Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Proposed North Plains Connector Project, Colstrip, Montana to Center/St. Anthony, North Dakota, 85182-85188 [2024-24879]
Download as PDF
85182
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 207 / Friday, October 25, 2024 / Notices
awards, respondents are strongly
advised NOT to include any information
in their responses that might be
considered business sensitive,
proprietary, or otherwise confidential.
DOE may reject any submissions
containing confidential business
information.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 1004.11, any
person submitting information that he
or she believes to be confidential and
exempt by law from public disclosure
should submit via email two wellmarked copies: One copy of the
document marked ‘‘confidential’’
including all the information believed to
be confidential, and one copy of the
document marked ‘‘non-confidential’’
with the information believed to be
confidential deleted. Failure to comply
with these marking requirements may
result in the disclosure of the unmarked
information under the Freedom of
Information Act or otherwise. The U.S.
Government is not liable for the
disclosure or use of unmarked
information and may use or disclose
such information for any purpose.
If your response contains confidential,
proprietary, or privileged information,
you must include a cover sheet marked
as follows identifying the specific pages
containing confidential, proprietary, or
privileged information:
Notice of Restriction on Disclosure and Use
of Data: Pages [list applicable pages] of this
response may contain confidential,
proprietary, or privileged information that is
exempt from public disclosure. Such
information shall be used or disclosed only
for the purposes described in this RFI. The
Government may use or disclose any
information that is not appropriately marked
or otherwise restricted, regardless of source.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
In addition, (1) the header and footer
of every page that contains confidential,
proprietary, or privileged information
must be marked as follows: ‘‘Contains
Confidential, Proprietary, or Privileged
Information Exempt from Public
Disclosure’’ and (2) every line and
paragraph containing proprietary,
privileged, or trade secret information
must be clearly marked with [[double
brackets]] or highlighting.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on October 18, 2024,
by David Crane, Under Secretary for
Infrastructure, Office of Infrastructure,
pursuant to delegated authority from the
Secretary of Energy. That document
with the original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters
the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on October 22,
2024.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2024–24848 Filed 10–24–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed North Plains Connector
Project, Colstrip, Montana to Center/St.
Anthony, North Dakota
Grid Deployment Office,
Department of Energy.
AGENCY:
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement and
request for comments.
ACTION:
Date
Time
Wednesday, November 6, 2024 .....
Thursday, November 7, 2024 .........
Tuesday, November 12, 2024 ........
Wednesday, November 13, 2024 ...
Tuesday, November 19, 2024 ........
4–7 p.m. CT .....
6–9 p.m. MT .....
4–7 p.m. MT .....
6–9 p.m. MT .....
12–3 p.m. MT ...
If any additional scoping meetings are
scheduled, the date(s) and location(s) of
those meetings will be announced at
least 15 days in advance through the
GDO North Plains Connector Project
website: https://www.energy.gov/nepa/
doeeis-0568-north-plains-connectormultiple-locations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Oct 24, 2024
Jkt 265001
In compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), the Federal
Land Policy and Management Act of
1976, as amended, and the Federal
Power Act (FPA), as amended, the Grid
Deployment Office (GDO), Department
of Energy (DOE), in coordination with
Federal cooperating agencies—the
Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Miles City Field Office, Miles City, MT;
the United States Forest Service (USFS),
an agency of the Department of
Agriculture (USDA), Dakota Prairie
Grasslands, Bismarck, ND; and the
Agricultural Research Service (ARS)
Fort Keogh Livestock and Range
Research Laboratory, Miles City, MT—
intends to prepare jointly, with the
Montana Department of Environmental
Quality (Montana DEQ), an
environmental impact statement (EIS;
DOE/EIS–0568) to analyze the potential
environmental impacts of granting
authorizations to North Plains
Connector LLC for siting, constructing,
operating, and maintaining the North
Plains Connector Project (‘‘the proposed
Project’’), an up to 525-kilovolt (kV)
high-voltage direct-current (HVDC)
electrical transmission line connecting
the Eastern and Western
Interconnections (also referred to as the
eastern and western grids). By this
notice, GDO is announcing the
beginning of the scoping process to
solicit public comments and identify
issues, impacts, and possible need for
mitigation.
SUMMARY:
This notice initiates the publicscoping process for the EIS. GDO
requests that the public submit
comments concerning the scope of the
analysis, potential alternatives and
impacts, and identification of relevant
information, analyses, and studies by
December 9, 2024. GDO will hold five
scoping meetings on the following dates
at the following locations:
DATES:
Location/format
Venue Twenty5, 3796 ND Hwy. 25, Mandan, ND 58554.
Astoria Event Center, 363 15 St. W, Dickinson, ND 58601.
Custer County Event Center, 42 Garryowen Road RC, Miles City, MT 59301.
Colstrip City Hall, 12 Cherry Street, Colstrip, MT 59323.
VIRTUAL via Webex, register here: https://bit.ly/NorthPlainsVirtual.
You can comment on the
proposed Project by contacting Rebecca
‘‘RJ’’ Boyle, NEPA Document Manager,
by any of the following methods:
• Email: northplainsconnector@
hq.doe.gov.
• Mail: Rebecca ‘‘RJ’’ Boyle, NPC
NEPA Document Manager, U.S.
Department of Energy, Grid Deployment
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Office, 1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585.
Documents pertinent to this NOI may
be examined online at https://
www.energy.gov/nepa/doeeis-0568north-plains-connector-multiplelocations.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca ‘‘RJ’’ Boyle, GDO NEPA
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 207 / Friday, October 25, 2024 / Notices
Document Manager,
northplainsconnector@hq.doe.gov; (301)
550–0364. Contact Ms. Boyle to have
your name added to the EIS mailing list.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
proposed Project would traverse both
private and public lands administered
by various local, state, and Federal
agencies and would require
authorizations for the crossing of
Federal lands managed by BLM, USFS,
and ARS, as well as authorizations from
Montana DEQ, North Dakota Public
Service Commission (NDPSC), and six
counties in North Dakota.
The proposed Project is currently
expected to require a right-of-way
(ROW) authorization from the BLM for
the portion of the proposed Project that
crosses approximately ten miles (about
240 acres) of lands administered by the
Miles City Field Office (MCFO) in
Montana as well as a mineral materials
sales contract for any Federal minerals
access necessary for the construction of
the ROW, whether those minerals occur
in Montana or in North Dakota; a
special-use permit (SUP) from USFS for
the portion of the proposed Project that
crosses approximately ten miles (about
250 acres) of lands administered by the
Dakota Prairie Grasslands (DPG) in
North Dakota; and an easement from the
ARS for the portion of the proposed
Project that crosses approximately eight
miles (about 200 acres) of lands
administered by the Fort Keogh
Livestock and Range Research
Laboratory in Montana. The developer
of the proposed Project, North Plains
Connector LLC (the ‘‘Project Proponent’’
or ‘‘North Plains’’), a wholly-owned,
single-purpose indirect subsidiary of
Grid United, LLC (‘‘Grid United’’), has
filed applications with the BLM, the
USFS, and ARS proposing to construct,
operate, and maintain the proposed
Project.
This proposed Project would also
cross state-managed public lands in
both Montana and North Dakota.1 North
Plains has submitted an Application for
a Certificate of Compliance under the
Montana Major Facility Siting Act
(MFSA) with the Montana DEQ. The
MFSA review allows Montana agencies
to review the Project, ensure protection
of Montana’s environmental resources,
consider socioeconomic impacts,
provide for public participation in the
siting decisions, and coordinate
amongst agencies and the various
1 North Plains will submit a Consolidated
Application for a Certificate of Corridor
Compatibility and Transmission Facility Route
Permit with the North Dakota Public Service
Commission (NDPSC). The NDPSC will conduct its
own review process separate from the coordinated
Montana-Federal environmental review.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Oct 24, 2024
Jkt 265001
required authorizations for the Project.
This process requires compliance with
the Montana Environmental Policy Act
(MEPA), which includes an
environmental review. The Joint Lead
Agencies will ensure that the EIS meets
the requirements of both NEPA and
MEPA.
Identification of Cooperating and
Participating Agencies
While GDO is the Lead Federal
Agency for the EIS, GDO does not have
the authority or responsibility to make
decisions on North Plains’ applications
to BLM, USFS, and ARS. Under Federal
law, BLM, USFS, and ARS each remain
responsible for responding to
authorization applications for lands
within their respective jurisdictions.
Pursuant to interagency agreements, and
in accordance with section 216(h) of the
FPA, GDO is the Lead Federal Agency
responsible for coordinating the various
Federal authorizations and related
environmental reviews needed for this
proposed Project. GDO and the Montana
DEQ are Joint Lead Agencies for this
Project’s EIS in accordance with section
107(a)(1)(B) of NEPA and CEQ
regulations (40 CFR 1501.7(b)). The
Joint Lead Agencies will ensure that the
EIS meets the requirements of both
NEPA and MEPA. BLM, USFS, and ARS
will participate as cooperating agencies
as defined at 40 CFR 1501.8. On
November 6, 2023, BLM, USFS, and
ARS signed cooperating agency
agreements with GDO outlining the
respective roles and responsibilities of
each agency during the proposed
Project.
