with
more-restrictive Federal regulations to
ensure that we meet our management
responsibilities, as outlined under
Statutory Authority, below. We issue
station-specific hunting and sport
fishing regulations when we open
wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries to
migratory game bird hunting, upland
game hunting, big game hunting, or
sport fishing. These regulations may list
the wildlife species that you may hunt
or fish; seasons; bag or creel (container
for carrying fish) limits; methods of
hunting or sport fishing; descriptions of
areas open to hunting or sport fishing;
and other provisions as appropriate.
Statutory Authority
The Administration Act, as amended
by the National Wildlife Refuge System
Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
Act; Pub. L. 105–57), governs the
administration and public use of
refuges, and the Refuge Recreation Act
of 1962 (Recreation Act; 16 U.S.C. 460k–
460k–4) governs the administration and
public use of refuges and hatcheries.
Amendments enacted by the
Improvement Act were built upon the
Administration Act in a manner that
provides an ‘‘organic act’’ for the Refuge
System, similar to organic acts that exist
for other public Federal lands. The
Improvement Act serves to ensure that
we effectively manage the Refuge
System as a national network of lands,
waters, and interests for the protection
and conservation of our Nation’s
wildlife resources. The Administration
Act states first and foremost that we
focus our Refuge System mission on
conservation of fish, wildlife, and plant
resources and their habitats. The
Improvement Act requires the Secretary,
before allowing a new use of a refuge,
or before expanding, renewing, or
extending an existing use of a refuge, to
determine that the use is compatible
with the purpose for which the refuge
was established and the mission of the
Refuge System. The Improvement Act
established as the policy of the United
States that wildlife-dependent
recreation, when compatible, is a
legitimate and appropriate public use of
the Refuge System, through which the
American public can develop an
appreciation for fish and wildlife. The
Improvement Act established six
wildlife-dependent recreational uses as
the priority general public uses of the
Refuge System. These uses are hunting,
fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation.
The Recreation Act authorizes the
Secretary to administer areas within the
Refuge System and Hatchery System for
public recreation as an appropriate
incidental or secondary use only to the
extent that doing so is practicable and
not inconsistent with the primary
purpose(s) for which Congress and the
Service established the areas. The
Recreation Act requires that any
recreational use of refuge or hatchery
lands be compatible with the primary
purpose(s) for which we established the
refuge and not inconsistent with other
previously authorized operations.
The Administration Act and
Recreation Act also authorize the
Secretary to issue regulations to carry
out the purposes of the Acts and
regulate uses.
We develop specific management
plans for each refuge prior to opening it
to hunting or sport fishing. In many
cases, we develop station-specific
regulations to ensure the compatibility
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
of the programs with the purpose(s) for
which we established the refuge or
hatchery and the Refuge and Hatchery
System mission. We ensure initial
compliance with the Administration Act
and the Recreation Act for hunting and
sport fishing on newly acquired land
through an interim determination of
compatibility made at or near the time
of acquisition. These regulations ensure
that we make the determinations
required by these acts prior to adding
refuges to the lists of areas open to
hunting and sport fishing in 50 CFR
parts 32 and 71. We ensure continued
compliance by the development of
comprehensive conservation plans and
step-down management plans, and by
annual review of hunting and sport
fishing programs and regulations.
Summary of Comments and Responses
On August 2, 2024, we published in
the Federal Register (89 FR 63139) a
proposed rule to open or expand
hunting and fishing opportunities at 12
refuges for the 2024–2025 hunting
seasons. We accepted public comments
on the proposed rule for 30 days, ending
September 3, 2024. By that date, we
received 154 comments on the proposed
rule. More than two-thirds of these
comments were identical or
nonsubstantive comments. We received
68 unique comments, and 47 of those
comments were substantive. We discuss
the unique, substantive comments we
received below by topic. Beyond our
responses below, additional stationspecific information on how we
responded to comments on particular
hunting or fishing opportunities at a
given refuge or hatchery can be found in
that station’s final hunting and/or
fishing package, each of which can be
located in Docket No. FWS–HQ–NWRS–
2024–0034 on https://
www.regulations.gov.
Comment (1): We received more than
100 comments expressing general
support for the proposed hunting
expansions in the rule. These comments
of general support either expressed
appreciation for the increased hunting
access in the proposed rule overall,
expressed appreciation for increased
access at particular refuges, or both. In
addition to this general support, some
commenters requested additional
hunting and fishing opportunities.
Requests for additional opportunities to
hunt waterfowl were most common.
Our Response: Hunting and fishing on
Service lands is a tradition that dates
back to the early 1900s. In passing the
Improvement Act, Congress reaffirmed
that the Refuge System was created to
conserve fish, wildlife, plants, and their
habitats, and would facilitate
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
opportunities for Americans to
participate in compatible wildlifedependent recreation, including hunting
and fishing, on Refuge System lands.
We prioritize wildlife-dependent
recreation, including hunting and
fishing, when doing so is compatible
with the purpose of the refuge and the
mission of the Refuge System.
We will continue to open and expand
hunting and sport fishing opportunities
across the Refuge System; however, as
detailed further in our response to
Comment (2), below, opening or
expanding hunting or fishing
opportunities on Service lands is not a
quick or simple process. The annual
regulatory cycle begins in June or July
of each year for the following hunting
and sport fishing season (the planning
cycle for this 2024–2025 final rule began
in June 2023). This annual timeline
allows us time to collaborate closely
with our State, Tribal, and Territorial
partners, as well as other partners
including nongovernmental
organizations, on potential
opportunities. It also provides us with
time to complete environmental
analyses and other requirements for
opening or expanding new
opportunities. Therefore, it would be
impracticable for the Service to
complete multiple regulatory cycles in
one calendar year due to the logistics of
coordinating with various partners.
Once we determine that a hunting or
sport fishing opportunity can be carried
out in a manner compatible with
individual station purposes and
objectives, we work expeditiously to
open it. In addition to creation of new
opportunities, this also applies to
commenter requests for changes in the
season dates, days of the week, hours
open, methods of take, or other
logistical requirements that would
expand existing opportunities,
including those that would also align
our hunting and fishing regulations
more closely with State hunting and
fishing regulations.
Within the context of these
continuous annual regulatory cycles, the
Service does welcome nongovernmental
organizations and individual hunters
and anglers sharing their thoughts on
potential future opportunities through
public comments and other
opportunities. We seek to provide
hunting and fishing opportunities that
both serve our wildlife conservation and
management objectives and provide the
highest quality recreational experience
that we can offer for hunters and
anglers, including when it comes to
waterfowl hunting specifically, so we
give due consideration to the requests
and recommendations that we receive.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (2): Several commenters
expressed general opposition to any
hunting or fishing in the Refuge System.
Some of these commenters stated that
hunting was antithetical to the purposes
of a ‘‘refuge,’’ which, in their opinion,
should serve as an inviolate sanctuary
for all wildlife. The remaining
commenters generically opposed
expanded hunting or fishing
opportunities at specific stations, or
opposed specific hunting activities such
as waterfowl hunting.
Our Response: The Service prioritizes
facilitating wildlife-dependent
recreational opportunities, including
hunting and fishing, on Service land in
compliance with applicable Service law
and policy. For refuges, the
Administration Act, as amended,
stipulates that hunting (along with
fishing, wildlife observation and
photography, and environmental
education and interpretation), if found
to be compatible, is a legitimate and
priority general public use of a refuge
and should be facilitated (16 U.S.C.
668dd(a)(3)(D)). Thus, we only allow
hunting of resident wildlife on Refuge
System lands if such activity has been
determined compatible with the
established purpose(s) of the refuge and
the mission of the Refuge System as
required by the Administration Act. For
the 12 stations opening or expanding
hunting or fishing in this rule, we
determined that the proposed actions
were compatible.
Each station manager makes a
decision regarding hunting and fishing
opportunities only after rigorous
examination of the available
information, consultation and
coordination with States and Tribes,
and compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.),
as well as other applicable laws and
regulations. The many steps taken
before a station opens or expands a
hunting or fishing opportunity on the
refuge ensure that the Service does not
allow any opportunity that would
compromise the purpose of the station
or the mission of the Refuge System.
Hunting of resident wildlife on
Service lands generally occurs
consistent with State regulations,
including seasons and bag limits.
Station-specific hunting regulations can
be more restrictive (but not more liberal)
than State regulations and often are
more restrictive in order to help meet
specific refuge objectives. These
objectives include resident wildlife
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
88149
population and habitat objectives,
minimizing disturbance impacts to
wildlife, maintaining high-quality
opportunities for hunting and other
wildlife-dependent recreation,
minimizing conflicts with other public
uses and/or refuge management
activities, and protecting public safety.
The word ‘‘refuge’’ includes the idea
of providing a haven of safety as one of
its definitions, and as such, hunting
might seem an inconsistent use of the
Refuge System. However, again, the
Administration Act stipulates that
hunting, if found compatible, is a
legitimate and priority general public
use of a wildlife refuge. Furthermore,
we manage refuges to support healthy
wildlife populations that in many cases
produce harvestable surpluses that are a
renewable resource. As practiced on
refuges, hunting and fishing do not pose
a threat to wildlife populations. It is
important to note that taking certain
individuals through hunting does not
necessarily reduce a population overall,
as hunting can simply replace other
types of mortality. In some cases,
however, we use hunting as a
management tool with the explicit goal
of reducing a population; this is often
the case with exotic and/or invasive
species that threaten ecosystem
stability. Therefore, facilitating hunting
opportunities is an important aspect of
the Service’s roles and responsibilities
as outlined in the legislation
establishing the Refuge System, and the
Service will continue to facilitate these
opportunities where compatible with
the purpose of the specific refuge and
the mission of the Refuge System.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (3): We received comments
from the West Virginia Division of
Natural Resources, the Louisiana
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries,
the Association of Fish and Wildlife
Agencies, and the Northeast Association
of Fish and Wildlife Agencies on the
opportunities in the proposed rule. The
West Virginia Division of Natural
Resources supported the expansion of
hunting at Canaan Valley NWR, but also
expressed concern that requiring leadfree ammunition on the new Big Cove
Unit could reduce hunter participation,
reduce take of deer, and create
enforcement challenges. The West
Virginia Division of Natural Resources
also recommended incentive-based
approaches to the use of lead-free
ammunition. The Louisiana Department
of Wildlife and Fisheries commented
specifically on the proposed hunt plan
for Bayou Teche NWR and expressed
support for the expanded hunting
access. The Association of Fish and
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
88150
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Wildlife Agencies expressed general
support for increased access for hunters
and anglers, but expressed concerns
about the Service’s position on the use
of lead ammunition and the individual
refuges introducing lead-free
ammunition requirements; the
Association of Fish and Wildlife
Agencies also expressed appreciation
for coordination and communication
between the Service and State agencies
and advocated for the Service to pursue
approaches based in education and
incentives that encourage hunters to
voluntarily choose to use lead-free
ammunition, in particular the voluntary
incentive pilot program developed in
collaboration with the Hunting and
Wildlife Conservation Council, an
external stakeholder advisory group for
the Department of the Interior. The
Northeast Association of Fish and
Wildlife Agencies expressed support for
the Service increasing hunting and
fishing opportunities and for the
Service’s pilot program for providing
hunters with incentives to voluntarily
use lead-free ammunition, but objected
to the regulations requiring the use of
lead-free ammunition as inconsistent
with State regulations and as lacking
sufficient scientific support.
Our Response: The Service
appreciates the support of, and is
committed to working with, our state
partners to identify additional
opportunities for expansion of hunting
and sport fishing on Service lands and
waters. We welcome and value State
partner input on all aspects of our
hunting and fishing programs.
In response to the West Virginia
Division of Natural Resources, we
appreciate the support for the expanded
hunting acres for all existing hunting
and acknowledge the concerns
expressed with the lead-free
ammunition requirement on the new
Big Cove Unit. As to the
recommendation to explore incentives
for the use of lead-free ammunition, we
are actively implementing a pilot
program to test out direct incentives for
hunters to voluntarily use lead-free
ammunition for designated hunts at
Canaan Valley NWR and six other
refuges in the fall of 2024, as discussed
in our response to Comment (4), below.
On the concerns about hunter
participation and harvest rates related to
the lead-free ammunition requirement,
as discussed in more detail in our
responses to Comments (6) through (13),
below, the Service has not seen
evidence of hunter participation
declines elsewhere in response to leadfree requirements, and, accordingly, we
do not anticipate insufficient harvest of
deer. Also, in the specific case of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
Canaan Valley NWR, even if declines in
hunter participation on the Big Cove
Unit were to occur in response to the
lead-free ammunition requirement,
hunters would likely simply shift their
activities to the other hunt units of the
same refuge and still harvest from the
same deer population. On the concern
about enforcement challenges for the
lead-free ammunition requirement, as
discussed in our response to Comment
(14), below, we are confident in our
ability to enforce the regulations, since
this requirement does not
fundamentally differ from existing
regulations elsewhere in the Refuge
System and our law enforcement
personnel receive applicable training.
In response to the Louisiana
Department of Wildlife and Fisheries,
we appreciate the support for the new
opportunities at Bayou Teche NWR and
look forward to collaboration and
coordination on potential future hunting
and fishing opportunities in Louisiana.
In response to the Association of Fish
and Wildlife Agencies, we appreciate
the support for the hunting and fishing
openings and expansions in this
rulemaking and value our shared
commitment to compatible hunter and
angler access on the National Wildlife
Refuge System. We also appreciate the
support for our lead-free voluntary
incentive pilot program, developed in
collaboration and coordination with
State agencies in the seven States where
the pilot sites are located. As discussed
in our response to Comment (4), below,
we are committed to robustly pursuing
this voluntary approach and evaluating
the potential efficacy for addressing lead
poisoning in wildlife. At the same time,
the Service’s position remains that the
best available science demonstrates the
impacts of lead ammunition on wildlife
and ecological health and supports the
Service not introducing new
opportunities that would increase the
use of lead ammunition until we have
identified the best path forward. Our
lead-free pilot program could produce a
voluntary incentive model that proves
to be the best path forward, but we must
first take time to test out the incentives,
collect data, and evaluate our results.
Going forward, we will continue to
invite input and involvement from the
Association of Fish and Wildlife
Agencies and our individual State
partners as we continue to evaluate the
future of lead use on Service lands and
waters as part of an open and
transparent process to find the best
methods to address lead’s impact on
wildlife and ecological health. As to the
Association of Fish and Wildlife
Agencies’ objections to regulations
requiring lead-free ammunition use, see
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
our responses to Comments (7) through
(9), below, addressing the concerns
about scientific evidence, cost, and
availability, which are shared by some
other commenters. Similarly, see our
response to Comment (14), below,
regarding commenters’ concerns about
the enforceability of lead-free
ammunition requirements.
In response to the Northeast
Association of Fish and Wildlife
Agencies, we value the support for the
increased recreational access through
this rule and appreciate the recognition
of our collaboration and coordination on
increasing access and on exploring
voluntary incentives for the use of leadfree ammunition. We disagree with the
notion that there is insufficient
scientific evidence to support regulatory
requirements for hunters to use lead-free
ammunition, as discussed in our
response to Comment (7), below, but the
Service is willing to address the
demonstrated poisoning of wildlife from
the use of lead ammunition for hunting
through voluntary incentives, should
they prove to be sufficiently effective.
As to the concern that such regulations
typically differ from State regulations,
while we endeavor to align our
regulations with State regulations
wherever feasible, the Service routinely
sets requirements for hunters and
anglers that are more restrictive than the
applicable State regulations whenever
necessitated by our conservation
mission or refuge purposes, as noted in
our response to Comment (2), above.
Requirements to use lead-free
ammunition are one example in this
category, alongside limitations on
season dates, time of day, methods of
take, and more that are similarly
necessary because the Service is
obligated to prioritize the health of
wildlife species and their habitats on
Refuge System lands and waters.
Hunting and fishing activities must be
assessed to be compatible with our
conservation mission as authorized by
appropriate regulations, and we must
introduce further regulations as
necessary to ensure their continued
compatibility in order to keep a given
opportunity open.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (4): Several commenters
either encouraged the Service to pursue
incentives encouraging hunters to
voluntarily use lead-free ammunition or
specifically expressed support for the
Service’s new pilot program providing
direct incentives for hunters
participating in designated hunts at
seven selected refuges in the fall of
2024. Most of these commenters noted
that they objected to any regulations
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
requiring the use of lead-free
ammunition, but some commenters
were supportive of both lead-free
regulatory requirements and voluntary
approaches like the Service’s new pilot
program.
Our Response: The Service has
encouraged and will continue to
encourage voluntary use of non-lead
ammunition and tackle, including
through our new collaborative pilot
program for providing direct incentives
and robust educational workshops to
hunters, but we also have the authority
to impose regulatory requirements for
use of lead-free ammunition for
designated hunting on individual
refuges. Notably, the Refuge System,
and all Service lands and waters, are
different from private, State, and even
other Federal public lands. We have
legal obligations to prioritize wildlife
health and biodiversity, to consider the
compatibility of new and ongoing
hunting and fishing activities, and to
assess the potential impact of these
activities on the natural resources under
our jurisdiction. The Service is
evaluating the future of lead use through
an open and transparent process with
input from a broad array of partners and
stakeholders about the best approach,
which may include education and
incentives encouraging voluntary
choice. During this process, the Service
does not intend to authorize hunting
and fishing opportunities that increase
the use of lead ammunition and tackle
on the Refuge System. This is consistent
with our full commitment to the leadfree pilot program for hunter education
and incentives, which is aimed at
identifying the most effective voluntary
approach to addressing lead poisoning
in wildlife from lead ammunition.
In this rule, the Service has put in
place a lead-free ammunition
requirement for newly opened elk
hunting at four refuges in North Dakota
and for all hunting on the new Big Cove
Unit at Canaan Valley NWR in West
Virginia. These requirements are each
either limited to a specific species or to
a specific hunt unit. Each of these
targeted requirements is based on the
best available science and the sound
professional judgement of Service
personnel, and was put in place only
after discussions with the relevant State
agency.
We appreciate the support from
commenters for our new pilot program
for providing hunters with educational
workshops and direct economic
incentives to voluntarily use lead-free
ammunition. The Service was able to
collaborate with some of the commenter
organizations and others, in particular
the Hunting and Wildlife Conservation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
Council, in the design of the lead-free
pilot program. The Service is also
collaborating with individual State
agencies and the North American NonLead Partnership in implementing the
pilot program. We are encouraged by the
potential for the pilot program to
identify and demonstrate the most
effective voluntary approach to
addressing lead ammunition impacts to
wildlife and ecological health.
The 2024 iteration of the pilot
program will take place for designated
hunts at seven selected refuges
throughout the Refuge System. The pilot
program is designed to address the
hurdles of awareness, demonstrated
performance, price, and availability that
are considered some of the major
barriers for hunters in voluntarily
choosing to use lead-free ammunition.
Accordingly, at each pilot site, the
Service will utilize educational
messaging, including voluntary
intensive educational workshops with
ammunition performance
demonstrations at selected sites.
Similarly, at each pilot site, we will
offer a rebate incentive in the form of a
prepaid debit card for eligible hunters
who provide proof of their purchase of
lead-free ammunition, on a first come,
first served basis. The implementation
of the pilot program at seven sites in
2024 will mark a substantial step in
progress toward addressing poisoning of
wildlife from lead ammunition and will
set the stage for further refinement of
the educational and direct incentive
elements of the lead-free pilot program,
as well as provide data for analysis of
the potential impacts and potential
scalability of the program. As we
operate the pilot program, we will seek
to continue the open and collaborative
approach we have utilized thus far and
hope to receive continued support and
cooperation from hunters and from
external hunting and conservation
organizations.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (5): Several commenters
expressed concern over the use of lead
ammunition or lead fishing tackle on
Service lands and waters. Nearly all of
these commenters expressed support for
the individual lead-free requirements in
the proposed rule. Most of these
commenters urged the Service to
eliminate the use of lead ammunition
and tackle throughout the Refuge
System. Many commenters expressed
concerns about raptor species, including
the bald eagle (Haliaeetus
leucocephalus), and other species that
scientific studies have shown to be
especially susceptible to adverse health
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
88151
impacts from lead ammunition and
tackle.
Our Response: The Service
appreciates the concerns from
commenters about the issue of
bioavailability of lead in the
environment and is aware of the
potential impacts of lead on fish and
wildlife. See, for example, the recent
study from the U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS) with Service collaboration,
Vincent Slabe, et al. ‘‘Demographic
implications of lead poisoning for eagles
across North America,’’ which is
available online through a link at
https://www.usgs.gov/news/nationalnews-release/groundbreaking-studyfinds-widespread-lead-poisoning-baldand-golden. Accordingly, the Service
pays special attention to species
susceptible to lead uptake and to
sources of lead that could impact
wildlife and ecological health.
Historically, the principal cause of
lead poisoning in waterfowl was the
high densities of lead shot in wetland
sediments associated with migratory
bird hunting activities (Kendall et al.
1996). In 1991, as a result of high bird
mortality, the Service instituted a
nationwide ban on the use of lead shot
for hunting waterfowl and coots (see 50
CFR 32.2(k)). However, lead
ammunition is still used for other types
of hunting, and lead tackle is used for
fishing on private and public lands and
waters, including within the Refuge
System.
Due to the continued lead use outside
of waterfowl hunting, there remains
concern about the bioavailability of
spent lead ammunition (bullets) and
fishing tackle on the environment, the
health of fish and wildlife, and human
health. The Service is aware of fish and
wildlife species, including endangered
and threatened species, that are
susceptible to the build-up of lead in
their systems coming directly from their
food sources or secondhand through the
food ingested by their food sources.
There is also evidence that some species
are susceptible to direct ingestion of
lead ammunition or tackle due to their
foraging behaviors. For example, the
Service recognizes that ingested lead
fishing tackle has been found to be a
leading cause of mortality in adult
common loons (Grade, T. et al. (2017).
Population-level effects of lead fishing
tackle on common loons. The Journal of
Wildlife Management 82(1): pp. 155–
164). The impacts of lead on human
health and safety have been a focus of
several scientific studies. We are
familiar with studies that have found
the ingestion of animals harvested via
the use of lead ammunition increased
levels of lead in the human body (e.g.,
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
88152
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Buenz, E. (2016). Lead exposure through
eating wild game. American Journal of
Medicine, 128: p. 458).
It is because of lead’s potential for
ecological health impacts that, in this
rulemaking, the Service has continued
to take a measured approach in not
adding to the use of lead on refuge lands
(see 87 FR 35136, June 9, 2022).
Accordingly, the opportunities in this
final rule either do not involve the use
of lead ammunition or tackle (i.e.,
waterfowl hunting or archery) or require
the use of lead-free ammunition or
tackle. This measured approach is also
part of the Service’s broader
commitment to evaluating the future of
lead use throughout the Refuge System.
In response to the commenters’
request that the Service eliminate the
use of lead ammunition and fishing
tackle throughout the Refuge System,
the Service is committed to doing what
best serves the public interest and our
conservation mission, including
facilitating compatible, wildlifedependent, recreational hunting and
fishing. As we committed to do in our
2021–2022 rulemaking (see 86 FR 48822
at 48830, August 31, 2021) and our
2022–2023 rulemaking (see 87 FR 57108
at 57122, September 16, 2022), the
Service has been evaluating, and
continues to evaluate, lead use in
hunting and fishing on Service lands
and waters. This rule is designed to
avoid increased use of lead on refuges
as the Service continues to evaluate the
future of lead use by seeking input from
partners, through a transparent process,
to inform the determination of what
actions and methods are appropriate for
addressing the potential for adverse
environmental and ecological health
impacts. This process includes a
commitment to fully exploring a
voluntary approach through our new
pilot program for hunter education and
incentives.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (6): Several commenters
expressed opposition to the Service
requiring the use of lead-free
ammunition for designated hunting
opportunities at individual refuges in
this rule or in general. Some of these
commenters simply expressed a general
opposition to the concept of lead-free
requirements, but the rest put forward
one or more points in arguing against
lead-free requirements. The concerns
collectively expressed by these more
substantive comments are addressed in
Comment (7) through Comment (13),
below.
Our Response: The Service has
allowed, and with the promulgation of
this rule continues to allow, the use of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
lead ammunition and/or tackle in
hunting and sport fishing in most of the
Refuge System. The vast majority of
stations and individual hunting and
fishing opportunities currently permit
lead use, consistent with State
regulations allowing the use of lead
ammunition and tackle. Lead
ammunition and tackle are currently
allowed where we have previously
determined the activity is not likely to
result in dangerous levels of lead
exposure. However, the Service has
been transparent about its intent to
seriously consider the future of lead use,
consistent with its role as the steward of
the Refuge System. Therefore, we are
evaluating what is best for the resources
belonging to the American public
regarding the future use of lead
ammunition and tackle on Service lands
and waters. The best available science,
analyzed as part of this rulemaking,
demonstrates that lead ammunition and
tackle have negative impacts on both
human health and wildlife health, and
those impacts are more acute for some
species.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (7): Most of the comments
opposed to regulations concerning the
use of lead ammunition questioned the
sufficiency of scientific support for leadfree requirements. Some of the
commenters also claimed there is
specifically a lack of scientific evidence
of ‘‘population-level’’ lead impacts and
this means lead-free ammunition
requirements are unwarranted.
Our Response: We refer commenters
concerned about scientific evidence in
support of the rulemaking to the
analyses of environmental impacts in
the NEPA and ESA section 7
documentation for each refuge in this
rulemaking and the cumulative impacts
report accompanying the rulemaking,
which are all available in Docket No.
FWS–HQ–NWRS–2024–0034 on https://
www.regulations.gov. For our NEPA and
ESA section 7 analyses, we considered
peer-reviewed scientific studies
evaluating the impacts of lead to
humans, to wildlife generally, and to
specific species—including endangered
and threatened species and species
especially susceptible to lead
ammunition or tackle exposure. While
this evidence is not determinative as to
whether lead-free ammunition and
tackle should be required in all cases,
given the full range of factors to
consider on the topic of lead use, it is
inaccurate to claim that there is no
scientific evidence of adverse impacts to
human health or wildlife and ecological
health, or both, from lead ammunition
and tackle or that the Service has not
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
presented such evidence as part of this
rulemaking. Each refuge in this rule
used the best available science and the
expertise and sound professional
judgment of refuge staff to determine
that our management strategies,
including promulgated non-lead
requirements, are based on sound
science and the specific circumstances
of that individual refuge.
Moreover, we also reject the related
claim that scientific evidence of socalled ‘‘population-level’’ impacts to
wildlife is both a prerequisite to Service
action and lacking in the available
science. Depending on the situation, we
may manage wildlife at the ‘‘population
level’’ or at the ‘‘individual level,’’ such
as acting to protect individuals of an
endangered or threatened species.
Similarly, depending on the situation,
we may adopt regulations, policies, or
practices that respond to or prevent
adverse impacts at the population level
or to individual animals and plants. In
fact, there are clear cases where we need
to act preventatively or early to control
invasive species, pests, or animal
diseases, since they are much more
difficult to eradicate when there is
‘‘population-level’’ damage.
‘‘Population-level’’ impacts are not
necessary for regulation to the exclusion
of any other factors, although in the past
the Service and others have regulated
lead use based, at least in part, on
addressing impacts to whole
populations, as demonstrated impacts to
waterfowl populations and the
population of California condors
prompted the 1991 nationwide
prohibition on waterfowl hunting with
lead ammunition (see 56 FR 22100, May
13, 1991) and the 2019 prohibition on
hunting with lead ammunition in
California (see California Assembly Bill
No. 711, California Fish and Game Code
at section 3004.5), respectively. In any
case, the scientific literature
demonstrates that lead use has
‘‘population-level’’ impacts.
There is evidence of population-level
impacts and potential population-level
impacts to waterfowl and upland game
bird species from lead fishing tackle and
lead ammunition through direct
ingestion. Lead fishing tackle presents a
risk of lead poisoning to many
waterfowl species, including loons and
swans (Pokras and Chafel 1992; Rattner
et al. 2008; Strom et al. 2009). The
primary concerns are discarded whole
or fragmented lead sinkers, as well as
other lead tackle and even lead
ammunition released into the water,
that rest on river and lake bottoms
where diving birds ingest them
alongside pebbles, as pebbles are
necessary to break down food through
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
grinding in the birds’ digestive systems.
This results in lead poisoning because
the grinding action breaks down the
pieces of ingested lead into fine lead
particles inside of the birds that can
then enter their blood streams. Studies
have consistently found impacts of
ingested lead fishing tackle are a leading
cause of mortality in adult common
loons (Pokras and Chafel 1992;
Scheuhammer and Norris 1995; Franson
et al. 2003; Pokras et al. 2009; Grade et
al. 2017; Grade et al. 2019). Strom et al.
(2009) assessed lead exposure in
Wisconsin birds and found that
approximately 25 percent of the
trumpeter swan fatalities from 1991
through 2007 were attributed to ingested
lead. Also, lead ammunition discarded
on land presents a similar risk of lead
poisoning from upland game birds
swallowing discarded ammunition
alongside the pebbles they use for
digestion.
Another source of population-level
impacts and potential population-level
impacts from lead is indirect ingestion
by birds of prey and other scavengers
from consuming animals shot with lead
ammunition. The primary concerns for
birds of prey are lead fragments from
lead ammunition that remain in the
carcasses and gut piles of hunted
animals that are scavenged by these
birds. The fine fragments of lead,
observable in x-rays of harvested game
animals, are ingested because they are
embedded in the meat and other animal
tissues being scavenged and then enter
the digestive systems and blood streams
of the birds of prey. Many studies have
looked at the impacts of this lead
exposure to eagle health (see, e.g.,
Kramer and Redig 1997; O’Halloran et
al. 1998; Kelly and Kelly 2005; Golden
et al. 2016; Hoffman 1985a, 1985b;
Pattee 1984; Stauber 2010). This
includes the recent study, published in
2022, from the USGS with Service
collaboration, Vincent Slabe, et al.
‘‘Demographic implications of lead
poisoning for eagles across North
America,’’ which is available online via
a link at https://www.usgs.gov/news/
national-news-release/groundbreakingstudy-finds-widespread-lead-poisoningbald-and-golden. This study explicitly
finds that lead poisoning is causing
population growth ratesto slowfor bald
eagles by 3.8percentand golden eagles
by 0.8 percent annually. These growthslowing impacts to populations are
statistically significant and, in the case
of bald eagles, are occurring for a
species that was previously endangered
and is still in the process of recovering
to historical levels. Thus, it is inaccurate
to claim there are not known
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
‘‘population-level’’ impacts from lead
use.
Finally, the Service’s mission and
statutory obligations require refuges to
be closed to hunting and fishing by
default, and this changes only when we
have determined hunting or fishing
activities are compatible with our
conservation mission and we have
promulgated regulations to open
designated areas to hunting and fishing.
