Air Plan Approval; California; South Coast Air Quality Management District, 84083-84084 [2024-24219]

Download as PDF 84083 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 203 / Monday, October 21, 2024 / Rules and Regulations payee is not valid. For purposes of this section, a payee who has provided the payor with an address for the payee’s nominee, trustee, or agent without also providing the payee’s residence address has not provided a residence address. (f)(1) Q–5. Do the withholding rules under section 3405(a) and (b) apply to a payee who is to receive a payment or distribution that is subject to the withholding rules that apply to nonresident aliens (or that would be so subject but for a tax treaty)? (2) A–5. In accordance with section 3405(e)(1)(B)(iii), a designated distribution does not include a distribution of a United States-source payment that is subject to withholding under the rules of sections 1441 through 1446 of the Code (or that would be so subject but for a tax treaty). Therefore, the withholding rules under section 3405(a) and (b) do not apply to such a distribution. For example, section 3405(a) or (b) withholding would not apply to a pension or other deferred compensation plan distribution to be made to a payee who is a nonresident alien (or other individual payee who is presumed to be a foreign person under the presumption rules of § 1.1441– 1(b)(3)). In such a case, withholding under the rules of section 1441, rather than under the rules of section 3405(a) or (b), would apply to such a distribution. (g)(1) Q–6. What is the applicability date of this section? (2) A–6. This section applies with respect to payments and distributions made on or after January 1, 2026. Local agency 1118 BILLING CODE 4830–01–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R09–OAR–2023–0568; FRL–11558– 02–R9] Air Plan Approval; California; South Coast Air Quality Management District Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve revisions to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) from refinery flares. We are approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: This rule is effective November 20, 2024. ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–R09–OAR–2023–0568. All SUMMARY: The EPA’s proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received two comments. The comments discussed California’s legalization of recreational marijuana and its impact on air quality. Upon review, the EPA determined that the comments fail to raise issues germane to the proposed revisions to SCAQMD Rule 1118, which exclusively regulates Jkt 265001 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donnique Sherman, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 947–4129 or by email at sherman.donnique@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. Table of Contents I. Proposed Action II. Public Comments and EPA Responses III. EPA Action IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Proposed Action On March 8, 2024 (89 FR 16712), the EPA proposed to approve the following rule into the California SIP. Amended Control of Emissions from Refinery Flares ........................................... II. Public Comments and EPA Responses lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 [FR Doc. 2024–24224 Filed 10–18–24; 8:45 am] documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through https:// www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability information. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if you are a person with a disability who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Rule title We proposed to approve this rule because we determined that it complies with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action contains more information on the rule and our evaluation. 18:15 Oct 18, 2024 Douglas W. O’Donnell, Deputy Commissioner. Approved: September 21, 2024. Aviva R. Aron-Dine, Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy). Rule No. SCAQMD ............................. VerDate Sep<11>2014 However, taxpayers may apply it to earlier payments and distributions. emissions of VOCs and NOX from refinery flares. The rule revisions being approved with this action increase rule enforceability by correcting the previously identified director’s discretion deficiency in our September 22, 2022 action. Therefore, we have determined that these comments do not necessitate a response, and the EPA will not provide specific responses to the comments in this notice. III. EPA Action No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rule as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Submitted 01/06/23 05/11/23 approving this rule into the California SIP. The January 6, 2023 version of Rule 1118 will replace the previously approved version of this rule in the SIP. IV. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of SCAQMD Rule 1118, ‘‘Control of Emissions from Refinery Flares,’’ amended on January 6, 2023, which regulates emissions of VOCs and NOX from refinery flares. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM 21OCR1 84084 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 203 / Monday, October 21, 2024 / Rules and Regulations through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with RULES1 V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023); • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) because it approves a state program; • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act. In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:15 Oct 18, 2024 Jkt 265001 specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address ‘‘disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects’’ of their actions on minority populations and low-income populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law. The EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ‘‘the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and policies.’’ The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean that ‘‘no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and commercial operations or programs and policies.’’ The State did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation. The EPA did not perform an EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in this action. Consideration of EJ is not required as part of this action, and there is no information in the record inconsistent with the stated goal of Executive Order 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people of color, low-income populations, and Indigenous peoples. This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act, and the EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 20, 2024. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 9990 List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: October 9, 2024. Martha Guzman Aceves, Regional Administrator, Region IX. For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental Protection Agency amends part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F—California 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(586)(i)(A)(2) and (c)(610)(i)(B) to read as follows: ■ § 52.220 Identification of plan—in part. * * * * * (c) * * * (586) * * * (i) * * * (A) * * * (2) Previously approved on September 22, 2022, in paragraph (c)(586)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in (c)(610)(i)(B)(1) of this section: Rule 1118, ‘‘Control of Emissions from Refinery Flares,’’ amended on July 7, 2017. * * * * * (610) * * * (i) * * * (B) South Coast Air Quality Management District. (1) Rule 1118, ‘‘Control of Emissions from Refinery Flares,’’ amended on January 6, 2023. (2) [Reserved] * * * * * [FR Doc. 2024–24219 Filed 10–18–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P E:\FR\FM\21OCR1.SGM 21OCR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 203 (Monday, October 21, 2024)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 84083-84084]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-24219]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2023-0568; FRL-11558-02-R9]