In addition to the Joint Lead Agency
(Montana DEQ) and the three
cooperating agencies (BLM, USFS, and
ARS) already participating in the
Project, per 40 CFR 1501.8, GDO will
invite other Federal agencies with
jurisdiction by law, or those Tribal,
State, or local governments with special
expertise related to the relevant
environmental issues, to collaborate as
cooperating agencies. GDO will provide
cooperating agencies with a written
summary of expectations, including
schedules, milestones, responsibilities,
scope, and details of agency expected
contributions. Governmental agencies
that are not designated cooperating or
participating agencies will have the
opportunity to provide information,
comments, and consultation to GDO
during the public input stages of the
NEPA process.
Proposed Project Details
The proposed Project would consist of
approximately 420 total miles of
overhead electrical transmission line
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
85183
connecting the eastern and western
grids. The 420-mile route described in
this section will be known as the
Proposed Route Alternative. In addition
to 420-mile route described, the Project
proposes to include the following:
• A new 500-kilovolt (kV) extra high
voltage (EHV) alternating current (AC)
electrical transmission line in Rosebud
County, Montana (Rosebud
Transmission Line). The new line
would consist of two separate, parallel
circuits, each approximately 3 miles
long with an associated right-of-way
approximately 320 feet wide. The
Rosebud Transmission Line would
extend east from the existing Colstrip
Substation owned by a third-party, to a
new AC/direct current (DC) converter
station in Rosebud County. The Colstrip
Substation would serve as the
interconnection point to the Western
Electricity Coordinating Council
(WECC) power system for the western
grid. NorthWestern Energy Group, Inc.,
a utility company that serves South
Dakota, Nebraska, and Montana, is
currently upgrading this substation to
allow for additional interconnections
into the region. These modifications are
ongoing independent of the proposed
Project, but the proposed Project would
utilize these upgrades for
interconnection.
• One new AC/DC converter station
in Rosebud County, Montana (Rosebud
County Converter Station). The
converter station would connect the
eastern terminus of the Rosebud
Transmission Line to the western
terminus of the new high voltage direct
current (HVDC) electrical transmission
line.
• An approximately 341-mile, up to
525-kV, HVDC transmission line from
Montana into North Dakota with an
associated 200-foot-wide right-of-way
(HDVC Transmission Line).
Æ Montana: North Plains would
install approximately 172 miles of the
HVDC Transmission Line in Rosebud,
Custer, and Fallon counties. The line
would extend east from the new
Rosebud County Converter Station to
the Montana-North Dakota state line in
Fallon County.
Æ North Dakota: North Plains would
install approximately 169 miles of the
HVDC Transmission Line in Golden
Valley, Slope, Hettinger, Grant, and
Morton counties. The line would extend
east from the Montana-North Dakota
border in Golden Valley County to the
new AC/DC Converter Station in Morton
County, North Dakota.
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
85184
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 207 / Friday, October 25, 2024 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
• One new AC/DC converter station
in Morton County, North Dakota
(Morton County Converter Station). The
converter station would connect the
eastern terminus of the new HVDC
Transmission Line to the western
terminus of two new 345-kV EHV AC
electric transmission line segments.
• Approximately 51 miles of new
345-kV EHV AC transmission line
located in Morton and Oliver counties,
North Dakota, within an associated
right-of-way approximately 200 feet
wide (Oliver Transmission Line). The
line would extend east and north from
the Morton County Converter Station in
Morton County to a separately planned
Oliver County Substation in Oliver
County, North Dakota. Minnesota Power
has proposed and would develop the
Oliver County Substation as part of the
Minnesota Power HVDC Modernization
Project, which is modernizing the
existing Square Butte HVDC System
between North Dakota and Minnesota
that was built in the 1970s. The Oliver
County Substation would serve as the
interconnection point to the
Midcontinent Independent System
Operator (MISO) for the eastern grid.
• Approximately 22 miles of new
345-kV EHV AC transmission line near
St. Anthony in Morton County, North
Dakota (Morton Transmission Line). The
line would extend east and southeast
from the Morton County Converter
Station to a new Morton County
Switchyard, which connects or isolates
lines for fault clearance and
maintenance. The Morton County
Switchyard would serve as the
interconnection point to the Southwest
Power Pool (SPP) system for the eastern
grid.
The Project would also include
associated facilities, including
temporary and permanent access roads,
telecommunication systems, and
grounding components.
The Project would require temporary
workspaces during the construction
phase to access the construction site,
stage equipment and material, and
install the various Project components.
(See https://www.energy.gov/nepa/
doeeis-0568-north-plains-connectormultiple-locations for a map of the
proposed Project).
Purpose and Need
While GDO is the Lead Federal
Agency for the EIS, GDO does not have
the authority or responsibility to make
decisions on North Plains’ applications
to BLM, USFS, and ARS. Those Federal
agencies retain their respective
decision-making authority and
responsibilities with respect to North
Plains’ applications on their
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Oct 24, 2024
Jkt 265001
respectively managed lands.
Accordingly, each of those agencies has
provided its own purpose and need in
addition to the general purpose and
need and GDO’s purpose and need to
establish the basis for their individual
decisions to be made for this Project.
General Purpose and Need
The Joint Lead Agencies, along with
BLM, USFS, and ARS, all agree on the
general purpose and need for North
Plains’ proposed transmission line
Project, which is to enhance the
reliability, capacity, and efficiency
between the Eastern and Western
Interconnections of the electric grid.
Construction of the proposed Project
aims to increase wholesale energy
market access for generation resources;
provide services and technology to help
maintain operational flexibility of the
grid; and provide a highly controllable
electric transmission pathway that can
quickly and efficiently shift power to
meet real-time system needs, including
mitigating weather-driven and system
outage conditions that can otherwise
affect the reliable provision of
electricity. The new transmission line
would provide a more resilient and
flexible infrastructure, ensuring a stable
supply of electricity to residential,
commercial, and industrial consumers.
The proposed transmission line
Project seeks to address several needs
found in the project area, including
meeting and balancing increasing
demands for electricity found in both
the eastern and western grids,
integrating diversified sources of energy,
increasing the reliability and resilience
of the electrical grid, and promoting
regional economic development by
expanding opportunities for market
access for electricity generators
throughout the region. A 2020 National
Renewable Energy Laboratory Study
‘‘The Value of Increased HVDC Capacity
Between Eastern and Western U.S.
Grids: The Interconnections Seam
Study’’ 2 showed that increased transfer
capability between the eastern and
western grids could result in a 35-year
benefit-to-cost ratio as high as 2.89 and
net present value consumer savings of
up to $28.8 billion.
GDO Purpose and Need
GDO’s purpose is to fulfill its
responsibilities under the FPA to
coordinate a single environmental
review that follows a standard, two-year
permitting schedule for transmission
infrastructure projects that require
Federal permitting. In fulfilling its
responsibilities, GDO seeks to
2 www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/76850.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
streamline the Federal permitting
process for qualifying electric
transmission projects to expand and
accelerate development of electric
transmission capacity in the United
States and, in turn, ensure Americans
have access to reliable, affordable, and
clean energy; promote grid resilience
and reliability; modernize the United
States grid; reduce permitting delays;
and promote economic growth.
BLM Purpose and Need
BLM’s purpose is to respond to North
Plains’ request for right-of-way access
across about ten miles of Federal lands
administered by the Miles City Field
Office, Montana, for the siting,
construction, and operation of an up to
525-kV-rated, bi-directional HVDC
transmission facility and associated
support facilities within a 200-foot
right-of-way which would be part of a
system of high voltage AC and DC
facilities over approximately 400 miles
between Colstrip, Montana and Oliver
and Morton Counties, North Dakota.
This request for a right-of-way may
include necessary access of Federal
mineral materials in Montana and North
Dakota for the construction of projectrelated infrastructure.
The need for the action is established
through BLM’s responsibility under the
Federal Land Policy Management Act
(FLPMA) to respond to requests for
rights-of-way across BLM-managed
lands, as well as the Surfaces Resources
Act of 1955 and the Act of July 31, 1947
(Disposal of Materials on Public Lands)
for any necessary mineral material sales
contracts.
USFS Purpose and Need
The proposed Project would require
the issuance of a special use permit for
the crossing of about ten miles of
Federal lands managed by the USFS on
the Little Missouri National Grasslands,
North Dakota. For this crossing, the
proposed Project would entail siting,
construction, and operation of an up to
525-kV-rated, bi-directional HVDC
transmission facility and associated
support facilities within a 200-foot
right-of-way which would be part of a
system of high voltage AC and DC
facilities over approximately 10.3 miles
(3.1 miles Golden Valley County; 7.2
miles Slope County) on the Little
Missouri National Grassland.
Section 368(c) of the Energy Policy
Act of 2005 directs USFS to establish
procedures for identifying and
designating additional energy corridors
on Federal lands and to expedite
applications for energy transmission
and distribution facilities within those
corridors. USFS is mandated to
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 207 / Friday, October 25, 2024 / Notices
cooperate and coordinate with other
Federal agencies to optimize siting of
rights-of-way for energy corridors on
National Forest System lands (30 U.S.C.