Hunting and fishing access and
opportunities are thus constrained by
the regulations to only those activities
that are compatible. Thus, the Service
has an obligation to demonstrate, using
the best available science, that any given
aspect of hunting or fishing on the
Refuge System is compatible with our
mission. The Service has also built into
our compatibility process the need to
reevaluate compatibility determinations
after a set period, either 10 or 15 years,
depending on the use, because new
science or new conditions could compel
the Service to change our compatibility
determinations. In the case of the use of
lead, our past determinations that lead
ammunition and lead tackle were
permissible to use on Refuge System
lands does not change this fundamental
structure of our processes. The use of
lead ammunition and tackle, like any
other visitor activity, can only be
allowed on a refuge if, and only for as
long as, the refuge applies the best
available science and sound
professional judgment to find it
compatible. The suggestion from some
commenters that historical use of lead
or past determinations that lead use was
compatible compels us to find the future
use of lead compatible is therefore
counter to our mission and statutory
obligations. This suggestion also ignores
the accumulation of lead in the
environment over time. The Service will
continue to revisit our compatibility
determinations, as required, while
considering the best available science
and applying sound professional
judgment.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (8): Some commenters
opposed to requirements in this rule to
use lead-free ammunition claimed leadfree ammunition is more expensive than
lead ammunition. Some of these
commenters further expressed the
concern that lead-free ammunition
requirements could prevent
participation in hunting due to price
differences.
Our Response: We do not agree that
lead-free ammunition is prohibitively
expensive, especially in comparison to
lead ammunition. However, we
recognize that there could be some cost
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
88153
burden of compliance for hunting and
fishing opportunities where lead-free
ammunition or tackle is required. For
example, lead-free ammunition is very
close in price to premium lead
ammunition but can be more expensive
than some lead ammunition. Notably,
the Maine Department of Inland
Fisheries and Wildlife and others have
recognized that this cost difference is
typically less than $10 per box of
ammunition, with boxes usually lasting
multiple hunting seasons (see online at
https://www.maine.gov/ifw/huntingtrapping/hunting/nonleadammunition.html).
When we have restricted lead
ammunition use, we have first ensured
that the ecological health and
conservation benefits outweigh any
potential for cost burden on hunters. We
are confident that non-lead ammunition
is not cost-prohibitive, as hunting
continues on all Refuge System stations
where we have restricted lead use.
Moreover, we have not seen declines in
hunting use attributable to lead-free
ammunition requirements. In other
words, hunting-use day declines at
stations that require lead-free
ammunition do not appear to deviate
from general trends of declining hunting
participation that affect all stations in
the Refuge System. Where we have seen
meaningful declines is in the price of
lead-free ammunition options, as there
has been a continuous trend for years of
decreasing prices, and the 1991
nationwide ban on lead ammunition for
waterfowl hunting shows that
regulations can spur innovation and
production, which brings the prices
down for lead-free options.
Finally, even though the cost burden
of compliance with lead-free
ammunition requirements on individual
refuges is not onerous, the Service is
considering various measures to
incentivize hunters to transition from
lead to lead-free ammunition and
mitigate the costs of the transition. In
fact, we are in the process of
implementing an ambitious lead-free
voluntary pilot program, beginning this
fall for the 2024 hunting seasons, that
includes providing direct economic
incentives to hunters to address the
price difference as a barrier to choosing
lead-free ammunition. This pilot
program is discussed further in our
response to Comment (4), above. We
look forward to continuing to work
closely with the Hunting and Wildlife
Conservation Council, the Association
of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, our state
agency partners, and other hunting
organizations to further develop our
lead-free voluntary pilot program.
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
88154
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (9): Most commenters
opposed to non-lead ammunition and
tackle requirements asserted that there
is limited availability of lead-free
ammunition compared to that of lead
ammunition, such that requiring leadfree ammunition would prevent
participation in refuge hunting
opportunities. Some of these
commenters further noted that the
availability of non-lead ammunition is
more limited for certain firearms and
types of ammunition, especially .22 rifle
ammunition. One commenter also,
tangentially to the topic of availability,
stated that the Gun Control Act of 1968,
as amended (GCA; 18 U.S.C. 921 et
seq.), and associated Bureau of Alcohol,
Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF)
regulations (27 CFR part 478)
concerning armor piercing ammunition
hinder the production and thus
availability of lead-free ammunition.
Our Response: We do not agree that
lead-free ammunition and tackle are
insufficiently available to hunters and
anglers in localities where we have
restricted the use of lead ammunition or
tackle, either in the past or through this
rulemaking. However, we recognize that
there could be some compliance burden
in identifying and locating lead-free
ammunition and tackle for hunting and
fishing opportunities, where required.
Where we have restricted lead use in the
past or will restrict it through this
rulemaking, we have ensured that the
ecological health and conservation
benefits outweigh any potential for
compliance burden on hunters and
anglers, including the ease of locating
available lead-free ammunition and
tackle. As with the costs of lead-free
options, for opportunities where leadfree ammunition or tackle are required,
the Service has not seen declines in
hunting or fishing participation that can
be attributed to lead-free ammunition or
tackle being less widely available than
lead ammunition and tackle. Also, as
with costs, there are existing trends of
increasing availability of lead-free
options, and the 1991 national ban on
lead ammunition for waterfowl hunting
demonstrates that regulations requiring
the use of lead-free ammunition can
promote increased availability. Also, the
pilot program that the Service is
implementing this fall for the 2024
hunting seasons will also help to
address availability, as more hunters
voluntarily participate and the
increased demand gives manufacturers a
reason to produce, and retailers a reason
to offer, more lead-free ammunition. In
fact, the Service is interested in
collaboration with retailers that can
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
directly address awareness and
availability of lead-free ammunition and
tackle as we continue to develop our
pilot program.
Additionally, we recognize that nonlead ammunition may be less available
than lead ammunition, in general, for
some models of firearms and certain
ammunition calibers. This is especially
concerning, as noted by some
commenters, for .22 rifle ammunition
where existing lines of lead-free
ammunition have been recently
discontinued. Lead-free ammunition
remains available, but this development
will impact availability and could
impact refuge hunting where lead-free
ammunition is required, particularly
squirrel hunting. The Service will
continue to monitor the lead-free
options in the market and take the
information into account in deciding
whether and where to require lead-free
ammunition. We also encourage
industry and retailers to continue to
manufacture and offer more lead-free
ammunition options so that ammunition
is available to hunters, whether they are
required, or voluntarily choose, to use
lead-free ammunition.
Finally, the claim that the Gun
Control Act of 1968 (GCA) and
associated ATF regulations concerning
armor piercing ammunition hinder the
production and thus availability of leadfree ammunition is beyond the scope of
this rulemaking. However, the Service
has raised this issue with the ATF at the
recommendation of the Hunting and
Wildlife Conservation Council.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (10): A few commenters
pointed to sources of lead, other than
hunting and fishing with lead
ammunition and tackle, in the
environment. These commenters
asserted that the Service should not
have lead-free ammunition and tackle
requirements because these other
sources of lead also cause negative
health impacts for fish and wildlife.
Our Response: While there are of
course other potential sources of lead in
the environment, including other
sources that may be bioavailable to
wildlife, the Service does not see this as
diminishing the importance or
conservation benefits of addressing lead
poisoning of wildlife from hunting with
lead ammunition or from fishing with
lead tackle. While these other sources of
lead vary in the degree of risk that they
could present to wildlife, the Service is
duly concerned by the health risks from
any potential source of lead exposure
for wildlife and humans. There are
likely benefits to be had from efforts to
address each of these sources in turn,
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
but that is generally beyond the scope
of this rulemaking.
Moreover, these other potential
sources of lead do not change the fact
that the best available science has
drawn a clear link between the use of
lead ammunition and tackle and its
ecological health impacts. In fact, the
study from Slabe et al. (2022), cited
earlier in our response to Comment (7),
provides strong evidence that not only
is there an impact to eagles from lead
ammunition specifically, but there is
also strong evidence that it represents
the most important source of lead
exposure for the species studied.
Essentially, the study demonstrated that
the highest rates of acute lead poisoning
in eagles, measured by liver lead
concentrations, corresponded in terms
of timing with the use of lead
ammunition in the form of a nationwide
spike in lead poisoning during winter
months in the midst of hunting seasons.
To the extent other sources of lead do
bear on our decisions about lead
ammunition and tackle use, these
additional lead sources in fact weigh in
favor of lead-use restrictions, as lead can
accumulate in wildlife from repeated
exposure from one or multiple sources
(see, e.g., Behmke 2015). Similarly, the
Service is also not discouraged from
either incentivizing or requiring the use
of lead-free ammunition and tackle,
where appropriate, by the continued use
of lead ammunition and tackle for
hunting and fishing on nearby State and
privately held lands and waters. The
Service will act to address threats,
including from visitor uses, as necessary
within our authority, in the interest of
our conservation mission even if, and
often especially when, human activities
outside of refuge borders present similar
threats.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (11): One comment opposed
to non-lead ammunition and tackle
requirements maintained that lead
ammunition and tackle are made of an
inorganic, insoluble form of lead that
poses less risk of harm to humans or
animals.
Our Response: While inorganic lead
presents a low risk of adverse health
impacts while it retains its solid,
molded form (i.e., anglers face relatively
little risk from handling lead tackle), the
basis for concern about lead
ammunition and tackle is that there are
multiple ways for such lead to become
harmful to human and wildlife health.
Organic lead (i.e., the banned gasoline
additive tetramethyl lead) is more
dangerous than inorganic lead because
it can be absorbed through the skin.
Inorganic lead can also have serious
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
impacts in certain forms (e.g., fragments
and particles) and once it is inside an
animal.
First, as briefly described in our
response to Comment (7), lead
ammunition, including bonded lead
ammunition, fragments when it hits an
animal, and this distributes tiny pieces
of lead within a wide radius in the soft
tissues of the harvested animal (see
Trinogga et al. (2019). Fragmentation of
lead-free and lead-based hunting rifle
bullets under real life hunting
conditions in Germany. Amibo 48(9):
pp. 1056–1064 (published online March
23, 2019)). These tiny fragments of lead
are then consumed by scavenger species
eating carcasses or gut piles left behind
or humans eating the game meat. In this
tiny, fragmented form and acted on by
digestive enzymes and acids, the lead
derived from ammunition can then shed
particles that enter the blood stream and
affect systems throughout the body,
presenting both chronic and acute
health risks.
Second, as briefly described in our
response to Comment (7), lead
ammunition and tackle that is deposited
along shores or at the bottom of bodies
of water can be ingested by several
species of birds that forage in these
locations for pebbles, as pebbles are
necessary to break down food through
grinding in a special organ of their
digestive systems called a gizzard. This
grinding process, along with digestive
acids and enzymes that accompany food
into the gizzard, can easily break down
lead ammunition and tackle into
fragments and cause it to shed particles,
just as the process breaks down the
stones and shells the birds intended to
ingest. These lead particles are then able
to enter the bloodstream and affect
systems throughout the body, presenting
both chronic and acute health risks.
Third, lead ammunition and tackle
that ends up discarded in bodies of
water may begin to dissolve and thus
introduce lead particles into the water
that present both chronic and acute
health risks to both aquatic animals
living in the water and terrestrial
animals drinking from the water. This
process requires high acidity in the
water that dissolves lead ammunition or
tackle, and it is essentially the same
concern as the problem of corrosion
from acidic water in lead water pipes.
These particles of lead dissolved into
the water are easily taken up into the
bloodstream as they pass through
digestive systems.
It is through these known processes
that lead ammunition and tackle present
a risk, and the best available scientific
evidence indicates that these processes
are occurring at rates that are causing
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
negative impacts on the health of certain
wildlife species. Thus, we seriously
consider the impact of inorganic forms
of lead, such as lead ammunition and
tackle, on wildlife and human health in
our regulatory and management
processes.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of this comment.
Comment (12): One commenter, in
objecting to the regulation of lead
ammunition and tackle, expressed
nonsubstantive concerns centered on
their views about the constitutionality
and/or legality of the Service creating
non-lead ammunition and tackle
requirements through our regulations.
This comment also offered
nonsubstantive concerns about their
general projections of impacts to the
ammunition and tackle industry and the
broader economy.
Our Response: The Service
thoroughly addressed these and similar
concerns in our final rule for the 2022–
2023 station-specific hunting and sport
fishing regulations (see 87 FR 57108 at
57117–57119, September 16, 2022). Our
position remains the same on these
topics in this 2024–2025 rulemaking.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of this comment.
Comment (13): A few commenters
expressed concerns about the
availability of copper for use in
ammunition, as copper is one of the
alternatives to lead used for non-lead
ammunition. The comments expressed
concern that due to limited sources of
copper and demand for copper for other
uses, an increase in demand for copper
for ammunition from non-lead
ammunition requirements may not be
possible or could drive up the cost of
non-lead ammunition.
Our Response: These concerns are
outside the scope of this rulemaking. It
is outside the expertise of the Service
and the scope of this rule to speculate
about the current or future availability
of copper, or how it could affect prices
for goods made using copper. There are,
however, two things the Service can say
on this topic. First, by requiring the use
of lead-free ammunition for elk hunting
at four refuges and all hunting on one
unit of another refuge in this rule, the
Service is not specifically requiring the
use of copper ammunition. Second, the
non-lead ammunition regulations in this
rulemaking impact a small portion of
the market for ammunition.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (14): We also received
several comments concerning potential
compliance and enforcement challenges
related to requirements for hunters to
use lead-free ammunition, in particular
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
88155
the requirement specific to the Big Cove
Unit of Canaan Valley NWR set forth in
this rule. Some of these comments
specifically noted the compliance
challenge that it may be difficult for
hunters to discern when they are on the
Big Cove Unit and when they are on
another unit of the refuge. Some also
expressed concerns related to
enforcement with the difficulty of law
enforcement to differentiate between
lead-free and lead ammunition and with
the wording of the lead-free requirement
stating that hunters may only ‘‘possess’’
lead-free ammunition when this is
applied to big game hunters who choose
to carry a sidearm containing lead
ammunition for self-defense.
Our Response: The compliance and
enforcement challenges identified in
these comments are indeed inherent
challenges when it comes to lead-free
ammunition requirements within a
given jurisdictional boundary. On the
compliance side, while we recognize
that differences in regulations between
adjacent units of huntable land present
the potential for confusion, this
situation occurs in other contexts
because of differences in land uses and
ownership, and responsible hunters are
familiar with the responsibility to be
aware of what land they are on and the
applicable regulations. Our law
enforcement personnel have been
appropriately and effectively enforcing
similar requirements for years at various
individual refuges and already receive
applicable training. The requirement
will be enforced by Service law
enforcement officers in the same
manner as similar existing lead-free
ammunition requirements elsewhere in
the Refuge System, some of which
already apply to big game hunting
ammunition and some of which apply
only to designated units within a given
refuge or individual refuges within a
complex.
This includes the scenario of a big
game hunter carrying a lawful side-arm
for self-defense purposes while hunting.
The Service’s refuge hunting regulations
govern the lawful use and possession of
firearms and ammunition for hunting,
but do not prohibit possession for
purposes of self-defense of a handgun,
and ammunition it contains, lawfully
carried under applicable State law.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (15): Several commenters
expressed concerns about or objections
to the removal of a permit requirement
for the existing muzzleloader deer hunt
at Fort Niobrara NWR, including
concern about hunting pressure
reducing the quality of the deer hunt.
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
88156
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Our Response: The Service
acknowledges the concern that
removing the Fort Niobrara NWR refugespecific permit requirement may affect
the quality of the muzzleloader deer
hunt there. We do not anticipate that
removing the refuge permit requirement
will increase the number of hunters that
participate in the Fort Niobrara
muzzleloader deer hunt, but we
recognize that it could. Our desired
result is to reduce an administrative
burden for hunters and to more closely
align refuge regulations with State
regulations. We will continue to
monitor muzzleloader deer hunter use
at the refuge. If we identify significant
negative impacts to habitat, wildlife, or
refuge visitors, we will consider further
regulatory changes.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (16): Two comments
expressed objections to the closing of
111 acres that are currently open to
hunting at Crab Orchard NWR.
Our Response: This closure of a small
area within Crab Orchard NWR is
necessary in order to allow for use of the
area for other public recreational uses,
including camping. In addition to our
safety and compatibility considerations,
the Service must comply with State
laws related to how close hunting may
be authorized to the intended camping
area. Crab Orchard NWR will still offer
hunters more than 44,000 huntable
acres.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (17): We received multiple
comments expressing concern about
opportunities for hunting of predator
species, including black bear, bobcat,
fox, and coyote hunting. Some of these
comments also object to the use of dogs
and hunting at night when hunting
these species.
Our Response: Refuge managers
consider predator management
decisions on a case-by-case basis. As
with all species, a refuge manager makes
a decision about managing predator
populations, which are included in the
category of resident wildlife, including
allowing predatory species to be hunted,
only after careful examination to ensure
the action would comply with relevant
laws, policies, and directives.
The Administration Act, as amended,
directs the Service to manage refuges for
biological integrity, diversity, and
environmental health. Predators play a
critical role in the integrity, diversity,
and overall health of ecosystems, so
before allowing predators to be hunted,
a refuge manager must ensure that these
actions do not threaten the integrity,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
diversity, or health of the refuge
ecosystem.
The refuge manager must also
determine that the action is compatible
with refuge purposes and the mission of
the Refuge System, and in keeping with
the refuge’s comprehensive
conservation plan (CCP) and other stepdown plans. In addition, the refuge
manager analyzes the impacts of the
actions on the environment through the
NEPA process and section 7 of the ESA.
Therefore, a refuge manager must take
many steps to ensure that any
opportunity for hunting predators on a
refuge meets the Service’s applicable
laws and policies. All of the same
considerations apply where, on a caseby-case basis, we authorize the use of
dogs or align with State regulations to
allow hunting at night in conjunction
with predator hunting or other hunting.
The Administration Act, as amended,
also mandates that regulations
authorizing hunting or fishing of fish
and resident wildlife within the Refuge
System shall be, to the extent
practicable, consistent with State fish
and wildlife laws, regulations, and
management plans (16 U.S.C.
668dd(m)). Therefore, all the
opportunities for hunting predators in
this rule that are intended to bring
greater consistency with State fish and
wildlife laws, regulations, and
management plans are part of realizing
the Service’s mission. Moreover, these,
as with all predator hunting
determinations and all hunting and
fishing determinations, were only made
after careful consideration by the refuge
manager to ensure that such actions
would not threaten the integrity,
diversity, and overall health of the
ecosystem and were compatible with
both the purpose of the refuge and the
mission of the Refuge System.
Finally, both the NEPA process and
the rulemaking process provide the
opportunity for the public to provide
comments and any additional
information on the impacts of our
actions. We considered the additional
information provided from the public
on this issue during these public
comment periods and determined that
they did not affect our initial
determinations that the opportunities
for hunting predators on specific refuges
will have no more than minor impacts
on the population health of these
species or other wildlife at the local,
regional, or national level.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (18): We received two
comments expressing concern about the
Service having adequate funding and
staffing, including law enforcement
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
officers, to administer our hunting and
fishing opportunities.
Our Response: We appreciate the
concern of these commenters for
sufficient funding and staffing to safely
and effectively administer hunting and
fishing activities throughout the Refuge
System. Importantly, Service policy
(603 FW 2.12.A.(7); see https://
www.fws.gov/policy-library/603fw2)
requires station managers to determine
that adequate resources, including
personnel, exist or can be provided by
the Service or a partner to properly
develop, operate, and maintain the use
in a way that will not materially
interfere with or detract from fulfillment
of the refuge purpose(s) and the
Service’s mission. If resources are
lacking for establishment or
continuation of wildlife-dependent
recreational uses, the refuge manager
will make reasonable efforts to obtain
additional resources or outside
assistance from States, other public
agencies, local communities, and/or
private and nonprofit groups before
determining that the use is not
compatible. For example, when Service
law enforcement resources are lacking,
we are often able to rely upon State fish
and game law-enforcement capacity to
assist in enforcement of hunting and
fishing regulations. For all refuges
opening or expanding hunting or sport
fishing in this rule, we have determined
that we have adequate resources,
including available funds and
personnel, to develop, operate, and
maintain the proposed hunt programs.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (19): We received one
comment arguing that we should have
prepared an environmental impact
statement (EIS) instead of stationspecific environmental analyses (EAs)
combined with a national cumulative
impact report.
Our Response: The Service disagrees
with the assertion that we should
prepare an EIS before opening or
expanding hunting and fishing
opportunities on refuges. We completed
individual EAs for, or applied
categorical exclusions to, each refuge in
this rule, in compliance with NEPA, to
evaluate the impacts of opening or
expanding hunting or fishing
opportunities through this rulemaking.
These EAs and categorical exclusions
underwent regional and national review
to address and consider these actions
from a local, regional, multi-State, and/
or flyway perspective, and to consider
the cumulative impacts from this larger
geographical context. The 2024–2025
cumulative impacts report concludes,
after analyzing the impacts, collectively,
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
of all EAs and categorical exclusions
prepared in connection with this rule,
that the rule would not have significant
impacts at the local, regional, or
national level. The commenter who
raised these environmental analysis
concerns provided no additional
information that would change this
analysis or our conclusion. As discussed
above, we annually conduct
management activities on refuges that
minimize or offset impacts of hunting
and fishing on physical and cultural
resources, including establishing
designated areas for hunting; restricting
levels of use; confining access and travel
to designated locations; providing
education programs and materials for
hunters, anglers, and other users; and
conducting law enforcement activities.
In this rulemaking, the Service is
expanding opportunities for recreational
hunting and fishing. Expanding
opportunities does not necessarily result
in increased impacts to refuge resources.
We anticipate that for some refuges,
these expansions will not result in
changes in usage of the refuge. In other
cases, these expansions may lead to
some increase in use of refuges, but
these changes would likely be minor.
Opening of new refuges or new
opportunities may attract people to the
refuge, but these hunters and/or anglers
were likely already participating
elsewhere on State or other Federal
lands. Overall, considering the
decreasing trends in hunting generally,
and trends on refuges specifically, we
do not expect this final rule to have a
significant impact on the environment.
As noted in our cumulative impacts
report, hunter participation trends have
been generally declining, some refuges
attract a very small number of
participants, and often participation
rates decline over the course of a season.
Finally, a Federal court found that
this approach, using a bottom-up
analysis to assess the cumulative impact
of increased hunting and fishing across
the entire Refuge System, was an
appropriate way for the Service to
analyze the impacts of the rule in
compliance with NEPA (see Fund for
Animals v. Hall, 777 F. Supp. 2d 92, 105
(D.D.C. 2011)).
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of this comment.
Comment (20): We received two
comments that advocated for requiring
some form of monetary payment to the
Service for members of the public to
participate in recreational uses other
than hunting or fishing.
Our Response: Notably, the Service
does not uniformly charge entrance or
recreation fees, but does for some
stations on a case-by-case basis. Any
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
such fee, however, is outside the scope
of this rulemaking, which is devoted to
regulations for hunting and fishing
activities on the Refuge System.
The Service collects entrance and
recreation fees under the authorities of
the Refuge Revenue Sharing Act of 1935
(16 U.S.C. 715s) and the Federal Lands
Recreation Enhancement Act (FLREA;
16 U.S.C. 6801 et seq.). Service policy
requires refuge managers to consider
two factors in determining fees for any
activity: Fair market value and costs
involved in providing the use. Because
fair market value and refuge costs can
differ among localities, there is often a
range of different fees for similar
activities in different locations. For
locations that collect fees under FLREA,
public comment periods are required
when refuges initiate fees and to change
the types and amounts of fees. We
encourage public participation in this
process.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of these comments.
Comment (21): We received one
comment that advocated for barring all
filming on the Refuge System.
Our Response: The Service already
has policies and regulations governing
filming on the Refuge System, which are
outside the scope of this rulemaking.
We will note that filming has the
potential to impact wildlife or habitat,
particularly larger-scale commercial
filming and noncommercial filming
involving models, sets, or lighting
equipment. Under our current
regulations (see 50 CFR 27.71 and 43
CFR part 5), such filming will require a
special use permit and the associated
evaluation of the potential impacts prior
to granting the permit. However, we
encourage refuge visitors to use their
personal hand-held cameras and
cellphones to capture photos video of
wildlife and of natural scenery in order
to share with friends and loved ones
and to preserve memories of their visits.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of this comment.
Comment (22): We received one
comment requesting an extension of the
public comment period through
December 3, 2024.
Our Response: We declined to extend
the public comment period for the
August 2, 2024, proposed rule (89 FR
63139). While extending the comment
period was not necessary and extending
it by 3 months would not have been
feasible, the Service acknowledges that,
for this annual rule cycle, the public
comment period was shorter than those
we provided in the last few years. This
was necessitated by consideration of the
balance between providing as much
opportunity for public comment as
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
88157
possible while keeping delays to fall
hunting opportunities to a minimum.
We provided 30 days for public
comments, and, within that time, we
received comments covering the full
range of typical topics for this annual
rulemaking from a substantial number
of the industry, sporting, and
conservation organizations that are
stakeholders for these regulations. The
comments we received on the August 2,
2024, proposed rule are also a
representative set of comments from
individual members of the public. The
Service believes that 30 days was an
adequate amount of time for interested
parties to provide their comments to us.
We did not make any changes to the
rule as a result of this comment.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
As discussed above, under Summary
of Comments and Responses, we made
no changes in this final rule based on
comments we received on the August 2,
2024, proposed rule (89 FR 63139) and
NEPA documents for individual refuges.
We did, however, withdraw the
proposed authorization of incidental
take of feral hog when big game hunting
on Green River NWR. As of earlier this
year, the Kentucky Department of Fish
and Wildlife Resources prohibits
hunting of feral hogs, also known as
wild pigs, within Kentucky. The
Department is pursuing a strategy of
eradication through trapping for this
invasive species, and we are seeking to
ensure our refuge regulations are
aligned with this effort. We encourage
anyone hunting or otherwise recreating
on Green River NWR to report sightings
of feral hogs to the Kentucky
Department of Fish and Wildlife
Resources.
We also made several editorial,
nonsubstantive revisions to this rule to
improve clarity or to correct crossreferences.
Effective Date
We are making this rule effective
upon the date of its filing at the Office
of the Federal Register (see DATES,
above). We provided a 30-day public
comment period for the August 2, 2024,
proposed rule (89 FR 63139). We have
determined that any further delay in
implementing these station-specific
hunting and sport fishing regulations
would not be in the public interest, in
that a delay would hinder the effective
planning and administration of refuges’
hunting and sport fishing programs.
This rule does not impact the public
generally in terms of requiring lead time
for compliance. Rather, it relieves
restrictions in that it allows activities on
refuges and hatcheries that we would
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
88158
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
otherwise prohibit. Therefore, we find
good cause under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) and
808(1) to make this rule effective upon
the date of its filing at the Office of the
Federal Register.
Amendments to Existing Regulations
Updates to Hunting and Fishing
Opportunities on NWRs
This document codifies in the Code of
Federal Regulations all the Service’s
hunting and/or sport fishing regulations
that we are updating since the last time
we published a rule amending these
regulations (88 FR 74050; October 30,
2023) and that are applicable at Refuge
System units previously opened to
hunting and/or sport fishing. We adopt
these changes to better inform the
general public of the regulations at each
station, to increase understanding and
compliance with these regulations, and
to make enforcement of these
regulations more efficient. In addition to
finding these regulations in 50 CFR
parts 32, visitors to our stations may
find them reiterated in literature
distributed by each station or posted on
signs.
TABLE 1—CHANGES FOR 2024–2025 HUNTING/SPORT FISHING SEASON
Station
State
Migratory bird
hunting
Upland game
hunting
Big game hunting
Bayou Teche NWR .....................
Canaan Valley NWR ...................
Des Lacs NWR ............................
Green River NWR .......................
Horicon NWR ..............................
J. Clark Salyer NWR ...................
Lostwood NWR ...........................
Trinity River NWR .......................
Turnbull NWR ..............................
Upper Souris NWR ......................
Valentine NWR ............................
Waccamaw NWR ........................
Louisiana ...............
West Virginia .........
North Dakota .........
Kentucky ................
Wisconsin ..............
North Dakota .........
North Dakota .........
Texas .....................
Washington ............
North Dakota .........
Nebraska ...............
South Carolina .......
E ............................
E ............................
Closed ...................
N ............................
Already Open ........
Already Open ........
Closed ...................
O ............................
Already Open ........
Closed ...................
Already Open ........
E ............................
Already Open ........
E ............................
Already Open ........
Closed ...................
Already Open ........
Already Open ........
Already Open ........
Already Open ........
Closed ...................
Already Open ........
E ............................
Already Open ........
E ............................
E ............................
O ............................
N ............................
Already Open ........
O ............................
O ............................
E ............................
E ............................
O ............................
Already Open ........
Already Open ........
Sport fishing
Already
Already
Closed.
Closed.
E.
Already
Closed.
Already
Closed.
Already
Already
Already
Open.
Open.
Open.
Open.
Open.
Open.
Open.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Key:
N = New station opened for the first time.
O = Opening (New species and/or new activity on a station previously open to other activities).
E = Expansion (Station is already open to the activity: the final rule adds new lands/waters, modifies areas open to hunting or fishing, extends
season dates, adds a targeted hunt, modifies season dates, modifies hunting hours, etc.).
The changes for the 2024–2025
hunting/fishing season noted in the
table above are each based on a
complete administrative record which,
among other detailed documentation,
also includes a hunt plan, a
compatibility determination (for
refuges), and the appropriate NEPA
analysis, all of which were the subject
of a public review and comment
process. These documents are available
upon request.
The Service recognizes the possible
effects of lead ammunition on refuge
resources and human health, and we
will continue to evaluate and
appropriately regulate the use of lead
ammunition and tackle on Service lands
and waters. The Service has initiated
stakeholder engagement to implement a
deliberate, open, and transparent
process of evaluating the future of lead
use on Service lands and waters,
working with our State partners and
seeking input and recommendations
from the Hunting and Wildlife
Conservation Council, other
stakeholders, and the public. The best
available science, analyzed as part of
this rulemaking, indicates that lead
ammunition and tackle have negative
impacts on both wildlife and human
health. Based on the best available
science and sound professional
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
judgment, where appropriate, the
Service may propose to require the use
of non-lead ammunition and tackle on
Service lands and waters, as we have
previously done in certain areas. While
the Service continues to evaluate the
future of lead use in hunting and fishing
on Service lands and waters, we will
work with stakeholders and the public
to evaluate lead use through the annual
rulemaking process. In the interim, the
Service does not intend to allow
opportunities increasing or authorizing
the new use of lead on Service lands
and waters, and this rule is consistent
with that approach.
Crab Orchard NWR will close hunting
on 111 acres that are currently open to
hunting, out of more than 44,000
huntable acres, so that the area can be
repurposed for other visitor recreational
uses, including camping. Turnbull,
Horicon, and Valentine NWRs are
expanding hunting and fishing to
species where lead-free ammunition or
tackle is already required on the refuges.
Trinity River, Bayou Teche, Green
River, and Waccamaw NWRs will each
open or expand archery deer hunting or
open or expand migratory bird hunting,
both of which are hunting activities that
do not involve lead ammunition. Des
Lacs, J. Clark Salyer, Lostwood, and
Upper Souris NWRs are opening elk
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
hunting that will require the use of leadfree ammunition immediately in the fall
2024 season. In this final rule, Canaan
Valley NWR will expand all existing
hunting onto the newly acquired Big
Cove Unit and require the use of leadfree ammunition immediately for all
hunting in the fall 2024 seasons on the
Big Cove Unit.
Fish Advisory
For health reasons, anglers should
review and follow State-issued
consumption advisories before enjoying
recreational sport fishing opportunities
on Service-managed waters. You can
find information about current fishconsumption advisories on the internet
at https://www.epa.gov/choose-fish-andshellfish-wisely.
