Notice of Availability for the Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks National Monument Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement, New Mexico, 82622-82624 [2024-23428]
Download as PDF
82622
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 198 / Friday, October 11, 2024 / Notices
foreseeable actions, as well as any
connected actions that are closely
related and should be discussed in the
same DEIS.
8. The alternatives, information, and
analyses submitted during the public
scoping period and the summary
thereof.
9. Other information relevant to the
GCP and its impacts on the human
environment.
Virtual Public Meetings
We will conduct two virtual public
meetings. See DATES and ADDRESSES for
the dates and times. During the virtual
public meetings, the Service and Bureau
will present information pertinent to the
GCP and give the public the opportunity
to ask questions about the draft GCP and
DEIS. Oral or written comments will not
be accepted during the meeting; written
comments may be submitted by one of
the methods listed in ADDRESSES.
Reasonable Accommodations
Persons needing reasonable
accommodations to participate in the
public meetings should contact the
Service’s Carlsbad Fish and Wildlife
Office, using one of the methods listed
in ADDRESSES. To allow sufficient time
to process requests, please make contact
at least 15 days before the public
meetings. Information regarding this
proposed action is available in
alternative formats upon request.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
Public Availability of Comments
You may submit your comments and
materials by one of the methods listed
in ADDRESSES. Before including your
address, phone number, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—might
be made publicly available at any time.
Although you can ask us in your
comment to withhold your personal
identifying information from public
review, we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to do so. All submissions
from organizations or businesses, and
from individuals identifying themselves
as representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses, will be
made available for public disclosure in
their entirety. Comments and materials
we receive, as well as references for
supporting documentation we used in
preparing the DEIS, will be available for
public inspection online in Docket No.
FWS–R8–ES–2023–0084 at https://
www.regulations.gov/ (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 10, 2024
Jkt 265001
Next Steps and Decision To Be Made
After public review and comment, the
Service will evaluate the GCP, DEIS,
and any comments received to
determine whether the GCP provides an
adequate basis for meeting the
requirements of section 10(a)(2)(B) of
the ESA for future permit applications
submitted under the GCP. The decision
whether to approve and use the GCP
will also be informed by the data,
analyses, and findings in the EIS and
public comments received on the DEIS
and GCP. The Service will document its
determinations in an ESA section 10
findings document, ESA section 7
biological opinion, and NEPA record of
decision that will be developed at the
conclusion of the ESA and NEPA
compliance processes. FWS expects to
submit a final EIS (FEIS) for publication
in the Federal Register by May 2025. At
least 30 days after the FEIS is published,
we expect that the Service will complete
a record of decision on the GCP in
accordance with applicable timeframes
established in 40 CFR 1506.11 (2022)
and issue a decision on the GCP. The
current estimate for the issuance of
record of decision is July 2025.
Authority
We provide this notice in accordance
with the requirements of NEPA and its
implementing regulations (40 CFR
1503.1 and 1506.6; 2022).
Michael J. Senn,
Assistant Regional Director—Ecological
Services, California-Great Basin Region, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. 2024–23573 Filed 10–10–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[BLM_NM_FRN_MO4500183052]
Notice of Availability for the Organ
Mountains-Desert Peaks National
Monument Proposed Resource
Management Plan and Final
Environmental Impact Statement, New
Mexico
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
In compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), as amended, and the
Federal Land Policy and Management
Act of 1976, as amended, the Bureau of
Land Management (BLM) has prepared
a Proposed Resource Management Plan
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(RMP) and Final Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the Organ
Mountains-Desert Peaks National
Monument (Monument) and by this
notice is announcing the start of the 30day protest period for the Proposed
RMP.
This notice announces a 30-day
protest period to the BLM on the
Proposed RMP beginning on the date
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) publishes its Notice of
Availability (NOA) of the Proposed RMP
and Final EIS in the Federal Register.
