Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes, 81403-81405 [2024-23038]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
website, and the Service will calculate
the fee using the noncontract hourly rate
published pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)
of this section multiplied by 5. If you
operate a business that buys, handles,
weighs, or transports grain for sale in
foreign commerce, or you are in a
control relationship with respect to a
business that buys, handles, weighs, or
transports grain for sale in interstate
commerce, you must complete an
application and pay the published fee.
(2) Designation amendments. The fee
for amending designations will be
published annually in the Federal
Register and on the Service’s public
website. The Service will calculate the
fee using the cost of publication plus 1
hour at the noncontract hourly rate. If
submitting an application to amend a
designation, the published fee must be
paid.
■ 6. In § 800.72:
■ a. Lift the stay on paragraph (b); and
■ b. Revise paragraph (b).
The revision reads as follows:
§ 800.72 Explanation of additional service
fees for services performed in the United
States only.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) In addition to a 2-hour minimum
charge for service on Saturdays,
Sundays, and holidays, an additional
charge will be assessed when the
revenue from the services in
§ 800.71(a)(1) does not equal or exceed
what would have been collected at the
applicable hourly rate. The additional
charge will be the difference between
the actual unit fee revenue and the
hourly fee revenue. Hours accrued for
travel and standby time shall apply in
determining the hours for the minimum
fee.
§ 800.73
[Amended]
7. In § 800.73, in paragraph (d), in the
second sentence remove the citation
‘‘§§ 800.72(a) and 800.74’’ and add in its
place the citation ‘‘§ 800.72’’.
■
§ 800.74
■
[Removed]
8. Remove § 800.74.
§ 800.156
[Amended]
9. In § 800.156, in paragraph (d)(5), in
the last sentence remove the citation
‘‘§ 800.74’’ and add in its place the
citation ‘‘§ 800.71’’.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
■
§ 800.197
[Amended]
10. In § 800.197, in paragraph (b)(3),
remove the citation ‘‘§ 800.74’’ and add
in its place the citation ‘‘§ 800.71’’.
■
Melissa Bailey,
Associate Administrator, Agricultural
Marketing Service.
[FR Doc. 2024–23192 Filed 10–7–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Oct 07, 2024
Jkt 265001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2024–2327; Project
Identifier MCAI–2024–00233–T]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus SAS Model A319–111,
112, –113, –114, –115, –131, –132, and
–133 airplanes; A320–211, –212, –214,
–216, –231, –232, and –233 airplanes;
and A321–111, –112, –131, –211, –212,
–213, –231, and –232 airplanes. This
proposed AD was prompted by a fullscale fatigue test that found cracks on
the main landing gear (MLG) bay rear
skin panel at the stringer run-out at
Frame 46 and Stringer 32 on the lefthand and right-hand sides. This
proposed AD would require repetitive
special detailed inspections (SDIs) of
the affected area for cracking and
applicable corrective actions, as
specified in a European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is
proposed for incorporation by reference
(IBR). The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
SUMMARY:
The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by November 22,
2024.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
regulations.gov. Follow the instructions
for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD
docket at regulations.gov under Docket
No.-FAA–2024–2327; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and
5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the mandatory
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
81403
continuing airworthiness information
(MCAI), any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
• For EASA material identified in this
proposed AD, contact EASA, KonradAdenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000;
email ADs@easa.europa.eu; website
easa.europa.eu. You may find this
material on the EASA website at
ad.easa.europa.eu. It is also available at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–
2024–2327.
• You may view this material at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim
Dowling, Aviation Safety Engineer,
FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 206–
231–3667; email: timothy.p.dowling@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include
‘‘Docket No. FAA–2024–2327; Project
Identifier MCAI–2024–00233–T’’ at the
beginning of your comments. The most
helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change,
and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by
the closing date and may amend this
proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal
information you provide. The agency
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received
about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
E:\FR\FM\08OCP1.SGM
08OCP1
81404
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Tim Dowling,
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury,
NY 11590; telephone 206–231–3667;
email: timothy.p.dowling@faa.gov. Any
commentary that the FAA receives
which is not specifically designated as
CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Background
EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA AD 2024–0089,
dated April 15, 2024 (EASA AD 2024–
0089) (also referred to as the MCAI), to
correct an unsafe condition for certain
Airbus SAS Model A319–111, –112,
–113, –114, –115, –131, –132, and –133
airplanes; A320–211, –212, –214, –215,
–216, –231, –232, and –233 airplanes;
and A321–111, –112, –131, –211, –212,
–213, –231, and –232 airplanes. Model
A320–215 airplanes are not certificated
by the FAA and are not included on the
U.S. type certificate data sheet; this AD
therefore does not include those
airplanes in the applicability. The MCAI
states that cracks were found on the
MLG bay rear skin panel at stringer runout at Frame 46 and Stringer 32 on the
left-hand and right-hand sides during a
full-scale fatigue test. This condition, if
not detected and corrected, could lead
to crack propagation, possibly resulting
in reduced structural integrity of the
airplane.
