Periodic Reporting, 87319-87320 [2024-25401]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2024 / Proposed Rules (c) Applicability This AD applies to General Electric Company (GE) Model GE90–110B1 and GE90–115B engines. (2) Thereafter, repeat the replacement of the FADEC MN4 microprocessor at the first FADEC component shop visit after accumulating 5,000 cycles since the last replacement but before accumulating 11,000 cycles since the last replacement. (d) Subject Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 7320, Fuel Controlling System. (e) Unsafe Condition This AD was prompted by an in-service occurrence of loss of engine thrust control resulting in uncommanded high thrust. The FAA is issuing this AD to prevent dispatch of the airplane when certain faults caused by degradation of the MN4 integrated circuit in the full authority digital engine control (FADEC) are displayed and certain FADEC conditions are present, and to prevent failure of the electronic engine control (EEC) FADEC integrated circuit (MN4) microprocessor solder ball. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in loss of engine thrust control and reduced control of the airplane. (f) Compliance Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified, unless already done. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS (g) Retained Actions From AD 2020–20–17 (1) After October 23, 2020 (the effective date of AD 2020–20–17), notwithstanding the provisions of the operator’s minimum equipment list (MEL), dispatch of an airplane is prohibited if the engine indicating and crew alerting system (EICAS) displays the status message ‘‘ENG EEC C1 L’’ or ‘‘ENG EEC C1 R’’ and any condition is present that is listed in the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs 3.A.(2)(f), 3.A.3(a), or 3.A.(4) of GE GE90–100 Service Bulletin 73–0117 R01, dated August 5, 2020. (2) As terminating action for the requirements of paragraph (g)(1) of this AD, within 120 days of October 23, 2020 (the effective date of AD 2020–20–17), revise the existing FAA-approved MEL by incorporating into the MEL the dispatch restrictions listed in paragraph (g)(1) of this AD as a required operation or maintenance procedure. Specific alternative MEL wording to accomplish the actions specified in paragraph (g)(1) of this AD can be approved by the operator’s principal operations or maintenance inspector. (h) Retained Actions From AD 2021–15–05 (1) Within the following compliance times after September 13, 2021 (the effective date of AD 2021–15–05), replace the FADEC MN4 microprocessor using an approved overhaul procedure: (i) For a FADEC MN4 microprocessor with 10,500 or more cycles since new (CSN), replace the FADEC MN4 microprocessor before accumulating 500 additional cycles on the FADEC MN4 microprocessor. (ii) For a FADEC MN4 microprocessor with 5,000 CSN or more, but fewer than 10,500 CSN, replace the FADEC MN4 microprocessor at the next FADEC component shop visit or before accumulating 11,000 CSN on the FADEC MN4 microprocessor, whichever occurs first. VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:18 Oct 31, 2024 Jkt 265001 (i) Retained Definitions From AD 2021–15– 05 For the purpose of this AD: (1) An ‘‘approved overhaul procedure’’ is one of the following: (i) Replacement of the FADEC MN4 microprocessor using FADEC Internationalapproved maintenance procedures; or (ii) Replacement of the FADEC MN4 microprocessor using the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 3.A., of GE GE90–100 Service Bulletin 73–0118, Revision 01, dated April 27, 2021. (2) A ‘‘FADEC component shop visit’’ is the induction of the FADEC into a repair facility to perform internal maintenance on the FADEC. (j) New Required Actions Within 180 days after the effective date of this AD, replace any EEC FADEC software version that is earlier than A.0.8.6 with an EEC FADEC software version that is eligible for installation. (k) Terminating Action The actions specified in paragraph (j) of this AD constitute terminating action for all the requirements of paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD. (l) Installation Prohibition As of the effective date of this AD, no person may install on any engine, an EEC FADEC software version that is earlier than A.0.8.6. (m) Definition For the purpose of this AD, an ‘‘EEC FADEC software version that is eligible for installation’’ is any software version that is A.0.8.6 or later. (n) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs) (1) The Manager, AIR–520 Continued Operational Safety Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the AIR–520 Continued Operational Safety Branch, send it to the attention of the person identified in paragraph (o) of this AD and email to: AMOC@faa.gov. (2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office/ certificate holding district office. (o) Additional Information For more information about this AD, contact Alexander Thickstun, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; phone: (202) 267–8292; email: alexander.m.thickstun@faa.gov. PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 87319 (p) Material Incorporated by Reference (1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by reference (IBR) of the material listed in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. (2) You must use this material as applicable to do the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise. (3) The following material was approved for IBR on October 23, 2020 (85 FR 63443, October 8, 2020). (i) General Electric Company (GE) GE90– 100 Service Bulletin 73–0117 R01, dated August 5, 2020. (ii) [Reserved] (4) The following material was approved for IBR on September 13, 2021 (86 FR 43409, August 9, 2021). (i) GE GE90–100 Service Bulletin 73–0118, Revision 01, dated April 27, 2021. (ii) [Reserved] (5) For GE material identified in this AD, contact GE, 1 Neumann Way, Cincinnati, OH 45215; phone: (513) 552–3272; email: aviation.fleetsupport@ge.com; website: ge.com. (6) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110. (7) You may view this material at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this material at NARA, visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@nara.gov. Issued on October 25, 2024. Suzanne Masterson, Deputy Director, Integrated Certificate Management Division, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. 2024–25377 Filed 10–31–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION 39 CFR Part 3050 [Docket No. RM2025–2; Order No. 7831] Periodic Reporting AGENCY: ACTION: Postal Regulatory Commission. Notice of proposed rulemaking. The Commission is acknowledging a recent Postal Service filing requesting the Commission initiate a rulemaking proceeding to consider changes to analytical principles relating to periodic reports. This document informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and takes other administrative steps. SUMMARY: Comments are due: November 27, 2024. DATES: E:\FR\FM\01NOP1.SGM 01NOP1 87320 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 212 / Friday, November 1, 2024 / Proposed Rules Submit comments electronically via the Commission’s Filing Online system at https:// www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing alternatives. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202–789–6820. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: ADDRESSES: Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Proposal III. Notice and Comment IV. Ordering Paragraphs khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS I. Introduction On October 22, 2024, the Postal Service filed a petition pursuant to 39 CFR 3050.11 requesting that the Commission initiate a rulemaking proceeding to consider changes to analytical principles relating to periodic reports.1 The Petition identifies the proposed analytical changes filed in this docket as modifications to the mail processing cost model for Parcel Select and Parcel Return Service. Petition, Proposal at 1. II. Proposal Background. The Postal Service states that, in Order No. 6536, the Commission approved structural changes designed to simplify the Parcel Select price structure. See id. at 1, n.3. The Postal Service further states that, in Order No. 6798, the Commission approved conforming changes to the Parcel Select and Parcel Return Service (PRS) mail processing and transportation cost models. See id. at 2, n.4. The Postal Service notes that in Fiscal Year (FY) 2024, the Commission approved several Negotiated Service Agreements (NSAs) that include a provision for DHubentered packages, whose supporting workpapers ‘‘utilized the DSCF–SCF mail processing cost as a proxy for the DHub non-presort cost[.]’’ See id. at 2. The Postal Service states that in its requests it declared the intention to propose a DHub non-presort mail flow model and corresponding mail processing cost for Commission review. Id. Proposal. For purposes of reporting costs for NSAs under which ‘‘the customer will be able to enter machinable non-presorted DHub 1 Petition of the United States Postal Service to Initiate a Proceeding to Change Analytical Principles and Notice of Filing Non-Public Materials, October 22, 2024 (Petition). The proposed change is attached to the Petition (Proposal). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:18 Oct 31, 2024 Jkt 265001 packages at specific designated Sorting & Delivery Centers (S&DCs) that contain parcel sorting equipment[,]’’ the Postal Service proposes that the Parcel Select and PRS mail processing cost model be modified to ‘‘include a non-presort machinable mail flow (DHub) and corresponding mail processing cost estimates for DHub-entered packages.’’ See id. at 2–3. This new flow and corresponding cost estimate would be in addition to existing flows and cost estimates for 5-digit presorted DHubentered packages and non-presorted DSCF-entered packages. See id. The Postal Service filed under seal the proposed modified mail processing cost model with the Petition. Id. at 3. The proposed cost model includes DHub cost estimates for non-presort machinable Parcel Select Heavy Weight (PSHW) and non-presort machinable Parcel Select Light Weight (PSLW) mailpieces. Id. The corresponding new mail flow includes ‘‘differing hub container movement costs and additional sortation’’ and has ‘‘only pallet container unloading costs, as well as additional costs for parcel machine processing and manual processing’’ along with ‘‘[c]osts for the loading and unloading of Postal Service hampers of sorted parcels[.]’’ Id. The new mail flow uses the same delivery unit cost for secondary parcel sortation as the existing 5-digit presorted DHub mail flow. Id. A second, similar new mail flow is included in the proposed cost model for DHub non-presort PSLW which uses delivery unit costs specific to PSLW. See id. Impact. The Postal Service emphasizes that existing mail processing unit costs are, in general, not impacted by the Proposal, which instead introduces two new cost estimates. Id. at 4. The Postal Service notes that adoption of the Proposal would not have had any effect on FY 2023 costs at the Cost and Revenue Analysis (CRA) level, and that the approved NSAs that include a provision for DHub-entered packages had no such volume in FY 2024. Id. III. Notice and Comment The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2025–2 for consideration of matters raised by the Petition. More information on the Petition may be accessed via the Commission’s website at https://www.prc.gov. Interested persons may submit comments on the Petition and the Proposal no later than November 27, 2024. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Arif Hafiz is designated as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent the interests of the general public in this proceeding. PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 IV. Ordering Paragraphs It is ordered: 1. The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2025–2 for consideration of the matters raised by the Petition of the United States Postal Service to Initiate a Proceeding to Change Analytical Principles and Notice of Filing NonPublic Materials, filed October 22, 2024. 2. Comments by interested persons in this proceeding are due no later than November 27, 2024. 3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints Arif Hafiz to serve as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent the interests of the general public in this docket. 4. The Secretary shall arrange for the publication of this order in the Federal Register. By the Commission. Erica A. Barker, Secretary. [FR Doc. 2024–25401 Filed 10–31–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R06–OAR–2021–0539; FRL–12282– 03–R6] Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Partial Approval, Partial Disapproval and Promulgation; Texas; Regional Haze; Extension of Comment Period Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule; extension of comment period. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is extending the comment period for the proposed rule ‘‘Air Quality State Implementation Plans; Partial Approval, Partial Disapproval and Promulgation; Texas; Regional Haze’’ that was published on October 15, 2024. The proposal provided for a public comment period ending November 14, 2024. In response to requests for additional time to develop and submit comments on the proposed rulemaking, the EPA is extending the comment period to December 3, 2024. DATES: The comment period for the proposed rule published on October 15, 2024, at 89 FR 83338 is extended. Comments must be received on or before December 3, 2024. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA–R06– SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\01NOP1.SGM 01NOP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 212 (Friday, November 1, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 87319-87320]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25401]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION

39 CFR Part 3050

[Docket No. RM2025-2; Order No. 7831]


Periodic Reporting

AGENCY: Postal Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Commission is acknowledging a recent Postal Service filing 
requesting the Commission initiate a rulemaking proceeding to consider 
changes to analytical principles relating to periodic reports. This 
document informs the public of the filing, invites public comment, and 
takes other administrative steps.

DATES: Comments are due: November 27, 2024.

[[Page 87320]]


ADDRESSES: Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing 
Online system at https://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments 
electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing 
alternatives.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 
202-789-6820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Table of Contents

I. Introduction
II. Proposal
III. Notice and Comment
IV. Ordering Paragraphs

I. Introduction

    On October 22, 2024, the Postal Service filed a petition pursuant 
to 39 CFR 3050.11 requesting that the Commission initiate a rulemaking 
proceeding to consider changes to analytical principles relating to 
periodic reports.\1\ The Petition identifies the proposed analytical 
changes filed in this docket as modifications to the mail processing 
cost model for Parcel Select and Parcel Return Service. Petition, 
Proposal at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Petition of the United States Postal Service to Initiate a 
Proceeding to Change Analytical Principles and Notice of Filing Non-
Public Materials, October 22, 2024 (Petition). The proposed change 
is attached to the Petition (Proposal).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Proposal