185(p); 43 U.S.C. 1763), and to endeavor
to expedite applications for energy
transmission and distribution facilities
on National Forest System lands
through coordination with other
affected Federal agencies.
listed or -eligible archaeological sites;
inventoried roadless areas; most major
waterbodies; greater sage grouse
(GRSG) 3 habitat; visually sensitive
areas; congested utility corridors; and
urban development. The public is
encouraged to provide other alternatives
for consideration along with any
information and analyses they have on
such suggested alternatives.
ARS Purpose and Need
ARS’s purpose is to respond to North
Plains’ request for an easement access
across about eight miles of Federal land
managed by ARS in Montana for the
siting, construction, and operation of an
up to 525-kV-rated, bi-directional HVDC
transmission facility and associated
support facilities within a 200-foot
right-of-way. The need for the action is
established through 43 U.S.C. 961,
Rights-of-Way for Power and
Communications Facilities.
Other Alternatives
The following discussion describes
the five major route alternatives
considered during Project planning.
Subject to comments received during
scoping, these alternatives may either be
dismissed from further analysis or
evaluated in detail in the EIS. They are
identified as the following:
• Northern Route Alternative (Rosebud,
Custer, and Fallon Counties,
Montana)
• Central Route Alternative (Rosebud,
Custer, and Fallon Counties,
Montana)
• Southern Route Alternative (Rosebud,
Custer, and Fallon Counties,
Montana)
• Tongue River Route Alternative
(Custer County, Montana)
• Eastern Route Alternative (Slope,
Stark, Morton, and Oliver Counties,
North Dakota)
See https://www.energy.gov/nepa/
doeeis-0568-north-plains-connectormultiple-locations for a detailed map of
these route alternatives.
Alternatives
Several alternatives have been
identified for potential analysis in the
forthcoming EIS. These alternatives
include different routing options, as
well as variations in routing and
transmission technology. GDO
welcomes comments on all preliminary
alternatives as well as suggestions for
additional alternatives. The alternatives
currently under consideration for the
proposed Project are as follows:
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
The No Action Alternative
Under the No Action Alternative, the
Agency permits and authorizations
would not be granted and the agencies
will assume for purposes of the EIS that
the Project would not be constructed.
The existing transmission infrastructure
would remain unchanged, and any
associated improvements or upgrades to
address current and future demand,
reliability, and rapid changes in
generation would not be implemented.
This alternative serves as a baseline
against which the impacts of the other
alternatives can be compared.
Proposed Route Alternative
The Proposed Route Alternative for
the proposed Project is currently
anticipated to include an approximately
420-mile, up to 525-kV electrical
transmission line connecting the eastern
and western grids, with an associated
ROW that would generally be
approximately 200 feet wide. According
to North Plains, this route attempts to
best balance use of existing road and
transmission line corridors while
avoiding national and state parks;
national historic landmarks and
National Register of Historic Places-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Oct 24, 2024
Jkt 265001
Northern Route Alternative
This route was developed to
maximize co-location with existing
linear utilities near Interstate 94 and to
minimize routing within the GRSG
General Habitat Management Area
(GHMA) in accordance with the BLM’s
MCFO Approved Resource Management
Plan (ARMP).
The Northern Route Alternative
diverges from the Proposed Route
Alternative by leaving directly north
from the Colstrip Substation and
generally running on a more northerly
path through Rosebud and Custer
Counties, Montana. From Fallon
County, Montana, to the endpoints in
North Dakota, the route is the same as
that seen in the Proposed Route
Alternative.
The Northern Route Alternative is 8.5
miles shorter than the Proposed Route
Alternative and crosses 2 fewer
3 The GRSG is a sagebrush species that is in
decline across its range due to habitat loss and has
been recognized as threatened or near threatened by
several national and international organizations
Federal agencies manage protection of the species
through several habitat designations, which protect
GRSG habitat based on value.
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
85185
perennial waterbodies, and almost 40
miles less GRSG general habitat. The
Northern Route Alternative also crosses
2.8 miles more of ARS-administered
land and more intermittent or
ephemeral waterbodies, and 0.4 mile
more BLM-administered Visual
Resources Management (VRM) Class II
land. Further, the Northern Route
Alternative is within 1 mile of 59 more
identified cultural resources sites; is
within 0.5 mile of the Strawberry Hill
Designated Recreation Area; and crosses
9 more transmission lines than the
Proposed Route Alternative. This route’s
northern passage out of Colstrip also
crosses several parcels with underlying
energy development easements that
would conflict with siting an electric
transmission line. Finally, this
alternative nears the Yellowstone River,
contains numerous occurrences of
sensitive species, including bats, fish,
and eagles, sensitive riparian habitats,
and could present increased Tribal and
cultural concerns.
Central Route Alternative
This route was designed to avoid the
challenges associated with the
Yellowstone River valley, congested
highway corridors, and urban
development areas near Miles City. It
resembles the Northern Route
Alternative but leaves Colstrip,
Montana, in a more northeasterly
direction. The Central Route Alternative
then maintains a generally central
alignment between the Northern Route
Alternative and the Southern Route
Alternative. The Central Route
Alternative aims to strike a balance by
incorporating stakeholder feedback
associated with co-location of the
transmission line with other
infrastructure. The Central Route
Alternative also avoids the easements
north of Colstrip noted in the Northern
Alternative.
The Central Route Alternative crosses
conservation easements to conserve,
protect, and enhance native wildlife
habitat. This alternative also crosses
conservation easements northeast of
Colstrip that include terms that are
intended to conserve, protect, and
enhance native wildlife habitat. This
alternative also crosses Tongue River
near 12 Mile Dam, which is a heavily
used recreational area for fishing and
camping about 0.6 mile to the north,
existing residential development, and
more irrigated cropland than the
Proposed Route Alternative.
Southern Route Alternative
This route intends to take advantage
of the gentler topography east of
Colstrip compared to the other routes.
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
85186
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 207 / Friday, October 25, 2024 / Notices
Further, this route is not within 0.5
miles of a designated recreation area.
This route additionally also avoids ARSadministered lands and is about 25
miles shorter than the Proposed Route.
This route avoids some resources, like
perennial and ephemeral waterbodies,
but crosses others, like VRM Class II
areas near the Tongue River, Pumpkin
Creek, and east of the Powder River in
Custer County, Montana, as well as sites
of Tribal and cultural significance.
There are also accessibility constraints
east of the Powder River that would
require engineered roadways and long
access roads, which could increase the
Project impacts during construction and
operation.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Tongue River Route Alternative
The Tongue River Route Alternative
passes through the Tongue River Valley.
The route is not within 0.25 mile of a
GRSG no occupancy zone nor within 0.5
miles of a designated recreation area.
The Tongue River Route is almost 30
miles shorter than the Proposed Route
Alternative, does not cross ARSadministered lands, and avoids almost
50 miles of GRSG habitat. The Tongue
River Route Alternative, however,
crosses 5.3 miles more VRM Class II
land, is within 1.0 mile of 110 more
cultural resource sites, crosses 2 more
conservation lands/easements, and
crosses 40 more county and local roads
than the Proposed Route Alternative.
Several Tribal resources and protected
species along the Tongue River have
been previously identified during
surveys.
Eastern Route Alternative
The Eastern Route Alternative was
designed prior to the addition of the 22
miles of EHV AC Morton Transmission
Line in Morton County, North Dakota, to
the Project scope and objectives.
Therefore, this route does not include
the SPP interconnection near St.
Anthony as described in the Proposed
Route Alternative.
The Eastern Route Alternative
diverges from the Proposed Route
Alternative in Slope County just east of
the Montana-North Dakota state line. To
achieve a route that balances all
potential impacts from the proposed
Project, the Eastern Route Alternative
heads slightly northeast and east from
the North Dakota-Montana state line
before it heads southwest to cross the
Little Missouri River and generally east
through the North Dakota badlands.
The primary considerations for the
Eastern Route Alternative design were
aligning with existing linear utilities,
paralleling Interstate 94 along a more
direct route, adhering to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Oct 24, 2024
Jkt 265001
recommendation provided by the USFS
to cross the Little Missouri River on
private lands, and avoidance of GRSG
primary range designated by the North
Dakota Game and Fish Department.
Minor Route Variations
During Project planning, North Plains
incorporated many minor route
variations into its Proposed Route
Alternative. Minor route variations are
different from major route alternatives
in that they are usually shorter and are
often designed to accommodate a
particular landowner request or to avoid
a site-specific environmental resource or
engineering constraint. Although minor
route variations may range from a few
hundred feet long to several miles long,
minor route variations typically remain
within the same area as the Proposed
Route. Examples of route variations
include realigning the route from a hay
field to pastureland on a ranch to avoid
disruption to cultivation; moving a
structure location to avoid placing it in
a wetland; and adjusting the centerline
alignment along a slope to improve
constructability.
Endpoint Alternatives
As described in the Proposed Project
Details, North Plains determined the
proposed Project would connect the
existing Colstrip Substation in Rosebud
County, Montana, to the Oliver County
Substation approximately 6 miles
southeast of Center, North Dakota, and
a new Morton County Switchyard near
St. Anthony, North Dakota. The Project
Proponent considered another facility as
a potential Western interconnection
point: the other nearest potential
endpoint in Montana, the existing
Broadview Substation in Yellowstone
County. This alternative facility would
add about 100 miles of transmission line
to the Project. In North Dakota, the
Project Proponent determined the
proposed Project endpoints are the most
reasonable connection locations to
existing infrastructure on the Eastern
Interconnection grid without adding
considerable length.
