Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation, 85892-85895 [2024-25035]
Download as PDF
85892
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Proposed Rules
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
Regulatory Findings
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by reports of
cracked intermediate pressure compressor
(IPC) shaft assembly front air seals. The FAA
is issuing this AD to prevent an IPC stage 1
disk burst or failure of the IPC front seal. The
unsafe condition, if not addressed, could
result in an IPC stage 1 disk burst with
consequent release of high energy debris and
damage to the airplane or failure of the IPC
front seal and release of debris, which could
lead to an engine in-flight shutdown (IFSD)
and in the case of a dual IFSD could result
in reduced control of the airplane.
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Would not affect intrastate
aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
■
Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd & Co KG:
Docket No. FAA–2024–2414; Project
Identifier MCAI–2024–00530–E.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) by December 13,
2024.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:33 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Rolls-Royce
Deutschland Ltd & Co KG Model Trent 1000–
AE3, Trent 1000–CE3, Trent 1000–D3, Trent
1000–G3, Trent 1000–H3, Trent 1000–J3,
Trent 1000–K3, Trent 1000–L3, Trent 1000–
M3, Trent 1000–N3, Trent 1000–P3, Trent
1000–Q3, Trent 1000–R3, Trent 7000–72, and
Trent 7000–72C engines.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code 7230, Turbine Engine Compressor
Section.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Required Actions
Except as specified in paragraphs (h), (i),
and (j) of this AD: Perform all required
actions within the compliance times
specified in, and in accordance with,
European Union Aviation Safety Agency AD
2024–0178, dated September 12, 2024 (EASA
AD 2024–0178).
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2024–0178
(1) Where EASA AD 2024–0178 refers to its
effective date, this AD requires using the
effective date of this AD.
(2) Where the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2024–0178 specifies
to reject the engine, this AD requires
removing the affected part from service.
(3) This AD does not adopt the Remarks
paragraph of EASA AD 2024–0178.
(i) No Reporting Requirement
Although the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2024–0178 specifies
to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
(j) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, AIR–520 Continued
Operational Safety Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if
requested using the procedures found in 14
CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector
or local Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the Manager, AIR–520 Continued
Operational Safety Branch, send it to the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
attention of the person identified in
paragraph (k) of this AD and email to:
AMOC@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(k) Additional Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Barbara Caufield, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, 2200 South 216th Street, Des
Moines, WA 98198; phone: (781) 238–7146;
email: barbara.caufield@faa.gov.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the material listed in this paragraph
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this material as
applicable to do the actions required by this
AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2024–0178, dated September 12,
2024.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For EASA material identified in this
AD, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; phone: +49 221
8999 000; email: ADs@easa.europa.eu;
website: easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at
ad.easa.europa.eu.
(4) You may view this material at FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803. For information on
the availability of this material at the FAA,
call (817) 222–5110.
(5) You may view this material at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@nara.gov.
Issued on October 22, 2024.
Peter A. White,
Deputy Director, Integrated Certificate
Management Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2024–24964 Filed 10–28–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 310
[Docket ID: DoD–2024–OS–0112]
RIN 0790–AL45
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
Office of the Secretary,
Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of Defense
(Department or DoD) is giving
concurrent notice of a new system of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Proposed Rules
records pursuant to the Privacy Act of
1974 for the DoD–0024, ‘‘Catch a Serial
Offender (CATCH) Program Records,’’
system of records and this proposed
rulemaking. In this proposed
rulemaking, the Department proposes to
exempt portions of this system of
records from certain provisions of the
Privacy Act to avoid interference during
the conduct of criminal, civil, or
administrative actions or investigations;
and to protect the identity of
confidential sources incident involving
adult sexual assault allegations.
Send comments on or before
December 30, 2024.
DATES:
You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and title,
by any of the following methods.
* Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
* Mail: Department of Defense, Office
of the Assistant to the Secretary of
Defense for Privacy, Civil Liberties, and
Transparency, Regulatory Directorate,
4800 Mark Center Drive, Attn: Mailbox
24, Suite 05F16, Alexandria, VA 22350–
1700.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or Regulation Identifier
Number (RIN) for this Federal Register
document. The general policy for
comments and other submissions from
members of the public is to make these
submissions available for public
viewing on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
ADDRESSES:
Ms.