The EPA usually publishes its NOAs on
Fridays. Protests must be postmarked or
electronically submitted on the BLM’s
ePlanning website during the 30-day
protest period.
ADDRESSES: The Proposed RMP, Final
EIS, and associated documents are
available on the BLM ePlanning project
website at: https://eplanning.blm.gov/
eplanning-ui/project/92170/510.
Documents pertinent to this proposal
may also be examined at the BLM Las
Cruces District Office, 1800 Marquess
Street, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88005.
Instructions for filing a protest with
the BLM for the Proposed RMP and
Final EIS for the Monument can be
found at: https://www.blm.gov/
programs/planning-and-nepa/publicparticipation/filing-a-plan-protest and at
43 CFR 1610.5–2.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BLM RMP Project Manager Patrick Rich
at 405–579–7154 or prich@blm.gov or
acting Monument Manager Lane Hauser
at 575–525–4358 or lhauser@blm.gov.
Individuals in the United States who are
deaf, deaf-blind, hard of hearing, or
have a speech disability may dial 711
(TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services for
contacting Patrick Rich. Individuals
outside the United States should use the
relay services offered within their
country to make international calls to
the point-of-contact in the United
States.
DATES:
The
decision area is located in Doña Ana
County, New Mexico, and encompasses
approximately 496,591 acres of BLMmanaged public lands. Resources on
Monument lands administered by the
BLM within the decision area are
currently managed under the 1993
Mimbres RMP, as amended, and
additional guidance directed in
Presidential Proclamation 9131.
The BLM identified, analyzed, and
considered mitigation to address
reasonably foreseeable impacts
associated with land use allocations and
resource management goals and
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 198 / Friday, October 11, 2024 / Notices
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
objectives employed to develop the
alternatives, in accordance with 40 CFR
1502.14(e).
The BLM proactively coordinated the
NEPA and land use planning processes
early in the planning effort to ensure
compliance with applicable procedural
requirements under the Endangered
Species Act (16 U.S.C. 1536) and section
106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act (54 U.S.C. 306108), as
provided in 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3),
including public involvement
requirements of section 106.
On December 1, 2021, the BLM
initiated government-to-government
consultation with 13 federally
recognized Tribes with historic or
cultural resources within the area
potentially affected by the Proposed
RMP. In accordance with Executive
Order 13175, BLM Manual section 1780,
and other Departmental policies, the
BLM considered Tribal concerns,
including potential impacts to Indian
trust assets and cultural resources,
throughout the land use planning
process.
The BLM invited Tribal Nations;
Federal, State, and local agencies; and
stakeholders that demonstrated interest
in or that could have been impacted by
the RMP, to participate in the planning
process and, if eligible, to participate as
cooperating agencies. Ten eligible
entities accepted the BLM’s invitation to
join the RMP planning effort as
cooperating agencies.
On June 22, 2023, the BLM published
a Notice of Intent in the Federal
Register (88 FR 40846), notifying the
public of a formal scoping period and
soliciting public participation. The BLM
held six public scoping meetings in and
around Las Cruces, New Mexico, during
July 2023.
On April 5, 2024, the BLM published
an NOA in the Federal Register (89 FR
24030), announcing a 90-day public
comment period (April 5, 2024, through
July 5, 2024) and the availability of the
Draft EIS and Draft RMP for review and
comment. The BLM held two in-person
public meetings and two virtual public
meetings in Las Cruces, New Mexico,
during June 2024.
Proposed RMP
The Final EIS documents analysis of
environmental impacts associated with
the five alternatives considered for
management of Monument lands, to
include the 10 congressionally
designated wilderness areas located
within the Monument’s boundaries. The
Proposed RMP provides five land use
management alternatives. Each
alternative consists of distinct land use
allocations and resource management
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 10, 2024
Jkt 265001
goals, objectives, and management
direction focused on protecting
Monument objects of scientific and
historic interest, preserving wilderness
character, and the conservation of
natural resources, resource values, and
wildlife habitat. The Proposed RMP
(Alternative E) was developed in
response to public comments received
on the Draft EIS and RMP during the 90day public comment period and is
based, primarily, on land use allocations
and resource management goals and
objectives found in Alternative C (Draft
EIS Preferred Alternative).