Converter Station Alternatives
As described in the Proposed Project
Details, North Plains proposes to use
two converter stations near the Project
endpoints. The siting of converter
stations is constrained insofar as the
stations need to be located near the
Project endpoints and they must occur
along the transmission line route. A
converter station site that is not on the
proposed transmission line route
necessitates proposing a new
transmission line route. North Plains is
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in the process of evaluating alternatives
to its proposed converter station sites.
Summary of Expected Impacts
Field investigations, environmental
surveys, and other studies are being
conducted for the proposed Project to
evaluate anticipated impacts to air,
noise, climate, geologic hazards, mineral
and energy resources, paleontological
resources, soils, water, vegetation,
wildlife, threatened and endangered
species, cultural resources, visual
resources, Federal projects, recreation
activities, wilderness, and other
resources. North Plains is currently
conducting field surveys for wetlands/
waterbodies, vegetation, general habitat,
threatened and endangered and special
status species, cultural and tribal
resources, architectural history, and
paleontological resources. North Plains
is also preparing a Phase 1 bat
hibernacula assessment, whooping
crane habitat assessment, impact
assessments for bald and golden eagles
(to support Bald and Golden Eagle
Protection Act compliance), and GRSG
(to support the Montana GRSG
mitigation plan), migratory bird habitat
assessment (to support the Migratory
Bird Treaty Act compliance plan), and
species and habitat assessments for
federally listed and proposed species to
support compliance with section 7 of
the Endangered Species Act.
GDO and the cooperating agencies
will identify, analyze, and consider
mitigation to address the reasonably
foreseeable impacts to resources from
the proposed Project and all analyzed
reasonable alternatives 4 and, in
accordance with 40 CFR 1502.14(e),
include appropriate mitigation measures
not already included in the proposed
route alternative or other alternatives.
Potential impacts on built, human,
and natural environments from the
proposed Project will be studied during
the Federal, State, and local
environmental review processes. These
review processes and potential impacts
will be analyzed in the EIS. The public
is invited to participate in the scoping
process to identify potential alternatives
and impacts, information, studies, and
analyses relevant to the proposed
Project and Alternatives.
Anticipated Permits and Authorizations
The Project Proponent will need to
secure permits and authorizations from
several Federal and state agencies,
which include but are not limited to
those listed below.
4 ‘‘Reasonable alternatives’’ means a reasonable
range of alternatives that are technically and
economically feasible and meet the purpose and
need for the proposed action.
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 207 / Friday, October 25, 2024 / Notices
Agency
Permit/authorization
Bureau of Land Management ...................................................................
Right-of-way grant, short-term right-of-way grant, and mineral materials
sales contract.
Special Use Permit.
Easement.
Permits to cross Federal Aid Highway.
General easement, Section 10 permit, and Section 404 permit.
Certificate of Compliance under the Major Facility Siting Act.
Certificate of Corridor Compatibility and Transmission Facility Route
Permit.
Conditional Use Permits.
Forest Service ..........................................................................................
Agricultural Research Service ..................................................................
Federal Highway Administration ...............................................................
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers .................................................................
Montana Department of Environmental Quality .......................................
North Dakota Public Service Commission ...............................................
North Dakota County Governments (Golden Valley, Grant, Hettinger,
Morton, Oliver, and Slope Counties).
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
85187
Schedule for the Decision-Making
Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping period for the EIS. GDO will
provide additional opportunities for
public participation consistent with
DOE NEPA regulations (10 CFR part
1021) and CEQ NEPA regulations (40
CFR parts 1500–1508), including a 45day comment period on the Draft EIS.
Please note that, when commenting
during either the scoping or the public
comment period, your comment and
personal information, if provided, will
be retained as a part of the single,
consolidated, public record for the
project. GDO will allow for anonymous
comments.
GDO plans to publish the Draft EIS for
public review in Fall 2025 and the Final
EIS in Fall 2026. BLM, ARS, and DEQ
will release respective decision
documents no sooner than 30 days after
release of the Final EIS. The USFS will
release its own Draft Record of Decision
(ROD) alongside the Final EIS, and upon
conclusion of the objections process
required under USFS regulations, will
release a final ROD. Following the
issuance of each agency’s individual
RODs, GDO will issue a determination
that the duration for each land-use
authorization is commensurate with the
anticipated use of the facility, per FPA
Section 216(h)(3).
USFS would not issue a ROD
concerning applicable USFS
authorizations until after completion of
the objections process in 36 CFR part
218, subparts A and B. Objections will
be accepted only from those who have
previously submitted specific written
comments regarding the proposed
Project during scoping or other
designated opportunity for public
comment in accordance with 36 CFR
218.5(a). Issues raised in objections
must be based on previously submitted
timely, specific written comments
regarding the proposed Project unless
based on new information arising after
designated opportunities, and objectors
must make a connection between issues
raised in comment in their objections.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Oct 24, 2024
Jkt 265001
Objections must be filed within 45 days,
after the Final EIS and draft ROD. The
objection must include specific issues
related to the proposed Project; if
applicable, how the objector believes
the decision violates law, regulation, or
policy; and suggested remedies that
would resolve the objection. USFS
reviews objections and may engage in
discussions with objectors to resolve
issues. The Reviewing Officer (a USFS
official) will issue a written response to
the objections, which may include
instructions to the responsible official
must complete before signing the
decision. After the objection process is
complete, the Dakota Prairie Grasslands
Forest Supervisor would issue the ROD.
Responsible Official and Nature of
Decision To Be Made
While GDO is the Lead Federal
Agency for the Project EIS, GDO does
not have authority or responsibility to
make decisions on North Plains’
applications to BLM, USFS, and ARS.
Those Federal agencies retain their
respective decision-making authorities
and responsibilities with respect to
North Plains’ applications. Accordingly,
each Federal agency’s deciding officials
and the scope of decisions to be made
are listed here:
BLM: The Field Manager of the Miles
City Field Office (MCFO) is the
Responsible Official. The Field Manager
as the Responsible Official will decide
whether to grant the ROW for the
portion of the transmission line and
associated infrastructure located on
public lands administered by the
MCFO, and if so, under what terms and
conditions. Any necessary mineral
materials sales contracts would be
granted by either the Field Manager for
the Miles City Field Office or the North
Dakota Field Office, depending on
where the mineral materials are located.
USFS: The Dakota Prairie Grasslands
Forest Supervisor is the Responsible
Official. The Forest Supervisor as the
Responsible Official will decide
whether to issue a SUP for the proposed
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Project for the portion of the project
Proposed on USFS-managed land.
ARS: The Plains Area Real Estate
Lease Contracting Officer is the
Responsible Official. The Plains Area
Real Estate Lease Contracting Officer as
the Responsible Official will decide
whether to grant an easement for the
portion of the transmission line and
associated infrastructure the proposed
Project proposes to place on Federal
lands under the control of ARS.
Additional Information
GDO and the cooperating agencies
will utilize and coordinate the NEPA
process to help support compliance
with applicable procedural
requirements under Section 106 of the
National Historic Preservation Act (54
U.S.C. 306108) as provided in 36 CFR
800.2(d)(3), including public
involvement requirements of Section
106. GDO and the cooperating agencies
will consult with Indian Tribal Nations
on a government-to-government basis in
accordance with relevant Departmental
policies. Tribal concerns, including
impacts on Indian trust assets and
potential impacts to cultural resources,
will be given due consideration.
Federal, state, and local agencies, along
with Indian Tribal Nations and other
stakeholders that may be interested in or
affected by the proposed Project, are
invited to participate in the scoping
process and, if eligible, may request or
be requested by the GDO to participate
in the development of the EIS as a
cooperating agency.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on October 21, 2024,
by Maria D. Robinson, Director, Grid
Deployment Office, pursuant to
delegated authority from the Secretary
of Energy. That document evidencing
this delegation of authority with the
original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
85188
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 207 / Friday, October 25, 2024 / Notices
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters
the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on October 22,
2024.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2024–24879 Filed 10–24–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Combined Notice of Filings #1
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric corporate
filings:
Docket Numbers: EC25–10–000.
Applicants: Number Three Wind LLC.
Description: Application for
Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act of Number Three
Wind LLC.
Filed Date: 10/18/24.
Accession Number: 20241018–5221.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/24.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric rate
filings:
Docket Numbers: ER24–2447–002.
Applicants: PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
Description: Compliance filing:
Compliance related to Capacity
Obligations for Load Adjustments to be
effective 8/31/2024.
Filed Date: 10/21/24.
Accession Number: 20241021–5147.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/24.
Docket Numbers: ER24–2843–003.
Applicants: Atrisco Solar SF LLC.
Description: Tariff Amendment: Third
Amendment to the Amended and
Restated Lease Agreement to be effective
8/24/2024.
Filed Date: 10/21/24.
Accession Number: 20241021–5028.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 10/31/24.
Docket Numbers: ER25–150–000.