Rahwa Keleta, OSD.DPCLTD@mail.mil,
(703) 256–1408.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Background
In accordance with the Privacy Act of
1974, the DoD is establishing a new
system of records titled ‘‘Catch a Serial
Offender (CATCH) Program Records,’’
DoD–0024. This system of records
covers DoD’s maintenance of records
used to collect and compare sexual
assault reports for the purpose of
identifying alleged serial sexual assault
offenders. These records will consist of
information voluntarily submitted into
the CATCH system by eligible victims
who elect to participate in the CATCH
program and provide information about
an alleged adult sexual assault incident,
without identifying such victims,
through established CATCH processes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:33 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
II. Privacy Act Exemption
The Privacy Act allows Federal
agencies to exempt eligible records in a
system of records from certain
provisions of the Act, including those
that provide individuals with a right to
request access to and amendment of
their own records. If an agency intends
to exempt a particular system of records,
it must first go through the rulemaking
process to provide public notice and an
opportunity to comment on the
proposed exemption. This proposed
rule explains why an exemption is being
claimed for this system of records and
invites public comment, which DoD
will consider before the issuance of a
final rule implementing the exemption.
The DoD proposes to modify 32 CFR
part 310 to add a new Privacy Act
exemption rule for the DoD–0024,
‘‘Catch a Serial Offender (CATCH)
Program Records,’’ system of records.
The DoD proposes to exempt this
system of records because these records
support the conduct of criminal law
enforcement activities, and certain
requirements of the Privacy Act may
interfere with the effective execution of
these activities. The Privacy Act,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2),
authorizes agencies with a principal law
enforcement function pertaining to the
enforcement of criminal laws (including
activities of prosecutors, courts, etc.) to
claim an exemption for systems of
records that contain information
identifying criminal offenders and
alleged offenders, information compiled
for the purpose of criminal
investigation, or reports compiled
during criminal law enforcement
proceedings. The DoD is proposing to
claim exemptions from several
provisions of the Privacy Act, including
various access, amendment, disclosure
accounting, and notice requirements,
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) to
prevent the harms articulated in this
rule from occurring.
A notice of a new system of records
for DoD–0024, ‘‘Catch a Serial Offender
(CATCH) Program Records,’’ is
published elsewhere in this issue of the
Federal Register.
Regulatory Analysis
Executive Order 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review,’’ as Amended by
Executive Order 14094, ‘‘Modernizing
Regulatory Review,’’ and Executive
Order 13563, ‘‘Improving Regulation
and Regulatory Review’’
Executive Orders 12866 (as amended
by Executive Order 14094) and 13563
direct agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
85893
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distribute impacts, and equity).
Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. It has been determined that
this rule is not a significant regulatory
action.
Section 202, Public Law 104–4,
‘‘Unfunded Mandates Reform Act’’
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1532(a)) requires agencies to assess
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule whose mandates may
result in the expenditure by State, local,
and Tribal governments in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, in any one year
of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. This rule will not
mandate any requirements for State,
local, or Tribal governments, nor will it
affect private sector costs.
Public Law 96–354, ‘‘Regulatory
Flexibility Act’’ (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
The Assistant to the Secretary of
Defense for Privacy, Civil Liberties, and
Transparency has certified that this
proposed rule is not subject to the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.) because it would not, if
promulgated, have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed
rule is concerned only with the
administration of Privacy Act systems of
records within the DoD. Therefore, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, as amended,
does not require DoD to prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis.
Public Law 96–511, ‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’ (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) was enacted to
minimize the paperwork burden for
individuals; small businesses;
educational and nonprofit institutions;
Federal contractors; State, local, and
Tribal governments; and other persons
resulting from the collection of
information by or for the Federal
Government. The Act requires agencies
obtain approval from the Office of
Management and Budget before using
identical questions to collect
information from ten or more persons.
This proposed rule does not impose
reporting or recordkeeping requirements
on the public.
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
85894
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
Executive Order 13132 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule that has federalism
implications, imposes substantial direct
compliance costs on State and local
governments, and is not required by
statute, or has federalism implications
and preempts state law. This proposed
rule will not have a substantial effect on
State and local governments.
Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments’’
Executive Order 13175 establishes
certain requirements that an agency
must meet when it promulgates a
proposed rule (and subsequent final
rule) that imposes substantial direct
compliance costs on one or more Indian
Tribes, preempts Tribal law, or affects
the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes. This
proposed rule will not have a
substantial effect on Indian Tribal
governments.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 310
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 310 is
proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 310—PROTECTION OF PRIVACY
AND ACCESS TO AND AMENDMENT
OF INDIVIDUAL RECORDS UNDER
THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR
part 310 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Amend § 310.13 by adding
paragraph (e)(15) to read as follows:
■
§ 310.13 Exemptions for DoD-wide
systems.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(15) System identifier and name.
