Implementation of Additional Export Controls Against Russia and Belarus Under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR); and Clarifications, 87279-87282 [2024-25445]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
482–1430, Email: william.griffin@
bis.doc.gov.
For questions on the Entity List
changes in this final rule, contact the
Chair, End-User Review Committee,
Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Export Administration, Bureau of
Industry and Security, Department of
Commerce, Phone: (202) 482–5991,
Email: ERC@bis.doc.gov. For emails,
include ‘‘Russia and Belarus, October
2024 export control measures’’ in the
subject line.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
*
Matthew S. Borman,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Strategic Trade and Technology Security.
[FR Doc. 2024–25411 Filed 10–30–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 744 and 746
[Docket No. 241028–0281]
RIN 0694–AJ93
Implementation of Additional Export
Controls Against Russia and Belarus
Under the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR); and Clarifications
Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this final rule, the Bureau
of Industry and Security (BIS) makes
changes to the export controls against
Russia and Belarus under the Export
Administration Regulations (EAR). This
final rule expands the scope of the
Russian and Belarusian Industry Sector
Sanctions by imposing controls on nine
key precursors for riot control agents
and a chemical weapon that Russia has
deployed against Ukraine in violation of
the Chemical Weapons Convention
(CWC). This final rule also makes
adjustments to exclusions, exceptions,
and licensing policy for exports,
reexports, or transfers (in-country) to
certain components of the governments
of Country Group A:5 and A:6
destinations that are in Russia and
Belarus. Lastly, this final rule clarifies
that the Russia/Belarus-Military End
User and Procurement Foreign-Direct
Product (FDP) rule and the EAR’s other
Entity List FDP rules’ license
requirements extend to or within any
destination or to any end user or party
that otherwise meets the criteria. This
final rule is being published
concurrently with a BIS final rule,
‘‘Additions and Revisions of Entities to
the Entity List’’ (RIN 0694–AJ94), which
includes additional changes related to
export controls related to Russia and
Belarus.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective November
1, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general questions on this final rule,
contact Collmann Griffin, Senior Policy
Advisor, International Policy Office,
Bureau of Industry and Security,
Department of Commerce, Phone: 202–
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Oct 31, 2024
Jkt 265001
87279
B. Changes related to governments of
Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations
for certain exclusions, license exception
eligibility, and licensing policy; and
C. Clarifying that the Entity List FDP
rules’ license requirement extends to or
within any destination or to any end
user or party that otherwise meets the
criteria.
II. Amendments to the EAR
A. Additions to Supplement No. 6 to
Part 746 To Control Key Precursors for
Riot Control Agents and a Chemical
Weapon That Russia Has Deployed
I. Background
Against Ukraine
A. Export Controls Implemented Against
The U.S. Department of Commerce is
Russia and Belarus
expanding controls under the EAR to
In response to Russia’s February 2022 include certain chemical precursors that
are essential for the ‘‘production’’ of
full-scale invasion of Ukraine, BIS
chemical riot control agents (RCAs) and
imposed extensive export controls on
Russia under the EAR as part of the final chloropicrin that Russia has deployed
against Ukraine in violation of the
rule, ‘‘Implementation of Sanctions
Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC).
Against Russia Under the Export
These new regulatory restrictions,
Administration Regulations (EAR)’’
(‘‘Russia Sanctions Rule’’) (87 FR 12226, which are specific to Russia and
Belarus, aim to limit the use of these
March 3, 2022). To address Belarus’s
complicity in the invasion, BIS imposed chemical precursors in the context of
similar export controls on Belarus under the war in Ukraine.
RCAs such as tear gas and other
the EAR in a final rule,
crowd dispersal chemicals have the
‘‘Implementation of Sanctions Against
Belarus’’ (‘‘Belarus Sanctions Rule’’) (87 potential for misuse in the context of
armed conflict. While RCAs are
FR 13048, March 6, 2022). Since March
2022, BIS has published numerous final commonly used by law enforcement,
their use as a method of warfare is
rules strengthening the export controls
prohibited by Article I of the CWC.
on Russia and Belarus, including
Chloropicrin is a toxic chemical
measures undertaken in coordination
included on Schedule 3 of the CWC’s
with U.S. allies and partners.
Annex on Chemicals. Its use against
B. Overview of This Final Rule
Ukrainian armed forces constitutes use
of a chemical weapon and is also
BIS is amending the EAR (15 CFR
prohibited under Article I of the CWC.
parts 730–744) to strengthen export
On April 4, 2024, the Department of
controls against Russia and Belarus by
expanding the scope of the Russian and State published its annual report to
Congress on Compliance with the
Belarusian Industry Sector Sanctions
Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC),
and clarify the applicability of the
which stated that Russia had used RCAs
Entity List FDP rules. BIS in this final
as a method of warfare against
rule is also making adjustments to
Ukrainian forces in violation of the
exclusions, exceptions, and licensing
policy for exports, reexports, or transfers CWC. This report concluded that ‘‘the
United States assesses that Russia has
(in-country) of items for the official
repeatedly used RCAs as a method of
business of diplomatic or consular
missions of the governments of Country warfare across the frontlines in
Group A:5 and A:6 destinations that are Ukraine.’’ On May 1, 2024, the
Department of State announced that it
located in Russia and Belarus.
had made a determination pursuant to
The Export Control Reform Act
(ECRA) provides the legal basis for BIS’s the Chemical and Biological Weapons
Control and Warfare Elimination Act of
principal authorities and serves as the
1991 (CBW Act of 1991) (22 U.S.C.
authority under which BIS issues this
5604–5605) that Russia had used
rule.
chloropicrin against Ukrainian troops in
The three sets of changes this final
rule makes are described in section II as violation of the CWC (see May 1, 2024
State Dept. Fact Sheet (Imposing New
follows:
Measures on Russia for its Full-Scale
A. Additions to supplement no. 6 to
War and Use of Chemical Weapons
part 746 to control nine key precursors
Against Ukraine)). On June 7, 2024, in
for riot control agents and a chemical
connection with this determination
weapon that Russia has deployed
under the CBW Act of 1991, the Acting
against Ukraine;
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
87280
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
Under Secretary of State for Political
Affairs imposed restrictions on Russia,
including on arms sales and related
financing. The Federal Register Notice
announcing these restrictions made
reference to the export controls that
Commerce maintains on Russia under
parts 744 and 746 (see 89 FR 48701,
June 7, 2024).
