Certain NAND Memory Devices and Electronic Devices Containing Same; Notice of the Commission's Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation, 82255-82256 [2024-23403]

Download as PDF lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 197 / Thursday, October 10, 2024 / Notices part 1, 43 CFR part 45, and 50 CFR part 221, to implement section 241 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EP Act), Public Law 109–58, enacted on August 8, 2005. Section 241 of the EP Act added a new section 33 to the Federal Power Act (FPA), 16 U.S.C. 823d, that allowed the license applicant or any other party to the license proceeding to propose an alternative to a condition or prescription that one or more of the Departments develop for inclusion in a hydropower license issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) under the FPA. This provision required that the Department of Agriculture, the Department of the Interior, and the Department of Commerce collect the information covered by 1094–0001. Under FPA section 33, the Secretary of the Department involved must accept the proposed alternative if the Secretary determines, based on substantial evidence provided by a party to the license proceeding or otherwise available to the Secretary, (a) that the alternative condition provides for the adequate protection and utilization of the reservation, or that the alternative prescription will be no less protective than the fishway initially proposed by the Secretary, and (b) that the alternative will either cost significantly less to implement or result in improved operation of the project works for electricity production. In order to make this determination, the regulations require that all of the following information be collected: (1) a description of the alternative, in an equivalent level of detail to the Department’s preliminary condition or prescription; (2) an explanation of how the alternative: (i) if a condition, will provide for the adequate protection and utilization of the reservation; or (ii) if a prescription, will be no less protective than the fishway prescribed by the bureau; (3) an explanation of how the alternative, as compared to the preliminary condition or prescription, will: (i) cost significantly less to implement; or (ii) result in improved operation of the project works for electricity production; (4) an explanation of how the alternative or revised alternative will affect: (i) energy supply, distribution, cost, and use; (ii) flood control; (iii) navigation; (iv) water supply; (v) air quality; and (vi) other aspects of environmental quality; and (5) specific citations to any scientific studies, literature, and other documented information relied on to support the proposal. This notice of proposed renewal of an existing information collection is being published by the Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance, VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:08 Oct 09, 2024 Jkt 265001 Department of the Interior, on behalf of all three Departments, and the data provided below covers anticipated responses (alternative conditions/ prescriptions and associated information) for all three Departments. Title of Collection: 7 CFR part 1; 43 CFR part 45; 50 CFR part 221; The Alternatives Process in Hydropower Licensing. OMB Control Number: 1094–0001. Form Number: None. Type of Review: Extension of a currently approved collection. Respondents/Affected Public: Business or for-profit entities. Total Estimated Number of Annual Respondents: 5. Total Estimated Number of Annual Responses: 5. Estimated Completion Time per Response: 500 hours. Total Estimated Number of Annual Burden Hours: 2,500 hours. Respondent’s Obligation: Voluntary. Frequency of Collection: Once per alternative proposed. Total Estimated Annual Nonhour Burden Cost: None. An agency may not conduct or sponsor and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The authority for this action is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq). Stephen G. Tryon, Director, Office of Environmental Policy and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2024–23481 Filed 10–9–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4334–63–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1412] Certain NAND Memory Devices and Electronic Devices Containing Same; Notice of the Commission’s Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 7) terminating the investigation based on a settlement agreement and withdrawal of the complaint. SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00057 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 82255 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward S. Jou, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3316. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. The Commission instituted this investigation on August 13, 2024, based on a complaint filed by MimirIP LLC of Dallas, Texas (‘‘Mimir’’). 89 FR 65931– 32 (Aug. 13, 2024). The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain NAND memory devices and electronic devices containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,637,919; 9,245,962; and 10,896,918. The notice of investigation named as respondents: Micron Technology, Inc. (‘‘Micron’’) of Boise, Idaho; Acer Inc. of New Taipei City, Taiwan; Acer America Corp. of San Jose, California; HP, Inc. of Palo Alto, California; Kingston Technology Company, Inc. of Fountain Valley, California; Lenovo Group Limited of Hong Kong, China; and Lenovo (United States) Inc. of Morrisville, North Carolina (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’). The Office of Unfair Import Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) is also a party in this investigation. On August 28, 2024, Mimir and Respondents filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation based on a settlement between Mimir and Micron that resolves all issues as to all Respondents in this investigation. On September 5, 2024, OUII filed a response in support of the motion. On September 6, 2024, the ALJ issued Order No. 6 requesting additional clarification regarding the motion. On September 10, 2024, Mimir and Micron jointly filed a supplement to the motion stating that Mimir requests termination of the investigation based on withdrawal of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM 10OCN1 82256 Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 197 / Thursday, October 10, 2024 / Notices the complaint with respect to the respondents other than Micron. On September 12, 2024, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting the joint motion to terminate the investigation. The ALJ found that the motion complied with the requirements of Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(b)(1)) with respect to the termination of Micron based on a settlement agreement, and the motion complied with the requirements of Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1)) with respect to the termination of the remaining respondents by withdrawal of the complaint. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The investigation is hereby terminated in its entirety. The Commission vote for this determination took place on October 4, 2024. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: October 4, 2024. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2024–23403 Filed 10–9–24; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1352] Certain Selective Thyroid Hormone Receptor-Beta Agonists, Processes for Manufacturing or Relating to Same, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that on October 3, 2024, the presiding Chief Administrative Law Judge (‘‘Chief ALJ’’) issued an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337. The Chief ALJ also issued a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding should a violation be found in the above-captioned investigation. The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation. This lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with NOTICES1 SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:08 Oct 09, 2024 Jkt 265001 notice is soliciting comments from the public and interested government agencies only. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Houda Morad, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–4716. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 provides that, if the Commission finds a violation, it shall exclude the articles concerned from the United States unless, after considering the effect of such exclusion upon the public health and welfare, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, and United States consumers, it finds that such articles should not be excluded from entry. (19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1)). A similar provision applies to cease and desist orders. (19 U.S.C. 1337(f)(1)). The Commission is soliciting submissions on public interest issues raised by the recommended relief should the Commission find a violation, specifically: a limited exclusion order directed to certain selective thyroid hormone receptor-beta agonists, processes for manufacturing or relating to same, and products containing same, imported, sold for importation, and/or sold after importation by respondents Ascletis Pharma Inc., Ascletis Pharmaceuticals Co. Ltd., Ascletis Bioscience Co., Ltd., Gannex Pharma Co., Ltd., and Jinzi Jason Wu (collectively, ‘‘Respondents’’), and cease and desist orders against the Respondents. Parties are to file public interest submissions pursuant to 19 CFR 210.50(a)(4). The Commission is interested in further development of the record on the public interest in this investigation. Accordingly, members of the public and interested government agencies are invited to file submissions of no more than five (5) pages, inclusive of attachments, concerning the public PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 interest in light of the Chief ALJ’s Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bonding issued in this investigation on October 3, 2024. Comments should address whether issuance of the recommended remedial orders in this investigation, should the Commission find a violation, would affect the public health and welfare in the United States, competitive conditions in the United States economy, the production of like or directly competitive articles in the United States, or United States consumers. In particular, the Commission is interested in comments that: (i) explain how the articles potentially subject to the recommended remedial orders are used in the United States; (ii) identify any public health, safety, or welfare concerns in the United States relating to the recommended orders; (iii) identify like or directly competitive articles that complainant, its licensees, or third parties make in the United States which could replace the subject articles if they were to be excluded; (iv) indicate whether complainant, complainant’s licensees, and/or thirdparty suppliers have the capacity to replace the volume of articles potentially subject to the recommended orders within a commercially reasonable time; and (v) explain how the recommended orders would impact consumers in the United States. Written submissions must be filed no later than by close of business on November 4, 2024. Persons filing written submissions must file the original document electronically on or before the deadlines stated above. The Commission’s paper filing requirements in 19 CFR 210.4(f) are currently waived. 85 FR 15798 (Mar. 19, 2020). Submissions should refer to the investigation number (‘‘Inv. No. 337–TA–1352’’) in a prominent place on the cover page and/or the first page. (See Handbook for Electronic Filing Procedures, https://www.usitc.gov/ secretary/fed_reg_notices/rules/ handbook_on_electronic_filing.pdf). Persons with questions regarding filing should contact the Secretary (202–205– 2000). Any person desiring to submit a document to the Commission in confidence must request confidential treatment by marking each document with a header indicating that the document contains confidential information. This marking will be deemed to satisfy the request procedure set forth in Rules 201.6(b) and 210.5(e)(2) (19 CFR 201.6(b) & E:\FR\FM\10OCN1.SGM 10OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 197 (Thursday, October 10, 2024)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82255-82256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23403]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1412]