The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA–2024–2327.
Material Incorporated by Reference
Under 1 CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2024–0089 specifies
procedures for repetitive SDIs of the
MLG bay rear skin panel at the stringer
run-out at Frame 46 and Stringer 32 on
the left-hand and right-hand sides.
Corrective actions include crack repair.
This material is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country and is approved for operation in
the United States. Pursuant to the FAA’s
bilateral agreement with this State of
Design Authority, it has notified the
FAA of the unsafe condition described
in the MCAI referenced above. The FAA
is issuing this NPRM after determining
that the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop
in other products of the same type
design.
Proposed AD Requirements in This
NPRM
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
EASA AD 2024–0089 described
previously, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Explanation of Required Compliance
Information
In the FAA’s ongoing efforts to
improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to
use some civil aviation authority (CAA)
ADs as the primary source of
information for compliance with
requirements for corresponding FAA
ADs. The FAA has been coordinating
this process with manufacturers and
CAAs. As a result, the FAA proposes to
incorporate EASA AD 2024–0089 by
reference in the FAA final rule. This
proposed AD would, therefore, require
compliance with EASA AD 2024–0089
in its entirety through that
incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same
as the heading of a particular section in
EASA AD 2024–0089 does not mean
that operators need comply only with
that section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ‘‘all required
actions and compliance times,’’
compliance with this AD requirement is
not limited to the section titled
‘‘Required Action(s) and Compliance
Time(s)’’ in EASA AD 2024–0089.
Material required by EASA AD 2024–
0089 for compliance will be available at
regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA–
2024–2327 after the FAA final rule is
published.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD, if
adopted as proposed, would affect 1,857
airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA
estimates the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per product
Cost on U.S. operators
3 work-hours × $85 per hour = $255 per inspection cycle ......
$0
$255 per inspection cycle .......
$473,535 per inspection cycle.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
The FAA has received no definitive
data on which to base the cost estimates
for the on-condition actions specified in
this proposed AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Oct 07, 2024
Jkt 265001
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
E:\FR\FM\08OCP1.SGM
08OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 195 / Tuesday, October 8, 2024 / Proposed Rules
(2) Would not affect intrastate
aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
■
Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA–2024–2327;
Project Identifier MCAI–2024–00233–T.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) by November
22, 2024.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus SAS Model
airplanes specified in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (3) of this AD, certificated in any
category, as identified in European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2024–
0089, dated April 15, 2024 (EASA AD 2024–
0089).
(1) Model A319–111, –112, –113, –114,
–115, –131, –132, and –133 airplanes.
(2) Model A320–211, –212, –214, –216,
–231, –232, and –233 airplanes.
(3) Model A321–111, –112, –131, –211,
–212, –213, –231, and –232 airplanes.
ddrumheller on DSK120RN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a full-scale
fatigue test that found cracks on the main
landing gear (MLG) bay rear skin panel at
stringer run-out at Frame 46 and Stringer 32
on the left-hand and right-hand sides. The
FAA is issuing this AD to detect potential
fatigue cracking on the MLG bay rear skin
panel at the stringer run-out at Frame 46 and
Stringer 32 on the left-hand and right-hand
sides. The unsafe condition, if not addressed,
could lead to crack propagation, possibly
resulting in reduced structural integrity of
the airplane.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Oct 07, 2024
Jkt 265001
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraphs (h) and
(i) of this AD: Comply with all required
actions and compliance times specified in,
and in accordance with, EASA AD 2024–
0089.
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2024–0089
(1) Where EASA AD 2024–0089 refers to its
effective date, this AD requires using the
effective date of this AD.
(2) Where paragraph (2) of EASA AD 2024–
0089 specifies ‘‘If, during any inspection as
required by paragraph (1) of this AD,
discrepancies are detected, as defined in the
SB, before next flight, contact Airbus for
approved repair instructions and accomplish
those instructions accordingly,’’ this AD
requires replacing that text with ‘‘If, during
any inspection as required by paragraph (1)
of this AD, any cracking is found, before next
flight, repair the cracking using a method
approved by the Manager, International
Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus
SAS’s EASA Design Organization Approval
(DOA). If approved by the DOA, the approval
must include the DOA-authorized signature.’’
(3) This AD does not adopt the ‘‘Remarks’’
section of EASA AD 2024–0089.
(i) No Reporting Requirement
Although the material referenced in EASA
AD 2024–0089 specifies to submit certain
information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.