Russia’s use of RCAs as a method of
warfare and its use of chloropicrin as a
chemical weapon during its war of
aggression in Ukraine raise concerns
about Russia’s further production and
weaponization of these chemicals.
Controlling the export of key chemical
precursors, therefore, represents a
critical step toward preventing the
misuse of these chemicals in
furtherance of Russia’s military efforts.
This final rule builds upon a BIS final
rule that imposed controls on two
precursors of chloropicrin,
nitromethane and picric acid, as part of
a set of restrictions on Russia and
Belarus by targeting chemicals that
could be useful for Russia’s chemical
and biological weapons production
capabilities or diverted from Belarus to
Russia for these activities of concern (87
FR 57068, September 16, 2022). Adding
additional chemical precursors of
chloropicrin in this current rule further
supports that objective.
In assessing whether to impose these
new controls, it is important to
acknowledge that the chemical
precursors listed for control play a
significant role in civilian applications.
For example, these chemical precursors
are used in the production of
pharmaceuticals for treating respiratory
ailments and in anesthetic formulations.
In agriculture, these precursor
chemicals can function as pest control
agents or can be used for the production
of fertilizers, both crucial to food
security and medical treatments.
Recognizing these civilian applications,
these new controls are narrowly tailored
to apply only to Russia and Belarus. The
restrictions address the CWC Treaty’s
objective regarding the need to guard
against the potential misuse of these
chemical precursors while ensuring
continuing exports, reexports, and
transfers (in-country) as part of supply
chains related to legitimate use under
the CWC, particularly in medical and
agricultural sectors, in all destinations,
which for purposes of license
applications for Russia and Belarus is
addressed under the case-by-case
license review policy under
§ 746.8(b)(3)(iii).
Therefore, this final rule adds a new
paragraph (i) (Precursors for riot control
agents and chloropicrin as follows) to
supplement no. 6 to part 746 to control
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Oct 31, 2024
Jkt 265001
certain precursors of CS (oChlorobenzylidenemalononitrile or oChlorobenzalmalononitrile) (CAS 2698–
41–1); CN (Phenylacyl chloride or wChloroacetophenone) (CAS 532–27–4);
and Trichloro(nitro)methane
(Chloropicrin—CAS 76–06–2) and CR
(Dibenzoxazpine—CAS 257–07–8).
Specifically, this final rule adds
paragraphs (i)(1) through (9) to describe
these chemical precursors that will be
controlled under the EAR’s Russian and
Belarusian Industry Sector Sanctions.
The chemical precursors listed below
may be utilized in the production of
RCAs and chloropicrin:
1. Malononitrile (CAS 109–77–3)
2. 2-Chlorobenzaldehyde (CAS 89–98–5)
3. 2-Chlorobenzyl Alcohol (CAS 17849–
38–6)
4. 2-Chlorobenzylamine (CAS 89–97–4)
5. Benzene, 1-chloro-2(dimethoxymethyl) (CAS 70380–66–4)
6. Acetophenone (CAS 98–86–2)
7. Chloroacetyl Chloride (CAS 79–04–9)
8. Chloroform (CAS 67–66–3)
9. o-Aminophenol (CAS 95–55–6)
These expanded controls will
supplement the existing CCL controls
under ECCNs 1A984, 1C607, and 1C350.
BIS estimates that these changes will
result in an increase of ten license
applications submitted to BIS annually.
B. Changes Related to Governments of
Country Group A:5 and A:6 Destinations
for Certain Exclusions, License
Exception Eligibility, and Licensing
Policy
This final rule makes the following
changes to reduce the licensing burden
on certain government entities located
in Russia and Belarus by granting them
the same eligibility for certain
exclusions, license exceptions, and
licensing policy as is currently available
for private sector entities headquartered
in Country Group A:5 and A:6
countries.
1. Addition of license exception
eligibility in § 746.8(c)(2)(vi) for official
business of diplomatic or consular
missions of the governments of Country
Group A:5 and A:6 destinations
In § 746.8, this final rule expands the
scope of paragraph (c)(2)(vi) to add the
phrase ‘‘or for the official business of
diplomatic or consular missions of the
governments of Country Group A:5 and
A:6 destinations’’ that are operating in
Russia or Belarus as entities eligible
under this paragraph to receive items
under License Exception Encryption
commodities, software, and technology
(ENC). In order to receive items under
License Exception ENC, the export,
reexport, or transfer (in-country) would
also need to not be restricted under
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
§ 740.2 and meet all of the applicable
terms and conditions of License
Exception ENC under § 740.17. The
addition of license exception eligibility
for the embassies and consulates of
Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations
is consistent with U.S. national security
and foreign policy interests. BIS decided
to make this change after reviewing a
question from the public that asked
whether License Exception ENC could
be used for an export that otherwise met
the terms of License Exception ENC for
an export to an embassy for the official
use of a Country Group A:5 and A:6
destination. Prior to this final rule,
paragraph (c)(2) of § 746.8 would have
excluded the use of License Exception
ENC by such government entities.
BIS estimates that these changes will
result in a decrease of five license
applications submitted to BIS annually.
2. Addition to exclusion in
§ 746.8(a)(12)(ii) for official business of
diplomatic or consular missions of the
governments of Country Group A:5 and
A:6 destinations.
In § 746.8(a)(12)(ii) (Mass market
encryption commodities and software,
and software designated EAR99), this
final rule revises this paragraph to add
a new exclusion under paragraph
(a)(12)(ii)(F) to specify that exports,
reexports, and transfers (in-country) for
the official business of diplomatic or
consular missions of the governments of
Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations
that are operating in Russia or Belarus
are also within the scope of this
paragraph (a)(12) exclusion. This final
rule also revises paragraph (a)(12)(ii)(D)
to remove the word ‘or’ and revises
paragraph (a)(12)(E) to remove the
period and add a semi-colon and the
word ‘or’ at the end of the paragraph to
reflect the addition of new paragraph
(a)(12)(ii)(F).