DoD–0024, ‘‘Catch a Serial Offender
(CATCH) Program Records.’’
(i) Exemptions. This system of records
is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a (c)(3) and
(4); (d)(1), (2), (3), and (4); (e)(1); (e)(2);
(e)(3); (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I); (e)(5); (e)(8);
(f) and (g).
(ii) Authority. 5 U.S.C. 552a (j)(2).
(iii) Exemption from the particular
subsections. Exemption from the
particular subsections is justified
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) for the
following reasons:
(A) Subsection (c)(3), (d)(1), and
(d)(2). Records in this system of records
may contain investigatory material
compiled for criminal law enforcement
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:33 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
purposes to include information
identifying criminal offenders and
alleged offenders, information compiled
for the purpose of criminal
investigation, or reports compiled
during criminal law enforcement
proceedings. Application of exemption
(j)(2) may be necessary as access to,
amendment of, or release of the
accounting of disclosures of such
records could inform a record subject of
an investigation of the existence, nature,
or scope of an actual or potential law
enforcement or disciplinary
investigation, and thereby seriously
impede law enforcement or
prosecutorial efforts by permitting the
record subject and other persons to
whom he might disclose the records to
avoid criminal penalties or disciplinary
measures; access to, amendment of, or
release of the accounting of disclosures
could also reveal confidential sources
who might not have otherwise come
forward to assist in an investigation and
thereby hinder DoD’s ability to obtain
information from future confidential
sources and result in an unwarranted
invasion of the privacy of others.
(B) Subsection (c)(4), (d)(3) and (4).
These subsections are inapplicable to
the extent that an exemption is being
claimed from subsections (d)(1) and (2).
(C) Subsection (e)(1). In the collection
of information for investigatory or law
enforcement purposes, it is not always
possible to conclusively determine the
relevance and necessity of particular
information in the early stages of the
investigation or adjudication. In some
instances, it will be only after the
collected information is evaluated in
light of other information that its
relevance and necessity for effective
investigation and adjudication can be
assessed. Collection of such information
permits more informed decision-making
by the Department when making
required disciplinary and prosecutorial
determinations.
(D) Subsection (e)(2). To collect
information from the subject individual
could serve notice that he or she is the
subject of a criminal investigation and
thereby present a serious impediment to
such investigations. Collection of
information only from the individual
accused of criminal activity or
misconduct could also subvert
discovery of relevant evidence and
subvert the course of justice.
Accordingly, application of exemption
(j)(2) may be necessary.
(E) Subsection (e)(3). To inform
individuals as required by this
subsection could reveal the existence of
a criminal investigation and
compromise investigative efforts.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Accordingly, application of exemption
(j)(2) may be necessary.
(F) Subsection (e)(4)(G) and (H).
These subsections are inapplicable to
the extent exemption is claimed from
subsections (d)(1) and (2).
(G) Subsection (e)(4)(I). To the extent
that this provision is construed to
require more detailed disclosure about
record sources than the broad, generic
information currently published in the
system notice, an exemption from this
provision is necessary to protect the
confidentiality of sources of information
and to protect privacy and physical
safety of witnesses and informants.
Accordingly, application of exemption
(j)(2) may be necessary.
(H) Subsection (e)(5). It is often
impossible to determine in advance if
investigatory records contained in this
system are accurate, relevant, timely
and complete, but, in the interests of
effective law enforcement, it is
necessary to retain this information to
maintain an accurate record of the
investigatory activity to preserve the
integrity of the investigation and satisfy
various Constitutional and evidentiary
requirements, such as mandatory
disclosure of potentially exculpatory
information in the investigative file to a
defendant. It is also necessary to retain
this information to aid in establishing
patterns of activity and provide
investigative leads. With the passage of
time, seemingly irrelevant or untimely
information may acquire new
significance as further investigation
brings new details to light and the
accuracy of such information can only
be determined through judicial
processes. Accordingly, application of
exemption (j)(2) may be necessary.
(I) Subsection (e)(8). To serve notice
could give persons sufficient warning to
evade investigative efforts. Accordingly,
application of exemption (j)(2) may be
necessary.
