Waiver of Launch Collective Risk Limit for a Near-Orbital Trajectory, 88338-88340 [2024-25851]
Download as PDF
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
88338
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Notices
Total Annual ‘‘Non-Hour Burden’’
Cost: None identified. Filings are
submitted electronically to the Board.
Needs and Uses: This collection
shows the balance, quarterly and
cumulative, for the current and prior
year of the carrier’s assets and liabilities,
gross capital expenditures, and revenue
tons carried. See 49 CFR 1243.2. The
Board uses the information in this
report to ensure competitive, efficient,
and safe transportation through general
oversight programs that monitor and
forecast the financial and operating
condition of railroads, and through
specific regulation of railroad rate and
service issues and rail restructuring
proposals, including railroad mergers,
consolidations, acquisitions of control,
and abandonments. Information from
these reports is used by the Board, other
Federal agencies, and industry groups to
assess industry growth and operations,
detect changes in carrier financial
stability, and identify trends that may
affect the national transportation
system. Revenue ton-miles, which are
reported in these reports, are compiled
and published by the Board in its
quarterly Selected Earnings Data Report,
which is published on the Board’s
website, https://www.stb.gov/stb/
industry/econ_reports.html. The
reformatted form and instructions may
be viewed at https://www.stb.gov/wpcontent/uploads/Condensed-BalanceSheet.csv and https://www.stb.gov/wpcontent/uploads/Instructions-forCondensed-Balance-Sheet.pdf,
respectively. It should be noted that the
form for this report has been reformatted
in a way that should allow for more
efficient submission and agency
processing, but the information has not
changed. The form continues to contain
all of the same data elements. The
information contained in this report is
not available from any other source.
Under the PRA, a federal agency that
conducts or sponsors a collection of
information must display a currently
valid OMB control number. A collection
of information, which is defined in 44
U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR 1320.3(c),
includes agency requirements that
persons submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to the agency, third
parties, or the public. Section 3507(b) of
the PRA requires, concurrent with an
agency’s submitting a collection to OMB
for approval, a 30-day notice and
comment period through publication in
the Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
including each proposed extension of an
existing collection of information.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
Dated: October 1, 2024.
Kenyatta Clay,
Clearance Clerk.
Board Agenda Comments, 400 West
Summit Hill Drive, Knoxville,
Tennessee 37902.
[FR Doc. 2024–25867 Filed 11–6–24; 8:45 am]
Dated: October 31, 2024.
Edward C. Meade,
Agency Liaison.
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
[FR Doc. 2024–25932 Filed 11–5–24; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 8120–08–P
Sunshine Act Meetings
9 a.m. CT on November
7, 2024.
PLACE: Curris Center, Murray, Kentucky.
STATUS: Open.
MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Meeting No. 24–04
AGENCY:
TIME AND DATE:
The TVA Board of Directors will hold
a public meeting on November 7 at the
Curris Center on the campus of Murray
State University, 1415 Chestnut Street,
Murray, Kentucky. The meeting will be
called to order at 9 a.m. CT to consider
the agenda items listed below. TVA
management will answer questions from
the news media following the Board
meeting.
On November 6, at the Curris Center,
the public may comment on any agenda
item or subject at a Board-hosted public
listening session which begins at 2 p.m.
CT and will last until 4:00 p.m.
Preregistration is required to address the
Board.
Agenda
1. Approval of Minutes of the August
22, 2024 Board Meeting
2. Report of the People and Governance
Committee
A. FY24 and FY25 Performance and
Compensation
3. Report of the Audit, Risk, and
Cybersecurity Committee
4. Report of the Operations and Nuclear
Oversight Committee
5. Report of the External Stakeholders
and Regulation Committee
A. Greater than 100 MW firm power
arrangement with CTC Property
LLC (xAI)
6. Report of the Finance, Rates, and
Portfolio Committee
7. Information Items
A. Natural Gas Transportation
Capacity Contract
B. Incentive Metrics
C. Amended TVA Board Practice
Capital Projects Approvals
8. Report from President and CEO
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
For more information: Please call
Ashton Davies, TVA Media Relations at
(865) 632–6000, Knoxville, Tennessee.