3. Addition of governments of Country
Group A:5 and A:6 destinations to the
case-by-case licensing policy under
§ 746.8(b)(3)(vi).
In § 746.8(b)(3)(vi), this final rule
revises the case-by-case licensing policy
for license applications submitted
pursuant to paragraphs (a)(1), (2), and
(4) through (8) of this section, to add a
new paragraph (b)(3)(vi)(F). With this
revision, the case-by-case license review
policy to determine whether the
transaction in question would benefit
the Russian or Belarusian government or
defense sector will also apply to
applications involving items destined
for official business of governments of
Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations
that are operating in Russia or Belarus.
This final rule also revises paragraph
(b)(3)(vi)(D) to remove the word ‘or’ and
revises paragraph (b)(3)(vi)(E) to remove
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
the period and add a semi-colon and the
word ‘or’ at the end of the paragraph to
reflect the addition of new paragraph
(b)(3)(vi)(F).
C. Clarifying That the Entity List-Related
FDP Rules License Requirement Extends
to or Within Any Destination or to Any
End User or Party That Otherwise Meets
the Criteria
This final rule revises §§ 744.11 and
746.8 of the EAR to clarify that the three
Entity List-related FDP rules’ license
requirements extend to or within any
destination or to any end user or party.
This final rule makes clarifying changes
to § 744.11 by revising paragraphs
(a)(2)(i) (Footnote 1 entities) and
(a)(2)(iv) (Footnote 4 entities) to specify
that parties may not, without a license,
reexport, export from abroad, or transfer
(in-country) to or within any destination
or to any end user or party any foreignproduced item subject to the EAR
pursuant to the referenced FDP rules
under § 734.9(e)(1) or (2), respectively.
Specifically, this final rule adds the
phrase ‘to or within any destination or
to any end user or party’ to clarify the
scope of this license requirement. This
final rule makes the same clarifying
revision in § 746.8(a)(3) (Russia/BelarusMilitary End User and Procurement FDP
rule) (Footnote 3 entities).
BIS estimates these changes described
in section II.C will not result in any
change to the number of license
applications submitted to BIS annually.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Savings Clause
For the changes being made in this
final rule, shipments of items removed
from eligibility for a License Exception
or export, reexport, or transfer (incountry) without a license (NLR) as a
result of this regulatory action that were
en route aboard a carrier to a port of
export, reexport, or transfer (in-country),
on November 1, 2024, pursuant to actual
orders for export, reexport, or transfer
(in-country) to or within a foreign
destination, may proceed to that
destination under the previous
eligibility for a License Exception or
export, reexport, or transfer (in-country)
without a license (NLR), provided the
export, reexport, or transfer (in-country)
is completed no later than on December
2, 2024.
Export Control Reform Act of 2018
On August 13, 2018, the President
signed into law the John S. McCain
National Defense Authorization Act for
Fiscal Year 2019, which included the
Export Control Reform Act of 2018
(ECRA) (codified, as amended, at 50
U.S.C. 4801–4852). ECRA provides the
legal basis for BIS’s principal authorities
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Oct 31, 2024
Jkt 265001
and serves as the authority under which
BIS issues this rule. In particular, and as
noted elsewhere, Section 1753 of ECRA
(50 U.S.C. 4812) authorizes the
regulation of exports, reexports, and
transfers (in-country) of items subject to
U.S. jurisdiction. Further, Section
1754(a)(1)–(16) of ECRA (50 U.S.C.
4813(a)(1)–(16)) authorizes, inter alia:
(1) the establishment of a list of
controlled items; (2) the prohibition of
unauthorized exports, reexports, and
transfers (in-country); (3) the
requirement of licenses or other
authorizations for exports, reexports,
and transfers (in-country) of controlled
items; (4) the apprising of the public of
changes in policy, regulations, and
procedures; and (5) any other action
necessary to carry out ECRA that is not
otherwise prohibited by law. Pursuant
to Section 1762(a) of ECRA (50 U.S.C.
4821(a)), these changes can be imposed
in a final rule without prior notice and
comment.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. BIS has examined the impact of this
rule as required by Executive Orders
(E.O.) 12866, 13563, and 14094, which
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(e.g., potential economic,
environmental, public, health, and
safety effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Pursuant to E.O. 12866, as
amended, this final rule has not been
determined to be a ‘‘significant
regulatory action.’’
2. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall any person be
subject to a penalty for failure to comply
with, a collection of information subject
to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Control Number. This rule
involves the following OMB-approved
collections of information subject to the
PRA:
• 0694–0088, ‘‘Simple Network
Application Process and Multipurpose
Application Form,’’ which carries a
burden hour estimate of 29.4 minutes
for a manual or electronic submission;
• 0694–0096 ‘‘Five Year Records
Retention Period,’’ which carries a
burden hour estimate of less than 1
minute for a manual or electronic
submission; and
• 0607–0152 ‘‘Automated Export
System (AES) Program,’’ which carries a
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
87281
burden hour estimate of 3 minutes per
electronic submission.
BIS estimates that these new controls
on Russia and Belarus under the EAR
will result in an increase of five license
applications submitted annually to BIS.
However, the additional burden falls
within the existing estimates currently
associated with these control numbers.
Additional information regarding these
collections of information—including
all background materials—can be found
at: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain by using the search function
to enter either the title of the collection
or the OMB Control Number.
3. This rule does not contain policies
with Federalism implications as that
term is defined under E.O. 13132.
4. Pursuant to section 1762 of ECRA
(50 U.S.C. 4821), this action is exempt
from the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553) requirements for
notice of proposed rulemaking,
opportunity for public participation,
and delay in effective date. While
section 1762 of ECRA provides
sufficient authority for such an
exemption, this action is also
independently exempt from these APA
requirements because it involves a
military or foreign affairs function of the
United States (5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)).