(J) Subsection (f). To the extent that
portions of the system are exempt from
the provisions of the Privacy Act
concerning individual access and
amendment of records, DoD is not
required to establish rules concerning
procedures and requirements relating to
such provisions. Accordingly,
application of exemptions (j)(2) may be
necessary.
(K) Subsection (g). This subsection is
inapplicable to the extent that the
system is exempt from other specific
subsections of the Privacy Act to which
the civil remedies provisions pertain.
(iv) Exempt records from other
systems. In the course of carrying out
the overall purpose for this system,
exempt records from other systems of
records may in turn become part of the
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2024 / Proposed Rules
records maintained in this system. To
the extent that copies of exempt records
from those other systems of records are
maintained in this system, the DoD
claims the same exemptions for the
records from those other systems that
are entered into this system, as claimed
for the prior system(s) of which they are
a part, provided the reason for the
exemption remains valid and necessary.
Dated: October 23, 2024.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2024–25035 Filed 10–28–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
49 CFR Part 211
[Docket No. FRA–2024–0033]
RIN 2130–AC97
Federal Railroad Administration’s
Procedures for Waivers and SafetyRelated Proceedings
Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA), U.S. Department
of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This proposed rule would
update FRA’s procedures for waivers
and safety-related proceedings to define
the two components of the statutory
waiver and suspension standard, ‘‘in the
public interest’’ and ‘‘consistent with
railroad safety.’’ By defining these
terms, FRA intends to clarify the
standard the agency will apply when
evaluating petitions for regulatory relief.
FRA also proposes to require petitions
for relief to include evidence of
meaningful consultation with
appropriate stakeholders. Additionally,
FRA proposes to make minor updates to
agency rules of practice.
DATES: Written comments on this
proposed rule must be received on or
before December 30, 2024. Comments
received after that date will be
considered to the extent possible
without incurring additional expense or
delay.
ADDRESSES:
Comments: Comments related to
Docket No. FRA–2024–0033 may be
submitted by going to
www.regulations.gov and following the
online instructions for submitting
comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:33 Oct 28, 2024
Jkt 265001
docket number or Regulatory
Identification Number (RIN) for this
rulemaking. All comments received will
be posted without change to
www.regulations.gov; this includes any
personal information. Please see the
Privacy Act heading in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document for Privacy Act
information related to any submitted
comments or materials.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to
www.regulations.gov and follow the
online instructions for accessing the
docket.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Veronica Chittim, Senior Attorney,
Office of the Chief Counsel, at
veronica.chittim@dot.gov, 202–480–
3410; or Lucinda Henriksen, Senior
Advisor, Office of Railroad Safety, at
lucinda.henriksen@dot.gov, 202–657–
2842.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
FRA has broad discretionary authority
to waive or suspend the requirement to
comply with any rule, regulation, or
order upon a finding that doing so is ‘‘in
the public interest and consistent with
railroad safety.’’ 49 U.S.C. 20103(d).1
Within FRA, decisional authority for
waivers rests with FRA’s Railroad Safety
Board (Board).2 FRA’s Rules of Practice,
49 CFR part 211, set forth the general
requirements for petitions to the Board
and the general outline of the Board’s
processes.3 The burden of proving the
request is justified rests with the
petitioner.4
In January 2023, FRA published
guidance pertaining to waiver
procedures and process titled Guidance
on Submitting Requests for Waivers,
Block Signal Applications, and Other
Approval Requests to FRA (Guidance).5
The Guidance outlined best practices for
petitioners to use when developing and
submitting waiver, suspension, and
other approval requests, and best
practices impacted stakeholders (e.g.,
the public, railroad employees, and
labor organizations) may use to ensure
their views, concerns, and comments
1 The Secretary of Transportation is authorized to
issue such waivers or suspensions and the Secretary
has delegated that authority to FRA. 49 U.S.C.
20103(d)(1) and 49 CFR 1.89(a).
2 49 CFR 211.41(a).
3 49 CFR part 211, subpart C (§§ 211.41 through
211.45).
4 See 49 CFR 211.9.
5 https://railroads.dot.gov/elibrary/guidancesubmitting-requests-waivers-block-signalapplications-and-other-approval-requests; 88 FR
1448 (Jan. 10, 2023).
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
85895
are thoroughly considered throughout
the process. This proposal would
provide additional detail on portions of
the guidance, and make certain
recommendations therein mandatory,
such as the recommended consultation
prior to filing of a petition.