Applicants: Midcontinent
Independent System Operator, Inc.
Description: Compliance filing: 2024–
10–18_Request for Waiver of COD re:
2018–2019 Projects to be effective N/A.
Filed Date: 10/18/24.
Accession Number: 20241018–5172.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/24.
Docket Numbers: ER25–151–000.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:40 Oct 24, 2024
Jkt 265001
Applicants: Duff Solar Park LLC.
Description: Baseline eTariff Filing:
Market-Based Rate Application to be
effective 12/18/2024.
Filed Date: 10/18/24.
Accession Number: 20241018–5173.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/24.
Docket Numbers: ER25–152–000.
Applicants: Pleasantville Solar Park
LLC.
Description: Baseline eTariff Filing:
Market-Based Rate Application to be
effective 12/18/2024.
Filed Date: 10/18/24.
Accession Number: 20241018–5176.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/24.
Docket Numbers: ER25–153–000.
Applicants: Riverstart Solar Park IV
LLC.
Description: Baseline eTariff Filing:
Market-Based Rate Application to be
effective 12/18/2024.
Filed Date: 10/18/24.
Accession Number: 20241018–5184.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/24.
Docket Numbers: ER25–154–000.
Applicants: Sandrini BESS Storage
LLC.
Description: Baseline eTariff Filing:
Market-Based Rate Application to be
effective 12/18/2024.
Filed Date: 10/18/24.
Accession Number: 20241018–5189.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/24.
Docket Numbers: ER25–155–000.
Applicants: PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
Description: Tariff Amendment:
Notice of Cancellation of WMPA, SA
No. 6088; AF1–209 to be effective 12/
18/2024.
Filed Date: 10/18/24.
Accession Number: 20241018–5194.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/24.
Docket Numbers: ER25–156–000.
Applicants: Peregrine Energy Storage,
LLC.
Description: Baseline eTariff Filing:
Peregrine Energy Storage, LLC MBR
Tariff to be effective 12/18/2024.
Filed Date: 10/18/24.
Accession Number: 20241018–5197.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/24.
Docket Numbers: ER25–157–000.
Applicants: Pacific Gas and Electric
Company.
Description: Notice of Termination of
Service Agreement No. 69 under PG&E’s
FERC Electric Tariff Volume No. 5.
Filed Date: 10/16/24.
Accession Number: 20241016–5246.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/6/24.
Docket Numbers: ER25–158–000
Applicants: Constellation Energy
Generation, LLC.
Description: Constellation Energy
Generation, LLC requests a limited one-
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
time waiver of the must-offer exception
deadline in PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.’s Open Access Transmission
Tariff Attachment DD Section 6.6(g).
Filed Date: 10/18/24.
Accession Number: 20241018–5229.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/8/24.
Docket Numbers: ER25–160–000.
Applicants: Morris Solar, LLC.
Description: Baseline eTariff Filing:
Morris Solar, LLC MBR Tariff to be
effective 11/1/2024.
Filed Date: 10/21/24.
Accession Number: 20241021–5067.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/24.
Docket Numbers: ER25–161–000.
Applicants: PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
Description: 205(d) Rate Filing:
Amendment to ISA, Service Agreement
No. 6278; Queue No. AD2–048 to be
effective 12/21/2024.
Filed Date: 10/21/24.
Accession Number: 20241021–5072.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/24.
Docket Numbers: ER25–162–000.
Applicants: Midcontinent
Independent System Operator, Inc.
Description: 205(d) Rate Filing: 2024–
10–21_SA 4368 ATC–WPL GIA (S1017)
to be effective 10/10/2024.
Filed Date: 10/21/24.
Accession Number: 20241021–5081.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/24.
Docket Numbers: ER25–163–000.
Applicants: Midcontinent
Independent System Operator, Inc.
Description: 205(d) Rate Filing: 2024–
10–21_SA 4370 ATC–WPL GIA (S1018)
to be effective 10/11/2024.
Filed Date: 10/21/24.
Accession Number: 20241021–5085.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/24.
Docket Numbers: ER25–164–000.
Applicants: Midcontinent
Independent System Operator, Inc.
Description: 205(d) Rate Filing: 2024–
10–21_SA 2687 Termination of METCNew Covert FCA (T94) to be effective
10/22/2024.
Filed Date: 10/21/24.
Accession Number: 20241021–5088.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/24.
Docket Numbers: ER25–165–000.
Applicants: Midcontinent
Independent System Operator, Inc.
Description: 205(d) Rate Filing: 2024–
10–21_SA 4369 ATC–EDP Renewables
North America GIA (J1502) to be
effective 10/10/2024.
Filed Date: 10/21/24.
Accession Number: 20241021–5097.
Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/12/24.
Docket Numbers: ER25–166–000.
Applicants: PJM Interconnection,
L.L.C.
Description: Tariff Amendment:
Notice of Cancellation—WMPA Service
E:\FR\FM\25OCN1.SGM
25OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 207 (Friday, October 25, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 85182-85188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24879]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
the Proposed North Plains Connector Project, Colstrip, Montana to
Center/St. Anthony, North Dakota
AGENCY: Grid Deployment Office, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement
and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended (NEPA), the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of
1976, as amended, and the Federal Power Act (FPA), as amended, the Grid
Deployment Office (GDO), Department of Energy (DOE), in coordination
with Federal cooperating agencies--the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)
Miles City Field Office, Miles City, MT; the United States Forest
Service (USFS), an agency of the Department of Agriculture (USDA),
Dakota Prairie Grasslands, Bismarck, ND; and the Agricultural Research
Service (ARS) Fort Keogh Livestock and Range Research Laboratory, Miles
City, MT--intends to prepare jointly, with the Montana Department of
Environmental Quality (Montana DEQ), an environmental impact statement
(EIS; DOE/EIS-0568) to analyze the potential environmental impacts of
granting authorizations to North Plains Connector LLC for siting,
constructing, operating, and maintaining the North Plains Connector
Project (``the proposed Project''), an up to 525-kilovolt (kV) high-
voltage direct-current (HVDC) electrical transmission line connecting
the Eastern and Western Interconnections (also referred to as the
eastern and western grids). By this notice, GDO is announcing the
beginning of the scoping process to solicit public comments and
identify issues, impacts, and possible need for mitigation.
DATES: This notice initiates the public-scoping process for the EIS.
GDO requests that the public submit comments concerning the scope of
the analysis, potential alternatives and impacts, and identification of
relevant information, analyses, and studies by December 9, 2024. GDO
will hold five scoping meetings on the following dates at the following
locations:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date Time Location/format
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wednesday, November 6, 2024............. 4-7 p.m. CT..................... Venue Twenty5, 3796 ND Hwy. 25,
Mandan, ND 58554.
Thursday, November 7, 2024.............. 6-9 p.m. MT..................... Astoria Event Center, 363 15 St. W,
Dickinson, ND 58601.
Tuesday, November 12, 2024.............. 4-7 p.m. MT..................... Custer County Event Center, 42
Garryowen Road RC, Miles City, MT
59301.
Wednesday, November 13, 2024............ 6-9 p.m. MT..................... Colstrip City Hall, 12 Cherry
Street, Colstrip, MT 59323.
Tuesday, November 19, 2024.............. 12-3 p.m. MT.................... VIRTUAL via Webex, register here:
https://bit.ly/NorthPlainsVirtual.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If any additional scoping meetings are scheduled, the date(s) and
location(s) of those meetings will be announced at least 15 days in
advance through the GDO North Plains Connector Project website: https://www.energy.gov/nepa/doeeis-0568-north-plains-connector-multiple-locations.
ADDRESSES: You can comment on the proposed Project by contacting
Rebecca ``RJ'' Boyle, NEPA Document Manager, by any of the following
methods:
Email: [email protected].
Mail: Rebecca ``RJ'' Boyle, NPC NEPA Document Manager,
U.S. Department of Energy, Grid Deployment Office, 1000 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20585.
Documents pertinent to this NOI may be examined online at https://www.energy.gov/nepa/doeeis-0568-north-plains-connector-multiple-locations.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca ``RJ'' Boyle, GDO NEPA
[[Page 85183]]
Document Manager, [email protected]; (301) 550-0364.
Contact Ms. Boyle to have your name added to the EIS mailing list.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The proposed Project would traverse both
private and public lands administered by various local, state, and
Federal agencies and would require authorizations for the crossing of
Federal lands managed by BLM, USFS, and ARS, as well as authorizations
from Montana DEQ, North Dakota Public Service Commission (NDPSC), and
six counties in North Dakota.
The proposed Project is currently expected to require a right-of-
way (ROW) authorization from the BLM for the portion of the proposed
Project that crosses approximately ten miles (about 240 acres) of lands
administered by the Miles City Field Office (MCFO) in Montana as well
as a mineral materials sales contract for any Federal minerals access
necessary for the construction of the ROW, whether those minerals occur
in Montana or in North Dakota; a special-use permit (SUP) from USFS for
the portion of the proposed Project that crosses approximately ten
miles (about 250 acres) of lands administered by the Dakota Prairie
Grasslands (DPG) in North Dakota; and an easement from the ARS for the
portion of the proposed Project that crosses approximately eight miles
(about 200 acres) of lands administered by the Fort Keogh Livestock and
Range Research Laboratory in Montana. The developer of the proposed
Project, North Plains Connector LLC (the ``Project Proponent'' or
``North Plains''), a wholly-owned, single-purpose indirect subsidiary
of Grid United, LLC (``Grid United''), has filed applications with the
BLM, the USFS, and ARS proposing to construct, operate, and maintain
the proposed Project.