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review—
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
14094
Executive Order 14094 amends and
reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866
and E.O. 13563 and states that
regulatory analysis should facilitate
agency efforts to develop regulations
that serve the public interest, advance
statutory objectives, and are consistent
with E.O. 12866, E.O. 13563, and E.O.
14094. Regulatory analysis, as
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
practicable and appropriate, shall
recognize distributive impacts and
equity, to the extent permitted by law.
E.O. 13563 emphasizes further that
regulations must be based on the best
available science and that the
rulemaking process must allow for
public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed
this final rule in a manner consistent
with these requirements.
E.O. 12866, as reaffirmed by E.O.
13563 and amended by E.O. 14094,
provides that the Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) in the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) will review all significant rules.
OIRA has determined that this rule is
not significant.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA; 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), as amended
by the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(SBREFA; title II of Pub. L. 104–121,
March 29, 1996), whenever a Federal
agency is required to publish a notice of
rulemaking for any proposed or final
rule, it must prepare and make available
for public comment a regulatory
flexibility analysis that describes the
effect of the rule on small entities (i.e.,
small businesses, small organizations,
and small government jurisdictions).
However, no regulatory flexibility
analysis is required if the head of an
agency certifies that the rule will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Thus, for a regulatory flexibility analysis
to be required, impacts must exceed a
threshold for ‘‘significant impact’’ and a
threshold for a ‘‘substantial number of
small entities.’’ See 5 U.S.C. 605(b).
SBREFA amended the Regulatory
Flexibility Act to require Federal
88159
agencies to provide a statement of the
factual basis for certifying that a rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule opens or expands hunting or
fishing on 12 NWRs. As a result, visitor
use for wildlife-dependent recreation on
these stations will change. If the stations
establishing new programs were a pure
addition to the current supply of those
activities, it would mean an estimated
maximum increase of 1,481 user days
(one person per day participating in a
recreational opportunity; see table 2,
below). Because the participation trend
is flat in these activities, this increase in
supply will most likely be offset by
other sites losing participants.
Therefore, this is likely to be a
substitute site for the activity and not
necessarily an increase in participation
rates for the activity.
TABLE 2—ESTIMATED MAXIMUM CHANGE IN RECREATION OPPORTUNITIES IN 2024–2025
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
[2023 Dollars in thousands]
Station
Additional
hunting days
Additional
fishing days
Bayou Teche NWR ......................................................................................................................
Canaan Valley NWR ....................................................................................................................
Des Lacs NWR ............................................................................................................................
Green River NWR ........................................................................................................................
Horicon NWR ...............................................................................................................................
J. Clark Salyer NWR ...................................................................................................................
Lostwood NWR ............................................................................................................................
Trinity River NWR ........................................................................................................................
Turnbull NWR ..............................................................................................................................
Upper Souris NWR ......................................................................................................................
Valentine NWR ............................................................................................................................
Waccamaw NWR .........................................................................................................................
40
20
70
144
........................
70
70
300
272
70
60
0
........................
........................
........................
........................
365
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
$1.6
0.8
2.8
5.7
15.1
2.8
2.8
11.9
10.8
2.8
2.4
0
Total ......................................................................................................................................
1,116
365
59.5
To the extent visitors spend time and
money in the area of the station that
they would not have spent there
anyway, they contribute new income to
the regional economy and benefit local
businesses. Due to the unavailability of
site-specific expenditure data, we use
the national estimates from the 2016
National Survey of Fishing, Hunting,
and Wildlife Associated Recreation to
identify expenditures for food and
lodging, transportation, and other
incidental expenses. Using the average
expenditures for these categories with
the maximum expected additional
participation of the Refuge System
yields approximately $59,000 in
recreation-related expenditures (see
table 2, above). By having ripple effects
throughout the economy, these direct
expenditures are only part of the
economic impact of these recreational
activities. Using a national impact
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
multiplier for hunting activities (2.51)
derived from the report ‘‘Hunting in
America: An Economic Force for
Conservation’’ and for fishing activities
(2.51) derived from the report
‘‘Sportfishing in America’’ yields a total
maximum economic impact of
approximately $150,000 (2023 dollars)
(Southwick Associates, Inc., 2018).
Since we know that most of the
fishing and hunting occurs within 100
miles of a participant’s residence, then
it is unlikely that most of this spending
will be ‘‘new’’ money coming into a
local economy; therefore, this spending
will be offset with a decrease in some
other sector of the local economy. The
net gain to the local economies will be
no more than $149,000 and likely less.
Since 80 percent of the participants
travel less than 100 miles to engage in
hunting and fishing activities, their
spending patterns will not add new
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Additional
expenditures
money into the local economy and,
therefore, the real impact will be on the
order of about $30,000 annually.
Small businesses within the retail
trade industry (such as hotels, gas
stations, taxidermy shops, bait-andtackle shops, and similar businesses)
may be affected by some increased or
decreased station visitation. A large
percentage of these retail trade
establishments in the local communities
around NWRs qualify as small
businesses (see table 3, below). We
expect that the incremental recreational
changes will be scattered, and so we do
not expect that the rule will have a
significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities in
any region or nationally. As noted
previously, we expect at most $59,500
to be spent in total in the refuges’ local
economies. The maximum increase will
be less than one-tenth of 1 percent for
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
88160
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
local retail trade spending (see table 3,
below). Table 3 does not include entries
for those NWRs for which we project no
changes in recreation opportunities in
2024–2025; see table 2, above.
TABLE 3—COMPARATIVE EXPENDITURES FOR RETAIL TRADE ASSOCIATED WITH ADDITIONAL STATION VISITATION FOR
2024–2025
[Thousands, 2023 dollars]
Retail trade
in 2017 1
Station/county(ies)
Bayou Teche:
St. Mary Parish, LA ..........................................................
Canaan Valley:
Grant, WV .........................................................................
Tucker, WV .......................................................................
Des Lacs:
Renville, ND ......................................................................
Green River:
Henderson, KY .................................................................
Horicon:
Dodge, WI .........................................................................
Fond du Lac, WI ...............................................................
J. Clark Salyer:
McHenry, ND ....................................................................
Lostwood:
Burke, ND .........................................................................
Mountrail, ND ....................................................................
Trinity River:
Liberty, TX ........................................................................
Turnbull:
Spokane, WA ....................................................................
Upper Souris:
Renville, ND ......................................................................
Ward, ND ..........................................................................
Valentine:
Cherry, NE ........................................................................
Waccamaw:
Georgetown, SC ...............................................................
1 U.S.
Addition
as % of
total
Establishments
in 2017 1
Establishments
with fewer than
10 employees
in 2017
$658,214
$2
<0.1
186
145
133,024
79,611
0
0
<0.1
<0.1
42
28
28
20
43,869
3
<0.1
13
11
825,225
6
<0.1
150
98
1,069,734
2,137,970
8
8
<0.1
<0.1
232
344
154
207
39,926
3
<0.1
19
14
38,614
228,282
1
1
<0.1
<0.1
8
47
4
27
1,047,020
12
<0.1
201
143
9,754,429
11
<0.1
1,627
1,036
43,869
1,844,525
1
1
<0.1
<0.1
13
309
11
169
116,107
2
<0.1
43
30
1,035,984
0
0
287
206
Census Bureau.
With the small change in overall
spending anticipated from this rule, it is
unlikely that a substantial number of
small entities will have more than a
small impact from the spending change
near the affected stations. Therefore, we
certify that this rule will not have a
significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities as
defined under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). A regulatory
flexibility analysis is not required.
Accordingly, a small entity compliance
guide is not required.
Congressional Review Act
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Estimated
maximum
addition
from new
activities
The rule is not a major rule under 5
U.S.C. 804(2), the Congressional Review
Act. We anticipate no significant
employment or small business effects.
This rule:
a. Will not have an annual effect on
the economy of $100 million or more.
The minimal impact will be scattered
across the country and will most likely
not be significant in any local area.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
b. Will not cause a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers;
individual industries; Federal, State, or
local government agencies; or
geographic regions. This rule will have
only a slight effect on the costs of
hunting opportunities for Americans. If
the substitute sites are farther from the
participants’ residences, then an
increase in travel costs will occur. The
Service does not have information to
quantify this change in travel cost but
assumes that, since most people travel
less than 100 miles to hunt, the
increased travel cost will be small. We
do not expect this rule to affect the
supply or demand for hunting
opportunities in the United States, and,
therefore, it should not affect prices for
hunting equipment and supplies, or the
retailers that sell equipment.
c. Will not have significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
This rule represents only a small
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
proportion of recreational spending at
NWRs. Therefore, this rule will have no
measurable economic effect on the
wildlife-dependent industry, which has
annual sales of equipment and travel
expenditures of $72 billion nationwide.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Since this rule will apply to public
use of federally owned and managed
refuges, it will not impose an unfunded
mandate on State, local, or Tribal
governments or the private sector of
more than $100 million per year. The
rule will not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or Tribal
governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information
required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not
required.
Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with E.O. 12630, this
rule will not have significant takings
implications. This rule will affect only
visitors at NWRs and describes what
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
they can do while they are on a Service
station.
of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
available from the stations at the
addresses provided below.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Endangered Species Act Section 7
Consultation
Available Information for Specific
Stations
We comply with section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), when
developing comprehensive conservation
plans and step-down management
plans—which includes hunting and/or
fishing plans—for public use of refuges
and hatcheries, and prior to
implementing any new or revised public
recreation program on a station as
identified in 50 CFR 26.32. We
complied with section 7 for each of the
stations affected by this rulemaking.
Individual refuge and hatchery
headquarters have information about
public use programs and conditions that
apply to their specific programs and
maps of their respective areas. To find
out how to contact a specific refuge or
hatchery, contact the appropriate
Service office for the States and
Territories listed below:
Hawaii, Idaho, Oregon, and
Washington. Regional Chief, National
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Eastside Federal
Complex, Suite 1692, 911 NE 11th
Avenue, Portland, OR 97232–4181;
Telephone (503) 231–6203.
Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and
Texas. Regional Chief, National Wildlife
Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, P.O. Box 1306, 500 Gold
Avenue SW, Albuquerque, NM 87103;
Telephone (505) 248–6635.
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan,
Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, and
Wisconsin. Regional Chief, National
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 5600 American Blvd.
West, Suite 990, Bloomington, MN
55437–1458; Telephone (612) 713–5476.
Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia,
Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North
Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee,
Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands.
Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge
System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
1875 Century Boulevard, Atlanta, GA
30345; Telephone (404) 679–7356.
Connecticut, Delaware, District of
Columbia, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New
Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West
Virginia. Regional Chief, National
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate Center
Drive, Hadley, MA 01035–9589;
Telephone (413) 253–8307.
Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska,
North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and
Wyoming. Regional Chief, National
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 134 Union Blvd.,
Lakewood, CO 80228; Telephone (303)
236–4377.
Alaska. Regional Chief, National
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, 1011 E Tudor Rd.,
Anchorage, AK 99503; Telephone (907)
786–3545.
California and Nevada. Regional
Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2800
Cottage Way, Room W–2606,
As discussed under Regulatory
Planning and Review and Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act, above, this rule
will not have sufficient federalism
implications to warrant the preparation
of a federalism summary impact
statement under E.O. 13132. In
preparing this rule, we worked with
State governments.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the
Department of the Interior has
determined that this rule will not
unduly burden the judicial system and
that it meets the requirements of
sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the Order.
Energy Supply, Distribution or Use (E.O.
13211)
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
E.O. 13211 on regulations that
significantly affect energy supply,
distribution, or use. E.O. 13211 requires
agencies to prepare statements of energy
effects when undertaking certain
actions. Because this rule will open or
expand hunting opportunities on 12
NWRs, it is not a significant regulatory
action under E.O. 12866, and we do not
expect it to significantly affect energy
supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore,
this action is not a significant energy
action, and no statement of energy
effects is required.
Consultation and Coordination With
Indian Tribal Governments (E.O. 13175)
In accordance with E.O. 13175, we
have evaluated possible effects on
federally recognized Indian Tribes and
have determined that there are no
effects. We coordinate recreational use
on NWRs and National Fish Hatcheries
with Tribal governments having
adjoining or overlapping jurisdiction
before we propose new or revised
regulations.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
88161
This rule does not contain any new
collections of information that require
approval by the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.). OMB previously approved the
information collection requirements
associated with application and
reporting requirements associated with
hunting and sport fishing and assigned
OMB Control Number 1018–0140
(expires 09/30/2025). An agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
National Environmental Policy Act
We analyzed this rule in accordance
with the criteria of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4332(C)), 43 CFR part
46, and 516 Departmental Manual (DM)
8.
A categorical exclusion from NEPA
documentation applies to publication of
amendments to station-specific hunting
and fishing regulations because they are
technical and procedural in nature, and
the environmental effects are too broad,
speculative, or conjectural to lend
themselves to meaningful analysis (43
CFR 46.210 and 516 DM 8). Concerning
the actions that are the subject of this
rulemaking, we have complied with
NEPA at the project level when
developing each package. This is
consistent with the Department of the
Interior instructions for compliance
with NEPA where actions are covered
sufficiently by an earlier environmental
document (43 CFR 46.120).
Prior to the addition of a refuge or
hatchery to the list of areas open to
hunting and fishing in 50 CFR parts 32
and 71, we develop hunting and fishing
plans for the affected stations. We
incorporate these station hunting and
fishing activities in the station
comprehensive conservation plan and/
or other step-down management plans,
pursuant to our refuge planning
guidance in 602 Fish and Wildlife
Service Manual (FW) 1, 3, and 4. We
prepare these comprehensive
conservation plans and step-down plans
in compliance with section 102(2)(C) of
NEPA, the Council on Environmental
Quality’s regulations for implementing
NEPA in 40 CFR parts 1500 through
1508, and the Department of Interior’s
NEPA regulations at 43 CFR part 46. We
invite the affected public to participate
in the review, development, and
implementation of these plans. Copies
of all plans and NEPA compliance are
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
88162
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Sacramento, CA 95825; Telephone (916)
767–9241.
Primary Author
Christian Myers, Division of Natural
Resources and Conservation Planning,
National Wildlife Refuge System, is the
primary author of this rulemaking
document.
Regulation Changes Summary Table
The regulatory amendments set forth
below are presented alongside existing
station-specific regulations that have not
been amended. For a table that provides
additional clarity on which specific
regulatory provisions have been
amended, please see Docket No. FWS–
HQ–NWRS–2024–0034 on https://
www.regulations.gov for a separate
document containing a table that
provides additional clarity on which
specific regulatory provisions have been
amended and how they have been
amended.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 32
Fishing, Hunting, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife,
Wildlife refuges.
Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons described in the
preamble, we amend title 50, chapter I,
subchapter C of the Code of Federal
Regulations as set forth below:
PART 32—HUNTING AND FISHING
1. The authority citation for part 32
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 16 U.S.C. 460k,
664, 668dd–668ee, and 715i; Pub. L. 115–20,
131 Stat. 86.
2. Amend § 32.7 by revising and
republishing paragraph (q) to read as
follows:
■
§ 32.7 What refuge units are open to
hunting and/or sport fishing?
*
*
*
*
(q) Kentucky. (1) Clarks River National
Wildlife Refuge.
(2) Green River National Wildlife
Refuge.
(3) Ohio River Islands National
Wildlife Refuge.
(4) Reelfoot National Wildlife Refuge.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Amend § 32.24 by revising and
republishing paragraphs (j), (m), and (x)
to read as follows:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
*
§ 32.24
California.
*
*
*
*
*
(j) Lower Klamath National Wildlife
Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of goose,
duck, coot, moorhen, and snipe on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) In the controlled waterfowl
hunting area, we require a valid Refuge
Recreation Pass (available electronically
or in person at the refuge office) for all
hunters age 16 or older. All hunters age
15 and younger must remain in the
immediate presence of an adult (age 18
or older) at all times while in the field.
(ii) Unless otherwise posted, we
require advance reservations for the first
2 days of the hunting season.
Reservations are obtained through the
waterfowl lottery each year.
(iii) Hunters may enter the refuge at
4:30 a.m. unless otherwise posted.
(iv) Shooting hours end at 1 p.m. on
all California portions of the refuge with
the following exceptions:
(A) The refuge manager may designate
up to 6 afternoon special youth, ladies,
veteran, or disabled hunter waterfowl
hunts per season.
(B) The refuge manager may designate
up to 3 days per week of afternoon
waterfowl hunting for the general public
after December 1.
(v) We prohibit the setting of decoys
in retrieving zones.
(vi) Pit-style hunting blinds located in
the Stearns units and unit 9D are firstcome, first-served. We require you to
hunt within a 200-foot (61-meter) radius
of the blind.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of pheasant on designated areas
of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) In the controlled pheasant hunting
area, we require a valid Refuge
Recreation Pass (available electronically
or in person at the refuge office) for all
hunters age 16 or older.
(ii) All hunters age 15 or younger
must remain in the immediate presence
of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times
while in the field.
(3)–(4) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
(m) Modoc National Wildlife Refuge—
(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We
allow hunting of goose, duck, coot,
moorhen, and snipe on designated areas
of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) On the opening weekend of the
hunting season, hunters must possess
and carry a refuge permit (FWS Form 3–
2439, Hunt Application/Permit—
National Wildlife Refuge System) issued
through random drawing to hunters
with advance reservations only.
(ii) After the opening weekend of the
hunting season, we only allow hunting
on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays.
Hunters must check-in and out of the
refuge by using self-service permits
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(FWS Form 3–2405, Self-Clearing
Check-in/out Permit). Hunters must
completely fill out the ‘‘Refuge Hunt
Permit’’ portion of the permit and
deposit it in the drop box prior to
hunting. Hunters must complete and
display the ‘‘Daily Vehicle Permit’’ in
the windshield of the hunter’s vehicle
prior to hunting. The hunter must
possess and carry the ‘‘Record of Kill’’
and ‘‘Waterfowl Harvest Statistics’’
portions of the permit while on the
refuge and turn them in prior to exiting
the hunting area.
(iii) In the designated spaced blind
area, you must remain within the blind
assigned to you.
(iv) All hunters age 15 and younger
must remain in the immediate presence
of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times
while in the field.
(v) You may not possess more than 25
shot shells while in the field once you
have left your assigned parking lot or
boat launch.
(vi) You may only use portable blinds
in the free-roam hunting areas.
(vii) You must remove all blinds,
decoys, shell casings, other personal
equipment, and refuse from the refuge at
the end of each day (see §§ 27.93 and
27.94 of this chapter).
(viii) Hunters must enter and exit the
hunting area from the three designated
hunt parking lots, which we open 11⁄2
hours before legal shooting time and
close 1 hour after legal shooting time
each hunt day.
(ix) We only allow walk-in access to
the hunt area by foot and nonmotorized
cart.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of pheasant on designated areas
of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) We limit hunting to junior hunters
possessing a valid State Junior Hunting
License and refuge Junior Pheasant
Hunt Permit (FWS Form 3–2439, Hunt
Application/Permit—National Wildlife
Refuge System).
(ii) All hunters age 15 and younger
must remain in the immediate presence
of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times
while in the field.
(3) [Reserved]
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport
fishing only on Dorris Reservoir subject
to the following conditions:
(i) We prohibit fishing from October 1
to January 31.
(ii) We allow fishing only from legal
sunrise to legal sunset.
(iii) We allow only walk-in access to
Dorris Reservoir from February 1
through March 31.
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(iv) We allow use of boats for fishing
on Dorris Reservoir only from April 1
through September 30.
*
*
*
*
*
(x) Tule Lake National Wildlife
Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of goose,
duck, coot, moorhen, and snipe on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) In the controlled waterfowl
hunting area, we require a valid Refuge
Recreation Pass (available electronically
or in person at the refuge office) for all
hunters age 16 or older.
(ii) All hunters age 15 or younger
must remain in the immediate presence
of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times
while in the field.
(iii) Unless otherwise posted, we
require advance reservations for the first
2 days of the hunting season. You may
obtain a reservation through the
waterfowl lottery each year.
(iv) Hunters may enter the refuge at
4:30 a.m. unless otherwise posted.
(v) Shooting hours end at 1 p.m. on
all portions of the refuge with the
following exceptions:
(A) The refuge manager may designate
up to 6 afternoon special youth, ladies,
veteran, or disabled hunter waterfowl
hunts per season.
(B) The refuge manager may designate
up to 3 days per week of afternoon
waterfowl hunting for the general public
after December 1.
(vi) You select blind sites by lottery at
the beginning of each hunt day. You
may shoot only from within your
assigned blind site.
(vii) We prohibit the setting of decoys
in retrieving zones.
(viii) We prohibit air-thrust and
inboard water-thrust boats while
hunting. We prohibit the use of allterrain amphibious or utility-type
vehicles (UTVs) in wetland units.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of pheasant on designated areas
of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) In the controlled pheasant hunting
area, we require a valid Refuge
Recreation Pass (available electronically
or in person at the refuge office) for all
hunters age 16 or older.
(ii) All hunters age 15 or younger
must remain in the immediate presence
of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times
while in the field.
(3)–(4) [Reserved]
■ 4. Amend § 32.36 by redesignating
paragraphs (b) and (c) as (c) and (d),
respectively; and adding a new
paragraph (b).
The addition reads as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
§ 32.36
Kentucky.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Green River National Wildlife
Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of duck,
goose, coot, merganser, teal, and dove
on designated areas of the refuge subject
to the following conditions:
(i) Each hunter age 12 and older must
possess and carry a signed refuge
hunting brochure (FWS Form 3–2439,
Hunt Application/Permit—National
Wildlife Refuge System) while hunting
on the refuge.
(ii) All hunters age 15 or younger
must be supervised by an adult age 21
or older and must remain in sight of and
normal voice contact with the adult.
The adult may supervise no more than
two youths.
(iii) We prohibit hunting within 100
yards (91 meters) of a residence,
graveled road, or hiking trail managed
by the Service as part of Green River
NWR.
(iv) We prohibit the use of trail
cameras.
(v) We allow the use of boats operated
only by manual power or an electric
trolling motor for hunters to access the
refuge. We prohibit the use of internal
combustion motors, personal watercraft
(e.g., jet skis), airboats, and hovercraft
on waters owned and managed by Green
River NWR.
(vi) We allow the use of bikes,
including e-bikes, for hunters to access
the refuge along designated routes only
(graveled and paved roads, and
established trails) managed by the
Service as part of Green River NWR. We
prohibit the use of internal combustion
motors on lands owned and managed by
Green River NWR.
(vii) We allow the use of off-road or
all-terrain vehicles (e.g., ATVs/UTVs)
only for mobility-impaired hunters who,
while hunting on the refuge, possess
and carry a valid General Activities
Special Use Permit (FWS Form 3–1383–
G) approved by the refuge manager.
(viii) We prohibit marking or flagging
any tree or other refuge feature with
non-biodegradable reflectors, paint,
flagging, or other substances.
(ix) Access to open hunting areas of
the refuge is from 2 hours before legal
sunrise to 2 hours after legal sunset.
(x) We prohibit the killing or
wounding of a game animal and then
intentionally or knowingly failing to
make a reasonable effort to retrieve and
include it in the hunter’s bag limit.
(xi) We allow duck, goose, coot, wood
duck, teal, and merganser hunting from
1⁄2 hour before legal sunrise until 12
p.m. (noon). We allow dove hunting
according to State shooting hours.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
88163
(xii) We allow the use of dogs for
migratory game bird hunting. Dog
owners and handlers must have a collar
on each dog with the owner’s contact
information (FWS Form 3–2439).
(xiii) For migratory game bird
hunting, you must remove all decoys,
blinds, and hunting equipment at the
end of each day’s hunt (see § 27.93 of
this chapter).
(xiv) For youth, seniors, and disabled
hunters, as defined by the State, the
Horseshoe Bend Unit will be open to
waterfowl hunting during the months of
December and January of the Statewide
waterfowl season, and during the
additional Statewide veterans and youth
hunt dates in February.
(xv) We prohibit waterfowl hunting
during any Statewide seasons prior to
December.
(xvi) We prohibit all entry to the
Tscharner East section of the Bluff Unit
from November 1 through March 31.
(xvii) The big game quota hunt in the
month of November of the Statewide
white-tailed deer season is open only to
holders of a big game quota permit
(FWS Form 3–2439, Hunt Application/
Permit—National Wildlife Refuge
System). During that hunt, the
Tscharner West section of the Bluff Unit
and the Horseshoe Bend Unit are closed
to all non-selected hunters and the
general public.
(2) [Reserved]
(3) Big game hunting. We allow only
archery and crossbow hunting of whitetailed deer and turkey on designated
areas of the refuge subject to the
following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (b)(1)(i), (iii) through (x),
(xvi), and (xvii) of this section apply.
(ii) Hunters age 15 and younger must
be supervised by an adult age 21 or
older and must remain in sight of and
normal voice contact with the adult.
The adult may supervise no more than
one youth.
(iii) We allow white-tailed deer and
turkey hunting according to State
shooting hours.
(iv) You must use safety belts at all
times when occupying tree stands.
(v) You must remove all tree stands
(portable and climbing) and ground
blinds by legal sunset of each day’s
hunt.
(vi) You may use no more than one
stand or blind per hunter.
(vii) The big game quota permit (FWS
Form 3–2439, Hunt Application/
Permit—National Wildlife Refuge
System) is a limited entry permit, is
zone-specific, and is nontransferable.
(viii) During the big game quota hunt,
we allow only hunters possessing a
valid big game quota permit (FWS Form
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
88164
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
3–2439, Hunt Application/Permit—
National Wildlife Refuge System) on the
refuge and only for the purposes of deer
and turkey hunting.
(ix) For the drawn holders of a big
game quota permit (FWS Form 3–2439,
Hunt Application/Permit—National
Wildlife Refuge System), the Horseshoe
Bend Unit and Tscharner West section
of the Bluff Unit will be open, up to 21
days, during the month of November of
the Statewide season.
(x) For youth, seniors, and disabled
hunters, as defined by the State, the
Horseshoe Bend Unit and Tscharner
West section of the Bluff Unit will be
open to archery and crossbow hunting
of deer and turkey during the months of
September and October in accordance
with State season dates.
(xi) For youth, as defined by the State,
the Horseshoe Bend Unit and Tscharner
West section of the Bluff Unit will be
open to archery and crossbow hunting
of turkey during the months of April
and May in accordance with State
season dates.
(4) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Amend § 32.37 by revising and
republishing paragraphs (d), (e), and (m)
to read as follows:
§ 32.37
Louisiana.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Bayou Teche National Wildlife
Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of duck,
merganser, teal, light and dark goose,
coot, gallinule, rail, snipe, dove, and
woodcock on designated areas of the
refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) Each person age 18 and older must
possess and carry a valid, signed refuge
user brochure while on the refuge.
(ii) We prohibit hunting or discharge
of firearms (see § 27.42 of this chapter)
within 500 feet (152 meters (m)) of any
residence or oil and gas infrastructure,
or within 200 feet (61 m) of any road,
railroad, levee, water control structure,
designated public use trail, designated
parking area, or other designated public
use facility.
(iii) All youth hunters age 15 and
younger must be supervised by an adult
during all hunts. One adult may
supervise up to two youths during small
game and migratory game bird hunts,
but may supervise only one youth
during big game hunts. The supervising
adult must maintain visual and voice
contact with the youth at all times.
Adult guardians are responsible for
ensuring that youth hunters do not
violate refuge rules.
(iv) We require waterfowl and
gallinule hunters to remove all portable
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
blinds and decoys from the refuge by 2
p.m. each day (see §§ 27.93 and 27.94 of
this chapter).
(v) Migratory bird hunters are only
allowed to enter the refuge after 4 a.m.
(vi) We allow waterfowl hunting daily
until 2 p.m. during the State regular
season, State teal season, and State
youth and veteran waterfowl seasons.
We allow gallinule, snipe, and rail
hunting until 2 p.m.
(vii) When hunting migratory game
birds, you may only use dogs to locate,
point, and retrieve game.
(viii) We allow only the use of
reflective tacks as marking devices.
(ix) We only allow the incidental take
of nutria with approved shot and
weapons during any open waterfowl
season on the refuge. We allow the
incidental take of raccoon, feral hog,
armadillo, opossum, and coyote with
approved shot and weapons during any
open season on the refuge.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of squirrel and rabbit, and the
incidental take of nutria, coyote,
raccoon, armadillo, and opossum, on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) We only allow hunting from the
start of the State squirrel and rabbit
seasons until the last day of State
waterfowl season for the State
Waterfowl Zone in which you are
hunting.
(ii) We prohibit upland game hunting
on days corresponding with refuge deer
gun hunts.
(iii) Hunters must leave the refuge no
later than 2 hours after legal sunset.
(iv) When hunting, you must possess
only shot size 4 or smaller or 0.22
caliber rimfire rifles or smaller. We
allow the use of air rifles.
(v) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (iii), (viii),
and (ix) of this section apply.
(vi) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (d)(2)(i) through (iv) of this
section do not apply to upland game
hunting on the Mitigation Units.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow the
hunting of white-tailed deer, and the
incidental take of feral hog, on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) We allow hunting of deer only with
firearms (see § 27.42 of this chapter)
during 5 specific days during October
and November. A youth gun hunt will
occur during the last weekend of
October, on both Saturday and Sunday.
The general gun hunt will occur during
the final full weekend in November over
3 days: the Friday immediately before
the weekend, Saturday, and Sunday.
(ii) We allow archery deer hunting
according to the State of Louisiana
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
archery season. We close refuge archery
hunting during refuge deer gun hunts.
(iii) We allow each hunter to possess
only one deer per day; the deer may be
a buck or a doe.
(iv) Hunters may use only portable
deer stands. Hunters may erect deer
stands no earlier than 48 hours before
the deer archery season and must
remove them from the refuge within 48
hours after the season closes (see § 27.93
of this chapter). Hunters may place only
one deer stand on the refuge. Deer
stands must have the owner’s State
hunting license/sportsman’s
identification number clearly printed on
the stand.
(v) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (iii), (viii),
and (ix), and (d)(2)(iii) of this section
apply.
(vi) The condition set forth at
paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this section does
not apply to big game hunting on the
Mitigation Units.
(vii) We prohibit the use of deer
decoys.
(viii) We prohibit organized deer
drives. We define a ‘‘deer drive’’ as an
organized or planned effort to pursue,
drive, chase, or otherwise frighten or
cause deer to move in the direction of
any person(s) who is part of the
organized or planned hunt and known
to be waiting for the deer.
(ix) Deer hunters must display State
Wildlife Management Area (WMA)
hunter-orange or blaze-pink (as
governed by State WMA regulations).
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport
fishing in all refuge waters subject to the
following conditions:
(i) We prohibit the use of unattended
nets, traps, or lines (trot, jug, bush, etc.).
(ii) The condition set forth at
paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section
applies.
(iii) The refuge is only open to
recreational finfishing and shellfishing
from legal sunrise to legal sunset.
(e) Big Branch Marsh National
Wildlife Refuge—
(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We
allow hunting of duck, merganser, teal,
coot, light and dark goose, snipe, rail,
gallinule, dove, and woodcock on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) Each person age 18 and older must
possess and carry a valid, signed refuge
user brochure while on the refuge.
(ii) We allow waterfowl, snipe, rail,
gallinule, dove, and goose hunting on
Wednesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays, and
Sundays from 1⁄2 hour before legal
sunrise until 2 p.m., including
waterfowl hunting during the State teal
season and State youth and veterans
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
waterfowl seasons. We only allow
hunting of woodcock until 2 p.m.