In this rulemaking, FRA is proposing
to update its procedures for waivers and
safety-related proceedings in 49 CFR
part 211 to clarify the standard to be
applied by FRA when deciding whether
to grant a request for regulatory relief.
Specifically, FRA is proposing to define
both the ‘‘in the public interest’’ and
‘‘consistent with railroad safety’’
components of the statutory standard in
49 U.S.C. 20103(d), for purposes of
evaluating waiver or suspension
requests. Additionally, FRA is
proposing to require petitions for
regulatory relief to include evidence of
meaningful consultation with
stakeholders.
II. Section-by-Section Analysis
Part 211
§ 211.1
General
FRA proposes to make minor editorial
amendments to § 211.1(a) to remove
outdated language regarding the Federal
Railroad Safety Act (concerning
proceedings initiated after 1976).
Further, FRA proposes to replace the
obsolete statutory citation (45 U.S.C.
432) for emergency orders with the
current citation, 49 U.S.C. 20104. FRA
also proposes to clarify that a
proceeding will be deemed to be
initiated and the time period for its
disposition will begin on the date a
petition or application that complies
with the requirements of this chapter is
confirmed to be complete (not merely
the date it is received) by FRA.
FRA also proposes to make technical
amendments to the definitions of
‘‘Safety Act,’’ ‘‘Docket Clerk,’’ and
‘‘Railroad Safety Board.’’ Specifically, in
the definition of ‘‘Safety Act’’ in
§ 211.1(b)(3), FRA proposes to update
the citation (45 U.S.C. 421 et seq.) to 49
U.S.C. ch. 201 et seq., as the existing
citation is obsolete. FRA proposes to
add a cross-reference in § 211.1(a) to the
proposed updated definition of ‘‘Safety
Act’’ in § 211.1(b)(3). In the definition of
‘‘Docket Clerk’’ in § 211.1(b)(4), FRA
proposes to (1) remove the reference to
the ‘‘Office of Chief Counsel Docket
Clerk,’’ as this position no longer exists
at FRA, and (2) replace the physical
address for the DOT Docket Clerk with
the website www.regulations.gov.
Within the definition of ‘‘Railroad
Safety Board’’ in § 211.1(b)(5), FRA
proposes to insert the word ‘‘Railroad’’
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 209 (Tuesday, October 29, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 85892-85895]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-25035]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
32 CFR Part 310
[Docket ID: DoD-2024-OS-0112]
RIN 0790-AL45
Privacy Act of 1974; Implementation
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Defense (Department or DoD) is giving
concurrent notice of a new system of
[[Page 85893]]
records pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 for the DoD-0024, ``Catch a
Serial Offender (CATCH) Program Records,'' system of records and this
proposed rulemaking. In this proposed rulemaking, the Department
proposes to exempt portions of this system of records from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act to avoid interference during the conduct
of criminal, civil, or administrative actions or investigations; and to
protect the identity of confidential sources incident involving adult
sexual assault allegations.
DATES: Send comments on or before December 30, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and
title, by any of the following methods.
* Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
* Mail: Department of Defense, Office of the Assistant to the
Secretary of Defense for Privacy, Civil Liberties, and Transparency,
Regulatory Directorate, 4800 Mark Center Drive, Attn: Mailbox 24, Suite
05F16, Alexandria, VA 22350-1700.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) for this
Federal Register document. The general policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public is to make these submissions
available for public viewing on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Rahwa Keleta, [email protected],
(703) 256-1408.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, the DoD is establishing
a new system of records titled ``Catch a Serial Offender (CATCH)
Program Records,'' DoD-0024. This system of records covers DoD's
maintenance of records used to collect and compare sexual assault
reports for the purpose of identifying alleged serial sexual assault
offenders. These records will consist of information voluntarily
submitted into the CATCH system by eligible victims who elect to
participate in the CATCH program and provide information about an
alleged adult sexual assault incident, without identifying such
victims, through established CATCH processes.
II. Privacy Act Exemption
The Privacy Act allows Federal agencies to exempt eligible records
in a system of records from certain provisions of the Act, including
those that provide individuals with a right to request access to and
amendment of their own records. If an agency intends to exempt a
particular system of records, it must first go through the rulemaking
process to provide public notice and an opportunity to comment on the
proposed exemption. This proposed rule explains why an exemption is
being claimed for this system of records and invites public comment,
which DoD will consider before the issuance of a final rule
implementing the exemption.