(j) Additional AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or
responsible Flight Standards Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the International Validation
Branch, send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (k) of this AD and
email to: AMOC@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the responsible
Flight Standards Office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus SAS’s
EASA DOA. If approved by the DOA, the
approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except
as required by paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, if
any material contains procedures or tests that
are identified as RC, those procedures and
tests must be done to comply with this AD;
any procedures or tests that are not identified
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
81405
as RC are recommended. Those procedures
and tests that are not identified as RC may
be deviated from using accepted methods in
accordance with the operator’s maintenance
or inspection program without obtaining
approval of an AMOC, provided the
procedures and tests identified as RC can be
done and the airplane can be put back in an
airworthy condition. Any substitutions or
changes to procedures or tests identified as
RC require approval of an AMOC.
(k) Additional Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Tim Dowling, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 206–
231–3667; email: timothy.p.dowling@faa.gov.
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference of
the material listed in this paragraph under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this material as
applicable to do the actions required by this
AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2024–0089, dated April 15, 2024.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For EASA material identified in this
AD, contact EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3,
50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu;
website easa.europa.eu. You may find this
material on the EASA website at
ad.easa.europa.eu.
(4) You may view this material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195.
(5) You may view this material at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations or email fr.inspection@nara.gov.
Issued on October 1, 2024.
Peter A. White,
Deputy Director, Integrated Certificate
Management Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2024–23038 Filed 10–7–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
E:\FR\FM\08OCP1.SGM
08OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 195 (Tuesday, October 8, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 81403-81405]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23038]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2024-2327; Project Identifier MCAI-2024-00233-T]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus SAS Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain Airbus SAS Model A319-111, 112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -
132, and -133 airplanes; A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -
233 airplanes; and A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -
232 airplanes. This proposed AD was prompted by a full-scale fatigue
test that found cracks on the main landing gear (MLG) bay rear skin
panel at the stringer run-out at Frame 46 and Stringer 32 on the left-
hand and right-hand sides. This proposed AD would require repetitive
special detailed inspections (SDIs) of the affected area for cracking
and applicable corrective actions, as specified in a European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which is proposed for incorporation
by reference (IBR). The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by November
22, 2024.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to regulations.gov. Follow
the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
AD Docket: You may examine the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No.-FAA-2024-2327; or in person at Docket Operations between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this NPRM, the mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI), any comments received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
Material Incorporated by Reference:
For EASA material identified in this proposed AD, contact
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email [email protected]; website easa.europa.eu. You may
find this material on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu. It is also
available at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2024-2327.
You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 206-231-3195.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tim Dowling, Aviation Safety Engineer,
FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 206-
231-3667; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2024-2327;
Project Identifier MCAI-2024-00233-T'' at the beginning of your
comments. The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the
proposal, explain the reason for any recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this NPRM.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as
[[Page 81404]]
private, and that is relevant or responsive to this NPRM, it is
important that you clearly designate the submitted comments as CBI.
Please mark each page of your submission containing CBI as ``PROPIN.''
The FAA will treat such marked submissions as confidential under the
FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public docket of this NPRM.
Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Tim Dowling, Aviation
Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone 206-231-3667; email: [email protected]. Any
commentary that the FAA receives which is not specifically designated
as CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.
Background
EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2024-0089, dated April 15, 2024
(EASA AD 2024-0089) (also referred to as the MCAI), to correct an
unsafe condition for certain Airbus SAS Model A319-111, -112, -113, -
114, -115, -131, -132, and -133 airplanes; A320-211, -212, -214, -215,
-216, -231, -232, and -233 airplanes; and A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -
212, -213, -231, and -232 airplanes. Model A320-215 airplanes are not
certificated by the FAA and are not included on the U.S. type
certificate data sheet; this AD therefore does not include those
airplanes in the applicability. The MCAI states that cracks were found
on the MLG bay rear skin panel at stringer run-out at Frame 46 and
Stringer 32 on the left-hand and right-hand sides during a full-scale
fatigue test. This condition, if not detected and corrected, could lead
to crack propagation, possibly resulting in reduced structural
integrity of the airplane.
The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.
You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at regulations.gov under
Docket No. FAA-2024-2327.
Material Incorporated by Reference Under 1 CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2024-0089 specifies procedures for repetitive SDIs of the
MLG bay rear skin panel at the stringer run-out at Frame 46 and
Stringer 32 on the left-hand and right-hand sides. Corrective actions
include crack repair.
