Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for the Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment for Big Game Habitat Conservation for Oil and Gas Management, Colorado, 84384-84385 [2024-24336]

Download as PDF 84384 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2024 / Notices After preparing the Draft RMP Amendment/EIS in coordination with 30 cooperating agencies and working with Tribes, the BLM announced the 90day comment period through publication of its Notice of Availability in the Federal Register on November 9, 2023 (88 FR 77353). Based on public comments received on the Draft RMP Amendment/Draft EIS, the BLM updated the Proposed RMP Amendment/Final EIS (Alternative F) by incorporating management actions and allowable uses from Alternatives A, B, C, D and E, including corrections and rewording for clarification of purpose and intent. The BLM provided the Proposed RMP Amendment on July 5, 2024, for a 30day protest period. The BLM received five unique protest letter submissions. Three letters contained valid protest issues. After careful review of the responses to the valid protest issues in the protest resolution report, the BLM Director concluded that the BLM Colorado and Utah State Directors followed the applicable laws, regulations, and policies, and considered all relevant resource information and public input. The BLM Director dismissed the protests, and that decision is the final decision of the U.S. Department of the Interior. Responses to protest issues are compiled and documented in a Protest Resolution Report (see ADDRESSES). The BLM provided the Proposed RMP Amendment to the Governors of Colorado and Utah for a 60-day Governor’s consistency review. The State of Utah identified potential inconsistencies with State policy and the State Resource Management Plan. In response, the BLM modified a travel management action and followed up with a response letter to address additional topics of concern. The State of Colorado did not identify any inconsistencies with State or local plans, policies or programs identified during the Governor’s consistency review of the Proposed RMP Amendment. ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 (Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6; 43 CFR 1610.5– 1) Douglas J. Vilsack, BLM Colorado State Director. [FR Doc. 2024–24335 Filed 10–21–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4331–16–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:10 Oct 21, 2024 Jkt 265001 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [BLM_CO_FRN_MO4500182534] Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for the Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment for Big Game Habitat Conservation for Oil and Gas Management, Colorado Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability. AGENCY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the availability of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Approved Resource Management Plan (RMP) Amendment for Big Game Habitat Conservation for Oil and Gas Management in Colorado. The Colorado State Director signed the ROD on October 17, 2024, which constitutes the final decision of the BLM and makes the Approved RMP Amendment effective immediately. DATES: The Colorado State Director signed the ROD on October 17, 2024. ADDRESSES: The ROD/Approved RMP Amendment is available online at https://go.usa.gov/xzXxY. Printed copies of the ROD/Approved RMP Amendment are available for public inspection at the Colorado State Office, Denver Federal Center Building 40, Lakewood, CO 80215, or can be provided upon request by contacting the BLM at BLM_CO_corridors_planning@ blm.gov. A copy of the Protest Resolution Report is available at: https:// www.blm.gov/programs/planning-andnepa/public-participation/protestresolution-reports. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Bittner, Deputy State Director, Resources, telephone 303–239–3768; address BLM Colorado State Office, Attn: Big Game Corridor amendment/ Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Denver Federal Center Building 40, P.O. Box 151029, Lakewood, CO 80215; email BLM_CO_corridors_planning@ blm.gov. Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services for contacting Mr. Bittner. Individuals outside the United States should use the relay services offered within their country to make international calls to the point-ofcontact in the United States. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Approved RMP Amendment changes the following existing plans: SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 • Eastern Colorado RMP for the Royal Gorge Field Office (2024) • San Luis Resource Area RMP (1991) • Gunnison Resource Area RMP (1993) • Uncompahgre Field Office RMP (2020) • Colorado River Valley Field Office RMP (2015) and Roan Plateau Amendment (2016) • Grand Junction Field Office RMP (2015) • Kremmling RMP (2015) • Little Snake RMP (2011) • White River Field Office RMP (1997) • Tres Rios Field Office RMP (2015) • Canyons of the Ancients National Monument RMP (2010) • Gunnison Gorge National Conservation Area RMP (2004) The planning area includes all counties in Colorado and encompasses approximately 8.3 million acres of public land and approximately 27 million acres of Federal mineral estate. The decision area includes all 8.3 million acres of BLM-administered surface land (except where Federal minerals have been withdrawn from mineral leasing) plus approximately 4.7 million acres of Federal mineral split estate where the surface is owned by private owners, local government, or the State. The Approved RMP Amendment describes the actions and management guidance for the conservation of big game High Priority Habitat (HPH) and oil and gas management. The RMP Amendment aligns BLM management of oil and gas in big game HPH with the Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission (ECMC) rules for oil and gas development in elk, mule deer, pronghorn, and bighorn sheep HPH (Rule 1202.c, d; Rule 1203). Where lands are open to oil and gas leasing under existing RMPs, the plan prescribes measures consistent with the ECMC rules to conserve seasonal habitats and connectivity within big game HPH in support of Colorado Parks and Wildlife’s (CPW) big game population objectives. The approved RMP Amendment calls for the BLM to consider alternative locations for oil and gas operations that either avoid big game HPH altogether, or, where avoidance is not feasible, minimize adverse impacts to the maximum extent possible. The plan includes a controlled surface use stipulation that limits facility density to no more than one active oil and gas location per square mile in big game HPH. A consideration of CPW recommendations for route density is included as an objective and as a lease notice to further guide implementation. E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM 22OCN1 ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 204 / Tuesday, October 22, 2024 / Notices This surface density limitation would require the operator to address adverse direct and unavoidable indirect impacts