The DoD proposes to modify 32 CFR part 310 to add a new Privacy Act
exemption rule for the DoD-0024, ``Catch a Serial Offender (CATCH)
Program Records,'' system of records. The DoD proposes to exempt this
system of records because these records support the conduct of criminal
law enforcement activities, and certain requirements of the Privacy Act
may interfere with the effective execution of these activities. The
Privacy Act, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), authorizes agencies with
a principal law enforcement function pertaining to the enforcement of
criminal laws (including activities of prosecutors, courts, etc.) to
claim an exemption for systems of records that contain information
identifying criminal offenders and alleged offenders, information
compiled for the purpose of criminal investigation, or reports compiled
during criminal law enforcement proceedings. The DoD is proposing to
claim exemptions from several provisions of the Privacy Act, including
various access, amendment, disclosure accounting, and notice
requirements, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) to prevent the harms
articulated in this rule from occurring.
A notice of a new system of records for DoD-0024, ``Catch a Serial
Offender (CATCH) Program Records,'' is published elsewhere in this
issue of the Federal Register.
Regulatory Analysis
Executive Order 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review,'' as Amended
by Executive Order 14094, ``Modernizing Regulatory Review,'' and
Executive Order 13563, ``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review''
Executive Orders 12866 (as amended by Executive Order 14094) and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety effects, distribute
impacts, and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance
of quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility. It has been determined
that this rule is not a significant regulatory action.
Section 202, Public Law 104-4, ``Unfunded Mandates Reform Act''
Section 202(a) of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2
U.S.C. 1532(a)) requires agencies to assess anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule whose mandates may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, in any one year of $100 million in 1995
dollars, updated annually for inflation. This rule will not mandate any
requirements for State, local, or Tribal governments, nor will it
affect private sector costs.
Public Law 96-354, ``Regulatory Flexibility Act'' (5 U.S.C. Chapter 6)
The Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Privacy, Civil
Liberties, and Transparency has certified that this proposed rule is
not subject to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
because it would not, if promulgated, have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. This proposed rule is
concerned only with the administration of Privacy Act systems of
records within the DoD. Therefore, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, as
amended, does not require DoD to prepare a regulatory flexibility
analysis.
Public Law 96-511, ``Paperwork Reduction Act'' (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35)
The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) was enacted to
minimize the paperwork burden for individuals; small businesses;
educational and nonprofit institutions; Federal contractors; State,
local, and Tribal governments; and other persons resulting from the
collection of information by or for the Federal Government. The Act
requires agencies obtain approval from the Office of Management and
Budget before using identical questions to collect information from ten
or more persons. This proposed rule does not impose reporting or
recordkeeping requirements on the public.
[[Page 85894]]
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
Executive Order 13132 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule that has
federalism implications, imposes substantial direct compliance costs on
State and local governments, and is not required by statute, or has
federalism implications and preempts state law. This proposed rule will
not have a substantial effect on State and local governments.
Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments''
Executive Order 13175 establishes certain requirements that an
agency must meet when it promulgates a proposed rule (and subsequent
final rule) that imposes substantial direct compliance costs on one or
more Indian Tribes, preempts Tribal law, or affects the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian
Tribes. This proposed rule will not have a substantial effect on Indian
Tribal governments.
List of Subjects in 32 CFR Part 310
Privacy.
Accordingly, 32 CFR part 310 is proposed to be amended as follows:
PART 310--PROTECTION OF PRIVACY AND ACCESS TO AND AMENDMENT OF
INDIVIDUAL RECORDS UNDER THE PRIVACY ACT OF 1974
0
1. The authority citation for 32 CFR part 310 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552a.
0
2. Amend Sec. 310.13 by adding paragraph (e)(15) to read as follows:
Sec. 310.13 Exemptions for DoD-wide systems.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(15) System identifier and name. DoD-0024, ``Catch a Serial
Offender (CATCH) Program Records.''
(i) Exemptions. This system of records is exempt from 5 U.S.C. 552a
(c)(3) and (4); (d)(1), (2), (3), and (4); (e)(1); (e)(2); (e)(3);
(e)(4)(G), (H), and (I); (e)(5); (e)(8); (f) and (g).
(ii) Authority. 5 U.S.C. 552a (j)(2).