    Background. The Postal Service states that, in Order No. 6536, the 
Commission approved structural changes designed to simplify the Parcel 
Select price structure. See id. at 1, n.3. The Postal Service further 
states that, in Order No. 6798, the Commission approved conforming 
changes to the Parcel Select and Parcel Return Service (PRS) mail 
processing and transportation cost models. See id. at 2, n.4. The 
Postal Service notes that in Fiscal Year (FY) 2024, the Commission 
approved several Negotiated Service Agreements (NSAs) that include a 
provision for DHub-entered packages, whose supporting workpapers 
``utilized the DSCF-SCF mail processing cost as a proxy for the DHub 
non-presort cost[.]'' See id. at 2. The Postal Service states that in 
its requests it declared the intention to propose a DHub non-presort 
mail flow model and corresponding mail processing cost for Commission 
review. Id.
    Proposal. For purposes of reporting costs for NSAs under which 
``the customer will be able to enter machinable non-presorted DHub 
packages at specific designated Sorting & Delivery Centers (S&DCs) that 
contain parcel sorting equipment[,]'' the Postal Service proposes that 
the Parcel Select and PRS mail processing cost model be modified to 
``include a non-presort machinable mail flow (DHub) and corresponding 
mail processing cost estimates for DHub-entered packages.'' See id. at 
2-3. This new flow and corresponding cost estimate would be in addition 
to existing flows and cost estimates for 5-digit presorted DHub-entered 
packages and non-presorted DSCF-entered packages. See id.
    The Postal Service filed under seal the proposed modified mail 
processing cost model with the Petition. Id. at 3. The proposed cost 
model includes DHub cost estimates for non-presort machinable Parcel 
Select Heavy Weight (PSHW) and non-presort machinable Parcel Select 
Light Weight (PSLW) mailpieces. Id. The corresponding new mail flow 
includes ``differing hub container movement costs and additional 
sortation'' and has ``only pallet container unloading costs, as well as 
additional costs for parcel machine processing and manual processing'' 
along with ``[c]osts for the loading and unloading of Postal Service 
hampers of sorted parcels[.]'' Id. The new mail flow uses the same 
delivery unit cost for secondary parcel sortation as the existing 5-
digit presorted DHub mail flow. Id. A second, similar new mail flow is 
included in the proposed cost model for DHub non-presort PSLW which 
uses delivery unit costs specific to PSLW. See id.
    Impact. The Postal Service emphasizes that existing mail processing 
unit costs are, in general, not impacted by the Proposal, which instead 
introduces two new cost estimates. Id. at 4. The Postal Service notes 
that adoption of the Proposal would not have had any effect on FY 2023 
costs at the Cost and Revenue Analysis (CRA) level, and that the 
approved NSAs that include a provision for DHub-entered packages had no 
such volume in FY 2024. Id.

III. Notice and Comment

    The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2025-2 for consideration of 
matters raised by the Petition. More information on the Petition may be 
accessed via the Commission's website at https://www.prc.gov. Interested 
persons may submit comments on the Petition and the Proposal no later 
than November 27, 2024. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, Arif Hafiz is 
designated as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to 
represent the interests of the general public in this proceeding.

IV. Ordering Paragraphs

    It is ordered:
    1. The Commission establishes Docket No. RM2025-2 for consideration 
of the matters raised by the Petition of the United States Postal 
Service to Initiate a Proceeding to Change Analytical Principles and 
Notice of Filing Non-Public Materials, filed October 22, 2024.
    2. Comments by interested persons in this proceeding are due no 
later than November 27, 2024.
    3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints Arif Hafiz to 
serve as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to 
represent the interests of the general public in this docket.
    4. The Secretary shall arrange for the publication of this order in 
the Federal Register.

    By the Commission.
Erica A. Barker,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2024-25401 Filed 10-31-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.