Anyone who wishes to comment on any
of the agenda in writing may send their
comments to: TVA Board of Directors,
PO 00000
Frm 00109
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Federal Aviation Administration
Waiver of Launch Collective Risk Limit
for a Near-Orbital Trajectory
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of waiver.
This notice concerns a
petition for waiver submitted to the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
by Space Exploration Technologies
Corporation (SpaceX) to waive the
launch collective risk limit of 1 × 10¥4
expected casualties (Ec) for Starship
Super Heavy missions that utilize a
near-orbital trajectory. The near-orbital
Starship Super Heavy missions have
been deemed suborbital such that a
single launch collective risk limit of 1
× 10¥4 Ec has been applied to cover the
aggregate of the risks from the suborbital
launch and suborbital reentry phases of
each mission. The SpaceX petition
requests an increase to the collective
risk limit, to not exceed 2 × 10¥4 Ec,
with the condition that neither the
suborbital launch nor suborbital reentry
risks exceed 1 × 10¥4 Ec individually.
The FAA grants the petition for nearorbital Starship Super Heavy missions
to allow a risk budget that parallels but
remains consistent with an orbital
mission profile that has a separate risk
limit of 1 × 10¥4 Ec for both the launch
and reentry phases.
DATES: Issued in Washington, DC, on
July 31, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical questions concerning this
waiver, contact Paul Wilde, Senior
Technical Specialist, Commercial Space
Transportation—Office of Operational
Safety, 800 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202)
267–5727; email: paul.wilde@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
On April 18, 2024, SpaceX submitted
a waiver petition to the Federal Aviation
Administration’s (FAA’s) Office of
Commercial Space Transportation (AST)
requesting relief from 14 CFR
E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM
07NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
450.101(a)(1)(i) for a unique near-orbital
trajectory SpaceX designed for the
initial Starship Super Heavy launches
from Boca Chica in Texas. SpaceX
requested an increase to the collective
risk criteria, to not exceed 2 × 10¥4 Ec,
with neither suborbital launch nor
suborbital reentry risks exceeding 1 ×
10¥4 Ec. SpaceX requested that the
waiver be effective for Starship Super
Heavy launches starting with Flight 4
and beyond that utilize a near-orbital
trajectory, where the maximum perigee
altitude is less than +130 km and greater
than ¥50 km. Additionally, SpaceX
requested a waiver of the 60-day
requirement for submission of waiver
petitions per § 404.5(a). SpaceX updated
its request on May 17, 2024. with
additional rationale to support the
waiver petition. On June 4, 2024, the
FAA notified SpaceX that the waiver
request was still under evaluation and
there would be no determination prior
to the planned launch of Flight 4 on
June 6, 2024. SpaceX requested the FAA
consider the waiver for the next flight,
namely Flight 5. The request to waive
the procedural requirements set forth in
§ 404.5(a) is no longer applicable as
SpaceX since requested the waiver to
apply starting with Flight 5.
Near-Orbital Trajectory of Starship
Super Heavy Missions
SpaceX’s initial developmental test
missions are for launches conducted on
a near-orbital trajectory, where the
nominal trajectory does not achieve
orbital insertion as defined in § 401.7.1
Therefore, the FAA has considered each
mission a suborbital launch that
includes a suborbital reentry, and has
applied a single launch collective risk
limit of 1 × 10¥4 Ec in accordance with
§ 450.101(a)(1)(i). Per § 450.3(b)(3)(iii),
for a suborbital launch that includes a
suborbital reentry, launch ends after
reaching apogee.