through mitigation. This includes avoidance, minimization, and compensatory mitigation strategies in subsequent implementation-level National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analyses for proposed actions that may result in big game HPH loss and degradation. Subsequent implementation-level mitigation could limit the duration and extent of development activities in big game HPH through all phases of development by avoiding activities in HPH, applying surface density and timing limitations, and mitigating residual impacts. The BLM may also require compensatory mitigation to offset disturbance or density limitation exceedances and adverse direct and unavoidable indirect impacts that result in the functional loss of habitat from oil and gas development in big game HPH. The BLM, after coordination with CPW, will determine whether compensatory mitigation proposed by the operator is sufficient to protect big game HPH from adverse direct and unavoidable indirect impacts. The BLM has the discretion to require an operator to modify surface operations to change or add specific mitigation measures when supported by scientific analysis and consistent with existing rights. Potential mitigation or conservation measures not already required as stipulations would be analyzed in a site-specific NEPA document and incorporated, as appropriate, as conditions of approval of the permit, plan of development, or other use authorization. The plan would require operators to develop and implement mitigation plans to minimize and offset direct, indirect, and cumulative adverse impacts. The RMP Amendment includes management guidance for enhanced coordination and use of best available science and information during implementation. The BLM provided the Proposed RMP/Final EIS on July 19, 2024, for a 30-day protest period and did not receive any valid protests. No changes to the Proposed RMP Amendment/EIS were necessary. The BLM provided the Proposed RMP Amendment to the Governor of Colorado for a 60-day Governor’s consistency review. No inconsistencies with State or local plans, policies, or programs were identified during the Governor’s consistency review of the Proposed RMP Amendment. No changes to the RMP Amendment or EIS were necessary as a result of the Governor’s consistency review. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:10 Oct 21, 2024 Jkt 265001 (Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2) Douglas J. Vilsack, State Director. BILLING CODE 4331–16–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Bureau of Land Management [BLM_CO_FRN_MO4500181910] Availability of the Records of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plans for the Grand Junction Field Office and the Colorado River Valley Field Office, Colorado Bureau of Land Management, Interior. ACTION: Notice of availability. AGENCY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the availability of the Records of Decision (RODs) for the approved Resource Management Plans (RMPs) for the Colorado River Valley Field Office (CRVFO) and the Grand Junction Field Office (GJFO) located in western Colorado. The Colorado State Director signed the RODs on October 16, 2024, which constitutes the decision of the BLM and makes the approved RMPs effective immediately. DATES: The Colorado State Director signed the RODs on October 16, 2024. ADDRESSES: The RODs/approved RMPs are available online at https:// eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/ project/2016085/510. Printed copies of the RODs/approved RMPs are available for public inspection at the Colorado River Valley and Grand Junction Field Offices or can be provided upon request by contacting BLM Project Manager Heather Sauls at hsauls@blm.gov or 970–878–3855. A copy of the Protest Resolution Report is available at: https:// www.blm.gov/programs/planning-andnepa/public-participation/protestresolution-reports. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Heather Sauls, Project Manager, telephone 970–878–3855; address BLM Upper Colorado River District, 2518 H Road, Grand Junction, CO 81506; email hsauls@blm.gov. Individuals in the United States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications relay services for contacting Ms. Sauls. Individuals outside the United States should use the relay services offered within their SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in the United States. The planning area is identical to the combined planning areas for the 2015 CRVFO RMP and the 2015 GJFO RMP. Within the CRVFO portion of the supplemental EIS planning area, approximately 517,500 acres of BLMadministered surface lands and approximately 711,300 acres of BLMadministered Federal fluid mineral estate are in Eagle, Garfield, Mesa, Pitkin, and Routt Counties in Colorado. Within the GJFO portion of the planning area, approximately 1,067,500 acres of BLM-administered surface lands and approximately 1,235,600 acres of BLMadministered Federal fluid mineral estate are in Garfield, Mesa, Montrose, and Rio Blanco Counties in Colorado. The decision area is BLM-administered surface lands (BLM-administered lands) and the Federal fluid mineral estate below BLM-administered lands, splitestate lands, and other Federal lands (but not National Forest System lands). The BLM prepared a supplemental environmental impact statement (EIS) to the 2014 CRVFO RMP/final EIS and 2015 GJFO RMP/Final EIS. The BLM issued RODs and approved the RMPs for the CRVFO and GJFO in 2015. The supplemental EIS was written in response to a United States District Court, District of Colorado, opinion and order (1:16–cv–01822–LTB) regarding the CRVFO RMP ROD and a subsequent settlement agreement. The court granted a partial remand without vacating the decisions contained in the EIS and ROD so that the BLM could address two deficiencies identified by the court. The supplemental EIS also responds to a court-approved voluntary remand of the GJFO ROD (1–19–cv–02869–REB) to allow the BLM to address the same deficiencies identified in the CRVFO case. Through this collaborative planning effort, the approved RMPs describe the actions to guide future management and meet desired resource conditions. The proposed RMP (Alternative G) in the final supplemental EIS was carried forward as the approved RMP. As part of this supplemental EIS planning effort, the BLM identified several units within the planning area requiring an updated wilderness characteristics inventory; the updated inventory increased the size of the Flat Tops unit (from 3,500 acres to 6,900 acres) and the Pisgah Mountain unit (from 14,500 acres to 16,300 acres). The approved RMP retains the areas closed to fluid mineral leasing in the 2015 CRVFO and GJFO RMPs and also SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: [FR Doc. 2024–24336 Filed 10–21–24; 8:45 am] Sfmt 4703 84385 E:\FR\FM\22OCN1.SGM 22OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 204 (Tuesday, October 22, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84384-84385]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24336]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

