Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Volatile Organic Compounds, 81036-81038 [2024-23140]
Download as PDF
81036
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 89, No. 194
Monday, October 7, 2024
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R05–OAR–2023–0493; FRL–12089–
01–R5]
Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Volatile
Organic Compounds
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
September 28, 2023, State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal
from the Ohio Environmental Protection
Agency (Ohio EPA). The SIP submittal
consists of a source-specific limitation
for a flexographic printing line cold
cleaner at the Valgroup company’s
plastic extrusion plant in Findlay, Ohio.
The source-specific limitation reflects
the technological differences between
the facility’s new control unit and
established cold cleaner requirements
currently established in Ohio’s SIP.
Ohio EPA has determined that the
source-specific limit for the cold cleaner
is more stringent than existing cold
cleaner limits in the Ohio SIP. The
limitation is established through the
Ohio SIP for control of emissions of
volatile organic compounds (VOCs)
from stationary sources and is listed as
an enforceable condition in the facility’s
operating permit, issued by Ohio EPA
on July 18, 2023.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before November 6, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R05–
OAR–2023–0493 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
langman.michael@epa.gov. For
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from the docket. EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:15 Oct 04, 2024
Jkt 262001
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI),
Proprietary Business Information (PBI),
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. EPA will generally not consider
comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e.
on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission
methods, please contact the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the
full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI, PBI, or
multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anthony Maietta, Air and Radiation
Division (AR18J), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 353–8777,
maietta.anthony@epa.gov. The EPA
Region 5 office is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
I. What is the background for this
action?
The Ohio SIP contains VOC emissions
control requirements for solvent metal
cold cleaning (metal parts washing) at
Title 3745, Chapter 21, Rule 09 of the
Ohio Administrative Code (OAC 3745–
21–09), more specifically at OAC 3745–
21–09(O)(2). On December 27, 2022,
Valgroup applied for a new cold
cleaning unit at its Findlay facility to be
added to its operating permit.
Paragraphs OAC 3745–21–09(O)(2)(c)(i)
and (ii) of the SIP require the
installation of a freeboard that gives a
freeboard ratio greater than or equal to
0.7, and a water cover with usage of a
solvent that is heavier than water.
However, Valgroup’s new cold cleaner
is not designed in such a way that these
methods could apply to the equipment.
In its December 27, 2022, request,
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Valgroup indicated that installation of
either device as described in paragraphs
OAC 3745–21–09(O)(2)(c)(i) and (ii) was
technically infeasible. Valgroup
requested approval of the installation of
a regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) to
control its new cold cleaner, as allowed
under paragraph OAC 3745–21–
09(O)(2)(c)(iii) which indicates that
‘‘[o]ther systems of equivalent control
. . . approved by the director’’ may be
installed.
In an April 17, 2023, Equivalent
Control Determination letter to Ohio
EPA, Valgroup demonstrated that
installation of the requested RTO would
provide a greater control efficiency than
available through OAC 3745–21–
09(O)(2)(c)(i) and (ii). Upon review of
the Equivalent Control Determination,
Ohio EPA agreed with Valgroup’s
request. Ohio EPA made a draft permitto-install available for public comment,
with the option for a commenter to
request a public hearing on the permit.
The public comment and hearing
request period was held from June 17 to
July 17, 2023. No comments were
received and no hearing was requested.
Ohio EPA issued the final permit-toinstall to Valgroup on July 18, 2023. The
new permit, Ohio EPA permit number
P0133504, establishes operating,
recordkeeping, and reporting
requirements for the new RTO
emissions unit at the Findley plant
(Ohio facility ID 0332010121).
As required in the Ohio SIP for VOCs
from stationary sources under OAC
3745–21–09(B)(2), in order to approve a
source-specific control option under
OAC 3745–21–09(O)(2)(c)(iii), the
revision must be submitted to EPA and
approved as a revision to the Ohio SIP.
On September 28, 2023, Ohio EPA
submitted a request for EPA to approve
the source-specific terms and conditions
from Valgroup’s July 18, 2023, permitto-install into the Ohio SIP, which
contains the RTO and its operating,
recordkeeping, and reporting
requirements.
II. What is EPA’s analysis of the sourcespecific VOC limit?
The cold cleaning unit is part of a
flexographic printing line that Valgroup
submitted a permit application to install
in December 2022. The cold cleaner
utilizes a solvent greater than 0.6
pounds per square inch absolute
measured at one hundred degrees
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 194 / Monday, October 7, 2024 / Proposed Rules
Fahrenheit to clean parts of the
flexographic printing line after use. The
solvent vapor pressure requires
Valgroup to comply with one of the
three vapor control measures for cold
cleaners outlined in Ohio’s SIP at OAC
3745–21–09(O)(2)(c).