The Ec criteria identified in § 450.101
apply to flight. SpaceX, in its waiver
petition, divides the phases of Starship
Super Heavy flight into two distinct
phases. First, SpaceX identifies the
launch phase 2 to be from ignition of the
Super Heavy booster (first stage) to the
initial second engine cutoff (SECO–1) of
the Starship upper stage. In addition,
the launch phase includes stage
separation, followed by the Super Heavy
booster performing a boostback burn to
return to the launch site or a designated
landing area offshore. After stage
separation, Starship ignites its engines
until SECO–1. Due to the shallow
perigee of the Starship trajectory after
SECO–1, Earth’s gravity will cause the
Starship to passively enter the Earth’s
atmosphere in either a controlled or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
uncontrolled suborbital reentry. For a
controlled suborbital reentry, Starship
may perform a landing burn prior to
ocean splashdown. An uncontrolled
suborbital reentry of Starship would
almost certainly result in an in-air
breakup with debris expected to land
within published hazard areas.3 In both
scenarios, Starship hazardous debris 4
would impact the open ocean between
Madagascar and Australia. SpaceX
identifies the suborbital reentry phase of
the Starship flight to be from SECO–1 of
the Starship to its final impact or
landing because the perigee only
decreases in the post-SECO–1 phases of
flight.
Waiver Criteria
Chapter 509 allows the FAA to waive
a license requirement if the waiver (1)
will not jeopardize public health and
safety, safety of property; (2) will not
jeopardize national security and foreign
policy interests of the United States; and
(3) will be in the public interest. See 51
U.S.C. 50905(b)(3); 14 CFR 404.5(b).
Section 450.101(a)(1)(i) Waiver Petition
Section 450.101(a)(1)(i) requires that
the risk to all members of the public,
excluding persons in aircraft and
neighboring operations personnel, must
not exceed 1 × 10¥4 Ec. For a suborbital
launch, or a suborbital launch with a
suborbital reentry,5 the 1 × 10¥4 Ec in
§ 450.101(a)(1)(i) applies from liftoff
through final impact or landing.
SpaceX’s waiver petition is for its
Starship Super Heavy missions from
Boca Chica that involve a near-orbital
trajectory, where the Starship almost
obtains the necessary position and
velocity to achieve orbital insertion (i.e.,
make it into orbit). Because Starship
does not achieve orbital insertion, the
FAA considers the near-orbital Starship
Super Heavy missions to be suborbital
in which a single launch collective risk
limit of 1 × 10¥4 Ec is applied to cover
the sum or aggregate of the risks from
the suborbital launch and suborbital
reentry phases of each mission. SpaceX
seeks relief from the application of a
single launch collective risk limit
required by § 450.101(a)(1)(i) and
requests that the FAA allow for two
separate 1 × 10¥4 Ec risk limits, one for
the suborbital launch phase and one for
the suborbital reentry phase, similar to
what is allocated to an orbital mission
when a vehicle achieves orbital
insertion and then reenters from Earth
orbit.
In making a waiver determination, the
FAA must analyze whether the waiver:
(1) would jeopardize public health and
safety or safety of property; (2) would
jeopardize national security and foreign
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
88339
policy interests of the United States; and
(3) is in the public interest. See 51
U.S.C. 50905(b)(3); 14 CFR 404.5(b).
i. Public Health and Safety and Safety
of Property
The FAA finds that the trajectory
proposed by SpaceX is more like an
orbital trajectory than a suborbital
trajectory. Because suborbital
trajectories do not involve separate,
licensable reentries, they are afforded
one risk budget. By contrast, orbital
trajectories with a return result in a
separate and licensable reentry which
necessitates a risk budget for launch and
a risk budget for reentry. For future
flights of the Starship Super Heavy that
use this trajectory and end in the Indian
Ocean, SpaceX has identified a
trajectory that would allow the FAA to
apply two separate risk budgets without
jeopardizing public health and safety.