The five alternatives analyzed in the
Final EIS are as follows:
• Alternative A (No Action):
Maintains the 1993 Mimbres RMP
management direction. Incorporates
Monument management direction from
Presidential Proclamation 9131.
• Alternative B (Protection-focused):
Protects objects of scientific and historic
interest. Protects, preserves, and
enhances habitat, natural resources, and
resource values while providing limited
recreation and travel opportunities.
Most proactive in promoting land use
management activities focused on
preservation, restoration, and
enhancement.
• Alternative C (Draft Preferred):
Protects Monument objects of scientific
and historic interest. Institutes
preservation management principles for
designated wilderness. Provides an
objective approach to land use
management, employing conservation
management principles for wildlife
habitat, natural resources, and resource
values. Employs targeted preservation
goals and objectives, while allowing
recreation uses that promote sustained
socioeconomic progression.
• Alternative D (Recreation-focused):
Emphasizes opportunities for resource
uses, such as recreation, off-highway
vehicle and mechanized use, and
livestock grazing, while maintaining
ecological function to protect
Monument resources, objects, and
values. Institutes preservation
management principles for designated
wilderness.
• Alternative E (Proposed): Institutes
similar land use allocations and
resource management goals and
objectives as Alternative C. Provides
additional flexibility in the management
of natural resources, while protecting
Monument objects and preserving
wilderness character. Emphasizes the
importance of future implementation
and activity-level planning efforts, such
as integrated travel/transportation and
recreation area management planning,
wilderness management plans,
rangeland management plans, habitat
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
82623
management plans, and cultural
resource and Monument object
inventory and management.
The BLM New Mexico State Director
has selected Alternative E as the
‘‘Proposed RMP alternative.’’
Alternative E was designed to protect
Monument objects, preserve wilderness
character, and conserve natural and
cultural resources, resource values, and
wildlife habitat, while allowing for
compatible uses on Monument lands.
The Proposed RMP alternative includes
important conservation and
preservation measures designed to
protect Monument objects of scientific
and historic interest, as well as other
resources and resource values,
including:
• Wilderness areas (239,596-acres):
Emphasizes preservation of wilderness
character, with allowance for
compatible uses;
• Areas of Critical Environmental
Concern (ACEC): Designates the Doña
Ana Mountains ACEC (1,427 acres) and
the Organ/Franklin Mountains ACEC
(36,658 acres);
• Special Recreation Management
Area (SRMA): Designates the Doña Ana
Mountains SRMA (5,858 acres) and the
Organ Mountains SRMA (36,658 acres);
• Soils: provides for protection and
active management of soils, while
limiting soil disturbing activities;
• Vegetative communities: provides
for the conservation and restoration of
reference vegetative communities;
• Wildlife: preserves and restores
native habitat, while enhancing wildlife
corridors and connectivity;
• Visual resources: preserves high
value visual resources through
protective management goals and
objectives;
• Livestock grazing: establishes goals
and objectives developed to ensure
appropriate protection of Monument
objects, preservation of wilderness
character, and conservation of natural
resources and resource values;
• Travel management (Monument):
establishes use allocations and
management goals and objectives
limiting motorized vehicle use to
designated roads and non-motorized
mechanized vehicle use to designated
roads and trails on the Monument, as
directed in Presidential Proclamation
9131;
• Travel management (wilderness):
establishes preservation goals and
objectives, in accordance with the
Wilderness Act, that prohibit motorized
vehicle use or non-motorized
mechanized vehicle use in designated
wilderness areas; and
• Lands and realty: provides
protection of Monument objects,
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
82624
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 198 / Friday, October 11, 2024 / Notices
preservation of wilderness character,
and conservation of natural resources,
resource values, and wildlife habitat
through establishment of right-of-way
exclusion and avoidance areas across
the Monument.