Typically, cold cleaners resemble a
large top hinged-lid tank containing the
solvent that metal parts are dipped into
to be cleaned. The distance of the tank’s
side walls from the solvent surface to
the top edge of the tank is called the
freeboard. OAC 3749–21–09(O)(2)(c)(1)
requires cold cleaners to have a
‘freeboard ratio’, defined as the
freeboard height divided by the width of
the solvent area, greater than or equal to
0.7. As indicated in EPA’s Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards
Guidelines for Control of Volatile
Organic Emissions from Solvent Metal
Cleaning (solvent metal cleaning control
techniques guidelines or CTG),
utilization of this freeboard ratio will
result in a 25%–30% VOC control
efficiency from the cold cleaning
process. See EPA–450/2–77–022,
November 1977.
The cold cleaner that Valgroup
proposed to install is not designed as a
top hinged-lid tank containing solvent.
Instead, metal parts are loaded into the
empty cleaner via a side door which is
then closed. The solvent is held in a
separate storage tank and pumped into
the cleaner, washing the metal parts and
draining back into the separate storage
tank. Therefore, there is no volume of
liquid solvent in the cold cleaner to
form a freeboard ratio for Valgroup to
comply with.
The second compliance option listed
at OAC 3745–21–09(O)(2)(c)(2) requires
the source to utilize a solvent that is
heavier than water and then keep a
water cover on top of the solvent. As
indicated in EPA’s Compilation of Air
Pollutant Emissions Factors from
Stationary Sources (AP–42), use of a
water cover results in a 55%–69% VOC
control efficiency. However, Valgroup’s
cold cleaner does not maintain a
constant level of solvent in the wash
chamber. As described above, the
solvent is instead drained back into a
separate storage tank. Additionally, in
its December 27, 2022, request,
Valgroup indicated that the solvent
utilized in the cold cleaner is less dense
than water. Therefore, there is no
technically-feasible way for Valgroup’s
cold cleaner to comply with the water
cover requirement at OAC 3745–21–
09(O)(2)(c)(2).
The third control device compliance
option for Valgroup’s cold cleaner, at
OAC 3745–21–09(O)(2)(c), is for ‘‘[o]ther
systems of equivalent control . . .
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Oct 04, 2024
Jkt 262001
approved by the director’’. In Valgroup’s
December 27, 2022, request, the
company proposed an RTO that could
meet an overall VOC destruction
efficiency of 88%. The overall VOC
destruction efficiency is based on 90%
capture efficiency and 98% control
efficiency between the inlet and outlet
of the RTO. The 88% overall destruction
efficiency exceeds the freeboard and
water cover compliance options in OAC
3745–21–09(O)(2)(c). So long as Ohio
requires the Valgroup cold cleaner RTO
to meet a control efficiency equivalent
to or better than the freeboard and water
cover compliance options, the RTO is
approvable into the Ohio SIP.
Ohio EPA reviewed the proposed
RTO’s specifications as part of its
examination of Valgroup’s December 27,
2022, request and in its July 18, 2023,
permit-to-install for Valgroup. Ohio EPA
listed the 88% overall destruction
efficiency, 90% capture efficiency, and
98% control efficiency as terms and
conditions for the unit in paragraphs
C.2.b)(1), C.2.b)(1)d., C.2.b)(2), and
C.2.b)(2)(d. of the permit-to-install. The
limit is more stringent than the
freeboard and water cover compliance
options outlined in 3745–21–09(O)(2)(c)
and therefore is approvable into the
Ohio SIP.
In addition to a VOC control
requirement, the July 18, 2023, permitto-install also contains recordkeeping
and reporting requirements for the RTO.