5. Because neither the Administrative
Procedure Act nor any other law
requires that notice of proposed
rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment be given for this rule,
the analytical requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.) are not applicable. Accordingly,
no Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
is required, and none has been
prepared.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 744
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Terrorism.
15 CFR Part 746
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, parts 744 and 746 of the
Export Administration Regulations (15
CFR parts 730 through 774) are revised
to read as follows:
PART 744—END-USE AND END-USER
CONTROLS
1. The authority citation for part 744
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4801–4852; 50 U.S.C.
4601 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C.
3201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22 U.S.C. 7201
et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR
20947, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O.
12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p.
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
87282
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2024 / Rules and Regulations
608; E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994
Comp., p. 950; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3
CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR
45167, 3 CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O.
13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p.
783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 786; Notice of November 8, 2022,
87 FR 68015, 3 CFR, 2022 Comp., p. 563;
Notice of September 18, 2024, 89 FR 77011
(September 20, 2024).
2. Section 744.11 is amended by
revising the first sentence of paragraph
(a)(2)(i) and the first sentence of
paragraph (a)(2)(iv) to read as follows:
■
§ 744.11 License requirements that apply
to entities acting or at significant risk of
acting contrary to the national security or
foreign policy interests of the United States.
*
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Footnote 1 entities. You may not,
without a license or license exception,
reexport, export from abroad, or transfer
(in-country) to or within any destination
or to any end user or party any foreignproduced item subject to the EAR
pursuant to § 734.9(e)(1) of the EAR.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
(iv) Footnote 4 entities. You may not,
without a license, reexport, export from
abroad, or transfer (in-country) to or
within any destination or to any end
user or party any foreign-produced item
subject to the EAR pursuant to
§ 734.9(e)(2) of the EAR. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
PART 746—EMBARGOES AND OTHER
SPECIAL CONTROLS
3. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 746 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4801–4852; 50 U.S.C.
4601 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C.
287c; Sec 1503, Pub. L. 108–11, 117 Stat. 559;
22 U.S.C. 2151 note; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O.
12854, 58 FR 36587, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p.
614; E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205, 3 CFR, 1994
Comp., p. 899; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3
CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13338, 69 FR
26751, 3 CFR, 2004 Comp., p 168;
Presidential Determination 2003–23, 68 FR
26459, 3 CFR, 2004 Comp., p. 320;
Presidential Determination 2007–7, 72 FR
1899, 3 CFR, 2006 Comp., p. 325; Notice of
May 8, 2024, 89 FR 40355 (May 9, 2024).
4. Section 746.8 is amended by:
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(3),
(a)(12)(ii)(D) and (E);
■ b. Adding paragraph (a)(12)(ii)(F);
■ c. Revising paragraphs (b)(3)(vi)(D)
and (E);
■ d. Adding paragraph (b)(3)(vi)(F); and
■ e. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(vi).
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
■
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Oct 31, 2024
Jkt 265001
§ 746.8 Sanctions against Russia and
Belarus.
(a) * * *
*
*
*
*
(3) Russia/Belarus-Military End User
and Procurement FDP rule. A license is
required to reexport, export from
abroad, or transfer (in-country) to or
within any destination or to any end
user or party any foreign-produced item
subject to the EAR under § 734.9(g) of
the EAR.
*
*
*
*
*
(12) * * *
(ii) * * *
(D) Wholly owned subsidiaries,
branches, or sales offices of companies
headquartered in countries from
Country Group A:5 and A:6 in
supplement no. 1 to part 740;
(E) Joint ventures between two or
more companies headquartered in
Country Group A:5 and A:6 in
supplement no. 1 to part 740, including
the wholly owned subsidiaries,
branches, or sales offices of such joint
ventures; or
(F) For official business of diplomatic
or consular missions of the governments
of Country Group A:5 and A:6
destinations.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(vi) * * *
(D) The wholly owned subsidiaries,
branches, or sales offices of companies
headquartered in countries from
Country Group A:5 and A:6 in
supplement no. 1 to part 740;
(E) Joint ventures of companies
headquartered in Country Groups A:5
and A:6 with other companies
headquartered in Country Groups A:5
and A:6; or
(F) For official business of
governments of Country Group A:5 and
A:6 destinations.
(vii) Applications for companies
headquartered in Country Groups A:5
and A:6 to support civil
telecommunications infrastructure.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(vi) License Exception Encryption
commodities, software, and technology
(ENC) for civil end-users that are
wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries,
branches, or sales offices; foreign
subsidiaries, branches, or sales offices of
U.S. companies that are joint ventures
with other U.S. companies; joint
ventures of U.S. companies with
companies headquartered in countries
from Country Group A:5 and A:6 in
supplement no. 1 to part 740 of the EAR
countries; the wholly-owned
*
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
subsidiaries, branches, or sales offices of
companies headquartered in countries
from Country Group A:5 and A:6 in
supplement no. 1 to part 740; joint
ventures of companies headquartered in
Country Group A:5 and A:6 with other
companies headquartered in Country
Groups A:5 and A:6; or for official
business of diplomatic or consular
missions of the governments of Country
Group A:5 and A:6 destinations
(§§ 740.13(c) and 740.17 of the EAR).
■ 5. Supplement no. 6 to part 746 is
amended by adding paragraph (i) to read
as follows:
Supplement No. 6 to Part 746—Russian
and Belarusian Industry Sector
Sanctions Pursuant to § 746.8(a)(6)
(i) Pre-cursors for riot control agents and
chloropicrin as follows:
(1) Malononitrile (CAS 109–77–3);
(2) 2-Chlorobenzaldehyde (CAS 89–98–5);
(3) 2-Chlorobenzyl Alcohol (CAS 17849–
38–6);
(4) 2-Chlorobenzylamine (CAS 89–97–4);
(5) Benzene, 1-chloro-2-(dimethoxymethyl)
(CAS 70380–66–4);
(6) Acetophenone (CAS 98–86–2);
(7) Chloroacetyl Chloride (CAS 79–04–9);
(8) Chloroform (CAS 67–66–3); and
(9) o-Aminophenol (CAS 95–55–6).