Bureau of Land Management

[BLM_CO_FRN_MO4500182534]


Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for the Approved 
Resource Management Plan Amendment for Big Game Habitat Conservation 
for Oil and Gas Management, Colorado

AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) announces the availability 
of the Record of Decision (ROD) for the Approved Resource Management 
Plan (RMP) Amendment for Big Game Habitat Conservation for Oil and Gas 
Management in Colorado. The Colorado State Director signed the ROD on 
October 17, 2024, which constitutes the final decision of the BLM and 
makes the Approved RMP Amendment effective immediately.

DATES: The Colorado State Director signed the ROD on October 17, 2024.

ADDRESSES: The ROD/Approved RMP Amendment is available online at 
https://go.usa.gov/xzXxY. Printed copies of the ROD/Approved RMP 
Amendment are available for public inspection at the Colorado State 
Office, Denver Federal Center Building 40, Lakewood, CO 80215, or can 
be provided upon request by contacting the BLM at 
[email protected].
    A copy of the Protest Resolution Report is available at: https://www.blm.gov/programs/planning-and-nepa/public-participation/protest-resolution-reports.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Bittner, Deputy State Director, 
Resources, telephone 303-239-3768; address BLM Colorado State Office, 
Attn: Big Game Corridor amendment/Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), 
Denver Federal Center Building 40, P.O. Box 151029, Lakewood, CO 80215; 
email [email protected]. Individuals in the United 
States who are deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have a speech 
disability may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access 
telecommunications relay services for contacting Mr. Bittner. 
Individuals outside the United States should use the relay services 
offered within their country to make international calls to the point-
of-contact in the United States.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Approved RMP Amendment changes the 
following existing plans:

 Eastern Colorado RMP for the Royal Gorge Field Office (2024)
 San Luis Resource Area RMP (1991)
 Gunnison Resource Area RMP (1993)
 Uncompahgre Field Office RMP (2020)
 Colorado River Valley Field Office RMP (2015) and Roan Plateau 
Amendment (2016)
 Grand Junction Field Office RMP (2015)
 Kremmling RMP (2015)
 Little Snake RMP (2011)
 White River Field Office RMP (1997)
 Tres Rios Field Office RMP (2015)
 Canyons of the Ancients National Monument RMP (2010)
 Gunnison Gorge National Conservation Area RMP (2004)

    The planning area includes all counties in Colorado and encompasses 
approximately 8.3 million acres of public land and approximately 27 
million acres of Federal mineral estate. The decision area includes all 
8.3 million acres of BLM-administered surface land (except where 
Federal minerals have been withdrawn from mineral leasing) plus 
approximately 4.7 million acres of Federal mineral split estate where 
the surface is owned by private owners, local government, or the State.
    The Approved RMP Amendment describes the actions and management 
guidance for the conservation of big game High Priority Habitat (HPH) 
and oil and gas management. The RMP Amendment aligns BLM management of 
oil and gas in big game HPH with the Colorado Energy and Carbon 
Management Commission (ECMC) rules for oil and gas development in elk, 
mule deer, pronghorn, and bighorn sheep HPH (Rule 1202.c, d; Rule 
1203). Where lands are open to oil and gas leasing under existing RMPs, 
the plan prescribes measures consistent with the ECMC rules to conserve 
seasonal habitats and connectivity within big game HPH in support of 
Colorado Parks and Wildlife's (CPW) big game population objectives. The 
approved RMP Amendment calls for the BLM to consider alternative 
locations for oil and gas operations that either avoid big game HPH 
altogether, or, where avoidance is not feasible, minimize adverse 
impacts to the maximum extent possible. The plan includes a controlled 
surface use stipulation that limits facility density to no more than 
one active oil and gas location per square mile in big game HPH. A 
consideration of CPW recommendations for route density is included as 
an objective and as a lease notice to further guide implementation.

[[Page 84385]]

    This surface density limitation would require the operator to 
address adverse direct and unavoidable indirect impacts through 
mitigation. This includes avoidance, minimization, and compensatory 
mitigation strategies in subsequent implementation-level National 
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) analyses for proposed actions that may 
result in big game HPH loss and degradation. Subsequent implementation-
level mitigation could limit the duration and extent of development 
activities in big game HPH through all phases of development by 
avoiding activities in HPH, applying surface density and timing 
limitations, and mitigating residual impacts. The BLM may also require 
compensatory mitigation to offset disturbance or density limitation 
exceedances and adverse direct and unavoidable indirect impacts that 
result in the functional loss of habitat from oil and gas development 
in big game HPH. The BLM, after coordination with CPW, will determine 
whether compensatory mitigation proposed by the operator is sufficient 
to protect big game HPH from adverse direct and unavoidable indirect 
impacts.
    The BLM has the discretion to require an operator to modify surface 
operations to change or add specific mitigation measures when supported 
by scientific analysis and consistent with existing rights. Potential 
mitigation or conservation measures not already required as 
stipulations would be analyzed in a site-specific NEPA document and 
incorporated, as appropriate, as conditions of approval of the permit, 
plan of development, or other use authorization. The plan would require 
operators to develop and implement mitigation plans to minimize and 
offset direct, indirect, and cumulative adverse impacts. The RMP 
Amendment includes management guidance for enhanced coordination and 
use of best available science and information during implementation.
    The BLM provided the Proposed RMP/Final EIS on July 19, 2024, for a 
30-day protest period and did not receive any valid protests. No 
changes to the Proposed RMP Amendment/EIS were necessary.
    The BLM provided the Proposed RMP Amendment to the Governor of 
Colorado for a 60-day Governor's consistency review. No inconsistencies 
with State or local plans, policies, or programs were identified during 
the Governor's consistency review of the Proposed RMP Amendment. No 
changes to the RMP Amendment or EIS were necessary as a result of the 
Governor's consistency review.

(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2)

Douglas J. Vilsack,
State Director.
[FR Doc. 2024-24336 Filed 10-21-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4331-16-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.