Paragraphs C.2.d) and C.2.d)(1) of the
permit-to-install require Valgroup to
maintain a daily log of operating time
for the RTO and monitoring equipment
and record all 3-hour periods of
operation when the average combustion
temperature in the RTO was more than
50 degrees Fahrenheit below the average
combustion temperature measured
during the unit’s most recent
compliance test. Until the unit has been
compliance tested, the RTO must be
operated and maintained in accordance
with the manufacturer’s instructions
and operating manual. Paragraphs C.2.e)
and C.2.e)(2) require Valgroup to submit
quarterly summaries of the operating
time and 3-hour average combustion
temperatures of the RTO, on a set
calendar date schedule. EPA has
determined that the recordkeeping and
reporting requirements for the RTO are
appropriate compliance demonstration
mechanisms to ensure that the VOC
control requirements are being met, and
that these compliance demonstration
requirements are approvable into the
Ohio SIP.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is proposing to approve the
addition of paragraphs C.2.b)(1),
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
81037
C.2.b)(1)d., C.2.b)(2), C.2.b)(2)d., C.2.d),
C.2.d)(1), C.2.e), and C.2.e)(2) as listed
in the July 18, 2023, permit-to-install for
the Valgroup company into the Ohio
SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rulemaking, EPA is proposing
to include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
certain provisions of the Ohio Division
of Air Pollution Control Permit-toInstall for Valgroup’s Findlay, Ohio
plastic extrusion plant, effective July 18,
2023, as described in section III of this
preamble. EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these documents
generally available through https://
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 5 Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Clean Air Act and
applicable Federal regulations. 42
U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus,
in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this
action merely approves State law as
meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by State law. For
that reason, this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993), and 14094 (88 FR
21879, April 11, 2023);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
81038
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 194 / Monday, October 7, 2024 / Proposed Rules
lotter on DSK11XQN23PROD with PROPOSALS1
• Is not subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997)
because it approves a State program;
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001); and
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act.
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian Tribe has demonstrated that a
Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rulemaking does not
have Tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on Tribal
governments or preempt Tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:01 Oct 04, 2024
Jkt 262001
Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal
agencies to identify and address
‘‘disproportionately high and adverse
human health or environmental effects’’
of their actions on communities with
environmental justice (EJ) concerns to
the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law. EPA defines EJ as
‘‘the fair treatment and meaningful
involvement of all people regardless of
race, color, national origin, or income
with respect to the development,
implementation, and enforcement of
environmental laws, regulations, and
policies.’’ EPA further defines the term
fair treatment to mean that ‘‘no group of
people should bear a disproportionate
burden of environmental harms and
risks, including those resulting from the
negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and
commercial operations or programs and
policies.’’
Ohio EPA did not evaluate EJ
considerations as part of its SIP
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
submittal; the CAA and applicable
implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation.
EPA did not perform an EJ analysis and
did not consider EJ in this action.
Consideration of EJ is not required as
part of this action, and there is no
information in the record inconsistent
with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of
achieving EJ for communities with EJ
concerns.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: October 2, 2024.
Debra Shore,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2024–23140 Filed 10–4–24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\07OCP1.SGM
07OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 89, Number 194 (Monday, October 7, 2024)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 81036-81038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2024-23140]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 89, No. 194 / Monday, October 7, 2024 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 81036]]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R05-OAR-2023-0493; FRL-12089-01-R5]
Air Plan Approval; Ohio; Volatile Organic Compounds
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a September 28, 2023, State Implementation Plan (SIP) submittal
from the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (Ohio EPA). The SIP
submittal consists of a source-specific limitation for a flexographic
printing line cold cleaner at the Valgroup company's plastic extrusion
plant in Findlay, Ohio. The source-specific limitation reflects the
technological differences between the facility's new control unit and
established cold cleaner requirements currently established in Ohio's
SIP. Ohio EPA has determined that the source-specific limit for the
cold cleaner is more stringent than existing cold cleaner limits in the
Ohio SIP. The limitation is established through the Ohio SIP for
control of emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from
stationary sources and is listed as an enforceable condition in the
facility's operating permit, issued by Ohio EPA on July 18, 2023.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 6, 2024.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R05-
OAR-2023-0493 at https://www.regulations.gov, or via email to
[email protected]. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed from the docket. EPA may publish
any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically
any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information
(CBI), Proprietary Business Information (PBI), or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions
(audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The
written comment is considered the official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public
comment policy, information about CBI, PBI, or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anthony Maietta, Air and Radiation
Division (AR18J), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 353-8777,
[email protected]. The EPA Region 5 office is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
I. What is the background for this action?
The Ohio SIP contains VOC emissions control requirements for
solvent metal cold cleaning (metal parts washing) at Title 3745,
Chapter 21, Rule 09 of the Ohio Administrative Code (OAC 3745-21-09),
more specifically at OAC 3745-21-09(O)(2). On December 27, 2022,
Valgroup applied for a new cold cleaning unit at its Findlay facility
to be added to its operating permit. Paragraphs OAC 3745-21-
09(O)(2)(c)(i) and (ii) of the SIP require the installation of a
freeboard that gives a freeboard ratio greater than or equal to 0.7,
and a water cover with usage of a solvent that is heavier than water.
