Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: 8(a) Program (DFARS Case 2024-D025), 82196-82198 [2024-23230]
Download as PDF
82196
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 197 / Thursday, October 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
PART 242—CONTRACT
ADMINISTRATION AND AUDIT
SERVICES
5. Revise section 242.503–2 to read as
follows:
■
242.503–2 Postaward conference
procedure.
DD Form 1484, Post-Award
Conference Record, may be used in
conducting the conference and in
preparing the conference report.
(End of clause)
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
252.234–7003
Alternate I. As prescribed in
234.7105(b), use the following clause,
which uses different paragraphs
(b)(3)(ii)(B), (c), and (d) than the basic
clause:
[Removed and Reserved]
6. Remove and reserve section
252.234–7003.
■ 7. Revise section 252.234–7004 to
read as follows:
■
252.234–7004
Reporting.
Cost and Software Data
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
As prescribed in 234.7105(a), use the
following basic clause:
Cost and Software Data Reporting—Basic
(DATE)
(a) Definition. As used in this clause—
Undefinitized contract action means any
contract action for which the contract terms,
specifications, or price are not agreed upon
before performance is begun under the
action. Examples are letter contracts, orders
under basic ordering agreements, and
provisioned item orders, for which the price
has not been agreed upon before performance
has begun.
(b) Requirements. In the performance of
this contract, the Contractor shall—
(1) Use cost and software data reporting
(CSDR) processes and procedures that
accomplish the requirements contained in
the contract CSDR Plan (DD Form 2794) and
applicable data item description(s);
(2) Establish, implement, and maintain
processes and procedures that provide for the
consistent collection and generation of
reliable actual cost data required by the
contract CSDR Plan (DD Form 2794) and
applicable data item description(s); and
(3)(i) Within 60 days of contract award or
the definitization of an undefinitized contract
action, complete a CSDR-readiness review
with the Cost Assessment and Program
Evaluation, Deputy Director for Cost
Assessment and the cost estimating
component of the relevant military
department or defense agency in order to
review CSDR requirements.
(ii) During the CSDR-readiness review, the
Contractor shall—
(A) Describe the processes and procedures
the Contractor will use to—
(1) Provide for the consistent collection
and generation of reliable CSDR data; and
(2) Deliver timely CSDR data deliverables
required by the contract CSDR Plan (DD
Form 2794) and applicable data item
description(s);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Oct 09, 2024
Jkt 265001
(B) Identify any subcontractor whose
contract is expected to exceed $50 million;
and
(C) Identify any potential revisions to
CSDR requirements that may better align data
reporting to the Contractor’s procedures.
(c) Notification. For subcontracts expected
to exceed $50 million, if the Contractor
changes subcontractors or awards new
subcontracts, the Contractor shall notify the
Contracting Officer within 10 days of award.
(d) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall
include this clause in subcontracts at any tier
that are expected to exceed $50 million.
Cost and Software Data Reporting—
Alternate I (DATE)
(a) Definition. As used in this clause—
Undefinitized contract action means any
contract action for which the contract terms,
specifications, or price are not agreed upon
before performance is begun under the
action. Examples are letter contracts, orders
under basic ordering agreements, and
provisioned item orders, for which the price
has not been agreed upon before performance
has begun.
(b) Requirements. In the performance of
this contract, the Contractor shall—
(1) Use cost and software data reporting
(CSDR) processes and procedures that
accomplish the requirements contained in
the contract CSDR Plan (DD Form 2794) and
applicable data item description(s);
(2) Establish, implement, and maintain
processes and procedures that provide for the
consistent collection and generation of
reliable actual cost data required by the
contract CSDR Plan (DD Form 2794) and
applicable data item description(s); and
(3)(i) Within 60 days of contract award or
the definitization of an undefinitized contract
action, complete a CSDR-readiness review
with the Cost Assessment and Program
Evaluation, Deputy Director for Cost
Assessment and the cost estimating
component of the relevant military
department or defense agency in order to
review CSDR requirements.
(ii) During the CSDR-readiness review, the
Contractor shall—
(A) Describe the processes and procedures
the Contractor will use to—
(1) Provide for the consistent collection
and generation of reliable CSDR data; and
(2) Deliver timely CSDR data deliverables
required by the contract CSDR Plan (DD
Form 2794) and applicable data item
description(s);
(B) Identify any subcontractor whose
contract is expected to exceed $20 million;
and
(C) Identify any potential revisions to
CSDR requirements that may better align data
reporting to the Contractor’s procedures.