Air Plan Approval; California; South Coast Air Quality Management 
District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final 
action to approve revisions to the South Coast Air Quality Management 
District (SCAQMD) portion of the California State Implementation Plan 
(SIP). These revisions concern emissions of volatile organic compounds 
(VOCs) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX) from refinery flares. We 
are approving a local rule that regulates these emission sources under 
the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act).

DATES: This rule is effective November 20, 2024.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2023-0568. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in 
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as 
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket 
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please 
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section for additional availability information. If you need assistance 
in a language other than English or if you are a person with a 
disability who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, 
please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION 
CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Donnique Sherman, EPA Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 947-4129 or by 
email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and 
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On March 8, 2024 (89 FR 16712), the EPA proposed to approve the 
following rule into the California SIP.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Local agency                  Rule No.              Rule title              Amended     Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SCAQMD..................................         1118  Control of Emissions from           01/06/23     05/11/23
                                                        Refinery Flares.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We proposed to approve this rule because we determined that it 
complies with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action 
contains more information on the rule and our evaluation.

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. 
During this period, we received two comments. The comments discussed 
California's legalization of recreational marijuana and its impact on 
air quality. Upon review, the EPA determined that the comments fail to 
raise issues germane to the proposed revisions to SCAQMD Rule 1118, 
which exclusively regulates emissions of VOCs and NOX from 
refinery flares. The rule revisions being approved with this action 
increase rule enforceability by correcting the previously identified 
director's discretion deficiency in our September 22, 2022 action. 
Therefore, we have determined that these comments do not necessitate a 
response, and the EPA will not provide specific responses to the 
comments in this notice.

III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rule 
as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in 
section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is approving this rule into the 
California SIP.
    The January 6, 2023 version of Rule 1118 will replace the 
previously approved version of this rule in the SIP.

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes 
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of SCAQMD 
Rule 1118, ``Control of Emissions from Refinery Flares,'' amended on 
January 6, 2023, which regulates emissions of VOCs and NOX 
from refinery flares. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, 
these documents available

[[Page 84084]]

through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please 
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section of this preamble for more information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and 
applicable federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023);
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, 
April 23, 1997) because it approves a state program;
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act.
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal 
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000).
    Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629, 
February 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address 
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental 
effects'' of their actions on minority populations and low-income 
populations to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law. 
The EPA defines environmental justice (EJ) as ``the fair treatment and 
meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, 
national origin, or income with respect to the development, 
implementation, and enforcement of environmental laws, regulations, and 
policies.'' The EPA further defines the term fair treatment to mean 
that ``no group of people should bear a disproportionate burden of 
environmental harms and risks, including those resulting from the 
negative environmental consequences of industrial, governmental, and 
commercial operations or programs and policies.''
    The State did not evaluate environmental justice considerations as 
part of its SIP submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing 
regulations neither prohibit nor require such an evaluation. The EPA 
did not perform an EJ analysis and did not consider EJ in this action. 
Consideration of EJ is not required as part of this action, and there 
is no information in the record inconsistent with the stated goal of 
Executive Order 12898 of achieving environmental justice for people of 
color, low-income populations, and Indigenous peoples.
    This action is subject to the Congressional Review Act, and the EPA 
will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the 
Comptroller General of the United States. This action is not a ``major 
rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court 
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by December 20, 2024. Filing a 
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule 
does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of 
judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for 
judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness 
of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in 
proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, 
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: October 9, 2024.
Martha Guzman Aceves,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.

    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the Environmental 
Protection Agency amends part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of 
Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(586)(i)(A)(2) and 
(c)(610)(i)(B) to read as follows:


Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan--in part.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (586) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (2) Previously approved on September 22, 2022, in paragraph 
(c)(586)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in 
(c)(610)(i)(B)(1) of this section: Rule 1118, ``Control of Emissions 
from Refinery Flares,'' amended on July 7, 2017.
* * * * *
    (610) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) South Coast Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rule 1118, ``Control of Emissions from Refinery Flares,'' 
amended on January 6, 2023.
    (2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2024-24219 Filed 10-18-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.