This proposed Project would also cross state-managed public lands
in both Montana and North Dakota.\1\ North Plains has submitted an
Application for a Certificate of Compliance under the Montana Major
Facility Siting Act (MFSA) with the Montana DEQ. The MFSA review allows
Montana agencies to review the Project, ensure protection of Montana's
environmental resources, consider socioeconomic impacts, provide for
public participation in the siting decisions, and coordinate amongst
agencies and the various required authorizations for the Project. This
process requires compliance with the Montana Environmental Policy Act
(MEPA), which includes an environmental review. The Joint Lead Agencies
will ensure that the EIS meets the requirements of both NEPA and MEPA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ North Plains will submit a Consolidated Application for a
Certificate of Corridor Compatibility and Transmission Facility
Route Permit with the North Dakota Public Service Commission
(NDPSC). The NDPSC will conduct its own review process separate from
the coordinated Montana-Federal environmental review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Identification of Cooperating and Participating Agencies
While GDO is the Lead Federal Agency for the EIS, GDO does not have
the authority or responsibility to make decisions on North Plains'
applications to BLM, USFS, and ARS. Under Federal law, BLM, USFS, and
ARS each remain responsible for responding to authorization
applications for lands within their respective jurisdictions. Pursuant
to interagency agreements, and in accordance with section 216(h) of the
FPA, GDO is the Lead Federal Agency responsible for coordinating the
various Federal authorizations and related environmental reviews needed
for this proposed Project. GDO and the Montana DEQ are Joint Lead
Agencies for this Project's EIS in accordance with section 107(a)(1)(B)
of NEPA and CEQ regulations (40 CFR 1501.7(b)). The Joint Lead Agencies
will ensure that the EIS meets the requirements of both NEPA and MEPA.
BLM, USFS, and ARS will participate as cooperating agencies as defined
at 40 CFR 1501.8. On November 6, 2023, BLM, USFS, and ARS signed
cooperating agency agreements with GDO outlining the respective roles
and responsibilities of each agency during the proposed Project.
In addition to the Joint Lead Agency (Montana DEQ) and the three
cooperating agencies (BLM, USFS, and ARS) already participating in the
Project, per 40 CFR 1501.8, GDO will invite other Federal agencies with
jurisdiction by law, or those Tribal, State, or local governments with
special expertise related to the relevant environmental issues, to
collaborate as cooperating agencies. GDO will provide cooperating
agencies with a written summary of expectations, including schedules,
milestones, responsibilities, scope, and details of agency expected
contributions. Governmental agencies that are not designated
cooperating or participating agencies will have the opportunity to
provide information, comments, and consultation to GDO during the
public input stages of the NEPA process.
Proposed Project Details
The proposed Project would consist of approximately 420 total miles
of overhead electrical transmission line connecting the eastern and
western grids. The 420-mile route described in this section will be
known as the Proposed Route Alternative. In addition to 420-mile route
described, the Project proposes to include the following:
A new 500-kilovolt (kV) extra high voltage (EHV)
alternating current (AC) electrical transmission line in Rosebud
County, Montana (Rosebud Transmission Line). The new line would consist
of two separate, parallel circuits, each approximately 3 miles long
with an associated right-of-way approximately 320 feet wide. The
Rosebud Transmission Line would extend east from the existing Colstrip
Substation owned by a third-party, to a new AC/direct current (DC)
converter station in Rosebud County. The Colstrip Substation would
serve as the interconnection point to the Western Electricity
Coordinating Council (WECC) power system for the western grid.
NorthWestern Energy Group, Inc., a utility company that serves South
Dakota, Nebraska, and Montana, is currently upgrading this substation
to allow for additional interconnections into the region. These
modifications are ongoing independent of the proposed Project, but the
proposed Project would utilize these upgrades for interconnection.
One new AC/DC converter station in Rosebud County, Montana
(Rosebud County Converter Station). The converter station would connect
the eastern terminus of the Rosebud Transmission Line to the western
terminus of the new high voltage direct current (HVDC) electrical
transmission line.
An approximately 341-mile, up to 525-kV, HVDC transmission
line from Montana into North Dakota with an associated 200-foot-wide
right-of-way (HDVC Transmission Line).
[cir] Montana: North Plains would install approximately 172 miles
of the HVDC Transmission Line in Rosebud, Custer, and Fallon counties.
The line would extend east from the new Rosebud County Converter
Station to the Montana-North Dakota state line in Fallon County.
[cir] North Dakota: North Plains would install approximately 169
miles of the HVDC Transmission Line in Golden Valley, Slope, Hettinger,
Grant, and Morton counties. The line would extend east from the
Montana-North Dakota border in Golden Valley County to the new AC/DC
Converter Station in Morton County, North Dakota.
[[Page 85184]]
One new AC/DC converter station in Morton County, North
Dakota (Morton County Converter Station). The converter station would
connect the eastern terminus of the new HVDC Transmission Line to the
western terminus of two new 345-kV EHV AC electric transmission line
segments.
Approximately 51 miles of new 345-kV EHV AC transmission
line located in Morton and Oliver counties, North Dakota, within an
associated right-of-way approximately 200 feet wide (Oliver
Transmission Line). The line would extend east and north from the
Morton County Converter Station in Morton County to a separately
planned Oliver County Substation in Oliver County, North Dakota.
Minnesota Power has proposed and would develop the Oliver County
Substation as part of the Minnesota Power HVDC Modernization Project,
which is modernizing the existing Square Butte HVDC System between
North Dakota and Minnesota that was built in the 1970s. The Oliver
County Substation would serve as the interconnection point to the
Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO) for the eastern grid.
Approximately 22 miles of new 345-kV EHV AC transmission
line near St. Anthony in Morton County, North Dakota (Morton
Transmission Line). The line would extend east and southeast from the
Morton County Converter Station to a new Morton County Switchyard,
which connects or isolates lines for fault clearance and maintenance.
The Morton County Switchyard would serve as the interconnection point
to the Southwest Power Pool (SPP) system for the eastern grid.
The Project would also include associated facilities, including
temporary and permanent access roads, telecommunication systems, and
grounding components.
The Project would require temporary workspaces during the
construction phase to access the construction site, stage equipment and
material, and install the various Project components. (See https://www.energy.gov/nepa/doeeis-0568-north-plains-connector-multiple-locations for a map of the proposed Project).
Purpose and Need
While GDO is the Lead Federal Agency for the EIS, GDO does not have
the authority or responsibility to make decisions on North Plains'
applications to BLM, USFS, and ARS. Those Federal agencies retain their
respective decision-making authority and responsibilities with respect
to North Plains' applications on their respectively managed lands.
Accordingly, each of those agencies has provided its own purpose and
need in addition to the general purpose and need and GDO's purpose and
need to establish the basis for their individual decisions to be made
for this Project.
General Purpose and Need
The Joint Lead Agencies, along with BLM, USFS, and ARS, all agree
on the general purpose and need for North Plains' proposed transmission
line Project, which is to enhance the reliability, capacity, and
efficiency between the Eastern and Western Interconnections of the
electric grid. Construction of the proposed Project aims to increase
wholesale energy market access for generation resources; provide
services and technology to help maintain operational flexibility of the
grid; and provide a highly controllable electric transmission pathway
that can quickly and efficiently shift power to meet real-time system
needs, including mitigating weather-driven and system outage conditions
that can otherwise affect the reliable provision of electricity. The
new transmission line would provide a more resilient and flexible
infrastructure, ensuring a stable supply of electricity to residential,
commercial, and industrial consumers.
The proposed transmission line Project seeks to address several
needs found in the project area, including meeting and balancing
increasing demands for electricity found in both the eastern and
western grids, integrating diversified sources of energy, increasing
the reliability and resilience of the electrical grid, and promoting
regional economic development by expanding opportunities for market
access for electricity generators throughout the region. A 2020
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Study ``The Value of Increased
HVDC Capacity Between Eastern and Western U.S. Grids: The
Interconnections Seam Study'' \2\ showed that increased transfer
capability between the eastern and western grids could result in a 35-
year benefit-to-cost ratio as high as 2.89 and net present value
consumer savings of up to $28.8 billion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ www.nrel.gov/docs/fy21osti/76850.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
GDO Purpose and Need
GDO's purpose is to fulfill its responsibilities under the FPA to
coordinate a single environmental review that follows a standard, two-
year permitting schedule for transmission infrastructure projects that
require Federal permitting. In fulfilling its responsibilities, GDO
seeks to streamline the Federal permitting process for qualifying
electric transmission projects to expand and accelerate development of
electric transmission capacity in the United States and, in turn,
ensure Americans have access to reliable, affordable, and clean energy;
promote grid resilience and reliability; modernize the United States
grid; reduce permitting delays; and promote economic growth.