Protest of the Proposed RMP
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with NOTICES1
The BLM’s planning regulations state
that any person who participated in the
preparation of the RMP and has an
interest that will or might be adversely
affected by approval of the Proposed
RMP may protest its approval to the
BLM Director. Protest of the Proposed
RMP constitutes the final opportunity
for administrative review of the
proposed land use planning decisions
prior to the BLM adopting an Approved
RMP.
All protests must be in writing and
mailed to the appropriate address, as set
forth in the ADDRESSES section earlier or
submitted electronically through the
BLM ePlanning project website, as
previously described. Protests submitted
electronically by any means other than
the ePlanning project website will be
invalid unless a protest is also
submitted as a hard copy. The BLM
Director will render a written decision
on each protest. The Director’s decision
shall be the final decision of the
Department of the Interior. Responses to
valid protest issues will be compiled
and documented in a Protest Resolution
Report that will be made available
following the protest resolution online
at: https://www.blm.gov/programs/
planning-and-nepa/publicparticipation/protest-resolution-reports.
Upon resolution of protests, the BLM
will issue a Record of Decision and
Approved RMP.
Before including your phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your protest,
you should be aware that your entire
protest—including your personal
identifying information—may be made
publicly available at any time. While
you can ask the BLM in your protest to
withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10,
43 CFR 1610.2, 43 CFR 1610.5)
Melanie G. Barnes,
BLM New Mexico State Director.
[FR Doc. 2024–23428 Filed 10–10–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4331–23–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 10, 2024
Jkt 265001
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[BLM_OR_FRN_MO4500180774]
Notice of Availability of the Proposed
Resource Management Plan and Final
Environmental Impact Statement for
the Cascade-Siskiyou National
Monument in Oregon/Washington and
California
Bureau of Land Management.
Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In compliance with the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969, as amended, and the Federal Land
Policy and Management Act of 1976, as
amended, the Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) has prepared a
Proposed Resource Management Plan
(RMP) and Final Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the CascadeSiskiyou National Monument (CSNM)
and by this notice is announcing the
start of a 30-day protest period of the
Proposed RMP.
DATES: This notice announces a 30-day
protest period to the BLM on the
Proposed RMP beginning with the date
following the Environmental Protection
Agency’s (EPA) publication of its Notice
of Availability (NOA) of the Proposed
RMP/Final EIS in the Federal Register.
The EPA usually publishes its NOAs on
Fridays. Protests must be postmarked or
electronically submitted on the BLM’s
ePlanning site during the 30-day protest
period.
ADDRESSES: The Proposed RMP and
Final EIS is available on the BLM
ePlanning project website at https://
eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/
project/2023675/510 and at the BLM
Medford District, 3040 Biddle Rd,
Medford, OR 97504; and the BLM
Klamath Falls Field Office, 2795
Anderson Avenue, Bldg. #25, Klamath
Falls, OR 97603.
Instructions for filing a protest with
the BLM for the CSNM can be found at:
https://www.blm.gov/programs/
planning-and-nepa/publicparticipation/filing-a-plan-protest and
at 43 CFR 1610.5–2. Protests must be
submitted at the ePlanning website
listed above or to: BLM Director,
Attention: Protest Coordinator (HQ210),
P.O. Box 151029, Lakewood, CO 80215.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Nikki Haskett, Program Manager,
telephone (458)–246–8861; address
3040 Biddle Rd, Medford, OR 97504;
email blm_csnm_rmp@blm.gov.
Individuals in the United States who are
deaf, deafblind, hard of hearing, or have
a speech disability may dial 711 (TTY,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
TDD, or TeleBraille) to access
telecommunications relay services for
contacting Ms. Haskett. Individuals
outside the United States should use the
relay services offered within their
country to make international calls to
the point-of-contact in the United
States.