(iii) We allow light goose hunting for
that part of the season that extends
beyond the regular duck season from 1⁄2
hour before legal sunrise until 2 p.m.
(iv) We allow only temporary blinds,
and hunters must remove blinds and
decoys by 2 p.m. each day (see § 27.93
of this chapter).
(v) All youth hunters age 15 and
younger must be supervised by an adult
during all hunts. One adult may
supervise up to two youths during small
game hunts and migratory bird hunts,
but may supervise only one youth
during big game hunts. The supervising
adult must maintain visual and voice
contact with the youth at all times.
Adult guardians are responsible for
ensuring that youth hunters do not
violate refuge rules.
(vi) We prohibit hunting or discharge
of firearms (see § 27.42 of this chapter)
within 500 feet (152 meters (m)) of any
residence adjacent to the refuge or oil
and gas infrastructure on the refuge, or
within 200 feet (61 m) from the center
of any road, railroad, levee, water
control structure, designated public use
maintained trail, designated parking
area, or other designated public use
facility.
(vii) We allow migratory bird hunters
to enter the refuge no earlier than 4 a.m.,
and all hunters must exit the refuge no
later than 2 hours after legal sunset.
(viii) We allow only reflective tacks as
trail markers on the refuge.
(ix) We allow the incidental take of
raccoon, feral hog, armadillo, opossum,
and coyote with approved shot and
weapons allowed during any open
season on the refuge.
(x) We only allow the incidental take
of nutria with approved shot and
weapons during any open waterfowl
(duck, teal, merganser, light and dark
goose, and coot) season on the refuge.
(xi) We prohibit hunters and anglers
from utilizing air boats, air thrust boats,
mud boats, aircraft, and air-cooled
propulsion engines on the refuge.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of squirrel, rabbit, and quail,
and the incidental take of nutria, coyote,
raccoon, armadillo, and opossum, on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) When hunting, you must possess
only shot size 4 or smaller, or 0.22
caliber rim-fire rifles or smaller. We
allow the use of air rifles.
(ii) When hunting squirrel and rabbit,
and for the incidental take of raccoon,
we allow the use of dogs only after the
close of the State archery deer season.
When hunting quail, you may only use
dogs to locate, point, and retrieve.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
(iii) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (v), (vi), and (viii)
through (xi) of this section apply.
(iv) During the dog season for squirrel
and rabbit, all hunters, including
archers (while on the ground), except
waterfowl hunters, must wear a
minimum of a cap or hat that is hunter
orange, blaze pink, or other such color
as governed by State regulations.
(v) We only allow hunting of quail
until 2 p.m.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow
hunting of white-tailed deer, and the
incidental take of feral hog, on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) We are open only during the State
season for archery hunting of deer.
(ii) We prohibit organized deer drives.
We define a ‘‘deer drive’’ as an
organized or planned effort to pursue,
drive, chase, or otherwise frighten or
cause deer to move in the direction of
any person(s) who is part of the
organized or planned hunt and known
to be waiting for the deer.
(iii) We allow placement of temporary
deer stands no earlier than 48 hours
prior to the start of deer archery season.
Hunters must remove all deer stands
within 48 hours after the archery deer
season closes (see § 27.93 of this
chapter). We allow only one deer stand
per hunter on the refuge. Deer stands
must have the owner’s State license/
sportsmen’s identification number
clearly printed on the stand. We
prohibit hunting stands on trees painted
with white bands.
(iv) Deer hunters must display State
Wildlife Management Area (WMA)
hunter-orange or blaze-pink (as
governed by State WMA regulations)
while on the ground.
(v) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (v), (vi), and (viii)
through (xi) of this section apply.
(vi) We prohibit the use of deer
decoys.
(4) Sport fishing. We allow
recreational finfishing and shellfishing
on designated areas of the refuge subject
to the following conditions:
(i) You may only fish from legal
sunrise until legal sunset, except we
allow night fishing from the bank and
pier on Lake Road.
(ii) You must only use rod and reel or
pole and line while finfishing.
(iii) You must attend to any fishing,
crabbing, and crawfishing equipment at
all times.
(iv) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (e)(1)(i) and (xi) of this
section apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) Delta National Wildlife Refuge—
(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
88165
allow hunting of duck, merganser, teal,
light and dark goose, dove, snipe, rail,
gallinule, and coot on designated areas
of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) Each person age 18 and older must
possess and carry a valid, signed refuge
user brochure while on the refuge.
(ii) We allow migratory bird hunting
on Wednesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays,
and Sundays from 1⁄2 hour before legal
sunrise until 2 p.m. during the State
seasons, including the regular waterfowl
season, the State teal season, State youth
waterfowl season, State veterans
waterfowl season, and State light goose
special conservation season.
(iii) We only allow temporary blinds.
You must remove both blinds and
decoys by 2 p.m. each day (see § 27.93
of this chapter).
(iv) When hunting migratory game
birds, you may only use dogs to locate,
point, and retrieve game.
(v) We prohibit discharge of firearms
(see § 27.42 of this chapter) within 500
feet (152 meters (m)) of any residence or
oil and gas infrastructure, or within 200
feet (61 m) of any road, railroad, levee,
water control structure, designated
public use trail, designated parking area,
or other designated public use facilities.
(vi) All youth hunters age 15 and
younger must be supervised by an adult
during all hunts. One adult may
supervise up to two youths during
upland game and migratory game bird
hunts, but may supervise only one
youth during big game hunts. The
supervising adult must maintain visual
and voice contact with the youth at all
times.
(vii) Migratory bird hunters may enter
the refuge no earlier than 4 a.m., and all
hunters must exit the refuge no later
than 2 hours after legal sunset.
(viii) We allow the incidental take of
raccoon, feral hog, armadillo, opossum,
and coyote with approved shot and
weapons allowed during any open
season on the refuge.
(ix) We only allow the incidental take
of nutria with approved shot and
weapons during any open waterfowl
season on the refuge.
(x) We allow only the use of reflective
tacks as marking devices.
(xi) We close all refuge lands between
Raphael Pass and Main Pass to public
entry, including hunting and fishing,
from November 1 through the end of
February; year-round access is only
allowed in Main, Raphael, Octave,
Women, and Flatboat passes.
(xii) We prohibit hunters and anglers
from utilizing air boats, air thrust boats,
mud boats, aircraft, and air-cooled
propulsion engines on the refuge.
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
88166
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of rabbit, and the incidental
take of nutria, coyote, raccoon,
armadillo, and opossum, on designated
areas of the refuge subject to the
following conditions:
(i) The refuge rabbit season opens the
day after the State duck season closes
and continues through the remainder of
the State rabbit season.
(ii) We restrict hunting to shotgun
only.
(iii) We allow the use of dogs when
rabbit hunting.
(iv) We prohibit upland game hunting
on days corresponding with refuge deer
gun hunts.
(v) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (m)(1)(i), (v) through (viii),
(xi), and (xii) of this section apply.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow
hunting of white-tailed deer on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (m)(1)(i) and (v) through (xii)
of this section apply.
(ii) We allow archery deer hunting,
bucks only, from October 1 through 15.
We allow either-sex archery deer
hunting from October 16 through 31,
and from the day after the close of the
State duck season through the end of the
State deer archery season.
(iii) We allow placement of temporary
deer stands up to 48 hours prior to the
start of deer archery season. Hunters
must remove all deer stands within 48
hours after the archery deer season
closes (see § 27.93 of this chapter). We
allow only one deer stand per hunter on
the refuge. Deer stands must have the
owner’s State license/sportsmen’s
identification number clearly printed on
the stand.
(iv) We prohibit organized deer
drives. We define a ‘‘deer drive’’ as an
organized or planned effort to pursue,
drive, chase, or otherwise frighten or
cause deer to move in the direction of
any person(s) who is part of the
organized or planned hunt and known
to be waiting for the deer.
(v) We prohibit the use of deer
decoys.
(vi) We allow shotgun hunting of deer
on the Saturday and Sunday during the
first split of the regular waterfowl
season.
(vii) Deer hunters must display State
Wildlife Management Area (WMA)
hunter-orange or blaze-pink (as
governed by State WMA regulations).
(4) Sport fishing. We allow
recreational finfishing and shellfishing
on designated areas of the refuge subject
to the following conditions:
(i) We only allow sport finfishing and
shellfishing from 1⁄2 hour before legal
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
sunrise until 1⁄2 hour after legal sunset.
During the State waterfowl hunting
seasons, we only allow sport finfishing
and shellfishing from 2 p.m. until 1⁄2
hour after legal sunset.
(ii) We prohibit the use of trotlines,
limblines, slat traps, jug lines, nets, or
alligator lines.
(iii) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (m)(1)(i), (xi), and (xii) of
this section apply.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. Amend § 32.41 by revising and
republishing paragraph (f) to read as
follows:
§ 32.41
Michigan.
*
*
*
*
*
(f) Shiawassee National Wildlife
Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of waterfowl
(duck and goose), American woodcock,
American crow, American coot,
common gallinule, sora, Virginia rail,
and Wilson’s snipe on designated areas
of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) You must possess and carry a
refuge check-in card (FWS Form 3–
2405, Self-Clearing Check-in Permit).
(ii) We allow waterfowl hunting on
Saturdays, Sundays, Tuesdays, and
Thursdays during the regular goose
season after September 30.
(iii) We allow hunter access to the
refuge 2 hours before legal shooting time
to 2 hours after legal shooting time.
(iv) You may possess no more than 25
shotgun shells while hunting in the
field.
(v) We allow the use of dogs while
hunting, provided the dog is under the
immediate control of the hunter at all
times.
(vi) We allow the take of feral hogs
incidental to other lawful hunting using
legal methods of take.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of turkey, small game (eastern
fox squirrel, eastern cottontail, and ringnecked pheasant), and furbearers
(raccoon, coyote, and red fox) on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (f)(1)(iii) and (vi) of this
section apply, except we allow hunter
access to the refuge for furbearer
hunting from 1⁄2 hour before legal
sunrise to 1⁄2 hour after legal sunset.
(ii) You may only hunt turkey during
the spring season.
(iii) We allow dogs for hunting.
Raccoon hunting dogs must wear global
positioning system (GPS) or radio
collars.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow
hunting of white-tailed deer on
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (f)(1)(iii) and (vi) of this
section apply.
(ii) You must possess and carry a
refuge permit (State-issued permit).
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport
fishing on designated areas of the refuge
subject to the following conditions:
(i) We allow fishing by boat in
navigable waterways but not within any
managed refuge units.
(ii) We allow bank fishing from legal
sunrise to legal sunset only at
designated sites along the Tittabawassee
and Cass Rivers.
■ 7. Amend § 32.42 by revising and
republishing paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
§ 32.42
Minnesota.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge—
(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We
allow youth waterfowl hunting on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) We allow the use of dogs while
hunting, provided the dog is under the
immediate control of the hunter at all
times.
(ii) Hunters must dismantle hunting
blinds, platforms, and ladders made
from natural vegetation at the end of
each day.
(iii) You must remove all boats,
decoys, blind materials, stands,
platforms, cameras, and other personal
property brought onto the refuge at the
end of each day (see §§ 27.93 and 27.94
of this chapter).
(iv) We close the refuge from 7 p.m.
to 5:30 a.m.
(v) We allow the use of motorless
boats for hunting.
(vi) We only allow waterfowl hunting
during the State’s youth waterfowl
season.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of ruffed grouse and sharptailed grouse on designated areas of the
refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (v) of this
section apply.
(ii) We only allow hunting from the
opening of the State’s deer firearms
season to the close of the State’s ruffed
grouse and sharp-tailed grouse seasons,
respectively.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow
hunting of white-tailed deer and moose
on designated areas of the refuge subject
to the following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (iv), and (v) of this
section apply.
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(ii) We prohibit shooting on, from,
over, across, or within 30 feet (9 meters)
of a roadway open to motorized public
vehicle transportation at a big game
animal or a decoy of a big game animal.
(iii) We only allow archery hunting
from the start of the State’s deer firearms
season, and close as governed by the
State’s archery deer season.
(iv) You must remove all boats,
decoys, cameras, and other personal
property brought onto the refuge at the
end of each day (see §§ 27.93 and 27.94
of this chapter).
(v) We allow only portable tree
stands; portable, elevated hunting
platforms not attached to trees; and
portable ground blinds that can be
hand-carried into the hunting area.
(vi) You may place your tree stand(s),
elevated platform(s), and/or ground
blind(s) on the refuge only during your
designated licensed season. You must
remove these stands/blinds by the end
of your designated licensed season (see
§ 27.93 of this chapter). Unoccupied
stands/blinds may be used by anyone.
(vii) We allow only two stands/blinds
per hunter on the refuge. You must
clearly label the stands/blinds with your
State hunting license number.
(viii) We prohibit the use of nails,
wire, screws, or bolts to attach a stand
to a tree.
(ix) We prohibit hunting from a tree
into which a metal object has been
driven to support a hunter.
(4) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. Amend § 32.45 by revising and
republishing paragraph (o) to read as
follows:
§ 32.45
Montana.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
(o) Lost Trail National Wildlife
Refuge—(1) [Reserved]
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of turkey and mountain grouse
on designated areas of the refuge subject
to the following conditions:
(i) We allow use of riding or pack
stock on designated access routes
through the refuge to access off-refuge
lands as identified in the public use
leaflet.
(ii) We prohibit retrieval of game in
areas closed to hunting without a refuge
retrieval permit.
(iii) We allow portable or temporary
blinds and tree stands.
(iv) You may only use or possess
nontoxic shot shells while in the field
(see § 32.2(k)).
(3) Big game hunting. We allow
hunting of elk, white-tailed deer, and
mule deer on designated areas of the
refuge subject to the following
conditions:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (o)(2)(i) through (iii) of this
section apply.
(ii) Persons assisting disabled hunters
must not be afield with a hunting
firearm, bow, or other hunting device.
(4) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Amend § 32.46 by revising and
republishing paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
§ 32.46
Nebraska.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Fort Niobrara National Wildlife
Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of coot,
crow, dark goose, dove, duck, light
goose, rail, snipe, teal, and woodcock on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) Hunters and anglers may access the
refuge from 2 hours before legal sunrise
until 2 hours after legal sunset.
(ii) We allow access from designated
areas of the refuge.
(iii) You must remove all blinds and
decoys at the conclusion of each day’s
hunt (see § 27.93 of this chapter).
(iv) We allow the use of dogs when
hunting August 1 through April 30.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of badger, bobcat, coyote, fox,
long-tailed weasel, mink, opossum,
prairie dog, porcupine, rabbit, hare,
raccoon, skunk, squirrel, woodchuck,
State-defined furbearers, greater prairie
chicken, grouse, partridge, pheasant,
quail, and turkey on designated areas of
the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (ii), and (iv) of this
section apply.
(ii) We allow hunting with
muzzleloader, archery, shotgun, and
falconry.
(iii) You may only possess nontoxic
shot when hunting turkey (see
§ 32.2(k)).
(iv) Shooting hours for coyote, prairie
dog, porcupine, woodchuck, and Statedefined furbearers are 1⁄2 hour before
legal sunrise to 1⁄2 hour after legal
sunset.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow
hunting of deer, elk, and pronghorn
antelope on designated areas of the
refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii) of this
section apply.
(ii) We allow hunting only with
muzzleloader and archery equipment.
(iii) We allow portable tree stands and
ground blinds to be used from August
16 through January 31.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
88167
(4) Sport fishing. We allow fishing on
Minnechaduza Creek and on the
Niobrara River, downstream from the
Cornell Dam, subject to the following
conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii) of this
section apply.
(ii) We prohibit the use of limb or set
lines.
(iii) We prohibit the take of baitfish,
reptiles, and amphibians.
(iv) We prohibit use or possession of
alcoholic beverages while fishing on
refuge lands and waters.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. Amend § 32.53 by revising and
republishing paragraphs (q), (w), (oo),
and (kkk) to read as follows:
§ 32.53
North Dakota.
*
*
*
*
*
(q) Des Lacs National Wildlife
Refuge—(1) [Reserved]
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of fox, sharp-tailed grouse,
Hungarian partridge, turkey, and ringnecked pheasant on designated areas of
the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) We open for upland game bird
hunting on the day following the close
of the regular deer gun season through
the end of the State season.
(ii) We allow the use of hunting dogs
for retrieval of upland game.
(iii) We allow fox hunting from the
day following the regular firearm deer
season until March 31.
(iv) We prohibit accessing refuge
lands from refuge waters.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow deer,
elk, and moose hunting on designated
areas of the refuge subject to the
following conditions:
(i) We only allow the use of portable
tree stands and ground blinds. We
prohibit leaving stands and blinds
overnight on the refuge (see § 27.93 of
this chapter).
(ii) We prohibit entry to the refuge
before 12 p.m. (noon) on the first day of
the respective bow, gun, or
muzzleloader deer hunting seasons.
(iii) The condition set forth at
paragraph (q)(2)(iv) of this section
applies.
(iv) You may only possess nontoxic
ammunition when hunting elk (see
§ 32.2(k)).
(4) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
(w) J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife
Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of goose,
duck, and coot on designated areas of
the refuge subject to the following
condition: We allow the use of dogs for
hunting and retrieving game birds.
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
88168
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of ruffed and sharp-tailed
grouse, Hungarian partridge, turkey,
ring-necked pheasant, and fox on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) We open the refuge to hunting for
sharp-tailed grouse, Hungarian
partridge, and ring-necked pheasant
north of the Willow-Upham road on the
day following the close of the regular
firearm deer season.
(ii) We open the refuge to fox hunting
on the day following the close of the
regular firearm deer season. Fox hunting
on the refuge closes March 31.
(iii) Hunters may possess only
approved nontoxic shot (see § 32.2(k))
for all upland game hunting, including
turkey.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow
hunting of deer, elk, and moose on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) You must possess and carry a
refuge permit to hunt antlered deer on
the refuge outside the nine public
hunting areas during the regular
firearms season.
(ii) We prohibit entry to the refuge
before 12 p.m. (noon) on the first day of
the respective bow, gun, or
muzzleloader deer hunting seasons. You
may access refuge roads open to the
public before 12 p.m. (noon).
(iii) You may only possess nontoxic
ammunition when hunting elk (see
§ 32.2(k)).
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport
fishing on designated areas of the refuge
subject to the following conditions:
(i) We allow boat fishing from May 1
through September 30.
(ii) We allow ice fishing and dark
house spearfishing. We allow
snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles
(ATVs), utility terrain vehicles (UTVs),
motor vehicles, and fish houses on the
ice as conditions allow.
*
*
*
*
*
(oo) Lostwood National Wildlife
Refuge—(1) [Reserved]
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of sharp-tailed grouse,
Hungarian partridge, and ring-necked
pheasant on designated areas of the
refuge subject to the following
condition: We allow the use of dogs to
retrieve upland game.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow deer,
elk, and moose hunting on designated
areas of the refuge subject to the
following conditions:
(i) We prohibit entry to the refuge
before 12 p.m. (noon) on the first day of
the respective archery, gun, or
muzzleloader deer hunting season.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
(ii) You may only possess nontoxic
ammunition when hunting elk (see
§ 32.2(k)).
(4) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
(kkk) Upper Souris National Wildlife
Refuge—(1) [Reserved]
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of wild turkey, sharp-tailed
grouse, Hungarian partridge, and
pheasant on designated areas of the
refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) We allow the use of dogs for
hunting and retrieving of upland game
birds.
(ii) We allow hunters on the refuge
from 5 a.m. until 10 p.m.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow deer,
elk, and moose hunting on designated
areas of the refuge subject to the
following conditions:
(i) We only allow the use of portable
tree stands and ground blinds. You must
remove stands and blinds from the
refuge at the end of each day’s hunt (see
§ 27.93 of this chapter).
(ii) The condition set forth at
paragraph (kkk)(2)(ii) of this section
applies.
(iii) We prohibit entry to the refuge
before 12 p.m. (noon) on the first day of
the respective bow, gun, or
muzzleloader deer hunting seasons.
(iv) You may only possess nontoxic
ammunition when hunting elk (see
§ 32.2(k)).
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport
fishing on designated areas of the refuge
subject to the following conditions:
(i) We allow the use of fishing boats,
canoes, kayaks, and float tubes in
designated boat fishing areas from Lake
Darling Dam north to State Highway 28
(Greene) crossing for fishing from May
1 through September 30.
(ii) We allow fishing from
nonmotorized vessels only on the
Beaver Lodge Canoe Trail from May 1
through September 30.
(iii) We allow boating and fishing
from vessels on the Souris River from
Mouse River Park to the north boundary
of the refuge from May 1 through
September 30.
(iv) We allow snowmobiles, all-terrain
vehicles (ATVs), utility terrain vehicles
(UTVs), motor vehicles, and fish houses
on the ice as conditions allow from Lake
Darling Dam north to Carter Dam (Dam
41) for ice fishing.
(v) We allow you to place fish houses
overnight on the ice of Lake Darling as
governed by State regulations.
(vi) We allow anglers to place portable
fish houses on the Souris River north of
Carter Dam (Dam 41) and south of Lake
Darling Dam for ice fishing, but anglers
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
must remove the fish houses from the
refuge at the end of each day’s fishing
activity (see § 27.93 of this chapter).
(vii) We allow anglers on the refuge
from 5 a.m. until 10 p.m.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. Amend § 32.62 by revising and
republishing paragraph (p) to read as
follows:
§ 32.62
Texas.
*
*
*
*
*
(p) Trinity River National Wildlife
Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of duck,
merganser, and coot on designated areas
of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) We only allow hunting on
Champion Lake with a refuge-issued
permit (signed hunt brochure).
(ii) We only allow hunting on
Champion Lake on Saturdays and
Sundays during the State duck season.
Hunters may not enter the refuge until
4:30 a.m. and must be out of the hunt
area by 12 p.m. (noon).
(iii) We allow the use of dogs when
retrieving game.
(iv) Hunters age 16 and younger must
be under the direct supervision of an
adult age 17 or older.
(v) We require a minimum distance
between hunt parties of 150 yards (135
meters).
(vi) We allow motors of 10
horsepower or less on Champion Lake.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting for squirrel, and incidental take
of rabbit, on designated areas of the
refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) We require hunters to possess a
permit issued by Texas Parks and
Wildlife Department (TPWD). Permits
are issued by a lottery drawing. The
hunter must carry the nontransferable
permit at all times while hunting.
(ii) The condition set forth at
paragraph (p)(1)(iii) of this section
applies.
(iii) We allow all-terrain vehicle use
for hunters with disabilities in
designated units.
(iv) We require a minimum distance
between hunt parties of 200 yards (180
meters).
(v) Hunters may enter the refuge no
earlier than 4:30 a.m. We allow hunting
from 30 minutes before legal sunrise to
30 minutes after legal sunset only
during the days specified on the permit.
Hunters must be off the refuge 11⁄2 hours
after legal sunset.
(vi) Hunters may place no more than
one temporary stand on the refuge.
Hunters may place the stand during the
scouting week before the hunt begins
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
and must remove it the day the hunt
ends (see § 27.93 of this chapter).
Hunters must label blinds with the
name of the permit holder.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow
hunting of white-tailed deer, and
incidental take of feral hog, on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) We require hunters to possess a
TPWD-issued permit. Permits are issued
by a lottery drawing. The hunter must
carry the nontransferable permit at all
times while hunting.
(ii) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (p)(1)(iii) and (p)(2)(iii)
through (vi) of this section apply.
(iii) We allow archery hunting of
white-tailed deer during the refuge
designated 23-day archery season.
(iv) We allow gun hunting of whitetailed deer during the State-designated
general gun season in two 9-day ‘‘miniseasons’’ and during the Statedesignated muzzleloader season.
(4) Sport fishing. We allow fishing on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) We only allow fishing with pole
and line, rod and reel, or hand-held
line.
(ii) We prohibit the use of trotlines,
setlines, bows and arrows, gigs, spears,
fish traps, crab/crawfish traps, and/or
nets.
(iii) We prohibit the harvesting of frog
or turtle (see § 27.21 of this chapter).
(iv) We allow fishing from legal
sunrise to legal sunset.
■ 12. Amend § 32.66 by revising and
republishing paragraph (c) to read as
follows:
§ 32.66
Washington.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Conboy Lake National Wildlife
Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of goose,
duck, coot, and snipe on designated
areas of the refuge subject to the
following conditions:
(i) We prohibit discharge of any
firearm within 1⁄4 mile (396 meters) of
any maintained building or Federal
facility, such as, but not limited to, a
structure designed for storage, human
occupancy, or shelter for animals.
(ii) Hunters must remove all decoys
and other equipment at the end of each
day’s hunt (see § 27.93 of this chapter).
(2)–(4) [Reserved]
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. Amend § 32.67 by revising and
republishing paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
§ 32.67
*
*
West Virginia.
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
(a) Canaan Valley National Wildlife
Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of goose,
duck, rail, coot, gallinule, mourning
dove, snipe, and woodcock on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) We require each hunter to possess
and carry a signed refuge hunting
brochure (signed brochure).
(ii) Hunters may enter the refuge 1
hour before legal sunrise and must exit
the refuge, including parking areas, no
later than 1 hour after legal sunset.
(iii) We prohibit overnight parking
except by Special Use Permit (FWS
Form 3–1383–G) on Forest Road 80.
(iv) We allow the use of dogs
consistent with State regulations.
(v) We prohibit dog training except
during legal hunting seasons.
(vi) You may only use or possess
approved lead-free shot shells and
ammunition while in the Big Cove Unit
(see § 32.2(k)).
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
the hunting of ruffed grouse, squirrel,
cottontail rabbit, snowshoe hare, red
fox, gray fox, bobcat, woodchuck,
coyote, opossum, striped skunk, and
raccoon on designated areas of the
refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (iv), (v), and (vi) of
this section apply.
(ii) You may hunt coyote, raccoon,
opossum, skunk, and fox at night, but
you must obtain a Special Use Permit
(FWS Form 3–1383–G) at the refuge
headquarters before hunting.
(iii) We only allow hunting in the No
Rifle Zones with the following
equipment: archery (including
crossbow), shotgun, or muzzleloader.
(iv) We prohibit the hunting of upland
game species from March 1 through
August 31.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow the
hunting of white-tailed deer, black bear,
and turkey on designated areas of the
refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at
paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (iv), (vi), and
(a)(2)(iii) of this section apply.
(ii) We allow the use of dogs for
hunting black bear during the gun
season.
(iii) We prohibit organized deer
drives. We define a ‘‘deer drive’’ as an
organized or planned effort to pursue,
drive, chase, or otherwise frighten or
cause deer to move in the direction of
any person(s) who is part of the
organized or planned hunt and known
to be waiting for the deer.
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport
fishing on designated areas of the refuge
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
88169
subject to the following condition: We
prohibit the use of lead fishing tackle on
designated areas of the refuge.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 14. Amend § 32.68 by revising and
republishing paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
§ 32.68
Wisconsin.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Horicon National Wildlife
Refuge—(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of goose,
duck, coot, common moorhen, and
American woodcock on designated
areas of the refuge subject to the
following condition: We allow only
participants in the Learn to Hunt and
other special programs to hunt goose,
duck, coot, and common moorhen.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow
hunting of wild turkey, ring-necked
pheasant, gray partridge, ruffed grouse,
squirrel, cottontail rabbit, snowshoe
hare, raccoon, opossum, striped skunk,
red fox, gray fox, coyote, and bobcat on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) For hunting, you may use or
possess only approved nontoxic shot
shells while in the field, including shot
shells used for hunting wild turkey (see
§ 32.2(k)).
(ii) We prohibit night hunting of
upland game from 30 minutes after legal
sunset until 30 minutes before legal
sunrise the following day.
(iii) We allow the use of dogs while
hunting upland game (except raccoon,
opossum, striped skunk, red fox, gray
fox, coyote, and bobcat), provided the
dog is under the immediate control of
the hunter at all times.
(iv) Coyote, red fox, gray fox, and
bobcat hunting begins on the first day of
the traditional 9-day gun deer season.
(v) Coyote hunting ends on the last
day of the season for fox.
(vi) You may only hunt striped skunk
and opossum during the season for
raccoon.
(vii) You may only hunt snowshoe
hare during the season for cottontail
rabbit.
(viii) Hunters may enter the refuge no
earlier than 2 hours before legal
shooting hours and must exit the refuge
no later than 2 hours after legal shooting
hours.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow
hunting of white-tailed deer and black
bear in designated areas of the refuge
subject to the following conditions:
(i) You must remove all boats, decoys,
game cameras, blinds, blind materials,
stands, platforms, and other personal
equipment brought onto the refuge at
the end of each day’s hunt (see § 27.93
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
88170
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
of this chapter). We prohibit hunting
from any stand left up overnight.
(ii) We prohibit hunting bear with
dogs.
(iii) Hunters must possess a refuge
permit (FWS Form 3–2439, Hunt
Application/Permit—National Wildlife
Refuge System) to hunt in Area E
(surrounding the office/visitor center).
(iv) The condition set forth at
paragraph (d)(2)(viii) applies.
(v) Any ground blind used during any
gun deer season must display at least
144 square inches (929 square
centimeters) of solid-blaze-orange or
fluorescent pink material visible from
all directions.
(4) Sport fishing. We allow fishing on
designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) We only allow bank fishing or
fishing through the ice.
(ii) We prohibit the use of fishing
weights or lures containing lead.
(iii) We prohibit the taking of any
mussel (clam), crayfish, frog, leech, or
turtle species by any method on the
refuge (see § 27.21 of this chapter).
(iv) We allow fishing in designated
areas from legal sunrise to legal sunset
each day.
*
*
*
*
*
Shannon A. Estenoz,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and
Parks.
[FR Doc. 2024–25905 Filed 11–6–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 665
[Docket No. 241101–0287]
available at https://
www.regulations.gov/docket/NOAANMFS-2024-0088, or from Sarah Malloy,
Regional Administrator, NMFS Pacific
Islands Regional Office (PIRO), 1845
Wasp Blvd., Bldg. 176, Honolulu, HI
96818.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
RIN 0648–BN03
Pacific Island Fisheries; Amendment 7
to the Fishery Ecosystem Plan for the
American Samoa Archipelago and
Final Rule; Discontinue Rebuilding
Plan for American Samoa Bottomfish
and Implement Annual Catch Limits
and Accountability Measures for
Fishing Years 2024–2026
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends the
Fishery Ecosystem Plan for the
American Samoa Archipelago (FEP) to
discontinue the rebuilding plan for
American Samoa bottomfish and
implements single-species annual catch
limits (ACL) and accountability
measures (AM) for bottomfish in the
American Samoa archipelago for fishing
years 2024, 2025 and 2026. The action
is necessary because new best scientific
information indicates the fishery is not
overfished or experiencing overfishing,
and new ACLs and AMs are warranted.
This final rule supports the long-term
sustainability of the fishery.
DATES: This rule is effective December 9,
2024.
ADDRESSES: Background information on
the bottomfish fishery in American
Samoa is found in the FEP available
from the Western Pacific Regional
Fishery Management Council, 1164
Bishop St., Suite 1400, Honolulu, HI
96813, telephone 808–522–8220, fax
808–522–8226, or https://
www.wpcouncil.org. Copies of
supporting documents for this action are
SUMMARY:
Keith Kamikawa, NMFS Pacific Islands
Regional Office, Sustainable Fisheries,
808–725–5177.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: NMFS and
the Western Pacific Fishery
Management Council (Council) manage
the bottomfish fishery in the U.S.