BLM Purpose and Need
BLM's purpose is to respond to North Plains' request for right-of-
way access across about ten miles of Federal lands administered by the
Miles City Field Office, Montana, for the siting, construction, and
operation of an up to 525-kV-rated, bi-directional HVDC transmission
facility and associated support facilities within a 200-foot right-of-
way which would be part of a system of high voltage AC and DC
facilities over approximately 400 miles between Colstrip, Montana and
Oliver and Morton Counties, North Dakota. This request for a right-of-
way may include necessary access of Federal mineral materials in
Montana and North Dakota for the construction of project-related
infrastructure.
The need for the action is established through BLM's responsibility
under the Federal Land Policy Management Act (FLPMA) to respond to
requests for rights-of-way across BLM-managed lands, as well as the
Surfaces Resources Act of 1955 and the Act of July 31, 1947 (Disposal
of Materials on Public Lands) for any necessary mineral material sales
contracts.
USFS Purpose and Need
The proposed Project would require the issuance of a special use
permit for the crossing of about ten miles of Federal lands managed by
the USFS on the Little Missouri National Grasslands, North Dakota. For
this crossing, the proposed Project would entail siting, construction,
and operation of an up to 525-kV-rated, bi-directional HVDC
transmission facility and associated support facilities within a 200-
foot right-of-way which would be part of a system of high voltage AC
and DC facilities over approximately 10.3 miles (3.1 miles Golden
Valley County; 7.2 miles Slope County) on the Little Missouri National
Grassland.
Section 368(c) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 directs USFS to
establish procedures for identifying and designating additional energy
corridors on Federal lands and to expedite applications for energy
transmission and distribution facilities within those corridors. USFS
is mandated to
[[Page 85185]]
cooperate and coordinate with other Federal agencies to optimize siting
of rights-of-way for energy corridors on National Forest System lands
(30 U.S.C. 185(p); 43 U.S.C. 1763), and to endeavor to expedite
applications for energy transmission and distribution facilities on
National Forest System lands through coordination with other affected
Federal agencies.
ARS Purpose and Need
ARS's purpose is to respond to North Plains' request for an
easement access across about eight miles of Federal land managed by ARS
in Montana for the siting, construction, and operation of an up to 525-
kV-rated, bi-directional HVDC transmission facility and associated
support facilities within a 200-foot right-of-way. The need for the
action is established through 43 U.S.C. 961, Rights-of-Way for Power
and Communications Facilities.
Alternatives
Several alternatives have been identified for potential analysis in
the forthcoming EIS. These alternatives include different routing
options, as well as variations in routing and transmission technology.
GDO welcomes comments on all preliminary alternatives as well as
suggestions for additional alternatives. The alternatives currently
under consideration for the proposed Project are as follows:
The No Action Alternative
Under the No Action Alternative, the Agency permits and
authorizations would not be granted and the agencies will assume for
purposes of the EIS that the Project would not be constructed. The
existing transmission infrastructure would remain unchanged, and any
associated improvements or upgrades to address current and future
demand, reliability, and rapid changes in generation would not be
implemented. This alternative serves as a baseline against which the
impacts of the other alternatives can be compared.
Proposed Route Alternative
The Proposed Route Alternative for the proposed Project is
currently anticipated to include an approximately 420-mile, up to 525-
kV electrical transmission line connecting the eastern and western
grids, with an associated ROW that would generally be approximately 200
feet wide. According to North Plains, this route attempts to best
balance use of existing road and transmission line corridors while
avoiding national and state parks; national historic landmarks and
National Register of Historic Places-listed or -eligible archaeological
sites; inventoried roadless areas; most major waterbodies; greater sage
grouse (GRSG) \3\ habitat; visually sensitive areas; congested utility
corridors; and urban development. The public is encouraged to provide
other alternatives for consideration along with any information and
analyses they have on such suggested alternatives.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The GRSG is a sagebrush species that is in decline across
its range due to habitat loss and has been recognized as threatened
or near threatened by several national and international
organizations Federal agencies manage protection of the species
through several habitat designations, which protect GRSG habitat
based on value.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Other Alternatives
The following discussion describes the five major route
alternatives considered during Project planning. Subject to comments
received during scoping, these alternatives may either be dismissed
from further analysis or evaluated in detail in the EIS. They are
identified as the following:
Northern Route Alternative (Rosebud, Custer, and Fallon
Counties, Montana)
Central Route Alternative (Rosebud, Custer, and Fallon
Counties, Montana)
Southern Route Alternative (Rosebud, Custer, and Fallon
Counties, Montana)
Tongue River Route Alternative (Custer County, Montana)
Eastern Route Alternative (Slope, Stark, Morton, and Oliver
Counties, North Dakota)
See https://www.energy.gov/nepa/doeeis-0568-north-plains-connector-multiple-locations for a detailed map of these route alternatives.
Northern Route Alternative
This route was developed to maximize co-location with existing
linear utilities near Interstate 94 and to minimize routing within the
GRSG General Habitat Management Area (GHMA) in accordance with the
BLM's MCFO Approved Resource Management Plan (ARMP).
The Northern Route Alternative diverges from the Proposed Route
Alternative by leaving directly north from the Colstrip Substation and
generally running on a more northerly path through Rosebud and Custer
Counties, Montana. From Fallon County, Montana, to the endpoints in
North Dakota, the route is the same as that seen in the Proposed Route
Alternative.
The Northern Route Alternative is 8.5 miles shorter than the
Proposed Route Alternative and crosses 2 fewer perennial waterbodies,
and almost 40 miles less GRSG general habitat. The Northern Route
Alternative also crosses 2.8 miles more of ARS-administered land and
more intermittent or ephemeral waterbodies, and 0.4 mile more BLM-
administered Visual Resources Management (VRM) Class II land. Further,
the Northern Route Alternative is within 1 mile of 59 more identified
cultural resources sites; is within 0.5 mile of the Strawberry Hill
Designated Recreation Area; and crosses 9 more transmission lines than
the Proposed Route Alternative. This route's northern passage out of
Colstrip also crosses several parcels with underlying energy
development easements that would conflict with siting an electric
transmission line. Finally, this alternative nears the Yellowstone
River, contains numerous occurrences of sensitive species, including
bats, fish, and eagles, sensitive riparian habitats, and could present
increased Tribal and cultural concerns.
Central Route Alternative
This route was designed to avoid the challenges associated with the
Yellowstone River valley, congested highway corridors, and urban
development areas near Miles City. It resembles the Northern Route
Alternative but leaves Colstrip, Montana, in a more northeasterly
direction. The Central Route Alternative then maintains a generally
central alignment between the Northern Route Alternative and the
Southern Route Alternative. The Central Route Alternative aims to
strike a balance by incorporating stakeholder feedback associated with
co-location of the transmission line with other infrastructure. The
Central Route Alternative also avoids the easements north of Colstrip
noted in the Northern Alternative.
The Central Route Alternative crosses conservation easements to
conserve, protect, and enhance native wildlife habitat. This
alternative also crosses conservation easements northeast of Colstrip
that include terms that are intended to conserve, protect, and enhance
native wildlife habitat. This alternative also crosses Tongue River
near 12 Mile Dam, which is a heavily used recreational area for fishing
and camping about 0.6 mile to the north, existing residential
development, and more irrigated cropland than the Proposed Route
Alternative.
Southern Route Alternative
This route intends to take advantage of the gentler topography east
of Colstrip compared to the other routes.
[[Page 85186]]
Further, this route is not within 0.5 miles of a designated recreation
area. This route additionally also avoids ARS-administered lands and is
about 25 miles shorter than the Proposed Route.
This route avoids some resources, like perennial and ephemeral
waterbodies, but crosses others, like VRM Class II areas near the
Tongue River, Pumpkin Creek, and east of the Powder River in Custer
County, Montana, as well as sites of Tribal and cultural significance.
There are also accessibility constraints east of the Powder River that
would require engineered roadways and long access roads, which could
increase the Project impacts during construction and operation.
Tongue River Route Alternative
The Tongue River Route Alternative passes through the Tongue River
Valley. The route is not within 0.25 mile of a GRSG no occupancy zone
nor within 0.5 miles of a designated recreation area. The Tongue River
Route is almost 30 miles shorter than the Proposed Route Alternative,
does not cross ARS-administered lands, and avoids almost 50 miles of
GRSG habitat. The Tongue River Route Alternative, however, crosses 5.3
miles more VRM Class II land, is within 1.0 mile of 110 more cultural
resource sites, crosses 2 more conservation lands/easements, and
crosses 40 more county and local roads than the Proposed Route
Alternative.
Several Tribal resources and protected species along the Tongue
River have been previously identified during surveys.
Eastern Route Alternative
The Eastern Route Alternative was designed prior to the addition of
the 22 miles of EHV AC Morton Transmission Line in Morton County, North
Dakota, to the Project scope and objectives. Therefore, this route does
not include the SPP interconnection near St. Anthony as described in
the Proposed Route Alternative.
The Eastern Route Alternative diverges from the Proposed Route
Alternative in Slope County just east of the Montana-North Dakota state
line. To achieve a route that balances all potential impacts from the
proposed Project, the Eastern Route Alternative heads slightly
northeast and east from the North Dakota-Montana state line before it
heads southwest to cross the Little Missouri River and generally east
through the North Dakota badlands.