The
CSNM boundary, as identified by
Presidential Proclamation No. 9564,
constitutes the planning area for this
RMP. The planning area is 170,407 acres
and includes lands within Jackson and
Klamath Counties in Oregon, and
Siskiyou County in California. The
CSNM’s decision area is the
approximately 113,500 acres of BLMadministered lands within the planning
area. While most of the BLMadministered lands are within the BLM
Ashland and Klamath Falls Field
Offices in Oregon, approximately 5,000
acres are located within the BLM
Redding Field Office in California.
The BLM’s current RMPs for lands in
the decision area do not address all the
legal mandates related to management
of the congressionally designated
National Conservation Lands (i.e., Soda
Mountain Wilderness; the Jenny Creek
and Spring Creek Wild and Scenic
Rivers; the Applegate Trail, which is
part of the California National Historic
Trail; and the Pacific Crest National
Scenic Trail) and the lands included in
President Obama’s enlargement of the
monument boundary. In addition, some
aspects of the existing RMPs covering
the planning area need to be updated to
be consistent with current BLM policies.
The RMP’s underlying purpose (40
CFR 1502.13) is to provide a
management framework, including
objectives and management direction,
that guides the BLM’s management of
the decision area to protect and restore
the resources, objects, and values for
which the area was designated.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Proposed Action and Alternatives
The Cascade-Siskiyou National
Monument Draft RMP and EIS 90-day
public comment period began on April
5, 2024, and ended on July 5, 2024. The
BLM held four public meetings during
the public comment period. The BLM
considered and incorporated in the
Proposed RMP, as appropriate,
comments received from the public,
consulting Tribes, cooperating agencies,
and internal BLM review. Public
comments resulted in the addition of
clarifying text, minor changes to the
existing alternatives, and a Proposed
RMP that is within the range of
alternatives and effects analyzed in the
Draft RMP/EIS. In addition to the
E:\FR\FM\11OCN1.SGM
11OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 198 (Friday, October 11, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82622-82624]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23428]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
[BLM_NM_FRN_MO4500183052]
Notice of Availability for the Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks
National Monument Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final
Environmental Impact Statement, New Mexico
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA), as amended, and the Federal Land Policy and Management Act
of 1976, as amended, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has prepared a
Proposed Resource Management Plan (RMP) and Final Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) for the Organ Mountains-Desert Peaks National Monument
(Monument) and by this notice is announcing the start of the 30-day
protest period for the Proposed RMP.
DATES: This notice announces a 30-day protest period to the BLM on the
Proposed RMP beginning on the date the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) publishes its Notice of Availability (NOA) of the Proposed RMP
and Final EIS in the Federal Register. The EPA usually publishes its
NOAs on Fridays. Protests must be postmarked or electronically
submitted on the BLM's ePlanning website during the 30-day protest
period.
ADDRESSES: The Proposed RMP, Final EIS, and associated documents are
available on the BLM ePlanning project website at: https://eplanning.blm.gov/eplanning-ui/project/92170/510. Documents pertinent
to this proposal may also be examined at the BLM Las Cruces District
Office, 1800 Marquess Street, Las Cruces, New Mexico 88005.
Instructions for filing a protest with the BLM for the Proposed RMP
and Final EIS for the Monument can be found at: https://www.blm.gov/
programs/planning-and-nepa/public-participation/filing-a-plan-protest
and at 43 CFR 1610.5-2.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: BLM RMP Project Manager Patrick Rich
at 405-579-7154 or [email protected] or acting Monument Manager Lane Hauser
at 575-525-4358 or [email protected]. Individuals in the United States
who are deaf, deaf-blind, hard of hearing, or have a speech disability
may dial 711 (TTY, TDD, or TeleBraille) to access telecommunications
relay services for contacting Patrick Rich. Individuals outside the
United States should use the relay services offered within their
country to make international calls to the point-of-contact in the
United States.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The decision area is located in Do[ntilde]a
Ana County, New Mexico, and encompasses approximately 496,591 acres of
BLM-managed public lands. Resources on Monument lands administered by
the BLM within the decision area are currently managed under the 1993
Mimbres RMP, as amended, and additional guidance directed in
Presidential Proclamation 9131.