Matthew S. Borman,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for
Strategic Trade and Technology Security.
[FR Doc. 2024–25445 Filed 10–30–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–JT–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Part 630
[Docket No. FHWA–2022–0017]
RIN 2125–AG05
Work Zone Safety and Mobility and
Temporary Traffic Control Devices
Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FHWA amends its
regulations that govern traffic safety and
mobility in highway and street work
zones. The FHWA recognizes that
increasing road construction activity on
our highways can lead to travel
disruptions which could potentially
result in congestion and crashes, as well
as loss in productivity and public
frustration with work zones. The
changes will facilitate consideration of
the broader safety and mobility impacts
of work zones in a more coordinated
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01NOR1.SGM
01NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 212 (Friday, November 1, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 87279-87282]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25445]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Parts 744 and 746
[Docket No. 241028-0281]
RIN 0694-AJ93
Implementation of Additional Export Controls Against Russia and
Belarus Under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR); and
Clarifications
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this final rule, the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS)
makes changes to the export controls against Russia and Belarus under
the Export Administration Regulations (EAR). This final rule expands
the scope of the Russian and Belarusian Industry Sector Sanctions by
imposing controls on nine key precursors for riot control agents and a
chemical weapon that Russia has deployed against Ukraine in violation
of the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). This final rule also makes
adjustments to exclusions, exceptions, and licensing policy for
exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country) to certain components of
the governments of Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations that are in
Russia and Belarus. Lastly, this final rule clarifies that the Russia/
Belarus-Military End User and Procurement Foreign-Direct Product (FDP)
rule and the EAR's other Entity List FDP rules' license requirements
extend to or within any destination or to any end user or party that
otherwise meets the criteria. This final rule is being published
concurrently with a BIS final rule, ``Additions and Revisions of
Entities to the Entity List'' (RIN 0694-AJ94), which includes
additional changes related to export controls related to Russia and
Belarus.
DATES: This rule is effective November 1, 2024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions on this final
rule, contact Collmann Griffin, Senior Policy Advisor, International
Policy Office, Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of Commerce,
Phone: 202-482-1430, Email: [email protected].
For questions on the Entity List changes in this final rule,
contact the Chair, End-User Review Committee, Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Export Administration, Bureau of Industry and Security,
Department of Commerce, Phone: (202) 482-5991, Email: [email protected].
For emails, include ``Russia and Belarus, October 2024 export control
measures'' in the subject line.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. Export Controls Implemented Against Russia and Belarus
In response to Russia's February 2022 full-scale invasion of
Ukraine, BIS imposed extensive export controls on Russia under the EAR
as part of the final rule, ``Implementation of Sanctions Against Russia
Under the Export Administration Regulations (EAR)'' (``Russia Sanctions
Rule'') (87 FR 12226, March 3, 2022). To address Belarus's complicity
in the invasion, BIS imposed similar export controls on Belarus under
the EAR in a final rule, ``Implementation of Sanctions Against
Belarus'' (``Belarus Sanctions Rule'') (87 FR 13048, March 6, 2022).
Since March 2022, BIS has published numerous final rules strengthening
the export controls on Russia and Belarus, including measures
undertaken in coordination with U.S. allies and partners.
B. Overview of This Final Rule
BIS is amending the EAR (15 CFR parts 730-744) to strengthen export
controls against Russia and Belarus by expanding the scope of the
Russian and Belarusian Industry Sector Sanctions and clarify the
applicability of the Entity List FDP rules. BIS in this final rule is
also making adjustments to exclusions, exceptions, and licensing policy
for exports, reexports, or transfers (in-country) of items for the
official business of diplomatic or consular missions of the governments
of Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations that are located in Russia
and Belarus.
The Export Control Reform Act (ECRA) provides the legal basis for
BIS's principal authorities and serves as the authority under which BIS
issues this rule.
The three sets of changes this final rule makes are described in
section II as follows:
A. Additions to supplement no. 6 to part 746 to control nine key
precursors for riot control agents and a chemical weapon that Russia
has deployed against Ukraine;
B. Changes related to governments of Country Group A:5 and A:6
destinations for certain exclusions, license exception eligibility, and
licensing policy; and
C. Clarifying that the Entity List FDP rules' license requirement
extends to or within any destination or to any end user or party that
otherwise meets the criteria.
II. Amendments to the EAR
A. Additions to Supplement No. 6 to Part 746 To Control Key Precursors
for Riot Control Agents and a Chemical Weapon That Russia Has Deployed
Against Ukraine
The U.S. Department of Commerce is expanding controls under the EAR
to include certain chemical precursors that are essential for the
``production'' of chemical riot control agents (RCAs) and chloropicrin
that Russia has deployed against Ukraine in violation of the Chemical
Weapons Convention (CWC). These new regulatory restrictions, which are
specific to Russia and Belarus, aim to limit the use of these chemical
precursors in the context of the war in Ukraine.
RCAs such as tear gas and other crowd dispersal chemicals have the
potential for misuse in the context of armed conflict. While RCAs are
commonly used by law enforcement, their use as a method of warfare is
prohibited by Article I of the CWC. Chloropicrin is a toxic chemical
included on Schedule 3 of the CWC's Annex on Chemicals. Its use against
Ukrainian armed forces constitutes use of a chemical weapon and is also
prohibited under Article I of the CWC.
On April 4, 2024, the Department of State published its annual
report to Congress on Compliance with the Chemical Weapons Convention
(CWC), which stated that Russia had used RCAs as a method of warfare
against Ukrainian forces in violation of the CWC. This report concluded
that ``the United States assesses that Russia has repeatedly used RCAs
as a method of warfare across the frontlines in Ukraine.'' On May 1,
2024, the Department of State announced that it had made a
determination pursuant to the Chemical and Biological Weapons Control
and Warfare Elimination Act of 1991 (CBW Act of 1991) (22 U.S.C. 5604-
5605) that Russia had used chloropicrin against Ukrainian troops in
violation of the CWC (see May 1, 2024 State Dept. Fact Sheet (Imposing
New Measures on Russia for its Full-Scale War and Use of Chemical
Weapons Against Ukraine)). On June 7, 2024, in connection with this
determination under the CBW Act of 1991, the Acting
[[Page 87280]]
Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs imposed restrictions on
Russia, including on arms sales and related financing. The Federal
Register Notice announcing these restrictions made reference to the
export controls that Commerce maintains on Russia under parts 744 and
746 (see 89 FR 48701, June 7, 2024).