Exclusive Economic Zone (i.e., Federal
waters, generally 3–200 nautical miles
(nmi) (6–345 kilometers (km)) around
American Samoa under the FEP for the
American Samoa Archipelago, as
authorized by the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (Magnuson-Stevens Act). The 2019
stock assessment for the American
Samoa bottomfish fishery indicated that
the stock was overfished and
experiencing overfishing. The fishery
has therefore been managed under a
rebuilding plan since 2022 (87 FR
25590, May 5, 2022). However, in
September 2023 NMFS determined that
none of the stocks in the fishery are
overfished and were not overfished in
the year in which the 2019 overfished
determination was made or in any year
since. Accordingly, NMFS is
discontinuing the rebuilding plan, and
implementing new ACLs and AMs to
prevent overfishing and provide
sustainable management for the fishery
consistent with the FEP, the MagnusonStevens Act and implementing
regulations.
NMFS is implementing the following
single-species ACLs for each of the
bottomfish management unit species
(BMUS) assessed by the 2023
benchmark stock assessment for fishing
years 2024, 2025 and 2026. The fishing
year for American Samoa bottomfish
begins on January 1 and ends on
December 31.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1
TABLE 1—ACLS FOR AMERICAN SAMOA BMUS FOR FISHING YEARS 2024, 2025, AND 2026
ACL
(lb/kg)
Species
Samoan name
Aphareus rutilans .....................................................................
Aprion virescens ......................................................................
Caranx lugubris ........................................................................
Etelis coruscans .......................................................................
Lethrinus rubrioperculatus .......................................................
Lutjanus kasmira ......................................................................
Pristipomoides flavipinnis .........................................................
Pristipomoides zonatus ............................................................
Variola louti ..............................................................................
Palu-gutusiliva .........................................................................
Asoama ...................................................................................
Tafauli ......................................................................................
Palu-loa ...................................................................................
Filoa-paomumu .......................................................................
Savane ....................................................................................
Palu-sina .................................................................................
Palu-ula ...................................................................................
Velo .........................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\07NOR1.SGM
07NOR1
8,554/3,880
4,872/2,210
3,086/1,400
4,872/2,210
8,554/3,880
16,645/7,550
2,579/1,170
1,521/690
2,205/1,000
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 216 (Thursday, November 7, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 88147-88170]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25905]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 32
[Docket No. FWS-HQ-NWRS-2024-0034; FXRS12610900000-245-FF09R20000]
RIN 1018-BH17
National Wildlife Refuge System; 2024-2025 Station-Specific
Hunting and Sport Fishing Regulations
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), open or
expand hunting opportunities on 12 National Wildlife Refuges (NWRs). We
also close hunting on 111 acres at Crab Orchard NWR so that the area
can be repurposed for other recreational uses, including camping. We
also make changes to existing station-specific regulations in order to
reduce the regulatory burden on the public, increase access for hunters
and anglers on Service lands and waters, and comply with a Presidential
mandate for plain-language standards. Finally, the best available
science, analyzed as part of this rulemaking, indicates that lead
ammunition and tackle have negative impacts on both wildlife and human
health. With this final rule, Canaan Valley NWR in West Virginia will
require lead-free ammunition for all hunting on the new Big Cove Unit.
Additionally, Des Lacs, J. Clark Salyer, Lostwood, and Upper Souris
NWRs in North Dakota will require lead-free ammunition for newly opened
elk hunting. While the Service continues to evaluate the future of lead
use in hunting and fishing on Service lands and waters, this rulemaking
does not include any opportunities that increase or authorize the new
use of lead.
DATES: This rule is effective November 6, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christian Myers, (571) 422-3595.
Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of
hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or
TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services. Individuals
outside the United States should use the relay services offered within
their country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in
the United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The National Wildlife Refuge System Administration Act of 1966 (16
U.S.C. 668dd-668ee), as amended (Administration Act), closes NWRs in
all States except Alaska to all uses until opened. The Secretary of the
Interior (Secretary) may open refuge areas to any use, including
hunting and/or sport fishing, upon a determination that the use is
compatible with the purposes of the refuge and National Wildlife Refuge
System (Refuge System) mission. The action also must be in accordance
with provisions of all laws applicable to the areas, developed in
coordination with
[[Page 88148]]
the appropriate State fish and wildlife agency(ies), consistent with
the principles of sound fish and wildlife management and
administration, and otherwise in the public interest. These
requirements ensure that we maintain the biological integrity,
diversity, and environmental health of the Refuge System for the
benefit of present and future generations of Americans.
We annually review hunting and sport fishing programs to determine
whether to include additional stations or whether individual station
regulations governing existing programs need modifications. Changing
environmental conditions, State and Federal regulations, and other
factors affecting fish and wildlife populations and habitat may warrant
modifications to station-specific regulations to ensure the continued
compatibility of hunting and sport fishing programs and to ensure that
these programs will not materially interfere with or detract from the
fulfillment of station purposes or the Service's mission.
Provisions governing hunting and sport fishing on refuges are in
title 50 of the Code of Federal Regulations at part 32 (50 CFR part
32), and on hatcheries at part 71 (50 CFR part 71). We regulate hunting
and sport fishing to:
Ensure compatibility with refuge and hatchery purpose(s);
Properly manage fish and wildlife resource(s);
Protect other values;
Ensure visitor safety; and
Provide opportunities for fish- and wildlife-dependent
recreation.
On many stations where we decide to allow hunting and sport
fishing, our general policy of adopting regulations identical to State
hunting and sport fishing regulations is adequate to meet these
objectives. On other stations, we must supplement State regulations
with more-restrictive Federal regulations to ensure that we meet our
management responsibilities, as outlined under Statutory Authority,
below. We issue station-specific hunting and sport fishing regulations
when we open wildlife refuges and fish hatcheries to migratory game
bird hunting, upland game hunting, big game hunting, or sport fishing.
These regulations may list the wildlife species that you may hunt or
fish; seasons; bag or creel (container for carrying fish) limits;
methods of hunting or sport fishing; descriptions of areas open to
hunting or sport fishing; and other provisions as appropriate.
Statutory Authority
The Administration Act, as amended by the National Wildlife Refuge
System Improvement Act of 1997 (Improvement Act; Pub. L. 105-57),
governs the administration and public use of refuges, and the Refuge
Recreation Act of 1962 (Recreation Act; 16 U.S.C. 460k-460k-4) governs
the administration and public use of refuges and hatcheries.
Amendments enacted by the Improvement Act were built upon the
Administration Act in a manner that provides an ``organic act'' for the
Refuge System, similar to organic acts that exist for other public
Federal lands. The Improvement Act serves to ensure that we effectively
manage the Refuge System as a national network of lands, waters, and
interests for the protection and conservation of our Nation's wildlife
resources. The Administration Act states first and foremost that we
focus our Refuge System mission on conservation of fish, wildlife, and
plant resources and their habitats. The Improvement Act requires the
Secretary, before allowing a new use of a refuge, or before expanding,
renewing, or extending an existing use of a refuge, to determine that
the use is compatible with the purpose for which the refuge was
established and the mission of the Refuge System. The Improvement Act
established as the policy of the United States that wildlife-dependent
recreation, when compatible, is a legitimate and appropriate public use
of the Refuge System, through which the American public can develop an
appreciation for fish and wildlife. The Improvement Act established six
wildlife-dependent recreational uses as the priority general public
uses of the Refuge System. These uses are hunting, fishing, wildlife
observation and photography, and environmental education and
interpretation.
The Recreation Act authorizes the Secretary to administer areas
within the Refuge System and Hatchery System for public recreation as
an appropriate incidental or secondary use only to the extent that
doing so is practicable and not inconsistent with the primary
purpose(s) for which Congress and the Service established the areas.
The Recreation Act requires that any recreational use of refuge or
hatchery lands be compatible with the primary purpose(s) for which we
established the refuge and not inconsistent with other previously
authorized operations.
The Administration Act and Recreation Act also authorize the
Secretary to issue regulations to carry out the purposes of the Acts
and regulate uses.
We develop specific management plans for each refuge prior to
opening it to hunting or sport fishing. In many cases, we develop
station-specific regulations to ensure the compatibility of the
programs with the purpose(s) for which we established the refuge or
hatchery and the Refuge and Hatchery System mission. We ensure initial
compliance with the Administration Act and the Recreation Act for
hunting and sport fishing on newly acquired land through an interim
determination of compatibility made at or near the time of acquisition.
These regulations ensure that we make the determinations required by
these acts prior to adding refuges to the lists of areas open to
hunting and sport fishing in 50 CFR parts 32 and 71. We ensure
continued compliance by the development of comprehensive conservation
plans and step-down management plans, and by annual review of hunting
and sport fishing programs and regulations.
Summary of Comments and Responses
On August 2, 2024, we published in the Federal Register (89 FR
63139) a proposed rule to open or expand hunting and fishing
opportunities at 12 refuges for the 2024-2025 hunting seasons. We
accepted public comments on the proposed rule for 30 days, ending
September 3, 2024. By that date, we received 154 comments on the
proposed rule. More than two-thirds of these comments were identical or
nonsubstantive comments. We received 68 unique comments, and 47 of
those comments were substantive. We discuss the unique, substantive
comments we received below by topic. Beyond our responses below,
additional station-specific information on how we responded to comments
on particular hunting or fishing opportunities at a given refuge or
hatchery can be found in that station's final hunting and/or fishing
package, each of which can be located in Docket No. FWS-HQ-NWRS-2024-
0034 on https://www.regulations.gov.
Comment (1): We received more than 100 comments expressing general
support for the proposed hunting expansions in the rule. These comments
of general support either expressed appreciation for the increased
hunting access in the proposed rule overall, expressed appreciation for
increased access at particular refuges, or both. In addition to this
general support, some commenters requested additional hunting and
fishing opportunities. Requests for additional opportunities to hunt
waterfowl were most common.
Our Response: Hunting and fishing on Service lands is a tradition
that dates back to the early 1900s. In passing the Improvement Act,
Congress reaffirmed that the Refuge System was created to conserve
fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats, and would facilitate
[[Page 88149]]
opportunities for Americans to participate in compatible wildlife-
dependent recreation, including hunting and fishing, on Refuge System
lands. We prioritize wildlife-dependent recreation, including hunting
and fishing, when doing so is compatible with the purpose of the refuge
and the mission of the Refuge System.
We will continue to open and expand hunting and sport fishing
opportunities across the Refuge System; however, as detailed further in
our response to Comment (2), below, opening or expanding hunting or
fishing opportunities on Service lands is not a quick or simple
process. The annual regulatory cycle begins in June or July of each
year for the following hunting and sport fishing season (the planning
cycle for this 2024-2025 final rule began in June 2023). This annual
timeline allows us time to collaborate closely with our State, Tribal,
and Territorial partners, as well as other partners including
nongovernmental organizations, on potential opportunities. It also
provides us with time to complete environmental analyses and other
requirements for opening or expanding new opportunities. Therefore, it
would be impracticable for the Service to complete multiple regulatory
cycles in one calendar year due to the logistics of coordinating with
various partners. Once we determine that a hunting or sport fishing
opportunity can be carried out in a manner compatible with individual
station purposes and objectives, we work expeditiously to open it. In
addition to creation of new opportunities, this also applies to
commenter requests for changes in the season dates, days of the week,
hours open, methods of take, or other logistical requirements that
would expand existing opportunities, including those that would also
align our hunting and fishing regulations more closely with State
hunting and fishing regulations.
Within the context of these continuous annual regulatory cycles,
the Service does welcome nongovernmental organizations and individual
hunters and anglers sharing their thoughts on potential future
opportunities through public comments and other opportunities. We seek
to provide hunting and fishing opportunities that both serve our
wildlife conservation and management objectives and provide the highest
quality recreational experience that we can offer for hunters and
anglers, including when it comes to waterfowl hunting specifically, so
we give due consideration to the requests and recommendations that we
receive.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (2): Several commenters expressed general opposition to any
hunting or fishing in the Refuge System. Some of these commenters
stated that hunting was antithetical to the purposes of a ``refuge,''
which, in their opinion, should serve as an inviolate sanctuary for all
wildlife. The remaining commenters generically opposed expanded hunting
or fishing opportunities at specific stations, or opposed specific
hunting activities such as waterfowl hunting.
Our Response: The Service prioritizes facilitating wildlife-
dependent recreational opportunities, including hunting and fishing, on
Service land in compliance with applicable Service law and policy. For
refuges, the Administration Act, as amended, stipulates that hunting
(along with fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and
environmental education and interpretation), if found to be compatible,
is a legitimate and priority general public use of a refuge and should
be facilitated (16 U.S.C. 668dd(a)(3)(D)). Thus, we only allow hunting
of resident wildlife on Refuge System lands if such activity has been
determined compatible with the established purpose(s) of the refuge and
the mission of the Refuge System as required by the Administration Act.
For the 12 stations opening or expanding hunting or fishing in this
rule, we determined that the proposed actions were compatible.
Each station manager makes a decision regarding hunting and fishing
opportunities only after rigorous examination of the available
information, consultation and coordination with States and Tribes, and
compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.) and section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), as well as other applicable laws
and regulations. The many steps taken before a station opens or expands
a hunting or fishing opportunity on the refuge ensure that the Service
does not allow any opportunity that would compromise the purpose of the
station or the mission of the Refuge System.
Hunting of resident wildlife on Service lands generally occurs
consistent with State regulations, including seasons and bag limits.
Station-specific hunting regulations can be more restrictive (but not
more liberal) than State regulations and often are more restrictive in
order to help meet specific refuge objectives. These objectives include
resident wildlife population and habitat objectives, minimizing
disturbance impacts to wildlife, maintaining high-quality opportunities
for hunting and other wildlife-dependent recreation, minimizing
conflicts with other public uses and/or refuge management activities,
and protecting public safety.
The word ``refuge'' includes the idea of providing a haven of
safety as one of its definitions, and as such, hunting might seem an
inconsistent use of the Refuge System. However, again, the
Administration Act stipulates that hunting, if found compatible, is a
legitimate and priority general public use of a wildlife refuge.
Furthermore, we manage refuges to support healthy wildlife populations
that in many cases produce harvestable surpluses that are a renewable
resource. As practiced on refuges, hunting and fishing do not pose a
threat to wildlife populations. It is important to note that taking
certain individuals through hunting does not necessarily reduce a
population overall, as hunting can simply replace other types of
mortality. In some cases, however, we use hunting as a management tool
with the explicit goal of reducing a population; this is often the case
with exotic and/or invasive species that threaten ecosystem stability.
Therefore, facilitating hunting opportunities is an important aspect of
the Service's roles and responsibilities as outlined in the legislation
establishing the Refuge System, and the Service will continue to
facilitate these opportunities where compatible with the purpose of the
specific refuge and the mission of the Refuge System.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (3): We received comments from the West Virginia Division
of Natural Resources, the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and
Fisheries, the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, and the
Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies on the
opportunities in the proposed rule. The West Virginia Division of
Natural Resources supported the expansion of hunting at Canaan Valley
NWR, but also expressed concern that requiring lead-free ammunition on
the new Big Cove Unit could reduce hunter participation, reduce take of
deer, and create enforcement challenges. The West Virginia Division of
Natural Resources also recommended incentive-based approaches to the
use of lead-free ammunition. The Louisiana Department of Wildlife and
Fisheries commented specifically on the proposed hunt plan for Bayou
Teche NWR and expressed support for the expanded hunting access. The
Association of Fish and
[[Page 88150]]
Wildlife Agencies expressed general support for increased access for
hunters and anglers, but expressed concerns about the Service's
position on the use of lead ammunition and the individual refuges
introducing lead-free ammunition requirements; the Association of Fish
and Wildlife Agencies also expressed appreciation for coordination and
communication between the Service and State agencies and advocated for
the Service to pursue approaches based in education and incentives that
encourage hunters to voluntarily choose to use lead-free ammunition, in
particular the voluntary incentive pilot program developed in
collaboration with the Hunting and Wildlife Conservation Council, an
external stakeholder advisory group for the Department of the Interior.
The Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies expressed
support for the Service increasing hunting and fishing opportunities
and for the Service's pilot program for providing hunters with
incentives to voluntarily use lead-free ammunition, but objected to the
regulations requiring the use of lead-free ammunition as inconsistent
with State regulations and as lacking sufficient scientific support.
Our Response: The Service appreciates the support of, and is
committed to working with, our state partners to identify additional
opportunities for expansion of hunting and sport fishing on Service
lands and waters. We welcome and value State partner input on all
aspects of our hunting and fishing programs.
In response to the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, we
appreciate the support for the expanded hunting acres for all existing
hunting and acknowledge the concerns expressed with the lead-free
ammunition requirement on the new Big Cove Unit. As to the
recommendation to explore incentives for the use of lead-free
ammunition, we are actively implementing a pilot program to test out
direct incentives for hunters to voluntarily use lead-free ammunition
for designated hunts at Canaan Valley NWR and six other refuges in the
fall of 2024, as discussed in our response to Comment (4), below. On
the concerns about hunter participation and harvest rates related to
the lead-free ammunition requirement, as discussed in more detail in
our responses to Comments (6) through (13), below, the Service has not
seen evidence of hunter participation declines elsewhere in response to
lead-free requirements, and, accordingly, we do not anticipate
insufficient harvest of deer. Also, in the specific case of Canaan
Valley NWR, even if declines in hunter participation on the Big Cove
Unit were to occur in response to the lead-free ammunition requirement,
hunters would likely simply shift their activities to the other hunt
units of the same refuge and still harvest from the same deer
population. On the concern about enforcement challenges for the lead-
free ammunition requirement, as discussed in our response to Comment
(14), below, we are confident in our ability to enforce the
regulations, since this requirement does not fundamentally differ from
existing regulations elsewhere in the Refuge System and our law
enforcement personnel receive applicable training.
In response to the Louisiana Department of Wildlife and Fisheries,
we appreciate the support for the new opportunities at Bayou Teche NWR
and look forward to collaboration and coordination on potential future
hunting and fishing opportunities in Louisiana.
In response to the Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, we
appreciate the support for the hunting and fishing openings and
expansions in this rulemaking and value our shared commitment to
compatible hunter and angler access on the National Wildlife Refuge
System. We also appreciate the support for our lead-free voluntary
incentive pilot program, developed in collaboration and coordination
with State agencies in the seven States where the pilot sites are
located. As discussed in our response to Comment (4), below, we are
committed to robustly pursuing this voluntary approach and evaluating
the potential efficacy for addressing lead poisoning in wildlife. At
the same time, the Service's position remains that the best available
science demonstrates the impacts of lead ammunition on wildlife and
ecological health and supports the Service not introducing new
opportunities that would increase the use of lead ammunition until we
have identified the best path forward. Our lead-free pilot program
could produce a voluntary incentive model that proves to be the best
path forward, but we must first take time to test out the incentives,
collect data, and evaluate our results. Going forward, we will continue
to invite input and involvement from the Association of Fish and
Wildlife Agencies and our individual State partners as we continue to
evaluate the future of lead use on Service lands and waters as part of
an open and transparent process to find the best methods to address
lead's impact on wildlife and ecological health. As to the Association
of Fish and Wildlife Agencies' objections to regulations requiring
lead-free ammunition use, see our responses to Comments (7) through
(9), below, addressing the concerns about scientific evidence, cost,
and availability, which are shared by some other commenters. Similarly,
see our response to Comment (14), below, regarding commenters' concerns
about the enforceability of lead-free ammunition requirements.
In response to the Northeast Association of Fish and Wildlife
Agencies, we value the support for the increased recreational access
through this rule and appreciate the recognition of our collaboration
and coordination on increasing access and on exploring voluntary
incentives for the use of lead-free ammunition. We disagree with the
notion that there is insufficient scientific evidence to support
regulatory requirements for hunters to use lead-free ammunition, as
discussed in our response to Comment (7), below, but the Service is
willing to address the demonstrated poisoning of wildlife from the use
of lead ammunition for hunting through voluntary incentives, should
they prove to be sufficiently effective. As to the concern that such
regulations typically differ from State regulations, while we endeavor
to align our regulations with State regulations wherever feasible, the
Service routinely sets requirements for hunters and anglers that are
more restrictive than the applicable State regulations whenever
necessitated by our conservation mission or refuge purposes, as noted
in our response to Comment (2), above. Requirements to use lead-free
ammunition are one example in this category, alongside limitations on
season dates, time of day, methods of take, and more that are similarly
necessary because the Service is obligated to prioritize the health of
wildlife species and their habitats on Refuge System lands and waters.
Hunting and fishing activities must be assessed to be compatible with
our conservation mission as authorized by appropriate regulations, and
we must introduce further regulations as necessary to ensure their
continued compatibility in order to keep a given opportunity open.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (4): Several commenters either encouraged the Service to
pursue incentives encouraging hunters to voluntarily use lead-free
ammunition or specifically expressed support for the Service's new
pilot program providing direct incentives for hunters participating in
designated hunts at seven selected refuges in the fall of 2024. Most of
these commenters noted that they objected to any regulations
[[Page 88151]]
requiring the use of lead-free ammunition, but some commenters were
supportive of both lead-free regulatory requirements and voluntary
approaches like the Service's new pilot program.
Our Response: The Service has encouraged and will continue to
encourage voluntary use of non-lead ammunition and tackle, including
through our new collaborative pilot program for providing direct
incentives and robust educational workshops to hunters, but we also
have the authority to impose regulatory requirements for use of lead-
free ammunition for designated hunting on individual refuges. Notably,
the Refuge System, and all Service lands and waters, are different from
private, State, and even other Federal public lands. We have legal
obligations to prioritize wildlife health and biodiversity, to consider
the compatibility of new and ongoing hunting and fishing activities,
and to assess the potential impact of these activities on the natural
resources under our jurisdiction. The Service is evaluating the future
of lead use through an open and transparent process with input from a
broad array of partners and stakeholders about the best approach, which
may include education and incentives encouraging voluntary choice.
During this process, the Service does not intend to authorize hunting
and fishing opportunities that increase the use of lead ammunition and
tackle on the Refuge System. This is consistent with our full
commitment to the lead-free pilot program for hunter education and
incentives, which is aimed at identifying the most effective voluntary
approach to addressing lead poisoning in wildlife from lead ammunition.
In this rule, the Service has put in place a lead-free ammunition
requirement for newly opened elk hunting at four refuges in North
Dakota and for all hunting on the new Big Cove Unit at Canaan Valley
NWR in West Virginia. These requirements are each either limited to a
specific species or to a specific hunt unit. Each of these targeted
requirements is based on the best available science and the sound
professional judgement of Service personnel, and was put in place only
after discussions with the relevant State agency.
We appreciate the support from commenters for our new pilot program
for providing hunters with educational workshops and direct economic
incentives to voluntarily use lead-free ammunition. The Service was
able to collaborate with some of the commenter organizations and
others, in particular the Hunting and Wildlife Conservation Council, in
the design of the lead-free pilot program. The Service is also
collaborating with individual State agencies and the North American
Non-Lead Partnership in implementing the pilot program. We are
encouraged by the potential for the pilot program to identify and
demonstrate the most effective voluntary approach to addressing lead
ammunition impacts to wildlife and ecological health.
The 2024 iteration of the pilot program will take place for
designated hunts at seven selected refuges throughout the Refuge
System. The pilot program is designed to address the hurdles of
awareness, demonstrated performance, price, and availability that are
considered some of the major barriers for hunters in voluntarily
choosing to use lead-free ammunition. Accordingly, at each pilot site,
the Service will utilize educational messaging, including voluntary
intensive educational workshops with ammunition performance
demonstrations at selected sites. Similarly, at each pilot site, we
will offer a rebate incentive in the form of a prepaid debit card for
eligible hunters who provide proof of their purchase of lead-free
ammunition, on a first come, first served basis. The implementation of
the pilot program at seven sites in 2024 will mark a substantial step
in progress toward addressing poisoning of wildlife from lead
ammunition and will set the stage for further refinement of the
educational and direct incentive elements of the lead-free pilot
program, as well as provide data for analysis of the potential impacts
and potential scalability of the program. As we operate the pilot
program, we will seek to continue the open and collaborative approach
we have utilized thus far and hope to receive continued support and
cooperation from hunters and from external hunting and conservation
organizations.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (5): Several commenters expressed concern over the use of
lead ammunition or lead fishing tackle on Service lands and waters.
Nearly all of these commenters expressed support for the individual
lead-free requirements in the proposed rule. Most of these commenters
urged the Service to eliminate the use of lead ammunition and tackle
throughout the Refuge System. Many commenters expressed concerns about
raptor species, including the bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus),
and other species that scientific studies have shown to be especially
susceptible to adverse health impacts from lead ammunition and tackle.
Our Response: The Service appreciates the concerns from commenters
about the issue of bioavailability of lead in the environment and is
aware of the potential impacts of lead on fish and wildlife. See, for
example, the recent study from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) with
Service collaboration, Vincent Slabe, et al. ``Demographic implications
of lead poisoning for eagles across North America,'' which is available
online through a link at https://www.usgs.gov/news/national-news-release/groundbreaking-study-finds-widespread-lead-poisoning-bald-and-golden. Accordingly, the Service pays special attention to species
susceptible to lead uptake and to sources of lead that could impact
wildlife and ecological health.
Historically, the principal cause of lead poisoning in waterfowl
was the high densities of lead shot in wetland sediments associated
with migratory bird hunting activities (Kendall et al. 1996). In 1991,
as a result of high bird mortality, the Service instituted a nationwide
ban on the use of lead shot for hunting waterfowl and coots (see 50 CFR
32.2(k)). However, lead ammunition is still used for other types of
hunting, and lead tackle is used for fishing on private and public
lands and waters, including within the Refuge System.
Due to the continued lead use outside of waterfowl hunting, there
remains concern about the bioavailability of spent lead ammunition
(bullets) and fishing tackle on the environment, the health of fish and
wildlife, and human health. The Service is aware of fish and wildlife
species, including endangered and threatened species, that are
susceptible to the build-up of lead in their systems coming directly
from their food sources or secondhand through the food ingested by
their food sources. There is also evidence that some species are
susceptible to direct ingestion of lead ammunition or tackle due to
their foraging behaviors. For example, the Service recognizes that
ingested lead fishing tackle has been found to be a leading cause of
mortality in adult common loons (Grade, T. et al. (2017). Population-
level effects of lead fishing tackle on common loons. The Journal of
Wildlife Management 82(1): pp. 155-164). The impacts of lead on human
health and safety have been a focus of several scientific studies. We
are familiar with studies that have found the ingestion of animals
harvested via the use of lead ammunition increased levels of lead in
the human body (e.g.,
[[Page 88152]]
Buenz, E. (2016). Lead exposure through eating wild game. American
Journal of Medicine, 128: p. 458).
It is because of lead's potential for ecological health impacts
that, in this rulemaking, the Service has continued to take a measured
approach in not adding to the use of lead on refuge lands (see 87 FR
35136, June 9, 2022). Accordingly, the opportunities in this final rule
either do not involve the use of lead ammunition or tackle (i.e.,
waterfowl hunting or archery) or require the use of lead-free
ammunition or tackle. This measured approach is also part of the
Service's broader commitment to evaluating the future of lead use
throughout the Refuge System.
In response to the commenters' request that the Service eliminate
the use of lead ammunition and fishing tackle throughout the Refuge
System, the Service is committed to doing what best serves the public
interest and our conservation mission, including facilitating
compatible, wildlife-dependent, recreational hunting and fishing. As we
committed to do in our 2021-2022 rulemaking (see 86 FR 48822 at 48830,
August 31, 2021) and our 2022-2023 rulemaking (see 87 FR 57108 at
57122, September 16, 2022), the Service has been evaluating, and
continues to evaluate, lead use in hunting and fishing on Service lands
and waters. This rule is designed to avoid increased use of lead on
refuges as the Service continues to evaluate the future of lead use by
seeking input from partners, through a transparent process, to inform
the determination of what actions and methods are appropriate for
addressing the potential for adverse environmental and ecological
health impacts. This process includes a commitment to fully exploring a
voluntary approach through our new pilot program for hunter education
and incentives.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (6): Several commenters expressed opposition to the Service
requiring the use of lead-free ammunition for designated hunting
opportunities at individual refuges in this rule or in general. Some of
these commenters simply expressed a general opposition to the concept
of lead-free requirements, but the rest put forward one or more points
in arguing against lead-free requirements. The concerns collectively
expressed by these more substantive comments are addressed in Comment
(7) through Comment (13), below.
Our Response: The Service has allowed, and with the promulgation of
this rule continues to allow, the use of lead ammunition and/or tackle
in hunting and sport fishing in most of the Refuge System. The vast
majority of stations and individual hunting and fishing opportunities
currently permit lead use, consistent with State regulations allowing
the use of lead ammunition and tackle. Lead ammunition and tackle are
currently allowed where we have previously determined the activity is
not likely to result in dangerous levels of lead exposure. However, the
Service has been transparent about its intent to seriously consider the
future of lead use, consistent with its role as the steward of the
Refuge System. Therefore, we are evaluating what is best for the
resources belonging to the American public regarding the future use of
lead ammunition and tackle on Service lands and waters. The best
available science, analyzed as part of this rulemaking, demonstrates
that lead ammunition and tackle have negative impacts on both human
health and wildlife health, and those impacts are more acute for some
species.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (7): Most of the comments opposed to regulations concerning
the use of lead ammunition questioned the sufficiency of scientific
support for lead-free requirements. Some of the commenters also claimed
there is specifically a lack of scientific evidence of ``population-
level'' lead impacts and this means lead-free ammunition requirements
are unwarranted.
Our Response: We refer commenters concerned about scientific
evidence in support of the rulemaking to the analyses of environmental
impacts in the NEPA and ESA section 7 documentation for each refuge in
this rulemaking and the cumulative impacts report accompanying the
rulemaking, which are all available in Docket No. FWS-HQ-NWRS-2024-0034
on https://www.regulations.gov. For our NEPA and ESA section 7
analyses, we considered peer-reviewed scientific studies evaluating the
impacts of lead to humans, to wildlife generally, and to specific
species--including endangered and threatened species and species
especially susceptible to lead ammunition or tackle exposure. While
this evidence is not determinative as to whether lead-free ammunition
and tackle should be required in all cases, given the full range of
factors to consider on the topic of lead use, it is inaccurate to claim
that there is no scientific evidence of adverse impacts to human health
or wildlife and ecological health, or both, from lead ammunition and
tackle or that the Service has not presented such evidence as part of
this rulemaking. Each refuge in this rule used the best available
science and the expertise and sound professional judgment of refuge
staff to determine that our management strategies, including
promulgated non-lead requirements, are based on sound science and the
specific circumstances of that individual refuge.
Moreover, we also reject the related claim that scientific evidence
of so-called ``population-level'' impacts to wildlife is both a
prerequisite to Service action and lacking in the available science.