This increase in the collective risk
threshold from 1 × 10¥4 to 2 × 10¥4 Ec,
with neither launch nor reentry
exceeding 1 × 10¥4 Ec, exposes the
public to overall less risk than that of an
orbital mission followed by a separate
reentry, given the current Starship flight
history. SpaceX demonstrated that
utilizing the near-orbital trajectory
targeting an Indian Ocean landing,
which avoids random reentry risk from
failures that may occur while on-orbit
and provides near certainty that any
hazardous debris would impact
locations in the Indian Ocean, will not
jeopardize public health and safety. The
FAA independently found that the
public risk associated with a random
reentry of the Starship, at this stage in
its development, would be 40 to 50
times higher than the collective risk
threshold of 1 × 10¥4 Ec. Forcing
Starship engine cut-off to occur just
prior to reaching orbital perigee (and
thus maintaining a suborbital trajectory)
allows SpaceX to predict with high
certainty debris impact locations given
a failure.
For an orbital launch, the criteria in
§ 450.101(a) apply from liftoff through
orbital insertion. For a suborbital
launch, or a suborbital launch and
reentry, the criteria in § 450.101(a)
apply from liftoff through final impact
or landing. To determine whether a
launch is orbital or suborbital, the FAA
determines whether the trajectory is a
suborbital trajectory or achieves orbital
insertion. The near-orbital trajectory
targeting an Indian Ocean landing as
proposed by SpaceX does not fully meet
the definition of suborbital trajectory
per § 401.7, nor does the operation
achieve orbital insertion. Specifically,
the near orbital trajectory does not fully
meet the definition of suborbital
E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM
07NON1
88340
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 216 / Thursday, November 7, 2024 / Notices
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1
trajectory because under § 401.7, a
suborbital trajectory is when the
vacuum instantaneous impact point
(IIP) of a vehicle’s flight path does not
leave the surface of the Earth. Starship’s
nominal IIP leaves the earth for a few
seconds. Secondly, the near orbital
trajectory is not an orbital trajectory
because it does not lead to orbital
insertion. Orbital insertion is defined in
§ 401.7 as the point at which a vehicle
achieves a minimum 70-nautical mile
perigee based on a computation that
accounts for drag. In this case, the
Starship Super Heavy does not achieve
a 70-nautical mile perigee. Because
Starship does not achieve orbital
insertion, it conducts a suborbital
reentry, which is different from a
reentry from Earth orbit that involves a
final health check prior to initiating
deorbit. The near-orbital trajectory
presents a unique circumstance as it
relates to the application of the safety
criteria outlined in § 450.101.
The FAA finds that granting SpaceX
a waiver to § 450.101(a)(1)(i) with the
following terms and conditions would
not jeopardize public health and safety
or safety of property:
• The risk to all members of the
public, excluding persons in aircraft and
neighboring operations personnel, must
not exceed 1 × 10¥4 Ec for the phases
of flight from the lift-off of the Super
Heavy first stage to the initial SECO–1
of Starship.
• The risk to all members of the
public, excluding persons in aircraft and
neighboring operations personnel, must
not exceed 1 × 10¥4 Ec for the phases
of flight from the initial SECO–1 to final
impact or landing.
• The risk to all members of the
public, excluding persons in aircraft and
neighboring operations personnel, must
not exceed 2 × 10¥4 Ec for all phases of
flight from lift-off through final impact
or landing.
• The Starship mission profile
utilizes a near-orbital trajectory where
maximum perigee is less than positive
130 km and greater than negative 50 km,
and the normal trajectory limits
predicted debris impacts to broad ocean
areas in the Indian Ocean.
ii. National Security and Foreign Policy
Implications
The FAA has identified no national
security or foreign policy implications
associated with granting this waiver.
iii. Public Interest
On June 20, 2024, the FAA received
a letter from the National Aeronautics
and Space Administration (NASA)
Human Landing System (HLS) program
conveying the importance and criticality
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:15 Nov 06, 2024
Jkt 265001
of the Starship Super Heavy system and
rapid iterations of flight test operations
to NASA and its Artemis program. The
Starship program, and these test flights,
are essential to further the technology
required to support the NASA Artemis
program and key to returning U.S.
Government astronauts to the moon, as
reinforced by the letter from NASA. For
these reasons, the FAA finds that
granting this waiver will be in the
public interest.