(c) Notification. For subcontracts expected
to exceed $20 million, if the Contractor
changes subcontractors or awards new
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
subcontracts, the Contractor shall notify the
Contracting Officer within 10 days of award.
(d) Subcontracts. The Contractor shall
include this clause in subcontracts at any tier
that are expected to exceed $20 million.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2024–23229 Filed 10–9–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations
System
48 CFR Part 252
[Docket DARS–2024–0032]
RIN 0750–AM22
Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement: 8(a) Program
(DFARS Case 2024–D025)
Defense Acquisition
Regulations System, Department of
Defense (DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
DoD is proposing to amend
the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to
revise joint venture eligibility
requirements and nonmanufacturer rule
applicability to 8(a) contracts awarded
pursuant to the 8(a) Partnership
Agreement between DoD and the Small
Business Administration. These changes
are necessary to align the DFARS with
the Federal Acquisition Regulation
(FAR).
SUMMARY:
Comments on the proposed rule
should be submitted in writing to the
address shown below on or before
December 9, 2024, to be considered in
the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
identified by DFARS Case 2024–D025,
using either of the following methods:
Æ Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Search for
DFARS Case 2024–D025. Select
‘‘Comment’’ and follow the instructions
to submit a comment. Please include
‘‘DFARS Case 2024–D025’’ on any
attached documents.
Æ Email: osd.dfars@mail.mil. Include
DFARS Case 2024–D025 in the subject
line of the message.
Comments received generally will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided. To
confirm receipt of your comment(s),
please check https://
www.regulations.gov, approximately
two to three days after submission to
verify posting.
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\10OCP1.SGM
10OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 197 / Thursday, October 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeanette Snyder, telephone 703–508–
7524.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is proposing to revise the DFARS
to align with changes made to the FAR
via the final rules published in the
Federal Register on August 11, 2021 (86
FR 44233) and on September 23, 2022
(87 FR 58219). The final rule for FAR
Case 2016–011, Revision of Limitations
on Subcontracting, published on August
11, 2021, standardized the application
of the nonmanufacturer rule
requirements for the socioeconomic
programs identified at FAR 19.000(a)(3).
The final rule for FAR Case 2017–019,
Policy on Joint Ventures, published on
September 23, 2022, clarified the
eligibility of joint ventures under the
8(a) Program.
This rule is also proposing to revise
the DFARS to align with the proposed
rule for FAR Case 2021–020, Limitations
on Subcontracting Revisions, published
on January 17, 2024 (89 FR 2910). This
FAR rule proposed to remove the
nonmanufacturer rule requirements for
8(a) participants from FAR 19.809–2 as
was intended to be accomplished via
the final rule published on August 11,
2021, and to remove the kit assembler
rule set from the nonmanufacturer rule.
This DFARS rule proposes to make
similar changes.
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
II. Discussion and Analysis
This rule proposes to modify the
contract clause at DFARS 225.219–7010,
Notification of Competition Limited to
Eligible 8(a) Participants—Partnership
Agreement, to add joint ventures to the
list of concerns from whom offers are
solicited for 8(a) Program acquisitions
that are processed in accordance with
the 8(a) Partnership Agreement between
DoD and the Small Business
Administration (SBA) (the Agreement).
This proposed rule also includes the
removal of the kit assembler rule set and
the nonmanufacturer rule requirements
addressed in paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2),
and (d)(3) of the clause at DFARS
252.219–7010 to align with the clause at
FAR 52.219–33, Nonmanufacturer Rule,
which specifies the nonmanufacturer
rule requirements for all socioeconomic
categories.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or
Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT), for Commercial
Products (Including Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items),
and for Commercial Services
This proposed rule amends the clause
at DFARS 225.219–7010, Notification of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Oct 09, 2024
Jkt 265001
Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a)
Participants—Partnership Agreement;
however, this proposed rule does not
impose any new requirements on
contracts at or below the SAT, for
commercial products including COTS
items, or for commercial services. The
clause will continue to not apply to
acquisitions at or below the SAT and
will continue to apply to acquisitions of
commercial products including COTS
items, and to acquisitions of commercial
services.