Depending on the situation, we may manage wildlife at the ``population
level'' or at the ``individual level,'' such as acting to protect
individuals of an endangered or threatened species. Similarly,
depending on the situation, we may adopt regulations, policies, or
practices that respond to or prevent adverse impacts at the population
level or to individual animals and plants. In fact, there are clear
cases where we need to act preventatively or early to control invasive
species, pests, or animal diseases, since they are much more difficult
to eradicate when there is ``population-level'' damage. ``Population-
level'' impacts are not necessary for regulation to the exclusion of
any other factors, although in the past the Service and others have
regulated lead use based, at least in part, on addressing impacts to
whole populations, as demonstrated impacts to waterfowl populations and
the population of California condors prompted the 1991 nationwide
prohibition on waterfowl hunting with lead ammunition (see 56 FR 22100,
May 13, 1991) and the 2019 prohibition on hunting with lead ammunition
in California (see California Assembly Bill No. 711, California Fish
and Game Code at section 3004.5), respectively. In any case, the
scientific literature demonstrates that lead use has ``population-
level'' impacts.
There is evidence of population-level impacts and potential
population-level impacts to waterfowl and upland game bird species from
lead fishing tackle and lead ammunition through direct ingestion. Lead
fishing tackle presents a risk of lead poisoning to many waterfowl
species, including loons and swans (Pokras and Chafel 1992; Rattner et
al. 2008; Strom et al. 2009). The primary concerns are discarded whole
or fragmented lead sinkers, as well as other lead tackle and even lead
ammunition released into the water, that rest on river and lake bottoms
where diving birds ingest them alongside pebbles, as pebbles are
necessary to break down food through
[[Page 88153]]
grinding in the birds' digestive systems. This results in lead
poisoning because the grinding action breaks down the pieces of
ingested lead into fine lead particles inside of the birds that can
then enter their blood streams. Studies have consistently found impacts
of ingested lead fishing tackle are a leading cause of mortality in
adult common loons (Pokras and Chafel 1992; Scheuhammer and Norris
1995; Franson et al. 2003; Pokras et al. 2009; Grade et al. 2017; Grade
et al. 2019). Strom et al. (2009) assessed lead exposure in Wisconsin
birds and found that approximately 25 percent of the trumpeter swan
fatalities from 1991 through 2007 were attributed to ingested lead.
Also, lead ammunition discarded on land presents a similar risk of lead
poisoning from upland game birds swallowing discarded ammunition
alongside the pebbles they use for digestion.
Another source of population-level impacts and potential
population-level impacts from lead is indirect ingestion by birds of
prey and other scavengers from consuming animals shot with lead
ammunition. The primary concerns for birds of prey are lead fragments
from lead ammunition that remain in the carcasses and gut piles of
hunted animals that are scavenged by these birds. The fine fragments of
lead, observable in x-rays of harvested game animals, are ingested
because they are embedded in the meat and other animal tissues being
scavenged and then enter the digestive systems and blood streams of the
birds of prey. Many studies have looked at the impacts of this lead
exposure to eagle health (see, e.g., Kramer and Redig 1997; O'Halloran
et al. 1998; Kelly and Kelly 2005; Golden et al. 2016; Hoffman 1985a,
1985b; Pattee 1984; Stauber 2010). This includes the recent study,
published in 2022, from the USGS with Service collaboration, Vincent
Slabe, et al. ``Demographic implications of lead poisoning for eagles
across North America,'' which is available online via a link at https://www.usgs.gov/news/national-news-release/groundbreaking-study-finds-widespread-lead-poisoning-bald-and-golden. This study explicitly finds
that lead poisoning is causing population growth ratesto slowfor bald
eagles by 3.8percentand golden eagles by 0.8 percent annually. These
growth-slowing impacts to populations are statistically significant
and, in the case of bald eagles, are occurring for a species that was
previously endangered and is still in the process of recovering to
historical levels. Thus, it is inaccurate to claim there are not known
``population-level'' impacts from lead use.
Finally, the Service's mission and statutory obligations require
refuges to be closed to hunting and fishing by default, and this
changes only when we have determined hunting or fishing activities are
compatible with our conservation mission and we have promulgated
regulations to open designated areas to hunting and fishing. Hunting
and fishing access and opportunities are thus constrained by the
regulations to only those activities that are compatible. Thus, the
Service has an obligation to demonstrate, using the best available
science, that any given aspect of hunting or fishing on the Refuge
System is compatible with our mission. The Service has also built into
our compatibility process the need to reevaluate compatibility
determinations after a set period, either 10 or 15 years, depending on
the use, because new science or new conditions could compel the Service
to change our compatibility determinations. In the case of the use of
lead, our past determinations that lead ammunition and lead tackle were
permissible to use on Refuge System lands does not change this
fundamental structure of our processes. The use of lead ammunition and
tackle, like any other visitor activity, can only be allowed on a
refuge if, and only for as long as, the refuge applies the best
available science and sound professional judgment to find it
compatible. The suggestion from some commenters that historical use of
lead or past determinations that lead use was compatible compels us to
find the future use of lead compatible is therefore counter to our
mission and statutory obligations. This suggestion also ignores the
accumulation of lead in the environment over time. The Service will
continue to revisit our compatibility determinations, as required,
while considering the best available science and applying sound
professional judgment.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (8): Some commenters opposed to requirements in this rule
to use lead-free ammunition claimed lead-free ammunition is more
expensive than lead ammunition. Some of these commenters further
expressed the concern that lead-free ammunition requirements could
prevent participation in hunting due to price differences.
Our Response: We do not agree that lead-free ammunition is
prohibitively expensive, especially in comparison to lead ammunition.
However, we recognize that there could be some cost burden of
compliance for hunting and fishing opportunities where lead-free
ammunition or tackle is required. For example, lead-free ammunition is
very close in price to premium lead ammunition but can be more
expensive than some lead ammunition. Notably, the Maine Department of
Inland Fisheries and Wildlife and others have recognized that this cost
difference is typically less than $10 per box of ammunition, with boxes
usually lasting multiple hunting seasons (see online at https://www.maine.gov/ifw/hunting-trapping/hunting/nonlead-ammunition.html).
When we have restricted lead ammunition use, we have first ensured
that the ecological health and conservation benefits outweigh any
potential for cost burden on hunters. We are confident that non-lead
ammunition is not cost-prohibitive, as hunting continues on all Refuge
System stations where we have restricted lead use. Moreover, we have
not seen declines in hunting use attributable to lead-free ammunition
requirements. In other words, hunting-use day declines at stations that
require lead-free ammunition do not appear to deviate from general
trends of declining hunting participation that affect all stations in
the Refuge System. Where we have seen meaningful declines is in the
price of lead-free ammunition options, as there has been a continuous
trend for years of decreasing prices, and the 1991 nationwide ban on
lead ammunition for waterfowl hunting shows that regulations can spur
innovation and production, which brings the prices down for lead-free
options.
Finally, even though the cost burden of compliance with lead-free
ammunition requirements on individual refuges is not onerous, the
Service is considering various measures to incentivize hunters to
transition from lead to lead-free ammunition and mitigate the costs of
the transition. In fact, we are in the process of implementing an
ambitious lead-free voluntary pilot program, beginning this fall for
the 2024 hunting seasons, that includes providing direct economic
incentives to hunters to address the price difference as a barrier to
choosing lead-free ammunition. This pilot program is discussed further
in our response to Comment (4), above. We look forward to continuing to
work closely with the Hunting and Wildlife Conservation Council, the
Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, our state agency partners,
and other hunting organizations to further develop our lead-free
voluntary pilot program.
[[Page 88154]]
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (9): Most commenters opposed to non-lead ammunition and
tackle requirements asserted that there is limited availability of
lead-free ammunition compared to that of lead ammunition, such that
requiring lead-free ammunition would prevent participation in refuge
hunting opportunities. Some of these commenters further noted that the
availability of non-lead ammunition is more limited for certain
firearms and types of ammunition, especially .22 rifle ammunition. One
commenter also, tangentially to the topic of availability, stated that
the Gun Control Act of 1968, as amended (GCA; 18 U.S.C. 921 et seq.),
and associated Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
(ATF) regulations (27 CFR part 478) concerning armor piercing
ammunition hinder the production and thus availability of lead-free
ammunition.
Our Response: We do not agree that lead-free ammunition and tackle
are insufficiently available to hunters and anglers in localities where
we have restricted the use of lead ammunition or tackle, either in the
past or through this rulemaking. However, we recognize that there could
be some compliance burden in identifying and locating lead-free
ammunition and tackle for hunting and fishing opportunities, where
required. Where we have restricted lead use in the past or will
restrict it through this rulemaking, we have ensured that the
ecological health and conservation benefits outweigh any potential for
compliance burden on hunters and anglers, including the ease of
locating available lead-free ammunition and tackle. As with the costs
of lead-free options, for opportunities where lead-free ammunition or
tackle are required, the Service has not seen declines in hunting or
fishing participation that can be attributed to lead-free ammunition or
tackle being less widely available than lead ammunition and tackle.
Also, as with costs, there are existing trends of increasing
availability of lead-free options, and the 1991 national ban on lead
ammunition for waterfowl hunting demonstrates that regulations
requiring the use of lead-free ammunition can promote increased
availability. Also, the pilot program that the Service is implementing
this fall for the 2024 hunting seasons will also help to address
availability, as more hunters voluntarily participate and the increased
demand gives manufacturers a reason to produce, and retailers a reason
to offer, more lead-free ammunition. In fact, the Service is interested
in collaboration with retailers that can directly address awareness and
availability of lead-free ammunition and tackle as we continue to
develop our pilot program.
Additionally, we recognize that non-lead ammunition may be less
available than lead ammunition, in general, for some models of firearms
and certain ammunition calibers. This is especially concerning, as
noted by some commenters, for .22 rifle ammunition where existing lines
of lead-free ammunition have been recently discontinued. Lead-free
ammunition remains available, but this development will impact
availability and could impact refuge hunting where lead-free ammunition
is required, particularly squirrel hunting. The Service will continue
to monitor the lead-free options in the market and take the information
into account in deciding whether and where to require lead-free
ammunition. We also encourage industry and retailers to continue to
manufacture and offer more lead-free ammunition options so that
ammunition is available to hunters, whether they are required, or
voluntarily choose, to use lead-free ammunition.
Finally, the claim that the Gun Control Act of 1968 (GCA) and
associated ATF regulations concerning armor piercing ammunition hinder
the production and thus availability of lead-free ammunition is beyond
the scope of this rulemaking. However, the Service has raised this
issue with the ATF at the recommendation of the Hunting and Wildlife
Conservation Council.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (10): A few commenters pointed to sources of lead, other
than hunting and fishing with lead ammunition and tackle, in the
environment. These commenters asserted that the Service should not have
lead-free ammunition and tackle requirements because these other
sources of lead also cause negative health impacts for fish and
wildlife.
Our Response: While there are of course other potential sources of
lead in the environment, including other sources that may be
bioavailable to wildlife, the Service does not see this as diminishing
the importance or conservation benefits of addressing lead poisoning of
wildlife from hunting with lead ammunition or from fishing with lead
tackle. While these other sources of lead vary in the degree of risk
that they could present to wildlife, the Service is duly concerned by
the health risks from any potential source of lead exposure for
wildlife and humans. There are likely benefits to be had from efforts
to address each of these sources in turn, but that is generally beyond
the scope of this rulemaking.
Moreover, these other potential sources of lead do not change the
fact that the best available science has drawn a clear link between the
use of lead ammunition and tackle and its ecological health impacts. In
fact, the study from Slabe et al. (2022), cited earlier in our response
to Comment (7), provides strong evidence that not only is there an
impact to eagles from lead ammunition specifically, but there is also
strong evidence that it represents the most important source of lead
exposure for the species studied. Essentially, the study demonstrated
that the highest rates of acute lead poisoning in eagles, measured by
liver lead concentrations, corresponded in terms of timing with the use
of lead ammunition in the form of a nationwide spike in lead poisoning
during winter months in the midst of hunting seasons. To the extent
other sources of lead do bear on our decisions about lead ammunition
and tackle use, these additional lead sources in fact weigh in favor of
lead-use restrictions, as lead can accumulate in wildlife from repeated
exposure from one or multiple sources (see, e.g., Behmke 2015).
Similarly, the Service is also not discouraged from either
incentivizing or requiring the use of lead-free ammunition and tackle,
where appropriate, by the continued use of lead ammunition and tackle
for hunting and fishing on nearby State and privately held lands and
waters. The Service will act to address threats, including from visitor
uses, as necessary within our authority, in the interest of our
conservation mission even if, and often especially when, human
activities outside of refuge borders present similar threats.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (11): One comment opposed to non-lead ammunition and tackle
requirements maintained that lead ammunition and tackle are made of an
inorganic, insoluble form of lead that poses less risk of harm to
humans or animals.
Our Response: While inorganic lead presents a low risk of adverse
health impacts while it retains its solid, molded form (i.e., anglers
face relatively little risk from handling lead tackle), the basis for
concern about lead ammunition and tackle is that there are multiple
ways for such lead to become harmful to human and wildlife health.
Organic lead (i.e., the banned gasoline additive tetramethyl lead) is
more dangerous than inorganic lead because it can be absorbed through
the skin. Inorganic lead can also have serious
[[Page 88155]]
impacts in certain forms (e.g., fragments and particles) and once it is
inside an animal.
First, as briefly described in our response to Comment (7), lead
ammunition, including bonded lead ammunition, fragments when it hits an
animal, and this distributes tiny pieces of lead within a wide radius
in the soft tissues of the harvested animal (see Trinogga et al.
(2019). Fragmentation of lead-free and lead-based hunting rifle bullets
under real life hunting conditions in Germany. Amibo 48(9): pp. 1056-
1064 (published online March 23, 2019)). These tiny fragments of lead
are then consumed by scavenger species eating carcasses or gut piles
left behind or humans eating the game meat. In this tiny, fragmented
form and acted on by digestive enzymes and acids, the lead derived from
ammunition can then shed particles that enter the blood stream and
affect systems throughout the body, presenting both chronic and acute
health risks.
Second, as briefly described in our response to Comment (7), lead
ammunition and tackle that is deposited along shores or at the bottom
of bodies of water can be ingested by several species of birds that
forage in these locations for pebbles, as pebbles are necessary to
break down food through grinding in a special organ of their digestive
systems called a gizzard. This grinding process, along with digestive
acids and enzymes that accompany food into the gizzard, can easily
break down lead ammunition and tackle into fragments and cause it to
shed particles, just as the process breaks down the stones and shells
the birds intended to ingest. These lead particles are then able to
enter the bloodstream and affect systems throughout the body,
presenting both chronic and acute health risks.
Third, lead ammunition and tackle that ends up discarded in bodies
of water may begin to dissolve and thus introduce lead particles into
the water that present both chronic and acute health risks to both
aquatic animals living in the water and terrestrial animals drinking
from the water. This process requires high acidity in the water that
dissolves lead ammunition or tackle, and it is essentially the same
concern as the problem of corrosion from acidic water in lead water
pipes. These particles of lead dissolved into the water are easily
taken up into the bloodstream as they pass through digestive systems.
It is through these known processes that lead ammunition and tackle
present a risk, and the best available scientific evidence indicates
that these processes are occurring at rates that are causing negative
impacts on the health of certain wildlife species. Thus, we seriously
consider the impact of inorganic forms of lead, such as lead ammunition
and tackle, on wildlife and human health in our regulatory and
management processes.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of this
comment.
Comment (12): One commenter, in objecting to the regulation of lead
ammunition and tackle, expressed nonsubstantive concerns centered on
their views about the constitutionality and/or legality of the Service
creating non-lead ammunition and tackle requirements through our
regulations. This comment also offered nonsubstantive concerns about
their general projections of impacts to the ammunition and tackle
industry and the broader economy.
Our Response: The Service thoroughly addressed these and similar
concerns in our final rule for the 2022-2023 station-specific hunting
and sport fishing regulations (see 87 FR 57108 at 57117-57119,
September 16, 2022). Our position remains the same on these topics in
this 2024-2025 rulemaking.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of this
comment.
Comment (13): A few commenters expressed concerns about the
availability of copper for use in ammunition, as copper is one of the
alternatives to lead used for non-lead ammunition. The comments
expressed concern that due to limited sources of copper and demand for
copper for other uses, an increase in demand for copper for ammunition
from non-lead ammunition requirements may not be possible or could
drive up the cost of non-lead ammunition.
Our Response: These concerns are outside the scope of this
rulemaking. It is outside the expertise of the Service and the scope of
this rule to speculate about the current or future availability of
copper, or how it could affect prices for goods made using copper.
There are, however, two things the Service can say on this topic.
First, by requiring the use of lead-free ammunition for elk hunting at
four refuges and all hunting on one unit of another refuge in this
rule, the Service is not specifically requiring the use of copper
ammunition. Second, the non-lead ammunition regulations in this
rulemaking impact a small portion of the market for ammunition.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (14): We also received several comments concerning
potential compliance and enforcement challenges related to requirements
for hunters to use lead-free ammunition, in particular the requirement
specific to the Big Cove Unit of Canaan Valley NWR set forth in this
rule. Some of these comments specifically noted the compliance
challenge that it may be difficult for hunters to discern when they are
on the Big Cove Unit and when they are on another unit of the refuge.
Some also expressed concerns related to enforcement with the difficulty
of law enforcement to differentiate between lead-free and lead
ammunition and with the wording of the lead-free requirement stating
that hunters may only ``possess'' lead-free ammunition when this is
applied to big game hunters who choose to carry a sidearm containing
lead ammunition for self-defense.
Our Response: The compliance and enforcement challenges identified
in these comments are indeed inherent challenges when it comes to lead-
free ammunition requirements within a given jurisdictional boundary. On
the compliance side, while we recognize that differences in regulations
between adjacent units of huntable land present the potential for
confusion, this situation occurs in other contexts because of
differences in land uses and ownership, and responsible hunters are
familiar with the responsibility to be aware of what land they are on
and the applicable regulations. Our law enforcement personnel have been
appropriately and effectively enforcing similar requirements for years
at various individual refuges and already receive applicable training.
The requirement will be enforced by Service law enforcement officers in
the same manner as similar existing lead-free ammunition requirements
elsewhere in the Refuge System, some of which already apply to big game
hunting ammunition and some of which apply only to designated units
within a given refuge or individual refuges within a complex.
This includes the scenario of a big game hunter carrying a lawful
side-arm for self-defense purposes while hunting. The Service's refuge
hunting regulations govern the lawful use and possession of firearms
and ammunition for hunting, but do not prohibit possession for purposes
of self-defense of a handgun, and ammunition it contains, lawfully
carried under applicable State law.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (15): Several commenters expressed concerns about or
objections to the removal of a permit requirement for the existing
muzzleloader deer hunt at Fort Niobrara NWR, including concern about
hunting pressure reducing the quality of the deer hunt.
[[Page 88156]]
Our Response: The Service acknowledges the concern that removing
the Fort Niobrara NWR refuge-specific permit requirement may affect the
quality of the muzzleloader deer hunt there. We do not anticipate that
removing the refuge permit requirement will increase the number of
hunters that participate in the Fort Niobrara muzzleloader deer hunt,
but we recognize that it could. Our desired result is to reduce an
administrative burden for hunters and to more closely align refuge
regulations with State regulations. We will continue to monitor
muzzleloader deer hunter use at the refuge. If we identify significant
negative impacts to habitat, wildlife, or refuge visitors, we will
consider further regulatory changes.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (16): Two comments expressed objections to the closing of
111 acres that are currently open to hunting at Crab Orchard NWR.
Our Response: This closure of a small area within Crab Orchard NWR
is necessary in order to allow for use of the area for other public
recreational uses, including camping. In addition to our safety and
compatibility considerations, the Service must comply with State laws
related to how close hunting may be authorized to the intended camping
area. Crab Orchard NWR will still offer hunters more than 44,000
huntable acres.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (17): We received multiple comments expressing concern
about opportunities for hunting of predator species, including black
bear, bobcat, fox, and coyote hunting. Some of these comments also
object to the use of dogs and hunting at night when hunting these
species.
Our Response: Refuge managers consider predator management
decisions on a case-by-case basis. As with all species, a refuge
manager makes a decision about managing predator populations, which are
included in the category of resident wildlife, including allowing
predatory species to be hunted, only after careful examination to
ensure the action would comply with relevant laws, policies, and
directives.
The Administration Act, as amended, directs the Service to manage
refuges for biological integrity, diversity, and environmental health.
Predators play a critical role in the integrity, diversity, and overall
health of ecosystems, so before allowing predators to be hunted, a
refuge manager must ensure that these actions do not threaten the
integrity, diversity, or health of the refuge ecosystem.
The refuge manager must also determine that the action is
compatible with refuge purposes and the mission of the Refuge System,
and in keeping with the refuge's comprehensive conservation plan (CCP)
and other step-down plans. In addition, the refuge manager analyzes the
impacts of the actions on the environment through the NEPA process and
section 7 of the ESA. Therefore, a refuge manager must take many steps
to ensure that any opportunity for hunting predators on a refuge meets
the Service's applicable laws and policies. All of the same
considerations apply where, on a case-by-case basis, we authorize the
use of dogs or align with State regulations to allow hunting at night
in conjunction with predator hunting or other hunting.
The Administration Act, as amended, also mandates that regulations
authorizing hunting or fishing of fish and resident wildlife within the
Refuge System shall be, to the extent practicable, consistent with
State fish and wildlife laws, regulations, and management plans (16
U.S.C. 668dd(m)). Therefore, all the opportunities for hunting
predators in this rule that are intended to bring greater consistency
with State fish and wildlife laws, regulations, and management plans
are part of realizing the Service's mission. Moreover, these, as with
all predator hunting determinations and all hunting and fishing
determinations, were only made after careful consideration by the
refuge manager to ensure that such actions would not threaten the
integrity, diversity, and overall health of the ecosystem and were
compatible with both the purpose of the refuge and the mission of the
Refuge System.
Finally, both the NEPA process and the rulemaking process provide
the opportunity for the public to provide comments and any additional
information on the impacts of our actions. We considered the additional
information provided from the public on this issue during these public
comment periods and determined that they did not affect our initial
determinations that the opportunities for hunting predators on specific
refuges will have no more than minor impacts on the population health
of these species or other wildlife at the local, regional, or national
level.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (18): We received two comments expressing concern about the
Service having adequate funding and staffing, including law enforcement
officers, to administer our hunting and fishing opportunities.
Our Response: We appreciate the concern of these commenters for
sufficient funding and staffing to safely and effectively administer
hunting and fishing activities throughout the Refuge System.
Importantly, Service policy (603 FW 2.12.A.(7); see https://www.fws.gov/policy-library/603fw2) requires station managers to
determine that adequate resources, including personnel, exist or can be
provided by the Service or a partner to properly develop, operate, and
maintain the use in a way that will not materially interfere with or
detract from fulfillment of the refuge purpose(s) and the Service's
mission. If resources are lacking for establishment or continuation of
wildlife-dependent recreational uses, the refuge manager will make
reasonable efforts to obtain additional resources or outside assistance
from States, other public agencies, local communities, and/or private
and nonprofit groups before determining that the use is not compatible.
For example, when Service law enforcement resources are lacking, we are
often able to rely upon State fish and game law-enforcement capacity to
assist in enforcement of hunting and fishing regulations. For all
refuges opening or expanding hunting or sport fishing in this rule, we
have determined that we have adequate resources, including available
funds and personnel, to develop, operate, and maintain the proposed
hunt programs.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (19): We received one comment arguing that we should have
prepared an environmental impact statement (EIS) instead of station-
specific environmental analyses (EAs) combined with a national
cumulative impact report.
Our Response: The Service disagrees with the assertion that we
should prepare an EIS before opening or expanding hunting and fishing
opportunities on refuges. We completed individual EAs for, or applied
categorical exclusions to, each refuge in this rule, in compliance with
NEPA, to evaluate the impacts of opening or expanding hunting or
fishing opportunities through this rulemaking. These EAs and
categorical exclusions underwent regional and national review to
address and consider these actions from a local, regional, multi-State,
and/or flyway perspective, and to consider the cumulative impacts from
this larger geographical context. The 2024-2025 cumulative impacts
report concludes, after analyzing the impacts, collectively,
[[Page 88157]]
of all EAs and categorical exclusions prepared in connection with this
rule, that the rule would not have significant impacts at the local,
regional, or national level. The commenter who raised these
environmental analysis concerns provided no additional information that
would change this analysis or our conclusion. As discussed above, we
annually conduct management activities on refuges that minimize or
offset impacts of hunting and fishing on physical and cultural
resources, including establishing designated areas for hunting;
restricting levels of use; confining access and travel to designated
locations; providing education programs and materials for hunters,
anglers, and other users; and conducting law enforcement activities.
In this rulemaking, the Service is expanding opportunities for
recreational hunting and fishing. Expanding opportunities does not
necessarily result in increased impacts to refuge resources. We
anticipate that for some refuges, these expansions will not result in
changes in usage of the refuge. In other cases, these expansions may
lead to some increase in use of refuges, but these changes would likely
be minor. Opening of new refuges or new opportunities may attract
people to the refuge, but these hunters and/or anglers were likely
already participating elsewhere on State or other Federal lands.
Overall, considering the decreasing trends in hunting generally, and
trends on refuges specifically, we do not expect this final rule to
have a significant impact on the environment. As noted in our
cumulative impacts report, hunter participation trends have been
generally declining, some refuges attract a very small number of
participants, and often participation rates decline over the course of
a season.
Finally, a Federal court found that this approach, using a bottom-
up analysis to assess the cumulative impact of increased hunting and
fishing across the entire Refuge System, was an appropriate way for the
Service to analyze the impacts of the rule in compliance with NEPA (see
Fund for Animals v. Hall, 777 F. Supp. 2d 92, 105 (D.D.C. 2011)).
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of this
comment.
Comment (20): We received two comments that advocated for requiring
some form of monetary payment to the Service for members of the public
to participate in recreational uses other than hunting or fishing.
Our Response: Notably, the Service does not uniformly charge
entrance or recreation fees, but does for some stations on a case-by-
case basis. Any such fee, however, is outside the scope of this
rulemaking, which is devoted to regulations for hunting and fishing
activities on the Refuge System.
The Service collects entrance and recreation fees under the
authorities of the Refuge Revenue Sharing Act of 1935 (16 U.S.C. 715s)
and the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (FLREA; 16 U.S.C. 6801
et seq.). Service policy requires refuge managers to consider two
factors in determining fees for any activity: Fair market value and
costs involved in providing the use. Because fair market value and
refuge costs can differ among localities, there is often a range of
different fees for similar activities in different locations. For
locations that collect fees under FLREA, public comment periods are
required when refuges initiate fees and to change the types and amounts
of fees. We encourage public participation in this process.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of these
comments.
Comment (21): We received one comment that advocated for barring
all filming on the Refuge System.
Our Response: The Service already has policies and regulations
governing filming on the Refuge System, which are outside the scope of
this rulemaking. We will note that filming has the potential to impact
wildlife or habitat, particularly larger-scale commercial filming and
noncommercial filming involving models, sets, or lighting equipment.
Under our current regulations (see 50 CFR 27.71 and 43 CFR part 5),
such filming will require a special use permit and the associated
evaluation of the potential impacts prior to granting the permit.
However, we encourage refuge visitors to use their personal hand-held
cameras and cellphones to capture photos video of wildlife and of
natural scenery in order to share with friends and loved ones and to
preserve memories of their visits.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of this
comment.
Comment (22): We received one comment requesting an extension of
the public comment period through December 3, 2024.
Our Response: We declined to extend the public comment period for
the August 2, 2024, proposed rule (89 FR 63139). While extending the
comment period was not necessary and extending it by 3 months would not
have been feasible, the Service acknowledges that, for this annual rule
cycle, the public comment period was shorter than those we provided in
the last few years. This was necessitated by consideration of the
balance between providing as much opportunity for public comment as
possible while keeping delays to fall hunting opportunities to a
minimum. We provided 30 days for public comments, and, within that
time, we received comments covering the full range of typical topics
for this annual rulemaking from a substantial number of the industry,
sporting, and conservation organizations that are stakeholders for
these regulations. The comments we received on the August 2, 2024,
proposed rule are also a representative set of comments from individual
members of the public. The Service believes that 30 days was an
adequate amount of time for interested parties to provide their
comments to us.
We did not make any changes to the rule as a result of this
comment.
Changes From the Proposed Rule
As discussed above, under Summary of Comments and Responses, we
made no changes in this final rule based on comments we received on the
August 2, 2024, proposed rule (89 FR 63139) and NEPA documents for
individual refuges.
We did, however, withdraw the proposed authorization of incidental
take of feral hog when big game hunting on Green River NWR. As of
earlier this year, the Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife
Resources prohibits hunting of feral hogs, also known as wild pigs,
within Kentucky. The Department is pursuing a strategy of eradication
through trapping for this invasive species, and we are seeking to
ensure our refuge regulations are aligned with this effort. We
encourage anyone hunting or otherwise recreating on Green River NWR to
report sightings of feral hogs to the Kentucky Department of Fish and
Wildlife Resources.
We also made several editorial, nonsubstantive revisions to this
rule to improve clarity or to correct cross-references.
Effective Date
We are making this rule effective upon the date of its filing at
the Office of the Federal Register (see DATES, above). We provided a
30-day public comment period for the August 2, 2024, proposed rule (89
FR 63139). We have determined that any further delay in implementing
these station-specific hunting and sport fishing regulations would not
be in the public interest, in that a delay would hinder the effective
planning and administration of refuges' hunting and sport fishing
programs. This rule does not impact the public generally in terms of
requiring lead time for compliance. Rather, it relieves restrictions in
that it allows activities on refuges and hatcheries that we would
[[Page 88158]]
otherwise prohibit. Therefore, we find good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3) and 808(1) to make this rule effective upon the date of its
filing at the Office of the Federal Register.
Amendments to Existing Regulations
Updates to Hunting and Fishing Opportunities on NWRs
This document codifies in the Code of Federal Regulations all the
Service's hunting and/or sport fishing regulations that we are updating
since the last time we published a rule amending these regulations (88
FR 74050; October 30, 2023) and that are applicable at Refuge System
units previously opened to hunting and/or sport fishing. We adopt these
changes to better inform the general public of the regulations at each
station, to increase understanding and compliance with these
regulations, and to make enforcement of these regulations more
efficient. In addition to finding these regulations in 50 CFR parts 32,
visitors to our stations may find them reiterated in literature
distributed by each station or posted on signs.
Table 1--Changes for 2024-2025 Hunting/Sport Fishing Season
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Station State Migratory bird hunting Upland game hunting Big game hunting Sport fishing
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bayou Teche NWR.................... Louisiana............. E..................... Already Open......... E.................... Already Open.
Canaan Valley NWR.................. West Virginia......... E..................... E.................... E.................... Already Open.
Des Lacs NWR....................... North Dakota.......... Closed................ Already Open......... O.................... Closed.
Green River NWR.................... Kentucky.............. N..................... Closed............... N.................... Closed.
Horicon NWR........................ Wisconsin............. Already Open.......... Already Open......... Already Open......... E.
J. Clark Salyer NWR................ North Dakota.......... Already Open.......... Already Open......... O.................... Already Open.
Lostwood NWR....................... North Dakota.......... Closed................ Already Open......... O.................... Closed.
Trinity River NWR.................. Texas................. O..................... Already Open......... E.................... Already Open.
Turnbull NWR....................... Washington............ Already Open.......... Closed............... E.................... Closed.
Upper Souris NWR................... North Dakota.......... Closed................ Already Open......... O.................... Already Open.
Valentine NWR...................... Nebraska.............. Already Open.......... E.................... Already Open......... Already Open.