Russia's use of RCAs as a method of warfare and its use of
chloropicrin as a chemical weapon during its war of aggression in
Ukraine raise concerns about Russia's further production and
weaponization of these chemicals. Controlling the export of key
chemical precursors, therefore, represents a critical step toward
preventing the misuse of these chemicals in furtherance of Russia's
military efforts.
This final rule builds upon a BIS final rule that imposed controls
on two precursors of chloropicrin, nitromethane and picric acid, as
part of a set of restrictions on Russia and Belarus by targeting
chemicals that could be useful for Russia's chemical and biological
weapons production capabilities or diverted from Belarus to Russia for
these activities of concern (87 FR 57068, September 16, 2022). Adding
additional chemical precursors of chloropicrin in this current rule
further supports that objective.
In assessing whether to impose these new controls, it is important
to acknowledge that the chemical precursors listed for control play a
significant role in civilian applications. For example, these chemical
precursors are used in the production of pharmaceuticals for treating
respiratory ailments and in anesthetic formulations. In agriculture,
these precursor chemicals can function as pest control agents or can be
used for the production of fertilizers, both crucial to food security
and medical treatments. Recognizing these civilian applications, these
new controls are narrowly tailored to apply only to Russia and Belarus.
The restrictions address the CWC Treaty's objective regarding the need
to guard against the potential misuse of these chemical precursors
while ensuring continuing exports, reexports, and transfers (in-
country) as part of supply chains related to legitimate use under the
CWC, particularly in medical and agricultural sectors, in all
destinations, which for purposes of license applications for Russia and
Belarus is addressed under the case-by-case license review policy under
Sec. 746.8(b)(3)(iii).
Therefore, this final rule adds a new paragraph (i) (Precursors for
riot control agents and chloropicrin as follows) to supplement no. 6 to
part 746 to control certain precursors of CS (o-
Chlorobenzylidenemalononitrile or o-Chlorobenzalmalononitrile) (CAS
2698-41-1); CN (Phenylacyl chloride or w-Chloroacetophenone) (CAS 532-
27-4); and Trichloro(nitro)methane (Chloropicrin--CAS 76-06-2) and CR
(Dibenzoxazpine--CAS 257-07-8). Specifically, this final rule adds
paragraphs (i)(1) through (9) to describe these chemical precursors
that will be controlled under the EAR's Russian and Belarusian Industry
Sector Sanctions. The chemical precursors listed below may be utilized
in the production of RCAs and chloropicrin:
1. Malononitrile (CAS 109-77-3)
2. 2-Chlorobenzaldehyde (CAS 89-98-5)
3. 2-Chlorobenzyl Alcohol (CAS 17849-38-6)
4. 2-Chlorobenzylamine (CAS 89-97-4)
5. Benzene, 1-chloro-2-(dimethoxymethyl) (CAS 70380-66-4)
6. Acetophenone (CAS 98-86-2)
7. Chloroacetyl Chloride (CAS 79-04-9)
8. Chloroform (CAS 67-66-3)
9. o-Aminophenol (CAS 95-55-6)
These expanded controls will supplement the existing CCL controls
under ECCNs 1A984, 1C607, and 1C350. BIS estimates that these changes
will result in an increase of ten license applications submitted to BIS
annually.
B. Changes Related to Governments of Country Group A:5 and A:6
Destinations for Certain Exclusions, License Exception Eligibility, and
Licensing Policy
This final rule makes the following changes to reduce the licensing
burden on certain government entities located in Russia and Belarus by
granting them the same eligibility for certain exclusions, license
exceptions, and licensing policy as is currently available for private
sector entities headquartered in Country Group A:5 and A:6 countries.
1. Addition of license exception eligibility in Sec.
746.8(c)(2)(vi) for official business of diplomatic or consular
missions of the governments of Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations
In Sec. 746.8, this final rule expands the scope of paragraph
(c)(2)(vi) to add the phrase ``or for the official business of
diplomatic or consular missions of the governments of Country Group A:5
and A:6 destinations'' that are operating in Russia or Belarus as
entities eligible under this paragraph to receive items under License
Exception Encryption commodities, software, and technology (ENC). In
order to receive items under License Exception ENC, the export,
reexport, or transfer (in-country) would also need to not be restricted
under Sec. 740.2 and meet all of the applicable terms and conditions
of License Exception ENC under Sec. 740.17. The addition of license
exception eligibility for the embassies and consulates of Country Group
A:5 and A:6 destinations is consistent with U.S. national security and
foreign policy interests. BIS decided to make this change after
reviewing a question from the public that asked whether License
Exception ENC could be used for an export that otherwise met the terms
of License Exception ENC for an export to an embassy for the official
use of a Country Group A:5 and A:6 destination. Prior to this final
rule, paragraph (c)(2) of Sec. 746.8 would have excluded the use of
License Exception ENC by such government entities.
BIS estimates that these changes will result in a decrease of five
license applications submitted to BIS annually.
2. Addition to exclusion in Sec. 746.8(a)(12)(ii) for official
business of diplomatic or consular missions of the governments of
Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations.
In Sec. 746.8(a)(12)(ii) (Mass market encryption commodities and
software, and software designated EAR99), this final rule revises this
paragraph to add a new exclusion under paragraph (a)(12)(ii)(F) to
specify that exports, reexports, and transfers (in-country) for the
official business of diplomatic or consular missions of the governments
of Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations that are operating in Russia
or Belarus are also within the scope of this paragraph (a)(12)
exclusion. This final rule also revises paragraph (a)(12)(ii)(D) to
remove the word `or' and revises paragraph (a)(12)(E) to remove the
period and add a semi-colon and the word `or' at the end of the
paragraph to reflect the addition of new paragraph (a)(12)(ii)(F).