IV. Expected Impact of the Rule
This proposed rule, when finalized, is
expected to impact 8(a) participants,
including 8(a) joint ventures, who enter
into contracts with DoD that are
processed in accordance with the
Agreement. These participants will be
required to comply with the
nonmanufacturer rule requirements in
the clause at FAR 52.219–33. As a
result, DoD may see an increase in the
number of 8(a) participants that submit
proposals for contracts processed in
accordance with the Agreement, which
may expand the defense industrial base.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and
13563 direct agencies to assess all costs
and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). E.O. 13563 emphasizes the
importance of quantifying both costs
and benefits, of reducing costs, of
harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility. This is not a significant
regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of
E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning and
Review, as amended.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this proposed
rule, when finalized, to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq.,
because this rule merely updates the
DFARS to align with the FAR. However,
an initial regulatory flexibility analysis
has been performed and is summarized
as follows:
This proposed rule is necessary to
revise the contract clause at DFARS
252.219–7010, Notification of
Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a)
Participants—Partnership Agreement, to
align with changes made to the FAR
regarding joint venture eligibility for
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
82197
8(a) Program acquisitions processed in
accordance with the 8(a) Partnership
Agreement between DoD and the Small
Business Administration (SBA). This
proposed rule also removes the
nonmanufacturer rule requirements
from the clause to align with changes
made to the FAR.
The objective of the rule is to revise
the DFARS to align with amendments
made to the FAR. The legal basis for the
rule is 41 U.S.C. 1303.
According to data from the
Procurement Business Intelligence
Service, in the last three fiscal years
DoD awarded contracts that included
the clause at DFARS 252.219–7010 to
unique small entities as follows: 848 in
fiscal year 2021; 553 in fiscal year 2022;
600 in fiscal year 2023. This averages
out to 667 per fiscal year. Therefore,
DoD estimates that the number of small
entities to which this rule will apply is
approximately 667.
This proposed rule does not impose
any new reporting, recordkeeping, or
other compliance requirements for small
entities.
This proposed rule does not
duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any
other Federal rules.
DoD did not identify any significant
alternatives to the proposed rule. Any
impact is expected to be beneficial.
DoD invites comments from small
business concerns and other interested
parties on the expected impact of this
proposed rule on small entities.
DoD will also consider comments
from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected
by this proposed rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties
must submit such comments separately
and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS
Case 2024–D025), in correspondence.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not contain
any information collection requirements
that require the approval of the Office of
Management and Budget under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition
Regulations System.
Therefore, the Defense Acquisition
Regulations System proposes to amend
48 CFR part 252 as follows:
E:\FR\FM\10OCP1.SGM
10OCP1
82198
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 197 / Thursday, October 10, 2024 / Proposed Rules
PART 252—SOLICITATION
PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT
CLAUSES
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR
part 252 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR
chapter 1.
2. Revise and republish section
252.219–7010 to read as follows:
■
252.219–7010 Notification of Competition
Limited to Eligible 8(a) Participants—
Partnership Agreement.
As prescribed in 219.811–3(2), use the
following clause:
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Notification of Competition Limited to
Eligible 8(a) Participants—Partnership
Agreement (DATE)
(a) Offers are solicited only from—
(1) Small business concerns expressly
certified by the Small Business
Administration (SBA) for participation in
SBA’s 8(a) Program and which meet the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:07 Oct 09, 2024
Jkt 265001
following criteria at the time of submission
of offer:
(i) The Offeror is in conformance with the
8(a) support limitation set forth in its
approved business plan.
(ii) The Offeror is in conformance with the
Business Activity Targets set forth in its
approved business plan or any remedial
action directed by SBA.
(iii) If the competition is to be limited to
8(a) concerns within one or more specific
SBA regions or districts, then the Offeror’s
approved business plan is on file and
serviced by lll. [Contracting Officer
completes by inserting the appropriate SBA
District and/or Regional Office(s) as
identified by SBA.]
(2) A joint venture, in which at least one
of the 8(a) program participants that is a
party to the joint venture complies with the
criteria set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this
clause, and that has a joint venture agreement
that complies with 13 CFR 124.513(c); or
(3) A joint venture—
(i) That is comprised of a mentor and an
8(a) protégé with an approved mentorprotégé agreement under an SBA mentorprotégé program;
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
(ii) In which at least one of the 8(a)
program participants that is a party to the
joint venture complies with the criteria set
forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this clause; and
(iii) With a joint venture agreement that
complies with 13 CFR 124.513(c).
(b) By submission of its offer, the Offeror
represents that it meets the applicable criteria
set forth in paragraph (a) of this clause.
(c) Any award resulting from this
solicitation will be made directly by the
Contracting Officer to the successful 8(a)
offeror selected through the evaluation
criteria set forth in this solicitation.