Certain NAND Memory Devices and Electronic Devices Containing 
Same; Notice of the Commission's Determination Not To Review an Initial 
Determination Terminating the Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative 
law judge's (``ALJ'') initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 7) 
terminating the investigation based on a settlement agreement and 
withdrawal of the complaint.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward S. Jou, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3316. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may 
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may 
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on 
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal 
on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on August 13, 2024, based on a complaint filed by MimirIP LLC of 
Dallas, Texas (``Mimir''). 89 FR 65931-32 (Aug. 13, 2024). The 
complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain NAND memory 
devices and electronic devices containing same by reason of 
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,637,919; 
9,245,962; and 10,896,918. The notice of investigation named as 
respondents: Micron Technology, Inc. (``Micron'') of Boise, Idaho; Acer 
Inc. of New Taipei City, Taiwan; Acer America Corp. of San Jose, 
California; HP, Inc. of Palo Alto, California; Kingston Technology 
Company, Inc. of Fountain Valley, California; Lenovo Group Limited of 
Hong Kong, China; and Lenovo (United States) Inc. of Morrisville, North 
Carolina (collectively, ``Respondents''). The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations (``OUII'') is also a party in this investigation.
    On August 28, 2024, Mimir and Respondents filed a joint motion to 
terminate the investigation based on a settlement between Mimir and 
Micron that resolves all issues as to all Respondents in this 
investigation. On September 5, 2024, OUII filed a response in support 
of the motion. On September 6, 2024, the ALJ issued Order No. 6 
requesting additional clarification regarding the motion. On September 
10, 2024, Mimir and Micron jointly filed a supplement to the motion 
stating that Mimir requests termination of the investigation based on 
withdrawal of

[[Page 82256]]

the complaint with respect to the respondents other than Micron.
    On September 12, 2024, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting the 
joint motion to terminate the investigation. The ALJ found that the 
motion complied with the requirements of Commission Rule 210.21(b)(1) 
(19 CFR 210.21(b)(1)) with respect to the termination of Micron based 
on a settlement agreement, and the motion complied with the 
requirements of Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1)) with 
respect to the termination of the remaining respondents by withdrawal 
of the complaint. No petitions for review of the ID were filed.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The 
investigation is hereby terminated in its entirety.
    The Commission vote for this determination took place on October 4, 
2024.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 
part 210).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 4, 2024.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2024-23403 Filed 10-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.