3. Addition of governments of Country Group A:5 and A:6
destinations to the case-by-case licensing policy under Sec.
746.8(b)(3)(vi).
In Sec. 746.8(b)(3)(vi), this final rule revises the case-by-case
licensing policy for license applications submitted pursuant to
paragraphs (a)(1), (2), and (4) through (8) of this section, to add a
new paragraph (b)(3)(vi)(F). With this revision, the case-by-case
license review policy to determine whether the transaction in question
would benefit the Russian or Belarusian government or defense sector
will also apply to applications involving items destined for official
business of governments of Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations that
are operating in Russia or Belarus. This final rule also revises
paragraph (b)(3)(vi)(D) to remove the word `or' and revises paragraph
(b)(3)(vi)(E) to remove
[[Page 87281]]
the period and add a semi-colon and the word `or' at the end of the
paragraph to reflect the addition of new paragraph (b)(3)(vi)(F).
C. Clarifying That the Entity List-Related FDP Rules License
Requirement Extends to or Within Any Destination or to Any End User or
Party That Otherwise Meets the Criteria
This final rule revises Sec. Sec. 744.11 and 746.8 of the EAR to
clarify that the three Entity List-related FDP rules' license
requirements extend to or within any destination or to any end user or
party. This final rule makes clarifying changes to Sec. 744.11 by
revising paragraphs (a)(2)(i) (Footnote 1 entities) and (a)(2)(iv)
(Footnote 4 entities) to specify that parties may not, without a
license, reexport, export from abroad, or transfer (in-country) to or
within any destination or to any end user or party any foreign-produced
item subject to the EAR pursuant to the referenced FDP rules under
Sec. 734.9(e)(1) or (2), respectively. Specifically, this final rule
adds the phrase `to or within any destination or to any end user or
party' to clarify the scope of this license requirement. This final
rule makes the same clarifying revision in Sec. 746.8(a)(3) (Russia/
Belarus-Military End User and Procurement FDP rule) (Footnote 3
entities).
BIS estimates these changes described in section II.C will not
result in any change to the number of license applications submitted to
BIS annually.
Savings Clause
For the changes being made in this final rule, shipments of items
removed from eligibility for a License Exception or export, reexport,
or transfer (in-country) without a license (NLR) as a result of this
regulatory action that were en route aboard a carrier to a port of
export, reexport, or transfer (in-country), on November 1, 2024,
pursuant to actual orders for export, reexport, or transfer (in-
country) to or within a foreign destination, may proceed to that
destination under the previous eligibility for a License Exception or
export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) without a license (NLR),
provided the export, reexport, or transfer (in-country) is completed no
later than on December 2, 2024.
Export Control Reform Act of 2018
On August 13, 2018, the President signed into law the John S.
McCain National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2019, which
included the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (ECRA) (codified, as
amended, at 50 U.S.C. 4801-4852). ECRA provides the legal basis for
BIS's principal authorities and serves as the authority under which BIS
issues this rule. In particular, and as noted elsewhere, Section 1753
of ECRA (50 U.S.C. 4812) authorizes the regulation of exports,
reexports, and transfers (in-country) of items subject to U.S.
jurisdiction. Further, Section 1754(a)(1)-(16) of ECRA (50 U.S.C.
4813(a)(1)-(16)) authorizes, inter alia: (1) the establishment of a
list of controlled items; (2) the prohibition of unauthorized exports,
reexports, and transfers (in-country); (3) the requirement of licenses
or other authorizations for exports, reexports, and transfers (in-
country) of controlled items; (4) the apprising of the public of
changes in policy, regulations, and procedures; and (5) any other
action necessary to carry out ECRA that is not otherwise prohibited by
law. Pursuant to Section 1762(a) of ECRA (50 U.S.C. 4821(a)), these
changes can be imposed in a final rule without prior notice and
comment.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. BIS has examined the impact of this rule as required by
Executive Orders (E.O.) 12866, 13563, and 14094, which direct agencies
to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives
and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that
maximize net benefits (e.g., potential economic, environmental, public,
health, and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Pursuant
to E.O. 12866, as amended, this final rule has not been determined to
be a ``significant regulatory action.''
2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to, nor shall any person be subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), unless that collection of information displays a
currently valid Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number.
This rule involves the following OMB-approved collections of
information subject to the PRA:
0694-0088, ``Simple Network Application Process and
Multipurpose Application Form,'' which carries a burden hour estimate
of 29.4 minutes for a manual or electronic submission;
0694-0096 ``Five Year Records Retention Period,'' which
carries a burden hour estimate of less than 1 minute for a manual or
electronic submission; and
0607-0152 ``Automated Export System (AES) Program,'' which
carries a burden hour estimate of 3 minutes per electronic submission.
BIS estimates that these new controls on Russia and Belarus under
the EAR will result in an increase of five license applications
submitted annually to BIS. However, the additional burden falls within
the existing estimates currently associated with these control numbers.
Additional information regarding these collections of information--
including all background materials--can be found at: https://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain by using the search function to enter
either the title of the collection or the OMB Control Number.
3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined under E.O. 13132.
4. Pursuant to section 1762 of ECRA (50 U.S.C. 4821), this action
is exempt from the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553)
requirements for notice of proposed rulemaking, opportunity for public
participation, and delay in effective date. While section 1762 of ECRA
provides sufficient authority for such an exemption, this action is
also independently exempt from these APA requirements because it
involves a military or foreign affairs function of the United States (5
U.S.C. 553(a)(1)).
5. Because neither the Administrative Procedure Act nor any other
law requires that notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment be given for this rule, the analytical requirements of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are not
applicable. Accordingly, no Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis is
required, and none has been prepared.
List of Subjects
15 CFR Part 744
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Terrorism.