Endnotes
1 § 401.7 states that ‘‘Orbital insertion
means the point at which a vehicle achieves
a minimum 70-nautical mile perigee based
on a computation that accounts for drag.’’
Seventy nautical miles equals 130 km.
2 The FAA notes that this is different from
the FAA’s definition of launch in 14 CFR
401.7, which encompasses certain pre- and
post-flight activities when the launch occurs
from a U.S. site.
3 This is because the loads on the Starship
would exceed its structural limits.
4 § 401.7 states that ‘‘Hazardous debris
means any object or substance capable of
causing a casualty or loss of functionality to
a critical asset. Hazardous debris includes
inert debris and explosive debris such as an
intact vehicle, vehicle fragments, any
detached vehicle component whether intact
or in fragments, payload, and any planned
jettison bodies.’’
5 The FAA introduced suborbital reentry in
its experimental permit final rulemaking in
2007 and reaffirmed its position in the
Streamlined Launch and Reentry License
Requirements final rule (85 FR 79566, 79583
(2020)). The CSLAA describes suborbital
rockets as reentering. See 51 U.S.C.
50905(b)(4) and 50906. Congress made clear
that a suborbital rocket can ‘‘reenter’’ for
purposes of licensing or permitting. It is not
necessary to reach orbit to be in outer space.
Although a suborbital rocket does not reach
the velocity necessary to orbit the Earth, the
vehicle can reach altitudes sufficient to be
considered outer space.
James Hatt,
Space Policy Division Manager, Commercial
Space Transportation, Federal Aviation
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024–25851 Filed 11–6–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Improvement of Publication of
Helicopter Air Ambulance (HAA)
Operations
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
The Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) is announcing the availability of
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Helicopter Air Ambulance Operations
data. The Helicopter Air Ambulance
Operations data has been posted in
accordance with 49 U.S.C. 44731, as
amended.
DATES: The most recently posted
Helicopter Air Ambulance Operations
data is for 2023. The FAA will continue
to collect, analyze, and make available
the HAA data in accordance with 49
U.S.C. 44731(d)(2).
ADDRESSES: How to obtain copies: A
copy of this publication may be
downloaded from: https://www.faa.gov/
about/office_org/headquarters_offices/
avs/offices/afx/afs/afs200.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nolan Crawford, 202–267–8166, Flight
Standards Service, AFS–220, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20591, 9-AFS-200-Correspondence@
faa.gov.
Issued in Washington, DC, on October 31,
2024.
James Nolan Crawford,
Air Transportation Division, 135 Flight
Operation Section, Aviation Safety Inspector.
[FR Doc. 2024–25707 Filed 11–6–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
[Docket No. FHWA–2019–0013]
Renewal Package From the State of
Texas to the Surface Transportation
Project Delivery Program and
Proposed Second Renewed
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
Assigning Environmental
Responsibilities to the State
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed MOU and
request for comments.
AGENCY:
This notice announces that
FHWA has received and reviewed a
renewal package from the Texas
Department of Transportation (TxDOT)
requesting participation in the Surface
Transportation Project Delivery Program
(Program). This Program allows FHWA
to assign, and States to assume,
responsibilities under the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and
all or part of FHWA’s responsibilities
for environmental review, consultation,
or other actions required under any
Federal environmental law with respect
to one or more Federal highway projects
within the State. The FHWA has
determined the renewal package to be
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07NON1.SGM
07NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 216 (Thursday, November 7, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 88338-88340]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25851]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Waiver of Launch Collective Risk Limit for a Near-Orbital
Trajectory
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation.
ACTION: Notice of waiver.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice concerns a petition for waiver submitted to the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) by Space Exploration Technologies
Corporation (SpaceX) to waive the launch collective risk limit of 1 x
10-4 expected casualties (Ec) for Starship Super
Heavy missions that utilize a near-orbital trajectory. The near-orbital
Starship Super Heavy missions have been deemed suborbital such that a
single launch collective risk limit of 1 x 10-4
Ec has been applied to cover the aggregate of the risks from
the suborbital launch and suborbital reentry phases of each mission.