However, Valgroup's new cold cleaner is not designed in such a way that
these methods could apply to the equipment. In its December 27, 2022,
request, Valgroup indicated that installation of either device as
described in paragraphs OAC 3745-21-09(O)(2)(c)(i) and (ii) was
technically infeasible. Valgroup requested approval of the installation
of a regenerative thermal oxidizer (RTO) to control its new cold
cleaner, as allowed under paragraph OAC 3745-21-09(O)(2)(c)(iii) which
indicates that ``[o]ther systems of equivalent control . . . approved
by the director'' may be installed.
In an April 17, 2023, Equivalent Control Determination letter to
Ohio EPA, Valgroup demonstrated that installation of the requested RTO
would provide a greater control efficiency than available through OAC
3745-21-09(O)(2)(c)(i) and (ii). Upon review of the Equivalent Control
Determination, Ohio EPA agreed with Valgroup's request. Ohio EPA made a
draft permit-to-install available for public comment, with the option
for a commenter to request a public hearing on the permit. The public
comment and hearing request period was held from June 17 to July 17,
2023. No comments were received and no hearing was requested. Ohio EPA
issued the final permit-to-install to Valgroup on July 18, 2023. The
new permit, Ohio EPA permit number P0133504, establishes operating,
recordkeeping, and reporting requirements for the new RTO emissions
unit at the Findley plant (Ohio facility ID 0332010121).
As required in the Ohio SIP for VOCs from stationary sources under
OAC 3745-21-09(B)(2), in order to approve a source-specific control
option under OAC 3745-21-09(O)(2)(c)(iii), the revision must be
submitted to EPA and approved as a revision to the Ohio SIP. On
September 28, 2023, Ohio EPA submitted a request for EPA to approve the
source-specific terms and conditions from Valgroup's July 18, 2023,
permit-to-install into the Ohio SIP, which contains the RTO and its
operating, recordkeeping, and reporting requirements.
II. What is EPA's analysis of the source-specific VOC limit?
The cold cleaning unit is part of a flexographic printing line that
Valgroup submitted a permit application to install in December 2022.
The cold cleaner utilizes a solvent greater than 0.6 pounds per square
inch absolute measured at one hundred degrees
[[Page 81037]]
Fahrenheit to clean parts of the flexographic printing line after use.
The solvent vapor pressure requires Valgroup to comply with one of the
three vapor control measures for cold cleaners outlined in Ohio's SIP
at OAC 3745-21-09(O)(2)(c).
Typically, cold cleaners resemble a large top hinged-lid tank
containing the solvent that metal parts are dipped into to be cleaned.
The distance of the tank's side walls from the solvent surface to the
top edge of the tank is called the freeboard. OAC 3749-21-
09(O)(2)(c)(1) requires cold cleaners to have a `freeboard ratio',
defined as the freeboard height divided by the width of the solvent
area, greater than or equal to 0.7. As indicated in EPA's Office of Air
Quality Planning and Standards Guidelines for Control of Volatile
Organic Emissions from Solvent Metal Cleaning (solvent metal cleaning
control techniques guidelines or CTG), utilization of this freeboard
ratio will result in a 25%-30% VOC control efficiency from the cold
cleaning process. See EPA-450/2-77-022, November 1977.
The cold cleaner that Valgroup proposed to install is not designed
as a top hinged-lid tank containing solvent. Instead, metal parts are
loaded into the empty cleaner via a side door which is then closed. The
solvent is held in a separate storage tank and pumped into the cleaner,
washing the metal parts and draining back into the separate storage
tank. Therefore, there is no volume of liquid solvent in the cold
cleaner to form a freeboard ratio for Valgroup to comply with.
The second compliance option listed at OAC 3745-21-09(O)(2)(c)(2)
requires the source to utilize a solvent that is heavier than water and
then keep a water cover on top of the solvent. As indicated in EPA's
Compilation of Air Pollutant Emissions Factors from Stationary Sources
(AP-42), use of a water cover results in a 55%-69% VOC control
efficiency. However, Valgroup's cold cleaner does not maintain a
constant level of solvent in the wash chamber. As described above, the
solvent is instead drained back into a separate storage tank.
Additionally, in its December 27, 2022, request, Valgroup indicated
that the solvent utilized in the cold cleaner is less dense than water.