The primary considerations for the Eastern Route Alternative design
were aligning with existing linear utilities, paralleling Interstate 94
along a more direct route, adhering to the recommendation provided by
the USFS to cross the Little Missouri River on private lands, and
avoidance of GRSG primary range designated by the North Dakota Game and
Fish Department.
Minor Route Variations
During Project planning, North Plains incorporated many minor route
variations into its Proposed Route Alternative. Minor route variations
are different from major route alternatives in that they are usually
shorter and are often designed to accommodate a particular landowner
request or to avoid a site-specific environmental resource or
engineering constraint. Although minor route variations may range from
a few hundred feet long to several miles long, minor route variations
typically remain within the same area as the Proposed Route. Examples
of route variations include realigning the route from a hay field to
pastureland on a ranch to avoid disruption to cultivation; moving a
structure location to avoid placing it in a wetland; and adjusting the
centerline alignment along a slope to improve constructability.
Endpoint Alternatives
As described in the Proposed Project Details, North Plains
determined the proposed Project would connect the existing Colstrip
Substation in Rosebud County, Montana, to the Oliver County Substation
approximately 6 miles southeast of Center, North Dakota, and a new
Morton County Switchyard near St. Anthony, North Dakota. The Project
Proponent considered another facility as a potential Western
interconnection point: the other nearest potential endpoint in Montana,
the existing Broadview Substation in Yellowstone County. This
alternative facility would add about 100 miles of transmission line to
the Project. In North Dakota, the Project Proponent determined the
proposed Project endpoints are the most reasonable connection locations
to existing infrastructure on the Eastern Interconnection grid without
adding considerable length.
Converter Station Alternatives
As described in the Proposed Project Details, North Plains proposes
to use two converter stations near the Project endpoints. The siting of
converter stations is constrained insofar as the stations need to be
located near the Project endpoints and they must occur along the
transmission line route. A converter station site that is not on the
proposed transmission line route necessitates proposing a new
transmission line route. North Plains is in the process of evaluating
alternatives to its proposed converter station sites.
Summary of Expected Impacts
Field investigations, environmental surveys, and other studies are
being conducted for the proposed Project to evaluate anticipated
impacts to air, noise, climate, geologic hazards, mineral and energy
resources, paleontological resources, soils, water, vegetation,
wildlife, threatened and endangered species, cultural resources, visual
resources, Federal projects, recreation activities, wilderness, and
other resources. North Plains is currently conducting field surveys for
wetlands/waterbodies, vegetation, general habitat, threatened and
endangered and special status species, cultural and tribal resources,
architectural history, and paleontological resources. North Plains is
also preparing a Phase 1 bat hibernacula assessment, whooping crane
habitat assessment, impact assessments for bald and golden eagles (to
support Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act compliance), and GRSG (to
support the Montana GRSG mitigation plan), migratory bird habitat
assessment (to support the Migratory Bird Treaty Act compliance plan),
and species and habitat assessments for federally listed and proposed
species to support compliance with section 7 of the Endangered Species
Act.
GDO and the cooperating agencies will identify, analyze, and
consider mitigation to address the reasonably foreseeable impacts to
resources from the proposed Project and all analyzed reasonable
alternatives \4\ and, in accordance with 40 CFR 1502.14(e), include
appropriate mitigation measures not already included in the proposed
route alternative or other alternatives.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ ``Reasonable alternatives'' means a reasonable range of
alternatives that are technically and economically feasible and meet
the purpose and need for the proposed action.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Potential impacts on built, human, and natural environments from
the proposed Project will be studied during the Federal, State, and
local environmental review processes. These review processes and
potential impacts will be analyzed in the EIS. The public is invited to
participate in the scoping process to identify potential alternatives
and impacts, information, studies, and analyses relevant to the
proposed Project and Alternatives.
Anticipated Permits and Authorizations
The Project Proponent will need to secure permits and
authorizations from several Federal and state agencies, which include
but are not limited to those listed below.
[[Page 85187]]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agency Permit/authorization
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bureau of Land Management.............. Right-of-way grant, short-term
right-of-way grant, and
mineral materials sales
contract.
Forest Service......................... Special Use Permit.
Agricultural Research Service.......... Easement.
Federal Highway Administration......... Permits to cross Federal Aid
Highway.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers........... General easement, Section 10
permit, and Section 404
permit.
Montana Department of Environmental Certificate of Compliance under
Quality. the Major Facility Siting Act.
North Dakota Public Service Commission. Certificate of Corridor
Compatibility and Transmission
Facility Route Permit.
North Dakota County Governments (Golden Conditional Use Permits.
Valley, Grant, Hettinger, Morton,
Oliver, and Slope Counties).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Schedule for the Decision-Making Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping period for the EIS. GDO
will provide additional opportunities for public participation
consistent with DOE NEPA regulations (10 CFR part 1021) and CEQ NEPA
regulations (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), including a 45-day comment period
on the Draft EIS. Please note that, when commenting during either the
scoping or the public comment period, your comment and personal
information, if provided, will be retained as a part of the single,
consolidated, public record for the project. GDO will allow for
anonymous comments.
GDO plans to publish the Draft EIS for public review in Fall 2025
and the Final EIS in Fall 2026. BLM, ARS, and DEQ will release
respective decision documents no sooner than 30 days after release of
the Final EIS. The USFS will release its own Draft Record of Decision
(ROD) alongside the Final EIS, and upon conclusion of the objections
process required under USFS regulations, will release a final ROD.
Following the issuance of each agency's individual RODs, GDO will issue
a determination that the duration for each land-use authorization is
commensurate with the anticipated use of the facility, per FPA Section
216(h)(3).
USFS would not issue a ROD concerning applicable USFS
authorizations until after completion of the objections process in 36
CFR part 218, subparts A and B. Objections will be accepted only from
those who have previously submitted specific written comments regarding
the proposed Project during scoping or other designated opportunity for
public comment in accordance with 36 CFR 218.5(a). Issues raised in
objections must be based on previously submitted timely, specific
written comments regarding the proposed Project unless based on new
information arising after designated opportunities, and objectors must
make a connection between issues raised in comment in their objections.
Objections must be filed within 45 days, after the Final EIS and draft
ROD. The objection must include specific issues related to the proposed
Project; if applicable, how the objector believes the decision violates
law, regulation, or policy; and suggested remedies that would resolve
the objection. USFS reviews objections and may engage in discussions
with objectors to resolve issues. The Reviewing Officer (a USFS
official) will issue a written response to the objections, which may
include instructions to the responsible official must complete before
signing the decision. After the objection process is complete, the
Dakota Prairie Grasslands Forest Supervisor would issue the ROD.
Responsible Official and Nature of Decision To Be Made
While GDO is the Lead Federal Agency for the Project EIS, GDO does
not have authority or responsibility to make decisions on North Plains'
applications to BLM, USFS, and ARS. Those Federal agencies retain their
respective decision-making authorities and responsibilities with
respect to North Plains' applications. Accordingly, each Federal
agency's deciding officials and the scope of decisions to be made are
listed here:
BLM: The Field Manager of the Miles City Field Office (MCFO) is the
Responsible Official. The Field Manager as the Responsible Official
will decide whether to grant the ROW for the portion of the
transmission line and associated infrastructure located on public lands
administered by the MCFO, and if so, under what terms and conditions.
Any necessary mineral materials sales contracts would be granted by
either the Field Manager for the Miles City Field Office or the North
Dakota Field Office, depending on where the mineral materials are
located.
USFS: The Dakota Prairie Grasslands Forest Supervisor is the
Responsible Official. The Forest Supervisor as the Responsible Official
will decide whether to issue a SUP for the proposed Project for the
portion of the project Proposed on USFS-managed land.
ARS: The Plains Area Real Estate Lease Contracting Officer is the
Responsible Official. The Plains Area Real Estate Lease Contracting
Officer as the Responsible Official will decide whether to grant an
easement for the portion of the transmission line and associated
infrastructure the proposed Project proposes to place on Federal lands
under the control of ARS.
Additional Information
GDO and the cooperating agencies will utilize and coordinate the
NEPA process to help support compliance with applicable procedural
requirements under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation
Act (54 U.S.C. 306108) as provided in 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3), including
public involvement requirements of Section 106. GDO and the cooperating
agencies will consult with Indian Tribal Nations on a government-to-
government basis in accordance with relevant Departmental policies.
Tribal concerns, including impacts on Indian trust assets and potential
impacts to cultural resources, will be given due consideration.
Federal, state, and local agencies, along with Indian Tribal Nations
and other stakeholders that may be interested in or affected by the
proposed Project, are invited to participate in the scoping process
and, if eligible, may request or be requested by the GDO to participate
in the development of the EIS as a cooperating agency.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on October 21,
2024, by Maria D. Robinson, Director, Grid Deployment Office, pursuant
to delegated authority from the Secretary of Energy. That document
evidencing this delegation of authority with the original signature and
date is maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in
compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the
undersigned DOE Federal
[[Page 85188]]
Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for publication, as an official document
of the Department of Energy. This administrative process in no way
alters the legal effect of this document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on October 22, 2024.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2024-24879 Filed 10-24-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P