(d) The lll [insert name of SBA’s
contractor] will notify the lll [insert
name of contracting agency] Contracting
Officer in writing immediately upon entering
an agreement (either oral or written) to
transfer all or part of its stock or other
ownership interest to any other party.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2024–23230 Filed 10–9–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001–FR–P
E:\FR\FM\10OCP1.SGM
10OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 197 (Thursday, October 10, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 82196-82198]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23230]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Defense Acquisition Regulations System
48 CFR Part 252
[Docket DARS-2024-0032]
RIN 0750-AM22
Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement: 8(a) Program
(DFARS Case 2024-D025)
AGENCY: Defense Acquisition Regulations System, Department of Defense
(DoD).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition
Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to revise joint venture eligibility
requirements and nonmanufacturer rule applicability to 8(a) contracts
awarded pursuant to the 8(a) Partnership Agreement between DoD and the
Small Business Administration. These changes are necessary to align the
DFARS with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR).
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to
the address shown below on or before December 9, 2024, to be considered
in the formation of a final rule.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments identified by DFARS Case 2024-D025, using
either of the following methods:
[cir] Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Search for DFARS Case 2024-D025. Select ``Comment'' and follow the
instructions to submit a comment. Please include ``DFARS Case 2024-
D025'' on any attached documents.
[cir] Email: [email protected]. Include DFARS Case 2024-D025 in
the subject line of the message.
Comments received generally will be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided. To confirm receipt of your comment(s), please check https://www.regulations.gov, approximately two to three days after submission
to verify posting.
[[Page 82197]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeanette Snyder, telephone 703-508-
7524.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
DoD is proposing to revise the DFARS to align with changes made to
the FAR via the final rules published in the Federal Register on August
11, 2021 (86 FR 44233) and on September 23, 2022 (87 FR 58219). The
final rule for FAR Case 2016-011, Revision of Limitations on
Subcontracting, published on August 11, 2021, standardized the
application of the nonmanufacturer rule requirements for the
socioeconomic programs identified at FAR 19.000(a)(3). The final rule
for FAR Case 2017-019, Policy on Joint Ventures, published on September
23, 2022, clarified the eligibility of joint ventures under the 8(a)
Program.
This rule is also proposing to revise the DFARS to align with the
proposed rule for FAR Case 2021-020, Limitations on Subcontracting
Revisions, published on January 17, 2024 (89 FR 2910). This FAR rule
proposed to remove the nonmanufacturer rule requirements for 8(a)
participants from FAR 19.809-2 as was intended to be accomplished via
the final rule published on August 11, 2021, and to remove the kit
assembler rule set from the nonmanufacturer rule. This DFARS rule
proposes to make similar changes.
II. Discussion and Analysis
This rule proposes to modify the contract clause at DFARS 225.219-
7010, Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a)
Participants--Partnership Agreement, to add joint ventures to the list
of concerns from whom offers are solicited for 8(a) Program
acquisitions that are processed in accordance with the 8(a) Partnership
Agreement between DoD and the Small Business Administration (SBA) (the
Agreement). This proposed rule also includes the removal of the kit
assembler rule set and the nonmanufacturer rule requirements addressed
in paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3) of the clause at DFARS
252.219-7010 to align with the clause at FAR 52.219-33, Nonmanufacturer
Rule, which specifies the nonmanufacturer rule requirements for all
socioeconomic categories.
III. Applicability to Contracts at or Below the Simplified Acquisition
Threshold (SAT), for Commercial Products (Including Commercially
Available Off-the-Shelf (COTS) Items), and for Commercial Services
This proposed rule amends the clause at DFARS 225.219-7010,
Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a) Participants--
Partnership Agreement; however, this proposed rule does not impose any
new requirements on contracts at or below the SAT, for commercial
products including COTS items, or for commercial services. The clause
will continue to not apply to acquisitions at or below the SAT and will
continue to apply to acquisitions of commercial products including COTS
items, and to acquisitions of commercial services.
IV. Expected Impact of the Rule
This proposed rule, when finalized, is expected to impact 8(a)
participants, including 8(a) joint ventures, who enter into contracts
with DoD that are processed in accordance with the Agreement. These
participants will be required to comply with the nonmanufacturer rule
requirements in the clause at FAR 52.219-33. As a result, DoD may see
an increase in the number of 8(a) participants that submit proposals
for contracts processed in accordance with the Agreement, which may
expand the defense industrial base.
V. Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Executive Orders (E.O.s) 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess
all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). E.O.
13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and benefits,
of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting flexibility.
This is not a significant regulatory action and, therefore, was not
subject to review under section 6(b) of E.O. 12866, Regulatory Planning
and Review, as amended.