The SpaceX petition requests an increase to the collective risk limit,
to not exceed 2 x 10-4 Ec, with the condition
that neither the suborbital launch nor suborbital reentry risks exceed
1 x 10-4 Ec individually. The FAA grants the
petition for near-orbital Starship Super Heavy missions to allow a risk
budget that parallels but remains consistent with an orbital mission
profile that has a separate risk limit of 1 x 10-4
Ec for both the launch and reentry phases.
DATES: Issued in Washington, DC, on July 31, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning
this waiver, contact Paul Wilde, Senior Technical Specialist,
Commercial Space Transportation--Office of Operational Safety, 800
Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20591; telephone: (202) 267-
5727; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 18, 2024, SpaceX submitted a waiver petition to the
Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA's) Office of Commercial Space
Transportation (AST) requesting relief from 14 CFR
[[Page 88339]]
450.101(a)(1)(i) for a unique near-orbital trajectory SpaceX designed
for the initial Starship Super Heavy launches from Boca Chica in Texas.
SpaceX requested an increase to the collective risk criteria, to not
exceed 2 x 10-4 Ec, with neither suborbital
launch nor suborbital reentry risks exceeding 1 x 10-4
Ec. SpaceX requested that the waiver be effective for
Starship Super Heavy launches starting with Flight 4 and beyond that
utilize a near-orbital trajectory, where the maximum perigee altitude
is less than +130 km and greater than -50 km. Additionally, SpaceX
requested a waiver of the 60-day requirement for submission of waiver
petitions per Sec. 404.5(a). SpaceX updated its request on May 17,
2024. with additional rationale to support the waiver petition. On June
4, 2024, the FAA notified SpaceX that the waiver request was still
under evaluation and there would be no determination prior to the
planned launch of Flight 4 on June 6, 2024. SpaceX requested the FAA
consider the waiver for the next flight, namely Flight 5. The request
to waive the procedural requirements set forth in Sec. 404.5(a) is no
longer applicable as SpaceX since requested the waiver to apply
starting with Flight 5.
Near-Orbital Trajectory of Starship Super Heavy Missions
SpaceX's initial developmental test missions are for launches
conducted on a near-orbital trajectory, where the nominal trajectory
does not achieve orbital insertion as defined in Sec. 401.7.\1\
Therefore, the FAA has considered each mission a suborbital launch that
includes a suborbital reentry, and has applied a single launch
collective risk limit of 1 x 10-4 Ec in
accordance with Sec. 450.101(a)(1)(i). Per Sec. 450.3(b)(3)(iii), for
a suborbital launch that includes a suborbital reentry, launch ends
after reaching apogee.
The Ec criteria identified in Sec. 450.101 apply to
flight. SpaceX, in its waiver petition, divides the phases of Starship
Super Heavy flight into two distinct phases. First, SpaceX identifies
the launch phase \2\ to be from ignition of the Super Heavy booster
(first stage) to the initial second engine cutoff (SECO-1) of the
Starship upper stage. In addition, the launch phase includes stage
separation, followed by the Super Heavy booster performing a boostback
burn to return to the launch site or a designated landing area
offshore. After stage separation, Starship ignites its engines until
SECO-1. Due to the shallow perigee of the Starship trajectory after
SECO-1, Earth's gravity will cause the Starship to passively enter the
Earth's atmosphere in either a controlled or uncontrolled suborbital
reentry. For a controlled suborbital reentry, Starship may perform a
landing burn prior to ocean splashdown. An uncontrolled suborbital
reentry of Starship would almost certainly result in an in-air breakup
with debris expected to land within published hazard areas.\3\ In both
scenarios, Starship hazardous debris \4\ would impact the open ocean
between Madagascar and Australia. SpaceX identifies the suborbital
reentry phase of the Starship flight to be from SECO-1 of the Starship
to its final impact or landing because the perigee only decreases in
the post-SECO-1 phases of flight.
Waiver Criteria
Chapter 509 allows the FAA to waive a license requirement if the
waiver (1) will not jeopardize public health and safety, safety of
property; (2) will not jeopardize national security and foreign policy
interests of the United States; and (3) will be in the public interest.