The BLM identified, analyzed, and considered mitigation to address
reasonably foreseeable impacts associated with land use allocations and
resource management goals and
[[Page 82623]]
objectives employed to develop the alternatives, in accordance with 40
CFR 1502.14(e).
The BLM proactively coordinated the NEPA and land use planning
processes early in the planning effort to ensure compliance with
applicable procedural requirements under the Endangered Species Act (16
U.S.C. 1536) and section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act
(54 U.S.C. 306108), as provided in 36 CFR 800.2(d)(3), including public
involvement requirements of section 106.
On December 1, 2021, the BLM initiated government-to-government
consultation with 13 federally recognized Tribes with historic or
cultural resources within the area potentially affected by the Proposed
RMP. In accordance with Executive Order 13175, BLM Manual section 1780,
and other Departmental policies, the BLM considered Tribal concerns,
including potential impacts to Indian trust assets and cultural
resources, throughout the land use planning process.
The BLM invited Tribal Nations; Federal, State, and local agencies;
and stakeholders that demonstrated interest in or that could have been
impacted by the RMP, to participate in the planning process and, if
eligible, to participate as cooperating agencies. Ten eligible entities
accepted the BLM's invitation to join the RMP planning effort as
cooperating agencies.
On June 22, 2023, the BLM published a Notice of Intent in the
Federal Register (88 FR 40846), notifying the public of a formal
scoping period and soliciting public participation. The BLM held six
public scoping meetings in and around Las Cruces, New Mexico, during
July 2023.
On April 5, 2024, the BLM published an NOA in the Federal Register
(89 FR 24030), announcing a 90-day public comment period (April 5,
2024, through July 5, 2024) and the availability of the Draft EIS and
Draft RMP for review and comment. The BLM held two in-person public
meetings and two virtual public meetings in Las Cruces, New Mexico,
during June 2024.
Proposed RMP
The Final EIS documents analysis of environmental impacts
associated with the five alternatives considered for management of
Monument lands, to include the 10 congressionally designated wilderness
areas located within the Monument's boundaries. The Proposed RMP
provides five land use management alternatives. Each alternative
consists of distinct land use allocations and resource management
goals, objectives, and management direction focused on protecting
Monument objects of scientific and historic interest, preserving
wilderness character, and the conservation of natural resources,
resource values, and wildlife habitat. The Proposed RMP (Alternative E)
was developed in response to public comments received on the Draft EIS
and RMP during the 90-day public comment period and is based,
primarily, on land use allocations and resource management goals and
objectives found in Alternative C (Draft EIS Preferred Alternative).
The five alternatives analyzed in the Final EIS are as follows:
Alternative A (No Action): Maintains the 1993 Mimbres RMP
management direction. Incorporates Monument management direction from
Presidential Proclamation 9131.
Alternative B (Protection-focused): Protects objects of
scientific and historic interest. Protects, preserves, and enhances
habitat, natural resources, and resource values while providing limited
recreation and travel opportunities. Most proactive in promoting land
use management activities focused on preservation, restoration, and
enhancement.
Alternative C (Draft Preferred): Protects Monument objects
of scientific and historic interest. Institutes preservation management
principles for designated wilderness. Provides an objective approach to
land use management, employing conservation management principles for
wildlife habitat, natural resources, and resource values. Employs
targeted preservation goals and objectives, while allowing recreation
uses that promote sustained socioeconomic progression.
Alternative D (Recreation-focused): Emphasizes
opportunities for resource uses, such as recreation, off-highway
vehicle and mechanized use, and livestock grazing, while maintaining
ecological function to protect Monument resources, objects, and values.
Institutes preservation management principles for designated
wilderness.