VI. Regulatory Flexibility Act
DoD does not expect this proposed rule, when finalized, to have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et
seq., because this rule merely updates the DFARS to align with the FAR.
However, an initial regulatory flexibility analysis has been performed
and is summarized as follows:
This proposed rule is necessary to revise the contract clause at
DFARS 252.219-7010, Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible
8(a) Participants--Partnership Agreement, to align with changes made to
the FAR regarding joint venture eligibility for 8(a) Program
acquisitions processed in accordance with the 8(a) Partnership
Agreement between DoD and the Small Business Administration (SBA). This
proposed rule also removes the nonmanufacturer rule requirements from
the clause to align with changes made to the FAR.
The objective of the rule is to revise the DFARS to align with
amendments made to the FAR. The legal basis for the rule is 41 U.S.C.
1303.
According to data from the Procurement Business Intelligence
Service, in the last three fiscal years DoD awarded contracts that
included the clause at DFARS 252.219-7010 to unique small entities as
follows: 848 in fiscal year 2021; 553 in fiscal year 2022; 600 in
fiscal year 2023. This averages out to 667 per fiscal year. Therefore,
DoD estimates that the number of small entities to which this rule will
apply is approximately 667.
This proposed rule does not impose any new reporting,
recordkeeping, or other compliance requirements for small entities.
This proposed rule does not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with
any other Federal rules.
DoD did not identify any significant alternatives to the proposed
rule. Any impact is expected to be beneficial.
DoD invites comments from small business concerns and other
interested parties on the expected impact of this proposed rule on
small entities.
DoD will also consider comments from small entities concerning the
existing regulations in subparts affected by this proposed rule in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Interested parties must submit such
comments separately and should cite 5 U.S.C. 610 (DFARS Case 2024-
D025), in correspondence.
VII. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not contain any information collection
requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and
Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35).
List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 252
Government procurement.
Jennifer D. Johnson,
Editor/Publisher, Defense Acquisition Regulations System.
Therefore, the Defense Acquisition Regulations System proposes to
amend 48 CFR part 252 as follows:
[[Page 82198]]
PART 252--SOLICITATION PROVISIONS AND CONTRACT CLAUSES
0
1. The authority citation for 48 CFR part 252 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 41 U.S.C. 1303 and 48 CFR chapter 1.
0
2. Revise and republish section 252.219-7010 to read as follows:
252.219-7010 Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a)
Participants--Partnership Agreement.
As prescribed in 219.811-3(2), use the following clause:
Notification of Competition Limited to Eligible 8(a) Participants--
Partnership Agreement (DATE)
(a) Offers are solicited only from--
(1) Small business concerns expressly certified by the Small
Business Administration (SBA) for participation in SBA's 8(a)
Program and which meet the following criteria at the time of
submission of offer:
(i) The Offeror is in conformance with the 8(a) support
limitation set forth in its approved business plan.
(ii) The Offeror is in conformance with the Business Activity
Targets set forth in its approved business plan or any remedial
action directed by SBA.
(iii) If the competition is to be limited to 8(a) concerns
within one or more specific SBA regions or districts, then the
Offeror's approved business plan is on file and serviced by ___.
[Contracting Officer completes by inserting the appropriate SBA
District and/or Regional Office(s) as identified by SBA.]
(2) A joint venture, in which at least one of the 8(a) program
participants that is a party to the joint venture complies with the
criteria set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this clause, and that has
a joint venture agreement that complies with 13 CFR 124.513(c); or
(3) A joint venture--
(i) That is comprised of a mentor and an 8(a)
prot[eacute]g[eacute] with an approved mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute]
agreement under an SBA mentor-prot[eacute]g[eacute] program;
(ii) In which at least one of the 8(a) program participants that
is a party to the joint venture complies with the criteria set forth
in paragraph (a)(1) of this clause; and
(iii) With a joint venture agreement that complies with 13 CFR
124.513(c).
(b) By submission of its offer, the Offeror represents that it
meets the applicable criteria set forth in paragraph (a) of this
clause.
(c) Any award resulting from this solicitation will be made
directly by the Contracting Officer to the successful 8(a) offeror
selected through the evaluation criteria set forth in this
solicitation.
(d) The ___ [insert name of SBA's contractor] will notify the
___ [insert name of contracting agency] Contracting Officer in
writing immediately upon entering an agreement (either oral or
written) to transfer all or part of its stock or other ownership
interest to any other party.
(End of clause)
[FR Doc. 2024-23230 Filed 10-9-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6001-FR-P