See 51 U.S.C. 50905(b)(3); 14 CFR 404.5(b).
Section 450.101(a)(1)(i) Waiver Petition
Section 450.101(a)(1)(i) requires that the risk to all members of
the public, excluding persons in aircraft and neighboring operations
personnel, must not exceed 1 x 10-4 Ec. For a
suborbital launch, or a suborbital launch with a suborbital reentry,\5\
the 1 x 10-4 Ec in Sec. 450.101(a)(1)(i) applies
from liftoff through final impact or landing. SpaceX's waiver petition
is for its Starship Super Heavy missions from Boca Chica that involve a
near-orbital trajectory, where the Starship almost obtains the
necessary position and velocity to achieve orbital insertion (i.e.,
make it into orbit). Because Starship does not achieve orbital
insertion, the FAA considers the near-orbital Starship Super Heavy
missions to be suborbital in which a single launch collective risk
limit of 1 x 10-4 Ec is applied to cover the sum
or aggregate of the risks from the suborbital launch and suborbital
reentry phases of each mission. SpaceX seeks relief from the
application of a single launch collective risk limit required by Sec.
450.101(a)(1)(i) and requests that the FAA allow for two separate 1 x
10-4 Ec risk limits, one for the suborbital
launch phase and one for the suborbital reentry phase, similar to what
is allocated to an orbital mission when a vehicle achieves orbital
insertion and then reenters from Earth orbit.
In making a waiver determination, the FAA must analyze whether the
waiver: (1) would jeopardize public health and safety or safety of
property; (2) would jeopardize national security and foreign policy
interests of the United States; and (3) is in the public interest. See
51 U.S.C. 50905(b)(3); 14 CFR 404.5(b).
i. Public Health and Safety and Safety of Property
The FAA finds that the trajectory proposed by SpaceX is more like
an orbital trajectory than a suborbital trajectory. Because suborbital
trajectories do not involve separate, licensable reentries, they are
afforded one risk budget. By contrast, orbital trajectories with a
return result in a separate and licensable reentry which necessitates a
risk budget for launch and a risk budget for reentry. For future
flights of the Starship Super Heavy that use this trajectory and end in
the Indian Ocean, SpaceX has identified a trajectory that would allow
the FAA to apply two separate risk budgets without jeopardizing public
health and safety. This increase in the collective risk threshold from
1 x 10-4 to 2 x 10-4 Ec, with neither
launch nor reentry exceeding 1 x 10-4 Ec, exposes
the public to overall less risk than that of an orbital mission
followed by a separate reentry, given the current Starship flight
history. SpaceX demonstrated that utilizing the near-orbital trajectory
targeting an Indian Ocean landing, which avoids random reentry risk
from failures that may occur while on-orbit and provides near certainty
that any hazardous debris would impact locations in the Indian Ocean,
will not jeopardize public health and safety. The FAA independently
found that the public risk associated with a random reentry of the
Starship, at this stage in its development, would be 40 to 50 times
higher than the collective risk threshold of 1 x 10-4
Ec. Forcing Starship engine cut-off to occur just prior to
reaching orbital perigee (and thus maintaining a suborbital trajectory)
allows SpaceX to predict with high certainty debris impact locations
given a failure.
For an orbital launch, the criteria in Sec. 450.101(a) apply from
liftoff through orbital insertion. For a suborbital launch, or a
suborbital launch and reentry, the criteria in Sec. 450.101(a) apply
from liftoff through final impact or landing. To determine whether a
launch is orbital or suborbital, the FAA determines whether the
trajectory is a suborbital trajectory or achieves orbital insertion.