15 CFR Part 746
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Accordingly, parts 744 and 746 of the Export Administration
Regulations (15 CFR parts 730 through 774) are revised to read as
follows:
PART 744--END-USE AND END-USER CONTROLS
0
1. The authority citation for part 744 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4801-4852; 50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12058, 43 FR 20947, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp., p. 179; E.O. 12851, 58 FR 33181, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p.
[[Page 87282]]
608; E.O. 12938, 59 FR 59099, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 950; E.O. 13026,
61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13099, 63 FR 45167, 3
CFR, 1998 Comp., p. 208; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp.,
p. 783; E.O. 13224, 66 FR 49079, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 786; Notice
of November 8, 2022, 87 FR 68015, 3 CFR, 2022 Comp., p. 563; Notice
of September 18, 2024, 89 FR 77011 (September 20, 2024).
0
2. Section 744.11 is amended by revising the first sentence of
paragraph (a)(2)(i) and the first sentence of paragraph (a)(2)(iv) to
read as follows:
Sec. 744.11 License requirements that apply to entities acting or at
significant risk of acting contrary to the national security or foreign
policy interests of the United States.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Footnote 1 entities. You may not, without a license or license
exception, reexport, export from abroad, or transfer (in-country) to or
within any destination or to any end user or party any foreign-produced
item subject to the EAR pursuant to Sec. 734.9(e)(1) of the EAR.
* * *
* * * * *
(iv) Footnote 4 entities. You may not, without a license, reexport,
export from abroad, or transfer (in-country) to or within any
destination or to any end user or party any foreign-produced item
subject to the EAR pursuant to Sec. 734.9(e)(2) of the EAR. * * *
* * * * *
PART 746--EMBARGOES AND OTHER SPECIAL CONTROLS
0
3. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 746 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4801-4852; 50 U.S.C. 4601 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 287c; Sec 1503, Pub. L. 108-11, 117
Stat. 559; 22 U.S.C. 2151 note; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 22 U.S.C. 7201 et
seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 12854, 58 FR 36587, 3 CFR, 1993 Comp., p.
614; E.O. 12918, 59 FR 28205, 3 CFR, 1994 Comp., p. 899; E.O. 13222,
66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp., p. 783; E.O. 13338, 69 FR 26751, 3
CFR, 2004 Comp., p 168; Presidential Determination 2003-23, 68 FR
26459, 3 CFR, 2004 Comp., p. 320; Presidential Determination 2007-7,
72 FR 1899, 3 CFR, 2006 Comp., p. 325; Notice of May 8, 2024, 89 FR
40355 (May 9, 2024).
0
4. Section 746.8 is amended by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a)(3), (a)(12)(ii)(D) and (E);
0
b. Adding paragraph (a)(12)(ii)(F);
0
c. Revising paragraphs (b)(3)(vi)(D) and (E);
0
d. Adding paragraph (b)(3)(vi)(F); and
0
e. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(vi).
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 746.8 Sanctions against Russia and Belarus.
(a) * * *
* * * * *
(3) Russia/Belarus-Military End User and Procurement FDP rule. A
license is required to reexport, export from abroad, or transfer (in-
country) to or within any destination or to any end user or party any
foreign-produced item subject to the EAR under Sec. 734.9(g) of the
EAR.
* * * * *
(12) * * *
(ii) * * *
(D) Wholly owned subsidiaries, branches, or sales offices of
companies headquartered in countries from Country Group A:5 and A:6 in
supplement no. 1 to part 740;
(E) Joint ventures between two or more companies headquartered in
Country Group A:5 and A:6 in supplement no. 1 to part 740, including
the wholly owned subsidiaries, branches, or sales offices of such joint
ventures; or
(F) For official business of diplomatic or consular missions of the
governments of Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * *
(vi) * * *
(D) The wholly owned subsidiaries, branches, or sales offices of
companies headquartered in countries from Country Group A:5 and A:6 in
supplement no. 1 to part 740;
(E) Joint ventures of companies headquartered in Country Groups A:5
and A:6 with other companies headquartered in Country Groups A:5 and
A:6; or
(F) For official business of governments of Country Group A:5 and
A:6 destinations.
(vii) Applications for companies headquartered in Country Groups
A:5 and A:6 to support civil telecommunications infrastructure.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(vi) License Exception Encryption commodities, software, and
technology (ENC) for civil end-users that are wholly-owned U.S.
subsidiaries, branches, or sales offices; foreign subsidiaries,
branches, or sales offices of U.S. companies that are joint ventures
with other U.S. companies; joint ventures of U.S. companies with
companies headquartered in countries from Country Group A:5 and A:6 in
supplement no. 1 to part 740 of the EAR countries; the wholly-owned
subsidiaries, branches, or sales offices of companies headquartered in
countries from Country Group A:5 and A:6 in supplement no. 1 to part
740; joint ventures of companies headquartered in Country Group A:5 and
A:6 with other companies headquartered in Country Groups A:5 and A:6;
or for official business of diplomatic or consular missions of the
governments of Country Group A:5 and A:6 destinations (Sec. Sec.
740.13(c) and 740.17 of the EAR).
0
5. Supplement no. 6 to part 746 is amended by adding paragraph (i) to
read as follows:
Supplement No. 6 to Part 746--Russian and Belarusian Industry Sector
Sanctions Pursuant to Sec. 746.8(a)(6)
(i) Pre-cursors for riot control agents and chloropicrin as
follows:
(1) Malononitrile (CAS 109-77-3);
(2) 2-Chlorobenzaldehyde (CAS 89-98-5);
(3) 2-Chlorobenzyl Alcohol (CAS 17849-38-6);
(4) 2-Chlorobenzylamine (CAS 89-97-4);
(5) Benzene, 1-chloro-2-(dimethoxymethyl) (CAS 70380-66-4);
(6) Acetophenone (CAS 98-86-2);
(7) Chloroacetyl Chloride (CAS 79-04-9);
(8) Chloroform (CAS 67-66-3); and
(9) o-Aminophenol (CAS 95-55-6).
Matthew S. Borman,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Strategic Trade and Technology
Security.
[FR Doc. 2024-25445 Filed 10-30-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-JT-P