Therefore, there is no technically-feasible way for Valgroup's cold
cleaner to comply with the water cover requirement at OAC 3745-21-
09(O)(2)(c)(2).
The third control device compliance option for Valgroup's cold
cleaner, at OAC 3745-21-09(O)(2)(c), is for ``[o]ther systems of
equivalent control . . . approved by the director''. In Valgroup's
December 27, 2022, request, the company proposed an RTO that could meet
an overall VOC destruction efficiency of 88%. The overall VOC
destruction efficiency is based on 90% capture efficiency and 98%
control efficiency between the inlet and outlet of the RTO. The 88%
overall destruction efficiency exceeds the freeboard and water cover
compliance options in OAC 3745-21-09(O)(2)(c). So long as Ohio requires
the Valgroup cold cleaner RTO to meet a control efficiency equivalent
to or better than the freeboard and water cover compliance options, the
RTO is approvable into the Ohio SIP.
Ohio EPA reviewed the proposed RTO's specifications as part of its
examination of Valgroup's December 27, 2022, request and in its July
18, 2023, permit-to-install for Valgroup. Ohio EPA listed the 88%
overall destruction efficiency, 90% capture efficiency, and 98% control
efficiency as terms and conditions for the unit in paragraphs
C.2.b)(1), C.2.b)(1)d., C.2.b)(2), and C.2.b)(2)(d. of the permit-to-
install. The limit is more stringent than the freeboard and water cover
compliance options outlined in 3745-21-09(O)(2)(c) and therefore is
approvable into the Ohio SIP.
In addition to a VOC control requirement, the July 18, 2023,
permit-to-install also contains recordkeeping and reporting
requirements for the RTO. Paragraphs C.2.d) and C.2.d)(1) of the
permit-to-install require Valgroup to maintain a daily log of operating
time for the RTO and monitoring equipment and record all 3-hour periods
of operation when the average combustion temperature in the RTO was
more than 50 degrees Fahrenheit below the average combustion
temperature measured during the unit's most recent compliance test.
Until the unit has been compliance tested, the RTO must be operated and
maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions and
operating manual. Paragraphs C.2.e) and C.2.e)(2) require Valgroup to
submit quarterly summaries of the operating time and 3-hour average
combustion temperatures of the RTO, on a set calendar date schedule.
EPA has determined that the recordkeeping and reporting requirements
for the RTO are appropriate compliance demonstration mechanisms to
ensure that the VOC control requirements are being met, and that these
compliance demonstration requirements are approvable into the Ohio SIP.
III. What action is EPA taking?
EPA is proposing to approve the addition of paragraphs C.2.b)(1),
C.2.b)(1)d., C.2.b)(2), C.2.b)(2)d., C.2.d), C.2.d)(1), C.2.e), and
C.2.e)(2) as listed in the July 18, 2023, permit-to-install for the
Valgroup company into the Ohio SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rulemaking, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference certain provisions of the Ohio Division of Air Pollution
Control Permit-to-Install for Valgroup's Findlay, Ohio plastic
extrusion plant, effective July 18, 2023, as described in section III
of this preamble. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these
documents generally available through https://www.regulations.gov and
at the EPA Region 5 Office (please contact the person identified in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act.
Accordingly, this action merely approves State law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by State law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993), and 14094 (88 FR 21879, April 11, 2023);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
[[Page 81038]]
Is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997) because it approves a State program;
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); and
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the Clean Air Act.
In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian Tribe has
demonstrated that a Tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rulemaking does not have Tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000).
Executive Order 12898 (Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations, 59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994) directs Federal agencies to identify and address
``disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects'' of their actions on communities with environmental justice
(EJ) concerns to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law.
EPA defines EJ as ``the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of
all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income with
respect to the development, implementation, and enforcement of
environmental laws, regulations, and policies.'' EPA further defines
the term fair treatment to mean that ``no group of people should bear a
disproportionate burden of environmental harms and risks, including
those resulting from the negative environmental consequences of
industrial, governmental, and commercial operations or programs and
policies.''
Ohio EPA did not evaluate EJ considerations as part of its SIP
submittal; the CAA and applicable implementing regulations neither
prohibit nor require such an evaluation. EPA did not perform an EJ
analysis and did not consider EJ in this action. Consideration of EJ is
not required as part of this action, and there is no information in the
record inconsistent with the stated goal of E.O. 12898 of achieving EJ
for communities with EJ concerns.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: October 2, 2024.
Debra Shore,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2024-23140 Filed 10-4-24; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P