The near-orbital trajectory targeting an Indian Ocean landing as
proposed by SpaceX does not fully meet the definition of suborbital
trajectory per Sec. 401.7, nor does the operation achieve orbital
insertion. Specifically, the near orbital trajectory does not fully
meet the definition of suborbital
[[Page 88340]]
trajectory because under Sec. 401.7, a suborbital trajectory is when
the vacuum instantaneous impact point (IIP) of a vehicle's flight path
does not leave the surface of the Earth. Starship's nominal IIP leaves
the earth for a few seconds. Secondly, the near orbital trajectory is
not an orbital trajectory because it does not lead to orbital
insertion. Orbital insertion is defined in Sec. 401.7 as the point at
which a vehicle achieves a minimum 70-nautical mile perigee based on a
computation that accounts for drag. In this case, the Starship Super
Heavy does not achieve a 70-nautical mile perigee. Because Starship
does not achieve orbital insertion, it conducts a suborbital reentry,
which is different from a reentry from Earth orbit that involves a
final health check prior to initiating deorbit. The near-orbital
trajectory presents a unique circumstance as it relates to the
application of the safety criteria outlined in Sec. 450.101.
The FAA finds that granting SpaceX a waiver to Sec.
450.101(a)(1)(i) with the following terms and conditions would not
jeopardize public health and safety or safety of property:
The risk to all members of the public, excluding persons
in aircraft and neighboring operations personnel, must not exceed 1 x
10-4 Ec for the phases of flight from the lift-
off of the Super Heavy first stage to the initial SECO-1 of Starship.
The risk to all members of the public, excluding persons
in aircraft and neighboring operations personnel, must not exceed 1 x
10-4 Ec for the phases of flight from the initial
SECO-1 to final impact or landing.
The risk to all members of the public, excluding persons
in aircraft and neighboring operations personnel, must not exceed 2 x
10-4 Ec for all phases of flight from lift-off
through final impact or landing.
The Starship mission profile utilizes a near-orbital
trajectory where maximum perigee is less than positive 130 km and
greater than negative 50 km, and the normal trajectory limits predicted
debris impacts to broad ocean areas in the Indian Ocean.
ii. National Security and Foreign Policy Implications
The FAA has identified no national security or foreign policy
implications associated with granting this waiver.
iii. Public Interest
On June 20, 2024, the FAA received a letter from the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Human Landing System (HLS)
program conveying the importance and criticality of the Starship Super
Heavy system and rapid iterations of flight test operations to NASA and
its Artemis program. The Starship program, and these test flights, are
essential to further the technology required to support the NASA
Artemis program and key to returning U.S. Government astronauts to the
moon, as reinforced by the letter from NASA. For these reasons, the FAA
finds that granting this waiver will be in the public interest.
Endnotes
\1\ Sec. 401.7 states that ``Orbital insertion means the point
at which a vehicle achieves a minimum 70-nautical mile perigee based
on a computation that accounts for drag.'' Seventy nautical miles
equals 130 km.
\2\ The FAA notes that this is different from the FAA's
definition of launch in 14 CFR 401.7, which encompasses certain pre-
and post-flight activities when the launch occurs from a U.S. site.
\3\ This is because the loads on the Starship would exceed its
structural limits.
\4\ Sec. 401.7 states that ``Hazardous debris means any object
or substance capable of causing a casualty or loss of functionality
to a critical asset. Hazardous debris includes inert debris and
explosive debris such as an intact vehicle, vehicle fragments, any
detached vehicle component whether intact or in fragments, payload,
and any planned jettison bodies.''
\5\ The FAA introduced suborbital reentry in its experimental
permit final rulemaking in 2007 and reaffirmed its position in the
Streamlined Launch and Reentry License Requirements final rule (85
FR 79566, 79583 (2020)). The CSLAA describes suborbital rockets as
reentering. See 51 U.S.C. 50905(b)(4) and 50906. Congress made clear
that a suborbital rocket can ``reenter'' for purposes of licensing
or permitting. It is not necessary to reach orbit to be in outer
space. Although a suborbital rocket does not reach the velocity
necessary to orbit the Earth, the vehicle can reach altitudes
sufficient to be considered outer space.
James Hatt,
Space Policy Division Manager, Commercial Space Transportation, Federal
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2024-25851 Filed 11-6-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P