Alternative E (Proposed): Institutes similar land use
allocations and resource management goals and objectives as Alternative
C. Provides additional flexibility in the management of natural
resources, while protecting Monument objects and preserving wilderness
character. Emphasizes the importance of future implementation and
activity-level planning efforts, such as integrated travel/
transportation and recreation area management planning, wilderness
management plans, rangeland management plans, habitat management plans,
and cultural resource and Monument object inventory and management.
The BLM New Mexico State Director has selected Alternative E as the
``Proposed RMP alternative.'' Alternative E was designed to protect
Monument objects, preserve wilderness character, and conserve natural
and cultural resources, resource values, and wildlife habitat, while
allowing for compatible uses on Monument lands. The Proposed RMP
alternative includes important conservation and preservation measures
designed to protect Monument objects of scientific and historic
interest, as well as other resources and resource values, including:
Wilderness areas (239,596-acres): Emphasizes preservation
of wilderness character, with allowance for compatible uses;
Areas of Critical Environmental Concern (ACEC): Designates
the Do[ntilde]a Ana Mountains ACEC (1,427 acres) and the Organ/Franklin
Mountains ACEC (36,658 acres);
Special Recreation Management Area (SRMA): Designates the
Do[ntilde]a Ana Mountains SRMA (5,858 acres) and the Organ Mountains
SRMA (36,658 acres);
Soils: provides for protection and active management of
soils, while limiting soil disturbing activities;
Vegetative communities: provides for the conservation and
restoration of reference vegetative communities;
Wildlife: preserves and restores native habitat, while
enhancing wildlife corridors and connectivity;
Visual resources: preserves high value visual resources
through protective management goals and objectives;
Livestock grazing: establishes goals and objectives
developed to ensure appropriate protection of Monument objects,
preservation of wilderness character, and conservation of natural
resources and resource values;
Travel management (Monument): establishes use allocations
and management goals and objectives limiting motorized vehicle use to
designated roads and non-motorized mechanized vehicle use to designated
roads and trails on the Monument, as directed in Presidential
Proclamation 9131;
Travel management (wilderness): establishes preservation
goals and objectives, in accordance with the Wilderness Act, that
prohibit motorized vehicle use or non-motorized mechanized vehicle use
in designated wilderness areas; and
Lands and realty: provides protection of Monument objects,
[[Page 82624]]
preservation of wilderness character, and conservation of natural
resources, resource values, and wildlife habitat through establishment
of right-of-way exclusion and avoidance areas across the Monument.
Protest of the Proposed RMP
The BLM's planning regulations state that any person who
participated in the preparation of the RMP and has an interest that
will or might be adversely affected by approval of the Proposed RMP may
protest its approval to the BLM Director. Protest of the Proposed RMP
constitutes the final opportunity for administrative review of the
proposed land use planning decisions prior to the BLM adopting an
Approved RMP.
All protests must be in writing and mailed to the appropriate
address, as set forth in the ADDRESSES section earlier or submitted
electronically through the BLM ePlanning project website, as previously
described. Protests submitted electronically by any means other than
the ePlanning project website will be invalid unless a protest is also
submitted as a hard copy. The BLM Director will render a written
decision on each protest. The Director's decision shall be the final
decision of the Department of the Interior. Responses to valid protest
issues will be compiled and documented in a Protest Resolution Report
that will be made available following the protest resolution online at:
https://www.blm.gov/programs/planning-and-nepa/public-participation/protest-resolution-reports. Upon resolution of protests, the BLM will
issue a Record of Decision and Approved RMP.
Before including your phone number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your protest, you should be aware
that your entire protest--including your personal identifying
information--may be made publicly available at any time. While you can
ask the BLM in your protest to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be
able to do so.
(Authority: 40 CFR 1506.6, 40 CFR 1506.10, 43 CFR 1610.2, 43 CFR
1610.5)
Melanie G. Barnes,
BLM New Mexico State Director.
[FR Doc. 2024-23428 Filed 10-10-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4331-23-P