Waccamaw NWR....................... South Carolina........ E..................... Already Open......... Already Open......... Already Open.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key:
N = New station opened for the first time.
O = Opening (New species and/or new activity on a station previously open to other activities).
E = Expansion (Station is already open to the activity: the final rule adds new lands/waters, modifies areas open to hunting or fishing, extends season
dates, adds a targeted hunt, modifies season dates, modifies hunting hours, etc.).
The changes for the 2024-2025 hunting/fishing season noted in the
table above are each based on a complete administrative record which,
among other detailed documentation, also includes a hunt plan, a
compatibility determination (for refuges), and the appropriate NEPA
analysis, all of which were the subject of a public review and comment
process. These documents are available upon request.
The Service recognizes the possible effects of lead ammunition on
refuge resources and human health, and we will continue to evaluate and
appropriately regulate the use of lead ammunition and tackle on Service
lands and waters. The Service has initiated stakeholder engagement to
implement a deliberate, open, and transparent process of evaluating the
future of lead use on Service lands and waters, working with our State
partners and seeking input and recommendations from the Hunting and
Wildlife Conservation Council, other stakeholders, and the public. The
best available science, analyzed as part of this rulemaking, indicates
that lead ammunition and tackle have negative impacts on both wildlife
and human health. Based on the best available science and sound
professional judgment, where appropriate, the Service may propose to
require the use of non-lead ammunition and tackle on Service lands and
waters, as we have previously done in certain areas. While the Service
continues to evaluate the future of lead use in hunting and fishing on
Service lands and waters, we will work with stakeholders and the public
to evaluate lead use through the annual rulemaking process. In the
interim, the Service does not intend to allow opportunities increasing
or authorizing the new use of lead on Service lands and waters, and
this rule is consistent with that approach.
Crab Orchard NWR will close hunting on 111 acres that are currently
open to hunting, out of more than 44,000 huntable acres, so that the
area can be repurposed for other visitor recreational uses, including
camping. Turnbull, Horicon, and Valentine NWRs are expanding hunting
and fishing to species where lead-free ammunition or tackle is already
required on the refuges. Trinity River, Bayou Teche, Green River, and
Waccamaw NWRs will each open or expand archery deer hunting or open or
expand migratory bird hunting, both of which are hunting activities
that do not involve lead ammunition. Des Lacs, J. Clark Salyer,
Lostwood, and Upper Souris NWRs are opening elk hunting that will
require the use of lead-free ammunition immediately in the fall 2024
season. In this final rule, Canaan Valley NWR will expand all existing
hunting onto the newly acquired Big Cove Unit and require the use of
lead-free ammunition immediately for all hunting in the fall 2024
seasons on the Big Cove Unit.
Fish Advisory
For health reasons, anglers should review and follow State-issued
consumption advisories before enjoying recreational sport fishing
opportunities on Service-managed waters. You can find information about
current fish-consumption advisories on the internet at https://www.epa.gov/choose-fish-and-shellfish-wisely.
Required Determinations
Regulatory Planning and Review--Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
14094
Executive Order 14094 amends and reaffirms the principles of E.O.
12866 and E.O. 13563 and states that regulatory analysis should
facilitate agency efforts to develop regulations that serve the public
interest, advance statutory objectives, and are consistent with E.O.
12866, E.O. 13563, and E.O. 14094. Regulatory analysis, as
[[Page 88159]]
practicable and appropriate, shall recognize distributive impacts and
equity, to the extent permitted by law. E.O. 13563 emphasizes further
that regulations must be based on the best available science and that
the rulemaking process must allow for public participation and an open
exchange of ideas. We have developed this final rule in a manner
consistent with these requirements.
E.O. 12866, as reaffirmed by E.O. 13563 and amended by E.O. 14094,
provides that the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA)
in the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will review all
significant rules. OIRA has determined that this rule is not
significant.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA; 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.),
as amended by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (SBREFA; title II of Pub. L. 104-121, March 29, 1996), whenever a
Federal agency is required to publish a notice of rulemaking for any
proposed or final rule, it must prepare and make available for public
comment a regulatory flexibility analysis that describes the effect of
the rule on small entities (i.e., small businesses, small
organizations, and small government jurisdictions). However, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is required if the head of an agency
certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities. Thus, for a regulatory
flexibility analysis to be required, impacts must exceed a threshold
for ``significant impact'' and a threshold for a ``substantial number
of small entities.'' See 5 U.S.C. 605(b). SBREFA amended the Regulatory
Flexibility Act to require Federal agencies to provide a statement of
the factual basis for certifying that a rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This rule opens or expands hunting or fishing on 12 NWRs. As a
result, visitor use for wildlife-dependent recreation on these stations
will change. If the stations establishing new programs were a pure
addition to the current supply of those activities, it would mean an
estimated maximum increase of 1,481 user days (one person per day
participating in a recreational opportunity; see table 2, below).
Because the participation trend is flat in these activities, this
increase in supply will most likely be offset by other sites losing
participants. Therefore, this is likely to be a substitute site for the
activity and not necessarily an increase in participation rates for the
activity.
Table 2--Estimated Maximum Change in Recreation Opportunities in 2024-2025
[2023 Dollars in thousands]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Additional Additional Additional
Station hunting days fishing days expenditures
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bayou Teche NWR................................................. 40 .............. $1.6
Canaan Valley NWR............................................... 20 .............. 0.8
Des Lacs NWR.................................................... 70 .............. 2.8
Green River NWR................................................. 144 .............. 5.7
Horicon NWR..................................................... .............. 365 15.1
J. Clark Salyer NWR............................................. 70 .............. 2.8
Lostwood NWR.................................................... 70 .............. 2.8
Trinity River NWR............................................... 300 .............. 11.9
Turnbull NWR.................................................... 272 .............. 10.8
Upper Souris NWR................................................ 70 .............. 2.8
Valentine NWR................................................... 60 .............. 2.4
Waccamaw NWR.................................................... 0 .............. 0
-----------------------------------------------
Total....................................................... 1,116 365 59.5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To the extent visitors spend time and money in the area of the
station that they would not have spent there anyway, they contribute
new income to the regional economy and benefit local businesses. Due to
the unavailability of site-specific expenditure data, we use the
national estimates from the 2016 National Survey of Fishing, Hunting,
and Wildlife Associated Recreation to identify expenditures for food
and lodging, transportation, and other incidental expenses. Using the
average expenditures for these categories with the maximum expected
additional participation of the Refuge System yields approximately
$59,000 in recreation-related expenditures (see table 2, above). By
having ripple effects throughout the economy, these direct expenditures
are only part of the economic impact of these recreational activities.
Using a national impact multiplier for hunting activities (2.51)
derived from the report ``Hunting in America: An Economic Force for
Conservation'' and for fishing activities (2.51) derived from the
report ``Sportfishing in America'' yields a total maximum economic
impact of approximately $150,000 (2023 dollars) (Southwick Associates,
Inc., 2018).
Since we know that most of the fishing and hunting occurs within
100 miles of a participant's residence, then it is unlikely that most
of this spending will be ``new'' money coming into a local economy;
therefore, this spending will be offset with a decrease in some other
sector of the local economy. The net gain to the local economies will
be no more than $149,000 and likely less. Since 80 percent of the
participants travel less than 100 miles to engage in hunting and
fishing activities, their spending patterns will not add new money into
the local economy and, therefore, the real impact will be on the order
of about $30,000 annually.
Small businesses within the retail trade industry (such as hotels,
gas stations, taxidermy shops, bait-and-tackle shops, and similar
businesses) may be affected by some increased or decreased station
visitation. A large percentage of these retail trade establishments in
the local communities around NWRs qualify as small businesses (see
table 3, below). We expect that the incremental recreational changes
will be scattered, and so we do not expect that the rule will have a
significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities
in any region or nationally. As noted previously, we expect at most
$59,500 to be spent in total in the refuges' local economies. The
maximum increase will be less than one-tenth of 1 percent for
[[Page 88160]]
local retail trade spending (see table 3, below). Table 3 does not
include entries for those NWRs for which we project no changes in
recreation opportunities in 2024-2025; see table 2, above.
Table 3--Comparative Expenditures for Retail Trade Associated With Additional Station Visitation for 2024-2025
[Thousands, 2023 dollars]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated
maximum Establishments
Station/county(ies) Retail trade addition Addition as Establishments with fewer than
in 2017 \1\ from new % of total in 2017 \1\ 10 employees in
activities 2017
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bayou Teche:
St. Mary Parish, LA............. $658,214 $2 <0.1 186 145
Canaan Valley:
Grant, WV....................... 133,024 0 <0.1 42 28
Tucker, WV...................... 79,611 0 <0.1 28 20
Des Lacs:
Renville, ND.................... 43,869 3 <0.1 13 11
Green River:
Henderson, KY................... 825,225 6 <0.1 150 98
Horicon:
Dodge, WI....................... 1,069,734 8 <0.1 232 154
Fond du Lac, WI................. 2,137,970 8 <0.1 344 207
J. Clark Salyer:
McHenry, ND..................... 39,926 3 <0.1 19 14
Lostwood:
Burke, ND....................... 38,614 1 <0.1 8 4
Mountrail, ND................... 228,282 1 <0.1 47 27
Trinity River:
Liberty, TX..................... 1,047,020 12 <0.1 201 143
Turnbull:
Spokane, WA..................... 9,754,429 11 <0.1 1,627 1,036
Upper Souris:
Renville, ND.................... 43,869 1 <0.1 13 11
Ward, ND........................ 1,844,525 1 <0.1 309 169
Valentine:
Cherry, NE...................... 116,107 2 <0.1 43 30
Waccamaw:
Georgetown, SC.................. 1,035,984 0 0 287 206
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ U.S. Census Bureau.
With the small change in overall spending anticipated from this
rule, it is unlikely that a substantial number of small entities will
have more than a small impact from the spending change near the
affected stations. Therefore, we certify that this rule will not have a
significant economic effect on a substantial number of small entities
as defined under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.).
A regulatory flexibility analysis is not required. Accordingly, a small
entity compliance guide is not required.
Congressional Review Act
The rule is not a major rule under 5 U.S.C. 804(2), the
Congressional Review Act. We anticipate no significant employment or
small business effects. This rule:
a. Will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more. The minimal impact will be scattered across the country and will
most likely not be significant in any local area.
b. Will not cause a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers; individual industries; Federal, State, or local government
agencies; or geographic regions. This rule will have only a slight
effect on the costs of hunting opportunities for Americans. If the
substitute sites are farther from the participants' residences, then an
increase in travel costs will occur. The Service does not have
information to quantify this change in travel cost but assumes that,
since most people travel less than 100 miles to hunt, the increased
travel cost will be small. We do not expect this rule to affect the
supply or demand for hunting opportunities in the United States, and,
therefore, it should not affect prices for hunting equipment and
supplies, or the retailers that sell equipment.
c. Will not have significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or the ability of
U.S.-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises. This
rule represents only a small proportion of recreational spending at
NWRs. Therefore, this rule will have no measurable economic effect on
the wildlife-dependent industry, which has annual sales of equipment
and travel expenditures of $72 billion nationwide.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Since this rule will apply to public use of federally owned and
managed refuges, it will not impose an unfunded mandate on State,
local, or Tribal governments or the private sector of more than $100
million per year. The rule will not have a significant or unique effect
on State, local, or Tribal governments or the private sector. A
statement containing the information required by the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
Takings (E.O. 12630)
In accordance with E.O. 12630, this rule will not have significant
takings implications. This rule will affect only visitors at NWRs and
describes what
[[Page 88161]]
they can do while they are on a Service station.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
As discussed under Regulatory Planning and Review and Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act, above, this rule will not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a federalism
summary impact statement under E.O. 13132. In preparing this rule, we
worked with State governments.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O. 12988)
In accordance with E.O. 12988, the Department of the Interior has
determined that this rule will not unduly burden the judicial system
and that it meets the requirements of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of the
Order.
Energy Supply, Distribution or Use (E.O. 13211)
On May 18, 2001, the President issued E.O. 13211 on regulations
that significantly affect energy supply, distribution, or use. E.O.
13211 requires agencies to prepare statements of energy effects when
undertaking certain actions. Because this rule will open or expand
hunting opportunities on 12 NWRs, it is not a significant regulatory
action under E.O. 12866, and we do not expect it to significantly
affect energy supplies, distribution, or use. Therefore, this action is
not a significant energy action, and no statement of energy effects is
required.
Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments (E.O.
13175)
In accordance with E.O. 13175, we have evaluated possible effects
on federally recognized Indian Tribes and have determined that there
are no effects. We coordinate recreational use on NWRs and National
Fish Hatcheries with Tribal governments having adjoining or overlapping
jurisdiction before we propose new or revised regulations.
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)
This rule does not contain any new collections of information that
require approval by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). OMB
previously approved the information collection requirements associated
with application and reporting requirements associated with hunting and
sport fishing and assigned OMB Control Number 1018-0140 (expires 09/30/
2025). An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays
a currently valid OMB control number.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultation
We comply with section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), when developing comprehensive
conservation plans and step-down management plans--which includes
hunting and/or fishing plans--for public use of refuges and hatcheries,
and prior to implementing any new or revised public recreation program
on a station as identified in 50 CFR 26.32. We complied with section 7
for each of the stations affected by this rulemaking.
National Environmental Policy Act
We analyzed this rule in accordance with the criteria of the
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA; 42 U.S.C. 4332(C)), 43
CFR part 46, and 516 Departmental Manual (DM) 8.
A categorical exclusion from NEPA documentation applies to
publication of amendments to station-specific hunting and fishing
regulations because they are technical and procedural in nature, and
the environmental effects are too broad, speculative, or conjectural to
lend themselves to meaningful analysis (43 CFR 46.210 and 516 DM 8).
Concerning the actions that are the subject of this rulemaking, we have
complied with NEPA at the project level when developing each package.
This is consistent with the Department of the Interior instructions for
compliance with NEPA where actions are covered sufficiently by an
earlier environmental document (43 CFR 46.120).
Prior to the addition of a refuge or hatchery to the list of areas
open to hunting and fishing in 50 CFR parts 32 and 71, we develop
hunting and fishing plans for the affected stations. We incorporate
these station hunting and fishing activities in the station
comprehensive conservation plan and/or other step-down management
plans, pursuant to our refuge planning guidance in 602 Fish and
Wildlife Service Manual (FW) 1, 3, and 4. We prepare these
comprehensive conservation plans and step-down plans in compliance with
section 102(2)(C) of NEPA, the Council on Environmental Quality's
regulations for implementing NEPA in 40 CFR parts 1500 through 1508,
and the Department of Interior's NEPA regulations at 43 CFR part 46. We
invite the affected public to participate in the review, development,
and implementation of these plans. Copies of all plans and NEPA
compliance are available from the stations at the addresses provided
below.
Available Information for Specific Stations
Individual refuge and hatchery headquarters have information about
public use programs and conditions that apply to their specific
programs and maps of their respective areas. To find out how to contact
a specific refuge or hatchery, contact the appropriate Service office
for the States and Territories listed below:
Hawaii, Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. Regional Chief, National
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Eastside
Federal Complex, Suite 1692, 911 NE 11th Avenue, Portland, OR 97232-
4181; Telephone (503) 231-6203.
Arizona, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. Regional Chief, National
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, P.O. Box 1306,
500 Gold Avenue SW, Albuquerque, NM 87103; Telephone (505) 248-6635.
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Ohio, and
Wisconsin. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 5600 American Blvd. West, Suite 990, Bloomington,
MN 55437-1458; Telephone (612) 713-5476.
Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana,
Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Puerto Rico,
and the Virgin Islands. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge
System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1875 Century Boulevard,
Atlanta, GA 30345; Telephone (404) 679-7356.
Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Maine, Maryland,
Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode
Island, Vermont, Virginia, and West Virginia. Regional Chief, National
Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Westgate
Center Drive, Hadley, MA 01035-9589; Telephone (413) 253-8307.
Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota,
Utah, and Wyoming. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 134 Union Blvd., Lakewood, CO 80228;
Telephone (303) 236-4377.
Alaska. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge System, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, 1011 E Tudor Rd., Anchorage, AK 99503; Telephone
(907) 786-3545.
California and Nevada. Regional Chief, National Wildlife Refuge
System, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2606,
[[Page 88162]]
Sacramento, CA 95825; Telephone (916) 767-9241.
Primary Author
Christian Myers, Division of Natural Resources and Conservation
Planning, National Wildlife Refuge System, is the primary author of
this rulemaking document.
Regulation Changes Summary Table
The regulatory amendments set forth below are presented alongside
existing station-specific regulations that have not been amended. For a
table that provides additional clarity on which specific regulatory
provisions have been amended, please see Docket No. FWS-HQ-NWRS-2024-
0034 on https://www.regulations.gov for a separate document containing
a table that provides additional clarity on which specific regulatory
provisions have been amended and how they have been amended.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 32
Fishing, Hunting, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wildlife, Wildlife refuges.
Regulation Promulgation
For the reasons described in the preamble, we amend title 50,
chapter I, subchapter C of the Code of Federal Regulations as set forth
below:
PART 32--HUNTING AND FISHING
0
1. The authority citation for part 32 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 16 U.S.C. 460k, 664, 668dd-668ee, and
715i; Pub. L. 115-20, 131 Stat. 86.
0
2. Amend Sec. 32.7 by revising and republishing paragraph (q) to read
as follows:
Sec. 32.7 What refuge units are open to hunting and/or sport
fishing?
* * * * *
(q) Kentucky. (1) Clarks River National Wildlife Refuge.
(2) Green River National Wildlife Refuge.
(3) Ohio River Islands National Wildlife Refuge.
(4) Reelfoot National Wildlife Refuge.
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 32.24 by revising and republishing paragraphs (j), (m),
and (x) to read as follows:
Sec. 32.24 California.
* * * * *
(j) Lower Klamath National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, coot, moorhen, and snipe on
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) In the controlled waterfowl hunting area, we require a valid
Refuge Recreation Pass (available electronically or in person at the
refuge office) for all hunters age 16 or older. All hunters age 15 and
younger must remain in the immediate presence of an adult (age 18 or
older) at all times while in the field.
(ii) Unless otherwise posted, we require advance reservations for
the first 2 days of the hunting season. Reservations are obtained
through the waterfowl lottery each year.
(iii) Hunters may enter the refuge at 4:30 a.m. unless otherwise
posted.
(iv) Shooting hours end at 1 p.m. on all California portions of the
refuge with the following exceptions:
(A) The refuge manager may designate up to 6 afternoon special
youth, ladies, veteran, or disabled hunter waterfowl hunts per season.
(B) The refuge manager may designate up to 3 days per week of
afternoon waterfowl hunting for the general public after December 1.
(v) We prohibit the setting of decoys in retrieving zones.
(vi) Pit-style hunting blinds located in the Stearns units and unit
9D are first-come, first-served. We require you to hunt within a 200-
foot (61-meter) radius of the blind.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of pheasant on designated
areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) In the controlled pheasant hunting area, we require a valid
Refuge Recreation Pass (available electronically or in person at the
refuge office) for all hunters age 16 or older.
(ii) All hunters age 15 or younger must remain in the immediate
presence of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times while in the field.
(3)-(4) [Reserved]
* * * * *
(m) Modoc National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, coot, moorhen, and snipe on
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) On the opening weekend of the hunting season, hunters must
possess and carry a refuge permit (FWS Form 3-2439, Hunt Application/
Permit--National Wildlife Refuge System) issued through random drawing
to hunters with advance reservations only.
(ii) After the opening weekend of the hunting season, we only allow
hunting on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. Hunters must check-in
and out of the refuge by using self-service permits (FWS Form 3-2405,
Self-Clearing Check-in/out Permit). Hunters must completely fill out
the ``Refuge Hunt Permit'' portion of the permit and deposit it in the
drop box prior to hunting. Hunters must complete and display the
``Daily Vehicle Permit'' in the windshield of the hunter's vehicle
prior to hunting. The hunter must possess and carry the ``Record of
Kill'' and ``Waterfowl Harvest Statistics'' portions of the permit
while on the refuge and turn them in prior to exiting the hunting area.
(iii) In the designated spaced blind area, you must remain within
the blind assigned to you.
(iv) All hunters age 15 and younger must remain in the immediate
presence of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times while in the field.
(v) You may not possess more than 25 shot shells while in the field
once you have left your assigned parking lot or boat launch.
(vi) You may only use portable blinds in the free-roam hunting
areas.
(vii) You must remove all blinds, decoys, shell casings, other
personal equipment, and refuse from the refuge at the end of each day
(see Sec. Sec. 27.93 and 27.94 of this chapter).
(viii) Hunters must enter and exit the hunting area from the three
designated hunt parking lots, which we open 1\1/2\ hours before legal
shooting time and close 1 hour after legal shooting time each hunt day.
(ix) We only allow walk-in access to the hunt area by foot and
nonmotorized cart.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of pheasant on designated
areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) We limit hunting to junior hunters possessing a valid State
Junior Hunting License and refuge Junior Pheasant Hunt Permit (FWS Form
3-2439, Hunt Application/Permit--National Wildlife Refuge System).
(ii) All hunters age 15 and younger must remain in the immediate
presence of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times while in the field.
(3) [Reserved]
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing only on Dorris Reservoir
subject to the following conditions:
(i) We prohibit fishing from October 1 to January 31.
(ii) We allow fishing only from legal sunrise to legal sunset.
(iii) We allow only walk-in access to Dorris Reservoir from
February 1 through March 31.
[[Page 88163]]
(iv) We allow use of boats for fishing on Dorris Reservoir only
from April 1 through September 30.
* * * * *
(x) Tule Lake National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, coot, moorhen, and snipe on
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) In the controlled waterfowl hunting area, we require a valid
Refuge Recreation Pass (available electronically or in person at the
refuge office) for all hunters age 16 or older.
(ii) All hunters age 15 or younger must remain in the immediate
presence of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times while in the field.
(iii) Unless otherwise posted, we require advance reservations for
the first 2 days of the hunting season. You may obtain a reservation
through the waterfowl lottery each year.
(iv) Hunters may enter the refuge at 4:30 a.m. unless otherwise
posted.
(v) Shooting hours end at 1 p.m. on all portions of the refuge with
the following exceptions:
(A) The refuge manager may designate up to 6 afternoon special
youth, ladies, veteran, or disabled hunter waterfowl hunts per season.
(B) The refuge manager may designate up to 3 days per week of
afternoon waterfowl hunting for the general public after December 1.
(vi) You select blind sites by lottery at the beginning of each
hunt day. You may shoot only from within your assigned blind site.
(vii) We prohibit the setting of decoys in retrieving zones.
(viii) We prohibit air-thrust and inboard water-thrust boats while
hunting. We prohibit the use of all-terrain amphibious or utility-type
vehicles (UTVs) in wetland units.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of pheasant on designated
areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) In the controlled pheasant hunting area, we require a valid
Refuge Recreation Pass (available electronically or in person at the
refuge office) for all hunters age 16 or older.
(ii) All hunters age 15 or younger must remain in the immediate
presence of an adult (age 18 or older) at all times while in the field.
(3)-(4) [Reserved]
0
4. Amend Sec. 32.36 by redesignating paragraphs (b) and (c) as (c) and
(d), respectively; and adding a new paragraph (b).
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 32.36 Kentucky.
* * * * *
(b) Green River National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of duck, goose, coot, merganser, teal, and
dove on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) Each hunter age 12 and older must possess and carry a signed
refuge hunting brochure (FWS Form 3-2439, Hunt Application/Permit--
National Wildlife Refuge System) while hunting on the refuge.
(ii) All hunters age 15 or younger must be supervised by an adult
age 21 or older and must remain in sight of and normal voice contact
with the adult. The adult may supervise no more than two youths.
(iii) We prohibit hunting within 100 yards (91 meters) of a
residence, graveled road, or hiking trail managed by the Service as
part of Green River NWR.
(iv) We prohibit the use of trail cameras.
(v) We allow the use of boats operated only by manual power or an
electric trolling motor for hunters to access the refuge. We prohibit
the use of internal combustion motors, personal watercraft (e.g., jet
skis), airboats, and hovercraft on waters owned and managed by Green
River NWR.
(vi) We allow the use of bikes, including e-bikes, for hunters to
access the refuge along designated routes only (graveled and paved
roads, and established trails) managed by the Service as part of Green
River NWR. We prohibit the use of internal combustion motors on lands
owned and managed by Green River NWR.
(vii) We allow the use of off-road or all-terrain vehicles (e.g.,
ATVs/UTVs) only for mobility-impaired hunters who, while hunting on the
refuge, possess and carry a valid General Activities Special Use Permit
(FWS Form 3-1383-G) approved by the refuge manager.
(viii) We prohibit marking or flagging any tree or other refuge
feature with non-biodegradable reflectors, paint, flagging, or other
substances.
(ix) Access to open hunting areas of the refuge is from 2 hours
before legal sunrise to 2 hours after legal sunset.
(x) We prohibit the killing or wounding of a game animal and then
intentionally or knowingly failing to make a reasonable effort to
retrieve and include it in the hunter's bag limit.
(xi) We allow duck, goose, coot, wood duck, teal, and merganser
hunting from \1/2\ hour before legal sunrise until 12 p.m. (noon). We
allow dove hunting according to State shooting hours.
(xii) We allow the use of dogs for migratory game bird hunting. Dog
owners and handlers must have a collar on each dog with the owner's
contact information (FWS Form 3-2439).
(xiii) For migratory game bird hunting, you must remove all decoys,
blinds, and hunting equipment at the end of each day's hunt (see Sec.
27.93 of this chapter).
(xiv) For youth, seniors, and disabled hunters, as defined by the
State, the Horseshoe Bend Unit will be open to waterfowl hunting during
the months of December and January of the Statewide waterfowl season,
and during the additional Statewide veterans and youth hunt dates in
February.
(xv) We prohibit waterfowl hunting during any Statewide seasons
prior to December.
(xvi) We prohibit all entry to the Tscharner East section of the
Bluff Unit from November 1 through March 31.
(xvii) The big game quota hunt in the month of November of the
Statewide white-tailed deer season is open only to holders of a big
game quota permit (FWS Form 3-2439, Hunt Application/Permit--National
Wildlife Refuge System). During that hunt, the Tscharner West section
of the Bluff Unit and the Horseshoe Bend Unit are closed to all non-
selected hunters and the general public.
(2) [Reserved]
(3) Big game hunting. We allow only archery and crossbow hunting of
white-tailed deer and turkey on designated areas of the refuge subject
to the following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (b)(1)(i), (iii) through
(x), (xvi), and (xvii) of this section apply.
(ii) Hunters age 15 and younger must be supervised by an adult age
21 or older and must remain in sight of and normal voice contact with
the adult. The adult may supervise no more than one youth.
(iii) We allow white-tailed deer and turkey hunting according to
State shooting hours.
(iv) You must use safety belts at all times when occupying tree
stands.
(v) You must remove all tree stands (portable and climbing) and
ground blinds by legal sunset of each day's hunt.
(vi) You may use no more than one stand or blind per hunter.
(vii) The big game quota permit (FWS Form 3-2439, Hunt Application/
Permit--National Wildlife Refuge System) is a limited entry permit, is
zone-specific, and is nontransferable.
(viii) During the big game quota hunt, we allow only hunters
possessing a valid big game quota permit (FWS Form
[[Page 88164]]
3-2439, Hunt Application/Permit--National Wildlife Refuge System) on
the refuge and only for the purposes of deer and turkey hunting.
(ix) For the drawn holders of a big game quota permit (FWS Form 3-
2439, Hunt Application/Permit--National Wildlife Refuge System), the
Horseshoe Bend Unit and Tscharner West section of the Bluff Unit will
be open, up to 21 days, during the month of November of the Statewide
season.
(x) For youth, seniors, and disabled hunters, as defined by the
State, the Horseshoe Bend Unit and Tscharner West section of the Bluff
Unit will be open to archery and crossbow hunting of deer and turkey
during the months of September and October in accordance with State
season dates.
(xi) For youth, as defined by the State, the Horseshoe Bend Unit
and Tscharner West section of the Bluff Unit will be open to archery
and crossbow hunting of turkey during the months of April and May in
accordance with State season dates.
(4) [Reserved]
* * * * *
0
5. Amend Sec. 32.37 by revising and republishing paragraphs (d), (e),
and (m) to read as follows:
Sec. 32.37 Louisiana.
* * * * *
(d) Bayou Teche National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of duck, merganser, teal, light and dark
goose, coot, gallinule, rail, snipe, dove, and woodcock on designated
areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) Each person age 18 and older must possess and carry a valid,
signed refuge user brochure while on the refuge.
(ii) We prohibit hunting or discharge of firearms (see Sec. 27.42
of this chapter) within 500 feet (152 meters (m)) of any residence or
oil and gas infrastructure, or within 200 feet (61 m) of any road,
railroad, levee, water control structure, designated public use trail,
designated parking area, or other designated public use facility.
(iii) All youth hunters age 15 and younger must be supervised by an
adult during all hunts. One adult may supervise up to two youths during
small game and migratory game bird hunts, but may supervise only one
youth during big game hunts. The supervising adult must maintain visual
and voice contact with the youth at all times. Adult guardians are
responsible for ensuring that youth hunters do not violate refuge
rules.
(iv) We require waterfowl and gallinule hunters to remove all
portable blinds and decoys from the refuge by 2 p.m. each day (see
Sec. Sec. 27.93 and 27.94 of this chapter).
(v) Migratory bird hunters are only allowed to enter the refuge
after 4 a.m.
(vi) We allow waterfowl hunting daily until 2 p.m. during the State
regular season, State teal season, and State youth and veteran
waterfowl seasons. We allow gallinule, snipe, and rail hunting until 2
p.m.
(vii) When hunting migratory game birds, you may only use dogs to
locate, point, and retrieve game.
(viii) We allow only the use of reflective tacks as marking
devices.
(ix) We only allow the incidental take of nutria with approved shot
and weapons during any open waterfowl season on the refuge. We allow
the incidental take of raccoon, feral hog, armadillo, opossum, and
coyote with approved shot and weapons during any open season on the
refuge.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of squirrel and rabbit,
and the incidental take of nutria, coyote, raccoon, armadillo, and
opossum, on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) We only allow hunting from the start of the State squirrel and
rabbit seasons until the last day of State waterfowl season for the
State Waterfowl Zone in which you are hunting.
(ii) We prohibit upland game hunting on days corresponding with
refuge deer gun hunts.
(iii) Hunters must leave the refuge no later than 2 hours after
legal sunset.
(iv) When hunting, you must possess only shot size 4 or smaller or
0.22 caliber rimfire rifles or smaller. We allow the use of air rifles.
(v) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (iii),
(viii), and (ix) of this section apply.
(vi) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (d)(2)(i) through (iv)
of this section do not apply to upland game hunting on the Mitigation
Units.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow the hunting of white-tailed deer,
and the incidental take of feral hog, on designated areas of the refuge
subject to the following conditions:
(i) We allow hunting of deer only with firearms (see Sec. 27.42 of
this chapter) during 5 specific days during October and November. A
youth gun hunt will occur during the last weekend of October, on both
Saturday and Sunday. The general gun hunt will occur during the final
full weekend in November over 3 days: the Friday immediately before the
weekend, Saturday, and Sunday.
(ii) We allow archery deer hunting according to the State of
Louisiana archery season. We close refuge archery hunting during refuge
deer gun hunts.