(iii) Exemption from the particular subsections. Exemption from the
particular subsections is justified pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2) for
the following reasons:
(A) Subsection (c)(3), (d)(1), and (d)(2). Records in this system
of records may contain investigatory material compiled for criminal law
enforcement purposes to include information identifying criminal
offenders and alleged offenders, information compiled for the purpose
of criminal investigation, or reports compiled during criminal law
enforcement proceedings. Application of exemption (j)(2) may be
necessary as access to, amendment of, or release of the accounting of
disclosures of such records could inform a record subject of an
investigation of the existence, nature, or scope of an actual or
potential law enforcement or disciplinary investigation, and thereby
seriously impede law enforcement or prosecutorial efforts by permitting
the record subject and other persons to whom he might disclose the
records to avoid criminal penalties or disciplinary measures; access
to, amendment of, or release of the accounting of disclosures could
also reveal confidential sources who might not have otherwise come
forward to assist in an investigation and thereby hinder DoD's ability
to obtain information from future confidential sources and result in an
unwarranted invasion of the privacy of others.
(B) Subsection (c)(4), (d)(3) and (4). These subsections are
inapplicable to the extent that an exemption is being claimed from
subsections (d)(1) and (2).
(C) Subsection (e)(1). In the collection of information for
investigatory or law enforcement purposes, it is not always possible to
conclusively determine the relevance and necessity of particular
information in the early stages of the investigation or adjudication.
In some instances, it will be only after the collected information is
evaluated in light of other information that its relevance and
necessity for effective investigation and adjudication can be assessed.
Collection of such information permits more informed decision-making by
the Department when making required disciplinary and prosecutorial
determinations.
(D) Subsection (e)(2). To collect information from the subject
individual could serve notice that he or she is the subject of a
criminal investigation and thereby present a serious impediment to such
investigations. Collection of information only from the individual
accused of criminal activity or misconduct could also subvert discovery
of relevant evidence and subvert the course of justice. Accordingly,
application of exemption (j)(2) may be necessary.
(E) Subsection (e)(3). To inform individuals as required by this
subsection could reveal the existence of a criminal investigation and
compromise investigative efforts. Accordingly, application of exemption
(j)(2) may be necessary.
(F) Subsection (e)(4)(G) and (H). These subsections are
inapplicable to the extent exemption is claimed from subsections (d)(1)
and (2).
(G) Subsection (e)(4)(I). To the extent that this provision is
construed to require more detailed disclosure about record sources than
the broad, generic information currently published in the system
notice, an exemption from this provision is necessary to protect the
confidentiality of sources of information and to protect privacy and
physical safety of witnesses and informants. Accordingly, application
of exemption (j)(2) may be necessary.
(H) Subsection (e)(5). It is often impossible to determine in
advance if investigatory records contained in this system are accurate,
relevant, timely and complete, but, in the interests of effective law
enforcement, it is necessary to retain this information to maintain an
accurate record of the investigatory activity to preserve the integrity
of the investigation and satisfy various Constitutional and evidentiary
requirements, such as mandatory disclosure of potentially exculpatory
information in the investigative file to a defendant. It is also
necessary to retain this information to aid in establishing patterns of
activity and provide investigative leads. With the passage of time,
seemingly irrelevant or untimely information may acquire new
significance as further investigation brings new details to light and
the accuracy of such information can only be determined through
judicial processes. Accordingly, application of exemption (j)(2) may be
necessary.
(I) Subsection (e)(8). To serve notice could give persons
sufficient warning to evade investigative efforts. Accordingly,
application of exemption (j)(2) may be necessary.
(J) Subsection (f). To the extent that portions of the system are
exempt from the provisions of the Privacy Act concerning individual
access and amendment of records, DoD is not required to establish rules
concerning procedures and requirements relating to such provisions.
Accordingly, application of exemptions (j)(2) may be necessary.
(K) Subsection (g). This subsection is inapplicable to the extent
that the system is exempt from other specific subsections of the
Privacy Act to which the civil remedies provisions pertain.
(iv) Exempt records from other systems. In the course of carrying
out the overall purpose for this system, exempt records from other
systems of records may in turn become part of the
[[Page 85895]]
records maintained in this system. To the extent that copies of exempt
records from those other systems of records are maintained in this
system, the DoD claims the same exemptions for the records from those
other systems that are entered into this system, as claimed for the
prior system(s) of which they are a part, provided the reason for the
exemption remains valid and necessary.
Dated: October 23, 2024.
Aaron T. Siegel,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. 2024-25035 Filed 10-28-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P