This material is reasonably available because the interested
parties have access to it through their normal course of business or by
the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant to
the FAA's bilateral agreement with this State of Design Authority, it
has notified the FAA of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA is issuing this NPRM after determining that
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
in other products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements in This NPRM
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2024-0089 described previously, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Explanation of Required Compliance Information
In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA developed a process to use some civil aviation
authority (CAA) ADs as the primary source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has been
coordinating this process with manufacturers and CAAs. As a result, the
FAA proposes to incorporate EASA AD 2024-0089 by reference in the FAA
final rule. This proposed AD would, therefore, require compliance with
EASA AD 2024-0089 in its entirety through that incorporation, except
for any differences identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of
this proposed AD. Using common terms that are the same as the heading
of a particular section in EASA AD 2024-0089 does not mean that
operators need comply only with that section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ``all required actions and compliance times,''
compliance with this AD requirement is not limited to the section
titled ``Required Action(s) and Compliance Time(s)'' in EASA AD 2024-
0089. Material required by EASA AD 2024-0089 for compliance will be
available at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2024-2327 after the
FAA final rule is published.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 1,857 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the
following costs to comply with this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 work-hours x $85 per hour = $255 per $0 $255 per inspection cycle. $473,535 per inspection
inspection cycle. cycle.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA has received no definitive data on which to base the cost
estimates for the on-condition actions specified in this proposed AD.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
[[Page 81405]]
(2) Would not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Would not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
Airbus SAS: Docket No. FAA-2024-2327; Project Identifier MCAI-2024-
00233-T.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by November 22, 2024.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus SAS Model airplanes specified in
paragraphs (c)(1) through (3) of this AD, certificated in any
category, as identified in European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2024-0089, dated April 15, 2024 (EASA AD 2024-0089).
(1) Model A319-111, -112, -113, -114, -115, -131, -132, and -133
airplanes.
(2) Model A320-211, -212, -214, -216, -231, -232, and -233
airplanes.
(3) Model A321-111, -112, -131, -211, -212, -213, -231, and -232
airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53, Fuselage.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by a full-scale fatigue test that found
cracks on the main landing gear (MLG) bay rear skin panel at
stringer run-out at Frame 46 and Stringer 32 on the left-hand and
right-hand sides. The FAA is issuing this AD to detect potential
fatigue cracking on the MLG bay rear skin panel at the stringer run-
out at Frame 46 and Stringer 32 on the left-hand and right-hand
sides. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could lead to crack
propagation, possibly resulting in reduced structural integrity of
the airplane.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraphs (h) and (i) of this AD: Comply
with all required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2024-0089.
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2024-0089
(1) Where EASA AD 2024-0089 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
(2) Where paragraph (2) of EASA AD 2024-0089 specifies ``If,
during any inspection as required by paragraph (1) of this AD,
discrepancies are detected, as defined in the SB, before next
flight, contact Airbus for approved repair instructions and
accomplish those instructions accordingly,'' this AD requires
replacing that text with ``If, during any inspection as required by
paragraph (1) of this AD, any cracking is found, before next flight,
repair the cracking using a method approved by the Manager,
International Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus SAS's EASA
Design Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA, the
approval must include the DOA-authorized signature.''
(3) This AD does not adopt the ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD
2024-0089.
(i) No Reporting Requirement
Although the material referenced in EASA AD 2024-0089 specifies
to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD does not
include that requirement.
(j) Additional AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight Standards Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly to the manager of the
International Validation Branch, send it to the attention of the
person identified in paragraph (k) of this AD and email to:
[email protected]. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector,
the manager of the responsible Flight Standards Office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, International
Validation Branch, FAA; or EASA; or Airbus SAS's EASA DOA. If
approved by the DOA, the approval must include the DOA-authorized
signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except as required by
paragraph (j)(2) of this AD, if any material contains procedures or
tests that are identified as RC, those procedures and tests must be
done to comply with this AD; any procedures or tests that are not
identified as RC are recommended. Those procedures and tests that
are not identified as RC may be deviated from using accepted methods
in accordance with the operator's maintenance or inspection program
without obtaining approval of an AMOC, provided the procedures and
tests identified as RC can be done and the airplane can be put back
in an airworthy condition. Any substitutions or changes to
procedures or tests identified as RC require approval of an AMOC.
(k) Additional Information
For more information about this AD, contact Tim Dowling,
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 206-231-3667; email:
[email protected].
(l) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference of the material listed in this paragraph
under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this material as applicable to do the actions
required by this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2024-0089,
dated April 15, 2024.
(ii) [Reserved]
(3) For EASA material identified in this AD, contact EASA,
Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221
8999 000; email [email protected]; website easa.europa.eu. You may
find this material on the EASA website at ad.easa.europa.eu.
(4) You may view this material at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St.,
Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
(5) You may view this material at the National Archives and
Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, visit www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations or email [email protected].
Issued on October 1, 2024.
Peter A. White,
Deputy Director, Integrated Certificate Management Division, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2024-23038 Filed 10-7-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P