(iii) We allow each hunter to possess only one deer per day; the
deer may be a buck or a doe.
(iv) Hunters may use only portable deer stands. Hunters may erect
deer stands no earlier than 48 hours before the deer archery season and
must remove them from the refuge within 48 hours after the season
closes (see Sec. 27.93 of this chapter). Hunters may place only one
deer stand on the refuge. Deer stands must have the owner's State
hunting license/sportsman's identification number clearly printed on
the stand.
(v) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (d)(1)(i) through (iii),
(viii), and (ix), and (d)(2)(iii) of this section apply.
(vi) The condition set forth at paragraph (d)(3)(i) of this section
does not apply to big game hunting on the Mitigation Units.
(vii) We prohibit the use of deer decoys.
(viii) We prohibit organized deer drives. We define a ``deer
drive'' as an organized or planned effort to pursue, drive, chase, or
otherwise frighten or cause deer to move in the direction of any
person(s) who is part of the organized or planned hunt and known to be
waiting for the deer.
(ix) Deer hunters must display State Wildlife Management Area (WMA)
hunter-orange or blaze-pink (as governed by State WMA regulations).
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing in all refuge waters
subject to the following conditions:
(i) We prohibit the use of unattended nets, traps, or lines (trot,
jug, bush, etc.).
(ii) The condition set forth at paragraph (d)(1)(i) of this section
applies.
(iii) The refuge is only open to recreational finfishing and
shellfishing from legal sunrise to legal sunset.
(e) Big Branch Marsh National Wildlife Refuge--
(1) Migratory game bird hunting. We allow hunting of duck,
merganser, teal, coot, light and dark goose, snipe, rail, gallinule,
dove, and woodcock on designated areas of the refuge subject to the
following conditions:
(i) Each person age 18 and older must possess and carry a valid,
signed refuge user brochure while on the refuge.
(ii) We allow waterfowl, snipe, rail, gallinule, dove, and goose
hunting on Wednesdays, Thursdays, Saturdays, and Sundays from \1/2\
hour before legal sunrise until 2 p.m., including waterfowl hunting
during the State teal season and State youth and veterans
[[Page 88165]]
waterfowl seasons. We only allow hunting of woodcock until 2 p.m.
(iii) We allow light goose hunting for that part of the season that
extends beyond the regular duck season from \1/2\ hour before legal
sunrise until 2 p.m.
(iv) We allow only temporary blinds, and hunters must remove blinds
and decoys by 2 p.m. each day (see Sec. 27.93 of this chapter).
(v) All youth hunters age 15 and younger must be supervised by an
adult during all hunts. One adult may supervise up to two youths during
small game hunts and migratory bird hunts, but may supervise only one
youth during big game hunts. The supervising adult must maintain visual
and voice contact with the youth at all times. Adult guardians are
responsible for ensuring that youth hunters do not violate refuge
rules.
(vi) We prohibit hunting or discharge of firearms (see Sec. 27.42
of this chapter) within 500 feet (152 meters (m)) of any residence
adjacent to the refuge or oil and gas infrastructure on the refuge, or
within 200 feet (61 m) from the center of any road, railroad, levee,
water control structure, designated public use maintained trail,
designated parking area, or other designated public use facility.
(vii) We allow migratory bird hunters to enter the refuge no
earlier than 4 a.m., and all hunters must exit the refuge no later than
2 hours after legal sunset.
(viii) We allow only reflective tacks as trail markers on the
refuge.
(ix) We allow the incidental take of raccoon, feral hog, armadillo,
opossum, and coyote with approved shot and weapons allowed during any
open season on the refuge.
(x) We only allow the incidental take of nutria with approved shot
and weapons during any open waterfowl (duck, teal, merganser, light and
dark goose, and coot) season on the refuge.
(xi) We prohibit hunters and anglers from utilizing air boats, air
thrust boats, mud boats, aircraft, and air-cooled propulsion engines on
the refuge.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of squirrel, rabbit, and
quail, and the incidental take of nutria, coyote, raccoon, armadillo,
and opossum, on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) When hunting, you must possess only shot size 4 or smaller, or
0.22 caliber rim-fire rifles or smaller. We allow the use of air
rifles.
(ii) When hunting squirrel and rabbit, and for the incidental take
of raccoon, we allow the use of dogs only after the close of the State
archery deer season. When hunting quail, you may only use dogs to
locate, point, and retrieve.
(iii) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (v), (vi),
and (viii) through (xi) of this section apply.
(iv) During the dog season for squirrel and rabbit, all hunters,
including archers (while on the ground), except waterfowl hunters, must
wear a minimum of a cap or hat that is hunter orange, blaze pink, or
other such color as governed by State regulations.
(v) We only allow hunting of quail until 2 p.m.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer, and
the incidental take of feral hog, on designated areas of the refuge
subject to the following conditions:
(i) We are open only during the State season for archery hunting of
deer.
(ii) We prohibit organized deer drives. We define a ``deer drive''
as an organized or planned effort to pursue, drive, chase, or otherwise
frighten or cause deer to move in the direction of any person(s) who is
part of the organized or planned hunt and known to be waiting for the
deer.
(iii) We allow placement of temporary deer stands no earlier than
48 hours prior to the start of deer archery season. Hunters must remove
all deer stands within 48 hours after the archery deer season closes
(see Sec. 27.93 of this chapter). We allow only one deer stand per
hunter on the refuge. Deer stands must have the owner's State license/
sportsmen's identification number clearly printed on the stand. We
prohibit hunting stands on trees painted with white bands.
(iv) Deer hunters must display State Wildlife Management Area (WMA)
hunter-orange or blaze-pink (as governed by State WMA regulations)
while on the ground.
(v) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (e)(1)(i), (v), (vi),
and (viii) through (xi) of this section apply.
(vi) We prohibit the use of deer decoys.
(4) Sport fishing. We allow recreational finfishing and
shellfishing on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) You may only fish from legal sunrise until legal sunset, except
we allow night fishing from the bank and pier on Lake Road.
(ii) You must only use rod and reel or pole and line while
finfishing.
(iii) You must attend to any fishing, crabbing, and crawfishing
equipment at all times.
(iv) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (e)(1)(i) and (xi) of
this section apply.
* * * * *
(m) Delta National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of duck, merganser, teal, light and dark
goose, dove, snipe, rail, gallinule, and coot on designated areas of
the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) Each person age 18 and older must possess and carry a valid,
signed refuge user brochure while on the refuge.
(ii) We allow migratory bird hunting on Wednesdays, Thursdays,
Saturdays, and Sundays from \1/2\ hour before legal sunrise until 2
p.m. during the State seasons, including the regular waterfowl season,
the State teal season, State youth waterfowl season, State veterans
waterfowl season, and State light goose special conservation season.
(iii) We only allow temporary blinds. You must remove both blinds
and decoys by 2 p.m. each day (see Sec. 27.93 of this chapter).
(iv) When hunting migratory game birds, you may only use dogs to
locate, point, and retrieve game.
(v) We prohibit discharge of firearms (see Sec. 27.42 of this
chapter) within 500 feet (152 meters (m)) of any residence or oil and
gas infrastructure, or within 200 feet (61 m) of any road, railroad,
levee, water control structure, designated public use trail, designated
parking area, or other designated public use facilities.
(vi) All youth hunters age 15 and younger must be supervised by an
adult during all hunts. One adult may supervise up to two youths during
upland game and migratory game bird hunts, but may supervise only one
youth during big game hunts. The supervising adult must maintain visual
and voice contact with the youth at all times.
(vii) Migratory bird hunters may enter the refuge no earlier than 4
a.m., and all hunters must exit the refuge no later than 2 hours after
legal sunset.
(viii) We allow the incidental take of raccoon, feral hog,
armadillo, opossum, and coyote with approved shot and weapons allowed
during any open season on the refuge.
(ix) We only allow the incidental take of nutria with approved shot
and weapons during any open waterfowl season on the refuge.
(x) We allow only the use of reflective tacks as marking devices.
(xi) We close all refuge lands between Raphael Pass and Main Pass
to public entry, including hunting and fishing, from November 1 through
the end of February; year-round access is only allowed in Main,
Raphael, Octave, Women, and Flatboat passes.
(xii) We prohibit hunters and anglers from utilizing air boats, air
thrust boats, mud boats, aircraft, and air-cooled propulsion engines on
the refuge.
[[Page 88166]]
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of rabbit, and the
incidental take of nutria, coyote, raccoon, armadillo, and opossum, on
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) The refuge rabbit season opens the day after the State duck
season closes and continues through the remainder of the State rabbit
season.
(ii) We restrict hunting to shotgun only.
(iii) We allow the use of dogs when rabbit hunting.
(iv) We prohibit upland game hunting on days corresponding with
refuge deer gun hunts.
(v) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (m)(1)(i), (v) through
(viii), (xi), and (xii) of this section apply.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer on
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (m)(1)(i) and (v)
through (xii) of this section apply.
(ii) We allow archery deer hunting, bucks only, from October 1
through 15. We allow either-sex archery deer hunting from October 16
through 31, and from the day after the close of the State duck season
through the end of the State deer archery season.
(iii) We allow placement of temporary deer stands up to 48 hours
prior to the start of deer archery season. Hunters must remove all deer
stands within 48 hours after the archery deer season closes (see Sec.
27.93 of this chapter). We allow only one deer stand per hunter on the
refuge. Deer stands must have the owner's State license/sportsmen's
identification number clearly printed on the stand.
(iv) We prohibit organized deer drives. We define a ``deer drive''
as an organized or planned effort to pursue, drive, chase, or otherwise
frighten or cause deer to move in the direction of any person(s) who is
part of the organized or planned hunt and known to be waiting for the
deer.
(v) We prohibit the use of deer decoys.
(vi) We allow shotgun hunting of deer on the Saturday and Sunday
during the first split of the regular waterfowl season.
(vii) Deer hunters must display State Wildlife Management Area
(WMA) hunter-orange or blaze-pink (as governed by State WMA
regulations).
(4) Sport fishing. We allow recreational finfishing and
shellfishing on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) We only allow sport finfishing and shellfishing from \1/2\ hour
before legal sunrise until \1/2\ hour after legal sunset. During the
State waterfowl hunting seasons, we only allow sport finfishing and
shellfishing from 2 p.m. until \1/2\ hour after legal sunset.
(ii) We prohibit the use of trotlines, limblines, slat traps, jug
lines, nets, or alligator lines.
(iii) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (m)(1)(i), (xi), and
(xii) of this section apply.
* * * * *
0
6. Amend Sec. 32.41 by revising and republishing paragraph (f) to read
as follows:
Sec. 32.41 Michigan.
* * * * *
(f) Shiawassee National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of waterfowl (duck and goose), American
woodcock, American crow, American coot, common gallinule, sora,
Virginia rail, and Wilson's snipe on designated areas of the refuge
subject to the following conditions:
(i) You must possess and carry a refuge check-in card (FWS Form 3-
2405, Self-Clearing Check-in Permit).
(ii) We allow waterfowl hunting on Saturdays, Sundays, Tuesdays,
and Thursdays during the regular goose season after September 30.
(iii) We allow hunter access to the refuge 2 hours before legal
shooting time to 2 hours after legal shooting time.
(iv) You may possess no more than 25 shotgun shells while hunting
in the field.
(v) We allow the use of dogs while hunting, provided the dog is
under the immediate control of the hunter at all times.
(vi) We allow the take of feral hogs incidental to other lawful
hunting using legal methods of take.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of turkey, small game
(eastern fox squirrel, eastern cottontail, and ring-necked pheasant),
and furbearers (raccoon, coyote, and red fox) on designated areas of
the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (f)(1)(iii) and (vi) of
this section apply, except we allow hunter access to the refuge for
furbearer hunting from \1/2\ hour before legal sunrise to \1/2\ hour
after legal sunset.
(ii) You may only hunt turkey during the spring season.
(iii) We allow dogs for hunting. Raccoon hunting dogs must wear
global positioning system (GPS) or radio collars.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer on
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (f)(1)(iii) and (vi) of
this section apply.
(ii) You must possess and carry a refuge permit (State-issued
permit).
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of
the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) We allow fishing by boat in navigable waterways but not within
any managed refuge units.
(ii) We allow bank fishing from legal sunrise to legal sunset only
at designated sites along the Tittabawassee and Cass Rivers.
0
7. Amend Sec. 32.42 by revising and republishing paragraph (a) to read
as follows:
Sec. 32.42 Minnesota.
* * * * *
(a) Agassiz National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow youth waterfowl hunting on designated areas of the
refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) We allow the use of dogs while hunting, provided the dog is
under the immediate control of the hunter at all times.
(ii) Hunters must dismantle hunting blinds, platforms, and ladders
made from natural vegetation at the end of each day.
(iii) You must remove all boats, decoys, blind materials, stands,
platforms, cameras, and other personal property brought onto the refuge
at the end of each day (see Sec. Sec. 27.93 and 27.94 of this
chapter).
(iv) We close the refuge from 7 p.m. to 5:30 a.m.
(v) We allow the use of motorless boats for hunting.
(vi) We only allow waterfowl hunting during the State's youth
waterfowl season.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of ruffed grouse and
sharp-tailed grouse on designated areas of the refuge subject to the
following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (v) of
this section apply.
(ii) We only allow hunting from the opening of the State's deer
firearms season to the close of the State's ruffed grouse and sharp-
tailed grouse seasons, respectively.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer and
moose on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (iv), and (v)
of this section apply.
[[Page 88167]]
(ii) We prohibit shooting on, from, over, across, or within 30 feet
(9 meters) of a roadway open to motorized public vehicle transportation
at a big game animal or a decoy of a big game animal.
(iii) We only allow archery hunting from the start of the State's
deer firearms season, and close as governed by the State's archery deer
season.
(iv) You must remove all boats, decoys, cameras, and other personal
property brought onto the refuge at the end of each day (see Sec. Sec.
27.93 and 27.94 of this chapter).
(v) We allow only portable tree stands; portable, elevated hunting
platforms not attached to trees; and portable ground blinds that can be
hand-carried into the hunting area.
(vi) You may place your tree stand(s), elevated platform(s), and/or
ground blind(s) on the refuge only during your designated licensed
season. You must remove these stands/blinds by the end of your
designated licensed season (see Sec. 27.93 of this chapter).
Unoccupied stands/blinds may be used by anyone.
(vii) We allow only two stands/blinds per hunter on the refuge. You
must clearly label the stands/blinds with your State hunting license
number.
(viii) We prohibit the use of nails, wire, screws, or bolts to
attach a stand to a tree.
(ix) We prohibit hunting from a tree into which a metal object has
been driven to support a hunter.
(4) [Reserved]
* * * * *
0
8. Amend Sec. 32.45 by revising and republishing paragraph (o) to read
as follows:
Sec. 32.45 Montana.
* * * * *
(o) Lost Trail National Wildlife Refuge--(1) [Reserved]
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of turkey and mountain
grouse on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) We allow use of riding or pack stock on designated access
routes through the refuge to access off-refuge lands as identified in
the public use leaflet.
(ii) We prohibit retrieval of game in areas closed to hunting
without a refuge retrieval permit.
(iii) We allow portable or temporary blinds and tree stands.
(iv) You may only use or possess nontoxic shot shells while in the
field (see Sec. 32.2(k)).
(3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of elk, white-tailed deer,
and mule deer on designated areas of the refuge subject to the
following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (o)(2)(i) through (iii)
of this section apply.
(ii) Persons assisting disabled hunters must not be afield with a
hunting firearm, bow, or other hunting device.
(4) [Reserved]
* * * * *
0
9. Amend Sec. 32.46 by revising and republishing paragraph (c) to read
as follows:
Sec. 32.46 Nebraska.
* * * * *
(c) Fort Niobrara National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of coot, crow, dark goose, dove, duck, light
goose, rail, snipe, teal, and woodcock on designated areas of the
refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) Hunters and anglers may access the refuge from 2 hours before
legal sunrise until 2 hours after legal sunset.
(ii) We allow access from designated areas of the refuge.
(iii) You must remove all blinds and decoys at the conclusion of
each day's hunt (see Sec. 27.93 of this chapter).
(iv) We allow the use of dogs when hunting August 1 through April
30.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of badger, bobcat,
coyote, fox, long-tailed weasel, mink, opossum, prairie dog, porcupine,
rabbit, hare, raccoon, skunk, squirrel, woodchuck, State-defined
furbearers, greater prairie chicken, grouse, partridge, pheasant,
quail, and turkey on designated areas of the refuge subject to the
following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (c)(1)(i), (ii), and
(iv) of this section apply.
(ii) We allow hunting with muzzleloader, archery, shotgun, and
falconry.
(iii) You may only possess nontoxic shot when hunting turkey (see
Sec. 32.2(k)).
(iv) Shooting hours for coyote, prairie dog, porcupine, woodchuck,
and State-defined furbearers are \1/2\ hour before legal sunrise to \1/
2\ hour after legal sunset.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of deer, elk, and pronghorn
antelope on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii) of
this section apply.
(ii) We allow hunting only with muzzleloader and archery equipment.
(iii) We allow portable tree stands and ground blinds to be used
from August 16 through January 31.
(4) Sport fishing. We allow fishing on Minnechaduza Creek and on
the Niobrara River, downstream from the Cornell Dam, subject to the
following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (c)(1)(i) and (ii) of
this section apply.
(ii) We prohibit the use of limb or set lines.
(iii) We prohibit the take of baitfish, reptiles, and amphibians.
(iv) We prohibit use or possession of alcoholic beverages while
fishing on refuge lands and waters.
* * * * *
0
10. Amend Sec. 32.53 by revising and republishing paragraphs (q), (w),
(oo), and (kkk) to read as follows:
Sec. 32.53 North Dakota.
* * * * *
(q) Des Lacs National Wildlife Refuge--(1) [Reserved]
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of fox, sharp-tailed
grouse, Hungarian partridge, turkey, and ring-necked pheasant on
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) We open for upland game bird hunting on the day following the
close of the regular deer gun season through the end of the State
season.
(ii) We allow the use of hunting dogs for retrieval of upland game.
(iii) We allow fox hunting from the day following the regular
firearm deer season until March 31.
(iv) We prohibit accessing refuge lands from refuge waters.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow deer, elk, and moose hunting on
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) We only allow the use of portable tree stands and ground
blinds. We prohibit leaving stands and blinds overnight on the refuge
(see Sec. 27.93 of this chapter).
(ii) We prohibit entry to the refuge before 12 p.m. (noon) on the
first day of the respective bow, gun, or muzzleloader deer hunting
seasons.
(iii) The condition set forth at paragraph (q)(2)(iv) of this
section applies.
(iv) You may only possess nontoxic ammunition when hunting elk (see
Sec. 32.2(k)).
(4) [Reserved]
* * * * *
(w) J. Clark Salyer National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game
bird hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, and coot on designated
areas of the refuge subject to the following condition: We allow the
use of dogs for hunting and retrieving game birds.
[[Page 88168]]
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of ruffed and sharp-
tailed grouse, Hungarian partridge, turkey, ring-necked pheasant, and
fox on designated areas of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) We open the refuge to hunting for sharp-tailed grouse,
Hungarian partridge, and ring-necked pheasant north of the Willow-Upham
road on the day following the close of the regular firearm deer season.
(ii) We open the refuge to fox hunting on the day following the
close of the regular firearm deer season. Fox hunting on the refuge
closes March 31.
(iii) Hunters may possess only approved nontoxic shot (see Sec.
32.2(k)) for all upland game hunting, including turkey.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of deer, elk, and moose on
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) You must possess and carry a refuge permit to hunt antlered
deer on the refuge outside the nine public hunting areas during the
regular firearms season.
(ii) We prohibit entry to the refuge before 12 p.m. (noon) on the
first day of the respective bow, gun, or muzzleloader deer hunting
seasons. You may access refuge roads open to the public before 12 p.m.
(noon).
(iii) You may only possess nontoxic ammunition when hunting elk
(see Sec. 32.2(k)).
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of
the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) We allow boat fishing from May 1 through September 30.
(ii) We allow ice fishing and dark house spearfishing. We allow
snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), utility terrain vehicles
(UTVs), motor vehicles, and fish houses on the ice as conditions allow.
* * * * *
(oo) Lostwood National Wildlife Refuge--(1) [Reserved]
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of sharp-tailed grouse,
Hungarian partridge, and ring-necked pheasant on designated areas of
the refuge subject to the following condition: We allow the use of dogs
to retrieve upland game.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow deer, elk, and moose hunting on
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) We prohibit entry to the refuge before 12 p.m. (noon) on the
first day of the respective archery, gun, or muzzleloader deer hunting
season.
(ii) You may only possess nontoxic ammunition when hunting elk (see
Sec. 32.2(k)).
(4) [Reserved]
* * * * *
(kkk) Upper Souris National Wildlife Refuge--(1) [Reserved]
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of wild turkey, sharp-
tailed grouse, Hungarian partridge, and pheasant on designated areas of
the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) We allow the use of dogs for hunting and retrieving of upland
game birds.
(ii) We allow hunters on the refuge from 5 a.m. until 10 p.m.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow deer, elk, and moose hunting on
designated areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) We only allow the use of portable tree stands and ground
blinds. You must remove stands and blinds from the refuge at the end of
each day's hunt (see Sec. 27.93 of this chapter).
(ii) The condition set forth at paragraph (kkk)(2)(ii) of this
section applies.
(iii) We prohibit entry to the refuge before 12 p.m. (noon) on the
first day of the respective bow, gun, or muzzleloader deer hunting
seasons.
(iv) You may only possess nontoxic ammunition when hunting elk (see
Sec. 32.2(k)).
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of
the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) We allow the use of fishing boats, canoes, kayaks, and float
tubes in designated boat fishing areas from Lake Darling Dam north to
State Highway 28 (Greene) crossing for fishing from May 1 through
September 30.
(ii) We allow fishing from nonmotorized vessels only on the Beaver
Lodge Canoe Trail from May 1 through September 30.
(iii) We allow boating and fishing from vessels on the Souris River
from Mouse River Park to the north boundary of the refuge from May 1
through September 30.
(iv) We allow snowmobiles, all-terrain vehicles (ATVs), utility
terrain vehicles (UTVs), motor vehicles, and fish houses on the ice as
conditions allow from Lake Darling Dam north to Carter Dam (Dam 41) for
ice fishing.
(v) We allow you to place fish houses overnight on the ice of Lake
Darling as governed by State regulations.
(vi) We allow anglers to place portable fish houses on the Souris
River north of Carter Dam (Dam 41) and south of Lake Darling Dam for
ice fishing, but anglers must remove the fish houses from the refuge at
the end of each day's fishing activity (see Sec. 27.93 of this
chapter).
(vii) We allow anglers on the refuge from 5 a.m. until 10 p.m.
* * * * *
0
11. Amend Sec. 32.62 by revising and republishing paragraph (p) to
read as follows:
Sec. 32.62 Texas.
* * * * *
(p) Trinity River National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of duck, merganser, and coot on designated
areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) We only allow hunting on Champion Lake with a refuge-issued
permit (signed hunt brochure).
(ii) We only allow hunting on Champion Lake on Saturdays and
Sundays during the State duck season. Hunters may not enter the refuge
until 4:30 a.m. and must be out of the hunt area by 12 p.m. (noon).
(iii) We allow the use of dogs when retrieving game.
(iv) Hunters age 16 and younger must be under the direct
supervision of an adult age 17 or older.
(v) We require a minimum distance between hunt parties of 150 yards
(135 meters).
(vi) We allow motors of 10 horsepower or less on Champion Lake.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting for squirrel, and
incidental take of rabbit, on designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) We require hunters to possess a permit issued by Texas Parks
and Wildlife Department (TPWD). Permits are issued by a lottery
drawing. The hunter must carry the nontransferable permit at all times
while hunting.
(ii) The condition set forth at paragraph (p)(1)(iii) of this
section applies.
(iii) We allow all-terrain vehicle use for hunters with
disabilities in designated units.
(iv) We require a minimum distance between hunt parties of 200
yards (180 meters).
(v) Hunters may enter the refuge no earlier than 4:30 a.m. We allow
hunting from 30 minutes before legal sunrise to 30 minutes after legal
sunset only during the days specified on the permit. Hunters must be
off the refuge 1\1/2\ hours after legal sunset.
(vi) Hunters may place no more than one temporary stand on the
refuge. Hunters may place the stand during the scouting week before the
hunt begins
[[Page 88169]]
and must remove it the day the hunt ends (see Sec. 27.93 of this
chapter). Hunters must label blinds with the name of the permit holder.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer, and
incidental take of feral hog, on designated areas of the refuge subject
to the following conditions:
(i) We require hunters to possess a TPWD-issued permit. Permits are
issued by a lottery drawing. The hunter must carry the nontransferable
permit at all times while hunting.
(ii) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (p)(1)(iii) and
(p)(2)(iii) through (vi) of this section apply.
(iii) We allow archery hunting of white-tailed deer during the
refuge designated 23-day archery season.
(iv) We allow gun hunting of white-tailed deer during the State-
designated general gun season in two 9-day ``mini-seasons'' and during
the State-designated muzzleloader season.
(4) Sport fishing. We allow fishing on designated areas of the
refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) We only allow fishing with pole and line, rod and reel, or
hand-held line.
(ii) We prohibit the use of trotlines, setlines, bows and arrows,
gigs, spears, fish traps, crab/crawfish traps, and/or nets.
(iii) We prohibit the harvesting of frog or turtle (see Sec. 27.21
of this chapter).
(iv) We allow fishing from legal sunrise to legal sunset.
0
12. Amend Sec. 32.66 by revising and republishing paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
Sec. 32.66 Washington.
* * * * *
(c) Conboy Lake National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, coot, and snipe on designated
areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) We prohibit discharge of any firearm within \1/4\ mile (396
meters) of any maintained building or Federal facility, such as, but
not limited to, a structure designed for storage, human occupancy, or
shelter for animals.
(ii) Hunters must remove all decoys and other equipment at the end
of each day's hunt (see Sec. 27.93 of this chapter).
(2)-(4) [Reserved]
* * * * *
0
13. Amend Sec. 32.67 by revising and republishing paragraph (a) to
read as follows:
Sec. 32.67 West Virginia.
* * * * *
(a) Canaan Valley National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, rail, coot, gallinule,
mourning dove, snipe, and woodcock on designated areas of the refuge
subject to the following conditions:
(i) We require each hunter to possess and carry a signed refuge
hunting brochure (signed brochure).
(ii) Hunters may enter the refuge 1 hour before legal sunrise and
must exit the refuge, including parking areas, no later than 1 hour
after legal sunset.
(iii) We prohibit overnight parking except by Special Use Permit
(FWS Form 3-1383-G) on Forest Road 80.
(iv) We allow the use of dogs consistent with State regulations.
(v) We prohibit dog training except during legal hunting seasons.
(vi) You may only use or possess approved lead-free shot shells and
ammunition while in the Big Cove Unit (see Sec. 32.2(k)).
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow the hunting of ruffed grouse,
squirrel, cottontail rabbit, snowshoe hare, red fox, gray fox, bobcat,
woodchuck, coyote, opossum, striped skunk, and raccoon on designated
areas of the refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (iv), (v),
and (vi) of this section apply.
(ii) You may hunt coyote, raccoon, opossum, skunk, and fox at
night, but you must obtain a Special Use Permit (FWS Form 3-1383-G) at
the refuge headquarters before hunting.
(iii) We only allow hunting in the No Rifle Zones with the
following equipment: archery (including crossbow), shotgun, or
muzzleloader.
(iv) We prohibit the hunting of upland game species from March 1
through August 31.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow the hunting of white-tailed deer,
black bear, and turkey on designated areas of the refuge subject to the
following conditions:
(i) The conditions set forth at paragraphs (a)(1)(i), (iv), (vi),
and (a)(2)(iii) of this section apply.
(ii) We allow the use of dogs for hunting black bear during the gun
season.
(iii) We prohibit organized deer drives. We define a ``deer drive''
as an organized or planned effort to pursue, drive, chase, or otherwise
frighten or cause deer to move in the direction of any person(s) who is
part of the organized or planned hunt and known to be waiting for the
deer.
(4) Sport fishing. We allow sport fishing on designated areas of
the refuge subject to the following condition: We prohibit the use of
lead fishing tackle on designated areas of the refuge.
* * * * *
0
14. Amend Sec. 32.68 by revising and republishing paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
Sec. 32.68 Wisconsin.
* * * * *
(d) Horicon National Wildlife Refuge--(1) Migratory game bird
hunting. We allow hunting of goose, duck, coot, common moorhen, and
American woodcock on designated areas of the refuge subject to the
following condition: We allow only participants in the Learn to Hunt
and other special programs to hunt goose, duck, coot, and common
moorhen.
(2) Upland game hunting. We allow hunting of wild turkey, ring-
necked pheasant, gray partridge, ruffed grouse, squirrel, cottontail
rabbit, snowshoe hare, raccoon, opossum, striped skunk, red fox, gray
fox, coyote, and bobcat on designated areas of the refuge subject to
the following conditions:
(i) For hunting, you may use or possess only approved nontoxic shot
shells while in the field, including shot shells used for hunting wild
turkey (see Sec. 32.2(k)).
(ii) We prohibit night hunting of upland game from 30 minutes after
legal sunset until 30 minutes before legal sunrise the following day.
(iii) We allow the use of dogs while hunting upland game (except
raccoon, opossum, striped skunk, red fox, gray fox, coyote, and
bobcat), provided the dog is under the immediate control of the hunter
at all times.
(iv) Coyote, red fox, gray fox, and bobcat hunting begins on the
first day of the traditional 9-day gun deer season.
(v) Coyote hunting ends on the last day of the season for fox.
(vi) You may only hunt striped skunk and opossum during the season
for raccoon.
(vii) You may only hunt snowshoe hare during the season for
cottontail rabbit.
(viii) Hunters may enter the refuge no earlier than 2 hours before
legal shooting hours and must exit the refuge no later than 2 hours
after legal shooting hours.
(3) Big game hunting. We allow hunting of white-tailed deer and
black bear in designated areas of the refuge subject to the following
conditions:
(i) You must remove all boats, decoys, game cameras, blinds, blind
materials, stands, platforms, and other personal equipment brought onto
the refuge at the end of each day's hunt (see Sec. 27.93
[[Page 88170]]
of this chapter). We prohibit hunting from any stand left up overnight.
(ii) We prohibit hunting bear with dogs.
(iii) Hunters must possess a refuge permit (FWS Form 3-2439, Hunt
Application/Permit--National Wildlife Refuge System) to hunt in Area E
(surrounding the office/visitor center).
(iv) The condition set forth at paragraph (d)(2)(viii) applies.
(v) Any ground blind used during any gun deer season must display
at least 144 square inches (929 square centimeters) of solid-blaze-
orange or fluorescent pink material visible from all directions.
(4) Sport fishing. We allow fishing on designated areas of the
refuge subject to the following conditions:
(i) We only allow bank fishing or fishing through the ice.
(ii) We prohibit the use of fishing weights or lures containing
lead.
(iii) We prohibit the taking of any mussel (clam), crayfish, frog,
leech, or turtle species by any method on the refuge (see Sec. 27.21
of this chapter).
(iv) We allow fishing in designated areas from legal sunrise to
legal sunset each day.
* * * * *
Shannon A. Estenoz,
Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks.
[FR Doc. 2024-25905 Filed 11-6-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P